Blade Runner 2049

6

manuelgcgNov 19, 2017

First things first, this movie is not for everybody. Blade Runner 2049 has amazing sceneries, great CGI, fantastic practical effects and a world so well made that whilst watching the movie you just feel part of it. However the story its quiteFirst things first, this movie is not for everybody. Blade Runner 2049 has amazing sceneries, great CGI, fantastic practical effects and a world so well made that whilst watching the movie you just feel part of it. However the story its quite disappointing with an unnecessary length that could have been easily reduced by removing sections of the movie that added nothing more than beautiful scenarios.

Pros
+ Beautiful universe
+ Fantastic performance from Ana de Armas
+ Top notch CGI
+ Great use of practical effects
+ Stunning scenes with an incomparable immersion
+ Amazing soundtrack

Cons
- Unnecessary long
- Slow paced
- Weak Story
- Poor performances

This movie suffers the same negatives as the original Blade Runner, if you liked the first you must watch it.

If you are looking for a movie to admire its beauty and how well made it is, this movie is a 9/10

If you just want to watch a movie and just enjoy it and have a good time it is a 4-5/10

I am going to score it a 6/10 to balance these two.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

6

HotelCentralFeb 13, 2018

This is the film that's persuading me that Hollywood, or the current generation of directors and writers, probably have nothing more to offer that's going to interest me, now or ever.

I mean, I hardly know what to say about this film. ItThis is the film that's persuading me that Hollywood, or the current generation of directors and writers, probably have nothing more to offer that's going to interest me, now or ever.

I mean, I hardly know what to say about this film. It does nothing to compete with the visuals of the original. The soundtrack is numbing. Gosling's character is so utterly devoid of emotion throughout 99% of the film that it's a bit like watching an old-time steam train chugging down the tracks. And, oh look, it's Rick Deckard! What's up with him? Does it make any difference? Probably not. And Deckard has a dog! Same questions. Same answers. Sad.

Ok, so spoiler alert: There's this "miracle", see? And Mr. Wallace, the super-genius, can't figure how it happened, and he desperately wants to know how it happened so he can make it happen again. The only problem, of course, is that no one ever explains how come this thing that happens is such a big damn miracle when the human race has already previously produced people smart enough to design replicant "brains." (His name was "Tyrell.") I mean, compared to a "brain" that seems to function a lot like an actual human brain, designing a human reproductive tract probably shouldn't be all that difficult. And if I-the-viewer don't believe it's all that difficult then the whole point of the film starts looking contrived and silly.

Now, if I wanted to nitpick, I could point to crazy things like a "blade runner" laying his gun on a table while confronting a dangerous fugitive, or, say, dopey things like the same guy being told to surrender his badge and gun two scenes in a row, or, say, things from bizarro world, like a police official telling a blade runner to murder somebody who is NOT a replicant, because blah blah blah, you'll be saving the world--but why even get into it?

Blade Runner 2049 did nothing for me. I don't think the original film was the greatest film ever made, but it was sure a lot more interesting than the sequel, and the original film with the narration was the best version of all, and all these cute stories from the 30 years in between about Deckard being a replicant were absurd from word one.

Oh and the one funny bit in Blade Runner 2049? Deckard bragging about his skill as a blade runner. The unfortunate truth is that Deckard's main skill was projecting his Every-Man Charm while getting himself ambushed and beaten to a pulp.

And one more thing. Mr. Wallace seems to think that Deckard fell in love with Rachel when they first met. Was that before or after Deckard asked Tyrell, "How can it not know what it is?" I mean, give me a break.

Peace. Out.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

papi_tescoFeb 12, 2018

yeah this movie is amzing on every level it has some of the greatest cinematography ive ever seen, amzing acting, a really interesting main character who uncoveres a mystry at the same time as the audience, and while it isn't everywhere inyeah this movie is amzing on every level it has some of the greatest cinematography ive ever seen, amzing acting, a really interesting main character who uncoveres a mystry at the same time as the audience, and while it isn't everywhere in the movie the action scenes are corigraphed very well and are some tense and suspensfull it has you on the edge of yur seat, the plot is very good and has great characters to go with it, it has an amzing soundtrack that suits the tone of the movie perfectly.tjis film also leaves the big cliff hanger of the first one untouched respecting its source material.the villan of the this movie that being jared letos character of niander Wallace is a bit weird and is present that much throuout the film but Sylvia Hoeks as luv is an wallaces assistant/personal killing machine is such an indimidating character and allways has an ominous presence through out the movie.but by far the part that steals the show is ryan goslings character of k who is so interesting and well written every timehe finds something out so do you and unravaling the mystery of the film with him is just fantastic.this film has literaly became my favorite of all time.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

CraigEcholsFeb 11, 2018

Slow. Slower. Slowest. It really feels like Blade Runner 2049 was made for people who wants to feel special by picking up on complexity. I get that movies need some complexity for a good story, but BR2049 seems to throw everything that it canSlow. Slower. Slowest. It really feels like Blade Runner 2049 was made for people who wants to feel special by picking up on complexity. I get that movies need some complexity for a good story, but BR2049 seems to throw everything that it can in order to make itself stand out. Granted, the original Blade Runner was long and complex, but the story made sure you understood the key points. This movie throws dialogue after monologue after slow pacing scene after long walk down the street after you. This movie was about 50 minutes too long for scenes that weren't necessarily needed (the menage a trois scene). I get that action movies don't need to feature lots of explosions and car chases and raining bullets and acrobatics, but you can literally count on your hands and toes how many shots were fired in this movie (I counted 11....I'm not even kidding). The plot twist at the end sort of screamed deus ex machina to me as well. I don't know. It just sort of felt cheap like, well than what was the point of the movie then? The biggest issue to me was I just never ever felt any sense of urgency in the movie. It's like "We have this big problem that could cause a massive war, but let's take our time solving it." The soundtrack did a good job of providing tension, but....I never actually felt there was any. There was little show of any conflict or struggle. This would have made a great thriller/mystery, but I got bored for the most part. The beginning scene with Gosling vs. Bautista was honestly the best scene in my opinion. Overall, this movie is a SLOTH to get through with very little sense of antagonism to be found.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

0

Chris454Feb 11, 2018

One of the most overrated movies of all time. None of it is that great or memorable

4 of 34 users found this helpful430

All this user's reviews

10

AJDALTONFeb 11, 2018

The running time of the Blade Runner 2049 movie is 2hrs37mins. Arguably, it’s a daunting commitment for any potential viewer. You might go thinking: ‘Ah, that means the tempo’s slow and it’s overly-long or self-indulgent.’ Rest assured,The running time of the Blade Runner 2049 movie is 2hrs37mins. Arguably, it’s a daunting commitment for any potential viewer. You might go thinking: ‘Ah, that means the tempo’s slow and it’s overly-long or self-indulgent.’ Rest assured, however, that when you are occupied watching awe-inspiring visuals and listening to an intriguing soundscape, you simply don’t notice the time passing. And there’s a decent detective story with tantalising clues, a multi-layered plot and exciting conflicts thrown in as well. This film truly has the lot.

The director is Denis Villeneuve, who also made the award-winning SF flick Arrival. He recaptures the vision of the future we see in the original Blade Runner and then builds upon it, with fine world-building (enough for a third movie, without doubt) and his own original ideas. He is also a skilled, light-touch story-teller. There is nothing clumsy or clunky in Blade Runner 2049. It is all subtlety, allusion and some playful confusion. Such an approach would make for a frustrating watch with certain directors, but Villeneuve makes sure to deliver on revelations and to resolve every aspect of what is going on. It’s masterfully done.

The story? Well, the cyborgs/androids of the first movie have been replaced by a new series of much-more-obedient AIs. These AIs each has an artificial ‘childhood memory’ implanted into them so that they can react in a more human way to day-to-day life, and so that they can react with a certain personality. We follow one AI detective (played skillfully by Ryan Gosling) who comes to suspect that his memory is real and holds clues to the mystery with which he has been tasked by his boss (the ever-wonderful Robin Wright). Chuck in an evil tech corporation (with a sick boss and terrifying henchwoman) and we have everything we need for a dark and glorious tale. And it’s no secret that Harrison Ford is in the movie: he’s not wasted either; his ‘own’ story is really moved on by 2049… In fact, 2049 sorts out all the plot holes of the original film, which I would never have thought possible.

And here’s the kicker. I was never the biggest fan of the original Blade Runner, either when I saw it as a 15yrold at the cinema, or as a 40-year-old who assumed that all the ‘fuss’ about this ‘cult’ movie meant his youthful self must have missed something. I just thought of the original as a fairly predictable, clumsy and derivative SF flop (it wasn’t any Star Wars!). Yet Blade Runner 2049 has stood everything on its head. It’s almost as if my childhood memory is an artificial one, one that had been implanted to give me character. It’s as if my program has now been rewritten and I am born again. And that’s my last point about the movie: it has an eerie familiarity to it that makes it truly prescient and uncanny. It is a vision of what is most assuredly going to happen to our species. It has the power of prophecy. And so… I can only score this movie 10 out of 10 (a first for me).… Expand

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

3

LightsideFeb 8, 2018

Not Blade Runner in the slightest. Basically a reimagining. The movie as a whole is crafted well visually but plot holes, weird moments, laughable music, changes to locations, empty acting can't save it. For example the LAPD headquarters forNot Blade Runner in the slightest. Basically a reimagining. The movie as a whole is crafted well visually but plot holes, weird moments, laughable music, changes to locations, empty acting can't save it. For example the LAPD headquarters for Blade Runners is completely different. Why? Less rain throughout and instead a dusty ash like setting is used. Almost sterile locations compared to the original Blade Runner. Then you have a political motive by the end thrown in to make you roll your eyes even more. The pacing is almost comical that most shots linger on actors just starring off into space. As for the performers funny enough only Harrison Ford knows how to act and surprisingly the only part of the movie I enjoyed. If what you call acting is Gosling, the overrated Jared Leto and all the others just standing still not doing anything.. then it's time we really asked the question why these performers are paid high figures for this sort of thing? Acting has becoming modeling these days. Only Ford like I said made any sort of impact. Back to the very depressing plot, everything about it sucks including the revelation replicants can now have babies.. (wtf?!) and have skulls like humans? and what's the point of having replicants when you have AI holograms interacting with humans now? I know they don't do physical work but Pris was a pleasure model right? So why AI lovegrams all of a sudden? I mean there are so many plot holes and stupid ideas you wonder how this ever got off the ground. An insult to Ridley's original frankly. I guess maybe that's why they called it 2049 instead of Blade Runner 2. I was reluctant to see this but finally gave in because some were slamming Ford's appearance. Well Ford's expression and role in the whole film sums up my thoughts about it that you just want to retire and get as far away from LA as possible.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

6

fredjesusFeb 7, 2018

um bom filme com bons efeitos visuais, porem muito lento e previsível, grande de mais e sem muito conteúdo pra justificar, não chega a ser um fracasso mas não se compara ao original

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

jcanfisFeb 6, 2018

Most sequels can not keep up to their high expectations. Blade Runner 2049 does.
i was satisfied with story, visuals and pacing. Not boring at all.

6 of 7 users found this helpful61

All this user's reviews

10

andy24king24Jan 30, 2018

When I saw or managed to make it thru the very slow burner that was Blade Runner The Final Cut, I was obviously dubious about this. I thought that I’d need to see and enjoy the original before this. Denis Villeneuve quotes you don’t need toWhen I saw or managed to make it thru the very slow burner that was Blade Runner The Final Cut, I was obviously dubious about this. I thought that I’d need to see and enjoy the original before this. Denis Villeneuve quotes you don’t need to have seen the original to enjoy his film cos this stands on its own. Though a lot of the film does involve the original in its plot. So I sat down to watch this juggernaut of a film, and juggernaut I mean 2 hours 43 mins. You do get sceptical as why it’s that long and think am I wasting my time and money here but. And big but. I watched Mark Kermode gives his review. He said that opening 30 mins of the movie surprisingly set the amazing pace and that in itself defines the greatness of this epic film. There are no standout performances here, not Gosling, not Ford, no one but there is one and that is the director Denis Villeneuve. What he delivers here is something of awesomeness, something astonishing. The visuals, the lighting, everything about the design and scale of this is just mind blowing. You definitely don’t have to enjoy the original to enjoy this. And at 163 mins, it doesn’t feel that long at all. This really is the creme de la creme of sci fi perfection. And ok I said earlier that Gosling and Ford aren’t the standout performers but there performances are brilliant. Gosling’s performance is of particular interest considering a year ago he was nominated for best actor for La La Land. But forget La La Land here. This is simply put the greatest sci fi, action thriller ever made. Denis Villeneuve your the man. Shame you didn’t get a best director nod at this years Oscars, just the nomination would have sufficed. 5 out 5, 10 out 10.… Expand

4 of 5 users found this helpful41

All this user's reviews

10

zedzdedJan 29, 2018

Well worth the wait. I was terrified they were going to dump over the original with a lacklustre sequel but they respectfully incorporated the first movie while going somewhere original too. I think this is a movie I will watch again andWell worth the wait. I was terrified they were going to dump over the original with a lacklustre sequel but they respectfully incorporated the first movie while going somewhere original too. I think this is a movie I will watch again and again. Wonderful. Thanks to all the creators, you have created an amazing piece of art and a thoroughly enjoyable piece of entertainment.… Expand

4 of 5 users found this helpful41

All this user's reviews

9

nightmovesJan 29, 2018

Blade Runner 2049 is a great movie that keeps you guessing until the very end. The movie has a great cast and plot. Also, the tech that was created for this movie seems so real and fits so well into their crafted world. The only negative forBlade Runner 2049 is a great movie that keeps you guessing until the very end. The movie has a great cast and plot. Also, the tech that was created for this movie seems so real and fits so well into their crafted world. The only negative for me would be the "soundtrack". Villeneuve opted to copy the booms and bass drops from his other movie the Arrival and I feel that it distracts from the movie in places.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

10

StrongHarmJan 28, 2018

Absolutely and utterly brilliant. I expected a movie with some scenes reminiscent of the original epic film. What I received was answers to the lingering questions I've had since I saw Bladerunner in 1982. The love of the original isAbsolutely and utterly brilliant. I expected a movie with some scenes reminiscent of the original epic film. What I received was answers to the lingering questions I've had since I saw Bladerunner in 1982. The love of the original is evident in this followup. The subtle nod to Rutger Hauer's scene left me breathless. If you're an unfeeling angry cynic who sat down to this movie expecting to hate it, I feel sorry for you. I never considered that Ridley Scott might outdo himself after Prometheus. I stand corrected. This was a beautiful moving picture.… Expand

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

10

KuggzJan 28, 2018

Put on headphones sit back and let your mind get blown. It takes two viewings to appreciate what this really is. I saw it at the theatre and wasn't sure but once I saw it again at home I realized this is a masterpiece.

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

7

phillyjeffJan 28, 2018

BR 2049 is visually stunning, just like the first movie. At almost 3 hours it is too long. They should of edited it down to 120 minutes

1 of 23 users found this helpful122

All this user's reviews

6

Zaine6Jan 28, 2018

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Felt the story was a bit hard to keep up with, forced complexity. The lack of expressions from Ryan Gosling also turned me off, other robots appeared to have a little more expression and Ryan's was just a tad too much. Finally I found the plot twist at the end where Ryan was not the Son to be very disheartening and even more so that he does not get to be with his AI wife in any form. In fact we do not see where he will go from this at all.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

6

JoeCoolJan 25, 2018

Beautifully made world, but the plot drags itself along so slowly it hurts. Excellent visuals and some really great scenes but overall the movie was quite the disappointment. Not the masterpiece I had expected at all.

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

7

tamcwlmmJan 23, 2018

Great story and visual effects. I liked this one more than the original. Great performances by Ryan Gosling and Harrison Ford. Sometimes it was hard to keep up because some much is happening in this movie. I like the throwbacks to the oldGreat story and visual effects. I liked this one more than the original. Great performances by Ryan Gosling and Harrison Ford. Sometimes it was hard to keep up because some much is happening in this movie. I like the throwbacks to the old movie, with the old recordings, that was a nice touch. People say this is the best Sci-fi of 2017. I say it's one of the best, as there were great, and for me personally better sci-fi movies in 2017.… Expand

1 of 15 users found this helpful114

All this user's reviews

4

cheroldJan 21, 2018

Imagine Blade Runner without a strong directorial vision, and interesting story, or engaging characters. If you find that impossible to imagine, just watch the forgettable sci-fi flick Blade Runner 2049.

Instead of the distinct '40s-noir ofImagine Blade Runner without a strong directorial vision, and interesting story, or engaging characters. If you find that impossible to imagine, just watch the forgettable sci-fi flick Blade Runner 2049.

Instead of the distinct '40s-noir of the original, 2049 offers scale without purpose and a dusty color palette. Instead of riveting, distinct, excellently-acted characters, you've got sturdy but unforgettable people. Blade Runner was full of amazing moments and places, such as the room of living toys and Rutger Hauer's every word, but 2049 has nothing but a bland lead and a bunch of characters whose motives can't be looked at too closely. Scenes come not out of the story but out of a desire to have something happened, resulting in pointless interactions like the tormenting of a naked replicant. There aren't so much huge plot holes as poor motivations and small inconsistencies that make everything in the movie feel false.

If you don't compare this to Blade Runner, it's a mediocre but almost-watchable movie with the occasional interesting idea (the talking, naked ad, the memory designer's creation of a birthday party), but as a sequel to a classic, this movie is a travesty. And how is it that a futuristic L.A. heavily influenced by Japanese cultures has no Asians in the entire city? It's as though there's no detail so big or small that the filmmakers won't ignore it.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

10

UmangGoslingJan 21, 2018

This movie reminds me of why I love watching movies.it has everything perfect I mean every Little thing is perfect stars from Screenplay is awesome it has every layer that I want from the movie like Blade Runner.I am a big fan of RidleyThis movie reminds me of why I love watching movies.it has everything perfect I mean every Little thing is perfect stars from Screenplay is awesome it has every layer that I want from the movie like Blade Runner.I am a big fan of Ridley Scott's original 1982 Blade Runner its flawed masterpiece and I love the movie too.let's talk about the cinematography of Mr. Roger Deakins I love that mans vision for movies the visuals are mesmerizing and heart touching and a lot of the work, not Evan Camerawork. Mr.Deni Villeneuve directing doing such a fantastic job he is the guy who created Sicario,Prisoner,Enemy,and arrival it makes total seance that he is Great director working today and lets talk about acting of Ryan Gosling this man is getting better and better at his job his work is amazing and Harrison Ford and Robin Wright also did nice job and also Female Actress as well.The soundtrack of this move is Beautiful as hell and overall this is the best Sci-fi movie I have seen in a long time.One thing that I am very impressed about that is they didn't try too hard for making this sequel I mean they didn't try to make a 7 or 8 movie franchise they just make a great Sequel of all time. This movie is now on my all-time best movies list.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

7

rpmJan 20, 2018

I have to admit that when I love a film as much as I did the original Blade Runner I was both very excited and very nervous to watch a sequel. Will it add to the story? Will it cheapen the story? Will it take it directions I don't personallyI have to admit that when I love a film as much as I did the original Blade Runner I was both very excited and very nervous to watch a sequel. Will it add to the story? Will it cheapen the story? Will it take it directions I don't personally feel the original pointed? Well, I will say that this sequel is a well made film but to me it is very different from the original...even though it borrows some of the same characters, settings, and sounds. The original was at its core a detective story that just happened to take place in the future. The philosophical elements about topics such as slavery, religion, and technological vs. organic "life" were present and dealt with within the action, but in the sequel they are the story and it is handled in such a heavy, depressing way that I can't really say I enjoyed it. I respect it, I appreciate the artistry in its creation, but I really didn't have fun watching it...and I recall having immense fun watching the original. This sequel is just so damn bleak. What is the point of even existing in that world?… Expand

1 of 8 users found this helpful17

All this user's reviews

9

jacoobi456Oct 6, 2017

Blade Runner 2049 is a sequel to the amazing 1982 film, this time directed by Denis Villeneuve. This film was aesthetically outstanding in every way. The costumes were incredible, the sets and set design made you connect so much more with theBlade Runner 2049 is a sequel to the amazing 1982 film, this time directed by Denis Villeneuve. This film was aesthetically outstanding in every way. The costumes were incredible, the sets and set design made you connect so much more with the characters because they felt so real, especially in downtown LA. You could tell a lot of effort went into the different sets, as each one is son unique, from K's (Ryan Gosling's) bedroom to the offices in the LAPD tower to the farm etc. Speaking of Ryan Gosling, he's done another great job in this role. Not once did I doubt he was a Blade Runner, and he effortlessly explorers his characters' subplot (one which I will not elaborate on for obvious reasons), and he just radiated bad-assery. There were a lot of takes with little to no sound/script, and all we had to look at were the amazing sets and emoting of the actors, which was pretty much always impeccable. All the actors and actresses involved did great performances - Harrison Ford slipped back into his role as Rick Deckard just like he was back in the 80's, and the villain(s) were menacing and equally as compelling as Gosling & Ford. (If it's not obvious already, the cameos of people in the 1982 version were very, very much appreciated!)

Probably my favourite aspect was the multitude of different angles and shots that Villeneuve used, as it constantly gave so many different perspectives of the sets and the characters and told the story in a very technical yet beautiful way, which leads me to congratulate the editors on a very good job well done. Not only did they tell the story well, they seamlessly linked flashbacks with the present plot, and often films can suffer from poor/excessive flashbacks, and I am happy to say: this one doesn't. As for issues, the pacing suffered on a few occasions, and to be perfectly honest I felt the film went on a little too long. There were some long takes (only some, as some were extremely effective) that dragged on a bit, and made me almost wish that it would cut to a different character/scene. Also,even though the sound was outstanding in this film and so sheerly loud, I sometimes felt the music was a little out of place in some scenes. This is probably one of my personal nit-picks, but in a couple of occasions I was like 'why is there music playing right now?' However, when there needed to be music there was, so there weren't scenes where I was asking for it to be added, just a couple where I think it should've been removed, (again, probably a personal thing.) The action scenes were great and well-choreographed, but to be honest I was expecting a few more that there actually was. Conclusion: if you liked the first one, definitely see this one (but I think you'll prefer the first one, I know I did), and even if you haven't seen the first one you should check it out, as it is visually stunning.… Expand

10 of 19 users found this helpful109

All this user's reviews

0

NotonmywatchJan 20, 2018

BR2049 is nothing more than sci-fi porn. And like most higher-end porn, there's but a mere soupçon of a story, which only aids in serving the inevitable money shot. The inevitable money shot hit audiences square in the eyes, but there'sBR2049 is nothing more than sci-fi porn. And like most higher-end porn, there's but a mere soupçon of a story, which only aids in serving the inevitable money shot. The inevitable money shot hit audiences square in the eyes, but there's clearly a latency of pain or else more viewers would feel as I and many others do—that this reboot is a total failure from beginning to end. It steals its core idea from Battlestar Galactica and is basically a mishmash of other sci-fi tropes and traps into which the movie keeps sinking. Horrible. Sad. Shameful. The original BR was brilliant and masterful and subtle. This one is the exact opposite. Jared Leto and Robin Wright are completely miscast and laughable caricatures of themselves. The director should never direct another picture again until he's made to watch good, classic films that were made before MTV ruined everything for us.… Expand

5 of 11 users found this helpful56

All this user's reviews

2

p_reinJan 19, 2018

There is one thing that bothered me throughout the whole movie. Even though the soundtrack was amazing on its own it did not fit the scenes half the time. Music was super dramatic while what was happening on screen was nothing worthThere is one thing that bothered me throughout the whole movie. Even though the soundtrack was amazing on its own it did not fit the scenes half the time. Music was super dramatic while what was happening on screen was nothing worth mentioning. Music alone is not enough to make a scene dramatic or deep, it has to be a combination of both. They were force feeding us "Look at how deep and existential this looks and sounds!!!" while the plot was mediocre at best.… Expand

5 of 11 users found this helpful56

All this user's reviews

3

2morovianJan 18, 2018

The film tries to impress us with its connection to the original, when in fact it just cannibalizes the Ridley Scott masterpiece for the only value it has. It's just not organically woven into the new film and it's painfully obvious, rightThe film tries to impress us with its connection to the original, when in fact it just cannibalizes the Ridley Scott masterpiece for the only value it has. It's just not organically woven into the new film and it's painfully obvious, right down to the 'imitation Vangelis' soundtrack which is so bad it should be illegal. 2049 has no depth and dimension and points to the work of a very mediocre director re-configuring and dispensing the bland expectations of a 21st century sci-fi audience who are so dumbed-down by 21st century schlock by now that they, sadly, can't tell the difference. I had to keep telling myself that the film had nothing to do with the original just to get through, but then I was left with the stark, 2-dimensionality of a truly poor work that relies on its visual effects and darkest themes to anesthetize the audience into believing they actually saw something worthwhile.… Expand

6 of 11 users found this helpful65

All this user's reviews

7

bentearwalkingJan 16, 2018

Wow! The potential of this movie was so big. I really loved the way each scene led to the next. I loved the transitions, pacing, timing of the scenes and emotions and colors. It was just so well done! However, I found the story really hard toWow! The potential of this movie was so big. I really loved the way each scene led to the next. I loved the transitions, pacing, timing of the scenes and emotions and colors. It was just so well done! However, I found the story really hard to follow. I wanted to understand because it all seemed so well put together but this is one of those movies where I will need to watch again and again and then also read a summary online to really grasp what was happening. I would love to watch this movie in a 7.1 surround with a UHD TV though... wow it's beautiful and deserves to be rewatched for its beauty and complex story.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

10

mrdr4gonJan 15, 2018

A beautifully crafted slow-burner that expands the world of the previous film, respectfully acknowledging the 1982 film while carving out a path of it's own. Thankfully, 2049 is a superior sequel, managing even out all of the issues with theA beautifully crafted slow-burner that expands the world of the previous film, respectfully acknowledging the 1982 film while carving out a path of it's own. Thankfully, 2049 is a superior sequel, managing even out all of the issues with the previous film and turn it into something more substantive.… Expand

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

9

Tony1984Jan 15, 2018

The original Blade Runner was my first introduction to metaphysical philosophy. It was one of most profound and beautiful movies of the 20th century and it still affects me to this day..When I saw Ryan Gosling cast in the 2049 I was veryThe original Blade Runner was my first introduction to metaphysical philosophy. It was one of most profound and beautiful movies of the 20th century and it still affects me to this day..When I saw Ryan Gosling cast in the 2049 I was very disappointed. I swore to myself never to attend a movie of his again after the disgusting abomination that is "Only God Forgives" but I relented eventually, Blade Runner is that important.. He is the weakest part of the movie for me. I just don't like his voice or face. Thats personal preference.
And what is the movie? A continuation of the transhumanist question from Blade Runner 1. Can replicants ( or even AI's who receive very positive treatment here) have souls? Can man be a God and create life? My anwswer is no and the movie answers in the affirmative, understandably. Judge for yourself.
Symbolism and esotericism saturate every scene. Every line of dialogue, prop, stance, quirk, image,prominent and obscured has an obvious meaning ...and hidden one...It feels religious in its exposition because in a way it is. Its arcane and occultist. It makes one think and want to return for closer inspection. Whatever your philosophical position there can be no denying the beauty visually and aurally of this devastated dystopia. Gosling apart, a masterpiece..… Expand

7 of 8 users found this helpful71

All this user's reviews

10

nikblu1904Jan 15, 2018

Blade Runner 2049 is one of the best movies I've seen in 2017. Didn't found it boring at all.

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

10

donelsonOct 6, 2017

Yes, a masterpiece of canon, and style, and production. Spare and sensual, with an extraordinary central performance by Ryan Gosling, great plotting and dialogue in an examination of the nature of love, of memory and of identity. The best ofYes, a masterpiece of canon, and style, and production. Spare and sensual, with an extraordinary central performance by Ryan Gosling, great plotting and dialogue in an examination of the nature of love, of memory and of identity. The best of science fiction in that it explores who we really are under almost inconceivable stresses.

You can feel the love and effort poured into this movie in every second of film. The music evokes and expands on the original, returns us to this future we know so well from so long ago now.

Remember: Science fiction has no ceiling.

10 stars.

Update:
I've just seen Blade Runner 2049 for the third time today. I've never done this before for any movie.

Extraordinary. Wonderful. A true masterpiece. Each time I see it, it gets better, deeper, and more profound. The script, direction and performances are flawless.
The gentle love scene with the hologram Joi actively blending with the real girl Mariette, matching their movements, to allow Joi to physically express her love for K is exquisite. Astonishing. The best and most extraordinary love scene I've ever experienced in the cinema. I wept.

So much of this movie is so profound, so searching and wonderful. The themes of identity, memory, and love are explored with joy and respect. I will see the movie again, in a week or so.… Expand

14 of 25 users found this helpful1411

All this user's reviews

2

EludiumQ36Jan 13, 2018

There's simply no justification for the 9 and 10 ratings - pure shills. This is a 7 at best but far worse for me due to its glacial pacing and dim/dark lighting. It's a film that you can feel yourself actually age. The plot is totally obtuse,There's simply no justification for the 9 and 10 ratings - pure shills. This is a 7 at best but far worse for me due to its glacial pacing and dim/dark lighting. It's a film that you can feel yourself actually age. The plot is totally obtuse, I defy anyone to tell me what the #$%^ the point of this was, on your own without internet assistance. And Harrison Ford at age 75 has no business being cast in this. He doesn't need the money or attention and we deserve to see better than old geezers in their last hurrah. Thank god for the distractingly gorgeous Ana de Armas, without her in it the film is a flat zero. The VFX swerve from great to awful and the accompanying music is worthless, though at times the foreboding made my soundbar awesome, but for a 2.5 hr experience my soundbar should've been rocking most of that time. Poor, poor effort.… Expand

7 of 15 users found this helpful78

All this user's reviews

8

robertoiglesiasJan 13, 2018

Blade Runner 2049 is a nice movie that can be slow, but will most likely put a smile on your face.

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

3

ducmanJan 13, 2018

I kept watching for an hour. Hoping that there was something to come, got to bored. Really with these actors, why not make a movie that keeps your attention at least. So sad they didn't use the potential, maybe better next time? The originalI kept watching for an hour. Hoping that there was something to come, got to bored. Really with these actors, why not make a movie that keeps your attention at least. So sad they didn't use the potential, maybe better next time? The original was way better
sorry.… Expand

5 of 11 users found this helpful56

All this user's reviews

6

NBFCJan 11, 2018

I love the original Blade Runner, it's one of my personal favorite films.

I was excited that Denis Villeneuve was directing this and not the notoriously hit-or-miss Ridley Scott. Villeneuve always had a great sweeping visual eye, which wasI love the original Blade Runner, it's one of my personal favorite films.

I was excited that Denis Villeneuve was directing this and not the notoriously hit-or-miss Ridley Scott.

Villeneuve always had a great sweeping visual eye, which was showcased in his previous sci-fi outing Arrival and that quality continues to be on display in this sequel. Right off the bat it feels like you are transported back into the rainy, dreary and mysterious world that Scott first introduced to audiences back in 1982.

Adjusted for inflation, this sequel has more than twice the budget of the original and not a single dime was wasted as far as the visuals are concerned. Everything from the rainy LA streets, to Joe’s (Gosling) apartment, to Wallace’s (Leto) baroque-style lair, to the almost apocalyptic junkyard and the eerie abandoned Las Vegas look absolutely gorgeous. This is by far one of the most beautiful-looking movies to have come out all year.

The storyline (conceived by original BR writer Hampton Fancher) also consists of a few intriguing ideas that are prime ready for a hard science-fiction affair such as this.

Despite what the trailers may have you believe, this is not an action film but an atmospheric methodically paced piece of philosophical examination (which is keeping true to the style of the original). Having said that, there is a particularly great un-conventional action set-piece in the third act involving a fight scene on a beach while a downed flying car is being washed away by the heavy tide.

While there are some great ideas, scenes and brilliant visuals; I still can't help but feel a bit underwhelmed.

I think it comes down to three issues:

1. The score, provided this time by Hans Zimmer and Benjamin Wallfisch, is very underwhelming. Now I like the work of Hans Zimmer (even if I admit he is over-exposed) and absolutely loved his work on this year’s Dunkirk but the dark drum-heavy ambience he provides to accompany Villeneuve visuals is lacking the sheer adventure and memorable cues of Vangelis.

2. The the pacing to feel rather baggy.

Now the original movie had a slow methodical pace too but it was also tight at two hours and focused on a handful of characters. The whole affair has a very Tarkovsky-like pacing to it, and I personally can't stand how slow Tarkovsky paces his films.

The storyline just feels bloated.

BB 2049 nearly clocks in at three hours but outside of Joe, Joi and Luv (Hoeks), all the other characters are given all-too brief screen time in order to make an impact. Wallace, the Steve Jobs-like main villain, is only in the movie for two scenes and Deckard (Ford) doesn’t comes into the narrative until 3/4 of the way through.

Most of the movie is taken up by Joe’s search for Deckard, which goes by way too slow and most of the third act is spent setting up for possible sequels/spin-offs. BR 2049 may have taken measures to expand the universe only hinted at in the original, but it was done in a way that felt banal and removed from the personal more soulful approach in Scott’s masterpiece.

3. The acting.

Dave Bautista (aka. Drax the Destroyer) impresses in his one scene with Ryan Gosling, showcasing an emotional range previously unseen. There is also an intense and thought-provoking dialogue exchange between Deckard and Wallace that showcases Harrison Ford sincerely ACTING instead of just growling his lines like he has been doing too often as of late.

But on the whole, the acting quality is okay but un-spectacular. Ryan Gosling is essentially giving the same stoic performance he did in Drive and I couldn’t get past Armas’ perplexing accent. Robin Wright gives another under-whelming performance like she did in this year’s Wonder Woman and Jared Leto is in the movie far too little to make an impression. Probably the most baffling performance was Lennie James, who literally disappears from the movie after just three minutes of screen time!!

I wish I can give more praise and I am aware that this movie has been getting great write-ups from critics and audiences alike, so I do seem to be in a minority here. There is plenty to like but at the end of the day watching BR 2049 was the equivalent to walking through an expensive art gallery.

It all looks gorgeous but not much in the way of emotional impact.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

10

marinosvalJan 9, 2018

If humanity ever created a perfect movie, this is it. I don't want to say anything else because I feel it would spoil this piece of art.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

luke100Jan 9, 2018

Probably my favorite sci-fi movie, which is surprising since I have no love for the original. Minor plotholes are nothing against stunning visuals, great performances, excellent dialogue, interesting themes, fun twists and perfectly slow tempo.

5 of 8 users found this helpful53

All this user's reviews

9

RonQuixote_Jan 8, 2018

A story that didn't need to be told ended up being the story I didn't know I needed. 2049 expands on the world created by its predecessor and still manages to be as daring and beautiful. The 2 hour and 45-minute run-time somehow seem shorterA story that didn't need to be told ended up being the story I didn't know I needed. 2049 expands on the world created by its predecessor and still manages to be as daring and beautiful. The 2 hour and 45-minute run-time somehow seem shorter than the 2 hours of the original (depending on what version you watch, duh). This movie is masterclass from Denis Villeneuve because every single decision made in this movie was the best one possible.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

9

LUKEOPERCOUPJan 7, 2018

Easily one of the best movies in the gere among years.. since Avatar i think. With a lot of turn, while it's amazing to watch also catch your mind to think about things that are happening

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

10

wl-humeJan 6, 2018

My favourite movie of the year, I made an account just to grade this. It takes its time getting there but it's worth it, it's the kind of movie I wanted the first bad Blade Runner movie to be. Also a small side note it does a better job withMy favourite movie of the year, I made an account just to grade this. It takes its time getting there but it's worth it, it's the kind of movie I wanted the first bad Blade Runner movie to be. Also a small side note it does a better job with female characters than its prequel and most movies nowadays and does so effortlessly.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

3

JalpanJan 6, 2018

Its extremely silent movie which is almost 3 hours long. One of the most boring and depressing movies I have ever seen.

3 of 9 users found this helpful36

All this user's reviews

10

Grubes2001Jan 6, 2018

Beautiful, spectacular and deep as the original ! Villeneuve managed to do what I didn't imagine possible : expanding the universe of an all-time sci-fi classic without killing or denaturing it (Hello Last Jedis), however adding interestingBeautiful, spectacular and deep as the original ! Villeneuve managed to do what I didn't imagine possible : expanding the universe of an all-time sci-fi classic without killing or denaturing it (Hello Last Jedis), however adding interesting elements to the plot.
Can't wait for the remake of Dune now, a universe deserving a movie at its level (besides Jodorwski's Dune documentary)… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

9

eva3si0nJan 4, 2018

The best movie cyberpunk of 2017 and in general last 5 years. Yes the sequel is much simpler than the original. In general Denis Villeneuve the excellent director, has perfectly reported the atmosphere of the original, but after all the firstThe best movie cyberpunk of 2017 and in general last 5 years. Yes the sequel is much simpler than the original. In general Denis Villeneuve the excellent director, has perfectly reported the atmosphere of the original, but after all the first hour of the movie is tightened and in general almost doesn't bear important semantic loading. Jarrett Leto has perfectly played the antagonist, will be sure continuation soon and he will be revealed completely as personnel. And the main thing, is an ending. She has a little disappointed, after all there is a wish to see the complete final, let and open, but complete. As in the first part, but not just end of a deytstviye and credits.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

10

MarcStone2061Jan 3, 2018

This movie did for Blade Runner what Mad Max: Fury Road did for the Mad Max franchise; impossibly recaptured the original glory some 30+ years later. I was around in the early 8Os when Blade Runner came out...one thing this sequel couldn'tThis movie did for Blade Runner what Mad Max: Fury Road did for the Mad Max franchise; impossibly recaptured the original glory some 30+ years later. I was around in the early 8Os when Blade Runner came out...one thing this sequel couldn't recapture was the bleak Asian noir of a future some 30 years away It was realistic gritty window into the far future for 80s folk and it was mesmerizing. Even though the new movie didn't recapture the far future mesmerizing effect...it couldn't...it did copy exactly that bleak Asian noir of the near future. Back then we saw a vision of what could be and arguably made it come true in a lot of ways. Today the atmosphere seems familiar and enveloping and 'hey were gonna have that done in a few years, I can already see it' type way.

"We shall not cease from exploration, and the end of all our exploring will be to arrive where we started and know the place for the first time." - T. S. Eliot… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

10

lucasstarkJan 2, 2018

the movie is amazing from start to end, a sequel the original deserves, a must see movie

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

9

Rhaegar1980Jan 1, 2018

A great sequel, with just one problem: 10-15 minutes too long.
Beside that: awesome atmosphere, visuals, audio and storytelling.
A simple story for complex characters.
New classic together with the immortal first chapter.

4 of 4 users found this helpful40

All this user's reviews

9

movieconsultantDec 31, 2017

A beautifully shot film. The story is carefully crafted and realistic. The cinematography and music are terrific and they work well together to deliver a truly immersive film despite its long runtime. It deals with issues similar to the firstA beautifully shot film. The story is carefully crafted and realistic. The cinematography and music are terrific and they work well together to deliver a truly immersive film despite its long runtime. It deals with issues similar to the first film and is a great addition that not only expands the blade runner universe but also keeps the sense of mystery surrounding that world.… Expand

6 of 8 users found this helpful62

All this user's reviews

10

Jeb077Dec 30, 2017

A super smart, dark, mysterious, and methodical sci-fi flick that we rarely get these days. It's an anti toxin for all the popcorn, blow 'em up action movies masquerading around as sci-fi. The absolute best thing of this movie is theA super smart, dark, mysterious, and methodical sci-fi flick that we rarely get these days. It's an anti toxin for all the popcorn, blow 'em up action movies masquerading around as sci-fi. The absolute best thing of this movie is the atmosphere, backed by a near 200 million dollar budget this futuristic world comes to life and leaves you wanting to see more of it even after the near 3 hour runtime. Flying cars, super realistic ruined landscapes, holographic advertisement in the streets, and amazing sound effects bring it all too life.

Acting there wasn't a bad character in the film. Most stoic in personality, too match the oppressed world. Gosling is solid, although not quite oscar worthy I'd say. At one point he yells at the top of his lungs when he finds out a critical piece of information, it was one of the best moments for him and the film could use a little more of that from him. Silvia Hoeks is downright chilling as the central villain, a little too "female terminator" at the end but one of the most convincing female villains I've seen. Overall the women in this show brought the movie up from good to excellent. All were spot on in their roles and memorable characters. Ford is featured less in the film than the advertisements might indicate. He did better in this than in the Force Awakens, partly from having a more important, convincing role. Quibbles as I said before, Gosling could run the gamut of emotions a little more often. The final fight scene a little overdone, and a few too many things put in for sequel purposes (which we may never get). There are a ton of details packed in this movie. You'll need at least 2 viewings to catch everything. Too bad it didn't perform as good as expected, we may never see another true sci-fi epic on this scale.… Expand

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

7

TheWaffleDec 30, 2017

Blade Runner 2049 is a slow and methodical film with plenty of interesting ideas and visuals, but it struggles through the second half. Ryan Gosling, Robin Wright, Ana de Armas, and even David Bautista are excellent. The opening act was a joyBlade Runner 2049 is a slow and methodical film with plenty of interesting ideas and visuals, but it struggles through the second half. Ryan Gosling, Robin Wright, Ana de Armas, and even David Bautista are excellent. The opening act was a joy to watch as this cast effortless draws you back into the alienating world of future LA. Unfortunately, that strong beginning gives way to a meandering film that falls back on nostalgia for the original and struggles to forge a compelling new path. The villains feel superfluous and there are hints of a broader world that never really take shape. I wish I could rate this film more highly, but it just doesn't stick the landing.… Expand

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

4

dr0nzerDec 30, 2017

I didn't see the first one but the concept was intriguing and was hoping this would bring me up to speed on the original, sadly it was not the case.
I feel that this film is for the fans of the series and you have to know the universe, itI didn't see the first one but the concept was intriguing and was hoping this would bring me up to speed on the original, sadly it was not the case.
I feel that this film is for the fans of the series and you have to know the universe, it does not really engage new comers and thus limit it's audience.
I sit in the latter group of people and this film was too long, sitting just shy of 3 hours, it's slow paced and pretty boring, I didn't have the patience to finish it and called it quits 1hr.45mins in.
If I was in the former group as described above, I'm sure my reaction would be different and it's a shame the film did not to do more to capture new audiences...… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

10

JKHReviewsDec 29, 2017

Though this may sound less like a review, but I will put it as simply. Words cannot describe this film, and only by watching it will you understand why it deserves this 10. From the stunningly beautiful and well-crafted cinematography, andThough this may sound less like a review, but I will put it as simply. Words cannot describe this film, and only by watching it will you understand why it deserves this 10. From the stunningly beautiful and well-crafted cinematography, and with a plot giving the film it's a standalone perspective. Even as a sequel, Blade Runner 2049 is truly a film never to forget.… Expand

4 of 5 users found this helpful41

All this user's reviews

8

ranjan04rajeevDec 29, 2017

Overall the movie is enjoyable, with stunning visuals and great score. It lacks that punchy Hollywood action and buildup. But the movie sticks to its theme and genre and explores what it is to be human. It is definitely a critical masterpieceOverall the movie is enjoyable, with stunning visuals and great score. It lacks that punchy Hollywood action and buildup. But the movie sticks to its theme and genre and explores what it is to be human. It is definitely a critical masterpiece and surely be nominated for Academy awards.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

10

nkukDec 29, 2017

This was by far my favourite film of the year. It has a clear and well executed vision, sumptuous visuals, an intriguing plot, which is a strong natural sequel to the original film, not some un-necessary "reboot" or unconnected story. TheThis was by far my favourite film of the year. It has a clear and well executed vision, sumptuous visuals, an intriguing plot, which is a strong natural sequel to the original film, not some un-necessary "reboot" or unconnected story. The acting is great and the ending really well done. Some said the movie was too long, but I didn't think so.… Expand

4 of 5 users found this helpful41

All this user's reviews

0

GieverDec 29, 2017

I really don't get why there are so many positive reviews to such a boring movie.It's one of those self absorbing don't take the camera off of me im a demigod kind of film that deserves zero praise. I Don't get why the audience fail to seeI really don't get why there are so many positive reviews to such a boring movie.It's one of those self absorbing don't take the camera off of me im a demigod kind of film that deserves zero praise. I Don't get why the audience fail to see this. Viewers instead pretend to be socialite critiques trying so hard themselves to be notice and praised, so they write a review that there social media sheeple will think is acceptable, thus you have all these unworthy positives. Entire movie is bland, not much more i need to say. Just believe me when i tell you this and not the social media sheeple idiots.… Expand

4 of 19 users found this helpful415

All this user's reviews

10

hosekishoDec 28, 2017

Finds its own voice while respecting the original. One of the best movies I've seen in a long time.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

ZaarekDec 27, 2017

I loved everything about this movie. This is the kind of movie that makes you travel to another world but at the same time treats of very concrete human topics. It is so rich, it's full of information and questions at the same time. It makesI loved everything about this movie. This is the kind of movie that makes you travel to another world but at the same time treats of very concrete human topics. It is so rich, it's full of information and questions at the same time. It makes you travel both visually and mentally at the same time. During the whole movie you'll be wondering if it is science-fiction or anticipation? Some philosophical topics are treated without getting boring. What's the meaning of destiny or sense of purpose? What's the difference between man and machine if both are capable of having feelings and emotions? Denis Villeneuve, his crew and the cast just set new standards to what a masterpiece can be. Well done guys.… Expand

6 of 6 users found this helpful60

All this user's reviews

10

Vidods6Dec 27, 2017

One of the best movies in this century. Definitely the most beautiful movie ever made. It was just as I expected it to be. Slow paced with brilliant scenes of action and they gave us some answers to the questions from the first movie, butOne of the best movies in this century. Definitely the most beautiful movie ever made. It was just as I expected it to be. Slow paced with brilliant scenes of action and they gave us some answers to the questions from the first movie, but there is also some new mysteries now. Has the spirit of the first movie and I like that. Of course, it is not for everyone, especially for those with weak minds who are looking for constant action sequences.… Expand

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

0

wanderlei2Dec 27, 2017

I gouged my eyes out with burning sticks because it was less painful than watching Blade Runner 2049.

5 of 52 users found this helpful547

All this user's reviews

9

WalterKovacsDec 26, 2017

True homage to the original. A great sequel. Truly refreshing. The ending tapered off and some characters should have been better developed for a trade of some of the other scenes. A must see, especially in 3-D.

6 of 6 users found this helpful60

All this user's reviews

8

dharmaDec 26, 2017

Blade Runner 2019 is the ultimate fan film. On that level it works incredibly well. It answers all the riddles posed on the first film while offering new ones (possibly for another sequel). It also has incredible effects and cinematographyBlade Runner 2019 is the ultimate fan film. On that level it works incredibly well. It answers all the riddles posed on the first film while offering new ones (possibly for another sequel). It also has incredible effects and cinematography that will probably net this an Oscar nomination. Yet there lies its ultimate weakness: it is not an accessible film. If you haven't seen the first one, forget about understanding this flick. It is also bladder busting long at 2 hours and 45 minutes. It is a film that is budgeted for cinema, but can only be savored in home video (a bit like the original's 'faith'). This is why studios sometimes are reluctant to 'please the fans' too much. At the end of the day, they are not enough to make back the film's enormous budget.… Expand

5 of 21 users found this helpful516

All this user's reviews

9

DubeauOct 9, 2017

BR 2049 continues the story of the replicants and blade runner. It does so by branching new intrigues into the original script and adding dept. The presentation of the future is still a great warning for all of us. The movie has amazing FXBR 2049 continues the story of the replicants and blade runner. It does so by branching new intrigues into the original script and adding dept. The presentation of the future is still a great warning for all of us. The movie has amazing FX and has some actions. But the main effect of this movie is still the atmosphere and partially Vangelis alike music. I say alike, because it's a pale imitation of Vangelis style and the music is sadly not always that great, and become too many times a collection of sound effects. The actors are excellent, even the side characters are interesting. Don't go to that movie if you want an action flick or you are tired. The movie required your attention, even if it's mostly a visual film, the plot can be elaborate enough. Villeneuve did a fascinating movie that will go into the rank of classic, with the original one...no less. The music is maybe the aspect where it seems too loud and lacking variety. I give it a 90%, go see it if you love scifi. Update: At second viewing, I found that it lacked some action in the middle of the movie. The problem is that maybe, for a Blade Runner, he didn't do much of it in the movie (except at the beginning). Also many scenes linger too much, and it slow down the pace when they come in succession. But if you approach this as a detective movie, it kind of fits better. Still think it's a good movie.… Expand

8 of 15 users found this helpful87

All this user's reviews

8

KaptenVideoDec 24, 2017

A young blade runner's (Ryan Gosling) discovery of a long-buried secret leads him to track down older colleague (Harrison Ford), who's been missing for thirty years. In the future, there are people whose job is to find and kill human-likeA young blade runner's (Ryan Gosling) discovery of a long-buried secret leads him to track down older colleague (Harrison Ford), who's been missing for thirty years. In the future, there are people whose job is to find and kill human-like robots, you know, and they are called blade runners.

Also appearing, Jared Leto, Robin Wright, Dave Bautista, Ana de Armas, Sylvia Hoeks, Mackenzie Davis, David Dastmalchian et al.

The original „Blade Runner“ (1982) is lauded as one of the best and most important sci-fi movies ever. I have seen it, of course, even more than once, and read the Philip K. Dick’s story it’s based on, but never see the appeal, honestly. Was quite bored with it, actually.

So why do they like it so much? I am too lazy to research it on the interweb, so I am just gonna take a wild guess and offer that when it came out, it was a long-waited antidote to all the silly sci-fi movies craze that had ruled in the previous five years.

You see, throughout history sci-fi was always a „serious“ and artsy cinema genre but then „Star Wars“ (1977) came out and made huge amount of people want something different entirely.

So „Blade Runner“ was, for sci-fi geeks, a long-awaited return to form, with its moodiness, sombre atmosphere and deep philosophical questions such as what makes us „real“ anyway, and is human life more important than artificially created one.

„Blade Runner“ flopped in cinemas originally but over the years it has built an admirable cult following. And the fans are surely glad to know that the long-planned sequel is finally here and stays far away from mainstream fare, respecting its „serious“ roots and everything.

Yes, the trailers look spectacular and have plenty of rip-roaring action but the new „Blade Runner“ is all about returning to the form, easily supassing the original movie in every aspect, at least for yours truly.

Be warned: not only does it last for close to three hours, it’s so artsy that you may feel the need to go grab some junk food later. Just to, you know, compensate.

The story is slow, not too eventful, a few action setpieces, not much dialogue – and the existing sounds more like monologue than real natural conversation between persons.

Filled with futuristic landscapes and environments, the movie looks gorgeous but there’s a noticeble discord between viewer and characters/events. The experience is cold and disheartening by design, always keeping you at arms length, so to speak.

It does have Ryan Gosling and Harrison Ford starring, but the result is far from perfect date movie… unless both are big movie lovers and/or loved the original „Blade Runner“.

You may also have trouble with understanding the backstory and certain things about the characters. It is even difficult to say whether everything is meant to feel so ambiguous, asking us to offer our own answers, or the makers have tried to remain as „artsy“ as possible. I think it’s meant to be that hard to grasp. It’s directed by Denis Villeneuve after all („Prisoners“, „Enemy“, „Sicario“, „Arrival“).

To be honest, the movie does not have any good reason to last for close to three hours, but at least it’s full of thoughtful and well-crafted material, not filler crap like many „event“ movies.

The main topics such as the future of artifical intellect and the value of life, especially human life versus the artificially created one, are intriguing if you are able to open up to the whole experience.

And if you manage to open up already, you may admire how spiritual this bleak and cold futuristic story can be at its core. I dug throught the symbolism evident in the story and found out that it is really about the importance of feelings – this is all you really have to get through life. Just what the spiritual systems have taught us for thousands of years.

There will be many who will feel turned offed by this approach, I am sure. For an expensive 150 million U.S. dollar movie, it sure tries its earnest not to be easily liked and digested.

But it’s gorgeous and after a while, you may notice that it really speaks to you. Some may dig the moodiness, or Gosling’s face, but there’s enough serious content beneath the surface.

For all it’s emotional distant-ness and terrifying length, „Blade Runner 2049“ is not my cup of tea, but I think it’s a noteworthy piece of modern art. Considering the hefty budget, it is also probably the most expensive piece of modern art ever made.

All in all, for what it is, the movie could not be better in any aspect. Except for maybe giving Leto a bigger role.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

7

purplewelchyDec 23, 2017

Its pretty good especially visually..
Just not as good as the original one.

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

10

MessyfingersDec 22, 2017

Unbelievably brilliant. As a sequel, it builds on the universe and characters created decades ago, but creates something new. Absolutely breathtaking visually, orgasmic score, great sound, superb acting and directing. Villeneuve deserves anUnbelievably brilliant. As a sequel, it builds on the universe and characters created decades ago, but creates something new. Absolutely breathtaking visually, orgasmic score, great sound, superb acting and directing. Villeneuve deserves an Oscar for this.… Expand

5 of 6 users found this helpful51

All this user's reviews

8

JyroJyroNov 10, 2017

An auditory & visual masterpiece that stays true to the original film whilst also feeling suitably futuristic and nuanced in a number of different ways. I did feel it was a little too ponderous at times, but this is still a seriouslyAn auditory & visual masterpiece that stays true to the original film whilst also feeling suitably futuristic and nuanced in a number of different ways. I did feel it was a little too ponderous at times, but this is still a seriously mesmerising sequel from Villeneuve.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

9

GreggorDec 21, 2017

Blade Runner 2049 is a shining successor to the original. It stays true to the first movie in almost every way. While there were a few dry sections toward the beginning, the overall design of the film begins to dawn on you toward the end. IBlade Runner 2049 is a shining successor to the original. It stays true to the first movie in almost every way. While there were a few dry sections toward the beginning, the overall design of the film begins to dawn on you toward the end. I reconsidered my entire opinion of this movie from a negative to a positive one somewhere past the halfway point. I hope the success of this one means many more additions to the Blade Runner universe.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

9

FurtinDec 21, 2017

Was totally blown away as I really feared a sequel to the original masterpiece and one of the best Sci-Fi movies ever made.

2049 is what SW:TLJ is not: aware of its heritage and completely absorbs its world building and pacing. AnotherWas totally blown away as I really feared a sequel to the original masterpiece and one of the best Sci-Fi movies ever made.

2049 is what SW:TLJ is not: aware of its heritage and completely absorbs its world building and pacing.
Another masterpiece, just like the original that aged so very well and yet we have a modern one. Great visual and auditive experience too.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

9

HyapeDec 21, 2017

It's an amazing picrure. A near perfect, with deep deep atmospere. A masterpiece.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

8

JohnvincentDec 21, 2017

This movie was visually amazing. The sound in the theater was hard to sit through however. I hope it was just the theaters sound system.

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

10

EvisDec 20, 2017

While it's hard to say any movie is perfect this movie sits at the very top of the pile for me when it comes to science fiction. The artistry, direction, acting, writing, sound and music are all spot on. It's a thought provoking scienceWhile it's hard to say any movie is perfect this movie sits at the very top of the pile for me when it comes to science fiction. The artistry, direction, acting, writing, sound and music are all spot on. It's a thought provoking science fiction rather than an action based thriller. If that's something you enjoy then this is an amazing film. One that I hope will set the bar for films to come despite not bringing in much at the box office.… Expand

5 of 6 users found this helpful51

All this user's reviews

10

soulassssnsDec 20, 2017

+Visuals
+Acting
+Script

Film was fantastic and is a great sequel to one of my all time favorite films. Cannot wait for the Blu-Ray to come out.

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

7

myneeshDec 20, 2017

I never thought a sequel would happen. Great direction, good visuals, sound and style. A little artsy...
The original Blade Runner is superior though.

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

3

Kdk2626Dec 19, 2017

I so wanted to love this movie: looks great, good acting. But the plot is trite and the script is dull. Worse, it is a movie that takes itself too seriously - it's trying to be an art house film, and by doing so it only manages to commit theI so wanted to love this movie: looks great, good acting. But the plot is trite and the script is dull. Worse, it is a movie that takes itself too seriously - it's trying to be an art house film, and by doing so it only manages to commit the cardinal sin of boring the audience.… Expand

2 of 10 users found this helpful28

All this user's reviews

7

MiracSpectacDec 19, 2017

Blade Runner 2049 is one of the most beautiful films I've ever seen. It's brilliantly atmospheric in ways that truly display the height of cinematography. Unfortunately, this is somewhat sullied by a misdirected story that is dragged out toBlade Runner 2049 is one of the most beautiful films I've ever seen. It's brilliantly atmospheric in ways that truly display the height of cinematography. Unfortunately, this is somewhat sullied by a misdirected story that is dragged out to the extreme. Even as a fan of movies that take their time developing, I practically fell asleep in the theatre watching this. Nothing felt meaningful and the entire story could've been told in a couple hours or less. However, seeing as I could easily watch it again on the visuals alone, I still believe it's a great movie.… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

9

ConorMacleodDec 18, 2017

Blade Runner 2049 is one of the greatest science fiction noir films of this decade. It's rich with VFX and a narrative that builds upon the world and characters of the previous film. The slow burn of the runtime pulls off a third act that isBlade Runner 2049 is one of the greatest science fiction noir films of this decade. It's rich with VFX and a narrative that builds upon the world and characters of the previous film. The slow burn of the runtime pulls off a third act that is just **** awesome, and the filmmakers should be commended for their work.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

10

AmazeKingDec 18, 2017

A visual masterpiece with a plot that nods to the original without completely relying on it. New characters are well written. Environments are fleshed out, and the set designs are incredibly detailed. Soundtrack meshes with the visual inA visual masterpiece with a plot that nods to the original without completely relying on it. New characters are well written. Environments are fleshed out, and the set designs are incredibly detailed. Soundtrack meshes with the visual in perfect harmony. A true break-through for Sci-Fi films in the 21st century. Still able to keep an art house feel despite being a big budget movie. In my opinion it even does several things better than the original. My favorite film to be released in the past decade.… Expand

4 of 8 users found this helpful44

All this user's reviews

9

SaydaNeenDec 18, 2017

Very good, movie. Keeps you entertained and engaged in the story throughout its long playtime. The lore, the environment and the risks it takes with the subplots is well written.

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

10

Willyam_CarrDec 18, 2017

Denis Villeneuve has made a $150 million art film that also happens to be a sequel. Roger Deakins' cinematography a career best here; the way he plays with natural light and color is breathe-taking. The costume design is impeccable as well;Denis Villeneuve has made a $150 million art film that also happens to be a sequel. Roger Deakins' cinematography a career best here; the way he plays with natural light and color is breathe-taking. The costume design is impeccable as well; the outfits look like they belong on a runway without feeling disconnected from the universe. Sadly it is not for everyone. While the pace is steady, some people will certainly find it slow and boring. However, in my humble opinion, Blade Runner 2049 is the best film of the year, and superior to Ridley Scott's original Blade Runner.… Expand

5 of 7 users found this helpful52

All this user's reviews

3

TheDavoDec 17, 2017

A steaming hot mess. I am not sure that with an outline of what was happening, I would even know. All noise and action and no real character or plot development. Great to look at and listen to but ultimately, completely empty. Entertaining ifA steaming hot mess. I am not sure that with an outline of what was happening, I would even know. All noise and action and no real character or plot development. Great to look at and listen to but ultimately, completely empty. Entertaining if you don't need a story.… Expand

3 of 10 users found this helpful37

All this user's reviews

10

Frosty1979Dec 17, 2017

My personal favourite movie of 2017. Such a travesty that not more people watched it, while the awful new Star Wars has ton of people watching it, even though it's quite ****

If you like well planned, thought through and executed stories,My personal favourite movie of 2017. Such a travesty that not more people watched it, while the awful new Star Wars has ton of people watching it, even though it's quite ****

If you like well planned, thought through and executed stories, interesting characters with personality and the scifi/cyberpunk setting, then this movie doesn't disappoint.… Expand

5 of 8 users found this helpful53

All this user's reviews

10

duckoutboyDec 16, 2017

Mr. Ridley Scott. I was betrayed the Effing Covenant. However, this movie is good Sequel of blade runner. You get impressed me Again. I saw you again.

5 of 7 users found this helpful52

All this user's reviews

10

OlcshowDec 15, 2017

Sziasztok. Hol is kezdjem. Ez a film valami zseniális. Rendezés hangvágás operatőri munka látvány színészek. Szinte hibátlan film. Ilyen jó sci-fi-t igen rég láttam.

5 of 6 users found this helpful51

All this user's reviews

6

raporgiDec 11, 2017

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. nice visuals from Dennis and his cinematographer. too many scenes that linger and the story is just dumb. if the movie was better paced I wouldve scored this higher, its just a slog to get through. the whole rebel/messiah bs comes out of nowhere and just flies in the face of the original.… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

2

ElijahloveDec 7, 2017

Style over substance does not a great movie make. Cool visuals. Nice sound. That's it. Period. Had trouble staying awake. That's the first test. Does a film grab the audience and take them to a different place. The original is farStyle over substance does not a great movie make. Cool visuals. Nice sound. That's it. Period. Had trouble staying awake. That's the first test. Does a film grab the audience and take them to a different place. The original is far superior. Especially the end of the original with Rutger Hauer's monologue. Great stuff. This 2049 film though . Doa. This film is way too long and boring. Excite us. Take us on an adventure. Show us what you are thinking. The movie makers failed. Ruined a great franchise.… Expand

1 of 9 users found this helpful18

All this user's reviews

10

PeterAlexanderDec 6, 2017

Stunning imagery, immersive sound effects, well-crafted characters and a story filled with mystery ensure Denis Villeneuve's sequel matches the original Blade Runner. Blade Runner 2049 brings the dystopian world back to life in spectacular fashion.

5 of 9 users found this helpful54

All this user's reviews

10

UncleswiggleDec 3, 2017

Coming from a new fan, this movie is nothing short of a masterpiece. Definitely one of the best movies I've seen this year. The cinematography was probably the best I've seen in a long while. I highly recommend this movie to anyone new fan or old.

5 of 6 users found this helpful51

All this user's reviews

9

Mihael_Prislin0Dec 1, 2017

Yet the best movie of 2017! It is also one of the best sequels of any franchize! Spectacular visual efects, amazing soundtrack, beautiful performances, a perfect movie to watch in theatres! You need to be a fan of the original to understandYet the best movie of 2017! It is also one of the best sequels of any franchize! Spectacular visual efects, amazing soundtrack, beautiful performances, a perfect movie to watch in theatres! You need to be a fan of the original to understand the point of the movie! If you didn't have a chance of watching the original, than you shouldn't be watching this one! Dennis Villenauve never dissapoints you!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

Loler13grDec 1, 2017

A visual masterpiece. Maybe one of the best movies of the 2000s. The story stands on it's own but having watched the first movie helps. Ryan Gosling is perfect for his role and Harrison Ford is not back just for a paycheck and a cameo. TheA visual masterpiece. Maybe one of the best movies of the 2000s. The story stands on it's own but having watched the first movie helps. Ryan Gosling is perfect for his role and Harrison Ford is not back just for a paycheck and a cameo. The soundtrack is more or less the same as the first movie and it ties in perfectly to the world created. Overall a must watch.… Expand

5 of 8 users found this helpful53

All this user's reviews

10

gtwistNov 26, 2017

Blade Runner 2049 is one of the best, most provocative, and DEFINITELY one of the best looking movie of the year. Ryan Gosling gives one the best and most subtle performances he's ever given, and Harrison Ford is great as well. DenisBlade Runner 2049 is one of the best, most provocative, and DEFINITELY one of the best looking movie of the year. Ryan Gosling gives one the best and most subtle performances he's ever given, and Harrison Ford is great as well. Denis Villeneuve is proving to be one of the best directors working today, and I can't wait to see what he does next!… Expand

5 of 8 users found this helpful53

All this user's reviews

10

Easycw44Nov 25, 2017

One of the best movies I've ever had a chance to watch in theater. The cinematography, direction, and acting are some of the strongest I've seen in quite some time, especially considering the style of movie it is. To some it may feel a bitOne of the best movies I've ever had a chance to watch in theater. The cinematography, direction, and acting are some of the strongest I've seen in quite some time, especially considering the style of movie it is. To some it may feel a bit long, which is understandable, but it is still the best sequel made since The Dark Knight, and before that, The Godfather II. Kudos to all involved.… Expand

10 of 13 users found this helpful103

All this user's reviews

3

Fortysixter_UKNov 23, 2017

I found this film to be quite poor. The production, acting and music were just fine, but somewhere along the way, the sense of intrigue, the sense of fun, a decent pace, and a good story were sadly cast aside for a slow, ponderous movie ofI found this film to be quite poor. The production, acting and music were just fine, but somewhere along the way, the sense of intrigue, the sense of fun, a decent pace, and a good story were sadly cast aside for a slow, ponderous movie of little interest. The first Bladerunner is a fine film in all its versions. Bladerunner 2049 will just go down in history as a non starter, dulled beyond belief. A huge disappointment.… Expand

2 of 8 users found this helpful26

All this user's reviews

10

fgallindoNov 21, 2017

A great Villeneuve´s film that evidences a much bigger film that is the original Blade Runner. I have rarely had the opportunity to witness a sequence that both explains and enhances its predecessor. Hollywood in its anxiety to make sequelsA great Villeneuve´s film that evidences a much bigger film that is the original Blade Runner. I have rarely had the opportunity to witness a sequence that both explains and enhances its predecessor. Hollywood in its anxiety to make sequels and copies that guarantee box office successes could learn from 2049, Copolla's "The Godfather Part II" or Irvin Kershner´s "The Empire Strikes Back" and experience more undiluted and better content "Parts II" or "Episodes VII", for example. 2049 teaches us that you can be "fruit and original", to be "part and principle" where all the best sequences of the film, design and music are an homage to everything we learned from Ridleys Scott´s Blade Runner. After all, even in 2049, the apple must does not fall far from the tree.… Expand

5 of 8 users found this helpful53

All this user's reviews

8

PotaeSuprakitNov 19, 2017

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Blade Runner 2049 returns very few of the characters from the original film but they manage to breathe life into this movie through the new ones they created. Officer K isn't the most lively protagonist but he gets an eye-opening character arc that kept me involved. Deckard doesn't appear till later in the movie but he remains interesting and what they decide to do with him makes his appearance worthwhile. I also really liked some of the smaller supporting characters. Sapper really helps kick off the movie, what Joi represents is extremely emotional and Mariette is so mysterious that her involvement brings up more and more questions. Add in that Niander Wallace and Luv make for pretty menacing villains and you have a pretty well-rounded and fascinating script.

I don't think that the actors/actresses will be the focal point of the awards attention that this movie will get but that doesn't mean there aren't exemplary performances. Gosling is good as K, he's deliberately robotic and he accomplishes a lot through his subtlety. Harrison Ford isn't in the movie as much as I wanted him to be (he's still one of my all-time favourite actors) but he holds up his end. He works with Gosling well and they have a solid rapport. Surprisingly, I really liked Sylvia Hoeks. She stole a lot of her scenes and I thought she was great even acting against a stacked cast. Dave Bautista showed he has a lot more range than people give him credit for. Jared Leto is in a very Jared Leto role (deliberately weird and hard to understand) but he does it well and although he might be a little creepy, the guy is still a great actor. I also want to credit Ana de Armas, she was distinctly warm and she showed a lot more emotion than I had seen from her previously.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

9

chesaroNov 19, 2017

A good movie, and good sequel, i watched the first one (for the first time) the day before, and i think it is the best movie i've watched this year so far.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

10

QviceNov 18, 2017

It had moments that gave me that inner tingle that surged through my entire body. Only a handful of movies have ever be able to hit those nerves so well. Truly remarkable cinema.

5 of 6 users found this helpful51

All this user's reviews

10

QuietlionmusicNov 18, 2017

Wow! This movie was amazing. Thoroughly entertained throughout. I would go so far as to say this is a rare example of a sequel that supersedes that of it's predecessor. BR:2049 paints the perfect picture of a dystopian future. The story isWow! This movie was amazing. Thoroughly entertained throughout. I would go so far as to say this is a rare example of a sequel that supersedes that of it's predecessor. BR:2049 paints the perfect picture of a dystopian future. The story is compelling and really draws you in. I don't have one bad thing to say about it. Go see it!… Expand

5 of 8 users found this helpful53

All this user's reviews

7

PyledwNov 18, 2017

If you liked the first film then you will really enjoy this film. Honestly this movie feels exactly like the original film. That blending of the old style with the new makes this an any enjoyable film for any movie lover.

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

9

Mragusa2Oct 8, 2017

A true masterpiece, both in terms of science fiction, and the art of cinema in general. Visually, it's one of the most beautiful films I have ever seen, period. Nearly every scene looks like something out of a painting. The acting isA true masterpiece, both in terms of science fiction, and the art of cinema in general. Visually, it's one of the most beautiful films I have ever seen, period. Nearly every scene looks like something out of a painting. The acting is phenomenal, with a near perfect cast. One of my biggest criticisms with most of today's movies is that they never take the time to tell their story. Blade Runner does exactly the opposite: each & every scene is critical to the plot of the film, so when you hear someone say it's sucks because of how long it is, they probably prefer loud, boring movies like Michael Bay's crapfest.… Expand

7 of 13 users found this helpful76

All this user's reviews

9

whoischarlotteNov 16, 2017

This was beautifully crafted and has a lovely style to it. Even with an almost 3 hours running time, it didn't drag and I didn't feel bored. Definitely recommend if you're a fan of the original.

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

9

MallRat15Nov 15, 2017

One of my favourites of the year. An absolutely visually stunning movie deserves the Special Effects Oscar this year for sure. The sound is also amazing the soundtrack and sound effects really immerse you into the film. All of theOne of my favourites of the year. An absolutely visually stunning movie deserves the Special Effects Oscar this year for sure. The sound is also amazing the soundtrack and sound effects really immerse you into the film. All of the performances lead by Ford and Gosling were very good. The movie is a little long a few boring scenes, if it was cut down by 15 minutes or so it would be an almost perfect movie. A must see this year.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

10

Roger1718Nov 14, 2017

One of the best movies that came out this year, no doubt regarding that. The whole movie is simply mesmerizing, and the cinematography and visuals are indeed truly exceptional. This movie totally deserves your money.

5 of 7 users found this helpful52

All this user's reviews

Blade Runner 2049

User Reviews