The King

Netflix | Release Date: October 11, 2019

7.8	USER SCORE Generally favorable reviews based on 214 Ratings

USER RATING DISTRIBUTION

Watch Now

Stream On

Buy on

Review this movie

VOTE NOW

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.

Check box if your review contains spoilers

0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User score By date Most helpful

DodgerNov 14, 2019

Disapointed by this movie in alot of ways. Firstly and probably most importantly, its a complete re-write of history, I mean honestly they get almost every single aspect of the story wrong. This lack of basic attention to the history of theDisapointed by this movie in alot of ways. Firstly and probably most importantly, its a complete re-write of history, I mean honestly they get almost every single aspect of the story wrong. This lack of basic attention to the history of the time also ties into the second disapointing part, the abysmal battle at the end of the movie, it literaly made no sense at all from a story or tactical standpoint. Unfortunately the movie is also ludicrously long for the minimal story contained within and at the same time felt horribly truncated in terms plot and character development. On top of all this the pacing is extremley stop-start with fairly considerable jumps in character motivation and plot points.

The points i've given it are for the top notch set/prop production and some of the cinematography. Avoid this movie if you care about history and/or your own time.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

ReezeTheVampireNov 7, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I truly cannot fathom how anyone considers this so much as a decent movie. Let me sum up the good parts: the lighting is good, the acting is fine overall, the cinematography is generally decent with a handful of god awful shots. With that out of the way, let me state this movie's biggest problem; this is a near two and a half hour long movie that has less narrative content that a 20 minute episode of a children's cartoon. Here is a summary: The king is about to die but his eldest son is a drunk so he wants to give the position to his younger son, but the younger son dies so the eldest son becomes king. The movie takes the entire first HOUR to say that. I would say about 60% of that hour could be cut with zero impact to the plot in any way, shape, or form. Then it takes the next half hour to give the King a goal, confirm he is a pacifist, use trebuchet on a castle, and introduce our main antagonist an hour into the film with about 2 minutes of screen time. Then we spend the next 15 minutes quite literally walking through a forest to discover a big enemy force. Then there is another minute long scene with the antagonist, the worst medieval battle I've ever seen with tactics that make no sense, and then the antagonist is killed by extras because he slipped in the mud. We are now at about 115 minutes. What's the next 25 minutes, you may ask? People talking about the stuff that we just watched and then the King gets scolded for being a war monger even though he is a pacifist. This movie could have been an hour long episode of GoT but decided to spend an hour and half accomplishing absolutely nothing with countless dead shots, conversations that lead no where and mean nothing, and B roll. On top of all of this the character of the King makes zero sense and flips back and forth in personality between just about every scene. I also cannot overstate how awful the battle at the end was. They build it up to be a big, brutal battle where the enemy is countered because there is some mud. There is no blood, no limbs, no screams of death, no fires, nothing; it was the least convincing battle I have ever seen in any movie of any type of any genre. Even showing the aftermath there are a few dozen men laying in mud; no wounded men screaming, no blood-soaked grass, no limbs, no men stuck on spears, nothing. Also, the King here kills a few people in the 'big battle' by punching them in the face...while they were wearing helmets. Absolute drivel.… Expand

2 of 7 users found this helpful25

All this user's reviews

MeritCobaFeb 1, 2020

Perhaps this is the moment to blame Monty Python for emphasizing all that is wrong with medieval movies. Then again it was all meant to be silly and so The King could have been if it hadn't been so depressing. Gloomy isn't funny.

The KingPerhaps this is the moment to blame Monty Python for emphasizing all that is wrong with medieval movies. Then again it was all meant to be silly and so The King could have been if it hadn't been so depressing. Gloomy isn't funny.

The King depicts the life of one of the more remarkable kings of England: Henry the Fifth, a man immortalized in a play by Shakespeare. He wasn't king for long, but almost succeeded in joining France and England into one union after remarkable successes on the field of battle, of which the battle of Agincourt in 1415 is the most notable. History would certainly have been different had that lasted. Given all that, it should be easy to make a movie of this grander than life figure. No need to embellish or twist things to make an otherwise boring historical figure into something watchable. Alas, the movie makers beg to differ. Let's toss all that boring historical stuff aside and just make up new things as we go along. And throw in some Holy Grail things, like dirty peasants, down trodden poor clothing and anything else that have been cliched to death by now.

It is fascinating to see them turn Henry into an erratic angsty teen that would fit right in with the Twilight saga cast. Henry, leader of men, the warrior king, mumbles his lines and sits in depressed silence throughout the film. Into the breach once more, he mumbles and listlessly waves his sword. His men stare at him. Sorry, did you say something?

The movie is almost drained of any color, like it is shot on an overcast or rainy day. The characters are drained of any liveliness as well. Like half dead men they stumble about. They look sick, or undead, or drunk. Oh... look.... the enemy.... Let's gape at them for a while. That movies aren't well versed in depicting war will not surprise you, but that they even get the most basic things wrong is amazing. Like having your fully equipped knights march on foot overland without any cavalry screen to find out where your enemy is. At one moment the column of men, and it is actually a long column without any flanking forces, comes up on a hill and then somehow Henry senses the French army is behind the hill. And by Jove, they are! And neither army has any scouts out, or screening forces or camp guards. I swear that the French army didn't even notice that one figure in plain sight on the top of the hill. Why make a movie about a king who spends most of his live on the battlefield while you have totally no understanding of how war is waged? Or, apparently, no interest whatsoever to ask people who do know? I bet there are enough people in England who can tell you how to avoid the most basic of errors? But all of this isn't the worst about this movie. The worst is how amazingly uninspiring it is and weird. For some reason the French king is disdainful of Henry. Apparently it is, so we are told, because of Henry's rowdy live before he became king. Let's just rewind this a little. Henry is a lazy layabout who spends his live whoring, drinking and doing nothing much until he becomes king. And then he changes from that into an experienced warrior who bests experienced knights in duels and defeats one of the most powerful armies in medieval Europe. Picture that.

SO the French king thinks Henry to be a weak king and thus mocks him, sends assassins and plots against him. And eventually, Henry has enough and thus invades France to teach their kind a lesson.

So far the totally made up history of the movie. In reality the story was different. The rumor that Henry was a whoring drunk was just that: a rumor. In fact he was well experienced in war. And the reason he invades France is not because he was insulted, but because he claimed the throne of France.

It baffles why you need to twist history if history is good enough to tell an engaging story? Anyway.. this uninspired movie exasperates. Maybe they should call it: the mumbler saga: breaking history.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews