The New Yorker's Scores
- Movies
- TV
For 3,480 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
37% higher than the average critic
-
2% same as the average critic
-
61% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 1.1 points higher than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 66
| Highest review score: | Fiume o morte! | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Bio-Dome |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 1,939 out of 3480
-
Mixed: 1,343 out of 3480
-
Negative: 198 out of 3480
3480
movie
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
One of the dreariest films in the Katharine Hepburn-Spencer Tracy series; it has a metallic flavor.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The Oscar Wilde story has its compelling gimmick and its cheap thrills, and despite the failings of Albert Lewin as writer and director, he has an appetite for decadence and plushy decor.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
- The New Yorker
-
- The New Yorker
-
- The New Yorker
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
This came late in the series but it's still fairly cheerful.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
This shrewd, smoothly tawdry thriller, directed by Billy Wilder, is one of the high points of nineteen-forties films. Barbara Stanwyck’s Phyllis Dietrichson—a platinum blonde who wears tight white sweaters, an anklet, and sleazy-kinky shoes—is perhaps the best acted and the most fixating of all the slutty, cold-blooded femmes fatales of the film-noir genre.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
This pseudo-Victorian thriller is rather more enjoyable than one might expect, and Bergman is, intermittently, genuinely moving.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
This is one of Preston Sturges's surreal-slapstick-satire-conniption-fit comedies, and part of our great crude heritage.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
- The New Yorker
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
In its own terms, the movie--the eighth Garland and Rooney had made together--is just about irresistible.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Someone at Universal had the brainstorm of redoing the 1925 silent Lon Chaney horror picture and taking advantage of the fact that it was set in an opera house to make it not only a sound picture but a high-toned musical. The result is this flaccid, sedate version.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
- The New Yorker
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The whole thing became amorphous and confused. Paramount did rather better by the romance than the politics; Ingrid Bergman is lovely and affecting as Maria.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Denby
The most familiar movie in the world is still fresh; it has so many little busy corners to nestle in... Casablanca is the most sociable, the most companionable film ever made. Life as an endless party.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
It's very well worked out in terms of character and it has a sustained grip, but it certainly isn't as much fun as several of his other films.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
While other B-budget horror producers were still using gorillas, haunted houses, and disembodied arms, Lewton and the director, Jacques Tourneur, employed suggestion, creepy sound effects, and inventive camera angles, leaving everything to the viewers' fear-filled imagination.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The only reason to see this hunk of twaddle is the better to savor the memory of the Carol Burnett - Harvey Korman parody, which also was shorter. Mervyn LeRoy, who directed many a big clinker, also gets the blame for this one.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Tracy and Hepburn, but not a comedy, and not good, either.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The director, Irving Rapper, is just barely competent, and the action plods along, yet this picture is all of a piece, and if it were better it might not work at all. This way, it's a schlock classic.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The farce situations are pushed too broadly, and have a sanctimonious patriotic veneer, but this first American film directed by Billy Wilder was a box-office hit.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
There's no denying that for many people sequences such as Bambi's birth have an enduring primal power.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
The film as it stands is a vision of a lost world of graces and traditions that are as alluring as they are confining, as beautiful as they are useless—as well as a portrait of the makers and the victims of modernity.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
A big, enjoyable musical biography, well directed by Michael Curtiz.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
M-G-M's wartime salute to gallant England, engineered to make the audience choke up.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
A good-natured and engaging minor novel by Steinbeck, turned into a good-natured and engaging (though corny and quaint and picturesque) film at M-G-M.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
A mixed-up and over-loaded American spy thriller by Alfred Hitchcok, with the unengaging Robert Cummings in the lead and an unappealing cast, featuring Priscilla Lane and Otto Kruger. Nothing holds together, but there are still enough scary sequences to make the picture entertaining.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Ernst Lubitsch, who directed, starts off on the wrong foot and never gets his balance; the performers yowl their lines, and the burlesque of the Nazis, who cower before their superior officers, is more crudely gleeful than funny.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Sturges is more at home in slapstick irony (as in The Lady Eve, earlier in '41) than in the mixed tones of this comedy-melodrama, but it's a memorable film nevertheless.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The play was built on topical jokes and a series of vaudeville turns, and in this version the jokes are flat and the turns seemed forced and not very funny.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by