User Score
5.1

Mixed or average reviews- based on 2645 Ratings

User score distribution:
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. Dec 9, 2015
    5
    It's kinda fun for a short time.
    For me there isn't anything motivating for longer period.
    Just a few maps.

    But at least the graphics and sounds are awesome.
  2. Dec 9, 2015
    3
    It sucks that I spent $60 on this game. On the bright side, I can go onto Ebay and sell it for $55. Out of all the games I have played and read the reviews on, Star Wars Battlefront has the most honest NEGATIVE reviews I seen.
  3. Dec 9, 2015
    2
    How I wish I listened to the user reviews on metacritic before spending 70 USD on this game. Aside from the excellent graphics and sound design battlefront really doesnt have much going for it. After the first few hours it gets very boring very fast. No single player exists, except for a survivor mode, the combat/gameplay is below average as far as a first person shooters go.

    The
    How I wish I listened to the user reviews on metacritic before spending 70 USD on this game. Aside from the excellent graphics and sound design battlefront really doesnt have much going for it. After the first few hours it gets very boring very fast. No single player exists, except for a survivor mode, the combat/gameplay is below average as far as a first person shooters go.

    The multiplayer mode feels broken, spawn points are ridiculous, there are only eleven guns which all feel the same, no customization at all, repetitive maps which are too few. From the 9 game modes only about 3 of them are appealing. Character customization is a joke. You have to spend in game credits to unlock characters and they really dont offer much until you unlock the last levels if you bother to get that far. Vehicles and fighter jets controls are so basic and you have to walk around the map hunting for pop-ups to activate them rather than going to a que to access them. Worst of all you cant really team up with your friends in a squad. Instead you can be a partner with only one friend, other friends who join cant be in a squad with you so its like your not even playing with them. So much for multiplayer.

    I expected that with DICEs involvement starwars battlefront would be built upon further adding alot of the great things we saw in battlefield 3 & 4. Rather this game is a hollow shell of what it could be. Spending 70 dollars on a game so void of content is disappointing to say the least. Maybe its because of the graphics its so expensive, but if thats the case they should have sacrificed visuals for actual content or priced at what its worth, a 30 USD game. Its a shame they can get away with pricing it for so much when it has nothing. Other games of the same price have hoooours of gameplay and content. There is no way im going to fork out another 50USD for additional maps in there DLC. If you want to play an FPS do yourself a favor and buy ANYTHING other than this game.
    Expand
  4. Dec 9, 2015
    5
    If you want good graphics, this is for you. Graphics+dying a lot+lag is what I see a lot in this game. I bought it hoping for something along the lines of the original but no, this isn't the best reboot at all. They need to add more content, for sure. EA also needs to fix the lag issues. I'm sick of dying a lot, feels a lot like CoD but better (graphics-wise & no teenagers calling meIf you want good graphics, this is for you. Graphics+dying a lot+lag is what I see a lot in this game. I bought it hoping for something along the lines of the original but no, this isn't the best reboot at all. They need to add more content, for sure. EA also needs to fix the lag issues. I'm sick of dying a lot, feels a lot like CoD but better (graphics-wise & no teenagers calling me names). So, in other words, just get this if you want to play a nicer graphics version of CoD but with more lag. Expand
  5. Dec 9, 2015
    0
    No content. If they worked on it for another year, added more planets/maps, added more heroes, allowed you to fly upside down for more than 2 seconds, let you steer your snowspeeder while it's taking down a walker, and made it so your lightsaber can actually cut people while it's coming back to you then... yeah. THEN I would have spent 60 dollars on it.
  6. Dec 8, 2015
    0
    This game was not ready to be released . Amazing graphics, but it just it, nothing more. DICE disappointed and desrespected all the star wars fans. We need more than beauty to have a great game. Few game modes, poor customization, flight controls sucks. We have no story mode and space battle mode. If you don't buy all the DLC's you won't get the entire game.
  7. Dec 8, 2015
    0
    terrible experience, trying to find a server with more than 10% people is near impossible. i'm sure this game would be fun if i could ever get in 1 star.
  8. Dec 8, 2015
    6
    The Game is amazing, looks incredible, the on-line mode is great... But the game have a very big problem NO STORY MODE and the offline mode is really poor.
  9. Dec 8, 2015
    0
    A game that came out tens years ago blows this out of the water. What does it say about this $60 game? There are two or three vehicles no distinct classes like the original Battlefront. Atleast call it star wars battle field and even then its still a terrible game in comparison and in general for the price of $60.
  10. Dec 8, 2015
    4
    Good graphics, good sound.
    If you're not hyper star wars fan, you shouldn't buy this game, you get bored soon.
    Only 4 Maps In AT-AT Mode, few weapons, the season pass has more content than the original game.
    Don't buy this game, if youre not super star wars fan
    I feel like I wasted my money.
  11. Dec 8, 2015
    2
    Don't waste your money on this one guys, please.
    1.) Match requires no co ordination among the players. Feels more like COD then BF
    2.) They have messed with the auto aiming it seems, its insane how you can take out enemies at long rage without zooming. 3.) EVERY GUN FEELS THE SAME. BF is lot better then this CR*P 4.) And don't get me started on the content. Seriously EA seriously, you
    Don't waste your money on this one guys, please.
    1.) Match requires no co ordination among the players. Feels more like COD then BF
    2.) They have messed with the auto aiming it seems, its insane how you can take out enemies at long rage without zooming.
    3.) EVERY GUN FEELS THE SAME. BF is lot better then this CR*P
    4.) And don't get me started on the content. Seriously EA seriously, you really think every time you come out with season pass as the game launches, people won't know that you take out content from the complete game and release them later as DLCs (well i bought the game so i guess the jokes on me)
    @ DICE - Ur Stroy telling ability for FPS already su*ked and now you have stop trying
    There is a reason why EA got worst company in the world award, past couple of years by "Consumerist" (i think last year it was comcast, not sure). When you make a game and break it into pieces and sell them @ full price, hatred from consumers comes naturally. And as lot of reviewer have already mentioned before, this is becoming a trend now (looking at you, Ubisoft! ) - only multiplayer @ full price.
    Expand
  12. Dec 8, 2015
    3
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Don't let the title fool you; I liked the Prequels. It was merely a reference to the irrational, only partly meritorious hate that they receive.

    I'm going to start with the absolute reality. I work for a living. Money is not something that falls out of the sky, and $69.99 plus tax is a significant amount. I charge $75.00 to tune a piano. This disc cost me the amount of an entire job. I was quite eager to get it. I had been looking forward to it. I love Star Wars. It's probably my favorite film series. I'm as immersed in the Expanded Universe as the typical Star Wars fan. That's why this game is so upsetting. If you've played the game, you know full well where I'm going with this: the hour of tutorials, and only about an hour of actual games if you're playing offline, and then having to pay an additional $49.99 if you want the content that really rightly should have come with the initial sticker price (minus the Battle of Jakku, which we'll be getting free: what a surprise!), and then having to pay for the privilege of playing multi-player.

    But...I've been reviewing games for awhile on other forums, and I wouldn't be much of a reviewer if I just complained about the most glaring issues without even getting into the game. So, let us begin.

    I bought Battlefront when I got my PS4. Fortunately, I bought the PS4 with the Disney Infinity 3.0 bundle, so I actually wound up paying the same but got a couple more games out of the deal (yes, that's how the math came out...I don't know what genius came up with that sales gimmick). So, I got it home, didn't have enough lines to hook up my PS4 to the internet, was too lazy to unplug my computer so I could enjoy online PS4 gameplay for awhile, so I just settled for the offline content for the time being.

    STORY: 1/10 There is no story. You are literally replaying battles from the Original Trilogy, and one that wasn't seen, but alluded to, without the story. They are the battles of Hoth, Tatooine, Endor, and Sullust. Yep, that's all. You can go through them in tutorials, mission mode, or survival mode. It also comes with a screensaver that features C-3PO and R2-D2 arguing with each other.

    GRAPHICS: 10/10The visuals in this game are absolutely stunning. Seriously, I wonder why the CGI in movies look so lousy when we have video games that look like this. Seriously, you could stare at these scenes for hours.

    GAMEPLAY (PART 1: OFFLINE): 4/10 The tutorials are a good place to start as they teach you the different styles of gameplay and the controls. You can play either ground missions or starfighter missions. The ground missions are typical of first person shooters such as Call of Duty or Fallout. The aerial missions are also disappointingly common as well, with controls similar to just about any flight simulator. The system is straightforward: kill as many enemies as you can while dying and respawning a ridiculous amount of times. It's a style of gameplay conducive to multiplayer, but I've never really enjoyed it as it just feels like losing over and over again, even when the game says you won. It's very difficult to aim in ground missions, and I understand that the lack of an autolock is for realism, but at the very least, they could incorporate some kind of system to assist with aiming. It's not this hard to aim and shoot in real life, and it's an exceedingly frustrating system. You can focus on a target with L2, but this still isn't an autolock, so it doesn't lock; it just tightens controls so that your sights don't jump all over the place when trying to aim.

    Aerial controls are another matter. L2 does act as an autolock, but an extremely tight one. If an enemy ship even slightly gets out of your sights, the autolock will break. It's still a very good autolock, and using it improves the game tremendously. Not using the autolock makes it virtually impossible to hit the target. Also, you have to hold down the L2 to use it, so your hand motions on the controller are extremely limited (not that it's a detriment, considering how limited your maneuverability is). Also, you have to maintain the lock when firing missiles until they hit their target (which isn't how missiles work in any reality). Dogfighting is very cumbersome.

    The speeder bikes on Endor: piloting a Star Wars speeder bike is a fun thing to do in video games. It's a really hard aspect of gameplay to mess up, but somehow, Battlefront manages it. In the extremely overrated quest for realism, this aspect is an EPIC PHAIL. It's true that that the ground assault and aerial missions have controls that aren't stellar, but they're okay, which is just fine for merchandising gimmick game, even one as beautiful as this, but the speeder bikes in this game are simply a terrible experience, and it's all because of the high level of ultra-realism that this game employs.

    Let me see if I can make this point: NOTHING KILLS A GAME LIKE ULTRA-REALISM!

    Now, there are those that argue that ultra-realism is the best gaming goal. No, it's not. Sorry, but it just isn't. First, let's start with the obvious point: if we wanted realism, we wouldn't be playing video games. Next: games are supposed to be enjoyed. Even frustration and stress can be enjoyable to a certain degree, but when that's all there is, it stops being fun. How do we know it's not fun? Simple: I'm writing a review on Star Wars: Battlefront instead of playing it. Do you see what's going on here? If it were fun, I'd be playing it.

    So, what's wrong with the speeders? Nothing, except that you are just going to die. If you manage to get your speed up, there is no thrill like in other games. You explode, die and respawn the second you hit something. Why was it made like this? Because life bars and hit points aren't realistic. So, if anything you touch kills you, unless you're going really slow, then whatever you hit just doesn't kill you as quickly. If you want to know who did speeders well, go back to N64 Shadows of the Empire. The controls and game play in the swoop level were pretty much like they are in this game: you even die the second you hit a rock wall. The difference? You don't die the instant you hit another swoop, and it's actually not as ridiculously easy to wreck as it is in Battlefront, and it's still pretty easy to wreck. That was my favorite level in that game. I played it over and over again. Battlefront actually made me hate speeders. This was terrible. Whoever designed the gameplay for the speeders should have been made to redo it. You know, patches have become a crutch and they've become an excuse to release a crappy game. If there is a patch that fixes the abysmal control on the Battlefront speeders, that's exactly what I am going to think: they were just more concerned with making a deadline than making a good game.

    So, playing ever single mission, and survival mode after the tutorial, it took me two hours to finish the offline content. All of it. I played the entire offline game that I paid 70 dollars for in 2 hours. Every mission. I suppose I could go back and play the Dark Side, but that would only give me another hour of gameplay. 70 dollars of this. Oh, and sometime this month, we're supposed to get the Battle of Jakku for free. That'll be another 20 minutes per side of the Force. That's all you get for 70 dollars. Want more? Well, more is coming, but you have to pay for it. I got 100 hours of content in Metal Gear Solid 4 for 50 dollars, and I couldn't even get a 3 hour Star Wars game for 70. No, you do not get to play multiplayer for 70 dollars; you still have to pay for that, but that may be more on Playstation than EA, but you still can't play the multiplayer unless you pay the monthly fee for Playstation Plus. If you're not willing to do that, you're SOL. You could pony up the 50 dollars for a yearly sub, but why? Why can't I just play the damned game? Why can't I just get what I've already paid for?

    GAMEPLAY (PART 2: ONLINE): 6/10 This is where the game is. There isn't much more in the way of content. There's a few more missions, but nothing truly remarkable. Everything is played against other players in versus combat. There's Droid Run, which is a King of the Hill style game in which you capture three droids before the opposing team does. There's Fighter Squadron, which is exactly what it sounds like, and my personal favorite (but that's only because the ground missions are so damned hard, again because realism). There's Walker Assault, which is the Battle of Hoth...again...this time with people other than you and the AI. There's Hero Hunt where you get to play all by yourself against everyone! And they're trying to kill you! And they're not trying to kill each other! Fun! Everything else is just variations on war: defend the cargo while stealing the other guy's cargo. Capture enemy supply drops. Or Supremacy, where you have to drive the enemy away (In other words, kill more of them.), or Blast, which is basically the same thing.

    What these missions offer are credits and ranks that you can unlock new items and abilities with. You have very little choice in your in game appearance. You have to win the privilege to change your in game appearance. This helps to make the game fun. Also, you have enemy players that are obviously going to be better than you. The gameplay here in multiplayer is about the same, but it's much more fun than in singleplayer mode. You also begin to really see the limitations. Your ships can't do barrel rolls or loops unless you press the D-Pad, and you only get three special aerial moves. The down button on the D-Pad changes you from external view to cockpit view. In my opinion, this only makes the aerial combat more fun as instead of having maneuvers handed to you, you have to be creative.

    I only wish the ground battles were as enjoyable, and the fact these missions feel more like a chore cannot possibly be more apparent in the fact that far fewer people seem to play them than the fighter missions, and it seems that there are a lot more awards and bonuses for playing the ground missions, or maybe I'm only seeing them listed since I don't get a list of bonuses for the aerial missions, but I still get them. That's telling. The fact that they display the fact that there a bonuses for the ground missions but don't make bonuses for the aerial missions apparent tells me that they know the ground missions are poorly done. It's very hard to kill and it's very easy to be killed.

    On the plus side, in the Hero vs. Villain game, you get the opportunity to play as one of three main characters on each side. If you're not a troop from the start, you either get to play as Luke, Leia, or Han, or if you're on the Dark Side, Darth Vader, The Emperor, or Boba Fett. In one game, I played as Darth Vader and actually got into an epic lightsaber duel with Luke (I lost)...on top of the Millennium Falcon!!! I wish I recorded that! That was awesome! But, ahem...whatever awesomeness there is to be had in these ground missions doesn't redeem their overall tediousness. It's impossible to aim decently, even at close range, and any attempt to aim will surely get you killed. Good cover appears to be all over the place, but it's surprisingly useless. The levels are so open, no areas are defensible, and because of this, using cover is really pointless because there's no way to form a line and keep enemies from sneaking up behind you. So it really is, "die over and over again until the match is over", and that is a really depressing and unenjoyable style of gameplay.

    The aerial battles are really the only missions that are really, truly fun, but there's only two, one that takes place in the four different settings the game comes with and Walker Assault, which is the Battle of Hoth.

    MUSIC: All Star Wars stock music, a lot of it unrecognizable entries from other video games and audio books. Very high quality recordings that are quite nicely added to appropriate settings and situations.

    REPLAYABILITY: 2/10 None for the singleplayer mode. This game gets very boring, very quickly. It's only marginally better in the multiplayer mode as each mission quickly becomes the same thing over and over again. The real fun is in fighting against other players that have managed to annoy you so much that you have got to get them just once. Sadly, this game is extremely overpriced. For aerial battles, you only get two missions, one set in three of the four settings (no aerial battles over Endor, so no, you will not be blowing up the Death Star II). You also only get 6 ground missions, each of them only in the four settings. The fact of the matter is, you only get a few hours of gameplay, each with goals that don't really interest you. Trust me: this is not the type of game you have to win before you're done.

    All this game has to offer is fighting the same battles over and over again. There's nothing at stake. There's no ending to justify winning. You just fight the enemy until the mission is over and you either win or lose, and if it's multiplayer mode, you slowly get credits to get barely two or three dozen available upgrades that you can't even buy until you have achieved a high enough rank, and these upgrades aren't even that good. There are no upgrades for the fighter ships, and what you get for your ground missions are blasters that are weaker than what you're already using or are only good for certain conditions that aren't going to come up that often. You can get a thermal detonator or a grenade, and those are good, but upgrades include a function that for a brief time makes it possible to more easily aim your gun, just for example. There's nothing really worth it. The only thing you get are different appearances, and they are basically just a variety of the same dozen humans with a few different hairstyles. You have to put in dozens of hours of gameplay before you'll be allowed to play an alien (the highest being a Twi'lek at Rank 50). Think about it: days and days of playing the same missions over and over and over and over again just to be able to make your in game appearance as customizable as the game will allow. There are only a dozen or so blasters available, with the most useful one being available at Rank 4.

    The graphics cannot redeem this game, and their score is negated by the shortcomings. Because of paying for multiplay and having to pay for additional content, I can't even recommend this game at bargain prices, and even if that wasn't an issue, the typical bargain price of 15 to 20 dollars is still quite high. This is the true 5 dollar bin game.
    Expand
  13. Dec 7, 2015
    0
    This game bites! I ordered it with a really nice PS4 with Darth Vader on the case. The game has ruined the whole experience. Star Wars is about adventure and fantasy, not about shooting up the whole damn galaxy. There is nothing scientific about shooting everything that moves. The game designers would be wise to get another job, because they suck at this, and really need to do somethingThis game bites! I ordered it with a really nice PS4 with Darth Vader on the case. The game has ruined the whole experience. Star Wars is about adventure and fantasy, not about shooting up the whole damn galaxy. There is nothing scientific about shooting everything that moves. The game designers would be wise to get another job, because they suck at this, and really need to do something else before they ruin another great fantasy movie series. I would not recommend this game to anyone. Expand
  14. Dec 7, 2015
    7
    There isn't much I can say that has not been said by other critics, so I'll keep it simple; It looks good, sounds good, & is fun to dip into, however it is an on-line, multi-player game, with additional solo/duo modes tacked on. It sadly is lacking Battlefront series staples, such as getting into vehicles (you now pick up a token), flying into orbit (you don't leave atmospheres), hijackingThere isn't much I can say that has not been said by other critics, so I'll keep it simple; It looks good, sounds good, & is fun to dip into, however it is an on-line, multi-player game, with additional solo/duo modes tacked on. It sadly is lacking Battlefront series staples, such as getting into vehicles (you now pick up a token), flying into orbit (you don't leave atmospheres), hijacking enemy vehicles (due to the new token system), & the Galactic Conquest mode.

    I would value the core game at £20. if it contained the season pass then £40 would be fair.
    Sadly this game stands to be the biggest financial rip-off that I have ever seen to date as it's priced at £40 for the core game, & over £100 for the complete game!

    Star Wars fans will buy SWB for the hype, it will sell well & be enjoyed by casual gamers, & the core gamers will either tire of it quickly, or play it in addition to other similar games, as a secondary, or tertiary game, but I doubt as a primary one.
    Expand
  15. Dec 7, 2015
    10
    I find it a great game but lacked what all battlefront is the originality of the first two and I wish they at least had a history as its predecessors , but it did me good online game , I expect to see DLC height for play
  16. Dec 7, 2015
    7
    I'm still not sure how I feel about this game. Everyone's criticism with the game are completely on point but at the same time, I've justified buying this by saying to myself "can I get the same amount of fun or more from going out and drinking 3 nights?" Anyway, here's what you get in the base game.

    4 Maps: They say you get more but that's total BS. It's 4 maps that and sections are
    I'm still not sure how I feel about this game. Everyone's criticism with the game are completely on point but at the same time, I've justified buying this by saying to myself "can I get the same amount of fun or more from going out and drinking 3 nights?" Anyway, here's what you get in the base game.

    4 Maps: They say you get more but that's total BS. It's 4 maps that and sections are cutoff and tweaked a little for small game modes

    3 Offline modes: Training - basically a tutorial but every game mechanic gets it's own quick little mission. Survival - you basic survival mode that you can play with a buddy offline, it gets real boring after one play though. Battle - You can fight a friend offline which can be fun if you're both similar skill levels, otherwise it's basically just beat up your friend who doesn't own the game mode.

    Character Customization: You can purchase a new head from a somewhat ethnically diverse selection with in-game points. The higher your level, you can unlock and purchase (in-game credits) one of the 3 hair styles for each head. Get near the high levels you can get a scout trooper, shadow trooper skin for the empire and a handful of different alien head for the rebels.

    9 Multiplayer Mods: There is suppose to be one more coming as well with the free dlc. So there actually is quite a few game modes, but you'll probably spend most of your time in Supremacy or Walker Assault. If you like dogfighting there is a mode just for star fighters where you jump into a big mess and shot down AI and Humies.

    I feel like we are giving EA a little too much flack for having a season pass since that has pretty much been the standard in AAA games for a while now. At least this one you're likely to get quite a bit of content in the DLCs. The big question of course is, how much of that should have been in the base game? More than what's there but the game is pretty, it's star wars and it's kind of fun so like a moth to the flame I go.
    Expand
  17. Dec 6, 2015
    2
    This is NOT Star Wars Battlefront.
    It lacks content
    Lacks maps and planets
    No Galactic Conquest
    No Clone Wars
    No Space battles
    Spawning is horribly broken
    Bugs and glitches
    Only half a game at launch
    Overpriced Season Pass
    They focused too much on the graphics than on the gameplay itself.
  18. Dec 6, 2015
    8
    Fun, but with shortcomings.

    It's as if DICE has never made a multiplayer game before. There's no team shuffling/balancing. No in-game map. No server browser. Poor matchmaking, and you can't even adjust it for region. No custom servers. No voice chat. We don't get many maps for the premier game modes. They've done little to prevent spawn camping. And argh, helmetless stormtroopers for
    Fun, but with shortcomings.

    It's as if DICE has never made a multiplayer game before. There's no team shuffling/balancing. No in-game map. No server browser. Poor matchmaking, and you can't even adjust it for region. No custom servers. No voice chat. We don't get many maps for the premier game modes. They've done little to prevent spawn camping. And argh, helmetless stormtroopers for "customization"?!?

    It's a polarizing title. You may love it, you may hate it, or you may be in the middle...but you'll never know which until you play it. So I'm recommending it, despite shortcomings. Which is why I gave it an 8.
    Expand
  19. Dec 6, 2015
    0
    The graphics are amazing and for me that was were amazing ended. The guns are boring at best, the multiplayer matches are very unbalanced, only a few maps to play and after 1 night of playing this I already started to get bored.
  20. Dec 6, 2015
    2
    EA made 2 VERY big mistakes on this game.

    1: name: just by naming the game 'battlefront' you attract a number of people who have played BF1 & 2. BF & 2 were VERY good games in their time(at least i remember as such) a singleplayer you could replay time and time agian. BF2 espacially had very good replayability mostly because of it's galactic conquest mode.EA is a fool to deny this group
    EA made 2 VERY big mistakes on this game.

    1: name: just by naming the game 'battlefront' you attract a number of people who have played BF1 & 2. BF & 2 were VERY good games in their time(at least i remember as such) a singleplayer you could replay time and time agian. BF2 espacially had very good replayability mostly because of it's galactic conquest mode.EA is a fool to deny this group their singleplayer campaign and galactic conquest(i was a huge fan of the galactic conquest mode in BF2 and am playing it still because of the lack of a proper successor). a better name for this game would be STAR WARS BATTLEFIELD.

    2. focus on graphics: by focusing on graphics they didn't spend enough time fleshing out the mechanics. not mentioning repurposing envirmonents from BF1 & 2, well at least working from them. what keeps a gamer in the game is not the graphics it's the gameplay for multiplayer and the story for singleplayer. craphics come second at best. noone want to play a game that has holes in it's gameplay.

    There is a perfect word for this game: HONEYTRAP. beatilfull on the outside but shallow once you get to know it.
    Expand
  21. Dec 6, 2015
    0
    Well, EA has managed to do it again.

    Despite tons of ideas and suggestions from Gamers, despite their past failures with SimCity, Mass Effect 3, and other titles. And despite the fact that they won "worst company of the year" 2 times in a row and are the only company in the history of the world to achieve that; they still proceeded to ignore the consumers and rush Battlefront out the
    Well, EA has managed to do it again.

    Despite tons of ideas and suggestions from Gamers, despite their past failures with SimCity, Mass Effect 3, and other titles. And despite the fact that they won "worst company of the year" 2 times in a row and are the only company in the history of the world to achieve that; they still proceeded to ignore the consumers and rush Battlefront out the door with little to no substance in the hopes of capitalizing on the release of the movie. Astounding. Simply astounding.

    I think the most interesting thing about EA "Wanna-be" Battlefront is just how much MORE content the old Battlefront games had than this new one does, and that was 10 years ago back in 2005....

    Let's compare shall we? What does Star wars Battlefront 2 from 2005 have that EA "Wanna-be" battlefront doesn't?

    *a campaign
    *command posts
    *reinforcement counts
    *balanced gameplay
    *good spawns
    *space combat
    *a nice ranking system (for 2005, but yet STILL better than this one's ranking system. How did that happen?)
    *Good light saber combat
    *Better ground vehicles
    *galactic conquest
    *32vs32
    *good squad combat

    And plenty more. For ANYONE even CONSIDERING handing over their hard earned money for this half-assed game that looks and sounds good and that's about it; might I suggest that you head over to steam, throw down $10 for Battlefront 2, and play that instead.

    I am not lying or exaggerating when I say that EA "Wanna-be" Battlefront will give you less satisfying playtime than Battlefront 2, a game that will only cost you $10 and was made a little over a decade ago.

    P.S Star Wars Battlefront 1&2 was developed by Pandemic studios. In 2009, EA shut them down. So yeah, there's that too.
    Expand
  22. Dec 5, 2015
    3
    Pretty game, but utterly boring. Nothing like the original battlefront games. Matches are smaller, maps are smaller, vehicles are power ups rather than strewn about, hide for health is a boring mechanic, no space battles. Did enjoy the implementation of the heroes this time, but I am glad I played at a friends rather than forked out the cash myself. Disappointing step backwards for the series.
  23. Dec 5, 2015
    4
    Many years ago I played a great game on PS2 called Star Wars Battlefront, it was one of the best games I've ever played, it was one of those games you can play over and over again and not get bored playing. Sadly this new game falls short from living up to the expectation of it's predecessor.

    Pros: -The game has great graffics you can see very good details in everything and the storm
    Many years ago I played a great game on PS2 called Star Wars Battlefront, it was one of the best games I've ever played, it was one of those games you can play over and over again and not get bored playing. Sadly this new game falls short from living up to the expectation of it's predecessor.

    Pros:
    -The game has great graffics you can see very good details in everything and the storm trooper battle armor was highly detailed.
    -The game is a fun shooter nothing really to special about its just another shooter with some vehicles.

    Cons:
    -Not as good as the much older PS2 version!
    -The maps are small
    -You have less freedom of movement, many maps funnel you instead of letting you move about freely throughout the battlefield which completely destroys any strategy
    -No space battles, many like myself loved the space battles from the older game. They really could have done something amazing if they had taken the time to add that in
    -No Single player campaign and no Galactic conquest. 100% multiplayer, as much as I love multiplayer its fun every now and then to play a single player campaign
    -You cant just go and jump in a vehicle if you want to you have to find a vehicle marker which is like playing where's Waldo. then once you get the marker you disappear off the battlefield like a ghost?
    -Very little vehicle action at all, your lucky to see more than 2 AT-ST's at the same time, the air vehicles are about the same maybe 4 to 6 in the air at one time and the air space you can fly is usually very small.

    After waiting of years for a new Battlefront to come out I'm disappointing at the results. I expected more especially from the creators of one of my favorite games, Battlefield 4. This game feels dull in comparison to its much older counter part! How is it that a game that was made in 2004 is more fun than this game?
    Expand
  24. Dec 5, 2015
    1
    I am a HUGE Star Wars fan. I have played every star wars game that has come out for the Xbox and PC. (All the way back to Star Wars Starfighter) So please, know when I say that I DO love Star wars.

    The graphics are really good. The the Star fighter mode is fun at the beginning, but gets old after the third round. I got bored really quickly with this game. There is no sort of story line.
    I am a HUGE Star Wars fan. I have played every star wars game that has come out for the Xbox and PC. (All the way back to Star Wars Starfighter) So please, know when I say that I DO love Star wars.

    The graphics are really good. The the Star fighter mode is fun at the beginning, but gets old after the third round. I got bored really quickly with this game. There is no sort of story line. I didn't want to believe I was already getting bored with the game 3 days after it's release.

    Overall, I am SO disappointed! If you played the original battlefront, go back! There is no space battles, I unlocked all the weapons in about a day, the character model unlocks all suck, you can't upgrade or modify the weapons like they said you would be able to, (like in Battlefield 3) and there are only 3 worlds (Endor, Hoth and Sullist). It looks like they put together the bare-bone-basics just to sell sell sell! The season pass costs $49.99 and I can't believe I WAISTED $69.99 on the preorder.

    I did not have an unreasonable notion of how the game would be before it's release. I played Star Wars Battlefront 1 & 2 back in the day, and hoped it would be similar, but with more upgrades, weapons and starfighter modes. (I especially loved the space battles) This game is a huge step back! It was like buying the Beta for $70.00.

    Even if you love Star Wars, save yourself, your wallet and your sanity from this boring, cookie-cutter game. I only gave it a 1 rating because at least the graphics don't suck.
    Expand
  25. Dec 5, 2015
    0
    Who in their right mind would make a battlefront sequel without a campaign mode? What a waste of effort from a designer team that got blocked by the marketing team that wants to sell 2 tiny stories as paid DLC... thank god i didn't buy this online. I am returning my copy tomorrow... Go buy star wars infinity if you want more versatile content in the star wars genre. They have campaign andWho in their right mind would make a battlefront sequel without a campaign mode? What a waste of effort from a designer team that got blocked by the marketing team that wants to sell 2 tiny stories as paid DLC... thank god i didn't buy this online. I am returning my copy tomorrow... Go buy star wars infinity if you want more versatile content in the star wars genre. They have campaign and multiplayer and free DLCs.... or play an old battlefront copy on your PC.... Expand
  26. Dec 5, 2015
    5
    This game proves graphics isn't all in a game and how far the dlc abuse has been taken.
    Of course, it's not a bad game, and it's graphically amazing, but the BIG lack of content doesn't help.
    In my opinion: don't buy this game, or wait until a price drop, but don't support this politic of unfinished games.
  27. Dec 4, 2015
    2
    This game had so much potential to be one off the top games of the year. The old StarWars Battlefront had a number of different content areas which are completely absent from this game. Growing up playing Battlefront 2 I enjoyed the in depth story and the galactic conquest which me and my brother could play for hours just to have a winner. This game has improved upon the graphics of theThis game had so much potential to be one off the top games of the year. The old StarWars Battlefront had a number of different content areas which are completely absent from this game. Growing up playing Battlefront 2 I enjoyed the in depth story and the galactic conquest which me and my brother could play for hours just to have a winner. This game has improved upon the graphics of the old games however that is as much credit that I can give it. This game could have been improved drastically if they merely had the old starwars battlefront 2 remade with better graphics. Instead we were given a basic COD game that had less maps and game modes and less character customisation with power ups scattererd accross the map like we were playing mario kart. This game is a failure on so many levels and I am happy to go back to ps2 in order to play a game that while it doesn't have fantastic graphics does have amazing gameplay and content . Graphics do not make a game. Expand
  28. Dec 4, 2015
    3
    I'd been looking forward to this game since they first announced it. Even when I heard negative rumors about the Beta, I cast my doubts aside. I bought it and was bored within a couple hours. Great graphics and sounds, but that does not make a game. No content is almost an understatement. As you know by now there's no single player. Co-op modes are dumb. The vehicles are a total joke andI'd been looking forward to this game since they first announced it. Even when I heard negative rumors about the Beta, I cast my doubts aside. I bought it and was bored within a couple hours. Great graphics and sounds, but that does not make a game. No content is almost an understatement. As you know by now there's no single player. Co-op modes are dumb. The vehicles are a total joke and the weapons aren't much better.

    This game is all marketing and hype, I HIGHLY suggest you don't buy into it. I'm giving it 3 stars for good graphics and decent sounds, but that's all. Almost hate this one as much as Halo MCC.
    Expand
  29. Dec 4, 2015
    9
    Simply outrageous the negative reviews, this game is quite simply one of the best games ever. I have play ed bf4 and bf3 and battlefront 2, all are similar to this but the fluidity, the gameplay, graphics everything is better and with jokku coming out the endless amount of content delivers. I just hope dice can stick to its roots and not nerf devery gun like in the battlefield franchise,Simply outrageous the negative reviews, this game is quite simply one of the best games ever. I have play ed bf4 and bf3 and battlefront 2, all are similar to this but the fluidity, the gameplay, graphics everything is better and with jokku coming out the endless amount of content delivers. I just hope dice can stick to its roots and not nerf devery gun like in the battlefield franchise, hopefully they can patch wats needed and add more better gameplay. These fools giving horrible reviews must be on the recieving end of my onslaught, because the game is achallenge has tons of pick ups and features. They must be paid or simply first timer gamers beacause this is the top 3 games since 2000. Give this game a play and enjoy. Expand
  30. Dec 4, 2015
    4
    Never been so disappointed .. I was waiting for that game and postive regardless of the pre release comments but after 5-6 days i got a refund... I tried the beta on PC, really liked it, i knew the game was missing some stuff but it was visually stunning, star wars atmosphere and sound. Still it felt more of a console game to me.

    Then i decided to get it on ps4. I rather play games like
    Never been so disappointed .. I was waiting for that game and postive regardless of the pre release comments but after 5-6 days i got a refund... I tried the beta on PC, really liked it, i knew the game was missing some stuff but it was visually stunning, star wars atmosphere and sound. Still it felt more of a console game to me.

    Then i decided to get it on ps4. I rather play games like BF4 on PC and fast paced arcade like Bfront on PS4 but my experience was horrible. Same weapons, not enough content, grenade spaming, lack of creativity with the cards (even though it wasnt a bad idea), horrible spawns, repetitive, ''loading screen arcade style'' fighter dog fighting ...
    There was a real potential, some mp modes are fun, even with 4 maps it was ok, heroes, walker assault. I gave that game a second chance but after a game i felt that it was broken, some games looked like Unreal tournament (jet pack, laser spaming, grenades flying non stop), no strategy and constant frustration .. I look back and honestly i didnt miss anything and probably wont. Just dont buy it, unless it's 29$.
    Expand
Metascore
73

Mixed or average reviews - based on 59 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 31 out of 59
  2. Negative: 0 out of 59
  1. Playstation Official Magazine UK
    Jan 23, 2016
    80
    It's not the most complex shooter, but it's the ideal pick-up-and-play experience for Star Wars fans. Stunning environments, solid shooting and immersive sound design mask the shortcomings. [Jan 2016, p.82]
  2. Jan 20, 2016
    75
    With the new film of the space opera saga finally on the big screen and the release of Battlefront's new sequel, both after a decade overdue, it is definitely the best time to be a Star Wars fan. The game itself is a dream-come-true for fans, and the Star Wars spectacle is strong in this one. However, if it is depth and longevity you seek... this is not the game you are looking for.
  3. Play UK
    Jan 16, 2016
    60
    Spectacular production values help to make this game enjoyable in the early going, but it soon enough shows that it is painfully lacking in terms of maps and depth in its current form. [Issue#265, p.72]