Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare

 PC
User Score
4.9

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 1348 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 436 out of 1348
  2. Mixed: 307 out of 1348
  3. Negative: 605 out of 1348
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. Costs1129
    Nov 3, 2014
    5
    Not horrible... but not that good either. If you liked Ghosts then you will ignore the bad map design, lagging, and monotony of this new title. The only word that keeps coming to mind is "meh." A lot of the new mechanics seem fun at first, until you realize they are almost more of a liability than not. Nothing has changed to drove people away from the corner hugging circle camping thatNot horrible... but not that good either. If you liked Ghosts then you will ignore the bad map design, lagging, and monotony of this new title. The only word that keeps coming to mind is "meh." A lot of the new mechanics seem fun at first, until you realize they are almost more of a liability than not. Nothing has changed to drove people away from the corner hugging circle camping that dominates so many other COD titles. I may consider changing my score as weapon unlocks either reiconfroce this monotony (lowering my score) or overcomes it (raising my score).… Expand
  2. Avadon
    Nov 3, 2014
    5
    Technically, the game is well optimized but the multiplayer does suffer from some occasional network stuttering. It's in a far better state than Ghosts though, that's for sure. Single player is as short as always and pretty meh. Gameplay is CoD but slightly faster with some mobility and exosuit techniques, and with a lot of weapons and customization. I think it's appropriate to compare itTechnically, the game is well optimized but the multiplayer does suffer from some occasional network stuttering. It's in a far better state than Ghosts though, that's for sure. Single player is as short as always and pretty meh. Gameplay is CoD but slightly faster with some mobility and exosuit techniques, and with a lot of weapons and customization. I think it's appropriate to compare it to Titanfall now, since that's the direction they are moving in, and I'd say that Titanfall is definitely more fun. CoD:AW does not have as good and memorable map design as Titanfall, movement is much slower, graphics are worse and of course there are no Titans. Also the "parkour" in CoD is quite a bit clunkier than Titanfall's, you will smash into walls constantly while boosting and overall it doesn't feel as cool and organic as Titanfall's. Yes, it has a ton of weapons, but most of them are bad and nobody ever uses them. In conclusion, CoD:AW is a step in the right direction and an improvement in some areas, but I don't expect it will hold my interest any longer than Titanfall since it's overall weaker, and they're essentially charging 100$ for this. It's definitely not worth that amount of money in my opinion.… Expand
  3. Ireland914
    Dec 17, 2014
    7
    This is the most innovative Call of Duty title in years. It plays like a classic arena shooter which is a nice change to the usual gameplay. The graphics are decent and the single player aspect is pretty enjoyable if that's what you're interested in. I buy COD games solely for the multiplayer portion and in this title, I was not disappointed.

    The reason I refrain from giving this game a    This is the most innovative Call of Duty title in years. It plays like a classic arena shooter which is a nice change to the usual gameplay. The graphics are decent and the single player aspect is pretty enjoyable if that's what you're interested in. I buy COD games solely for the multiplayer portion and in this title, I was not disappointed.

    The reason I refrain from giving this game a higher rating is due to the terrible launch it had. Sadly, this is expected for blockbuster titles these days and I find it unacceptable. Performance on launch was horrendous and the lack of dedicated servers is a joke. Poor optimization at time of launch and a missing server browser held this game back from being amazing.    … Expand
  4. the-epikninja
    Dec 17, 2014
    7
    Leaving out the biased comments aside. Everyone, please stop exercising your bigotry and try to make an attempt to play the game before criticizing it's value. I have played the Battlefield franchise for years, which I lean more towards to because of my personal preference when it comes to simulating warfare.

    Thanks to the Steam sale, I was able to give AW a go without hesitation, I    Leaving out the biased comments aside. Everyone, please stop exercising your bigotry and try to make an attempt to play the game before criticizing it's value. I have played the Battlefield franchise for years, which I lean more towards to because of my personal preference when it comes to simulating warfare.

    Thanks to the Steam sale, I was able to give AW a go without hesitation, I admit that I was intrigued when I saw the trailer. Bought it at a lower price to set my expectations and never looked back.

    Honestly, this is coming from a Battlefield 4 player. Advanced Warfare looked absolutely breathtaking with all the fancy DirectX 11 features like Bokeh DOF, Spacial Bloom, Tessellation, NVIDIA exclusive HBAO+ AO, TXAA Anti-Aliasing and Volumetric Rays.
    Supersampling is also an option which I've enjoyed using without much impact on performance.
    Overall, despite the awful plot and tedious linear gameplay on top of its apathetic expositions. Almost forgot to mention the ancient peer to peer multiplayer hosting. AW is a must buy for most seasoned veterans of both franchises.

    7.5/10 Singeplayer
    6/10 Multiplayer    … Expand
  5. Horridus
    Nov 12, 2014
    5
    Decent single player campaign but too short about 4 hours , but action packed and one of the better call of duty single player campaign in the last few years.

    Graphics is a strange feeling , half of the game looks really good like the weapons, faces, lights and smoke , but the other half like background, water and houses looks like i am playing a PS2 game 10 yeas ago ! Activison    Decent single player campaign but too short about 4 hours , but action packed and one of the better call of duty single player campaign in the last few years.

    Graphics is a strange feeling , half of the game looks really good like the weapons, faces, lights and smoke , but the other half like background, water and houses looks like i am playing a PS2 game 10 yeas ago !

    Activison doesnt want to pay for a new graphics engine ??

    The multiplayer portion of the game is really crap, seriously it is just a tiny bit better than cod ghost.
    there are allready hackers , and the gun damage is strangely random, huge lag spikes and the fastest leveling system in the world...

    So i am left with a 50/50 experience , the single player is allright but too short and the multiplayer
    is ****

    so i feel like Activision is really milking the cow with the lastest cod titles and thats really sad because there is potential if the programmers didnt felt rushed, maybe release a new cod game every 2 years instead of these half hearted games.    … Expand
  6. Le__Xenomorph
    Jan 6, 2015
    7
    This is kind of a first impression review. I have played a good 3 hours of the game on Steam. The graphics are amazing, the soundtrack is great, and just overall it is visually beautiful. Not to mention the story (from what I've seen) is much stronger than the other Call of Duty games. The guns are very cool as well and do feel like they are from the future. But where the game's problemsThis is kind of a first impression review. I have played a good 3 hours of the game on Steam. The graphics are amazing, the soundtrack is great, and just overall it is visually beautiful. Not to mention the story (from what I've seen) is much stronger than the other Call of Duty games. The guns are very cool as well and do feel like they are from the future. But where the game's problems lie are in its questionable frame-rate drops and its amount of glitches. One of them is the off lip-syncing. I don't know if anyone has this issue, but the lips seem to be a split second behind their voices. Not to mention some murky textures and sometimes, the unresponsive controls. Overall, the controls are good, but sometimes when i double-jump, my character doesn't respond to it. I see a great potential for this game as long as they have dedicated servers for the multiplayer. 7/10 (good)… Expand
  7. fl3shy
    Nov 6, 2014
    5
    I just don't get why people like these games. I haven't played one since Modern Warfare 1- and it really seems like nothing has improved. In fact it feels worse than I remember those games. Slammer maps, less depth in gameplay, story / progression mechanics that lack depth, and laughable tactics / strategy.

    If you enjoy running from set piece to set piece, hiding behind cars as you pick    I just don't get why people like these games. I haven't played one since Modern Warfare 1- and it really seems like nothing has improved. In fact it feels worse than I remember those games. Slammer maps, less depth in gameplay, story / progression mechanics that lack depth, and laughable tactics / strategy.

    If you enjoy running from set piece to set piece, hiding behind cars as you pick off wave after wave of enemies, then this game is for you. If you love pre-scripted quick time events, this game is for you. If you have a hard on for drones, this game is for you. If you have been a COD lover for the last 10 years, this game is for you. Otherwise, there are way better offerings; it's the golden age of PC gaming and we don't have to support this garbage.    … Expand
  8. meediocre
    Nov 18, 2014
    6
    The Crysis games, and more recently the latest Wolfenstein, are all far more enjoyable FPS experiences, with better story and gunplay. Too much of the SP campaign in Advanced Warfare is (to be expected), on rails bombastic action. It's the first COD I've played since MW2, and I can honestly say that despite an upgrade in visuals, everything is still too much like sitting on a fairgroundThe Crysis games, and more recently the latest Wolfenstein, are all far more enjoyable FPS experiences, with better story and gunplay. Too much of the SP campaign in Advanced Warfare is (to be expected), on rails bombastic action. It's the first COD I've played since MW2, and I can honestly say that despite an upgrade in visuals, everything is still too much like sitting on a fairground ride, playing whack-a-mole and creeping forward. The exo-suit features barely come into play. Still, there is some fun to have here, and some of the levels are exciting enough to make me feel like I hadn't completely wasted my money.… Expand
  9. Banhammer0
    Nov 26, 2014
    6
    If Black Ops 2 and Titanfall had a baby it would be Advanced Warfare.
    You have almost the same (no wallrun sadly) moves available but with all the mechanics and style of CoD.
    Pros: - Exo-moves are fun - Optimization is very good for a CoD game, equal to BLOPS 2 - Create-a-class in this CoD is the best so far - Crates dropping weapon variants and clothing for your character is a fun    If Black Ops 2 and Titanfall had a baby it would be Advanced Warfare.
    You have almost the same (no wallrun sadly) moves available but with all the mechanics and style of CoD.
    Pros:
    - Exo-moves are fun
    - Optimization is very good for a CoD game, equal to BLOPS 2
    - Create-a-class in this CoD is the best so far
    - Crates dropping weapon variants and clothing for your character is a fun addition
    Unfortunately this CoD has some major issues
    Cons:
    - Kill streaks are the LEAST FUN in any CoD game released so far (very hard to get and just...weak)
    - CHEATERS !!!!! Those **** 12-year olds who fukd your mom last night are back with a vengeance. Not as bad as MW 3 but enough to make me sick of playing it.
    - Item progression is kinda bad, some challenges required for certain attachments and camoes are very grindy, and there is no reason for it

    Not a bad CoD title but I may go back to BLOPS 2 after a while, killstreaks ruin it for me. This CoD is just not nearly as rewarding. 6/10    … Expand
  10. Hseeker25
    Nov 14, 2014
    5
    Campaign is very good but very predictable, multiplayer sadly again with very small boxed map making it even smaller now since you can jump all over, also insta death who shoots first is still in, mechs arent as impressive as titanfall, just average but overal just good for a few hours of boredom.
  11. nwoslave
    Nov 9, 2014
    5
    I rented this game for two days and the following is my impression of it after playing on my ps3.
    there is no way this took three years to make.
    Hard freezes at various moments mainly either in party lobby or in game lobby. 2 second game freezes while shooting and normal movement mic display placement gets in the way of viewing the battlefield because they put it on some 16bit    I rented this game for two days and the following is my impression of it after playing on my ps3.
    there is no way this took three years to make.

    Hard freezes at various moments mainly either in party lobby or in game lobby.
    2 second game freezes while shooting and normal movement
    mic display placement gets in the way of viewing the battlefield because they put it on some 16bit resolution and just outside of center screen.
    slow button response while in party or game lobby
    1. closing after action report
    2. Change load out
    3. While leaving game
    4. Opening supply caches

    Matchmaking clearly is broken. worst lag in any COD game ever and im not using hyperbole.
    game starts feel like you were thrown into it. no more countdown and start at same time.
    no difference in amount of bullets it takes to die in HC and Core modes
    takes almost 30 seconds for the find game button to display and allow searching
    gun fx sounds are flat and no difference between them.
    There is little to no recoil in the guns.
    lack of guns.
    some op guns.
    perks are stupid. you will run a couple of them for all ten setups.
    almost all exo perks are useless and do not power back up in the event you can survive insta-kills after using up all the energy it takes to use them.
    new items and the gun pictures take forever to display
    customization items with time limits are stupid
    colors are flat and muted, no one can be seen even on the brightest maps.
    maps are decent and small definitely more chaotic with people able to jump up behind you.
    campers are far and few between.
    re-spawn has a limbo mode where you’re not really spawned but in some spectator mode while playing CORE mode.
    QS is still around

    i highly suggest renting first. DO NOT SPEND MONEY ON THIS GAME UPFRONT.
    i would have given it a lower score but i think the jetpacks are good addition and provide a new dynamic to the game.    … Expand
  12. Garfoodle
    Nov 22, 2014
    6
    Its not bad, nor is it good. It works on PC, is fun, in that CoD sort of way, has good facial animations and Kevin Spacey. While it wont change your outlook on CoD, its still enjoyable for those who are into this kind of game.
  13. InsaneLaserPT
    Apr 18, 2015
    7
    7/10
    The game is not bad but there are some things that really suck in this game:
    -Only some guns are good (ASM1, Bal-27)
    -Exos are really crap after some time.
    -Some connection problems.
  14. horrorreviews
    Nov 15, 2014
    7
    Although this game looked and appeared to be a lot better than its predecessors, COD AW is unfortunately just a next gen re skin of the same garbage we've been getting for years now. Its sad how so many game companies think improved visuals and a few new mechanics is enough. That aside, this was actually a fun game to play. The futuristic stuff was done much better than in blops2 and theAlthough this game looked and appeared to be a lot better than its predecessors, COD AW is unfortunately just a next gen re skin of the same garbage we've been getting for years now. Its sad how so many game companies think improved visuals and a few new mechanics is enough. That aside, this was actually a fun game to play. The futuristic stuff was done much better than in blops2 and the new survivor mode is surprisingly fun. Still the underlying mechanics are the same and and multiplayer is still the same old thing. Definitely the best COD in years but that may simply be due to its optimization for next gen and is still not enough to resurrect the series.… Expand
  15. tormentor55
    Nov 11, 2014
    5
    COD Advanced Warfare is better than ghosts. it really is, but you can't get worse than ghosts. Whenever I look at the game I see Titanfall and black-light Retribution written all over it. While black light is a mixed bag, it's freemium model becomes tolerable after the 5 dollar pass. (which i mentioned in my review for the ps4 port.) PC people should rejoice since the freemium on the PCCOD Advanced Warfare is better than ghosts. it really is, but you can't get worse than ghosts. Whenever I look at the game I see Titanfall and black-light Retribution written all over it. While black light is a mixed bag, it's freemium model becomes tolerable after the 5 dollar pass. (which i mentioned in my review for the ps4 port.) PC people should rejoice since the freemium on the PC version is only for skins and doesn't require 5 bucks. Better to spend 5 bucks on black light for ps4 or free on PC. (plus since black-light is free, no PS plus required.) The cost for COD AW: $60(actual game) $50-$60(PS plus) and more money for DLC.
    Cost for Black light: $0(To play) $5(To unlock guns permanently, one time fee, free on PC.) $0 (For multiplayer fees).
    I understand that this review is mentioning black-light a lot but that's what AW is essentially a $60 dollar Black light, Titanfall and Crysis with the crappy Call of Duty repetition. AW isn't as **** as people say it is. It's just not worth the price considering how the final product compares to the hype and their are superior alternatives that either cost the same or are cheaper. EX: Battlefield.
    AW is closest to fresh air that the franchise has gotten in MW2. the problem is that it's not fresh enough.    … Expand
  16. bvenjamin
    Dec 17, 2014
    5
    I haven't played this game but it seems my review will be as informative as all the ones already uploaded.

    upvote if u never want to see a useful review again
  17. global_1995
    Jan 1, 2015
    5
    garbage game, not too many things i can control in the game that we should be able to, its like theyre teasing us, keep on getting "loading" in the middle of intense scenes, not very realistic, good graphics horrible recticles and dont ever get back up from my "team" in campaign. i thought call of duty wouldve stepped it up
  18. UnOffical
    Jan 24, 2015
    6
    The call of duty series has always been a strange one. Call of duty 4 was brilliant, and was (in my personal opinion) one of the best COD games ever made. MW2 was highly anticipated, and did an OK job at expanding the story line and improving multiplayer by a considerable amount. One of the first "Off topic" call of duty games was World At War, which changed the whole way COD was played.The call of duty series has always been a strange one. Call of duty 4 was brilliant, and was (in my personal opinion) one of the best COD games ever made. MW2 was highly anticipated, and did an OK job at expanding the story line and improving multiplayer by a considerable amount. One of the first "Off topic" call of duty games was World At War, which changed the whole way COD was played. Advanced warfare is a modern World at war. It has drastically changed the way COD is played, in good (and bad) ways. Many people have became highly critical of this game due to it's new features. Because of this, AW has developed a sort of "Love/Hate" Relationship with its fans. I think that sledgehammer took a huge risk with this game- which was unexpected, due most cod games being the same thing, but with different things in them. Call of duty is a lot like a sandwich. The concept is the bread, and the series/title is the filling. The bread stays the same, but the filling changes. They have changed the bread to flatbread for this game.
    The campaign lacks replay ability. It's very short too. Engine is very old, and it's turning into titanfall.
    If you're a die hard COD fan and you have the money spare, this is a decent buy. If you've never played COD games before, give this one a miss- it's nothing like its predecessors.    … Expand
  19. alexalexalexale
    Mar 28, 2015
    7
    Finaly somethink new and fresh this doesnt save the series forever but it is a step in the right direction
    just hope the next one is better that would be awesome
  20. Tubey
    Nov 5, 2014
    7
    It's... good! I didn't buy it because, you know, Call of Duty and I'm not an idiot, but I played it on a friends machine and was pleasantly surprised.

    It's not great, don't get me wrong. The campaign is as per usual worthless, but the added mobility in movement in multiplayer has completely refreshed the gunplay experience and if you set aside any prior hatred of the CoD franchise    It's... good! I didn't buy it because, you know, Call of Duty and I'm not an idiot, but I played it on a friends machine and was pleasantly surprised.

    It's not great, don't get me wrong. The campaign is as per usual worthless, but the added mobility in movement in multiplayer has completely refreshed the gunplay experience and if you set aside any prior hatred of the CoD franchise (which I certainly had, Ghosts was absolutely dreadful and CoD came to represent EVERYTHING bad about AAA titles) and treat it as a standalone title on its' own merits, then you'll have fun here.

    Is it Game of the Year material? Nope. But it was never going to be. What it is is a decent gunner that will provide good old fashioned fun for those who dip in, especially thanks to the wide range of customisation and levelling options and variety of weaponry.    … Expand
  21. Jetpil0t
    Nov 7, 2014
    6
    The absence of dedicated servers on PC once again makes this yet another multiplayer disappointment. This is by the far the single biggest reason to avoid this game on the PC on principle and in practice.
    The single player I found to be typically derivative from previous titles in it's level design and story (so expect nothing new here) however this time however it has included (and to a    The absence of dedicated servers on PC once again makes this yet another multiplayer disappointment. This is by the far the single biggest reason to avoid this game on the PC on principle and in practice.
    The single player I found to be typically derivative from previous titles in it's level design and story (so expect nothing new here) however this time however it has included (and to a much more subdued extent) mechanics borrowed from other shooters. These additional mechanics offer very minor, but welcome improvements to the single player gameplay overall, but you could play the respective source material and enjoy these various mechanics to a much fuller extent through significantly better single player experiences, so there implementation here with no real innovation doesn't feel worth while overall.
    Visually it looks superior to Ghosts, but by about as much as each COD game generally improves visuals every year. Certainly the visuals put on show in the trailers are from pre-rendered cut scenes, which look significantly better than the game play, even maxed out on PC, which is fairly misleading.
    It does however run significantly better and comes with plenty of quality settings, which is a welcome change.
    Many reviewers have touted these improvements to really freshen up the series, however this is only because the series suffered from extremely derivative and repetitive content for so many years. On it's own it is the iterative improvement each new installment should be, but offers nothing revolutionary like United Offensive or Modern Warfare did back in the series prime.
    This game sits above many of the series worst entries, but falls significantly shorter of the series highs.
    I wouldn't recommend this on PC if you are interested in the multiplayer, you don't have any dedicated servers and so much like Ghosts the community will be next to nonexistent in only a few months. I wouldn't recommend the single player on it's own especially for the full retail price. If you are interested in what's here, Crysis Warhead is very similar and significantly more enjoyable and well made single player game and it also has the advantage of looking better than Advanced Warfare, despite it's age.
    Overall I wouldn't recommend this installment, the lack of dedicated servers and ho-hum single player do nothing to justify the price or stand out from the last few installments overall.
    Perhaps a return to WW2 that focuses on core mechanics is what the series needs to really deliver once again. Or perhaps it's finished and it's time to move onto other more innovative franchises, only time will tell.
    6/10    … Expand
  22. Merr
    Nov 10, 2014
    5
    I was sceptic about this CoD. Last CoD, that i bought was Black Ops 1, and this one is pretty good.
    I love this new jumps and so on. I think it's much better than Titanfall which is pretty "slow" game.

    Some preformance problems on my PC(i5 2500k, GTX 770, 8GB RAM), but they are not big problem.
  23. Cadder
    Nov 5, 2014
    7
    Solid FPS Game for PC - Interesting singleplayer with FKING KEVIN SPACEY, Good Graphics[ not great, but not as bad as in Ghosts], Game performs quite well on my medium class Laptop [ 80 fps on high settings 1080p in multiplayer], New Mechanics- Exo suits, boosts, Quite Entertaining multiplayer [ Its like 50% COD + 25% Crysis +25% Titanfall]. I was not disappointed with my purchase- I gotSolid FPS Game for PC - Interesting singleplayer with FKING KEVIN SPACEY, Good Graphics[ not great, but not as bad as in Ghosts], Game performs quite well on my medium class Laptop [ 80 fps on high settings 1080p in multiplayer], New Mechanics- Exo suits, boosts, Quite Entertaining multiplayer [ Its like 50% COD + 25% Crysis +25% Titanfall]. I was not disappointed with my purchase- I got more then i expected- If u like FPS games you should at least give the game a look.… Expand
  24. xTobyMc
    Nov 5, 2014
    7
    The game is neither amazing or poor, it's somewhere in between. The good news is that Advanced Warfare is far better on PC than Ghosts ever was and at least it's playable this time. The main story is interesting but nowhere near as good as campaigns from the likes of Modern Warfare and Modern Warfare 2 in my opinion. You'll enjoy singleplayer, but you won't be itching to replay it over andThe game is neither amazing or poor, it's somewhere in between. The good news is that Advanced Warfare is far better on PC than Ghosts ever was and at least it's playable this time. The main story is interesting but nowhere near as good as campaigns from the likes of Modern Warfare and Modern Warfare 2 in my opinion. You'll enjoy singleplayer, but you won't be itching to replay it over and over again in the future.

    PC performance is okay. There's been a lot of issues with mouse sensitivity problems and frame stutter, each of which have their solutions but can't be entirely eliminated. Hopefully this will be patched soon, the game is only 2 days old as of this review. Unfortunately with a GTX 780 I'm forced to play on low settings with shadows turned off just to sustain the 91fps cap in multiplayer (something which is also very annoying for people with high Hz monitors like me), also bear in mind I'm running in 1440p.

    Multiplayer itself is... well, it's Titanfall. It is so blatantly obvious they've copied Titanfall's approach, which doesn't necessarily bother me too much as it's still enjoyable, but does show a lack of innovation. Multiplayer is satisfying but nothing new. It's still Call of Duty and feels like any other game in the franchise, just with more verticality due to the Exo suits. One big problem I have though is the pace of games. On console the controllers restrict turning movement and is much slower, making games more controlled and less chaotic. On PC people are running around like mad men with their mice sensitivities allowing for much faster reactions compared to console. I find the games are overwhelmingly fast and you don't have much time to think. It's literally an iteration of spawn > 1 kill > die > spawn > 1 kill > die... etc.    … Expand
  25. Thatweirdguy
    Nov 21, 2014
    7
    Other then not having the promised dedicated servers its overall a massive improvement over the previous Cod titles which highly includes Ghost .As a new game to the series it offers a high amount of new experience to players through the great multiplayer gameplay and interesting storyline.
    Pros*
    - Newly designed maps and new movement system - Bringing back the FOV option and a huge    Other then not having the promised dedicated servers its overall a massive improvement over the previous Cod titles which highly includes Ghost .As a new game to the series it offers a high amount of new experience to players through the great multiplayer gameplay and interesting storyline.
    Pros*
    - Newly designed maps and new movement system
    - Bringing back the FOV option and a huge upgrade on graphic options
    - Great leveling up system for weapons + supply drops
    - Perfect spawns and balanced weapon damage
    - Good PC port for players and offers a new perspective of futuristic warfare
    - Brand new Exo system and weapon upgrades
    - Theres a lot more ... buy the game and see for yourself
    - GHOST NEVER GOT FACEPALMED SO BAD
    Cons*
    - Lacks Multiplayer weapons ( like even ghost had more weapons )
    - Hosted servers and promised dedicated servers ? Like ( shot first die first )
    - Double kill tags for attachment unlocks seriously its hard enough to kill one person , and espeically
    on open field maps with laggy severs.
    - Peer to Peer Connection really ruin the game and created lag issues ( disadvantage
    eg ( Spam a whole mag at someone and still not dead)
    - Need more multiplayer maps as i feel like im playing the same map over and over
    - Are there any more ? Give us our dedicated servers
    Well this is recommended to FPS shooters as promised play cod as you never before cause this is true but after when they give us out dedicated servers otherwise newbies to COD will face a disadvantage over veteran players

    Overall i give it a 7 / 10 for having the worst multiplayer connection severs until they add in dedicated servers i can truly rate it a 8.5 / 10 .    … Expand
  26. Amitashi
    Nov 9, 2014
    7
    I really liked single player campaign. My nephew said that this game is his favourite game of weekend. It taked some time to adjust my PC. Most problems were caused by antivirus that ruined hard drive perfomance. Then I removed it, formatted volume, set pagefiles and game began to work like charm. Campaign is great. I think it's one of finest campaigns in Call Of Duty history. MultiplayerI really liked single player campaign. My nephew said that this game is his favourite game of weekend. It taked some time to adjust my PC. Most problems were caused by antivirus that ruined hard drive perfomance. Then I removed it, formatted volume, set pagefiles and game began to work like charm. Campaign is great. I think it's one of finest campaigns in Call Of Duty history. Multiplayer seems too futuristic to me but is still good.… Expand
  27. james2003
    Nov 15, 2014
    5
    What it gives with one hand it takes away with the other and that seems to be the theme that runs through. You are this super solider with an exo-suit, but it only allows you to experience super human abilities in very constricted ways. You can only climb walls at certain points, you can only use shields at certain points, and the only relatively free reign is the powered jump.

    Missions    What it gives with one hand it takes away with the other and that seems to be the theme that runs through. You are this super solider with an exo-suit, but it only allows you to experience super human abilities in very constricted ways. You can only climb walls at certain points, you can only use shields at certain points, and the only relatively free reign is the powered jump.

    Missions are short, story is weak, and characters are forgettable. I almost feel sorry for Kevin Spacey being involve in this, and most of time he is the only driving force in the story. But perhaps that's just me... as I have played every game in this series and there is nothing new to offer. Or perhaps that it's time for Activision to either get really creative or drop it.

    Gameplay is interrupted by the inclusion of button tapping moments. While the idea is good the method has been over used. This means that game play feels choppy, as you have to drop everything and match key presses with on screen instructions. Then there are parts of the story it just glosses over and downright ignores. In my books it's the worst crime because it assumes that people are stupid and insults them greatly.

    Gameplay there really isn't anything new here, and what parts that are new are so briefly used that it's instantly forgettable. You get to use stealth suits, climb walls, fall from great heights, grapple hooks ... but sadly all of it makes up less than 5% of single player game. Some great ideas but poorly executed just like the direction of Crysis. The game gives you superhuman abilities then forces you to use a gun, so expect for the most part to be frustrated and disappointed.

    But what I can't understand is the Professional Critics, what game where they playing... I'd like to know? Current score is 77 by them and 4.6 by users, have they lost touch, or has silver crossed their palms?
    The good things are grenades, some really clever features, but again they over complicate it with the keys you have to press to select them. I don't know who designed the key layout, but it has to be some contortionist that was born with six fingers. Everything feels wrong which means sadly you end up shooting everything in your way using little of the "added" features that AW boosts so proudly about.

    Then there are level cut screens which would be a good time to load the mission in. Clever and has been used in games for decades, but for whatever reason it loads half, waits until the movie has finished then loads the second half. Why? Also you have to watch the movie, without being able to skip, this becomes an issue when you have finished a level. Where you have to watch the proceeding level clip before you are able to quit the game, this seem silly for whatever reason they decided to do this for? Then when you start the game, you have to watch the same clip again.

    Can't comment on Multiplayer, which I haven't played, and Activation probably thanks me for.
    I am giving this a score of 5; I think it more than fair perhaps a little generous at times. Though I can't say I really enjoyed it, there wasn't a big moment where I refused to play it. It was just average, maybe a little less, and that's the biggest shame of it all. It could have done so much better.    … Expand
  28. lee020
    Nov 10, 2014
    6
    For me the COD series is moving too far away from it roots,I used to love it's simplicity, and it was in this simplicity came the exciting playability. Now it is more about remembering how to get the grenade you want, or timing the double jump. In COD I want to be thinking about the tactics not the button pushing.

    Also for me it's another game ruined by being console ported. Was I    For me the COD series is moving too far away from it roots,I used to love it's simplicity, and it was in this simplicity came the exciting playability. Now it is more about remembering how to get the grenade you want, or timing the double jump. In COD I want to be thinking about the tactics not the button pushing.

    Also for me it's another game ruined by being console ported. Was I the only one who had to pause the game to search the internet on how to slide at a cruicial moment because the only help I got in game was "Push to slide?

    It's ok, but please less Halo and more COD next time.    … Expand
  29. firefalcon124
    Nov 12, 2014
    6
    While Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare is an improvement from the horror which Ghosts was, the developers of this franchise needs to do better than this to bring Call of Duty back to its glory days.
    On a positive note, the PC port is good, and the multi-player is no half shabby thanks to the new "exo-suits".
    The biggest improvement needs to come from the Singleplayer. I beat it in as    While Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare is an improvement from the horror which Ghosts was, the developers of this franchise needs to do better than this to bring Call of Duty back to its glory days.
    On a positive note, the PC port is good, and the multi-player is no half shabby thanks to the new "exo-suits".

    The biggest improvement needs to come from the Singleplayer. I beat it in as little as 5 hours, running past NPCs on the hardest difficulty mode. The campaign is once again a whole "MURICA SAVES THE WORLD" explosion fest, which I'm personally starting to get sick of.

    This can be the start of a turnaround for Call of Duty, but a lot remains to be improved.    … Expand
  30. fycworldwide
    Jan 21, 2015
    7
    Basically what sledgehammer did was take ghosts, improve it significantly, and add a jetpack because why the **** not. This ends up with a mediocre game, that is more enjoyable than ghosts by a longshot. Nothing amazing, but its alright.
  31. jelikey
    Aug 21, 2015
    7
    this game gives me standard fun. series as well. and new technology of future war is good to see. but, the single campaign mission is too short, and optimization is a little poor.
  32. krj38
    May 8, 2015
    7
    I'm a BF person when it comes to online shooters. However, I felt like playing an FPS campaign, just for relaxation. After having skipped a couple of CoD games (my last one was Modern Warfare 3 and it was tiresome) I borrowed CoD:AW and was quite pleased with the result. What follows is a review of the single-player mode only.

    The campaign is, well, Call of Duty. Tons of explosions,    I'm a BF person when it comes to online shooters. However, I felt like playing an FPS campaign, just for relaxation. After having skipped a couple of CoD games (my last one was Modern Warfare 3 and it was tiresome) I borrowed CoD:AW and was quite pleased with the result. What follows is a review of the single-player mode only.

    The campaign is, well, Call of Duty. Tons of explosions, overly epic action, "you're a regular soldier, but it so happens that you save the world" sort of stuff. The plot has its moment and takes around 5-6 hours to complete. It's full of cliches and a quasi-patriotic solemnity. It's also annoying at times. The total death toll after one playthrough reached 1700 casualties. This means that 1700 people died shot by the player/protagonist. And I find it difficult to believe that such a killing-machine can be incapacitated or imprisoned by someone and is rendered helpless. I just don't buy it. And this, I mean the heroes weaknesses, are constantly shown "during cut-scenes" to add drama to the action. However, instead of drama, I find it annoying. Take for instance the stealth mission in Detroid. You have a freaking exo-suit that allows you to bend metal and tear off car doors: why can't I punch the first encoutered guard in the face and take away his rifle? I don't know. And this sucks.

    Overall, I found the campaign rather pleasant. So I'd give it a 6,5 and as halves aren't allowed, 7 it is!    … Expand
  33. NatT96
    Jul 6, 2015
    6
    This game was painfully poorly optimized requiring an extreme amount of power for PC's. I mean this lags on mid graphics cars and even high ones as well with massive frame drops and oh boy, every single review is correct, having dedicated servers is a must for the price I paid for this title, its so gosh darn bad....this is the last COD game for me.
  34. Nerosoma889
    Feb 10, 2016
    5
    Looked forward to this, but disappointed me straight away, so much so that I was not even interested in the zombie DLC, which is quite rare for me. The graphics were horrendous for my above average PC (770 / i5 / 8GB), but was later fixed with some troubleshooting and online tutorials (thanks CODAW). Overall, story was quite mild, however, I like how levels are non-linear in some cases,Looked forward to this, but disappointed me straight away, so much so that I was not even interested in the zombie DLC, which is quite rare for me. The graphics were horrendous for my above average PC (770 / i5 / 8GB), but was later fixed with some troubleshooting and online tutorials (thanks CODAW). Overall, story was quite mild, however, I like how levels are non-linear in some cases, and was probably the best part of the entire campaign.

    The multiplayer was your bog standard COD, no real difference apart from the movement system, which became boring and quite annoying as time went on.    … Expand
  35. sgthombre
    Sep 26, 2016
    7
    I'm just writing at least 150 characters because I wanted to save this review in a more convenient way to look back at scores that I had given stuff as a user.
  36. gold
    Jun 2, 2018
    5
    Даже на минимальных настройках лагало, не возможно было играть (ближе к концу игры перестало). Сюжет - 9, Графика - минимальная графика на 5, геймплей - 4.
  37. dggt
    Mar 9, 2023
    5
    покращилася тільки графіка, і то погано оптимізована, сетінг трешовий й не цікавий, стрільба нудна, сюжет тухлий, вдосталь халтури для ААА проекту, пукалка на вечір під пивко
  38. Cz3rw0ny
    Feb 10, 2021
    7
    It is not a bad game. It is a Call of Duty game, which kind of answers all the questions regarding the gameplay and the mechanics. I am not into COD Multiplayer, but single was quite entertaining and short enough not to bore me.
  39. Nameless2131
    Feb 6, 2020
    5
    5/10 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
  40. Crimert
    Jan 16, 2021
    7
    I can say that the campaign mode was okay. I found this game better than the COD: Black Ops series and the COD: Ghosts. But it's still not good enough for me... 7hrs on record.
  41. moonlaba
    Jan 17, 2022
    6
    여러 스타 배우를 고용한다고 없던 캐릭터성이 생기진 않는다는점.. 근현대물인건 신선했지만 여러 슈트의 능력들이 1회용으로 그것도 별로 유용하게도 쓰이지 않는다는점이 아쉽다.
  42. r03vg
    Apr 15, 2020
    6
    Одна из последних ролей Кевина Спейси. Все еще та самая старая Call of Duty с мыльными текстурами. Хороший звук, интересная история.
  43. yeezymane
    Apr 1, 2021
    7
    Графика - 8/10
    Игровой процесс - 7/10
    Сюжет - 7/10
    Музыка - 5/10
  44. hileger
    Oct 29, 2022
    5
    Пиздец какого гавно стрельба как из игрушечных пистолетиков лагает на 2070 игра 2014 года хуеплеты , да таже гост на уровне была ,а это просто мусор
  45. Greek_objektife
    Jun 9, 2021
    5
    Получилась намного лучше чем Ghosts,сюжет хоть и туп,но неплохо написан,графика была кардинально улучшена и геймплей благодаря сеттингу будущего стал поразнообразнее но мультиплеер полное говно и зомби режим скучный
  46. ErayTellezi
    Nov 17, 2020
    7
    Cod'un 10 yıl süren fecaat döneminde arada çıkan ender güzel oyunlardan. ok
  47. bar0yka
    Dec 29, 2022
    5
    sıkıcı grafikler aynı bazı yerlerde hata veriyor ve hikaye leş .
  48. vova22379
    Dec 18, 2021
    6
    ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
  49. Murdockk
    Jun 27, 2023
    5
    Genel call of duty çizgilerinin dışına çıkmış bir oyundu. Oyuna bir yenilik getirip daha gelecek vari bir oyun yapmışlardı. Beni de pek sarmamıştı açıkçası
  50. Miz_Gamer
    Nov 20, 2022
    7
    Graphics 7/10
    Sounds 8/10
    Gameplay 6/10
    Story:6/10
    DLC:2/10
    Multiplayer:6/10
  51. threeoftendie
    Feb 5, 2023
    7
    Это одна из игр моего детства. И, несмотря на возраст и недостатки, о которых я сейчас узнаю от других, она не кажется мне плохой
  52. Snjake
    Mar 18, 2023
    7
    Overhated i liked the story and enjoyed the multiplayer with friends a lot.

Awards & Rankings

85
#85 Best PC Game of 2014
24
#24 Most Discussed PC Game of 2014
59
#59 Most Shared PC Game of 2014

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
78

Generally favorable reviews - based on 18 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 15 out of 18
  2. Mixed: 2 out of 18
  3. Negative: 1 out of 18
  1. CD-Action
    Jan 9, 2015
    85
    This game is a lot of fun. There’s some Crysis in it, some Titanfall, some elements borrowed from Unreal Tournament and Battlefield. Underneath it’s still Call of Duty though, finally modernized in terms of visuals. [13/2014, p.50]
  2. PC PowerPlay
    Dec 23, 2014
    80
    It's the best Call of Duty campaign in years, and the multiplayer continues to scratch a certain itch. [Jan 2015, p.64]
  3. GameWatcher
    Dec 14, 2014
    80
    A new engine and new ideas breath new life into a series that was in serious danger of turning stale.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »