Blade Runner 2049

10

gislenecarvalhoOct 12, 2017

A direction of art and photography that makes the sequence of Blade Runner seem even more grandiose than its predecessor. Philip K. Dick would be proud of this sequence if he were alive.

6 of 11 users found this helpful65

All this user's reviews

9

PericowskyOct 12, 2017

There is nothing that Denis Villeneuve has done wrong lately, after his hits with Sicario and Arrival, comes the sequel to one of the most beloved cult films in all of film history. Visually it is majestic, the visual effects, theThere is nothing that Denis Villeneuve has done wrong lately, after his hits with Sicario and Arrival, comes the sequel to one of the most beloved cult films in all of film history. Visually it is majestic, the visual effects, the photography, the design of production and even the costumes are great executions. Ryan Gosling embodies well in bad roles like Drive, and in this is no exception, he stays to perfection. Maybe not be better than the first movie, but handles other issues, so that good work of the screenwriter.… Expand

6 of 10 users found this helpful64

All this user's reviews

10

DuraznitoOct 6, 2017

Simplemente espectacular, sublime, hermoso. Mi miedo mas grande era que esta película sea puramente acción y nada de trama, menos mal que me equivoque. La historia es bellisima con algunos giros de guion inesperados. No es la peliculaSimplemente espectacular, sublime, hermoso. Mi miedo mas grande era que esta película sea puramente acción y nada de trama, menos mal que me equivoque. La historia es bellisima con algunos giros de guion inesperados. No es la pelicula perfecta, tiene algunas incongruencias, pero para durar 3 horas sabe llevar bastante bien toda la traba debido a su ambientacion y trama. Una buena sucesora de la Blade Runner original… Expand

14 of 26 users found this helpful1412

All this user's reviews

10

ciorgaOct 12, 2017

This movie is the definition of perfect art in cinematography. It makes you wonder and interpret its content on so many levels. It's well balanced, stunningly beautiful, atmospheric. A perfect sci-fi thirller. One of the very few movies IThis movie is the definition of perfect art in cinematography. It makes you wonder and interpret its content on so many levels. It's well balanced, stunningly beautiful, atmospheric. A perfect sci-fi thirller. One of the very few movies I could watch many times. It's a must watch for all open minds. Who knows maybe that's how our future will look like in 30 years...… Expand

10 of 16 users found this helpful106

All this user's reviews

10

ThomasfrillOct 12, 2017

This movie is an absolute must watch for every sci-fi fan, and also for the hardcore fans of the first movie! And oh my god the cinematgraphy is just outstanding! A very good and logical sequel with a question even today mankind has to ask!

8 of 13 users found this helpful85

All this user's reviews

9

ishaan023Oct 12, 2017

Enthralling,mesmerizing,visually stunning,masterpiece and a future classic are the words that suitably describe Blade Runner 2049

Blade runner 2049 is an exquisitely crafted sequel which stands shoulder to shoulder with its predecessor,BladeEnthralling,mesmerizing,visually stunning,masterpiece and a future classic are the words that suitably describe Blade Runner 2049

Blade runner 2049 is an exquisitely crafted sequel which stands shoulder to shoulder with its predecessor,Blade runner,one of the greatest movies ever made.

The neo-noir setting with an unwavering sense of impending doom amplifies the eeriness and adds dimensions to the film.The plot is solid , rich with characters and minor details all building up to an intense climax.Ryan Gosling , Harrison Ford, Ana De Armas, Jared Leto, Sylvia Hoeks act masterfully in their respective roles .Ryan Gosling plays the role of the lead perfectly .The characters are well built and rounded .Much is left to be desired out of Jared Leto’s character who feels kind of left out in the movie plot but is sure to play a major role in future sequels ,if any are made.The direction and cinematography is where the movie hits a homerun.Denis Villeneuve has created a mindblowing, sci-fi masterpiece no doubt.He is hands-down one of the best directors in the industry at the moment.Villeneuve has done a great job by skillfully integrating suspense and tension with the core of the movie plot.Roger Deakins does an amazing job as the cinematographer .The cinematography is one of the best I have ever seen in a movie.Every shot tells a story ,represents a theme chaos,beauty,love,fear,tension,insecurity etc.The production design and quality is top notch.The cinemascore and sound effects are amazing.
The plot pacing is where the movie dips and could be turn off for some moviegoers.The movie is long,plain long(163 minutes) and the pace is slow.Not all moments are part of the main movie plot ,but introduced for possible movie sequels

Final Verdict:Blade runner 2049 is a plot driven,intense,lengthy and a mindblowing sci-fi movie not less than a piece of art.If you love this kind of cinema this movie is for you.If your movie preference is the cars blowing,fights-breaking,explosion occurring every 15-min Michael Bay movie then this is not for you as you would lose all patience by the time movie reaches its climax.

Score: 9/10: Translates to “Must Watch”… Expand

8 of 10 users found this helpful82

All this user's reviews

6

GittoploOct 12, 2017

I was not disappointed, I was wryly amused by the end. Original Blade Runner is in my top 20 just to set the expectation. I think modern day viewers are so starved for grandiose thought provoking cinema that they would prepare to swallowI was not disappointed, I was wryly amused by the end. Original Blade Runner is in my top 20 just to set the expectation. I think modern day viewers are so starved for grandiose thought provoking cinema that they would prepare to swallow anything. Now to the film:

- Visuals were great at times
- Gosling was ok in the main role although he is no Belmondo or Rutger.
- The plot was poor. Very poor. Why replay Children of Men? Or many other films. Harrison should not have been in the movie. Now it kind of spoiled the original ending for me. All themes of memory, soul etc were done to death. Recent examples are Prometheus and Covenant that do it better. Original has already explored all these more than a human themes.
- The music wasn't there. When they finally played The Theme at the end, I was shaking my head. No music no atmosphere.
- Instead of making a film, director was vying for glory. Cult classic. This film hasn't touched me once and I never want to see it again. By the end, it was almost a comedy.

Overall, ok film. I didn't expect much so not disappointed. I give it 6 out of 10.… Expand

2 of 11 users found this helpful29

All this user's reviews

10

JavierChileOct 12, 2017

I don't know what can be possibly bad in this movie. It excels in everything it proposes itself.

It is slow, yes. But it is slow in a positive way. Every scene is carefully thinked to be audiovisually exquisite. At that pace, you can trulyI don't know what can be possibly bad in this movie. It excels in everything it proposes itself.

It is slow, yes. But it is slow in a positive way. Every scene is carefully thinked to be audiovisually exquisite. At that pace, you can truly think in the deep moral and phylosophical themes the movie proposes. You can suck all the main character's emotions.

The world both blade runners have created is extremely interesting and coherent. I saw the first like 2 weeks before seeing Blade Runner 2049 and I consider myself a devote fan now.

10/10 for me!… Expand

10 of 14 users found this helpful104

All this user's reviews

6

gargooletzOct 12, 2017

Visually stunning on many levels but fails to create a believable, living world. Everything is really well designed but not much of this is exciting or fresh. The film has serious pacing issues, a plethora of plot holes and despite beingVisually stunning on many levels but fails to create a believable, living world. Everything is really well designed but not much of this is exciting or fresh. The film has serious pacing issues, a plethora of plot holes and despite being almost 3 hours long, feels like huge chunks of it were left on the editing room floor. It asks some interesting questions but unfortunately doesn't explore any of them and just seems to lack focus.… Expand

6 of 17 users found this helpful611

All this user's reviews

1

StanCliffBroadOct 12, 2017

More than 2 1/2 hours long, I knew it had to have something or other, to hold my attention, but no, I sat through the whole thing waiting for something interesting to happen. Ryan Gosling can't act, what a shocker! Turgid script, even vacuousMore than 2 1/2 hours long, I knew it had to have something or other, to hold my attention, but no, I sat through the whole thing waiting for something interesting to happen. Ryan Gosling can't act, what a shocker! Turgid script, even vacuous in parts. 'Pris' lookey likey, was the worst actress of all.
Look all you Producers out there, Robin Wright has hit the wall, so stop casting her.
The only good bit for me was the baddie, Sylvia Hoeks did a fine job with the script she was given, but she should've been given more to do, what a waste.… Expand

5 of 22 users found this helpful517

All this user's reviews

7

TVJerryOct 12, 2017

This long-awaited sequel starts 30 years after the original, when a new blade runner (Ryan Gosling) is on a quest to uncover secrets and discover the fate of the original star (Harrison Ford). This film is LONG on atmosphere (and I mean 140This long-awaited sequel starts 30 years after the original, when a new blade runner (Ryan Gosling) is on a quest to uncover secrets and discover the fate of the original star (Harrison Ford). This film is LONG on atmosphere (and I mean 140 minutes). The wasteland settings and vast modern interiors are interesting, although they never seem as captivating as the original. There are some cool tricks, but nothing more original than numerous other films have done. Everyone is very serious and they take FOREVER to do anything. This film is about 30 minutes past its prime. Still, there are stimulating elements to the filmmaking that create magnificent moments of desolation and intrigue.… Expand

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

9

Passingby777Oct 12, 2017

First of all what i loved the most is the atmosphere and the story telling. I had watched the first one before and was impressed by how little dialogue was needed to move the plot along and to convey the message. Most recent movies left meFirst of all what i loved the most is the atmosphere and the story telling. I had watched the first one before and was impressed by how little dialogue was needed to move the plot along and to convey the message. Most recent movies left me with a sower aftertaste and with the impression that it was numbed down by having a huge amount of dialogue and explanations. The original used the atmosphere, the sounds and the characters to tell it's story and the difference from the modern approach was really obvious. The feeling i had while watching the original i found again while seeing 2049.
It is a sequel but without making you feel that not watching the original was a big mistake. This was the one movie in a very long time that did not disappoint me. I have loved it. It is something else and i could go on and on about the plot twist that was introduces incredibly well but at the same time was not in your face and then what happened afterwards when you felt that you passed the traditional twist... Anyway, if you love SciFi movies and have felt violated by the abortions that came out in the last years (at most 3 were good) or the traditional Hollywood recipes i cannot recommend this one enough.… Expand

7 of 9 users found this helpful72

All this user's reviews

10

OcraM-SAOct 12, 2017

What a movie, Denis Villeneuve delivers again! I honestly cannot fault this film, it was gripping from start to finish. Every scene is carefully crafted, and oozes with atmosphere.

5 of 8 users found this helpful53

All this user's reviews

10

DavidWasHereOct 11, 2017

This movie is everything a good film should be, regardless of if it's a sequel or not. Everything is top notch, from Dennis Villeneuve's direction, to the fantastic production design, to Roger Deakins' breathtaking cinematography, to stellarThis movie is everything a good film should be, regardless of if it's a sequel or not. Everything is top notch, from Dennis Villeneuve's direction, to the fantastic production design, to Roger Deakins' breathtaking cinematography, to stellar performances from Gosling, Ford, Leto, Wright, and especially Sylvia Hoeks who so deserves an Oscar nom for her performance, to the amazing visual effects, to the excellent score by Hans Zimmer and Benjamin Wallfisch that stands on it's own and tributes Vangelis's iconic original score, to the sound design. It is all here!

As a sequel, it continues what made the first film good and expands upon it's universe, as well as tribute the original film but can stand on it's own, as an a stand-alone film it is great, where viewers not familiar with the cult classic can understand what is going on without getting lost.… Expand

6 of 10 users found this helpful64

All this user's reviews

10

BKumarOct 11, 2017

Couldn't have been better made to do justification to the original cult classic. Audio-visual treat and beautiful storytelling. Box office performance was expected to be low considering the original movie was too catering to a particular cultCouldn't have been better made to do justification to the original cult classic. Audio-visual treat and beautiful storytelling. Box office performance was expected to be low considering the original movie was too catering to a particular cult following.… Expand

7 of 10 users found this helpful73

All this user's reviews

10

Meth-dudeOct 11, 2017

From the spectacular acting performances, to the groundbreaking special effects, to the very effective story, Blade Runner 2049 has everything to make a good sequel. Villeneuve directed a masterpiece. I do believe that this movie will go downFrom the spectacular acting performances, to the groundbreaking special effects, to the very effective story, Blade Runner 2049 has everything to make a good sequel. Villeneuve directed a masterpiece. I do believe that this movie will go down in history as not only one of the best sequels, but also, as one of the best science fiction movie ever made. I highly recommend watching this one.… Expand

5 of 8 users found this helpful53

All this user's reviews

10

43in2014Oct 11, 2017

The short review: This sci-fi, action thriller is a great film, visually, sound-wise, story-wise and acting-wise. Think Dunkirk (2017) but with a great story.
> Related media: It is a sequel to 1982's Blade Runner, which was itself based onThe short review: This sci-fi, action thriller is a great film, visually, sound-wise, story-wise and acting-wise. Think Dunkirk (2017) but with a great story.
> Related media: It is a sequel to 1982's Blade Runner, which was itself based on the novel 'Do androids dream of electric sheep?'. That original film has a novel based on it and three other sequel novels. I have not seen nor read any of them, but I have heard a lot about the film and I know its story, generally.
> What's it like?: It borrows the dystopian style of the original film and tells the story of a new LAPD blade runner (officer tasked with killing rogue replicants) named K, who is himself, a replicant (artificially-built humans). His job and investigation leads him to discover more about himself and about a major secret about the replicants.
> Pros: > 1) It has great visual- and audio-styles and great visual- and audio-effects. I look forward to it winning many major awards. > 2) The story, script and acting are also great and there are some awards possible there too. This film is directed by Denis Villeneuve not Ridley Scott, and considering the latter's recent films, that's a good thing. > 3) The film presents many interesting futuristic things. > Cons: > 1. It may be able to lose some 15 minutes by speeding up some parts slowed down unnecessarily for artistic reasons. > How would the the different age groups rate it?
Children: (not rated for children)
Teens: Average (It's probably a bit too complex and slow for the general teen.)
Young adults: Excellent
Medium age adults: Excellent
Old adults: Good > Rating: 5/5 (no half scores). Pay to watch it in the cinema and then buy the DVD.… Expand

6 of 10 users found this helpful64

All this user's reviews

8

sscott0829twOct 11, 2017

Blade runner 2049 is beautiful and breathtaking. The characters are all well acting. The world is stunning and believable. This is not a action movie, is a normal story. That will make you think of it after you walk out of the theater. IBlade runner 2049 is beautiful and breathtaking. The characters are all well acting. The world is stunning and believable. This is not a action movie, is a normal story. That will make you think of it after you walk out of the theater. I didn't give this movie a higher score is because the slow paste and some plot that they didn't explain. Hope they make a third movie.… Expand

7 of 10 users found this helpful73

All this user's reviews

10

Dana88Oct 11, 2017

For me it is the best movie from the artistic side - artistic masterpiece, arcydzieło. The music, sound design, shots, the play of lights.. 10 out of 10. The story might feel a bit straightforward at the beginning, but.. only at theFor me it is the best movie from the artistic side - artistic masterpiece, arcydzieło. The music, sound design, shots, the play of lights.. 10 out of 10. The story might feel a bit straightforward at the beginning, but.. only at the beginning. Then the truth hits your face and you feel lost for a moment or two. Nice twist, perfectly done! I heard voices in the cinema that ppl lost the track or that it was to heavy for them.. It wasn't that hard to understand all the leads if you paid attention to the details. So keep the eyes and ears open ;)… Expand

6 of 10 users found this helpful64

All this user's reviews

9

chunjurrinchhenOct 11, 2017

This movie has been not doing well in cinemas and this is the reason we get Movies like Transformers more often than these kinds of masterpiece. I loved everything about this movie. The music was awesome,visuals are just so delicious andThis movie has been not doing well in cinemas and this is the reason we get Movies like Transformers more often than these kinds of masterpiece. I loved everything about this movie. The music was awesome,visuals are just so delicious and looked so real, the story was open ended for the viewers to theorize, it was so intelligently made and made people wonder how things came to be and i love the fact that the movie didnt give us all the answers at the end. Great performace from Gosling, he kind of carried the movie all the way through. Jared Leto was just weird, dont know if its a praise or criticism lol. MUST WATCH and save CINEMA… Expand

7 of 10 users found this helpful73

All this user's reviews

10

tsmothers93Oct 11, 2017

The film burns slow but burns deep. The cinematography and set production is unlike any movie I've seen all year. It displays quiet power that draws you and doesn't let go. It's an art film with a big budget.

6 of 9 users found this helpful63

All this user's reviews

9

SomeRandomGuy00Oct 11, 2017

It's been years since I've experienced a movie in theatres where almost every image left me in awe. Not impressed, not merely captivated, but in awe. In most “good looking” films, it's easy to find several scenes in images where your eyesIt's been years since I've experienced a movie in theatres where almost every image left me in awe. Not impressed, not merely captivated, but in awe. In most “good looking” films, it's easy to find several scenes in images where your eyes feel like shrugging compared to the rest of the film's imagery. It was difficult to find very many scenes like that in Blade Runner 2049. Even when there's next to no visual action going on in the frame, these images still find a way to impress. But thankfully, there's more to Blade Runner 2049 than just pretty pictures. Director Denis Villeneuve never forgets that this is a Blade Runner movie, a dark mystery about what it really means to be human in a world filled to the brim with advanced technology. The lovely visuals aid the story, instead of trying to bury it.

The sound design also really helps in bringing this troubled world to life. The musical score, while lacking the magic of Vangelis's score for the original film, still works in harmony with the moods and emotions for each scene. From throat-singing in Wallace's (Jared Leto) chamber, to the menacing drums used for a futuristic L.A.P.D. tower, to the playful chimes used in Detective K's romantic encounters with the optimistic Joi (Ana De Armas); these little touches in the soundtrack truly emphasize the emotion of each scene. Again, supporting the film, not trying to make up for it. It's a miracle that this soundtrack turned out as good as it did, considering the last minute change of composers and the fact that the soundtrack is almost entirely original. And of course, a dystopia could never come to life without convincing sound effects, and Blade Runner 2049 is no exception. This is an overused statement, but every sound used outside of the soundtrack truly feels real. No blaster sounds, no explosions that sound way quieter than they should, and no other silly overused sci-fi sound effects. Every bang, crash, jump, shot, step, and yell sounds exactly like it should. For example, in Dave Bautista's scene, we originally find him farming in a heavy radioactive suit. And with that moment, we can hear the heavy steps, echoes, and breathing that would go on in such a suit. The audience is there in his suit, and we didn't need any cheap POV or overlong establishing shots to get that level of immersion. It's such a short, inconsequential scene, but it's impressive that even the smallest scenes in Blade Runner 2049 are trying to pull you into its world instead of pushing you away.

And then, we arrive at the final stage of crafting a fictional world: the characters. Admittedly, there are few characters that feel like they never get any time to properly develop. Although, looking back at the film, maybe that's because I enjoyed their company so much. Ryan Gosling, an actor who should win the most improved actor award at this point, is perfect as a morally conflicted detective. I truly believed every step of his struggle, every emotion he conveyed, and every blow to his face. And this is all done without a shred of overacting or “phoning it in”, so to speak. Harrison Ford, reprising his role as Deckard, feels like he's actually acting this time. I was afraid that he was gonna “Bruce Willis” this important role, but he actually delivered. Is it because Harrison actually cares about this character? Or because the director cared enough to get him to actually act? Who knows? What matters is that he conveys a character that is both emotionally devastated and slightly desensitized to his previous events. All of the actors also suit their characters quite well, especially Jared Leto as Wallace and Ana De Armas as Joi. The actors certainly make the film's world all the more interesting and emotional, even when the story and writing fail to do so.

It truly shows how special this film is, however, that these story flaws seem so small. This is still an intriguing mystery story with a lot of tricks up it's sleeve, even for longtime fans of Blade Runner and dystopian Science Fiction. It's also impressive that the film never loses touch of it's themes, like the first film this is still a story about how life and reality can even be considered special in a society filled with technology and prejudice. And it's a breath of fresh air that every aspect of the film effectively conveys that message, instead of just a clever script and a few great performances. Yes, the film isn't quite as smart or clever as it's predecessor, but any movie that gets even close to reaching the magic of Blade Runner is well worth your time. The visual experience alone is worth the price of admission, but thankfully there's so much more lurking beneath the smooth surface.

See it in IMAX if you can.… Expand

7 of 11 users found this helpful74

All this user's reviews

10

rescaOct 11, 2017

Amazing film, so much to think about for scifi fans. Really hope more people give this film a chance because it deserves a better box office than right now.

5 of 10 users found this helpful55

All this user's reviews

9

The3AcademySinsOct 11, 2017

This is the amazing sequel to Blade Runner that we definitely did not deserve. It's better than any Blade Runner sequel I could have imagined. The direction is fantastic, and it might be Dennis Villeneuve's best work to date. The acting isThis is the amazing sequel to Blade Runner that we definitely did not deserve. It's better than any Blade Runner sequel I could have imagined. The direction is fantastic, and it might be Dennis Villeneuve's best work to date. The acting is beautiful, and there is not a weak link in the cast. The script is mind blowingly incredible, and very true to the original Blade Runner film.

This movie is an experience. You will be transported to this other world and blown away. Watch this movie on the biggest screen that you can, it will only add to how beautiful this movie looks. I spent the rest of the day thinking about life after I walked out of the theater. This movie will inspire you. Go see it.… Expand

7 of 12 users found this helpful75

All this user's reviews

9

IttiacesOct 11, 2017

As a sequel to the original 1982 film, this latest chapter from the blade runner universe holds its own. We find our protagonist, played by Ryan Gosling, working with the police to hunt down replicants, cyborgs indistinguishable from humans.As a sequel to the original 1982 film, this latest chapter from the blade runner universe holds its own. We find our protagonist, played by Ryan Gosling, working with the police to hunt down replicants, cyborgs indistinguishable from humans. A special mission sets him on a particularly dangerous path of self-discovery. Gosling is superb here. I initially criticised him as a choice for this role, but I was hands down wrong. He portrays the character with an innocence and sense of vulnerability that is very touching and heartfelt. Harrison Ford is excellent but doesn't have as much screen time as I'm sure fans were expecting. The story is well paced for the most part and manages to keep the audience engaged. I saw this in a huge theatre that was packed to the brim and you could've heard a pin drop throughout the entire screening. The visuals are stunning and progressive without being separated too far from the first outing. It's creatively graded to emphasise certain atmospheres and moods which I found interesting. The attention to detail in the sets is impressive although most of it is CGI. The cinematography is also very impressive, and overall it's a beautifully conceived film. On the downside, at nearly 3 hours it's incredibly long, and you do start to feel that towards the last 30 minutes or so. Disappointingly, I also found some of the themes to be quite derogatory to women. Lots of brothels, hookers, nakedness, digital women created as companions. There was no gender balance in this somewhat sordid area. Although we did have a female villain, and head of police so at least some attempt at strong female characters admittedly. Overall, it's one of the best films of the year and will probably make the list as one of the finest sequels ever made. Highly recommended.… Expand

10 of 14 users found this helpful104

All this user's reviews

10

tuwaluaOct 11, 2017

Its a real blessing that the new Bladerunner keeps the old pacing. In a time where all big franchises from star wars to star trek uses only quick action to get the attention of the viewers. I liked the old style of film making which allowsIts a real blessing that the new Bladerunner keeps the old pacing. In a time where all big franchises from star wars to star trek uses only quick action to get the attention of the viewers. I liked the old style of film making which allows the viewer to think about it while watching. In my opinion its one of the best sequels ever made! A must for every scifi fan and a definitely must for Bladrunner fans!… Expand

6 of 13 users found this helpful67

All this user's reviews

9

adamako666Oct 11, 2017

One of the best films i have seen in a long time. This film takes the concepts of the first film and expands on them beautifully. The cinematography is awesome making every scene a feast for the eyes. The soundtrack accompanies thisOne of the best films i have seen in a long time. This film takes the concepts of the first film and expands on them beautifully. The cinematography is awesome making every scene a feast for the eyes. The soundtrack accompanies this marvelously, at times invading your personal space. It was also nice to hear some of the original soundtrack included in the film. I would recommend this film to anyone, including people who did not enjoy the first one (although you really should watch the first before viewing).… Expand

7 of 11 users found this helpful74

All this user's reviews

10

FancypantserOct 8, 2017

We saw the original in '82, fell in love with everything about it. It shaped our family's aesthetic in many ways, and predicted so many changes in society's relation with technology. The sequel is a gift, a treat, a miracle. Such a beautifulWe saw the original in '82, fell in love with everything about it. It shaped our family's aesthetic in many ways, and predicted so many changes in society's relation with technology. The sequel is a gift, a treat, a miracle. Such a beautiful film, will go see it again next week.… Expand

10 of 17 users found this helpful107

All this user's reviews

7

SyFy4LyfeOct 10, 2017

I thought it was good. The cinematography is excellent, a treat for the eyes. There's a lot of things to like about this movie for sure. There's a slow burn meditation feel here that I really appreciate.
But I must take issue with thoseI thought it was good. The cinematography is excellent, a treat for the eyes. There's a lot of things to like about this movie for sure. There's a slow burn meditation feel here that I really appreciate.
But I must take issue with those claiming that it is a masterpiece and equal to the original.
Overall, 2049 is joyless and too clinical and serious. Characters lack depth and there's not much emotional complexity to interactions. We also don't experience the cultural immersion like in the original. Clutter, dilapidation, the real life of despair and loneliness on a personal level was what Blade Runner somehow captured and somehow was able to transcend and give a glimpse of hope.
BR 2049 is a bleak dystopian wasteland. The soundtrack is mostly full of industrial sounding doom horns blasting you into submission, and at times this sonic approach is ill-placed. There is little subtlety - it pales in comparison to the Vangelis score.
2049 is well-made, it is gorgeous and crafty, and it does not commit any major sins. But I really doubt this will be one we will be watching over and over and over again for decades to come. Just go and watch the original, and you will realize how much this sequel is lacking in complexity and soul.… Expand

5 of 10 users found this helpful55

All this user's reviews

10

DrChocolateOct 10, 2017

Excellent film. Perfectly picks up where the original left off and continues with the themes of empathy vs. artificiality. Some questions we had from the original film were answered, and some things were purposely left unsaid in trueExcellent film. Perfectly picks up where the original left off and continues with the themes of empathy vs. artificiality. Some questions we had from the original film were answered, and some things were purposely left unsaid in true Bladerunner fashion. I don't want to give anything away, but fans of the original film will not be disappointed.… Expand

10 of 15 users found this helpful105

All this user's reviews

3

MahbubAli92Oct 10, 2017

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Overall it was interesting but deeply flawed. I wanted to like it, but I can see why it flopped so badly (grossed even less than The Mummy in its opening weekend LOL).

GOOD
- Spectacular visuals, as though the dystopia of the original has taken several big steps closer to hell in the last 30 years (reinforced by how the old music has been remixed to be discordant and oppressive)

- The hologram girlfriend was a cute concept, though she is largely irrelevant to the plot

- I respect that it at least tried to be a thoughtful movie for grownups, something that is increasingly rare these days (especially for big budget movies). Though I have to admit it's not really as smart as it thinks it is, mainly because the ideas it grapples with ("what if people were... ROBOTS?") don't actually resonate with anything real. Really the most powerful thing about it was the portrayal of urban decay and alienation via the eternal trifecta of pollution, multiculturalism, and corporate greed.

BAD
- Making the main character a robot was unbelievably stupid. Gosling's flat affect and lack of personality make it impossible to emotionally engage with the character. Since this is 100% Gosling's story, the fact that he's a mopey unrelatable autistic robot (who barely even shows any warmth to his videogame girlfriend) absolutely cripples the movie's emotional impact.

- Bringing back Harrison Ford was also dumb. Rick Deckard is not an iconic character, nobody cares what became of him and seeing him again is not an exciting prospect. Harrison Ford needs to quit rehashing every role he did back when movies were original and good.

- Way too long for what it is, with many slack scenes that drag out self-indulgently. A competent editor could easily get this below 2 hours with the plot intact.

- Ultimately the big reveal ("ZOMG A REPLICANT GOT PREGNANT!") isn't that interesting plotwise or thematically. News flash: humanoid robots aren't real and probably never will be, so "what if they could get pregnant" isn't a meaningful question to explore (contra the fanboys, it doesn't actually "make you think about what it means to be human" or w/e). After Villenueve kept claiming there was going to be a huge earthshaking twist, he needed to deliver something much better than this (should've used the element from the book where replicants have infiltrated business/media/government and are trying to twist them to their own ends).

- For a movie that takes itself so seriously it sure had a ton of lame genre cliches, including the one-dimensionally evil corporate magnate having a beautiful ninja robot assassin bodyguard, who has a kung fu fight with hero at the climax. If I wanted goofy stuff like that I would've watched the crappy Ghost in the Shell remake again.

It's really a shame this was such a box office disaster, since there was clearly a lot of thought and effort that went into making it. But I can't blame audiences for not lining up to watch 3 hours of grim navel-gazing about robots grappling with robot existentialism.… Expand

6 of 23 users found this helpful617

All this user's reviews

8

SpangleOct 10, 2017

A little under a year ago, I declared Denis Villeneuve to be my favorite modern director in my review of Arrival. Now, with Blade Runner 2049, Villeneuve confirms my assertion and furthers my belief that Roger Deakins is the best modernA little under a year ago, I declared Denis Villeneuve to be my favorite modern director in my review of Arrival. Now, with Blade Runner 2049, Villeneuve confirms my assertion and furthers my belief that Roger Deakins is the best modern cinematographer. Put the two together and poetic, thoughtful, and visual magic happens. Blade Runner 2049 is the perfect embodiment of this with the two combining to bring forth a film that stands as one of the best of 2017 to date. Gorgeous, thoughtful, and brilliantly unraveling at a methodical-but-not-slow pace, Blade Runner 2049 is a film that makes me want to revisit the original, after having absolutely loathed it three years ago (I saw the Final Cut so do not even bring up the different cuts). Now, as my own journey through cinema alters, I am in a position to enjoy and bask in the glory that is Blade Runner with 2049, Villeneuve, and Deakins, being the gateway. Blending Tarkovsky influences, Tarkovsky religion, and the story of Blade Runner, Blade Runner 2049 is a thought-provoking work that goes well beyond the essential question of; are replicants equal and deserve to live or are they sub-human?

That said, the philosophy and ideas certainly take a backseat to the work of Roger Deakins. Watching Blade Runner 2049 is akin to being able to watch a painter work on his masterpiece, marrying warm oranges with cold blues, hues of pink, and shades of green, all in the name of creating a smorgasbord of beauty that stands as a testament to both the skill of Deakins in shooting a film and his ability to use color to tell a story. In terms of just the visuals themselves, however, the gorgeous reliance on silhouettes as Agent K (Ryan Gosling) walks out of white, billowing smoke and as Agent K walks through the orange wasteland that is Las Vegas, demonstrate some of this beauty. As do shots of Gosling walks through the cold blues and greens of Los Angeles, the dark ships flying through the orange air of Vegas, the white light of a ship with orange taillights against the dark black sky, the shot of a dog staring into the distance as its master is gone, a fire burning bright orange in the dark of the night, a blind man walking out of the shadows into the orangeish hue of temple, a car pulling into a snowy and green-walled parking garage with its red brakes beaming off the ground, and a glowing pink hologram with blue hair bending over to talk to Agent K and bringing with her the pink radiance surrounding her and blending it with the dark blue aura about him. This is a film with no shot out of place, no moment that is not striking, and more than anything else, this is a testament to Deakins. Turning colors into a visual mosaic of mastery and the simple beauty of the colors themselves, Blade Runner 2049 - before the year is even over - is the most visually stunning work of 2017. There can is no debate. Few films paint such a brilliant picture that words seem to fall short of truly expressing.

Perhaps one of the greatest displays of the film's brilliant visuals comes in how it uses the colors within its palette and also its locales/sets. As an agent for the Los Angeles Police Department, Agent K is tasked with hunting down replicants. He himself was synthetically made, but is a model who cannot rebel and made after the blackout, thus, is tasked with killing replicants who may still wish to rebel. While fully obedient, he is nonetheless an outsider. At home, he finds his front door has been vandalized to say "Die Skinner". Prostitutes are wary of him due to his status as a Blade Runner. The only one who accepts him is Joi (Ana de Armas), who is girlfriend and also a hologram made as a companion for him. As he walks the streets of Los Angeles, it is constantly raining or snowing with cold blues, greens, and purples, abounding through the streets. At work, the walls are flat white and his own demeanor his cold and repressed. Joi brings him joy, but limited given the fact that she is not real and they cannot touch. His existence is one that sees him kill replicants, who he feels a connection to, but he does as he is told. For Agent K, his life is one of coldness and repression. As such, his environment embodies exactly this. Cold and unwelcoming, the cold colors found in Los Angeles define Agent K as a man who lives on the outside. This is not his home, nor is he welcome in Los Angeles. He is a man in a foreign land with no fire to warm his chilly exterior.

By direct contrast, Agent K finally finds his people and his cause in Las Vegas. As a post-apocalyptic and radioactive city, Las Vegas is covered in a thick haze that is turned a burnt orange due to the orange, burned out sky above. Left behind as Rick Deckard (Harrison Ford) is whisked away by Luv (Sylvia Hoeks), Agent K finds himself surrounded by replicants. Taken to the underground compound, surrounded by those like himself, and a warm orange fire, Agent K has finally found where he is meant to be.… Expand

7 of 15 users found this helpful78

All this user's reviews

9

ahnehnoisOct 10, 2017

The tone of the original has been recreated and advanced in a convincing and worthwhile way, for better or for worse. Where the original inspired many sci-fi pieces over the last twenty or thirty years, the sequel clearly borrows from theThe tone of the original has been recreated and advanced in a convincing and worthwhile way, for better or for worse. Where the original inspired many sci-fi pieces over the last twenty or thirty years, the sequel clearly borrows from the genre, with one of its several twists being borrowed from the very Blade-Runner-ish Battlestar Galactica.

As many references to the original as there are, some work better than others. I can live with an Edward James Olmos cameo, but Sean Young was really awkwardly shoehorned in. The funny references to long lost companies permeate the background and that's cool, but what's less cool is the ubiquitous Hans Zimmer aping the electronic soundscape of the original but completely missing the meditative quality of Vangelis' original.

On its own merits though, the new Blade Runner is more of a thinker's movie than most, and offers several intriguing twists, memorable characters, and iconic imagery. It's worth seeing, and going in without spoilers, and giving a think as to how far away we are from its world right now.… Expand

7 of 11 users found this helpful74

All this user's reviews

8

InActionMan64Oct 10, 2017

Totally worth it. Feels like BR, looks like BR, sounds like BR. Yes, there's sequel setup but its subtle and non-invasive to the story. As to the sexism angle, this is an elseworlds setting with non-humans, there are things that look humanTotally worth it. Feels like BR, looks like BR, sounds like BR. Yes, there's sequel setup but its subtle and non-invasive to the story. As to the sexism angle, this is an elseworlds setting with non-humans, there are things that look human but aren't.… Expand

7 of 13 users found this helpful76

All this user's reviews

9

LukibusOct 10, 2017

Stunning, immersive, thrilling. A special mention deserves the photografy, colors, music and sound effects, which creates a wonderful sense of immersion. The story is surely more complex and rich compared to the first one (it has more twistsStunning, immersive, thrilling. A special mention deserves the photografy, colors, music and sound effects, which creates a wonderful sense of immersion. The story is surely more complex and rich compared to the first one (it has more twists and complexity). I was amazed and captivated till the end of the movie.… Expand

7 of 12 users found this helpful75

All this user's reviews

10

LordZerefOct 10, 2017

Quite easily one of the best films I've ever watched. The visuals, the acting, the world, the story, THE MUSIC is all great. The themes the film focuses on really interested me and it had my full attention. Please if you're watching thisQuite easily one of the best films I've ever watched. The visuals, the acting, the world, the story, THE MUSIC is all great. The themes the film focuses on really interested me and it had my full attention. Please if you're watching this movie do not expect an action movie because I will guarantee you will dislike it otherwise. This film is one where you have to really pay attention to the film, to understand it's themes, it's characters and the world it is representing. It is honestly disappointing for a film like this to not be appreciated enough at the box office. I don't want to spoil the film, so go watch this! (Also I would recommend watching the original Blade Runner and the three shorts, Blade Runner 2022, Blade Runner 2036 and Blade Runner 2048 prior to watching this film, to enhance your experience).… Expand

10 of 16 users found this helpful106

All this user's reviews

10

tonyeditorOct 10, 2017

It's fitting that the film has divided audiences the way it has. Seems appropriate to the Blade Runner mythos. I think its achievements swamp its weaknesses. This is an immediate classic and at least the equal to its predecessor.

10 of 17 users found this helpful107

All this user's reviews

6

StrepsOct 10, 2017

Blade Runner was a movie that didn't need a sequel. The thing that made it good was the fact that it left the audience to decide what happened next and how the world changed after. 2049 spends a lot of time reminding you of the conceptsBlade Runner was a movie that didn't need a sequel. The thing that made it good was the fact that it left the audience to decide what happened next and how the world changed after. 2049 spends a lot of time reminding you of the concepts from the original, it even rehashes the same ideas and scenes that make this film needlessly long. It almost felt like a remake rather than a sequel or a continuation of the story. I am not sure if it was dumbed down to appeal to a less patient audience, or if cinema is forever changed and doesn't leave much in the imagination of the viewer.

There are numerous times in the film where it repeats scenes, just in case you didn't get it the first three times it showed you, and you get the feeling that the director for some unknown reason has to hold your hand the entire film. Can't I, the viewer make up my mind and figure out my own conclusion without having it rammed down my throat over and over again.

Agent K's love interest and accompanying drawn out and grating scenes, are some of the worst cinema I have seen in a long time. This entire plot line was another re-hashed idea from the original film. At one point It felt like I was watching an episode of Battlestar Galactica, that's how little this film has tried to push the boundaries of story telling.

Jared Leto's performance is borderline awful in this film, he over acts every scene, and honestly the film would have been better without him and his character which is a homage to the previous corporate goon. The character of Wallace (Jared Leto) doesn't fit in the film nor does his story line add any substance to the movie other than dragging the running time for 30 minuets longer.

The film really crashed and burned when a scene towards the end with Deckard and Wallace makes the Princess Leia CGI scene from Rouge One, look like Oscar level cinema.

This could have been a nice way to tie up the 1982 film, but it brings zero innovation to story telling, and never lets the viewer out of its grip long enough to have allow for imagination to rise up. There are too many rehashed concepts that are just told slightly differently and it doesn't explore anything new.… Expand

5 of 16 users found this helpful511

All this user's reviews

2

buffboyOct 9, 2017

Blade Runner 2049 was so long it felt more like Blade WALKING. 2 stars because I liked some parts. Ridley Scott? Ridley Shot himself in the foot with this one!

11 of 32 users found this helpful1121

All this user's reviews

10

lilkillpappyOct 9, 2017

If you want a true return to form for Blade Runner and for sci-fi in general then you will be very satisfied with this movie. This movie checks all the correct boxes. Deep and complex characters, great and inspired acting, beautiful andIf you want a true return to form for Blade Runner and for sci-fi in general then you will be very satisfied with this movie. This movie checks all the correct boxes. Deep and complex characters, great and inspired acting, beautiful and artistic settings and scenery and cinematography, fantastic music and sounds, and a story that is subtle and interesting and pulls you in. This director, Denis Villeneuve, is creating the best science fiction of this generation, and perhaps the best science fiction ever. I couldn't have enjoyed this film any more.… Expand

10 of 15 users found this helpful105

All this user's reviews

8

valerianOct 9, 2017

I’m not sure, but I wouldn’t be surprised if this film taken a lot of inspiration from Baraka and Ghost in the Shell (1995).

Both films in my opinion, are perfect, for what they intended to aim, but they can be very straining for mostI’m not sure, but I wouldn’t be surprised if this film taken a lot of inspiration from Baraka and Ghost in the Shell (1995).

Both films in my opinion, are perfect, for what they intended to aim, but they can be very straining for most viewers because it felt slow or confusing to watch. And both these films were barely an hour long.

This film very similar to these except, it has double the length time. And that can be straining for even really patient audiences.

Not for everyone, but to those who want to be immersed into such a well thought out, beautiful world, it’ll be up your ally.

This film needed better editing, especially at around the last 45 min mark though.

Really nice surprise! 8.9/10… Expand

7 of 12 users found this helpful75

All this user's reviews

10

ProsmoothOct 9, 2017

There is a lot more to this screenplay than meets the eye. I think this is one of those films that demands 3 or 4 viewings before you can get a grasp on it. For one thing, the sensory overload on the first viewing kind of blunts a lot of theThere is a lot more to this screenplay than meets the eye. I think this is one of those films that demands 3 or 4 viewings before you can get a grasp on it. For one thing, the sensory overload on the first viewing kind of blunts a lot of the subtext. The cinematography and sound are nearly beyond belief. True art. The music is grand. The acting and characters are tremendous. If you're not a fan of Russian cinema or deliberate directors like Kubrick --you'll probably hate it. Go see Transformers 8. This isn't the movie for you. Will probably bomb at the box office because it's a thinking man's film, and that is just a damn shame.… Expand

5 of 11 users found this helpful56

All this user's reviews

9

LynnuxOct 9, 2017

Well done, Mr. Villeneuve. Finally a good example for Jar Jar Abrams and Disney how to make a sequel.
The sound was a bit too obtrusive and oversteered in the cinema I watched this.

7 of 11 users found this helpful74

All this user's reviews

8

RuslanDZEOct 9, 2017

When I watched Original Blade Runner at my childhood years I was not impressed by a movie. Then before watching BR2049 I watched it again. And I understood why people love it and many directors and creators were inspired by that. So I wasWhen I watched Original Blade Runner at my childhood years I was not impressed by a movie. Then before watching BR2049 I watched it again. And I understood why people love it and many directors and creators were inspired by that. So I was excited to see it now and good that I do not have nostalgia for an original one, since I watched it just recently. First at all, VISUALS. Denis Villeneuve and operator worked one the best looking movies. And visuals are masterly emphasize futuristic objects/ SCI Fi elements. I loved that like an original movie, future here represent in a really realistic way. You believe that in few decades we may live like that. And I can say that about whole movie. It feels down to earth. Nothing feels fake. Soundtrack is wonderful and it relates to the action very well. Ryan Gosling is a very good. Sci Fi Noir is very rare genre in movie industry and you have to watch this movie If you are movie nerd. Only doensides I have. That is eventually, movie falls flat. Some story lines do not have any progression. Jared Leto is wasted. And overall it does not make you think a lot. Well, it may be just a start and we will see an another sequel.… Expand

6 of 23 users found this helpful617

All this user's reviews

9

Butterbean1Oct 9, 2017

It's movies like Blade Runner 2049 that are keeping the magic of cinema alive and it absolutely demands to be experienced on the biggest screen available. Ignore the relatively few low scores and see arguably one of the best ever films of it's genre.

11 of 18 users found this helpful117

All this user's reviews

10

CottenipeteOct 9, 2017

Music and visuals are incredible. The story is good enough. It's long but not unnecessarily drawn out. The length allows it to become immersive. See it in a good imax for added bonus because this movie at top volume is great.

10 of 17 users found this helpful107

All this user's reviews

3

David_HOct 9, 2017

As a qualifier, I’m old enough to have seen and been a big fan of the original Blade Runner, plus I’ve always been a sci-fi fan. That said, the better half and I were both disappointed in this sequel. You know how you hear that much of aAs a qualifier, I’m old enough to have seen and been a big fan of the original Blade Runner, plus I’ve always been a sci-fi fan. That said, the better half and I were both disappointed in this sequel. You know how you hear that much of a movie ends up on the cutting room floor? Well for this movie it’s like they forgot to do the cutting; they just left everything in it. Generally, it comes across as a film that is trying way too hard to be “epic”. Yes there are long sweeping vistas, advanced cinematography and long scenes with very sparse dialogue. Sometimes this approach can be entertaining, but for 163 minutes? This film requires a large capacity bladder and if you include previews, be aware you will be sitting there for about 3 hours. Where the original had so much action and interesting characters, this sequel is almost the opposite; most characters show no emotion at all and the whole thing drags so slowly, we came close to walking out after about two excruciating hours. I’ll admit performances by Ford, Gosling and Leto were good considering the script they were handed. However again it was way too long and to make matters worse, you leave with hardly a hint of an uplift.… Expand

6 of 26 users found this helpful620

All this user's reviews

7

GinaKOct 9, 2017

I have seen the original version of Blade Runner so many times that I probably have it memorized. Unfortunately, I did not completely appreciate this latest version, which was overblown in my opinion and too repetitive – which is odd since II have seen the original version of Blade Runner so many times that I probably have it memorized. Unfortunately, I did not completely appreciate this latest version, which was overblown in my opinion and too repetitive – which is odd since I would not say that about any of the Villeneuve films I have seen (Prisoners, Sicario, The Arrival). Both my companion and I almost dozed off at some point early in the film, but the second half held our attention. One problem for me was missing the many interesting, original minor characters in the original that kept things livelier. A new set would have been appreciated instead of Ryan Gosling and his many, many wounds and the many women who turned up in various forms. A disappointment. Not terrible, but not great either… Expand

3 of 8 users found this helpful35

All this user's reviews

10

theimmortalmooOct 9, 2017

'it's 40 miles of bad road.

I can't stress how long, and amazing this film is, it is interesting along with great character developments and twists and turns all the way.

10 of 15 users found this helpful105

All this user's reviews

10

JamesRogersBushOct 9, 2017

There is one constant connecting the few naysayers among the critics of Blade Runner 2049: They all sound surprisingly like the naysayers of the original. I remember watching the original and loving it, even though many critics panned it inThere is one constant connecting the few naysayers among the critics of Blade Runner 2049: They all sound surprisingly like the naysayers of the original. I remember watching the original and loving it, even though many critics panned it in the same way that a few are doing now. The only real difference is that while a majority of critics at first panned the original and then slowly changed their minds, this time most critics get what Blade Runner is all about and are appreciating it from the get-go, while a paltry few, some of whom didn't like the original either, are panning it for much the same reasons the original was panned: It's too obscure, it's a mood piece that doesn't really hold up as a story, it's too long, it's more a series of set pieces than an engaging drama, etc. Well, guess what naysayers, the majority don't care, and all you've done is miss the point and distance yourselves from having a great movie experience. And given time, this Blade Runner, like the original, will grow an audience, beyond it's critics and even it's fan base. Thats what this kind of film does - it comes on like a slow acting drug, that wallops us in the beginning, then slowly drags us to a new place, and finally sinks in, long after we think we are done with it. The seeds that it plants in our psyche will eventually grow into our subconscious, where we will find ourselves having feelings about the film that we didn't have at first viewing. But for some, the seeds will never germinate and they will be left with nothing to show but a feeling of 'what was that all about?' While for those of us whose seeds do grow, a feeling of quiet awe and understanding will begin to take shape. And, if we haven't seen it already, we will begin to see that Blade Runner is most importantly about our inability to ever fully know who we really are and what this drama we are living is really all about. It also shows us a vision of a possible future, that we may already be on our way to creating - a future where love, the most basic emotion of all, like the trees that no longer grow in 2049, finds it hard to find a place to grow. And yet, like the small flowers that Joe finds at the foot of the dead tree where Rachel is buried, love still finds a way to survive.
And finally, eyeball to eyeball, that was and is the first image in both films and the point of the whole thing. Voigt-comp, the ultimate test of who is human and who is not. Technology, testing, and can the test be fool proof, or are we just fooling ourselves into believing that our testing really proves anything? Human or AI? What will be the ultimate difference, how will we tell the difference, and will it even matter when the replicants and AI decide not to take it anymore and then take their place on the evolutionary ladder. Next up, replicant revolution, AI liberation, and the subservience of the human genome to a future where the world is reborn, and love, the one ingredient that cannot be altered or done away with, is still at the heart of existence.… Expand

10 of 17 users found this helpful107

All this user's reviews

9

CurlleeOct 9, 2017

The 1982 film did not impress me, not even the final cut version. It was simply too boring. So I was not excited about 2049. But I found myself glued to nearly every frame. While the cinematography is the main attraction, most of theThe 1982 film did not impress me, not even the final cut version. It was simply too boring. So I was not excited about 2049. But I found myself glued to nearly every frame. While the cinematography is the main attraction, most of the characters, story, and score were interesting. Great direction and acting. The only things that I was not overly fond of were Leto's character and the last segment of the movie (except the last scene), where it felt out of place compared to the rest of the film. But one of the year's best for me.… Expand

7 of 12 users found this helpful75

All this user's reviews

10

Rwmfilm85Oct 9, 2017

After my first view of this film, I felt it was more style over substance, but upon second viewing I realized I was wrong and there is plenty of substance beneath waiting to be uncovered with multiple viewings. If you're a fan of theAfter my first view of this film, I felt it was more style over substance, but upon second viewing I realized I was wrong and there is plenty of substance beneath waiting to be uncovered with multiple viewings. If you're a fan of the original Blade Runner, you'll love this film. If you aren't, as I wasn't a big fan of it, I loved it as a film on its own and it brought more depth and meaning when I went back and viewed the original after seeing this. This is the rare sequel that supersedes the original; think Godfather: Part II or The Dark Knight.… Expand

10 of 17 users found this helpful107

All this user's reviews

9

MattBrady99Oct 9, 2017

"Pain reminds you the joy you felt was real".

Wow! WOW WOW WOW WOW WOW WOW! And another WOW! "Blade Runner 2049" is a fantastic follow up to the first and fixes a lot of the issues people had with the 1982 film. Without any director or"Pain reminds you the joy you felt was real".

Wow! WOW WOW WOW WOW WOW WOW! And another WOW!

"Blade Runner 2049" is a fantastic follow up to the first and fixes a lot of the issues people had with the 1982 film. Without any director or extended cut. It's everything a sequel should do. Hell, you can watch this without watching the first and wouldn't get lost. Something "Force Awakes", "Jurassic World", and "Finding Dory" should take notes on. This is the type of film that will inspire young film makers out there to pick up a camera and make art. It's that great.

As I said in my "Arrival" review, Denis Villeneuve can release a movie every year and be close of making a masterpiece. This is the masterpiece. When "Prisoners" and "Enemy" was released, a lot of people saw great promise for him in the future, but never has a director live up to that praise. You can see the love and respect he has for the original without cheating out by playing on your nostalgic to win you over, not with Blade Runner. He also brings something new to the universe and made the whole thing thought-provoking.

Roger Deakins continues to out shine himself with every film his apart of, however this might be his best work yet. The beautiful imagery, framing, the use of darkest and neon lights really adds to the amazement of the world building. It's one of the most good looking films I've this year and nothing will top it. I swear if this doesn't get him that long and well deserved Oscar, then nothing will. I lost respect for the Academy a long time ago, but this will make them look spineless.

The performances from everyone were all fantastic. Ryan Gosling and Robin Wright are great as always. Harrison Ford gave probably the best performance I've seen from him. And Jared Leto redeeming himself after the garbage fire that was "Suicide Squad", despite the small screen time. I finally saw him playing a character, not a try-hard 'look at my method acting'.

The score was incredible and has this blasting roar to it that the speakers at my cinema literally vibrated every time. I didn't see it in IMAX, it's that effective.

What surprised me more is how engaging the story was and how emotional it got. By the end, I felt a tear coming down my eye. Little CGI was used in certain aspects as it went for a more practical path with it's effects. The final result is remarkable.

Overall rating: Villeneuve nailed what many thought was impossible. My eye for his next movie has gone up sky high. Please go support this.… Expand

7 of 11 users found this helpful74

All this user's reviews

10

metaknightmareOct 8, 2017

A masterpiece through and through. My mind was blown away. The layers upon layers that this movie builds up and then peels away are jaw-dropping. Beyond the great plot, the film oozes with symbolical substance that adds to the impact of theA masterpiece through and through. My mind was blown away. The layers upon layers that this movie builds up and then peels away are jaw-dropping. Beyond the great plot, the film oozes with symbolical substance that adds to the impact of the story whether it be visually or musically. Biblical, political, environmental, universal themes are all added as spices to this delicious concoction of science-fiction glory. Every scene and nuance is cinematic gold. The most consistently outstanding cinematography I've seen in a long time. Great movies believe their audience to be intelligent, this film believes so and is actively trying to outfox you, always being one step ahead and thus making the viewer wonder what is next while leaving food for thought for a second viewing. Once you have reached the core at the end, you feel as though you have been unraveled yourself. The 2hr 45min runtime gave them the perfect time to give us the best possible sequel they could and they surpassed all expectations with an epic. You'd think it's a long time but not when you are hooked from the first shot. This is the greatest sci-fi trip since The Matrix. I recommend seeing it in IMAX or another large format theater. Enjoy.… Expand

11 of 18 users found this helpful117

All this user's reviews

10

CapnAwesomeOct 9, 2017

It's an absolute travesty that this movie is a box office bust, but this will definitely be a cult classic like the first Blade Runner. The cinematography and world-building in this movie is unbelievably amazing. It's a 2 hr 43 minute movieIt's an absolute travesty that this movie is a box office bust, but this will definitely be a cult classic like the first Blade Runner. The cinematography and world-building in this movie is unbelievably amazing. It's a 2 hr 43 minute movie that was completely enjoyable the whole time. Great story, great action, great acting, and really does a great job asking the audience what it really means to be human. My favorite movie this year and I would recommend it to everyone.… Expand

10 of 17 users found this helpful107

All this user's reviews

8

BBQTuckOct 9, 2017

To keep it simple, Blade Runner 2049 is a visually stunning neo-noir sci-fi film. If you see it in the theater, don't get a drink because the 2 hr and 44 minute run time will surely lead to a mid-movie piss break.

Overall the film is moody,To keep it simple, Blade Runner 2049 is a visually stunning neo-noir sci-fi film. If you see it in the theater, don't get a drink because the 2 hr and 44 minute run time will surely lead to a mid-movie piss break.

Overall the film is moody, heavy, deliberate and did I mention it was long? Ryan Gosling does his typical Ryan Gosling thing where he kind of skulks around with an blank look on his face, but it somehow looks cool. Imagine his character from "Drive", but somehow with an even cooler jacket. Harrison Ford continues to do his excellent "grumpy reprisals" of classic roles, and he handles this role about as well as he handled Han Solo in "The Force Awakens". The plot is solid, but nothing that will blow you away, and the setting of the film along with the soundtrack seem to be what's stuck in your head after viewing instead of the actual events that take place in the film. There's also Robin Wright Penn providing exposition, a hologram waifu, sequel bait, and Dave Bautista. Despite having a massive budget, there is no giant action set-piece scene in the third act, so don't go in expecting one, but to be honest it really wouldn't fit with the tone of this movie. There is however a beautifully crafted scene involving a sinking car that will give you an anxiety attack. Long story short. See this movies in theaters if you can stomach the giant run-time. It's an absolute treat on the eyes and ears, and Gosling and Ford provide excellent performances that prop up an fine but mostly serviceable plot.… Expand

6 of 17 users found this helpful611

All this user's reviews

5

lmorinOct 9, 2017

The movie was a big disappointment. I felt the special effects were great, but the plot fell short, ending as a simple chase movie good guys vs bad guys and no clever solution. Muttered dialogue contributed to frequent confusion about theThe movie was a big disappointment. I felt the special effects were great, but the plot fell short, ending as a simple chase movie good guys vs bad guys and no clever solution. Muttered dialogue contributed to frequent confusion about the plot twists. I was amazed at the emphasis on the female body in this futuristic scifi story as it seemed so completely dated. Why weren't there more sex objects of choice also on display? The original was much better, IMHO.… Expand

6 of 22 users found this helpful616

All this user's reviews

7

DukeJonOct 9, 2017

Two and a half hours of Ryan Gosling staring mournfully into the middle distance. I liked the flying cars. So slow I almost fell asleep in the middle of the movie.

6 of 13 users found this helpful67

All this user's reviews

6

JaguargaitUrsaOct 9, 2017

Story was drawn out. This movie did not improve on the original in anyway but rehashed it's themes and style. Recommended if you haven't seen the original.

3 of 14 users found this helpful311

All this user's reviews

9

gq_foineOct 9, 2017

My review after watching IMAX. Having seeing the first Blade Runner and how amazing I thought the original movie was, I had extremely high expectations on the sequel. This is not a perfect movie and had some missed opportunities where theMy review after watching IMAX. Having seeing the first Blade Runner and how amazing I thought the original movie was, I had extremely high expectations on the sequel. This is not a perfect movie and had some missed opportunities where the story could have further developed and shined more to have it become a true masterpiece, but overall this was definitely a solid 8+. Let's starts with the pros:

Amazing cast of characters and actors! I really thought Ryan Gosling (Officer K) did a fantastic job! And the other two amazing characters was Officer K - AI lover- JOI (Ana De Armas) and Jared Leto (Wallace). Visuals- Were amazing and loved them the artistic theme and colors.. But I wished they used less CGI and more real and authentic sceneries. The CGI felt to sterile, clean and less grit in the real world. Music- was great! But, I felt they tried very hard to keep it up with the original Blade runner. I really loved the Jazz tones and 60's nostalgia- that was amazing!!. But I would have preferred more classical synthesized electronic tones and the credits music was horrible- heavy metal. They could have put like 80's theme style music/ song rolling through the credits. My biggest beef was the story and some of the sterile CGI stuff. While I don't want to spoil anything, I just felt they could have really done a better job building the character's relationships and development. I would have been more emotionally attached vs feeling I don't care if this person dies. Something that Nier Automata (Video Game) does a much better job making feel more attach to "replicants". Frankly, I was more attached to Officer's K AI relationship more than Deckard to his..... I think this was a great movie but maybe I need to watch it again to say it's was a masterpiece. I didn't go away saying ahhhhhhh.... Or really felt emotional connected to Officer K, or Deckard. I was more connected to the AI than these characters. But visually, music and acting was on point except the CGI crap. I would give it 8.5/10. And the original blade runner is 9.5. I hope the next Blade Runner they work on developing the Characters better and relationships so I can feel emotionally connected, less CGI, and a stronger Plot.… Expand

7 of 11 users found this helpful74

All this user's reviews

9

Jibun86Oct 9, 2017

First of all I must say the original movie is my favorite movie of all times. That said, and taking into account the expectations I had over the movie I must say it is a remarkable film.
Its pacing is similar to the original and not evenFirst of all I must say the original movie is my favorite movie of all times. That said, and taking into account the expectations I had over the movie I must say it is a remarkable film.
Its pacing is similar to the original and not even closer to what the trailer let us thought would be a frenetic action film.
Plot is deep and well led by the main mystery which I found unexpected and very well-chosen. And the cast performs really well, special mention to Ryan Gosling and its character.
There is not doubt the movie is visually impeccable, however I had opposed feelings about it. I found it not to be exactly faithful to the original with too much light in general and partially losing the retro aspect of the original.
The sound was OK, but far away from the greatness of the original and you can easily notice it when a piece of the 82's movie sounds in the new film.
I cannot say if new audiences will like it, but for those who already knew Blade Runner it will be at least a decent sequel.… Expand

7 of 11 users found this helpful74

All this user's reviews

5

BossukOct 9, 2017

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The original BR had a simple storyline, but told it in a way that was intriguing, atmospheric and engaging. And at the end you felt you understood the characters. BR 2049 has tried to capture this, but has unfortunately fallen short.

Spoiler Alert
It seems the penchant for films to over complicate stories nowadays has not been ignored by the writers of BR2049. The film has some amazing scenes and dialogue, but then when they get into the nitty gritty, the film instead raises more questions than it answers.

I left the cinema wondering" I think i enjoyed that...but I'm not sure. What about x and y"

The motives of some of the characters is unclear, why are you doing this? The overriding story is clear, but individual motives are certainly not.

The film is too long. One scene has 10 minutes of K walking round an abandoned hotel. No tension, no atmospheric music, no dialogue, no action. Literally nothing happens. Ok, we get it, the hotel is disused and abandoned. It was purely wasted time. There are a few scenes like this that did nothing for the film. Completely unnecessary time fillers that do nothing. What's worse is that this wasted time could have been spent filling on some of the obvious gaps in the story.

e.g. What the hell is baselining? I can guess, but why isn't the film explaining this to me? What does the fact he failed the test actually mean? And why are they now going to kill him for failing the test.

Then add to this, the actions or lack of in some scenes make no sense. These is no excuse for this. One scene that stands out is when Deckard is kidnapped. why is K left alive? As far as the female protagonist is concerned, she has no further use for him, so there is no reason to leave him alive. The only course of action would be to kill him. How did she find him?

If all the records were lost in the blackout, how did they find out what Rachel looked like. the only record we have is audio?

Just a couple of examples of where this film falls very short.… Expand

7 of 21 users found this helpful714

All this user's reviews

9

antmolly1995Oct 8, 2017

Blade Runner 2049 is a beautifully crafted film and as good as any fan of the original could realistically expect it to be. I was nervous about what Villeneuve would come up with as I was not a fan of Arrival which I thought was far tooBlade Runner 2049 is a beautifully crafted film and as good as any fan of the original could realistically expect it to be. I was nervous about what Villeneuve would come up with as I was not a fan of Arrival which I thought was far too ponderous. Fortunately he's delivered the goods and then some!… Expand

25 of 35 users found this helpful2510

All this user's reviews

10

LuhterOct 9, 2017

A lot of people complain about the slow plot. Well, the first Blade Runner had a slow almost non-existent main plot: Deckard hunts for some replicants. What made it a great movie was the atmosphere, visuals, and philosophical implications.A lot of people complain about the slow plot. Well, the first Blade Runner had a slow almost non-existent main plot: Deckard hunts for some replicants. What made it a great movie was the atmosphere, visuals, and philosophical implications. The movie conveyed exactly the same feeling like the original Blade Runner. The thing is, cinematic techniques evolved. A movie carbon copy of Blade Runner released today won't give the same feeling like back then. And it's amazing Dennis managed to capture that feeling with this sequel. He truly is a master of the craft

While seemingly the film lacked a final "The C-Beams Speech", it actually didn't, because it started with one, "never witness a miracle"

The movie is great. It's slow, but I loved it this way, because a fast movie will make all the visual go to waste. Just don't watch it tired or as an action flick. While the plot line is not his strongest point (neither was the first's movie) it's still engaging, fresh and it doesn't keep you bored. Enjoy the movie as it should: a visual experience… Expand

10 of 17 users found this helpful107

All this user's reviews

5

DavidnbOct 8, 2017

It took a hell of a long time to get there, and when we did, I wasn't sure it was worth the wait. I'm sorry, but it must be said, H. Ford is among the coolest guys on the planet, but he is not one of our greatest actors, and his presence feltIt took a hell of a long time to get there, and when we did, I wasn't sure it was worth the wait. I'm sorry, but it must be said, H. Ford is among the coolest guys on the planet, but he is not one of our greatest actors, and his presence felt just a little bit rediculous. It looked great though.… Expand

3 of 17 users found this helpful314

All this user's reviews

10

MattyiceOct 8, 2017

In an extremely rare case, I believe Blade Runner 2049 manages to outdo the original story it's based on. The acting and writing superb, atmosphere is glowing and awe-inspiring, the direction is top-notch, and the story is just as great asIn an extremely rare case, I believe Blade Runner 2049 manages to outdo the original story it's based on. The acting and writing superb, atmosphere is glowing and awe-inspiring, the direction is top-notch, and the story is just as great as the first one. The score by Hans Zimmer and Ben Wallfisch is arguably the best of the year and holds true to Vangelis' original score and exceeds it in many ways. This film encapsulates everything a movie sequel or remake should do: expand on the original's ideas and improve on it. Blade Runner 2049 does just that, making it a rare sequel that can match the legendary original.… Expand

10 of 15 users found this helpful105

All this user's reviews

9

OctavisOct 8, 2017

BR2049 is a masterpiece, a brilliantly directed and absolutely visually stunning film. BR2049 compliments the original 1982 Blade Runner cult classic with action, drama, suspense and a plot which connects the original film perfectly. The filmBR2049 is a masterpiece, a brilliantly directed and absolutely visually stunning film. BR2049 compliments the original 1982 Blade Runner cult classic with action, drama, suspense and a plot which connects the original film perfectly. The film is a must see in an IMAX theater to fully appreciate everything BR2049 has to offer however it is a must see on the big screen. Finally a film has been made that reminds me of why we go to the movies. One of the best films you will ever experience in IMAX or the big screen. Blade Runner 2049 is a must see...… Expand

7 of 12 users found this helpful75

All this user's reviews

10

RerenaissanceOct 8, 2017

"Break the world"... that is exactly what this film has done. A dark, deep, and mesmerizing ode to the 1982 original that redefined the genre, Blade Runner 2049 is a science fiction phenomenon. Like his predecessor, the great Ridley Scott,"Break the world"... that is exactly what this film has done. A dark, deep, and mesmerizing ode to the 1982 original that redefined the genre, Blade Runner 2049 is a science fiction phenomenon. Like his predecessor, the great Ridley Scott, Denis Villenueve has managed to preserve the artificial heart of the first Blade Runner, crafting a personal story in an impersonal world. But this time, the dark, foggy streets of LA and the technotopia which surrounds it isn't just seen, it is lived. This is a film which demands attention and patience, and rewards you with a compelling, thought provoking, and heart-wrenching story, interesting characters, and some old fashioned sci-fi fun. For die hard Blade Runner fans, this is the sequel of our electric dreams, checking off all of the boxes, hitting ever mark seamlessly; resuscitating the mind-bending world of cyber-punk that was left for dead with the Matrix in 1999.… Expand

10 of 16 users found this helpful106

All this user's reviews

10

KeroliftOct 8, 2017

It's sci-fi brought to perfection, every aspect of the movie was made to honor the prequel while at the same time stand on it's own, the plot is a modern day 80's detectivesque movie, Gosling plays the role the the audience has, someone thatIt's sci-fi brought to perfection, every aspect of the movie was made to honor the prequel while at the same time stand on it's own, the plot is a modern day 80's detectivesque movie, Gosling plays the role the the audience has, someone that knows what has transpired bot doesn't exactly knows how that affects his surroundings, and work his way to discover one of the most deep, solid and human stories that cinematography has to offer, and a classic that is a worthy succesor, a great movie on it's own, and an even better succesor… Expand

10 of 17 users found this helpful107

All this user's reviews

6

keemtOct 8, 2017

Looks good, moves slow, and doesn't reward with a good plot. The plot touches on themes but doesn't explore them. The original Bladerunner was awkward and this one is even moreso. The original Bladerunner did have at least a core messageLooks good, moves slow, and doesn't reward with a good plot. The plot touches on themes but doesn't explore them. The original Bladerunner was awkward and this one is even moreso. The original Bladerunner did have at least a core message that was pretty new and very satisfyingly conveyed. What can I say, the director has the same lackings in every movie and did it again in Bladerunner 2049. At least we got a decent sequel that is beautiful.… Expand

3 of 15 users found this helpful312

All this user's reviews

10

DigitalMindZOct 8, 2017

Je reviens du cinéma où j’ai vu, à mon avis, l’un des meilleurs films de cette année : Blade Runner 2049. C’est une suite qui respecte beaucoup le style visuel et narratif du premier tome de 1982. Blade Runner 2049 est une expérience richeJe reviens du cinéma où j’ai vu, à mon avis, l’un des meilleurs films de cette année : Blade Runner 2049. C’est une suite qui respecte beaucoup le style visuel et narratif du premier tome de 1982. Blade Runner 2049 est une expérience riche tant et si bien que j’ai eut l’impression d’écouter de la musique classique, mais en regardant un écran. Denis Villeneuve ne se contente pas simplement de raconter une histoire en présentant une série de plans rapides, mais il prend le temps de partager le moment tel que vécu par les personnages. Il explore les différentes perspectives d’une scène afin d’accentuer son impact. De plus, il stimule notre sens auditif comme moyen mnémonique en référence à d’autres scènes. Je vous encourage grandement à aller voir ce film très bien réalisé. J’ai déjà envie de le revoir. Et il vaut définitivement la pleine de se le procurer sur Blu Ray.… Expand

7 of 13 users found this helpful76

All this user's reviews

8

CineAutoctonoOct 8, 2017

"Blade Runner 2049" was a very good film, the special effects and story were amazing, and as long as the performances were great. Ryan Gosling was very good in his role, we see again Harrison Ford, playing Rick Deckard, and Ford does not"Blade Runner 2049" was a very good film, the special effects and story were amazing, and as long as the performances were great. Ryan Gosling was very good in his role, we see again Harrison Ford, playing Rick Deckard, and Ford does not fail, this movie has been one of the biggest and one of the best this year.… Expand

4 of 9 users found this helpful45

All this user's reviews

6

WdMacOct 8, 2017

Great production value and very interesting set design. pretty good acting too. Very long winded dialogue, and lots of pointless padding. The plot is largely moved forward by vigorous use of mcguffins and red herrings. Not a bad movie, butGreat production value and very interesting set design. pretty good acting too. Very long winded dialogue, and lots of pointless padding. The plot is largely moved forward by vigorous use of mcguffins and red herrings. Not a bad movie, but not a great one in my opinion… Expand

5 of 15 users found this helpful510

All this user's reviews

10

victoralvarezOct 8, 2017

This movie is a stand out in newer sic fi titles due to the fact that it uses plot, details, and conversations to engage the viewer instead of action as most sic fi films do. While some may say this is the weak point of this film I love thisThis movie is a stand out in newer sic fi titles due to the fact that it uses plot, details, and conversations to engage the viewer instead of action as most sic fi films do. While some may say this is the weak point of this film I love this since it just makes the movie even more interesting by introducing and developing character, which I personally find important in a movie for it to be engaging to me. Another part of this film that I loved was the overall aesthetic of the environment, with its futuristic, gloomy California it creates a very iconic setting for the film. The story and cast however are definitely the centerpieces of the film, since the cast was chosen very well to match their characters, and the story is just unimaginably well written in my opinion.… Expand

10 of 18 users found this helpful108

All this user's reviews

9

PeabarterOct 8, 2017

I cautiously got excited to see this movie. Of course, I watched the Final cut version of Blade Runner with my son 2 days before. My anticipation increased when I saw overwhelming critic ratings, but I only read one review ahead of time. II cautiously got excited to see this movie. Of course, I watched the Final cut version of Blade Runner with my son 2 days before. My anticipation increased when I saw overwhelming critic ratings, but I only read one review ahead of time. I was worried that too high expectations would result in my being disappointed with the film. I did note that the film was 2 hrs and 40 minutes long so I prepared myself for a long movie. The obvious place to see this film was the IMAX at the MN zoo which has a true 70 mm screen (97 ft high!!!) and the most awesome sound presentation that I have ever heard.

I'm happy to say that I was not let down by my high expectations. I loved the story, visuals and sound track of Blade Runner 2049! The movie plays like a mystery/detective story and keeps the audience immersed and thinking about what they are watching. This movie may not be for everyone since there are many scenes with no talking as it follows the protagonist, detective K (played well by Ryan Gosling), while he works the clues and moves around the futuristic world. Just sit back and enjoy the visuals and music score during these scenes. It is so nice to see a movie that is built around an intricate story with character development and not just how many chase scenes they can string together. Hollywood are you listening??? Blade Runner 2049 does a great job stitching the special effects into the movie to complement the story rather than vice versa. Be sure to watch the original Blade Runner before going to see this movie. The stories are linked and you will be doing yourself a disservice otherwise.… Expand

7 of 12 users found this helpful75

All this user's reviews

10

acoolguyOct 8, 2017

The future of waifu technology is looking bright.

(The movie was really fantastic just like the original, but the biggest take away for me was what I mentioned above)

10 of 17 users found this helpful107

All this user's reviews

4

jondavisOct 8, 2017

Visually stunning, but beyond that nothing special. Story seemed intentionally confusing and some of the fighting sequences felt implausible. The depiction of women in this movie is also troubling. There are breasts galore in the picture andVisually stunning, but beyond that nothing special. Story seemed intentionally confusing and some of the fighting sequences felt implausible. The depiction of women in this movie is also troubling. There are breasts galore in the picture and women are treated as objects. The only friendly woman is a hologram. The other female characters are either hyper-masculine prisoners of their occupation, an actual prisoner, or prostitutes. I understand it's supposed to be dystopian but the male characters don't seem to be as one-dimensional as the female characters. Jared Leto's character is like a bad SNL skit.… Expand

9 of 27 users found this helpful918

All this user's reviews

10

DeadlyCarrotOct 8, 2017

This is an amzing movie if you're prepared for a slow, complex and heavily atmospheric experience. If you're fine with all of that, then you will love this movie.

10 of 16 users found this helpful106

All this user's reviews

2

rgjrOct 7, 2017

Blade Runner is long and very slow. Supposedly this is to build the plot, but at times it is very hard to follow. After we walked out of the movie I discussed the plot with the person I went with and they had completely missed what was goingBlade Runner is long and very slow. Supposedly this is to build the plot, but at times it is very hard to follow. After we walked out of the movie I discussed the plot with the person I went with and they had completely missed what was going on. Worse, the ending makes no sense. Supposedly Harrison Ford can now meet his child but nothing has happened in the movie that allows that. In good conscience I cannot recommend that anyone spend money on this movie.… Expand

10 of 48 users found this helpful1038

All this user's reviews

9

MaxsonOct 8, 2017

The movie might be a bit too long for some people, and there's definitely a lot to take in while watching this movie. Blade Runner 2049 is a great sequel, and very faithful to the original. The movie is absolutely gorgeous, every scene isThe movie might be a bit too long for some people, and there's definitely a lot to take in while watching this movie. Blade Runner 2049 is a great sequel, and very faithful to the original. The movie is absolutely gorgeous, every scene is like a piece of art. Surprisingly, I was never bored with the movie thanks to the captivating dialogues and great acting from the cast.… Expand

7 of 12 users found this helpful75

All this user's reviews

10

djniceyOct 8, 2017

Firstly the negatives - its not a popcorn movie. If you see that as a positive rather than a negative, then its likely you will really enjoy this masterpiece of a sequel. You really need to have seen the first film, if you enjoyed the firstFirstly the negatives - its not a popcorn movie. If you see that as a positive rather than a negative, then its likely you will really enjoy this masterpiece of a sequel. You really need to have seen the first film, if you enjoyed the first then this film should be a treat. The story, cinematography, acting, and sound are as good as you could hope for and this is the best follow up to any film I've seen.

Blade Runner is one of my favorite films, this has just been added to my list. I wont spoil the story but you wont see many better sequels than this.… Expand

5 of 8 users found this helpful53

All this user's reviews

7

AxeTOct 8, 2017

Very faithful to and like the original it's a long slow build to a somewhat rewarding payoff, but unlike the original this isn't a ground breaking cinematic experience simply because it's a decades later sequel taking all its cues from theVery faithful to and like the original it's a long slow build to a somewhat rewarding payoff, but unlike the original this isn't a ground breaking cinematic experience simply because it's a decades later sequel taking all its cues from the first one. The story is a compelling if convoluted follow up probably requiring having seen and liked "Blade Runner" to appreciate, with this movie delivering a single timely scene alone worth the price of admission, perhaps some of the most imaginative visuals and the best sound in a movie theatre this year (best suited in IMAX), and a supporting actor Oscar caliber performance by Harrison Ford.… Expand

4 of 8 users found this helpful44

All this user's reviews

10

madebywingOct 8, 2017

The film is a simple deep complex poetic masterpiece. Blade Runner 2049 does a perfect job of expanding on the brilliantly sewn seeds that were planted in the original 1982 Blade Runner. Before watching it we recommend you revisit the firstThe film is a simple deep complex poetic masterpiece. Blade Runner 2049 does a perfect job of expanding on the brilliantly sewn seeds that were planted in the original 1982 Blade Runner. Before watching it we recommend you revisit the first and even read analysis online to get into the juicy juice. Blade Runner 2049 was made for those who are familiar with the storyline and is a sci-fi monument and masterpiece. Whatever you do — forget about the reviews! One of the ones to stay away from is written by RICHARD LAWSON From Variety magazine. The following was a headline from another article he wrote: “Who Is America’s Most Envied Kardashian-Jenner? We finally have an answer to this most serious of questions.” Well Richard go back to your social media and most serious questions with the Kardashians.… Expand

11 of 19 users found this helpful118

All this user's reviews

10

BrianMcCriticOct 8, 2017

Blade Runner 2049 is a spectacle in story, sound, and visuals. A flawless piece of film making that should receive numerous awards, especially for Roger Deakins the time is now give this man his Oscar already. This is a true masterpiece!! A+

11 of 16 users found this helpful115

All this user's reviews

9

kheasOct 8, 2017

Having grown up in the 80's and 90's I was exposed to many amazing films. Films that set the stage for the cinema we now know. Groundbreaking themes, visuals, sound and more. The original film, Blade Runner, was one of these films andHaving grown up in the 80's and 90's I was exposed to many amazing films. Films that set the stage for the cinema we now know. Groundbreaking themes, visuals, sound and more. The original film, Blade Runner, was one of these films and when a sequel was (finally) officially announced, I was both delighted and skeptical of this new film. Having seen it today, I am pleased to announce that I feel it was the perfect sequel, flaws and all. for more: http://wp.me/p93it6-Ik… Expand

7 of 13 users found this helpful76

All this user's reviews

10

Creeper3455Oct 8, 2017

In a world filled with nothing but countless setups for gigantic movie universes (with some of them being great),we finally have a movie that,even if it's a sequel,can FINALLY breath its own fresh air. This is what Blade Runner 2049 feelsIn a world filled with nothing but countless setups for gigantic movie universes (with some of them being great),we finally have a movie that,even if it's a sequel,can FINALLY breath its own fresh air. This is what Blade Runner 2049 feels like. A BIG proof that there is still some cinematic air to breathe (Oh,and that Sony can still live in making movies). Even the fact that it's directed by Denis Villeneuve (the guy behind the intriguing 'Arrival') can tell its authenticity,with a story that won't disappoint the fans,especially if it's a 153-minute movie where you can barely find a moment where the movie gets weak or nonsensical. Aside from the story,everything else is flaw-free. Roger Deakins (13-time Oscar nominated) still manages to make beautiful shots with its cinematography (give the man a Creepin' Oscar!). If actors like Ryan Gosling or Harrison Ford have a long or a short screen-time,it's still works,since they had some terrific performances. All the Special Effects in the movie,just like the story,had its own life,from gigantic holograms to life-like buildings to flying cars (a thing that we're now supposed to have,i guess...) and you could even see the drastic change from 1982 to 2017. The only flaw i have with this movie is the kind of flaw that a movie like Blade Runner has,and that's the pacing. It gets from severe to calm,then gets action-packed all of the sudden. But aside from the 'uncountable' flaw,there's,as i said,nothing else to pinpoint about. If you're a fan of the original,you'll enjoy it at best,but if you're looking for a movie that doesn't act like a comic-book movie or a gigantic set-up movie,this should perfectly do the trick for you. Blade Runner 2049 is astounding and i can't recommend it enough,as it's one of the best movies of 2017 and THE best sequel of all-time. (as if the SW movies and The Dark Knight were strongly weak compared to this)… Expand

10 of 16 users found this helpful106

All this user's reviews

8

FranzHcriticOct 8, 2017

I've always held 'Blade Runner' as one of the greatest sci-fi films of all time. As a self-proclaimed film connoisseur, I believed a sequel to a film of such magnitude could never do it justice. However, I was proven (not totally) wrong withI've always held 'Blade Runner' as one of the greatest sci-fi films of all time. As a self-proclaimed film connoisseur, I believed a sequel to a film of such magnitude could never do it justice. However, I was proven (not totally) wrong with '2049'. It posed deep, meaningful questions of what it means to be human, to have emotions. The cinematography and score helped to match the atmosphere with the original in a way I never thought it would. My criticisms lie with the pace, and Gosling, who comes off as pedestrian. As a sequel though, it's an amazing movie.… Expand

8 of 13 users found this helpful85

All this user's reviews

6

buehlereOct 8, 2017

The movie's style and visual effects are groundbreaking. However, I think the movie falls apart in the second act, failing to bring its themes and plot together. By the end, I feel like even Villeneuve was exhausted by what he was trying toThe movie's style and visual effects are groundbreaking. However, I think the movie falls apart in the second act, failing to bring its themes and plot together. By the end, I feel like even Villeneuve was exhausted by what he was trying to accomplish. I would be wary of these "masterpiece" reviews.… Expand

22 of 48 users found this helpful2226

All this user's reviews

9

imraankOct 8, 2017

Visually stunning. Lack of context may come about for some who have not seen the original and may not result as an enjoyable experience within terms of storyline. Denis Villeneuve is the next Nolan.

7 of 13 users found this helpful76

All this user's reviews

9

LauberfenOct 8, 2017

Matches the tone, style and philosophical reflections of the original, while clearly advancing the plot, rather than attempting a re-boot. Moves into a more clearly dystopia setting, which is a plus in my book. Sound track has clearMatches the tone, style and philosophical reflections of the original, while clearly advancing the plot, rather than attempting a re-boot. Moves into a more clearly dystopia setting, which is a plus in my book. Sound track has clear similarities to Arrival, but ends up a little aggressive; both uncomfortably loud at points and some too quiet dialogue. Demands a second viewing.… Expand

7 of 13 users found this helpful76

All this user's reviews

10

J227BROct 8, 2017

In my opinion I found Blade Runner 2049 a masterpeice on its own merits that remained respectful to Blade Runner, its longer more grand than the original. The film as some amazing visuals, cinemaphotography with an epic and hypnoticIn my opinion I found Blade Runner 2049 a masterpeice on its own merits that remained respectful to Blade Runner, its longer more grand than the original. The film as some amazing visuals, cinemaphotography with an epic and hypnotic soundtrack with some unique industrial and electronic beats. I found that the sequal got me thinking a lot more than the original, all the cast played their parts well. I would advise to give this film a chance and go to watch this film if you're a fan of the original and if you love cyberpunk sic-fi and a thinking man's film and most of all a fan of Blade Runner.… Expand

10 of 16 users found this helpful106

All this user's reviews

10

temptershellOct 8, 2017

One of the best movies of recent years. Brilliant continuation and spectacular science fiction movie. Amazing pictures, great acting and special effects. Everything is delightful and beautiful. The directorial skills on high level. I waitedOne of the best movies of recent years. Brilliant continuation and spectacular science fiction movie. Amazing pictures, great acting and special effects. Everything is delightful and beautiful. The directorial skills on high level. I waited for this movie many years.… Expand

11 of 19 users found this helpful118

All this user's reviews

6

PugnaciousOct 8, 2017

Yep, another masterpiece, only... not so much. If movies are primarily about the story, the new Blade Runner sucks. There are too many unnecessary scenes, too many amazingly slow ones, and many which I like to call executions - on the surfaceYep, another masterpiece, only... not so much. If movies are primarily about the story, the new Blade Runner sucks. There are too many unnecessary scenes, too many amazingly slow ones, and many which I like to call executions - on the surface something happens there, but indeed they are only about exposition. Every scene with annoying Jared Leto is just that: cheap exposition. Bad guys are one-dimensional, unlike Rutger Hauer in the first movie. Rich, original environment of the first movie are now desolate ruins. Which is nice, for a second, but then you see almost all scenes are empty. At some point, it looks like there are not secondary characters in this world. Gosling was a good choice, and there is enough good thing in BR that you still can watch it and have fun, but BR2049 should simply be much better than this.… Expand

22 of 52 users found this helpful2230

All this user's reviews

4

pschiresonOct 8, 2017

A big fan of the original Blade Runner, I was looking forward to Blade Runner 2049. The trailers were promising and the casting looked terrific. On a deeper level, the film's themes continue to intrigue. I saw the film in 3D yesterday: anA big fan of the original Blade Runner, I was looking forward to Blade Runner 2049. The trailers were promising and the casting looked terrific. On a deeper level, the film's themes continue to intrigue. I saw the film in 3D yesterday: an interminable disappointment. After an hour, Ryan Gosling's understatement flattens out. Jared Leto's overly mannered performance (not to mention his cheesy lines) feel like they're from a B movie. Likewise the confrontation in the third act in which the villainous cyborg gets her comeuppance. Robin Wright is fine, but occupies only a tiny corner of the film. Harrison Ford enlivens things, but it must be 90 minutes into the film before he shows up. And the music, relentlessly heavy-handed cues of menace, as if it were necessary. Pretentious, overdone, interminable.… Expand

6 of 22 users found this helpful616

All this user's reviews

9

Notarius2323Oct 7, 2017

p«Бегущий по лезвию 2049 »: Снятся ли андроидам достойные сиквелы? В 1982 году, с жанром научной фантастики произошел феномен имя которому Бегущий по лезвию, за авторством сэра Ридли Скотта. Центральной темой фильма были взаимоотношения междуp«Бегущий по лезвию 2049 »: Снятся ли андроидам достойные сиквелы? В 1982 году, с жанром научной фантастики произошел феномен имя которому Бегущий по лезвию, за авторством сэра Ридли Скотта. Центральной темой фильма были взаимоотношения между репликантами (искусственной формой жизни) и людьми, а так же затрагивалась тема: жизни и смерти. Критики смешано отреагировали на картину и их мнения разделились: кто-то ругал фильм за излишнюю монотонность, а кто-то хвалил визуальную составляющую. В прокате у кинокартины Скотта дела тоже не заладились, где ее ждал провал. И все же, это не помешало «Бегущему по лезвию» выдержать испытание временем и приобрести статус культовой кинокартины. Прошло 30 лет, на большие экраны выходит сиквел, «Бегущий по лезвию 2049» в режиссерском кресле Дени Вильнев, Ридли Скотт значится продюсером, а за сценарий отвечает автор оригинала Хэмптон Финчер. Что же получилось у канадского кинорежиссера? Вильнев не скрывал, что многие элементы в сценарии он переработал под свое видение, при этом развивая основную идею оригинала. Фильм затрагивает тему человечности и поднимает ряд вопросов: что делает человека, человеком? Наличие души? Мораль или может быть эмоции? Вопросы, проходят сквозь сюжет поделенный на 3 акта – ближе к финалу, которого, ожидает Рик Декард 30 лет хранивший тайну способную перевернуть мир. В «Бегущем по Лезвию 2049» окончательно размыта грань между человеком и новыми моделями репликантов, оно и неудивительно ведь главный девиз Tyrell Corporation: "больше человек, чем сам человек". Как и в оригинале у картины неспешный темп повествования и большой акцент на деталях, а хронометраж составляет неполные 3 часа. Вообще любая попытка углубления в тему сюжета - спойлер, поэтому детали стоит опустить. Одна из сильнейших сторон фильма – визуальная составляющая, каждый кадр настоящее произведение искусства: его построение, плавность переходов, великолепная работа с цветовой гаммой и неважно будь то урбанистические джунгли дождливого Лос-Анджелеса, усыпанные тысячами неоновых вывесок и голограмм или апокалиптические руины старого города. Роджер Дикинс – настоящий маэстро, в его послужном списке такие работы, как «Побег и Шоушенка», «Старикам тут не место» и 7 номинаций на премию Оскар. «Бегущий по лезвию 2049», образцовый сиквел и значимое событие для современной кинофантастики, в то время пока некоторые студии продолжают штамповать ремейки или продолжения на грани ремейка, Дени Вильнев, снимает свое авторское видение «Бегущего по Лезвию» развивая идеи оригинала, а не эксплуатирует старые. Итог: к просмотру обязательно… Expand

10 of 19 users found this helpful109

All this user's reviews

2

nanokiwiOct 7, 2017

Movie seemed intent on putting moviegoer to sleep and then waking them with loud bangs. I would awaken to think I was watching some kind of cruelly beautiful Czechoslovakian arthouse film.

25 of 85 users found this helpful2560

All this user's reviews

10

avr50Oct 7, 2017

Blade Runner 2049 is, in my opinion, better than the first movie. The movie, that is almost three hours long, it doesn´t seem like that, in fact, I wanted to last 30 minutes more, at least. Denis Villenueve is proving to the world, that he isBlade Runner 2049 is, in my opinion, better than the first movie. The movie, that is almost three hours long, it doesn´t seem like that, in fact, I wanted to last 30 minutes more, at least. Denis Villenueve is proving to the world, that he is one of the best directors working today, with titles like "Arrival"; now, he has another masterpiece to add to his references. This movie is gorgeous, the visuals are incredible, something that exceeded my expectations. Ryan Gosling does his best performance ever. Harrison Ford is good also, and his presence in the movie is not only for pleasing fans of the first movie, it has a purpose. Some will say that this movie it´s more complicated than the first one, but I don´t think so, in fact, this movie is more easy to digest than the first one. As a note, this would not be pleasent, if you have not seen the first one. In the end, Blade Runner 2049 is a masterpiece, something to not be missed if you love cinema (and if you like the first movie)… Expand

10 of 16 users found this helpful106

All this user's reviews

10

lager96Oct 7, 2017

Blade Runner 2049, like it's predecessor, is a flawed masterpiece, except it isn't flawed. Right from the opening shot you are immersed into this bleak world. The atmosphere and the haunting score complement the already fantasticBlade Runner 2049, like it's predecessor, is a flawed masterpiece, except it isn't flawed. Right from the opening shot you are immersed into this bleak world. The atmosphere and the haunting score complement the already fantastic cinematography to make this one of the years highlighted films. Ryan Gosling and Harrison Ford give their best performances to date, which helps elevate the story (which I won't spoil here) to a masterful degree. In fact, every actor and actress in this film give it everything they have and it shows. There isn't a single weak link in the cast which you cannot say very often. This is one of the years best films, if not the best. If your a fan of the original or sci-fi movies in general, you owe it to yourself to watch this masterpiece of a film!… Expand

10 of 21 users found this helpful1011

All this user's reviews

1

RickBellOct 7, 2017

Completely over-rated by the critics, because they love this pretentious, slow-paced and confusing trainwreck of a sequel. Two of the female leads have noticeable Spanish accents to their English (similar to Penelope Cruz), which is jarringlyCompletely over-rated by the critics, because they love this pretentious, slow-paced and confusing trainwreck of a sequel. Two of the female leads have noticeable Spanish accents to their English (similar to Penelope Cruz), which is jarringly out of place. The movie is unappealing due to some of its violent and sexual scenes that are in poor taste and unnecessarily long. Not enough action, and poorly written. The disappointment in the audience was palpable after the movie ended. Ridley Scott should have directed it himself instead of Villanueva.… Expand

7 of 36 users found this helpful729

All this user's reviews

10

FilmaticOct 7, 2017

perfect cinematography, perfect CGI, perfect acting, good story. Perfect metaphors, thought provoking ideas. Best SCI FI of this decade EASILY. enjoyed nearly every single scene, as it was mastered to perfection. Whatever you do WATCH IT INperfect cinematography, perfect CGI, perfect acting, good story. Perfect metaphors, thought provoking ideas. Best SCI FI of this decade EASILY. enjoyed nearly every single scene, as it was mastered to perfection. Whatever you do WATCH IT IN IMAX. PLEASE FOR THE LOVE OF GOD. IT'S SO BEAUTIFUL VISUALLY, AND AUDIO WISE I WAS ABOUT TO CRY. MAKES DUNKIRK look like a pile of ash.… Expand

11 of 19 users found this helpful118

All this user's reviews

Blade Runner 2049

User Reviews