The New Yorker's Scores
- Movies
- TV
For 3,480 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
37% higher than the average critic
-
2% same as the average critic
-
61% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 1.1 points higher than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 66
| Highest review score: | Fiume o morte! | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Bio-Dome |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 1,939 out of 3480
-
Mixed: 1,343 out of 3480
-
Negative: 198 out of 3480
3480
movie
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
- The New Yorker
-
- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
A thin but well-shot suspense melodrama, kept from collapsing by the suggestiveness and intensity that the director, Jacques Tourneur, pours on.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The film loses its imaginative energy once it moves out of the ripe, sleazy carny milieu, and from the start the technique of the director, Edmund Goulding, is conventional, even a little stodgy. Still, the material, adapted from William Gresham's novel by Jules Furthman, is unusual and the cast first-rate.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The pictures is an almost total drag, though Agnes Moorehead, as the villainess, has a sensational exit through plate-glass windows.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The director, Michael Curtiz, seems to be totally out of his element in this careful, deadly version of the celebrated, long-running Broadway comedy.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
It has a sweetness and a simplicity that suggest greatness of feeling, and this is so rare in films that to cite a comparison one searches beyond the medium.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The title is accurate: this is a crudely powerful prison picture.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The film has a strong style that is very different from Lean's earlier work. He seems to have finally to have let go--to have pulled out all the stops. The film is emotional, exciting, full of action.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
When Jody and Fodderwing are together, something quirky and magical seems to be happening on the screen; when Jody and his deer are together the boy's emotion has a fairytale glitter; and when Jody's mother reveals a streak of humor she's so pleased at her dumb joke that you find yourself staring in disbelief--and laughing. Even Peck seems to blend into the atmosphere.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Though the director, Carol Reed, doesn't quite succeed in creating a masterpiece (the inflated ideas in the script don't allow him to), there are bravura visual passages, the sound is often startlingly effective, and the film provides an experience that can't be shrugged off.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Richard Brody
Lupino’s flinty performance and Bennett’s haunted one infuse the movie’s pugnacity and violence with tender vulnerability, and Walsh, a cinematic poet of brassy urbanity, stokes the story’s volatile elements—artistic passions, high-society temptations, streetwise bravery, postwar trauma, family loyalty, and the secrets and lies that pass for romance—to a crescendo of abraded grandeur.- The New Yorker
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
A forgettable Bogart melodrama that was already familiar when it came out; it had been synthesized from several of his hits, with Lizabeth Scott's role processed out of Mary Astor and Lauren Bacall routines.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
It's not a great picture; it's too schematic and it drags on after you get the points. However, the episodes and details stand out and help to compensate for the soggy plot strands, and there's something absorbing about the banality of its large-scale good intentions; it's compulsively watchable.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
- The New Yorker
-
- The New Yorker
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Bergman is literally ravishing in what is probably her sexiest performance. Great trash, great fun.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The action is tense and fast, and the film catches the lurid Chandler atmosphere.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
A celebrated, craftsmanlike tearjerker, and incredibly neat.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
It's a smooth, proficient, somewhat languorous thriller, handsomely shot with some showy long takes. It's quite watchable, but the script is clever in a shallow way; the people need more dimensions.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Entertaining, though overlong. The director, Tay Garnett, knew almost enough tricks to sustain this glossily bowdlerized version of the James M. Cain novel, and he used Lana Turner maybe better than any other director did.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Perhaps the farthest out of the Bob Hope--Bing Crosby road pictures. Some of the patter is pure, relaxed craziness, but the topical jokes and the awful quips keep pulling it down.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
As an example of the "woman's picture" this doesn't have any of the grubbiness or conviction of the Barbara Stanwyck Stella Dallas, but de Havilland works hard confecting cold cream.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
The central conceit of glorifying progress and moral uplift in a musical comedy set in New Mexico in the 1880s is certainly a strange one, but it worked out surprisingly well--though the charm is mostly heavy.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Yet, with all the obvious ingredients for success, Spellbound is a disaster.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Miss Crawford's heavy breathing was certified as acting when she won an Academy Award for her performance here.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Val Lewton produced, but except for a few touches, it's a mess.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
Ugh. A murder mystery that starts from a Leslie Charteris story but never gets anyplace you'd want to go to.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
This Gene Kelly-Frank Sinatra musical has an abundance of energy and spirit, and you may feel it could be wonderful if it weren't so stupidly wholesome.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pauline Kael
One of the dreariest films in the Katharine Hepburn-Spencer Tracy series; it has a metallic flavor.- The New Yorker
-
Reviewed by