The New Yorker's Scores
- Movies
- TV
For 3,481 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
37% higher than the average critic
-
2% same as the average critic
-
61% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 1.1 points higher than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 66
| Highest review score: | Fiume o morte! | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Bio-Dome |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 1,939 out of 3481
-
Mixed: 1,344 out of 3481
-
Negative: 198 out of 3481
3481
movie
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
It's a creditable though unadventurous film, handsomely staged in the M-G-M backlot style for classics.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
A stirring 18-centry sea adventure...For the kind of big budget, studio controlled romantic adventure that this is, it's very well done.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
This suave, amusing spy melodrama is directed with so sure a touch that the suspense is charged with wit; it's one of the three or four best things Hitchcock ever did.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
- The New Yorker
-
- The New Yorker
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The best scenes--especially an assassination attempt at Royal Albert Hall--are stunning, but Hitchcock seems sloppily unconcerned about the unconvincing material in between the tricks and jokes.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Classic, compulsively watchable rags-to-riches-and-heartbreak weeper, from a novel by Fannie Hurst.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The plot is trivial French farce (about mistaken identities), but the dances are among the wittiest and the most lyrical expressions of American romanticism on the screen.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
People hadn't seen anything like it; that doesn't mean they needed to.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
It started a new cycle in screen entertainment by demonstrating that a murder mystery could also be a sophisticated screwball comedy.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
No one has ever fully explained what gives this basically slight romantic comedy its particular - and enormous - charm.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The picture--which is almost surreally entertaining--is also famous for its madcap choreography; chorus girls dancing on the wings of planes, to the title song.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The film was lavishly produced, with great care given to the sets and costumes and makeup, but the spirit is missing.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
A lovely, graceful film, and surprisingly faithful to the atmosphere, the Victorian sentiments, and the Victorian strengths of the Louisa May Alcott novel.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
- The New Yorker
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
A little poky but impressively well done, with witty special effects (by John P. Fulton) and traces of the Whale humor that enlivened his Old Dark House and The Bride of Frankenstein.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The first time you see this film, you're likely to find it silly, autoerotic, static, absurd, and you may feel cheated after having heard so much about it. But though it may seem to have no depth, you're not likely to forget it -- it has a suggestiveness unlike any other film.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
It has some silly, yet irresistibly wonderful examples of Busby Berkeley's pinwheel choreography.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Great fun in the uninhibited early-30s style, made at M-G-M before fear of church pressure groups turned the studio respectable and pompous.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The self-conscious good taste of it all creaks, but Noel Coward knows plenty of tricks, and the performers know how to get the most out of his lines.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
- The New Yorker
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Harlow is intensely liable, delivering her zingy wisecracks with a wonderful dirty good humor, and Gable is at that early peak in his career when he is so sizzlingly sexual that it seems both funny and natural for the two women to be fighting over him.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Most of the players give impossibly bad performances—they chew up the camera. But if you want to see what screen glamour used to be, and what, originally, “stars” were, this is perhaps the best example of all time.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The Marx Brothers in one of their niftiest corny-surreal comedies; it isn't in the class of their Duck Soup but then what else is?- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Overall, it's a terrific movie, even though the pacing doesn't always seem quite right.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
- The New Yorker
-
- The New Yorker
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The director, Rouben Mamoulian, rather overdoes the pseudo-science at the beginning, but at some levels this story seems to work in every version, and this one, set in a starched mid-Victorian environment, suggests the lust that has to come out--and the attraction of the gutter.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Probably the most famous of all horror films, and one of the best.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
- The New Yorker