Battlefield V

 PC
User Score
3.0

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 3148 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 674 out of 3148
  2. Mixed: 296 out of 3148
  3. Negative: 2,178 out of 3148
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. highroller1911
    Aug 13, 2019
    1
    I bought this game because I liked the game modes Frontlines and Domination. They Removed it .... The Game was fun at release but got worse by every Patch. Their so called "Live Service" is providing skins. No new Maps or bad designed maps. With the released game modes removed this game is not worth playing for me. I recommend not to buy this game because it's bugged, unpollished andI bought this game because I liked the game modes Frontlines and Domination. They Removed it .... The Game was fun at release but got worse by every Patch. Their so called "Live Service" is providing skins. No new Maps or bad designed maps. With the released game modes removed this game is not worth playing for me. I recommend not to buy this game because it's bugged, unpollished and delivers bad/no new content.… Expand
  2. bfhater911
    Sep 4, 2019
    0
    Full of Bugs and with all the patches its even worse!! I gave a 0 for this garbage game. :)
  3. RoyalCheese
    Dec 14, 2019
    0
    The single player campaign does not save progress (the game is already a year). A ton of bugs. Constantly jumps TTK. Update broke the interface and had to download the game again. The promised mechanics never appeared. Already introduced mechanics are absolutely unnecessary (for example the construction of barricades). Servers lose connections all the time. Should I continue?
  4. HerTz
    Nov 2, 2019
    0
    Modo campanha mediano, online um lixo falta de modos bons e players, hitkill a cada segundo, péssimo netcode
  5. Jackless
    Oct 7, 2019
    3
    Seriously? Comparing it to BF1, this is garbage. Okay on the design and graphical side this is amazing. However, the technical part is weird. I will not talk about the campaign as it is bad, it is plain to see that this game is a multiplayer experience only. Speaking about that, it is not worth playing. There is no variety in guns( like 5 guns in the whole game, of course, I'mSeriously? Comparing it to BF1, this is garbage. Okay on the design and graphical side this is amazing. However, the technical part is weird. I will not talk about the campaign as it is bad, it is plain to see that this game is a multiplayer experience only. Speaking about that, it is not worth playing. There is no variety in guns( like 5 guns in the whole game, of course, I'm exaggerating) not a lot of actions compared to BF1. I am not comparing the game to BF3 or BF4. The game does not have proper WW2 setting, on top of that, it does not smell like a DIce game at all. The main menu is user-friendly but IMO, too plain. The new FIrestrom mode is a good addition to the game but it doesn't fix the game and its fundamental problems. The game is worth playing if you pay 10-20$ for it.… Expand
  6. MrPato
    Jan 31, 2020
    4
    This is simply the worst battlefield I ever played. Tons of bugs and glitches, Hackers all around the map,My Internet is good and this is the only multiplayer game that I lose connection every single time in a multiplayer match, Poor Singleplayer Stories ( Except the Last Tiger ), The Worst TTK I have ever seen in a battlefield game, or just in any FPS I ever played in general, for me theThis is simply the worst battlefield I ever played. Tons of bugs and glitches, Hackers all around the map,My Internet is good and this is the only multiplayer game that I lose connection every single time in a multiplayer match, Poor Singleplayer Stories ( Except the Last Tiger ), The Worst TTK I have ever seen in a battlefield game, or just in any FPS I ever played in general, for me the only good thing is that this game is really beatifull, prob the best looking game in the franchise, but that does not mean that this game is good. Just stick with BF4 or BF1, hell, even hardline if you want. Thank you EA and DICE for ruining my favorite gaming franchise.… Expand
  7. ShimazuPL
    Nov 4, 2019
    0
    This is one of the worst FPS games I've ever played. However, it looks beautiful graphically, which does not change the fact that visibility on some maps is very difficult
  8. Im_just_playing
    Apr 17, 2020
    4
    No words, just no words about this mediocre game... Campain's sucks and updates are ruining everything. I had more fun in BF1, BF3, BF4, and BFBC2... ._.
  9. FlippyFlop
    Nov 28, 2019
    0
    Created an account just to review this sorry excuse of a Battlefield game. There is no consistency in the game, sometimes a gun causes huge damage, at other times small amount of damage. Sometimes bullets dont damge enemies, even though you're standing 2 feet apart and they clearly hit the enemy. Sometimes you spawn right in front of enemies, and other times you spawn alone on the otherCreated an account just to review this sorry excuse of a Battlefield game. There is no consistency in the game, sometimes a gun causes huge damage, at other times small amount of damage. Sometimes bullets dont damge enemies, even though you're standing 2 feet apart and they clearly hit the enemy. Sometimes you spawn right in front of enemies, and other times you spawn alone on the other side of the map. Battlefield 5 is probably the worst game in the series, period. The time i wasted playing this game is time i will never be able to get back, and that is unforgivable.… Expand
  10. Aztaban
    Feb 20, 2020
    0
    November 12th 2018 - DICE: Autobalance is our top priority.
    February 20th 2020 - Still no autobalance
    I dont wann see how long will it take for them to fix bugs which are not top priority. Anyway if you enjoy game with **** performance, which is the copy of previous game. And you also enjoy 5v30( they are pretty common...at lesat 1 in 2 hours) buy the game. Otherwise dont spend    November 12th 2018 - DICE: Autobalance is our top priority.
    February 20th 2020 - Still no autobalance

    I dont wann see how long will it take for them to fix bugs which are not top priority.

    Anyway if you enjoy game with **** performance, which is the copy of previous game. And you also enjoy 5v30( they are pretty common...at lesat 1 in 2 hours) buy the game. Otherwise dont spend money on this **** money graber.    … Expand
  11. Smidley
    Dec 9, 2019
    0
    With patch 5.2 I can no longer recommend this game. They ignored the userbase and now the game is horrible. They did the same thing last year around the same time for the attempted holiday sales. Didn't work then. Wont work now and the game is unplayable.
  12. Mauzer31
    May 3, 2020
    0
    Specially added black-Nazis with women in charge. There is no the most important theater of action- east-european Soviet territory. Anti-historical sh*t. -10/10
  13. topologist2
    Dec 29, 2019
    4
    Don't look at the meaningless critic reviews obviously, this game has the worst rating in it's entire series for a reason. If you are looking for a quality battlefield game like 3 or battlefield I. This game definitely isn't it. As someone who has been a battlefield fan since Battlefield 2. I can tell you with confidence that this game is one of the worst. DICE basically fell into the SJWDon't look at the meaningless critic reviews obviously, this game has the worst rating in it's entire series for a reason. If you are looking for a quality battlefield game like 3 or battlefield I. This game definitely isn't it. As someone who has been a battlefield fan since Battlefield 2. I can tell you with confidence that this game is one of the worst. DICE basically fell into the SJW outcry and this game is a product of their fall instead of looking at actual historical events.
    They also tried implementing the boring and monotonous "battle-royale" genre that has plagued every game to try to improve their ratings but it didn't do squat for the game.
    In conclusion go back to the older battlefields, they are years ahead of this game and are so much better it actually turns this game into a comedy more than a first-person shooter.    … Expand
  14. vldst1
    Jun 28, 2020
    0
    Full crap, a broken game after 2 years of updates.
    Company **** -
    Guns full of crap To open a normal weapon, I xs how many hours do I need to spend for each class to open. As they say, well done, they stuck smelly skins into the game and decided to make money on it. When moving from a lying position to a standing position, you can’t shoot at a person and for me it was just a complete    Full crap, a broken game after 2 years of updates.
    Company **** -
    Guns full of crap
    To open a normal weapon, I xs how many hours do I need to spend for each class to open. As they say, well done, they stuck smelly skins into the game and decided to make money on it.
    When moving from a lying position to a standing position, you can’t shoot at a person and for me it was just a complete pzdc!
    There is no Soviet Union, and I'm just shocked by this, you really bastards went head first? You have Internet, you have history. You tell a real **** story about women if you really want this, where they really fought and everything was real. But you are simply chmoshniki who decided to go on about politics. When a game turns into a political subtext, DICE just ****
    I hope you **** suddenly bent into your **** and will never create games again    … Expand
  15. carlospioli
    May 3, 2020
    3
    Eu particularmente estou voltando do "Battlefield V" para o "Battlefield 1". E (mesmo que uns não gostem deles) eu citarei os motivos:

    Motivo 1 - Battlefield 5 com aviões dominantes: Dois times com aviões um ignorando o outro e usando o veículo com um único objetivo, o de tacar bomba na cabeça dos pelotões. Tem piloto saindo de rodada com 100-0 ou 150-0 em alguns mapas que permitem    Eu particularmente estou voltando do "Battlefield V" para o "Battlefield 1". E (mesmo que uns não gostem deles) eu citarei os motivos:

    Motivo 1 - Battlefield 5 com aviões dominantes: Dois times com aviões um ignorando o outro e usando o veículo com um único objetivo, o de tacar bomba na cabeça dos pelotões. Tem piloto saindo de rodada com 100-0 ou 150-0 em alguns mapas que permitem aviões bombardeiros. As "anti-aéreas" nem fazem cócegas neles e tem limite de distância, sendo que o avião pode facilmente se recuperar e se consertar no ar! Sem falar os clãs que estão marcando os pelotões com o avião, sinalizadores ficam mais altos e dificilmente são destruídos!

    Motivo 2 - O jogo tá lotado de trapaceiros, pessoas utilizando programinhas para facilitar o jogo. E são esses trapaceiros com "k/d" altos que são os mais cobiçados e se engajam para carregar outros jogadores em clãs. Infelizmente de cada 10 clãs eu reconheci uns 9 tem pelo menos 2-3 cara jogando com trapaça lá, ou mais! (Para seu time conseguir algum sucesso, é preciso pelo menos uns 10-20 jogadores "rushando" de uma vez o mapa todo e tomando todas as bandeiras. Pois nenhum trapaceiro nunca vai querer bater de frente com "5 ou mais" jogadores, e nem vai!

    Motivo 3 - Pontuação pelo conceituadíssimo "Open critic": Battlefield 1 (96%) / Battlefield V (74%).

    Motivo 4 - Estou ainda esperando uma atualização com a "FEB" e sua notável luta na "batalha de Monte Castello". O famoso "Dia D" americano na Normandia. E não esse compilado na ilha japonesa, a "batalha de Iwo Jima" (dos EUA contra o Japão.). Seria mais bonito se focassem nas batalhas principais, "Pearl Harbour" (poderia ter sido colocado no "modo história", no jogo.). Cadê a participação da Rússia também na guerra? Eles não poderiam inventar uma guerra entre Grã Bretanha e Alemanha com barcos, aviões e submarinos? Poderia! São tantas coisas que estão deixadas de lado para se criar um jogo sobre a famosa 2ª Guerra mundial.

    Motivo 5 - Esse pessoal (haters) que ficam ofendidinhos com tudo que postamos no fórum e vivem imitando gato roco, só "mimimi". Esses que vivem tomando toddynho dentro de clazinhos abarrotados de menininhos valentinhos e não fazem nada na vida, papai paga até mensalidade da escola e fala de boca cheia que é bom jogador. Eu até concordo! No caso daqueles que despendem o dia todo da vida sem fazer nenhuma coisa além de jogar o mesmo jogo o dia inteiro. (Prefiro bloquear e sequer leio a mensagem desse pessoal, sendo aqui no fórum ou até mesmo dentro do jogo.)

    Bom, enquanto sou eu que pago as minhas contas e não ofendi ninguém de tudo o que disse aqui no fórum além das crianças que se sentiram ofendidinhas porque fazem coisa errada no jogo só tenho uma coisa para dizer: Segundo o site PEGI (Pan European Game Information), o jogo "Battlefield V" é recomendado por nada menos que pessoas com 16 anos ou mais.

    #MinhaOpinião    … Expand
  16. drushdrix
    Jan 27, 2020
    2
    I love the Battlefield series, but something went wrong with this one.
    1) Constant crashes and disconnects
    First of all this is the only game where I usually get disconnected or crash to desktop 2-3 times during a gaming session of less than a couple of hours. Unacceptable because I have seen these errors in bascially all Battlefield games, and it is frustrating finally finding a great    I love the Battlefield series, but something went wrong with this one.
    1) Constant crashes and disconnects
    First of all this is the only game where I usually get disconnected or crash to desktop 2-3 times during a gaming session of less than a couple of hours. Unacceptable because I have seen these errors in bascially all Battlefield games, and it is frustrating finally finding a great game and then get a crash to desktop 15 min into the game. Some days it happens, some days it doesn't (which is super frustrating... You knever know).

    Have tried a few fixes and the problem still persists and its worth noticing its the only game this happens in.

    Other bugs: I press I want to play a game of Grand Operations. Many times you get dropped into A) Wrong game mode B) Match almost over.

    2) Change of core mechanichs
    They changed so many core mechanichs in the game to please 'the masses' while ruining the experience for many seasoned Battlefield fans.

    Why did they remove 3D spotting? Great mechanic that I have really liked since Bad Company 2.

    Oh man, I could go on. On the positive side many great looking maps with dynamic weather and "epic feeling" when you storm enemtey positions followed by tanks and planes. But experience is quickly ruined by all the negatives (at least from a seasoned BF games POV)

    3) Oh and did I mention cheaters on many servers in PC? Encounter a few situations during the week where people are obviously using aimbot. Why is there no !voteban systems implemented?
    Why not innovate (in regard to the BF series at least) and introduce a killcam?

    Honestly wish i didn't buy this medicore WWII fps.    … Expand
  17. Pirschjager
    Feb 15, 2020
    0
    Ебанный политкорректный кусок блять дерьма
  18. DavePokora
    Feb 28, 2020
    0
    This game is So unbalanced, crappy **** dont buy this **** and waste your nerves for that. Bf 1 was WAAAAAAAY better. New expansion doesnt change anything. I v played 4 maos in multiplayer and turned that **** off forever. My team could t even go out of spawn as an attacker. Regret buying this **** So much. Even ****ty cod MW is better than this.
  19. acotts
    Mar 11, 2020
    0
    worst game with a lot of hacker and EA don't banned or do **** anything to that **** hacker
  20. pakmen
    Jul 6, 2021
    0
    zero good maps, zero good guns, zero fun, zero score. Do not buy this, it is not battlefield you like, you'll regret.
  21. MrAubergine
    Apr 4, 2020
    2
    Being a fan of the Battlefield saga, and after the disaster of Battlefield 1, i initially felt hyped about this game. Now that I've played it extensively i truly feel betrayed by DICE. Now i wanted to adress some of my opinions on this game:

    - Yes, DICE wanted the game to feel realistic and in some ways, it does. Graphics and Sounds are amazing, as they usually are in this saga, but the    Being a fan of the Battlefield saga, and after the disaster of Battlefield 1, i initially felt hyped about this game. Now that I've played it extensively i truly feel betrayed by DICE. Now i wanted to adress some of my opinions on this game:

    - Yes, DICE wanted the game to feel realistic and in some ways, it does. Graphics and Sounds are amazing, as they usually are in this saga, but the inclusion of Women as front soldiers and guns that never actually made it to the front kinda defeats the point. On top of that, the fact that soviets are not included in the game is straight out outrageous, considering they are the ones who actually won the war, not the americans, nor the british.
    - The Game is crippled with bugs, from graphics to terrains, and especially matchmaking. The quick play button gives you about 50% chance of joining a half empty game, and there is almost no map or game mode diversity on most servers. Even then matches are very often completely unbalanced and just end up frustrating players who end up leaving.
    - The GUI is one of the worst I've ever seen. For real. The "Play" menu is confusing, the "company" (where you equip) and "armory" (your inventory) are horrible and should be fused, the same goes for the "Chapter Rewards" and the "Asignments", as both are missions that gives you rewards.
    - Talking about rewards, the "Chapters" system is unfair, pay-to-win (even tho the game costs 40€ for the standard version) and unlocking any decent skin or gun demand an insane amount of dedication. More insane is the fact that most decent guns where part of chapters, so if you didn't play during that time, well you gotta pay or you ain't getting it.
    - The accessories are basically skins, and the sights are unlocked from the beginning (which is stupid), and the only real customization is the specializations which are few and don't give the player any sense of progress. Not even talking about the absence of a free camera to look at your gun.
    - The vehicles are few, so almost never available, overpowered and the infantry has almost no way of fighting them.
    - The classes that worked amazingly in BF3 and BF4 (Assault, Engineer, Support, Recon) are now pointless kits for you to choose between SMGs, Semi Rifles, Machine Guns/Shotguns or Bolt Action Rifles and give absolutely no incentive on Teamwork or cooperation. Good luck getting healed by the occasional helpful medic.

    In conclusion the game dynamics are not bad, even tho it feels more of a big map CoD rather than a true Battlefield, but the game is completely let down by a shady EA monetization system, truly horrible game design and a complete lack of will by DICE to fix the issues and include the content that should have been there since the beginning. As a casual run&shoot game, i'm not saying you can't have fun, but as a 2018 triple-A, serious shooter this is simply unacceptable. As a long time Battlefield fan i cannot recommend anyone to buy this game, and as long as DICE and EA keep pulling out this kind of garbage i do not see why anyone should support them.    … Expand
  22. sirius2145
    Jul 23, 2020
    0
    I write this review in 2020. Lacks everything what you expect froml FPS about WW2. The game is boring.
  23. iwillsurvive100
    Apr 12, 2020
    0
    garbage game. you get killed in less than 1 second. wait 15 seconds to respawn. respawn again and get killed in 1 second. wish I could refund this game but I cant cos its not steam based.

    don't buy this game, and any other EA game.
  24. YennsGoons
    May 4, 2020
    0
    This game **** up from the first button to the end. This is still not my Battlefield and ended up not being my Battlefield until the last day.
  25. vladimir22666
    Apr 29, 2020
    0
    1.5 years of beta-testing. still no optimization (on gtx970 and i7 6700 cant rich 60fps on low settings 1080p). Still no fractions (no Allies of World War II). No maps (only unknown places like a "some bridge", "some mountain", and Metro + IwoJima + Wake Islands). No balance.
    And now we finding it "out of support this summer". I need refund.
    #EA_liars #EA_refund
  26. mansponge123
    Jun 18, 2020
    0
    Rubbish. Same game. Weapons hit like wet noodles. No real customization. It's a shame really because it could have been good but the multiplayer is absolutely garbage. It's basically a rehash of Battlefield 1 but if you're wanting some customization, don't expect it. Don't buy the game. if you've got Origin access and fancy a go, go for it, but otherwise save your money
  27. rpo59
    Jun 22, 2020
    0
    I could write a very long text about my thoughts and feelings about the problems in/with the game. Long story short: this is the least enjoyable, most frustrating, most unbalanced, most painful-to-play multiplayer game with the worst singleplayer I have ever bought and played. I will not buy any Battlefield/Dice game ever again. I feel angry and scammed.
  28. cobaner
    Aug 19, 2020
    0
    When you but a game for 60 bucks you expect it to work. battlefield 5 has only given me headaches every time I play I have to redo the start mission then I have a 50-50 chance of the game connecting to the servers. when it can't connect I get no information on why just says it can't. I have given up on even trying to play the game because it is such a pain to even try and makes more senseWhen you but a game for 60 bucks you expect it to work. battlefield 5 has only given me headaches every time I play I have to redo the start mission then I have a 50-50 chance of the game connecting to the servers. when it can't connect I get no information on why just says it can't. I have given up on even trying to play the game because it is such a pain to even try and makes more sense to not was my time and go play something else. I have tried fixing the issues but to no avail.… Expand
  29. Longbomber
    Sep 2, 2020
    1
    They make unnecessary changes to game modes that were fine, crushing what little good the game did right along with any desire to keep this waste of space on my hard drive.
  30. Anaxus_
    Jul 10, 2021
    0
    Fake history................................................................................................................
  31. ZeroH3dge
    Jun 14, 2021
    0
    EA: "If you don't like it, don't buy it".
    Core BF players: Ok, we wont buy it.
  32. Nixoid
    Nov 8, 2021
    1
    Cheaters
    unplayable gameplay
    you dont's see any enemy around you
    Cheaters
    Cheaters
    Cheaters
  33. Pyter
    Feb 23, 2022
    0
    im casual player and when i by every match see wallhackers and aimbots headshotting with planes i just got no fun
  34. Haba
    Dec 2, 2018
    1
    Buy a 60 dollar game today. Oh, but you don't actually get the game today. You'll get the first part today, next part in two months, the third part in six months and... Brought to you by the developer who takes absolute PRIDE in not listening to the players.
  35. leadwarner
    Dec 1, 2018
    1
    This game insults the story.It is also a disrespect for all veterans and all those who participated in that war,
  36. Sydex
    Dec 2, 2018
    1
    The worst game in the series. I was hoping until the last moment, but the miracle did not happen. The game is meanly killed by its own creators. Goodbye BF, rest in peace.
  37. Lynx007
    Jan 2, 2019
    1
    Ich weiß nicht wo ich anfangen soll...

    Habe mich so darauf gefreut... Aber lasst die finger davon... Was BF5 nicht bietet.... Tolle Panzer gefechte... Der Tiger ist ein witz... und die gefühlt jeder Soldat hat jetzt Antipanzer waffen... man fühlt sich wie in nem Papiertiger... und darf auf wie ein Sniper auf Distanzu zu Flage Campen... bls nicht reinfahren.... Die Ballance    Ich weiß nicht wo ich anfangen soll...

    Habe mich so darauf gefreut... Aber lasst die finger davon...

    Was BF5 nicht bietet....
    Tolle Panzer gefechte... Der Tiger ist ein witz... und die gefühlt jeder Soldat hat jetzt Antipanzer waffen... man fühlt sich wie in nem Papiertiger... und darf auf wie ein Sniper auf Distanzu zu Flage Campen... bls nicht reinfahren....

    Die Ballance zwischen den Klassen ist auch ein Witz... Der Assault kann jetzt gefühlt alles... Hat eine sehr starke Assaultrifle, Panzerfaust, Spregnstoff, Granatwerfer....
    Der Medic, tja der hat eine Maschienen pistole, muss reichen... Dafür kann jetzt jedes Squadmember auch Recieven, wen auch nicht so schnell.
    Support und Engineur hat man jetzt zusammen geworfen... Dafür haben die keinen Panzerfaust mehr..
    Und Sniper, tja der kann nur noch Snipern und das nur richtig mit zwei Gewehren die auch mit nur einem Schuss in den Kopf töten.
    Wer hat sich den diesen Mist ausgedacht????
    Balance zwischen den Waffen, gibt es auch nicht.... Jede klassen hat zwei Waffen die etwas taugen... das war es...

    Und es gibt kein Hardcore mehr, kein Friendlyfire, dafür noob Map, noobspot, noob weapon damage, noob weapon spraying Style.... Pfuideifel...

    Sprayen ist besser als geziehlte chüsse.... Es ist kommt nicht einmal an BF4 ran. Und das hat sehr generft wegen seinen Lootboxen und den kleinen Pay2Win/Pay2Shortcut mechaniken.... Hier gibts das nicht mehr, dafür fehlt es wirklich an fast allem...

    Bugs, ach ja, regelmäsig feststecken tut man auch noch, oder es gibt unsichtbare Wände die einen die Schüsse wegnehmen....

    Ist schon mehr Wert als 0...    … Expand
  38. fatz150
    Jan 15, 2019
    0
    Ok, I do not know where to start.
    - It has only 2 fractions
    - It's 1/15/2019, and I still have the no-coin bug, which means I can not upgrade my weapons or buy skins - There are women in the game who scream nonsense over the battlefield and they are not from the soviets (the only army that really had women in WW2) - I can not switch all my characters to male (pilot) - You can not play    Ok, I do not know where to start.
    - It has only 2 fractions
    - It's 1/15/2019, and I still have the no-coin bug, which means I can not upgrade my weapons or buy skins
    - There are women in the game who scream nonsense over the battlefield and they are not from the soviets (the only army that really had women in WW2)
    - I can not switch all my characters to male (pilot)
    - You can not play a dark-skinned character with the Germans
    - No Battle-Royal
    - Censored to get FSK 16
    - Full of Bugs    … Expand
  39. athagiorgos
    Jan 13, 2019
    0
    Battlefield V is not a battlefield game. I have been a veteran battlefield player and I just LOVE the series BUT this is not a battlefield game. This is literally garbage. It is so unrealistic, I dont even know why people think its graphic are nice, the graphics are terrible. It is 2019 and this is the next battlefiled game with its amazing graphics and gameplay???? The sound of shootingBattlefield V is not a battlefield game. I have been a veteran battlefield player and I just LOVE the series BUT this is not a battlefield game. This is literally garbage. It is so unrealistic, I dont even know why people think its graphic are nice, the graphics are terrible. It is 2019 and this is the next battlefiled game with its amazing graphics and gameplay???? The sound of shooting with a weapon is like puppy, granades are exploding and it sounds like someone's farted. WTF Dice and EA?????? I just went back to BF1 and the graphics are completely different, BF1 is so good and close to real life that BFV looks like a game from 2008. Even BF3 and BF4 had amazing gunplays and graphics. To anyone out there thinking to buy this piece of **** just don't.… Expand
  40. 4125MakeItSo
    Dec 19, 2018
    0
    Genderfield with absolutely wrong history. This is totally not WW2. Game was awful but developers make it worse and worse. Not my Battlefield with not my TTK.
  41. kjubb
    Jan 3, 2019
    0
    It would even be a good game if it had not been so embarrassingly trying to lie to the history of the Second World War. The number of women on the WWII front is estimated at less than 1%, the negroes were also a small percentage, but the game indoctrinates the player that these groups played a significant role in this war :D EA did not learn anything from Battlefield I. Of course, EA triesIt would even be a good game if it had not been so embarrassingly trying to lie to the history of the Second World War. The number of women on the WWII front is estimated at less than 1%, the negroes were also a small percentage, but the game indoctrinates the player that these groups played a significant role in this war :D EA did not learn anything from Battlefield I. Of course, EA tries to please blacks and feminists, but the negligible number of copies sold and the metacritic user score (2.9 / 10) shows that the players are not stupid, but EA management folks are. It is a pity for developers who had to implement sick visions of their bosses. Because graphically it's quite good, the mechanics are OK too.… Expand
  42. swuomo
    Dec 4, 2018
    0
    Apart from the obvious and obnoxious falsities in historical accounts depicted by the game that were debunked countless times by members of the game's community who actually know their history, the gameplay is flawed in the following ways:

    Problems range from the - mildly infuriating bugs (random damage when traversing certain terrains, reload animation errors, intermission between    Apart from the obvious and obnoxious falsities in historical accounts depicted by the game that were debunked countless times by members of the game's community who actually know their history, the gameplay is flawed in the following ways:

    Problems range from the

    - mildly infuriating bugs (random damage when traversing certain terrains, reload animation errors, intermission between rounds is eternally stuck unless you manually consent to go to the round by pressing Continue, plane physics is at best wrong, and at worst, you can crash into a mountain peak head-on then take off with 20% health like nothing ever happened) to the
    - insanely thought out game mechanics (progression system is completely disagreeable, replacing weapons attachments with a CoD perks system, and vehicle progression is haphazard with nonsensical balance of strength, where certain progression paths guarantee an overpowered vehicle, like the Spitfire mk VA left side tree. "Company coins" and its ancestor from BF1 "Warbonds" are just a needless hazing ritual for a new player that serve little to improve gameplay apart from adding grind before unlocking needed perks.

    KEEP AN EYE on company coins as they are not only pure progression currency, but also what you use to purchase skins in the in-game Teen Vogue magaz --ehm, "Armoury". They are likely to be subject to microtransactions in the future. Let's face it, after the game flopped as hard as it did, they can backtrack on any promises made.    … Expand
  43. Jack9774
    Jan 6, 2019
    0
    this fcking ea and dice is did most fcking thing, they just changed history and they is removed from history ussr, wtf is this? why? are you idiots? you just propaganda fcking feminism in this piece of ****

    facepalm ea and dice, you're gone lose your customers, idiots.
  44. max0x7ba
    Jan 10, 2019
    1
    The game is unfinished and extremely clunky, the content is lacking, the UI is horrible. It should not have been released in such a poor state.
  45. Darck
    Dec 2, 2018
    0
    Second time!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Why? Why u made same? We need Battelfild! We dont need only "hardcore mode" U remuved normal spot and? Instal grafic on minimum in game for normal visibility. Also game not finished. Deja vu?
  46. Gardarika
    Dec 5, 2018
    0
    Battlefield, unlike its competitor Call of Duty, has always been different is the reliability and realism, and now we are presented with a toy shooter with painted characters. Sucked out of the finger conveyor nonsense that has nothing to do with world War II. And there is a assumption that after the release of Battlefield 5 fans of the franchise sharply diminished.
  47. andrec85
    Jan 10, 2019
    0
    This is just my opinion
    If i could give less then 0 this would be the game and i played almost 100hr trying to like it before someone said that i am just here to hate on the game
    The worst battlefield ever made..Leave aside all the sjw talks and inaccurate ww2 history,i am not giving 0 because of that but for the GUNPLAY and lack of some iconic ww2 content(americans and russian military    This is just my opinion
    If i could give less then 0 this would be the game and i played almost 100hr trying to like it before someone said that i am just here to hate on the game
    The worst battlefield ever made..Leave aside all the sjw talks and inaccurate ww2 history,i am not giving 0 because of that but for the GUNPLAY and lack of some iconic ww2 content(americans and russian military forces weapons ecc),is where BFV fails big,and i mean big.
    All the fans wanted was a return to the roots,a return to that amazing feeling you had with BC2 BF3 and 4,where the gunpaly was truly amazing and satisfying(at least in bc2 and bf3),but in BfV none of that exist.The gunplay is pathetic,and it doesn't feel real/satisfying at all,it became another generic Cod style shooter,basically all the weapons are the same,shooting them feel the same,no difference and their customization is simply terrible..the single player is awful as well with some of the most stupid AI that i ever seen in the series..No american and russians armies,half of the weapons recycled from BF1 ,most of the animation recycled as well,a well done copy paste job here.
    No effort here to deliver a finished product with quality content
    Bottom line,Battlefield is dead,they finally managed to kill the franchise for good this time..i am happy only because i bought the game when it was on sale for just 27 euro,for more then this price is a rip off    … Expand
  48. Richggg
    Dec 28, 2018
    1
    First lets not talk about all the political stuff, it is a okay game, everything is pretty much mediocre but certainly playable, no it doesn't worth the price tag in my opinion, especially consider RDR2 is marketed at the same price assuming you have a console.
    Well, I don't know exactly how hard it would be for these marketing people and these what so called game "journalist" to    First lets not talk about all the political stuff, it is a okay game, everything is pretty much mediocre but certainly playable, no it doesn't worth the price tag in my opinion, especially consider RDR2 is marketed at the same price assuming you have a console.
    Well, I don't know exactly how hard it would be for these marketing people and these what so called game "journalist" to understand that you don't need to make everything political correct in order to show support to certain subject, alright? There are a lot more way to show support like making donations, make a story line that actually relate to the mater instead of forcefully to make it political correct. just learn from car makers, some of the openly show support to lgbtq community and gender equality which i am totally fine with, but they don't force you to watch a 1min ads talking about equality every time you enter the car, or only paint it in rainbow color to show support. If i wanna watch political propaganda brainwash, i will just go watch tv news.
    Yes, 2018 is a bad year for gamers, fallout 76 is a bad game because I see no effort of making it better from Bethesda, and they failed to deliver what they "promised". Cod bo4 is bad because it has become too far from its root, and the quick cash grabbing practice is just disgusting. BF5 is a whole different story, while the game is okay and has some potential, the publisher and devs are just ignorant and make it to please these political activist aka.some game journalist (with all respect to these hard working programmers who actually physically make the game), and it has gone too far from its customers. Im glad they learned it the hard way but at the same time knowing that they are not going to change anyway...
    In the end, if i get a second chance, I will probably spend the money on some actually creative and interesting game like thief simulator or a premium vehicle in war thunder, and a chick fil a sandwich.    … Expand
  49. MrBla
    Dec 1, 2018
    2
    Just a reskin of BF1. Good graphics is everything this game has. It's overpriced, has nothing to do with WW2, gameplay is boring and too simplified, multiplayer is doesn't require teamwork, maps are small, spawns are too quick, everyone is running around shooting each other like in call of duty. Avoid this game, don't be fooled by amazing graphics.
  50. OOa007
    Feb 4, 2019
    0
    Please dont buy. This is coming from a HUGE LONG TIME FAN of battlefield. I started with bf1942 and they were doing great for many years but I noticed a drop in effort and quality with bf4 which was barely any different or better from bf3 then bf1 came out I was so happy to go back in time but IT was A TOTAL disappointment multiplayer. Single player was good but multiplayer is importantPlease dont buy. This is coming from a HUGE LONG TIME FAN of battlefield. I started with bf1942 and they were doing great for many years but I noticed a drop in effort and quality with bf4 which was barely any different or better from bf3 then bf1 came out I was so happy to go back in time but IT was A TOTAL disappointment multiplayer. Single player was good but multiplayer is important for reputability and bf1 SUCKS i tried the beta of BFV and it is the same thing as bf1 its REALLY CRAP!!! THEY need to go back to their creative roots like in bf1942… Expand
  51. SebastianD
    Dec 12, 2018
    0
    This is not battlefield anymore. Just EA could release such a disaster. Please don't buy anything from EA if you love video games, in the end, it's our fault, not them, if we keep feeding these scumbags.
  52. facehugger22
    Jan 22, 2019
    1
    Even worse than BF1 if that is possible. It is bad on pretty much every level. I can't even see my character any longer while trying to customize. Snipers can leap and roll around like an arcade game while still landing head shots. It feels like alpha in every way.
  53. derBum
    Dec 4, 2018
    2
    Singleplayer is boring. But single player isnt important.

    Multiplayer is a total mess. Time to kill is too short. Bombers reign the battlefield and can only effectivelly harmed by other planes. The gameplay is pure frustration most of the time you are dead and dont know why. I am an experienced Player, but this meatgrinder sucks. I would love to give this **** back to dice. I will    Singleplayer is boring. But single player isnt important.

    Multiplayer is a total mess. Time to kill is too short. Bombers reign the battlefield and can only effectivelly harmed by other planes.
    The gameplay is pure frustration most of the time you are dead and dont know why.
    I am an experienced Player, but this meatgrinder sucks.
    I would love to give this **** back to dice.
    I will never buy any product of them.    … Expand
  54. lapiscoco
    Nov 29, 2018
    1
    Been playing the BF series since 2002. It has come a long way. In the recent releases, I enjoy BF4 the most, and that remains unchanged thus far. Tanks and planes are just being eroded away in BF1 and now basically stupid in BF5. If you love strictly infantry warfare, this may not bother you. But what made the BF series so vivid are the tanks and planes! Campaign is short, but most peopleBeen playing the BF series since 2002. It has come a long way. In the recent releases, I enjoy BF4 the most, and that remains unchanged thus far. Tanks and planes are just being eroded away in BF1 and now basically stupid in BF5. If you love strictly infantry warfare, this may not bother you. But what made the BF series so vivid are the tanks and planes! Campaign is short, but most people are looking to spend way more hours in multiplayer on BF games. Realism is one thing, but making a game ridiculous doesn’t justify.

    The game feels unfinished and buggy in general. Unresponsive controls make certain multiplayer scenarios laughable, not in a good way. These problems didn’t even exist in BF1...    … Expand
  55. william1134
    Dec 18, 2018
    1
    Shockingly Bad game with forced political correctness distorting REAL HISTORY.

    Dice have decided to distort history and throw in a huge dollop of historical revisionism because they are pushing an agenda... this is really really bad.. Now I don't care if you want to customise your character to be a woman.. its kinda weird having black nazi women running around but my problem is how    Shockingly Bad game with forced political correctness distorting REAL HISTORY.

    Dice have decided to distort history and throw in a huge dollop of historical revisionism because they are pushing an agenda... this is really really bad.. Now I don't care if you want to customise your character to be a woman.. its kinda weird having black nazi women running around but my problem is how they are forcing it down your throat and when you play the game it really breaks the immersion and just makes these seem like some kind of fantasy history. For example the british team all wearing blue wode... what?

    Now the bugs and balance.. oh boy.. the game is a **** with game breaking bugs everywhere and awful balance. This game has no longevity as you spawn and die very quickly. It is more like cod than anything else...

    Basically don't buy this.    … Expand
  56. Elnealio
    Nov 25, 2018
    0
    This game has so much fun stuff but it riddled with super annoying bugs and design decisions.

    AA is useless, even when you do great on an AA vs a plane they just avoid and heal and are back in the game after like 20 seconds and will avoid that AA turret or just come back to kill you and repeats this. You got no chance against planes. If your team is only potatoes you will get **** in    This game has so much fun stuff but it riddled with super annoying bugs and design decisions.

    AA is useless, even when you do great on an AA vs a plane they just avoid and heal and are back in the game after like 20 seconds and will avoid that AA turret or just come back to kill you and repeats this. You got no chance against planes. If your team is only potatoes you will get **** in the air.

    Furthermore, extremely weird and annoying terrain blobs that make you slide down at certain cap points making it impossible to aim at range to countersnipe.

    The spawn selection is horrendoes. It is extremely slow and the transition from squad to map is annoying especially when your teammates gets in combat and you gotta **** transition again.

    there is a lot more but i dont want to put in the effort to write it.    … Expand
  57. MagicSquid
    Feb 2, 2019
    4
    The graphics and sound are nice. It's a shame the rest of the game didn't come included in the purchase.

    There are not enough maps. Not enough vehicles. Waaay too few guns per class. Medic gun balance issues (it's a Nerf gun, basically) Low player population during non-peak hours. Single player campaigns are tedious at best. Progression system is terrible. The customizing of    The graphics and sound are nice. It's a shame the rest of the game didn't come included in the purchase.

    There are not enough maps.
    Not enough vehicles.
    Waaay too few guns per class.
    Medic gun balance issues (it's a Nerf gun, basically)
    Low player population during non-peak hours.
    Single player campaigns are tedious at best.
    Progression system is terrible.

    The customizing of your weapons is poorly implemented. Cosmetic unlocks that don't impact the performance of the gun? Why have them in the game?!

    Strange netcode makes it feel like you're getting hit by a wall of enemy fire, while from their perspective, they're hitting you with a long, sustained rifle burst to take you down. It makes for an odd experience.

    Lots of bugs.

    For a AAA game, this game sure doesn't live up to it.    … Expand
  58. Surg3on
    Dec 4, 2018
    4
    This is not Battlefield. Perhaps we can call it Infantry Skirmish 1? The dull progression, terrible UI, tiny squads, punishing medic mechanics, almost no vehicles.... its just not battlefield anymore. There is no variety, no tank battles, no trying different kits unless you have limitless time to grind. Battlefield is meant to be BIG. What differentiates this game from generic popularThis is not Battlefield. Perhaps we can call it Infantry Skirmish 1? The dull progression, terrible UI, tiny squads, punishing medic mechanics, almost no vehicles.... its just not battlefield anymore. There is no variety, no tank battles, no trying different kits unless you have limitless time to grind. Battlefield is meant to be BIG. What differentiates this game from generic popular FPS shooter X? Its pretty. Is it prettier than BF1? not really. Was BF1 more fun? yes. Was BFanything but Hardline more fun? yes.

    Just for the record I don't really care about female/male model mix or stretching the historical story a bit as long as it feels fun to play. Its just not fun , I'm sorry Dice. I love you and wish you all the best.    … Expand
  59. slanderbot
    Mar 7, 2019
    3
    Even at 30$ USD this game is a pathetic hollow shell of what Dice pre-EA stood for and contributed to the game industry.

    It has been truly EA-afied, just like everything EA touches. The game becomes dumbed down, streamlined, and pumped full of "politically correct" **** Along with destroying any deep and meaningful mechanics or immersive qualities. All because EA is pushing DICE to    Even at 30$ USD this game is a pathetic hollow shell of what Dice pre-EA stood for and contributed to the game industry.

    It has been truly EA-afied, just like everything EA touches. The game becomes dumbed down, streamlined, and pumped full of "politically correct" **** Along with destroying any deep and meaningful mechanics or immersive qualities.

    All because EA is pushing DICE to make a microtransaction delivery system, not a real substantial game that the fans will enjoy. It's a real shame because you can still see the passion some people at DICE are pouring into the game. It shines through the cracks of the **** plastered front EA has covered DICE with.

    Go play Apex Legends if you want a well made, well-executed game. Sure it's not an epic historical shooter, but god damn it's so much better than what Battlefield provides currently. Play it now while you still have time, before the corruption of EA kills that too.    … Expand
  60. Dryani
    Nov 29, 2018
    0
    Trash game. Even more of a sniper-fest than usual. Revisionist history is a scary thing.
  61. mrdollar
    Dec 2, 2018
    0
    Boring, repetitive, insanely low limited on players online, too few weapons chooses, instant respawns. Also the last nail in coffin - leftist SJW propaganda, no thanks.
  62. eimisas
    Dec 3, 2018
    0
    The war was won by white males. That's a fact. The game is the leftist fantasy to rewrite gender-equality history. 0/10
  63. archenemyxx
    Dec 4, 2018
    0
    This is the first Battlefield game I can say is truly bad. I have played Battlefield games since the Wake Island Demo years and years ago. DICE has lost touch with is customers and its finally coming back to bite them in the ass. GET WOKE GO BROKE
  64. DoubleHelix
    Dec 18, 2018
    0
    This game look like to be created by a people, who never were on any history lesson. This game lies with it so much. After playing it I can think the Germans never even think about starting a war, Hitler never exists, and Germans never tried to dominate whole Europe.
  65. Radiationbum
    Jul 24, 2020
    4
    Battlefield 5 'if you don't like don't buy it'

    You cant change the past but sure can lie about it for you're own politically motivated agenda thats Dice's new moto, if featuring woman so prominently on the front lines of WW2 when it was almost entirely made up of men is not enough, then rewriting history so that the bravery and actions of 2 commandos squads is completely cut out of an    Battlefield 5 'if you don't like don't buy it'

    You cant change the past but sure can lie about it for you're own politically motivated agenda thats Dice's new moto, if featuring woman so prominently on the front lines of WW2 when it was almost entirely made up of men is not enough, then rewriting history so that the bravery and actions of 2 commandos squads is completely cut out of an historic military operation so all their work is shown to be done by a single girl up against hundreds of German solders, this is just disgusting taking creative liberties is a common practice to help fit the story being told around a movie, game or a book, but the changes made would be like saying the Normandy landing where lead by woman which we all know is not true.

    Visually the game is as great as Battlefield 1 and plays very much the same except multiplayer has had many changes to create more of a general challenge to normal playstyles, while creating a more of a demand for squad diversity of classes to succeed.

    Don't buy this game so you don't fund companies who call their fan base 'uneducated' for pointing out the obvious lies, women didn't server on the front lines in anywhere near the number of men that were fighting and they certainly didn't let men or woman with prophetic arms fight and those handicapped people with missing arms certainly couldn't fire rifles effectively so they would be a liability, and DICE say its 'authentic'.    … Expand
  66. CasaRomeo
    Nov 28, 2018
    0
    Simple its an Invester pleasing game nothing else, all this Diversity is just there to get the Score. -.-
  67. topolologist
    Nov 29, 2018
    1
    After playing 30 hours total I tried to enjoy this game, but it's completely broken and depressing to play. I honestly don't care that they stupidly messed up the historical aspect of the game. I focused on the gameplay, the maps, and other aspects only, and it was still a total turn off.
    This is a very generic shooter & isn't unique like it used to be in the earlier battlefield games.    After playing 30 hours total I tried to enjoy this game, but it's completely broken and depressing to play. I honestly don't care that they stupidly messed up the historical aspect of the game. I focused on the gameplay, the maps, and other aspects only, and it was still a total turn off.
    This is a very generic shooter & isn't unique like it used to be in the earlier battlefield games.
    The movement is insanely bugged and uncomfortable to control, leading to unpredictable and stupid deaths. Then you have to deal with pathetic laughable spawns that never make sense.
    The maps get very boring with about 1 or 2 interesting maps upon a few playthroughs, then they just become a headache to play.
    The squads are the complete trash as most are locked and the one you get into are usually with players who have no clue how to play the game.
    Don't buy this game, the devs don't care about anyone but the money in their pockets.
    The delusional people who say this game is great and there is nothing wrong most likely never experienced the older battlefield games(BF1,BF2,BF3), This is not the game you want to waste money on, trust me.
    Long time BF player here and I wouldn't have even payed $20 for this heap of trash.    … Expand
  68. RedneckVideoGmR
    Nov 30, 2018
    1
    I think EA, Activision Blizzard and Bathesda should merge into one big corp. at this point.

    Very bad game indeed.

    I'm glad that SJW EA dev got fired.
  69. oracletas
    Nov 30, 2018
    0
    -No more SJW !
    -They are not your audience to begin with !
    -Remember who made you a thing !
    -And show us some respect !
  70. byis
    Nov 30, 2018
    0
    They take all the amazing stories, about heroes who fought for our rights, from WW2 and rewrites them completely to fit their agenda. This is no more a WW2 game than Minecraft. That they do this while calling their fanbase "uneducated" is beyond a joke.

    While it might look nice at times it's a shallow and very casual experience that never catches your attention more than for a fleeting    They take all the amazing stories, about heroes who fought for our rights, from WW2 and rewrites them completely to fit their agenda. This is no more a WW2 game than Minecraft. That they do this while calling their fanbase "uneducated" is beyond a joke.

    While it might look nice at times it's a shallow and very casual experience that never catches your attention more than for a fleeting second, and as soon as you turn the game off you won't remember anything that happened, because it has all blended together in a blob of mediocrity.

    The changes from BF1 might be improvements, but it's still the same core game, if you already own BF1 stick to playing that, because very little has changed and it's not worth your money.

    If this wasn't the BF franchise I might have gone easier on it and given it a 5, but this is a franchise that I've loved since the first game, and to see them ruin it more and more by every itteration since BF3 has earned them no leeway. This franchise is dead to me and I will never again come back to something this disgusting.    … Expand
  71. adrianroraim
    Dec 2, 2018
    0
    I have played the game
    And I have lived in a dictatorship all my life, propaganda of any sort is never good
  72. FeiXenogears
    Dec 2, 2018
    0
    From the very beginning they screwed up by attacking gamer's and saying we are uneducated and sexist for saying no woman with a metal prosthetic arm served in the war, we also said another fact and that is like 99% of the people who served was men. They also took certain important events from WW2 and switched so a woman was the hero and not how it really happened.
    Dice also said don't buy    From the very beginning they screwed up by attacking gamer's and saying we are uneducated and sexist for saying no woman with a metal prosthetic arm served in the war, we also said another fact and that is like 99% of the people who served was men. They also took certain important events from WW2 and switched so a woman was the hero and not how it really happened.
    Dice also said don't buy the game along with many other issues with this game.    … Expand
  73. Ariandel
    Dec 9, 2018
    0
    Genderfield;) Call of Duty is better than this not-a-game. It's finally has come
  74. pumpplow
    Dec 15, 2018
    0
    I tried to approach this game without prejudice, knowing that there are a lot of problems reported since launch - bugs, balancing issues, and the feeling of early access right from the get go. I tried hard, but this is the most unplayable, laughable and content-lacking release in the series yet. It is an enormous letdown, which has less of everything that made the game good, and more ofI tried to approach this game without prejudice, knowing that there are a lot of problems reported since launch - bugs, balancing issues, and the feeling of early access right from the get go. I tried hard, but this is the most unplayable, laughable and content-lacking release in the series yet. It is an enormous letdown, which has less of everything that made the game good, and more of what made the previous games annoying. The worst part though, by far, is the balancing - with the new mechanics that focus on squadplay, you will be dominated by a bunch of players that actually do it. So far I've tried my best to play together, but it does nothing. The teams are unbalanced to the point where you get landslide victories in every match, getting annihilated by snipers and better-equipped players every time. This game is as annoying as it gets, has little to offer besides laughable bugs, and is also being changed randomly by DICE, especially in terms of the recent TTK change, which nobody quite understands. To sum things up - don't buy it, let alone think about buying it.… Expand
  75. Cozs
    Dec 22, 2018
    0
    Call of battlefield 5.

    This is no Battlefield. There is almost no vehicles and maps are very small. Its a call of duty game.

    Back to Battlefield 4 i guess...
  76. ElectricityBill
    Dec 26, 2018
    0
    Literally a *********
    They push their own political agenda and use an excuse of putting "fun over authenticity" to hinder this. The game feels like a joke. A joke which will cost you a huge amount of money
  77. samhawk
    Dec 28, 2018
    1
    I first though that this game would have more content like more maps, more single player missions, USSR and Japan even, including battles with these armies, but nope, instead we get tons of useless skins on our weapons and - vehicles. It’s like EA and DICE wants to give you a false sense of reality that you get a lot of content in this game, because they made ALL these customizations onI first though that this game would have more content like more maps, more single player missions, USSR and Japan even, including battles with these armies, but nope, instead we get tons of useless skins on our weapons and - vehicles. It’s like EA and DICE wants to give you a false sense of reality that you get a lot of content in this game, because they made ALL these customizations on ALL your stuff, but in reality, they only made skins which a 10-year-old can do by modding, I see what you did there DICE and EA.

    The first free DLC was recently released, it’s a step in the right direction, but again content is so little, and the upcoming DLCs seems to be the same. The game feels empty, shallow, unfinished and not driven by creativity but by finance. Maybe just maybe there is hope when the last DLC is out.
    And not to mention these animations for dying, reviving or getting revived, it takes forever. These animatons it does not fit into multiplayer, its frustration and stupid.

    Potential was there with amazing graphics, but so wasted, the sales also speaks for itself.    … Expand
  78. bai_push
    Dec 29, 2018
    1
    Gameplay that shoots down bean-like enemies from a distance to a sharp point can truly offer fun less than diarrhea. Result The sniper and the cavalry like the caterpillar just shoot from far distance. A new game that completely abandoned the part of the shootout with the enemy which is the fun of FPS. Seriously, damn. It is also **** that reviews are being bought. Seriously dice shouldGameplay that shoots down bean-like enemies from a distance to a sharp point can truly offer fun less than diarrhea. Result The sniper and the cavalry like the caterpillar just shoot from far distance. A new game that completely abandoned the part of the shootout with the enemy which is the fun of FPS. Seriously, damn. It is also **** that reviews are being bought. Seriously dice should reflect. I would like to know what to do with priority to political collectivity and how game play becomes **** Graphics are good so give one point.… Expand
  79. zacdu
    Dec 30, 2018
    1
    The gameplay is fine. But the networking and UI/UX bugs almost make this game unplayable. The matchmaking in this game is broken, it will never fill a team with new players, I have multiple instances a night of a Domination game that is 4 v 15+ - the game never brings new players into a round. Besides the terrible matchmaking, you're lucky if you're able to back out of a game and have theThe gameplay is fine. But the networking and UI/UX bugs almost make this game unplayable. The matchmaking in this game is broken, it will never fill a team with new players, I have multiple instances a night of a Domination game that is 4 v 15+ - the game never brings new players into a round. Besides the terrible matchmaking, you're lucky if you're able to back out of a game and have the main menu appear. I experience a black indefinite loading screen at least once a night when I play (either going into matchmaking or coming out of it).

    Simply, the online user experience of this game is effectively broken.    … Expand
  80. averyaim
    Dec 29, 2018
    0
    feminism feminism feminism feminism feminism feminism feminism feminism feminism feminism feminism feminism feminism feminism feminism feminism feminism feminism feminism feminism IS BAD
  81. andyy417
    Nov 30, 2018
    1
    Please do not support EA/DICE for their anti-consumer BS and pushing politics into their games ffs ty for listening.
  82. williehk
    Dec 23, 2018
    0
    Played the Last Tiger campaign, didn't bother to try the rest 3
    - not sure why it doesn't provide deutsch UI option but the voice is in deutsch, apparently u only get to choose from a list of pre-detemined locales
    - tall as **** panzer commander - very inaccurate uniforms - Completely rubbish script, who the **** would have time to hang people up when the whole city is burning. The    Played the Last Tiger campaign, didn't bother to try the rest 3
    - not sure why it doesn't provide deutsch UI option but the voice is in deutsch, apparently u only get to choose from a list of pre-detemined locales
    - tall as **** panzer commander
    - very inaccurate uniforms
    - Completely rubbish script, who the **** would have time to hang people up when the whole city is burning.

    The game mechanics are barely tolerable, very unfriendly to new players
    - rush n strafe action-shooter style
    - obviously wrong shell ballistics
    - u start w/ crappy guns and vehicles in servers filled with hardcore nerds, basically u can expect to be one shot few moment into the re-spawn, - The biggest issue of all is the re-spawn mechanism, high learning curve, no new comers like to be spawn-killed n yet this is exactly the thing u get in this game
    - no HE / AP distinction
    - the short barrel Panzer IV cant even kill infantry at close range with the smoothbore gun

    Bought it for less than a day at 50% off, refunded immediately.
    This is no doubt another piece of money grab title glued up together with whatever they have in store
    I would rather pay the same amount for post scriptum / RO3 than this piece of ****    … Expand
  83. Xon
    Mar 7, 2019
    4
    Pretty graphics.
    Inaccurate sounds.
    Factually inaccurate campaign to promote politcal agendas. Multiplayer is frustrating. Some interesting maps, many bugs and glitches and poorly implemented ideas. I've had 350+ hours per BF since BFBC2. After 50 hours I uninstalled the game, I felt that I was wasting what little free time I have on EA executives' bonuses. BFV was not made for    Pretty graphics.
    Inaccurate sounds.
    Factually inaccurate campaign to promote politcal agendas.

    Multiplayer is frustrating. Some interesting maps, many bugs and glitches and poorly implemented ideas.

    I've had 350+ hours per BF since BFBC2. After 50 hours I uninstalled the game, I felt that I was wasting what little free time I have on EA executives' bonuses. BFV was not made for gamers, just investors and executives to make money for nothing.    … Expand
  84. soulassssns
    Dec 3, 2018
    0
    According to DICE/EA I am uneducated and there for should simply not buy their game. Apparently I am no longer in their demographic even though I have played every single other Battlefield game prior to BFV. So I am going to take my uneducated dollars with me and move on to bigger and better games.
  85. Mitsie
    Dec 1, 2018
    0
    Have been a Battlefield Fan since BF1942 and i own all the games, 1942, Vietnam, 2142, BF2, BC (Xbox), BC2, BF3, BF4, BF:Hardline and BF1.. I have played Battlefield every week of my life and have been a true fan.. I knew from Battlefield 1 that the franchise was moving in the wrong direction. The reason Battlefield was so good previously was it had depth and as time went on it had a highHave been a Battlefield Fan since BF1942 and i own all the games, 1942, Vietnam, 2142, BF2, BC (Xbox), BC2, BF3, BF4, BF:Hardline and BF1.. I have played Battlefield every week of my life and have been a true fan.. I knew from Battlefield 1 that the franchise was moving in the wrong direction. The reason Battlefield was so good previously was it had depth and as time went on it had a high skill curve. You had to learn the maps you needed to learn the weapons and know how to overcome each situation. It had tense moments, where you were walking through a town in BF2 with your squad and you heard footsteps on the otherside of the building, you would take position and try your best to keep each other alive. The game was exciting and exhilarating.. The Graphics where terrible but the game play was fun and felt like you were actually a soldier on the battlefield. Fans bought the game because of the gameplay and lots of COD fans started turning away from that franchise because it was repetition with the same engine with no skill level.. COD killed the skilled FPS genre. My last favourite COD game was MW2 and after that it just felt like a reskin and was boring. Battlefield 1 was the start of the "Lets be like COD" mentality, Lets reduce the skill level so far down that kids can play it. Then in Battlefield they notice R6:Siege are doing well so they start pinching the Alpha pack idea from that see if EA can get on the band wagon of making money. What EA have forgot is why people are buying skins and putting their money into R6:Siege.. Is Because its a skilled shooter with enjoyable gameplay. Its the gameplay that is key, EA's moto is Make it look shiny and grab the cash, they have forgot what making games is all about.. I Pre-Ordered Battlefield 5 and when i seen the reviews come out it sort of put me off and then my friend paid £10 for a trial of Origin Premier and played the single player campaign and played the multiplayer to death, beforer me and I had paid £70 i decided to cancel my pre order. I then went a purchased Hitman 2 (Which i love) I went and played on my Friends Origin Premier before it ran out and tried Battlefield 5.. and so glad i did and got a better game for my money.. From a true hardcore Battlefield Fan, i can sadly say BATTLEFIELD IS DEAD R.I.P !!!… Expand
  86. JohnnyBNL
    Nov 29, 2018
    0
    Too many women at war... fake history.... no atmosphere... To many snipers. No good rewards if you play as a team-player, no one cares about reviving you. A big 0 for not even trying to make something great. Don't BUY!
  87. Jorchking
    Nov 1, 2020
    4
    Es un juego que sigue divirtiendo y se siente lo "Battlefield", pero es muy triste lo que han hecho con esta saga. Parece que a DICE le va quedando grande tanta responsabilidad.
    Lo han usado como campaña política en cuanto a la igualdad sexista (parece que hay más mujeres que hombres), desafiaron a los mismos compradores de la franquicia (insólito), censura, falla argumental y de    Es un juego que sigue divirtiendo y se siente lo "Battlefield", pero es muy triste lo que han hecho con esta saga. Parece que a DICE le va quedando grande tanta responsabilidad.
    Lo han usado como campaña política en cuanto a la igualdad sexista (parece que hay más mujeres que hombres), desafiaron a los mismos compradores de la franquicia (insólito), censura, falla argumental y de precisión en cuanto a la posición histórica donde se quiere situar el juego, sin contenido básicamente tanto en multijugador como en campaña (es muy corta y mala, de las peores)... Todo lo que no debió hacer lo ha hecho.

    Los errores principales: - Lo mismo que Battlefield 1 pero esta vez aún más desafiante y marcado (algo que les terminó costando caro): Agenda de "diversidad e igualdad" que lo expresan no sólo en la portada (la portada debe ser representativo del acontecimiento, pero de nuevo pusieron a una minoría como la mujer en la 2ª Guerra Mundial) sino también en todo el juego... De manera irreal se ve a veces hasta más cantidad de mujeres y negros que de nazis blancos arios... Insólito - Multijugador decepcionante: Los mapas son mediocres y todo lo que es diversidad de armas (esta era importante y no lo otro) es flojo. - Mismo error que Battlefield 1: Campaña muy mala con mini historias de fascículo, cortas, con imprecisión histórica y desperdicio de la temática de la 2ª Guerra Mundial. Parece que para EA y Dice está mal ser blanco, rubio y ario, que hay que meter mujeres y negros en esos lugares (claramente, una bajada de línea). Les creería, pero es la 2ª vez consecutiva que lo hacen. - Censura de símbolos históricos de la Guerra como la de los nazis. Guste o no, forman parte de nuestra historia. -Battle Royale muerto.

    En fin, el mayor pecado de este juego es tener escaso contendido. A las 10 horas ya no sabía qué hacer, se hace repetitivo y aburrido. La campaña es ultra decepcionante.
    Calificación de juego: 4.5. Calificación por politización, campaña de "igualdad y diversidad" en acontecimientos donde no hay lugar a eso, y falta de respeto a la Segunda Guerra Mundial: 2.
    Edito: Recomiendo Call of Duty WWII en su lugar que narra mejor los hechos de la Guerra Mundial, aunque igual no llega a ser épico como uno espera de una temática así, pero algo es algo.    … Expand
  88. Tristus
    Feb 22, 2019
    0
    This game is unplayable... the mechanics are **** the balance is **** server lags with 20 ms ping >.> Cheater are a problem, too... OMG i regret baying this piece of **** so hard.
  89. SpaceBAR
    Dec 1, 2018
    0
    To me. Worst Battlefield ever. If you want leftist SJW political propaganda, it's for you.
  90. tHeSiD
    Dec 17, 2018
    0
    What an absolute **** I bought it when it was 50% off and thought I was getting my money's worth. I should have listened to the users here and not the "critics" There is absolutely no redeeming quality in this game's multiplayer. Quake 3 had 100 times better netcode in 2000 than this pile of **** in 2018. How did dice fall so low?
  91. s3rgio00
    Nov 29, 2018
    0
    Being a fan since Battlefield 1942. This game is being destroyed by political correctness. And not true WW2 game. They deviated from the battlefield formula and fans are not happy.
  92. AlexeiGorbo
    Feb 24, 2019
    4
    Battlefield V is unfinished, broken, and lacks any and all vision. Mechanically it's a leap in the right direction and an improvement upon its predecessors. Gun game, animations, and the general feel and control are all visibly the best the franchise has seen, but that's about as far as the improvements stretch. Visually this game looks incredible on PC, and was designed from the ground upBattlefield V is unfinished, broken, and lacks any and all vision. Mechanically it's a leap in the right direction and an improvement upon its predecessors. Gun game, animations, and the general feel and control are all visibly the best the franchise has seen, but that's about as far as the improvements stretch. Visually this game looks incredible on PC, and was designed from the ground up to utilize Nvidia's RTX technology. The problem is that when scaled to consoles, BFV is a clear visible step backwards compared to BF1. Lighting is almost broken, since it's either too bright or too dark, and everything has a sort of overexposure look to it that makes visibility a hassle and nothing short of rage inducing. Shadows are basically a wormhole into the dark abyss, and enemies sitting two feet away are seemingly invisible. Recent updates made this slightly better, but your mileage may very. Overall, the LODs are also noticeably less detailed on console compared to BF1, with muddy textures and steady pop in that both deceives and distracts you. You'll proceed to engage enemies, only to find that they were behind cover that hadn't rendered in yet upon getting closer. Vegetation also looks bad, not decent, not mediocre, literally terrible. Trees and bushes use mesh patterns, and a lot of the time trees won't render fully. Vegetation also takes a sort of blocky 2D appearance at range.

    The single player experience on BFV is a souless heap of **** with paper thin, shallow characters that aren't developed to any capacity to make you care about them, and they're accompanied by terrible, cringe worthy writing and typical war cliches. The gameplay doesn't get much better, since most missions revolve around you using one man army like stealth tactics around an open area, completing fetch or destroy objectives while taking out seemingly mindless AI.

    Multiplayer is just a giant meh-fest of lost potential. There's a great game somewhere lost in this experience, but its muddled by bugs, lack of content, and forgettable maps. Weapon and class balance is at the worst the franchise has seen, and that's not the result of a faster TTK. Hit detection, server performance, and overall netcode are also subpar, with consoles only featuring 30Hz servers, There's no custom servers, no RSP, and the customization is rather shallow, which leads into my next point below in the next paragraph. This is the only game I've played where I'll steadily deal 130-150 damage on an enemy, only for him to magically 1 frame me. People only have 100 health, but you can sponge 150+ damage into them and still get killed in a single frame by them. It's broken, and the recent "fixes" didn't fix anything. This game is just a mess.

    BFV has the worst progression system of any shooter I've played. The in-game economy is just God awful, and everything is an unnecessary grind. There's very little meaningful customization, and what is there is mostly aesthetic. Unlocking the same couple of skins for each weapon requires a constant grind of tedious assignments like "kill 10 enemies in 1 life while attacking objectives while shooting from the hip", along with a general side objective like "get 60 kills" or "deal 2000 damage". What does this unlock? Why, a muzzle, or a stock, and a muzzle or a stock in one color no less. To unlock full sets, you need to keep completing samey tedious assignments. To add insult to injury, the max level cap is just level 50. Compare that to BF1's base 100 or BF4's 140, and you get my point. The amount of company count, BFV's in-game currency you unlock is very minuscule as well, and unlocking items as small as a grip cost 1500cc on the low end, which is comical. No doubt this is so EA can inject microtransactions or collect on the premium sale of coin. Things like complete outfits, which STILL require tedious assignments to even unlock cost upwards of 15,000cc. You get my point, progression sucks.

    Combined Arms is a travesty and a huge embarrassment to DICE as a studio. It's go here and kill these people co-op on multiplayer maps with mindless bots that sponge bullets and magically 1 hit you. It's dull, mindless, and I don't understand why it was ever even delayed to begin with. Funnier yet, the cutscenes have sound bugs or appear blurry leading into the missions, which is just further lack of polish on a feature that was delayed 3 months; pitiful.

    Overall, this game is bad. It's agenda pushing single player experience is dull with no soul, the multiplayer is broken, unfinished, starving of content, bug filled, and lacking of any polish, and the co-op is literally just a huge "f@ck you" and cherry on top of this whole ****ty experience.

    I love Battlefield, but it's sad to see such a pathetic low after so many highs. What the hell went wrong?    … Expand
  93. Sanadoon
    Feb 26, 2019
    3
    Not worth buying even at half price.. Continue to play Battlefield 1. No reason to go to this game with worse mechanics and visuals.

    Consider buying on deep discount, when they sell it for $5, and once the "battle royal" mode is out.
  94. pasha4ur
    Jan 27, 2019
    0
    There are no content, interesting gameplay and maps, good netcode and weapon customization.
    There are tons of bugs and long dying screen
  95. EugeneYap83
    Feb 20, 2019
    0
    Online Multiplayer is very boring, has very little content compared to BF4 and BF3. This game is a giant leap backward. Multiplayer voice acting is bad On Asian Servers are filled with cheaters.
    Single player is just horrendously bad, everything feels dulls, forgettable experience and serve no other purpose than to push SJW agenda.
    Save your money and don't buy this game.
  96. Sabardo
    Nov 28, 2018
    0
    BFV in buggy unfinished game that should still be in closed beta. This is not a game that AAA company should release. Battlefield franchise has gone worse ever since Battlefield 3 which already was not as good as BFBC2 but still a lot better than BFV or BF1.
  97. inZa
    Feb 23, 2019
    1
    First Battlefield i hate. I have all of them and this is not battlefield. Battlefield 1 was on the edge, but this is jsut buggy COD in frostbite engine. RIP Battlefield franchies......
  98. ak8268
    Nov 29, 2018
    3
    Words or phrases that represent this game: disappointing, wasted opportunity, bland, political.
    This is the first battlefield game I had zero hype for and I have been putting in 500+ hours on each game since BC2. DICE/EA decided to market the game towards people who are not even passionate about the game. As a result, we got a WW2 game that is not recognizable as a WW2 game. It feels like    Words or phrases that represent this game: disappointing, wasted opportunity, bland, political.
    This is the first battlefield game I had zero hype for and I have been putting in 500+ hours on each game since BC2. DICE/EA decided to market the game towards people who are not even passionate about the game. As a result, we got a WW2 game that is not recognizable as a WW2 game. It feels like a bland game where it is hard to really understand the actual setting.

    The game is super buggy. I found myself being stuck between pebbles and broken terrain ad having to re-deploy. There were game modes that bugged out and would never end. The netcode took a step backwards compared to BF1. The menus are an absolute mess, requiring you to go back and forth, clicking on this and that. Even the in game “quit” button still does not work, a known problem from BF1.

    I will admit that the game sounds, graphics and visuals are amazing. The actual gameplay is a decent step forward. But at the end of the day, it is still a mess. I keep asking myself, why does EA keep making the same mistakes over and over.    … Expand
  99. MayCallBsh
    Nov 29, 2018
    0
    When your players are against all the SJW bs you prefer pleasing Feminists and such - this is what you get
  100. M300
    Dec 8, 2018
    0
    Battlefield 4 warned me what BF was going to be like going forwards but never in my life did i imagine it catering to people who need a safe space.

    I played it in beta and my first olay i enjoyed it... Until you see how dumbed down it is and how it traps you into a cluster like it is a generic Call of Duty game. I did not purchase it and i sincerely hope people will use their wallets    Battlefield 4 warned me what BF was going to be like going forwards but never in my life did i imagine it catering to people who need a safe space.

    I played it in beta and my first olay i enjoyed it... Until you see how dumbed down it is and how it traps you into a cluster like it is a generic Call of Duty game. I did not purchase it and i sincerely hope people will use their wallets wiser. Stop feeding the SJW, low intellect field these games have become.

    Bf4 was buggy. It was buggy in beta. BFV is no different, rinse/repeat.
    Only now we need woman validation & censored chat messages on too of a broken game and more dumbing down for simpletons.    … Expand
Page:

Awards & Rankings

53
#53 Best PC Game of 2018
2
#2 Most Discussed PC Game of 2018
7
#7 Most Shared PC Game of 2018

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
81

Generally favorable reviews - based on 52 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 45 out of 52
  2. Mixed: 7 out of 52
  3. Negative: 0 out of 52
  1. CD-Action
    Nov 14, 2019
    85
    It’s far from being ideal but all the glitches and shortcomings don’t ruin the overall fun of Battlefield V’s multiplayer experience. Although the single player portion of the game is not bad at all, I would have been disappointed if I bought the game just for it. [13/2018, p.56]
  2. PLAY! Zine
    Mar 5, 2019
    80
    In Battlefield V we got back to WW2, but with refined gunplay and death system which works great. There are also little problems such as low number of maps and stability issues, that are taking the fun away, but nothing that can't be fixed.
    Read full review
  3. LEVEL (Czech Republic)
    Dec 31, 2018
    80
    A great World War II shooter that will grow and improve. Do not buy the game because of its singleplayer, but if you consider the campaign a bonus to the multiplayer, you will be satisfied. [Issue#291]
See all critic reviews »