The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1

Lionsgate | Release Date: November 21, 2014

6.3	USER SCORE Generally favorable reviews based on 1005 Ratings

USER RATING DISTRIBUTION

Watch Now

Stream On

Buy on

Stream On

Expand

Review this movie

VOTE NOW

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.

Check box if your review contains spoilers

0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User score By date Most helpful

srp428Nov 21, 2014

I really enjoyed the movie, I was a little worried because of the critics, but at the end I cannot find a particular reason not to enjoy it - one particular scene with a song was the BEST! Only 8 because of being an unnecessary part that isI really enjoyed the movie, I was a little worried because of the critics, but at the end I cannot find a particular reason not to enjoy it - one particular scene with a song was the BEST! Only 8 because of being an unnecessary part that is obviously a money grab, if not it would've been perfect for me (or almost). Go see it or wait for it on DVD because of the money grab, but it is worth it at least - if you try to forget the two-parts thing.… Expand

2 of 7 users found this helpful25

All this user's reviews

wilsonadamsNov 21, 2014

As an enthusiast of dystopian fiction, and film, not as an enthusiast of the Hunger Games novels, my take on this film is simple: it was unnecessarily uneventful. The third book did not need to be split into 2 films if this was to be theAs an enthusiast of dystopian fiction, and film, not as an enthusiast of the Hunger Games novels, my take on this film is simple: it was unnecessarily uneventful. The third book did not need to be split into 2 films if this was to be the outcome of the Part 1 instalment. The lack of excitement is not my reasoning for this rating. The film was flush with intrigue and theme and emotion and decent enough acting and dialogue. It has enough meaningful lessons on how propaganda is just as important as fighting battles, if not more, to enlighten anyone. But those elements, unfortunately, are all this film had to offer. No conceivable climax or conclusion, no fulfillment at the end of this 2 hours. It did not make me want to see the next film, it made me want it to come to some kind of ending already. I wish I could go back, and wait for the Part 2 to be released, so I could watch them back to back. Seeing this was a waste of time.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

browna411Nov 21, 2014

If you're not mature enough to handle the depth and darkness of this film, then you aren't going to like it

The film actually makes you feel emotional.

4 of 19 users found this helpful415

All this user's reviews

gustavochagasNov 21, 2014

The movie was savorless and very anti-climatic, one thing worth was the acting by Jennifer Lawrence, Woody Harrelson and Philip Seymour Hoffman

Positive Points: +Good Acting +Reflexions about mernchandise and propaganda NegativeThe movie was savorless and very anti-climatic, one thing worth was the acting by Jennifer Lawrence, Woody Harrelson and Philip Seymour Hoffman

Positive Points: +Good Acting
+Reflexions about mernchandise and propaganda

Negative Points: -No climax
-Anti-climatic cliffhanger to connect with part 2 (I miss Marvel's post-credits scenes)… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

CitizenaustinNov 21, 2014

To start with they things I loved about this movie, (1) Jennifer Lawrence was fabulous as always. I enjoyed the weak-hero angle to her character. (2) Visually it is very striking and original. Even the real-life sets were very interesting.To start with they things I loved about this movie, (1) Jennifer Lawrence was fabulous as always. I enjoyed the weak-hero angle to her character. (2) Visually it is very striking and original. Even the real-life sets were very interesting. (3) The most underrated piece of this movie was the makeup. So much attention to detail!
Now on to my problems... (1) Donald Sutherland was somewhat over-the-top in his portrayal of President Snow, as opposed to the quiet subtler character in the first two movies. (2) Lots of exposition in the first act.
All in all it was a very entertaining movie and I would recommend seeing it. 6/10… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

BrianMcCriticNov 21, 2014

A different film in the Hunger Games story a film based on political intrigue, and propaganda. While I found myself missing the games, I also can't wait to see how the story ends. A-

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

rivalskoolsNov 21, 2014

Three words: Shameless Cash Grab. The movie lacks any real emotional connection with Katniss and company. Once again The Hunger Games expects us to care about a host of underdeveloperd characters (like Liam Hemsworth for example who had aboutThree words: Shameless Cash Grab. The movie lacks any real emotional connection with Katniss and company. Once again The Hunger Games expects us to care about a host of underdeveloperd characters (like Liam Hemsworth for example who had about 5 minutes screen time in the previous two outings). The film panders to teenagers full of angst. The film hits a few mildly interesting notes on propaganda and power, however these are drowned out by Katniss listening to her hormones rather than her head. This film is not a '10'. I haven't read the books so I like many others don't care if Mockingjay - Part 1 resonates with those who have… Expand

23 of 37 users found this helpful2314

All this user's reviews

JacobNov 21, 2014

Mockingjay Part I surprised the h*ll out of me. This film was able to deliver a tightly written story that was flawlessly paced without sacrificing content from the book, brought out the best of every character, and was really well shot. IMockingjay Part I surprised the h*ll out of me. This film was able to deliver a tightly written story that was flawlessly paced without sacrificing content from the book, brought out the best of every character, and was really well shot. I often complain that film adaptations of a book rush through their story leaving out various character and plot points well this film doesn’t. I thought that splitting Mockingjay into two movies was a dumb cash grab and that’s probably what Lionsgate thought to but this movie made it work unbelievable well. This is one of the best film adaptations of a book I’ve ever seen. The film stayed true to the book without taking out anything significant and nothing was underdeveloped. The quality of this film makes me wish other film adaptations would follow similar suit and split their books into multiple films as it could lead to better storytelling (ex. the later Harry Potter films). Lionsgate’s financial decision not only has brought them more money but a better story than it would have otherwise. This film reminded me how much I loved the first half of Mockingjay and showed how to make a great adaptation of book. This might be spur of the moment but I might even go so far as to say not only is this the best of the franchise but this is right behind the Lord of the Rings trilogy as one of the best film adaptations of a book ever. This is the third book the one that got weakest reception combine that with threequels tending to suck this film shouldn’t have been this awesome but it was. Well done Lionsgate well done. Curious if Mockingjay Part II will follow similar suit. Hope so because as of right now this is one of the best film franchises I’ve ever seen being consistently good in a way that I have not seen in other franchises.… Expand

4 of 9 users found this helpful45

All this user's reviews

ScribeHardNov 21, 2014

I’ve not read the Harry Potter books, but when I saw the last two films – 7.1 and 7.2 – both were so rich and dense and captivating, as both stories and spectacles, it made sense to me why they made two films out of one book. Not here.I’ve not read the Harry Potter books, but when I saw the last two films – 7.1 and 7.2 – both were so rich and dense and captivating, as both stories and spectacles, it made sense to me why they made two films out of one book. Not here. There is so much nothing happening in The Hunger Games: Mockingjay – Part 1 that the film feels like money-making, fan-exploiting filler. In the hands of more skilled filmmakers, a tight and tense 20-30 minute introduction in front of Part 2 could do a greater service to the franchise than this 2+ hour chore.… Expand

10 of 17 users found this helpful107

All this user's reviews

asjklasjklasNov 21, 2014

Though it's inexcusable to sincerely review at an early extent, Mockingjay, Pt. I has an unfulfillment—as evident in a lot of sequels caught in midway-'til-the-finale hell—that volunteers it as the weakest contender in The Hunger GamesThough it's inexcusable to sincerely review at an early extent, Mockingjay, Pt. I has an unfulfillment—as evident in a lot of sequels caught in midway-'til-the-finale hell—that volunteers it as the weakest contender in The Hunger Games trilogy thus far. Despite—as usual—the touching performances and meaningfully darker atmosphere in comparison to its predecessors, Mockingjay, Pt. I obviously lacks a lot of action and melodrama foreseen in the future once the series' final installment arrives. Perhaps with age (and a completed second-half), the minor disappointments will wither away like the [SPOILER, sort of] ashes of District 12. R.I.P., Philip Seymour Hoffman.… Expand

8 of 18 users found this helpful810

All this user's reviews

altranterNov 21, 2014

.Katniss Everdeen plays a great character . Katniss is center stage as we see what happened at the end of the games in "Catching Fire," with Katniss poised to be the revolutionary force .. But really this is a film all about Jennifer.Katniss Everdeen plays a great character . Katniss is center stage as we see what happened at the end of the games in "Catching Fire," with Katniss poised to be the revolutionary force .. But really this is a film all about Jennifer Lawrence, .Altogether, this is quite an awesome film which has very high production qualities and some interesting animation technioques, and I would recommend the film for this alone. I will be looking forward to a sequel… Expand

5 of 12 users found this helpful57

All this user's reviews

victorhjklNov 21, 2014

This movie has an wonderful plot and telling the story in the best way. the actors are incredible, like Josh Hutcherson, Liam Hemsworth and the amazing Jennifer Lawrence that, like always, shine as Katniss Everdeen and moves you. They madeThis movie has an wonderful plot and telling the story in the best way. the actors are incredible, like Josh Hutcherson, Liam Hemsworth and the amazing Jennifer Lawrence that, like always, shine as Katniss Everdeen and moves you. They made some changes in the way of telling the story but it still great and In the end of the movie you will think: "when does release the part 2?"… Expand

16 of 53 users found this helpful1637

All this user's reviews

HaithamBNov 21, 2014

"The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1" is a durable feature that satisfies both a Hunger Games' fan and a casual viewer. However, the movie was missing some of the emotional punch that as a humongous Hunger Games' fan was expecting. Despite,"The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1" is a durable feature that satisfies both a Hunger Games' fan and a casual viewer. However, the movie was missing some of the emotional punch that as a humongous Hunger Games' fan was expecting. Despite, it is still an active, hard as nails start of an end.… Expand

5 of 14 users found this helpful59

All this user's reviews

prev next

Page: