Christian Science Monitor's Scores
- Movies
- TV
For 4,492 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
55% higher than the average critic
-
2% same as the average critic
-
43% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 2.1 points higher than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 67
| Highest review score: | 'Round Midnight | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Couples Retreat |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 2,780 out of 4492
-
Mixed: 1,361 out of 4492
-
Negative: 351 out of 4492
4492
movie
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt
A triumph of psychological drama, owing as much to Ms. Bier's sensitive style as to Anders Thomas Jensen's smart screenplay, based on Bier's own story idea.- Christian Science Monitor
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Christian Science Monitor
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt
Amiably bland actors can be fun to watch, as Tom Hanks has proved. Freeman is no Hanks, though, and The Hitchhiker's Guide won't boost anyone's career into hyperspace. Or give your mind a workout.- Christian Science Monitor
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt
Most of the movie is standard action fare, but the political commentary is interesting when it's allowed to surface.- Christian Science Monitor
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Christian Science Monitor
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt
It's unlikely there will ever be a more moving portrait of the shared selfhood, usually veiled by politics, common to the Palestinian and Israeli peoples.- Christian Science Monitor
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt
The picture repeats itself a lot, but Dash is a good sport in poking barbed fun at the PR machinations of today's music business.- Christian Science Monitor
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Christian Science Monitor
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt
Dance's directorial debut isn't exciting, but it's deeply felt and engagingly acted. Why doesn't he take more advantage of the story's opportunities for fine music, though?- Christian Science Monitor
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt
There's interesting material about Soviet history, but searching for answers about the revolutionary's spouse turns out to be less than engrossing.- Christian Science Monitor
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt
For close-up views of large African animals in the wild, this IMAX spectacle is hard to beat. However, the film takes up too much of its brief running time tracking down the photogenic beasts.- Christian Science Monitor
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt
A swiftly told, smartly acted yarn, and it even has an idea or two on its mind.- Christian Science Monitor
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt
What's the point of the picture, except to allow Kutcher fans occasional peeks at acting talent he usually keeps hidden?- Christian Science Monitor
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt
Entertaining documentary about stuntwomen who do risky business for a living.- Christian Science Monitor
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Christian Science Monitor
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt
Furtado's comic thriller is a telling commentary on modern avarice in Brazil and elsewhere, which touches on everything from "The Simpsons" to "Rear Window" along the way. Too bad it runs out of ideas before the overlong story is over.- Christian Science Monitor
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt
Very inventive, but stay away if you can't stomach over-the-top violence.- Christian Science Monitor
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt
This remake stays close to the eponymous 1979 horror movie it's based on, except for being precisely 10,000 times scarier.- Christian Science Monitor
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt
House of D, arrives in theaters this week, after debuting at the Tribeca Film Festival last year. I'm sorry to report it's the opposite of impressive.- Christian Science Monitor
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt
There's heavy influence from the "Brave New World" brand of dystopian fantasy, but engaging performances and a stylized visual approach lend it originality.- Christian Science Monitor
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt
Like all this adventurous filmmaker's work, it's truly one of a kind.- Christian Science Monitor
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt
The best is "Equilibrium" by Soderbergh, about a man being analyzed by a distracted shrink.- Christian Science Monitor
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Christian Science Monitor
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt
It's not a masterpiece, but its story of Civil War enemies banding together for battle against Indian warriors and French soldiers packs an occasional wallop.- Christian Science Monitor
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Christian Science Monitor
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt
If it weren't so smartly filmed and acted, this might add up to an over-the-top mess. But watch how inventively Mr. Antal keeps the action moving and you'll see why his picture has won a passel of prizes.- Christian Science Monitor
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt
While Jaoui's film is interesting to watch, it dawdles enough to lose its storytelling grip.- Christian Science Monitor
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt
This leisurely, transfixing movie is much more interested in nostalgic atmosphere than "educational" facts.- Christian Science Monitor
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt
Sadly it's been botched. Guess Who serves up such flat dialogue and stilted situations that it's hard to sit through.- Christian Science Monitor
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt
Smart and engrossing, if too heavy on the symbolism at times.- Christian Science Monitor
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by