The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1
Lionsgate | Release Date: November 21, 2014
6.3
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 1005 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
538
Mixed:
319
Negative:
148
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User scoreBy dateMost helpful
5
cheeseberger11Dec 4, 2014
The movie was okay. I enjoyed Jennifer Lawrence and Philip Seymour Hoffman's performances. The movie was filled with over-extended scenes but I wouldn't consider them boring. Liam Hemsworth`s character has been under-developed the entireThe movie was okay. I enjoyed Jennifer Lawrence and Philip Seymour Hoffman's performances. The movie was filled with over-extended scenes but I wouldn't consider them boring. Liam Hemsworth`s character has been under-developed the entire series and it continues in Mockingjay. Many other characters are also under-developed and seem to just pop in at random places. Overall I feel like they could've made a 3 hour movie to sum up the series rather than making two but they make more money this way.… Expand
5 of 5 users found this helpful50
All this user's reviews
4
Brutus54Dec 3, 2014
Fairly tedious, and a bit of a disappointment after Catching Fire. Not much happens. Basically everyone hides down a hole while the facility gets bombed. Yawn. Moderately interesting political sub-plot though, and reasonable performances fromFairly tedious, and a bit of a disappointment after Catching Fire. Not much happens. Basically everyone hides down a hole while the facility gets bombed. Yawn. Moderately interesting political sub-plot though, and reasonable performances from Moore and Lawrence. Hoffman's performance mostly consists of eye rolling and implied tension about something or other - presumably this will be revealed in the next movie. Darkly filmed (ie mostly down a hole) and variably directed. Hard not to agree with other's perceptions that the principal focus here is on extending the movie franchise to allow for more extended wallowing in teenage angst.… Expand
4 of 4 users found this helpful40
All this user's reviews
4
shufflesnuffleNov 30, 2014
If you feel like you were left hanging after Catching Fire, then you need to see Mockingjay, but don’t be in any rush. I would give the movie a 4/10, compared to the first two movies Mockingjay Part I was a disappointment. I was impressed byIf you feel like you were left hanging after Catching Fire, then you need to see Mockingjay, but don’t be in any rush. I would give the movie a 4/10, compared to the first two movies Mockingjay Part I was a disappointment. I was impressed by the acting done by the late Philip Seymour Hoffman, and most of the acting done by Jennifer Lawrence was great, but it didn’t match her performance in the first two films. Hopefully part two will make up for part one.
To catch you up, after Katniss (Jennifer Lawrence) was taken up into the aircraft at the end of Catching Fire you learn that there is a plan to spark a rebellion in Panem. Rebel President Alma Coin (Julianne Moore) and Plutarch Heavensbee (Philip Seymour Hoffman) plan to use Katniss as the vehicle to fuel the rebellion. As you learn in Catching Fire, Peeta (Josh Hucherson) has been taken by the Capitol to threaten those who go against them and torture Katniss.
The first 45 minutes of the movie are boring and depressing to say the least. I felt like the whole movie was basically the Rebels’ creating propaganda videos to try and rally the troops, and Katniss going through various states of emotion. One second she would be sad the next scared and the next happy. The thing that bothered me the most about the movie was how long it took to reach the climax. You don’t have any feeling of suspense or anticipation until the last fifteen minutes of the movie. The creators also expect us to care about characters like Katniss’ family and Gale (Liam Hemsworth) when they only get like ten minutes on the screen. Also, I believe the whole part one and part two setup they decided to do to the film is a desperate cash grab to try and get people to come spend money to see the ending next year.
One thing I thought the movie did a good job of is creating the dystopian/revolution mood. It felt like the whole movie was in dark lighting which set a gloomy atmosphere. Also the settings of many of the scenes took place in areas destroyed or in shambles, giving it the dystopian mood. One more thing I thought was done well was the placement of action scenes spread around the movie, they were all well placed throughout the movie.
To conclude, there were things done well such as the settings and mood as well as the acting done by Philip Seymour Hoffman, and most of the acting done by Jennifer Lawrence. Despite the few good things, the movie was still bad. The lack of climatic events during most of the movie, the vapidity, and lack of character development made this movie bad. So in my opinion if you’re planning to go see it, save your money, and wait until it’s on Netflix.… Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
5
lasttimeisawNov 30, 2014
This third instalment of THE HUNGER GAMES arrives as appointed, although the money-grubbing manoeuvre to divide the final book into two movies can automatically repel those who are not in the fan-base, and feel disgusted by its rapaciousThis third instalment of THE HUNGER GAMES arrives as appointed, although the money-grubbing manoeuvre to divide the final book into two movies can automatically repel those who are not in the fan-base, and feel disgusted by its rapacious appetite. Actually it is where I belong, unfortunately, Moore is the new addition in the cast, as President Coin, leadership usually is not in her wheelhouse, remember CHILDREN OF MEN (2006, 9/10)? Plus my perfectionist side urges me to continue since I have watched the first two THE HUNGER GAMES (2012, 7/10) and THE HUNGER GAMES: CATCHING FIRE (2013, 6/10), for better or worse, I will definitely watch the final chapter next year to wrap it up, sorry to fall into the machination of capitalistic greed. However, I will keep a clear mind to next year’s INSURGENT (2015) and MAZE RUNNER: SCORCH TRIALS (2015).

continue reading my review on my blog, google: cinema omnivore. thanks,… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
6
Annoymous1Dec 4, 2014
This movie had so much net worth and lots of good effects. As an avid reader of the books, I was disappointed by the over-use of sad atmosphere, as it ruins the effects a bit. It was good, but not as good as it aimed to be.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
5
DCEdmondsJan 14, 2015
"The Hunger Games: Mockingjay Part 1" 10 Scale Rating: 4.5 (Mediocre) ...

The Good: For the most part, the cast turns in solid performances. Julianne Moore starts off stiff, but eventually finds her way and does a good job. The late"The Hunger Games: Mockingjay Part 1" 10 Scale Rating: 4.5 (Mediocre) ...

The Good: For the most part, the cast turns in solid performances. Julianne Moore starts off stiff, but eventually finds her way and does a good job. The late Phillip Seymour Hoffman was excellent, though that is to be expected. Josh Hutcherson and Liam Hemsworth are once again adequate and I had no complaints there. Donald Sutherland, however, was hands down the best part of the film. While his scenes were few and far between, he dominated the screen every time he appeared. He seemed to enjoy playing the villainous President Snow and it shows. The last 30 minutes of the film are solid and somewhat entertaining.

The Bad: Sadly, the film is slow and boring to the point that it is difficult to watch. Very little of note actually happens for the 1:30 of the movie and I found myself wanting it to hurry up and just end. Jennifer Lawrence did her best with what she had to work with, but spent the bulk of the film sobbing and crying at every turn. You'd think that a strong character like Katniss, who has seen and been through a LOT at this point, would be able to hold it together. I gave the first two films an 8.0 out of 10.0, so this is a massive letdown and I hope that the final film in the series has much more to offer.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
4
MruncledoobDec 3, 2014
The final novel in the hunger games series was filled with suspense and political tension. This movie however, was none of that. With the film dumbed down significantly to fit the simple mind of today's youth, it delivered very few of theThe final novel in the hunger games series was filled with suspense and political tension. This movie however, was none of that. With the film dumbed down significantly to fit the simple mind of today's youth, it delivered very few of the political themes that made the last installment great. It also suffered from extremely one dimensional characters that made the film an all out "snooze fest" that even the star power of Jennifer Lawrence and Woody Harelson couldn't save.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
5
RalfbergsJun 7, 2015
Compared to other parts of the Hunger games this one really lacked something in my opinion. I mean, there weren't that many story parts in the movie and not much happened in my opinion, which would be worth mentioning. I think they justCompared to other parts of the Hunger games this one really lacked something in my opinion. I mean, there weren't that many story parts in the movie and not much happened in my opinion, which would be worth mentioning. I think they just strecthed it out to two parts so that it would make more money (talking about Mockingjay parts). There weren't really much of emotional parts or really anything that interesting happenning which would make this a stand out movie. Not that it was a boring movie, but I think much more was expected from it. What I did like was the soundtrack though :)… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
6
PeterAlexanderJun 10, 2015
The attempt to split the final act into two films is a mistake often seen nowadays and it ends in the same result every time. Whilst on the most part the Hunger Games: Mockingjay Part 1 is an engaging movie, it is a distinct drop in qualityThe attempt to split the final act into two films is a mistake often seen nowadays and it ends in the same result every time. Whilst on the most part the Hunger Games: Mockingjay Part 1 is an engaging movie, it is a distinct drop in quality in comparison to the two previous films. The film is far too slow paced and fails to capture the audience from start to finish. Despite this, there are redeeming qualities that make this film enjoyable to watch. The exploration of propaganda and the harsh realities of war are at some points demonstrated to perfection. This is not enough to justify the final act being split into two films however.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
5
AaronDWassermanJun 26, 2015
Pretty mediocre, I get this is a set up for the finale, but it was boring, Deathly Hallows part 1 did the splitting of the books better. This just felt like a waste of time.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
4
MikeWoodardJrNov 19, 2015
'Mockingjay Part 1' is a reminder that splitting and dragging out a relatively small book into two films, while a great financial scheme for studios, kills the value of its story. Where 'Catching Fire' had those who hadn't read the series,'Mockingjay Part 1' is a reminder that splitting and dragging out a relatively small book into two films, while a great financial scheme for studios, kills the value of its story. Where 'Catching Fire' had those who hadn't read the series, (Me!,) captivated, Part 1 crashes back to reality, and reveals the flaws of the franchise. Katniss, a character you could root for as a strong female protagonist, falls right back into the Hollywood trap of being entirely dependent on a man, and even manages to make her more gullible, naive, and unlikable than she ever was in the first two films. The story's initial premise, as a battle of political ad campaigns, with both sides taking their shots back and forth, is interesting, but falls victim to slow pacing a repetitive story points. While 'Catching Fire' managed to infuse its political commentary into an engaging story, here we are treated to overblown politics with very little engaging action. The supporting cast is a delightful but wasted treat, as former Academy Award winners are pushed into mainly support roles. This includes the late Phillip Seymour Hoffman, a real beam of light in the previous film, whose character serves no real arc in this part of the story. The plot suffers from the two-part problem, as there is no real pay-off or development of the characters, and it ends more abruptly and confusing than its predecessor. The movie grinds to a halt in some areas, with fake-tension scenes that have no real bearing on the overall plot. It comes to a breaking point when Katniss is literally teasing a cat with a flashlight, and suddenly discovers a realization she should have known from near the beginning of the film. Overall, a huge letdown based on what the previous films had set-up. Instead of leaving the non-book reading viewers wanting more, it leaves us with more of a deep sigh and leaves us wondering why we devoted our time to this series in the first place.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
6
gdiego135Dec 4, 2015
Pure BOREDOM this movie is pointless, like Part 1's always are, nothing interesting happens like at all!!!!!! I don't recommend this movie, but the first and second one are pretty good so just watch or rewatch those.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
4
StarchyWarriorNov 23, 2014
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This movie confused me. There is a part where she is looking at all the burnt corpses of her compatriots that makes me feel like it is trying to be a gritty war movie. But in the end it was just a girl adventure movie with the obligatory romance, crying scenes, and romance cliche #496 the part where the two lovers don't understand each other. PETA I mean Peeta at one point turns evil only for the reason to justify Catpiss being sad and angry. I am genuinely baffled how popular this movie is not worth my money.… Expand
5 of 7 users found this helpful52
All this user's reviews
5
Unladenswallow0Dec 7, 2014
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This was not a bad movie, all the hate that its getting is not really basing it on anything other than some childish hatred for things that are popular. That said, though i did not think this was a bad movie, it left me feeling like the whole thing was a little un necessary. Here's why.

It felt like filler, now i saw the deathly hallows part one which was basically camping simulator with magic, and this movie felt like propaganda simulator with explosions. The start of the movie was to say the least less than stellar, it had no OUMMPH it was boring and i felt like i was watching a bad episode of ER.

Katniss FIRES ONE ARROW THE ENTIRE GOD DAMN MOVIE! Holy **** sorry i had to get that off my chest. Very few action scenes, with one bloody excellent Tom Clancy like infiltration scene that was, to be honest, pretty damn cool. Those red lights had me .

The people of Panau or whatever the planet is called seem to be mindless sheep, following the words of some girl theve never met, not thinking for themselves, throwing themselves in front of bullets and bombing the **** out of damns all because they saw something on TV? It seems like the entire world hinges on the words of Katniss and a few other mildly interesting side characters who dont do much but stand in the backround and eyebrow act.

Jennifer Lawrence is an amazing actress, dont get me wrong, and there were actually a few scenes where i felt goosebumps when she was recording her propoganda speech, but it felt hollow. Nothing really happened to make this seem worthwhile.

Also Kaitniss bombed a hospital. I dont know if any one else noticed this but when Kaitniss shot down the bomber, she caused it to crash into the hospital quencing any hope of finding survivors.

Overall i was dissapointed, it needed more action and less talking.… Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
4
Iky009Nov 21, 2014
Disappointing !. It was just bad, I could not feel emotion in the film, Katniss does not pass any emotion, it seemed very artificial, even the rest of the cast shows this difficulty. And sad, even the action scenes can not save the movie,Disappointing !. It was just bad, I could not feel emotion in the film, Katniss does not pass any emotion, it seemed very artificial, even the rest of the cast shows this difficulty. And sad, even the action scenes can not save the movie, which I thought would improve, fell too much, the movie was disgusting, the drama did not convey feelings and the characters the same thing. Part 1 was a complete disaster.… Expand
6 of 10 users found this helpful64
All this user's reviews
4
homerbaldmanNov 21, 2014
I liked the first 2 but I can sum this movie up in one word:"filler". They could easily have condensed this mercenary mess into the finale but since it seems that most everybody these days is willing to sacrifice quality in place of theI liked the first 2 but I can sum this movie up in one word:"filler". They could easily have condensed this mercenary mess into the finale but since it seems that most everybody these days is willing to sacrifice quality in place of the almighty dollar the moviegoer ends up the loser.… Expand
3 of 5 users found this helpful32
All this user's reviews
4
ScribeHardNov 21, 2014
I’ve not read the Harry Potter books, but when I saw the last two films – 7.1 and 7.2 – both were so rich and dense and captivating, as both stories and spectacles, it made sense to me why they made two films out of one book. Not here.I’ve not read the Harry Potter books, but when I saw the last two films – 7.1 and 7.2 – both were so rich and dense and captivating, as both stories and spectacles, it made sense to me why they made two films out of one book. Not here. There is so much nothing happening in The Hunger Games: Mockingjay – Part 1 that the film feels like money-making, fan-exploiting filler. In the hands of more skilled filmmakers, a tight and tense 20-30 minute introduction in front of Part 2 could do a greater service to the franchise than this 2+ hour chore.… Expand
10 of 17 users found this helpful107
All this user's reviews
4
Nerdy_DadNov 22, 2014
This movie was an obvious ploy to get more money out of us. It was largely dull and boring. I was looking at my watch multiple times to see when this garbage would end. YOu could easily skip this movie. Nothing happens that really makesThis movie was an obvious ploy to get more money out of us. It was largely dull and boring. I was looking at my watch multiple times to see when this garbage would end. YOu could easily skip this movie. Nothing happens that really makes you put any pieces together. Save your money.… Expand
5 of 10 users found this helpful55
All this user's reviews
5
suzydiamondNov 30, 2014
Wow, what a disappointment compared to the first and the second movie. Mostly talk, not a lot of action and just plain boring. When I start to doze off that mean I'm getting bored. The acting was good but this entire movie was justWow, what a disappointment compared to the first and the second movie. Mostly talk, not a lot of action and just plain boring. When I start to doze off that mean I'm getting bored. The acting was good but this entire movie was just coasting to the finale. Let's hope the finale is MUCH better!… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
4
spageopriyaDec 3, 2014
Mockingjay is a 2010 science fiction novel by American author Suzanne Collins. It is the last installment of The Hunger Games, following 2008's The Hunger Games and 2009's Catching Fire. The book continues the story of Katniss Everdeen, whoMockingjay is a 2010 science fiction novel by American author Suzanne Collins. It is the last installment of The Hunger Games, following 2008's The Hunger Games and 2009's Catching Fire. The book continues the story of Katniss Everdeen, who agrees to unify the districts of Panem in a rebellion against the tyrannical Capitol.The hunger games -(Mockingjay) see the tailor this game.it is good game.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
6
gustavochagasNov 21, 2014
The movie was savorless and very anti-climatic, one thing worth was the acting by Jennifer Lawrence, Woody Harrelson and Philip Seymour Hoffman

Positive Points: +Good Acting +Reflexions about mernchandise and propaganda NegativeThe movie was savorless and very anti-climatic, one thing worth was the acting by Jennifer Lawrence, Woody Harrelson and Philip Seymour Hoffman

Positive Points: +Good Acting
+Reflexions about mernchandise and propaganda

Negative Points: -No climax
-Anti-climatic cliffhanger to connect with part 2 (I miss Marvel's post-credits scenes)… Expand
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
6
michael1208Nov 22, 2014
Perhaps melancholy and silence are the two most precise words to describe what is actually happening in this first half of the final chapter. The action sequences are drastically lesser as compared to the first two installments, but it worksPerhaps melancholy and silence are the two most precise words to describe what is actually happening in this first half of the final chapter. The action sequences are drastically lesser as compared to the first two installments, but it works well as a bridge to connect what has already happened previously and to expect what is yet to come. It is clear to see the main intention behind to separate this adventure into two parts, which might look necessary providing that it has just covered a quarter of the last book, but unfortunately rather than presenting further details, it keeps on dragging certain unnecessary parts even though the political satire seems to be quite smart, if audiences are patient enough to follow the dialogues. As the core of the story line, Academy Award winner - Jennifer Lawrence undoubtedly performs extremely well physically, mentally and emotionally once again as Katniss Everdeen, it also presents a stunning ending compared to Catching Fire; not to say boring but overall this chapter appears to be a little bit overlong and weak, causing the lack of powerful revolution and rebellion spirits.… Expand
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
4
GreatMartinNov 22, 2014
Not having read “The Hunger Games” trilogy but having seen the first two movies I feel the last book was made into two parts just to make another billion dollars. You can skip “The Hunger Games: Mockingjay Part 1” without missing anything.Not having read “The Hunger Games” trilogy but having seen the first two movies I feel the last book was made into two parts just to make another billion dollars. You can skip “The Hunger Games: Mockingjay Part 1” without missing anything.

It seems the main story behind Part 1 is to make Katniss a ‘product’ to sell the idea of overthrowing President Snow to the remaining citizens of District 13 and making her the face of the revolution. There are two ‘action’ scenes, one being Katniss trying to take down a plane with her bow and arrow and another a rescue mission but the rest is a lot of talk and huge TV screens for the president and the leader of the uprising to give speeches.

Jennifer Lawrence, as always, has an interesting face to watch as it says a lot. Liam Hemsworth is given more screen time while Josh Hutcherson a lot less. Woody Harrelson, Stanley Tucci and Jeffry Wright do good with what little screen time they get. The standout here is Elizabeth here who has to do a lot when style, glamour and color are not available to her. Philip Seymour Hoffman died during the production and his role is pieced together which instead of honoring the man in his last film role diminishes his effectiveness. Julianne Moore is introduced as the new leader trying to bring down the president but really has nothing to do except make speeches though there is one short scene between her and Lawrence that is sharp.

The only reason to see “the Hunger Games: Mockingjay Part 1” is if you like watch Jennifer Lawrence, otherwise I would say skip it and wait for part 2 a year from now.… Expand
4 of 12 users found this helpful48
All this user's reviews
6
SimpleMethodDec 2, 2014
Catching Fire was so great, and now we have this. Mockingjay is literally 100% build-up to a payoff we won't be seeing until November of next year, and that's really frustrating. The pace here isn't great either, and I was pretty boredCatching Fire was so great, and now we have this. Mockingjay is literally 100% build-up to a payoff we won't be seeing until November of next year, and that's really frustrating. The pace here isn't great either, and I was pretty bored throughout. There's not too much going. The movie feels like about 45 minutes of plot stretched out over two hours, and it's just unnecessary. While I have no doubt Part 2 will be stellar, this was disappointing.… Expand
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
5
donnelbrDec 3, 2014
I've seen this film twice (friend really wanted to see it, though I already had). ...not because it was a great film. It was actually pretty boring. However, the acting is good, and script above average. For those who have read the book,I've seen this film twice (friend really wanted to see it, though I already had). ...not because it was a great film. It was actually pretty boring. However, the acting is good, and script above average. For those who have read the book, they cut a lot out of the film, as you'd expect. For those who haven't, the feeling must be that splitting the book into two movies was a way to make more money. The truth in my opinion is less sinister. The third book of the series is actually not as good as the first couple. So the movie was going to be less than great no matter what. Splitting the book in two, made it less than that. In summary, I think the producers did a decent job. But it's by no means a great film.… Expand
2 of 9 users found this helpful27
All this user's reviews
6
CitizenaustinNov 21, 2014
To start with they things I loved about this movie, (1) Jennifer Lawrence was fabulous as always. I enjoyed the weak-hero angle to her character. (2) Visually it is very striking and original. Even the real-life sets were very interesting.To start with they things I loved about this movie, (1) Jennifer Lawrence was fabulous as always. I enjoyed the weak-hero angle to her character. (2) Visually it is very striking and original. Even the real-life sets were very interesting. (3) The most underrated piece of this movie was the makeup. So much attention to detail!
Now on to my problems... (1) Donald Sutherland was somewhat over-the-top in his portrayal of President Snow, as opposed to the quiet subtler character in the first two movies. (2) Lots of exposition in the first act.
All in all it was a very entertaining movie and I would recommend seeing it. 6/10… Expand
1 of 5 users found this helpful14
All this user's reviews
4
nonasteFeb 27, 2015
Unfortunately this movie was lame and weak compared to the first two. Just read the other "Mixed" and "Negative" comments to learn why. What a letdown
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
6
georgyporgyNov 26, 2014
It's not bad, it just feels too much like filler and a set up for the final film, which I have no doubt will be far more entertaining. Kind of a shame though considering how good the second one was.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
4
wilsonadamsNov 21, 2014
As an enthusiast of dystopian fiction, and film, not as an enthusiast of the Hunger Games novels, my take on this film is simple: it was unnecessarily uneventful. The third book did not need to be split into 2 films if this was to be theAs an enthusiast of dystopian fiction, and film, not as an enthusiast of the Hunger Games novels, my take on this film is simple: it was unnecessarily uneventful. The third book did not need to be split into 2 films if this was to be the outcome of the Part 1 instalment. The lack of excitement is not my reasoning for this rating. The film was flush with intrigue and theme and emotion and decent enough acting and dialogue. It has enough meaningful lessons on how propaganda is just as important as fighting battles, if not more, to enlighten anyone. But those elements, unfortunately, are all this film had to offer. No conceivable climax or conclusion, no fulfillment at the end of this 2 hours. It did not make me want to see the next film, it made me want it to come to some kind of ending already. I wish I could go back, and wait for the Part 2 to be released, so I could watch them back to back. Seeing this was a waste of time.… Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
5
zonatedmuleDec 23, 2014
The movie is not bad but not great, the form that they want to make a love history is too stupid and the form of making a war of propaganda is to bad made it. The producers eliminates important elements that the first half of the book has andThe movie is not bad but not great, the form that they want to make a love history is too stupid and the form of making a war of propaganda is to bad made it. The producers eliminates important elements that the first half of the book has and the result is a movie that has a lot of boring moments and bad representation of the book.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
5
GuilhermeAugApr 1, 2015
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. No doubt that the film was well-acted, but it was boring, because when you watch "The Hunger Games" film franchise, you always expect action scenes to be in the entire film or a grand part of it and this kind of stuff, but this one... It didn't have anything like the other two past films... Including a completely awkward ending.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
6
SilverartsMay 2, 2015
Mockingjay Part 1 allows a different view of all characters, scenes and current knowledge the audience possess of the games as a whole. As the point of the games is completely removed from the films presence. This therefore would add a uniqueMockingjay Part 1 allows a different view of all characters, scenes and current knowledge the audience possess of the games as a whole. As the point of the games is completely removed from the films presence. This therefore would add a unique edge as Katniss’ journey through fame and struggle for Peter is shown with great light. Nevertheless this consequence of light, leads to too much detail which appears of an excess through the duration of the film, as the main climax only lied between the scenes of reuniting Katniss and Peter. Even so the tension through the stories concept was fulfilled with intelligent, bold, but obscure effects via scene distribution in Katniss’ (Jennifer Lawrence) anger which is well thought through in accordance to acting the role successfully. Additionally the growing admiration for Peter that develops through the film is complimented by the phenomenal representation in recreating the distress through costume design and makeup construction by layering and contouring, accurately executing his purpose during the film, even though evidencing this purpose during the film could be improved, instead of the single resource of the TV analogy via scripture.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
5
zNeverSleepingOct 14, 2020
Por mais que o filme tenha me prendido, sinto que poderia haver algo a mais.

Como citei na review anterior, havia um bom background para estabelecer o universo - e assim: os personagens; mas o desenvolvimento aqui me pareceu nulo. É como sePor mais que o filme tenha me prendido, sinto que poderia haver algo a mais.

Como citei na review anterior, havia um bom background para estabelecer o universo - e assim: os personagens; mas o desenvolvimento aqui me pareceu nulo. É como se os personagens apenas fossem pra frente. O relacionamento entre Peeta e Katness é um exemplo de quão forçado algo pode vir a ser sem devida atenção. Há alguns elementos que são tirados por pura conveniência e isso passou a me incomodar bastante, que me faz deixar a suspensão da descrença de lado, o que deslegitimiza todo o filme - mas não, isso não aconteceu ainda.

No quesito entretenimento, acredito que o filme cumpre o seu propósito: passa o tempo. Mas só fica nisso mesmo.

Audio: English, with portuguese subtitles. J4300 32' TV Speakers
Quality: 720p SDR [Bluray]… Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
5
JJ2FAS4UDec 30, 2021
----------------------------------5.4/10-----------------------------------
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
5
smijatovJan 30, 2016
All through watching Mockingjay I thought somehow it feeling familiar... and I realised it reminded me a bit of the Harry Potter series and the point where Harry Potter got darker and more grown up. While the Potter franchise successfullyAll through watching Mockingjay I thought somehow it feeling familiar... and I realised it reminded me a bit of the Harry Potter series and the point where Harry Potter got darker and more grown up. While the Potter franchise successfully transitioned from it's 12-year old demographic, The Hunger Games, did not quite manage so well.

Not all is bad. There is some interesting criticism here of media and propaganda, but those are all smack -in-the-face type of observations. The film makes no secret of it. The darkness comes from the topic itself: the film is set in the aftermath of a violent crackdown by the Capitol onto the rebelling districts. It is dystopic, but what is missing is the emotion behind it. Jennifer Lawrence is more Jennifer Lawrence than Katniss, and when she is Katniss...well, Katniss is annoying. The consistent need to push her into doing what she has to do is quite frustrating. Mind you, it is (probably?) a limitation imposed in the Hunger Games books, but that still does not make her any less annoying and infuriating when she'd rather choose Peeta over the future of the whole world.

Technically, the Hunger Games have polished up quite nicely. The CGI does not look as dated as it did in the first film, which is good. This film is very grim and dark - the colourful costumes of the Capitol have been replaced by the darkness of the underground shelter and the military uniform. Overall, though, the film sustains the continuation of a mediocre, yet entertaining, franchise. That being said, this one is the least entertaining film so far. The whole "Part 1" charade is a charade at its best. Not much really happens here, beyond some character "development" for Katniss (also known as everyone pushing her to get her act together).

The first film is still the most engaging and entertaining one - let us hope they will end the series on a better note than Mockingjay Part 1, because otherwise, it will be a snooze.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
intruder313Nov 5, 2015
The book is quite boring and splitting it in two has resulted in an interminably dull first part. Part 2 looks more promising as they have saved the best bits / action for that.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
netflicJan 4, 2015
This is the third movie in "Hunger Games" series.
I haven't read the books but watched previous two movies. In my opinion, this one is the weakest so far. While performances of Jennifer Lawrence, Phillip Saymour Hoffman (RIP), and JulianneThis is the third movie in "Hunger Games" series.
I haven't read the books but watched previous two movies. In my opinion, this one is the weakest so far. While performances of Jennifer Lawrence, Phillip Saymour Hoffman (RIP), and Julianne Moore deserve praise, there are too many over-stratched episodes. The director probably tried to follow the books closely. However, many people think that by making two movies out of one book, they were just milking more money out of the audience. There were a few scenes that were great, but too few for a two hour movie. If cut in half, I would love it.
I understand that Part 1 is a preparation for a grand finale but as I was leaving the theater I was disappointed, I expected much more. I hope Part 2 will justify being bored half of Part 1.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
JbrizzyNov 27, 2014
This movie was the epitome of filler and cash grab. This movie was just boring as all hell. The last two movies had me crying and at the edge of my seat. This one just had me rolling my eyes and sitting in disgust and disbelief. DisbeliefThis movie was the epitome of filler and cash grab. This movie was just boring as all hell. The last two movies had me crying and at the edge of my seat. This one just had me rolling my eyes and sitting in disgust and disbelief. Disbelief that a great franchise like this would have such a lackluster installment. The only scene that had some suspense is when the small team infiltrated the hunger games tower (which was way towards the end might I add). But hey they made their goal. The probably raked in almost a billion dollars due to this movie and will continue to have loyal fans. I just pray that this franchise gets the wonderful send off this deserves. This movie was two hours of my life that I will never get back… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
Odin-Dec 10, 2014
In short, The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1 is a long and tedious film lacking depth and meaning. The storyline is vanilla and boring which can be summarised as a protagonist striving to free a world from tyranny, the way in which this isIn short, The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1 is a long and tedious film lacking depth and meaning. The storyline is vanilla and boring which can be summarised as a protagonist striving to free a world from tyranny, the way in which this is done however is outside the box and creative but I question its execution.

With Jennifer Lawrence at the helm, she does a poor job in evoking a passionate narrative and leaves you feeling like she’s simply trying too much which is annoying and irritating to watch.

The film stagnates and over saturates the viewer with the same monotone imagery repeating the same message, the constant sit downs with supporting actors comforting each other or offering pep talks gets old after the first several times, this is basically the film, with little else to add contrast to mix things up.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
moonman1994May 19, 2015
Although not plainly bad, all The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1 is, is setup for part 2. This large amount of setup and background information keeps the view desiring a sequel but does not put forth an interesting film. This causes theAlthough not plainly bad, all The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1 is, is setup for part 2. This large amount of setup and background information keeps the view desiring a sequel but does not put forth an interesting film. This causes the film at many times to drag. That being said the entire cast is still great and it will be exciting to see the conclusion in part 2.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
riaan_radioheadJan 8, 2015
Mockingjay Part 1 is a competently acted and shot picture but it is also a movie mostly void of any entertainment value. This is young adult post apocalyptic fiction that takes itself way too seriously (its source material is hardlyMockingjay Part 1 is a competently acted and shot picture but it is also a movie mostly void of any entertainment value. This is young adult post apocalyptic fiction that takes itself way too seriously (its source material is hardly comparable or relevant as say Children of Men, 1984) and offers little in terms of blockbuster thrills and excitement.
Where Catching Fire was largely entertaining in its action packed final act, Mockingjay Part 1 is an unnecessarily somber film that covers just enough ground but to setup the final installment due in 12 months… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
CaptainCupboardNov 25, 2014
Can only say I am rather disappointed. Simply not as good as the previous two films, scenes of action lacked surprise and excitement. Only thing that really kept me watching were the occasional glimpses of comedy.The last two films left me inCan only say I am rather disappointed. Simply not as good as the previous two films, scenes of action lacked surprise and excitement. Only thing that really kept me watching were the occasional glimpses of comedy.The last two films left me in suspense but Mockingjay does not; it almost felt like a poor way to fill a gap rather than a film. Some good elements like attention to detail but all in all depressingly average.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
Jack_SunshineSep 8, 2015
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. With the presumably thrilling conclusion to The Hunger Games series just over the horizon, we return to last year’s Mockingjay – Part 1 in an attempt for my reviews to maintain at least some contemporary relevance. There are two ways to look at a film which is part of a series. One is to view it as a chapter in the larger story, making this one little more than the calm before the storm. The other way is to see if the narrative works as a standalone film, and sadly here it does not.

The film has followed the trend of turning the last part of a novel series into a two part picture (Harry Potter, Twilight, to an extent The Hobbit) so that Part 1 becomes so much set-up for a ‘missing’ final act. Is it a cynical cash-grab to stretch the franchise out for another year, or sincere attempt to do justice to the literature? Who can say?

With Mockingjay – Part 2, this effect is thoroughly in place, moving from one relatively unsatisfying cliff-hanger at the end of Catching Fire to another at the end of itself. It somehow manages to be another big ol’ film of (just) over two hours, although it’s almost half an hour shorter than Catching Fire, which took over half its running time to actually get to the bloomin’ Hunger Games.

Though the full title retains the series banner, there are no games here, so the arena combat angle that provided a clear structure to the first two films is gone. Maybe that’s for the best. The second film was in many ways a retread of the first, though the pre-game ruminations I’ve just lamented were really about the seeds of rebellion, and our heroine Katniss (Jennifer Lawrence) and her Mockingjay becoming the symbols of the revolution (the Mockingjay starts life as a symbolic token Katniss is given by an elderly neighbour in the first film, which gradually takes on greater significance).

So it’s not a standalone story, but what’s this film about, and where does it take the characters we met in the last two films? At first glance, not very far. Most of the movie takes place in an underground bunker where the rebellion is based, safe below District 13 (a mysterious place previously believed to have been long destroyed), while the two sides throw propaganda back and forth at each other. Katniss does get out into the field, but she only fires one arrow (although granted, it does quite some damage).

But at the film’s core is this media warfare of hearts and minds, and Katniss’ initial reluctance to play into it. Her struggle is to weigh the needs of the many, who see so much in her, against her own personal losses and dissatisfaction with how the revolution is being run. She is always asking who should have been saved, and at what cost?

The film inherits the great cast of the series, from Jennifer Lawrence herself, whose name is now synonymous with the franchise and characters, to the continued presence of Woody Harrelson and Elizabeth Banks, who play off each other nicely after their frosty relationship of the last two films. What is good is that as we spend more time out of the area with the rebels, Gale (Liam Hemsworth) finally has a little more to do, getting out into the field with Katniss and even leading one of the film’s few action sequences, a daring raid on the capital to liberate the captured victors of Catching Fire.

Similarly, Philip Seymour Hoffman, who tragically died during filming, manages to maintain a complete and worthy presence as the games master turned rebel propagandist. His more reasoned encouragement of Katniss brings a subtle reserve to offset the fiery District 13 President Alma Coin (Julianne Moore) who is all rousing speeches and lack of compromise, continually at loggerheads with our heroine. Much of the first third of the film is her coercive attempts to make her agree to participate in the propaganda; though we ask ourselves how different this really is to the gaudy reality TV of the first film.

Everybody has their own two cents to say on how the revolution should be run, but on the other side of the coin. President Snow (Donald Sutherland) abandons his affable façade in the face of all out war to snarl and gloat from the video screen.

I have said that true action sequences are few and far between; they are dispersed like raisins in a bowl of porridge through the film’s inflated length, but they come as a re-engaging wake up call. I particularly enjoyed the scenes of open rebellion in other Districts.

Returning Catching Fire director Francis Lawrence has finally delivered the darker sequel suggested by his back catalogue (Constantine, I am Legend). Of note is the apocalyptic sequence in which Katniss breaks down while exploring the ruins of District 12. The Hunger Games universe has always come with a high human cost, but never has it been so graphic.

So while the film is well made and there are many standout scenes, the pacing still feels slow and the dramatic narrative is far from satisfying. After all, it’s really only half a film.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
bfoore90Nov 20, 2019
Mockingjay Part 1 was a low point in the series. With the principle cast returning with expanded roles for some, its still not enough to life this movie above being just "okay"
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
diogomendesDec 19, 2014
With a cast that delivers superb performances and a story that offers some beautiful scenarios, "The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1" is nowhere near a bad movie, but it lacks the action and the emotion that made the previous movies so compelling.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
AcePilot24Nov 26, 2014
Boring,Cash Grab,Lack of Action,Lack of interest with characters,Pretty nice acting from the actors but Catniss is not that interesting in this movie,Decent plot .
And thats why this movie will keep overrated by the fan girls and keep makinBoring,Cash Grab,Lack of Action,Lack of interest with characters,Pretty nice acting from the actors but Catniss is not that interesting in this movie,Decent plot .
And thats why this movie will keep overrated by the fan girls and keep makin more money and not caring about the entertainment i hope Mockingjay - Part 2 will fix all of those problems in their sequel… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
WelshTomJan 13, 2015
Some admittedly fine acting performances fail to redeem what is ultimately an hour's worth of decent content elongated into two boring hours. Do not waste time and money seeing this blatant cash-in at the cinema - watch it as a warm-up justSome admittedly fine acting performances fail to redeem what is ultimately an hour's worth of decent content elongated into two boring hours. Do not waste time and money seeing this blatant cash-in at the cinema - watch it as a warm-up just before the real finale is released.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
prawntoast1Mar 28, 2015
Took me while to get round to watching this movie especially after enjoying the previous two Hunger Games movies (particularly Catching Fire). But overall Mockingjay Part 1 was disappointing, very disappointing. It seemed like a mere cashTook me while to get round to watching this movie especially after enjoying the previous two Hunger Games movies (particularly Catching Fire). But overall Mockingjay Part 1 was disappointing, very disappointing. It seemed like a mere cash grab because nothing much actually happened in this movie. I found myself absolutely hating Katniss and Peta and finding them very annoying. In conclusion, Mockingjay Part 1 is a very forgettable movie but saying that I will still probably watch Part 2.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
MortiNov 30, 2014
Don't expect anything great from this film except for special effects unless of course you're a twelve year old boy or girl.

The main problem I had with the movies and the books is that, if you are actually mature, you will have noDon't expect anything great from this film except for special effects unless of course you're a twelve year old boy or girl.

The main problem I had with the movies and the books is that, if you are actually mature, you will have no emotional attachment to any of the people in the series. This is purely because they have no personality and are completely two dimensional as you would expect from a movie where the target audience is only there for explosions or Liam Hemsworth. However, I don't believe this excuses not trying to improve on Susanne Collin's simplistic writing style for the sake of making a piece of art, which they could do with their massive budget, as well as pander to their original audience.

One of the worst aspects of the movie had to be the acting. I am sincerely disappointed with Jennifer Lawrence's performance, since she is supposed to be capable of delivering Oscar winning pieces of acting yet in this she was just plain standard. She seemed like she was just trying to look like she cared and not that she really did. A key point of acting is that you have to become your character and feel what they are feeling, if not then you must be extremely good at lying: in this film Jennifer Lawrence seemed to be stuck somewhere in the middle in an unconvincing and cringe worthy performance. Most of the acting was like this with the exception of Philip Seymour Hoffman who was brilliant and Katnisse's sister who was terrible. (average for a child actor though)

Some scenes of the film did however hold the film up with fantastic special effects and directing that made you come back from the boring scenes of Katniss crying or characters you didn't care about talking. However when they did show these scenes it did just make me feel frustrated that they would spend so much money on CGI and sets that they couldn't spend some more money on writers or half decent actors.

I seriously believe that there does need to be a change in the Cinema industry and that is acting over attractiveness. Instead of hiring guys with washboard abs to play main characters, why not hire people who can actually act? The same goes for female roles as well, the actress who played Prim was utterly wooden but had a pretty face so she got the part. What the hell is going on?… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
canelopeeaterDec 9, 2014
Should you watch it? Maybe. If you like cliffhangers Epic battle scenes, and if you've actually watched the other movies. (If not you'd be completely lost). The director more or less stuck to the book about 40 percent of the time, getting youShould you watch it? Maybe. If you like cliffhangers Epic battle scenes, and if you've actually watched the other movies. (If not you'd be completely lost). The director more or less stuck to the book about 40 percent of the time, getting you confused at certain moments, and probably getting you angry when things dont go the way you'd expect. All in all, this movie left me waiting for Part 2, partly because the intense battle sequences raised my expectations for the big finale. Should you watch it? I say yes, if you are a true Hunger Games Fan, and no, if you haven't watched the other movies or at least read the books, or if you hate extreme cliffhangers… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
Count_DookuDec 8, 2014
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I must say that I am no fan of the series, the other two films entertained me but not impassioned me. I believe that history is for young-adult (I am, but I like the deep arguments and in my opinion this is not it). When I went to see Mockingjay Part 1 with my friends I thought, "Well, at least the action scenes make me have a good time because I do not really like history" shortly after would prove that I was wrong and now I will tell you why. To begin the concept of rebellion is widely used, but this is not the main problem, I always thought that if a concept widely used you add something new is good, but in this film do not add any interesting concept remains the same as always, two sides, shooting, hostage rescues ... When I first heard within the film the Mockingjay what I thought would finally demonstrate what can be drawn from such an argument, but it turned out just to be a instrument for advertising of one side. The scenes are unnecessarily lengthened so you end up getting bored in the action scenes the camera moves too much, and loving undertone is typical of two boys with different ideas and a girl who can not decide, well, very basic all . I do not recommend this movie people who have not seen the others, people who do not like (or simply are not interested) the saga. But if you like the series I encourage you to see it and waste your time on that boring two-hour movie that lives of the fame that the other movies won. Gentlemen, I think it's better to read the books than see this on the big screen.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
xxSnowman250xxDec 13, 2014
Overall in my opinion not worth seeing.Many people say its because you have to read the book, but when a movie finishes and not a single person claps in the theater ,that means something is wrong.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
meneilmadDec 15, 2014
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. "The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1" is far away the worst movie of the series when the focus is stir emotions. Obviously, so many people cried in the parts of Josh suffering ('cause, lord, his fans are like, crazy as any others), and so many people cried when he was back to Jennifer (but remembering: also thinking that she was the enemy), and in the parts of the districts (OK, I admit, I cried when Katniss sang The Hanging Tree too). But most of the people who has cried read the books as well. Was not that emotional to my parents (who just listened to me talking about the books over and over again), or to my friends (that think that the only thing important in the movie is Josh parts). Is not a bad movie considering the direction and the script. But comparing that movie to the other two, it's not the best.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
UnderagedReviewDec 15, 2014
The movie was good and is following the books almost perfect, but it is really stretched out, like they do the best they can to make the story as much exiting as the first 2 movies. This destoyes a lot, because it ruins the impression of theThe movie was good and is following the books almost perfect, but it is really stretched out, like they do the best they can to make the story as much exiting as the first 2 movies. This destoyes a lot, because it ruins the impression of the film. You are not stunned by the end of the movie. It leaves a impression like something is missing, that you just watched half of a movie. Worth watching if it is available for you.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
petrocsDec 17, 2014
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The Hunger Games film franchise has been one of the most popular in recent memory. From the first film on, the film's premise has centered around murder and class warfare, but at the center of that bleakness was a beacon of hope, Katniss Everdeen, however, in Mockingjay Part 1, that hope takes a turn for the worse. Centered around the aftermath of the events of Catching Fire, we find our heroine at her darkest point, surrounded by a colony of freedom fighters and lost without the man whom she has grown to care for, Peeta. There's a shadow looming over Katniss and a growing weigh upon her shoulders. The penultimate film in this franchise has moved on from the games and into the war.
Katniss Everdeen (Jennifer Lawrence) finds herself in an underground bunker within District 13. Following the escape from the quarter quell, the tributes have either been captured by the Capitol or were rescued by Plutarch's (Philip Seymour Hoffman) rebel squadron. Katniss is suffering from PTSD and remains under the care of the district's medical staff. Fellow survivor Finnick Odair (Sam Claflin) is suffering from the same despair and is resigned to survivors remorse, mourning for the loss of his beloved Annie and the others who were captured by the Capital. Katniss is taken to see President Coin (Julianne Moore), the president of District 13 and the leader of the rebellion who requires Katniss' help to win the war over President Snow (Donald Sutherland). Katniss reluctantly agrees, but on the condition that Peeta (Josh Hutcherson) and the other tributes would be rescued. Just one problem, it appears Peeta has been recruited and is now a spokesperson for the Capital and is speaking out against the revolution.
Katniss, believing that Peeta is being brainwashed into saying these outlandish remarks, decides that she will not rest until she can rescue her friend. Through a series of vignettes, the rebellion broadcasts images of Katniss in battle defeating the Capitol guards and hoping to convince those unwilling to fight to take up arms and join Katniss and District 13's side. With the help of Gale (Liam Hemsworth), her former beau, Katniss travels from district to district to assess the damages done by the Capitol and reaffirming her decision to take up arms against her oppressors. Peeta, through a series of intimate interviews with Capitol spokesperson Caesar Flickerman (Stanley Tucci), pleads for the resistance to lay down their arms and work to strive peace with the Capitol. The two former companions who had protected each other in the games are now sparring in a war of words with the fate of the world at each others finger tips.
Each side makes their move to gain a powerful foothold in their vicious war. As the rebellion gains support, President Coin elects to send in a rescue mission to bring back to captive tributes, including Peeta, and remove the Capital's most powerful propaganda weapon. With time running out, will the resistance succeed in rescuing the tributes and turning the tide of the war or will they fall prey to the plans of President Snow and tip the scales in the favor the Capital?
Deciding to stick closely to the plot of the novel by Suzanne Collins, director Francis Lawrence delivers a politically charged dystopian drama that is not for the faint of heart. Like many war films, The Hunger Games: Mockingjay Part 1 is unwavering in its relentless depiction of the brutality of war. That being said, the film may be too bleak for many of the films core fans. Fans of the book series on the other hand are sure to be prepared for the events that transpire.
The acting in the movie has a lot to be desired. Whether it be the screenplay from Peter Craig and Danny Strong or the actors themselves, there's something missing in the delivery of much of the films dialogue. Jennifer Lawrence is the staple that keeps this film together but much of the film is spent retreading on the awkward love triangle between Katniss, Gale and Peeta. The chemistry between Liam Hemsworth and Jennifer Lawrence is as flat as it was in the previous films. Josh Hutcherson, in limited screen time, makes the most of it and turns in a great performance. The transformation of his character from the previous films til now is one of the bright spots of Mockingjay Part 1. Two disappointments for me were the use of Julianne Moore and the late great Philip Seymour Hoffman. Each provide lifeless depictions of their characters and the lack of emotions in the delivery of important dialogue is truly disappointing.
Overall, The Hunger Games: Mockingjay Part 1 is excruciatingly slow and opts for more drama than action this time around. Film goers may be disappointed at the pacing of this one. Truth be told, this final book did not need to be split into two separate movies; one would've been just fine. Lionsgate missed the mark with this decision. Let's hope word of mouth doesn't hurt too much because this franchise deserves a better fate.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
crai3gDec 27, 2014
It wasn't horrible but very slow paced compared to previous ones. You'll walk away wondering when the next release will be offered. They could have made Mockingjay into one film instead of 2 and it would have been better. Can anyone say $$$
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
shl13132Dec 30, 2014
I wanted to like this movie, I really did. I enjoyed the first two installments of the series and this movie just didn't deliver. The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1 felt like a long extended trailer for Mockingjay - Part 2. You will sitI wanted to like this movie, I really did. I enjoyed the first two installments of the series and this movie just didn't deliver. The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1 felt like a long extended trailer for Mockingjay - Part 2. You will sit there watching this movie waiting for something to happen, the last ten minutes of this movie were intense and entertaining, and I was thinking, "Yes, now we get to the good part," then the movie ended. Jennifer Lawrence gave a fantastic performance as Katniss, but Josh Hutcherson did not have as much screen time as he has had in the past two movies, making it harder for him to build on his character. Elizabeth Banks, Woody Harrelson, Liam Hemsworth, Philip Seymour Hoffman and Donald Sutherland have excellent performances. The only problem with characters I had with this movie was Julianne Moore, her acting was great but the story did not go deep enough into character. The last thing wrong with this movie is Katniss Spent a great deal of the movie crying, she did one thing throughout this two hour movie, and you already saw it in the trailer.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
jlittle1404Jan 7, 2015
Sad to say this did not meet my expectations. Not enough action scenes and slower paced unlike the first two in the series. That being said if you are a Hunger Games fan you will appreciate the story and the continuing love triangle ofSad to say this did not meet my expectations. Not enough action scenes and slower paced unlike the first two in the series. That being said if you are a Hunger Games fan you will appreciate the story and the continuing love triangle of Katniss, Peeta, and Gale. Hopefully Mockingjay part 2 can pick up the slack! I give it a 6 out of 10… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
QldgamerFeb 1, 2015
Why they split this into two movies was clearly to make money, as the movie was padded so much it was pretty dull at times.

A mixed bag that struggled to draw me in.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
imdajudgem8Feb 6, 2015
Not as enjoyable as the past 2 Hunger Games movies, which were both fantastic. However, i do want to comment the acting is amazing and i would especially like to commend Liam Hemsworth. Overall an OK film.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
NRNSWApr 3, 2015
Not as good as previous Hunger Games and could have done with some more editing. I have a feeling that Part 1 and Part 2 could have been delivered as one film - but that wouldn't have made them as much money. Don't rush to see it - might beNot as good as previous Hunger Games and could have done with some more editing. I have a feeling that Part 1 and Part 2 could have been delivered as one film - but that wouldn't have made them as much money. Don't rush to see it - might be better to wait until Part 2 comes out and then watch them together.....… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
boubadiopFeb 24, 2015
This film is purely for building the story and you will probably never watch it again. Bit like the last harry potter,where no one really cares for part 1 after you've watched it once
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
DavidV293Mar 7, 2015
I'm not a fan of reading books. So I can't really judge. But I gotta say that this was not exciting. It was boring and it got me disappointed. Definitely worth a wait on Netflix and Redbox
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
MattBrady99Mar 10, 2015
Remember Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1, were nothing really exciting happens in that movie, and the movie has a slow paste run time and they try to save the all the exciting and awesome parts in part 2, and now we gotRemember Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1, were nothing really exciting happens in that movie, and the movie has a slow paste run time and they try to save the all the exciting and awesome parts in part 2, and now we got Mockingjay and I can happily say that Mockingjay is a little better than Deathly Hallows Part 1, but it does lack of the two parter thing and this movie is not near from perfect.

Mockingjay Part 1 continues the story has Katniss Everdeen along with Peeta Mellark, and a handful of other survivors, have successfully escaped the Quarterquell thanks to helps from Haymitch Abernathy and former gamemaster Plutarch Heavensbee. But escaping is just the start, as Katniss finds herself having to embrace the symbol she has become to the people of Panem - a symbol of rebellion against President Snow and the autocratic Capitol.

I was really looking forward to Mockingjay, because I thought the squeal (Catching Fire) was a big improvement and just overall a better movie then the first one. The trailer to Mockingjay won me over by it's excellent tone and it's brilliant shots, and I was actually counting down the days for the movie release, but now after seeing the film I got to say.... I'm a bit disappointing. Now let me get something out there, I don't hate this movie, I just think it's really disappointing for and please don't hate me for this.

Let's start off with the good things in this movie: Jennifer Lawrence was just flawless in this movie and now every time I see her in interviews or new movies I straight away like her as a person and as a actress. Rest of the cast did good as well. The movie had that Apocalypse settings to it and it suited the tone of the film and I'm just happy they got that right.

Now for the things that did not work at all and came off messy: The fact that this is a two parter really spoils the film for me, because without giving away anything, but basically this movie is just a set up for the next film and sometimes movies can pull that off, but when the the second part comes out not a lot really of people won't be talking about part 1 anymore, just like Harry Potter and I know I keep bring up Potter a lot but it's really hard not to.

The movies pasting is like watching a snail starting walking to point A to point B, that's the movies paste right there. The movie really wants me to care about the character's and the character's may not be boring, but there not really that interesting to me.

Overall Hunger Games: Mockingjay Part 1 feels less then a stand alone film, but more of a cash grab and I hate saying that because I really wanted to like this and I trying my damn best, but I'm sorry for letting you all down but this movie was a disappointing to me and saying that sucks.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
CineAutoctonoDec 2, 2015
Perhaps the worst of the saga, but it is good , there " Mockingjay : Part 1" , where courage and thirst for vengaza Katniss to Snow began certainly for its atrocities against it , there began the rebellion of the Mockingjay, TO BE CONTINUED...!
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
sjultiDec 6, 2016
This is by far the worst in the series, withe the games ending it became more about talking, and the movie is boring their is literally nothing going on in this one, the only thing that saves it from being bad are the actors.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
audricedselDec 26, 2016
Mockingjay - part 1 is a boring movie in this series. But, it's not bad, actually. It's still good, there are a lot of drama and politic about propaganda and something like that. That cliffhanger ending leaves the audiences a question thatMockingjay - part 1 is a boring movie in this series. But, it's not bad, actually. It's still good, there are a lot of drama and politic about propaganda and something like that. That cliffhanger ending leaves the audiences a question that will be answer in the part 2. Lawrence is still charming and more powerful.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
SomePersonaFeb 8, 2017
Same as the second part. Half a movie. It worked for the Deathly Hallows since it's seven hundred pages long, but it does not work much here. You might as well mush these movies together, edit some stuff out for length, and make one great movie.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
MonkiReviewsMay 28, 2017
It is kind of boring, and only half a movie. This is the first in the series without the actual Hunger Games, and it does it well. It just needs to be one movie.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
CoreGamer1408Dec 16, 2018
Joan of Arc gets all the peasants united or something? The Hunger Games are over and this more a war movie now, but it still worked so.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
DomgwyDec 20, 2017
Back in 2010 Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1 started a dangerous trend — splitting novel adaptations into multiple parts.

Since then we’ve seen the Twilight series split its finale in two and (unforgivably) J.R.R Tolkien’s 300Back in 2010 Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1 started a dangerous trend — splitting novel adaptations into multiple parts.

Since then we’ve seen the Twilight series split its finale in two and (unforgivably) J.R.R Tolkien’s 300 page ‘The Hobbit’ turned into a three film, nine hour epic.

So how does the latest entry in The Hunger Games franchise fare? To be honest, I think its pretty good.

After two films of build up the oppressed people of Panem are finally taking up arms against a brutal, totalitarian regime led by Donald Sutherland’s President Snow.

So you’d expect a lot of large scale action right? Na, we do get a lot of propaganda though.

Here the Battle Royale style ‘games’ take a back seat as the two political entity’s battle for the hearts and minds of the population.

The ideology of war and the effects of state run media are not often the subject of mainstream Hollywood films. To me however this has always been the most interesting element of the franchise, one that elevates it above the teenage, love triangle, blockbuster it is often dismissed as. I mean these films are so overtly political at this point that its even starting to negatively effect the box office takings in key worldwide markets.

So does all this politics and propaganda make the film boring? Absolutely not. Jennifer Lawrence’s performance once again brings real emotion and depth to Katniss demanding empathy despite some tricky (and at times downright unlikeable) character traits.

The extended running time also allows some of the series’ side characters to have some much needed development. Liam Hemsworth’s Gale and Elizabeth Banks’ Effie finally get scenes of their own, free from Katniss, where they can establish their own motivations and backgrounds.

The returning cast also up their game. Josh Hutcherson is fantastic as Peeta (despite reduced screen time) showing real restraint when needed in scenes a lesser actor would overplay. Of course Donald Sutherland is on fine menacing form as President Snow.

The only disappointment in terms of performance is the late, great, Philip Seymour Hoffman. Don’t get me wrong, he’s great, it just seems he's a little underused. It's a shame that what would turn out to be his final screen role is that of the rather subdued Plutarch Heavensbee. This is hardly a defining or particularly memorable posthumous role like Heath Ledgers Joker or Oliver Reed in Gladiator. Of course the filmmakers can’t be criticised for this and they show Hoffman the upmost respect, dedicating the film to his memory.

Unfortunately much like The Deathly Hallows, Mockingjay Part 1 can’t escape the feeling of being connective tissue and not a film in its own right. This instalment could quite fairly be accused of simply being a two hour trailer for next years’ conclusion. It’s impossible not to see the irony in a film with a quite Marxist message (the downtrodden proletariat rising up against a powerful ruling class) being split in half by a Hollywood elite for commercial gain.

But politics and commercialism aside, the fact remains that Mockingjay-Part 1 is a well made, well acted movie. In all honesty it probably shouldn’t exist but, as it does, there are far worse and less thought provoking ways to spend a couple of hours.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
ErikTheCriticSep 26, 2018
Part 1 is filled with clever political subtext and propaganda, with great acting and some very absorbing and emotional scenes. What is slightly lacking is the amount of action.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
glommanSep 10, 2021
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I don't really know what they went with here, while the first two movies had me at the edge of my seat, this one kinda falls flat. The whole plot with District 13 is way less interesting than it could have been and ofcourse Katniss is the sole factor that can turn the tides of the impending civil war. It gets old really quick.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
AWESOM-0Apr 27, 2020
The special effect have improved greatly and the acting is very good. However, I don’t get it, you have a powerful female character and a good vehicle to tell a modern story. Then the creators (didn’t read the novel so I can’t say the theThe special effect have improved greatly and the acting is very good. However, I don’t get it, you have a powerful female character and a good vehicle to tell a modern story. Then the creators (didn’t read the novel so I can’t say the the author meant this) pull out the old Hollywood troupes and fail to show her as this powerful/intelligent heroine that she is. Those little things kind of annoy me. I did enjoy the movie but it could have been better. Also being a fan of sci-fi, it’s kind of unforgivable to me to not show some kind of consistency in the use of technology.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
Sosmooth1982Dec 28, 2022
I thought series was going to be good. I don't know why people like these movies so much. The only thing that's good is the storyline. The movies have all sucked so far.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
TEMP0Jun 16, 2020
The Mockingjay Part 1 is an enjoyable adventure, although I have to accept there were flaws too. One of the main flaws being that they didn't let iconic YouTuber/Twitch Streamer Cr1TiKaL who had dreams of being actor get any screen time.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
SoapNuggetJul 15, 2020
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. When watching Mockingjay Part 1 right after Catching Fire it is obvious that it is much worse than the 2nd, the characters are only shooting commercials for 2 hours, where the only thing that happens is Peeta is brainwashed and gets rescued and that happens at the end of the movie.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
JKGamer76Sep 13, 2020
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This film is not that good. It is very basic and follows a tiring flow. You must to go watch this movie with an open mind.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
More From This Movie

64 Critic Reviews

6.3 User Reviews

Details & Credits|Trailers

Current Movie Releases
By MetascoreBy User Score
1 77 Project Hail Mary
2 75 Send Help
3 73 Hoppers
4 72 The Sheep Detectives
5 68 Crime 101
SEE ALL
Essential Links
New on Amazon Prime Video
New on Netflix
Coming Soon to DVD/Blu-ray
SEE ALL