Blade Runner 2049

10

THEwookieNov 14, 2017

Smart. Elegant. Beautiful. Relevant. All the things "great Sci-fi" is and can be will be found in this film. Beautiful performances captured by an innovative Director bring to life an amazing story in the world of "Blade Runner" WETA workshopSmart. Elegant. Beautiful. Relevant. All the things "great Sci-fi" is and can be will be found in this film. Beautiful performances captured by an innovative Director bring to life an amazing story in the world of "Blade Runner" WETA workshop outdoes themselves in their amazing model work as well as in the digital effects arena and this screenplay is passionate and powerful with a deep respect of the art that came before it. Hollywood should focus on making more pictures like THIS and less like "Transformers 5".… Expand

5 of 6 users found this helpful51

All this user's reviews

6

toronto_puzzlerNov 14, 2017

The film is visually stylish, but it is also derivative and emotionally unsatisfying. I found the pace slow and the mood depressive. While the film was entertaining, I missed the 'science' part of science fiction. "Blade Runner 2049" sharesThe film is visually stylish, but it is also derivative and emotionally unsatisfying. I found the pace slow and the mood depressive. While the film was entertaining, I missed the 'science' part of science fiction. "Blade Runner 2049" shares the spirit of Villeneuve's other films, while adopting the look and characters of the original "Blade Runner".… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

3

PeterayNov 12, 2017

Bring a pillow and blanket - this is a sleeper... What began as a visually striking movie with excellently staged cinematography, intriguing sets, and a few beautiful, sexy women, became a tiresomely long snore-fest. This dragged on...andBring a pillow and blanket - this is a sleeper... What began as a visually striking movie with excellently staged cinematography, intriguing sets, and a few beautiful, sexy women, became a tiresomely long snore-fest. This dragged on...and on...and ON...requiring much effort to stay awake through as the story-line took the occasional break from mind-numbing scenes of the characters meandering around in dark lands, to senseless violence. People literally snored this, my wife fell asleep, and I wanted only one thing FOR IT TO FINALLY END. Borrrrrrring... Ryan Gossling stars in another stinker. Save your money and watch TOTAL RECALL with the tracking so slow it adds another 45 minutes to the movie.… Expand

2 of 11 users found this helpful29

All this user's reviews

8

Compi24Nov 7, 2017

Director Denis Villeneuve continues his hot streak of stunning films with a sequel to one of cinema's - strike that - art's most influential pieces of expression. "Blade Runner 2049" is a mesmerizing plot-thickener with just enough intrigueDirector Denis Villeneuve continues his hot streak of stunning films with a sequel to one of cinema's - strike that - art's most influential pieces of expression. "Blade Runner 2049" is a mesmerizing plot-thickener with just enough intrigue to keep you hooked until the film's incredible final act. Let's not forget the unmistakably beautiful production design and cinematography, ultimately rendering this final product into what I believe to be 2017's best looking motion picture. A real wondrous feat that's left me salivating for whatever Villeneuve's got cooking up for next time.… Expand

6 of 12 users found this helpful66

All this user's reviews

4

elsiemonsterNov 6, 2017

I don't get why people love this movie so much. I admit that it was visually beautiful and the acting was great, but it was too quiet and slow. The story was okay-interesting. Why was it almost 3 hours long? Half-way through, I wasI don't get why people love this movie so much. I admit that it was visually beautiful and the acting was great, but it was too quiet and slow. The story was okay-interesting. Why was it almost 3 hours long? Half-way through, I was questioning my decision of watching this in a theater. If I was at home, I may have not finished it if I didn't fall asleep first.… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

10

alva3901Nov 5, 2017

Blade Runner 2049 is the sequel that measures equally to its predecessor, a masterpiece in its own right. However, it seems much like the original, that Blade Runner 2049 will not meet its status as an iconic sci-fi film for some years toBlade Runner 2049 is the sequel that measures equally to its predecessor, a masterpiece in its own right. However, it seems much like the original, that Blade Runner 2049 will not meet its status as an iconic sci-fi film for some years to come. This is a visual masterpiece, depicting the most beautiful ruin of a city that has graced a film. From beginning to end in its 2h 44min run-time, it captivates the wonder of a decrepit dystopian world, all of which is shot beautifully by the incomparable Roger Deakins. The cast led by Ryan Gosling who plays "K" and Harrison Ford who returns as "Rick Deckard", act superbly to create an awe-inspiring film on the big screen. Under the direction of Denis Villeneuve, Blade Runner 2049 shows that he is one of the most talented directors and one of the few masters of storytelling in the movie business today.… Expand

10 of 13 users found this helpful103

All this user's reviews

9

Gamed2longNov 5, 2017

Blade Runner 2049 is a beautiful unicorn of a film. The kind of film that only comes along once every few years. And it'll probably be talked about for years. Its very much art house film but with a modern blockbusters budget and resources.Blade Runner 2049 is a beautiful unicorn of a film. The kind of film that only comes along once every few years. And it'll probably be talked about for years. Its very much art house film but with a modern blockbusters budget and resources. The film plays with complex concepts that can quickly turn into debates. People have complained that the film is long and drags on. And if your looking for action events and plot twists that will be your experience. The film is like a 10 layer puzzle. The problem, like the original, is that the simplest layer on the bottom is strange and doesn't have much going on. Since that is usually all there is to simpler action flicks, if you don't look on other levels for more then you get bored. But on every other layer of the puzzle the pieces add up. The rules of the universe are self consistent and not broken. The narrative makes certain logic jumps without spoon-feeding you the information. Again, off-putting to people used to being spoon-fed every plot point. My experience for the first viewing of the film was with a language I am not yet fluent in. So a lot of the conversation was lost on me. I was amazed by the visual storytelling that was going on. My second viewing, in my native language, only added to it, though it helped I could focus on other details the second time around. More than 1 viewing suggested! Overall it is an incredibly impressive film, toying with the fundamental concept of what it means to be human. And what it means to be human in a world where memory can be implanted, where creations are becoming more perfect than their creators and what it means when you can't tell the difference anymore. In a way the film borrows ideas from other P.K.Dicks novels and takes them great places. True to the universe of the original film it also cut key elements of the book out. Overall best film I've seen in ages. Also props to the director. The romantic encounter scene is something absolutely unique. Given how often that contents been put to film, truly a feat!… Expand

6 of 11 users found this helpful65

All this user's reviews

9

akenaton1984Nov 4, 2017

Gran obra que retoma la película de 1981 desde un ángulo distinto. Lleno de híper-textualidades y un uso maravillosos de las tomas panorámicas en una civilización colapsada. Ejercicio de reflexión sobre la importancia de la memoria.

7 of 10 users found this helpful73

All this user's reviews

8

TimW001Nov 1, 2017

A beautiful sci-fi movie and a fantastic addition to the genre. The movie has outstanding colour use and cinematography. Also is able to tell a complex story with twists. Without rubbing it in the audience's face we all get the story. TheA beautiful sci-fi movie and a fantastic addition to the genre. The movie has outstanding colour use and cinematography. Also is able to tell a complex story with twists. Without rubbing it in the audience's face we all get the story. The movie is also not afraid of the long shot with no interruptions. I recommend seeing this movie.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

10

Voodoo123Nov 1, 2017

+Excellent visual style
+Memorable soundscape
+Fantastic cast +Superior existentialist plot +Welcome addition to the 'blade-runner-verse' -Be warned dystopic themes and 3 hour running time awaits! As a huge fan of the final cut blu ray I was+Excellent visual style
+Memorable soundscape
+Fantastic cast
+Superior existentialist plot
+Welcome addition to the 'blade-runner-verse'
-Be warned dystopic themes and 3 hour running time awaits!

As a huge fan of the final cut blu ray I was blown away by how this film bested my expectations. Worthy of the hype and in a lot of ways felt it could pass as a delightfully dystopic 3 hour black mirror/twighlight zone episode.… Expand

10 of 13 users found this helpful103

All this user's reviews

10

ExtintorOct 10, 2017

A phenomenal movie that left me completely stunned and wanting to watch it again almost immediately. As was the case with the original, the themes explored within are immediately impressive but also promise to reward the viewer who revisitsA phenomenal movie that left me completely stunned and wanting to watch it again almost immediately. As was the case with the original, the themes explored within are immediately impressive but also promise to reward the viewer who revisits the story again and again. Masterpiece.… Expand

10 of 16 users found this helpful106

All this user's reviews

8

MrNikitaTVNov 1, 2017

Бегущий по лезвию 2049- качественный и прекрасно сделанный фильм, не утративший дух оригинала. Это фильм с хорошим актерским составом и с неплохим сценарием и отличной картинкой. Что в фильме не понравился, так это слабый злодей и ляпы вБегущий по лезвию 2049- качественный и прекрасно сделанный фильм, не утративший дух оригинала. Это фильм с хорошим актерским составом и с неплохим сценарием и отличной картинкой. Что в фильме не понравился, так это слабый злодей и ляпы в сюжете. В целом фильм отличный, всем рекомендую идти!… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

10

MysticDingoOct 31, 2017

10/10. Way underseen movie that made much less money than it should have. This is a true successor to the original Blade Runner, and is a completely self contained story. There is no sequel baiting here, though one could be made if they10/10. Way underseen movie that made much less money than it should have. This is a true successor to the original Blade Runner, and is a completely self contained story. There is no sequel baiting here, though one could be made if they wanted to. This is unlikely though, seeing as how, while highly rated, the film just didn't bring in the audiences to make the kind of money that the production company was hoping for, and it's made quite a bit more money over seas than in the American market. It did make back it's budgeted money and with a small profit to boot, but the numbers just aren't there such that this will likely be the last Blade Runner movie. That being said, this movie will certainly live on as a sci-fi cult classic for years to come! This is easily the best movie that I have seen all year. The acting was superb by everyone, especially Ryan Gossling. Honestly, I haven't been a huge fan of Ryan as he normally acts in a lot of romance and artsy fartsy types of films that don't interest me much (see "The Notebook" and "La La Land"), but this movie showed me what a broad actor he truly is and the depth of his acting ability. As for aesthetics, the movie is beautifully shot. The cinematography is very cool and the CGI isn't noticeable. The story is also amazing. It more than lives up to the standards set in the first film and in my opinion surpasses it. Also, in some ways, BR 2049 more resembles the original work "Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep" by Philip K. Dick (the book that Blade Runner is based on) than the first film. Obviously neither film are really all that close to the book except in general concepts, but 2049 captures the dystopia portrayed in the book much better than the first movie did, likely due to advances in our film technology. I won't go into the story too much as I don't want to spoil anything. All I will say is that this film explores many of the same questions in the first movie and then some, with plenty of twists and turns and revelations to keep you hooked from beginning to end.

Denis Villeneuve as director, once again proves himself to be a true modern master. Many people have been complaining about where the next generation of genius directors are to replace people like Coppola, Scorsese, Spielburg, Kubrick, Stone, and Scott. With the exception of the Cohen and Nolan brothers we seem to be in a drought in our modern age of new upcoming genius directors, especially when the lions share of films are made by Michael "BOOM SPLOSIONS" Bay and J.J. "Lens Flare" Abrams. Well, one day we may very well be adding Villeneuve to that list of true masters if he continues to create movies like this.

Conclusion: If it's still in your local theater, GO SEE BLADE RUNNER 2049! It's my choice for Best Picture, and it would be criminal in my book if it wan't even nominated.… Expand

5 of 7 users found this helpful52

All this user's reviews

8

somedude14Oct 31, 2017

Has some pacing issues, especially near the end, but this was pretty good. Nailed the atmosphere of the original, even though the story isn't a retelling but an entirely new direction. Harrison Ford also put more effort into his performanceHas some pacing issues, especially near the end, but this was pretty good. Nailed the atmosphere of the original, even though the story isn't a retelling but an entirely new direction. Harrison Ford also put more effort into his performance as Rick Deckard here than he did as Han Solo in "The Force Awakens". Still the "old guy" showing up to pass the torch of the brand he helped build to the next generation by being recast in the same role to give it more credibility (not that this movie needed him, but it certainly doesn't hurt), but he definitely put more juice into this role. Maybe Han is a money thing to him and Deckard is more important - after all, Ford *did* want Han to be dead for good after the events in Star Wars: Episode 5.

Jared Leto puts in an uncharacteristically calm performance here. I would've liked to see his character get more development so he could have more screen time.

Would love to get a modern point-and-click game in this new universe - the only downside to this idea is Westwood isn't around to do it proper justice, so maybe it's better if that doesn't happen!… Expand

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

7

Termin8terOct 31, 2017

I originally didn't care at all about Blade Runner 2049. But when I was impressed by the second trailer, and found out that the director of the excellent Arrival was directing this, I gave it a shot. I had a mixed experience. Yes, the visualsI originally didn't care at all about Blade Runner 2049. But when I was impressed by the second trailer, and found out that the director of the excellent Arrival was directing this, I gave it a shot. I had a mixed experience. Yes, the visuals are amazing, the acting is good, and the soundtrack has some good parts, but I found the soundtrack got a bit repetitive at times, and there were a few of obnoxiously strange and sickening scenes in the movie that serve no purpose. But at least the director treats the audience like adults and doesn't cram a bunch of over bloated exposition down our throats. There were only a handful of scenes that I genuinely enjoyed, though. I might rewatch this later on, and I'm probably gonna watch the original Blade Runner soon, but at the moment, Blade Runner 2049 is just a decent movie for me.… Expand

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

8

FillTheAndroidOct 30, 2017

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? Yes, they do. So the film says, not the book. And new part of the Blade Runner continues the story of those who have souls, even if they're nothing more but replicants. Deep loud music written by Hans Zimmer with bright neon pictures of the future draws this world you'd never want to live in, but the world you'd want to take a look at. Blade runners still chasing replicants, replicats still trying to save their lifes. But now there's a greatest goal in this world. Replicants need to find a messiah, who will lead them to the freedom.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

8

poewilsonOct 30, 2017

The P.H. Metric 78.75/100

During my showing 7 people walked out, and there was only probably 15 of us, and they made it no more 50 minutes in. Several people I went to the theater with fell asleep, yet critically applauded and here comes theThe P.H. Metric 78.75/100

During my showing 7 people walked out, and there was only probably 15 of us, and they made it no more 50 minutes in. Several people I went to the theater with fell asleep, yet critically applauded and here comes the divide. Movies critics love, film does not make money even when they have huge investment and movies critics don’t love film makes enough money to fund 5-15 more movies. So in short this film is a disservice, because ultimately fewer studios are willing to take the risk on artsy films and all this film needed was to tighten up its pacing and it would have probably broken even and in terms of cinematic vision that is hardly selling your soul.

Directing: 8.75/10

The directing is superb and I am shocked with the level of investment that Villeneuve was given as much control as he was. Though it must be said that this film draws out shots for too long and this is from a man who loved the film Stalker. Where as something like Stalker is completely about the philosophical nature this film still tries to make it self an action/thriller/mystery film and these long takes end up killing the mystery and feels more like there is not enough story to go around, which ultimately is true. The shots themselves are lovely.

Acting: 7/10

Ford is Ford the man is not that great of an actor and he really is just cashing in on old franchises at this point. Gosling’s muted touch was decent enough and while Leto’s weird character was weird in a good way the character itself was unneeded. The main villain of the piece was over the top and worthy of being in a film that is trying so hard to be nuanced. She ends up coming off as a jarring screeching noise.

Cinematography: 10/10

Deakins’s cinematography shines, absolutely shines and this has to be his year. 13 noms and with Lubezki currently attached to a special award Oscar his major comp for the year is not there.

Editing 8.5/10

I feel bad for Joe Walker he kept the ship as tight as he could throughout, but ultimately due to the nature of these long drawn out takes that it feels like he was ultimately overruled when it came to where to cut the film.

Score/sound effects: 5.5/10

I would have scored this higher if I had not seen Arrival, where as the industrial style sound design should have been more engaging I could not help feeling they were reusing it from Arrival. Of course the sounds were meant to be jarring given all the silence we were fed, but ultimately it feels like that opening sequence in the remake of Funny Games, it is not shocking or jarring in the sense the creator wants, but more in the sense please turn down the TV those noises are starting to give me a headache.

Visual Effects: 9/10

I get a sense of Silent Hill (the first game) it feels like the fog and dust in certain scenes is there to hide rather than enhance and when one goes back to the original Blade Runner these modern effects (specifically shots of the city) do not look like the technology has really pushed the boundaries, in fact it looks more like the status quo, which mind you the status quo is excellent, but not genre defining.

Writing: 3/10

I am sad to find out there was a writer for this film. Now I previously mentioned Stalker which is similar in many regards, however the dialogue in that is profound, where is the dialogue in Blade Runner 2049 thinks it is. With such cliche android film lines as basically sacrificing yourself is the way to prove you are human. This concept never sits well with me, as apparently for an android the most human thing is to sacrifice yourself so that the human may continue to live a better life than you. That sounds like the kind of thing an android would be programmed to do. Asimov anybody? Everything just keeps pushing the fact that these androids want to be human, but ultimately it keeps slapping them down and saying they are not. It adds nothing to the greater debate over AI and ultimately when compared to the sheer quality of everything else in the film it looks out of place and useless, as if someone was brought in last minute to patch it up. Secondly the whole it could be him story was let out of the back to early on, so it made the double twist so predictable that it steals any power it had.

Production Design: 9.5/10

Those in production design you all need more respect and deserve to be pushed further into the foreground, because when you do an excellent job no one says anything, only look how well this and that is, but you owned this film.

Costume Design 9/10

Well done, especially Leto’s character, though I will say the only real negative was Wright’s outfit. What is this 2049 and she is channeling the 50’s or was she literally a copy of the police chief from Futurama. Also Ford’s was a little meh.

Make-up/Hairstyle 8.5/10

Again Leto is the high point, but not much else as everything is high quality, but nothing feels astounding.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

9

KerokiOct 29, 2017

Película visualmente muy bella, con buena fotografía y efectos. tal vez uno de los fallos es demorar algunas escenas mas de lo necesario ademas de ser lenta, esto puede llegar a ser aburrido o tedioso para algunos espectadores, aunque a mi enPelícula visualmente muy bella, con buena fotografía y efectos. tal vez uno de los fallos es demorar algunas escenas mas de lo necesario ademas de ser lenta, esto puede llegar a ser aburrido o tedioso para algunos espectadores, aunque a mi en lo personal me gusto. En cuanto a la trama me parece muy buena, es cierto que tiene algunos fallos de guion muy pequeños, pero en general muy buena pelicula.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

8

superproblemOct 29, 2017

typical slightly prolonged movie w/ Gosling. you can easily not watch a 1982 film, if you look at the prologue. Gosling is a god. symbols symbols symbols xd.

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

3

blahhhhOct 29, 2017

Why is this movie 2 hours and 45 minutes?

Saw it with a friend who is like a cult-fan of the original. I just can't get over how long the movie was. The story wasn't particularly interesting to me either.

3 of 13 users found this helpful310

All this user's reviews

7

SkulbOct 29, 2017

It is not easy to pick up a movie like BR to try and make a sequel. Use the interminable Hollywood tropes that almost every movie uses these days and you'll lose the adult crowd. Slow it down, like BR 2049, and you lose the attention spanIt is not easy to pick up a movie like BR to try and make a sequel. Use the interminable Hollywood tropes that almost every movie uses these days and you'll lose the adult crowd. Slow it down, like BR 2049, and you lose the attention span deficit youth. Stay too close to the original and the sequel becomes redundant. Diverge too much and it alienates fans of the original.
And indeed BR 2049 manages to somehow fall into all of these traps of sequel-making. It ends up as a sort of stew of Hollywood tropes, like the inevitable female Terminator in this movie, and artsy scenography in lieu of world building. Low clouds, rain and plenty of top down shots get rid of the need for convincing visual detail of the sort found in the original. And that gives us plenty of time for intellectualist masturbation over contemporary politics in what was supposed to be a movie representation of Gogol's Dead Souls.
But thanks to the American invasion of the planet it is of course now impossible to talk about slavery without immediately ending up in a squabble over racism. But these are two completely separate issues, which you can spend the rest of your life without being able to explain to an American. And then you can't understand either Gogol or Blade Runner.
And I'm not sure if the people who wrote BR 2049 understand it either. Having said that though, this is a good movie. But it is a bit long and very quiet in places. I was tired when I came into the theater and really struggled staying awake in the middle of it. Luckily something exploded loudly just as I was dozing off and I was able to stay conscious for the ending. But there needs to be a reason for a movie to be close to three hours long. And I'm not sure if I see it. Some trimming in editing, some work on the script to make it coherent with the original and some careful chiseling of some of the more heavy handed characterizations would not have been time wasted. But it is what it is. But if I have to see one more unrealistic ninja woman with glasses in a movie I might just go live in a monastery.

One thing that annoys me terribly is that Decker could not have been alive after thirty years if he was a replicant. This is the key theme in BR, which hints very strongly that he is in fact a replicant. And if he isn't a replicant there should be little need for him to hide in BR 2049. It was obviously more important to give Ford his cameo though, and narrative cohesion be damned! Why can't the people writing the script at least be made to carefully watch and truly understand the movie they are rebooting. This crew did the same thing with Alien Covenant. Fortunately BR 2049 is a million times better than that disaster though. Good call to keep Ridley Scott as far away from this movie as humanly possible.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

8

FonkeOct 28, 2017

Great movie, really enjoyed watching it. The movie was a bit too long for my liking, but but the music and acting is on point. Definitely worth watching.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

4

cadoverOct 25, 2017

The fact that the studio added Jared Leto to the script much later on to make the film 'edgier' should tell you all you need to know. A profit-hungry studio hack job that destroys the story line of the original. Pretending I never saw it soThe fact that the studio added Jared Leto to the script much later on to make the film 'edgier' should tell you all you need to know. A profit-hungry studio hack job that destroys the story line of the original. Pretending I never saw it so the original remains beautiful in my mind. Nothing against the director, but the nudity was unnecessary and gratuitous.
If you love the original, you won't miss anything if you skip this sequel. The number of shill reviews on metacritic is getting out of hand.… Expand

2 of 12 users found this helpful210

All this user's reviews

7

VexarOct 25, 2017

I have been waiting for this movie for a few decades it has the same vibe and open ended questions left by the first movie, and extended the first movies story in ways I never thought it would. I wish it did better at the box office I wouldI have been waiting for this movie for a few decades it has the same vibe and open ended questions left by the first movie, and extended the first movies story in ways I never thought it would. I wish it did better at the box office I would love to see more chapters in this world.… Expand

5 of 7 users found this helpful52

All this user's reviews

10

SeptemberFlyOct 25, 2017

Blade Runner 2049 will probably be looked back upon in the future as one of the more compelling sci-fi dramas of all time. It executes nearly everything to perfection, continuing to build upon some of the great aspects of the first film whileBlade Runner 2049 will probably be looked back upon in the future as one of the more compelling sci-fi dramas of all time. It executes nearly everything to perfection, continuing to build upon some of the great aspects of the first film while being able to avoid some of the narrative blunders of the original. The setting and visuals of the film are beyond beautiful. It does a great job of building upon the already majestic world of blade runner while adding some unique aspects of its own that helps it not feel like just an extension of the first film. The music is subtly very good as it helps you feel immersed into the film while not feeling overbearing. The narrative and characters are the things that stand out most about the film. Despite being nearly 3 hours long, it almost never feels boring and is captivating the whole way through. The only time I noticed that the film slowed down a bit was around the end of the first hour of the film, but quickly picks back up again and is incredibly engaging the rest of the way through. Ryan Gosling gives a great performance as he usually does and Harrison Ford gives one of the best performances of his career. Ana de Armas also gives a surprisingly good performance, although her character occasionally felt underutilized. Blade Runner 2049 is an amazing film that both fans of the original and new fans alike should enjoy.… Expand

5 of 6 users found this helpful51

All this user's reviews

8

soydansilvaOct 25, 2017

visually glorious, intense and dark; this direct sequel to 'Blade Runner' works as a futuristic journey with a mixture of nostalgia, but ultimately disappoints with a basic and repeated story - "more a machine than a person"

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

9

dapennOct 25, 2017

First off, this movie is quite amazing. From its cinematography, to its acting, to its overall plot it is a phenomenal movie from start to finish. But this is not a movie to go see with your friends. The one thing you need to know is that youFirst off, this movie is quite amazing. From its cinematography, to its acting, to its overall plot it is a phenomenal movie from start to finish. But this is not a movie to go see with your friends. The one thing you need to know is that you really need to pay attention to what happening. You should not look at your phone when watching this movie. This movie is almost 3 hours long and you really need to pay attention in order to get whats going on in this film. The pacing of the movie is slow and it takes its time explaining what is happening on screen, but paying attention is a definite. But if you have the time, this movie is surely worth the money!… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

3

MaxPayneIsGodOct 24, 2017

A visual masterpiece which unfortunately falls grossly flat of the (undeserved) hype. The original is a niche Sci-Fi classic which was not particularly popular upon release, in fact it was ridiculed. Any movie with 5 different versionsA visual masterpiece which unfortunately falls grossly flat of the (undeserved) hype. The original is a niche Sci-Fi classic which was not particularly popular upon release, in fact it was ridiculed. Any movie with 5 different versions obviously has something wrong with it, Ridley Scott has clearly acknowledged how broken it was/is. Harrison Ford has gone on record numerous times complaining about the entire process which is reiterated by his performance this time around.
A run time of 2hrs 45mins is totally unnecessary and the entire thing could've been over and done in less than 90. Everything is drawn out, way longer than it needs to be.
Gosling is as wooden as ever, he's channeled his character from Drive, Leto's over-the-top wannabe character actor melodrama is campy, he's still living off his Dallas Buyers Club success, the guy can't act. All the female leads are stereotypical Bond-esqe feme-fatals or damsels in distress. And lastly, Ford, Ford clearly doesn't want to be there (again) and with the amount of screen time he gets his $'s per minute pay check would be interesting.
They story is utterly laughable and has none of the mystique of the first one, its so completely contrived that to perceive this as anything other than a Hollywood cash grab is a joke. The "Love" scenes are a jab at where mankind is heading because of technology, but again, totally unnecessary and cringe worthy.
To summarise, I was stunned at how bad this film was, not disappointed, it was more like disbelief that something like this was (A) Made (B) Made this poorly.
Not the worst box office movie of the year, but after Wind River, IT and Logan its miles off the mark.… Expand

4 of 18 users found this helpful414

All this user's reviews

10

CLUELESS35861Oct 24, 2017

Outstanding sequel, shame the millennials can't wrap their heads around it without an "app for that". Continues the Philip K. Dick tale in great form, great cinema, great story. I suspect some the criticism is from people to lazy to read theOutstanding sequel, shame the millennials can't wrap their heads around it without an "app for that". Continues the Philip K. Dick tale in great form, great cinema, great story. I suspect some the criticism is from people to lazy to read the book, or, watch either movie, or have no semblance of imagination, and just read critiques and pile on. Needs to be seen in a theater, do not wait for Redbox, pretend its 1982 and the VHS store isn't going to see a rental issued for at least two years!… Expand

10 of 14 users found this helpful104

All this user's reviews

10

AdamJensen77Oct 24, 2017

The best posible sequel to a cult classic like Blade Runner, with the most beautiful visuals I've ever seen. The story is deep with lots of symbolism and meaning, if you are expecting big action scenes and explosions everywhere this is notThe best posible sequel to a cult classic like Blade Runner, with the most beautiful visuals I've ever seen. The story is deep with lots of symbolism and meaning, if you are expecting big action scenes and explosions everywhere this is not the movie for you. Ryan Gosling, Harrison Ford, Ana de Armas, Leto, etc... everyone is goddamn perfect in its rol. Thank you Denis Villeneuve for this new master piece.… Expand

11 of 15 users found this helpful114

All this user's reviews

1

lee2017usOct 23, 2017

From a movie enthusiastic person, this is the WORST NON-ACTION 'ACTION' MOVIE EVER 'CREATED' ON EARTH !!! I could not have been forced to WASTE MY 3 HOURS on it EVEN If I was PAID $50 to sit in this movie while TRYING NOT TO FALL ASLEEP !!!From a movie enthusiastic person, this is the WORST NON-ACTION 'ACTION' MOVIE EVER 'CREATED' ON EARTH !!! I could not have been forced to WASTE MY 3 HOURS on it EVEN If I was PAID $50 to sit in this movie while TRYING NOT TO FALL ASLEEP !!! and BTW, I need my retribution for the CONSTANT OVERPLAYED LOUD MUSICAL EFFECTS for 3 HR Pain & Suffering..
PS the ONLY Saving Grace to this movie is the beautiful virtual Cuban actress Ana De Armas!… Expand

3 of 18 users found this helpful315

All this user's reviews

10

xxxsssjjjkOct 23, 2017

good acting, music, scenery, sound (was too loud though)....................................................................................................................................................

10 of 13 users found this helpful103

All this user's reviews

8

MrWonderfulOct 23, 2017

The original Blade Runner is still my overall favourite movie so far in time. I went into 2049 with high hopes. It met my expectations but does not surpass the original as I thought it would. The story is good, especially once the second halfThe original Blade Runner is still my overall favourite movie so far in time. I went into 2049 with high hopes. It met my expectations but does not surpass the original as I thought it would. The story is good, especially once the second half commences and a big plot reveal is made. Visuals are astounding and makes up for the length of the film. I felt the movie could have gone longer and I would have remained interested because of the cinematography and excellent acting. The only real let down for me is the musical score, it just didn't contain the same emotive vibe as Vangelis' provided in the original. To me Blade Runner breathes life because of that amazing soundtrack whereas 2049 was too low key and decidedly similar to many another sci-fi movies of recent years such as Oblivion and Interstellar. I hope there will be a "Director's Cut" once released on 4K/Bluray. I also hope one day Blade Runner will evolve into a story that includes the mysterious Off World location(s) that the to films elude to.

I'm glad I saw 2049 on the big screen.… Expand

7 of 11 users found this helpful74

All this user's reviews

6

DavidpaOct 23, 2017

First one was more action based this one was more discovery be trying to uncover the mystery to the aspect of the plot Where is world directed what could’ve been a little bit shorter

1 of 8 users found this helpful17

All this user's reviews

8

FlexedacornOct 23, 2017

The Blade Runner sequel was an unexpected surprise, seeing how the original is now over 30 years old. I have a love hate relationship for the original as it was a bit of a slow burn, but I respected it for its world building, uniqueThe Blade Runner sequel was an unexpected surprise, seeing how the original is now over 30 years old. I have a love hate relationship for the original as it was a bit of a slow burn, but I respected it for its world building, unique cinematography and great ending. That being said the sequel did a great job of building upon the already established mythos.
Blade Runner 2049 did not feel revolutionary to filmmaking, but was an overall very good Sci Fi film. The acting was great, most notably the performances by Sylvia Hoeks and Jared Leto. Both actors really stole the show for every scene they were in. Some audiences reviews stated the movie felt too long, but honestly the pacing felt fine to me. My only critique of the film is that it did not have the bizarre vibe of the original. Gone were the mini clockwork replicants, crazy night clubs and claustrophobic streets. This is less of a knock on the film and more of a nod to how much work went into making the original film.
Overall I recommend this film to any fan of Sci-Fi films or those who like the original 1982 film.… Expand

8 of 11 users found this helpful83

All this user's reviews

5

wee3200Oct 23, 2017

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I thought if i won't very like this film, the reason will be i didn't understand the storyline or scenes. But i didn't, at least while i'm watching i know what's going on in every scenes, i can understand the storyline, but... i still not very like this film.

I can understand even K knowing he is not the chosen one, but his action that still chose to help Rick to meet his daughter are very selfless, it's meant a lot, usually if i seen similar happen on the big screen, i will very touching, and mostly will loved the film because of this, but this didn't happen on Blade Runner 2049.

Peoples have surprisingly high review for this film, too bad i'm not one of them that can enjoy in this film.… Expand

2 of 11 users found this helpful29

All this user's reviews

10

drbarlogOct 22, 2017

Great movie in every aspect. The true sequel of Blade Runner. The movie has stunning visuals, incredible music and plot is very solid. I don't afraid of Dune adaptation any more.

10 of 13 users found this helpful103

All this user's reviews

5

Dr-spacemanOct 21, 2017

This has a fantastic visual style and is probably the best movie ive seen as far as special effects and artistry is concerned. However the plot is not great and lacks a hook as compelling as the original blade runner. The villains are muchThis has a fantastic visual style and is probably the best movie ive seen as far as special effects and artistry is concerned. However the plot is not great and lacks a hook as compelling as the original blade runner. The villains are much less interesting when compared with Roy Batty in the original and the film's just too darned long. It needed more scenes like the opening one which had a compelling character. Only decent other character was Harrison Ford's. It is not gonna become a cult film like it's predecessor.… Expand

1 of 9 users found this helpful18

All this user's reviews

3

SchnitzelPoofOct 20, 2017

If I could save one person the time and money, then I've done my part. If you like fun or entertainment in any form, don't waste your time on this film. If you like engaging, captivating storytelling - this movie is not for you.
I can't evenIf I could save one person the time and money, then I've done my part. If you like fun or entertainment in any form, don't waste your time on this film. If you like engaging, captivating storytelling - this movie is not for you.
I can't even call it pretentious. It is a bad film because there's nothing appealing in it. Not bad in a good way, either, but simply boring, with unengaging characters, a foreign world that's never properly explained, and a tedious self-discovery journey, with some distant anti-human goals tacked in. The protagonist has zero charm, and the antagonist, or side characters, are about on the same level. The one minor character who had me curious is killed right in the opening scene - which happens to be the best in the film, by the way. Besides him, the only thing that merits some positive points is Harrison Ford's performance, which manages to bring in some levity, and a relatable character. However, he doesn't receive enough screen time to justify wasting 2.5 hours of your life watching a director experimenting with gloomy visual scenes, that have extremely dark lighting, and advance at an extremely slow pace, for no good reason. Rather than draw you in, they end up having zero emotional impact - just like the tiny, dead letters of the opening exposition.… Expand

4 of 18 users found this helpful414

All this user's reviews

10

Bugger217Oct 20, 2017

I've always loved the original Blade Runner, but never held it quite as high as many other sci-fi fans do. It does so many things incredibly well, but a certain chilliness always prevented me from fully connecting to it. Blade Runner 2049 isI've always loved the original Blade Runner, but never held it quite as high as many other sci-fi fans do. It does so many things incredibly well, but a certain chilliness always prevented me from fully connecting to it. Blade Runner 2049 is a different story. It's equally chilly on the surface, but has a warm, beating heart at its core.

Everything I didn't get out of the original, I got here. Director Denis Villeneuve and crew take the world, atmosphere, and themes created by Ridley Scott's team in 1982, and expertly expand upon those elements, providing a more intriguing plot, and more well-rounded characters for you to connect to.

Villenueve continues to prove he's one of the best in the business right now, pumping out great films year after year after year. He can seemingly do no wrong. The visuals in this thing are absolutely mind-blowing as well. I'll be shocked if the legendary Roger Deakins doesn't finally get his Oscar for this film. And The production designs is simply outstanding. I truly felt as if I had been transported to another place and time. Despite running 40 minutes longer than the original film, it never dragged. I never felt the need to check the time. It's perfectly paced, totally engaging, and as of right now, Blade Runner 2049 is my favorite film of 2017.… Expand

5 of 8 users found this helpful53

All this user's reviews

10

nanddoOct 20, 2017

For me it was one of the best Sci Movies of the last decade. Amazing photography, scene... the actors are magnificent acting, Ryan gosling just astonishing.

10 of 14 users found this helpful104

All this user's reviews

9

Will-BOct 19, 2017

It's visually stunning with a semi-easy plot to follow with some of the best performances you'll see from Gosling and Ford. This will go down as not only one of the best movies of 2017, but also one of the best sequels of all time.

9 of 10 users found this helpful91

All this user's reviews

9

MrLissOct 19, 2017

For me, the "Blade Runner, 2049" was the most anticipated film of the year. Ditched the pair for first in session and in view I can say that the expectations are justified. We have the same old Blade Runner — the philosophy in the cyberpunkFor me, the "Blade Runner, 2049" was the most anticipated film of the year. Ditched the pair for first in session and in view I can say that the expectations are justified. We have the same old Blade Runner — the philosophy in the cyberpunk world of the future, which is accompanied by gorgeous visuals, sincavage sound and neon signs. As a sequel, the tape looks incredibly well from the first minute it is visible that the project was a true fan of the original film. The atmosphere absorbs the head, the events stretch smoothly and slowly, which is a characteristic feature of the series and for many it is a minus (but not me). Despite the close relationship with the original, tape Villeneuve is sure to surprise and show something new. Almost completely disappeared aesthetics of film Noir, and instead proposed increased portion of action and a greater variety of locations, introduces viewers to the world of the future outside of big cities. Speaking about the actors and their characters I would like to highlight Dave Batista, which was very little, but in such a short amount of screen time he managed to create a memorable and interesting way, the background which can be seen in the short prequel to "2048: Nowhere to run", filmed by Luke Scott. Also for a small fraction of the duration in time perfectly to reveal the characters of Jared Leto and Harrison Ford. The latter even in the joint scenes with the main character managed to pull the viewer's attention on himself his endless charisma. The Key Officer in the performance of Ryan Gosling is ambiguous. In General, the role of the canadian classic — Ryan plays silent maloemotsionalny young people with a sad look, and in this film it is also due to the peculiarities of the character.

There were, of course, and without the drawbacks. For me, the obvious shortcomings of steel sagging narrative at the end of the first hour timekeeping, small, slow, even compared to the original tape, not until the end of the open arches of the characters (mostly Wallace), as well as the soundtrack. He, of course, good, Hans Zimmer as always on top, but still a new "Running" lacks the charm that gave the tracks by Vangelis, composer of the first part. But none of these minuses can not name at least serious, why the impressions of the paintings remain very positive. Done a great job with the material, the technical side of the film is just beyond praise and deserves at least Oscar nominations for the soundtrack, visual effects and cinematography. A worthy continuation of the classic, which once again proved to everyone that Denis Villeneuve is one of the best directors of our day.… Expand

5 of 8 users found this helpful53

All this user's reviews

7

AkumaJackOct 19, 2017

A decent film. The directing is on point and the settings are quite as good as the original blade runner. The problem is the plot. Especially in the last third of the movie. Still a good film thanks to Gosling acting and Vileneuve directing.

7 of 9 users found this helpful72

All this user's reviews

10

noahbldnOct 19, 2017

Those SJWs can piss off am I right? Seriously though, this is the kind of movie that shows exactly why people make movies. This is the kind of movie that we'll look back in thirty years and when everyone complains how no one makes good moviesThose SJWs can piss off am I right? Seriously though, this is the kind of movie that shows exactly why people make movies. This is the kind of movie that we'll look back in thirty years and when everyone complains how no one makes good movies we can tell them it's because they never went to see them. Every shot is eyegasmic, every scene blocked well, all performances are perfect, Villeneuve consistently proves himself as one of the best modern directors. This movie is about as perfect as it gets when it comes to films.… Expand

6 of 9 users found this helpful63

All this user's reviews

9

thebombOct 19, 2017

Blade Runner 2049 is a audio-visual masterpiece which thrives on its innovative scenery - each location is unique. It's hard not to get mesmerized by it's thrilling story which leaves as many questions open as it answers. The three hourBlade Runner 2049 is a audio-visual masterpiece which thrives on its innovative scenery - each location is unique. It's hard not to get mesmerized by it's thrilling story which leaves as many questions open as it answers. The three hour experience holds your attention up to a point where you don't want it to stop. While the acting doesn't deliver anything out of the ordinary, the attention-grabbing unlinear storytelling combined with purely beautiful cinematography makes this film a true gem. This is one to watch over and over again.… Expand

6 of 8 users found this helpful62

All this user's reviews

10

EwanManleyOct 18, 2017

Blade Runner 2049 is in my mind the best looking movie i've seen in a long time. But the story isn't slacking either, its beautifully written and just super super like good

10 of 13 users found this helpful103

All this user's reviews

7

cterryr2Oct 18, 2017

It looks great. The acting is good. The production values are excellent. I almost fell asleep at least 3 times while watching it in the afternoon. It's too slow paced. It's confusing. It's too long. On one hand I was bored and on the other IIt looks great. The acting is good. The production values are excellent. I almost fell asleep at least 3 times while watching it in the afternoon. It's too slow paced. It's confusing. It's too long. On one hand I was bored and on the other I was thrilled. I should have waited for the Netflix release though. I wasn't blown away by anything and think it's over hyped.… Expand

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

6

PlzRMOct 16, 2017

Это очень приятный фильм, в стиле Бегущего, он так же отлично смотрится в этой вселенной, но фильм от части потерял свое противостояние человека и репликанта, теперь в основе сюжета другие цели, которые не такие уж и глупые, за происходящимЭто очень приятный фильм, в стиле Бегущего, он так же отлично смотрится в этой вселенной, но фильм от части потерял свое противостояние человека и репликанта, теперь в основе сюжета другие цели, которые не такие уж и глупые, за происходящим приятно наблюдать. Главный герой, очень приятный, не карикатурный, за его действиями стоят вполне понятные цели. В целом все хорошо, только смена направления сюжета слегка путает, но их можно понять, они хотели сделать, что-то свое. Будущее у этой франшизы есть и смотреть стоит, но начинать лучше с первоисточников.… Expand

3 of 12 users found this helpful39

All this user's reviews

2

FlorentineOct 18, 2017

No, no, nooooooo! Please don't ever make me sit through that again. You can talk about character development and genres and whatever. This movie will take away your will to live! If 2049 is going to look like that, I'm glad I won't beNo, no, nooooooo! Please don't ever make me sit through that again. You can talk about character development and genres and whatever. This movie will take away your will to live! If 2049 is going to look like that, I'm glad I won't be around. By the way, I had a private screening with 3D and RPX and an assigned seat!!!… Expand

4 of 18 users found this helpful414

All this user's reviews

10

faellOct 18, 2017

An incredibly beautiful cinematography, a great story, great characters and performances, and a powerful and beauty ending. One of the greatest sci-fi movies ever made.

11 of 16 users found this helpful115

All this user's reviews

8

BlakDak666Oct 18, 2017

I never had seen the first Blade Runner film in any of its versions, so when watching this film I was nervous that I would not understand certain parts that referenced it. Thankfully, the film does nods and respectfully grows from itsI never had seen the first Blade Runner film in any of its versions, so when watching this film I was nervous that I would not understand certain parts that referenced it. Thankfully, the film does nods and respectfully grows from its previous entry and sparingly gives those references.

The visuals and technology used in this is phenomenal and this makes it one of the most impressively shot and well constructed worlds and society I have seen in films for years. The technology is believable and the apocalyptic-like world Blade Runner presents is creative and yet relative to the viewer. The acting was pretty dam good with Ryan Gosling , Harrison Ford and a few other characters putting a really impressive display of emotions and realistic humanity to the scenes. The action is a bit low, but it serves to move the plot forward and can be somewhat unnerving to watch. If you were expecting constant action in a sci-fi noir film, you will be very disappointed.

While I think the film was shot excellently, the cast did a great job on acting, I feel the story and certain scenes could have been better improved or toned down. The running length of the film has become a sort of like a joke for critics and they are not wrong as it is nearly two and half hours. Certain scenes could have been cut out and shorten a bit to propel the plot forward much more effectively. A couple head scratches came from me when certain plots were revealed and felt some moments were sort of cheesy to boot, so I would say that going in to see this film has to be under a certain mindset and test in patience. If you like constant action and ADHD style pacing, you will not enjoy this movie. Blade Runner 2049 is a well done film that successfully stands as its own sequel rather than a copy and paste of the original. Its world and visuals are award winning excellent, the casting was pretty good and only through excessive use of scenes and certain confusing areas do I feel the only cons for this film. If you like films and appreciate art, you are required to see this film. If you like a good detective movie, this is a recommendation. If you seen the original Blade Runner and not this yet, you should as soon as possible. This will not get everyone on board loving it, but those who appreciate its world and film as art will relish in this films for years to come.… Expand

8 of 11 users found this helpful83

All this user's reviews

10

SebastianPOct 18, 2017

Its the most beautiful and thoughtprovoking film ive ever seen. This is the peak of the filmmaking and no one should miss it! Even the first one was not as good as this, im blown away and cant wait to view ist again.

5 of 10 users found this helpful55

All this user's reviews

10

Morten67Oct 18, 2017

Utterly amazing! Perfect blend of dystopia and reviviting panoramas, screenplay and atmosphere. If Rutger Hauers character had partaken I had been sublime for me but that would probably mess with the story and the CGI.

6 of 11 users found this helpful65

All this user's reviews

10

davyjonesrunnerOct 17, 2017

Seen this on Imax with my Girlfriend and it is one of the best sequel to date. Don't watch it on Wi-Fi make sure its Hi-Fi because this is the best Sci-Fi. It is a well-delivered film the ASMR at portions of the film gives me chills. TheSeen this on Imax with my Girlfriend and it is one of the best sequel to date. Don't watch it on Wi-Fi make sure its Hi-Fi because this is the best Sci-Fi. It is a well-delivered film the ASMR at portions of the film gives me chills. The surround sound of this film is also one of the best in film to date.… Expand

10 of 14 users found this helpful104

All this user's reviews

9

mhouston52Oct 17, 2017

Blade Runner 2049 is a beautiful movie with some of the best cinematography I have ever seen. Although it did not attract many fans other than the typical Sci-Fi dystopian fan, it is one of the best movies I have ever seen. I give it a 9/10

6 of 9 users found this helpful63

All this user's reviews

10

OJFeynmanOct 17, 2017

A rare sequel that improves its predecessor without changing it. Masterful, expansive, devastating. Ridley Scott could not have made this film--it cares so much about the soul of the original. That soul is present in every frame of this veryA rare sequel that improves its predecessor without changing it. Masterful, expansive, devastating. Ridley Scott could not have made this film--it cares so much about the soul of the original. That soul is present in every frame of this very different film.… Expand

6 of 10 users found this helpful64

All this user's reviews

10

CometerOct 17, 2017

Well worth it. And quite frankly they managed to keep it true to the original while still being original. This is a movie so worth watching in the big screen for the astonishing sound and breathtaking sci-fi environments. But that is not whatWell worth it. And quite frankly they managed to keep it true to the original while still being original. This is a movie so worth watching in the big screen for the astonishing sound and breathtaking sci-fi environments. But that is not what the movie is about. It's about characters. Story.… Expand

10 of 19 users found this helpful109

All this user's reviews

10

KaratekaOct 17, 2017

A near perfect movie that misses a few key notes but makes up for it in other ways. Everyone feared that this movie would be a pointless sequel but somehow the crew succeeded at allowing it to breathe on its own and in many way surpass theA near perfect movie that misses a few key notes but makes up for it in other ways. Everyone feared that this movie would be a pointless sequel but somehow the crew succeeded at allowing it to breathe on its own and in many way surpass the original. The world of Blade Runner isn't a world where one man, or replicant, can save the entire world. In fact, it addresses the genre in asking whether or not that is even necessary of the hero of your story, never mind whether it is necessary for a being to be considered "human." K is Joe because he wants to be Joe. K chooses a small act of kindness over saving the future of his race because that is the connection he values more. There is so much to unpack from this film. Did Joi actually love K or was she simply a program telling him what he wanted? Was she an example of the fake and how close it can be to the real? Or were all the women in the film interested in K an example of the fake, in terms of the "human" connection so desperately wanted.
Some issues could have been fixed before release, the cinematography was perfect, but the soundtrack by Zimmer doesn't even come close to matching the perfection of the original soundtrack by Vangelis. Additionally the flashbacks seemed out of place for a Blade Runner movie, but as a Villeneuve staple it was probably to be expected. If I can make one recommendation to a person who loves film, it would be to watch this movie, and to think about it.… Expand

6 of 10 users found this helpful64

All this user's reviews

10

Jes1310Oct 16, 2017

WOW – a near perfect sci-fi movie. I have seen a lot of shorter films, that felt much longer than BR2049. Every minute of BR2049 is important. From the long “atmosfear” scenes, that does nothing more that add depth to the dark, sinister, grayWOW – a near perfect sci-fi movie. I have seen a lot of shorter films, that felt much longer than BR2049. Every minute of BR2049 is important. From the long “atmosfear” scenes, that does nothing more that add depth to the dark, sinister, gray world that is BR2049. Stunning sound and visuals go hand in hand to create a world like no other. Gosling, Armas, Leto and Ford all do a great job in bringing their characers to life. See it in I-MAX if possible !

For me a much more powerful I-MAX experience than Dunkirk.… Expand

5 of 8 users found this helpful53

All this user's reviews

3

ourtimehascomeOct 16, 2017

You might as well watch the original Blade Runner from 1982. It has stronger acting, better characters, an unpredictable story and fascinating cinematography. Though 2049 excels with its slow pace and spectacular presentation, it isYou might as well watch the original Blade Runner from 1982. It has stronger acting, better characters, an unpredictable story and fascinating cinematography. Though 2049 excels with its slow pace and spectacular presentation, it is ultimately a lifeless (pun intended) philosophical diatribe. A quintessential cerebral mess which asks too many questions without answering any from the first film. It's less like a sequel and more like a diversion. The ending is enough to make me wish I was a replicant so I wouldn't be so disappointed.… Expand

8 of 25 users found this helpful817

All this user's reviews

8

TwomblerOct 16, 2017

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Like many of us I've seen the original Blade Runner movie countless of times (Director's Cut is, by the way, the only version I acknowledge) but I've also read late Philip K. Dick's novel Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? Unfortunately this movie isn't a masterpiece although director Villeneuve has left his mark to every frame. And those frames are beautiful!

Blade Runner 2049 will receive Academy Award for best cinematography without a doubt. But it will not receive such honours for its screenplay.

If you've read Dick's novel you may share my opinion which is that this movie totally dismisses its biggest catch, androids. Now we have an android Blade Runner which has a virtual girlfriend. We have also an blind oligarch who desires to spread his androids to the rest of the universe. We have a retired Blade Runner who's gone missing and at some point you'll have a deja vu regarding Harrison Ford if you have seen Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of The Crystal Skull. Heed my words!

It takes a bit too long to build the athmosphere for the plot twist and we spend too much time inside this android Blade Runners apartment. His female supervisor is also quite useless and I felt she was in the movie only to emphasize how heartless android villain can be. But then again, android doesn't have a heart.

Our protagonist does wonder if he's something more than a mere machine. However writers didn't had the courage to write a human character because there is a quite popular theory about Deckard being a android himself.

In conclusion Blade Runner 2049 is a great movie but unfortunately doesn't beat the original. If you like Villeneuves earlier works you'll love it and if you love Ryan Gosling you'll probably watch it more than once.… Expand

6 of 20 users found this helpful614

All this user's reviews

1

StedeBonnetOct 16, 2017

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Sad to say it but Blade Runner 2049 is a dark, dull, hot-mess of a film—largely pointless and does nothing to advance the franchise. Only lonely fan-boys whose greatest fantasy is to take Siri or Alexa to their senior prom will find anything to like about this film. Worse yet is that the plot is basically lifted from the DaVinci Code--our hero deciphers sketchy clues from a lost age only to discover that he is searching for a "miracle" child hidden and protected by a secret society. Sound familiar? Visually interesting if you enjoy prolonged shots of bizarre architectural spaces of pointless design and Ryan Gosling's scruffy nerf-herder face staring blankly at them. At least the soundtrack contains enough needlessly booming discordant notes to regularly startle viewers back to consciousness as they struggle to endure the 164 minute running time. Very disappointing.… Expand

6 of 27 users found this helpful621

All this user's reviews

9

JLuis_001Oct 11, 2017

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Blade Runner is one of my favorite movies of all time, let's start out there, not only it's a great movie; it's also one of the fundamental pieces of science fiction in cinema. Ridley Scott's vision, the images, the music, another legendary role for Harrison Ford, the cult to the film, everything that encloses the name Blade Runner implies too many things.

Now let's take into account a director like Denis Villeneuve who in recent years has been cementing an exceptional career, his last five films have been among the best of cinema in their respective years of release.

Now bring those things together in a sequel, a sequel to a movie that many fans consider untouchable, a sequel that comes thirty five years after the original. To say that the expectations were gigantic is to stay too short, not only for everything that represents the original film but for the reputation of its director, but I also realized that it was completely unfair to judge the film for that.

But what was of Blade Runner 2049? Honestly? I honestly am very happy about the movie I watched, 2049 is a movie that did not damage the legacy of the original but rather enhances it, a sequel worthy of the name and in my opinion one of the most beautiful films visually speaking in the last decade.

I will not reveal anything independently of all those who have already seen it but what I can say that despite the simplicity of the plot in general, this is a coherent and functional story, everything is in place and pretty much works really good. Ryan Gosling as K manages to create an interesting, complicated, deep enough character completely different from what Harrison Ford did. Obviously the difference lies in that K is a replicant, therefore his path is different. The plot follows a simple but profound argumentative line; after all, the repercussions of the events that develop after the discovery of K are enormous and somehow establish what could give rise to another or other films, although it's something I doubt enormously.

The themes of 2049 deal with identity, the soul, love, artificiality, evolution, faith, hope and yes in the end talks about revolution, the lesson that is learned and the film belongs to Gosling's character, there should be no doubt about that. Harrison Ford makes his appearance like Deckard but he is not the focus of this movie, although its character has a substantial weight in the plot.

Now let's talk about the technical marvel that is 2049, let's start with the visual, **** me, Roger Deakins created something awesome, the shots in their entirety are intoxicating, Blade Runner 2049 is a visual orgasm, I don't have the slightest doubt, I haven't seen another film this year that looks like this one, I must emphasize it, it is ridiculous the visual level of this film and also the sets play a very important role and these are also first class, especially those of the offices of Wallace Corporation and in Las Vegas, that scene in which Ryan Gosling is walking through the sand with that brutal orange palette is beautiful, to hang it in a museum, what else can I say? is just spectacular.

Hans Zimmer and Benjamin Wallfisch's score, while it does not live up to what Vangelis did is actually pretty good, coupled with the outstanding sound design and sound effects, the film sounds awesome, I had never felt a movie theater vibrate that way.

Now I must speak of the bad things, which is not much but undoubtedly they do have effects in the film, the main one has to do with the way in which certain elements of the plot are carried and the rhythm of the narrative, that has nothing to do with the film's length because even though it lasts almost three hours, the film does not feel overlong at all, it's just that there are slow passages that stop the film a lot and they affect the general fluidity of the narrative.
Another problem has to do with the loose ends, the most surprising one has to do with Wallace - Leto's character - because we do not know what the **** happens with him and it's clear that his character has more at stake than what was seen and the way he disappears from the film is rude and unbelievably unsatisfactory. Those are the only reasons why I don't give it a ten but after that threshold, the movie is excellent.

Blade Runner 2049 is one of the best sequels in history, as I said it earlier is totally worthy to carry the title and also has the total right to erect itself as a complete and solid work of its own. Another home run for Villeneuve I'm more than ready and excited to see what he will do with Dune.

You may not like it; I honestly think it's not for all audiences, especially those who consume mostly or totally commercial films, nothing bad in it but at least if you are going to judge the film, judge it for what it is, no for what you expected.… Expand

7 of 12 users found this helpful75

All this user's reviews

0

GeezezJstLftChiOct 16, 2017

Dune/Matrix 2&3 bad... looooong, tedious, dreary and boring. I didn't care about any of the characters other than the Dave Bautista's Sapper Morton...save your theater-going money, wait for Free/$1.00 Blu-ray rental from your videoDune/Matrix 2&3 bad... looooong, tedious, dreary and boring. I didn't care about any of the characters other than the Dave Bautista's Sapper Morton...save your theater-going money, wait for Free/$1.00 Blu-ray rental from your video store...not even Netflix worthy...certainly not a good sequel to the great original.… Expand

7 of 35 users found this helpful728

All this user's reviews

7

seymoursgalOct 16, 2017

This is a well-made film. I really didn't like the first one, but I liked this. It was engrossing and visually stunning. And I like that's it's not just an action, action, action thing all the time. It has a story that's served well byThis is a well-made film. I really didn't like the first one, but I liked this. It was engrossing and visually stunning. And I like that's it's not just an action, action, action thing all the time. It has a story that's served well by slowing down at times. The female "bad guy" I thought could be quite over-the-top, but I liked all the other actors.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

9

ilyakorenevskyiOct 16, 2017

Film was great (in my point of view). Long but realy great. Fantastic atmosphere,beautiful audio, good actors job and nise plot. But you realy need to watch first Blade Runner to understand everyting. On the other side film is specific andFilm was great (in my point of view). Long but realy great. Fantastic atmosphere,beautiful audio, good actors job and nise plot. But you realy need to watch first Blade Runner to understand everyting. On the other side film is specific and long.
(Sorry for my grammar, i am not a native speaker)… Expand

7 of 10 users found this helpful73

All this user's reviews

7

BigDegs29Oct 16, 2017

Interesting movie, but about 30 - 40 minutes too long. It simply couldn't maintain its momentum. That said, I think it's a true sequel to the original, for which I also had pacing issues. If you're a sci-fi buff like me, definitely worth aInteresting movie, but about 30 - 40 minutes too long. It simply couldn't maintain its momentum. That said, I think it's a true sequel to the original, for which I also had pacing issues. If you're a sci-fi buff like me, definitely worth a watch in theaters. Otherwise, wait for home release.… Expand

4 of 7 users found this helpful43

All this user's reviews

10

ElGuapoOct 16, 2017

It was more than what I was expecting and I was expecting quite a bit. It was "wow!" from start to finish and had me immersed in the world of Blade Runner. This is what reading a good book or playing a good video game feels like when it'sIt was more than what I was expecting and I was expecting quite a bit. It was "wow!" from start to finish and had me immersed in the world of Blade Runner. This is what reading a good book or playing a good video game feels like when it's over...just...overwhelmingly great.

I can't wait for this to come out on blu ray so I can watch it another dozen times.… Expand

6 of 9 users found this helpful63

All this user's reviews

4

KaprawiecOct 16, 2017

This is long SONY/PEUGOT commercial, exactly like new car promotion. Beautifull visuals (especially gorgeous Ana de Armas which takes 3 out of 4 points given to the movie;) and audio but the substance is lacking. This should be at least halfThis is long SONY/PEUGOT commercial, exactly like new car promotion. Beautifull visuals (especially gorgeous Ana de Armas which takes 3 out of 4 points given to the movie;) and audio but the substance is lacking. This should be at least half shorter. The story is nonsense, dialogues were dumb and dragged like some Dynasty sitcom.… Expand

3 of 20 users found this helpful317

All this user's reviews

9

MrDevianceOct 15, 2017

This movie is everything that I expected of it and more.
It's amazing to see how a sequel in 2017 can top what used to be the best sci-fi of all time. This movie is actually better than the first Blade Runner movie.

7 of 9 users found this helpful72

All this user's reviews

8

marcmyworksOct 13, 2017

2049 is a deceiving film. It is very slow paced and atmospheric, which is in contrast to the original, which contained a lot more action and tension. Beautifully shot and acted, it nearly is set to be a perfect film, but where it fails is in2049 is a deceiving film. It is very slow paced and atmospheric, which is in contrast to the original, which contained a lot more action and tension. Beautifully shot and acted, it nearly is set to be a perfect film, but where it fails is in the length of certain scenes that do not add to character development.… Expand

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

9

maugzzOct 15, 2017

This is the first movie that truly fills up my senses in almost every way; it kept me nervous and anxious in my seat, wishing that it would not end, even if it is +2 hours long. The environment they create is perfect and even better than theThis is the first movie that truly fills up my senses in almost every way; it kept me nervous and anxious in my seat, wishing that it would not end, even if it is +2 hours long. The environment they create is perfect and even better than the one in the first one, with a better arraignment of colors and perfect acting from the cast, making me believe every action and phrase they said. The story is very good, much better than the first one, but leaving me wishing for more of this world, something that I would not have said from watching the first one.… Expand

8 of 11 users found this helpful83

All this user's reviews

0

katezoeOct 15, 2017

MAJOR disappointment. Movie was 1 hour to long and even then you would have been BORED! Acting wooden. Waste a time and money. FAKE REVIEWS! Make movies great again!

8 of 46 users found this helpful838

All this user's reviews

1

aaron_Oct 15, 2017

Personally less than impressed with Blade Runner 2049. There's a core story here that's good, but that story was stretched far too long before it could be realized. The twists in the plot came way too late and thus failed to keep me hooked. IPersonally less than impressed with Blade Runner 2049. There's a core story here that's good, but that story was stretched far too long before it could be realized. The twists in the plot came way too late and thus failed to keep me hooked. I believe the movie would have kept much better pace cutting down by half.

A little stimuli be it drama or action might have kept my blood circulating to prevent me from resting my eyes from time to time. The interaction with AI and the incredible tech required to create illusion seemed both extraordinary and out of place for the scenario, but that's minor. The action that did come felt exaggerated and unnecessary and something we've all seen a million times.

The 'Replicants' are smart enough to know or grasp that something is wrong and yet they need a miracle to prove it? Apparently the newer lobotomized models need more convincing that their position sucks and therefore a miracle is appropriate.

On the positive side the dystopian scenery is great and the acting is decent, but not even Harrison Ford could save this nearly three hour stoic-stroll through gloomy eco-winter from collapsing under its own weight.

All I can say is I envy those who enjoyed it.… Expand

9 of 29 users found this helpful920

All this user's reviews

10

danielvOct 15, 2017

Wow! What can i say, as soon as this movie ended i knew that it was going to be a long time before a ever saw a quality sci-fi like this again. I am a fan of the original and this one is as good. A masterpiece for sure and it expandsWow! What can i say, as soon as this movie ended i knew that it was going to be a long time before a ever saw a quality sci-fi like this again. I am a fan of the original and this one is as good. A masterpiece for sure and it expands significantly the original story. I relished every minute of this film and wish that the bluray version comes with a longer version (yes more more more). Kudos the french Canadian (Quebec) director Denis Villeneuve for nailing this!… Expand

5 of 8 users found this helpful53

All this user's reviews

6

Douglas56Oct 15, 2017

Don't fall for the lavish praise, this is a disappointing film. When I saw Villeneuve's Arrival, I predicted the Blade Runner sequel may not make the grade, and unfortunately the prediction came true. Like Villeneuve's previous efforts, thisDon't fall for the lavish praise, this is a disappointing film. When I saw Villeneuve's Arrival, I predicted the Blade Runner sequel may not make the grade, and unfortunately the prediction came true. Like Villeneuve's previous efforts, this film scores well for visuals and, I suppose, the soundtrack. But it is too nostalgic, too timid, too Hollywood and too long. The original Blade Runner was a cop thriller with some moral and philosophical solidity, a thrilling depiction of a world where the replicants are more recognisably us than the humans. Strip away the laboriously-worked back story and the impressive visual content and all that's left of BR 2049 is another action adventure where the good cop defeats all the bad guys. It's as if the writers were too scared to take the question of 'what is human?' a single step further, preferring to make endless references to the original film and set us up like comicbook fans, wondering what the next issue will hold. With Ridley Scott a spent force creatively and the overrated Villeneuve apparently unable to spot the dramatic flaws in a thin but very long script crammed with unlikely plot turns, the filmmakers have opted to turn a classic into a stylish clanger. The technological wizardry is occasionally intriguing but it's small compensation. Ryan Gosling is dull and grim as the protagonist in a dull and grim drama (not unlike Sicario in many respects) , and Harrison Ford does nothing to burnish our memory of Deckard. After his return to Star Wars and Blade Runner, what's next for Ford? A revival of Indiana Jones?… Expand

3 of 14 users found this helpful311

All this user's reviews

10

alejandro970Oct 15, 2017

The histoty retains fidelity to original of 1982, especially in philosophical context. It stans out in particular for the design of production -that tributes Metropolis- Roger Deakins photography and Hans Zimmer score. One of best choices ofThe histoty retains fidelity to original of 1982, especially in philosophical context. It stans out in particular for the design of production -that tributes Metropolis- Roger Deakins photography and Hans Zimmer score. One of best choices of autumn 2017.… Expand

9 of 12 users found this helpful93

All this user's reviews

6

CarFan1999Oct 15, 2017

The best part about this movie is the visuals. Every single set piece is amazing to look at, every shot from the cinematographer is perfect, and the computer effects are so good that everything in this looks real. It’s easily the mostThe best part about this movie is the visuals. Every single set piece is amazing to look at, every shot from the cinematographer is perfect, and the computer effects are so good that everything in this looks real. It’s easily the most visually stunning movie I have seen this year. The acting from Gosling and Ford is also well-done. The story is fine and a little basic, although some of the deeper philosophical questions it poses (like most sci-fi flicks) doesn’t add up to much. The only real problem with 2049 is the pacing. While better than the original Blade Runner, it is still really slow. This movie is unnecessarily long, almost 3 hours to be exact. You could cut over 30 minutes of footage in places and it wouldn’t make a difference. In addition, the advertising is also misleading. You would think that this is an action-thriller, but instead it’s a slow moving detective story with some moments of action. In the end, Blade Runner 2049 has fantastic, stunning visuals and good acting performances. However, the slow pacing and overlong runtime hurt the overall experience. Please note that you have to watch the original in order to understand this.… Expand

2 of 8 users found this helpful26

All this user's reviews

4

SandyRosenOct 15, 2017

I came with great expectations! I found the movie to be very flat, not at all the sequel that could have been or should have been, after 30 years. A total lack of imagination.

3 of 16 users found this helpful313

All this user's reviews

9

CrazyGandalfOct 15, 2017

the CGI in the movie is perfect, the vilain is terrible because he nearly doesnt appear, the story is really well build and makes you intrested the whole movie. rian gosling is great as K in the movie, but the movie is a little too long,the CGI in the movie is perfect, the vilain is terrible because he nearly doesnt appear, the story is really well build and makes you intrested the whole movie. rian gosling is great as K in the movie, but the movie is a little too long, sometimes the director Denis Villenuve take a long time to make something quick, but the movie is great… Expand

7 of 10 users found this helpful73

All this user's reviews

3

thebagginsOct 15, 2017

People giving this 10/10 are either paid to do so or have no frikin idea. This movie is terrible. 3/10 for the effects only. Not even Harrison Ford could save it.

12 of 33 users found this helpful1221

All this user's reviews

7

rcolon666Oct 15, 2017

I think this maybe is one of those movies I will have to review more times to have a complete opinion. At first sight I think it lacks the delicious tempo of the first one mixing action scenes with long artistic ones. I also find that theI think this maybe is one of those movies I will have to review more times to have a complete opinion. At first sight I think it lacks the delicious tempo of the first one mixing action scenes with long artistic ones. I also find that the philosopy it has been too simplified to make it a commercial product and finally, it is obviously too open to a third one...or more, I usually like more subtle ones.… Expand

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

4

BarryROct 14, 2017

Midway, I realised I was bored. The story was presented in too jumbled a manner with 2 major contradictions. One, a company was producing new replicants but had to kill old ones. Why? Two: Nowadays, we know that a smartphone can be tracked.Midway, I realised I was bored. The story was presented in too jumbled a manner with 2 major contradictions. One, a company was producing new replicants but had to kill old ones. Why? Two: Nowadays, we know that a smartphone can be tracked. So for sure a replicant would have inbuilt tracers. That really takes the steam out of both films.… Expand

4 of 18 users found this helpful414

All this user's reviews

6

Nobilis1984Oct 14, 2017

Far from the quality the original, however, nevertheless, become good. ---------------------------------------- If I did not know the original of 1982, I would be inspired brightly on. But this is not thus and, hence, it is for me a goodFar from the quality the original, however, nevertheless, become good. ---------------------------------------- If I did not know the original of 1982, I would be inspired brightly on. But this is not thus and, hence, it is for me a good average. The graduations they were put in 1982 are not reached here roughly. But I must say I about what is offered me Visually not can complain. I feel the story, however, disappointed. She is simply too weak to me. Part 1 is to be preferred anyway.… Expand

3 of 14 users found this helpful311

All this user's reviews

10

PhranqOct 14, 2017

Like a fine cognac, you have to be in the right mood and without distractions to thoroughly enjoy this Masterpiece. Time will prove this....like the original.

5 of 8 users found this helpful53

All this user's reviews

10

SaintRaZoROct 14, 2017

One of the best movie I've seen in my entire life. I loved the first movie and I adore this one as well. I just think they are both fantastic and both are the best cyberpunk movies of all time.

5 of 8 users found this helpful53

All this user's reviews

7

NikolayGOct 13, 2017

It is abundantly obvious why this movie didn't do as well as expected. It's too slow. Every shot, every single shot, lingers lovingly over every setting, every landscape, every apartment interior, every closet, every object, every littleIt is abundantly obvious why this movie didn't do as well as expected. It's too slow. Every shot, every single shot, lingers lovingly over every setting, every landscape, every apartment interior, every closet, every object, every little thing for twice, three times, sometimes eight times as long as needed to 'get it' - it's like watching a long game of golf. And the dialog. Someone speaks. Then there is this huge long pause before the other person responds. It's like the director or editor takes too high a dose of anti-depressants and he's just moving in slow motion. This movie should literally be half as long as it is or shorter. When released on demand and DVD a shorter cut should be included. Someone who had the power to say yay or nay fell asleep at the wheel letting this movie go out to theaters in this condition. It could have made twice as much money if it had reasonable pacing.

The second problem with this movie is that there's not enough Harrison Ford. I know he's old and a lot of people think he's a star of days gone by, but as soon as he enters this movie, as soon as you hear his voice, the movie gets real. It takes on more dimension, assumes real gravitas, and feels like a real movie. It's as if the other guy, Gosling (who never showed any emotion, which made him boring), was just there to hand the movie off to Ford and they took too long to do it. Also, they really should have made Gosling's holographic girlfriend do something critical to the plot. She acted well. The concept was cool. But ultimately, she supplied nothing critical to the story. That should have been fixed. A character who takes up so much on-screen time in a movie should not be expendable.

The third problem with this movie, which I think is the least important but it still bugged me, is that it doesn't look like Blade Runner. One reviewer said it looks more like Blade Runner than Blade Runner. But that's just not true. It lacks the dense urban neon crazy visual chaos of Blade Runner. It trades that for vast rust colored expanses that are nice, but are just a different aesthetic, and gives an entirely different feel to the movie. Sure, you get obligatory passes in the floating cars over the city, but even that looks quite different.

But even without reshooting anything, they could vastly increase the quality of this film just by cutting out all the dead space between dialog and cutting out all the gratuitous lingering pans. There is so much of that people in the theater were sighing and huffing with impatience. We wanted to see what came next, but it was like wading through molasses. And if there's any additional film of Harrison Ford on the cutting room floor, splice it into the movie. This movie needs more Ford!… Expand

3 of 9 users found this helpful36

All this user's reviews

7

Semtex_SteveOct 14, 2017

They really captured the feel of the first movie in this one, the world was just as futuristic and corrupt and modern day CGI really helped flesh out the cinematic style. The story was solid and entertaining and most of the characters playedThey really captured the feel of the first movie in this one, the world was just as futuristic and corrupt and modern day CGI really helped flesh out the cinematic style. The story was solid and entertaining and most of the characters played out exactly as intended.

My only problems were with Gosling - who can pull off an emotionless replicant pretty well, but isn't very good at expressing emotion later on as his character develops, and the music didn't really compare to the incredible soundtrack they had in the previous movie. Other than that it is a very good continuation of the Blade Runner story and I would defiantly recommend seeing it on the big screen to get the full experience.… Expand

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

10

clarkestarOct 14, 2017

Masterpiece. All those involved in realising Blade Runner 2049's construction - from the direction, writing, and aesthetic(s) (including the soundscape), to the cinematography, editing and acting - are (surely?!) operating within the upperMasterpiece. All those involved in realising Blade Runner 2049's construction - from the direction, writing, and aesthetic(s) (including the soundscape), to the cinematography, editing and acting - are (surely?!) operating within the upper echelon of film art/design. Thematically profound, visually stunning, and tonally aligned with its predecessor.… Expand

8 of 14 users found this helpful86

All this user's reviews

10

mpagaduanOct 12, 2017

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. There are great films, then there are films that can change your life.

I am in no way a critic. I am just a fan and a lover of films. So allow me to indulge myself by writing why Blade Runner 2049 became one of my favorite films of all time.

Let me start by saying that I didn’t like the original Blade Runner. I know it sounds blasphemous considering it’s a cult classic and is highly regarded as one of the most influential sci-fi films of all time. But for me, it felt too dragging and predictable at times. So I went to see 2049 with tempered expectations. I mean, I could’ve just skipped it but seeing director Denis Villeneuve’s previous works (Enemy, Arrival) I had this gut feel that he would do something special. I’m glad I didn’t skip because my gut feel was damn right.

Rarely do you see a blockbuster filled with depth and so many layers. After the credits rolled all I could say was “What?” because it’s tough to digest everything at first. But after thinking about it, together with reading articles and watching videos about it, I started to understand the movie which eventually led to me loving it. I read comments about it saying that the film tried to say a lot of things which eventually resulted in it being messy. While I agree that the film tries to say a lot, I don’t think that it’s messy. For me, it actually depicted the mind of someone who’s asking what it means to be human. Asking that question will lead to more questions than answers. That is what happens to Ryan Gosling’s Officer K.

Officer K is somehow trying to find his place in the world. This resonates with me a lot because I’m at the point in my life where I feel lost and I can’t seem to figure out where I should be. The film also asks what it means to be alive and what it is that makes us special. K lived his entire life knowing that he’s just a replicant hunting other replicants. Nothing more, nothing less. So when he discovered something that showed him he might be more than just a Blade Runner, he believed it. He believed that he is special, that there is more to his life than just the routine. He believed that there is more to him that what people say. That was the first time he felt truly special. But it turns out (spoiler alert!) that he’s just a decoy. He wasn’t so special after all. In a way, I can connect with that as well. Sometimes I ask myself if there’s more to life than the routine and the norm. Like K, I want to be special. I want to feel like I’m important and I mean something. I grew up in an environment where people downplay this longing and tell me I shouldn’t go after what I want. It makes me think that I’m just a peg in a board game and someone else is playing it. I feel like a small piece in a grand scheme just like how the replicants are. It makes me feel irrelevant. Eventually, K accepted the fact that he’s just a piece and played his part knowing that there’s a bigger picture. I think he felt like that was his true purpose, being one of the catalysts of change. Unlike K though, I’ve yet to accept that I’m just a peg and I still haven’t discovered my true individual purpose.

These are just some of the realizations I had that prove Blade Runner 2049 is a very deep, philosophical film. Based on the articles I’ve read, people always got something different from it and that’s why I love it. The film is open to interpretation because of how layered it is. At the heart of Villeneuve’s films, you’ll always see humanity in them and 2049 is a prime example. My only gripe with the film is that it’s a tad too long. Maybe that’s one of the main reasons why other people are hesitant to watch it and might’ve contributed to it’s somewhat poor performance at the box office. Less people who watched means less people I can talk to and discuss about my feelings for it. But other than that, the film is really great. The cinematography by Roger Deakins is near-perfect. Almost every shot looks stunning. It’s gorgeous. If the philosophical story doesn’t pique your interest, then watch it only for the visuals. It’s worth your money. I really hope that it goes down as a sci-fi classic much like its predecessor.

I can’t wait to buy my own original DVD and watch it over and over again to discover more layers. But while it’s still in the cinemas, go watch it and experience one of the best movies ever made.… Expand

10 of 15 users found this helpful105

All this user's reviews

10

BRfanOct 13, 2017

All in I went in with very low expectations and a wondering of why. I sat for three hours without a beverage or snack and did not miss it at all. The pacing is slow and methodical. The dialogue is drawn out. These are things I do not seeAll in I went in with very low expectations and a wondering of why. I sat for three hours without a beverage or snack and did not miss it at all. The pacing is slow and methodical. The dialogue is drawn out. These are things I do not see as a bad thing at all. That is the tension. The whole point of the movie is finding and understanding your place. Only way to so that properly is slowly. I felt like I was along for the ride. Visuals are top notch. Oddly I find the soundtrack to be phenomenal. It is not catchy, nor can I remember a note however it is edgy and fits the tone of the movie accurately. That is what music is supposed to do. I would say its not for everyone. I would say that if you don't like it I get it. Great movie. Perfect villain. Wallace is exactly what I would expect a megalomaniac to be. Can not wait to see it a third time.… Expand

5 of 7 users found this helpful52

All this user's reviews

9

igor_radchenkoOct 13, 2017

Denis Villeneuve unmistakably captures the tone and aesthetic of the Blade Runner universe, while bringing an original story that further explores the predecessor's themes. Combining that with state of the art visual effects and compellingDenis Villeneuve unmistakably captures the tone and aesthetic of the Blade Runner universe, while bringing an original story that further explores the predecessor's themes. Combining that with state of the art visual effects and compelling new characters, Blade Runner 2049 is exactly how a modern sequel to a classic cinematic experience should be tackled.… Expand

7 of 9 users found this helpful72

All this user's reviews

10

badgerryan19Oct 12, 2017

Great film. Everyone gives a great performance and the visuals are incredible. This is a movie that is a must watch in the theaters. But unfortunately no one is watching it. Which is a little surprising for how big the original film was. TheGreat film. Everyone gives a great performance and the visuals are incredible. This is a movie that is a must watch in the theaters. But unfortunately no one is watching it. Which is a little surprising for how big the original film was. The film does a very good Job by laying out it?s story. A lot of the great twist and turns to drive story forward as well. This will appeal to any sci-fi fan or anyone who love the original. It does a great job by building off the original film rather than going off the beaten path and doing something that is too far fetched. The score also is incredible and it gives a great tone to the film. I believe this will be nominated for best visuals, best score, and best picture of the year. Go watch the movie its worth every 2 hours and 44 minutes.… Expand

6 of 10 users found this helpful64

All this user's reviews

4

TrevorsViewOct 13, 2017

What separates real from machine? Do androids dream of electric sheep? Do we still think that humanity will someday crumble into a robot dystopia? Why do we still ask ourselves these obvious questions?

Blade Runner 2049 brings us to thirtyWhat separates real from machine? Do androids dream of electric sheep? Do we still think that humanity will someday crumble into a robot dystopia? Why do we still ask ourselves these obvious questions?

Blade Runner 2049 brings us to thirty years after the 1982 classic. If you love the original Blade Runner, then you may appreciate Harrison Ford as he reprises his old role, this time as a motivator for the supposedly replicant protagonist, detective K, played by Ryan Gosling (Drive, La La Land). Similar to his previous project, Arrival, director Denis Villeneuve attempts a philosophical study on the worth of humanity, except now resulting in a pointless anti-fantasy with no true knowledge about civilization.

Most of the film’s praise focuses on production designer Dennis Gassner’s (Bugsy, The Truman Show) creation of the sunless Californian city’s atmosphere, which it deserves. Between the desolate hell-red wasteland riddled by statues and the neon shades of evil corporations, immense spectacle commands the screen. The use of symbolic holograms within the city is particularly noteworthy, as a ballerina hologram three stories tall parades through the streets, and a nude pink hooker five stories tall rules over the solitary life; even inside the city walls, an Elvis concert juxtaposes a fist fight. Although more so than the visuals, the sound design sucks you into the experience the most—in the first scene, Villeneuve utilizes his silent storytelling skills with K at work in a protein farm, where the hard murder of a replicant takes place. Once K enters the city, the IMAX surround sound creates the big, unfamiliar world accompanied by a shrieking musical score by Hans Zimmer and Benjamin Wallfisch (Hidden Figures). You indeed feel caught in this cyberpunk future.

However, the visuals hardly redeem the flaws, due to little effort made to modernize the decades old material. Villeneuve draws no inspiration from our current values, with social media and all, in turn making the original look more dated in its incorrectly predicted philosophical ideas. In fact, this whole city exaggerates our lesser-prevalent problems to improbable levels without explaining precisely how human error led to the ecosystem’s collapse.

The excessive three-hour runtime contains 15% beautiful imagery and 85% chitchat in standardly lit sets; the average person might be able to follow these overused slow conversations without a single yawn if the villains were more multi-dimensional. The screenplay ironically says, “memory is feeling,” yet no feeling exists here, so you too will fail to remember whatever it tries to communicate.

Part of the problem to the atrocious boredom goes to the lackluster dialogue—after a standard text straight-forward tells you the backstory, everyone acts as a tool to spill out philosophical rambles. Since no tension builds, our mindset identifies these individuals as human shaped phone apps rather than expressive minds.

The entire production crew overall showed little respect to regular moviegoers; cinema should never be about self-satisfaction, but about telling a great story that speaks to anybody at a spiritual level. The ego stroking of the picture primarily shows in its character motive: a fatherhood subplot gets thrown in without enough prevalence, and a significant other for K arrives and leaves without any resolution, so the entire subject of love, both familial and romantic, needed much more presence. Humanity and love complete one another, so why would such a heartless directorial approach impact our souls?

Even more ironically, a heartthrob actor, one who has embraced materialism throughout his career, plays the lead. Consequently, he was a dreadful choice for the uncastable role: Ryan Gosling never reacts to the miraculous events around him, he just stares blankly as he recites his lines off a cue card.

One last detail disproves Blade Runner 2049 as a sci-fi masterpiece: it plagiarizes. If you already saw this movie, then you might have noticed that K’s name, a codename assigned to him at birth, resembles Star Wars: The Force Awakens., or that it ripped off a true modern sci-fi masterpiece, Her, when the holographic girlfriend uses a flesh-and-blood girl to sleep with K (essentially telling girls to submit their control to technology). So sorry, nothing new is said other than we people deserve to feel discouraged.

Now, to answer my starter questions: People are real, machines are inanimate, androids never dream, because only people dream, and humanity can never crumble to basically resemble robots. Look at Facebook: things still look pretty dang expressive compared to the original Blade Runner’s incorrect theories, so the future seems more hopeful than we give ourselves credit for.… Expand

4 of 21 users found this helpful417

All this user's reviews

9

currer_bellOct 13, 2017

It's not quite the instant classic the first movie was, but it was nearly impossible to do so anyway. This new Blade runner a an excellent movie nonetheless. I've read some bad reviews before watching the film and was kinda sceptical, but inIt's not quite the instant classic the first movie was, but it was nearly impossible to do so anyway. This new Blade runner a an excellent movie nonetheless. I've read some bad reviews before watching the film and was kinda sceptical, but in the end this movie is about as good a sequel can get. The visuals obviously are astonishing, the music is creepy and moody, and the story is gripping, good enough for me. Still It has some weaker moments, especially the last 20-30 minutes. The movie then become a bit messy and schizophrenic. But It's those crucial last 20 minutes that would have made Blade Runner 2049 a masterpiece like the first, but it kinda miss the spot. I also didn't like the Jared Leto character, the guru who speaks in parabolas and metaphors...it felt a bit cliché to me. Despite all that i can't give a lower score than 9, since the movie overall really lives up to the expectations. It's the kind movie I will watch 5-6 times without getting tired, this Blade Runner universe is just too fascinating.… Expand

7 of 9 users found this helpful72

All this user's reviews

6

mcgrzlyOct 13, 2017

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. As a sequel, Blade Runner 2049 works visually and sonically, as it further expands and explores the post-apocalyptical Earth that the first movie set up. Story-wise there is an interesting subversion of the 'Chosen One' trope, as Ryan Gosling's "K" is set up as the the savior until the final act, in which it is revealed that his memories that seem to built to this were actually made and put there by the hermit-like Mariette (Mackenzie Davis) - a clever subversion, that is somewhat undercut by the fact that the movie still sees Deckard (Harrison Ford) as such a Chosen One, in that he becomes the Allfather for the replicants. Overall, the movie seems to want to have its cake and eat it too, but doesn't even have the necessary ingredients to make that cake in the first place. Storylines are underdeveloped and never followed through, a lot of characters remain pretty flat (Jared Leto's evil inventor is especially horrible, a one note villain that basically just dishes out exposition and never gets into the interesting politics and ideologies of his character).

This is especially inexcusable, as the movie would have plenty of time to explore its characters and subplots in more depth, but instead spends a significant part of its 2 hour and fortysomething running time on shots of desolate landscapes and decrepit buildings – though granted, a lot of these shots are gorgeously put together, but even the most gorgeous shot gets tiring if there is not enough substance to sustain it.

Blade Runner 2049 succeeds in some ways, mostly visually and sonically, but falls flat in some major areas otherwise, mostly in providing engaging characters and storytelling throughout and following through with the plots it sets up.

P.S.: For a movie that presents a world that seems highly influenced by Japanese/Asian culture (Japanese script (Kanji?) is shown throughout, female advertisement holograms that seem to be inspired by Hatsune Miku etc.) there is a incredible lack of diversity in this movie.… Expand

3 of 11 users found this helpful38

All this user's reviews

10

md1989Oct 13, 2017

With the first film being my favorite film, i was hoping for big things with this film. It did not disappoint, however after the first viewing i was unsure what i had watched,being unable to quite figure it out. But after the second viewing iWith the first film being my favorite film, i was hoping for big things with this film. It did not disappoint, however after the first viewing i was unsure what i had watched,being unable to quite figure it out. But after the second viewing i realised that like the first it is a master craft and years down the road many will come to have this are their favorite film.
Visually amazing,the story whilst paying homage is its own film, and what else can you say about the cinematography, its unbelievable. It's just just sad that the box office is not being reflective of how good this is.
Highly recommend!… Expand

6 of 9 users found this helpful63

All this user's reviews

10

HusnanOct 12, 2017

From beginning to end, this movie holds your attention. I was a fan of the original, but not a die-hard fan. When I saw this, I was completely blown away. I had incredible expectations for this movie. The character development, narrative,From beginning to end, this movie holds your attention. I was a fan of the original, but not a die-hard fan. When I saw this, I was completely blown away. I had incredible expectations for this movie. The character development, narrative, script, editing, cinematography, directing, sets, miniatures, VFX, are just out of this world. A true Sci-Fi masterpiece.… Expand

6 of 11 users found this helpful65

All this user's reviews

9

P_AndyLewisOct 12, 2017

Visually stunning, fantastic progressive storytelling with satisfying and emotionally charged reveals.
The length of this film was a little overwhelming but that is just a minor issue amongst such a fantastic experience.

7 of 10 users found this helpful73

All this user's reviews

Blade Runner 2049

User Reviews