The New Yorker's Scores

  • Movies
  • TV
For 3,481 reviews, this publication has graded:
  • 37% higher than the average critic
  • 2% same as the average critic
  • 61% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 1.1 points higher than other critics. (0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 66
Highest review score: 100 Fiume o morte!
Lowest review score: 0 Bio-Dome
Score distribution:
3481 movie reviews
  1. It's apparent that the decor and color were intended to create moods, but the whole thing seems to be the product of an aberrant, second-rate imagination that confuses decor with art.
    • The New Yorker
  2. A huge, mawkish, trite circus movie directed by Cecil B. De Mille in a neo-Biblical style.
    • The New Yorker
  3. This exuberant satire of Hollywood in the late 20s, at the time of the transition from silents to talkies, is probably the most enjoyable of all American movie musicals.
    • The New Yorker
  4. An inspired piece of casting brought Humphrey Bogart and Katharine Hepburn together. This is a comedy, a love story, and a tale of adventure, and it is one of the most charming and entertaining movies ever made.
    • The New Yorker
  5. The introductory and closing scenes are tedious; the woman's whimpering is almost enough to drive one to the nearest exit. Yet the film transcends these discomforts; it has its own perfection.
    • The New Yorker
  6. The failure of innocence here is touchingly absurd; the film is stylized poetry, and it is like nothing else that De Sica ever did.
    • The New Yorker
  7. The action is stagey, but there's certainly enough going on.
    • The New Yorker
  8. Clarke's script, Charles Crichton's direction, and Georges Auric's music contribute to what is probably the most nearly perfect fubsy comedy of all time. It's a minor classic, a charmer.
    • The New Yorker
  9. Elia Kazan’s direction is often stagy, and the sets and the arrangement of actors are frequently too transparently “worked out,” but who cares when you’re looking at two of the greatest performances ever put on film and listening to some of the finest dialogue ever written by an American?
  10. Whatever one's reservations about this famous film, it is impressive, and in the love scene between Taylor and Clift, physical desire seems palpable.
    • The New Yorker
  11. The director Anthony Mann fleshes out the intricate story with vigorous and subtle attention to its disparate elements—political, psychological, and brutal.
  12. In the person of Alec Guinness, Fagin the Viper, the corrupter of youth, has a sly, depraved charm.
    • The New Yorker
  13. It's intensely enjoyable--in some ways the best of Hitchcock's American films.
    • The New Yorker
  14. A smashing kitsch entertainment.
    • The New Yorker
  15. Ersatz art of a very high grade, and one of the most enjoyable movies ever made.
    • The New Yorker
  16. This brittle satiric tribute to Hollywood's leopard-skin past--it's narrated by a corpse-- is almost too clever, yet it's at its best in this cleverness, and is slightly banal in the sequences dealing with a normal girl (Nancy Olson) and modern Hollywood.
    • The New Yorker
  17. Within its own terms the picture is sensitive and very well done, but it's also tiresomely fraudulent -- an idealization of a safe, shuttered existence, the good life according to M-G-M.
    • The New Yorker
  18. A rigid faced Joan Crawford, in a role that would make sense only if played by a ravishing young beauty. She's twice too old for it, and her acting is grim and masklike.
    • The New Yorker
  19. A competent (often overrated) thriller by John Huston about a group of crooks who plan a jewel robbery and how their characters determine the results.
    • The New Yorker
  20. As deceptions and disguises pile up, the layers of mystery grow thicker, and the lurid symbolism of material objects is thrust to the fore.
  21. Perhaps the most influential of all French films, and one of the most richly entertaining.
    • The New Yorker
  22. In its B-picture way, it has a fascinating crumminess.
    • The New Yorker
  23. Its exuberant love of New York seems forced, and most of the numbers are hearty and uninspired.
    • The New Yorker
  24. Cukor's work is too arch, too consciously, commercially clever, but it's also spirited, confident.
    • The New Yorker
  25. Ray's tense choreographic staging and tightly framed compositions give the film a sensuous, nervous feeling of imminent betrayal. Yet this film-noir stylization, elegant in design terms and emotionally powerful, is also very simplistic; the movie suffers from metaphysical liberalism--social injustice treated as cosmic fatalism.
    • The New Yorker
  26. Like Ford's other large-scale, elegiac Westerns of this period, it's not a plain action movie but a pictorial film with slow spots and great set pieces.
    • The New Yorker
  27. A Hitchcock stinker, set in Australia in the early 19th century (though shot in England).
    • The New Yorker
  28. Orson Welles' portrait of the friend, Harry Lime, is a study of corruption - evil, witty, unreachable.
    • The New Yorker
  29. This Freudian gangster picture, directed by Raoul Walsh, is very obvious, and it's so primitive and outrageous in its flamboyance that it seems to have been made much earlier than it was. But this flamboyance is also what makes some of its scenes stay with you.
    • The New Yorker
  30. It's not a great movie, or even a very good one (it's rather mechanical), but it touches one's experience in a way that makes it hard to forget.
    • The New Yorker

Top Trailers