Battlefield V

 PC
User Score
3.0

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 3148 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 674 out of 3148
  2. Mixed: 296 out of 3148
  3. Negative: 2,178 out of 3148
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. riken
    Mar 7, 2019
    4
    The campaign is pretty short and divided into 4 parts, which aren't connected directly. Whether the format is good or not, the last 2 stories were kinda enjoyable, but it isn't anything spectacular. I personally didn't enjoy the mechanics in the game itself and found game-play pretty chaotic.
  2. RDR_2_govno
    Nov 29, 2018
    0
    Ни за что нельзя качать эту фемонигерскую помойку, где им вылизывают жопу, плюя в лицо истории.
  3. 4everyoung84
    Nov 29, 2018
    0
    Llevo jugando a la saga bf desde 2006 en bf 2142. Esta es la peor experiencia que he tenido en un bf. Armas que solo funcionan con bipodes, hechos para campers, ventanas en todas partes, hechas para los campers de las ametralladoras. No tiene modo asalto, las armas están descompensadas, no se puede quitar el AA sin meter un comando...un desastre. Ojala le vaya peor que mal en ventas yLlevo jugando a la saga bf desde 2006 en bf 2142. Esta es la peor experiencia que he tenido en un bf. Armas que solo funcionan con bipodes, hechos para campers, ventanas en todas partes, hechas para los campers de las ametralladoras. No tiene modo asalto, las armas están descompensadas, no se puede quitar el AA sin meter un comando...un desastre. Ojala le vaya peor que mal en ventas y espabila DICE u EA.… Expand
  4. toddbuyhoward
    Dec 15, 2018
    0
    look at u dice, u are obosralsya.
    early access genderfield like game for full price. nah thank you)))                                                            
  5. StarXGamerEXEC
    Dec 3, 2018
    0
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This game takes "fast paced" gameplay to an unenjoyable level. Dying so quickly works when respawning is also quick, like Call of Duty. But this game compacts too many elements into not large enough maps.

    Some minor campaign spoilers here.
    The single player campaign? It would've been better just to not have one, than to use the disgusting revisionist versions that were implemented. An entire Norwegian commando team was effectively written out of their own mission, replaced by a "mom and daughter" team that embarked on the mission in ways that don't make sense for reasons that don't make sense at all.

    It also portrays the French as having segregated black soldiers and treated them as less. In actuality, Germans at times would kill all the blacks of captured squads, and there were white French commanders that died for defending their black soldiers. As well some white commanders were killed simply for having black soldiers in their command. This campaign effectively writes ALL of that out of history and portrays the French as just as racist as America was at the time. Revising history to make blacks or women look bad, or taking them out completely and giving credit for accomplishments to someone else simply for their race or gender should NOT be acceptable to any race, white or black, etc, or any gender, man or woman.

    The inclusion of some levels of historical accuracy, enough to know which missions and groups were being portrayed in accordance with the actual WWII, but leaving out and rewriting things to obviously fit an agenda, is just absolutely disgusting to those who did participate in and help out in the war effort.

    Definitely do not buy this game if you haven't already and you respect those who fought in that war. Because this game disrespects them to a great degree, and disrespects history itself, simply to fit the agenda of the game makers. Quite sad.    … Expand
  6. Good_Critic
    Dec 3, 2018
    1
    I found this version significantly better than the console variations, maybe its because the control scheme through this buggy mess made things much easier, or maybe it was because it was simply a better experience due to better graphics and frame rate. Regardless of either of these things, this game was bad and the only reason I'm giving it a 1 was due to how much better the PC variationI found this version significantly better than the console variations, maybe its because the control scheme through this buggy mess made things much easier, or maybe it was because it was simply a better experience due to better graphics and frame rate. Regardless of either of these things, this game was bad and the only reason I'm giving it a 1 was due to how much better the PC variation was.
    The guys who worked on the PC side of this deserve a raise, and then a subsequent demotion because I think no one can save this mess of a game.

    Anyway to sum up my problems with the game:

    -lack of content
    yes this was explained by free DLC, but that doesnt excuse it, I bought the game now, not after all the DLC came out. If they release a GOTY edition (and thats a big IF) with all the dlc, then i might consider changing my score to reflect that.

    -Its a bUgGy MeSs
    there's no helping this except with the passage of time

    -lack of authenticity and/or accuracy
    This is immersive for some players, but this game didn't do it for me. Which is a shame because there are a lot of games that do like DM or Battlefield 2.

    -Feels like Cod
    This is kinda self explanatory

    That's pretty much everything i have to say.
    Just be glad you guys didn't buy the console versions, and my condolences if you did.    … Expand
  7. Saxon793
    Nov 28, 2018
    0
    Having played Battlefield since Battlefield 2 I am incredibly upset with this game. Buggy as can be with numerous, confusing release packages. The whole thing stinks of EA's greed. Add to this a good dose of historical revisionism regarding Operation Grouse, blatant lies about the founding of the SBS and an Americanisation of the attitudes of the French to the Tirailleurs that I just can'tHaving played Battlefield since Battlefield 2 I am incredibly upset with this game. Buggy as can be with numerous, confusing release packages. The whole thing stinks of EA's greed. Add to this a good dose of historical revisionism regarding Operation Grouse, blatant lies about the founding of the SBS and an Americanisation of the attitudes of the French to the Tirailleurs that I just can't stand and I am done. 6 hours in and I know I've wasted my money. Thanks, EA, thanks Dice. I shan't be spending a penny more on any games your companies produce for a long time.… Expand
  8. UserNo228
    Nov 30, 2018
    3
    The fact that I went through all the trouble to register on this site should give you an idea of just how bad this game is.
    The campaign is bugged throughout and is not accurate at all. I could not progress in Nordlys because the second mission simply would not load; all I got was a bluish white snowy abyss around which I could move my camera, complete with the health bar and the BF1    The fact that I went through all the trouble to register on this site should give you an idea of just how bad this game is.
    The campaign is bugged throughout and is not accurate at all. I could not progress in Nordlys because the second mission simply would not load; all I got was a bluish white snowy abyss around which I could move my camera, complete with the health bar and the BF1 bayonet permanently stuck to the HUD. The cutscenes run unstably at 30 FPS, and I have a GTX 1070 as well as an i9. As for historical accuracy, there is none. Apparently a Norwegian lone skier completed Operation Gunnerside all by her lonesome. This is not even to mention that the USSR is not even in the vanilla version of the game, although apperently it will be added as a DLC much like the Russian Empire in BF1. Also I saw people saying that "This is the way DICE envision WW2, they purposefully made small stories without large battles,". But I do not want small stories. I want at least some large battles with hundreds of soldiers running around. From the campaign, it seems that the way DICE envisions WW2 is that it was some small conflict in which effectively infiltrators and partisans won the war. If DICE really wanted to create an alternate appearance to WW2 , then they should have marketed like Battlefield 2142, not as a realistic game like BF1. But I do have to give them the due respect, that they will allow a campaign for the opposite side, something which was not done in BF1. We will just have to wait and see what will happen with that.
    I have not played multiplayer as much as I wanted to because of how bland it became. The maps are not even comparable in size or structure to those in BF1. The gunplay is essentially like that of COD. The bolt action rifles are useless on some maps along with SLRs. They did add better gameplay mechanics, like greater squad integration, building fortifications, and realistic responses to nearby explosions, such as the shock wave knocking you over momentarily. I also am not against the customisation options of the soldiers, like allowing people to play as women, even though these things in general seem to have been initiated by some "progressives" and SJWs. On a side note I honestly do not understand why people do not like being allowed to play as women; in BF1 you were forced to play as a woman if you wanted to be a rifleman for the Russian Empire and no one said anything then.
    But these cool things do not change the fact that each class has about 5 weapons to chose from. I have yet to encounter bugs in the multiplayer side of things, but I have heard people have experienced them there too.
    All in all for an apparently complete AAA game price, we get an incomplete and deficient shooter. Maybe one day we will get to see it in its full glory, but I would expect this to take months to remedy, or longer if DICE are stubborn enough with their politicised views. I do not even know what happened to DICE. BF1 had its problems at launch, but they were not nearly as bad as this.    … Expand
  9. Lonewolf03
    Dec 1, 2018
    1
    The game is glitch filled and unappealing, it's biggest pro is that it uses the new Nvidia raytracing technology but that is about as deep as a piss puddle. EA has incurred the wrath of gamers everywhere by insulting us and pushing revisionist history on players, if one of the biggest draws is its realism then why push divisive politics into it? the reason is to appease the "pro-reviewers"The game is glitch filled and unappealing, it's biggest pro is that it uses the new Nvidia raytracing technology but that is about as deep as a piss puddle. EA has incurred the wrath of gamers everywhere by insulting us and pushing revisionist history on players, if one of the biggest draws is its realism then why push divisive politics into it? the reason is to appease the "pro-reviewers" instead of trying to make a game that the fans will love.… Expand
  10. carmalone
    Dec 4, 2018
    3
    Most buggy release after BF4, shooting feels much better comparing to BF1. To be honest it feels like a beta. Needs a lot of improvement. This is released waaay early than it should be. False and twisted single player campaign -garbage story telling- but no one cares single player. Online is boring after couple of hours. Overall below average. EA stop miling Dice, let them take the timeMost buggy release after BF4, shooting feels much better comparing to BF1. To be honest it feels like a beta. Needs a lot of improvement. This is released waaay early than it should be. False and twisted single player campaign -garbage story telling- but no one cares single player. Online is boring after couple of hours. Overall below average. EA stop miling Dice, let them take the time and make better video games.… Expand
  11. Daviaz12
    Dec 2, 2018
    0
    SJW all over the game, woman voices are so annoying, unrealistic game stories, the game is political correctness is way to strong on this game to be ignored, a game nobody asked for and adding women to the game and other etnic groups that dont even belong to this conflict is just too much SJW **** to be tolerated, worst Battlefield in history.
  12. mikepic171
    Dec 2, 2018
    0
    Very disappointed with Battlefield V. The hype did not live up to the product. The game is SEVERELY unbalanced and the matchmaking is terrible. Japan, the US, France, Russia, and Italy forces are not in the game. The weapon selection for the most part sucks and is extremely limited. And seriously....can someone explain to me in what alternate universe did so many women participate inVery disappointed with Battlefield V. The hype did not live up to the product. The game is SEVERELY unbalanced and the matchmaking is terrible. Japan, the US, France, Russia, and Italy forces are not in the game. The weapon selection for the most part sucks and is extremely limited. And seriously....can someone explain to me in what alternate universe did so many women participate in combat roles in WW2? If this was Battlefield: Stalingrad I can see that. That aside...sorry there were not a lot of women in combat roles in WW2. EA caved to SJW liberal idiots and further demolished what should have been a success. Overall I do not recommend this game.… Expand
  13. etoegor
    Dec 2, 2018
    0
    It just amazes me how much EA & DICE dont't care about its target audience! And they directly says to everyone who is not satisfied with the game - you are just stupid haters, we don't care. What can I say? Good luck in selling the game to SJW parasites!
  14. Alokin1337
    Dec 26, 2018
    4
    Лучший шутер в индустрии превращается в толерантное дно. "Историческая достоверность" просто поражает. Феменистки и Толерасты (по другому их никак не назовешь) умудряются лезть не только в индустрию, но теперь еще и в историю. Скоро Сталин станет мулатом, а женщина возвысит флаг СССР над Рейхстагом. Потрясающе. Если бы не эти толерантно-феменистические движения, игра получилась бы болееЛучший шутер в индустрии превращается в толерантное дно. "Историческая достоверность" просто поражает. Феменистки и Толерасты (по другому их никак не назовешь) умудряются лезть не только в индустрию, но теперь еще и в историю. Скоро Сталин станет мулатом, а женщина возвысит флаг СССР над Рейхстагом. Потрясающе. Если бы не эти толерантно-феменистические движения, игра получилась бы более достоверной, как в случае с BF1. Но в итоге мы видим женщин с протезами и женские крики на поле боя.

    Но помимо ебанутых борцов за толерантность и равенство, в хуевой игре надо винить EA, которых заворожила сладкая, полная свободы жизнь в богатстве, полученных на агрессивной монополизации. Они слушают не комьюнити, а финансовых аналитиков и инвесторов. И ограничивают время на разработку. BF1 делали более 3 лет, и техническая его составляющая получилась идеальной (как минимум в рамках серии BF). Но в случае с BFV, игру делали меньше 2 лет, в спешке и производственном аде. Из-за этого мы видим бесконечные матчи, нерабочие окна выбора оружия, бесчисленные проблемы с коллизией и многое, многое другое.

    Вместе все эти факторы и создали ту BFV, которую мы лицезреем. Но если бы не они, игра бы получилась отличной — хотя бы из-за стрельбы и физики оружия. Попробуйте найти хотя бы одного человека, который сказал бы, что стрельба в BFV плохая. Это вам не CoD с ее пластмассовой стрельбой.

    Но у нас есть, что есть. Но все же лично я уверен, что через год-два игру приведут в нормальное состояние, как в случае с BF4, которая спустя несколько лет после выхода свободно выдохнула, ведь ее больше не беспокоили бесчисленные технические проблемы. Так что, нам остается лишь ждать — либо исправления BF, либо появления на рынке конкурента, ибо таковых сейчас нет. И да, Call Of Duty проигрывает BF практически по всем параметрам.    … Expand
  15. Deny2x2
    Dec 3, 2018
    0
    Гендерфилд 5 - это просто пробитие дна. Никогда, НИКОГДА больше не куплю НИЧЕГО от ЕА и Дайс, пора им устроить просто бойкот. Голосуйте кошельком!
  16. ZboqZboq
    Dec 3, 2018
    0
    A terrible game, don't waste your money on it. Such a shame, I've been a fan of this franchise since BF1942, but moneygrabbers EA just ruined another franchise. I never ever thought I would say this, but Call of Duty actually surpassed Battlefield
  17. Gravediggger
    Dec 4, 2018
    0
    EA achieved only one thing. Less and lesser content for every BF they put out. BF1942 was a milestone in the genre with a huge mapset and vehicels and later on over a 1000 mods to explore. Now we came (again) to a glitch and bugfest of exorbitant proportions, some 8 poors maps and ridiculous set of weapons and vehicles with content promises that won't come just like in Battlefront and BF1.EA achieved only one thing. Less and lesser content for every BF they put out. BF1942 was a milestone in the genre with a huge mapset and vehicels and later on over a 1000 mods to explore. Now we came (again) to a glitch and bugfest of exorbitant proportions, some 8 poors maps and ridiculous set of weapons and vehicles with content promises that won't come just like in Battlefront and BF1. EA killed the franchise for good and once and for all. RIP.… Expand
  18. ghost_soul167
    Dec 4, 2018
    1
    I am a Battlefield veteran, having played every release of the series except those released only on Consoles. This entry in the series is an insult to the Battlefield franchise. I have been waiting for a return to the World War II era in Battlefield since Battlefield 2, but this entry isn't it. There is no feeling of war, or even "Battlefield" in this game and the map choices. VehiclesI am a Battlefield veteran, having played every release of the series except those released only on Consoles. This entry in the series is an insult to the Battlefield franchise. I have been waiting for a return to the World War II era in Battlefield since Battlefield 2, but this entry isn't it. There is no feeling of war, or even "Battlefield" in this game and the map choices. Vehicles (other than arial bombers) are rare to see in the match, and are limited in number to the point of being useless, or occasional squad call ins that almost everyone ignores in order to use the V2 rocket.

    The multiplayer modes are riddled with bugs such as the never-ending round, or infinite load screen bugs, and a map rotation that seems to favor 3 or 4 maps, not to mention a troubled net code that has issues registering hits and also gives the feeling that while you can unload a magazine of ammunition into someone and they survive, they in turn can hit you twice and kill you. The maps themselves also have issues. On every map I played I was able to find areas that would allow me to fall under the map where a less honest player would be able to rack up kills in complete safety. These areas on the 2 beta maps (Narvik and Rotterdam) were reported to DICE and they still existed at release. SInce release the places in the other 6 maps have been reported, but with the first wave of bugfixes and updates being delayed, who knows when they will be fixed.    … Expand
  19. Verminsup
    Dec 4, 2018
    3
    I have never had I game that I had so little fun with.
    I liked no man's sky at launch, I actually kind of enjoyed myself during the fallout 76 beta I even loved every other battlefield even though I was always bad at the game. But even though I was bad at the games I always enjoyed myself, I can't say that I do the same during battlefield 5.
    I do think that the graphics look good I do    I have never had I game that I had so little fun with.
    I liked no man's sky at launch, I actually kind of enjoyed myself during the fallout 76 beta I even loved every other battlefield even though I was always bad at the game. But even though I was bad at the games I always enjoyed myself, I can't say that I do the same during battlefield 5.
    I do think that the graphics look good
    I do think that the sound is amazing
    i do think that the game has decent gunplay
    But that doesn't make a game fun.    … Expand
  20. AlexanderPanin
    Dec 13, 2018
    0
    Вы убрали хард режим и сделали ебучий ттк! нахуй идите DICE и EA. просто идите нахуй.
    Слов блядь других нету, как блядь такое гавно можно было выпустить и не чинить его а дальше гробить. Уебки
  21. blackshinez
    Dec 15, 2018
    0
    Genderfield, не иначе. Прогнулись под феминизм.
    3000 за стандарт идишн? Вы *b@нулись?
    Очень ждал новый БФ про вторую мировую. Ждал зря. Играть не буду
  22. zoki
    Dec 17, 2018
    1
    Go Woke, Go Broke. The game is insulting.It is also a disrespect for all veterans and all those who participated in that war, SJW crap
  23. Dangarus
    Dec 25, 2018
    0
    Game has a lot of bugs that haven't been fixed since release. Superbullets and infinite loading screens all the time.
  24. Andi78rus
    Jan 6, 2019
    0
    СУКА ГДЕ РУССКИЕ? ПИДОРЫ!!!!
    ПАРНИ НЕ ПОКУПАЙТЕ ЭТО ДЕРЬМО!!!
  25. SkyTraix
    Jan 22, 2019
    0
    Как по мне слишком мало черных и азиатов, ведь они прошли ВОЙНУ!
  26. T-Babyboi
    Nov 16, 2019
    0
    Worst Muti-player experience I have ever had coming into ANY game.
    Graphics are good but that is quickly ruined by the nature of this games Multi-Player experience......The single player isnt that great either...yes I actually completed the game, still did not like it.
  27. dasBOT
    Nov 26, 2018
    1
    It doesn't matter how good the gameplay can be or how stunning the graphics is, without the proper anti cheat this game is dead to me, massive online shooter more like massive cheaters fest
  28. Paul-RP12
    Feb 19, 2019
    0
    #ReturnBaseTTK!

    WHAT ARE YOU DOING DICE???! You broke the game, you broke the game balance. You increased TTK to 20% and as a result, the medic became the most despised class. Medic is most of all needed on the battlefield, but now no one plays medic. Recon also lost his power. Gewerh 43 had 35 hit base damage, now is 29. In fact, the time to kill increased by a 33% (4 bullets vs 3)!    #ReturnBaseTTK!

    WHAT ARE YOU DOING DICE???! You broke the game, you broke the game balance. You increased TTK to 20% and as a result, the medic became the most despised class. Medic is most of all needed on the battlefield, but now no one plays medic. Recon also lost his power.

    Gewerh 43 had 35 hit base damage, now is 29. In fact, the time to kill increased by a 33% (4 bullets vs 3)! Are you idiots?!

    Among other things, you have seriously worsened the graphic component. Previously, each new project from DICE introduced something new, each subsequent game was better than the previous one on the schedule.

    you used to introduce new industrial quality standards, you made a visual revolution. Now the game looks much worse then Battlefield 1! Like a BF4! OMG! How did you manage to make worse?!

    A lot of bugs in game.    … Expand
  29. partyxpete
    Nov 28, 2018
    3
    Have you always wanted to play a ww2 game, but are offended by the fact that there are so many white men in most ww2 games? Do you wish that they would just forget about trying to be historically accurate, and include women and Asians on the battlefield, even though there weren’t any fighting in the battles depicted? Boy (or girl, or however you self identify) do I have the game for you!Have you always wanted to play a ww2 game, but are offended by the fact that there are so many white men in most ww2 games? Do you wish that they would just forget about trying to be historically accurate, and include women and Asians on the battlefield, even though there weren’t any fighting in the battles depicted? Boy (or girl, or however you self identify) do I have the game for you!

    There are so many great features, such as: boring and short campaign, terrible ui, clunky, stripped and simplified mechanics, 2 playable maps, no eastern front, a useless medic class, and micro transactions.

    buy now, and pay money to be our beta testers, so that we can finally fix this game after the player base is all but dead. just remember, you have to be educated to enjoy this game, so if you are an uneducated sexist privileged cis white male, then you’ll just have to settle for inferior games such as:

    Bf4 or bf3, as these games only have males, they can never be as fun as bfv.

    -EA “it’s in the game, so long as you buy our season pass and other various packs”    … Expand
  30. Bluehydra
    Jul 5, 2019
    0
    Not the battlefield i grew up with, since the end with battlefield bad company 2 the game has lean toward Call of duty and with today's gameplay its becomed a fast paced and boring shooter which have killed off team and squad play which also plagued Battlefield 1 a lot,

    beside that, the game lacks content and meaningful gameplay, which turns it into a shallow game. the Campaign is an    Not the battlefield i grew up with, since the end with battlefield bad company 2 the game has lean toward Call of duty and with today's gameplay its becomed a fast paced and boring shooter which have killed off team and squad play which also plagued Battlefield 1 a lot,

    beside that, the game lacks content and meaningful gameplay, which turns it into a shallow game.
    the Campaign is an insult and twisted what happen during WW2 for a more political correct view, which is disgusting. but i guess the Political correct people will approve, but i doubt they ever will play it lol.
    The game is riddle with bugs and issues that makes Battlefield 4 seems like a better release.

    so for me its 0 stars here.

    Update: after playing it again with a couple of friends its hasnt improved at all. still a sallow gameplay, and riddle with issues and gameplay mechanices :/

    sadly the is for me the End of battlefield,    … Expand
  31. kimski
    Nov 28, 2018
    0
    Not only does this game make me uncomfortable hearing constant women screaming on the battlefield .. but its an insult to the real heros that died on the battlefield.. EA and Dice should hold their heads in shame.
  32. maxi2018
    Dec 1, 2018
    0
    I am a die hard bf gamer and have played every single battlefield game since its inception (bf1942,Bf2,3,4,1 vitnam,etc) This is by far the most horrendously disappointing game i have ever bought. It is basically a re-skinned BF1 - looks marginally better but buggy as hell
    There is no coherency in the design of this game. No where do i feel like I am fighting in WW2. Maps are few and    I am a die hard bf gamer and have played every single battlefield game since its inception (bf1942,Bf2,3,4,1 vitnam,etc) This is by far the most horrendously disappointing game i have ever bought. It is basically a re-skinned BF1 - looks marginally better but buggy as hell
    There is no coherency in the design of this game. No where do i feel like I am fighting in WW2. Maps are few and boring and has ZERO historical significance. and WTF is is Woman everywhere in WW2 **** it's completely out of whack. Weapons are few. single players are badly done and wtf is this death sequence in multiplayer completely ruins the BF feel. I stop playing after 30 minutes and have not want to play again since. I want my money back!!

    Utter Trash! I rate this a 0!!    … Expand
  33. TheModernViking
    Dec 4, 2018
    0
    This Game is a Shame for the Battlefield Franchise, I was a HUGE fan of BF3 and 4, But this is just an SJW hell. From the Campaign, Rewriting History to add Females in operations that only contained men is just a Huge dishonor to the men who actually did the operation.
    I got this game for free, and afther its Glaring errors i uninstalled it to never ever tutch it again. i am so glad i    This Game is a Shame for the Battlefield Franchise, I was a HUGE fan of BF3 and 4, But this is just an SJW hell. From the Campaign, Rewriting History to add Females in operations that only contained men is just a Huge dishonor to the men who actually did the operation.
    I got this game for free, and afther its Glaring errors i uninstalled it to never ever tutch it again. i am so glad i installed it on my old pc so new pcs hardware never had touched this **** game.
    pc there are many untold True stories of WW2 Females why dident you tell them, instead of editing a mission done by men?
    pros, It has some good visuals so i am giving it a 1 ,
    This game is a Go Woke Get Broke type of game    … Expand
  34. NBT
    Nov 29, 2018
    0
    ohh dear ... where i should start .,.. some good changes where made .. grapics etc is still good and sound is really nice ... BUT !

    there were several bad choices like making snipers useless ... medic is a joke .. the only good class there is is the assault class that is overpowered completely .... on top of that .. .that female character choice ? well its not even a choice ... if    ohh dear ... where i should start .,.. some good changes where made .. grapics etc is still good and sound is really nice ... BUT !

    there were several bad choices like making snipers useless ... medic is a joke .. the only good class there is is the assault class that is overpowered completely ....

    on top of that .. .that female character choice ? well its not even a choice ... if you are driving a tank og plane you are forced to be a women ... because in WW2 women where the main driver , gunner etc for all vehicles ? WTF !? ... female characters are also standard for several classes ... This is forced diversity.

    The most offending thing in the end is the norwegian war story ... Holly F ... really ? a female .. you base your story on the heavy water sabotasj ... and you botch the whole story ... but in a women as a war hero that never existed to save her mother .. instead of just recreating the many herroric missions resistance fighter have been doing here ... this is a direct offence to our local heros her because EA wants to play SJW ... no no no dont support garbage like that

    Honestly .. the whole thing in multiplayer would not have been so bad if women where optional and not standard and forced ... and if they would not have botched the local war stories that are made up SJW stuff and offensive to local history and memory of our war heros ... i could at least have given it a 5/10 ... but since its so offensive towards us its a 0    … Expand
  35. Tsargorn
    Nov 22, 2018
    0
    Endless loads, crashes and bugs!
    And what even more matters: extremely stupid single player company.
    Perfect!
  36. Ondik55
    Nov 20, 2018
    0
    RIP BF
    Singleplayer is a bad ripoff of other FPS games with boring stealth/turret sequences .
    And i tought that Battlefield 1 was bad. Singleplayer and multiplayer are just huge clusterf**k of absolute bullsh*t. Most things in this game are wrong and glitches and bugs are everywhere. AAA company with this much money should atleast try to read wikipedia or something when attempting to    RIP BF
    Singleplayer is a bad ripoff of other FPS games with boring stealth/turret sequences .
    And i tought that Battlefield 1 was bad.
    Singleplayer and multiplayer are just huge clusterf**k of absolute bullsh*t.
    Most things in this game are wrong and glitches and bugs are everywhere. AAA company with this much money should atleast try to read wikipedia or something when attempting to make game based in history. But no.
    It's revisionism in action. EA please stop parasitizing on once great series name or take time to make decent games. Not this half made early acess garbage.    … Expand
  37. oldchap93
    Nov 20, 2018
    0
    Veteran of the series played every single bf game that was released on PC.
    This review is purely online gameplaywise. Sure there might be gradual improvement over time but as the game is now its just bad.
    Where to start... 1.removing of 3d spotting was nice idea, but created more issues. For one camping lmg players with laser beam guns [KE7]; cant spot a fokin tiger tank that is 20yrds    Veteran of the series played every single bf game that was released on PC.
    This review is purely online gameplaywise. Sure there might be gradual improvement over time but as the game is now its just bad.
    Where to start...
    1.removing of 3d spotting was nice idea, but created more issues. For one camping lmg players with laser beam guns [KE7]; cant spot a fokin tiger tank that is 20yrds away despite spamming Q button which limits communication with your team soo soo much .
    2.kill cam is worst ever combined with camping issue gets really annoying
    3.general lack of class and guns balance (losing firefights simply because of weapon used not aim or skill), many useless "filler" weapons as for now
    4.operation gamemode is a fokin pile of **** instead of gradual push on whole frontline its often decided on only a few players actions (picking up and planting bombs?!)
    5.ttd is very short, making firefights less about shooting skill and more about jumping on other players and luck (also 1 frame death bug)
    6.land vechicles are really weak as of now thanks to amount of handhold AT weapons avaiiable
    7.air vs land combat is dog**** again (AA guns don't do **** against bombers, only threaten fighters) therefore need decent fighter player to even attempt combat bombers
    8.fokin screenshake from explosions wont let you aim while ADS (holy **** it happens too often)
    9.maps aren't really fun imo, especially given the destruction levels. Can only enjoy Rotterdam
    10.Game somehow punishes soloplays, and given you can't always get online with your buddies it might ruin your experience    … Expand
  38. max2017
    Nov 26, 2018
    0
    This is garbage - I wouldn't' play it even it's FREE

    I am a rabid fan of BF series and has played though BF1942/2/3/4/Vietnam/1, but I cannot believe DICE made this absolute garbage of a game. It is evident that there is no COHERENT DESIGN in this game. It is NOT WW2. IT HAS NO SOUL. the stories are junk. Multiplayer is no fun. they just re skinned BF1 and even Blatantly recycled map    This is garbage - I wouldn't' play it even it's FREE

    I am a rabid fan of BF series and has played though BF1942/2/3/4/Vietnam/1, but I cannot believe DICE made this absolute garbage of a game. It is evident that there is no COHERENT DESIGN in this game. It is NOT WW2. IT HAS NO SOUL. the stories are junk. Multiplayer is no fun. they just re skinned BF1 and even Blatantly recycled map from BF1. Absolutely DESTROYED everything great about battlefield into a pile of horse **** buggy ,WEIRD shoot- them up that has no identify. Also stop with the Woman fighting everywhere in WW2 bull**** WTF absolute feminism gone nuts.

    I WANT MY MONEY BACK!!    … Expand
  39. Beliar
    Nov 27, 2018
    2
    I've been actually playing this game for some time now (12h) so I guess im way beyond "you have to feel the game" stage. I gotta say, it's one of the worst Battlefields released so far.

    Don't get me wrong, some of the improvements are cool (I liked fortifications, visual effects, graphics, sounds) but anything else is just garbage. The big maps feel too big, with to little vehicles.    I've been actually playing this game for some time now (12h) so I guess im way beyond "you have to feel the game" stage. I gotta say, it's one of the worst Battlefields released so far.

    Don't get me wrong, some of the improvements are cool (I liked fortifications, visual effects, graphics, sounds) but anything else is just garbage.

    The big maps feel too big, with to little vehicles. Gun play and movement are weird & clunky. Game in general feels rushed and unpolished (not to even mention bugs).

    Also I don't feel any immersion. It's not WW2, it's also not what was presented in BF1. It's somewhere....no where? And who thought about those stupid revival animations and character screaming "there's blood everywhere!"? Yeah no ***t Sherlock. In case you didn't know - teammates revive you with giving you a hand (literally). WTF?    … Expand
  40. Kulkuri
    Nov 28, 2018
    3
    The game is incomplete and not all the single-player content you pay for is even in the box. The game functions more like Call of Duty than Battlefield with focus on on-foot twitch-shooting rather than tactics and vehicles. That makes the game very shallow and not what I've looked forwards in a Battlefield game.

    Dice started trend towards CoD-like features in BF1 but this is where they    The game is incomplete and not all the single-player content you pay for is even in the box. The game functions more like Call of Duty than Battlefield with focus on on-foot twitch-shooting rather than tactics and vehicles. That makes the game very shallow and not what I've looked forwards in a Battlefield game.

    Dice started trend towards CoD-like features in BF1 but this is where they went all in with it. I'm also pissed off that EA gave some people who paid for it a significant head start in multiplayer. Weapons are often too powerful and should be rebalanced. Maps design is not quite what I've come to expect and like in Battlefield games such as Bad Company 2 and infantry clearly has the advantage in BFV where as vehicles and planes suffer. Distances are quite small sometimes as a result.

    Furthermore historical revisionism in this game is just mind boggling. Especially when we consider that Dice and EA are marketing the game as "historically accurate" and "window to the unseen and untold stories of WW2". Had they actually done that it would have featured e.g. German, Finnish, Italian or Japanese perspective to the WW2 which could have been interesting.

    Instead we now see e.g. 15 year girl act as a replacement to a squad of Norwegian commandos, depiction of British soldiers who volunteered for SBS as lowly criminals and French army as highly incompetent and racist (through e.g. "bigotry of low expectations" and "not giving deserved recognition") towards their colonial volunteer infantry from West Africa. This all is just ridiculous and washes away the actual valuable contributions of e.g. women who worked as nurses and or at ammunition factories.

    From technical perspective this is the prettiest Battlefield game up to date. It sounds good (although I must add that voice acting in this game especially for Germans is quite bad and cartoonish) and runs mostly right apart from the continuing issues of DirectX 12 renderer. I'd like to see Vulkan API support in Frostbite engine and thus in future Battlefield games. There are some bugs but nothing in the scale of BF4 when that game launched. I wasn't able to test the RTX features.

    Technical mastery doesn't save poor gameplay, poor writing which pushes far-left talking points and identity politics, lack of content, bad PR with the community, and just the fact that this isn't very exciting Battlefield game. Despite promises to show something new and interesting BFV just doesn't do anything significantly different than previous Battlefield games. People are better off playing Battlefield 3, 4, 1 and/or Bad Company 2 which are mostly bug fixed and have more interesting content and gameplay options.    … Expand
  41. pA1N
    Dec 15, 2018
    2
    Why did you have to make it call of duty? why the player models feel cheap and hollow? why the new game modes are so bad? why half of the game is not ready on release? why the gameplay feel of battlefield 1 is way better?
  42. BFDIEHARDFANBOY
    Dec 5, 2018
    0
    EA **** up the franchise. So for 60 bucks you get, half or less of the game modes, half or less of the game content, which is reduced by third from bf4 and bf3. Ridiculous singleplayer stories. Broken game-mechanics from bf1943 and the censorship that took censorship on a whole new level. Thank god I got this game on a separate new Origin account so I could refund the game by selling theEA **** up the franchise. So for 60 bucks you get, half or less of the game modes, half or less of the game content, which is reduced by third from bf4 and bf3. Ridiculous singleplayer stories. Broken game-mechanics from bf1943 and the censorship that took censorship on a whole new level. Thank god I got this game on a separate new Origin account so I could refund the game by selling the god damn account for 30 bucks ... right before the **** sale promotion hit the market.SO if you are hardcore bf fan boy .. DO NOT BUY .. if you are COD kid casual brain-dead player ... GO AHEAD .. u shall enjoy this pathetic pile of manure.And to add they killed the soul and heart of BF games with the progression system of vehicles and guns ... A BIG GO DUCKYOURSELF DICE ... not a single dev worked on bf3 and earlier releases have no part in this pile of manure. No programmer will stay in this company to do this such bad game. DID i mentioned that you can no longer swap team ... yeah .. **** you fanboys ... did i mentioned that you have to unlock weapons by completing weekly assignments and if you don't complete them u have to wait again for this assignment .... ANYONE WHO is a fan since 1942 bf game will say THAT THIS GAME IS NOT A BATTLEFIELD GAME ... go FУcК yourselves you paid bots DICE blackhat SEO ... and i made this acc to post my first review to warn other veteran BAttlefield fans NOT TO BUY THIS PILE of garbage… Expand
  43. RustyJames
    Jan 21, 2021
    1
    Worst first person shooter in last few years. Incredibly bad game with tons of bugs, cheaters, unbalanced mechanics, stupid single player, lots of garbage content, ruined WW2 setting. no idea, how they ruined the series since BF 2 and BF 3, but they do the most iconic downgrade. Dice, it is Battlefield, not COD and Unreal Tournament mix with SJW messages. It's totally OK when game finishesWorst first person shooter in last few years. Incredibly bad game with tons of bugs, cheaters, unbalanced mechanics, stupid single player, lots of garbage content, ruined WW2 setting. no idea, how they ruined the series since BF 2 and BF 3, but they do the most iconic downgrade. Dice, it is Battlefield, not COD and Unreal Tournament mix with SJW messages. It's totally OK when game finishes like 300-0 5 times in a row, with bunch of guys with 50-3 score (ofc tank players) in that trashgame.… Expand
  44. Skipp3rUA
    Dec 1, 2018
    1
    Just another EA uncompleted trash game. Boycott EA products, and you will save Battlefield franchise!!!
  45. Baschy
    Nov 28, 2018
    4
    I am an open minded guy, because I could see past the whole historical incorrectness (but I understand why people dislike it), but the game play has nothing to do with battlefield anymore. There are no parked vehicles that stand around, instead you re-sporn right inside the vehicle. This includes airplanes, witch you cant even land anymore. This feels more and more like call of duty, whichI am an open minded guy, because I could see past the whole historical incorrectness (but I understand why people dislike it), but the game play has nothing to do with battlefield anymore. There are no parked vehicles that stand around, instead you re-sporn right inside the vehicle. This includes airplanes, witch you cant even land anymore. This feels more and more like call of duty, which is not a bad game per se but battlefield shouid feel like battlefield and CoD should feel like CoD. I can not rate this game higher than below average because it is an utter disappointment. Also dislike EA's politics so stay away from this. Do not support this.… Expand
  46. lnadekol
    Dec 3, 2018
    0
    Не куплю даж по скидке это говно. Больше смейтесь на всяких закрытых вечеринках , мы будем смеяться последними)
  47. Denis_Marins
    Dec 17, 2018
    2
    Это полный п*здц они "пофиксили" ТТК, единственное что было номальное в игре и за это я отдал 3500Р? Что за херня DICE? ЗАЧЕМ???????
  48. BillCaggs16
    Dec 3, 2018
    0
    When the company turns against the people it is supposed to be serving, it will die. And Battlefield, EA, Dice, etc. all deserve what is coming.
  49. ParaMedic
    Nov 28, 2018
    3
    Not a friend of their wild customization, weapongrinding and headless-chicken-lone-wolf-gamemodes. Singleplayer as multiplayer feel wrong and somewhat unrealistic due to constant things that are in the wrong place and feel wrong. I feel like they take the word historic as serious as in their last games: not the least bit. They didn't try out something, they made it a bland BattlethingNot a friend of their wild customization, weapongrinding and headless-chicken-lone-wolf-gamemodes. Singleplayer as multiplayer feel wrong and somewhat unrealistic due to constant things that are in the wrong place and feel wrong. I feel like they take the word historic as serious as in their last games: not the least bit. They didn't try out something, they made it a bland Battlething (insert random number) puked out by dice.

    Singleplayer:
    Weapons that don't belong on a certain battlefield or theatre of war at all are combined with unrealistic war stories that grandfather made up.
    You are left alone in a somewhat open level with enemies all over the place that somehow thought it was wise to build weapon caches all around the map and don't even guard them at all. You can stealth, wich is mostly somewhat boring or you can shoot your way through wich is also kind of bland since it feels like playing an arena shooter with bots. There is no smart or good use of scripting to shake things up or make some missions more interesting. And the alone part bothers me, except for some special cases wars were not won by one man commandos, wars were won by platoons of soldiers taking objectives. The story snippets are nice and some are inspired by certain historic events that may have happened...but I think people wich really have fought there would be unhappy with how it's told.

    Multiplayer:
    Battliefield finally somewhat feels like the thing Dice wants it to be: another COD game. It's fast and you need to constantly be on the move otherwise you will die. Teamplay is seldom really there and you don't really need it, they patched that out with Battlefield 3 I guess. I hoped that the voice chat would make the game a bit more about teamplay, but it is only used to yell at your teammates or to troll with horrible music. The game is riddled with bugs. i kind of hated most shooters that tried to implement weaponresting for their unreliabilities with that feature. I was surprised that Dice had their problems with it also, and it has cost me my life countless times. And I wouldn't have a problem if girls or people that really feel like girls could play female characters, but I find it confusing to see that 50% of the team is composed of females. There may have been woman in the war, some even fighting, but....next stop Battlefield 6 - weird panzer girls anime ****    … Expand
  50. Clrhilla
    Nov 29, 2018
    1
    I regret buying this game. It's a terrible experience. I am taking it back as soon as the store opens up to get my money back
  51. Vladonnchik
    Dec 3, 2018
    0
    This is a very bad, untruthful, so nasty and tolerant game! For now, i will hate Dice and EA!
  52. cybermax
    Dec 16, 2018
    1
    This game was a lot of fun when it first came out. The gun play was fantastic and was really rewarding for aggressive and strategic play styles. I also liked how there was clear progression for each class. The game was admittedly addicting, especially if you are a completionist. The game also is rewarding for squads that play the objective.

    The game has a lot of bugs though. Here are    This game was a lot of fun when it first came out. The gun play was fantastic and was really rewarding for aggressive and strategic play styles. I also liked how there was clear progression for each class. The game was admittedly addicting, especially if you are a completionist. The game also is rewarding for squads that play the objective.

    The game has a lot of bugs though. Here are some of the bugs that still exist in the game:
    - Bad netcode which causes time-to-death (TTD) sequences at 1 or 2 frames
    - Getting stuck in the environment
    - Unable to jump over ledges that are practically 1 feet high
    - Unable to launch v1 and JB rockets and have half the screen blacked out
    - Cannot adjust assignments and weapon progression while in game
    - Not preventing spawns on squad-mates that are in combat, which leads to instant spawn deaths
    - No being able to spawn on points without clicking to a different point and clicking back
    - Slow loading screens when quitting out after a match has ended

    In mid December Dice updated the game with a longer time-to-kill (TTK) value, which means a large majority of the weapons require more shots to down someone. This change practically changed the game in the worst way possible. Instead of having fun and rewarding gun play, everything now is more spongy and promotes a more defensive/camping style. Before, if you flanked a team you were rewarded with multiple kills. If you flank now, more than often, the enemy team will notice you and take you down before you can finish more than 1 kill. This just promotes squads clustering up with other squads and "zerging" to one point at a time. Also, having a longer time-to-kill doesn't help new players because in order to down someone, you need more precise shots, which is something they may lack when they first start playing the game. So new players will just find that they can't kill enemies and they still die quickly due to bad netcode and by more skilled players that can shoot with precision. Therefore, these new players will just stop playing the game due to frustration.

    A large portion of the Battlefield community has asked Dice/EA NOT to adjust the time-to-kill, but instead fix the time-to-death issue which is associated with bad netcode. Dice/EA has ignored the loyal Battlefield community and rammed the TTK change down their throats, causing an uproar in social media. EA were hoping the change would please the casual new players during the holiday season, which it does not.

    Because the game is broken now more than ever and due to the lack of respect from Dice/EA, I'm giving this game a score of 1. This game can be salvaged if EA/Dice listens to logical advice. Your core player-base and fans deserve better.    … Expand
  53. itsDimitri
    Dec 16, 2018
    1
    Its not even that bad, just utterly pointless.
    Ofc its bugged, broken and comes with barely any content but I suppose that´s just what we have to expect from battlefield nowadays...
    The fact that its set in WW2 and finally features a warstory about the German side is a big pro, but unfortunately the only one. And even that is screwed as the game doesnt even mention the eastern front,    Its not even that bad, just utterly pointless.
    Ofc its bugged, broken and comes with barely any content but I suppose that´s just what we have to expect from battlefield nowadays...

    The fact that its set in WW2 and finally features a warstory about the German side is a big pro, but unfortunately the only one. And even that is screwed as the game doesnt even mention the eastern front, the pacific or China... but thank god we have a map set in Narvik, seriously someone needs to get their priorities right.
    And talking about warstories, why on earth would you take a covert operation famous for being completed without a single shot fired and turn it into the story of a girl single handedly obliterating half the german occupation force in Norway? JUST WHY??

    And for the Multiplayer: One-shot throwing knifes and killstreaks straight out of CoD and an attrition system that tries to force squadplay but only ends up being annoying and increasing the problem of one or two squads of well coordinated players dominating a match to the point where its just not fun anymore to play when you are alone.
    It just feels like DICE couldnt decide between making the game more casual and making it more hardcore, tried to do both and ended up achieving neither.
    The game is not unplayable, but Bf 3/4 and even Bf 1 are just much more enjoyable.

    And then there is the whole problem of historical revisionism, with DICE pandering to neo-feminist agendas and calling players "uneducated" for pointing out historical facts... but that has already been discussed enough.
    It just adds another reason to not spend your money on this game.

    Luckily however all of this is not really a problem since we can just continue playing Bf 3/4/1 without really missing out on anything, or get World War 3 which is both cheaper and better, or Hell Let Loose,...
    Thats the beauty of the free market, if you dont like something you can always switch to the competition.

    I do hope they get back on track with the next entry though, as it would be a real shame to see Battlefield die because of this mess...    … Expand
  54. Izotop
    Dec 22, 2018
    3
    Are you sure that you made the game, and not the clutter of graphics, code and sound? This is not a game, this is a mistake! Mistake #34601.
  55. LokenMoon
    Jan 7, 2019
    0
    I dont own the game. This is a review of EA. Pathetic way to launch a game. How dare you. My uneducated opinion.
  56. goga12
    Jan 26, 2019
    0
    игровые критики тупые идиоты игра говнище для тупых дегенаратов её цена максимум 10 р
  57. veyr0n09
    Jan 27, 2019
    0
    Worst game of the Century. Cant find any good aspects except the exit button. But ok the the exit button works as is should!
  58. DrugMaple
    Jan 27, 2019
    0
    With every update game become more sad...
    Tides of War is focused around Squad conquest which is SUPER RARE LEGENDARY piece of sh!t, i regret spending any amount of money on this!
  59. Diav
    Jan 27, 2019
    0
    Leaving aside the many questionable narrative decisions made in this game, there is a much bigger problem. Battlefield V on PC is a raging dumpster fire of bugs and poor optimization.

    I've played most of the BF games; they have all struggled with quality, but this thing is on a whole other level. We are more than 2 months past release day, and the game still won't even start reliably.    Leaving aside the many questionable narrative decisions made in this game, there is a much bigger problem. Battlefield V on PC is a raging dumpster fire of bugs and poor optimization.

    I've played most of the BF games; they have all struggled with quality, but this thing is on a whole other level. We are more than 2 months past release day, and the game still won't even start reliably. Origin, which is easily the worst launcher/DRM client in the industry, may be the culprit, but what difference does it make? Origin has, somehow, gotten incrementally worse over time. It feels like a homebrew java app now, and runs worse.

    If you can properly align your decoder ring long enough get BFV running, it's an uninspired, paint-by-numbers WWII shooter. In other words, it's boring.

    EA has taken some undeserved flak over the years. They've earned a ton, too, but some was just a pile-on.

    They deserve every ounce of it for this game. BFV is a low point for a publisher who has had too many of them in recent years.    … Expand
  60. ClatuVerataNict
    Feb 22, 2019
    0
    The cheating is so massive in this game and nothing is done about it. Doubt it? Go in Spectator mode just for a few on public servers and see for you self.
  61. gulanserhat
    Feb 23, 2019
    0
    this game very bad and i am bf1 players . bf1 more beautiful bf5. **** game bf5
  62. Toolguns
    Mar 3, 2019
    2
    Dice has lost touch with what made the beloved Battlefield series so great...

    Way too many different appearances for each Class (of infantry), it makes it confusing trying to identify who's who from who in Multiplayer (IE: trying to find a Medic or a Support? Good luck, there's 10+ different type of outfits each class can wear (Thanks EA and micro-transactions!). Oh and by the way,    Dice has lost touch with what made the beloved Battlefield series so great...

    Way too many different appearances for each Class (of infantry), it makes it confusing trying to identify who's who from who in Multiplayer (IE: trying to find a Medic or a Support? Good luck, there's 10+ different type of outfits each class can wear (Thanks EA and micro-transactions!). Oh and by the way, you can even change to a WOMAN now, so things even get that much more confusing in the chaos of Multiplayer)
    A little too much Dice, you should remember to keep things SIMPLE, TRANSPARENT, AND most importantly of all: FUN! (See Bad Company 2, If I needed a Medic I would just look for the dude wearing the red beret!)

    The audio (voice acting/positional audio + sound effects) in the Multiplayer are also underwhelming.
    Footsteps, audio cues and sound effects just aren't there to make it feel like a Battlefield game for me.
    To get a real sense of what the community expects from DICE in the audio department, see Battlefield Bad Company 2.

    The map designs now-a-days are also underwhelming...
    I don't feel the same vibes of a true WWII scenario (at least not yet) such as BF1942.

    All in all, MP sandbox experience is still there, but I feel that most of the OG DICE Devs are long gone now and don't know if Battlefield will ever be the same again.

    Also what's up with the SJW agenda being shoved down our throats?

    We want cussing, cursing, and authentic feel of a war game... not sensitive pansy whiny audio effects.

    What happened DICE?!?! Did your balls drop off?    … Expand
  63. lildicky
    Mar 3, 2019
    0
    The people in charge of creating this game are simply incompetent. Stupid cash grab, nowhere near as good as it can be. You will get bored in a few days.

    Save your money.
  64. srt8cat
    Mar 8, 2021
    0
    This game just blows. The menus are terrible, loading times are unbearable (even with a PCIe 4.0 m.2 drive) and the addition of female soldiers completely throws you off and takes you out of the experience. It feels like a fortnite kids game with a bf skin.

    As the developers said themselves; “don’t buy it”. Good thing I got this game for free with my GPU purchase.
  65. Mazma
    Dec 25, 2020
    1
    Basta, bisogna tornare alle guerre conteporanee, non dice nulla di nuovo, wow RTX fine dei giochi poi
  66. ChilledTony
    Jan 16, 2021
    0
    Battlefield 5 is a betrayal. DICE has betrayed us - the Battlefield game title community. This is the worst Battlefield game ever, after which I no longer believe (although I want to believe) in the return of the Battlefield game series. I've been playing the Battlefield series since 2003. I played over 10,000 hours in total.
  67. taweley869
    Feb 13, 2021
    0
    With patch 5.2 I can no longer recommend this game. They ignored the userbase and now the game is horrible. They did the same thing last year…
  68. godihatethisgam
    Mar 8, 2021
    0
    It would be really unfortunate if developers of this game got c4nc3r :D and died very painful death :D Really unfortunate:DDDD
  69. LudwigBeethoven
    Nov 20, 2018
    0
    Its like EA is asking to run out of business. Ok. Your wish may be granted.
  70. LinsGun
    Nov 19, 2018
    0
    strange trends. To go with time for tolerance is good. but to touch the game industry and to impose its course of history. that sounds too much to me.
  71. emperorbutts
    Nov 19, 2018
    0
    This game is an ea product. I miss battlefield tremendously. There was a time you turned to bf when every other game got boring ... What happened...?
  72. SANGAR
    Nov 19, 2018
    0
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. DICE сделали игру про масштабное мировое событие минувших лет, в котором они так умудрились обосраться, и нет, речь сейчас не идёт про отсутствие ссср в игре, речь идёт об отношении к людям со стороны студии DICE. Очень жаль что такая игра как "Battlefield" скатилась в такое дно. Надеюсь что "Battlefield V" это последняя игра, после которой студия DICE закроется.… Expand
  73. m-east
    Dec 4, 2018
    0
    $ 60 for early access.$ 60 for early access.$ 60 for early access.
    $ 60 for early access.$ 60 for early access.$ 60 for early access.
    $ 60 for early access.$ 60 for early access.$ 60 for early access.
  74. Phoenix790
    Nov 23, 2018
    2
    It’s clear that a lot of reviews are done because journalists are sucking up to EA. This is not a good game
  75. TpBro
    Dec 4, 2018
    0
    At its core, it's not Battlefield anymore. DICE created a Call of Duty clone with some Battlefield Elements.

    Please, do not buy this game and do not support EA as a company.

    Vote with your wallet and let's eradicate this cancer of a company from the market.
  76. Tyetan
    Nov 25, 2018
    0
    You love Battlefield right!? Zooking, Driving a Bobcat loaded w/ C4 into tanks, repair tool or defib killing bad buys? Well all that **** is gone so go **** yourself. The reason you ask, "realism" of course, but wait a minute there weren't any women combatants in WWII, were there? I don't know about you, but from what I remember in world history there weren't any female black wolfspiritYou love Battlefield right!? Zooking, Driving a Bobcat loaded w/ C4 into tanks, repair tool or defib killing bad buys? Well all that **** is gone so go **** yourself. The reason you ask, "realism" of course, but wait a minute there weren't any women combatants in WWII, were there? I don't know about you, but from what I remember in world history there weren't any female black wolfspirit lesbian Nazis filling the ranks of the Wermacht! Not only does the game fail as a history lesson, it also sucks as a shooter. Bad guys are hard to pick up off the background, the shooting sucks, map design is sub par, vehicles (except for the planes) handle like dog **** walking or running feels sluggish, and to top off this **** sandwich the game is unfinished and buggy as hell. Don't buy this game for your wallets sake, if you wanna try it just get the EA Premier Access for a month and test it out like I did. You and you bank account will thank me. Well my work here is done, I'm headed back to the Battlefield 4 where the fun still live on.… Expand
  77. The_Seaman_
    Nov 19, 2018
    0
    This easily could have been just a expansion pack.
    Multiplayer is fun, but not worth the full asking price,

    Business behind the pre-order deals and the play early versions are something that shouldnt be praised in this industry.
    Paying more for playing the game a few days early is a dirty move EA. The game is done when its done so everybody should be able to experience it.
  78. Azazator3000
    Nov 19, 2018
    0
    Огрызок игры за 60$ - круто, СССР на стороне фашистов - гениально, #apologizeforUSSR
  79. TombstoneWarden
    Nov 19, 2018
    0
    Waiting for EA to close DICE and they will stop mocking Battlefield games...
  80. maestroRogi
    Nov 19, 2018
    0
    The campaign is very historically incorrect. It is an insult to all that died during the second world war. The multiplayer is just BF1 but with new reload animations and some new(bad) mechanics. The devs force you to play as a team by giving you less ammo and fewer medkits HOWEVER this is the same as previous BattleField games where everyone runs off on their own and the speed of the gameThe campaign is very historically incorrect. It is an insult to all that died during the second world war. The multiplayer is just BF1 but with new reload animations and some new(bad) mechanics. The devs force you to play as a team by giving you less ammo and fewer medkits HOWEVER this is the same as previous BattleField games where everyone runs off on their own and the speed of the game instantly slows down. The game isn't fun in the slightest, it feels like a choir to go back and re-stock ammo and medkits. I would rather if this game allowed me to chose if I was a woman or a man during WW2 instead of forcing it upon me.
    I would not recommend this game, just play BF1 for pretty much the same experience.    … Expand
  81. Pozhiloy
    Nov 20, 2018
    0
    Thank you for womanfield 5!
    Тупа советский пушечно-мясной сброд даже в игру не включили
  82. unxc3113d
    Nov 23, 2018
    0
    Меню тормозит, к серверам не подключается, багов куча. Игру еще полгода доделывать и доделывать, сейчас это пустая трата денег. Я уже даже не говорю про женские крики на поле боя, отсутствие главного участника войны (СССР) и прочий бред. Игра элементарно не доделана, но продается за вполне себе приличные деньги. Единственное, что действительно работает лучше, чем в той же BF1 - по alt+f4Меню тормозит, к серверам не подключается, багов куча. Игру еще полгода доделывать и доделывать, сейчас это пустая трата денег. Я уже даже не говорю про женские крики на поле боя, отсутствие главного участника войны (СССР) и прочий бред. Игра элементарно не доделана, но продается за вполне себе приличные деньги. Единственное, что действительно работает лучше, чем в той же BF1 - по alt+f4 выходит быстрее. Синг посмотрел на ютубе и даже пункт меню с ним открывать не буду.… Expand
  83. DOrek
    Nov 23, 2018
    0
    AAA game from indie-studio litle DICE. OMG... Very BAD. Dont buy this sh** game go play on BF2 BFBC2 BF3 BF4
  84. Repo_
    Nov 24, 2018
    0
    Map Design is weird. There is not much love in graphics. Too less vehicles avaiible. It does not feel like WWII. It does not feel like Battlefield.
  85. HoneyCola
    Nov 25, 2018
    0
    so brazenly rewriting history because of feminism ... Game developers are already openly feeding us crap.
  86. alex_tsapin
    Nov 25, 2018
    0
    The atmosphere is lost. The feeling that I got into the women's locker room.
  87. FauxEden
    Jan 27, 2020
    0
    Total ****

    Game was released an unfinished piece of **** and yet somehow still managed to regress from that state. At least the losers at DICE LA is breaking new grounds at how bad you can be at your job.

    Honestly, put me in coach, I don't know **** about coding either and I'd like a paycheck for doing **** nothing too!
  88. Reph3at
    Dec 2, 2018
    1
    The gamy may be fun to play with friends but this doesn't justify the fact what the've done to the history. This game is just too influenced by retarded leftist propaganda, along with feminism. It's also incomplete. Just 8 maps, one of which being a little rework of BF1's Amiens. The resources are recycled as well. if you take a closer look at house models they are copied directly from theThe gamy may be fun to play with friends but this doesn't justify the fact what the've done to the history. This game is just too influenced by retarded leftist propaganda, along with feminism. It's also incomplete. Just 8 maps, one of which being a little rework of BF1's Amiens. The resources are recycled as well. if you take a closer look at house models they are copied directly from the Battlefield 1. The game ditches the Premium service but I feel like they had to do like this after bad first impressions (after May trailer was uploaded). I bought this game because I've received a 50% discount coupon for any order in my local store but I would never pay the full price (which is 45$ afaik). This game is jut not worth it. Battlefield 1 is way better than this, although it's the BF3/4 which I still consider as the best Battlefield games in the series.… Expand
  89. SolaireDaBest
    Dec 2, 2018
    0
    Youngsters, even with the non-stop SJW brainwashing in school, I assume you know there were no female cyborg infantry on the battlefield in WW2. But this is precisely where EA gets very tricksy.

    The real propaganda is the OTHER missions. The ones without cyborgs. EA wants you to think, by comparison, those are accurate. But did you know the Norway heavy water plant raid did happen? Only    Youngsters, even with the non-stop SJW brainwashing in school, I assume you know there were no female cyborg infantry on the battlefield in WW2. But this is precisely where EA gets very tricksy.

    The real propaganda is the OTHER missions. The ones without cyborgs. EA wants you to think, by comparison, those are accurate. But did you know the Norway heavy water plant raid did happen? Only it was conducted by a team of (shudder) men, not a mother-daughter superhero team? And so on.

    #GetWokeGoBroke until they learn.    … Expand
  90. JM81
    Nov 25, 2018
    4
    I dunno. I loved Battlefield 3, which was the last BF I played, and obviously older BF games, but this is just....... so, so different.

    I can't see anything that's going on. I feel like I'm being shot almost immediately by some super pro. The startout weapons are crap and I literally have to grind to get something that's good. There's literally DIRT on the sights.... like, why Dice?    I dunno. I loved Battlefield 3, which was the last BF I played, and obviously older BF games, but this is just....... so, so different.

    I can't see anything that's going on. I feel like I'm being shot almost immediately by some super pro. The startout weapons are crap and I literally have to grind to get something that's good.

    There's literally DIRT on the sights.... like, why Dice? That's just annoying. Anything that clutters your view is annoying to me, and there's toooooooooooooons of that **** in this game.

    I played it for a couple of hours, but never felt any sort of joy from it. It was a chore, emotionally speaking.    … Expand
  91. mrsalty101
    Dec 18, 2018
    0
    I really hope this is on the list of worst videogames of 2018 but I'll never know because it seams Metacritic can't make a working click-through list.
    As for those that bought the game for the "realistic war feel" despite handicapped women on the frontline, I feel bad for you that now they're patching it to make everyone bulletsponges because the noobs got killed too fast.
  92. broccoliballs
    Dec 3, 2018
    0
    White Man, White Man, White Man, White Man, White Man, White Man, White Man, White Man, White Man.
  93. Dyslexicnija
    Dec 4, 2018
    0
    This gaming is insulting to our history, we should be remembering our veterans and not insulting them.
  94. Tristan123
    Nov 30, 2018
    0
    So nice rewriting history to please some critics while taking a dump on the sacrifices of soldiers. Commando squad completed an important mission and BFV goes and tells a story of how they failed and how this young daughter beat an nazi company and destroyed the facility instead. Get woke go broke
  95. Fany000
    Nov 29, 2018
    1
    This is the historicaly most inaccurate game ever, worse, this is the game which trampled the history. How is possible that crap like this is spread in public? CoD WWII was not good, at least it was not fanciful, wanna be history based game, full of pocilital and feminism correctness (F*ck this **** I am not sexist, racist, nothing like this but I am a fan of history, and a girl withThis is the historicaly most inaccurate game ever, worse, this is the game which trampled the history. How is possible that crap like this is spread in public? CoD WWII was not good, at least it was not fanciful, wanna be history based game, full of pocilital and feminism correctness (F*ck this **** I am not sexist, racist, nothing like this but I am a fan of history, and a girl with robotic hand fighting in WWII is really beyond the borders), braindead people celebrating sh*t. For me playing this game was the worst gaming experience ever, and I am not talking about game qualities, because they are none, this game is a piece of sh*t, literally.… Expand
  96. vukkoz
    Nov 24, 2018
    3
    Glimpses of fun gunplay in the puddle of blandness, boredom, weird vehicle mechanics, horrid animations and 2 actually playable maps. A huge step back in the franchise that has taken a considerable decline since battlefield 4 and keeps on reaching lower and lower. I really regret buying this game, think twice before doing so. If you are new and want to try out the series, do yourself aGlimpses of fun gunplay in the puddle of blandness, boredom, weird vehicle mechanics, horrid animations and 2 actually playable maps. A huge step back in the franchise that has taken a considerable decline since battlefield 4 and keeps on reaching lower and lower. I really regret buying this game, think twice before doing so. If you are new and want to try out the series, do yourself a favour and get something cheaper and better - like bad company 2, bf 3 or 4.… Expand
  97. T4BLETOS
    Nov 27, 2018
    1
    Если вы не знали, спермобаки - угнетатели, именно чернокожие азиатки с членами выйграли ВМ2. Ставь луказ если ты анэдьюкейтед
  98. ERMAK_XOY
    Nov 28, 2018
    0
    Где русские?40 млн. человек не вернулись с войны , а играть нам предлагают за немцев? и почему наплевали на 6 героев которые и провели операцию? (EA DICE - ВОТ их имена лейтенанты Кнут Хаугланд и Каспер Идланд , сержанты Фредрик Кайзер (норв. Fredrik Kayser), Ханс Стурхауг (норв. Hans Storhaug), Арне Хьельструп и Биргер Стрёмсхейм (норв. Birger Strømsheim) , Это позор !!! Лучше быГде русские?40 млн. человек не вернулись с войны , а играть нам предлагают за немцев? и почему наплевали на 6 героев которые и провели операцию? (EA DICE - ВОТ их имена лейтенанты Кнут Хаугланд и Каспер Идланд , сержанты Фредрик Кайзер (норв. Fredrik Kayser), Ханс Стурхауг (норв. Hans Storhaug), Арне Хьельструп и Биргер Стрёмсхейм (норв. Birger Strømsheim) , Это позор !!! Лучше бы похронили бы серию только бы не выпускали ЭТО!!!!!… Expand
  99. ghoststalkr
    Nov 28, 2018
    0
    I completely recommend Battelfield: Bad Company 2. For a Battlefield game it has a pretty good story......oh! Battlefield V? it's a piece of sht, don't waste your time and money on this one.
  100. pcgamingisdead
    Dec 6, 2018
    0
    Pc gaming is dead, all these **** cashgrabs for years and years, blatant recycling and lack of quality. The PC gaming in 2018 is **** Videogame journalism is a JOKE. We need a new videogame market crash and weed these **** and greedy developers out.
Page:

Awards & Rankings

53
#53 Best PC Game of 2018
2
#2 Most Discussed PC Game of 2018
7
#7 Most Shared PC Game of 2018

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
81

Generally favorable reviews - based on 52 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 45 out of 52
  2. Mixed: 7 out of 52
  3. Negative: 0 out of 52
  1. CD-Action
    Nov 14, 2019
    85
    It’s far from being ideal but all the glitches and shortcomings don’t ruin the overall fun of Battlefield V’s multiplayer experience. Although the single player portion of the game is not bad at all, I would have been disappointed if I bought the game just for it. [13/2018, p.56]
  2. PLAY! Zine
    Mar 5, 2019
    80
    In Battlefield V we got back to WW2, but with refined gunplay and death system which works great. There are also little problems such as low number of maps and stability issues, that are taking the fun away, but nothing that can't be fixed.
    Read full review
  3. LEVEL (Czech Republic)
    Dec 31, 2018
    80
    A great World War II shooter that will grow and improve. Do not buy the game because of its singleplayer, but if you consider the campaign a bonus to the multiplayer, you will be satisfied. [Issue#291]
See all critic reviews »