Blade Runner 2049

9

RoosterJuiceOct 7, 2017

Best creative direction since Mad Max: Fury Road. Like Mad Max it improves on the world building and aesthetics of the original. Such amazing visuals, soundtrack and direction. If you do not like movies that are a dramatic slow burn (like theBest creative direction since Mad Max: Fury Road. Like Mad Max it improves on the world building and aesthetics of the original. Such amazing visuals, soundtrack and direction. If you do not like movies that are a dramatic slow burn (like the original Blade Runner) it will not be for you. Creepy, weird, brooding, dark, and mindbogglingly creative.
This is a truly rare science fiction world that the directors and writers take extremely seriously, reminiscent of 2001: A Space Odyssey.… Expand

8 of 16 users found this helpful88

All this user's reviews

10

NogStomperOct 7, 2017

I was worried this was going to be another remake. It isn't - its a continuation of the story from the original Blade Runner. This was perhaps the best film I have seen in years.
Normally, I only go through the trouble of writing a review ifI was worried this was going to be another remake. It isn't - its a continuation of the story from the original Blade Runner. This was perhaps the best film I have seen in years.
Normally, I only go through the trouble of writing a review if something was REALLY bad or REALLY good. This one was the latter.… Expand

10 of 16 users found this helpful106

All this user's reviews

0

HonestViewerOct 6, 2017

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Whoa, make sure you are wide awake for this 3 hour event or it will put you to sleep. But on second thought, they increased the volume so loud, quite a few times, we had to cover our ears. It woke us. Harrison Ford arrives more than half way in and not many lines.… Expand

13 of 84 users found this helpful1371

All this user's reviews

10

OlrikusOct 7, 2017

Blade Runner 2049 is awesome!
This film clearly respects its predecessor in each and every way and unlike recent bland sequels or reboots, it really stands on it's own.

11 of 19 users found this helpful118

All this user's reviews

10

ThepalOct 7, 2017

I went into this movie with low expectations due to seeing some critic reviews. They couldn't have been more wrong. This was one of the best sequels I've seen... I can't believe how well they got the feel of the original movie right, withoutI went into this movie with low expectations due to seeing some critic reviews. They couldn't have been more wrong. This was one of the best sequels I've seen... I can't believe how well they got the feel of the original movie right, without just repeating the storyline. And they actually dared to keep the pacing slow... almost unheard of these days in movies. Ryan Gosling was actually amazing... and his character was well-written.… Expand

11 of 18 users found this helpful117

All this user's reviews

9

allisonjane65Oct 7, 2017

I think negative comparisons with the original Blade Runner are unfair and unwarranted because BR2049 is an excellent stand alone movie. A knowledge of the original isn't really necessary {although an understanding of Deckard and Rachel'sI think negative comparisons with the original Blade Runner are unfair and unwarranted because BR2049 is an excellent stand alone movie. A knowledge of the original isn't really necessary {although an understanding of Deckard and Rachel's relationship would help}. Go and see it on the biggest screen you can and prepare to be wowed!… Expand

14 of 26 users found this helpful1412

All this user's reviews

1

norseOct 7, 2017

The movie is long, loud, and there's lots of water. Other than that, nothing much really happens. I was a fan of the original blade runner and was blown away by how bad Ridley Scott mangled this opportunity.

The most noteworthy character inThe movie is long, loud, and there's lots of water. Other than that, nothing much really happens. I was a fan of the original blade runner and was blown away by how bad Ridley Scott mangled this opportunity.

The most noteworthy character in the movie is played by insanely loud BRRRRRRAAAAAAAH sounds that occur every fifty seconds, presumably to keep watcher awake.

Stay away, you can spend your time more wisely by staring at a wall, any wall, really.… Expand

11 of 42 users found this helpful1131

All this user's reviews

3

maksprofitOct 7, 2017

While the film wasn't terrible, it wasn't amazing either. The interactions between characters was superficial and their motives were as well. There was nothing profound like there was in the first Blade Runner. The scenery and sets wereWhile the film wasn't terrible, it wasn't amazing either. The interactions between characters was superficial and their motives were as well. There was nothing profound like there was in the first Blade Runner. The scenery and sets were beautiful, as were some of the special effects, but a film can't be based solely on these things alone. It needed to have a villain, but it lacked this entirely. There was barely an iota of conflict during the film, it was simply void. We didn't know why the 'villains' were doing the things they did. The problem was again that these villains didn't have real motives. Nothing was believable, there was simply fabricated disdain and strife which didn't serve the purpose of creating a compelling story line. Also many of the scenes were too long, drawn out and weighed down with superfluous pause.… Expand

18 of 54 users found this helpful1836

All this user's reviews

9

lennycliff123Oct 7, 2017

I generally hate the word 'awesome' but it's a fitting description of Blade Runner 2049. Watching it {on the biggest screen I could find} took me back to the days when going to the cinema was an 'event'. The film, while not without its flawsI generally hate the word 'awesome' but it's a fitting description of Blade Runner 2049. Watching it {on the biggest screen I could find} took me back to the days when going to the cinema was an 'event'. The film, while not without its flaws is a mesmerizing experience as a whole. Highly recommended.… Expand

10 of 21 users found this helpful1011

All this user's reviews

8

Brent_MarchantOct 7, 2017

A long-awaited (and long-overdue) sequel to a legendary 1982 sci-fi classic that comes ever so close to nailing it save for a few elements that feel decidedly forced and...off. Stylistically beautiful and imaginative, impeccably well acted,A long-awaited (and long-overdue) sequel to a legendary 1982 sci-fi classic that comes ever so close to nailing it save for a few elements that feel decidedly forced and...off. Stylistically beautiful and imaginative, impeccably well acted, and incredibly intelligent in its narrative, the film hits many of the right notes right on the head. It's especially impressive that the film does not place an overreliance on special effects or action sequences to carry the story. However, several unduly intrusive subplots and narrative twists that clearly seem to be aimed at setting up another sequel dilute and impinge upon this otherwise well-crafted story, preventing the film from reaching the true cinematic greatness it could have attained.… Expand

11 of 21 users found this helpful1110

All this user's reviews

3

eberman123Oct 7, 2017

I was looking forward to this movie. I was disappointed because, yes the acting and cinematography were very good, the first hour was very boring. I walked out of the theater after the hour but maybe it got better.

8 of 38 users found this helpful830

All this user's reviews

5

amirrodanOct 7, 2017

not a good movie/ big disappointment.
visual is amazing but very boring
it dose not make u feel anything, storyline simple, characters flat, screenplay bad, cyberfunk dosent exist, too much talking with no point. and sound is too loud do theynot a good movie/ big disappointment.
visual is amazing but very boring
it dose not make u feel anything, storyline simple, characters flat, screenplay bad, cyberfunk dosent exist, too much talking with no point. and sound is too loud
do they really thought they got a good movie ?… Expand

9 of 36 users found this helpful927

All this user's reviews

10

terenceOct 7, 2017

Superior to the original Blade Runner, and one of the best scifi films for both scifi fans and non-fans alike. I just rewatched the original Blade Runner last night so this is not a comparison based on distant memories. The sequel has aSuperior to the original Blade Runner, and one of the best scifi films for both scifi fans and non-fans alike. I just rewatched the original Blade Runner last night so this is not a comparison based on distant memories. The sequel has a richer but also more approachable and understandable story, better acting and cast, and even better cinematography and music. Must see! Don't be scared away by the weak box office results or long run-time.… Expand

11 of 20 users found this helpful119

All this user's reviews

9

mace8704Oct 7, 2017

A true Blade Runner sequel that shares both the strengths and the flaws of its predecessors. Beautiful cinematography, ambiguous character motivations that leave a lot open to personal interpretation, slow pacing....Yep, that's the ol' BladeA true Blade Runner sequel that shares both the strengths and the flaws of its predecessors. Beautiful cinematography, ambiguous character motivations that leave a lot open to personal interpretation, slow pacing....Yep, that's the ol' Blade Runner. I'd strongly recommend this to any fan of the original film. **IMPORTANT** The film does a poor job of catching newcomers to franchise up on important plot details. It assumes you are familiar with Deckard and Rachel. To appreciate the narrative, you must be at least mildly familiar with the original 1982 Blade Runner film. I'd recommend the Final Cut version of the film. There are also 3 short animated prequels to 2049 that will help you understand the setting more. Strengths: Amazing cinematography, Great acting from the female supporting actresses and Gosling, ambiguous plot that will leave you debating with friends. Weakness: Poorly acted and written antagonist. Narrative is NOT self contained and demands a sequel and some familiarity with previous lore, slow pace.… Expand

11 of 21 users found this helpful1110

All this user's reviews

0

AlaingagnonOct 7, 2017

It ruined the original movie for me. I am a die hard science fiction fan. Loved the original until I watched this. First time in my life I couldn't wait for the movie to end. If my wife hadn't fallen asleep midway, we would have left.It ruined the original movie for me. I am a die hard science fiction fan. Loved the original until I watched this. First time in my life I couldn't wait for the movie to end. If my wife hadn't fallen asleep midway, we would have left. Boring, pretentious and self absorbing. Although it was almost 3 hours long, it felt much longer. Over the top musical score, all the actors did was stare and did not do the subject matter justice at all. Extremely disappointed. I waited for years and this is the **** the came up with?… Expand

14 of 69 users found this helpful1455

All this user's reviews

10

REM337Oct 7, 2017

High-impact movie that transcends the action category and takes you on a hectic journey into identity, memory and belonging. Magnificent photography and composition throughout the film along superb technical effects. On the top of that,High-impact movie that transcends the action category and takes you on a hectic journey into identity, memory and belonging. Magnificent photography and composition throughout the film along superb technical effects. On the top of that, world-building is expanded by bold and internally coherent ideas supporting the narrative. Would highly recommend to anyone to see it.… Expand

11 of 21 users found this helpful1110

All this user's reviews

10

Chiscokid88Oct 7, 2017

Blade Runner 2049 is a great installment to the Blade Runner world. A sequel that stands on its own. You can tell that this film will age well like a bottle of red wine.

11 of 21 users found this helpful1110

All this user's reviews

9

eagleeyevikingOct 7, 2017

While it doesn't raise thought-provoking questions as effectively as the original, "Blade Runner 2049" earns its position as a worthy sequel thanks to a captivating mystery, action that feels earned, intelligent themes & world building, andWhile it doesn't raise thought-provoking questions as effectively as the original, "Blade Runner 2049" earns its position as a worthy sequel thanks to a captivating mystery, action that feels earned, intelligent themes & world building, and lush cinematography which synthesises perfectly with an unearthly soundtrack. Never felt bored throughout the runtime and could have watched it for longer.… Expand

19 of 31 users found this helpful1912

All this user's reviews

9

jdb26354Oct 6, 2017

First time I saw the original Blade Runner (“2019”), I just stayed in my seat at the theater until the next showing and watched it again. I taped the movie at the theater to have the soundtrack, whose official version wasn’t released forFirst time I saw the original Blade Runner (“2019”), I just stayed in my seat at the theater until the next showing and watched it again. I taped the movie at the theater to have the soundtrack, whose official version wasn’t released for years. These facts put me in a 0.1% slice of fans of the movie.
So what to say of Blade Runner 2049 (“2049”)?
2019 pulled you into a world and a mood. The opening scene of Los Angeles in 2019 is not matched in 2049.
Making a virtue of necessity, Ridley Scott set 2019 at night (except for the controversial ending scene), which is cheaper to convey in the grimly grand manner he sought. Denis Villeneuve had the budget to venture into the day, which pays off best at the end, with the rest resting in an uneasy truce with sepia. The plot of 2019 was pedestrian; I think a Harrison Ford quote can be found that he played a detective who did not detect much. The plot of 2049 is hardly elaborate, but is more developed and satisfactory. Gosling is a god, and 2019 fans owe him a great debt for his embrace of the project despite the cult. 2019 actually aspired to the epic more in portrayal than in theme. 2049 has greater pretense to the epic—I spoil nothing, just watch the trailer (“the world is built on a wall that separates kind”). 2049 settles for less, but less ends up more. 2049 has a cracker jack supporting cast, although none delivers a line like Rutger Hauer’s “tears in the rain” from 2019. That’s what makes magic magic.
I’m glad that age and 2019’s cult status brought Harrison Ford back to the wisdom of his original choice to play Deckard. Sometimes you don’t give your younger self enough credit. Score honored the original, and sound generally was solid.
In sum, the army assembled by the hope of a reprise captures the prize of a wonderfully worthy movie in its own right. Doing justice to both 2019 and 2049, you watch no mere sequel. Too long? Perhaps. But better than gone.… Expand

10 of 19 users found this helpful109

All this user's reviews

9

pixelcraftablesOct 7, 2017

A fantastic visual spectacle in which the scenes speak stronger than the dialogue, forcing you to think and reflect on the themes touched. The story's focus is indirectly Deckard (Harrison Ford), and the mystery and intrigue of the desolate,A fantastic visual spectacle in which the scenes speak stronger than the dialogue, forcing you to think and reflect on the themes touched. The story's focus is indirectly Deckard (Harrison Ford), and the mystery and intrigue of the desolate, emotionless, replicant society where K (Ryan Gosling) operates keeps pushing the story forward towards its climax. Excellent performances by all actors, with Harrison Ford and especially Ana de Armis being the highlights, however I felt that Jared Leto's character Wallace was written to stylistically different from the other characters, and felt out of place compared to everyone else.… Expand

10 of 19 users found this helpful109

All this user's reviews

2

OverpaidOct 7, 2017

Bloated, portentous and worst of all, dumb posing as smart, for a Blade Runner obsessive like myself, Blade Runner 2049 is pretty much a worst-case outcome from the decision to “reboot”.

It combines the ultra-slow pacing of a RussianBloated, portentous and worst of all, dumb posing as smart, for a Blade Runner obsessive like myself, Blade Runner 2049 is pretty much a worst-case outcome from the decision to “reboot”.

It combines the ultra-slow pacing of a Russian art-house movie, with the implausible action sequences of a mainstream blockbuster. It has intellectual pretensions, but no real ideas, other than some half-baked biblical referencing. It takes a lazy, hand-waving approach to its plot and world-building. For me, that’s all unacceptable. If you decide to make the sequel to one of the most revered movies of all time, you need to get your quality bar pretty damn high. Blade Runner made its name by being genuinely intellectual, and having an insane level of attention to detail. This film fails to achieve either.

There are plots holes you could fit the Tyrell Corporation's headquarters through. I can’t talk about those without spoiling, but lets just note that the core premise of the movie as spelled out in the opening crawl, the invention and legalisation of unquestioningly obedient replicants, is in direct contradiction to almost everything that follows, including the rationale for the mission the protagonist is sent on. The acting is fine, good even, BUT the actors are doing their best with horribly written characters who constantly make decisions that are absurd, often in order to set up action scenes that shouldn’t logically occur. Where the original revelled in moral ambiguity, we get a cartoonish boss villain who looks and talks like an evil-yoga instructor and appears to live in a health spa, and an even more cartoonish hot-lady-assassin henchwoman. In keeping with that Holywoodisation, all the women in the film are presented as lust objects, either evil or victims, and not in the knowing sense of exploited Zhora or Rachel, but as sadistic titillation.

There are a bunch of scenes basically nicked from other movies, in particular Spike Jonze’s brilliant Her.

Where the original asked genuinely profound philosophical questions about what it means to be human, this one has some quasi-religious guff about miracles and souls that jars badly with the paranoid, psychological Dickian source material and the post-religious bio-technological world that was presented in the first film.

The world building is terrible.

The world we are shown also doesn’t tie in with the mostly deserted, “kibble” strewn dying earth of the original. That was a place where almost all the able-bodied have left for the off-world colonies and the only remaining animals were manufactured. Despite some kind of second eco-disaster and a tech disaster both fleetingly referred to in the opening crawl (and in Matrix2esque short films on youtube), the world presented here is less dilapidated, more progressive, more organised, etc. than in the original. Fading art -deco has been replaced by Scandinavian design.

The technology is all over the place. Again, that’s hard to talk about without getting into spoilers, but basically the film assumes that flawless AI’s and super functional “normal” robots/drones exist, and then doesn’t in any way address the ramifications of how those facts would impact the whole idea/purpose/issue of replicants, and how and why they are used, and how/why Blade Runners are used to track them down. I think that comes back to a recurring problem ideas being included because someone thought they were “cool” rather than being story/world driven.

There are constant heavy handed and unconvincing analogies beween replicants, and real-world slavery and racism which the film then does nothing to explore.

In some ways it’s a bit like the Force Awakens, another recent reboot that I hated. It’s a technically competent film that heavily references the original, in terms of props, characters and art style. It even features Harrison Ford. It has a plot driven by a series of improbable coincidences and chance discoveries that seems more like an excuse for “cool visuals” than a logical, character driven progression. But whereas the Force Awakens knew exactly what it wanted to be, going unashamedly for a nostalgia-fuelled, international, mass market audience, B2049 falls between stools.

I feel a lot of people are going to disagree with my negativity on this one. There’s massive hype and hope around this movie, and it is mostly beautiful. Understandably, Blade Runner fans will want to like this movie. but going back to the Force Awakens comparison, after six months have passed, and people have moved through denial and anger stages, the sad reality of how average this film is will sink in.

I went in to this one with mixed expectations. I loved Arrival, the director’s previous foray into SF, but on the other hand I thought that a reboot of Blade Runner was an inherently bad idea. For me, this one failed hard, both as a sequel and as general entertainment.… Expand

57 of 149 users found this helpful5792

All this user's reviews

4

Kadima82Oct 7, 2017

While it is visually and technically exquisite, Blade Runner 2049 does not engage us emotionally in terms of characters and storylines. Over a period of 180 minutes, this bring the spectator to the edge of boredom instead of their seats.

12 of 33 users found this helpful1221

All this user's reviews

7

Rebecca31Oct 7, 2017

A sequel to the cult classic Blade Runner 1982. We live in a world where movie sequels, prequels and remakes plague our cinemas. It's exhausting to read about yet another sequel set 20+ years after the original. In the case of Blade RunnerA sequel to the cult classic Blade Runner 1982. We live in a world where movie sequels, prequels and remakes plague our cinemas. It's exhausting to read about yet another sequel set 20+ years after the original. In the case of Blade Runner it's 35 years later, a definite risk and rarely pays off but we need not have worried. I'll start by saying I was never a huge fan of the original Blade Runner, for some reason I never got caught up in the hype and I feel almost the same towards Blade Runner 2049. It's great, visually spectacular and I enjoyed it but at the same time I wasn't exactly blown away by it. Yet this is a movie that shows you just how a sequel should be made. Well done Denis Villeneuve you've done something many people thought impossible, you've kept the fanboys happy whilst bringing in a new generation of fans all while keeping true to Blade Runner.

I won't say too much about the story, the less you know the better. Ryan Gosling stars as a young Blade Runner who tracks down former Blade Runner Harrison Ford. It's stunning just to watch, the attention to detail in every shot is mesmerizing. Chances are you probably won't see a more beautiful movie this year. Each scene seems to linger, not wanting to move on, allowing you to immerse yourself in this beautiful world. Not only is it hypnotic to look at but it's accompanied by that incredible soundtrack we know so well. Only on a grander scale, it certainly doesn't hold back. The acting is superb, Gosling and Ford make a great team. Poor Jared Leto can't catch a break these days. His character seemed grossly underused and honestly very wasted. Yet considering the much talked about running time of 163 minutes I don't know how this could have happened. Disappointing to see but I'll get over it.

A sequel that not only stays true to the original content but brings it to a whole new level. A definite recommendation for all you sci-fi fans and a must see for the Blade Runner fans.… Expand

10 of 18 users found this helpful108

All this user's reviews

9

lenny68Oct 6, 2017

There's certainly more style than substance on show in the new sequel, but the story is still engaging. At no point during the nearly three hours running time did I feel bored or frustrated with how the plot was moving along. There willThere's certainly more style than substance on show in the new sequel, but the story is still engaging. At no point during the nearly three hours running time did I feel bored or frustrated with how the plot was moving along. There will obviously be negative comparisons with the original, but this film should taken on it's own merit, and great merit it has.… Expand

31 of 47 users found this helpful3116

All this user's reviews

10

Ossy_King_99Oct 7, 2017

Cyberpunk perfection right there. Absolutely everything about this movie was perfect, amazing script, amazing soundtrack, amazing universe. Absolutely bloody brilliant, this is Triple SSS tier cyberpunk and I highly recommend it

14 of 23 users found this helpful149

All this user's reviews

3

TomSoapEdyBaconOct 7, 2017

+'s Visuals, Acting, CGI, Themes
-'s Editing, Sound, Plot
Great visuals and themes let down by the plot holes and poor writing. Too much pandering to the audience and repetition of simple points. Editing cuts were too long & boring without+'s Visuals, Acting, CGI, Themes
-'s Editing, Sound, Plot
Great visuals and themes let down by the plot holes and poor writing. Too much pandering to the audience and repetition of simple points. Editing cuts were too long & boring without substance. Overall film too long. Music can be great but the jump-scare sounds were too much, the sounds of city when flying were terrible, also a poor echo affect on a lot of dialogue in open settings which makes very hard to hear. Too much unexplained in the plot, why were there no other flying cars in a city of millions? Its only slightly better than Ghost in the Shell 2017.… Expand

11 of 44 users found this helpful1133

All this user's reviews

10

ALEGATOR1488Oct 6, 2017

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. It is best movie in 2017 year. I want to watch this movie every day. Denis Villeneuve surpassed Scott's original film. Visual effects, acting music, camera work is just the best thing in the film. Harrison Ford is still capable of such films. The music in the film is simply unsurpassed. The film is just 10/10… Expand

11 of 21 users found this helpful1110

All this user's reviews

10

nugness123Oct 6, 2017

Wow... go see this movie. Just do it. This is an absolute must for anyone even remotely interested in sci fi or Blade Runner. Holy **** **** please just see it to give money to the studio to encourage more of this in theaters.

11 of 22 users found this helpful1111

All this user's reviews

8

mintloOct 6, 2017

I have to admit I wasn't asking for a Blade Runner sequel, and when I heard they were doing one my expectations were rock bottom. I was pleasantly surprised and I enjoyed it. I appreciate how the story was simple, there was more focus onI have to admit I wasn't asking for a Blade Runner sequel, and when I heard they were doing one my expectations were rock bottom. I was pleasantly surprised and I enjoyed it. I appreciate how the story was simple, there was more focus on visuals and 'showing' rather than explaining and talking. I got sucked in to the movie and forgot about reality for 146 minutes which was nice.… Expand

10 of 19 users found this helpful109

All this user's reviews

1

JDMCOct 6, 2017

I would really, really like to know if all the critics who gave the new Blade Runner movie five stars saw the same film I did.
1) MOVIE: Overdrawn, overlong dramatic scenes, which often substituted LOUD soundtrack for real drama. Literally,I would really, really like to know if all the critics who gave the new Blade Runner movie five stars saw the same film I did.
1) MOVIE: Overdrawn, overlong dramatic scenes, which often substituted LOUD soundtrack for real drama. Literally, my wife and I had to HOLD OUR HANDS over our ears at four or five points in the film. Not cool.
....of course, my perceptions could have been tainted by the....
2) Theater: Stank. Literally, stank. and the handle on My wife's seat's armrest broke at one point and I ended up wearing most of her soda pop on my leg
3) Movie again: attempts to be deep and thoughtful too often become pretentious. This was literally the single worst moviegoing experience of my life. Bleh.… Expand

12 of 49 users found this helpful1237

All this user's reviews

9

SergioAllIndieOct 6, 2017

The sense of sobriety within the cinematographic language, as used on the 1982 film, remains there and is in my opinion enhanced. It couldn´t fell on better hands than Villeneuve´s, who with his usual shocking and raw depictions of violenceThe sense of sobriety within the cinematographic language, as used on the 1982 film, remains there and is in my opinion enhanced. It couldn´t fell on better hands than Villeneuve´s, who with his usual shocking and raw depictions of violence (not only physical, but emotional and dark-side-of-the-soul violence), make this film a truly complementary piece for the original Blade Runner; far from an excuse of just doing one. Deakins is the only master of his craft, sound design, original score and production design are exquisite too. Gosling´s performance is heartfelt and complex. Two thumps up for this one!… Expand

9 of 18 users found this helpful99

All this user's reviews

9

SupR_GOct 6, 2017

This is a stunning visual masterpiece. An absolute feast for the senses. A true spiritual successor to the original, with an excellent story and script to follow the first pioneer film. I knew going in, it would be a long and slow paced film,This is a stunning visual masterpiece. An absolute feast for the senses. A true spiritual successor to the original, with an excellent story and script to follow the first pioneer film. I knew going in, it would be a long and slow paced film, and so instead of holding my breath for the climax, I admired and soaked in the amazing world Villeneuve built. Any fan of the original will adore this film.… Expand

11 of 21 users found this helpful1110

All this user's reviews

10

LatinCritic13Oct 6, 2017

For those previously watched the first installment of Blade Runner or haven’t seen it, it’s safe to say that the latest installment of the Blade Runner franchise is easily one of the best sequels ever made PERIOD! Since this film is directedFor those previously watched the first installment of Blade Runner or haven’t seen it, it’s safe to say that the latest installment of the Blade Runner franchise is easily one of the best sequels ever made PERIOD! Since this film is directed by the man who made jawdropping films like Prisoners, Sicario, and Arrival, his articulation of direction and storytelling really does capture the right atmosphere that Ridley Scott has set since the first Blade Runner. Most people that worked with Ridley Scott had already returned for another ride, but this time with Denis Villeneuve. The things that Denis had done for this installment really shines without a shadow interfering at a splitsecond while watching this. The new characters and familiar faces for this latest installment impressed me, futuristic-like production design, electrifying visual and sound effects, kickass performances, spine-chilling orgasmic soundtrack, and the god-like cinematography that Roger Deakins set really does spark a lot of amazement for the sequel. (Get Roger Deakins his OSCAR ASAP!!!!) However, there’s a thing that kind of caused a very little ruckus throughout the movie, but it doesn’t affect the movie’s quality that much since there will be another sequel readied for us to see what lies beneath the door (If confirmed...) Like Deckard said “I did your job one—I was good at it” it clearly refers that someone else besides Scott or Villeneuve will take control and finish the story (if confirmed..) Without a doubt, Blade Runner 2049 is an outstanding achievement and a technical masterpiece that will be enjoyed by many sci-fi fans around the world.… Expand

18 of 31 users found this helpful1813

All this user's reviews

6

tr78478Oct 6, 2017

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. What a missed opportunity! Visually stunning....but missing some of the 'grime' of the original....even the 'junkyard' looked too perfectly dirty....casting and acting was great....but can someone please tell me why Niander Wallace (Jared Leto) was even in this movie? His storyline only confused things....
Some of the established themes were touched on, but they could have gone so much deeper: if the 'new' Replicants were unable to go 'crazy', what side effect does that produce in terms of their reactions to certain situations; did they do away with the old 'classifications'? If so, what does ambiguous role assignments do to their a.i.? They didn't even address the theme of 'life-span', and time...and what both mean when 'you' don't change...ever! Instead, we get overly drawn out scenes that end up not meaning anything, and Harrison Old ALMOST taking out two Replicants....come-aw, Denis!
Worth seeing if simply for the visuals....but doesn't add anything to the discussions that the first movie created.… Expand

9 of 29 users found this helpful920

All this user's reviews

10

NShep53Oct 6, 2017

The best movie of the year, Denis Villeneuve is a master of film-making. Ryan Gosling, Ana De Armas, Harrison Ford- all amazing. Roger Deakins deserves an Oscar!

11 of 21 users found this helpful1110

All this user's reviews

2

brucecook99Oct 6, 2017

This is visually exciting and a feast for the ears. Unfortunately every shot lingers on the screen for 3 or 4 times the length necessary to tell the story. And the story is hampered b y a lack of logic. When the villain Wallace tells Ford heThis is visually exciting and a feast for the ears. Unfortunately every shot lingers on the screen for 3 or 4 times the length necessary to tell the story. And the story is hampered b y a lack of logic. When the villain Wallace tells Ford he can take him off-world to torture him and get an answer he wants...he could do the same thing in the room he is in. And the big secret is obvious from early in the script.

This needs a rewrite from a skilled screenwriter and then a serious editor to trim out the fat...by which I mean you could keep every shot cut to the length to make the next story point and the movie would be less than 100 minutes.

The audience I saw it with was restless. There was no applause at the end, they just filed out in dispirited fashion.… Expand

30 of 88 users found this helpful3058

All this user's reviews

9

RabidBetaOct 6, 2017

The original is my favorite film, I should start with that. Is the sequel a masterpiece...no, but I'm more than happy with what I saw (in IMAX). Incredible world-building on par with the original, great casting/characters, award-winningThe original is my favorite film, I should start with that. Is the sequel a masterpiece...no, but I'm more than happy with what I saw (in IMAX). Incredible world-building on par with the original, great casting/characters, award-winning cinematography, great direction, excellent score, and a solid script. I felt it went on a bit too long, and a couple of scenes could be cut, and a few trimmed. But this long run doesn't hurt the film. I really liked it. I'll have to watch it a few dozen more times, and maybe I'll even come to love it as I do the original. Four star film, but I gave it five stars for not screwing up a franchise I thought couldn't possibly be sequel-ed well.… Expand

9 of 18 users found this helpful99

All this user's reviews

8

moviemitch96Oct 6, 2017

A film that definitely matched my expectations but didn't quite exceed them like I had hoped. Nonetheless, this film matches the quality and greatness of the original, and its scope is undeniably large and impressive, especially in terms ofA film that definitely matched my expectations but didn't quite exceed them like I had hoped. Nonetheless, this film matches the quality and greatness of the original, and its scope is undeniably large and impressive, especially in terms of the gorgeous visuals and always captivating cinematography from Roger Deakins (seriously, I'll be damned if this film isn't the one to finally get him that far overdue Oscar!) In addition, Ryan Gosling and Harrison Ford deliver reliably strong performances! My only gripe is that the film's first act starts out so exciting and promisingly, then slows way down in the middle act, almost too slow if you ask me. I also thought there were quite a few scenes and instances in the middle act that could've easily been trimmed down a bit, and I also noticed that there were a few ideas and moments that felt borrowed from other recent sci-fi films, but then things got back into full gear to deliver a powerhouse final act that ended beautifully, leaving me wanting so much more and making me more than willing to forgive the nearly three-hour runtime. Overall, this should satisfy most fans of the original, as it boasts the visuals, cinematography, magnificent score (well done as always Hans Zimmer!) and thought-provoking themes and symbolism that made the original such a unique and innovative experience! Just beware of the runtime and a middle act that takes it time, but it's well worth it by end!… Expand

8 of 16 users found this helpful88

All this user's reviews

10

DN345UOct 6, 2017

One of the best movie and the best sequel of this year. Loved so much story, atmosphere, details, cool features with technoligies, new and old characters so much loving, they are awesome, cameos too and visual effects. That's all what I canOne of the best movie and the best sequel of this year. Loved so much story, atmosphere, details, cool features with technoligies, new and old characters so much loving, they are awesome, cameos too and visual effects. That's all what I can tell about Blade Runner 2049. If next movie will direct same guy, who directed this movie, I will absolutely go to watch it.… Expand

11 of 21 users found this helpful1110

All this user's reviews

10

muhrduhrOct 6, 2017

This sequel surpass the original. The dystopian world depicted in the original movie has become even more real, dirty and cruel. This is an instant classic and a film that will send it's director Denis Villeneuve into the Sci-Fi hall of fame.This sequel surpass the original. The dystopian world depicted in the original movie has become even more real, dirty and cruel. This is an instant classic and a film that will send it's director Denis Villeneuve into the Sci-Fi hall of fame. I feared this movie could become a shallow action movie. Luckily I was wrong. This movie has it's own visual language and pace. It also touches on some questions we may have to ask ourselves in the future. This dark and beautiful film is best seen without any prior ideas of what it will contain.… Expand

11 of 21 users found this helpful1110

All this user's reviews

10

easterfieldsOct 6, 2017

I'm going to make an analogy. Blade Runner 2049 is to Blade Runner, what Aliens was to Alien. It's quite clear that both Blade Runners happen in the same universe. And I love how this one has several ways of tying back to the original whileI'm going to make an analogy. Blade Runner 2049 is to Blade Runner, what Aliens was to Alien. It's quite clear that both Blade Runners happen in the same universe. And I love how this one has several ways of tying back to the original while still being it's own unique vision of such a dystopian future that was originated by Ridley Scott so many years ago. The visuals in this film are a constant mental feast! Each scene is worthy of framing as art and if the cinematographer doesn't receive an Oscar, then no one is worthy of such an accolade. What is so intriguing about this movie is that while it does answer some questions, it actually raises others, especially more-so than the original. That is no easy task for a sequel and one that you will spend days contemplating afterwards. I must also credit the acting here as each character forges their own unique path and one that sends echoes intersecting everyone else. I would not be at all surprised if Harrison Ford receives a nomination considering this is his best performance in, dare I say, at least a decade! Please don't be turned off by the 2hr 43min running time. It felt like 90 minutes to me and it's one of those films that you're sad to see end. For it were possible, I would prefer it go on indefinitely. This is a treasure that MUST be seen in theaters (almost just for the musical score itself!). You will be sad if you don't!… Expand

13 of 25 users found this helpful1312

All this user's reviews

8

SammifxOct 6, 2017

It is a technical masterpiece and I cant fault the direction. The script however introduces a lot of elements that are never explored and tied up - and the abrupt ending makes me wonder if this was a directors cut with a lot of unexploredIt is a technical masterpiece and I cant fault the direction. The script however introduces a lot of elements that are never explored and tied up - and the abrupt ending makes me wonder if this was a directors cut with a lot of unexplored stuff or if it needs a directors cut with 2 more hours of content that will explore all the elements. I wish more time was spent on character development outside of Gosling as well. The pacing and sense of urgency also felt off despite the gravity of what was happening.… Expand

8 of 16 users found this helpful88

All this user's reviews

8

VoloxiOct 6, 2017

As someone who loved the original, I'm very happy this movie was made. But I have to say that all the grandeur that this movie is and represents is ruined by one simple thing. Ryan Gosling. Oh yes, he at first seems like the obvious choiceAs someone who loved the original, I'm very happy this movie was made. But I have to say that all the grandeur that this movie is and represents is ruined by one simple thing. Ryan Gosling. Oh yes, he at first seems like the obvious choice for the roll, I see that. Except that he plays the same character in all his movies; a person who expresses nothing. You can shoot him, stab him, kick him square in the balls, and the most you'll ever get as a reaction is that faint, quirky smile he's so known for. Personally, I don't see any difference between his characters, and how he behaves as a person off-camera. And I want to like him. I really do. But when he's put next to any other actor in the film, especially someone like the charismatic Harrison Ford, his brooding sense of quiet falls flat. When they told him he was to play a robot, did he envision something from a 50's sci-fi classic? All he needs are the short jerky movements and some beeps and boops and there it is. And Jared Leto is just as guilty. His calm and cool sociopathic representation of corporate owner just did not bring anything to the performance. Villian 101: you have to almost like them and fall to their charms to truly despise them when they are bad. In this respect, the original still wins out as the better film in my opinion.… Expand

10 of 19 users found this helpful109

All this user's reviews

10

perliOct 6, 2017

Althought I absolutely loved the original Blade Runner, seeing the trailer for the new one I thought that stunnig visuals might be emotionally too distant and that 163 min. might be a bit too long, and that the sequel just cannot catch theAlthought I absolutely loved the original Blade Runner, seeing the trailer for the new one I thought that stunnig visuals might be emotionally too distant and that 163 min. might be a bit too long, and that the sequel just cannot catch the magic of the original. My expectations were low, but the story of 2049 griped me from the very start and it just didn't let go. The styling of the movie – camera, the settings, the costumes and of course most importantly, the actors and the acting are all fantastic. Some stunnig visual scences are absolutely original, e. g. K's interaction with his hologram girlfriend. The engaging narrative is building noir, dystopian vision and the atmosphere that is thought provoking in contemporary highly uncertain global society with rapid technological leaps forward making celebrated, but for general population disturbing innovative disruptions. The rise of AI and its troubled relations with humans is presented well. For me, this film is as an event, movie of outstanding quality, a kind of one in ten years movie. The last so engaging science fiction was the first Matrix movie.… Expand

11 of 22 users found this helpful1111

All this user's reviews

0

ronzoroOct 6, 2017

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The new Bladerunner is so wrapped into symbolism, metaphors and themes that it forgets to make sense of it's world building, storytelling, character definition. Completely void of any inner logic, it falls short of even being a movie: it is indeed a magnificently crafted slow motion picture consisted of ingenious albeit often out of place designs and populated by a very talented crew of actors. Technically superb on a visual level, it is a gorgeous eye candy that gives you amp time to observe it's visual mastery and wonder why the heck couldn't they find someone to write for it, not that fanatic Ridley Scott that ruins Alien franchise with his last movies. The story is a series of most amazing coincidences that lead up to nothing at all, leaving you with deep questions like what do 12 hives of bees eat in a mad max fury road wasteland.… Expand

21 of 76 users found this helpful2155

All this user's reviews

10

neilrieckOct 6, 2017

A visually stunning movie with a sci-fi story to match. This sequel answered a lot of questions from Blade Runner 1982 while posing some new ones (so long time BR fans will be pleased). IMHO, this is the most thought provoking sci-fi movieA visually stunning movie with a sci-fi story to match. This sequel answered a lot of questions from Blade Runner 1982 while posing some new ones (so long time BR fans will be pleased). IMHO, this is the most thought provoking sci-fi movie since the first Matrix movie in 1999.… Expand

11 of 22 users found this helpful1111

All this user's reviews

10

alainduchesneauOct 6, 2017

You’re gonna love it — or hate it. And that’s the best quality I can think of of a movie. It means that Denis Villeneuve made a very personal and thoughtful piece of art.
A feast for the eyes AND the ears. Go see this in the theatre next youYou’re gonna love it — or hate it. And that’s the best quality I can think of of a movie. It means that Denis Villeneuve made a very personal and thoughtful piece of art.
A feast for the eyes AND the ears. Go see this in the theatre next you that have the best sound system. And the biggest screen, of course.
Big thumbs up to the cast. (Maybe just one thumb up for Jared Leto and Robin Wright…)
You may feel that some scene could have been cut, and you'd be right. Hence, this is not the masterpiece some reviewers are acclaiming, but it's close.… Expand

13 of 24 users found this helpful1311

All this user's reviews

9

SirwootalotOct 6, 2017

This is the closest thing we will ever have to a new movie by Andrei Tarkovsky.
The slow, deliberate pacing is crucial; it is meditative and entrancing, and the scenes between K and his "wife" are thoroughly Lynchian in their drawn-outThis is the closest thing we will ever have to a new movie by Andrei Tarkovsky.
The slow, deliberate pacing is crucial; it is meditative and entrancing, and the scenes between K and his "wife" are thoroughly Lynchian in their drawn-out intense discomfort.

I don't want to spoil too much, but there is a gun battle in a special sort of abandoned room - and it just might be the most bizarre, haunting, and perfect scene in Sci-fi cinema since the 1970s.

The only things holding me back from giving a perfect 10/10 are that the music, while very good, wasn't as "Vangelis-ey" as I would have liked - and that Jared Leto's performance stands out as being very awkward and overwrought in a movie that is otherwise a broiling ocean of wordless emotion and memory.… Expand

11 of 21 users found this helpful1110

All this user's reviews

9

BarreOct 6, 2017

Blade Runner 2049
Director: Dennis Villeneuve
Release Date: October 6, 2017 I cannot stress enough to see this movie only seeing the first trailer to come out and because I don’t want to spoil the story I wont be delving into the summary ofBlade Runner 2049
Director: Dennis Villeneuve
Release Date: October 6, 2017

I cannot stress enough to see this movie only seeing the first trailer to come out and because I don’t want to spoil the story I wont be delving into the summary of the film only the reasons it deserves your attention.. My expectations were set at this middling point of ok fro this film. I though they are either building upon the classic sci-fi masterpiece Blade Runner (released in 1982), or they are delivering this film for a complete cash in and an investment banking on the new generation liking it inevitably setting up future films they aren't necessary franchise films. But that’s the key word in describing Blade Runners brilliance, necessary. Sequels hardly ever do good because they weren't planned to be made, they feel like excess lore that usually feels only questionably fitting. But Blade Runner 2049 not only fits into the blade runner universe, but after seeing it I realized it filled a whole in my heart I didn’t realize I had. Blade Runner 2049 is going to be a pillar of a film I point to that stresses the masterful skill we have today. Roger Deacons , Hans Zimmer, and Dennis Villeneuve form a cinema dream team. The music rumbles with prestige at the perfect moments to exemplify the intensity in the scene. The cinematography is simply some of the best work I've seen from Roger Deacons (also known as one of the most revered and talented cinematographers to hit the industry) with such an expanded amount of colors and riveting set pieces truly do the job of immersing you in this universe. And Dennis Villeneuve has proven himself a master in this new era of film making; transcending one of the greatest films ever made with a story (which I wont spoil) that hooks you with thought provoking themes, sharp turns to keep from falling into predictableness and tugging on the moral heartstrings fantastically all while building these few but very memorable characters with unflinching performances. Everything is delivered with such refinement, Blade Runner 2049 earns the respect from new film goers and fans of the original alike, being one of the greatest sequels ever made and the best film of the year.… Expand

11 of 23 users found this helpful1112

All this user's reviews

9

MerrOct 6, 2017

Beautiful, suprising, sad, tragic and timely made. Not as good as first one, but a worthy sequel. First Blade Runner was asking a questions revelant for times it was made. Blade Runner 2049 asks question revelant for times we all live in andBeautiful, suprising, sad, tragic and timely made. Not as good as first one, but a worthy sequel. First Blade Runner was asking a questions revelant for times it was made. Blade Runner 2049 asks question revelant for times we all live in and the times soon to come.… Expand

11 of 21 users found this helpful1110

All this user's reviews

3

EstaimOct 6, 2017

Style over substance, pretentious emulation over valiant ambition. It's corious that this movie, in a sort of meta-narrative way, tries its best to be a replicant of the the original masterpiece but it totally fails to be what a replicant isStyle over substance, pretentious emulation over valiant ambition. It's corious that this movie, in a sort of meta-narrative way, tries its best to be a replicant of the the original masterpiece but it totally fails to be what a replicant is to a human, a perfect alternative of the original. 163 minutes of Gosling boring looking expression while not a single thought is passing through his damn head, cliché insane villan with zero substance and his clichè nazi dog kicking asses around for reasons. Wrong photography all over: it's a **** noir with a white and orange palette, totally lacking the oppressive atmosphere of the original movie. Plot bad written and bad narrated, full of plot holes and incongruencies. This is not only a bad movie compared to the original, this is an atrocius sci fi movie to the level of 2017 GoTS.… Expand

22 of 77 users found this helpful2255

All this user's reviews

9

TryASummersaultOct 6, 2017

8.6/10 Not a Sci/Fi masterpiece overall but definitely an astoundingly incredible spectacle to behold with some of the greatest imagery of all time. Villeneuve has solidified himself as probably the most visually brilliant director around8.6/10 Not a Sci/Fi masterpiece overall but definitely an astoundingly incredible spectacle to behold with some of the greatest imagery of all time. Villeneuve has solidified himself as probably the most visually brilliant director around right now with grand scapes of vast meticulous detail. As far as the story goes however there are some unnecessarily lengthy scenes/dialogues/plotting that aim to be far bigger than what they end up being and come off as somewhat pretentious at times. The plotting was exceptionally clever yet just suffered from pacing issues and odd twists that are perplexing yet frustrating. Gosling was fantastic as always, but Jared Leto was once again under utilized and his intriguingly fascinating character was barely extrapolated upon. Zimmer yet again crafted a perfect soundtrack and is an utter master of sonic brilliance.… Expand

11 of 22 users found this helpful1111

All this user's reviews

10

GDub1972Oct 6, 2017

This movie floored me. I love they took the themes of the original, but made their own movie, not a remake acting like a reboot. Acting is great, the look and sound is flawless. Definitely seeing it again this weekend.

12 of 23 users found this helpful1211

All this user's reviews

3

AlexMorteyzOct 6, 2017

A very very bad sequel. Instead of a good cyberpunk. Dear Ridley again continues to make films on biblical themes. I'm surprised that Michael fassbender did not appear in this movie.

10 of 50 users found this helpful1040

All this user's reviews

8

HTGamerOct 6, 2017

Blade Runner 2049 is a great neo-noir science fiction epic.

Story is set some 30 years after the first movie, with Deckard (Harrison Ford) having disappeared. Replicant "K" (Ryan Gosling) is working as a Blade Runner for the LAPD and huntsBlade Runner 2049 is a great neo-noir science fiction epic.

Story is set some 30 years after the first movie, with Deckard (Harrison Ford) having disappeared. Replicant "K" (Ryan Gosling) is working as a Blade Runner for the LAPD and hunts down older Replicant models to "retire" them because they are viewed as a threat to humanity. "K" later discovers a truth that might shake the world's foundations, and investigates out of duty and curiosity.

The plot is full of surprises and twists. Ford's appearance in the final 3rd of the film is great, but Gosling is the protagonist, his character (even if artificial) is well expanded upon. Blade Runner isn't a film about a hero saving the world, but it tells a human story.

The film is also a masterful audiovisual experience no one should miss out on.

However not everything is perfect. The ambient soundtrack is mostly majestic but there were times when it was a cacophony and made me mad. The offworld colonies are mentioned in both Blade Runner films but we didn't see anything of them again. Finally there are some minor plot holes and nonsense moments (like in every film), but also a big one with the Revolution.

In the end, Blade Runner 2049 is a great sequel. The first Blade Runner, though unique and intriguing, was somewhat underwhelming and it only had the great "tears in the rain" monologue in the very end that made it a cult hit. Blade Runner 2049 has no such monumental moment, but it's an overall better (if not perfect) film than the first one.

There are talks about a sequel, I'd gladly see more Blade Runner films.… Expand

11 of 22 users found this helpful1111

All this user's reviews

6

gokartmozart491Oct 6, 2017

I write this review as someone who considers the original film a 10. I left the film trying to figure out what the real plot was, what was supposed to reel me in to caring about what was going on and I think the problem is that Ryan GoslingI write this review as someone who considers the original film a 10. I left the film trying to figure out what the real plot was, what was supposed to reel me in to caring about what was going on and I think the problem is that Ryan Gosling is good looking and he has acting talent (sometimes), but he lacks any sort of charisma to make me care about his characters; thus the problem with Blade Runner 2049, he's supposed to be the center of the plot, but I'm not riveted by the conflict he's supposed to be the center of. One thing I will say that detracted from the film for me is that there are more ties to the modern world we know, making this Blade Runner feel much less foreign, alien, than the first one. The first film, you knew it was our Earth in the future, but there was little to drive that home. There is one passage where we're hit over the head with 20th Century popular culture, effectively popping the bubble that Blade Runner so meticulously crafted. Finally, the thing that bothered me from the time that I heard that Blade Runner 2049 was announced and that Harrison Ford would be playing a character in the present of the timeline, as a man who's aged 30 years, except one of the central, crucial plot points of the first film was as to whether Deckard was or wasn't a replicant himself, replicants, who at the time only had a four year life span, the evidence and testimony from the director in later interviews pointed to him actually being a replicant, so he shouldn't be alive. I was expecting some weak excuse to be made in this film, but it wasn't even discussed. K, is plainly made to be a replicant, so it would seem to be further evidence to the point that Deckard, as a Blade Runner, was one; so confusion ensues in the bad way. It was a pretty film, somewhat interesting, one plot point that should have been major felt pasted in, so, go and watch with low expectations.… Expand

9 of 22 users found this helpful913

All this user's reviews

10

Jess_HillOct 6, 2017

Exquisite. This is a beautifully crafted sequel worthy of the original, with the dystopian universe faithfully recreated and enhanced whilst maintaining the iconic aesthetic of the world. With perhaps the finest score of the year, stunninglyExquisite. This is a beautifully crafted sequel worthy of the original, with the dystopian universe faithfully recreated and enhanced whilst maintaining the iconic aesthetic of the world. With perhaps the finest score of the year, stunningly sumptuous visuals, and superb cinematography, this is a sensory feast that is best enjoyed in a theatre. Gosling gives his most enigmatic performance to date, and the performances are polished and nuanced throughout. Carefully paced and edited, this takes time to allow poignant moments to breathe, resulting in a very long but satisfying experience. A sublime film. 9.94/10… Expand

14 of 25 users found this helpful1411

All this user's reviews

10

jaredMOct 6, 2017

This film is a visual masterpiece, and a true feast for the eyes. at 2 hrs 45min you lose track of that extended run time as you become drawn into this brilliantly imagined world that hearkens back to the original with an efficiency unseen inThis film is a visual masterpiece, and a true feast for the eyes. at 2 hrs 45min you lose track of that extended run time as you become drawn into this brilliantly imagined world that hearkens back to the original with an efficiency unseen in most modern sequels of old films. Denis Villeneuve truly has knocked this movie out of the park and proves he was the perfect choice to take the blade runner reigns. The plot is engrossing and keeps you hooked with every subtle development.This Movie IMO is the single greatest film of the year and is a worthy and respectful sequel to the original film. blade runner 2049 is a refreshing piece of art in sea of rehashed garbage and easily stands above and beyond anything that has come out for awhile.… Expand

11 of 21 users found this helpful1110

All this user's reviews

9

MichaelObeOct 6, 2017

Thirty years after the events of the original film, a new line of replicants was created, more humble and subordinate. The corporation is headed by Mr. Wallace (Jared Leto). Officer LAPD K (Ryan Gosling) learns top-secret information thatThirty years after the events of the original film, a new line of replicants was created, more humble and subordinate. The corporation is headed by Mr. Wallace (Jared Leto). Officer LAPD K (Ryan Gosling) learns top-secret information that threatens the existence of the whole world. Trying to find answers to his questions, Kay begins looking for the former "blade runner" Rick Deckard (Harrison Ford), who disappeared without a trace 30 years ago. The extraordinary work of Roger Dickins deserves all sorts of praises and awards (Oscar winner finally?), and Denis Villeneuve continued the film of Sir Ridley Scott with dignity. This is a Denis's own film, which hardly fit into the standard understanding of the sequel. But a very long timing (~2 hours 43 minutes) is able to tire even those who are very pleased with the movie.… Expand

9 of 18 users found this helpful99

All this user's reviews

4

McGillotineOct 6, 2017

If I were addressing Blade Runner 2049 as a standalone film I may have been more lenient in giving the film a seven, however since this film is a sequel to Blade Runner (1982), my initial verdict of this film as it stands is a four.

BladeIf I were addressing Blade Runner 2049 as a standalone film I may have been more lenient in giving the film a seven, however since this film is a sequel to Blade Runner (1982), my initial verdict of this film as it stands is a four.

Blade Runner (1982) is by no means a perfect film, polarizing reviews at the time of release, a box office bomb and seven different versions of the film over the span of 25 years is enough to put any casual moviegoer off seeing this film within their lifetime. My experience with Blade Runner started with the director’s cut in 2005, I found it was boring, contrived and didn’t watch it again until nearly a decade later. Whenever I watch a film my objective opinion on whether a film is good or bad is never subject to change, however Blade Runner is an anomaly and upon repeated viewed of both the director’s cut and final cut my view shifted from hate to love for this film. Blade Runner (1982) is not a film in the conventional sense but instead an experiment, filled to the brim with story, culture and lore it has inspired countless sci-fi and neo-noir projects since its release. Blade Runner 2049 however feels more so like a conventional film and while it captures the Blade Runner look, the feel is lost in translation boiling down to a movie that’s excessively artificial and overall ‘okay’.

Blade Runner 2049 opens with ‘K’, A Los Angles Blade Runner played by Ryan Gosling tasked primarily with the job of ‘retiring’ The last of the Tyrell corp. Nexus 8 units who have exceeded the Nexus 6 lifespan of four years to more open-ended lifespans like human beings. While on a job K discovers an old and dark secret left behind by Eldon Tyrell's played by Joe Turkel in the 1982 film, Tyrell corp. that threatens the co-existence of human and replicant societies. All the while a darker force is at work by the name of Niander Wallace, whose Wallace corporation have since succeeded Tyrell in replicant manufacturing. What follows is a heavily long film at 2 hours 48 minutes that travels from location to location, with visits to familiar faces such as Rick Deckard played by Harrison Ford in the films second half to ease that nostalgic itch. Performances in this film vary tremendously from actors such as Ryan Gosling who easily carries the film and weaker performances from actors such as Jared Leto who once again blows his role out of proportion to be the films biggest ‘douchebag’. Actresses such as Robin Wright and Ana de Amras pull great performances in addition to actors such Dave Bautista plays a memorable performance as Sapper despite his small screen time. Harrison Ford feels a lot less versatile an actor as he did in the original Blade Runner but is otherwise enjoyable to watch as an older Deckard who seems to be tired from it all, desiring seclusion in his later life. One of the major realms this film comes apart in is the story. As stated before this film is very long at 2 hours and 48 minutes in comparison to its predecessor which is less than 2 hours long. While the outline of the film is promising and the first third of the film feels like a Blade Runner movie, the remaining two thirds make things needlessly more complicated as new side plots and locations are introduced that aren’t particularly interesting nor necessary in conjunction with the main story. The romance is another issue I had with the film and without spoiling much a scene between ‘K’ and Ana de Armas ‘Joi’ is quite possibly the most awkward romance scene I have ever witnessed in film. Furthermore, the films conclusion felt quite choppy and while topping Rutger Hauer's ‘Tears in rain’ monologue is by no means an easy task, the lack of existential questions or room for thought like the original film, leaves you more included to go ‘huh’ then question what it means to be human.

Another issue is the films soundtrack, while I can’t see why they didn’t get Vangelis back for the sequel considering he is still both alive and active, Denis Villeneuve instead hired Jóhann Jóhannsson to compose the films score. What we’re left with is a score that is fairly meh and isn’t all too memorable, many of the films dramatic scenes aren’t benefitted by the newer music and as a result you don’t tend to take much notice of the soundtrack. Part of me also thinks that Villeneuve found the soundtrack was underwhelming aswell as tracks from the original film are still used in certain sequences of the film. It is also worth noting that this is not the original soundtrack too as Hans Zimmer and Benjamin Wallfisch were brought in to modify the soundtrack.

As it stands until another viewing Blade Runner 2049 is an okay film by itself but is a less than stellar sequel that I think in time people will forget about it.… Expand

8 of 29 users found this helpful821

All this user's reviews

1

kmulhollandOct 6, 2017

I love the first film and watched it when it was first out then again many times. I read a review by Rotten Tomatoes before going. Highly scored. I disagree. Boring, drawn out, lacking in action and characterisation. Best scene was theI love the first film and watched it when it was first out then again many times. I read a review by Rotten Tomatoes before going. Highly scored. I disagree. Boring, drawn out, lacking in action and characterisation. Best scene was the first scene. And worst of all unnecessary drama. Where was any Rutger etc? A dismal sequel.… Expand

14 of 49 users found this helpful1435

All this user's reviews

6

tropicAcesOct 6, 2017

I could wake up tomorrow or in five years and realize this is a masterpiece, but as it stands now BLADE RUNNER 2049 Is a gorgeous-looking film with massive pacing and narrative issues. It has no right being 146 minutes long, and theI could wake up tomorrow or in five years and realize this is a masterpiece, but as it stands now BLADE RUNNER 2049 Is a gorgeous-looking film with massive pacing and narrative issues. It has no right being 146 minutes long, and the incredible effects, cinematography and a growling Harrison Ford can only distract you so long.… Expand

34 of 67 users found this helpful3433

All this user's reviews

9

HannahKOct 6, 2017

I went in with low expectations and a feeling that I was going to come out disappointed. I'm thrilled to say that while not perfect, Blade Runner 2049 is in my opinion the best film of the year {so far} and unlikely to be topped. Worth theI went in with low expectations and a feeling that I was going to come out disappointed. I'm thrilled to say that while not perfect, Blade Runner 2049 is in my opinion the best film of the year {so far} and unlikely to be topped. Worth the wait? You bet!… Expand

23 of 36 users found this helpful2313

All this user's reviews

10

cabo32Oct 6, 2017

With the original film being one of my favorite movies of all time, it was hard for me to believe the sequel could live up to the original. It does not live up to the original. It equals the original and simultaneously provides a storylineWith the original film being one of my favorite movies of all time, it was hard for me to believe the sequel could live up to the original. It does not live up to the original. It equals the original and simultaneously provides a storyline that seamlessly continues the original, 30 years later, while throughout paying 'homage' to the original in so countless subtle ways that blend the two productions together. Blade Runner is the movie it became thanks to the amazing visuals and the groundbreaking and timeless score by Vangelis which created the Los Angeles of the future in Blade Runner.

Blade Runner 2049 blends the original Vangelis sound with strikingly heavy, dark, atmospheric sound. Think of it as Vangelis blended with Trent Reznor & Atticus Ross' Book of Eli sound, and combine them with subtle hints of the Gravity & Interstellar soundtracks.

Exceptionally heavy and chilling and just as Vangelis' original score, creating a future world of undeniable and frightening reality; and for 2049, the overbearing heaviness of the music during the slow, unfolding scenes throughout the film, especially Sea Wall, provide a stunning depth and impact to the film. 2 hours 43 minutes too long? Not if you're a fan and looking for another 5 versions.

This is the Director's Cut and the storyline is much more profound and creepy once you think about it on your way home. There a few sequels that stand on their own to the original. This is a masterpiece of special effects, sets, and the storyline sets up BR3 effectively. It took 35 years for the sequel and it was worth the wait for the right people to come together and create their vision of BR and brilliantly succeed.

Worth the wait? Absolutely; and a must see on a big screen with a powerful sound system behind it the first time.

As a big fan of the orginal, thank you to everyone involved in the making of this film. It is....an experience.… Expand

13 of 24 users found this helpful1311

All this user's reviews

10

captain_kabzOct 6, 2017

It may not be perfect as it may not be as brilliant as the original picture. Nevertheless "Blade Runner 2049" is definetly an amazingly beautiful movie that has a lot of love for it's predecessor. It is seen in all of the aspects of theIt may not be perfect as it may not be as brilliant as the original picture. Nevertheless "Blade Runner 2049" is definetly an amazingly beautiful movie that has a lot of love for it's predecessor. It is seen in all of the aspects of the motion picture starting from soundtrack and camera work ending with characters and storyline. So I must say that the sequel totally deserves being called "Blade Runner".
I definetly have an infinite amount of respect for Denis Villeneuve for doing such an amazing films, keeping the Balde Runner legacy and cyberpunk genre alive.… Expand

11 of 21 users found this helpful1110

All this user's reviews

3

DrakorthaOct 6, 2017

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Contrived story and Pretentious story telling. Over the top exposition that drones on and on to overly explain and give feeling of importance to an unimportant plot. So the plot goes something like this; Rachel and Deckard had a child. so the movie spends 2 hours trying to convince you its important somehow. CGI Rachel was the lowest point of the movie, with the villain suggesting that it was planned for Rachel & Deckard to meet in some sort of master plan.

There are a handful of good scenes in this movie. Such as the opening scene, or in some of the visuals. But much of it is style over substance. The good pieces are far and few. And in between are just horribly long expository scenes where characters you dont care about talk about nothing at all. Nothing important or interesting happens throughout this entire movie. Just some stuff happens, some nice visuals thrown in, then it's over. I just wanted something to happen that I could care about. ANYTHING. go down in the streets. show what life is like down there. Let things happen on screen. Get me invested in a character or in the world. I just got so tired of boring people talking. Many of the sets are bland and uninspired. Bland white walls and bland white floors. or yellow walls and yellow floors. Don't bother if you enjoy the small details, because they aren't there. Many of the environments look sterile and lack the Blade Runner 1982 details. The Original movie wasnt like this at all. The environments were dirty, messy. unorganized, and lived in. You don't get that feeling at all in 2049. I get it that its supposed to be like 30 years later. But come on. This isnt meant to be **** star wars.

The soundtrack was calm and sentimental at times, and then at other times very obnoxious and loud. I didn't enjoy the tone of this movie. The original soundtrack by Vangelis was beautiful. But this was like a dying cat at times. Also, dubstep. Really? What I would have liked to see in a new Blade Runner film would be a grounded movie about a Blade Runner who hunts replicants. We got that in the opening scene like an appetizer. But then the rest of the movie is just up in the clouds, trying hard to push its meaningless plot as interesting and meaningful when in actuality it isn't. Blade Runner 2049 is style over substance.

My rating: Mediocre… Expand

23 of 88 users found this helpful2365

All this user's reviews

1

supermackOct 6, 2017

I did not like it. It felt like the movie was trying to be profound and meaningful but was just boring and gimmicky. I also felt it was too violent. The violence in the original film was part of the story - it was visceral and painful. InI did not like it. It felt like the movie was trying to be profound and meaningful but was just boring and gimmicky. I also felt it was too violent. The violence in the original film was part of the story - it was visceral and painful. In 2049 it was gratuitous and unnecessary.

I checked my watch 3-4 times during the film and left as soon as the credits rolled. So, yeah I was not impressed.

I was expecting to see some blade running but instead I was left baffled by the meaningless plot.

The crowning moment of the film's failure was the very poor ending. It was limp. The ending of the original film was powerful and nerve-shredding.… Expand

14 of 52 users found this helpful1438

All this user's reviews

0

ShadowareOct 6, 2017

+ Great panoramic views & cgi, good sound quality, cool actors.
- boring story & paper thin plot. Minutes of slow motion movement & staring somewhere behind the camera. To be honest, we all know how it is to be caught in thoughts for hours,+ Great panoramic views & cgi, good sound quality, cool actors.
- boring story & paper thin plot. Minutes of slow motion movement & staring somewhere behind the camera. To be honest, we all know how it is to be caught in thoughts for hours, but actually seeing it on screen? Pew, thats not the reason to go to the cinema. That whole movie felt for me like they took the main Charakter from Drive (ultra boring movie in my opinion) and trow him into the world of Blade Runner. Go watch the 1 Movie or Blade Runner Black Out 2022, that anime short movie is far better than this. But THIS, its not even the best movie of the month :(… Expand

14 of 62 users found this helpful1448

All this user's reviews

9

ChickenphOct 6, 2017

This is an outstanding movie. Very well-directed, and the design (and attention to detail) is exceptional...I can’t believe it, but this is a worthy sequel to the original.
It’s definitely atmospheric, so don’t go in expecting the emphasis toThis is an outstanding movie. Very well-directed, and the design (and attention to detail) is exceptional...I can’t believe it, but this is a worthy sequel to the original.
It’s definitely atmospheric, so don’t go in expecting the emphasis to be on action. I don’t know how else to say it: my friends and I left the theater and agreed that we were blown away.
Instant classic. There, I said it!… Expand

10 of 21 users found this helpful1011

All this user's reviews

9

yadevolOct 6, 2017

An absolute feast for the eyes {and ears} and despite it's running time and pace, absorbing and captivating. Unlike Arrival which I thought was very overrated and dare I say dull, Villeneuve has triumphed with this definitely worth the wait sequel.

16 of 30 users found this helpful1614

All this user's reviews

6

DefinitelyMaybOct 6, 2017

I've just finished watching Blade Runner 2049 and visually, its an amazing film that is second to none. After that said, I'm kind of disappointed with the film and don't think its anywhere as a lot of the critics I like have stated the filmI've just finished watching Blade Runner 2049 and visually, its an amazing film that is second to none. After that said, I'm kind of disappointed with the film and don't think its anywhere as a lot of the critics I like have stated the film to be.

First as a Denis Villeneuve fan who have seen all his English works (apart from Enemy), this is by far his least impressive work. The problem is not really his direction, but rather the less than impressive writing and some very on the nose-exposition that makes the world less believable as it should be. Perhaps the biggest problem with this film is that it raises a lot of questions that don't really invite intrigue as it hopes it should do. The film is plot heavy compared with the original, but unlike the original, I don't feel the world building in 2049 is as good as the original. For example, the original was always a character study with Deckard who lived in this futuristic LA who was suddenly plugged back to his job. Here we saw the cyberpunk world he lived in with many interactions between characters that seem real and genuine. However in 2049, Ryan Gosling's character is never really interacting with characters that feel part of the world, but rather characters to further the plot point.For example, many of the character interactions involve just two people who either point Gosling to somewhere or discuss exposition. You never get a sense of any of these characters. Note in the original the society seems lived in with Dekard constantly having to push people away or him drinking the alcohol at the bar which seems like what he would normally do etc. The biggest offender in 2049 is that the film has characters and events that lack consistent motivation with logic jumping points that bugged me throughout the film. Because I don't wanna spoil any of the plot really, its worth noting that a lot of what happens doesn't necessarily follow the things said or done preceding it. That said, the original Blade runner didn't really per se have much of a plot either, but which is why I've always classified the original as a character study more than anything else. Given that Villenueve is a master of this genre (given all his films are character studies), it is ultra disappointing that Ryan Gosling's character doesn't go through the same journey nor development that Deckard went through. Sure there might be some sentimental aspects that happens in the film, especially with the female characters, there is never a scene like when Deckard starts drinking (after killing Zhora) or his nod at the end that symbolises anything gone through, so when sentimental events happen in 2049, I never felt any emotion towards these events unfortunately.

The other problem with 2049 is that it sets up a lot of hints of a bigger world which feels like playing an RPG game with many side quests available. In fact, I would go so far as to compare this movie as awfully similar to the Deus Ex game series. Part of the problem lies with the co-writer Michael Green who also happen to write Alien Covenant and Logan which had the same issues popping up with this film (great premises and start, but then devovles into convuluted plots and sets up that goes nowhere)
Given that the original Blade runner inspired so much of the genre we know today, its disappointing that 2049 doesn't really offer us anything new or done better in terms of the sci-fi trope. In fact, 2049 rather borrows a lot of its plot and themes from current films that have done it better. There a little bit of Her here, a little bit of Children of Men here, and even a little bit of Ex Machina, but when put together, does not feel as satisfying.

Also with the extremely long movie length (I don't mind how long a film is), there could be a case made that it didnt need to take nearly 3 hours to tell this story. A lot of the film is broken into smaller dense sequences that involve people talking either about what is going on with the world, or furthering the plot. This is why I don't believe the world building is as good as the original. Whilst 2049 remains ever faithful to the Asian themes, the motif of the eyes etc, it has nowhere the ambiguity and the guts to tackle bigger issues like corporation takeover or the idea of 'white flight'. In fact, 2049 seems to abandon a lot of the themes from the original that doesn't seem to reflect in a more futurstic LA.

Overall 2049 is still a dazzle of a film and is worth watching as a good sequel. However, it is clearly overstated as the acting and cinematography are great, but not so acclaimed as some might say. There are lot of things that work in this film, but I feel as though this doesn't per se elevate the film to the status as the original. I hope this doesn't become a franchise and that if they decide to do the next iteration, it should be something with a more a personal setting and philosophical overtone, rather than a plot heavy noir.… Expand

39 of 90 users found this helpful3951

All this user's reviews

10

Darth_KaneOct 6, 2017

A near perfect movie, and a sequel we never thought would be possible. It touches themes from the original with respect, while expanding the plot and adding to the world intelligently.
The cinematography and music is also exceptional, oftenA near perfect movie, and a sequel we never thought would be possible. It touches themes from the original with respect, while expanding the plot and adding to the world intelligently.
The cinematography and music is also exceptional, often the music and picture works together to show us a hypnotic view of a grim future that seems too real. Denis Villeneuve is definitely one of the best directors of our time.… Expand

148 of 186 users found this helpful14838

All this user's reviews

10

MasterRileyOct 6, 2017

Blade Runner 2049 is riveting, magical, tense, transportive, emotional, and so much more. And I'm not just saying that. It gets everything right; from the intricately written plot, to the amazing performances, atmospheric music, lighting,Blade Runner 2049 is riveting, magical, tense, transportive, emotional, and so much more. And I'm not just saying that. It gets everything right; from the intricately written plot, to the amazing performances, atmospheric music, lighting, gorgeous cinematography, and set design. Like the original, it makes you get lost in its amazing world. The plot is full of surprises and will keep you on the edge of your seat until the credits roll. It stands up equally to the original, but in my opinion takes it even a step further. 2049 has a larger emphasis on humanity, bringing some really amazing heartfelt and emotional moments. It is one of the best films of the year and absolutely needs to be seen with fresh eyes.… Expand

11 of 22 users found this helpful1111

All this user's reviews

9

QuietGiantOct 6, 2017

Creating a worthy sequel to one of the most influential films of all time is one hell of a tall order. It deserves no less than a dream team of talent and thankfully that's exactly what it got. The direction is sharp, the visuals pop, theCreating a worthy sequel to one of the most influential films of all time is one hell of a tall order. It deserves no less than a dream team of talent and thankfully that's exactly what it got. The direction is sharp, the visuals pop, the performances emanate, and the writing is true to the source without merely aping all the old notes or ruining all the mystery. Core themes of the genre it helped create like the line between illusion and reality or defining humanity and one's identity are both upheld and explored in increasingly nuanced ways. Those worried about a neo noir film devolving into an action fest can breathe too as that was oversold by the marketing. The one trademark I do miss though is Vangelis' multilayered, ever present composition. 2049 strikes a different tone and isn't afraid of quiet moments, but the absence of one of its predecessor's most defining features remains conspicuous. Still, nearly everyone involved in the project is at the top of their game and should be proud of the work they've accomplished. Time will tell exactly how well the sequel stacks up to the 'original', but in any case it comes as close one could ask for today. I can still scarcely believe it, myself.… Expand

18 of 32 users found this helpful1814

All this user's reviews

10

someonegetmeoutOct 6, 2017

Speechless. One of the rare case when the sequel is at the same level of the first movie. I passed all the movie breathless due to an engaging story, an awesome photography and dialogues with themes that make us think about our future.Speechless. One of the rare case when the sequel is at the same level of the first movie. I passed all the movie breathless due to an engaging story, an awesome photography and dialogues with themes that make us think about our future. Because a future like Blade Runner is closer to what we think.
The result is outstanding and I can't find a fault. Perfect.… Expand

11 of 22 users found this helpful1111

All this user's reviews

8

LamontRaymondOct 6, 2017

It's crazy just how much I felt like I was back in the 80s. The tone and feel of the movie so mirrored the original. But the grandeur and sound (I think this film did some serious damage to speakers in my AMC) are off-the-charts. I love howIt's crazy just how much I felt like I was back in the 80s. The tone and feel of the movie so mirrored the original. But the grandeur and sound (I think this film did some serious damage to speakers in my AMC) are off-the-charts. I love how it rolls out thematically, and it scratches that nostalgic itch with several call-backs. Yes, it's a little long and certain scenes get stretch out, but wow, were the women roles in this film incredible. I'll have to see it again.… Expand

13 of 24 users found this helpful1311

All this user's reviews

10

cap1tal1smOct 6, 2017

I watched the original multiple times, including studying it as a film covered in a class on cinema, and this one not only: 1. Pays homage to the original; 2. expands intelligently upon the plot and world; 3. (Having brought two friends toI watched the original multiple times, including studying it as a film covered in a class on cinema, and this one not only: 1. Pays homage to the original; 2. expands intelligently upon the plot and world; 3. (Having brought two friends to see it who HAD NOT seen the original) Is a complete and utter masterpiece as a standalone film in and of itself.

10/10 easily, everything was phenomenal, the minor cons are it does plod on a bit too long at times, and Jared Leto had a Jokeresque-short amount of screentime.… Expand

11 of 22 users found this helpful1111

All this user's reviews

8

EpicLadySpongeOct 6, 2017

The very surprising fact how this sequel, 35 years later from the original's release, manages to take the things very lovable about its predecessor and make them a lot better for the modern people. The long 35-year wait is finally over. YouThe very surprising fact how this sequel, 35 years later from the original's release, manages to take the things very lovable about its predecessor and make them a lot better for the modern people. The long 35-year wait is finally over. You can go in and out with a hyped face because this sure is going to be a movie you got to see for yourself to feel the real experience.… Expand

13 of 24 users found this helpful1311

All this user's reviews

Blade Runner 2049

User Reviews