Spider-Man 3
Columbia Pictures | Release Date: May 4, 2007
6.5
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 2191 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
1,219
Mixed:
538
Negative:
434
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User scoreBy dateMost helpful
3
ChrisMay 12, 2007
This was a painful experience. They used every superhero cliche in the book. It was manipulative, ignorant, and just plain stupid. Every time I see a good review on here, I shudder, because it supports my belief that our culture is utterly This was a painful experience. They used every superhero cliche in the book. It was manipulative, ignorant, and just plain stupid. Every time I see a good review on here, I shudder, because it supports my belief that our culture is utterly brain dead. What a waste of film.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful
4
P.May 12, 2007
Yawn - worst of the series - 2 was pretty good and I had high expectations but overall I felt cheated - Sam Raimi has lost the plot and I agree with the guy who said Tim Burton should do more comic movies.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
CoryB.May 12, 2007
I think deep down I knew this movie was going to suck the moment I saw the costume they had James Franko (harry osborne) wear. What a pile of trash Spidey 3 is. I agree with my local paper that says J.K. Simmons and Bruce Campbell should I think deep down I knew this movie was going to suck the moment I saw the costume they had James Franko (harry osborne) wear. What a pile of trash Spidey 3 is. I agree with my local paper that says J.K. Simmons and Bruce Campbell should make a movie. My biggest complaint is killing off Venom and lack of script. I'm so disappointed, Mr. Raimi....… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
MarkC.May 11, 2007
Great movie , but they just dont make comic movies like they used to. No real artistic creativity. Tim Burton should create more of them. He almost did Superman returns and it was gonna be great, but he then turned it down for some reason.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
MikeMay 11, 2007
I don't know why everybody thought Spider-Man 2 was so great, but they don't like this one. Maybe I'm just biased because Venom is one of my favorite characters in the Marvel universe. Yeah, it has its corny parts...guess I don't know why everybody thought Spider-Man 2 was so great, but they don't like this one. Maybe I'm just biased because Venom is one of my favorite characters in the Marvel universe. Yeah, it has its corny parts...guess what...so did the first two! Yeah, it tries too hard to be emotional and funny at the same time...guess what...so did the first two! This installment was actually my favorite of the three. It doesn't exactly improve on the first two, but I disagree with the notion that it's any worse than the others.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
GiovanaC.May 11, 2007
It is a great movie with a lot of action and creates a lot of different emotions by it's development. The perfect closing for the sequel and is going to be on the top 3 of the blockbusters of this summer. A good movie if you watch it It is a great movie with a lot of action and creates a lot of different emotions by it's development. The perfect closing for the sequel and is going to be on the top 3 of the blockbusters of this summer. A good movie if you watch it with a positive attitude.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
KirbyD.May 11, 2007
This movie was excellent on all counts: story, action, effects, development, and continuity with the other 2. These low scores are atrocious, people are being way to over critical. Sit back and enjoy 2.3 hour's of top notch entertainment.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
JMay 11, 2007
This movie was... BAD. Atrocious dialogue. Good special effects. Terrible fight scenes in terms of scripted action - very mediocre. Blah.
0 of 1 users found this helpful
0
FrankF.May 10, 2007
How difficult is it to find a cast that has talent? Quite difficult apparently. My favorite parts were when I had trouble distinguishing between Toby Maguire's happy face and his angry face. And I think I have a cardboard box in my How difficult is it to find a cast that has talent? Quite difficult apparently. My favorite parts were when I had trouble distinguishing between Toby Maguire's happy face and his angry face. And I think I have a cardboard box in my basement that has more talent than Kirsten Dunst could ever muster. Two thirds of the way through I almost got up and walked out, but I decided to give it the benefit of the doubt, thinking it might get better yet. I could not have been more wrong. It just dragged on into oblivion. I was horribly disappointed.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
EthanR.May 10, 2007
Well first things first. The action scenes in this movie are amazing. But the storyline is mediocre. I personally liked all the things that was going on. But each storyline was pretty bland. I also would like to say that Toby Maguire had a Well first things first. The action scenes in this movie are amazing. But the storyline is mediocre. I personally liked all the things that was going on. But each storyline was pretty bland. I also would like to say that Toby Maguire had a huge double chin in the movie and looked really chubby. This movie had great special effects but it doesnt make up for an average movie. The fan favorite character Venom was awful in the movie with only about 20 minutes of screen time. The only actors I thought were into the movie were Topher Grace (Venom/Eddie Brock), J.K simmons (JJ) and I don't know his name but the new goblin. Average movie overall. I recommend that everyone wait until the dvd to see it!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
EricCotterMay 10, 2007
Easily the most disappointing movie I've ever seen. Not fun at all, way too cheesy for a Spidey flick (seriously, the whole teaming up part at the end, and then the shamefully ridiculous dance scene). Bad guys don't seem like they Easily the most disappointing movie I've ever seen. Not fun at all, way too cheesy for a Spidey flick (seriously, the whole teaming up part at the end, and then the shamefully ridiculous dance scene). Bad guys don't seem like they should be bad. All the characters are emotionally distant. The fight scenes are all right, but nothing like those in the previous movies. Clearly wanted to take the Batman aproach and be more dark and sinister, but failed so bad. Sam Raimi can do better, but now he'll probably never get the chance to redeem himself with the series. There have been talks of going on without him, and now it's obvious why.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful
4
JefframoneMay 10, 2007
WORST. SEQUEL. EVER. God this movie was long. Way too much going on. Tobey McGuire has got to be the worst actor since Ben Affleck to don a superhero costume. This was just a really pathetic attempt. I hope they don't make any more WORST. SEQUEL. EVER. God this movie was long. Way too much going on. Tobey McGuire has got to be the worst actor since Ben Affleck to don a superhero costume. This was just a really pathetic attempt. I hope they don't make any more because it's just embarassing.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
EddieM.May 10, 2007
First of all, the action in this movie was breathtaking, and second of all they took the comedy too far yes, but it was supposed to be funny, Sam Raimi did a phenomanal job with this movie and it does deserve alot more credit than it First of all, the action in this movie was breathtaking, and second of all they took the comedy too far yes, but it was supposed to be funny, Sam Raimi did a phenomanal job with this movie and it does deserve alot more credit than it actually does. Ben Brown, im the sheriff in these parts.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
IanH.May 10, 2007
The writing was horrible, and the action was mediocre -- not nearly good enough to make up for the unrealistic characters and dialogue.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
BillD.May 10, 2007
Best of the trilogy. Very successful management of multiple complex characters.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
StanleyF.May 9, 2007
While this is a moderately enjoyable movie, and we get to see the character grow and learn, it suffers from the beginnings of "sequel rot". Once again the writers seem to have decided more is better and included three villains. Sandman, at While this is a moderately enjoyable movie, and we get to see the character grow and learn, it suffers from the beginnings of "sequel rot". Once again the writers seem to have decided more is better and included three villains. Sandman, at least, should have been saved for his own movie, not wasted as a secondary. And the character development sequences also seemed to drag - maybe shortening the movie would have made it better.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
KyleW.May 9, 2007
Not nearly enough action, dragged on too long with scenes full of dull sappy scenes. and the whole movie was ruined with the stupid display of peter parker trying to act cool and "badass".
0 of 0 users found this helpful
4
AlexB.May 9, 2007
First let me start by saying that "Spider-Man 3" was three-and-a-half of the most mediocre films I have ever seen crammed into two-and-a-half hours of sub par editing. Second, I'd like to mention that there is something to be said about First let me start by saying that "Spider-Man 3" was three-and-a-half of the most mediocre films I have ever seen crammed into two-and-a-half hours of sub par editing. Second, I'd like to mention that there is something to be said about the fact that the majority of those that seem to be giving this film any positive reviews are those that read negative reviews, first, before actually seeing the movie. Coincidence! Me thinks not! Benificiaries of lowered expectations! Me thinks so! That said, those of us Spider-Man fanatics (made so by the comic books, and even more so by the solid "Spider-Man" and the superb "Spider-Man 2" films) that caught "S3" on an early screening, expecting to see an exponetial improvement in the third installment, were (*understatement alert*) let down like some many eleviated subway trains without a real hero to stop us from falling! I, however, have something much more thought provoking than throwing my full-headed mask in the ring of what has become a litany of critizism! I have a conspiracy theory! Could it be that an obviously exhausted Sam Raimi, as well as his cast, took a dive! Why, you say? Reason 1: He's tired! Its easier to make a crappy movie than a good one! (Duh!) Reason 2: After the truly "amazing" first sequel, and millions in promo, they knew you couldn't stay away. Plus, contracts are up! So, why not!?!? Reason 3: With a character as complex and likeable as this one, and with the huge fan following Spider-Man has, as well as the many well know, multi-dimensional, interesting roster of rogues that litter the Spider-Man mythology, it had been my assumption from the start that Spider-Man would become the next James Bond, with a seemingly limitless number of sequels. Sequels that, even if they lost some intrigue over the years, would still make only more money than 95% of the competition! Maybe Raimi purposely blew his load with three villians, over-the-top (attempts at) comedy, under-the-bottom dramatic perfomances, and the resolution (Parker forgiving the perp) of the driving force of Spidey's purpose for crime fighting! Maybe Sam and Co. are saying, "Whoever takes over," and someone will (Don't ever underestimate corporate greed. There will be more Spider-Man movies)", is going to have to start from scratch!" So, purely out of ego, they decide to crap in a box, wrap it up in a nice little (well promoted) package, and smear it up on the screen for our spewing (not a typo) pleasure. Bad form Sam! Bad form indeed, good sir! But I'm just saying. . . P.S. Venom was in this movie? Oh, that's right! Nature called! It must have been during those 5 minutes! I knew I shouldn't have washed my hands! I was so looking foward to seeing Venom! (Cricket! Cricket! Cricket!)… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
SamMay 9, 2007
Gorgeous, spectacular, and almost unbearably great, I loved every minute of it (save for the bridge scene).
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
MattH.May 9, 2007
WOW! You can really tell sam doesnt like venom!. lazy story, did he and the writers forget that john jameson is an astronaut? rushed gwen stacey in and out, and its almost like a love story between mr rami and the sandman!?. big action WOW! You can really tell sam doesnt like venom!. lazy story, did he and the writers forget that john jameson is an astronaut? rushed gwen stacey in and out, and its almost like a love story between mr rami and the sandman!?. big action sequences spoiled by nonsensical plot twists! anyone care to answer why the hobgoblin wasnt good enough for harry osborne in this film? but on the upper hand my girlfriend who doesnt follow comics or tv shows loved it! so a 3 it gets.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
4
ShaunL.May 9, 2007
The writing was so horrible it made me want to cry.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
AnonymousMCMay 9, 2007
Holy crap! You guys take this movie too seriously. It's a blast. Unless your one of those creepy guys who have seen every movie known to man and try to show their intellect by b*tching about how superhero movies A: are slightly differentHoly crap! You guys take this movie too seriously. It's a blast. Unless your one of those creepy guys who have seen every movie known to man and try to show their intellect by b*tching about how superhero movies A: are slightly different than the comics or B: are too much like the comics, you'll like this. The first sandman scene is the most beautiful special effects I've ever seen by the way.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
KevinN.May 9, 2007
Overall, this movie is an unsatisfying, sad mess. I mean really sad: there are multiple scenes with nearly every major character tearing up. A blubbering, baby-faced Tobey Maguire sealed the doom of this film which turned out not to be Overall, this movie is an unsatisfying, sad mess. I mean really sad: there are multiple scenes with nearly every major character tearing up. A blubbering, baby-faced Tobey Maguire sealed the doom of this film which turned out not to be escapist entertainment of any sort. Because of the spectacular arial special effects, the darkness of the film feels stilted. There are character and plot continuity problems which distract, also. I didn't connect with the characters: none were particularly sympathetic. What made Venom a spider versus some other type of villian is puzzling. Why Sandman grows to a 200-300 feet size is also unexplained. It also felt long--it was at least one hour before Spiderman even started to turn into the evil, black version. Tobey Maquire as a cocky, bad boy is so unbelievable, it's laughable.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
AlanJ.May 9, 2007
Great special effects. Interesting characters and storyline, but characters and story lines were fully developed. Overall, the movie was a bit on the long side.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
MattS.May 9, 2007
I enjoyed this film, but ultimately, I found it a disappointment. It is, however, my son's favorite movie of all time, a position previously held by "Night at the Museum".
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
DaveK.May 9, 2007
Well this is definitely the worst of the 3. The movie seemed to drag on and on and on, about half hour too long. And 3/4 of the scenes had Peter parker crying....too much romance, not enough action, and just awful. thank god its over.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
BrianK.May 9, 2007
Awful! Terrible sequel, just plain bad The acting was terrible, the writing so bad it was laughable, similar to Batman and Robin in terms of franchise ruining stupidity. [***SPOILER ALERT***] Topher Grace as VENOM??? are you kidding me??? Awful! Terrible sequel, just plain bad The acting was terrible, the writing so bad it was laughable, similar to Batman and Robin in terms of franchise ruining stupidity. [***SPOILER ALERT***] Topher Grace as VENOM??? are you kidding me??? The Baddest, most vile and coolest Spidey villain played by that wimp from that 70's show!? Venom is hardcore, he was portrayed as a one dimensional, wimp in this movie. The ending too was just plain stupid, and sappy. Please Mr. Raimi don't go the way of Lucas and ruin your brilliant Superhero franchise! I implore you, but you may have with this stinker!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
BenM.May 9, 2007
I dunno about this one. It's something that felt like overreaching. Like the original "Batman" or "War of the Worlds", some viewers will be fooled into thinking it's a great movie, but it's not. It's a mediocre movie made I dunno about this one. It's something that felt like overreaching. Like the original "Batman" or "War of the Worlds", some viewers will be fooled into thinking it's a great movie, but it's not. It's a mediocre movie made up of great things, good things and really, really bad things. I HATED Tobey Maguire's performance in this movie. And he made "Spider-Man 2" the great movie it was. My view of the "Spider-Man" series is like a juicy, succulent piece of meat sandwiched between two stale pieces of bread. You tolerate it, but you wish the bread was fresher. Spidey 1: 7/10 Spidey 2: 10/10 Spidey 3: 6/10… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
YoriDMay 8, 2007
BLAAAAAH...went in expecting less after feedback from other people that saw it and it was still worse than i thought...too long...and too long for all the wrong reasons...WTF were those saturday night fever/gi joe/dirty dancing scenes doingBLAAAAAH...went in expecting less after feedback from other people that saw it and it was still worse than i thought...too long...and too long for all the wrong reasons...WTF were those saturday night fever/gi joe/dirty dancing scenes doing in this movie...there was some horrible acting as well...disappointed to say the least...are you sure it was the same director?...i would have seen it no matter what as i fell in love with everything in the previous ones...whoever edited this one should be slowly devoured by venom...or just forced to watch this over and over again til their sanity caves in... :(

ps fx and action scenes deserve some recognition..only reason i didnt give it a -5… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful
4
AlLMay 8, 2007
My first reaction was 'not as good as the first or second spidey movies'. Then I watched them again and realised that they were never that good to begin with, and this one is no better. Everything that was cheesy, annoying or My first reaction was 'not as good as the first or second spidey movies'. Then I watched them again and realised that they were never that good to begin with, and this one is no better. Everything that was cheesy, annoying or nonsensical about the previous outings were repeated AND enhanced in this one- here's a few of my favourites: 1- Aunt May will always tell a long, meandering and wholly pointless anecdote about the past before making an utterly redundant point. 2- People who become warped super-villains will always blame Spiderman for everything, instead of realising that their predicament is their own stupid fault. 3. Peter Parker is a supremely confident super-athlete ONLY with his spider-suit on. While in street-clothes, and without a full-face mask to obscure his vision, he will become a totally hapless prat-falling doe-eyed goofball. 4- Mary-Jane handles disappointments, minor setbacks and commitment issues like a four-year old. 5- Harry Osborne is a brainless weepy idiot, who wouldn't know genuine affection if he was xxxxxxx xxx from behind. 6- Despite the fact that Peter Parker's secret identity is his most precious asset, he'll pull his mask off before, during or after a fight in front of others at least twice in each movie. 7. New York Police Officers and Firemen are happy to stand idly spectating while a vigilante makes them look stupid. 8- None of the award-winning journalists who work with Peter Parker are smart enough to even wonder how he gets aerial panoramic shots of Spiderman spot-fighting crime at least seven times a week. 9- Mary-Jane will still scream wide-eyed at the ground for minutes at a time despite being hung from something steel a mile up about 6 times now, but boy can she catch herself in a fall, and 10- Bruce Campbell is the most criminally overlooked actor of all time. Further, it also seems that the Osborne's butler is so senile that he doesn't notice the friction between Harry and his best friend until they have a fight which destroys an entire wing of the Osborne mansion, we as an audience are so utterly cow-eyed stupid we need TWO (badly-acted) news anchors spouting purile exposition to tell us that the hero is in trouble while he's being pounded by a 12-story sand golem, action sequences that are so kinetic you can't tell what's going on are now compulsory by law, and most incredible of all, Alien symbiotes have a unique property that causes the most stultifyingly unlikely coincidences to occur in their immediate vicinity ALL THE TIME. 3 of these 4 stars are for the scene where the sandman is reborn. Genuinely touching stuff. The rest- meh.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
JohnC.May 8, 2007
Honestly i thougt it was good. There have been a lot of expectations surrounding the film, but it was solid. Not as good as the second, but i judge movies on their own merits, whether they are alone or are ina trilogy. A good end to a great Honestly i thougt it was good. There have been a lot of expectations surrounding the film, but it was solid. Not as good as the second, but i judge movies on their own merits, whether they are alone or are ina trilogy. A good end to a great trilogy. worth your time.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
eeganracMay 8, 2007
the movie was terrible. to have to sit and watch two music numbers.........give me a f*ckin break! to have harry's butler come out of nowhere and talk sense in to harry, thats just piss poor lazy writing. venom is just an f*cking joke.the movie was terrible. to have to sit and watch two music numbers.........give me a f*ckin break! to have harry's butler come out of nowhere and talk sense in to harry, thats just piss poor lazy writing. venom is just an f*cking joke. the syboite (don't know how it is spelled) comes from a meteor, omfg this is 2007, not 1967! I liked the first spider-man, the second was just stolen from superman II. i would advise anyone to just wait until this movie is on dvd, cause it is an abomination! Nothing like at the end of the movie having sandman, and spider-man crying, wtf! please do not make another spider-man movie. if you go and see this movie than you are part of the problem.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful
2
KyleB.May 8, 2007
Most often dull. They waited to long to gte to Venom, a character who could fill an entire movie on his own
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
Ryan"TheMan"K.May 8, 2007
Though not as superior as it's predecessor "SPIDER-MAN 2" and while it's definitely (in my opinion) better than "SPIDER-MAN", this third installment is exciting, suspenseful and dazzling with more villains, better special F.X and Though not as superior as it's predecessor "SPIDER-MAN 2" and while it's definitely (in my opinion) better than "SPIDER-MAN", this third installment is exciting, suspenseful and dazzling with more villains, better special F.X and some fresh elements. I enjoyed it alot and it should be viewed by many fans of the series!!!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
4
AlexL.May 8, 2007
This is a good example of how to completely obliterate a franchise. Admitedly the second film wasn't exactly fantastic (requiring some rather large jumps of the imagination, especially due to the preposterous comic book science). It was This is a good example of how to completely obliterate a franchise. Admitedly the second film wasn't exactly fantastic (requiring some rather large jumps of the imagination, especially due to the preposterous comic book science). It was however vaguely loveable, sort of like an ugly puppy with crooked eyes and an insufferable habit of repeatedly yapping to attract attention. This film however was not loveable on any level. The script writing was poor, the acting was abysmal and the evil (emo) Peter Parker was embarrasing. I did however get a good laugh when the sandman fell into the "open air" de-molecularizer. "Sir there seems to be an increased silicon mass in the de-molecularizer"..."Don't worry it's probably just a bird, it'll fly off when the engine gets started". All I can say it must have been a pretty heavy bird to cause a 16 stone rise in weight. It's been a while since I've been so eager to get out of a cinema. Special fx were good, otherwise this would be a 2. If you're a fan of spiderman I would suggest that you don't do it to yourself!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
PaulD.May 8, 2007
Spider-Man 3 is going to split audiences. Personally, I love it. It has a tremendous blend of humor (Including great inside jokes), action, drama and special effects. However, some people will find certain aspects too cheesy, or miss certain Spider-Man 3 is going to split audiences. Personally, I love it. It has a tremendous blend of humor (Including great inside jokes), action, drama and special effects. However, some people will find certain aspects too cheesy, or miss certain jokes (I was the only person in the packed theatre who reacted to the appearance of Stan Lee for example). I sincerely hope that the reaction is not unjustly bad - it is my favourite of all 3, though I am almost certainly in the minority - as it's no secret that everyone wants a Spider-Man 4.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
TravisC.May 8, 2007
People sure seem to be expecting quite a bit from a movie basically made for children. It's a fun way to spend two and a half hours and just as good as the first two.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
BlatherscyteBlunderbussMay 8, 2007
Spider Man 2 should have been called Doctor Octopus 1. Where the prior sequel's villain overshadowed the supposed protagonist's weak story arc, in Spider Man 3 the story is all about Parker -- as it should be, IMO. If you want to Spider Man 2 should have been called Doctor Octopus 1. Where the prior sequel's villain overshadowed the supposed protagonist's weak story arc, in Spider Man 3 the story is all about Parker -- as it should be, IMO. If you want to see deep and fleshed-out villains, this is not the sequel for you. If you want to see Spider Man, it's nearly as good as the first film!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
MarkSMay 8, 2007
In opposition to most of the other reviewers I felt that 2 was a let-down from the excellence of the first film. In my mind this was much better than the weak, repetitive second installment. While it still has problems (it sometimes feels In opposition to most of the other reviewers I felt that 2 was a let-down from the excellence of the first film. In my mind this was much better than the weak, repetitive second installment. While it still has problems (it sometimes feels like they had two ideas for the film, but neither would be long enough so they were grafted together, a number of George Lucas caliber bad "romantic" moments, and some scenes that feel forced) it was a worthy sequel. So, considering that I liked the first one, felt the second was weak, and am a long-time comic fan (though, not generally a big reader of super-hero fare) this came out as the second-best in the series and a great way to spend a few hours.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
ChadS.May 8, 2007
A plot convolution that preceeds the final action set-piece prevents "Spider-Man 3" from soaring to even the modest level of the original(never-mind the near-brilliant second installment) "Spider-Man". The piece of pertinent information that A plot convolution that preceeds the final action set-piece prevents "Spider-Man 3" from soaring to even the modest level of the original(never-mind the near-brilliant second installment) "Spider-Man". The piece of pertinent information that Harry(James Franco) at long last learns is baffling in its tardiness, because you can't figure out the logic behind the teller's machinations in needlessly drawing out the long-standing vendetta his employer has against Peter Parker(Tobey Maguire). To spill the beans so late in the trilogy seems like an arbitrary decision on the screenwriter's part to move the story along. It doesn't feel organic. "Spider-Man 3" peaks during Maguire's dance number which smartly deconstructs the movie musical by lifting the veil of narcissism that's inherent in all musical numbers. Parker must have some deep-seated jealousy towards Mary Jane(Kirsten Dunst) and her burgeoning musical career. Since this is apparently the case(Parker never attends another performance), there should be some alteration in Maguire's glowing demeanor throughout Mary Jane's performance of the Broadway show's opening number as an indicator to his threatened ego.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
PaulY.May 7, 2007
Too busy. Three villains is too many, especially when the first two movies worked really well with one villain each. Venom was especially underused, basically appearing in only one scene and coming across as laughable with a sinister Too busy. Three villains is too many, especially when the first two movies worked really well with one villain each. Venom was especially underused, basically appearing in only one scene and coming across as laughable with a sinister creature spouting the voice of Eric Forman. On the plus side, visuals, acting, fight sequences, etc were all as top-notch as the first two installments of the series. It was those storytelling aspects that kept Spdey 3 from reaching its full potential.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
1
SamC.May 7, 2007
One of the worst movies I have ever seen. The emotional peaks and valleys the director tries to convey are overly dramatic and cheesy. Half of the movie is nothing but choppy conversations and awkward pauses; the other half is special One of the worst movies I have ever seen. The emotional peaks and valleys the director tries to convey are overly dramatic and cheesy. Half of the movie is nothing but choppy conversations and awkward pauses; the other half is special effects that vault so far into the realm of impossibility that one is soon bored with the straining tedium of it all. The only reason I gave it anything out of ten was Aunt May. Rosemary Harris is a gifted actress that has been surrounded by mediocrity throughout the trilogy.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
4
AaronN.May 7, 2007
There were a few decent action scenes or this movie would have earned a 2. God awful acting almost all around (Topher and Bruce being notable exceptions). some truly cringe inducing scenes w/ Toby strutting down the streets of NYC. theyThere were a few decent action scenes or this movie would have earned a 2. God awful acting almost all around (Topher and Bruce being notable exceptions). some truly cringe inducing scenes w/ Toby strutting down the streets of NYC. they spent a quarter of a billion dollars on a movie but didn't bother buying a decent script.. too many villians each poorly developed. * the editting was horrendous, the movie felt an hour too long. See it at the cheap theater :(… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
ToddS.May 7, 2007
Enjoyable, intriguing, great mix of effects and emotion.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
JohnnyS.May 7, 2007
Amazing Movie! Compelling story, great battle scenes, tight villians. i believe its the best of the series. the only problem is that there are a few too many emotional love scenes or sad battle scenes.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
JosephA.May 7, 2007
Superb. This movie does a fantastic job of blowing you away with amazing action, giving you a good laugh, and touching your heart all @ the same time. It was an excellent finish that beautifully satisfies the story that started in the first Superb. This movie does a fantastic job of blowing you away with amazing action, giving you a good laugh, and touching your heart all @ the same time. It was an excellent finish that beautifully satisfies the story that started in the first film by bringing Peter full circle. I can't for the life off me understand why anyone is complaining or putting the movie down, seriously. It was brilliiant. I'm so glad they didnt mess this up. A perfect trilogy with possibility for amendment. It's definitely my favorite of the 3. Definitely see it!!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
RayM.May 7, 2007
None of the heart of the previous 2 movies. Felt sterile and pieced together. Very disappointing, especially coming off of the greatest comic book movie ever made (Spiderman 2).
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
MichaelB.May 7, 2007
Great flick. I'm pretty surprised at the number of people who were unhappy with this movie. They cover a ton of major story elements, there's non-stop action, and plenty of awesome special effects. Not as good as the 2nd movie, but Great flick. I'm pretty surprised at the number of people who were unhappy with this movie. They cover a ton of major story elements, there's non-stop action, and plenty of awesome special effects. Not as good as the 2nd movie, but definitely worth seeing.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
TylerGreeneMay 7, 2007
I thought this movie was the best in the series. I loved every Spider Man movie and this one was my fave. I don't understand why everyone is downing it so much. I was just like the other Spider Man's. This movie had great action,I thought this movie was the best in the series. I loved every Spider Man movie and this one was my fave. I don't understand why everyone is downing it so much. I was just like the other Spider Man's. This movie had great action, great story, and great dialogue, i loved everything about this movie. It was funny but also serious. This movie pulled off everything. Easy 10.… Expand
4 of 7 users found this helpful
7
KentP.May 7, 2007
OK, I read the user reviews prior to going to the movie, so I was expecting the worst to begin with...It wasn't as bad as the "red" votes would have you believe...sure there was some sappy garbage at the end of the movie....sure there OK, I read the user reviews prior to going to the movie, so I was expecting the worst to begin with...It wasn't as bad as the "red" votes would have you believe...sure there was some sappy garbage at the end of the movie....sure there was some overly drawn-out parts in the beginning that could have been editted out...but for the most part the movie was quite enjoyable...people here talked about the pacing being poorly executed...I thought it was ok....people here hated the humor...I thought it was great - (and funny).....what's wrong with that anyway ?....The action sequences were very cool - fast and destructive - full marks there, in my opinion......I actually liked the transition to cocky Peter Parker with the dark suit on underneath - that was very VERY funny to watch - and the whole John Travolta strut, with the Jazz dancing stuff was also funny.....hey, it made me laugh - it wasn't "that" bad, people.....This is not supposed to be "dark" is it ?.....This is not Batman......In any event, sure - they could have made it better by tweaking a few things here and there, but overall it was enjoyable - (and I am a harsh critic)......By the way, I saw this in a so-called IMAX theater.....I did not see what the big deal was with IMAX - it looked almost the same as any other regular wide screen theater - save your money on the ticket price and see it in a regular theater....Ciao !… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
MostafaF.May 7, 2007
I saw the movie, and I really think it deserves a 9 out of 10. Even though there are scenes not included in the movie (included in the trailers only and other scenes would have been better if included). Ultimatley, this is the best movie in I saw the movie, and I really think it deserves a 9 out of 10. Even though there are scenes not included in the movie (included in the trailers only and other scenes would have been better if included). Ultimatley, this is the best movie in its trilogy, in terms of its story,effects,acting and the amount of effort and heart that has been put to this movie (two and half years in the making). I really hope that it gets Academy Awards in Effects (Visual and Sound), Editing. For people who haven't seen the movie yet, I highly recomend it and thank you for the readers for your time to read this, I appreciate it.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
RichardH.May 7, 2007
Honestly, a lot of people just didn't get this movie, the fact of the matter is, the first two spiderman films came out of nowhere, no one thought they would be good, and they blew everyone away because there was so little expectation, Honestly, a lot of people just didn't get this movie, the fact of the matter is, the first two spiderman films came out of nowhere, no one thought they would be good, and they blew everyone away because there was so little expectation, now that this film had so much hype everyone is suddenly hyper critical of it. The nay sayers can shove off quite frankly, this is a clever, funny, action packed, all round excellent film. It shocks me that people are picking holes in the funny parts of the film for being too cheesy, when that's exactly what they were supposed to be. Honestly, too many morons went out to see this film because of the hype, and that's the only reason a lot of the reviews have been poor. Because the film is anything but.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
AndyH.May 7, 2007
I can only describe this film as a missed opportunity. It could have been an epic, and indeed completed an epic trilogy, possibly one of the best super hero movie series of all time. But it was not. There was no lack of substance, everything I can only describe this film as a missed opportunity. It could have been an epic, and indeed completed an epic trilogy, possibly one of the best super hero movie series of all time. But it was not. There was no lack of substance, everything needed was there to create the movie it should have been. However there was also a lot more than was needed, and it was poorly put together. I do not have a problem with long films, but this should have been shorter. The writers seemed to feel the need to tie up every loose end, which I do not think is necessary or compelling, whether there is to be a sequel or not. Purely from observation it seems there was conflict on what the writers wanted this film to be, which is a shame. All though it is not my place to say how it could be improved, I think the removal of at least one villain would have been a start. Complicated films are good, but they should not be complicated due to an overflow of content, and this type of film should be simple if you wish to view it in such a light. Spider-man 3 is complicated in all the wrong ways.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
RickMay 7, 2007
Funny, amazing, incredible, goofy, all around great movie. The thing I like about the Spiderman movies is the villians. In all three movies the villian is not just evil to be evil but a person who has taken a few wrong turns. [***SPOILER***] Funny, amazing, incredible, goofy, all around great movie. The thing I like about the Spiderman movies is the villians. In all three movies the villian is not just evil to be evil but a person who has taken a few wrong turns. [***SPOILER***] Green Goblin had this moment of good at the end same for the Doc is Spiderman 2 and continued with Harry and Sandman in 3. Nothing is as simple as good and evil especially when dealing with people.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
NadieT.May 7, 2007
Loooooooong and boring. Tobey can't play a bad guy, looks like a parody of himself. Great effects but what's new. Please stop here and don't make us suffer thru a 4th one.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
JeffH.May 7, 2007
I went with some very critical friends who really disliked the musical scenes and thought Parker's antics with the dance number were totally unnecessary. My brother and friends hinted that the movie tried to involve or cover too many I went with some very critical friends who really disliked the musical scenes and thought Parker's antics with the dance number were totally unnecessary. My brother and friends hinted that the movie tried to involve or cover too many threads of different characters and such. Did they read or hear about other people's thoughts after opening night? I could have done without the dance scene and pelvis thrust myself, but the combat and special effects were astounding. Yes, there were a few characters to keep track of, but there was just enough background story to give the origin of these characters some substance rather than just throwing up some new villians out of nowhere. I think Sam Raimi could have done a better(different) way of showing Parker's vengeful side, but all in all the movie was pretty good. Keep in mind people - this movie is based upon a comic book character. Comics aren't exactly known for their extraordinary plots.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
RichardR.May 7, 2007
Oh boy, I was so exicted about watching this film. I abandoned the girlfriend, sat down with my oversized portions of snacks and beverages and prepared myself for the webslinging event of the year. This time spiderman had a whole array of Oh boy, I was so exicted about watching this film. I abandoned the girlfriend, sat down with my oversized portions of snacks and beverages and prepared myself for the webslinging event of the year. This time spiderman had a whole array of problems and bad guys to deal with. There was of course the continuing saga of the murder of his unlce, his friendship with harry and also lets not forget his efforts to make MJ the only woman in his life. And then there are the bad guys, Sandman, the hobgoblin and Venom. Does it sound like there is too much going going on? Well you would be right. This film did not have the boldness to follow one theme and one bad guy. I would have been happy to have spiderman slug it out with venom, who was extremly under used, and leave it at that. Forgiveness, commitment, vanity and pride were all addressed in this final part of the trilogy and it was hard to figure out what the film was trying to say. The effects of course were amazing and you know where all of the money went into making the film. Its a shame after such a brilliant second part of the trilogy, Spiderman 3 left me wanting more and extremly unsatisfied, maybe I need to see it again....… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
MelissaB.May 7, 2007
It was terrible. There was very little entertainment value. Special effects were bad, script was terrible. Bruce Campbell was the only entertaining bit.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
NickB.May 7, 2007
This movie was ok but so many of the key points of spider man were lost somewhere between the 2nd and the 3rd movie for example no spidey senses at all in the 3rd movie he literally gets hit in the back like 14 times without seeing it This movie was ok but so many of the key points of spider man were lost somewhere between the 2nd and the 3rd movie for example no spidey senses at all in the 3rd movie he literally gets hit in the back like 14 times without seeing it coming. And it doesn't have a lot of the points from the comic books where the sand man never was this good guy who apologized at the end he was always mean so it was ok but not very good.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
PriyaH.May 7, 2007
The movie is certainly entertaining with its fair share of drama and laughs and should be seen with that intention. If you are hoping for the same depth that was seen in Spiderman 2 you will be disappointed. This movie shows how sequels can The movie is certainly entertaining with its fair share of drama and laughs and should be seen with that intention. If you are hoping for the same depth that was seen in Spiderman 2 you will be disappointed. This movie shows how sequels can go wrong, especially when expectations are so high. In trying to outdo the previous spiderman the makers have gone too big. There is enough material in the movie for perhaps two more different spidermans to be made, resulting in the storylines not being properly and fully dealt with and being sidelines, lost in the race to fit all the action into a 2 hour 20 minute marathon. The effects have gone too big, the stroy too small with the result that the dialogue is corny and the emotional scenes becoming funny.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
ReelWorldMay 7, 2007
Just caught the film last night and I have mixed emotions. Overall, it was an enjoyable romp for a summer movie, but not without its flaws. The action scenes were very good - albeit a LOT of CG that looked obviously so. The plot was all over Just caught the film last night and I have mixed emotions. Overall, it was an enjoyable romp for a summer movie, but not without its flaws. The action scenes were very good - albeit a LOT of CG that looked obviously so. The plot was all over the place, and character development was almost non-existent. In a lot of ways, the film reminded me of "X-Men 3" - very rushed, with a storyline that jumped between the multiple plot points way too much. The CG effects of Sandman were hit and miss IMO. In some cases - it looked really good - and others not so much. Venom was majorly underused and when he was he looked a lot like that dog Milo from "The Mask" when he sticks the mask on - overexaggerated fangs, and lacking the protruding jaw from the comics - just something didn't look right with him. Add to that the fact that even when in full on fangs and white eyes mode - Venom still speaks with Topher's voice - no effect has been added to it at all - which quite honestly looked really off! In some cases it looked like pre-viz work almost. I knew it would be hard to pull of Venom - but with today's state of the art - I was expecting something different. Acting-wise - well - this is a comic book film, so I'm not looking for next year's potential Best Actor or Actress nominees here...When Peter goes evil mode with the black suit, the scenes are almost too much. I'm not sure what effect Raimi was looking to convey here, but I found much of the time he was just acting plain stupid. Spidey's fights while clad in black are much more brutal - with him not afraid to go beyond what is necessary in the battle - even to the extent of playing dirty. I've long stood by the theory that Dunst can't act and she once again proves it with a 2-dimensional run at MJ. Church, as Sandman, was a throwaway character. They gave him nothing to do except be a stand in for the CG department. Topher as Brock/Venom really didn't have ample time to create anything of a character - another drawback from the loopy storyline. James Franco sways between acting like Willem Dafoe - right down to the squinting left eye thing - to Degrassi mode when he has amnesia. Like I said - I'm not expecting awards here unless they're Razzies. The big huge battle royale has its moments of pure wow factor, offset by Venom's comical appearance. For most of the fight, Topher has the face pulled away, but you do get 4 or 5 really good looks at him in full on symbiote mode. Without ruining anything, the ending was a bit of a let-down. The Stan Lee cameo was a nice touch, and Campbell as the French waiter was funny, but the spidey sense line was right up there with the "Holy rusted metal" schtick. Again, stuff like that really detracted from the film IMO. All in all, I suppose it's a film worth seeing - but if you go in there thinking this is the superhero film to top the likes of "Batman Begins" or the second Spider-Man, you might be disappointed. Worth the price of admission at a matinée, and I look forward to the DVD in November in hopes of some deleted material to fill in some of the gaps and make some sense of the multitude of story arcs.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
PatrickCMay 7, 2007
This movie looks, visually, great. Too bad the script and lack of good acting make this movie unenjoyable. The film is too long with too little action fights which are the best scenes in the film. The film is a bad addition to a good This movie looks, visually, great. Too bad the script and lack of good acting make this movie unenjoyable. The film is too long with too little action fights which are the best scenes in the film. The film is a bad addition to a good superhero series.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
GigaMay 7, 2007
A very entertaining comic-movie with marvelous special effects, naive plot and funny little jokes. What else do you need to relax a bit?
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
NickP.May 7, 2007
Overall this movie was great, but it did have a couple flaws. [***SPOILER***] Harry dying at the end and little bit of time that you see Venom in there were some causes for concern. Also when things were going down nobody explained anything Overall this movie was great, but it did have a couple flaws. [***SPOILER***] Harry dying at the end and little bit of time that you see Venom in there were some causes for concern. Also when things were going down nobody explained anything to anyone, like MJ breaking up with Peter and Peter not telling MJ about Harry, oh and don't forget the butler holding his breath until after Peter and Harry beat the hell out of each other. I'm a fan of the series, but the fourth one needs to explain everything so the fans can have some closure.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
TomMay 7, 2007
By turns ridiculous and tedious, a piece of garbage. No pacing, no build-up, no suspense, no excitement, nothing holding it all together, just alternating between cartoonish action sequences, and unbelievably tedious and tiresome By turns ridiculous and tedious, a piece of garbage. No pacing, no build-up, no suspense, no excitement, nothing holding it all together, just alternating between cartoonish action sequences, and unbelievably tedious and tiresome pseudo-sentimental conversations. I don't know what happened to the director who made Spiderman 2. Maybe a little black glob of guck came from outer space and took him over. There was one excellent scene, the one where Flint Marko becomes Sandman, which had me saying "Cool!". Too bad there weren't more like it in the film.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
KenJ.May 7, 2007
Overall it was ok, the ending just didn't make any sense. [***SPOILERS***] The villians become these big soft wussies. They killed off the enemy way too quickly(Venom). Yes lots of cheesy moments but it is after all a movie that was Overall it was ok, the ending just didn't make any sense. [***SPOILERS***] The villians become these big soft wussies. They killed off the enemy way too quickly(Venom). Yes lots of cheesy moments but it is after all a movie that was based off of the comics which were just as cheesy and the first two films had corny scenes as well. It tends to get a bit confusing with all the characters being introduced at once, they probably should have just stuck with venom and the new goblin. The "depressed" peter parker was a joke, wasnt necessary. The fight scenes were pretty good, sandman appears about 10 mins in the movie just like venom...the fight at the end is about the best part of the movie, not the best movie but not the worst either, if you can live through the corny lines and all the lovey dovey bullsh.t.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
KairiS.May 7, 2007
Great flick. Good pacing. Just enough mix of humor, action, and fun. 2 thumbs up.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
BrendanO.May 6, 2007
Very disappointing. Cheesy dialogue, ridiculous musical scenes. You could tell the actors didn't buy into the script. People in the audience were actually laughing out loud during serious emotional scenes. I guess it wasn't a Very disappointing. Cheesy dialogue, ridiculous musical scenes. You could tell the actors didn't buy into the script. People in the audience were actually laughing out loud during serious emotional scenes. I guess it wasn't a horrible film, just really really bad, and considering that it followed two brilliant predecessors with Spiderman 1 and 2, that made it all the more disappointing. I did actually like Topher Grace as Venom and Bruce Campbell's short scene was very funny. I really hope they don't make a fourth. Batman & Robin anyone?… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
4
KirkD.May 6, 2007
What hurts the most about this movie is the failure to meet expectations. Don
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
WolfiefishMay 6, 2007
A chore and a bore. And I'm a Spidey fan. Read the onion review I totally agree. It was OTT. yes I know it's a superhero film. When Parker "became bad", why did he adopt a Hitler hairstyle? He also looked like the lead singer of A chore and a bore. And I'm a Spidey fan. Read the onion review I totally agree. It was OTT. yes I know it's a superhero film. When Parker "became bad", why did he adopt a Hitler hairstyle? He also looked like the lead singer of Placebo. Whats going on? Bruce Campbell stole the film. Campbell for Inspector Clouseau. (If thats how you spell his name)… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
SteveK.May 6, 2007
[***SPOILERS***] This movie is bad. It is not good. I repeat, it is bad. However, I must add that I am 29 years old. I saw this movie with a group of 26 people, ranging from 9-35. Everyone over the age of 18 hated it. And most of the people[***SPOILERS***] This movie is bad. It is not good. I repeat, it is bad. However, I must add that I am 29 years old. I saw this movie with a group of 26 people, ranging from 9-35. Everyone over the age of 18 hated it. And most of the people under the age of 18 liked it. So where do we begin? First off, as many have noted, there are too many villains. They all contriibute to the themes of the movie but none are fully fleshed out. And I am sick of movies using predictable coincedences to move the plot along. [**SPOILERS***] Seriously, the one guy who happens to fall into a pit where scientists are changing the molecular properties of sand just happens to be the guy who killed Peter's uncle? And the one person on earth that happens to stumble upon the alien symbiote just happens to be Spider-Man? When Peter and MJ are fighting, Gwen Stacy just happens to be eating in the same restaurant? When Spider-Man gets the alien suit off, Eddie Brock just happens to be in the same church? You can not be serious! Most movies rely on one or two coincidences to move the plot along, but this is just absurd. The fights just seem to drag on as does this movie. Peter's dark side is portrayed so comically, it's laughable. Sand Man's power is so ill-defined that it is not clear at all what this guy can do. Overall, this movie is the biggest movie disappointment since Matrix Revolutions. It gets an A for special effects, and Venom is nicely done (for the whole 10 minutes he appears in this movie), but the movie is a mess. And did I mention how bad this film is? I know you're going to watch it anyways. But you were warned.… Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful
2
KrisMay 6, 2007
Topher Grace as "Venom" is like Jack Black as "The Crow", totally miscast! Guess I'll have to wait for the next "Batman" in order to se a great hero film. So long, Spidey, it was good while it lasted.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
AndrewMay 6, 2007
Entertaining comic book hero kind of stuff. My only regret is the ending, just a touch sad. Otherwise, if you are a spidey fan, then you have to see it.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
LucasboydMay 6, 2007
First off, the only super-hero franchise to successfully pull off multiple heroes in one film (on the big screen) is X-Men. That said, I must admit I was not happy with this film; it's as if the writers realized something was "magical" First off, the only super-hero franchise to successfully pull off multiple heroes in one film (on the big screen) is X-Men. That said, I must admit I was not happy with this film; it's as if the writers realized something was "magical" in Spider-man 2 and decided to REALLY take it over the top. Corn-ball dialogue (even worse than Star Wars), confusing fight scenes, and even a "group hug" moment to emphasize "forgiveness" as the "central theme...gimme a break! I got all weepy-eyed at the end, not so much due to the overly dramatic and sappy final scenes, but because I paid over $60.00 bucks for my family and me to see this dreadfully mediocre film; I could have just opurchased a copy of "Command and Conquer" for the XBOX 360 and at least get some replay value, but I digress. This film is a rental!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
NateC.May 6, 2007
Better than the last two. You've got the black suit, Sandman, the New Green Goblin, Gwen Stacey, and Venom. Topher Grace as Venom was awesome. I loved it and hope it is not the last.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
BigpapasteveMay 6, 2007
I really enjoyed it. It wasn't perfect, thus the nine. I liked the fact that it had three villains, but I thought sand-man and harry should've died the first time, that way, he could focus on venom. In my opinion, it was right up I really enjoyed it. It wasn't perfect, thus the nine. I liked the fact that it had three villains, but I thought sand-man and harry should've died the first time, that way, he could focus on venom. In my opinion, it was right up there with the other two. I actually enjoyed emo peter. It was pretty funny stuff. In the end, you really should go and see what you think. I can sit here and tell you about it, but you should go out and make your opinion. (you need the exercise anyway) It's at least worth a rent when it comes out on dvd.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
MattMay 6, 2007
Ok...maybe it doesn't deserve a 10... but it definately DOESNT DESERVE A ZERO! ... we love the characters...and this is a great continuation of the story. ...to call it bad is just Sour Grapes over the depth of the last one. ...the Ok...maybe it doesn't deserve a 10... but it definately DOESNT DESERVE A ZERO! ... we love the characters...and this is a great continuation of the story. ...to call it bad is just Sour Grapes over the depth of the last one. ...the thing that pissed me off is the Stan Lee cameo, and some far fetched things. Still a must see.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
DanielJ.May 6, 2007
It wasn't as good as the second one and the first was still a little better, but 3 is still good. On the pro side, it was definitely the deepest of the trilogy and had the best character development in Peter, MJ, and Harry. On the con It wasn't as good as the second one and the first was still a little better, but 3 is still good. On the pro side, it was definitely the deepest of the trilogy and had the best character development in Peter, MJ, and Harry. On the con side, there was too many coincidences (the sympiote falling next to MJ and Peter, Marko stumbling into the particle physics experiment) and Sandman wasn't developed enough. I feel that Venom and Harry were, though. The focus of Venom was more on Eddie Brock and his gradual hatred for Spidey/Peter until it consumed him fully. Harry was juxtaposed to Brock to show forgiveness despite his hate. One last thing that bugged me a little was Sandman himself. Green Goblin and Ock were introduced in a way that seemed scientifically possible, while Sandman's creation was kinda ridiculous and was left unexplained. Spider-Man 3 was definitely good, but it sags at a few times under its characters' own weight.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
KenR.May 6, 2007
Too Many repeat elements from the previous films, too many cookie cutter villians, no development where it was needed and overdevelopment in the emotional side of characters which we already know very well, a lot of repeat themes from the Too Many repeat elements from the previous films, too many cookie cutter villians, no development where it was needed and overdevelopment in the emotional side of characters which we already know very well, a lot of repeat themes from the previous films too, how many times will spidey doubt his abilities?, how many times will mary jane be a flake in her personal life? and the most interesting villian is apparently destroyed in the end, it simply wasnt what it could have been. Sometimes 2 is good enough.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
JudyTMay 6, 2007
Pitiful movie. Never did like Tobey as Spidey. In the comic he wasn't so nerdy, that Clark Kent not Peter Parker.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
WarmongerMay 6, 2007
I thought it was a very good movie, except for a couple of scenes, that didn't really belong in this film, for instance, "dark" Peter Parker strutting his stuff before entering the cafe. All that was missing was the Bee Gee's I thought it was a very good movie, except for a couple of scenes, that didn't really belong in this film, for instance, "dark" Peter Parker strutting his stuff before entering the cafe. All that was missing was the Bee Gee's singing staying alive! and of course the infamous dance scene at the cafe....what we're they thinking?!! I don't mind a little corn but this went way beyond corny,it was just plain embarrassing!.... the rain drops keep falling on my head scene in the second movie pales in comparison!! I really hope they omit these scenes on the DVD.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
4
TonydannieMay 6, 2007
What is really sad is that X-men 3 was beter then this. I always said this was going to be the Superman 3 of the series. And just like superman tried to take on the Nuclear weapons in the fourth one. Spider-man will take on the Bush What is really sad is that X-men 3 was beter then this. I always said this was going to be the Superman 3 of the series. And just like superman tried to take on the Nuclear weapons in the fourth one. Spider-man will take on the Bush Administration on the next film. For shame.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
JoeR.May 6, 2007
Spiderman 3 is a movie that is incredibly formulaic, with the only break from past convention is a decrease in action, with the empty spots filled by angry coming-of-age conversation. The movie gets a 2/10 for the plot, gains a point for the Spiderman 3 is a movie that is incredibly formulaic, with the only break from past convention is a decrease in action, with the empty spots filled by angry coming-of-age conversation. The movie gets a 2/10 for the plot, gains a point for the wonderful (as usual) performance of James Franco, gains another for the surprisingly brilliant work of Thomas Haden Church, and ultimately falls back to 3/10 due to the cinematography, which consistently finds some way to make Kirsten Dunst look unattractive.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
CzarMay 6, 2007
Complete crap, the story was beyond stupid, the fight sequences were so lame. I know its a comic and everything but make the things that are happening at least slightly believable or in line with the laws of physics. Way too much animation Complete crap, the story was beyond stupid, the fight sequences were so lame. I know its a comic and everything but make the things that are happening at least slightly believable or in line with the laws of physics. Way too much animation and it was way too obvious. 45 minutes into the movie I was looking at my watch waiting to get out.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
LizMay 6, 2007
Loved this Spiderman movie! My favorite out of the three.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
TigsJ.May 6, 2007
It gets 3 for the only 3 good parts of it. 1. sandman looked cool 2.bruce campbell 3. venom look midly cool venom got 5 mins screentime all up 5 MINS and he is more famous than sandman. this movie was a chick flick also it wasnt spiderman itIt gets 3 for the only 3 good parts of it. 1. sandman looked cool 2.bruce campbell 3. venom look midly cool venom got 5 mins screentime all up 5 MINS and he is more famous than sandman. this movie was a chick flick also it wasnt spiderman it was peter parker and mary jane. lamest of the series. i went in with high expectations i left demanding my money back.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
CalebC.May 6, 2007
The Best of the trilogy. Its exciting, thrilling, dramatic, a bit funny, and weird. The Weird comes from things that the other spiderman movies haven't done. It takes on a different look into comic book films and its set apart from them The Best of the trilogy. Its exciting, thrilling, dramatic, a bit funny, and weird. The Weird comes from things that the other spiderman movies haven't done. It takes on a different look into comic book films and its set apart from them in a tremendous way.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
RobertM.May 6, 2007
Spiderman 1 - new way Spidey got his powers Spiderman 2 - Doc Ock was great! Spiderman 3 - Spiderman meets Lifetime network; Tobey McGuire dancing in a jazz club? I mean, come on! This movie is quite possibly the worst one of the three. Spiderman 1 - new way Spidey got his powers Spiderman 2 - Doc Ock was great! Spiderman 3 - Spiderman meets Lifetime network; Tobey McGuire dancing in a jazz club? I mean, come on! This movie is quite possibly the worst one of the three. Topher Grace as Venom is weak-he played Eddie Brock just as he played his character from That 70's show - a whining loser. The introduction of the character, Gwen Stacy, is just in case Kirsten Dunst does not return and considering her lack of script, I doubt she will return.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
AlisaH.May 6, 2007
This movie was really good, the acting, humor, action, and the romance. It made you feel and hope this guy makes it through to the end, you go oh crap when peter says something stupid to mj or other things. The only problem I had with the This movie was really good, the acting, humor, action, and the romance. It made you feel and hope this guy makes it through to the end, you go oh crap when peter says something stupid to mj or other things. The only problem I had with the movie was that Venom came in to late. Otherwise, I give kudos and wait anxiously for the next installment.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
ZahidI.May 6, 2007
Along with the corny lines, Harry's $2 costume, the flurry [and rushing] of story lines, one thing disturbed me more than anything else: the depiction of supposedly Spiderman's most feared supervillain, VENOM. First of all, Venom Along with the corny lines, Harry's $2 costume, the flurry [and rushing] of story lines, one thing disturbed me more than anything else: the depiction of supposedly Spiderman's most feared supervillain, VENOM. First of all, Venom lasted about 15 MIN of the entire 140 min! They don't even refer to him once as "Venom" either! He says "I" instead of "We." And according to the 90s cartoon he's supposed to be large, muscular, intimidating. Topher Grace played him, and I guess the directors decided to stick to the Ultimate Spiderman idea. He did a decent job playing Brock. But they should've either dedicated the entire film to one of the villains like Venom, or saved Venom for a 4th Spiderman and introduce him at the end of 3. Venom is the true anti-Spiderman. All these villains and *plotlines* has the audience not caring about the gravity of evilness the villains possess. It makes them look like a joke to viewers. CGI and nice special effects won't save a movie. Once again, Venom's in and out in 15-20. A dude who's supposed to be a big bad bastard, the scariest supervillain. Sam Raimi/Avi Arad/the other directors missed key plotpoints and overlooked a ton of things. They should've thought this one through longer, they had 3 years to do it! Reminds me of how Jay-Z disappointed w/his new album since he didn't spend much time recording/perfecting it.… Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful
1
CJawfulMay 6, 2007
The following is just my opinion. I'm utterly correct, but it's just my opinion. I wanted to like this film, but I didn't. It is extremely shallow and disjointed. The dialog is atrocious. The action sequences are pretty good. The following is just my opinion. I'm utterly correct, but it's just my opinion. I wanted to like this film, but I didn't. It is extremely shallow and disjointed. The dialog is atrocious. The action sequences are pretty good. I wish someone had given me the time codes for when the action sequences occur and I would have sat in the hallway until the times came up. I felt embarrassed for Topher Grace. I think he succeeded in making the best out of an extremely poorly written role. James Cromwell. Tobey did fine, but the director needs to remember that less (weeping) is more. (Future directors of Claire Danes, I'm talking to you.) Some of the emotion that Tobey was forced to create from thin air (due to the lousy script) also made me feel embarrassed for him. I fear that some of the odd choices he appeared to make were actually the fault of the editor or director, because several times I found myself asking, "Why did his eyes just widen like crazy? Why is he making that face?" James Franco did fine with poorly written dialog. Kirsten Dunst obviously knows where a body is buried. She emits zero honest emotion in her performance. I defy you to watch a scene from the first movie with your hand over her eyes and then distinguish any difference in the emotional output of her face. I WANT to like her. It's as if she's never gotten out of the line delivery from "Interview with a Vampire." Also, I'm sick of movies preaching to me. Desiring justice and being filled with revenge are NOT the same thing. Reacting to a violent attack with violence does not ALWAYS make the attacker and victim equally guilty of wrongdoing. Did you notice "James Cromwell" earlier in this paragraph? "Why was he stuck in there?" you might ask yourself. That's the same question you'll ask if you see this movie. Thank God for J.K. Simmons. He brought actual acting and comedy to the film. The audience I saw this film with seemed relieved and appreciative to be watching a performance finally. Bruce Campbell also did a good job. Other comedy in Spider-man 3 feels so contrived that it cheapens the entire film. I'm not saying it's not funny, but...well, you'll see. You'll see when you no doubt pay to go see this film and you, like me, will probably have to look at your shoes during the scenes with some of the worst dialog since Jar Jar Binks.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
MikeC.May 6, 2007
If you go into this movie expecting nothing but flare and glare, then I can understand how you were disappointed. To me, the movie was about the hardships that Peter Parker as a person had to experience. I think they should have followed the If you go into this movie expecting nothing but flare and glare, then I can understand how you were disappointed. To me, the movie was about the hardships that Peter Parker as a person had to experience. I think they should have followed the cartoon for the Symbiote. It seemed to..random. Harry's "amnesia" served no real purpose in the plot, and cramming Venom into the last 15 minutes was extremely disappointing. I think the directors had so many ideas for scenes, that when it came to putting it together, they lost focus on where the story was supposed to be in the end. The first hour+ felt slow-moving, and the last 30+ felt extremely rushed. Very X-Men 3-ish... :/… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
DanO.May 6, 2007
Well, this movie sucks, It deserves 0 out of 10 but what Can I do? Spider-Man 1 and 2 were indeed great movies, the second one far better than the first one and I only expected the films to climb higher, the ladder broke in some point and Well, this movie sucks, It deserves 0 out of 10 but what Can I do? Spider-Man 1 and 2 were indeed great movies, the second one far better than the first one and I only expected the films to climb higher, the ladder broke in some point and Sam Raimi decided to release a cheesy film about a hero who thinks an EMO hairdo will make him hostile and powerful. The whole movie falls down from the beginning, there's no character development at all because the director tossed a bunch of new villains and focused and the weak one, plus he never lined towards anything, on the contrary, you can easily forgot characters in the middle of the film and suddenly (after almost an hour or so) you'll say "oh yeah, that dude was in the movie right?) to me Spider-Man 3 never existed, download the restaurant sequence and that's it....the whole movie worths only for this SNL sketch :(… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
JamesA.May 6, 2007
The flaws of the movie were that it doesn't follow the comic. Venom himself should have been Hulk appearence (not size). The major flaw was that 3 enemies divided the action and no major battles occured unlike Spider-man 2. I say go and The flaws of the movie were that it doesn't follow the comic. Venom himself should have been Hulk appearence (not size). The major flaw was that 3 enemies divided the action and no major battles occured unlike Spider-man 2. I say go and see it, the movie was enjoyable.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
1
ChrisboMay 6, 2007
, I'm a HUGE fan of Spiderman...Liked the first movie, LOVED the second flick and was dying to see the third one. And since I live in Korea, I was able to see the movie tonight (SM3 opened in Asia 3 days before it opens in North, I'm a HUGE fan of Spiderman...Liked the first movie, LOVED the second flick and was dying to see the third one. And since I live in Korea, I was able to see the movie tonight (SM3 opened in Asia 3 days before it opens in North America). I'm sad to say, I was let down by the third film.

The biggest issue by far is the fact that there are FAR too many story lines going on at once. The movie feels very bogged down and not nearly enough time is given for proper character development.

In this movie, there is Spiderman, Mary Jane, Gwen Stacey, "New" Goblin Venom and Sandman. Each character is given the bare amount of time for development.

I'm assuming that since most of the cast is non-committal to returning for a fourth movie, the filmmakers decided to throw as many stories into this movie in case it was the end. It really takes away from the movie as a whole.

The other big issue I have is the very forced sense of humor the movie tries to take. From a very lame riff on John Travolta's walk from "Saturday night fever" to watching Peter Parker dance to jazz music, a lot of the humor feels like it's was written for a SNL sketch.

There is a very poor ending involving Spiderman and Sandman that defies logic.

I sincerely hope this is NOT the last Spiderman film, because if it is, it's certainly not the best way for the series to end. None of the magic and originality of the second film are here. I hope that a decision is made to do a fourth film and I hope if a fourth film is made, the filmmakers decide to go back to what made the second film so special.

** out of *****… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful
6
RobB.May 6, 2007
The drama with MJ almost ruined this movie for me. She is like that annoying Jar Jar Binks character in Star Wars I. She needs a much much smaller role in Spiderman 4 or none at all. The special effects were cool, but some were so fast I The drama with MJ almost ruined this movie for me. She is like that annoying Jar Jar Binks character in Star Wars I. She needs a much much smaller role in Spiderman 4 or none at all. The special effects were cool, but some were so fast I could not tell what happened. Overall it was good entertainment and if you liked 1 and 2 then definitely go see this one.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
AlexMay 6, 2007
As far as some franchise/superhero movies go, Spiderman 3 isn't bad. its entertaining enough to keep a Monster-addicted high-schooler (me) watching happily for the two hour running time. unfortunately, there are some departments where itAs far as some franchise/superhero movies go, Spiderman 3 isn't bad. its entertaining enough to keep a Monster-addicted high-schooler (me) watching happily for the two hour running time. unfortunately, there are some departments where it just falls short. the movie has a tendancy to skip around a bit, making it midly difficult to follow, and some of the acting (especially on Toby McGuire's part) just plain sucks. and then there was Venom. quite simply, he could not have been more poorly excecuted. he just came off as an evil, power hungry version of spiderman with bad teeth and black webs who wanted to exact revenge because he lost his job. Venom is one of my favorite bad guys, but after this movie, i'm not sure i can still say the same thing. but, i guess, in the end, it was still a fairly good movie. could have been better, but its still worth a good rental, or even a buy. overall, 7 out of 10.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
BenB.May 6, 2007
What a disappointment. This should have been the reinging moment for the franchise... instead all we get is an asinine plot, cardboard characters, and some of the worst dialogue I've heard in quite some time ("I'm the sherrif in What a disappointment. This should have been the reinging moment for the franchise... instead all we get is an asinine plot, cardboard characters, and some of the worst dialogue I've heard in quite some time ("I'm the sherrif in these here parts!") Sam Raimi, what have you done?… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
SteveS.May 6, 2007
It fell into all the traps of previous comic book films, particularly the third and fourth "Batman" movies -- too many villains and not enough development of the characters. The "bad" Peter Parker sequence was dreadful and by the end, when It fell into all the traps of previous comic book films, particularly the third and fourth "Batman" movies -- too many villains and not enough development of the characters. The "bad" Peter Parker sequence was dreadful and by the end, when Spider-Man was taking on a 40-foot Sandman, I felt like I was watching the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man from "Ghostbusters." Don't bother.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
DavidP.May 6, 2007
I REALLY wanted to like this movie more. I have been a fan of the last 2 movies and have had some exposure of the Spiderman franchise (in the earlier years). But although there was a need to fulfill the fanboy wishes the movie falls flat on I REALLY wanted to like this movie more. I have been a fan of the last 2 movies and have had some exposure of the Spiderman franchise (in the earlier years). But although there was a need to fulfill the fanboy wishes the movie falls flat on its face for pretty much all reasons. Visual effects although I'm sure they were pushing boundaries with the sandman 'particle' effects there were some hideous compositing in that movie. Script suffered from really corny one liners. Look, I KNOW these actors can act but goddam the dialogue was so bad they really couldn't. And the story and themes and not to mention some really subpar editing and music. The pacing was too slow and then suddenly rushed in the last 15minutes to set up the final battle. And then, some more dialogue about forgiveness and everyone is ok.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
Page:
More From This Movie

59 Critic Reviews

6.5 User Reviews

Details & Credits|Trailers

Current Movie Releases
By MetascoreBy User Score
1 77 Project Hail Mary
2 75 Send Help
3 73 Hoppers
4 72 The Sheep Detectives
5 68 Crime 101
SEE ALL
Essential Links
New on Amazon Prime Video
New on Netflix
Coming Soon to DVD/Blu-ray
SEE ALL