The New Yorker's Scores
- Movies
- TV
For 3,480 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
37% higher than the average critic
-
2% same as the average critic
-
61% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 1.1 points higher than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 66
| Highest review score: | Fiume o morte! | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Bio-Dome |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 1,939 out of 3480
-
Mixed: 1,343 out of 3480
-
Negative: 198 out of 3480
3480
movie
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
- The New Yorker
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Hardly even a shadow; Myrna Loy, William Powell, and Asta go through their paces for the fourth time, but the jauntiness is gone.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Moving and impressive in a big-Hollywood-picture-way.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
An almost perfect visual equivalent of the Dashiell Hammett thriller...It is (and this is rare in American films) a work of entertainment that is yet so skillfully constructed that after many years and many viewings it has the same brittle explosiveness - and even some of the same surprise - that it had in its first run.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
- The New Yorker
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The Orson Welles film is generally considered the greatest American film of the sound period, and it may be more fun than any other great movie.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
There's too much metaphysical gabbing and a labored boy-gets-girl romance, but audiences loved this chunk of whimsey.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Too bad that the director, George Cukor, doesn't have a little more feeling for the loony baroque; the story is treated much too soberly.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Terrible, but bearable; there's a fascination to its clunkiness.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The picture starts out in the confident Capra manner, but with a darker tone; by the end, you feel puzzled and cheated.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
A frivolous masterpiece. Like Bringing Up Baby, The Lady Eve is a mixture of visual and verbal slapstick, and of high artifice and pratfalls.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
In a long career of giving pleasure, this is one of the few occasions when (Rogers) failed; it isn't her worst acting but there's nothing in the soggy material to release the distinctive Ginger Rogers sense of fun.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Shiny and unfelt and smart-aleck-commercial as the movie is, it's almost irresistibly entertaining - one of the high spots of M-G-M professionalism.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Davis gives what is very likely the best study of female sexual hypocrisy in film history. Cold and proper, she yet manages to suggest the passion of a woman who'd kill a man for trying to leave her. She is helped by an excellent script (by Howard Koch) and by two unusually charged performances--James Stephenson as her lawyer and Herbert Marshall as her husband.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
So klunky and poorly paced, and so loaded with sanctimonious moral lessons, that even the George and Ira Gershwin score doesn't save it.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
There are agreeable overtones of Mark Twain tall tales in this good-humored, though uneven, version of the paradoxical life of Judge Roy Bean, with Walter Brennan in the part.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
- The New Yorker
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
The pugnacity of Walsh’s comic direction infuses turbulently free enterprise with tragedy.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Animated and bouncing, the movie is more Dickens than Austen; once one adjusts to this, it's a happy and carefree viewing experience.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Tennyson wrote Enoch Arden in 1864, and the movies have been making versions of it ever since D.W. Griffith did it in 1908 (and again in 1911). This one is the most famous and the funniest.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Magnificent romantic-gothic corn, full of Alfred Hitchcock's humor and inventiveness.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
In spite of his problem of sentiment, it's a happy, unpretentious farce.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
This famous film, high on most lists of the greatest films of all time, seems all wrong - phony when it should ring true. Yet, because of the material, it is often moving in spite of the acting, the directing, and the pseudo-Biblical pore-people talk.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Russell is at her comedy peak here...and as Walter Burns, Grant raises mugging to a joyful art.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Close to perfection--one of the most beautifully acted and paced romantic comedies ever made in this country.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The story, about the friendship between two lonely, vagrant ranch hands--the small, bedraggled, intelligent George and the simpleminded giant Lennie--is gimmicky and highly susceptible to parody, but it is emotionally effective just the same.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Though the film has its bright moments, and some weird ones, too, the first freshness is gone. Even the effects seem repetitive.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
James Stewart is charming and even a little bit sexy as the mild-mannered Destry.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The third in the series, and without any new ideas except a bad one: still airily casual, Nick and Nora Charles (William Powell and Myrna Loy) are now the parents of a baby boy.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
If you fed the earlier gangster movies into a machine and made a prototype, you'd come up with this picture.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by