Universal Pictures | Release Date: July 21, 2023
8.8
USER SCORE
Universal acclaim based on 1140 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
1,037
Mixed:
49
Negative:
54
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
9
s33c33Aug 9, 2023
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. A breath of fresh air from all the "typical" Hollywood films lately. Finally a movie that is intellectually satisfying for the year. The political drama also got me annoyed though is a sad reality until now. There is always a sad side of humanity despite the constant push for innovation. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
kevinCHONAug 8, 2023
this film surpassed my expectations. everything from the setting, the soundtrack to the surreal moments inside the head of oppenheimer. excellent character study that leaves you thinking for days about it
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
10
naruto1986Aug 8, 2023
Make u think about nuclear problems around the world and what if this happens today
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
9
HeaviermetalAug 8, 2023
I didn't fall asleep! 10/10 Your review must be at least 75 characters long.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
The_GeekyAug 8, 2023
Oppenheimer proves that it's not always necessary to use VFX or CGI elements to make a film perfect. That's the reason why it marks as a great film with great cinematography, and practical effects, the performance of Cillian Murphy and RobertOppenheimer proves that it's not always necessary to use VFX or CGI elements to make a film perfect. That's the reason why it marks as a great film with great cinematography, and practical effects, the performance of Cillian Murphy and Robert Downey Jr. was impeccable and perfect. Shout out to the makeup team for the effort which sparks a gleam into the film. I mean the film is not for everyone and specifically, who doesn't know what cinema is? I highly advise those people to not watch the film who do not like dialogue-heavy films. At the end only word for the film 'Superb'! Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
10
MarvelJoeAug 8, 2023
Oppenheimer, the title of the movie is called Oppenheimer. Not the "Manhattan Project", not the "Atomic Bomb", not "The Bombing of Hiroshima & Nagasaki", just Oppenheimer. It's about the life of a theorical physician who became the mostOppenheimer, the title of the movie is called Oppenheimer. Not the "Manhattan Project", not the "Atomic Bomb", not "The Bombing of Hiroshima & Nagasaki", just Oppenheimer. It's about the life of a theorical physician who became the most important man in the world and his downfall in his point of view. If you were going into this movie expecting just to be about the creation of the atomic bomb or see the destruction of Japan, then you're setting yourself up to be disappointed.

Although the creation of the bomb maybe the standing climax of this film, there are other purposes that has an important role: Oppenheimer's communist views, the Manhattan Project, security clearance hearing. We also get to see Lewis Strauss point of view of Oppenheimer and the trail as well. This movie is a biopic character study movie work so well in every way. The acting was phenomenal from all cast members, including Cillian Murphy and Robert Downey Jr. The pacing and editing were great, the music score was gripping, suspenseful, and well done. The sound has always been Nolan's criticism since The Dark Knight Rises, but it much better here in this movie despite being loud in IMAX.

The movie is treated like a documentary and its bit non-linear which I think some people would find boring considering it's a 3-hour movie of just people talking. I'll say knowing Nolan's style of filmmaking and it's a historical movie, it raises my expectations knowing where it was going. It's even better watching it on second viewing to look back what you miss during the first screening. I think this movie would've been received better for everybody if they didn't have issues with their attention span. Not all movies are meant to be entertaining but find some core of interested of something new we all been craving for. In the world where most summer blockbusters are CGI-fest, action packed, corny writing, this was actually refreshing.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
AcidCasualAug 8, 2023
It's ridiculous to critique the art direction, cinematography or the choice of actors at this point, because Nolan and his peers have that all locked in. There's something that still amazes me about the minimalism that fills all aspects ofIt's ridiculous to critique the art direction, cinematography or the choice of actors at this point, because Nolan and his peers have that all locked in. There's something that still amazes me about the minimalism that fills all aspects of his productions, like how the sets are never bloated, how the characters are understated, from set design, to makeup and wardrobe.

So many directors want you to know it's 1945 or 1980 so damn hard, in all shots. Nolan doesn't do that, and in turn, you forget it and start living in the moment, which is whatever he says it is.

My problem with Oppenheimer was that it was the first Nolan film that had taken the interesting narrative elements from his other films in a really obvious way. Like the parallel black and white scenes like in Momento. Actors who were like chariciture's of real people, like in his Batman films, and it actually took away the authenticity of the story itself. It seemed like it was almost done to reign the film in and make it more approachable, but in return, took something away.

It just didn't seem grounded as all his other films were... in that sense.

The acting was just phenomenal, Emily Blunt, what an amazing role, everything that came out of her mouth was convincing. Overall, couldn't fault it and even with the actors that only had little roles. They all were authentic.

Except for Florence Pugh, out of all the characters, her's didn't feel relatable, and if anything, not real at all. Like Cobb's wife Mal, in Inception.
Expand
0 of 4 users found this helpful04
All this user's reviews
9
MasterMind5Aug 8, 2023
Oppenheimer was one of the greatest movies I have ever seen. Now to some, this may be a hard movie to understand because it explores history, chemistry, physics but this is why it is incredible.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
8
MachineHeadAug 7, 2023
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. i saw this movie in imax and in 2d but there was not a big difference.you just get better graphics and that's it.this movie was overhyped.it is a regular cristophar nolan movie.its more like a court drama or documentary.but the background score and music is insane. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
VertaAug 7, 2023
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. For starters, this movie is an incredible mix of real life and fiction. The way this movie is real life events and fiction all in the same bag is awesome. The bomb scene. The panic atacks the main character has it's just incredible. The whole movie is incredible. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
JoaoRodarteAug 7, 2023
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Absolut masterpiece. Directing, writting and acting comming toguether beautifully. Would argue that this may be the best film of this season. A quick tip: I tought the film got better if you whatch it before with a comprehensive understanding of Oppenheimer story, so for this one, a couple of spoilers may actually improve your experience. Veritasseum has a great video on Oppenheimer that serves as a great prep for Nolan's movie. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
IsteffyAug 7, 2023
An excellent retelling of Oppenheimer's journey to making the atomic bomb and everything that happened because of it. Strap yourselves in, because this ride is 3 hours long and has no action scenes like you might be used to from Nolan films.An excellent retelling of Oppenheimer's journey to making the atomic bomb and everything that happened because of it. Strap yourselves in, because this ride is 3 hours long and has no action scenes like you might be used to from Nolan films. That being said, Nolan does it again!

This movie is a visual, audio, and acting masterpiece, and lives up to any hope that a true Nolan fan has. More so, it gives the audience a deep dive into the morality of the atomic bomb. Was the atomic bomb a terrible idea, or did it save the world from any future wars? This film aims to answer that.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
judahjsnAug 4, 2023
I felt exhausted by it when it was done. It was like a 3 hour movie trailer. Cut to within an inch of its life and scrambled out of sequence. It frustrated me by the end but it’s also the movie that convinced me that Nolan is capable ofI felt exhausted by it when it was done. It was like a 3 hour movie trailer. Cut to within an inch of its life and scrambled out of sequence. It frustrated me by the end but it’s also the movie that convinced me that Nolan is capable of mastery and not just spectacle. The cinematography, script, acting, music: all stunning.

I’ve loved Nolan’s films with huge reservations for years. His major vice, in my opinion, is that he’s deeply insecure about his stories being interesting or intelligent enough on their own merits. So he chops them up into confusing chronologies and buries the dialogue behind a wall of sound design and music so that you’re figuratively leaning forward in your seat just trying to comprehend the most basic elements of the story and script. It feels like you’re interested but really you’re just confused. It’s kind of a sleight of hand on the part of the director.

After being irked by these tendencies in Inception and Interstellar and fully annoyed by them in Dunkirk, Tenet was the culmination of all of Nolan’s worst tendencies and I basically gave up on taking him seriously after that.

I’m happy to say that Oppenheimer rights many of these wrongs. There is no punishing Wagnerian score from Hanz Zimmer. Instead it’s thoughtfully and often minimally scored with whole chunks of blessed quiet. Finally! I understood 90 percent of the dialogue in this movie, even though it was often happening too fast to process. Unfortunately it’s yet another Nolan film told in a spaghetti of chronology. This was so unnecessary. This story, played by this cast, with that dialogue would have been riveting in basic chronological order. It’s also just way too long. As good as RDJ is in the part, his storyline hijacks the film and turns it into some showdown between an embittered man and a scientist, instead of what the film starts out as: a meditation on a complicated genius whose paradoxes may be hypocrisies. Had the film been shorter and with more space in it, you could have had more time to luxuriate in the ambiguity. I’m glad I saw it on a big screen. It was really beautiful. I loved all the abstract micro photography they cut in. Since Nolan has asked us to consider Oppenheimer’s hypocrisies and short sightedness (“How can someone who sees so much be so blind?”), I’m going to call him out on a bit of what I see as b.s. Nolan has come out as the patron saint for seeing films in theaters on the big, silver screen. This is now part of his brand. My hot take is that Nolan makes films that can’t be experienced or even understood properly in a single viewing. He makes films that are designed to be rewatched multiple times at home before they are comprehendible. He makes movies for the DVD, director's commentary generation. Movies that sometimes need reddit and reviews and comments sections to translate. As opposed to films which offer a complete experience in a single sitting. I think he is working at odds with his stated goals. I hope Nolan makes a movie this good where he gives up on needless complexity and recognizes the power of quiet and space. And that he finally makes another film like Memento or The Prestige which offers a complete experience on first viewing.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
eliracAug 6, 2023
Oppenheimer is the kind of movie that transports you into another dimension.

The extraordinary narrative and incredible actors will make you forgive that movie's length of 3 hours. I strongly recommend this movie because, beyond its
Oppenheimer is the kind of movie that transports you into another dimension.

The extraordinary narrative and incredible actors will make you forgive that movie's length of 3 hours.

I strongly recommend this movie because, beyond its extraordinary narrative, it gives you new culture and information that you probably don't know and can motivate you to investigate more about the historical events that change the world.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
jacabamba7Aug 6, 2023
One of the best movies of 2023 and possibly the best of the year. The script is incredible, the non-linear narration, the photography, the performances of Cillian Murphy and Robert Downey Jr where a Marvel actor is more than that, plus aOne of the best movies of 2023 and possibly the best of the year. The script is incredible, the non-linear narration, the photography, the performances of Cillian Murphy and Robert Downey Jr where a Marvel actor is more than that, plus a story that catches you, that generates intrigue and desire to know how it culminates.
For me the best of Christopher Nolan's filmography and the best of the year 2023
Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
10
AllenGambleAug 6, 2023
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Great pacing and score. Captivating movie with some great performances across the board Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
7
Geralt123Aug 6, 2023
If you like watching movies where serious looking men wearing suits and hats discuss super important problems in offices behind closed doors and the sun shines through the half closed blinds, this is the movie for you.

While technically very
If you like watching movies where serious looking men wearing suits and hats discuss super important problems in offices behind closed doors and the sun shines through the half closed blinds, this is the movie for you.

While technically very good, I found the movie a little boring. The bomb related scenes were interesting, but all the political stuff (like 90% of the movie) felt very dry and stretched out.

If you like movies like JFK full of intrigues and accusations, you will probably like this movie.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
FinnLukaAug 6, 2023
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I watched it today in an IMAX cinema. It was a very nice film with extremely good video and audio quality. I liked how the story was told, but sometimes it gets a little confusing because there are many different people participating in the story.

I really appreciate that it's a film where you take away something informative rather than just being for entertainment. My favorite scene was the ending, where Oppenheimer talked with Einstein. They weren't sure if the detonation of the atomic bomb would trigger a chain reaction, causing the entire atmosphere to burn and end all life on earth. According to their calculations, the probability of this event was almost zero, and their calculations turned out to be correct; it didn't happen. However, after the detonations in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Oppenheimer told Einstein that he thinks their calculations were wrong, and the development team had indeed created a chain reaction. This basically means that now everyone is trying to build a bigger bomb since the concept has proven its potential, which is a significant threat to human life.
Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
8
ProfAmateurAug 6, 2023
Very good movie with an educational story. The actors were amazing, they've played their characters very good. The last third was a bit lenghty. Also didn't like the given image of his 'contrahent' even if he had at least the same goodVery good movie with an educational story. The actors were amazing, they've played their characters very good. The last third was a bit lenghty. Also didn't like the given image of his 'contrahent' even if he had at least the same good arguments as the protagonist. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
ChiIIaoiAug 6, 2023
Review só pra lembrar a nota que eu dei pro filme:
filme mt bom, agora só escrever pra passar dos 75 caracteres.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
DemonguyAug 6, 2023
Good movie with known actors I recommend watching a couple time as there's alot to take in
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
10
BlueGuyTalksAug 5, 2023
Christopher Nolan seems to always be at his peak in cinematic storytelling, with Oppenheimer being no stranger to the idea. The way Nolan casts a lens over J. Robert Oppenheimer’s life gives the biopic a grand, powerful, and extravagantChristopher Nolan seems to always be at his peak in cinematic storytelling, with Oppenheimer being no stranger to the idea. The way Nolan casts a lens over J. Robert Oppenheimer’s life gives the biopic a grand, powerful, and extravagant perspective, justifiably making “the bomb” one of the biggest moments in cinema and world history.

FULL REVIEW HERE: https://benruehl18.wixsite.com/the-blue-critic/post/oppenheimer-2023
Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
10
Star_G19Aug 5, 2023
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This was a very powerful film, arguably one of the most important messages ever made for any movie. The film also had a very powerful anti-Nationalist scene later on in the bleachers after the test bomb was detonated, it could be viewed as a warning, against what the power of the Atomic bomb could have done to America. It isn't really a time to be gloating about the power we used, but rather the implications of the inevitable arms race that resulted.

The film was powerful because it presents events that occurred in history 'as is', but also looks to the future- with a grim warning. All too often we have forgotten the dangers of what the post WWII Cold War era brought to the world in today's world 2023, but the danger is as real and present as it ever was now, as it was then. And the movie does such a excellent job showcasing that danger with a powerful and everlasting message

The message and themes of Oppenheimer will stay with you long after the credits roll. It is a beautiful and dark film. But one for the ages. With a director that is better than 99% of the rest of what comes out of Hollywood, one of the last true great Hollywood Directors to make a movie about so important of a Historical character and event in history.

Go see this movie, it will be perhaps one of the most important ones you will have ever seen.
Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
10
RichieValeroAug 5, 2023
Segunda guerra mundial, el físico Julius Robert Oppenheimer (Cillian Murphy) dentro del Proyecto Manhattan, crea ensayos nucleares para construir la bomba para EEUU. Una vez ve creada reflexiona sobre su creación y desde entonces su vidaSegunda guerra mundial, el físico Julius Robert Oppenheimer (Cillian Murphy) dentro del Proyecto Manhattan, crea ensayos nucleares para construir la bomba para EEUU. Una vez ve creada reflexiona sobre su creación y desde entonces su vida dependerá del uso de armas nucleares. NUESTRO GALACTUS

Wow, quién iba a decir en aquella época, los 40, que ya tendríamos creado el arma más letal y destructora cómo ha sido la bomba atómica, creada por J. Robert Oppenheimer, un físico neoyorquino de 1904 de orígen judío. No sé cómo vivió esa experiencia el ser humano pero en la sala del cine la he vivido cómo si fuera real con los temblores de las butacas. Además de que me tocó reservarlas en la 2a fila. Con los pelos de punta hasta el final.

Christopher Nolan regresa a las pantallas después de Tenet para demostrar una vez más que puede hacer lo que quiera, contándonos en este caso la biografía de Oppie (Cillian Murphy) y el monstruo que creó con el Proyecto Manhattan, lanzado en Hiroshima y Nagasaki en nombre de Harry Truman (Gary Oldman, el James Gordon de El Caballero Oscuro, obras maestras de nuestro Nolan), 33o presidente de EEUU, que acabó con la guerra en 1945. TRES HORAS, PERO NOLAN HACE QUE NO QUIERA MIRAR EL RELOJ.

Sonará muy típico, pero es uno de mis directores favoritos hasta el momento, aunque aún me falta mucho director por descubrir, pero me hace sentir algo diferente a los demás, es tán perfeccionista con cada segundo de la trama. Sus historias me fascinan, crea de ellas una paradoja y las vuelve lo más intimista posible. Nos hace pensar, reflexionar. Tratar temas que en nuestro día a día no cobran vida. Le puede salir mejor o peor pero su huella no desaparece y le reconocemos.

No quiero estropear la película con mis palabras. Pero cada vez que la veo me emociono más. Nolan no solo nos trae una película histórica cuyo tiempo no abruma porque está perfectamente narrada. Es una reflexión de lo más profunda sobre la moralidad de la ciencia y la condición humana añadiendo una banda sonora excelente que te hace ver las mismas visiones que tiene Robert, son increíbles. Al salir del cine guardé instantáneamente la banda sonora en mi playlist. Y por si fuera poco, también tenemos el lujo de presenciar actuaciones merecedoras de Oscar y merecidas de Cillian (Oppenheimer) y Robert Downey JR (Lewis Strauss), sólo estos dos pueden protagonizar a estos grandes personajes que te obligan a adentrarte en ellos entendiendo todos sus puntos débiles y fuertes, los hacen creíbles y conmovedores. Aunque los personajes femeninos no hayan tenido tanto papel en esta, tenemos a una Emily Blunt (Kitty Oppenheimer) poderosa, con unas reacciones faciales y frases fuertes, con gusto de presenciar. Lo mismo opino de la encantadora Florence Pugh (Jean Tatlock) que me ha hecho la historia más amena cuando ella aparecía. Pocos momentos pero fabulosos. En general, el reparto es brutal, hay intérpretes que no han tenido tanto protagonismo pero se nota que tienen que estar ahí: Rami Malek (David L. Hill), me encanta este hombre, Josh Peck (Kenneth Bainbridge), David Dastmalchian, Dane DeHaan (Kenneth Nichols). Y el gran Tom Conti interpretando al físico Albert Einstein, y muchos más. Más películas así necesitamos en el cine y presenciarlas con inquietud, que te lancen esas sensaciones cómo hace esta historia, que hoy en día poca gente experimenta, a veces por obligación social. Y se agradece, incluso emociona. Que bonito es el cine. Y cómo lo echo de menos cada vez que salgo de él.

RICARDO VALERO, JULIO 2023, ESPAÑA.
Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
10
JurikimurikAug 5, 2023
Amazing yet horrifying. Taking my breath and mind away. Deep and scary sometimes. Beautiful movie about one of the most important scientist in overall history, leaving you with many terrifying thoughts in your mind after watching.
This is how
Amazing yet horrifying. Taking my breath and mind away. Deep and scary sometimes. Beautiful movie about one of the most important scientist in overall history, leaving you with many terrifying thoughts in your mind after watching.
This is how biographical movies should be made.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
marco34laAug 5, 2023
Hi I'm sorry. The movie I watched had an extremely slow beginning and was poorly edited - jumping back and forth through time without really every explaining what was going on. It's as if they were trying to do quantum mathematics instead ofHi I'm sorry. The movie I watched had an extremely slow beginning and was poorly edited - jumping back and forth through time without really every explaining what was going on. It's as if they were trying to do quantum mathematics instead of simple addition that easily told a concise story. Too many loose ends. The middle portion of the movie was strong, but overall too much repetition of material and too much jumping around. Matt Damon was the worst actor in the movie. He has become a caricature of himself. When he walks on screen - you see Matt Damon, not a General. All the other actors blend in nicely and give great performances. Expand
0 of 9 users found this helpful09
All this user's reviews
9
peterpozar97Aug 5, 2023
The movie is well paced and it really doesn't feel 3 hours long. Great directing, great acting and superb sound design. The black and white scenes work great.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
mspurgeonAug 4, 2023
You will feel the 3-hour runtime and it is very much a period drama movie so don't expect much action or thrills from the movie. This is Nolan making a history class movie in his filmmaking style and it is a pleasure to see!
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
katezoeAug 3, 2023
Magnificent movie! Christopher Nolan should expect many Oscar nominations. The entire cast is phenomenal.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
HikayeciAug 3, 2023
Filmi 2 gün önce izledim ve resmen hayran kaldım. Nolan gene bizi şaşırtmadı ve harika bir film ortaya koydu. Filme benden önce gitmiş arkadaşlarım 10 üzerinden 7lik bir film olduğunu söylemişti ama bence rahat bir 9 u var. Film konusundaFilmi 2 gün önce izledim ve resmen hayran kaldım. Nolan gene bizi şaşırtmadı ve harika bir film ortaya koydu. Filme benden önce gitmiş arkadaşlarım 10 üzerinden 7lik bir film olduğunu söylemişti ama bence rahat bir 9 u var. Film konusunda neyi anlatabileceğimi gerçekten bilmiyorum. Tek söyleyebileceğim şey, eğer izlemediyseniz bir an önce izlemeniz. Tek kelime ile MÜKEMMEL bir film. Son zamanlarda bu kadar saçma filmin ortaya çıktığı dönemde böylesine kaliteli bir yapım izlemek şahsen bana ilaç gibi geldi. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
10
Kanso512Aug 3, 2023
This is the best movie I've ever watched. It absolutely lived up to all my expectations. It's a visually stunning cinematic masterpiece with exceptionally great acting by Cillian Murphy.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
10
David_911Aug 3, 2023
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The movie is undoubtedly a masterpiece. I don’t know if most of the s*x scenes were necessary though. I mean it showed how close the two characters are and justifies the way Oppenheimer felt after learning about the suicide. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
0
Redwyne1981Aug 2, 2023
The story the acting editing is all fine and perfect not surprised I mean a Christopher Nolan movie, major issue with the movie that made me leave the theater 1 and half hour before the movie end is : SOUND it is horribly badly mixed and LOUDThe story the acting editing is all fine and perfect not surprised I mean a Christopher Nolan movie, major issue with the movie that made me leave the theater 1 and half hour before the movie end is : SOUND it is horribly badly mixed and LOUD to the point where I heard distortion in a well respected high end theater !! some dialogues was really hard to hear in some cases. I wish they fix the sound in the blue-ray release, I wont recommend this movie at this point to anyone. Expand
1 of 22 users found this helpful121
All this user's reviews
9
alrifatAug 2, 2023
"Oppenheimer" is a captivating and thought-provoking film that delves into the complex life of J. Robert Oppenheimer, the brilliant physicist often credited as the father of the atomic bomb. Directed by Christopher Nolan, the movie offers a"Oppenheimer" is a captivating and thought-provoking film that delves into the complex life of J. Robert Oppenheimer, the brilliant physicist often credited as the father of the atomic bomb. Directed by Christopher Nolan, the movie offers a nuanced portrayal of Oppenheimer's journey, exploring both his scientific achievements and the moral dilemmas he faced.

One of the standout aspects of "Oppenheimer" is its exceptional storytelling. The film skillfully weaves together historical footage, interviews, and dramatic reenactments to create a compelling narrative that keeps viewers engaged throughout. The pacing is well-executed, allowing the audience to delve into Oppenheimer's personal struggles, ambitions, and the weight of his decisions.

The performances in "Oppenheimer" are commendable, particularly Kylian Murphy in the role of J. Robert Oppenheimer. Their portrayal captures the complexity of the character, showcasing Oppenheimer's brilliance, inner conflicts, and the toll that his involvement in the Manhattan Project took on him. The supporting cast also delivers strong performances, adding depth to the overall storytelling.

Additionally, the film's visual and technical aspects are noteworthy. The cinematography beautifully captures the era and settings, immersing the audience in the historical context. The attention to detail in the production design and costumes further enhances the authenticity of the film.

What sets "Oppenheimer" apart is its exploration of the ethical implications of scientific discovery. The movie raises important questions about the responsibility of scientists and the consequences of their creations. It invites viewers to reflect on the moral dilemmas faced by Oppenheimer and the ethical considerations that continue to surround scientific advancements.

Overall, "Oppenheimer" is a remarkable film that combines historical accuracy, strong performances, and thought-provoking storytelling. It sheds light on the life and complexities of J. Robert Oppenheimer while raising important ethical questions. Whether you're interested in history, science, or simply enjoy well-crafted cinema, "Oppenheimer" is a must-watch.
Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
9
Compi24Jul 22, 2023
"Oppenheimer" finds writer/director Christopher Nolan at his most in-depth, specific and all-encompassing, using quite possibly the greatest cast of performers this side of one of the "Ocean's" movies to deliver a harrowing, no-nonsense look"Oppenheimer" finds writer/director Christopher Nolan at his most in-depth, specific and all-encompassing, using quite possibly the greatest cast of performers this side of one of the "Ocean's" movies to deliver a harrowing, no-nonsense look at arguably the most important person to ever live. Thankfully, while the message and thematics are dire, the experience itself is still nonetheless absorbing and even exhilarating at times. The Trinity test sequence itself is worth the price of admission alone. For me, though, I think the most impressive feat to marvel at in this is that of Cillian Murphy's lead turn as the titular physicist in question. Without a doubt, this is a career-defining performance for him and I absolutely think it should be in consideration for the highest of honors, come awards season. Massive kudos to Nolan, as always, for making films that beg to be seen on the largest of screens. This is, most definitely, another one of those -- one I'm excited to watch again. Expand
3 of 4 users found this helpful31
All this user's reviews
6
arkanbrAug 2, 2023
Oppenheimer não é um filme, é como se fossem 3 filmes juntos. E eu gostei muito do filme de forma geral, mas não posso parar de pensar que o filme é muito, muito e muito extenso, e se apega a muitas coisas que não agregam em nada. Acho queOppenheimer não é um filme, é como se fossem 3 filmes juntos. E eu gostei muito do filme de forma geral, mas não posso parar de pensar que o filme é muito, muito e muito extenso, e se apega a muitas coisas que não agregam em nada. Acho que 120min contavam uma história melhor.

Também fiquei um pouco decepcionado com a promessa de um filme feito para o iMax. Mas com tantas cenas de diálogos, ambientes de alto contraste e preto e branco. Sinto que a melhor experiencia do filme é na minha casa.
Expand
0 of 5 users found this helpful05
All this user's reviews
9
zmgalen2000Aug 2, 2023
Oppenheimer NEEDS two watches. During my first showing, I actually dozed off for a minute because a lot of the dialogue went over my head. But I decided to give it another chance, and I’m glad I did. It meant that I was able to more fullyOppenheimer NEEDS two watches. During my first showing, I actually dozed off for a minute because a lot of the dialogue went over my head. But I decided to give it another chance, and I’m glad I did. It meant that I was able to more fully digest everything while having a greater understanding of each character. The film could definitely use a bit more intense sequences, sure, but overall, it’s a work of art. But yes, it is a BIT long. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
8
jakeyjakeJul 22, 2023
Christopher Nolan impresses yet again with another compelling and gripping drama, this time depicting the essential figure behind one of the most controversial moments in American politics, J Robert Oppenheimer. With a slew of greatChristopher Nolan impresses yet again with another compelling and gripping drama, this time depicting the essential figure behind one of the most controversial moments in American politics, J Robert Oppenheimer. With a slew of great performances scattered throughout the film's 3 hour runtime, Cillian Murphy dominates every scene he's in, which fortunately, is more than 90% of the movie. With this role I think Murphy has made his best case for the best actor award at the Oscars next March. Expand
3 of 4 users found this helpful31
All this user's reviews
10
HovdagoatAug 2, 2023
amazing movie. i'm ashamed this has been put out together with barbie and people compare the two.
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
10
WaltvenezzjrAug 2, 2023
The tone of this film. What it displayed, the acting is just incredible. Still get chills from watching it
6 of 6 users found this helpful60
All this user's reviews
0
kuehnauAug 2, 2023
Nothing but lies designed to glorifying a horrible part of our history. Never forget https://www.trinitydownwinders.com/
1 of 23 users found this helpful122
All this user's reviews
6
R55ClubmanAug 2, 2023
One of, if not the, most overhyped film in recent memory.  I fell into the trap, and so did the packed cinema last night.  Sadly, I think Nolans reputation precedes itself, where you are coerced into thinking everything the man does isOne of, if not the, most overhyped film in recent memory.  I fell into the trap, and so did the packed cinema last night.  Sadly, I think Nolans reputation precedes itself, where you are coerced into thinking everything the man does is genius.  The Batman Trilogy, Inception, Dunkirk and Interstellar = incredible.  But Tenet was a miss, and Oppenheimer was the same, but for different reasons.



The first 2 acts reminded me of 'The Imitation Game', which I enjoyed more, and for the life of me, I can not understand how there are that many people out there who enjoyed the final act of this movie, and are willing to rate it "10/10, best movie ever, top film of this decade".



If I was streaming it at home, I would have turned it off.. instead, I was sat in a packed cinema for 3 hours, waiting for the credits to role so I can go home.
Expand
1 of 7 users found this helpful16
All this user's reviews
10
atbranAug 1, 2023
This is one of the best movies I have ever seen! I very much love all aspects of this movie, although it does have some minor burrs around the edges. Despite that, I think that it qualifies as a near perfect movie and is incrediblyThis is one of the best movies I have ever seen! I very much love all aspects of this movie, although it does have some minor burrs around the edges. Despite that, I think that it qualifies as a near perfect movie and is incredibly historically accurate. Expand
4 of 4 users found this helpful40
All this user's reviews
10
Chronicle_HamzaAug 1, 2023
Beautiful cinematography
Beautiful sound effects
Breathtaking soundtracks
Great acting
A masterpiece in general
6 of 6 users found this helpful60
All this user's reviews
8
gracjanskiAug 1, 2023
I expected a bit more from this movie. The beginning was a bit long, Cillian murphy is almost in every scene and he is ugly (because too thin), some scenes are edited too fast.
The twist into the bureaucratic fight against Straus was great
4 of 5 users found this helpful41
All this user's reviews
7
BagelTCGAug 1, 2023
Solid movie, it does a good job at what it set out to do, but I did not feel any deep connection to the characters or sense of tension in their decisions.
3 of 4 users found this helpful31
All this user's reviews
9
OfficialFESFEWAug 1, 2023
It's a long movie but it's good. There are so many parts. Not the type of movie to watch twice.
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
10
MessikeremAug 1, 2023
You can find a lot of yourselfs this movie. You must watch oppenheimer. The actors was great also.
6 of 6 users found this helpful60
All this user's reviews
10
marick333Aug 1, 2023
"Oppenheimer" impresses with its exceptional cast and a gripping storyline that stays true to reality without any exaggerated elements. The film's realistic approach gives it a documentary-like feel, making it an engrossing cinematic"Oppenheimer" impresses with its exceptional cast and a gripping storyline that stays true to reality without any exaggerated elements. The film's realistic approach gives it a documentary-like feel, making it an engrossing cinematic experience. Some may compare it to a Wikipedia Movie, but personally, I found it highly captivating and enjoyed the authentic portrayal of historical events. Expand
6 of 6 users found this helpful60
All this user's reviews
9
UltanComboAug 1, 2023
One of the best movies I've ever seen. Its 3 hours long but it didn't feel like it. So well paced.
Cillian Murphy does a great job in this movie. Probably his best performance in his career. Robert Downey Jr was in this movie but his
One of the best movies I've ever seen. Its 3 hours long but it didn't feel like it. So well paced.
Cillian Murphy does a great job in this movie. Probably his best performance in his career. Robert Downey Jr was in this movie but his performance is completely different from Tony Stark.
My issue with this is the audio. The voices seemed to be a bit tinny. Very high pitch. Maybe it was the theater I was in but it did spoil my experience.
NINE out of ten but if that audio issue wasn't there then this would be a TEN
Expand
6 of 6 users found this helpful60
All this user's reviews
9
HasancankiracJul 31, 2023
This is not a light one. The story unfolds in 3 timelines and manages to capture an impressive amount of nuance and complexity without losing any of the drama or grandiosity. I think Nolan did it again with this one. I do not recommendThis is not a light one. The story unfolds in 3 timelines and manages to capture an impressive amount of nuance and complexity without losing any of the drama or grandiosity. I think Nolan did it again with this one. I do not recommend watching it after Barbie, or before Barbie for that matter. Expand
3 of 3 users found this helpful30
All this user's reviews
0
074GeodudeJul 31, 2023
Every single YouTube movie reviewer gave Oppenheimer a 10/10, legendary status, future classic masterpiece review. They couldn't get enough of it, hyping up how it was brilliant, poignant, a master of modern day cinema. I bought into theEvery single YouTube movie reviewer gave Oppenheimer a 10/10, legendary status, future classic masterpiece review. They couldn't get enough of it, hyping up how it was brilliant, poignant, a master of modern day cinema. I bought into the hype, went out to watch it over the weekend, and ugh was it a freaking pile of pretentious poop.

Nolan freaking LOOOOOVES to edit his movies nonchronologically for some reason. There were 3-4 different timelines, locations, and narratives taking place at the same time throughout the movie, it was nauseating. One minute you're in the present time with Oppenheimer working at his nice office and exposition dumping, them BOOM next minute you're back at the trial with Oppenheimer being interrogated, then POW suddenly it's young Oppenheimer going to school or going to communist parties, then BAM it's back to Strauss during his senate hearing, then ZOOM suddenly they're now in the New Mexico desert riding on horses. Just because something is told out of order and in a purposefully confusing way DOES NOT MAKE IT GOOD. In fact it's the exact opposite, IT MAKES IT BAD. It's a cheap lazy way to try to get your audience to figure out the movie by purposefully making it more harder to follow.

And what was up with the constant EXPLOSIONS?! Five minutes of people talking and exposition dumping then KABOOOOM HUGE FIREBALL. Then it's quiet again for two minutes with more people talking and exposition dumping then BOOMBOOMBOOM PEOPLE STOMPING THEIR FEET LOUDLY.

And holy hell was this movie pretentious as crap! I think I counted at least 5 different scenes were people were LOUDLY CHEERING AND SCREAMING "OPPIE! OPPIE! OPPIE!" They made Oppenheimer seem brilliant - no, they made him seem like a genius - NO, at one point he's literally proclaimed a effing PROPHET and he can do no wrong! Oppenheimer is so effing OP he can walk up to Albert effing Einstein, whisper into his ear, and make Einstein RAGE QUIT and STOMP OFF in defeat LOL.

But worst of all! WORST OF ALL! Was the effing PACING of the movie! My god this movie never had a scene last longer than 30-60 seconds, considering this movie is 180 minutes long that's gotta be HUNDREDS OF SCENES in this movie alone! What a terrible effing screen play! The movie didn't even seem like a movie, it was 90% exposition dump, I wanted to see them BUILDING THE ATOMIC BOMB, I wanted to see LOS ALAMOS and the MANHATTEN PROJECT with scientists theorizing and testing and planning... but none of that happens until 90 minutes into the movie and YOU ONLY GET TO SEE 30 SECOND CLIPS OF ANY OF THAT. Instead you get left with a THREE HOUR LONG MOVIE TRAILER. With 30-60 clips throughout the entire runtime, one liners everywhere that are supposed to be deep and poignant but since there's no time to let any of it soak or marinate it just feels so SHALLOW and EMPTY.

I rate it a 6/10, not a bad movie by any stretch, but nowhere near as good as Nolan's previous works. I actually fell asleep during the movie until LOUD EXPLOSIONS made me jump back up, maybe that's why Nolan edited so many explosions in the movie, to keep people from falling asleep LOL.
Expand
5 of 17 users found this helpful512
All this user's reviews
7
Ska-TeaJul 31, 2023
A Beautiful Mess.

I feel like Christopher Nolan Stans will like this, but overall this seems to be a fine wine in a Red Flip Cup. The editing and pacing tends to skew from fast and engaging to slow and confusing. Nolan has been the master of
A Beautiful Mess.

I feel like Christopher Nolan Stans will like this, but overall this seems to be a fine wine in a Red Flip Cup. The editing and pacing tends to skew from fast and engaging to slow and confusing. Nolan has been the master of show, don't tell and with this comes the central focus of Cillian Murphy as the real life Physicist, J Robert Oppenheimer.

From the opening shots you are drawn into a world according to Oppenheimer and his interactions with various people throughout his life of Theory to bringing in one of the most devastating weapons human's have ever created. This movie felt about 30-40 minutes too long, but I can understand why the director decided to keep a couple of the beats in there after the bomb and the consequences beyond blowing people up vs Oppenheimer's reputation. Like most Oscar Bait Films, you're kinda stuck with a one and done kinda watch.
Expand
3 of 4 users found this helpful31
All this user's reviews
8
JP32Jul 31, 2023
It is a movie entirely made up of critically important conversations, and for that reason, it is an actor’s dream project. The lineup here is about as good as it gets in this star-starved Hollywood era.
5 of 5 users found this helpful50
All this user's reviews
4
KamamuraJul 31, 2023
Weakest Nolan's film yet, IMO. Myrphy did what he could, but the film was overly long, inevitable shallow (dare to say anything deeper about science to the American audience!), with overly dramatic music that failed to mask the drag, pedanticWeakest Nolan's film yet, IMO. Myrphy did what he could, but the film was overly long, inevitable shallow (dare to say anything deeper about science to the American audience!), with overly dramatic music that failed to mask the drag, pedantic attention to meaningless details in service of dubious quasi-realistic impression, and ultimately arduously boring. The American apology for Hiroshima ends up sounding hollow and insincere, as do all psychopaths' attempts to emulate emotions. Expand
1 of 9 users found this helpful18
All this user's reviews
10
K9-BCJul 31, 2023
Es una pelicula muy buena, es una historia compleja y larga, y tratan de abarcar demasiado en corto tiempo, a pesar de ser de tres horas no se hace tediosa, y vale la pena, mi recomendación es que si quieres verla, ve una biografia de la vidaEs una pelicula muy buena, es una historia compleja y larga, y tratan de abarcar demasiado en corto tiempo, a pesar de ser de tres horas no se hace tediosa, y vale la pena, mi recomendación es que si quieres verla, ve una biografia de la vida de Oppenheimer, y un video informativo del proyecto Manhattan, es la unica forma de no sentirse tan perdido en la pelicula, si vas sin saber nada, no vas a entender la mitad de la película. Expand
6 of 6 users found this helpful60
All this user's reviews
0
triadneJul 31, 2023
There is no place for pornography in this type of movie. I am not giving you money for this.
3 of 25 users found this helpful322
All this user's reviews
10
DeruxJul 31, 2023
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Es una de las mejores películas que e visto su soundtrack , sus personajes todo en general es una obra maestra pero eso sí tienen que saber algo de historia para entender aparte de que es una mezcla de emociones sin duda de las mejores elis que e visto en mi vida también salí con lágrimas en los ojos la escena de la bomba es muy buena no como muchas pelis de acción que la luz va acompañada del sonido pero en esta peli no pasa porque la luz Hiba más rápido que el sonido eso sí que es ciencia y entender una explosion Expand
6 of 6 users found this helpful60
All this user's reviews
10
LuisTop23Jul 31, 2023
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Nao tenho nem palavras para falar que foi um filme extraordinário uma das novas obras de Christopher Nolan Expand
7 of 7 users found this helpful70
All this user's reviews
5
fan98Jul 31, 2023
It's a good movie,but the long dialogue bores me,but the last part is very good
0 of 8 users found this helpful08
All this user's reviews
10
SikluJul 31, 2023
A special movie made by one of the best directors ever. Long but feels short, great score and stunning cinematography. Very good acting and great story. Worth watching.
6 of 6 users found this helpful60
All this user's reviews
9
JuaPaJul 31, 2023
It's a great movie with a wonderful ensemble cast and strong script, yes it lasts 3 hours so for some it could be long but the story keeps you there, the only thing I'd complain about is the loud noise of explosions and stomps that soundIt's a great movie with a wonderful ensemble cast and strong script, yes it lasts 3 hours so for some it could be long but the story keeps you there, the only thing I'd complain about is the loud noise of explosions and stomps that sound sometimes. It's sad that people would prefer to watch that awful sexist ideologized hateful movie with a deceitful trailer like Barbie. Go watch Oppenheimer or Mission Impossible 7, those 2 are the good movies right now.

Regards from Peru.
Expand
5 of 5 users found this helpful50
All this user's reviews
10
davemelbourne58Jul 30, 2023
Oscar calling on Line 2. Great history lesson with a story so powerful, it will make you forget that you are watching a movie. Great cast. Important events that are still relevant to the world we live in today. Best movie I've seen in atOscar calling on Line 2. Great history lesson with a story so powerful, it will make you forget that you are watching a movie. Great cast. Important events that are still relevant to the world we live in today. Best movie I've seen in at least 3 years Expand
6 of 6 users found this helpful60
All this user's reviews
4
motar1novJul 30, 2023
This movie was a hot mess. It was clearly produced with a bent political agenda, because it almost seemed like two movies loosely strung together; the first about Oppenheimer coordinating scientists to build the bomb, and the second aboutThis movie was a hot mess. It was clearly produced with a bent political agenda, because it almost seemed like two movies loosely strung together; the first about Oppenheimer coordinating scientists to build the bomb, and the second about how he was a marter for doing so. It was hard to follow with all of the needlessly back-and-forth cut scenes to Oppenheimer's past and then to his future, and so forth. And did we really need all of the drama with him and his wives?! Just a wasted opportunity! Not to mention the volume....it was so overly loud in some points and so soft at others; this movie was just painful to watch, especially near the end. I wish I'd gone to see Barbie instead. Expand
1 of 9 users found this helpful18
All this user's reviews
10
IuppiterJul 30, 2023
I know why a person wouldn’t subjectively like this movie, but in terms of cinematics, thoughtfulness , and grand philosophical themes that this movie addresses and successfully explores you CANNOT say it’s objectively bad without justI know why a person wouldn’t subjectively like this movie, but in terms of cinematics, thoughtfulness , and grand philosophical themes that this movie addresses and successfully explores you CANNOT say it’s objectively bad without just seeming like a person uneducated or unknowledgeable about cinema. Expand
6 of 6 users found this helpful60
All this user's reviews
10
J1mboJul 30, 2023
Aside from the unnecessary sex scenes, the movie is a masterpiece, definitely a lot better than those **** Marvel movies that they seem to pump out every year. The most important thing about films is their quality, not their quantity.
7 of 7 users found this helpful70
All this user's reviews
8
lavalukeJul 30, 2023
there is some incredible scenes, sets, and acting in this film. However, the muddy dialogue and boring third act drags the score down quite a bit.
5 of 5 users found this helpful50
All this user's reviews
9
MichaelValJeanJul 30, 2023
This movie is awesome. You don't feel the 3 hours. The story is poignant. Also, Nolan succeeds to create a lot of pressure even if you know what will happend. The rythm of the movie can lost some people, mostly in the beginning, but when youThis movie is awesome. You don't feel the 3 hours. The story is poignant. Also, Nolan succeeds to create a lot of pressure even if you know what will happend. The rythm of the movie can lost some people, mostly in the beginning, but when you start to understand it, it's not a problem anymore. The sound design is fantastic. Finally, Oppenheimer succeeds to open your mind about the atomic bomb, by giving you the point of view from researchers. We forgot how much the atomic bomb changed the world because we born with it. The movie give us the point of view of the world who discover how much it's powerful. The last scene of the movie is really great for this. Oppenheimer is a movie you need to see. Expand
6 of 6 users found this helpful60
All this user's reviews
8
louaykebaierJul 30, 2023
That euphoric feeling of success and hard work paying off and the horrors of realizing what he has truly unleashed (or to put it in a better way) give it to a world that is not ready and would probably be never ready to handle suchThat euphoric feeling of success and hard work paying off and the horrors of realizing what he has truly unleashed (or to put it in a better way) give it to a world that is not ready and would probably be never ready to handle such powers...such immense power.
Like how it's been described from the beginning of the movie "Prometheus stole fire from the gods and gave it to man...For this he was chained to a rock and tortured for all eternity".
And after actually realizing the purpose of this "gift" and after that silence after the bang you'd be left in horror to the to the consequences of this gift.
And that why Oppenheimer is not your usual biopic it's a horror.
Expand
5 of 5 users found this helpful50
All this user's reviews
10
AlicaWindranaJul 30, 2023
наконец-то фильм без фан-сервиса на которого я сходил в кинотеатр, а не скачал с торрента, Кристофер Нолан гений. Бебронюх зачет сыграл, я бы написал так: "ВИДЕЛ ФИЛЬМ ТАМ ГЕРОЙ ВЫЛИТЫЙ Я" Больше подобных фильмов чтобы очистить индустрию отнаконец-то фильм без фан-сервиса на которого я сходил в кинотеатр, а не скачал с торрента, Кристофер Нолан гений. Бебронюх зачет сыграл, я бы написал так: "ВИДЕЛ ФИЛЬМ ТАМ ГЕРОЙ ВЫЛИТЫЙ Я" Больше подобных фильмов чтобы очистить индустрию от супергероики. Expand
3 of 3 users found this helpful30
All this user's reviews
5
deenshanJul 29, 2023
Surprise, a 3-hour movie about physics was boring AF. There was no reason for it to be that long. They could have trimmed an hour off of it and it would still be boring but at least not so painful to get through. Like a 3-hour documentary butSurprise, a 3-hour movie about physics was boring AF. There was no reason for it to be that long. They could have trimmed an hour off of it and it would still be boring but at least not so painful to get through. Like a 3-hour documentary but not an interesting one, like one you'd have on while you're taking a nap because it helps you sleep. I gave it a five because of good acting and I appreciated the true to history screenplay. Expand
0 of 7 users found this helpful07
All this user's reviews
0
Bigjohn23Jul 29, 2023
All the 10/10 reveiws on this are FAKE as the guy below says they keep repeating the same old phrases “take your hard earned barbie money” “3 hours felt like…” this film is awful, go and see mission impossible 7 instead.
3 of 17 users found this helpful314
All this user's reviews
10
tellmikeyyJul 29, 2023
Cinematic masterpiece from start to finish. IMAX was truly the only way to watch this and not once did I feel regret. Disturbing for sure, but definitely held back on the true horror of what history suffered through. Nolan is truly a masterCinematic masterpiece from start to finish. IMAX was truly the only way to watch this and not once did I feel regret. Disturbing for sure, but definitely held back on the true horror of what history suffered through. Nolan is truly a master at his craft! Expand
6 of 7 users found this helpful61
All this user's reviews
10
OrazioJul 29, 2023
Magnífico, Christopher Nolan mi papá GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOD
4 of 5 users found this helpful41
All this user's reviews
10
jamsbat99Jul 29, 2023
This movie is a cinematic masterpiece. Wildly entertaining, the visuals were amazing, the sound design was incredible, and it was incredibly accurate to true events. I highly reccomend this film.
5 of 6 users found this helpful51
All this user's reviews
9
zNeverSleepJul 29, 2023
Amazing.

I was unsure if Nolan could get me again because my experience with Dunkurk and Tenet - his most recent movies - was not great. Fortunately, Oppenheimer is much more than I expected. Even being an unknown genre to Nolan, the way he
Amazing.

I was unsure if Nolan could get me again because my experience with Dunkurk and Tenet - his most recent movies - was not great. Fortunately, Oppenheimer is much more than I expected.

Even being an unknown genre to Nolan, the way he conducts it is outstanding. Watching almost all of his films makes the experience even better because you can notice all of Nolan`s signatures. So, 3h of movie. Is it tiring somehow?

No. I got hooked on every single minute of it. Not only 'cause I was super interested in the subject. The dialog is really good, and if you like political matters, this is a field day for you. Along it, you have memorable performances from all cast, a magistral OST - that sounds amazing on cinema - and crazy photography with practical effects. Sounds scary 'cause it really is.

All that combined with a script that plays with time to create tension and man... you got one of the bests movies of the year. What a time to be alive. Also, I cannot forget to mention how masterfully Nolan can use silence as an instrument of terror. if you watch it, you know exactly what I am talking about.
Expand
5 of 6 users found this helpful51
All this user's reviews
10
alejandro970Jul 29, 2023
The 3 hours are the closest thing to running a marathon. What cannot be denied is that the story of the father of the atomic bomb is quite invasive when one delves into the personal and political connotations, as well as the consequences ofThe 3 hours are the closest thing to running a marathon. What cannot be denied is that the story of the father of the atomic bomb is quite invasive when one delves into the personal and political connotations, as well as the consequences of that fateful discovery. One of the ones that will make a lot of noise this year. Expand
6 of 6 users found this helpful60
All this user's reviews
10
Henrique2525Jul 28, 2023
Uma experiência incrível, imersão perfeita que te faz entrar na pele de Robert.Oppenheimer
4 of 5 users found this helpful41
All this user's reviews
10
OppenheimerGGJul 28, 2023
Amazing movie! Great acting great story exciting trough whole movie. Not boring at all felt more like 1 hour, dont care about those barbie fans trying to lower the rating.
4 of 5 users found this helpful41
All this user's reviews
7
dcmarloweJul 28, 2023
Great Cast. Way too long. Some, real drama. Terrible soundtrack. Not as great as the professional reviewers, have claimed.
5 of 6 users found this helpful51
All this user's reviews
9
ValderJul 28, 2023
"BUT- BUT THEY DIDN'T SHOW THE SUFFERING OF THE JAPANESE P- PEOPLE OF HIROSH- HIROSHIMA AND NAGASAKI!!" people with this argument can suck my nuts because they clearly didn't even bother reading the movie name.
8 of 8 users found this helpful80
All this user's reviews
10
titan2287Jul 28, 2023
This is a fantastic, yet haunting, movie. Cillian Murphy's performance as the man who created the world's most powerful weapon was fascinating to watch him progress from a curious ambitious scientist to a tortured regretful man.
7 of 7 users found this helpful70
All this user's reviews
10
WebramosJul 28, 2023
Another amazing Christopher Nolan movie! Amazing cinematography, great storytelling and an incredible cast. Take your hard-earned Barbie money and watch this one instead.
4 of 5 users found this helpful41
All this user's reviews
7
simonrs27Jul 28, 2023
No miré el reloj en todas las 3 horas. No es aburrida. Todo bien, todo correcto, y yo que me alegro.
3 of 4 users found this helpful31
All this user's reviews
0
Adam4Jul 28, 2023
These reveiws are so fake, whoever wrote them keeps referencing the prestige and “3 hours felt like 30 minutes”. Also they mark the reveiw as spoiler alert for no reason and they occasionally start sentences with a lower case letter. The realThese reveiws are so fake, whoever wrote them keeps referencing the prestige and “3 hours felt like 30 minutes”. Also they mark the reveiw as spoiler alert for no reason and they occasionally start sentences with a lower case letter. The real score should be like a 5. The nuclear bomb scene is terrible an actual grainy video of a nuclear bomb would have been much better this is just close ups of fire, penultimate scene is a massive anti climax. The sound of the other few explosions were good but that’s it, the rest of the time it’s just men talking. Boring, absolutely no way is this movie an 8 or a 9 these reveiws are fake as hell, I honestly wouldn’t even bother seeing it at all. Terrible. Expand
4 of 28 users found this helpful424
All this user's reviews
3
JudgeSmailsJul 27, 2023
Not only do I not understand all of the glowing reviews, I don't understand why this movie isn't getting panned. I'd say that it is 10% about the making of the bomb and 90% about a political witch hunt/ administrative process dealing withNot only do I not understand all of the glowing reviews, I don't understand why this movie isn't getting panned. I'd say that it is 10% about the making of the bomb and 90% about a political witch hunt/ administrative process dealing with his security clearance decades later. Who cares if an elderly man keeps his security clearance? He developed the bomb that killed hundreds of thousands of people and perhaps ended WWII. By focusing so much on his security clearance and what that might do for his finances and the tail end of his career, it severely minimizes the important part- the bomb. And the hearing dragged on and on and on. The rest of the movie was a combination of snappy CSI style clever dialogue chess and quick cuts with an overbearing soundtrack. It felt like a never ending montage. I have a physics major and I knew the general story as I'm a history buff. I should have been the target audience for this. I've give it a 3/10. Expand
2 of 13 users found this helpful211
All this user's reviews
10
jonasbomdiaJul 27, 2023
esse filme por mais que os diálogos sejam longos te prende de uma forma inacreditável, os diálogos são muito bons, mas não é um filme que todo mundo vai gostar, a história é contada muito bem, a música cara, a música a todo momento te colocaesse filme por mais que os diálogos sejam longos te prende de uma forma inacreditável, os diálogos são muito bons, mas não é um filme que todo mundo vai gostar, a história é contada muito bem, a música cara, a música a todo momento te coloca em tensão e grande parte da tensão é vinda da musica. recomendo Expand
9 of 9 users found this helpful90
All this user's reviews
8
moviecritic68Jul 27, 2023
Well acted & directed film. I probably would have given it a "9" if it hadn't drug out in parts. 3 hrs is a long time to keep an audience's attention.
8 of 8 users found this helpful80
All this user's reviews
10
WladiJul 27, 2023
Oppenheimer, featuring the mesmerizing talent of Cillian Murphy as the protagonist, is an absolute cinematic masterpiece that captivates audiences from start to finish. Directed by a visionary filmmaker, this film delivers a powerful andOppenheimer, featuring the mesmerizing talent of Cillian Murphy as the protagonist, is an absolute cinematic masterpiece that captivates audiences from start to finish. Directed by a visionary filmmaker, this film delivers a powerful and emotionally charged narrative that leaves a profound impact.

Cillian Murphy's portrayal of J. Robert Oppenheimer is nothing short of breathtaking. His acting prowess brings the enigmatic physicist to life in a way that is both authentic and deeply moving. Murphy's ability to embody the complexities of Oppenheimer's character, from his intellectual brilliance to his moral dilemmas, is a testament to his remarkable talent as an actor.

The film's cinematography is equally brilliant, transporting viewers to the era of World War II and the Manhattan Project. The attention to detail in recreating historical events and settings is truly commendable, adding an immersive layer to the storytelling that draws the audience into the world of Oppenheimer and his groundbreaking work.

The screenplay is beautifully crafted, offering a compelling narrative that balances Oppenheimer's personal struggles with the weighty responsibility of developing the atomic bomb. It delves into the ethical dilemmas faced by the protagonist, presenting a thought-provoking exploration of the consequences of scientific discovery and the price of progress.

Supporting performances in the film are equally praiseworthy, enhancing the depth of the storytelling and complementing Cillian Murphy's exceptional acting. The chemistry between the actors adds authenticity to the relationships depicted, making the emotional journey all the more impactful.

The film's musical score is hauntingly evocative, perfectly complementing the mood and intensity of each scene. It heightens the emotional resonance of the story and contributes to the overall cinematic experience.

In conclusion, Oppenheimer stands tall as a cinematic triumph, with Cillian Murphy's performance as the heart and soul of this extraordinary film. It's a testament to his versatility as an actor and his ability to embody complex characters with remarkable depth. The film's captivating storytelling, excellent direction, and evocative cinematography make it a must-watch for cinephiles and history enthusiasts alike. Oppenheimer is an unforgettable journey that lingers in the mind long after the credits roll, leaving a lasting impression on all who experience its brilliance.
Expand
5 of 6 users found this helpful51
All this user's reviews
10
chikiponmexJul 27, 2023
To be honest, even though I regard Christopher Nolan as one of my favourite, if not favourite film directors, when I first heard that Oppenheimer was his next film, I was a bit skeptical. Oppenheimer is a drama/biography is a genre Nolan hasTo be honest, even though I regard Christopher Nolan as one of my favourite, if not favourite film directors, when I first heard that Oppenheimer was his next film, I was a bit skeptical. Oppenheimer is a drama/biography is a genre Nolan has not tackled before. So I was not sure how this one would come out, and was cautious to jump on the hype of the Barbenheimer craze.

BUT

After watching the film, I realise my doubt was misplaced and I have grown significantly more respect and appreciation for Nolan's work.

Oppenheimer was an amazing film!

Despite it being nearly three hours long, I was really impressed how they managed to give the film a fast pace. The film never really felt like it slowed down. The intensity was constant throughout. In a weird way, it felt like the ticking of a time bomb, always progressing to something bigger.

Ludwig Göransson's soundtrack was impeccable. It just complemented the film so well and played a major role in maintaining the films quick pace. I don't think I could name a another film where the soundtrack was so integral to the film.

All the actors and actresses gave outstanding performances! Cillian Murphy! My goodness! Oscar Worthy performance from him. I enjoyed the way the film kept me enraptured in his Oppenheimer's psyche. He brought such an emotional intensity to each scene, purely through his facial expressions and body language. I truly empathized with his moments of conflict where he gets caught in the thick of war and politics and how he is forced to grapple with the consequences of his actions.

I was also throughly impressed with Robert Down Jr's performance as Lewis Strauss. He made it seem so easy. I believe he could be a contender for Best Supporting Actor.

Credit must go to Emily Blunt and Florence Pugh, who did not have as big roles as Murphy, but did really well when they were on screen.

I love that Nolan always opts for shooting using IMAX cameras because it gives his film a unique visual style. The shots didn't have insane composition but I enjoyed their shooting style. They made use of many closeups which kept me engaged and allowed me to sympathise with Oppenheimer more. The closeups ups also kept you absorbed in the tension and did not allow you to escape. I continue to enjoy Hoyte van Hoytema colour palette as well with the combination of greys, blue, black etc.

This film is also a triumph in filmmaking because Nolan showed that even though there is no action but mostly dialogue, there are still ways you can use the film language to make a film engaging. On top of that, he still manages to share his unique artistic flair because even though Oppenheimer is a biography, it still felt like a "Christopher Nolan Movie" with it's sprinkles of espionage, special effects, surreal imagery etc.

Oppenheimer manages to live up and surpass the hype in many ways and could honestly go down as one of the most riveting dramas/biographies ever made!
The ones giving it bad scores are childish reviewers that can not understand the meanings on the movie. Too many marvel movies I guess...
Expand
6 of 7 users found this helpful61
All this user's reviews
9
hoosllJul 27, 2023
How do you tell a story when history has recorded the ending. This is an amazing character study about what it is to be a theoretical scientist in academia as well as a project manager for one of the most important secret projects in modernHow do you tell a story when history has recorded the ending. This is an amazing character study about what it is to be a theoretical scientist in academia as well as a project manager for one of the most important secret projects in modern history. Robert Downey, Jr., is remarkable as a fragile man propelled along by ambition and revenge. All the acting is outstanding and the soundtrack moves the audience's emotions to crescendos. I took my grandsons (14 and 16 years old). They couldn't stop talking about the story, the characters, and the moviemaking. I appreciated the black/white device which defined the time jump and allowed the story to be told in "real time" and in "past time." I wish the female characters had had larger roles (are they on the cutting room floor?) but their fleeting presence gives a tacit view of his personal side. Einstein device was masterful. Expand
5 of 6 users found this helpful51
All this user's reviews
8
egoBorderJul 27, 2023
Visually impressive and thematically rich, this is easily Nolan's best film in a while. While the history's quite loose, it does dramatize the events well. Despite its running time and quiet nature, the film is riveting and magnetic
7 of 7 users found this helpful70
All this user's reviews
10
kanchaniehansikJul 23, 2023
Fantastic achievement by Christopher Nolan. This has to be one of his best.
9 of 10 users found this helpful91
All this user's reviews
8
mrc_brnJul 27, 2023
An 8 seems too low a score, a 9 maybe a slight exaggeration. It's a good movie though, a great story and it's well told. It's a tapestry of stories really, from very macro developments (pre-2nd world war through mcarthyism) to interpersonalAn 8 seems too low a score, a 9 maybe a slight exaggeration. It's a good movie though, a great story and it's well told. It's a tapestry of stories really, from very macro developments (pre-2nd world war through mcarthyism) to interpersonal relationships of the many characters, to the internal turmoil en development within the main character, Robert Oppenheimer. Very creative use of sound, vision, color and abstract visions to convey complex inner feelings/thoughts of the titular character. The performances across the board of the many a-list actors is fantastic as well. The 3-hours running time never felt long to me. Amazing to think this all really happened. Expand
4 of 5 users found this helpful41
All this user's reviews
7
antonimaJul 27, 2023
Well produced biography about J. Robert Oppenheimer. The politics of Oppenheimer, which are center stage in the latter portion of the movie, were boring to me but are an important part of the biography. I didn't like Cillian Murphy asWell produced biography about J. Robert Oppenheimer. The politics of Oppenheimer, which are center stage in the latter portion of the movie, were boring to me but are an important part of the biography. I didn't like Cillian Murphy as Oppenheimer, he seemed stiff and out of place in most scenes, despite the physical resemblance between the two men. In comparison, Robert Downey Jr. was excellent, Matt Damon was good, and overall a good performance from all the actors. I loved Truman's honesty HA! Expand
3 of 5 users found this helpful32
All this user's reviews
0
samah101Jul 27, 2023
3 hours you will wait until the movie finishes waiting and waiting and waiting to the Hiroshima and Nagasaki explosion and you will get disappointed they only show you 3 seconds of local test fire (not explosion) on the screen ,

the movie is
3 hours you will wait until the movie finishes waiting and waiting and waiting to the Hiroshima and Nagasaki explosion and you will get disappointed they only show you 3 seconds of local test fire (not explosion) on the screen ,

the movie is about the guy who made the Atomic bomb , you would expect some science stuff but you will get 0 science stuff just talking and talking and talking that gets you nowhere, the whole movie is a bout this guy and his love life and some trial last half hour, overrated movie and overrated Director .
Expand
6 of 23 users found this helpful617
All this user's reviews
5
JCEurovisionFanJul 27, 2023
Oppenheimer may be a great movie for some, but the historical context still remains because there have been some inaccuracies relating to the film. Not a bad movie, but not great either.
0 of 9 users found this helpful09
All this user's reviews
9
busiekJul 27, 2023
WOW! I don't know what to write so it will be brief: Breathtaking in every way! A must-see on the big screen. Excellent acting, great shots, superb sets and practical effects, sounds effects and soundtrack... Complex, detailed, dialog drivenWOW! I don't know what to write so it will be brief: Breathtaking in every way! A must-see on the big screen. Excellent acting, great shots, superb sets and practical effects, sounds effects and soundtrack... Complex, detailed, dialog driven multilayered story. But... Sadly after explosion of Trinity (excellent!) the movie becomes tedious and loses both dramatic and moral focus. Expand
3 of 4 users found this helpful31
All this user's reviews
8
43in2014Jul 24, 2023
The short review: This film covers J Robert Oppenheimer's and Lewis Strauss's careers, using the former's 1954 hearing on the renewal of his nuclear security clearance and the latter's 1959 Senate confirmation hearing on his nomination as theThe short review: This film covers J Robert Oppenheimer's and Lewis Strauss's careers, using the former's 1954 hearing on the renewal of his nuclear security clearance and the latter's 1959 Senate confirmation hearing on his nomination as the Secretary of Commerce, to go into multiple flashbacks that covered the development of the A- and H-bombs, the communist witch-hunt and the latter's hate over the former. It is a good film with great acting, but it is hampered by Nolan-isms and excessive dialogue.
> Related media: I have not read the book this film is based on called American Prometheus.
> Negatives:
> 1. The Nolan-isms present in Tenet are back! The two hearings mentioned above, being five years apart, are not covered chronologically. Then there are multiple flashbacks that are also not shown chronologically. Labels on the year of the event shown would have helped, but no... there is not a single one! Some scenes are shown in black and white to indicate they are close recreations of actual events, while the coloured scenes are dramatisations of other events. Smart-ass Nolan could have easily made this clear!
> 2. While I understand that this is a drama, there is too much dialogue, particularly when this is 3 hrs long (including credits). While the dialogue is somewhat engaging, the dialogue can be cut down by some 30 min and some of this replaced with more interesting scenes. This will unfortunately raise the film's cost of $100m by a lot however.
> 3. I had expected more coverage of the Manhattan Project work and did not expect than coverage of dialogue-heavy hearings.
> Positives:
> 1. It is a rather engaging film (engagement reduced due to length of film), with great acting from many.
> 2. It is an amazing effort to make a epic film for only $100m nowadays, considering the long list of actors, many of whom are respectable.
> How would the different age groups rate this: > Children: Average (overly long, dialogue-heavy and hard to follow)
> Teens: Good > Young adults: Excellent > Medium-age adults: Excellent > Older adults: Excellent
> My rating: 4/5 (no half scores). Go watch it in the cinema (because it is good and everyone is discussing it now; if the movie had come out at other times, you should only need to catch it on TV.)
Expand
7 of 8 users found this helpful71
All this user's reviews
10
tixi777Jul 26, 2023
Absolutely a must watch, at least once! Cillian Murphy did great as Robert Oppenheimer in the movie! Christopher Nolan did an amazing job directing this movie! Superb star studded cast!
5 of 6 users found this helpful51
All this user's reviews