Spider-Man 3

2

ChrisM.May 6, 2007

It's really pretty bad. I love Spiderman and I wanted it to be good, but it was really bad. The story lacks any kind of depth, there are many scenes that didn't need to be in the movie at all and were just plain stupid. (Like the It's really pretty bad. I love Spiderman and I wanted it to be good, but it was really bad. The story lacks any kind of depth, there are many scenes that didn't need to be in the movie at all and were just plain stupid. (Like the dance scene in the Cafe). They need to go back to the drawing board with the fanchise, because it's become indulgent, bloated and really disappointing. Don't waste your money on this movie.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

EaskyMay 6, 2007

This one may not be as good as last 2,however,it's a deeper one.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

NelsonS.May 6, 2007

Too many villains with no depth...too long which is one of the best marvel characters.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

LeeH.May 6, 2007

A fantastic movie suffering from inevitable hype and high expectations. Yes it crams a lot in the time it has, but how many other movies could still do it as well as it does? Not perfect but lots of fun, bringing three villians (or are A fantastic movie suffering from inevitable hype and high expectations. Yes it crams a lot in the time it has, but how many other movies could still do it as well as it does? Not perfect but lots of fun, bringing three villians (or are they?) into the mix as well as the romance and laughs. If this were the last in the series I would be far from disappointed - everything is concluded well given how much it has to do. Thank you Marvel, thank you Sony, thank you Sam!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

AnonymousMCMay 6, 2007

Not as good as the first 2 but still is worth seeing. Tries to mix too many sub-plots, too many characters, and in the end gives solutions that either ar in ahurry or not so convincing. But the humorous stuff are good (even McGuire behavingNot as good as the first 2 but still is worth seeing. Tries to mix too many sub-plots, too many characters, and in the end gives solutions that either ar in ahurry or not so convincing. But the humorous stuff are good (even McGuire behaving as jerk makes u laugh but THAT s the intention, people!), the drama that ALWAYS was there (check the previous Spideys) is here too and action in nevetheless awesome. I expected MORE of course. but to call this a bad movie is WAY out of line...… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

TomK.May 6, 2007

The movie wasn't perfect or excellent, but it was very good. the action, the effects, the actors and the comedy were excellent. Black Spidey was cool, Sandman was amazing. Many people didn't liked this movie because it isn't The movie wasn't perfect or excellent, but it was very good. the action, the effects, the actors and the comedy were excellent. Black Spidey was cool, Sandman was amazing. Many people didn't liked this movie because it isn't explore the characters to the deep; but it's already done in the previous films, most of the characters are the same, so nothing would get you a new information about the characters. The end of the movie turned down to be the weakest part of the movie, but when you remember the other parts of the movie you see how it was an excellent way to end this trilogy.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

MattW.May 6, 2007

I liked it. As a stand alone movie, its great. Its funny, action packed, and a lot better than most super hero movies.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

SegioC.May 5, 2007

Really cool, action, history, good effects.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

WillyMay 5, 2007

Sorry, but this movie is insulting. Is it suppose to be okay that there is no character consistency and any old damn thing can happen as long as a fancy video game demo is thrown at us every forty minutes? To name only a few... he does the Sorry, but this movie is insulting. Is it suppose to be okay that there is no character consistency and any old damn thing can happen as long as a fancy video game demo is thrown at us every forty minutes? To name only a few... he does the upsidedown kiss with the blond girl full on the mouth in front of MJ when he's getting along great with her, the neighbor girl who had a crush on him is thrilled that he and MJ are getting back together, Sandman robs banks violently and brutally tries to kill him, but says he was badgered into doing it (huh?), so he's really a nice guy; of all the people on earth that walking goo could have stuck to it happened to be Spiderman. Please. Let me know when you get back to filmmaking, Sam.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

2

WaylandMcAwesomeMay 5, 2007

Spiderman, my good sirs, is a fighter, not a sissy weiner that spends most of the movie crying. I wanted to see him fight. I fought more than he did; I fought boredom. Once upon a time, as a kid, I had dreams that Spiderman could be turnedSpiderman, my good sirs, is a fighter, not a sissy weiner that spends most of the movie crying. I wanted to see him fight. I fought more than he did; I fought boredom. Once upon a time, as a kid, I had dreams that Spiderman could be turned into a great trilogy. My dreams were shattered tonight. Mr. Raimi, I hope you are happy, because you have killed the dreams of little Wayland. For your sake, I hope your next project is to invent a time machine, go back in time, and save little Wayland.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful

3

asoykeMay 5, 2007

This was not a good movie. Shame on you Sam Raimi. You should change your name to Shlong Raimi, because that's how bad this movie was. Please don't cry about it. I got enough of that out of every single scene in the movie. WayThis was not a good movie. Shame on you Sam Raimi. You should change your name to Shlong Raimi, because that's how bad this movie was. Please don't cry about it. I got enough of that out of every single scene in the movie. Way to mess up a trilogy. Next time someone wants to pay you to direct a movie, please have them give my balls a call, because they could make a better movie.… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful

3

StevenS.May 5, 2007

Really bad. All the themes and ideas are fine, but the execution lacks any sense of emotional reality. The action sequences are predictable in their pacing by the end and the story itself is a flimsy skeleton to hang them on. I loved Really bad. All the themes and ideas are fine, but the execution lacks any sense of emotional reality. The action sequences are predictable in their pacing by the end and the story itself is a flimsy skeleton to hang them on. I loved Spiderman 2, so to me, they really screwed this one up.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

AMovieCriticMay 5, 2007

Once again, I'm going to have to disagree with the critics on this one. This movie was better than the 1st one, and it completely BLOWS AWAY the tear-filled, slow paced 2nd installment. This movie re-captures the feel of the first Once again, I'm going to have to disagree with the critics on this one. This movie was better than the 1st one, and it completely BLOWS AWAY the tear-filled, slow paced 2nd installment. This movie re-captures the feel of the first Spider-Man and mixes it with the improved effects from Spider-Man 2 (and really tops those as well) to create a nearly perfect Spider-Man movie. Best superhero movie I've ever seen. I was really into it. And after spending the entire 2nd movie sulking and lacking any redeeming qualities, Harry really is brought back in the 3rd movie as a very likable character. The scenes involving him and Peter are where the movie's at its best. Then there's the dark Spider-Man, also really high point of the movie, and there's the awesome Venom.... There's just too much great stuff to count. It does seem a little convoluted at first but it eventually evens itself out and ends up creating a very fun, action-packed movie that definitely outdoes the first 2 in almost every way imaginable. Definitely worth seeing. Would have been a perfect 10 if the script was edited...just slightly. Please keep superhero movies at under 2 hours, guys....… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

PO.DMay 5, 2007

Just walk away Sam, just walk away, and take the cast with you. Or Spider-man will soon turn into the walking dead. And someone lobotomize Avi Arad and Sony executives concerned for press ganging Venom into the movie. 1 villain and plot line Just walk away Sam, just walk away, and take the cast with you. Or Spider-man will soon turn into the walking dead. And someone lobotomize Avi Arad and Sony executives concerned for press ganging Venom into the movie. 1 villain and plot line too many. And the film isn't even fun, not even with the set-pieces. Sad, real sad. My spider-sense is clearly tingling for the franchise now. Batman & Robin it ain't, but there's a faint whiff of X3 and further doom if this be the case.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

2

MelvinG.May 5, 2007

That was awful. Very poor acting, story and editing. This franchise is done... "Spiderman Begins" anyone?

0 of 0 users found this helpful

2

JosephG.May 5, 2007

My wife and I stared at each other in disbelief during Peter's dance scene. The film's tone is completely inconsistent. Special effects are underwhelming. Spidey's costume still looks too glossy and doesn't look like My wife and I stared at each other in disbelief during Peter's dance scene. The film's tone is completely inconsistent. Special effects are underwhelming. Spidey's costume still looks too glossy and doesn't look like Tobey M.'s figure. Scenes seem to repeat themselves. Other scenes feel like outtakes from SM2. The first time Venom spoke, I laughed. He's supposed to have a fearsome, rough, grumbly voice, not sound just like Eric Forman. The film is so long, but it feels as if nothing happens. What a waste!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

2

BeauMay 5, 2007

There is a good movie that could have been made of Spider-Man vs Venom, New Goblin or Sandman, but putting all of them together in the same film means that each of them gets the barest of characterization and the action sequences become a There is a good movie that could have been made of Spider-Man vs Venom, New Goblin or Sandman, but putting all of them together in the same film means that each of them gets the barest of characterization and the action sequences become a mess. Kirsten Dunst has little to do but be mistreated throughout the film. Tobey Maguire is simply not believable as a bad boy. Skip this film.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

TylerDrainvilleMay 5, 2007

By far the worst Spider-Man film yet. They did a very poor job with Spidey's dark side and most of the villains here are shallow and pulled off quite badly. There were more laughs in the movie than "wow" moments, which was not what I By far the worst Spider-Man film yet. They did a very poor job with Spidey's dark side and most of the villains here are shallow and pulled off quite badly. There were more laughs in the movie than "wow" moments, which was not what I was expecting. Very disappointed.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

1

SnortchMay 5, 2007

This movie has about as appealing as freshly mowed over dog poop. I love SM and I enjoyed the first 2, but this one was really a waste. My eyes about rolled to the back of my head in several scenes...especially the contrived spidey swinging This movie has about as appealing as freshly mowed over dog poop. I love SM and I enjoyed the first 2, but this one was really a waste. My eyes about rolled to the back of my head in several scenes...especially the contrived spidey swinging in slow motion in front of the American flag...as if to say that Venom and Sandman are the terrorists...was surprised that the Proud to be American song didnt make it in there. Guhhh...what a waste!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

ChuckB.May 5, 2007

Predicable story and film school dialogue

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

SteveA.May 5, 2007

There were a few flaws. However, this movie had too much heart to dislike. I can picture Raimi not being one of the cool kids in school (that was probably someone like Michael Bay or James Cameron). Instead, he was probably the sweet, goofy There were a few flaws. However, this movie had too much heart to dislike. I can picture Raimi not being one of the cool kids in school (that was probably someone like Michael Bay or James Cameron). Instead, he was probably the sweet, goofy kid with a ton of talent and heart.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

JaredB.May 5, 2007

I just saw this film last night. At first, I really didn't know what I was in for. By the end of the movie, I was glad I chose to go. Aside from a corny and convoluted love story, this was the best of the trilogy. And, I didn't I just saw this film last night. At first, I really didn't know what I was in for. By the end of the movie, I was glad I chose to go. Aside from a corny and convoluted love story, this was the best of the trilogy. And, I didn't think they could do any better than they did with spiderman 2. I loved it!!!!!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

PammieB.May 5, 2007

Absolutly amazing movie. pure masterpiece. great suspence, many turns, and a very unexpected ending. DONT MISS!!!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

DougG.May 5, 2007

Awesome movie with a great message that more young people need to learn!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

JamesP.May 5, 2007

Obviously those who are reviewing this movie have never read the books they are based on. Spider-Man 3 was far superior to the clich'e events that took place in Spider-Man 2. The execution of 3 was perfect. It was well paced and the Obviously those who are reviewing this movie have never read the books they are based on. Spider-Man 3 was far superior to the clich'e events that took place in Spider-Man 2. The execution of 3 was perfect. It was well paced and the characters were all very well defined. I'm sure it was no easy task fitting 40 years of comic book history into three, two and a half hour movies, but Raimi pulls it off with precision. The movie touched on many emotions. The only flaw I found with this movie was in Venom's character. A. Venom has razor webbing. B. Speaks of himself as "We' as apposed to "I". C. No hinting to the creation of the character "Carnage".… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

MicS.May 5, 2007

It was pretty good. Not as good as 2 and 1, and somewhat of a let down only because we've seen it all before. Venom did feel a tiny bit rushed and thrown in at the end. I think it would've benefitted from just having the Sandman. It was pretty good. Not as good as 2 and 1, and somewhat of a let down only because we've seen it all before. Venom did feel a tiny bit rushed and thrown in at the end. I think it would've benefitted from just having the Sandman. Harry could've stayed. Other than that, was cool.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

BillMay 5, 2007

Very disappointed, although I did like the emo Peter Parker, which my friend and I got a good laugh out of.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

LeeS.May 5, 2007

Deeply flawed masterpeice. I think Sam Raimi didn't have the time needed to give this movie the edit that it needed. With a better cut Raimi could easily remove the worse scenes and improve the poorer and more contrived story elements. Deeply flawed masterpeice. I think Sam Raimi didn't have the time needed to give this movie the edit that it needed. With a better cut Raimi could easily remove the worse scenes and improve the poorer and more contrived story elements. However it will never be as good as Spider-man 2, which was pretty much perfect. There are some really great scenes and amazing action sequences, and the stellar cast help make the movie fun despite a few bad scenes, bad pacing and forced plot elements.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

SatyamC.May 5, 2007

The movie is decent but as a huge spider man fan, it just doesnt cut it. Great action but the director ruined the movie by making Parker seem like a fool. Also poor acting by Parker as he can't cry and takes away the seriousness from The movie is decent but as a huge spider man fan, it just doesnt cut it. Great action but the director ruined the movie by making Parker seem like a fool. Also poor acting by Parker as he can't cry and takes away the seriousness from the movie. At key moments we as audience tend to laugh instead of actually feel bad. Also to easy to predict.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

AnonymousMCMay 5, 2007

It really ashame the critics are really messing this up.The film has a dark side alot like the comic. I'm so glad that this film doesn't put a warm and fuzzy in everyones heart.It's not suppose to ..A really under appreciatedIt really ashame the critics are really messing this up.The film has a dark side alot like the comic. I'm so glad that this film doesn't put a warm and fuzzy in everyones heart.It's not suppose to ..A really under appreciated film..Maybe Fantastic 4 is more for the critics liking ....a really well crafted film..Nice to see the old Sam ways of story telling ..Thank you Sam Rami.......… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

JonahH.May 5, 2007

After reading all the incredibly negative reviews I was expecting this to be one of the worst letdowns since the almost unwatchable Jar Jar Binks/Star Wars trilogy. Turns out the movie is actually really good, its only main issue being a bit After reading all the incredibly negative reviews I was expecting this to be one of the worst letdowns since the almost unwatchable Jar Jar Binks/Star Wars trilogy. Turns out the movie is actually really good, its only main issue being a bit too long and slow in some parts. They could have cut about 15 minutes from it and it would have been fine. I'm not sure what people were expecting but I find this Spiderman to be on the same high-level as the other two, and I have to laugh at the doom and gloom reviews that many of the major critics have taken, they are really way off the mark this time. This movie has laughs, sad moments, and some excellent action scenes. Well worth the wait.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

ChrisVillegasMay 5, 2007

Best movie ever, idont know why people despyes so much this movie, the story is soo cool, and the fight scenes, why do they say that is exagerated? is spiderman, not batman, i mean, come on, its a super hero story, or did you wanted to seeBest movie ever, idont know why people despyes so much this movie, the story is soo cool, and the fight scenes, why do they say that is exagerated? is spiderman, not batman, i mean, come on, its a super hero story, or did you wanted to see another superman returns version? that really sucked!! give spidey a chance.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful

2

AtomK.May 5, 2007

God this movie sucked, I was checking my watch 1/3 the way through, and at the 3/4 mark I'm wondering if there is going to be any plot showing up. The first fight scene is some really great adrenalin filled action. The movie looks good God this movie sucked, I was checking my watch 1/3 the way through, and at the 3/4 mark I'm wondering if there is going to be any plot showing up. The first fight scene is some really great adrenalin filled action. The movie looks good and that's about it. I don't want an EMO spidy.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

GaborA.May 5, 2007

Scoring this movie is actually fairly challenging. There's really no point in mentioning the first two cuz even though i didnt really like them they were at least attempts at decent movies. On the other hand SM3 can only really be Scoring this movie is actually fairly challenging. There's really no point in mentioning the first two cuz even though i didnt really like them they were at least attempts at decent movies. On the other hand SM3 can only really be compared to something along the lines of Daredevil. These are super hero movies that are so bad they are laughable. "Laughable" being the key word in that sentence. I know its a common reviewers joke/hyperbole to say "I laughed when it was supposed to be dramatic," but theres absolutely no better way to describe this movie. I dont even know if i would recommend this movie to a friend considering it was mind bogglingly terrible yet i laughed twice as hard as i did during Hot Fuzz. Its like Raimi unintentionally almost made Evil Dead 3 instead of spider man.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

MatthewM.May 5, 2007

Sure its no Spider-man 1 or 2, but its nonetheless fantastic. CGI at a all time high. Acting most impressive. Definetly a must-see.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

JohnB.May 5, 2007

I went to the theater expecting to be entertained and I was. It has just as much "soul" as the others and actually pushes more boundaries than anyone could expect it to. One thing that was a little weird was Peter Parker's double chin. Oh well.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

I.RociterMay 5, 2007

This movie will do well only because Spider-Man 2 was one of the best superhero movies of all time movie goers and fans have come to love the franchise. Spider-Man 3, in contrast, is one of the worst superhero movies and could kill the This movie will do well only because Spider-Man 2 was one of the best superhero movies of all time movie goers and fans have come to love the franchise. Spider-Man 3, in contrast, is one of the worst superhero movies and could kill the franchise in much the same way Batman & Robin did to the caped crusader. Too many villains, poor dialog, bad plot device, terrible pacing, bad editing, a really emo Peter Parker. I could fill the screen with problems and you won't believe me until you see it yourself, but I beg you, if you want to hold that dear memory of Spider-Man and Spider-Man 2 in your memory, do not see this third installment.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

LeightonJ.May 5, 2007

This was by far THE worst spidey film released. It took an absolute age to get seriously started and then was over too quickly. That said there wer a couple of funny moments in the film. One thing that made me laugh but maybe shouldn't This was by far THE worst spidey film released. It took an absolute age to get seriously started and then was over too quickly. That said there wer a couple of funny moments in the film. One thing that made me laugh but maybe shouldn't have done was the way they tried to make Tobey Maguire look mean. The guy is weedy and that is why he works so well as spidey. He looked ridiculous when he was trying to look cocky. I hope that if they release a fourth that they will have learnt from their mistakes and actually make a film worth watching and more along the lines of the ACTUAL Spidey comics.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

TomW.May 5, 2007

This movie may have had alot more cheesy lines than the first two, but it's still an epic Spidey adventure like them also. I can tell many of these people commenting obviously did not watch or understand the movie. It was hinted This movie may have had alot more cheesy lines than the first two, but it's still an epic Spidey adventure like them also. I can tell many of these people commenting obviously did not watch or understand the movie. It was hinted throughout the entire movie that Flint was a good person. He didn't suddenly become good in the end. Talor P. obviously has to go back and watch the movie again.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

CamD.May 5, 2007

Almost flawless. This was absolutely amazing and I am completely lost as to how anyone could have disliked this movie. This is pure gold. I will never forget this movie in my life, simply because the story was surprising, fun, funny, and Almost flawless. This was absolutely amazing and I am completely lost as to how anyone could have disliked this movie. This is pure gold. I will never forget this movie in my life, simply because the story was surprising, fun, funny, and unpredictable, as well as the fight scenes were the best I have ever seen in any superhero movie let alone any movie. And let's not forget when spider-man fights with his best friend. Have we all forgotten what these movies are about? Absolutely amazing. I paid 15 bucks for advanced tickets to IMAX, and I would have paid 30.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

AndrewCMay 5, 2007

This Movie in my opinion is the best of the trilogy, It has new exciting villians which overpower the villians of the last two installments. There are however a few moments in the movie where you wonder why Raimi twists the story. Other than This Movie in my opinion is the best of the trilogy, It has new exciting villians which overpower the villians of the last two installments. There are however a few moments in the movie where you wonder why Raimi twists the story. Other than that, Spider Man gives off a new personality that pleased me throughout the movie. Overall, Spider Man 3 keeps you on the edge of your seat wanting more from the from the screen, and hopefuly, more installments of the series from Sam Raimi.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

1

BrianMay 5, 2007

Quite simply, the most boring movie I really wanted to like. Topher Grace is a Horrible !!!! Edie Brock and an even worse Venom. Venom being my favorite Marvel character I refuse to watch this Abomination ever again if I can help it. This is Quite simply, the most boring movie I really wanted to like. Topher Grace is a Horrible !!!! Edie Brock and an even worse Venom. Venom being my favorite Marvel character I refuse to watch this Abomination ever again if I can help it. This is such a disappointment and too long!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

JoeAverageMay 5, 2007

...Nice to see Topher Grace find some work...er, yeah...

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

HalB.May 5, 2007

More fun than I thought it would be. Yes, it focuses more on emotion than action at times, but what's wrong with that? There are a couple scenes that fall flat, but the overall story arc moves along nicely, the special effects are good More fun than I thought it would be. Yes, it focuses more on emotion than action at times, but what's wrong with that? There are a couple scenes that fall flat, but the overall story arc moves along nicely, the special effects are good (but don't dominate the film) and the acting is decent. People who give this anything below a 5 are way harsh. The cameo by Bruce Campbell is excellent. And who knew that Dunst cold actually sing? or that Toby could dance a bit?… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

ChesterJ>May 5, 2007

The special effects are top-notch, absolutely, but it's the amazing camera works and the beautifully interwoven story that gives Spider-Man 3 it's infallible greatness.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

2

JoanG.May 5, 2007

Dreadful. Characters, plotlines, and completely different tones are mashed together incoherently. My audience laughed at parts that were supposed to be heartfelt, and squirmed at what was supposed to be funny. And I loved the first two Dreadful. Characters, plotlines, and completely different tones are mashed together incoherently. My audience laughed at parts that were supposed to be heartfelt, and squirmed at what was supposed to be funny. And I loved the first two movies. How did Sam Rami go so wrong?… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

777May 5, 2007

The basic story line was good and the action was just outstanding but there was so many dumb sceens they should be ashamed.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

2

TaylorP.May 5, 2007

Quite possibly one of the worst movies of the year- and I enjoyed the first two (more the first one). I simply thought that this film is a product of too much money, and too much greed for more money. The characters are shallow, especially Quite possibly one of the worst movies of the year- and I enjoyed the first two (more the first one). I simply thought that this film is a product of too much money, and too much greed for more money. The characters are shallow, especially in my mind Flint Marko one who is characterized as relatively bad throughout the film only to drastically change in the last ten minutes of the film with no warning. In addition to this some of the "dramatic" fight scenes were simply laughable. Overall very disappointing movie, and yes, I would like my money back.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

MooMay 5, 2007

The worst superhero movie I have seen so far. Even ELEKTRA and the 1st FF movie was better than this one. Stupid dialogue (nearly as crap as in STAR WARS), lame actors (or rather flat characters), too exaggerated fighting scences, boring The worst superhero movie I have seen so far. Even ELEKTRA and the 1st FF movie was better than this one. Stupid dialogue (nearly as crap as in STAR WARS), lame actors (or rather flat characters), too exaggerated fighting scences, boring script (Uncle Ben RIP!?).The only things I liked were the supporting actors like Bruce Campbell and the very aesthetic "birth sequence" of Sandman.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

BenjaminB.May 5, 2007

The problem with this movie are that there are too many unneccessary scenes. do you want to see how MJ and Harry are cooking, do you want to see how peter is dancing to express his evil character traits, or do you want to see how he tries toThe problem with this movie are that there are too many unneccessary scenes. do you want to see how MJ and Harry are cooking, do you want to see how peter is dancing to express his evil character traits, or do you want to see how he tries to be a macho? I don't want. Maybe they were ment to be ironic, but they were too normal to be ironic and too stupid to be normal. the other movies had no ironie in it, so no one in the cinema got that it was (maybe) ment to be ironic. without these stupid scenes and a little bit more fighting-action I would give it a 10.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

SteveB.May 5, 2007

After the mansion fight scene between Peter and Harry I hoped it would be more like Burton's Batman instead of Schumacher's Batman. Regardless, it was a fair movie overall. I think that they had a chance to make it a better, After the mansion fight scene between Peter and Harry I hoped it would be more like Burton's Batman instead of Schumacher's Batman. Regardless, it was a fair movie overall. I think that they had a chance to make it a better, grittier film, but with $300 million and change at risk they took the safer route.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

BigRedMay 5, 2007

Who would have thought that I would actually want to leave a Spider-Man movie?

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

LewisB.May 5, 2007

Spider-Man 3 is the Lawrence Of Arabia of the superhero movies world. It is epic, sprawling, magnificent, meaningful, beautiful. Anyone who doesn't enjoy this movie must be a pretty spoilt brat or a cynical old misery. For near on three Spider-Man 3 is the Lawrence Of Arabia of the superhero movies world. It is epic, sprawling, magnificent, meaningful, beautiful. Anyone who doesn't enjoy this movie must be a pretty spoilt brat or a cynical old misery. For near on three hours it envelops you in its world and makes you CARE about the characters. How's that for a special effects laden blockbuster, a movie with characters that matter? The comedy works, the emotion works, the action works. Everything Raimi tries comes off. The set pieces are particularly astounding, ranging from an out of control crane to Spidey's numerous battles with the meaty villains on show. Like others, I think this is by far the best of the three (though I loved the first two as well). It's a modern-day classic, an enrapturing fantasy that exhibits all that's best in modern movie making. An experience not to be missed.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

TedB.May 5, 2007

This film was decent. I liked it. It wasn't too bad, it had tidbits of good humor, as well as a good cast, and action. All around good, enjoyable film.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

JohnnyP.May 5, 2007

A damn good film that exceeded my expectations. Reading from the reviews, I didn't expect much, but hey, it was well worth my time, and I say it's worth more than one viewing.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

PeterRollingO.May 5, 2007

In my opinion, the 2nd Spiderman was one of the best superhero movies ever made. It had the perfect balance of character development and action, and flowed smoothly. Because of that lasting impression, I went into the 3rd one with extremely In my opinion, the 2nd Spiderman was one of the best superhero movies ever made. It had the perfect balance of character development and action, and flowed smoothly. Because of that lasting impression, I went into the 3rd one with extremely high expectations - and therein lies the problem. If you took this movie by itself, and you had never seen the first two, you might think this was an incredible flick. And it is... when you compare it to most other comic-based films. But, rather annoyingly, there is a tendency to compare entries of a franchise with each other. In terms of what could have been better about it, it's not that the film is too long (I love long movies, like Lord of the Rings and Braveheart); it's that, in the time allotted, so much is being crammed that you kind of want the filmmakers to do one of two things: (1) either make this into two separate movies, or (2) make it 3 hours long and smooth out the rough edges. It seemed that a lot was left on the cutting room floor in an attempt to keep this under 3 hours. I told the guy sitting next to me that I could have sat another 30 minutes, because the best thing about this series is that the characters are so likeable. Sure, some scenes were dragged out a bit too long (e.g. when Parker has a 'bad'-itude and is strutting his stuff), but that really didn't bother me, because those scenes were funny (this is by far the funniest of the 3 movies). Like I said, it just seemed like the editor got a little "scissors-happy" and, as a result, the film seems choppy at times. Again, this could have been made into 2 phenomenal films or been turned into a "Return of the King-ish" guilty pleasure. Regardless, it was worth my money and I would like to see it again, just to determine if my opinion about it changes after a second helping. A masterpiece it is not, but it does make for a decent superhero movie, and I hope the 4th one gets made.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

PerroD.May 5, 2007

I thought the movie was great. If you go in expecting it to be as great as the first sequel then you might be a bit dissapointed. there are some solid performances from the cast especially from Thomas Haydn Church as Marko Flint and from I thought the movie was great. If you go in expecting it to be as great as the first sequel then you might be a bit dissapointed. there are some solid performances from the cast especially from Thomas Haydn Church as Marko Flint and from James Franco as Harry Osborn/The New Goblin. this one is also alot funnier than the other two movies with peter parker taking on a much more emo/goofy persona at about halfway through the movie. the effects were better this time around and even provided for a few jumps out of my seat. my only beef with this installment is that the ending was kind of awkward and somber and left much to be desired. but besides that the movie was fantastic and will probably be the best movie of the season.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

LukeA.May 5, 2007

This is far from perfect, but it still is a fun and exciting installment into the spider-man franchise. It has plenty of action, laughs as well as serious moments. Its campy and cheesy at times but thats because its a comic book movie. Go in This is far from perfect, but it still is a fun and exciting installment into the spider-man franchise. It has plenty of action, laughs as well as serious moments. Its campy and cheesy at times but thats because its a comic book movie. Go in wanting to have fun and not to critique every little detail.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

GeoffP.May 5, 2007

Cheesy plot and dialogue aside, the acting was very good, the humor was decent, and overall good enough action to keep me entertained.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

[Anonymous]May 5, 2007

The goo also sticks to Peter, but scale back on your expectations for a dark side. If you want to see a truly malevolent Maguire grab the DVD of The Good German in which he forces Cate Blanchett into rough anal sex and then punches her out.The goo also sticks to Peter, but scale back on your expectations for a dark side. If you want to see a truly malevolent Maguire grab the DVD of The Good German in which he forces Cate Blanchett into rough anal sex and then punches her out. The worst the goo does to Peter is turn him into a finger-snapping hipster recalling the Buddy Love character in The Nutty Professor (both the Jerry Lewis and Eddie Murphy versions). But Raimi knows we'll never buy Peter as a dick. So he uses the scene for comic effect -- babes laugh at his cool act -- and in the process liberates Maguire from the goody-goody goo that Peter wears like a second skin. The worst thing Peter does is use Gwen to make MJ jealous. And in a typical Raimi touch, the director finds time to show Gwen apologize to MJ for letting herself be a pawn in a man's game.

Spider-Man 3 is full of Raimi nuances. But the attack dogs are out in force. They see the film's budget (a reported $250 million) and the huge box-office take of the first two installments ($1.6 billion) as evidence that the filmmakers are in it for the money. Now there's a shock. Internet wags point out that Raimi, from a conservative Michigan family of Polish Jews, contributed $900 to Dubya's reelection campaign in 2004. What's next? Did Raimi phone in votes for Sanjaya? The third chapter in the Spidey saga (a fourth is in the planning stages) is uneven, ungainly and frayed at the edges but there's lively mischief in it still. My guess is that when the summer blockbuster season finishes pummeling us with formula, Spider-Man 3 is going to look like one of the few that was touched by human hands.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful

10

JimboH.May 5, 2007

Top flight action, good all around characters and plot.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

AnsonG.May 5, 2007

This movie lost all the fun and interest about it.That's how they're ending the Spider-Man series? The acting is poor. The writing is predictable and cheesy. The action, which the Spider-Man series has been so good at portraying, This movie lost all the fun and interest about it.That's how they're ending the Spider-Man series? The acting is poor. The writing is predictable and cheesy. The action, which the Spider-Man series has been so good at portraying, was jumpy and short-lived. I couldn't believe that the plot had to go in so many directions. It was a bit hard to follow at times and did not lend itself to character development. Although the same writers and directors were employed for this installment, it seemed like they were grasping at air. Take everything that you liked from the previous movies and make it completely over-done. They should have stuck to a single villain because there is not a lot of development of the Sandman character. It also suffers from the success and critical acclaim of the first two movies in that the movie tries to include every good thing but fails miserably in the amalgamation. The previews make it look great and totally appealing but you can really show an extremely lacking plot in a 30 second TV spot. Yes it will make a boatload of money but that can't overrule how utterly disappointing this first summer blockbuster is.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

PatrickMay 5, 2007

Awful movie from start to finish. It included every horrible movie cliche, and was far more chick flick than action film. The special effects were completely overdone and added nothing to terrible acting, dialogue, plot, etc. DO NOT SEE.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

RonJ.May 5, 2007

Clever and unconvential, this sort of film applies to independent film students, college kids, but not your average elderly crowd or for the entire family. Still it provides raucous laughter, and despite this division, it is necessary Clever and unconvential, this sort of film applies to independent film students, college kids, but not your average elderly crowd or for the entire family. Still it provides raucous laughter, and despite this division, it is necessary because even though it creates controversy, it is needed to show that everyday people are not one-dimensional people, and that not everything is so cut-and-dry. Their message hits this home, and this is why this film is so powerful.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

ChrisA.May 5, 2007

Powerfully gripping, and touching film, and Harry Osborn was actually good in this film. Too bad the Eddie Brock character seemed inconsistent, and the plot seemed rushed. Haydn Church was great in the bit role as the down on his luck, the Powerfully gripping, and touching film, and Harry Osborn was actually good in this film. Too bad the Eddie Brock character seemed inconsistent, and the plot seemed rushed. Haydn Church was great in the bit role as the down on his luck, the good-hearted but criminally Sandman, and this film was awesome. Good storyline, and buddy buddy film.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

PabloE.May 5, 2007

Sandman was a brilliant and worthy character in the Spiderman movies, but all of the supervillains got shortchanged by being crammed in the allotted time slot. Still, all of them showed a human side that shows us that we as human beings can Sandman was a brilliant and worthy character in the Spiderman movies, but all of the supervillains got shortchanged by being crammed in the allotted time slot. Still, all of them showed a human side that shows us that we as human beings can choose to be good or evil, to repent, and to do good things in our daily lives.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

AMovieCriticYoMay 5, 2007

Riveting, touching, brilliant. This divisiveness is what spurs on greatness. Every great underrated action cannot go without being in question. The film delivered on its promise. It brings humanity into its superheroes, and delivers with its Riveting, touching, brilliant. This divisiveness is what spurs on greatness. Every great underrated action cannot go without being in question. The film delivered on its promise. It brings humanity into its superheroes, and delivers with its comedic and dramatic potential and fulfills it. It is like Arrested Development meets Superman 2. An overall superb film. Also, Harry Osborn finally gets to show that he is a likeable character, and not whiny, and his part in the movie was incredible as a homicidal maniac-on and off again crazy best friend, who becomes an amnesiac, fights, and later, grows a conscience. The Green Goblin cooks, and paints. This is hillarious. Also, Venom was a dousche, but a convincing one at that. Lay off, haters.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

EddieB.May 5, 2007

The best comedic/action flick according to date, in the year of 2007. The theme of humanity and forgiveness is beautiful. Learn to love and stop hating from within.

0 of 1 users found this helpful

2

JustinS.May 5, 2007

A few good action sequences can't make up for the woeful and overstuffed plot.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

NathanC.May 5, 2007

A very interesting movie. This movie kept me on my toes, was touching, and was hillarious. From a film critic's point of view, it was okay. But the fact that it kept me roaring, laughing throughout, as well as showing its gripping A very interesting movie. This movie kept me on my toes, was touching, and was hillarious. From a film critic's point of view, it was okay. But the fact that it kept me roaring, laughing throughout, as well as showing its gripping poignancy shows that it is a brilliant underrated film of the DECADE!!! Also, Tobey Maguire was brilliant when he started to go bad, because it shows that people should take on moral responsibility and shouldn't hold grudges.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful

2

DavidR.May 5, 2007

I was generous with this high of a rating. The movie was awful!! I went to see an action film not a stupid comedy. Putting a huge american flag behind spider man is ridiculous!! Venom is a beast in the comics but he is merely a witty Topher I was generous with this high of a rating. The movie was awful!! I went to see an action film not a stupid comedy. Putting a huge american flag behind spider man is ridiculous!! Venom is a beast in the comics but he is merely a witty Topher Grace in this one. DO NOT see this movie if you like the first 2. Like X-Men they ruined the whole serious in one shot.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

JmonMay 4, 2007

Cheesy and riddled with plot holes, but not as bad as the "red" reviews make it out to be. Granted I'm not a devoted spiderman fan (this applies to the comics as well as the first two movies), and expected at best a corny but Cheesy and riddled with plot holes, but not as bad as the "red" reviews make it out to be. Granted I'm not a devoted spiderman fan (this applies to the comics as well as the first two movies), and expected at best a corny but diversionary Hollywood CGI fest. There are a number of genuinely funny scenes (the parade and Venom Toby come to mind) and the plot moves fast enough that it is difficult to become too bored or to dwell on the illogical plot and overrall triteness. This quick pace is also the movie's main failing, as, has been stated, there is simply too much crammed into the film, making it kindof a grabbag of two dimensional sublots- sandman, for instance, was unneeded and detracted from the more interestin venom and harry plots. however, the film (credit toby and kirsten in particular) maintains the overrall charm and breeziness of the first two installments and, despite its cliche moralizing, avoids the insensitivies and meanspiritedness of most movies of its ilk.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

BrianA.May 4, 2007

A real mess of a film, at least compared to the first two movies. I think things started going downhill towards the tail end of the second movie, and here, we see the Spider-Man franchise nose dive. The story is clunky and boring (episodes A real mess of a film, at least compared to the first two movies. I think things started going downhill towards the tail end of the second movie, and here, we see the Spider-Man franchise nose dive. The story is clunky and boring (episodes of "Days of Their Lives" have more interesting story arcs), and even the action sequences aren't that amazing. And as Parker turns into the black Spider-Man, the movie almost turns into some sort of strange slapstick. Really should be a disappointment to anyone - and a huge disappointment to franchise fans.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

ShabbirK.May 4, 2007

As a Spiderman fan and a look at trailers coming out of Sony, my expectations were crushed. The movie should have been called "Spidy, Goblin and MJ love story". A truly disapointing experince, the worst was the audience broke in to As a Spiderman fan and a look at trailers coming out of Sony, my expectations were crushed. The movie should have been called "Spidy, Goblin and MJ love story". A truly disapointing experince, the worst was the audience broke in to conversation often during the film, that show film failing to involve them.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

NormaS.May 4, 2007

Boring, Boring, Boring. I thought it would never end. The story was weak, the filming was awful and the special effects were amateur. In addition to this I had to sit there for over 2 hours. The only thing that saved this movie is that it Boring, Boring, Boring. I thought it would never end. The story was weak, the filming was awful and the special effects were amateur. In addition to this I had to sit there for over 2 hours. The only thing that saved this movie is that it appealed to my 10 year old son, though he despised the kissing scenes.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

1

RonP.May 4, 2007

One of the worst films I have seen. Truly awful in literally every respect. If one more actor cried onscreen, I would have vomited on the row in front of me. Too convoluted, too unintentionally funny. I can't believe I won't get One of the worst films I have seen. Truly awful in literally every respect. If one more actor cried onscreen, I would have vomited on the row in front of me. Too convoluted, too unintentionally funny. I can't believe I won't get these 2.5 hours back. I can't even get my money back. I adored the first two films, but Raimi became too self-indulgent. Avoid at all costs, and make up a resolution for yourself in your head. I guarantee it'll be better than this Hollywood tripe.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

2

DoubtingThomasMay 4, 2007

Completely disappointing. The only good parts are the ones that are unintentionally funny. Cliche-o-rama script, canned dialogue, contrived plot twists. Wouldn't have even been good as a comic book. Any action fantasy film starts out Completely disappointing. The only good parts are the ones that are unintentionally funny. Cliche-o-rama script, canned dialogue, contrived plot twists. Wouldn't have even been good as a comic book. Any action fantasy film starts out with a character as Broadway chanteuse - you know it's all downhill from there. Save the $10, and watch #1 or #2 again.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

MitchK.May 4, 2007

[ ***SPOILERS***] If this movie was 1 and a half hours shorter with a new ending, less dialogue and struting/jazz dancing, it would have been great. Sandman's new, yet conceivable, backstory was a good addition to the film and somewhat[ ***SPOILERS***] If this movie was 1 and a half hours shorter with a new ending, less dialogue and struting/jazz dancing, it would have been great. Sandman's new, yet conceivable, backstory was a good addition to the film and somewhat faithful to the comics. Venom, however, was a little less faithful, although the church scene was very good. And Harry's death sequence was actually pretty decent and, although it was under different circumstances, Raimi made it faithful to Lee's comics. As usual, Rosemary Harris is amazing as Parker's aunt and makes this ride a little less rocky. She and the incredible action sequences (what few of them there were) saved this movie from being a total abomination. No, what really made this movie bad was Spiderman himself, Tobey Maguire. The things Raimi made the dark, cocky Spiderman do were completely over-the-top. Just brutal! That jazz dancing scene in front of Mary-Jane was God awful. That and the dancing down the street that kept getting worse by the minute. That and the huge cliches at the end that totally ruined it made this one hard to watch all the way through. So, this is my suggestion: Keep the Sandman story, keep the battles between Harry and Peter, get rid of those damn French waitors and Pete's crazy attitude and the jazz dancing and make this a movie really worth watching. Sam Raimi's better than this, Spiderman 2 was awesome with Doc Oc! This one though, jeez. I say this as an average guy going to see an action flick: BRING YOUR GIRLFRIEND!!!! The 3-hour make-out session will be a hell of alot better than Spidey walking down the street giving the guns to the ladies. Seriously, lower your expectations before going in. There are some great effects and action sequences, but overall, I'd wait for the DVD.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

AnnW.May 4, 2007

A very boring movie. The thin characters were totally overwhelmed by the desperately clever, but uninspiring special effects.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

KenC.May 4, 2007

Playstation 2 is to Playstation 3 as Spider-Man 2 is to Spider-Man 3: highly anticipated, completely overdone, and definitely disappointing.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

1

BenS.May 4, 2007

A train wreck of a film. The super-generic misunderstanding that leads to a rift between Peter and MJ seems like something out of the worst episode of the worst soap opera ever. The overdone action scenes made up less than 10% of the film, A train wreck of a film. The super-generic misunderstanding that leads to a rift between Peter and MJ seems like something out of the worst episode of the worst soap opera ever. The overdone action scenes made up less than 10% of the film, and were terribly paced. The only thing that held me from walking out was the in-theater response. I normally burn with rage when people even whisper in a theater, but my theater seemed like one of the better episodes of Mystery Science Theater 3000. I laughed harder at this movie than I do for most comedies. Dialog wise, this movie should go down in history next to Plan Nine From Outer Space. I wouldn't recommend this movie to my worst enemy.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

TomG.May 4, 2007

This movie was basically all hype. The fight scenes were played very well, but the dialouge was horrible. Toby cant stop smiling can he? Even when he's crying. I really do not recommend this movie.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

IamnotacriticMay 4, 2007

I loved this movie more than any other spider-man movie or maybe even any other comic book movie or maybe even my children. kthx go see it i like spider-man.

0 of 2 users found this helpful

0

EnriqueMay 4, 2007

A big, resounding bomb!

0 of 4 users found this helpful

6

PaulT.May 4, 2007

A bit too long and I would of prefered a more good vs evil movie, with at least one bad guy from start to finish. But still nice to look at and a laugh at times.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

AndyS.May 4, 2007

I wanted it to be good. I almost willed it to be good. Alas, it was not good and, sadly, It wasn't even mediocre. The pacing was off, the dialog was off, the humor was off, and even the CGI just didn't seem that interesting. Even I wanted it to be good. I almost willed it to be good. Alas, it was not good and, sadly, It wasn't even mediocre. The pacing was off, the dialog was off, the humor was off, and even the CGI just didn't seem that interesting. Even the best CGI can't save a bad script. Slight of hand is generally more appreciated than a slap in the face; I had red cheeks by the time the credits rolled. Am I naive to hope for a better Spider-man than part 2?… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

2

GregB.May 4, 2007

This movie has "Blockbuster" written all over it, but in this case that is a BAD thing. What I mean is that this was certainly CALCULATED to be a mega-blockbuster, and it looks like all anybody cared about was making a lot of money. I used This movie has "Blockbuster" written all over it, but in this case that is a BAD thing. What I mean is that this was certainly CALCULATED to be a mega-blockbuster, and it looks like all anybody cared about was making a lot of money. I used to be a big Marvel comicbook fan. I am giddy with joy on the all-to-rare occasions when they get a super-hero movie right. The 1st 2 Superman's did it, the X-Men's got it very right, but there has been precious little besides those. I didn't care much for the 1st Spiderman. I appreciated that it was trying to be character driven, but a lot of the plot points used a bludgeon instead of a scalpal. So I didn't expect much from a continued series. But amazingly Spiderman 2 was a lot of fun. Alfred Molina really elevated the film as Doc Oc and there were other good things. But Spidey 3 was mostly painful to watch. I'd already read a lot of mixed reviews and I expected there would be problems, but I just wanted something that would be at least mildly fun. Some of the action MIGHT have been fun, in an otherwise decent film. But I was cringing at too many other factors. I WANTED very badly to find the redeeming qualities of this movie, but it was a useless hope. I am really baffled at all of the positive reviews. I really makes me question a lot of the sophmoric values that seem to be more and more prevalent in the society. It seems that people are losing track of what good film is about. On the other side it seems that lately there's been a lot of Nic Cage bashing in films that may not have been classics but that I found entertaining. National Treasure was a prime example of that. Sure, it wasn't the DaVinci Code (the book) but neither was the film version of that. And I found Nic Cage's new action sci-fi flick to be good fun. Those who didn't love the comics, please understand, if there are any good ideas in Spidey 3 they are Marvel's NOT Sam Raimi's. This film is just calculated to take in a lot of money. And for a time it may just succeed. When critics pick their worst films of the year they rarely really choose the absolute trash. They usually choose the films that had a lot of hype and were supposed to be major box office draws. In other words, the films that disappointed heightened expectations the most. Within that criteria, I would have the say that Spidey 3 is one of the worst movies of the year.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

JosephO.May 4, 2007

The people who don't understand the brooding apparently didn't understand the mechanics of the material that came from the meteorite. It ENHANCES emotions/powers, so when he is in the black suit, ALL of his emotions are enhanced...

0 of 0 users found this helpful

1

MattD.May 4, 2007

Long, dull, boring, full of cliches. CGI was great, but not near worth it. Do NOT recommend.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

SeanP.May 4, 2007

Blew me away, into the screen! Wow a heart catcher.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

CaptainmarvelMay 4, 2007

Film students all over earth, go see this film to learn how to mess up an otherwise good film, ten minutes before it all ends. sam raimi, who seems to have absoulte control of everything somehow looses focus towards the end, making all theFilm students all over earth, go see this film to learn how to mess up an otherwise good film, ten minutes before it all ends. sam raimi, who seems to have absoulte control of everything somehow looses focus towards the end, making all the vilians kind of apologise to spidey and spidey forgiving and crying while doing so...who is going to apologise to us? for believing this movie and paying the ticket price? how are we suppose to leave the theater wanting to be a superhero and humming the tune when at the end, they make spidey seem like a girly man? they didnt even have a hardcore spidey tune when the credits started to roll at the end...oh what a crime this is!...it started so well...but ended in a manner even a superhero cant save.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

LeeF.May 4, 2007

Mediocre and not enough payoff for sitting through the boring stuff.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

JamesR.May 4, 2007

Who the HELL cast TOBEY MCGUIRE AS VENOM?! O and the movie was definetely inferior to the first 2 films... The dancing cafe scene felt like spiderman turned into the mask... he was one step away from saying that "SMOKIN!" line...

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

ScottW.May 4, 2007

Just as good as the others. It could of been the best though.They just mix up the plots to much.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

A.StuartMay 4, 2007

This just wasn't good. It seemed like Raimi took numerous short films centered around Spiderman and decided to mash them together. Because he tried to squeeze everything into one movie, Raimi wasn't able to focus enough on a This just wasn't good. It seemed like Raimi took numerous short films centered around Spiderman and decided to mash them together. Because he tried to squeeze everything into one movie, Raimi wasn't able to focus enough on a coherent story or any character development. There wasn't even enough room for the good old web slinging through the streets of New York. For such a long movie, nothing was accomplished.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

SpidermanMay 4, 2007

is awesome ... hey is a movie fantasy, is not for the oscar is for take a break...

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

MartinL.May 4, 2007

M. Lee--What are you talking about? Spiderman 2 was infinitely better than 1. And why do you think people even care about the first 2 films? It is simply because of the character development, not the boring CGI crap/action that can be seen M. Lee--What are you talking about? Spiderman 2 was infinitely better than 1. And why do you think people even care about the first 2 films? It is simply because of the character development, not the boring CGI crap/action that can be seen in Power Rangers. Please, you sound like an idiot. This film was awful and unoriginal.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

FilmFellaMay 4, 2007

Though the movie is a bit long and a bit slow at times, this will easily be one of the best movies of the summer and most fun movies of the year. Smarter and Funnier than the previous movies help 3 find its niche in the Marvel Hall of Heros.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

CarsonK.May 4, 2007

I thought that the effects were amazing and the villains were tremendous. When everything is sort of o.k. and mellow for Peter the story is a little less interesting, but this is still my favorite spiderman movie.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

GregD.May 4, 2007

A huge disappointment. Some parts were extremely corny, at that is extremely disheartenly as the first two were wonderful films.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

Spider-Man 3

User Reviews