User Score
7.2

Mixed or average reviews- based on 2720 Ratings

User score distribution:
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. Mar 4, 2017
    3
    I try like this Battlefield, seriously, I was play in BF series from first BF 1942, game looks awesome, but, only looks. After few hours was bored, and cheaters, they are smart, but when You look on players with high scores, You are see, cheats for recoil (no spatter bullets, all go in one line), wallhack with show people, a lot players know where are you, even You hide, they always knowI try like this Battlefield, seriously, I was play in BF series from first BF 1942, game looks awesome, but, only looks. After few hours was bored, and cheaters, they are smart, but when You look on players with high scores, You are see, cheats for recoil (no spatter bullets, all go in one line), wallhack with show people, a lot players know where are you, even You hide, they always know where put grenade, or where to shoot, they go die few times (well when he die, people don't say it's cheater, and they got k/s 47/4), I believe they used hardware USB hacks . DICE tell us, it was back to old BF1942, sorry DICE, wrong way, game don't have soul of BF1942 and, this f... cheaters, broke this product. P.s. Look on YT how many people report cheaters and DICE seat silent. Buy or not to buy? well for graphic, yes, for gameplay, i was sad pay my money for it, thanks a GOD I don't buy premium BF1.

    Graphic : 9/10
    Gameplay: 2/10
    price to product: 2/10
    Expand
  2. Nov 8, 2016
    1
    The gameplay itself, is more like an 8.5, the aesthetics and beautiful of the game a 9.5, however there are several crippling bugs and errors many of the community are experiencing, namely directx errors.

    Not only have the community reached out via the forums to the developers, but also through e-mail, petitions, and support tickets. None of these have yielded results, and the issue
    The gameplay itself, is more like an 8.5, the aesthetics and beautiful of the game a 9.5, however there are several crippling bugs and errors many of the community are experiencing, namely directx errors.

    Not only have the community reached out via the forums to the developers, but also through e-mail, petitions, and support tickets. None of these have yielded results, and the issue remains.

    Support tickets that are sent are simply dismissed, as mine was. So thousands of players are unable to play.

    What good is a game if you cannot play it?
    Expand
  3. Feb 18, 2017
    0
    I'm not sure what happened to EA. They used to produce such good games but as of late in my opinion the standard has really dropped. Case in question Battlefield 1. This game reproduces many of the flaws found in other Battlefield games, most notably, the lack of real immersion and control on the part of the gamer. This is another Pavlovian game where you are presented with very narrowI'm not sure what happened to EA. They used to produce such good games but as of late in my opinion the standard has really dropped. Case in question Battlefield 1. This game reproduces many of the flaws found in other Battlefield games, most notably, the lack of real immersion and control on the part of the gamer. This is another Pavlovian game where you are presented with very narrow game sequences, where the gamer is "shoe horned" into doing specific things in a very specific way or no cigar. There's little ability here to really play the game and influence events in a meaningful and satisfying way. Indeed it feels more like a mildly interactive film where the gamer is more spectator, than player.

    Worse still are the horrible weapon physics, where you can shoot something many many times and it simply does not fall down or blow up. This is married up to impossible scenario's, where you are bound to loose again and again. Others expect you to loose and just feel like a waste of time. Of course we are getting a moral history lesson about the futility of war but hey its supposed to be a game too right? Chance to have some fun? No such luck.

    Just as annoying is you can not play as the other side. The Germans, Turks, etc are simply targets. If this game wanted to show war in its entirety then why not let the player, play both sides?

    This game is pretty but then so are most modern games. This in itself is in no way enough to justify what is a clumsy effort, that simply lacks the fun and interactive factor gamers want and I believe have a right to expect.

    .
    Expand
  4. Dec 5, 2016
    6
    The game looks and runs great! But that doesn't count for anything when this is the most "Call of Duty" like Battlefield yet, it's far too spray and prey. The starting weapons are under powered, the random unavoidable deaths (Star Wars Battlefront-esque) are ridiculous and I just can't ever feel like there's a team effort going on at all. Stick to Battlefield 4 with the expansions andThe game looks and runs great! But that doesn't count for anything when this is the most "Call of Duty" like Battlefield yet, it's far too spray and prey. The starting weapons are under powered, the random unavoidable deaths (Star Wars Battlefront-esque) are ridiculous and I just can't ever feel like there's a team effort going on at all. Stick to Battlefield 4 with the expansions and save your money until they seriously balance this game, or add more tactical maps. Expand
  5. Nov 3, 2016
    1
    Since Release i have a directx error. unplayable .But thats what i have seen looks good .Only the crashes is for me an one 1 ranking.Please DICE Fix this . Than a 10 Ranking
  6. Feb 12, 2017
    0
    I played BF1942 at a semi-pro level and followed the BF series ever since. This is the biggest loser game of them all. Extreme disappointment in multiplayer. Horrible physical model. Purchased content kills the game. Never again.
  7. Feb 13, 2017
    0
    Instant death from everything, grenade spam instant death, latest patch makes aircraft immortal (btw aircraft kill you instantly), nonstop assault run & gun shotguns / automatico instant death, behemoth instant death, building falls on you instant death, bayonet instant death.

    "Matching you with players of equal skill" and you wind up in a game against a full squad of 100s. Seems
    Instant death from everything, grenade spam instant death, latest patch makes aircraft immortal (btw aircraft kill you instantly), nonstop assault run & gun shotguns / automatico instant death, behemoth instant death, building falls on you instant death, bayonet instant death.

    "Matching you with players of equal skill" and you wind up in a game against a full squad of 100s. Seems legit.

    Oh, and hackers are rampant despite the adorable little "Fairfight ban" that pops up occasionally - I guess they catch a few of them but it doesn't feel like it. The dude going 110 / 10 seems to show up every other game.

    Jokes on me, they already got my money. Don't let the joke be on you and keep yours in your pocket.
    Expand
  8. Apr 4, 2017
    4
    Glitches, terrible matchmaking, divided player base (after pre-released DLC for 'Premium' players), and absolutely horrible in-game mechanics leaves me wanting something more. I never leave the game satisfied, even if I have a solid k/d - victory. I've played through to 'Lv.91', have all my classes @ 23+ - after initially drooling over Ultra settings graphics you begin to see the bad thatGlitches, terrible matchmaking, divided player base (after pre-released DLC for 'Premium' players), and absolutely horrible in-game mechanics leaves me wanting something more. I never leave the game satisfied, even if I have a solid k/d - victory. I've played through to 'Lv.91', have all my classes @ 23+ - after initially drooling over Ultra settings graphics you begin to see the bad that is in the game. BF1 is a 'Steam Greenlight', still in Beta/Alpha, in-development game - similar to what Windows 10 is - pay for a full game while the developer gives you a half made release. Here, let me charge you full price for this delicious pie that I say has 10 pieces, but only give you 1. NICE DICE/EA. Expand
  9. Nov 2, 2016
    1
    Game has alot of potential, but it's a functional greasefire: 2 major outages in a week. BF1 is simply BF4's stepsister.....New skin, but same old EA/Dice.
  10. Nov 2, 2016
    7
    Very fun game. The graphics are gorgeous. Glad that EA is using the Frostbite 3 engine on many of their future games. But as much like all other FPS games, they're all the same. Rush, kill, rush, kill. The singleplayer campaign is quite short. The war stories campaign style I couldn't really get around to liking it. Would have preferred a single story through the entire play through.
  11. Nov 6, 2016
    6
    + nice graphics
    + good atmosphere
    + some good maps
    + fun to play with friends
    + not infinite warfare

    - horrible solo experience
    - awful weapon balance
    - bad unlock system
    - no hardcore
    - worst menu interface ever created (PC version)
    - laggy/buggy at times
    - overpriced
  12. Nov 7, 2016
    0
    the game badly implemented search server, Proch multiplayer maps,
    Single player is too short, reminds dlc,
    camouflage for weapons erected in the absolute,
    the game does not create the atmosphere of the First World War
  13. Feb 17, 2017
    0
    Ебаная хуйня, блять. Хотите дисконнекты каждую игру, даунов тиммейтов со снайперками, полный имнбаланс оружия и техники? Вам сюда. Эта худшая игра 2016 и ее не спасает отличная графика.
  14. Oct 25, 2016
    5
    Well the campaign was fun, a little too easy and AI are dumb as hell as usual but somehow I still really liked the campaign.

    Unfortunately can't say the same for the multiplayer. I couldn't get any kills at all in this game and I'm generally pretty good at shooters. Then I figured out it's Star Wars Battlefront code with 'ranges' that you have to be in for each weapon, is why the guns
    Well the campaign was fun, a little too easy and AI are dumb as hell as usual but somehow I still really liked the campaign.

    Unfortunately can't say the same for the multiplayer. I couldn't get any kills at all in this game and I'm generally pretty good at shooters. Then I figured out it's Star Wars Battlefront code with 'ranges' that you have to be in for each weapon, is why the guns feel so bizarre. Once you get used to the ranges you'll get a lot better but I just don't like the feel of it. I should never be too close for a sniper rifle to work, and shotguns are absolutely useless at surprisingly short distances (like 30 feet or so and suddenly it does nothing). And support LGMs should take more time to pull up to ironsights and make you run slower but should be devastating as hell when hit. Instead they feel weaker than a little SMG which is too weird to describe. I just don't like the 'feel' of it.

    Also there's a lot of cheaters you see kicked every round. OMG it's only been out for three days!

    Anyway I guess it has potential if they fix the cheating and tune the guns a bit. But definitely not my favorite shooter out of the box.
    Expand
  15. Oct 31, 2016
    3
    tenten rates this game 10/10. If call game pigeon simulator then rating will be tenoutoftenten. Ten ten thinks micro transaction are too cheap and should cost tenten a 10/tenten brexits
  16. Nov 3, 2016
    0
    Where to even begin?

    This is not a ww1 game. It doesn't play like one. It plays like a ww2 game with a ww1 skin, they should have just made a ww2 game. The campaign is **** The multiplayer is lacking in content, too few weapons missing key weapons used in ww1 and instead substituting guns that were never used. The multiplayer is completely unbalanced, with planes being very
    Where to even begin?

    This is not a ww1 game. It doesn't play like one. It plays like a ww2 game with a ww1 skin, they should have just made a ww2 game.

    The campaign is ****

    The multiplayer is lacking in content, too few weapons missing key weapons used in ww1 and instead substituting guns that were never used. The multiplayer is completely unbalanced, with planes being very overpowered along with tanks, the light machine guns being weak and the sniper (still) being the best class, with only them getting bolt action rifles (unlike in ww1). The maps are pretty poor, with many either turning into mortar spam or sniper spam, some are good, but the broken balance and OP elite classes really ruin those few good maps. No hardcore (aka the good game mode) on launch. The melee system is beyond broken, with your guy's feet becoming glued to the floor to enter a receiving of a bayoneting (several of which I have seen go through walls).

    If you have to buy it buy it on sale. I really wish I could get my money back.
    Expand
  17. Apr 4, 2017
    2
    Imagine life where every time you woke up, you were shot in the head by a 10 year old and this repeated itself until you woke up in a new place.

    Welcome to BF1
  18. Oct 30, 2016
    1
    THANKS EA THANKS ALOT
    EAMod_Mike · You've been warned.
    EAMod_MikeEAMod_Mike October 29 Hey there Ninjamammoth, We have removed your following post: "Hello my SEA friends. I have been playing the game for the past 2 days. My advice would be either refund the game or DO NOT buy it. I have read multiple threads from SEA, South Africa, India and Dubai requesting for EA to provide
    THANKS EA THANKS ALOT
    EAMod_Mike · You've been warned.
    EAMod_MikeEAMod_Mike October 29
    Hey there Ninjamammoth,

    We have removed your following post:

    "Hello my SEA friends. I have been playing the game for the past 2 days. My advice would be either refund the game or DO NOT buy it. I have read multiple threads from SEA, South Africa, India and Dubai requesting for EA to provide servers to their paying customers but to no avail EA is being a **** and not even taking the time to reply. They DO NOT show any love or support to their fans across those countries i have listed. ZERO LOVE! Therefore my advice is DO NOT buy it. Such a disappointing "AAA" Company. Bf3 and Bf4 had multiple servers for the various SEA countries, they really went back in time and devolved from where they used to be. DO NOT SUPPORT EA AS THEY DO NOT SUPPORT US.
    They do not even bother reading the forums...
    There are only AUSSIE Servers and JAPANESE (LIKE JAPAN IS THE WHOLE OF ASIA) and both play at 130+ Ping"

    Posting profanity and caps lock are against forum guidelines. Please avoid this in your future posts.

    Thanks,
    EAMod_Mike
    BattleField Moderation Team
    NinjamammothNinjamammoth 5:29PM
    Yeah REMOVE MY POST HOW ABOUT YOU GUYS GET YOUR SH"T TOGETHER AND RESPOND TO OUR FORUMS ABOUT NOT HAVING ANY SOUTH EAST ASIA SERVERS. NO CUSTOMER SUPPORT FROM YOU ALL AT ALL, SEEMS LIKE YOU READ MY POSTS AS YOU CAN TAKE IT DOWN. You guys are horrid, expect us to play on JAPAN like its the only ASIAN country. im going to screenshot this and post it on reddit. You guys are just a scam, bf3 and bf4 had servers all round.

    Just got this reply from bf1 support staff. They bother to Reply and take down my messages but not PROVIDE US WITH ANY SUPPORT OR ANSWER TO SINGAPORE AND OTHER ASIAN COUNTRY SERVERS.
    Expand
  19. Oct 22, 2016
    7
    Although graphically a very good looking game with a lot of love for detail I'm ultimately frustrated by the game play that Battlefield 1 offers. Tactical shooter sure, fun factor sure, but although inspired by WW1 it leaves any semblance to that conflict far behind. In the end combat is Battlefront Star Wars with WW1 skins, only the power ups and jet packs are missing to complete thisAlthough graphically a very good looking game with a lot of love for detail I'm ultimately frustrated by the game play that Battlefield 1 offers. Tactical shooter sure, fun factor sure, but although inspired by WW1 it leaves any semblance to that conflict far behind. In the end combat is Battlefront Star Wars with WW1 skins, only the power ups and jet packs are missing to complete this comparison.

    The game actually plays like WW2 on steroids where the majority of players uses either sub machine guns or automatic weapons, add very effective tanks an abundance of anti tank ordinance even at infantry level and aircraft, including heavy bombers, that have the agility and power to weight ratio of modern fighters, and the end result is cognitive dissonance.

    This feeling is only enhanced by the misguided attempt to make BF1 a multi cultural experience, driving this to such high level that in multi play your German squad can Be comprised entirely by black men. Now black men did serve in the Imperial army, but in Africa. If you want to offer a multi cultural experience at least give the player some choice.

    In multiplay I try to stick to rifles and only specific light machine guns, out of some historical sense of duty, but as the majority embraces exotic sub machine and light machine guns, this only increases the frustration I am having with BF1.

    I hope there will be some hardcore more WW1 oriented game play offered in the future - even it was just a single server it would redeem BF1 in my eyes.
    Expand
  20. Nov 3, 2016
    0
    It has been 13 days since the launch and I am yet unable to play the game without having it crash every 20 minutes with a DirectX error. Both EA/DICE and Nvidia know about this issue but have been unable to find and fix the cause of the problem. Paying AAA price for a broken at launch game is becoming a really annoying standard with those large game companies.
  21. Nov 11, 2016
    4
    tl;dr - the game rewards failure. If a team is losing they get either a blimp or an armored train, depending on the map. It's like a participation trophy for the fat slow kids, but in this case the fat kid uses the trophy to bludgeon the first place kid to death.
  22. Oct 30, 2016
    6
    The graphics are excellent, the sound effects are top notch, the gameyplay is very good. Yet, Battlefield 1 is clearly a step backwards from BF3 and BF4. Features from previous games have been removed and there is an obvious lack of content. Where are the plethora of guns, equipment, assigmnemts and awards that the previous games had?
  23. Oct 25, 2016
    7
    Weapon balance don't exist, bayonet charge is more retarded than commando perk in MW2. The new feature like zeppelin, armored train or dreadnought can help even the weakest team win and I don't think it's good for this game and fair play.
  24. Nov 27, 2016
    0
    Pros: - Good Graphic - Good Sounds

    Negatives: - bad gameplay - too much bugs in a 50€ game(100€ with premium pass...) - rly poor weapon configurations - bad servers - ?skins? - etc etc.....

    In my Eyes is this not a Bf like Bf Hardline, they changed the game to hard, that has nothing to do with bf,
    only "€" want they see.
  25. Nov 7, 2016
    9
    I'm not a huge fan of the FPS genre, so if I am going to play one then it has to be amazing. This is amazing! I would give it a 10 but there are some things that could be better (Direct X, a few aimbots / cheats and the historical inaccuracy to name just a few). one of these are major or game breaking and if it was accurate then it could have been at the expense of gameplay, sooooo I getI'm not a huge fan of the FPS genre, so if I am going to play one then it has to be amazing. This is amazing! I would give it a 10 but there are some things that could be better (Direct X, a few aimbots / cheats and the historical inaccuracy to name just a few). one of these are major or game breaking and if it was accurate then it could have been at the expense of gameplay, sooooo I get it.

    Overall, this is the best Battlefield I've played in years!
    Expand
  26. May 2, 2017
    2
    I was not a fan of the portrayal of soldiers in the game, many of which were non-white. in a war were only 7% of the fighting forces were non-white having so many running around on the battlefield takes away from the historical accuracy DICE says they want to have. I understand they want to show the sides of the war not many people know about like the "Harlem hellfighters" and what not butI was not a fan of the portrayal of soldiers in the game, many of which were non-white. in a war were only 7% of the fighting forces were non-white having so many running around on the battlefield takes away from the historical accuracy DICE says they want to have. I understand they want to show the sides of the war not many people know about like the "Harlem hellfighters" and what not but that doesn't excuse the fact that there are so many blacks mixed in with the German, British and Australian Forces nor should it make up for the black man on the poster.

    Other than that the game is fun at times but the spawns are terrible i've spawned right behind enemies and killed like 3 people, fun for me but still. Also the game feels too messy i wanted there to be coordination and you have to charge the enemy all at once to cap a point or something but that was not the case.
    Expand
  27. Mar 25, 2017
    0
    the game is not bad but it is a rip-of for the money you pay, it's basicly another bad company 2 reskins (just as every bf is) they basicly say the made it world war 1 so they can make another world war 2 game in a few years to milk the franchise again. but the worst of all, origin the most pehtetic game platform ever.
  28. Mar 25, 2017
    0
    4 hours just trying to enter into a server, another 1 hour trying to press the exit button, no one single button works properly, battlefield 1? more like Battle against glitchs 1
  29. Apr 11, 2017
    10
    Haven't enjoyed a battlefield game this much since Battlefield 2

    They have gone back to basics with this game & the series is better for it, while I did love Battlefield 4 I also found the gadgetry in it to be a bit overwhelming & longed for the days of Battlefield 2 when things just seemed a lot more simple Battlefield 1 takes away a lot of the nonsense added since BC2 BF3 BF4 &
    Haven't enjoyed a battlefield game this much since Battlefield 2

    They have gone back to basics with this game & the series is better for it, while I did love Battlefield 4 I also found the gadgetry in it to be a bit overwhelming & longed for the days of Battlefield 2 when things just seemed a lot more simple

    Battlefield 1 takes away a lot of the nonsense added since BC2 BF3 BF4 & adds a lot of things that make sense, for example being able to squad queue or premium friend queue (allows people without DLC to queue with people who have it) or spawning away from a flag if its under attack, also spawning in general is awesome as you get a proper situational awareness from the map to the ground

    basically if you weren't a fan of choppers, long range mortar, flir etc then this is the Battlefield game for you

    The single player is pretty impressive as well if though a bit short
    Expand
  30. Aug 22, 2017
    5
    It's far from perfect, but easily my favorite Battlefield game. The animations in particular are the best in the business. Good vehicle balance and shooting mechanics, and a wide variety of weapons including melee weapons.

    EDIT: reduced my score because of anti-consumer business practices.
Metascore
88

Generally favorable reviews - based on 54 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 52 out of 54
  2. Negative: 0 out of 54
  1. PC PowerPlay
    Dec 18, 2016
    80
    Has DICE made the Great War Great again? Well, it's certainly delivered a fresh-feeling shooter in a very saturated market. But the missing modes are felt. [Issue#257, p.58]
  2. Edge Magazine
    Dec 14, 2016
    90
    Battlefield 1 is better than its predecessors in almost every way. [Christmas 2016, p.102]
  3. LEVEL (Czech Republic)
    Dec 12, 2016
    100
    Battlefield is back in shape and more so with fresh theme of the first Great War! After a long time, the campaign is successful and multiplayer is traditionally excellent. So, this year your choice is set! [Issue #269]