User Score
4.9

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 193 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 50 out of 193
  2. Negative: 78 out of 193
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. May 16, 2019
    3
    This game is broken. It was ambitious project at the time but it seems dev teams didn't have time to polish it.
  2. Apr 17, 2019
    7
    The first half of this review will be a brief sum up of what i thought of the game, and the second half will be about it as a remaster.
    As a video game its fun, a good story but the main missions arguably don't have enough gameplay in between cutscenes. The homestead side missions and the fort liberation missions are fun but other than that most of the side content is tedious. Despite
    The first half of this review will be a brief sum up of what i thought of the game, and the second half will be about it as a remaster.
    As a video game its fun, a good story but the main missions arguably don't have enough gameplay in between cutscenes. The homestead side missions and the fort liberation missions are fun but other than that most of the side content is tedious. Despite what some people say the controls re absolutely fine, they are the same as black flag and rogue. Playing this game also reminded me how much parkour is missing from the current games. And once you beat the campaign you automatically unlock loads of cool cheats. Unlike some of the previous assassins creed games, the modern day missions are actually really fun and are arguably better than many of the main historical missions as they have a better balance between cutscene and gameplay, with a good amount of gameplay between each cutscene. This game is definitely alot of fun and the fully optional naval missions are also great.

    This game is also great value as it comes with all dlc and the full game assassins creed liberation. Liberation was originally for the psvita, and it shows. It is clearly not of the same quality as the main game, but its basically free so hard to complain.

    In terms of the remaster, its very standard. Now runs is 4k on a ps4 pro, and has full HDR support. I played it on a pro and had frequent frame rate dips whenever I was running through trees. It seemed to go as low as 12 fps on horseback and running through trees, and this was on a pro and it is effectively a ps3 game. Not ideal. the most noticeable changes from the original are that the resolution is 4k, and that the colours are much nicer now. Granted there is a lot of yellow and blue, but its way better than the gray the original loved so much. There are also some nice quality of life improvements, such as the hud and weapon menus being much improved, you can now whistle whenever so stealth is now vaguely possible, as well as free aim and double assassinations from low profile to make life easier. Overall it is a good game in a solid remaster, despite some frame rate issues, and if you are a fan of the series and haven't played this one, i would definitely recommend it. However if you have not played assassins creed before, this isn't a good jumping on point, and if you have played this game before, there is little playing it again in this, as it isn't exactly revolutionary.
    Expand
  3. Jan 25, 2020
    6
    If you treat Assassin 's Creed 3 as a game, it 's generally not bad, but still one of the weak parts on the row with Revelation and Syndicate, if you only talk about the quality of a remaster - it 's mediocre and terrible in some places. Assassin 's Creed 3 itself was very important to the series because she spent 2 years topping up on the spot and telling Ezio 's story. There was a trulyIf you treat Assassin 's Creed 3 as a game, it 's generally not bad, but still one of the weak parts on the row with Revelation and Syndicate, if you only talk about the quality of a remaster - it 's mediocre and terrible in some places. Assassin 's Creed 3 itself was very important to the series because she spent 2 years topping up on the spot and telling Ezio 's story. There was a truly open world here, not a separate city. And the gameplay became more diverse, and also the mesh is chosen very successful. But the main character Connor turned out to be completely faceless and not memorable. There are elements that have succeeded, such as tasks to improve the Estate or maritime tasks. And there are one-of-a-kind painful tasks where you only need to listen to conversations. And the ending is mediocre, there is no connection that Desmond 's story is over. The game was not bad in 2012, but now its remaster causes only frustration and boredom. You can 't do remasters like that. Expand
  4. Oct 19, 2021
    0
    Неадекватные условия на 100% синхронизации, зачатую требующие выдрачивания задания, чтоб попасть в миллиметраж таймингов, или вообще на удачу! На удачу алло? Скучный сюжет, однако гг даже неплох, пока не превращается в истеричного Коннора, которого хочется растоптать в пыль (эх, Эцио, видел бы ты, бросил бы ассасинство). Длц короля Вашингтона проходите за один присест, игра сбрасываетНеадекватные условия на 100% синхронизации, зачатую требующие выдрачивания задания, чтоб попасть в миллиметраж таймингов, или вообще на удачу! На удачу алло? Скучный сюжет, однако гг даже неплох, пока не превращается в истеричного Коннора, которого хочется растоптать в пыль (эх, Эцио, видел бы ты, бросил бы ассасинство). Длц короля Вашингтона проходите за один присест, игра сбрасывает прогресс.
    Как тут ставить оценки со знаком минуса?
    Expand
  5. Oct 24, 2019
    1
    Viel zu viele Bugs. Viel zu viele Glitches. Das Spiel läuft nicht Flüssig. Ständig muss man stehen bleiben oder warten bis das Spiel hinterher kommt, was an Passagen schlecht ist, die eigentlich zügig zu spielen sein sollten. Ständig bleibt man an Dingen hängen oder klettert irgendwo hoch, obwohl das gar nicht beabsichtigt ist. Die Steuerung fühlt sich alles andere als kontrolliert an. DieViel zu viele Bugs. Viel zu viele Glitches. Das Spiel läuft nicht Flüssig. Ständig muss man stehen bleiben oder warten bis das Spiel hinterher kommt, was an Passagen schlecht ist, die eigentlich zügig zu spielen sein sollten. Ständig bleibt man an Dingen hängen oder klettert irgendwo hoch, obwohl das gar nicht beabsichtigt ist. Die Steuerung fühlt sich alles andere als kontrolliert an. Die Attentate in dem Spiel sind total grausig. Man kann sich nicht mehr wie gewohnt an Gegner anschleichen und diese, wie in den vorrigen teilen mit der versteckten Klinge beseitigen, ohne dass alles in näherer Umgebung mit alarmiert wird. Egal wie sehr man sich bemüht nicht entdeckt zu werden. Es funktioniert einfach nicht. Das sind die Probleme die ich jetzt nach 2 Stunden Spielzeit ertragen musste. Expand
  6. Nov 21, 2020
    1
    F this game. Horse riding is **** sync points are terrible. This is the worst AC game I have come across. I spent 15$ on it and I promise you that’s way too much money for this garbage. The controls have me so mad I’m about to break it lol
  7. Dec 26, 2020
    6
    Плюсы-можно свистеть в кустах,появились новые костюмы,можно свободно прицелится,наряд Альтаира обрел физику,поменялся интерфейс.появилось обозначение карты,освещение стало лучше,да и графика выглядит симпотично.К сожалению это все плюсы ремастера от оригинала.

    Минусы-Лица персонажей(мыльные и простые)когда в оригинале все было отлично особенно лица персонажей проявляется в кат
    Плюсы-можно свистеть в кустах,появились новые костюмы,можно свободно прицелится,наряд Альтаира обрел физику,поменялся интерфейс.появилось обозначение карты,освещение стало лучше,да и графика выглядит симпотично.К сожалению это все плюсы ремастера от оригинала.

    Минусы-Лица персонажей(мыльные и простые)когда в оригинале все было отлично особенно лица персонажей проявляется в кат сценах,господи да даже в сомом геймплее заметно,Туман да графика стала лучше но однако прорисовка местности ужасна,тоесть когда ты поднимаешься ты видишь сплошной туман когда в оригинале никого тумана нет,так же иногда светло а иногда слишком темно,а так же в игре немного мелочей сделали хуже,Также я встречал в игре баги очень много багов и их досих пор не подправили.

    Итог: Ремастер получился средним посравнению оригинала поэтому моя оценка 6/10 и это жалко.
    Expand
  8. Jan 3, 2021
    4
    Game was playable but boring and lackluster. Open world felt dead and the characters were generic. I was excited for the North American setting of this game but was disappointed. Found myself just waiting for the game to end. Do not recommend.
  9. Apr 1, 2019
    3
    I’m not sure why Ubisoft thought that this remaster was a good idea. Although it’s remastered in 4K HDR it is no longer a pretty game. And the controls that were acceptable six and a half years ago are completely atrocious. After playing the beautiful Odyssey for 5 months I just couldn’t go back. I tried, but between characters that don’t have eyelids to controls that seem to be designedI’m not sure why Ubisoft thought that this remaster was a good idea. Although it’s remastered in 4K HDR it is no longer a pretty game. And the controls that were acceptable six and a half years ago are completely atrocious. After playing the beautiful Odyssey for 5 months I just couldn’t go back. I tried, but between characters that don’t have eyelids to controls that seem to be designed to annoy I just couldn’t go back. Oh, and so much Animus gameplay. Any Animus is too much in my book, and there’s plenty of it in Assassin’s Creed 3. Expand
  10. Apr 1, 2019
    4
    Das war es? Ein altes AC mit kaum besserer Grafik und dafür 40€??
    Außer das die Texturen schöner aussehen und die Beleuchtung überzeugt ist nicht viel verbessert worden. Das kann jeder mit Grafik Mods deutlich besser.
    Ubisoft macht sich hier kaum Mühe. Sehr traurig.
  11. Apr 1, 2019
    5
    I'll just give a 5 because of the respect I have to AC saga, but this remaster sucks. Full of bugs, even more than the original one... What a shame, Ubisoft Barcelona.
  12. Apr 5, 2019
    4
    It was a very nice game. Was...
    These faces... I see them in nightmares.
    Don't buy the remastered version, you will regret.
  13. Mar 31, 2019
    0
    This version is a complete trash
    There are so many problems. for example: Definite sound, problems in game physics and problems of optimality...
    The game is only colored from blue to yellow
    It's not a remaster, it's a scam
    This game is not worth 40$
    According to Ubisoft's new policies, the company is trying to scam users instead of providing services.
  14. Mar 31, 2019
    9
    I think many of the reviews out there are just too biased by the last errors by Ubisoft. This remaster is alright, specially if you're playing in 4K HDR and have taken the time to adjust your TV and HDR settings properly. The only area that needs improvement for sure are some of the faces, specially early game, but it improves as the game moves on. I haven't found any bugs so far.I think many of the reviews out there are just too biased by the last errors by Ubisoft. This remaster is alright, specially if you're playing in 4K HDR and have taken the time to adjust your TV and HDR settings properly. The only area that needs improvement for sure are some of the faces, specially early game, but it improves as the game moves on. I haven't found any bugs so far.

    Please note this a remaster, not a remake, and still they have put good work in it and it looks much better than the original. I definitely recommend it if you did not play the original one.
    Expand
  15. Apr 5, 2019
    8
    Not a Ubisoft apologist at all, even if they've been making the right moves lately. I played the remaster on a PS4 Pro properly configured on a huge 4K TV. And it looks like a 2012 game with the settings on ultra on a huge screen. Improvements here and there, and of course since they changed their old "Arkham" control scheme 4 years ago, it gets some getting used to, but it's what youNot a Ubisoft apologist at all, even if they've been making the right moves lately. I played the remaster on a PS4 Pro properly configured on a huge 4K TV. And it looks like a 2012 game with the settings on ultra on a huge screen. Improvements here and there, and of course since they changed their old "Arkham" control scheme 4 years ago, it gets some getting used to, but it's what you expect from a remaster. Otherwise it'd be a remake. I must say I'm halfway through the campaign, and it holds up alright, so I'm giving it the same score I gave the original, because beside all that, it's the weakest AC game, and the protagonist is bland as hell, but I went in knowing that. I think people are used to remasters from pretty new games, and are judging it based on unfair standards. And most of the 0's are just review bombing, as it's the new trend here. Expand
  16. Apr 10, 2019
    0
    Здесь кто-то в отзывах пишет про баги в оригинальной части (не ремастере( - это оплный бред, все летало идеально. А сейчас они переиздали игру в которой все что сделали - обоссали желтым цветом графику и взвинтили цену до небес. Молодцы, Юби! Эталонно работаетеЗдесь кто-то в отзывах пишет про баги в оригинальной части (не ремастере( - это оплный бред, все летало идеально. А сейчас они переиздали игру в которой все что сделали - обоссали желтым цветом графику и взвинтили цену до небес. Молодцы, Юби! Эталонно работаете
  17. Apr 4, 2019
    6
    Feels like they removed all lighting, cranked up contrast and brightness and called it a day. Also why does a 7 year old game still getting 40ish fps?
  18. May 3, 2020
    0
    This remaster is bag. Many bugs. Много багов. Юбисофт скатился. Игра не стоит своих денег, не покупайте этот кал.
  19. Apr 5, 2019
    9
    For 40€ players get a fair package with AC III including all its DLCs and pre-order/deluxe bonuses, as well as the full AC:Liberation HD. In addition to that, we finally get more than just a resolution upgrade (as was the case with for example AC:Rogue) in the form of significantly better lighting, reflections and draw distance. Even gameplay was overhauled in very minor, but useful ways,For 40€ players get a fair package with AC III including all its DLCs and pre-order/deluxe bonuses, as well as the full AC:Liberation HD. In addition to that, we finally get more than just a resolution upgrade (as was the case with for example AC:Rogue) in the form of significantly better lighting, reflections and draw distance. Even gameplay was overhauled in very minor, but useful ways, most importantly the horrendous weapon select from the old base game was overhauled and there is a bunch of other stuff as well.
    Now, this is a Remaster very true to the original and if you didn't like that one, ACIII Remastered won't change that. However, if you liked the game as much as I did, it is a great package to get the game on current consoles with overhauls that were needed to make it as playable nowadays as it was back then.
    On the other hand, it is still somewhat buggy in a few areas and the mostly stellar new lighting makes visible some more ugly parts from the old game that were more hidden back then (most notably the faces in some cutscenes).

    AC III marked a turning point for the AC franchise in 2012. For better or worse. Looking back, I now see it as a successful blend of some of the older virtues the Assassin's Creed games had and that are now lost in the newer titles, and some of the improvements that have been made since them.
    Expand
  20. Mar 29, 2019
    4
    Seeing this game coming out now kind of makes me sad.

    On one hand, I had fun with it when it came out for Xbox360. Good old times, when there actually was a plot in the series. The end of the Desmond trilogy ended the saga for me. No real story after that. I played Unity, Syndicate and Origins. I enjoy them, but they're not great anymore. And here comes this AC 3 again. For 40 bucks. A
    Seeing this game coming out now kind of makes me sad.

    On one hand, I had fun with it when it came out for Xbox360. Good old times, when there actually was a plot in the series. The end of the Desmond trilogy ended the saga for me. No real story after that. I played Unity, Syndicate and Origins. I enjoy them, but they're not great anymore.
    And here comes this AC 3 again. For 40 bucks. A game from the last generation. It's a good game... But why releasing it?
    The saga is now very different, they clearly don't care about the Desmond universe anymore. AC is now a game series with well designed environments but plain and forgettable stories.
    So I can't recommend playing this game to newcomers, or fans from the latest AC entries. If you're a bit older and you liked "the other AC games", you have already played this one for sure.
    Expand
  21. Sep 18, 2020
    10
    Osksoso sljdjrjejd kdjskdlsjekdodjdk dıapsikeşznxncc rudooddksjldkdodnsd dpxn
  22. Mar 31, 2019
    9
    Ремастер хорошо, может немного подкачали лица, но, все лучше, чем те баги, которые были на ПК.
  23. Jul 2, 2019
    8
    I don't understand all of the hate for this game. I played it for the first time over the last few weeks and really enjoyed my time with it. Conner isn't a bad character - the story is pretty good. The thing that I really enjoyed was the setting. I thought that alone carried the game compared to some of the other AC games. I'm glad I went back to this.
  24. Jul 23, 2019
    5
    Normally, I'd give the game an 8 for great story and enjoyable gameplay. However, I am docking 3 points for the following reasons:
    1. Graphical glitches. Apart from your standard phasing-out textures, I routinely experience models phasing through the ground or through each other, interrupted actions sometimes finish their animations despite what is happening in the "reality" of the game
    Normally, I'd give the game an 8 for great story and enjoyable gameplay. However, I am docking 3 points for the following reasons:
    1. Graphical glitches. Apart from your standard phasing-out textures, I routinely experience models phasing through the ground or through each other, interrupted actions sometimes finish their animations despite what is happening in the "reality" of the game is different, and other things like HUD interference from quests different from the quest I am currently on.
    2. it also contains tons of gameplay glitches that marres the overall experience and makes your character look like kind of a goof, such as randomly missing ledges and not being able to move at times despite nothing blocking the way. These bugs are extremely common, with only mere minutes of gameplay separating them.
    3. The demands of some of the optional side quests with relation to the bugginess of the game. Let me make this clear: I have no problem with extremely demanding challenges. However, it is one thing if you fail because you were not "gud" enough, but it is an entirely different story when your success or failure is completely non-deterministic due to the inherent flaws with the game's engine. It is really disheartening to see all your hard work undone because the game decided to change the rules with an unfair glitch such as a guard randomly stopping in his tracks, preventing you from moving, or if you are required to perform a scripted assassination, except the game bugs out and does not allow you to assassinate them. Many times I would have to restart the memory before the game-breaking bug would go away. Couple that with some truly sadistic optional goals (which would have been fine if the game was not a glitchy mess), and you truly have a recipe for pure rage fuel.

    All in all. I truly enjoyed my experience. I just wish the did a better job at polishing the amazing array of bugs that come out of nowhere and really mess up with the experience of an otherwise wonderful game.
    Expand
  25. Apr 17, 2019
    10
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Great Game, It still deserves the original games 8.5/10 Rating it got as a game.
    Has new minor bugs due to new engine and new lighting BUT that doesnt mean it is a 4/10 anyone who is stupid to review bomb this is just trying to be bias on how the actual gameplay is.

    it includes the new features from later games and fixes minor old bugs but still has some bugs.
    Thats being said it is an amazing game and a classic at this point.

    Hope they do the same and remaster BrotherHood Next!
    Expand
  26. May 21, 2019
    6
    The game, as AC III, is great and funny. But the remaster is really poor. Yes, is 4K now and runs on PS4 Pro, but still have bugs and the FPS rating crash sometimes. It could have been done much better. Also, is it necessary to remaster all editions of Assassin's Creed?
  27. Oct 24, 2020
    3
    I really enjoyed this the first time around but they've managed to make no improvements to the master and add a shedload of serious bugs. Even some of the graphics look worse than in the original, it's freakishly bad.
  28. May 15, 2021
    7
    The remastered version of AC 3 not better than what was in 2012 lags,bugs more problems than any of the series but at the end of the day I love the AC 3 plot with such a good gamplay too thanx DESMOND ONE LAST TIME.
  29. Mar 25, 2022
    5
    Scénario mise en scène : 7/10
    Gameplay : 4/10
    Univers : 8/10
    Réalisation technique : 4/10
    Réalisation graphique : 4/10
  30. May 31, 2023
    7
    This would be a good game were it not so insanely buggy. It crashes frequently and can honestly be a slog to get through. Plus Connor is not nearly as interesting as Ezio.
  31. May 6, 2020
    10
    (only gave it 10 in a feeble attempt to improve the clearly impulsively made 0 scores lol. Actual score... 7- to to generous.... 5.5 or 6.5 out of 10)
    Can't help but feel most of these reviews are just pre-existing hate for the game, rather than whether it objectively improved in terms of visuals and mechanics (... can't change the preexisting shorting comings of story, character, .. etc
    (only gave it 10 in a feeble attempt to improve the clearly impulsively made 0 scores lol. Actual score... 7- to to generous.... 5.5 or 6.5 out of 10)
    Can't help but feel most of these reviews are just pre-existing hate for the game, rather than whether it objectively improved in terms of visuals and mechanics (... can't change the preexisting shorting comings of story, character, .. etc in a remaster of game that was never well received).While it hardly stands among the best remasters, its no where near as objectively worsening the game (... than it already did to itself in its original release) like the Ezio Collections (my gosh... that one NPC face from hell in the first opening scene with ezio and that gang, you all know what I'm talking about), but it did enhance the visuals noticeably and made some minor tweaks to gameplay: my god, the expansion in the crafting system definitely a welcome addition. Then little subtle tweaks to certain stealth and combat mechanics that made it better.
    Nothing groundbreaking, and doesn't change it from being the fundamentally mediocre game it was (Black Flag was the one to properly implement that innovative changes in the series more properly), but nevertheless, visually improved and a mildly/moderately smoother gameplay

    .... otherwise its still one of (if not) the weakest games in the series....and we all know we're only tempted to go back to AC3 for the brutally satisfying Tomahawk combat lol.
    Youre better off replaying Black Flag, if any AC's after Ezio (where the series went down hill after, Black Flag aside)
    Expand
  32. Nov 3, 2021
    0
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Really glitchy, and you can only play through the Haytham part of the game. Kanen'to:kon will get stuck in a **** tree as soon as you play as Connor. I'm really disappointed and pissed about this "remaster". What a joke. Expand
  33. Sep 26, 2020
    7
    I never played the original AC III and a co-worker of mine said he would let me have this game so i decided why not because i like playing AC games. Below are my likes and dislikes about the game.

    Likes: - How they have historical characters in the game as it makes the game a little more interesting. - The idea of the rope dart as there are a couple of creative ways to use it. - The
    I never played the original AC III and a co-worker of mine said he would let me have this game so i decided why not because i like playing AC games. Below are my likes and dislikes about the game.

    Likes:
    - How they have historical characters in the game as it makes the game a little more interesting.
    - The idea of the rope dart as there are a couple of creative ways to use it.
    - The era the game was set in and to a certain extent i like the environment more than Syndicates.
    - For the most part it plays like an AC game would.

    Dislikes:
    - I HATE how you cannot crouch in this game. It really takes the stealth approach away and it makes no sense why the developers could not put it in the game. While playing Haytham and Connor it just feels weird and stupid just walking up behind an enemy and killing them whereas if they were in crouch mode it would look and execute like a stealth game would. Another thing is that i would be in a fort or in enemy territory and since i can't crouch i would just walk around trying to avoid enemy detection and trying to find the nearest spot i could hide. WHO THE HELL IS GOING TO WALK AROUND IN THESE TYPES OF AREAS KNOWING THAT THERE ARE ENEMIES ALL AROUND YOU!!! A NORMAL PERSON WOULD CROUCH AND TRY TO BE UNDECTED!!! IT'S JUST MIND BOTTLING!!
    - I did not like eavesdropping at all as it just felt tedious and it's just one of those chores you avoid/hate doing and i am really glad they got rid of it in the later titles.
    - The fast travel points were few and far between and i did not like how you had to fast travel multiple times just to get to a main mission. It started to become very tedious. It would've been nice if the viewpoints you synchronized throughout the game could be unlocked as fast travel locations as it would've made going to locations A LOT EASIER.
    - Heavy weapon animations look awkward and slow so i just used an axe throughout the game.
    - What is with the glaring eyes on the characters in this game? It just looked awkward and out of place.
    - There are some horse handling issues in this game.
    - There are also some bugs in this game.
    - The world felt stale and boring at times.

    Misc:
    - Connor is my least favorite assassin. I would rather have Jacob Frye than this guy. I felt like they could've portrayed him as a different type of character.
    - Combat is a little awkward and sometimes a structure would get in your way as you were fighting which got annoying, but was bearable nonetheless.
    - I wish you could manually save because sometimes when you would die you would go further back than you would like.
    - The story was nothing special, but it wasn't horrible by any means.

    I would rather play Black Flag, Origins or Odyssey than this game, but that is not to say that this game was horrible it was just different and i still think it's a good game, but it does not at all come close to competing with those three games.
    Expand
  34. Nov 15, 2021
    5
    This game is broken. It was ambitious project at the time but it seems dev teams didn't have time to polish it.
  35. Nov 11, 2020
    9
    Played the in late 2020 and as all bugs has been fixed I could say that this is one of the best story in the AC series. Graphics is also much better than in AC2 but not much better than in AC2:Revelations.
  36. May 29, 2021
    4
    Lo comencé a jugar porque vino gratis en el pase de temporada de Odyssey (juego que aún no he comenzado). Es un error jugar a este juego luego de Origins y Valhalla, este título no ha envejecido bien, no como otros de esa época (años 2000 - 2005 aprox). No recomendado para los jugadores que comenzamos tarde con esta franquicia, para nada.
  37. Aug 15, 2020
    7
    The graphics and story is great. Enjoyable but alot of things i hate. What i hate is the progression system, sidequest are not encouraging to play you get little to no benefit/help for your main character so might as well not do it. The protagonist is dull. A naive indian dude. And what i hated most is the controls, most of the time its buggy you fail your mission not skill based but theThe graphics and story is great. Enjoyable but alot of things i hate. What i hate is the progression system, sidequest are not encouraging to play you get little to no benefit/help for your main character so might as well not do it. The protagonist is dull. A naive indian dude. And what i hated most is the controls, most of the time its buggy you fail your mission not skill based but the game is just buggy. Overall, i enjoy it. Expand
  38. May 10, 2020
    0
    By far the worst AAA game ever made... ESPECIALLY for a remaster. The remaster is even more buggy than the original, and they did nothing to make the flow of the mechanics feel any better, if anything it’s worse. They took a terrible game, made it operate worse and then slapped some paint on it to call it “pretty”. Do not buy.
  39. Apr 12, 2020
    2
    Unfinished free running, unintuitive combat, unresponsive animations/inputs. Unimaginative and phoned in mission design. Objectively unfinished remaster of an unfinished game. This can't be a norm anymore. EA actually finishes games and at least call of duty works. Ubisoft really is the worst AAA developer filled with creators who don't care
  40. Jan 30, 2022
    0
    That's game is just a trash compared to the previous ones.. the main protagonist is annoying, the story is boring, the new elements just don't fun at all..
  41. Jun 17, 2021
    6
    Крайне посредственный ремастер оригинальной третьей части. Багов завезли будь здоров, под текстуры проваливаюсь как в Брейкпойнте, такая же ситуация с невидимыми стенами и npc , которые прогружаются перед носом. Звук тоже какой то выпадающий из атмосферы, то ли слишком тихий, то ли наложен как то не так.В общем как ремастеру МАКСИМУМ 7/10. В оригинале - игра на 8,5/10.
    Что касаеется
    Крайне посредственный ремастер оригинальной третьей части. Багов завезли будь здоров, под текстуры проваливаюсь как в Брейкпойнте, такая же ситуация с невидимыми стенами и npc , которые прогружаются перед носом. Звук тоже какой то выпадающий из атмосферы, то ли слишком тихий, то ли наложен как то не так.В общем как ремастеру МАКСИМУМ 7/10. В оригинале - игра на 8,5/10.
    Что касаеется Liberation - Это вообще непонятно что, еле прошел... Пробежался чисто по сюжету. Играть за рабыню, которая любит переодеваться..Класс. Сюжет пресный, персонажи тоже(Мачеха еще ничего). Локации отврат, особенно болото. Никакая игра, может для PSV и хорошо было в свое время. 5/10 максимум.
    Expand
  42. Sep 19, 2020
    2
    Feels like a game made in 4 months. I dont understand how you can make a remaster worse. Unresponsive animations, very buggy, horrible free running. How did Ubisoft manage to mess up such a great game
  43. Nov 16, 2020
    7
    "Assassin's Creed III Remastered" es justo lo que proclama su tÍtulo, una remasterización. Hace algunos años pude disfrutar del titulo original, una entrega con diversos cambios técnicos, mejoras gráficas y muchas otras mejoras respecto a anteriores entregas de la saga. En 2019 presenciamos la remasterización. Cambios en la iluminación y resolución en 1080 es lo que obtuvimos además de"Assassin's Creed III Remastered" es justo lo que proclama su tÍtulo, una remasterización. Hace algunos años pude disfrutar del titulo original, una entrega con diversos cambios técnicos, mejoras gráficas y muchas otras mejoras respecto a anteriores entregas de la saga. En 2019 presenciamos la remasterización. Cambios en la iluminación y resolución en 1080 es lo que obtuvimos además de disfrutar de su DLC y el Assassin's Creed Liberation.
    Aún así, me ha decepcionado que la gente de Ubisoft no haya sabido arreglar ciertos bugs que hacen a veces terrible la experiencia de este juego.
    Expand
  44. Nov 29, 2021
    7
    El movimiento y las animaciones mejoran un montón, son muy buenas, un gran salto de calidad, todo es más dinámico. Aún así, se puede notar medio lento el gameplay en ocasiones.
    El remastered no le sienta demasiado bien, sobre todo en colores y texturas, por no hablar del modelado de los rostros, lo nuevo no le queda bien.
    Connor, desgraciadamente, pasará sin pena ni gloria por la saga,
    El movimiento y las animaciones mejoran un montón, son muy buenas, un gran salto de calidad, todo es más dinámico. Aún así, se puede notar medio lento el gameplay en ocasiones.
    El remastered no le sienta demasiado bien, sobre todo en colores y texturas, por no hablar del modelado de los rostros, lo nuevo no le queda bien.
    Connor, desgraciadamente, pasará sin pena ni gloria por la saga, tiene cero carisma y encima es un sosainas.

    · Cosas buenas: las mejoras gráficas son interesantes, sobre todo en iluminación, la trama y los giritos son buenas, y las nuevas mecánicas se agradecen.
    · Cosas malas: tiene defectos de desarrollo que ya tenía el de PS3, las caras de los personajes son terribles y Connor ni se le acerca a Ezio.
    · Conclusión: nadie había pedido el remastered, pero a mi me sirvió para poder jugarlo, ya que el de PS3 nunca lo tuve, historia interesante, sobre todo en el presente con Desmond, y bueno, se puede disfrutar pese a las cosas malas.
    Expand
  45. May 16, 2021
    8
    I played all the contents of this Game, I felt it was not as good as the other AC games I played, but at least made me curious about the AC Series and felt it was worth to play (Liberation was the one I liked less, because there were certain stories that were slow).
  46. May 23, 2021
    7
    Maybe I'm just a but nostalgic but I remember it being a relatively good game. I had fun with it.
  47. Jul 27, 2021
    7
    This was my first every Assassin's Creed game back on PS3 and I was really excited to get back and play this game. I like the American Revolution time period and how the graphics look better. It still was not good when I am climbing stuff as I would try to get Connor to move one direction but he would just move the opposite way. The most frustrating part is trying to get 100% completion.This was my first every Assassin's Creed game back on PS3 and I was really excited to get back and play this game. I like the American Revolution time period and how the graphics look better. It still was not good when I am climbing stuff as I would try to get Connor to move one direction but he would just move the opposite way. The most frustrating part is trying to get 100% completion. Those stupid story synchronization just made me made. Overall this is a good Remastered but it still had some problems like it did in the PS3 version. The dlc to the game was very boring to me and should not have been made. AC Liberation was pretty solid. The story set in New Orleans was nice change of area. Story could have been better but I like it a lot. Good game but was very irritating at some points. Expand
  48. Mar 11, 2022
    8
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Honestly, I would have enjoyed it more if I didn't rush it. The world's colors are disappointingly grey, but the combat (slaughtering the entire British army 1000 times) is fun. Though Desmond is a jersey the game is fun. Yet the ending leaves little to the imagination. Also, I think Kaniehť:ío and Haytham's romance could have been softly implied. Other than this, the game is amazing, and has great missions, and awesome characters, real or not. Play it. Expand
  49. Dec 24, 2022
    8
    Answer: 75 characters is between 10 words and 19 words with spaces included in the character count. If spaces are not included in the character count, then 75 characters is between 12 words and 25 words.
  50. Mar 17, 2023
    7
    Pros
    - one of the best feeling combat systems in the series
    - the frontier is fun to navigate - the estate and its related stories are fun - the bait and switch beginning was a shocker on a first playthrough - the modern day takes you through some interesting vistas Cons - one of the worst feeling stealth systems in the series - Connor is a slow burn protagonist that gets
    Pros
    - one of the best feeling combat systems in the series
    - the frontier is fun to navigate
    - the estate and its related stories are fun
    - the bait and switch beginning was a shocker on a first playthrough
    - the modern day takes you through some interesting vistas

    Cons
    - one of the worst feeling stealth systems in the series
    - Connor is a slow burn protagonist that gets interesting like three sequences before the game ends
    - this is the game that took the modern storyline into a back alley, shanked it and let it to bleed out

    ACIII is probably one of the more controversial entries into the franchise, in regards to what it has done to the story. But let us start with the good things.

    The combat feels fantastic. It is fast and responsive plus it is helped by Connors animations being some of the most brutal the series ever had. The enemy variety… all right, the three enemy types allow for a more fun version of the previous combat systems the series had, still allowing you to slaughter groups through a series of fast chained kills. Though now you need to press a single extra button to break the guard of the tougher enemies.

    The frontier is beautiful and fun to navigate through the ''natural'' convenient system of tree branches. The fact that it also changes with the seasons is also fantastic. Parkour getting overhauled where you can now perform quick vaults over low barriers also helps to make the game feel more fun.

    What is not fun though, is trying to pull off anything in stealth. ACIII was clearly designed to be a combat game. Nowhere else is it more obvious than during Act 7: Mission 3: Conflict Looms. For optional objectives you have to remain undetected on ships cramped with enemies and you also have to air assassinate a grenadier. If you ignore these and just fight everybody, this is a five minute mission. If you are going for the 100%... goooooood luck not getting frustrated to the maximum.

    This is also the game that ended the modern story with Desmond Miles. By getting rid of him in the end, Ubisoft ended five games of foreshadowing on one of their messiest fumbles ever. Every game that followed had nothing to add to the modern day storyline which is hilarious, as Desmond was clearly being set up to take the reins of a game set in modern times, gaining skills via the Bleeding Effect.

    ACIII, a game that tried a lot of things, but ultimately fell a little flat. Still worth playing but other than that, kinda meh.
    Expand
  51. Jul 11, 2023
    10
    This is one of the greatest game I ever played on the Assasin's Creed Saga...This game has a good story and gameplay and has an amazing atmosphere and represents the era perfectly.
    The Two Protagonist are well written and also the proganist Desmon Miles is written good he grew up with us and had marvelous experencies with his chapters...the gameplay parkour is still improve after 5
    This is one of the greatest game I ever played on the Assasin's Creed Saga...This game has a good story and gameplay and has an amazing atmosphere and represents the era perfectly.
    The Two Protagonist are well written and also the proganist Desmon Miles is written good he grew up with us and had marvelous experencies with his chapters...the gameplay parkour is still improve after 5 games...for my opinion the negative reviews about this gameare no sense I dindt have any problems about this remastered
    Expand
  52. Jul 8, 2023
    7
    I think AC3 gets a lot of heat for not rising to the greatness of the Ezio trilogy. It's not as good as the Ezio trilogy, which would easily get a 9/10 from me, if not a perfect score. But that by no means suggests that it is a bad addition to the franchise. The story is great and takes a different spin on the Assassin's from what we are used to up to this point in the series.I think AC3 gets a lot of heat for not rising to the greatness of the Ezio trilogy. It's not as good as the Ezio trilogy, which would easily get a 9/10 from me, if not a perfect score. But that by no means suggests that it is a bad addition to the franchise. The story is great and takes a different spin on the Assassin's from what we are used to up to this point in the series. Additionally, the combat system, I think is great. I played the original AC3 back when it came out on the XBOX360 and didn't get too into it. But I gave the remastered version a chance and I do not regret it. In addition to better graphics, the game seems to run smoother and quicker on better systems. I understand that it isn't for everyone, but I personally feel it is worth the play through if you are interested in the Assassin's Creed storyline. Also, I never experienced any bugs during my play through....at least nothing game breaking similar to the other reviewers. If I had, I probably would knock it down a peg or 2.... Expand
  53. Jul 27, 2023
    2
    Worst remaster ever!

    The game is full of bugs, more of that, they do not even fix the old bugs.
    The graphic worst than in original game.

    Shame on you Ubisoft!
  54. Aug 10, 2023
    7
    Assassin's Creed III: Remastered: 7/10

    The movements and animations are much improved, they are very good, a big leap in quality, everything is more dynamic. Still, the gameplay can be a little slow at times. The remastering doesn't do it justice, especially in terms of colours and textures, not to mention the modelling of the faces. Connor will unfortunately go down in the saga without
    Assassin's Creed III: Remastered: 7/10

    The movements and animations are much improved, they are very good, a big leap in quality, everything is more dynamic. Still, the gameplay can be a little slow at times. The remastering doesn't do it justice, especially in terms of colours and textures, not to mention the modelling of the faces. Connor will unfortunately go down in the saga without glory, he has zero charisma and he's a bore to boot.

    Assassin's Creed III: Liberation: 6/10

    It took me more than 6 restarts to finish the story in this fast-paced, glitch-ridden game. This game was not made in Montreal and was released before. Disappointing, but still a good basis for an AC.
    Expand
Metascore
72

Mixed or average reviews - based on 31 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 15 out of 31
  2. Negative: 0 out of 31
  1. May 21, 2019
    60
    For better or worse, Assassin's Creed III Remastered introduces the polarising Connor Kenway to current generation consoles. Aside from some impressive graphical reworking, it is in many ways a simple port: bugs and issues with the original remain largely the same outside of some much-appreciated quality of life improvements and a handful of minor tweaks. Those who enjoyed the original, as well as Assassin's Creed fans who haven't yet played it, will likely appreciate this remaster for what it is, as long as nothing revolutionary is expected of it.
  2. May 10, 2019
    75
    Assassin’s Creed 3 Remastered is a collection that comes packed with a heap of visual improvements and gameplay tweaks, yet maintains all the things that divided players back with the original release. There are still problems around, but it is a collection that transforms the experience to the modern-day standards and keeps us reminiscing the days when the series had much more promise.
  3. Apr 29, 2019
    70
    Assassin's Creed III Remastered is a mixed bag. It's repetitive combat and lackluster visuals, strung through with a few bright spots of naval combat and exploration, and unique displays of combat. Narratively, the game is as weak as they come. There's no mystery. Just an obligatory plot to finish the fight between the Assassins and Templars. Not to mention the mumbo jumbo with the First Civilization. The game is frustrating and not worth another look.