Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare

 PC
User Score
4.9

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 1348 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 436 out of 1348
  2. Mixed: 307 out of 1348
  3. Negative: 605 out of 1348
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. eduardvictor
    Nov 4, 2014
    0
    This is the first COD I've bought since COD 2 in 2005. I've played Battlefield for the past few years, from Battlefield Bad Company 2 to Battlefield 4, which I got sick of, because DICE are a bunch of incompetent morons that can't write the networking part of a game properly to save their lives.

    Earlier this year, I uninstalled BF 4 because it is a completely frustrating piece of ****    This is the first COD I've bought since COD 2 in 2005. I've played Battlefield for the past few years, from Battlefield Bad Company 2 to Battlefield 4, which I got sick of, because DICE are a bunch of incompetent morons that can't write the networking part of a game properly to save their lives.

    Earlier this year, I uninstalled BF 4 because it is a completely frustrating piece of **** and installed Planetside 2, which I've been playing since.

    Yesterday, I bought COD:AW, played the single player campaign and loved it.

    Today, I attempted to play multiplayer, IT WAS **** HORRIBLE, AND STILL IS, the **** lag is WORSE than Battlefield 4 because of the lack of **** dedicated servers.

    Sad state of affairs when COD 2 in **** 2005 had better netcode and dedicated servers, and when a huge game like Planetside 2 feels better and more responsive to play with 200 other players around you.

    In AW, I constantly get killed in one **** hit from EVERYTHING AND ANYTHING, by laggy ****

    If they do not add dedicated servers like EVERY **** PC multiplayer game should have, this is the last **** COD game I am buying AND I will ask for a refund. This is bull****, 110 dollars for a broken piece of **** that makes me want to punch a hole through my **** monitor EVERY TIME I get killed in a complete bull**** way.

    And it's not like I am some scrub, either, when I played a test match to get used to the gameplay in that simulation thing they have, my score was 40-3 at the end of the match. I've been playing shooters since 1995 and usually my KDR in multiplayer games never goes under 2.5.

    In this **** my first match was KDR 9, and every single **** one afterwards was under 0.6 and I've finished either last on the scoreboard or third to last. Absolute unplayable CRAP at this point, people will leave in DROVES if they keep this **** as broken as it is. I am still **** struggling to get my KDR to 1, because every **** thing kills me in one hit and 5 meters behind cover, and it takes my entire mag to kill anyone. Melee is also broken as complete **** last death I had today before I just **** rage quit, I went up to a guy, fired half a mag into his face and then meleed him, yet when the **** killcam showed, it just looked like I was running up to him, staring like a moron while he emptied his mag in my face.

    Absolutely **** shameful.

    I am surprised this **** is not illegal, in ANY OTHER **** industry, if you buy something and it's broken as **** or does not work as advertised, you have the right to get your god damn money back, but in gaming you get ****ED out of your money and can absolutely **** NOTHING to do about it. Bull**** theft, that's what it is.

    The game would be awesome if it had **** dedicated servers, so I could choose to play on servers with other people that have the same ping as I do, so we have a level playing field, and I'd be able to vote kick people with high ping or the server would autokick. With this **** you get ****ed by lag switching **** or some **** from China with ping of **** 600. BULL****.    … Expand
  2. trollmace
    Nov 5, 2014
    0
    tried to run game - fail, my cpu is too old
    @
    installed fix i found in the web
    @
    game runs smooth and well, even better than ghosts
    @
    fix is only for SP, MP is the reason i bought that pile of crap

    pls die activision, pls die sledgehammer, rest in piss call of duty series
  3. aidanman2
    Nov 7, 2014
    0
    bull game not worth it/..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
  4. Shaka_Igloo
    Nov 8, 2014
    0
    Like Ghosts this is not optimised for the PC at all. I have i7 3930K @4.3ghz in a watercooling loop along with two GTX780s all running at 35°C and 32gb RAM - and still this game won't play smoothly at 1080p! I don't expect much from CoD anymore but this is utterly worthless. If you enjoy PC gaming for the enhanced visual quality it offers - Don't buy this game.
  5. Zurpak
    Nov 5, 2014
    0
    All these people who give this game 10/10 must be either stupid or be activision employee...
    How can you say that this game the best cos since mw2?! I have spend hundreds of hours in mw2 and bo1 and i have to say that aw sucks!!! Once again this game is nothing more then chaotic bullet spiter crap...
  6. Trebor_UK
    Nov 11, 2014
    0
    This game is worse than a nasty case of ebola-aids, and Aliens: Colonial Marines put together.

    You'd think I learn after last years failure known as Ghosts, that Call of Duty games on PC were finished, and were never going to improve. Obviously not. I feel like I have sinned against humanity buying this game after buying Ghosts. To put it simply. DO NOT BUY THIS GAME. It is Ghosts    This game is worse than a nasty case of ebola-aids, and Aliens: Colonial Marines put together.

    You'd think I learn after last years failure known as Ghosts, that Call of Duty games on PC were finished, and were never going to improve. Obviously not. I feel like I have sinned against humanity buying this game after buying Ghosts.

    To put it simply. DO NOT BUY THIS GAME. It is Ghosts MK2.
    -Short, Bad story? Check!
    -Medicore graphics? Check!
    -id Tech 3 engine used in all previous CoD games, modified as "IW engine?" Check!
    -Lack of dedicated servers? Check!
    -Decent sounds? Okay, it does have good sounds.
    -Poor PC Port? Check!
    -Exact same gameplay as all previous cods except with a gimmicky "exo suit"? Check!
    -AIm assist in Multiplayer? Check. Seriously.

    They lied to us again. So much for the three year development cycle which would refresh Call of Duty and actually change and improve things. Only buy Treyarch Call of Duty games, they are the only ones who seem to somewhat care. Avoid Sledgehammer & Infinity Ward.    … Expand
  7. Mudpooch
    Nov 10, 2014
    1
    Extremely rotten cod fish is how I would describe my experience regarding this game.........................................................That's all
  8. ofc1978
    Nov 15, 2014
    0
    What is this! Played by a friends pc, it is so poor!!! A cheap Remake of Titanfall, with jumping Kids!!! omfg! This is the badest CoD i ever seen, Ghost was bad, but this...very bad!!! The graphic and engine is so cheap! CoD MW2 was better! Don´t buy this, my friend buy´s a key for 35.- Euro but this isn´t it worth!
    All in all: bad game!
  9. Trytobefair
    Nov 9, 2014
    3
    Hello dear Gamers, first of all, I would like to take a view on the system requirements for this game. Lag free, with all graphical features enabled costs roughly 2k up to 3k Dollars invest into your hardware, plus the 60$ for the game. What do you get for this amount: Skilled players need 3 hrs for single campaign. Mostly you need that time for the long loading times, even when you haveHello dear Gamers, first of all, I would like to take a view on the system requirements for this game. Lag free, with all graphical features enabled costs roughly 2k up to 3k Dollars invest into your hardware, plus the 60$ for the game. What do you get for this amount: Skilled players need 3 hrs for single campaign. Mostly you need that time for the long loading times, even when you have installed CODAW onto your SSD-drive. After that done you realize that you bought a laggy, peer-to-peer multiplayer network game with a seriously bad collision query responses. Is it 2060$ up to 3060$ worth it? Well, this game has its amazing graphical moments, it has its new shield armory, jump around moments, a tiny skill system plus they lent from Batman the grappling hook, but unfortunately, no its not worth 60$ plus the massive amount of hardware invest, because the only reason for buying this game was the dedicated server feature and they messed it up by just using a peer-to-peer client network - what a big big mistake.… Expand
  10. Koreenium
    Nov 15, 2014
    0
    YOLOSWAG besd gem evr!!! Much pew pew, lezor pistls, jet peks, emezing neu grefics, eye woterin storry. I kri evri tim. ;(

    Random BS to fill 150 character requirement.

    Musterd hev! 19/6 - IGN
  11. andrewscool101
    Jan 11, 2015
    0
    Very poor game. Campaign has no FOV slider making me feel sick playing it. When you play a mission in the campaign, there is a very long loading screen that will always stop at 50% during an intro video and won't load the rest until it's over meaning it takes a while to get into a mission. I have a pretty powerful PC so it's not my hardware. If the game crashes, you quit or even change aVery poor game. Campaign has no FOV slider making me feel sick playing it. When you play a mission in the campaign, there is a very long loading screen that will always stop at 50% during an intro video and won't load the rest until it's over meaning it takes a while to get into a mission. I have a pretty powerful PC so it's not my hardware. If the game crashes, you quit or even change a graphical setting, the intro video plays again (un-skippable) and the game has to reload, extremely annoying.
    The multiplayer has an FOV slider that goes up to 90, good enough for me. Well, it would be if the multiplayer actually worked! I haven't been online since November since the servers have never worked! Activision has been less than helpful until finally I spoke to someone who went through all the troubleshooting steps with me with no avail, so he said he would create a case report. I hope that something gets done about this.
    I should have listen to the "mixed" reviews on Steam and not bothered with this game.    … Expand
  12. parttimegenius
    Jan 7, 2015
    4
    Been playing COD since the first installment (yes, I’m that old). Skipped Ghosts, but bought all the others, even though I started to like the franchise less and less. Tried Advanced Warfare for a good three weeks and have just uninstalled it. Here are my two cents:

    - Poor optimization for pc: slightly larger maps (roughly half of all the maps) lag intolerably for minutes on end. And    Been playing COD since the first installment (yes, I’m that old). Skipped Ghosts, but bought all the others, even though I started to like the franchise less and less. Tried Advanced Warfare for a good three weeks and have just uninstalled it. Here are my two cents:

    - Poor optimization for pc: slightly larger maps (roughly half of all the maps) lag intolerably for minutes on end. And yes, my system (decent i5, 32 Gb of Ram, SSD, Radeon R9 290) should be able to handle the game easily. Hell, all the other games (including the new Wolfenstein) do. When the lag settles (about five minutes in) the game is almost over. The lag never goes away completely, it just becomes less of an issue. At the start, it’s like wading through mud. In an iron suit. Turn shaders on (an in-game video setting) and you’re lag free. But in that case most maps won’t load. At all. Pick your favorite option. Rinse and repeat.

    - Poor optimization for pc: the lag compensation is laughable. The faster your connection, the more you will die. According to the killcam, you might even die standing up when you’re actually prone. Or die while in cover, when killcam shows you in the open. Et cetera.

    - Bad anti-cheat (if any). There are cheaters. Period.

    - Small maps: the map may look big at first, but they aren’t really. You move so fast this time around (thanks to the exo suit), even the larger maps take seconds to cross. That is, if you can overcome the ever present lag.

    - Unbalanced guns: the laser guns require no aim. Whatsoever. Say ‘bye’ to skill.

    - Poor patching choices. Instead of fixing (or even addressing) the lag issues, the developers decided to tweak some guns. I can live with that, since the balance was not all that great. So what they did, was make lasers stronger. That’s right, the already overpowered, no aim needed gun was made even stronger than it was in the first place. Now all pre-teens really have to use them.

    - Controllers are allowed on the pc. They have auto aim. Which sort of defeats the purpose of skill based shooters.

    - Because controllers are allowed, pitch and aim (turn-speed) are adjustable, not in game, but in the configuration. On many maps you will see people constantly doing 1260’s in the air, while they quickscope anything bigger than a flea with amazing ease. I wonder if that was supposed to happen.

    - You will get shot in the back. A lot. Sure; flanking has always been a valid tactic, but this time around, because of the extremely fast movement, the ability to do all kind of jumps (exo suit) and the poor map design (did I mention they are small?) most one on one gunfights end by being shot in the back. Not by the player you were fighting, but by someone else entirely. This accounts for about 60-75% of all the kills.

    - And, lastly, there are no dedicated servers.

    That’s about it. Try for yourself. Maybe you will like it. I did not.    … Expand
  13. KurtCobain67
    Nov 9, 2014
    2
    Let me start off by saying that I already knew that this was going to be bad. Like, 4/10 bad. It turns out that this game managed to disappoint me further than that! Same garbage, no-skill game play with slightly different graphics that I can't even say have improved, same glitchy, buggy, laggy game play including things such as bullets following you around corners on your screen, but onLet me start off by saying that I already knew that this was going to be bad. Like, 4/10 bad. It turns out that this game managed to disappoint me further than that! Same garbage, no-skill game play with slightly different graphics that I can't even say have improved, same glitchy, buggy, laggy game play including things such as bullets following you around corners on your screen, but on the player's screen who killed you, you weren't around the corner yet. Even with multiplayer being the primary focus of this game, like every other recent Call of Duty title, (because we all know no ***** are given about CoD campaign) the multiplayer game play is highly disappointing. People will never learn that the CoD series has become a re-release of the previous games with mediocre additions and a futuristic twist that gets more exaggerated each time. Don't be one of those people. Don't let these idiots steal your money from you and go spend your $60 on something useful/meaningful such as a gift for your girlfriend/wife/mother.… Expand
  14. Str1ker
    Nov 9, 2014
    0
    Ghost was so bad i was thinking is not humanly possible to create and publish such a bad game again.
    boy i was wrong. Is not just bad on PC and not because of the cheaters on day 1, is also bad on every console! ps3 and xbox 360 suffers more then xbox one and ps4. Even do i dont see why? Is old game, a decade old engine...GTA V looks amazing and works amazing on those consoles. High    Ghost was so bad i was thinking is not humanly possible to create and publish such a bad game again.
    boy i was wrong. Is not just bad on PC and not because of the cheaters on day 1, is also bad on every console! ps3 and xbox 360 suffers more then xbox one and ps4. Even do i dont see why? Is old game, a decade old engine...GTA V looks amazing and works amazing on those consoles. High end PC like mine run out of memory. mmm OK. internet wired 100/50mbps i lag and stutter every single match. Thank god Far cry 4 coming out in 10 days, and this BS of a game will be forgotten.

    Dedicated servers coming? from where Oompa Loompa land?    … Expand
  15. technofan21
    Nov 10, 2014
    3
    To begin, I wanted to like this game. I haven't played the multiplayer, so I'll leave that out of the review. Personally, I feel that one can judge the quality of any FPS game by playing the story/campaign mode. Technically, this is just one big demo for the game itself, and the developers have to please customer as much as possible.

    In some ways, I felt that Ghosts was the correct    To begin, I wanted to like this game. I haven't played the multiplayer, so I'll leave that out of the review. Personally, I feel that one can judge the quality of any FPS game by playing the story/campaign mode. Technically, this is just one big demo for the game itself, and the developers have to please customer as much as possible.

    In some ways, I felt that Ghosts was the correct approach for the Call of Duty campaign. There were some really cool parts, some neat guns, and some down right awesome levels like the space mission.

    When I noticed that the game was going to focus around special abilities being used in combat, I again felt like the Call of Duty franchise was taking another large leap forward. However, I was so, so so so so wrong.

    You have all these super OP abilities, and half the time in the campaign you can't even use them. I feel so chained by the will of the programmer in the game that it honestly stopped the intense action packed fun. There were again, like Ghosts, some supremely bada** moments in the game, but they only lasted for a very short period of time. It seemed that each time I was having fun, Sledgehammer would rip that fun right from my hands.

    As far as graphics concerned, they were pretty allright. However, the graphics on characters and faces are absolutely astounding. This, in and of itself, is probably the only thing I like about the game.

    However, especially the way that this game progressed through the "story" mode ( the writing was absolutely tired and predictable) , all in all it felt like I was watching a very droll action film with bad direction. It was a good looking film, but it still just f***ing sucked.    … Expand
  16. Avadon
    Nov 3, 2014
    5
    Technically, the game is well optimized but the multiplayer does suffer from some occasional network stuttering. It's in a far better state than Ghosts though, that's for sure. Single player is as short as always and pretty meh. Gameplay is CoD but slightly faster with some mobility and exosuit techniques, and with a lot of weapons and customization. I think it's appropriate to compare itTechnically, the game is well optimized but the multiplayer does suffer from some occasional network stuttering. It's in a far better state than Ghosts though, that's for sure. Single player is as short as always and pretty meh. Gameplay is CoD but slightly faster with some mobility and exosuit techniques, and with a lot of weapons and customization. I think it's appropriate to compare it to Titanfall now, since that's the direction they are moving in, and I'd say that Titanfall is definitely more fun. CoD:AW does not have as good and memorable map design as Titanfall, movement is much slower, graphics are worse and of course there are no Titans. Also the "parkour" in CoD is quite a bit clunkier than Titanfall's, you will smash into walls constantly while boosting and overall it doesn't feel as cool and organic as Titanfall's. Yes, it has a ton of weapons, but most of them are bad and nobody ever uses them. In conclusion, CoD:AW is a step in the right direction and an improvement in some areas, but I don't expect it will hold my interest any longer than Titanfall since it's overall weaker, and they're essentially charging 100$ for this. It's definitely not worth that amount of money in my opinion.… Expand
  17. Allions
    Feb 22, 2015
    2
    Boght the key for this at 24€. My last COD was MW3 on xbox and i did not like it a lot.
    Anyway... this is a bad copy of titanfall with the COD multuplayer. The single player is BORING, feels the same thing from others CODs. The multiplayer is LAGGY (no dedicated server) always with the NAT problem (damn i play every online game OK and with this i need to do al the mess with my router?)    Boght the key for this at 24€. My last COD was MW3 on xbox and i did not like it a lot.
    Anyway... this is a bad copy of titanfall with the COD multuplayer. The single player is BORING, feels the same thing from others CODs. The multiplayer is LAGGY (no dedicated server) always with the NAT problem (damn i play every online game OK and with this i need to do al the mess with my router?) and not very funny. Many DLC as always with maps and guns... and the price is too high. Anyway i not reccomend them because the game is really bad. In multiplayer everyone only jump to avoid being hit. WTF!?    … Expand
  18. Darleh
    Nov 6, 2014
    0
    Call of Duty 4 was the last GOOD call of duty game. I would definitely not recommend this game to my friends. This is call of duty with jetpacks. Jetpacks were added on very late into game development (due to titanfall).
  19. Nerdy_Dad
    Nov 4, 2014
    4
    The campaign is good but I have to say the graphics are terrible for a next gen title. The multiplayer is again just repackaged with a few different game modes. The jumping around is cool at first but gets old. There are sniper weapons but I have yet to find a spot to use one. Multiplayer is geared towards run and gunners only in my opinion
  20. beladrim
    Nov 18, 2014
    2
    Reskined corridor shooter with a plot that will only appeal does with very low IQ's.

    Same old "PvP" where everyone is its own little rambo rather than going for actualy team play!

    The novolty?

    Kevin Spacey

    Exo suit that.... Doesn't do anything?

    Jet packs....

    Why do people still buy this crap?
  21. payne4evr
    Nov 9, 2014
    0
    Garbage. Play Battlefield 2142.. still leagues ahead of this game. This is garbage. Just a money sink. Activision just wants your money again.. it's that time of the year to harvest the cash from the dummies.. for something you'll just end up dropping in a couple weeks, once you discover there isn't really much else to the game... thank god for gamefly. not worth an investment. Look atGarbage. Play Battlefield 2142.. still leagues ahead of this game. This is garbage. Just a money sink. Activision just wants your money again.. it's that time of the year to harvest the cash from the dummies.. for something you'll just end up dropping in a couple weeks, once you discover there isn't really much else to the game... thank god for gamefly. not worth an investment. Look at IGN's review.. These guys can't be trusted anymore.. All of these big sites getting paid big bucks to pad their reviews.. They gave this game 9.1.. and if you think that's credible.. Look back to their review of ghosts.... which we all can admit was complete utter garbage... especially the squads mode. Ghosts got an 8.8? Serious? .3 difference between crap and a supposedly perfect game? i liked black ops 2 better.. and even it was not without fault.. just not as **** as ghosts. it's just hype to sucker you in because once you pay, you ain't gettin yer money back.. Time to do that thing people forgot how to do.. boycott.. The all-mighty dollar speaks volumes.. settle for crap and they'll keep u satisfied.. Time to say no.. Make a statement and they might actually listen. we need to make a law that allows returns for garbage.. 2 weeks is plenty.. if you can't enjoy a game for more than 2 weeks.. send that **** back for a full refund.. it would change the industry. fyi, not condoning battlefield.. their games are becoming garbage, too.. just a shame they didn't take 2142 further... enough of my rant.. do what u want.. but only you will have to regret it.… Expand
  22. Ireland914
    Dec 17, 2014
    7
    This is the most innovative Call of Duty title in years. It plays like a classic arena shooter which is a nice change to the usual gameplay. The graphics are decent and the single player aspect is pretty enjoyable if that's what you're interested in. I buy COD games solely for the multiplayer portion and in this title, I was not disappointed.

    The reason I refrain from giving this game a    This is the most innovative Call of Duty title in years. It plays like a classic arena shooter which is a nice change to the usual gameplay. The graphics are decent and the single player aspect is pretty enjoyable if that's what you're interested in. I buy COD games solely for the multiplayer portion and in this title, I was not disappointed.

    The reason I refrain from giving this game a higher rating is due to the terrible launch it had. Sadly, this is expected for blockbuster titles these days and I find it unacceptable. Performance on launch was horrendous and the lack of dedicated servers is a joke. Poor optimization at time of launch and a missing server browser held this game back from being amazing.    … Expand
  23. the-epikninja
    Dec 17, 2014
    7
    Leaving out the biased comments aside. Everyone, please stop exercising your bigotry and try to make an attempt to play the game before criticizing it's value. I have played the Battlefield franchise for years, which I lean more towards to because of my personal preference when it comes to simulating warfare.

    Thanks to the Steam sale, I was able to give AW a go without hesitation, I    Leaving out the biased comments aside. Everyone, please stop exercising your bigotry and try to make an attempt to play the game before criticizing it's value. I have played the Battlefield franchise for years, which I lean more towards to because of my personal preference when it comes to simulating warfare.

    Thanks to the Steam sale, I was able to give AW a go without hesitation, I admit that I was intrigued when I saw the trailer. Bought it at a lower price to set my expectations and never looked back.

    Honestly, this is coming from a Battlefield 4 player. Advanced Warfare looked absolutely breathtaking with all the fancy DirectX 11 features like Bokeh DOF, Spacial Bloom, Tessellation, NVIDIA exclusive HBAO+ AO, TXAA Anti-Aliasing and Volumetric Rays.
    Supersampling is also an option which I've enjoyed using without much impact on performance.
    Overall, despite the awful plot and tedious linear gameplay on top of its apathetic expositions. Almost forgot to mention the ancient peer to peer multiplayer hosting. AW is a must buy for most seasoned veterans of both franchises.

    7.5/10 Singeplayer
    6/10 Multiplayer    … Expand
  24. Horridus
    Nov 12, 2014
    5
    Decent single player campaign but too short about 4 hours , but action packed and one of the better call of duty single player campaign in the last few years.

    Graphics is a strange feeling , half of the game looks really good like the weapons, faces, lights and smoke , but the other half like background, water and houses looks like i am playing a PS2 game 10 yeas ago ! Activison    Decent single player campaign but too short about 4 hours , but action packed and one of the better call of duty single player campaign in the last few years.

    Graphics is a strange feeling , half of the game looks really good like the weapons, faces, lights and smoke , but the other half like background, water and houses looks like i am playing a PS2 game 10 yeas ago !

    Activison doesnt want to pay for a new graphics engine ??

    The multiplayer portion of the game is really crap, seriously it is just a tiny bit better than cod ghost.
    there are allready hackers , and the gun damage is strangely random, huge lag spikes and the fastest leveling system in the world...

    So i am left with a 50/50 experience , the single player is allright but too short and the multiplayer
    is ****

    so i feel like Activision is really milking the cow with the lastest cod titles and thats really sad because there is potential if the programmers didnt felt rushed, maybe release a new cod game every 2 years instead of these half hearted games.    … Expand
  25. TAFM17
    Dec 28, 2014
    0
    Just...Just no. £30 on this piece of crap. It's the same as ALL the other call of duty games, with sub-par graphics for the ps4, and for some reason the game just freezes when in mid-battle! It really is a bad game. DO NOT BUY THIS! .Well, there is a 4 hour campaign (!) , so nothing to talk about there, and the online is just bad.It's a copy and paste generic shooter, but you can doubleJust...Just no. £30 on this piece of crap. It's the same as ALL the other call of duty games, with sub-par graphics for the ps4, and for some reason the game just freezes when in mid-battle! It really is a bad game. DO NOT BUY THIS! .Well, there is a 4 hour campaign (!) , so nothing to talk about there, and the online is just bad.It's a copy and paste generic shooter, but you can double jump and run faster sometimes.So disappointed… Expand
  26. flyingpinguinz
    Nov 11, 2014
    2
    Honestly, this game is fun. It's like call of duty, with a little more mobility. But it is a call of duty game. Don't expect counter strike physics or anything. HOWEVER, this game is also upsetting .The graphics are bad. Just, awful. I'm running SLI GTX 780's. On ultra settings. At 1440p resolution. And the game still looks like I'm playing it on the Xbox One. Stupid. OH. And NO DEDICATEDHonestly, this game is fun. It's like call of duty, with a little more mobility. But it is a call of duty game. Don't expect counter strike physics or anything. HOWEVER, this game is also upsetting .The graphics are bad. Just, awful. I'm running SLI GTX 780's. On ultra settings. At 1440p resolution. And the game still looks like I'm playing it on the Xbox One. Stupid. OH. And NO DEDICATED SERVERS.... This makes the game laggy as all heck about 50% of the time. If these are fixed, the game will be okay. But I still wasted 60 bucks.… Expand
  27. timaloy
    Nov 6, 2014
    2
    mw4 rehash we have here same terrible online lag same graphics issues same old **** different year no support no anything poor effort from sledgehammer
  28. Le__Xenomorph
    Jan 6, 2015
    7
    This is kind of a first impression review. I have played a good 3 hours of the game on Steam. The graphics are amazing, the soundtrack is great, and just overall it is visually beautiful. Not to mention the story (from what I've seen) is much stronger than the other Call of Duty games. The guns are very cool as well and do feel like they are from the future. But where the game's problemsThis is kind of a first impression review. I have played a good 3 hours of the game on Steam. The graphics are amazing, the soundtrack is great, and just overall it is visually beautiful. Not to mention the story (from what I've seen) is much stronger than the other Call of Duty games. The guns are very cool as well and do feel like they are from the future. But where the game's problems lie are in its questionable frame-rate drops and its amount of glitches. One of them is the off lip-syncing. I don't know if anyone has this issue, but the lips seem to be a split second behind their voices. Not to mention some murky textures and sometimes, the unresponsive controls. Overall, the controls are good, but sometimes when i double-jump, my character doesn't respond to it. I see a great potential for this game as long as they have dedicated servers for the multiplayer. 7/10 (good)… Expand
  29. Camkey666
    Dec 3, 2014
    4
    While this call of duty isn't the worst of the franchise, it dosen't do much different once again, even with the exo suits. In the end they just end up as a way to escape more than anything. Again the game runs on a 10 year game engine and dosen't have any dedicated servers, along with cheap and worthless game mechanics.
  30. iamthewizard2
    Nov 8, 2014
    0
    What an absolute joke of a game! Changing anything in the menus closes and reopens the program making you wait at least a full minute before you can re-enter the game. The graphics are woeful compared to what they were showing in the pre-release gameplay trailers. Never again will I buy from this sh*thouse developer!
  31. fl3shy
    Nov 6, 2014
    5
    I just don't get why people like these games. I haven't played one since Modern Warfare 1- and it really seems like nothing has improved. In fact it feels worse than I remember those games. Slammer maps, less depth in gameplay, story / progression mechanics that lack depth, and laughable tactics / strategy.

    If you enjoy running from set piece to set piece, hiding behind cars as you pick    I just don't get why people like these games. I haven't played one since Modern Warfare 1- and it really seems like nothing has improved. In fact it feels worse than I remember those games. Slammer maps, less depth in gameplay, story / progression mechanics that lack depth, and laughable tactics / strategy.

    If you enjoy running from set piece to set piece, hiding behind cars as you pick off wave after wave of enemies, then this game is for you. If you love pre-scripted quick time events, this game is for you. If you have a hard on for drones, this game is for you. If you have been a COD lover for the last 10 years, this game is for you. Otherwise, there are way better offerings; it's the golden age of PC gaming and we don't have to support this garbage.    … Expand
  32. meediocre
    Nov 18, 2014
    6
    The Crysis games, and more recently the latest Wolfenstein, are all far more enjoyable FPS experiences, with better story and gunplay. Too much of the SP campaign in Advanced Warfare is (to be expected), on rails bombastic action. It's the first COD I've played since MW2, and I can honestly say that despite an upgrade in visuals, everything is still too much like sitting on a fairgroundThe Crysis games, and more recently the latest Wolfenstein, are all far more enjoyable FPS experiences, with better story and gunplay. Too much of the SP campaign in Advanced Warfare is (to be expected), on rails bombastic action. It's the first COD I've played since MW2, and I can honestly say that despite an upgrade in visuals, everything is still too much like sitting on a fairground ride, playing whack-a-mole and creeping forward. The exo-suit features barely come into play. Still, there is some fun to have here, and some of the levels are exciting enough to make me feel like I hadn't completely wasted my money.… Expand
  33. Saratosa75
    Feb 18, 2015
    4
    I haven't played any CoD game since the original. So count me off, as someone who got sick of the CoD games over the years. Nope. I played BF, BF2, BF3, The last game I've played was "Bad Company 2", which I thought was fun and well made. So I said, what the hell...I'll give it a shot. Bought it with a big discount (50% off) and see what's the fuss is all about.
    So....I think, there    I haven't played any CoD game since the original. So count me off, as someone who got sick of the CoD games over the years. Nope. I played BF, BF2, BF3, The last game I've played was "Bad Company 2", which I thought was fun and well made. So I said, what the hell...I'll give it a shot. Bought it with a big discount (50% off) and see what's the fuss is all about.
    So....I think, there isn't much changed since the original CoD. Sure the graphics look better, but damn, this game is old! The way it plays is just so same like 10 years ago! They seem to be unable to innovate? Why is this still small claustrophobic maps, while the single player is a tunnel shooter? Predetermined paths and scripted events, dumb AI. I thought we were over this a long time ago!
    Graphics is one thing, but for c-st sake..innovate something already! I can't even imagine, that all the incarnations of this game over the years (I can't even count the CoD titles I skipped over the years) and - apparently- it's still the same? People need to stop buying this, because in the corporate gaming world, your wallet is your vote. Please do not spend money on this series, the developers and the distributor needs to get a clear message, that it's time to move on!    … Expand
  34. Orderan
    Dec 29, 2014
    4
    I don't know if this game can be called titanfall 1.5 (since it has more content in term of weapons) or titanfall beta (since the exo armor gameplay is less exploited).

    I am not going to going to talk about the fact that activision promised dedicated servers, giving a picture of a guy giving the finger would have been less straightforward than doing that. For the rest, it's still    I don't know if this game can be called titanfall 1.5 (since it has more content in term of weapons) or titanfall beta (since the exo armor gameplay is less exploited).

    I am not going to going to talk about the fact that activision promised dedicated servers, giving a picture of a guy giving the finger would have been less straightforward than doing that.

    For the rest, it's still Call Of Duty. The same graphic engine pushed even as it is writhing in pain on the floor agonizing. The same "shot-take cover-watch your allies discuss how screwed you are" campaign.The same gameplay of chosing the sames guns with different models that have been there for 10 years ,then rush into a deathmatch to have fun with your killstreak, etcaetera...

    Something that evolved so little (and not enough often in a good way) that if you have already a title from MW2 onward into your library, you should reconsider if Advanced Warfare is worth it)    … Expand
  35. NutZdk
    Jan 10, 2015
    0
    Im gonna review the multiplayer only here, singleplayer might be good - but who the hell buys this for the singleplayer?
    No dedicated servers like usual, a big fat lie from the devs saying we will get them as usual.
    Performance issues, hit detection issues, lag issues - superlong load times that will sometimes just lock up and have you sit and watch your monitor till it times out 5-10    Im gonna review the multiplayer only here, singleplayer might be good - but who the hell buys this for the singleplayer?
    No dedicated servers like usual, a big fat lie from the devs saying we will get them as usual.
    Performance issues, hit detection issues, lag issues - superlong load times that will sometimes just lock up and have you sit and watch your monitor till it times out 5-10 minutes later without a chance to cancel it.
    The whole thing just feels lazy and it stinks a developer that doesnt give a **** about their game or their craft.
    The issues is killing the game and the devs are adding gamemodes and double exp - they clearly dont give a **** ... and why should they, come October/November and we have another set of devs that feed us the same bull**** and made up lies about their game.    … Expand
  36. regimechange
    Dec 27, 2014
    3
    A decent revamp of an already tired series. The new gadgets and tricks for more mobility help some with the multiplayer quality, but its nothing I haven't seen done better in other games before. 3/10 for effort.

    Also, still no dedicated servers, and the game is so unoptimized its ridiculous. I can play Ryse: Son of Rome on max but not CODAW?
  37. Shekky
    Nov 3, 2016
    0
    Terrible game. Futuristic shooter is unrealistic and not at all what I would be want. I miss the realism of previous call of duty games. Black Ops 1, Modern Warfare 2, Cod 4 are all games activision really needs to get back too.
  38. Banhammer0
    Nov 26, 2014
    6
    If Black Ops 2 and Titanfall had a baby it would be Advanced Warfare.
    You have almost the same (no wallrun sadly) moves available but with all the mechanics and style of CoD.
    Pros: - Exo-moves are fun - Optimization is very good for a CoD game, equal to BLOPS 2 - Create-a-class in this CoD is the best so far - Crates dropping weapon variants and clothing for your character is a fun    If Black Ops 2 and Titanfall had a baby it would be Advanced Warfare.
    You have almost the same (no wallrun sadly) moves available but with all the mechanics and style of CoD.
    Pros:
    - Exo-moves are fun
    - Optimization is very good for a CoD game, equal to BLOPS 2
    - Create-a-class in this CoD is the best so far
    - Crates dropping weapon variants and clothing for your character is a fun addition
    Unfortunately this CoD has some major issues
    Cons:
    - Kill streaks are the LEAST FUN in any CoD game released so far (very hard to get and just...weak)
    - CHEATERS !!!!! Those **** 12-year olds who fukd your mom last night are back with a vengeance. Not as bad as MW 3 but enough to make me sick of playing it.
    - Item progression is kinda bad, some challenges required for certain attachments and camoes are very grindy, and there is no reason for it

    Not a bad CoD title but I may go back to BLOPS 2 after a while, killstreaks ruin it for me. This CoD is just not nearly as rewarding. 6/10    … Expand
  39. Hseeker25
    Nov 14, 2014
    5
    Campaign is very good but very predictable, multiplayer sadly again with very small boxed map making it even smaller now since you can jump all over, also insta death who shoots first is still in, mechs arent as impressive as titanfall, just average but overal just good for a few hours of boredom.
  40. nwoslave
    Nov 9, 2014
    5
    I rented this game for two days and the following is my impression of it after playing on my ps3.
    there is no way this took three years to make.
    Hard freezes at various moments mainly either in party lobby or in game lobby. 2 second game freezes while shooting and normal movement mic display placement gets in the way of viewing the battlefield because they put it on some 16bit    I rented this game for two days and the following is my impression of it after playing on my ps3.
    there is no way this took three years to make.

    Hard freezes at various moments mainly either in party lobby or in game lobby.
    2 second game freezes while shooting and normal movement
    mic display placement gets in the way of viewing the battlefield because they put it on some 16bit resolution and just outside of center screen.
    slow button response while in party or game lobby
    1. closing after action report
    2. Change load out
    3. While leaving game
    4. Opening supply caches

    Matchmaking clearly is broken. worst lag in any COD game ever and im not using hyperbole.
    game starts feel like you were thrown into it. no more countdown and start at same time.
    no difference in amount of bullets it takes to die in HC and Core modes
    takes almost 30 seconds for the find game button to display and allow searching
    gun fx sounds are flat and no difference between them.
    There is little to no recoil in the guns.
    lack of guns.
    some op guns.
    perks are stupid. you will run a couple of them for all ten setups.
    almost all exo perks are useless and do not power back up in the event you can survive insta-kills after using up all the energy it takes to use them.
    new items and the gun pictures take forever to display
    customization items with time limits are stupid
    colors are flat and muted, no one can be seen even on the brightest maps.
    maps are decent and small definitely more chaotic with people able to jump up behind you.
    campers are far and few between.
    re-spawn has a limbo mode where you’re not really spawned but in some spectator mode while playing CORE mode.
    QS is still around

    i highly suggest renting first. DO NOT SPEND MONEY ON THIS GAME UPFRONT.
    i would have given it a lower score but i think the jetpacks are good addition and provide a new dynamic to the game.    … Expand
  41. Garfoodle
    Nov 22, 2014
    6
    Its not bad, nor is it good. It works on PC, is fun, in that CoD sort of way, has good facial animations and Kevin Spacey. While it wont change your outlook on CoD, its still enjoyable for those who are into this kind of game.
  42. InsaneLaserPT
    Apr 18, 2015
    7
    7/10
    The game is not bad but there are some things that really suck in this game:
    -Only some guns are good (ASM1, Bal-27)
    -Exos are really crap after some time.
    -Some connection problems.
  43. horrorreviews
    Nov 15, 2014
    7
    Although this game looked and appeared to be a lot better than its predecessors, COD AW is unfortunately just a next gen re skin of the same garbage we've been getting for years now. Its sad how so many game companies think improved visuals and a few new mechanics is enough. That aside, this was actually a fun game to play. The futuristic stuff was done much better than in blops2 and theAlthough this game looked and appeared to be a lot better than its predecessors, COD AW is unfortunately just a next gen re skin of the same garbage we've been getting for years now. Its sad how so many game companies think improved visuals and a few new mechanics is enough. That aside, this was actually a fun game to play. The futuristic stuff was done much better than in blops2 and the new survivor mode is surprisingly fun. Still the underlying mechanics are the same and and multiplayer is still the same old thing. Definitely the best COD in years but that may simply be due to its optimization for next gen and is still not enough to resurrect the series.… Expand
  44. tormentor55
    Nov 11, 2014
    5
    COD Advanced Warfare is better than ghosts. it really is, but you can't get worse than ghosts. Whenever I look at the game I see Titanfall and black-light Retribution written all over it. While black light is a mixed bag, it's freemium model becomes tolerable after the 5 dollar pass. (which i mentioned in my review for the ps4 port.) PC people should rejoice since the freemium on the PCCOD Advanced Warfare is better than ghosts. it really is, but you can't get worse than ghosts. Whenever I look at the game I see Titanfall and black-light Retribution written all over it. While black light is a mixed bag, it's freemium model becomes tolerable after the 5 dollar pass. (which i mentioned in my review for the ps4 port.) PC people should rejoice since the freemium on the PC version is only for skins and doesn't require 5 bucks. Better to spend 5 bucks on black light for ps4 or free on PC. (plus since black-light is free, no PS plus required.) The cost for COD AW: $60(actual game) $50-$60(PS plus) and more money for DLC.
    Cost for Black light: $0(To play) $5(To unlock guns permanently, one time fee, free on PC.) $0 (For multiplayer fees).
    I understand that this review is mentioning black-light a lot but that's what AW is essentially a $60 dollar Black light, Titanfall and Crysis with the crappy Call of Duty repetition. AW isn't as **** as people say it is. It's just not worth the price considering how the final product compares to the hype and their are superior alternatives that either cost the same or are cheaper. EX: Battlefield.
    AW is closest to fresh air that the franchise has gotten in MW2. the problem is that it's not fresh enough.    … Expand
  45. bvenjamin
    Dec 17, 2014
    5
    I haven't played this game but it seems my review will be as informative as all the ones already uploaded.

    upvote if u never want to see a useful review again
  46. wtfskilz
    Dec 5, 2014
    8
    Well the game Performance is better then on any of the former COD games,
    not too much CPU bottle neck and the graphics were looking very well.
    the game has many different futures compared to the last COD games. new weapons and upgrade options. Cons: You can't skip cut scenes and every time you make one graphic change it will replay the cut scene and reload the map, so if you have a    Well the game Performance is better then on any of the former COD games,
    not too much CPU bottle neck and the graphics were looking very well.
    the game has many different futures compared to the last COD games.
    new weapons and upgrade options.
    Cons: You can't skip cut scenes and every time you make one graphic change it will replay the cut scene and reload the map, so if you have a graphic issue, like texture tearing due to a setting called sun/spot shadow rendering. Well it took me about 20 minutes to find which setting was causing the issue.
    This game has issues with playing cut scenes the audio is delayed by 500MS, even if you use the setting to load map after the cut scenes.    … Expand
  47. global_1995
    Jan 1, 2015
    5
    garbage game, not too many things i can control in the game that we should be able to, its like theyre teasing us, keep on getting "loading" in the middle of intense scenes, not very realistic, good graphics horrible recticles and dont ever get back up from my "team" in campaign. i thought call of duty wouldve stepped it up
  48. UnOffical
    Jan 24, 2015
    6
    The call of duty series has always been a strange one. Call of duty 4 was brilliant, and was (in my personal opinion) one of the best COD games ever made. MW2 was highly anticipated, and did an OK job at expanding the story line and improving multiplayer by a considerable amount. One of the first "Off topic" call of duty games was World At War, which changed the whole way COD was played.The call of duty series has always been a strange one. Call of duty 4 was brilliant, and was (in my personal opinion) one of the best COD games ever made. MW2 was highly anticipated, and did an OK job at expanding the story line and improving multiplayer by a considerable amount. One of the first "Off topic" call of duty games was World At War, which changed the whole way COD was played. Advanced warfare is a modern World at war. It has drastically changed the way COD is played, in good (and bad) ways. Many people have became highly critical of this game due to it's new features. Because of this, AW has developed a sort of "Love/Hate" Relationship with its fans. I think that sledgehammer took a huge risk with this game- which was unexpected, due most cod games being the same thing, but with different things in them. Call of duty is a lot like a sandwich. The concept is the bread, and the series/title is the filling. The bread stays the same, but the filling changes. They have changed the bread to flatbread for this game.
    The campaign lacks replay ability. It's very short too. Engine is very old, and it's turning into titanfall.
    If you're a die hard COD fan and you have the money spare, this is a decent buy. If you've never played COD games before, give this one a miss- it's nothing like its predecessors.    … Expand
  49. AHMEDXtreme
    Feb 19, 2015
    0
    This game is just a BS*t and S*ks to the end . nothing new were added and if you,re trying to have a good match you wont cause of its sick methods however they,re trying to show show new features but they fail and so that this game doesn't deserve any money . stupid game
  50. alexalexalexale
    Mar 28, 2015
    7
    Finaly somethink new and fresh this doesnt save the series forever but it is a step in the right direction
    just hope the next one is better that would be awesome
  51. born28
    Sep 18, 2015
    4
    When this game isn't lagging its full of kids and full grown men with family's hacking it to bits. Snapping from one head shot to the next head shot, don't get me wrong there's fun to be had if you can avoid the lag and hackers good luck doing both!
  52. ucin97
    Oct 22, 2015
    0
    es puta mierda, por que ........por que si viendo que la pagina es puta mierda tambien. puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda putaes puta mierda, por que ........por que si viendo que la pagina es puta mierda tambien. puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda. Posdata; puta mierda de juego, basura inmunda, los locust de gears of war se limpian el culo lleno de callos con las caratulas del juego. Bazofia inmunda nacida del seno de activision,… Expand
  53. Sir_Swag117
    Jan 19, 2016
    0
    We need to make a video-game version of the Geneva Convention, before games like this spread and corrupt the Master Race. We must contain the disease.
  54. ultimadwarf
    Dec 11, 2014
    4
    Great gameplay, really different and interesting style. Horrible PC port.

    I have 8GB 1600Mhz RAM, an i5 4570 and an OCd 280X and can barely play this game on lowest settings at 720p. Horribly optimized.
  55. frankie-Z
    Dec 12, 2014
    0
    poor performance , there is no reason besides just not caring about the consumer that a game of this caliber should run so poorly on a PC , the continued lack of dedicated servers for MP is another reason to stay clear of this mess
  56. faceless-1
    Nov 24, 2014
    2
    This game got broken multiplayer. It fails to find games and you have to edit config to even work and even then its lag fest. The single player is super short and average at best.
  57. Tubey
    Nov 5, 2014
    7
    It's... good! I didn't buy it because, you know, Call of Duty and I'm not an idiot, but I played it on a friends machine and was pleasantly surprised.

    It's not great, don't get me wrong. The campaign is as per usual worthless, but the added mobility in movement in multiplayer has completely refreshed the gunplay experience and if you set aside any prior hatred of the CoD franchise    It's... good! I didn't buy it because, you know, Call of Duty and I'm not an idiot, but I played it on a friends machine and was pleasantly surprised.

    It's not great, don't get me wrong. The campaign is as per usual worthless, but the added mobility in movement in multiplayer has completely refreshed the gunplay experience and if you set aside any prior hatred of the CoD franchise (which I certainly had, Ghosts was absolutely dreadful and CoD came to represent EVERYTHING bad about AAA titles) and treat it as a standalone title on its' own merits, then you'll have fun here.

    Is it Game of the Year material? Nope. But it was never going to be. What it is is a decent gunner that will provide good old fashioned fun for those who dip in, especially thanks to the wide range of customisation and levelling options and variety of weaponry.    … Expand
  58. Jetpil0t
    Nov 7, 2014
    6
    The absence of dedicated servers on PC once again makes this yet another multiplayer disappointment. This is by the far the single biggest reason to avoid this game on the PC on principle and in practice.
    The single player I found to be typically derivative from previous titles in it's level design and story (so expect nothing new here) however this time however it has included (and to a    The absence of dedicated servers on PC once again makes this yet another multiplayer disappointment. This is by the far the single biggest reason to avoid this game on the PC on principle and in practice.
    The single player I found to be typically derivative from previous titles in it's level design and story (so expect nothing new here) however this time however it has included (and to a much more subdued extent) mechanics borrowed from other shooters. These additional mechanics offer very minor, but welcome improvements to the single player gameplay overall, but you could play the respective source material and enjoy these various mechanics to a much fuller extent through significantly better single player experiences, so there implementation here with no real innovation doesn't feel worth while overall.
    Visually it looks superior to Ghosts, but by about as much as each COD game generally improves visuals every year. Certainly the visuals put on show in the trailers are from pre-rendered cut scenes, which look significantly better than the game play, even maxed out on PC, which is fairly misleading.
    It does however run significantly better and comes with plenty of quality settings, which is a welcome change.
    Many reviewers have touted these improvements to really freshen up the series, however this is only because the series suffered from extremely derivative and repetitive content for so many years. On it's own it is the iterative improvement each new installment should be, but offers nothing revolutionary like United Offensive or Modern Warfare did back in the series prime.
    This game sits above many of the series worst entries, but falls significantly shorter of the series highs.
    I wouldn't recommend this on PC if you are interested in the multiplayer, you don't have any dedicated servers and so much like Ghosts the community will be next to nonexistent in only a few months. I wouldn't recommend the single player on it's own especially for the full retail price. If you are interested in what's here, Crysis Warhead is very similar and significantly more enjoyable and well made single player game and it also has the advantage of looking better than Advanced Warfare, despite it's age.
    Overall I wouldn't recommend this installment, the lack of dedicated servers and ho-hum single player do nothing to justify the price or stand out from the last few installments overall.
    Perhaps a return to WW2 that focuses on core mechanics is what the series needs to really deliver once again. Or perhaps it's finished and it's time to move onto other more innovative franchises, only time will tell.
    6/10    … Expand
  59. EmadIV
    Nov 3, 2014
    0
    Excellent title on the PC. Best COD imo since MW2 - maps are brilliant, new mechanics feel fresh, and the whole game runs like a charm. Highly recommended.
  60. akuustik
    Nov 3, 2014
    10
    I have tried the multiplayer, outstanding graphics and performance. As I thought the graphics are similar to Black Ops series and I like it. Ghosts was disaster, this changes everything, realy.
  61. fFatboy
    Nov 15, 2014
    9
    AW is one kof the best games ever made. graphically, technically and in it's ambition, its immense. To me it's a easily a 9 out of 10. Learning curve for multiplayer is steep but it allows you to use your brain once you get the hang of it.

    The people that score AAA games like this a 0,1,2 or 3 out of 10 are abusing the privilege of expressing their opinion. 6 out of 10 is a bad game    AW is one kof the best games ever made. graphically, technically and in it's ambition, its immense. To me it's a easily a 9 out of 10. Learning curve for multiplayer is steep but it allows you to use your brain once you get the hang of it.

    The people that score AAA games like this a 0,1,2 or 3 out of 10 are abusing the privilege of expressing their opinion. 6 out of 10 is a bad game these days and probably not worth buying. To score a game 0 it would have to crash at the menus every time you inserted the disc and then literally eject itself and try to decapitate you!

    Not sure where this desire to online hate manifests from. The impotent rage in some of the user reviews frustrates me but I suppose we can only accept it as a phenomenon of the technological age and not fall into the trap of hating as a response.    … Expand
  62. DrugsMeazureTim
    Dec 23, 2014
    8
    this game renewed the cod franchise. despite the short single player. the engine now have been changed. despite that on normal graphics it looks bad. ye my video card is gtx 660
    cod seen awful days since mw3 and ghosts. and then this one arrived. with a new fresh thing. the best cod since mw2 without a doubt. the singleplayer was short but fun overall. hit detection is now better. no    this game renewed the cod franchise. despite the short single player. the engine now have been changed. despite that on normal graphics it looks bad. ye my video card is gtx 660
    cod seen awful days since mw3 and ghosts. and then this one arrived. with a new fresh thing. the best cod since mw2 without a doubt. the singleplayer was short but fun overall. hit detection is now better. no trickshoots. no 10 year old kids like in the **** xbox live. i can enjoy it without 10 year old **** or frame rate issues. game is great. i hate activision, but this game made me bit forgive to them    … Expand
  63. Nerocz1
    Dec 8, 2014
    8
    Surprisingly great game. I was playing only single player and this game reminded me my favourite movie Elysium and it´s such a fun to play. Give it a try !!!
  64. VeteranPlayer
    Nov 18, 2014
    8
    Not so bad, the multy is playable, is not like Ghost, here you don't die by whistles.
    The graphics is cinematic and very wonderful, good job sledgehammer
  65. NervzZ
    Nov 3, 2014
    9
    Hello everyone, first of all I'd like to say that it's the first time I ever write a review. I usually don't but now I just had to, why? because it amaze me how many people rate this game 0/10 without having it, or even seeing any gameplay or anything. So here's my review! (and sorry for my bad english).

    I played a few hours, both a bit of multiplayer and singleplayer so my experience    Hello everyone, first of all I'd like to say that it's the first time I ever write a review. I usually don't but now I just had to, why? because it amaze me how many people rate this game 0/10 without having it, or even seeing any gameplay or anything. So here's my review! (and sorry for my bad english).

    I played a few hours, both a bit of multiplayer and singleplayer so my experience in this game isn't very big. I don't usually like call of duty but I had hope in this one because it doesn't seem to be a lame other copy of older cods. I saw some gameplays and trailers and I found the idea of exo skeletons and futuristic theme in call of duty quite promising.
    Of course I was not very confident, it is still a call of duty and it's Activision blabla.... you know the story...
    BUT! It's sledgehammer who did the developpement, a new studio that never did a whole game themselve, so maybe it will be innovative? Here's what my first impressions were:

    Singleplayer: I did not play much and therefor doesn't know much about the campain, i must admit. But the graphics were quite a surprise for me. First I was watching some screenshots of the game and I was like "Damn it must be a bit photoshopped or something" then on my computer I launched the game, near to max settings 1440p and the only things I can say: Amazing, some says that the engine is old and stuff, but really it doesn't seem so. I played the game and I can guarantee that the graphics of this game is really more than acceptable, okay textures, great lightings, really nice animations and good modelisation. The sounds of weapons may still not beat the quality of the latest battlefield but talking about environment sounds, there's a good job done here.
    I'll talk about the gameplay in the multiplayer section. For the plot of the story, I don't know much about it at the moment so I can't really talk about it.

    Multiplayer: I guess that's what you guys want more in this game, multiplayer. So I played a bit, against players and bots (yes there are bots and private game options).
    I'll start with the gameplay: One of the most nervous fps around, of course I can understand it is not the taste of everyone but I quite enjoyed it, maps are well designed, you can jump high and get to some points of the map to gain some visibility or just snipe some people, you can dash down and smash someone, slide, side dashes, etc. Many people say it's a titanfall ripoff, I played titanfall and trust me, it does not feel the same as titanfall at all ( and advanced warfare was already in developpement when titanfall came out so...). It's really fun, but a bit hard to manoevre. For the weapons I haven't tested them all, there are a lot of funny gadgets and weapons, that's all I can say, oh and the melee attack is a huge punch that sends your victim to the skies, if this is not cool, I don't know what is.

    game modes: This game has casual modes and competitive modes (esport) so everyone should be pleased, an accessible game for anybody and a good game to master and play competitively for the veterans.

    Didn't want to read all my review? no problem, here's the good and cons:

    Goods:
    - Good graphics
    - Solid and fast gameplay
    - Maps are a bit more open than in other call of duties (due to mobility)
    - Innovation compared to other call of duties
    Cons:
    - Expensive (ofc)
    - Too fast for some people I guess

    That's all, I initially put 8/10 because it's not an absolute perfect game but it's really good and I'll add a point to make cry all the haters that rates this game so bad without knowing anything so 9/10. (sorry again for my english).    … Expand
  66. Dorby1988
    Nov 4, 2014
    9
    This is a vast improvement over the recent CoD games, especially that last one. CoD has been on the decline for a while and I was losing hope in the series. This is the CoD that fixes almost everything wrong with the previous games. I was never a huge fan of the series since CoD 4, but I find this to be the one that is up to par with CoD4.
    I have been finding the single player to be one    This is a vast improvement over the recent CoD games, especially that last one. CoD has been on the decline for a while and I was losing hope in the series. This is the CoD that fixes almost everything wrong with the previous games. I was never a huge fan of the series since CoD 4, but I find this to be the one that is up to par with CoD4.
    I have been finding the single player to be one of the best in the series, with a great story and characters that are fleshed out. The campaign has a great pace and the addition of the exo suit add so much more mobility to the game with the jet pack and cloak and many other abilities to change things up. The campaign also has a great length, taking about 7 to 8 hours to complete.
    The multiplayer is a huge improvement as well. Feeling so much more fast paced and fluid. With the addition of the exo suit the MP has a much different feeling from the previous games, more in the realm of Quake. Camping is not as much of an issue now since the addition of the exo suit means you have to be quick on your feet to stay alive. Snipers are not as much of an issue now either since they have to be on the move much more now. When choosing your loadout and abilities there is so much more to choose from. The customization choices are vast with so many weapons and abilities to choose from. Even when choosing for score streaks there is abilities that you can add onto the streaks themselves to add even more customization. All in all this is one of the best CoDs in a while. Sledgehammer has rejuvenated a series that was dying.
    CoD AW is also a great PC port, with tons of graphic settings to choose from including PC specific features. It even has a FOV slider for multiplayer that I kind of wish was on the single player as well, but it is not too huge of an issue. This is also a great running game, it usually hovers around 100fps on my 780ti and 144hz monitor with maxed out graphics.    … Expand
  67. Quink666
    Nov 3, 2014
    8
    I am not a hardcore CoD fan but this is by far the best one i have plated uo to date. Awesome graphics on nextgen and PC, Fast fluent game play. Only bad thing is that i completed the Campaign and all Achievment/Trophies in about 13-15 hours. Have played much MP yet so dont know if its good or bad, I usually buy these games because of the single player/COOP. 8/10 easy.
  68. Alan1254
    Nov 3, 2014
    10
    COD:AW is by far one of the best COD game I`ve played. All 3 game modes are fun to play (with a bit of zombies at the end of COOP).

    Like it or not but if game is crashing for you then your PC/Laptop is not good enough to play it and Yes you might get 100 fps on CS:GO but that`s CS:GO not COD. I had no issues with it, getting 60+fps on ultra/max with BETA AMD drivers. If your texture are    COD:AW is by far one of the best COD game I`ve played. All 3 game modes are fun to play (with a bit of zombies at the end of COOP).

    Like it or not but if game is crashing for you then your PC/Laptop is not good enough to play it and Yes you might get 100 fps on CS:GO but that`s CS:GO not COD. I had no issues with it, getting 60+fps on ultra/max with BETA AMD drivers. If your texture are appearing washed out then you need to turn off 2 settings in advance video which makes rendering faster then texture should appear well. Much better PC port then most of the FPS games on release (e.g COD: Ghosts and BF4). This game is worth its price and zombies are coming in DLC because of the trailer at the end of coop.    … Expand
  69. LikeAlaaawt
    Nov 3, 2014
    10
    Those idiots who rated this game 0/10 are idiots who can't afford good internet and a decent computer.
    This game is new, not a copy and paste. I bet half of the people who rated this game bad don't even have this game. The maps are sized of cod ghost maps but it feels like i am playing mw2 !
  70. N00BMUNCHA
    Nov 3, 2014
    9
    Metacritic needs to check the reviews, take note that the only negative review at the time of this review is lowering the score by a long shot and it is completely unjustified.It is giving people a false indication of the games actual would be score without people joking around. THIS IS A REVIEW SITE for people to know if products are worth their money or not. Personally I find that CODMetacritic needs to check the reviews, take note that the only negative review at the time of this review is lowering the score by a long shot and it is completely unjustified.It is giving people a false indication of the games actual would be score without people joking around. THIS IS A REVIEW SITE for people to know if products are worth their money or not. Personally I find that COD has caught up to the modern age of FPS and has finally added something to spice up their much loved but very much repeated gameplay.… Expand
  71. mliecah
    Nov 3, 2014
    9
    This is call of duty. If you are hoping they completely redefined the previous games, you will be disappointed. This plays quite similar to previous call of duty games, but I personally believe that is a good thing. It definitely has some new twists as well, mainly the exosuit, which makes combat even more fast and exciting. This gives players the ability to quickly bail out of a toughThis is call of duty. If you are hoping they completely redefined the previous games, you will be disappointed. This plays quite similar to previous call of duty games, but I personally believe that is a good thing. It definitely has some new twists as well, mainly the exosuit, which makes combat even more fast and exciting. This gives players the ability to quickly bail out of a tough spot, but it really makes the gameplay more frantic in my opinion. I've had no lag or stuttering without touching any of the settings (although max ping by default is 800 like previous CoD games, so you can change that in an ini, which I have not done yet either). I have a i5 4670k and radeon 7870 2g. Game doesn't really LOOK impressive, but it doesn't look any different than ghosts did either. I'd recommend it to fans of the Call of Duty series, or someone looking for a new FPS to play for a little. PC population tends to die out quickly, and I don't doubt it will happen in the next few months for this game as well, but until then it's a pretty enjoyable time waster.… Expand
  72. Raanth
    Nov 3, 2014
    10
    People tend to dismiss this game due to having a new type of play style needed. Actually, this play style is quite unique in its own way thanks to the exo suit. Multiplayer for CoD will always be the same in terms of beating the other team, but AW decided to take the classic play style and amp it up a good notch. Also, classic multiplayer is there for those who do not enjoy the newPeople tend to dismiss this game due to having a new type of play style needed. Actually, this play style is quite unique in its own way thanks to the exo suit. Multiplayer for CoD will always be the same in terms of beating the other team, but AW decided to take the classic play style and amp it up a good notch. Also, classic multiplayer is there for those who do not enjoy the new multiplayer, although this new change does add in some fun qualities you can't find in other shooters.… Expand
  73. jasper6333
    Nov 3, 2014
    10
    well call of duty advanced warfare is in my books one super badass game, The singleplayer is as expected from a call of duty the voice acting is amazing, sounds/music is mediocre but overall the campaing is really fun! Multiplayer is one of the best if not the best multiplayer experience that i have had in a cod. the exo suit enhances the fast pace shooter what just is really fun to playwell call of duty advanced warfare is in my books one super badass game, The singleplayer is as expected from a call of duty the voice acting is amazing, sounds/music is mediocre but overall the campaing is really fun! Multiplayer is one of the best if not the best multiplayer experience that i have had in a cod. the exo suit enhances the fast pace shooter what just is really fun to play and due to all the customisation this multiplayer experience won't get boring after a while! Yea the co-op is a bit off but there are not many people playing the co-op. and if you want some cool co-op stuff in one DLC there will be zombies at least that's what i have heard....

    Best cod in Years

    and if you don't like the exo suits there is a classic playlist s well with exo suits disabled!    … Expand
  74. xbenzi
    Nov 3, 2014
    10
    Much better than Ghosts in every possible way. The game performs well usually getting 90fps constant on my PC. (i7 3770k, GTX680, 16GB ram.) The game has 24 different graphics options and allows you to change fov up to 90. This game is probably the most fast paced in the franchise and I like it. I haven't played a CoD game frequently since MW2 but this looks like it could be the one. ItMuch better than Ghosts in every possible way. The game performs well usually getting 90fps constant on my PC. (i7 3770k, GTX680, 16GB ram.) The game has 24 different graphics options and allows you to change fov up to 90. This game is probably the most fast paced in the franchise and I like it. I haven't played a CoD game frequently since MW2 but this looks like it could be the one. It has taked the best elements from games Crysis and Titanfall creating the Exo Suit. The game looks like it has depth in areas such as character customization, weapons, killstreaks and maps. I have only played the multiplayer and Co-Op. Co-Op involves 4 people fighting waves of soldiers, mechs, drones, etc. Allowing you to get new weapons, upgrade weapons, random killstreak drops and bonus abilities (max ammo etc.) Overall the multiplayer feels great and plays well.… Expand
  75. Sh8de
    Nov 3, 2014
    8
    I am enjoying this game immensely. The exoskeleton mobility adds a new dynamic to firefights in MP and the co-op mode. Game runs VERY well on pc. On a 780ti, 3820 i7 and 16gb of ram I am getting close to 100fps at 2560 * 1600. One of my only gripes would be matchmaking and that's because I'm spoiled from dedicated server browsing but nonetheless a fun game that I will be sinking a lot ofI am enjoying this game immensely. The exoskeleton mobility adds a new dynamic to firefights in MP and the co-op mode. Game runs VERY well on pc. On a 780ti, 3820 i7 and 16gb of ram I am getting close to 100fps at 2560 * 1600. One of my only gripes would be matchmaking and that's because I'm spoiled from dedicated server browsing but nonetheless a fun game that I will be sinking a lot of hours into.… Expand
  76. levelxplane
    Nov 3, 2014
    8
    Haven't played CoD since MW2. Advanced Warfare is enough of the same to feel comfortable, but systems like "Pick 13" and the ExoSuit make the experience feel fresh, provide tons of customization, and gives a stupidly fun game to kill time. Obvious inspiration from TItanfall, but where Respawn failed in delivering a fully loaded Multiplayer and Single player experience, AW succeed.
  77. malekithau
    Nov 3, 2014
    8
    I've played every COD since the original and this rates up there amongst the best. Yes it is still using an old engine and lacks dedicated servers at the moment but apart from that it is a great game. The graphics good even on my 4 year old machine. The cut scenes from the campaign look great. It doesn't have glare, smoke and snow like BF but given the scale of the combat this makes sense.I've played every COD since the original and this rates up there amongst the best. Yes it is still using an old engine and lacks dedicated servers at the moment but apart from that it is a great game. The graphics good even on my 4 year old machine. The cut scenes from the campaign look great. It doesn't have glare, smoke and snow like BF but given the scale of the combat this makes sense. The weapons feel like weapons (10 year infantry veteran here) unlike BF and some recent COD iterations. It reminds me a little of Titanfall which was a really fun game. Speed is about MW2/3 and maps similar in size to those. It's been ages since I played COD as the last few were garbage but I may be hanging around for this one. It's fun and that's really all that matters.… Expand
  78. ChaosSS
    Nov 4, 2014
    9
    Good game. Sledgehammer did a great work for their first product. Mechanics, graphics, storyline, multiplayer mod, all on high level of quality. Some little fellow says "old engine me-me-me, crysis/titanfail me-me-me"
    NOBODY CARES!!! GO TO SCHOOL AND DONT PLAY IT!
    Whining little @#$%es...
  79. Merr
    Nov 10, 2014
    5
    I was sceptic about this CoD. Last CoD, that i bought was Black Ops 1, and this one is pretty good.
    I love this new jumps and so on. I think it's much better than Titanfall which is pretty "slow" game.

    Some preformance problems on my PC(i5 2500k, GTX 770, 8GB RAM), but they are not big problem.
  80. pixilizations
    Nov 10, 2014
    10
    People seriously need to calm down. Is this game revolutionary? No of course it isn't. It's the next COD game. I don't see what all these negative reviews were expecting when they bought the latest **** Call of Duty game, if half of them even bought it. Reviewing things like this doesn't get your point across, Activision isn't going to see your negative reviews and decide "well guys theyPeople seriously need to calm down. Is this game revolutionary? No of course it isn't. It's the next COD game. I don't see what all these negative reviews were expecting when they bought the latest **** Call of Duty game, if half of them even bought it. Reviewing things like this doesn't get your point across, Activision isn't going to see your negative reviews and decide "well guys they got a point - time to stop making the most profitable game in history". While I don't think this game deserves a 10, I think the the overly negative reviews should also "call" for overly positive reviews. The game itself is fun, I got what I paid for - the multiplayer delivers on the already well known COD formula. The campaign is dumb fun - which is how a COD game is meant to be! Not a plot that makes you think too hard but rather an excuse to use some of the new stuff on display. It's a fun game and it's a Call of Duty game - if either of those don't appeal to you don't buy it. It's that simple.… Expand
  81. imAFreakinPanda
    Nov 4, 2014
    10
    I think people just WANT to hate this game. If you want to have fun and are looking for a good experience than buy it. It's surprisingly refreshing. It's a shame that the last few CoDs have ruined the franchise name. Give it another chance.
  82. slicshuter
    Nov 4, 2014
    9
    And once again, the COD hate bandwagon comes flying in. I'm no fanboy, I hated the past few COD games, but for the first time in years, Call of Duty has been revitalised with amazing graphics, a whole new way of playing and it runs perfectly fine, unlike Ghosts.
  83. donnydont
    Nov 4, 2014
    8
    A great move away from CoD Ghosts, the new Titanfall/Crysis-esque mechanics have allowed for a much more fast paced combat system, and some great close up fight action, but they are fairly balanced as they give away your position pretty quickly when you are flying around the map. Graphics are great, some maps are a bit boring but most are great. 8/10 solid fps
  84. SRG-RALLING
    Nov 4, 2014
    9
    Best COD I have played in years with great optimization for pc hardware and a very nice new look compared to older COD games (as in last year lol). Thank god for people not accepting the last two disasters. The game isn't all new thought, nor does it have never before used game mechanics but they are new to COD and it made it fun again. I mean I sat down and I didn't want to get back upBest COD I have played in years with great optimization for pc hardware and a very nice new look compared to older COD games (as in last year lol). Thank god for people not accepting the last two disasters. The game isn't all new thought, nor does it have never before used game mechanics but they are new to COD and it made it fun again. I mean I sat down and I didn't want to get back up and chuck a brick at my monitor for letting me see the pure crap coming from it. This game hooked me with it's Titanfall "like" twitch movement ( not quite as smooth or as free as TF ) and its new level designs allowing for less of a rail shooter "feel" to single player (I say "feel" as SP still is very hand holdy). Although it is not the best story it is still fun to play through with great voice acting and sharp new face capture tech adding depth to a fun box office like action adventure. The gun sounds are odd here and there, but they are from the future so I didn't mind the loud wines and soft pop's that sometimes seem not to fit how weapons look. Over all I have and probably will continue to enjoy this game so I say its a good buy for COD fans.… Expand
  85. Lemke
    Nov 4, 2014
    10
    Best COD in years. The only down point here is the co-op mode. The best thing from many games. Domination mode now is incredible, no more campers. You must run to save the day.
  86. ChiaFetus
    Nov 3, 2014
    9
    I really wish you had to link your steam account, or xbox live/psn account to your metacritic review to prove whether or not you've actually played the game. I stopped playing COD after MW 2, due to it just not being fun anymore. The multiplayer takes some getting used to in this, but overall it's pretty cool. Lots of customization, nice looking graphics (it's not Crysis 3, but it's wayI really wish you had to link your steam account, or xbox live/psn account to your metacritic review to prove whether or not you've actually played the game. I stopped playing COD after MW 2, due to it just not being fun anymore. The multiplayer takes some getting used to in this, but overall it's pretty cool. Lots of customization, nice looking graphics (it's not Crysis 3, but it's way better than previous games). I'm glad to see Kevin Spacey and Troy Baker in this, I haven't gotten too far in SP yet, but I'm liking what I see so far.… Expand
  87. mboner1
    Nov 7, 2014
    10
    Fun game really enjoying it. Would like to re-iterate what another user has said, the game doesnt run on the same old engine and it does have dedicated servers, just no lobby where you can pick from populated games of your choice like bf4, but lets be honest, bf4 is a abortion of a game, i have had more fun in 10 hours of advanced warfare multiplayer than i had in 200 hours of bf4 multiplayer.
  88. saurabh631
    Nov 5, 2014
    9
    completely next gen call of duty game fully packed with power and entertainment.the best fps game of this year so far so go for it its a full fun ride.
  89. Doctor_Gamer14
    Nov 5, 2014
    9
    Campaign was very nice and new. A very ADVANCED story then what ghost gave us. Graphics were great and the way the game played out was great. Multiplayer gave us a new way of playing with the exo suits and the new game modes were enjoyable. A very good recover from Ghost
  90. BugF1x3r
    Nov 8, 2014
    10
    This game is much better than Ghosts and the game-play is faster. However it still plays like the other Call of Duty games but this is not something bad.
  91. friedtofu1992
    Nov 4, 2014
    9
    The people rating this 0s apparently haven't even played the game. This isn't just a new MW with Kevin Spacey and Titanfall-esque jump suits. This is probably one of the greatest iterations of the Modern Warfare series. A great single-player campaign, full of cinematic moments and exciting gameplay(at one point you use a stealth octocopter to take out enemies from a distance, as anThe people rating this 0s apparently haven't even played the game. This isn't just a new MW with Kevin Spacey and Titanfall-esque jump suits. This is probably one of the greatest iterations of the Modern Warfare series. A great single-player campaign, full of cinematic moments and exciting gameplay(at one point you use a stealth octocopter to take out enemies from a distance, as an example). This is probably my favorite Modern Warfare game since COD 2, Sledgehammer has done an amazing job of listening to fans and critics alike to make this one of the most interesting and amazing gaming experiences I've had in the past couple of years. TRY IT FOR YOURSELF BEFORE YOU BASH IT.… Expand
  92. MRCODFREAK24
    Nov 8, 2014
    10
    This game has been the funnest call of duty game since black ops 1, I don't know why everyone is having a sook about it! People complaining about servers, your internet is probably so stop taking it out on the game.
  93. invizo
    Nov 4, 2014
    8
    Ask yourself, what other single player campaigns released in the past 2-3 years, measure up to this stereotypical re-release of a COD? The answer is Bioshock Infinite, Farcry 3, and maybe Metro Last Light.

    The sad fact of the matter is that even though this is a re-release on a proven series, it is still up to par with our very best single player games. To sum up my 9.0/10 -    Ask yourself, what other single player campaigns released in the past 2-3 years, measure up to this stereotypical re-release of a COD? The answer is Bioshock Infinite, Farcry 3, and maybe Metro Last Light.

    The sad fact of the matter is that even though this is a re-release on a proven series, it is still up to par with our very best single player games.

    To sum up my 9.0/10 - Addictive / Engaging / Immersive / Technically Astonishing single player game. Show me a game that made you want to play until the end the way Advanced Warfare did, very few have done it this past decade.

    Multiplayer - FAIR. JUST FAIR FFS.

    I have seen NOTHING here that Titanfall hasn't already done. It might be slightly more polished but 4v4 Competitive is a JOKE, and 12 player maps (6v6) still feel especially week compared to the days of COD:MW1(COD4).

    How many games these days deliver both a Multiplayer and a Singleplayer?
    You can't bash the entire product solely because of the Multiplayer, if you do that we will end up having Online or Offline only and more garbage indie titles occupying the top slots on Metacritic.    … Expand
  94. idohaker
    Jun 1, 2015
    4
    game is boring and exo suits are boring!!!!!! game is boring and exo suits are boring!!!!!! game is boring and exo suits are boring!!!!!! game is boring and exo suits are boring!!!!!!
  95. jst68
    Nov 5, 2014
    8
    Well, the single player mode is probably the best for the past few years. I also like all the new gadgets and the extra mobility. That said the game continue to follow a recognizable design pattern. For example, there is always a stealth level. This time it isn't a ghost level, but merely a run and hide level. Is that really all there is? Somehow the Battlefield series seems toWell, the single player mode is probably the best for the past few years. I also like all the new gadgets and the extra mobility. That said the game continue to follow a recognizable design pattern. For example, there is always a stealth level. This time it isn't a ghost level, but merely a run and hide level. Is that really all there is? Somehow the Battlefield series seems to evolve at a faster pace...
    I don't care much on CoD multiplayer because I pretty much gave up on it years ago. It is just overly populated with 14 year olds which takes away from the play experience. Besides Battlefield multiplayer offers more variety and feels more like an actual team vs team battle. CoD somehow never got there and I am guessing that this is intentional to keep the game simply for the younger audience...
    Anyhow, this is probably the best installment for quite some time.
    $50 for a season path of maps seems to be rip off. Especially, since it really feels like the maps are being extracted from the final game to make an extra bug!    … Expand
  96. worldcitizen19
    Nov 16, 2014
    10
    This finally represents the rebalancing of the Call of Duty franchise. The playing field is now much more level. With all the tools and gadgets a hell of a lot more variety and randomness as well as unpredictability has been introduced into the game making it competitive for all.

    That's what veterans who've dominated the game don't like. They don't like someone else coming along and    This finally represents the rebalancing of the Call of Duty franchise. The playing field is now much more level. With all the tools and gadgets a hell of a lot more variety and randomness as well as unpredictability has been introduced into the game making it competitive for all.

    That's what veterans who've dominated the game don't like. They don't like someone else coming along and whipping their butt because they are more creative. The rules should always make a competitive game not a club of elites who firever dominate. Take snipers. They've dominated for so long. What do they do that's skillful? They just camp and wait with a scope. Where's the skill in that? And if he misses he should be penalised and the advantage go to the opponent. Now the opponent can hunt him down before he gets away so that's more than fair.

    Seeing through walls. This is advanced warfare. We have heat seeking missiles as well as technology which can detect a heat signature so why not use it? This game was very well thought out. Yes it's linear but so are all COD games. It's not Far Cry.

    Another thing is what rig you play it on. This game has awesome graphics, sound and effects but what you get depends on how good your PC is. On my PC and GPU and with surround headphones I get an experience and immersion that makes me feel I'm right there myself. But others with weaker hardware may get a very ordinary experience.

    I'm just loving this and so far it's the best COD I've played. This is definitely a change for the better. New tools, new problems and a whole new game. For the campers and snipers and veterans of previous versions if you're good enough you'll make your mark here to but now you're made to earn it knowing one missed snipe will have a mob of eco suited enemies on your doorstep. You're no longer a protected species and can be hunted and got to as fast as you can flee so the onus on you now is not to miss. Now your skill is really being tested. Anyone can camp and snipe endlessly where nobody can get to them but now you can be gotten to in a flash and thus we hear your moaning and groaning. If you're really good now you're being asked to prove it.    … Expand
  97. Cadder
    Nov 5, 2014
    7
    Solid FPS Game for PC - Interesting singleplayer with FKING KEVIN SPACEY, Good Graphics[ not great, but not as bad as in Ghosts], Game performs quite well on my medium class Laptop [ 80 fps on high settings 1080p in multiplayer], New Mechanics- Exo suits, boosts, Quite Entertaining multiplayer [ Its like 50% COD + 25% Crysis +25% Titanfall]. I was not disappointed with my purchase- I gotSolid FPS Game for PC - Interesting singleplayer with FKING KEVIN SPACEY, Good Graphics[ not great, but not as bad as in Ghosts], Game performs quite well on my medium class Laptop [ 80 fps on high settings 1080p in multiplayer], New Mechanics- Exo suits, boosts, Quite Entertaining multiplayer [ Its like 50% COD + 25% Crysis +25% Titanfall]. I was not disappointed with my purchase- I got more then i expected- If u like FPS games you should at least give the game a look.… Expand
  98. megaD
    Jan 15, 2015
    10
    This game feels like a completely new Call of Duty! The graphics are much better than previously and the sound has been also improved too. The facial animation is astonishing and having Kevin Spacey as a really good actor in the game is awesome. Moreover the game has been bug free on day-1. This is something where Ubisoft and EA I.e. failed lately! Advanced Warfare doesn't have Nvidia-onlyThis game feels like a completely new Call of Duty! The graphics are much better than previously and the sound has been also improved too. The facial animation is astonishing and having Kevin Spacey as a really good actor in the game is awesome. Moreover the game has been bug free on day-1. This is something where Ubisoft and EA I.e. failed lately! Advanced Warfare doesn't have Nvidia-only features anymore either like the non-sense dynamic fur of the dog in Ghosts! Well done Splash Hammer Games!… Expand
  99. strelokk
    Dec 4, 2014
    9
    La campaña sigue teniendo las mismas mecanicas que las ultimas vistas, explosiones, espectacularidad, pasillos, etc...
    Aun con todo, tanto el motor graficos como las voces ayudan a meterse en la historia, y apoyado en el exo es una campaña muy amena de jugar.
    Cosa que no entiendo, esque la personalizacion que teniamos en el BO II se ha visto reducida a elegir que mejoras le ponemos al    La campaña sigue teniendo las mismas mecanicas que las ultimas vistas, explosiones, espectacularidad, pasillos, etc...
    Aun con todo, tanto el motor graficos como las voces ayudan a meterse en la historia, y apoyado en el exo es una campaña muy amena de jugar.
    Cosa que no entiendo, esque la personalizacion que teniamos en el BO II se ha visto reducida a elegir que mejoras le ponemos al exo ( mayor rapidez, mas salud, etc )
    El coop, modo horda, no es modo zombi, pero la verdad, no que quien dijo que habria seguro.... y la verdad comprarse un cod ( 60 pavos ) .... pues nose xDDD
    Decir que esta bien puesto que entre hordas podemos cambiar de armas, perks, las rachas, etc...
    Y pasando al multi, pues que decir, que es el cod mas completo hasta la fecha por muchas razones.

    1º Muchos mapas
    2º Muchos modos, dos nuevos que son muy divertidos ( unlink e iniciativa )
    3º Es el primer cod que permite personalizar esteticamente nuestro soldado, dandonos mas razones para jugar y desbloquear cosas con las que fardar :P
    4º El sistema de clases se ha mejorado mas, pasando de las 10 ranuras de BO II, a 13 ( pudiendonos quitar hasta las rachas )

    En lo puramente tecnico, el sonido normal, ni fu ni fa... Los graficos ( por fin ) es un nuevo motor, no es una revolucion ni mucho menos, pero al menos es de este siglo.
    El problema radica aunque esta bien optimizado, hay algunas opciones graficas que hasta que das con ella te chupa muchos recuros, eso unido al lag que y las congelaciones de pantalla algunas partidas sean un suplicio ( con el ultimo parche esto mejoro un poco ).

    Por ultimo decir que el exo, aporta ( desde mi punto de vista ) frescura y frenetismo a las partidas, cosa que le va de lujo a cualquier COD ( y si te gusto como a mi titanfall, mas todavia )    … Expand
  100. KoneSide
    Nov 13, 2014
    9
    Brilliant game, absolutely stunning for a CoD, I would call this "The new Era of Call of Duty" Exo suits and movements you feel so free and its sooo fast pasted, miles better than Ghosts and graphics matches BF4's, Def A MUST BUY! Best Call of Duty made so far imo (Said from a guy that started with CoD1 and has played every cod)
Page:

Awards & Rankings

85
#85 Best PC Game of 2014
24
#24 Most Discussed PC Game of 2014
59
#59 Most Shared PC Game of 2014

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
78

Generally favorable reviews - based on 18 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 15 out of 18
  2. Mixed: 2 out of 18
  3. Negative: 1 out of 18
  1. CD-Action
    Jan 9, 2015
    85
    This game is a lot of fun. There’s some Crysis in it, some Titanfall, some elements borrowed from Unreal Tournament and Battlefield. Underneath it’s still Call of Duty though, finally modernized in terms of visuals. [13/2014, p.50]
  2. PC PowerPlay
    Dec 23, 2014
    80
    It's the best Call of Duty campaign in years, and the multiplayer continues to scratch a certain itch. [Jan 2015, p.64]
  3. GameWatcher
    Dec 14, 2014
    80
    A new engine and new ideas breath new life into a series that was in serious danger of turning stale.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »