Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3

 Xbox 360
User Score
3.5

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 8685 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 2,253 out of 8685
  2. Mixed: 954 out of 8685
  3. Negative: 5,478 out of 8685
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. juddicusmaximus
    Nov 8, 2011
    3
    I had to make an account to add to this, this is AT BEST a poor expansion, i wasn't expecting much, but was still disappointed. what is weird about it? literally NO reason for sniper rifles to even be in multiplayer, not a single map is built to take advantage of range, and with the addition of the stalker perk allowing people to run and aim puts this game in more of a relationship toI had to make an account to add to this, this is AT BEST a poor expansion, i wasn't expecting much, but was still disappointed. what is weird about it? literally NO reason for sniper rifles to even be in multiplayer, not a single map is built to take advantage of range, and with the addition of the stalker perk allowing people to run and aim puts this game in more of a relationship to quake than any other MW game thus far. spec ops is cool, but my last cod let me play with 4 people in the other mode, this is 2? mmk. the guns sound neat and everything, but given that you can unlock more stuff for using the same one makes it hard for me to swap from my M4.
    With all of the maps being SO CLOSE QUARTERS, i know this game will turn into just people using SMGs. the precision guns like the M16 are worthless, all you need to do is spray. No innovation, all confusion. i am not a fan, this is the year to skip out on the COD franchise much like a bad madden game, its cheaper to just wait for the next. unfortunately i traded BO and MW2 in towards this... SO glad i didnt get elite membership though!    … Expand
  2. TakingOutTrash
    Nov 8, 2011
    3
    Same game. I would have given this game a "1" rating, but honestly. the Online is NOT as broken as MW2.. therefore Activision managed to get something fixed.

    +2 for some balancing
    -7 for same engine as CoD4
    -1000 dignity for every Activision team member who worked on CoD4, then proceeded to make terrible games thereafter. Just stop. CoD 4 is still better than MW3, that was 4 years ago.
  3. CYBER_SLUNK
    Nov 8, 2011
    3
    It's MW2 with worse graphics, smaller/crappier maps, and the speed turned up a few notches. For little kids hopped up on mountain dew to run around and die (with no respawn timer) while screaming profanities. It sucks.
  4. pgunna
    Nov 14, 2011
    3
    This game is recycled garbage, Black Ops was a much better game than this This is a step backwards in innovation! The menus are lazy, the maps are not thoughtful and there is no innovation here at all. I feel like they stole $60 from me and I would like it back.
  5. Faux
    Nov 9, 2011
    3
    My instinct was to give this game a 5- It defines "mediocre". It is not bad by any stretch. No, rather it is tired. It looks like MW2 and plays like MW2, which could have been forgiven if it was written like MW1. It wasn't. Expectation games are dangerous if your product doesn't come up to snuff, and so I'm giving it a 3.

    Things I like- just like MW2 the production values are fine.    My instinct was to give this game a 5- It defines "mediocre". It is not bad by any stretch. No, rather it is tired. It looks like MW2 and plays like MW2, which could have been forgiven if it was written like MW1. It wasn't. Expectation games are dangerous if your product doesn't come up to snuff, and so I'm giving it a 3.

    Things I like- just like MW2 the production values are fine. The single player campaign is over-the-top Michael-Bay-esque, and when it runs out of compelling story it uses swelling music or slo-vision chaos to give the appearance of emotional depth.

    Things I don't like- paying $60 for the same thing I purchased a few years ago. The technology is the same, the gameplay is the same, the environments are different and yet feel the same. It feels like a lazy installment of the series, hyped in order to make money rather than create a worthy successor to this landmark series.    … Expand
  6. BuggedJune
    Nov 9, 2011
    3
    I've come to terms with this game for what it is. an absolutely mindless arcade shooter that has no meat whatsoever. The franchise that defined itself for being the most realistic shooter at the time has less ties to realism than star wars had to WW1. thankfully i haven't expected too much from the game, and i wasn't terribly disappointed by the co-op stuff they added to the game, butI've come to terms with this game for what it is. an absolutely mindless arcade shooter that has no meat whatsoever. The franchise that defined itself for being the most realistic shooter at the time has less ties to realism than star wars had to WW1. thankfully i haven't expected too much from the game, and i wasn't terribly disappointed by the co-op stuff they added to the game, but aside from that? yeah, don't bother.… Expand
  7. butternut86
    Nov 9, 2011
    3
    Call of Duty 4 Modern warfare was an amazing game. I loved it. It was a ton of fun with great multiplayer. Modern Warfare 2 was similar to COD 4, but still pretty good. This game is a carbon copy of the COD games that came out before it.

    Activision doesn't bother to make a new game engine. It continually copies the same game year in and year out. I'm tired of spending 60 bucks for a    Call of Duty 4 Modern warfare was an amazing game. I loved it. It was a ton of fun with great multiplayer. Modern Warfare 2 was similar to COD 4, but still pretty good. This game is a carbon copy of the COD games that came out before it.

    Activision doesn't bother to make a new game engine. It continually copies the same game year in and year out. I'm tired of spending 60 bucks for a carbon copy of a game I played last year. I said to myself I would never buy a COD game again after Black ops. I'm tired of being fooled by activision. I DID play this game at my friends house. A lot of my friends are still under Activisions spell. They don't realize they are getting ripped off. The game is essentially the same as Modern Warfare 2. The campaign is the same, and so is the MP. The survival mode is new, but nothing special. PEOPLE NEED TO STOP BUYING COD GAMES SO ACTIVISION WILL MAKE A NEW GAME ENGINE!!!!

    If people keep buying COD games that reuse the same engine, Activision will keep making a carbon copies of their games. We need to send Activision a message and teach them a lesson that we won't fall for their money hungry tactics anymore. From this moment forward, promise yourself that you wont:

    Buy a Carbon copy of a COD game. DON"T BUY NEXT years COD!!

    You wont pay 15 dollars for four maps

    You won't wait online at midnight to buy a rehashed game

    The list can go on and on.. but the bottom line is, Activision will keep using their customers if they keep buying this crap. Stand up and don't take it anymore. As gamers, we deserve better. Activision hasn't changed their engine since 2007. Thats complete garbage.    … Expand
  8. Beavz0r
    Nov 9, 2011
    3
    If I had to rate the campaign, I would give it a 6-7 for being pretty fun and having such a grand scale of scope, but I'd have to dock it for aging visuals that are noticeably falling behind when compared to recent titles, such as Witcher 2, BF3, or Uncharted 3, or the upcoming behemoth Skyrim.

    Multiplayer plays the same as ever, and at least for me, is probably why the game already    If I had to rate the campaign, I would give it a 6-7 for being pretty fun and having such a grand scale of scope, but I'd have to dock it for aging visuals that are noticeably falling behind when compared to recent titles, such as Witcher 2, BF3, or Uncharted 3, or the upcoming behemoth Skyrim.

    Multiplayer plays the same as ever, and at least for me, is probably why the game already begins to feel dull after only ten hours of online play. It's the same reason I don't buy Madden year after year - I'd rather wait until a major change or innovation comes along to turn things fresh again.

    For that reason alone, I most likely will find myself finishing off the last few hours of the campaign, and shelving it for the time being.    … Expand
  9. Charades
    Nov 9, 2011
    3
    At some point, as a fan, you have to put your foot down and point out the bull-crap you're being fed. I'm sorry, I understand this game has good reviews and that's what people are going to be looking at, but I feel like I've been duped and I need to go somewhere to express my opinion. Looks like I'm not alone. This game is more or less, Modern Warfare 2. I feel like each year's MaddenAt some point, as a fan, you have to put your foot down and point out the bull-crap you're being fed. I'm sorry, I understand this game has good reviews and that's what people are going to be looking at, but I feel like I've been duped and I need to go somewhere to express my opinion. Looks like I'm not alone. This game is more or less, Modern Warfare 2. I feel like each year's Madden iteration has more advancement than this series. The fact that they're going to pile on the DLC, it's just bad vibes. Be wary of this game, unless you just want more of the previous Modern Warfare titles.

    I'm being generous giving this game a 3.    … Expand
  10. icarusbird
    Nov 9, 2011
    3
    Congratulations on somehow milking more and more money out of each subsequent copy of CoD: Modern Warfare. This game would be more aptly titled "Call of Duty: Modern Warfare Ep 3," as it is essentially an expansion pack to the same game we've been playing for four years. Infinity Ward really phoned it on the single-player campaign, and the multiplayer is--yet again--another glorified mapCongratulations on somehow milking more and more money out of each subsequent copy of CoD: Modern Warfare. This game would be more aptly titled "Call of Duty: Modern Warfare Ep 3," as it is essentially an expansion pack to the same game we've been playing for four years. Infinity Ward really phoned it on the single-player campaign, and the multiplayer is--yet again--another glorified map expansion and balance tweak. Modern Warfare 3: you get 9 for quality gameplay, minus 2 points for leaving that gameplay unchanged for four years, and minus 3 more points for charging us 60 bucks for the exact same experience. And you know what? Minus one more point for selling us over-priced DLC which was probably finished weeks before the game released.… Expand
  11. mclakers
    Nov 9, 2011
    3
    Same game as MW, MW2. short campaign, about 5-6 hrs. I honestly thought it would be a lot better. I should of listened to everyone's users review. Just threw 60 bucks down the drain. I recommend a rental at most.
  12. TheRedZombie
    Nov 21, 2011
    3
    I have been a die-hard CoD fan for years, but I have been growing tired of the series of late. So here it is! I gave this game the low score for many reasons. If Activision expects me to fork over $60 on practically the same game they have been releasing for the last 4 years with nothing more than a new story and minimal tweaks to the multiplayer, than they have seen my last dollar. TheyI have been a die-hard CoD fan for years, but I have been growing tired of the series of late. So here it is! I gave this game the low score for many reasons. If Activision expects me to fork over $60 on practically the same game they have been releasing for the last 4 years with nothing more than a new story and minimal tweaks to the multiplayer, than they have seen my last dollar. They haven't done a single thing to innovate the franchise in years. This franchise has become nothing more than a shameless yearly cash-grab on the behalf of the developers. I won't even get into the CoD elite service which offers nothing gamers haven't seen with games like Halo and Battlefield. At least those two examples don't charge you. The fact that the DLC for this series has become known for overpriced and underwhelming extras has added to my disenfranchisement with the whole series. Plus the fact that game like Deus Ex has released DLC that is longer than the campaign of MW3 is laughable. Activision needs to put this series to bed for a while until they can come up with something substantial to offer the gaming community.… Expand
  13. reaperff7
    Nov 9, 2011
    3
    look i'm not going to sit here and tell you guys this game is not without its fun elements. but that does not excuse the fact that the developers didn't even try to improve on the game and that is unacceptable. so if i have to give this game a low score just to nail this idea into their heads then i sure will. i loved black ops, so when i picked this game up i was expecting it to at leastlook i'm not going to sit here and tell you guys this game is not without its fun elements. but that does not excuse the fact that the developers didn't even try to improve on the game and that is unacceptable. so if i have to give this game a low score just to nail this idea into their heads then i sure will. i loved black ops, so when i picked this game up i was expecting it to at least run on the same engine. i was sadly mistaken because this game is ugly, and when i say ugly i mean UGLY! i have no doubt that infinity ward will pick up on this and the many other reviews being posted here and try to make there next game better, but as of now i'm just going to beat this sh***y campaign so i can trade this puppy right back to gamestop.… Expand
  14. mussskitz
    Nov 9, 2011
    3
    I gave the game a low score for a few reasons. I feel that because the damage is so beefed up that the game now doesn't rely on tactics and strategy as it is too strongly now based on reaction time and latency, this issue punishes those of us that don't have super low pings. Tied to the first issue, because the game is so fast my friends who havn't played as much CoD and don't reactI gave the game a low score for a few reasons. I feel that because the damage is so beefed up that the game now doesn't rely on tactics and strategy as it is too strongly now based on reaction time and latency, this issue punishes those of us that don't have super low pings. Tied to the first issue, because the game is so fast my friends who havn't played as much CoD and don't react completely on instinct (there isn't any time to consciously think about your actions) do not enjoy playing the game (so much for 'anyone can pick up and play") which makes it more difficult for me to enjoy. Another issue is team play. IW and SH keep coming up with ways to reward the individual for objective play under the guise that they are promoting "team play". If you want tips on how to promote team play you need only look at BF3. Because the game is so fast now there is no reason to call out to a friend about enemy locations because by the time they are able to react the same enemy has cleared out the room before you could finish the sentence. As far as map design an sniping is concerned... There are very few places you can legitimately snipe. The maps are so tiny that it only lends itself to quick scoping, by and large alienating people who want to kick back, take it a little slower and snipe from range. like normal snipers.

    In my honest opinion. the game needs to be slowed down by reducing damage in general to be somewhere between black ops and MW2.

    There is a reason the user score is so low IW/SH. These are only some of my concerns from my experience. I just hope they are listening.    … Expand
  15. zkalra
    Nov 10, 2011
    3
    Rehashed Garbage!! I mean come on. If you are going to spend 100 Mil on advertising a steaming pile, at least spend a significant proportion on the actual technology. BF3 really makes this garbage stand out even more. I have had it with these big companies squeezing the last drop of blood from us consumers by selling and hyping junk like this. truly disappointed.
  16. pjd5043
    Nov 10, 2011
    3
    Even knowing it was going to be a MW2 clone, the game managed to disappoint me. The single player was entertaining enough, although combating the never ending horde of enemies that spawn until you progress past a certain point is getting old. I would have liked the campaign to have been longer, the story was good but the campaign was just way to short.

    The multiplayer is where I the    Even knowing it was going to be a MW2 clone, the game managed to disappoint me. The single player was entertaining enough, although combating the never ending horde of enemies that spawn until you progress past a certain point is getting old. I would have liked the campaign to have been longer, the story was good but the campaign was just way to short.

    The multiplayer is where I the game disappointed me the most, and that's saying something from the already low expectations I had. Spawns are ridiculous in the game, after playing the multiplayer for a few hours, it astonishes me how often I kill someone to have them spawn behind me, or how often I spawn in an enemies path. The maps are all tiny full of winding corridors and very little open space. The guns respond terribly, and they all behave similarly (i.e. fire rate and stopping power). Kills come extremely easy, both ways, and take very little skill. Have had a few problems with lag so far, and it's not on my end, it's not that bad yet, but knowing the previous titles it will get worse with time. To me the multiplayer is just a chaotic mess, more akin to Halo than the COD titles I used to love playing. I give this a 3, because that's how many hours the campaign kept me entertained.    … Expand
  17. smashcore
    Nov 10, 2011
    3
    I'm sorely disappointed in the multiplayer. After playing both BF3 and MW3 multiplayer, BF3 is in my opinion the superior of the two.

    Graphically MW3 hasn't changed much while BF3 adds a new level of realism. Sound wise, and this is the first thing I noticed as soon as I started playing MW3 multiplayer, MW3 is dull. Every time the weapon fired it just kinda sounded like thuds to me. BF3    I'm sorely disappointed in the multiplayer. After playing both BF3 and MW3 multiplayer, BF3 is in my opinion the superior of the two.

    Graphically MW3 hasn't changed much while BF3 adds a new level of realism.

    Sound wise, and this is the first thing I noticed as soon as I started playing MW3 multiplayer, MW3 is dull. Every time the weapon fired it just kinda sounded like thuds to me. BF3 sound seems to have that special sharpness and crack when a weapon or explosion goes off.

    The maps, oh the maps..., are the exact same thing I've seen in MW for a while now. Each one is just laid out different and with different textures. Actually trying to use knowledge of the map to your advantage fails horribly because by the time you try to circle around any enemy they are either gone or already killed by the fast paced nature of things.

    The list of game modes available, while impressive, still lack ways to differentiate from each one, mostly due to the lack of map uniqueness.

    The only thing that saves it for me is the single player campaign.    … Expand
  18. Antitu
    Nov 10, 2011
    3
    Another year, another COD: and every new COD is worst than previous. MWF3 is repetitive, the 6 hour campaign is too short, and the multiplayer adds nothing new.
  19. ChuGNutS
    Nov 10, 2011
    3
    Its a MW2 expansion pack. End of. XP/ranks/kill streaks = the decline of skill in FPS and the 'run round like a noob' 'spawn die spawn die spawn die' mentality that ruins this game. No tactics No skill its an arcade game that doesnt come close to the likes of Counter Strike.
  20. CaSsh
    Nov 10, 2011
    3
    By the way, if ya haven't noticed already..ONLY the critics of companies that receive money, gifts and prizes from call of duty gave this game a 100 overall rating..

    ..p.s...I've never EVER played ANY battlefield games, strictly Call Of Duty..
  21. Kailurisu
    Nov 10, 2011
    3
    I don't normally bother to review games, but after seeing Glen Schofields call to gamers to review the game, I figured, I would give him exactly what he wants/needs, but he won't like it. So here is the deal, I bought this game for the multiplayer, who didn't, it doesnt mean I won't play single player or anything else, just that my main goal is to enjoy multiplayer. CoD has offered a veryI don't normally bother to review games, but after seeing Glen Schofields call to gamers to review the game, I figured, I would give him exactly what he wants/needs, but he won't like it. So here is the deal, I bought this game for the multiplayer, who didn't, it doesnt mean I won't play single player or anything else, just that my main goal is to enjoy multiplayer. CoD has offered a very specific flavor of multiplayer that I have enjoyed, but this iteration actually felt off, not quite as good as MW2 or Black Ops. More importantly, the maps for multiplayer, are bland, mostly too hectic and feel ugly. I haven't found a single map that I have enjoyed greatly. That is not a good start. Even remade maps would have served better. The Single player so far is boring, disjointed, and already I feel disconnected from the characters I love, Soap and Price. They don't have the same flavor, and the (SPOILER) guy meant to protect the Russian president being shot by Makarov..... that felt rehashed and boring, I'm not sure I will even bother finishing single player. Survival has been enjoyable, but its just like another form of zombies, good but in the end nothing unique at all. In the end Ill play it, probably more then it would seemed based on my review, a little hypocritical I know. However, I already know now that BF3 for me has taken over the joy that I once held for the CoD series. It seems treating your stars like crap, forcing them to leave, and throwing random **** barely tested developers on a much loved series is just not a good idea. (No offense to Treyarch, they at least seemed to try and did ok)… Expand
  22. ad00m
    Nov 10, 2011
    3
    Maps are too maze-like close-combat maps. I really havent imagined yet how this differs from MW2 other than the couple odd new killstreaks. I actually paid 60â
  23. jmugg
    Nov 10, 2011
    3
    I've enjoyed the story that MW has given us with all three games and I think MW3 is a good wrap up for this story line. Let's be honest though a good majority of people purchase this game for the multiplayer. Being that MW3 used the same engine and nearly all the same people worked on the game I expected it to be similar to MW2 for the most part. Maybe a MW2.5 even, and I was ok with thatI've enjoyed the story that MW has given us with all three games and I think MW3 is a good wrap up for this story line. Let's be honest though a good majority of people purchase this game for the multiplayer. Being that MW3 used the same engine and nearly all the same people worked on the game I expected it to be similar to MW2 for the most part. Maybe a MW2.5 even, and I was ok with that because the maps and the game play were really solid. You had a good mix of maps, meaning that the cartography of the maps were balanced in what you could do. If you liked run and gun you could play that style. If you liked to snipe, the map layouts on some maps were brilliant for that but they did include areas that you could run and gun. One map like this would be Fuel in MW2...minus the rock you could hide in obviously. Fast forward to today and as someone that enjoyed sniping, I feel that the cartography of the maps in MW3 are so boxy and corridor like that the only style of play style that is effective is run and gun. The elevation difference in the maps just doesn't seem to be that of the MW2 map Estate or in MW Creek. I'm not saying there needs to be open maps like MW2 Wasteland but maps like Fuel, Creek, Estate, High Rise, Afghan, Derail, Rundown and Underpass would be nice to have in the multiplayer. I feel like those maps had more of an organic feel to them and there were wide open areas and some not so open areas so you could snipe if you wanted but you could also run and gun. This lack of elevation change makes a lot of the multiplayer maps seem like the same thing over and over again just difference scenery. Out of the current set of maps there isn't one that I feel has that, oh this is going to be a classic map down the road and that isn't good from a multiplayer standpoint. Hopefully with DLC they can go back to the drawing board and rethink their cartography to give the maps a bit more of what they did in past games.… Expand
  24. Zenrir
    Nov 10, 2011
    3
    Typical CoD really. I've played them all since the first Call Of Duty on PC! And for MW3 the single player was awesome, i loved the story to it, the scripted scenes were wicked. I did like the multiplayer up until i realised i can't choose what god damn attachment i want. I have to level the gun up to like level 20? Just for a sight? Come on Black Ops had a much better system along withTypical CoD really. I've played them all since the first Call Of Duty on PC! And for MW3 the single player was awesome, i loved the story to it, the scripted scenes were wicked. I did like the multiplayer up until i realised i can't choose what god damn attachment i want. I have to level the gun up to like level 20? Just for a sight? Come on Black Ops had a much better system along with custom emblems. As for Spec-Ops well... the missions are alright. Lacking in variety though. The survival is abysmal. the air support is very very limited. as are the maps. The delta squads die within minutes and you have no gas mask to stop the chemical warfare. It's ridiculous. Zombies was much more balanced. Sort it out IW.… Expand
  25. ckyleburnett
    Nov 10, 2011
    3
    Logged about 10 hours into multiplayer. Absolute rubbish. This is a complete misstep for the series and utterly unforgivable. this is a horrid entry into the series. In one match i was playing last night, a sniper looks up into the sky to lob a grenade into the air..no problem there, but without bothering to even look down - he TAPS the L-trigger followed immediately by the fire button.Logged about 10 hours into multiplayer. Absolute rubbish. This is a complete misstep for the series and utterly unforgivable. this is a horrid entry into the series. In one match i was playing last night, a sniper looks up into the sky to lob a grenade into the air..no problem there, but without bothering to even look down - he TAPS the L-trigger followed immediately by the fire button. the view from his scope was looking directly up at the sky but somehow, the bullet managed to take a 45degree turn and result in a head show. Seriously - he was looking at the fricking sky!!! unreal, simply unreal. I have never felt so ripped off from a game in my entire life. DO NOT BUY.
    If you are a COD fan, stick to Black Ops - its far superior, or even Modern Warfare 2. The gameplay is not fluid and there is no real since of "flow" to the action. Enemies commonly spawn right next to you. Maps are extra small and none of them really stick out as being memorable.
    I haven't tried single player and very limited time with Spec Ops but what I have played i did like. probably the only decent parts of the game.    … Expand
  26. rizzah
    Nov 10, 2011
    3
    The multiplayer has taken a real downward spiral since mw2. The maps are small and are nothing more than run and gun. They no longer take skill and limits the value of alot of the weaponry.
  27. Novato1979
    Nov 16, 2011
    3
    The same graphics, same game play, everything is the same, not innovation, not fun. if i want to play COD i think my best option still COD:MW2 for far...
  28. MoldedCrumb8
    Nov 10, 2011
    3
    Sure the single-player is fun. Its a Shooter and you are shooting stuff all the time, no? But then again, I find myself on the 3rd game of the series asking who the **** these characters are and why should I care about them. The 4 hour campaign story is non existant, and we all know most of the people just dont give a **** about it (most dont even play it after hundreds of hours ofSure the single-player is fun. Its a Shooter and you are shooting stuff all the time, no? But then again, I find myself on the 3rd game of the series asking who the **** these characters are and why should I care about them. The 4 hour campaign story is non existant, and we all know most of the people just dont give a **** about it (most dont even play it after hundreds of hours of multiplayer action, and that happens on every CoD).. its a multiplayer focused game after all.
    But of course, the multiplayer has always been the same. What has changed since MW1? Some new maps? Some new guns and perks? The co-ops are nice though.
    I just dont think what im getting is worth another 60$. We used to joke that every modern shooter is the same.. but the MW series takes it to a new level. Sure it works, its fun to play and stuff, but If I already own MW1 and 2, I dont feel a real need to run to the store to get this.    … Expand
  29. bmilson74
    Nov 10, 2011
    3
    Online is where it fails this time around, maps all seem like the previous map. They don't seem to have variety and reuse elements from previous games. Single player seems to be the easiest one yet. The game seems to be geared towards keeping the casual player playing this buying all of the DLC. Made only for money. Now where do I review Elite?
  30. badt
    Nov 10, 2011
    3
    yes am a bf3 fan boy, but this is not compared to mw3 in any way. Its just a bad, boring game. After 2 hours i traded it in. Campaign too short, on-line is painful, but the other modes are fine but never seen myself going back after one full run-though. MW3 = Money Wasted 3
  31. ZeNublet
    Nov 10, 2011
    3
    I've played COD since I got a demo for the first one long ago on a "Maximum CD". I've seen the series grow and change except for recently when It stopped. COD MW3 is just another rehash of an old game with a new skin/logo and they except everyone to buy it. It's effectively nothing more than one of their cash cows now.

    The single player is okay but just like every game its over in one day    I've played COD since I got a demo for the first one long ago on a "Maximum CD". I've seen the series grow and change except for recently when It stopped. COD MW3 is just another rehash of an old game with a new skin/logo and they except everyone to buy it. It's effectively nothing more than one of their cash cows now.

    The single player is okay but just like every game its over in one day if you sit down to really play it. The online part of it is just the same as the previous except with what appears to be smaller sized maps. If you want just rent the game and beat the campaign. If your looking for online play just play any of the other copies that were released previously or just find another series.    … Expand
  32. coldcrysis
    Nov 10, 2011
    3
    Not as bad as the yearly updates of the Madden franchise, but bad nonetheless. This is basically MW2 but with its gameplay refined. The campaign is roughly 6 hours with mind-numbing action that will make Bad Boys II look dull. The online experience is the same as every year with a bunch a kids running around shooting each other. New year, same COD.
  33. envy
    Nov 10, 2011
    3
    3rd game in the MW franchise, and has yet to add anything really new and exciting. Still using an old engine, and same old premise. The campaign was alright, but short and not as ground breaking as some would say it is. Half of it felt like it was on rails. This game is being given way too much credit for what amounts to be pretty expensive DLC. Even sports games at least improve in3rd game in the MW franchise, and has yet to add anything really new and exciting. Still using an old engine, and same old premise. The campaign was alright, but short and not as ground breaking as some would say it is. Half of it felt like it was on rails. This game is being given way too much credit for what amounts to be pretty expensive DLC. Even sports games at least improve in graphical quality year over year and MW3 fails to even achieve that. I can understand that it's popular because it's easy to pick up and play, but definitely not my cup of tea.… Expand
  34. tiny40505
    Nov 10, 2011
    3
    You know what? Why wont they just admit this crap is just a rehash of Blops and MW2? I swear to god, I wanna enjoy this game, but I'm sick and freaking tired of it to no end. From the obvious rehashing of past ports to the horrible online it has become. Bad hit detection, kill-cams that show the true connection between two people, it's ridicules. This will never be CoD4 no matter how hardYou know what? Why wont they just admit this crap is just a rehash of Blops and MW2? I swear to god, I wanna enjoy this game, but I'm sick and freaking tired of it to no end. From the obvious rehashing of past ports to the horrible online it has become. Bad hit detection, kill-cams that show the true connection between two people, it's ridicules. This will never be CoD4 no matter how hard they try. They just need to get over it. IW is done since the real guys left, SledgeHammer sucks and Treyarch had it's day in the light with WaW which was awesome IMO. Activision will me milking this till the day the world ends. I've been a fan of CoD for along time and it kills me to see this franchise turn into some laughing stock of the gaming world. Believe it or not Schofield people actually hate this game. And the only reason you all make a killing like you do is because of the millions of 11 year olds who wanna LULxXxquickscopeXX420. I used to be a CoDrone like them, but you all can keep your ridicules 15$ map packs and rehashing for the kiddies. I gave this a 3 like I did because deep down I want CoD to return to it's amazingness that was CoD4, hell, even WaW to an extent. But in the end, CoD needs to stop BSing the video game world. I'm done, people who aren't 11 know what needs to be done with this game.… Expand
  35. Bohannon
    Nov 10, 2011
    3
    This feels like a rehash of a game that has been sold under different names, over and over again. A 5 hour campaign, different maps, slightly different guns and perks sounds like DLC to me - however being sold at the full retail value of a new game. No thanks.
  36. Zombi3
    Nov 10, 2011
    3
    They should have called this game MW2 Redux instead of MW3. Hell, MW2 played better than this game!
    To me they just done a copy and paste but this time with crappy controls and a crappy story!!! I'm just mad at myself for spending $100 for this crap...
  37. DarrkHawk
    Nov 10, 2011
    3
    I've had my doubts about MW3 ever since it's announcement. Personally, I have never liked the CoD franchise and missed out on CoD 4 which seems to be the best of the lot. I play the CoD games for campaign purposes only really so naturally, when I picked up MW3 I went straight to campaign. A very disappointing story line with very few "heightened" moments. Only one mission of the lot caughtI've had my doubts about MW3 ever since it's announcement. Personally, I have never liked the CoD franchise and missed out on CoD 4 which seems to be the best of the lot. I play the CoD games for campaign purposes only really so naturally, when I picked up MW3 I went straight to campaign. A very disappointing story line with very few "heightened" moments. Only one mission of the lot caught my full attention and makes up for the entire story in my opinion. It took me the worst part of 7 hours to complete this game on veteran (a new personal best on any games highest difficulty). Was very disappointing.
    Multiplayer mode is where CoD games shine or die for me and sadly, this one died as soon as I saw my video of multiplayer. It looks like an exact clone of its predecessor MW2. With a few new game modes and weapon tweaks, it does not change the game style at all. The tactics and abilities of almost every CoD player are the same on some very badly designed maps. With the range of maps given on this game, you would think that a half decent one would have made its way onto the game but sadly, it has not. A very poor Multiplayer experience to veterans and newbies alike.
    Spec Ops is only the real decent part of this game and is where 2/3 of my points come from. A complete recreation of the MW2 co-op missions and some new and "creative" (risky word) challenges which tests the players tactics, reactions and teamwork even on the easiest setting.

    Although this game will surely be up for the biggest (not best) game of the year, it has still left me with nothing but negative thoughts about the CoD franchise. A very poorly designed game.

    Campaign: 6/10
    Spec Ops: 8/10
    Multiplayer: 2/10    … Expand
  38. malypso
    Nov 10, 2011
    3
    I have been playing this game for some time now and feel comfortable enough to write a simple review about it. Lets be clear about one thing, my opinion is based on previous versions of the game and from a consumers point of view. Is it worth purchasing a game that has been recycled with few updates? To some it is, but for me its not. It is time to break the monotony of this game. This isI have been playing this game for some time now and feel comfortable enough to write a simple review about it. Lets be clear about one thing, my opinion is based on previous versions of the game and from a consumers point of view. Is it worth purchasing a game that has been recycled with few updates? To some it is, but for me its not. It is time to break the monotony of this game. This is MW2.5 at best! This game is couple of new maps, guns, and modes, that could've been released as an expansion pack. We as a consumer are entitled to more than just mindless shooters that feel like your hand is being held the whole way through. The only good thing about this game is the Spec Ops portion of it. I don't have much to say that I haven't said already. This will be the last COD purchase I make until Infinity Ward decides to build MW, or any COD from the ground up. It's nice to see 60fps but at the same time its hard to put up with textures that are last gen in hi resolution. If you have played MW before and MW2 and are expecting something different then don't be surprised when you pop this game in and say to yourself, "haven't I done this before"? You as a consumer deserve better...… Expand
  39. RighteousSteel
    Nov 10, 2011
    3
    Feels like CoD 4 and MW2 hashed into one game. That being said, if you don't mind spending $60 for another Call of Duty game, go ahead and buy it. There are still the same problems from MW2 multiplayer: camping, noob-tubes, small underage kids, ridiculous snowball killstreaks, and bad spawning sites. However, the campaign is a bit better than MW2 and harkens back the CoD 4 campaign manyFeels like CoD 4 and MW2 hashed into one game. That being said, if you don't mind spending $60 for another Call of Duty game, go ahead and buy it. There are still the same problems from MW2 multiplayer: camping, noob-tubes, small underage kids, ridiculous snowball killstreaks, and bad spawning sites. However, the campaign is a bit better than MW2 and harkens back the CoD 4 campaign many times. I like this game for the single-player campaign ONLY, which you can complete in about 6 hours. Just RENT it, do NOT buy it unless you want to pay for a bunch of new maps. Also, do NOT buy Elite, it is a waste of money, as well as the new "maps" which will most likely be re-releases of previous maps.… Expand
  40. CaptnAmerica86
    Nov 10, 2011
    3
    First off, IF YOU HAVENT PLAYED COD MODERN WARFARE ONLINE MULTIPLAYER YET, this is deffinitely worth your money... THE ONLY REASON I AM GIVING THIS A 3 IS BECAUSE as a sequel, it is deffinitely a rinse lather repeat for the devs (you wonder why they didnt just release it a month after Black Ops because it doesnt even seem like they did much work...)

    THE GOOD... there are a few nice    First off, IF YOU HAVENT PLAYED COD MODERN WARFARE ONLINE MULTIPLAYER YET, this is deffinitely worth your money... THE ONLY REASON I AM GIVING THIS A 3 IS BECAUSE as a sequel, it is deffinitely a rinse lather repeat for the devs (you wonder why they didnt just release it a month after Black Ops because it doesnt even seem like they did much work...)

    THE GOOD... there are a few nice adjustments since the last installment of the series. MUCH MUCH MUCH better hit detection. It no longer takes an entire magazine of ammunition to kill your enemies. No more instantkill nube-tubing (the 'nube tube' or grenade launcher is still in, just fixed so it almost never gets an instant kill). Much less lag from any other of the COD installments (I have been playing up to level 30 and have not seen a bit of lag yet. Occasionally, but nothing gamebreaking). The graphics have been polished a decent bit (You can see the sunlight reflect off of the dark gun metal in front of you, and the nice simple details of the environment around you are almost nice enough to make you stop and smell the roses once in awhile). They now offer a wider ability of items and killstreaks SPECIFIC to helping your team-mates and playing the obective rather than just being a lone wolf. What is also pretty cool is they have a whole other killstreak set for those who are really good at lone-wolfing. Instead of killstreaks, you get more and more perks, giving you six perks and a major advantage for one on one combat.

    Thats a lot of cool stuff, but thats about it. Heres where the game loses its luster...

    THE BAD... For those that have already experienced the COD series, you'll be a little disappointed. Not a lot has changed. In fact, its almost like playing a new map pack on MW2. Not even an exaggeration. If I were to put MW2 in your console and right as a match were about to start, tell you it was MW3, it might actually take you a few minutes to realize it was just MW2. It takes forever to unlock anything decent (I was using the pre-set classes they give you up until level 30 because nothing else I had could compare). Not only that, but you dont even look forward to unlocking anything (except perks of course) because the weapon selection is just so bland. There is little to no customization (hardcore Black Ops players, sorry) and I've tried to log on to ELITE only to get booted off or rerouted back to the game.    … Expand
  41. ITS_ENDOT
    Nov 10, 2011
    3
    just the same old cod we have had for 4 years runing, NOTHING has changed NOTHING is new NOTHING is unique. if you have played a previous cod game and are looking for something new, fresh and difrent then you will be highly dissapointed.
  42. Dusty_Bottoms
    Nov 10, 2011
    3
    Well I jumped right on the band wagon and bought this game without reading any user reviews I wish I had. Overall I am very disappointed. Maybe the developers felt if it ain't broke don't fix it, but I think they have ended up with a stale game, same stuff repeated. It is not a new MW game its a map pack for MW2 and no more. I am a PC player and I can't understand why the dedicated serversWell I jumped right on the band wagon and bought this game without reading any user reviews I wish I had. Overall I am very disappointed. Maybe the developers felt if it ain't broke don't fix it, but I think they have ended up with a stale game, same stuff repeated. It is not a new MW game its a map pack for MW2 and no more. I am a PC player and I can't understand why the dedicated servers are un-ranked. I'm in Ireland and don't have a great net connection but at least with dedicated servers I could find one with good ping but what's the point if you cant rank up on them, so I am forced to go the P2P option, which is, for me at least, a very inferior way of playing. You are at the mercy of lag, whom ever is the host has the advantage. Also with the p2p games it just feels like I am spending more time in game lobbies waiting for players to join than in game and when in game you get the always annoying mitigating host message. I'll stick with Black Ops for my COD kicks, enjoying BF3 at the mo and I'm looking forward to Skyrim tomorrow.… Expand
  43. newatlanta19006
    Nov 10, 2011
    3
    I unfortunately have to agree with the hater crowd today. I just finished the campaign and played a good bit of multiplayer and I had to check the disc to make sure it wasn't MW2. Hell, they might as well have just reset my MW2 multiplayer level and send me to MW2 and I wouldn't have known the difference. I don't blame the developers though, Activision nearly dissolved Infinity Ward whenI unfortunately have to agree with the hater crowd today. I just finished the campaign and played a good bit of multiplayer and I had to check the disc to make sure it wasn't MW2. Hell, they might as well have just reset my MW2 multiplayer level and send me to MW2 and I wouldn't have known the difference. I don't blame the developers though, Activision nearly dissolved Infinity Ward when the guys wanted to do something different. Big publishers are to blame for this overpriced re-release.… Expand
  44. Trizzor
    Nov 10, 2011
    3
    I created a metacritic account specifically for this review. This review is a bit longer than others, but it goes into more detail. That said, I just hit level 60 (of 80) in Multiplayer.
    MW2 was my first console FPS, and I fell in love with it. After a while though, the online play became more stressful than fun. Quickscoping, One-Man-Army and Marathon/Commando made it feel like I was    I created a metacritic account specifically for this review. This review is a bit longer than others, but it goes into more detail. That said, I just hit level 60 (of 80) in Multiplayer.
    MW2 was my first console FPS, and I fell in love with it. After a while though, the online play became more stressful than fun. Quickscoping, One-Man-Army and Marathon/Commando made it feel like I was being punished for wanting to enjoy myself. A year later Black Ops arrived...I was still playing it until the night I purchased MW3. My only issue with Black Ops was the gun imbalance (Famas/Aug/AK74u) and hit random detection, otherwise a fantastic multiplayer game. So here I am with MW3. Unlike BOPS, I'm already getting tired of it... for the wrong reasons. What everyone has said is true, it is MW2 with a couple new perks/weps/maps. ISSUE 1: The largest problem with the game, IMO is the spawn system in relation to the maps.
    The maps are much smaller than MW2/BOPS, and there are multiple ways to travel to a location (great for anti-campers) but this to me is its largest downfall. All the maps have so many turns, routes and drops that when you spawn there is almost an enemy near you at all times. Going for that Assault killstreak? Too bad, someone from the other team just spawned 10 yards behind you, literally as your back is to them. ISSUE 2: The number of levels to progress through is way to high. Why do I need to level up 60-74 levels just to unlock my favorite gun? Oh, there is a Prestige shop for that! Once you prestige, you get a token to â    … Expand
  45. WoodrowCall
    Nov 10, 2011
    3
    Wow!!!!! Same game with different maps!! Lets keep the original Call of Duty 4 and then sell the maps as DLC. I want to see an improvement over the last.
    No more MW for me!
  46. SquishedGremlin
    Nov 10, 2011
    3
    re-skinned, re-hashed, all been said before. Graphically similar if not the same as MW2, only thing that helps its case is the survival mode, that has earned all three stars I give
  47. AngryBrute
    Nov 11, 2011
    3
    Seriously disappointed with this game. It shows that "too much of the same is not always a good thing." The engine is really showing its age, the chaos that went on with Infinity Ward has defiantly scared the creativity. The story was very muddled by repetitious combat and uninspired level design, MP was ok but the maps were too small and felt like a giant **** zone.

    It is time for an    Seriously disappointed with this game. It shows that "too much of the same is not always a good thing." The engine is really showing its age, the chaos that went on with Infinity Ward has defiantly scared the creativity. The story was very muddled by repetitious combat and uninspired level design, MP was ok but the maps were too small and felt like a giant **** zone.

    It is time for an upgrade! I used to love the series lots, but now I am indifferent.    … Expand
  48. xBladeRunner
    Nov 10, 2011
    3
    So glad I didnt not spend my money on the Activision sucker train. I stood with friend at the midnight release for this game. Avoided all the hype and still didnt buy it that night. I did however give it a try once we got back to my buddys place and it was far worse than I expected. I have played many of the COD's COD, COD 2, COD 4 MW, COD WAW, and COD MW2. But by then Activision had notSo glad I didnt not spend my money on the Activision sucker train. I stood with friend at the midnight release for this game. Avoided all the hype and still didnt buy it that night. I did however give it a try once we got back to my buddys place and it was far worse than I expected. I have played many of the COD's COD, COD 2, COD 4 MW, COD WAW, and COD MW2. But by then Activision had not brought anything new to the table and was milking the fan base to no end. As far as my review it looks and plays no different than COD4. Not a bad thing if this game was released back in 2007. It felt like I was playing a 60 dollar map pack. Some new maps with new perks but not much else. With as much money the COD world has brought in I would have at least hoped that they would have updated the game engine or provided dedicated servers to avoid the crazy amount of modded players on this game. Yes the game has already been hacked. Within 24hrs. A mod is available for MW3. Not surprised since it is a game based on per to per play. By the way the friend I was standing in line with called today and his excitment was not were near what it was Monday night. I asked him what was wrong because he was sooo pumped for this game and the night or should I say morning we where playing it he was really over the top about how sweet it was. And he said after playing it for a couple of days now he understands what I was saying that night and feels slighted by all the hype and felt he got suckered. I told him not to feel bad and just dont support the Elite or map packs and you will help the industry by showing your voice with your dollars. This is the first review I have ever written but felt it needed to be done because the game was just sooo bad and could have been so much more.… Expand
  49. PsyEd
    Nov 10, 2011
    3
    What this really is just a MOD for MW2. Not really anything new. Apart from Kill Confirmed mode nothing really stands out. SP is boring and feels like a chore...MP is alright but more like a FIX of MW2 with maps by treyarch...if you played BLOPS you will know what I just wrote. Never again I will buy a CoD game at launch at full price.
  50. mw22
    Nov 10, 2011
    3
    This game is great if you're 12. It's been nothing but a bunch of little kids running around no-scoping for 3 days now. The graphics are terrible and the maps are tiny mazes of hallways and corridors. The campaign is short and too over the top. I don't recommend.
  51. ob1
    Nov 10, 2011
    3
    stealing our money and giving us the same old product. i am deeply disappointed with the game and elite subscription, i feel i have been duped in to buying an inferior product!
  52. boompow
    Nov 10, 2011
    3
    Sadly this itteration of CoD: MW is the same game you paid for a few years ago with the 2nd installment. Same engine, same gameplay, same "feel and effect". There is nothing new and MP is still so hectic that you need to be on speed to last even a second when you first start playing it. After a brilliant BF3 which pushed the genre, the visuals and sound this game feels like a ripoff.Sadly this itteration of CoD: MW is the same game you paid for a few years ago with the 2nd installment. Same engine, same gameplay, same "feel and effect". There is nothing new and MP is still so hectic that you need to be on speed to last even a second when you first start playing it. After a brilliant BF3 which pushed the genre, the visuals and sound this game feels like a ripoff. Paying premium price for a re-hash of a game I played two years ago pisses me off. Its not a bad game, its solid but it already was in past version, here you are paying for a new set of textures and 5 hours of "Duckhunt" style shooting in a convoluted story that feels flat and tired.… Expand
  53. Mocha1up
    Nov 11, 2011
    3
    This game is fun, real fun and frustrating. Nothing new but game modes a couple of new guns and slightly different maps. Even though this game is fun its not worth the $60 maybe $40. I've been a fan of IW since cod 2, but this time they let me down maybe its activisions fault I don't know but.... I think Treyarch did a better job this time with Blops. Structure InfinityWard I soil beThis game is fun, real fun and frustrating. Nothing new but game modes a couple of new guns and slightly different maps. Even though this game is fun its not worth the $60 maybe $40. I've been a fan of IW since cod 2, but this time they let me down maybe its activisions fault I don't know but.... I think Treyarch did a better job this time with Blops. Structure InfinityWard I soil be taking your posters off my wall now and changing my Blops emblem.....I will also be playing BF3 till Skyward 7Sword is out....… Expand
  54. Tgreer76
    Nov 11, 2011
    3
    Here is the deal- I loved the jump forward that Treyarch achieved with the gameplay of Black Ops. That is the reason Black Ops did so well too, was the tightness and precision in gameplay. But rather than build on that, Infinity Ward simply took the same game build from MW2, tweaked it a little, improved the graphics, and voila- MW3. You cannot take a step forward in gameplay, the mostHere is the deal- I loved the jump forward that Treyarch achieved with the gameplay of Black Ops. That is the reason Black Ops did so well too, was the tightness and precision in gameplay. But rather than build on that, Infinity Ward simply took the same game build from MW2, tweaked it a little, improved the graphics, and voila- MW3. You cannot take a step forward in gameplay, the most important aspect of gaming period, and then take a step back. That is why I am trading this game in today when I buy Skyrim. That is why this game should not fare as well in sales as Black Ops. Infinity Ward made a game that feels like you should be popping quarters into it, rather than emulate the precision Treyarch achieved. Infinity Ward- I hope you are listening.… Expand
  55. Juliapalooza
    Nov 11, 2011
    3
    Ahh, the irony: MODERN Warfare? Perhaps if it was 2007, I would be blown away. But alas! Last I checked, it's 2011 and this installment pales in comparison to the precision, smooth gameplay, realism, and FUN factor of Black Ops. I am well aware of the concept of a series, so I'm not going to slam the fact that it is more of the same. I expected more of the same, but BETTER. ItAhh, the irony: MODERN Warfare? Perhaps if it was 2007, I would be blown away. But alas! Last I checked, it's 2011 and this installment pales in comparison to the precision, smooth gameplay, realism, and FUN factor of Black Ops. I am well aware of the concept of a series, so I'm not going to slam the fact that it is more of the same. I expected more of the same, but BETTER. It simply is not. So disappointed. Trading it in today for Skyrim and will wait for the next COD installment in 2012, most likely to be developed by Treyarch. Oh, and for the record: BF3 sucks, too.… Expand
  56. Shotgun45
    Nov 11, 2011
    3
    As a long time fan of the series (and border line fanboy) this game was a huge let down. The campaign was ok at best. The multiplayer is just terrible. Bullet recognition seems to have gotten worse. At least in MW2 when I pulled up on an enemy charging at me I knew that I was going to get the kill. Now it seems that you can be first to spot your enemy running along, first to aim, first toAs a long time fan of the series (and border line fanboy) this game was a huge let down. The campaign was ok at best. The multiplayer is just terrible. Bullet recognition seems to have gotten worse. At least in MW2 when I pulled up on an enemy charging at me I knew that I was going to get the kill. Now it seems that you can be first to spot your enemy running along, first to aim, first to fire, and the first to die with your opponent getting away without a scratch. It's also even easier now to pin your opponents in their spawn. How random is the spawning when your are already in their sights, spawned around the corner from where you just died, or spawning an enemy directly behind you within 5 seconds of running out of the spawn?

    I honestly don't think gamers wanted a lot of change. Which, in a way, is good because this game doesn't deliver in that respect. What a lot of gamers wanted was a game that worked. The series MW series started 4 years ago and seems to be going backwards since.    … Expand
  57. hudsmack
    Nov 11, 2011
    3
    Frankly, I find it offensive that Activision and all the parties involved keep pumping out the same game with minor iterations and charging full price for it. It is no longer a compelling series and just because it sells well does not make it a good game. There has been no innovation in the series or gameplay since the original Modern Warfare. The gaming press seems content to laud it withFrankly, I find it offensive that Activision and all the parties involved keep pumping out the same game with minor iterations and charging full price for it. It is no longer a compelling series and just because it sells well does not make it a good game. There has been no innovation in the series or gameplay since the original Modern Warfare. The gaming press seems content to laud it with praise since it does sell well and they want to stay in good graces with Activision. The visuals are tired; the engine is tired; the story is tired; the gameplay is tired; the whole series is tired. Gamers would have just as much fun putting in the original Modern Warfare and paying $5-$10 for a new map pack every once in a while. That's all these titles are anymore, glorified map packs. And now, Activision has the audacity to create an "Elite" service and milk gamers for even more money. Suck on it Activision. This series will never see another dime from me.… Expand
  58. datdudejohn315
    Nov 11, 2011
    3
    The campaign wasn't that epic like the previews lead on .The Multiplayer wasn't all that hot. The online is to busy with UAV's and air power. There's hundreds of places that people camp in. The maps are huge it just wasn't worth the $65.00 i paid for it, I'm really disappointed with the game. I think Modern Warfare just became Guitar Hero the first 3 were great but they came out with toThe campaign wasn't that epic like the previews lead on .The Multiplayer wasn't all that hot. The online is to busy with UAV's and air power. There's hundreds of places that people camp in. The maps are huge it just wasn't worth the $65.00 i paid for it, I'm really disappointed with the game. I think Modern Warfare just became Guitar Hero the first 3 were great but they came out with to many to fast and made dumb changes. The game is the same old song and dance. The only think i liked was the fact that you got a kill for capping an objective.… Expand
  59. Tswe
    Nov 11, 2011
    3
    I have played all of the COD series. This one by far is the most disappointing. Basically like everyone is saying an expensive DLC. The graphics and engine got minor updates they say, but I can't really tell the difference from MW2 which came out 2 years ago. My biggest disappointment is with the multiplayer maps they are really small and feel cluttered.... I played a few games of TDMI have played all of the COD series. This one by far is the most disappointing. Basically like everyone is saying an expensive DLC. The graphics and engine got minor updates they say, but I can't really tell the difference from MW2 which came out 2 years ago. My biggest disappointment is with the multiplayer maps they are really small and feel cluttered.... I played a few games of TDM and domination last night and domination is almost impossible to play on most of these maps. A lot of the maps dont even stand out enough where you can tell the difference in them. Also the firing through the walls is a little ridiculous.

    The single player is ok, short but it is ok.
    The coop is ok.    … Expand
  60. voz43
    Nov 11, 2011
    3
    Black Ops this is not! MW3 is no where even close to being as good as Blacks Ops. I have not played much of the MW3 campaign or spec ops yet, so I will not comment on them. However the MW3 multiplayers is horrible. For starters the maps are the worst I have ever seen. I would say 12 of the 16 look exactly the same. No variety. Broken down, destroyed cities. And all of the maps areBlack Ops this is not! MW3 is no where even close to being as good as Blacks Ops. I have not played much of the MW3 campaign or spec ops yet, so I will not comment on them. However the MW3 multiplayers is horrible. For starters the maps are the worst I have ever seen. I would say 12 of the 16 look exactly the same. No variety. Broken down, destroyed cities. And all of the maps are so small, its ridiculous. The spawns point are just stupid. I cant tell you how many times I spawned directly in front of or next to an emeny only to get killed instantly. Just very poor map design in general. Makes Multiplayer not even fun. The leveling system, weapon upgrades, and perks are stupid. This is coming from someone who was borderline addicted to BO multiplayer. I am done with MW3 multi. I wll finish the campaign just to see what happen, and mess around with spec ops a little bit. But after that Im done with MW3. I will go back to playing BO, or better yet go buy BATTLEFIELD 3. Which I probably shoulda done in the first place. In my opinion Infinity Ward drpped the ball big time. Treyarch needs to make COD from now on.… Expand
  61. yomamar6
    Nov 11, 2011
    3
    Definitely a 9 if you liked MW2 because not much has changed. It's a map pack or expansion pack in my opinion and the only need for this hype was most likely to beef up the bottom line.
  62. Remedylive
    Nov 11, 2011
    3
    This game is nothing different from years gone by. Had a go and noticed nothing had changed apart from the graphics have been tweaked a bit more. But still millions of under 18's will have a lot of fun playing. I seem to know of more kids playing this game than adults, is it just me that has noticed this??
  63. b33r_mon3y
    Nov 11, 2011
    3
    The Glen guy (from Sledgehammer) begged the community to come review his game for him so here it is. My thoughts:

    Unfortunately the multiplayer experience is destroyed due to the horrible lag created by the lag compensation. After about 15 hours played online it is obvious that the game artificially introduces lag (sometimes up to .5-1 second) to "even" the playing field with those    The Glen guy (from Sledgehammer) begged the community to come review his game for him so here it is. My thoughts:

    Unfortunately the multiplayer experience is destroyed due to the horrible lag created by the lag compensation. After about 15 hours played online it is obvious that the game artificially introduces lag (sometimes up to .5-1 second) to "even" the playing field with those who do not have good connections. This typically results in many wtf moments when engaging into 1v1 gun battles (which the developers repeatedly said would be the focus of the game) where you see the person first and start shooting first but you appear to die from 1 bullet from the other player. Watching the kill cam shows a different story. The other player sees you first and starts emptying most of their magazine into you, clearly more then the 1 bullet that was shown earlier. Multiplayer is unplayable with these problems. These issues were in other CoDs however I have never experienced it as bad as now. If you want to run 'n gun look elsewhere.

    The maps are terrible. Tight corridors with numerous corners and overlooking windows lead to excessive camping. All the clutter in the environment is too easily abused for cover where what looks like the tip of someones head above an object is shown to be the barrell of their gun in the kill cam after they kill you. Additionally the spawns are terrible. Enemies spawn on top of you, in you, to the side of you, etc. The same happens when you spawn. It is not uncommon to spawn and take a couple steps and get killed. There is no logic to the spawn locations which seem to be random in nature. The developers stated numerous times that they wanted a fast paced game. If by fast paced they meant chaotic and illogical they succeeded.

    Gun damage is inconsistent, likely due to the terrible network compensation. One kill may take 3 bullets the next may take 6. Assault rifles are by far the best weapons in the game dominating the close, mid, and long range. A majority of the iron sights are ridiculus. For example the G36C iron sight covers up nearly 1/3 of the screen while ADS forcing the use of red dot sights. Perk selection has changed little since Modern Warfare 2.

    The only gameplay improvements I can see over Modern Warfare 2 are less power and prevailent noob tubes and air support has been toned down slightly.

    Single player experience is average. Your "buddies" are dumber then ever just standing around waiting for you to do all the work generally ignoring enemies that are right next to them. I watched many of the developer videos on YouTube and the IGN exclusives. It is clear that many of the pstatements made (gun vs. gun, 3-5 hot spots per map, better spawns, etc.) were not true. I spent $100 on the Hardend Edition and it was a rip off. Call of Duty Elite (included with it) doesn't work reliably and offers less features then what was included with Black Ops combat record! To make it worse, Elite isn't even integrated into the game! You have to exist Modern Warfare 3 to view the more "detailed" stats.

    So yea, lots of complaints. Very dissappointed.    … Expand
  64. JAMR92
    Nov 11, 2011
    3
    It's been said many times and I'll repeat it, MW3 is the same as the last one. This game has almost no innovation and is part of the problem with modern video games and the video game industry as a whole. This was nothing but a cash grab and it does not even deserve a rental, giving this game a 3 is generous on my part.
  65. ghostpetro9
    Nov 12, 2011
    3
    This game is not what they hyped it up to be, its basically a step back from black ops even though its MW and not Black ops, I would of thought the developer would have stepped it up a notch since the last release was Black ops which had much better graphics and much better game play than MW3. Anyways ill be playing BF3 which is the future of tactical FPS Games and really puts COD MW3 toThis game is not what they hyped it up to be, its basically a step back from black ops even though its MW and not Black ops, I would of thought the developer would have stepped it up a notch since the last release was Black ops which had much better graphics and much better game play than MW3. Anyways ill be playing BF3 which is the future of tactical FPS Games and really puts COD MW3 to shame. MW3 is Mediocre at best.........… Expand
  66. XPRESSXPERT
    Nov 11, 2011
    3
    Here's my take on MW3. Although there is nothing wrong with the game I can't find any true strong points, the multiplayer is the same as before but with a handful of new guns and a DLC's worth of new maps. However the problems with multiplayer are still there, yes it's still a fast paced shooter but that's mainly due to the close quarters maps which only require players to use smgs toHere's my take on MW3. Although there is nothing wrong with the game I can't find any true strong points, the multiplayer is the same as before but with a handful of new guns and a DLC's worth of new maps. However the problems with multiplayer are still there, yes it's still a fast paced shooter but that's mainly due to the close quarters maps which only require players to use smgs to dominate. I also found that the game can lean to much towards camping at times with too much focus on players getting kill streaks even with the new kill reward system. As for the campaign it continues from where it left off in MW2 in medias res, i feel that this is a little bit of a let down as new players unlike myself my not know the story. The AI system returns although against such titles as gears of war 3 and uncharted 3 it feels a little bit too cheap with the AI relying on using grenades to kill you and feels a bit robotic. As for the level designs they remind me a bit of gears of war 1 with many of the level involving moving down a street, stopping to kill some people in front moving to the next group with no real player ability needed to beat the game. Unless of the grenade spam difficulty (veteran). The new survival mode is good fun though much better in my opinion than the rather dated zombies, this mode can be a blast with a friend although hampered by the AI again. To conclude this game is feeling a bit dated and has less new content than Halo: ODST, think of it not a a new game but as an expansion pack like the change from fifa 11 to 12 or madden 11 to 12. Nothing new, but nothing truly broken from year to year. If you are going to buy this game then I suggest that you buy it second hand save your self some cash and wait for the patches to roll out. Thanks for reading.… Expand
  67. NoahB
    Nov 11, 2011
    3
    I was really expecting this game to be at the very least better than Black Ops. It's not. In every aspect of the gameplay it isn't even close to COD4 or MW2. COD4 set the bar extremely high and maybe people tend to expect something as gamebreaking and epic as that. And though MW2 has it's share of mods/hacks, etc, IMO there is no better multi-player interface than MW2. The sound,I was really expecting this game to be at the very least better than Black Ops. It's not. In every aspect of the gameplay it isn't even close to COD4 or MW2. COD4 set the bar extremely high and maybe people tend to expect something as gamebreaking and epic as that. And though MW2 has it's share of mods/hacks, etc, IMO there is no better multi-player interface than MW2. The sound, realism and the maps are very diverse. As far as the MW3 campaign, it lacks depth and innovation and tells a story that is similar to the previous titles in the series. Step outside the box. Look at Batman: Arkham City. Now THAT is how your follow up one of the best games for the 360 with a sequel. As far as the multiplayer.....I logged in over 10k team deaths in MW2 and had a k/d over 2.00, played maybe 100 or so in black ops because it really seemed like an Atari interface. This multiplayer has the same feel as black ops, so if you liked that MP then you'll like this. It's very micky mouse in a way. Seems more like a kids game then an epic online MP. There is really no "tactic" per say in this multiplayer. Everyone seems to use a rush loadout. The maps are very linear. I'm finding that I unload almost a full clip into someone and he shoots me once and I'm dead. WTF? Or, the guy sees me and I'm instantly dead with no chance to react. I realize that lag or connection speed can be an issue but thought that dedicated servers would solve the problem. Sledgehammer did a horrible job IMO with the whole MP interface, maps, visuals and sound. Where is the "old guard" at IW.......ohhh yeah it's Respawn. Really can't wait for their first shooter and maybe this franchise will be a thing of the past. I hope I'm wrong because I've really enjoyed it over the years. I just won't buy another COD game unless the reviews are clearly a newly created renaissance that brings us back to the glory days of this series.

    To be honest......I'm going back to COD4 and MW2 MP. The last two games make me feel as if this franchise hit its peak long ago. One thing is for sure.........we are the consumers have been sucked into the series and the only people are benefiting from it are the pub's and dev's in record sales, meanwhile we're stuck with a nice door stop of a game.    … Expand
  68. yokothefox
    Nov 11, 2011
    3
    I don't know why all these people are calling the game modern warfare 2.5, I mean, yeah it looks similar but the graphics engine is way better. The things I like about the game is the implement of the support package because it lets me play objectively without being punished by the scum of the game who like to camp and clip in corners instead of playing the game the way it's meant to beI don't know why all these people are calling the game modern warfare 2.5, I mean, yeah it looks similar but the graphics engine is way better. The things I like about the game is the implement of the support package because it lets me play objectively without being punished by the scum of the game who like to camp and clip in corners instead of playing the game the way it's meant to be played, but unfortunately it's unforgivable how not only does the matchmaking suck and the servers lag. To top it off the COD elite service is not even working even though it's a paid service for premium members. How is it that the "Most Anticipated" game to ever be released has this many problems? You would really think that they would use part of that quarter billion+ they've already made from the first week of sales to fix these problems faster. It's not like the biggest sold game in history has financial problems.… Expand
  69. bigdc666
    Nov 11, 2011
    3
    First of all I want to say that I base my reviews off value. So Does MW3 warrent your $60.00 purchase? Nope an 5.99 rental will just about do the trick. Modern warefare 3s campaign is filled with great explosions great sounds, and great graphics. From the Moment you start to the moment you finish its a heart pounding experience that most gamers will find awesome! BUT its so short you canFirst of all I want to say that I base my reviews off value. So Does MW3 warrent your $60.00 purchase? Nope an 5.99 rental will just about do the trick. Modern warefare 3s campaign is filled with great explosions great sounds, and great graphics. From the Moment you start to the moment you finish its a heart pounding experience that most gamers will find awesome! BUT its so short you can finish it on normal in one evening. So $60.00 and the story is over in one sitting. Sure there is multiplayer (and it's more of the same great MW action we all love) but thats what it is more of the same. 16 new maps, some new stuff that helps players that are not super hardcore get there streak stuff in. A new system that levels up each weapon as you use it. and a handful of other changes that overall don't make a difference from the core game play. But (at least on 360) if you are new to the series I recommend just staying away from the online component altogether. Everyone playing seems to already have the best weapons and accessories and they are already experts. Each time I spawned It was no mach. One on one there weapons were just to powerful. The team stuff was a little bit better but unless your going to pour hours and hours into the steap online learning curve your better off just sticking to the single player. And forget playing with bots in a practice arena that option is not available in MW3. So for most of us that will only play the single player and dable in the multiplayer this game as a whole is one of the biggest rip-offs of all time.… Expand
  70. Stice_Cold
    Nov 12, 2011
    3
    Top 5 Reasons Why I Dislike MW3: Multiplayer

    1. Spawning: In core, it seems as if you can't get more than three kills without somebody on the other team spawning around the corner from you. I have repeatedly watched myself kill another player, they spawn, and then they kill me, all in the time allotted in a kill-cam. The spawn-delay should be incorporate into all core game modes or    Top 5 Reasons Why I Dislike MW3: Multiplayer

    1. Spawning: In core, it seems as if you can't get more than three kills without somebody on the other team spawning around the corner from you. I have repeatedly watched myself kill another player, they spawn, and then they kill me, all in the time allotted in a kill-cam. The spawn-delay should be incorporate into all core game modes or completely revamp the spawning system like Brink or Battlefield 3.

    2. Inconsistency: You can kill somebody with 4 shots or less to the chest or waistline with almost any weapon, sometimes. I constantly get hit-markers over and over again and then my opponent pops back up and shoots me twice and I'm dead, and spawning around the corner. The stopping power perk allowed a variety of weapon use. I could sacrifice my original power for accuracy or double up on power. Now its just the stronger weapon wins, no matter how accurate you are. 3. Maps/Camping: These new maps look amazing, but that's all they are; something nice to look at. In multiplayer these maps are breeding grounds for camping players. Its so cluttered that people can hide behind almost anything and get there accolade, emblem, and title for being in the same spot the longest. On some maps, if the team puts up a semi adequate defense, it is impossible to flank them, Outpost and Arkaden are perfect examples. Hardcore was my sanctuary from this but its the worst now.

    4. Knifing: On my full green bar connection screen, I'm witnessing myself have the upper hand lunging to get my stab, but no, epic fail on my part. A quick side step and a few bullets or a knife in my back and I'm on the floor. Once again knifing is useless unless your enemy's back is turned. If you run into somebody you might get lucky and get them with the swiping motion of turning and hitting the knifing button at the same time we all love. Personally, I think the game would be better off without the knife in multiplayer or adopt the Halo way of close combat with a little changes of course.

    5. Audio Effects: You can't turn off the game music for some odd reason. The music deafens and drowns out all aspects of the game when something important happens. The sound of the weapons are disappointing, the sound effects in MW2 sounded much more realistic.

    I think I'll be switching to Battlefield 3 while my hours of waiting in line, anticipation, and excitement collect dust in its case.    … Expand
  71. Shotgun454
    Nov 12, 2011
    3
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Let's start off by saying a few things. This game was incredibly hyped, and both high and low expectations for this game arose. This review outlines my final opinion on this pile of mediocre **** so let's begin.

    1. A Modern Warfare 2 Clone
    It's almost the exact same game as Modern Warfare 2. Just look at eveything (title screen, the gameplay, weapons, levels ect.). Previous installments in the franchise at least had more variety and differences between each game; this pile of **** is a downright disgusting and blatantly inexcusable clone.

    2. The game is further proof of Activision tiresome efforts to milk the series.
    The series is getting milked raw, and so far, the milk is curdling up into a rancid pile of moldy **** A new installment every year? Don't be ridiculous, Activision. 3. The Survival Mode reeks of ass.
    Survival Mode is yet another ****ty addition to the franchise, and is inferior in almost every way to Nazi Zombies.

    4. The Campain mode should be cut out of the game (the series even) altogether.
    The Campaign Mode is yet again the same linear garbage, with barely any variety or enjoyment to be had. The same can be said for almost every modern COD game. Nuff said.

    5. COD: Elite: a useless addition to the series, that shouldn't exist in the first place.
    COD: Elite itself is a clone of other services, and the fact you have to pay for such a useless and gimmicky addition to the game, is more irrefutable proof that Activision is milking those **** raw. Not to mention, the service not being included as part of the game, made an already lackluster clone even more similar to it's predecessor. The integration with Facebook further proves that Activision is tageting the series towards casual gamers.

    6. Little retarded fraghead kids. Just look at your typical modern-day COD gamer. A nooblet, casual gamer fraghead kid, that loves shouting out retarded insult in the mic, and thinks that he's such a man at the game, when in reality he fails hard (noob), and has been fooled by the amount of awards this game spews out.

    7. Campers When it comes to the modern warfare franchise, people had been complaining about camping since day one, and meanwhile the problem still remains in the game (as it is a clone of MW2, what did you expect -_-). A ****ty spawning system, and cheap ways to get kills, not to mention the ease at obtaining killstreaks, just futher encourages camping.

    Conclusion:
    Stay away from this game if your a real gamer, and not some dimwitted **** All the points above are reasons significant enough to end one's decision in purchasing such a tremendously overhyped and ****ty game.

    The game is extremely mediocre and average, and I would have given it a 5/10, but from all the negatives I listed above, it just further drags the score down to...
    *drumroll*
    Final Score: 3 / 10    … Expand
  72. Deadpike
    Nov 12, 2011
    3
    The quick scoping campfest is back YAY!!!!! the maps have more corners for the heartbeat scanner lovers to sit in. Dont get me wrong i actually enjoyed mw2 and black ops was pleasurable but this little outing has caused me to call most of the world population a word that cannot be repeated here but like the campers it does begin with a C and why oh why can you put an ACOG on a sniperThe quick scoping campfest is back YAY!!!!! the maps have more corners for the heartbeat scanner lovers to sit in. Dont get me wrong i actually enjoyed mw2 and black ops was pleasurable but this little outing has caused me to call most of the world population a word that cannot be repeated here but like the campers it does begin with a C and why oh why can you put an ACOG on a sniper rifle god only knows.
    its not all doom and gloom the story is yes the same old but the set peices are clever and it was more enjoyable then BF3 but lets face it its the multiplayer we buy these games for and im sorry i get no joy so i shall be handing my copy back to the shop for skyrim.    … Expand
  73. jius
    Nov 12, 2011
    3
    This is really just MW2.5 - an expensive expansion pack. If the Critics were truely playing the game rather than sitting with their pre-release copies in their COD t-shirts, baseball caps, MW underwear and whatever else gifts they were showered with as they were half playing half writing their review, then perhaps their scores would have been closer to the truth. User scores and reviewsThis is really just MW2.5 - an expensive expansion pack. If the Critics were truely playing the game rather than sitting with their pre-release copies in their COD t-shirts, baseball caps, MW underwear and whatever else gifts they were showered with as they were half playing half writing their review, then perhaps their scores would have been closer to the truth. User scores and reviews say it all just as it really is. Fanboys and non-fanboys alike cannot deny this is a poor uninspired un-innovative release. But IW is still laughing all the way to the bank. I hope they apologise with some sort of FREE update to add something innovative!!… Expand
  74. PU3RTO_R3CON
    Nov 12, 2011
    3
    When you put this against Battlefield 3 ....battlefield will take it every time bc they had the guts to innovate and come up with some of the best graphics and best multiplayer ever! But modern warfares campaign was amazing and kept me interested and on the edge of my seat. If you compare MW3 by its self it is a solid game but it feels like an expansion of mw2. Very disappointed infinityWhen you put this against Battlefield 3 ....battlefield will take it every time bc they had the guts to innovate and come up with some of the best graphics and best multiplayer ever! But modern warfares campaign was amazing and kept me interested and on the edge of my seat. If you compare MW3 by its self it is a solid game but it feels like an expansion of mw2. Very disappointed infinity ward. Very disappointed!… Expand
  75. Laffybug
    Nov 12, 2011
    3
    TO BE CLEAR. Black Ops is my favorite FPS and I have never played Battlefield and have no intension to do so.

    I feel like clarifying my last review on this game. Black Ops was my first Call of Duty game. When I started i was horrible. With practice I became very good. There are all sorts of ways to play Black Ops: run and gun, corner camping and team camping, etc. I was a run and    TO BE CLEAR. Black Ops is my favorite FPS and I have never played Battlefield and have no intension to do so.

    I feel like clarifying my last review on this game. Black Ops was my first Call of Duty game. When I started i was horrible. With practice I became very good. There are all sorts of ways to play Black Ops: run and gun, corner camping and team camping, etc. I was a run and gunner while my signifcant other was a corner camper. We would literally cut off half of the map. My clan would rarely lose. We would have an idea of the area of where teams would spawn but wouldn't be able to cover the spawn by sitting two feet away from them. This brings me to MW3. I still run and gun which gives me little chance to be succesful. People literally spawn just feet from me and usually behind me. Earlier tonight I spawned in the middle of a building and had three people surrounding me. I was screwed. Another map my buddy was sitting on a wall shooting people who were spawning two feet below him. Aside from the spawning issue the guns are inconsistent. The power of weapons seems to flucuate greatly. I could go into more detail but puting this much time into reviewing this game after spending $120 for two copies is making me angry. I will be selling my copy to Gamestop tomorrow and play Black Ops until the next one comes out.    … Expand
  76. Youngbuckeroo
    Nov 12, 2011
    3
    There is nothing suspicious about low review scores, MW3 is garbage! The only reason i gave it a 3 is because i get to shoot my friends in their face online. Otherwise, it would be a 0 !! They got rid of personalized emblems for the same old tired mw2 emblems and titles! Lame! They beefed up the guns and made them louder and faster, which is great but i have to shoot someone three timesThere is nothing suspicious about low review scores, MW3 is garbage! The only reason i gave it a 3 is because i get to shoot my friends in their face online. Otherwise, it would be a 0 !! They got rid of personalized emblems for the same old tired mw2 emblems and titles! Lame! They beefed up the guns and made them louder and faster, which is great but i have to shoot someone three times in the face to get a kill, and at distance at least 5 times. The maps are terrible, complain all you want about WAW and BO but treyarch had great maps. Scenery is blurry, hectic and the elevations are ridiculous, you cant climb except stairs! Kill streaks have been changed to allow objective focused players some benefits (thank you)! Problem is now every 10 seconds theres another chopper or reaper or stealth bomber. Activision has let this game drown in its past glory, like that idiot guy you see around town driving the same car since 1983, because back then it was the coolest car on the street. Unfortunately you cant tell them that because their blind to the truth. This game is worn down, out of date and in need of an innovative over haul. I recommend do not buy this game at a store! There will be a million on ebay by the months end.!… Expand
  77. MartinP217
    Nov 13, 2011
    3
    mw3 is a fun game to play, don't get me wrong; but it feels more like an expansion pack than a new game. I feel as if the creators of the game really half assed this one. Most, if not all of the callsign titles and emblems are recycled from mw2. Most of the guns are the same, or slight variants on those from mw2. The only good thing I can say about this game that is new is the survivalmw3 is a fun game to play, don't get me wrong; but it feels more like an expansion pack than a new game. I feel as if the creators of the game really half assed this one. Most, if not all of the callsign titles and emblems are recycled from mw2. Most of the guns are the same, or slight variants on those from mw2. The only good thing I can say about this game that is new is the survival mode. Someone called this game mw2.5, and I couldnt agree more.Same game. Bought the hardened edition and I feel like I was ripped off.… Expand
  78. the_critic
    Nov 13, 2011
    3
    Activision need to stop their annual releases of the COD franchise. If they have nothing new or innovative to offer at the year anniversary of a titles release, offer a larger map pack with some small add-ins like camo or weapons. Iâ
  79. mvg_dirk
    Nov 13, 2011
    3
    i gave this a 3.1 as its just a mash up of WaW levels and previous Modern Warfare, give that the facial graphics are better other then that its just a botch job to be honest, and the MP is just MW2 and MW1 maps rehashed and tweaked
  80. ReaganSmash
    Nov 13, 2011
    3
    Im stunned that they can make a game worse than they have before. The kill streaks are awful, spawning is the worst out of any COD game. Its like they just got lazy. Can be a good game though with some updates. Oh yeah, and why the hell are we still quick scoping
  81. Mav1
    Nov 13, 2011
    3
    Strictly MP only review: Disappointment. There is no other word I can think of to describe MW3. My buddies and I have spent days (literally, by looking at our hour logs) playing MW2, Black Ops, etc together. We had so much fun, and got quite good, and had high hopes for MW3. Infinity Ward created a fantastic (though sometimes unbalanced) game with MW2, so I 'knew' MW3 would be great.Strictly MP only review: Disappointment. There is no other word I can think of to describe MW3. My buddies and I have spent days (literally, by looking at our hour logs) playing MW2, Black Ops, etc together. We had so much fun, and got quite good, and had high hopes for MW3. Infinity Ward created a fantastic (though sometimes unbalanced) game with MW2, so I 'knew' MW3 would be great. Wow was I wrong.

    The maps are the bane of MW3. I enjoy the other minor changes to online gameplay, but the maps are what makes MW3 an extreme disappointment. I cannot comprehend how the devs didn't notice that EVERY single map is practically the same: small, confined, and noob friendly. Why bother getting an AC130 when you can hide from it almost anywhere in any map. There are no long distance shooting skills needed, SMGs (UMP) are favored in any situation. There is no flow to the maps, just chaos. You constantly get shot in the back, there is no feeling of a standoff like in previous COD games. I literally could go on forever with how bad these maps are. It's obvious the map makers of IW were the ones that left, because these maps are atrocious, and kill any sense of fun or accomplishment online.    … Expand
  82. ininja2
    Nov 13, 2011
    3
    Come on, man. Can we at least have something new? I paid 60 dollars just to open up the box and play the same goddamn game I did a year ago, 2 years ago, 3, 4, 5. I WILL buy a new Call of Duty game if it comes out, but only if there's something innovative in there, something new. At least spend more time crafting a campaign that lasts more than 4 **** hours. I finished it in one sitting.Come on, man. Can we at least have something new? I paid 60 dollars just to open up the box and play the same goddamn game I did a year ago, 2 years ago, 3, 4, 5. I WILL buy a new Call of Duty game if it comes out, but only if there's something innovative in there, something new. At least spend more time crafting a campaign that lasts more than 4 **** hours. I finished it in one sitting. We need something new. We are BEGGING for something new. Sure, there's something here for the die-hards whose only wish in life is more maps and a few new guns, but for the majority of people, we need something that doesn't look like it spent 2 months in development. Creativity fuels games and Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 has none.

    Now if you'll excuse me, I'm gonna drop this game and get the 60 dollars I need for either Saints Row, Skyrim and The Darkness 2. Or any number of other games with a higher entertainment value than this.    … Expand
  83. Benti86
    Nov 13, 2011
    3
    I mean nothing personal against Call of Duty, personally I love the games, but as time has progressed I am really starting to remember why I truly enjoy a new Battlefield or Halo over this. Keyword, INNOVATION! CALL OF DUTY HAS LOST ALL CONCEPTS OF INNOVATION!!! Every year its the same game just from a different developer. Treyarch royally s****ed up zombies so they kinda went out theI mean nothing personal against Call of Duty, personally I love the games, but as time has progressed I am really starting to remember why I truly enjoy a new Battlefield or Halo over this. Keyword, INNOVATION! CALL OF DUTY HAS LOST ALL CONCEPTS OF INNOVATION!!! Every year its the same game just from a different developer. Treyarch royally s****ed up zombies so they kinda went out the window, seeing as though they always make steps backwards in Call of Duty games, good ideas on paper, but poor game play overall, and IF, I'm sorry but there are so many things that just exploded in this game that screamed to me. One explosives are no longer explosives! I'd feel better throwing a pillow than a grenade, one because they tend to bounce off of everything and two, The guy literally has to sit on it for it to kill him! Next thing is mobility, I like how they varied it up with the guns, but honestly? You run like a moron at maybe a half a foot per second if you use anything bigger than an assault rifle, which screams, "Shoot this idiot!!!" Campaign really lacked any strong moments that drew you in or any super BA ones, all of it was predictable and what about these fancy new game modes? In my eyes kill confirmed is dreadful unless its in team tac, you say it encourages teamwork, I say it encourages camping since kids just sit in the center of the map and camp dog tags! The game itself is structurally sound, but there is no way it should be hailed like this, I agree with the others this isn't MW3, this is MW2.5. I will still play it, but not as much as BF or Halo or Skyrim which brings me to another thing. I paid 50$ for CoD Elite and signed up the first day, so far the servers are still down, I don't have the Founder status yet and I don't know if I ever will get it and who knows what this means for the DLC schedule. Poor poor poor poor poor POOR planning on activisions part!… Expand
  84. KentuckyGamer
    Nov 13, 2011
    3
    I've never been so disappointed over a game in my life. I expected a lot from this best-selling shooter and I was regretting the purchase after fifteen minutes of online gaming. I thought Modern Warfare 2 was a step down from Call of Duty 4, but not as bad as Modern Warfare 3.
  85. grednelxii
    Nov 13, 2011
    3
    I am not the greatest gamer, not do I claim to be any good at first person shooters. However I do enjoy a good multi-player game no matter how horrible I do. So this will be an opinion of an average gamer who has no particular loyalty to a particular series. The campaign is the standard 6-8 hours that all FPS games seem to suffer from. The story picks up right after MW2. And from there weI am not the greatest gamer, not do I claim to be any good at first person shooters. However I do enjoy a good multi-player game no matter how horrible I do. So this will be an opinion of an average gamer who has no particular loyalty to a particular series. The campaign is the standard 6-8 hours that all FPS games seem to suffer from. The story picks up right after MW2. And from there we as the player take control of different people and move from one goal to the next, and in the end we kill the bad guys and all is well in the world. Pretty standard stuff here. I usually start off on easy, but not this time, I had to bump it up to normal for a little more of a challenge. It is a sad state when a gamer as me who plays on easy has to turn it up a notch. At this point I am considering attempting it on veteran to see how hard it is supposed to be. Overall the campaign is a simple go here, protect that, capture him fanfare. Not that people purchase this series for single player experiences.
    The multi-player on the other hand is what everyone wants to play. When I picked up MW2 it was fairly straight forward and easy to pick up and play, And so is this, because it looks, plays, and feels just like it's predecessor. Yes, they did change some perks, and kill streaks. But overall it is the same as before. Along with the same game play you also get the stereo typical players that are with it. Nothing makes me want to play a game more than a prepubescent kid telling me to leave and stop playing the game because I did not do as well as they did. Given all online games have these types of player, but it seems that most flock to CoD. Overall it is a good game, just more of the same. Most players will enjoy the game both online and off, but I cannot say that I am impressed with it as much as I was with the 4th installment of the series. It is as if the developer decided to put forth as little effort as possible and do what they did before. This holiday season I will be trading this title in and seeking a different title to invest my time on.    … Expand
  86. The_Abyss
    Nov 14, 2011
    3
    I'd like to take the high road here and not try to troll. Yes i play BF3,yes i have played MW3. I just find that MW3 is not a complete sequel. It barely pushes the innovation. I think that the developers are to scared to change anything, because of the fact that so many people have come to love the COD franchise. I find this game really boring, that's just me. that's why i have to giveI'd like to take the high road here and not try to troll. Yes i play BF3,yes i have played MW3. I just find that MW3 is not a complete sequel. It barely pushes the innovation. I think that the developers are to scared to change anything, because of the fact that so many people have come to love the COD franchise. I find this game really boring, that's just me. that's why i have to give this game a 3. It does little to change the formula and it's just not fun. FOR ME. And to me, a game needs to be fun and this game is just plain boring. I'm sorry IW, you have fallen. I remember when you used to have such pride in your games, and it reflected. Now, i just don't know.… Expand
  87. Erionte
    Nov 14, 2011
    3
    Son muy pocos cambios, la historia es muy predecible y muy corta la verdad mataron esta serie cuando salio el talento de infiniti war , el multi-jugador los cambios se me hicieron pobres los mapas están muy pequeños las armas están desbalanciadas , las special ops creo que es lo unico que vale la pena y todavia quieren que paguemos por elSon muy pocos cambios, la historia es muy predecible y muy corta la verdad mataron esta serie cuando salio el talento de infiniti war , el multi-jugador los cambios se me hicieron pobres los mapas están muy pequeños las armas están desbalanciadas , las special ops creo que es lo unico que vale la pena y todavia quieren que paguemos por el elite olvidalo prefiero un juego de mas calidad… Expand
  88. pnkntndr
    Nov 14, 2011
    3
    I started playing CoD with the original for the Xbox. I didn't get back into it until Black Ops due to a bunch of my friends poking at me until I bought it. I absolutely loved it. I went back and played MW1 and 2 as well as WaW as soon as I could get my hands on it. I had MW3 preordered as soon as it was announced. I haven't been this disappointed in a very long time. It feels like nothingI started playing CoD with the original for the Xbox. I didn't get back into it until Black Ops due to a bunch of my friends poking at me until I bought it. I absolutely loved it. I went back and played MW1 and 2 as well as WaW as soon as I could get my hands on it. I had MW3 preordered as soon as it was announced. I haven't been this disappointed in a very long time. It feels like nothing more then an overpriced DLC pack. While Spec Ops is very fun the multiplayer, where most players will spend the next year, seems to be rushed. It's grainy and glitchy. There are times where it feels like one bullet with kill you even when you aren't playing hardcore. Then when you watch the killcam you see that you were shot 5 times and it didn't register until that last bullet. The music is as douchey as the over-hyper developer that you could see the entire camera crew through his reflective sunglasses.( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TtRa4z0dt8k ). The multiplayer experience just seems like it was ignored for other portions of the game due to the fact that they knew that players were going to play it no matter what it was like. Not a single MP map is unique in any way shape or form. The section of the CoD games that everyone loves is nothing more then a turd that wasn't even polished. I really didn't expect to put my controller down so fast. Thank God Zelda is around the corner with a 10/10 from IGN.… Expand
  89. jonnyb2007
    Nov 14, 2011
    3
    This game flat out sucks. What a disappointment. Literally no changes were made, they find a formula that makes money and just rolls with it. The creators of this game should feel ashamed hyping this to be some amazing shooter and once we get it same old same. Just everything about this game will eventually make you angry and what is the point of playing a game when you are annoyed. GunsThis game flat out sucks. What a disappointment. Literally no changes were made, they find a formula that makes money and just rolls with it. The creators of this game should feel ashamed hyping this to be some amazing shooter and once we get it same old same. Just everything about this game will eventually make you angry and what is the point of playing a game when you are annoyed. Guns are overpowered, campers, the maps have no continuity, one new game mode in 4 years? That just makes me so angry to have wasted 60 dollars. I will never purchase another activation game, once they make money its all the same.. tony hawk, guitar hero, call of duty. Thanks but no thanks.… Expand
  90. SplitHorizon
    Nov 14, 2011
    3
    Very disappointed, I was looking forward to this game but after couple of hours I was bored of it cause it feels like an expansion pack for mw2. They did nothing but recycle everything from 2 and release it as a new game when really there is nothing new about it. Ill stick with BF3
  91. kissmyash24
    Nov 14, 2011
    3
    i really feel ripped off when I play MW3. I get that we wanted a game similar to MW2 but we did not want THE EXACT GAME. I have been a huge fan of the Call of Duty series since Cod 4 but i think MW3 is a step in the wrong direction. Issues that plagued MW2 can still be found in MW3. The hit detection is god awful, somehow when it appears I am around a corner i still die from gunfire, thisi really feel ripped off when I play MW3. I get that we wanted a game similar to MW2 but we did not want THE EXACT GAME. I have been a huge fan of the Call of Duty series since Cod 4 but i think MW3 is a step in the wrong direction. Issues that plagued MW2 can still be found in MW3. The hit detection is god awful, somehow when it appears I am around a corner i still die from gunfire, this also happened in MW2. The maps in this game are horrible. we wanted smaller maps...not small maps, all buildings, junk and broken cars everywhere with 10000 lines of sight. Lets talk about kill-streaks, i work my butt off to get these high streaks and they are so underpowered and easily shot-down. Air-support is pretty much useless now that point streaks can be earned through shooting them down. I was really looking forward to a NEW call of duty. Instead we got an expansion pack of MW2, new guns, some new crappy maps, and crappy killstreaks. The best part of this game was the campaign. I guess since they just took the MW2 multiplayer and put it in MW3 they had alot more time to focus on the campaign. I have a great analogy, MW3 is like the iPhone 4S, tons of hype for a new game, and something refreshing, but instead you get minor upgrades but the product itself is identical. IMHO save your money, BF3 is not good either. From one cod fan to another, i am truly disappointed.… Expand
  92. RoboPope
    Nov 14, 2011
    3
    I bought this game because I've had a ton of fun playing COD since the release of WAW 3 years ago. I wasn't impressed with Black Ops but there was still enough content and fun to be had to keep me playing for 4 months. MW3 just flat out blows. This is coming from someone who really enjoyed the game in the past. The Multi-player maps are horrid and multi-player as a whole has gotten a lotI bought this game because I've had a ton of fun playing COD since the release of WAW 3 years ago. I wasn't impressed with Black Ops but there was still enough content and fun to be had to keep me playing for 4 months. MW3 just flat out blows. This is coming from someone who really enjoyed the game in the past. The Multi-player maps are horrid and multi-player as a whole has gotten a lot worse. Campaign has always been meh and spec ops is what it is something I'd pay 8 bucks for on the Live market. I would take this game back if I could.

    I hope the developers don't brush all these reviews as "haters who didn't even buy the game". Your game sucks somehow infinity ward broke what didn't need fixing while adding next to nothing. Seriously, get your **** together next year.    … Expand
  93. IcyLuka85
    Nov 14, 2011
    3
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I'am italian..... Questo capitolo di Modern Warfare si è rinnovato pochissimo. Sono rimasto molto deluso nel vedere lo stesso menu , stessi suoni e parti di scenari riciclati. Giocandoci sentivo la forte sensazione di trovarmi in Modern Warfare 2 + Black Ops ..... è una vergogna e 70 euro non li vale minimamente. I Call of duty sono sempre la solita minestra riscaldata e questo capitolo piu di tutti per questo vanno puniti e do un 3 secco .… Expand
  94. Vekyo
    Nov 14, 2011
    3
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I was looking forward to this game even though it is a yearly release. I am still very impressed with the awe dropping performance of the single player campaign even though there were some annoying querks. For instance, shooting from the back of the truck in the chase will lead right to death once the doors are opened because the bullets were able to go through the door from the attacking Russian Humvee from behind. I got stuck in that part for a 5 hours before I had to restart the mission since I had a repetitive cycle. I could not change my strategy either because of a forced Quick time event. Dont get me wrong I like quick time events, in my opinion, they add to the cinematic experience. Something that also happened was random RPG's shooting and killing me when I am trying to kill other people that are shooting at me. I think that part needed a little more QA and that is something I didn't expect since it was never in the previous modern warefare games, the game has such high production budget with so much hype and attention to it, and not to mention 5 Activision studios putting their work in this game. Overall, I did like the Campaign though as the story was great! the cutscenes were great, and the environments look amazing as well! I have not had a chance to play spec ops mode yet, but I played a few hours of multiplayer and I was dissapointed than ever. Enemies spawn too much behind the player, so every time I am spawning there is always an enemy next to me or one that has visibility to me. That is not good because sometimes it takes a while to get used to where you and your team are after spawning. I don't think there was enough repo steps/QA in order to make sure that multiplayer functions like it should. I know it is suppose to be a fast past arcade style shooter, but you can still make it fast, balanced, and fair. One thing about this game as a mechanic or feedback loop that I hate is when I get shot, and I try to shoot back simultaneously and I cant because my upper body seems to want to jolt up when I get shot to prevent from shooting back. This makes no sense to me and it is completely unnatural. Even though the single player was solid besides a few placed quick time events and random RPG one hit kills that happened too often...It is a mediocre game compared to the first and second Modern Warfare games. Innovation and time would have been better, as well as making a longer single player and/or more spec ops missions. The other part that kills this game is lack of PC support (hence why pc sales did bad) for graphics and for ranked dedicated servers. This game is not worth $60.… Expand
  95. kid_a2
    Nov 14, 2011
    3
    Campaign is quite entertaining and MIchael Bay-esque which works better for videogames than a movie. Multiplayer however is the same as the past two MW games. The maps are too small which causes issues with spawn camping. Aim assist is too strong to the point where I can tell if someone is around a corner before seeing them because my gun starts swaying towards them. Graphics are slightlyCampaign is quite entertaining and MIchael Bay-esque which works better for videogames than a movie. Multiplayer however is the same as the past two MW games. The maps are too small which causes issues with spawn camping. Aim assist is too strong to the point where I can tell if someone is around a corner before seeing them because my gun starts swaying towards them. Graphics are slightly improved over MW2. Titles and emblems are mostly the same as MW2 which seems a bit lazy on the part of Infinity Ward and Sledgehammer. Spec-Ops is a lot of fun however and is definitely worth playing. However, the similarities to previous titles and multiplayer frustrations really bring down the score for me. Disappointing. Now I here that the developers are begging people to give it a higher score on this site...maybe instead of trying to pad ratings they should actually read these comments and figure out why it is scoring so low. It sells well I guess so they will keep on pushing the same game out every year. Oh and also COD Elite isn't working properly, of which I paid $50 so that is another rip-off. I know they said they will compensate users but still...if they are going to make me pay for a product I should be able to actually use it once.… Expand
  96. iScooper
    Nov 14, 2011
    3
    This game should be called Modern Warfare 2.5. This is the first Call of Duty game that I have been truly disappointed by. Nothing feels original in this game. The graphics look worse than the previous games, the menus are the exact same as MW2's, and the game-play feels dated, probably because we have been playing the same game now for 5 years. Either something has to change with thisThis game should be called Modern Warfare 2.5. This is the first Call of Duty game that I have been truly disappointed by. Nothing feels original in this game. The graphics look worse than the previous games, the menus are the exact same as MW2's, and the game-play feels dated, probably because we have been playing the same game now for 5 years. Either something has to change with this franchise next year or it looks like Call of Duty has run its course.… Expand
  97. MrPotato
    Nov 15, 2011
    3
    Single campaign is a bit absurd but quite good. This is also too short. But the rael dissapointment for me is multiplayer. This is like DLC for MW2. I prefer M0H 2010 or Homefront. I didn't recommend MW3. Sorry ...
  98. KentuckyWindage
    Nov 15, 2011
    3
    The major Call of Duty fanboys will defend COD games regardless of what was served up by Activision and the developers but as an unbiased gamer I can give a true and accurate review. The campaign is not great which is expected given past form. It is very rare to see a top quality FPS single player and I would say the last top quality ones were Half Life 2 and Episode 1 & 2. MultiplayerThe major Call of Duty fanboys will defend COD games regardless of what was served up by Activision and the developers but as an unbiased gamer I can give a true and accurate review. The campaign is not great which is expected given past form. It is very rare to see a top quality FPS single player and I would say the last top quality ones were Half Life 2 and Episode 1 & 2. Multiplayer though is even worse and any comments about this being MW 2.5 are well justified. Visuals and audio are second rate and the map design is poor with maps being too small and quickly forgettable. Then there is the fact that there are still no dedicated servers which makes online gaming still a game of chance and don't believe this nonsense they have spouted about dedicated servers costing 'billions of dollars' as it is complete lies. The fact is the Call of Duty series is living off the success of COD 4 which was a good game in its day but the last three instalments have been well below standard. The series is simply now aimed at the 15 and under who will insist it is still brilliant but take it from someone who knows what is quality and what is not. This is just not good enough.… Expand
  99. PunisherLH
    Nov 15, 2011
    3
    I do not own/I have not played Battlefield 3. I used to be a huge fan of the Call of Duty Series. This was until I went and bought Modern Warfare 3. The Campaign is by far the most predictable story I have ever come across. It doesn't do anything other than make me want to finish the Campaign simply for the achievement. The Multiplayer does not flow at all. The maps are by far the worst toI do not own/I have not played Battlefield 3. I used to be a huge fan of the Call of Duty Series. This was until I went and bought Modern Warfare 3. The Campaign is by far the most predictable story I have ever come across. It doesn't do anything other than make me want to finish the Campaign simply for the achievement. The Multiplayer does not flow at all. The maps are by far the worst to feature in any of the Call Of Duty games. The Killstreaks just do not feel rewarding enough. The only thing that makes this game bareable for me is Survival Mode. Infinity Ward's take on the Zombies mode featured in Treyarch games. It's actually pretty fun. Other than that, this game isn't worth buying new. Get this game pre-owned or just rent it. Call of Duty 2 = Fantastic. Call of Duty 3 = Alright. Call of Duty 4 = Revolutionary. Call of Duty WaW: Brilliant. Call of Duty: MW2: Pretty good. Call of Duty Black Ops = Ok. Call of Duty MW3 = Not very good. The Franchise as a whole has begun to start taking steps back. Why rely on the same old formula year after year? With this HUGE fan-base, it's time to start trying something new. If not, Gamers will eventually realise they are buying the same game every year, then the fan-base will deteriorate.… Expand
  100. tsenG
    Nov 15, 2011
    3
    Trollololo, Sledgehammer Games Devs asking for help in Twitter to the CoD fanboys or Beliebers of CoD to raise the note of MW3 users on Metacritic, well for me this games is the same game from the first MW, using the same Graphics Engine form MW, the only changes are Weapons and the HUD, i like the First MW Game and a bit of the MW2 but, MW3? no thanks, Activition only want the money ofTrollololo, Sledgehammer Games Devs asking for help in Twitter to the CoD fanboys or Beliebers of CoD to raise the note of MW3 users on Metacritic, well for me this games is the same game from the first MW, using the same Graphics Engine form MW, the only changes are Weapons and the HUD, i like the First MW Game and a bit of the MW2 but, MW3? no thanks, Activition only want the money of the CoD Beliebers for launch another CoD in the other year with the same Graphics Engine, CoD series are becoming a Need for Speed, only want money money money, CoD series are Death, if you love CoD dont buy this.… Expand
Page:

Awards & Rankings

13
#13 Best Xbox 360 Game of 2011
1
#1 Most Discussed Xbox 360 Game of 2011
13
#13 Most Shared Xbox 360 Game of 2011

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
88

Generally favorable reviews - based on 81 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 79 out of 81
  2. Mixed: 2 out of 81
  3. Negative: 0 out of 81
  1. Gamer Limit
    Jan 11, 2012
    85
    Ultimately, Modern Warfare 3 feels similar to it's brethren, but that doesn't mean it isn't a great game. The single player element is still exciting, and multiplayer has more options than ever – if you're a fan of Call of Duty, Modern Warfare 3 is a no brainer.
    Read full review
  2. Game Over Online
    Dec 28, 2011
    84
    Modern Warfare 3, while still an excellent thrill ride in its own right, feels far too similar to MW2 or even Black Ops for my taste.
    Read full review
  3. Xbox World 360 Magazine UK
    Dec 12, 2011
    88
    I never expected Modern Warfare 3 to go toe-to-toe with EA's juggernaut this year, but it came out of the gates with a tour de force campaign and co-op mode. It loses points with a perhaps too-familiar multiplayer that caters to the juvenile on Xbox Live; though don't be mistaken, Modern Warfare 3 is one hell of a shooter and a highlight for a series that just won't die – no matter how much we wish it bloody would, at times.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »