Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures | Release Date: May 27, 2016
5.9
USER SCORE
Mixed or average reviews based on 363 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
162
Mixed:
123
Negative:
78
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
6
eagleeyevikingOct 1, 2016
Alice Through the Looking Glass is a relatively solid kids movie with brilliant visual effects and a message about family and time even though the characters, humour and dialogue falls rather flat.
6 of 6 users found this helpful60
All this user's reviews
5
MrGingerGeekMay 29, 2016
A fun family film ruined by poor writing and ugly CGI. Still mostly enjoyable, but nothing you will remember after a few days. If you're looking for a masterpiece, keep looking.
5 of 9 users found this helpful54
All this user's reviews
5
willmJul 2, 2016
While at times endearing and charming, Alice Through the Looking Glass could've been shortened to a thirty minute Disney Channel special, and that's exactly what it feels like. Some incredible acting takes place in this movie, all except forWhile at times endearing and charming, Alice Through the Looking Glass could've been shortened to a thirty minute Disney Channel special, and that's exactly what it feels like. Some incredible acting takes place in this movie, all except for Johnny Depp's portrayal of the Mad Hatter, which is absolutely ear wrenching and makes every second of this movie worse. Director James Bobin essentially takes his formula he used on The Muppets: Most Wanted and rehashes it into an absolute snore fest from beginning to end. Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
6
JonZsuJun 18, 2016
Johnny Depp as Hatter provided us a performance that is so weak compares to the character's heavy make-up. Mia Wasikowska also declared to the audiences that she is acting towards layers of green screen all the time. Other than that, theJohnny Depp as Hatter provided us a performance that is so weak compares to the character's heavy make-up. Mia Wasikowska also declared to the audiences that she is acting towards layers of green screen all the time. Other than that, the movie is acceptable with its color and whimsical tone, but it is by no means a good Disney classic. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
5
Nobilis1984Jun 2, 2016
Part 1 I do not know personally. Therefore, I can make comparisons to.
Visually, the film is great and they have done an incredible job. The actors are convincing and play their roles well.
What me is sadly the story. Before Alice returns
Part 1 I do not know personally. Therefore, I can make comparisons to.
Visually, the film is great and they have done an incredible job. The actors are convincing and play their roles well.
What me is sadly the story. Before Alice returns to Wonderland has built good characters. These are known cliché characters but no matter.
The Wonderful World of film bobs in front of him and it runs everything like gum. There is no action in the film. Later there is then also great action scenes but in between is just nothing.
Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
4
Brent_MarchantJun 2, 2016
An ill-conceived attempt at creating a story that preserves the magic of the first film while cramming in a host of platitudes and insights, with a result that feels like a strung-together amalgamation of oh so many mismatched beads on aAn ill-conceived attempt at creating a story that preserves the magic of the first film while cramming in a host of platitudes and insights, with a result that feels like a strung-together amalgamation of oh so many mismatched beads on a chain. The special effects are indeed dazzling, and there are fine performances once again from Mia Wasikowska and Helena Bonham Carter. But these scant attributes can't overcome the film's many inherent weaknesses. Expand
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
6
BasilZeroJan 28, 2020
The sequel feels like it was not necessary to be made or at least took to long to come out (i.e. its been six years since the last one). The story seems to feel like more filler and does not have any connection to the original animated movie.The sequel feels like it was not necessary to be made or at least took to long to come out (i.e. its been six years since the last one). The story seems to feel like more filler and does not have any connection to the original animated movie. It has its own story after taking place of the events of the first movie. Great visual design and direction though the story seems to be not as good as the first live action one from 2010. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
6
GinaKJun 6, 2016
I’d like to comment on two things, which any adult going to see this film needs to know about – the audience and the film itself. The “adults” played with their iPhones, ate mountains of popcorn, and comforted wailing infants. Meanwhile, theI’d like to comment on two things, which any adult going to see this film needs to know about – the audience and the film itself. The “adults” played with their iPhones, ate mountains of popcorn, and comforted wailing infants. Meanwhile, the children sat quietly and watched the movie. For the rest of us, the movie was colorful but full of anachronisms. Alice the captain of a cargo ship? Yikes! An episode where Alice is almost treated in a hospital for “female hysteria”? Meaningless to anyone who is not a Victorian scholar. I also watched the trailer again, whose background music was Grace Slick singing “White Rabbit.” False advertising. Alice walked through a mirror – no “Drink Me, Eat Me” in this film. Maybe nowadays this is called a “mashup” – but to me it was just a movie that made little sense on any level. But given all this craziness – the badly behaved adults in the audience and the nutty script, I didn’t hate this film. For most of it, there was just a lot of colorful running around, kind of like a cinematic roller coaster, and if you paid attention and stayed sane until the end of the film when the search for the Hatter’s family kicks in, Johnny Depp and Helena Bonham Carter actually provided some real emotion and story. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
4
ElectroNickJun 7, 2016
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. After the failings of Burton's rendition of Wonderland I was going into this film expecting to hate it. However I was surprised that it wasn't as bad as I thought it would be. There are some notable improvements over the original film for example Wonderland is actually bright and colorful as opposed to the previous film with a dull color palate. The lead actress actually tries to stay invested this time and gives an attempt to give an emotional performance. Sacha Baron Coen pays as Time and he is fun to watch since he is aware that he is in a mediocre film and decides to just do whatever he wanted with his performance. The same can be applied to Helen Bahm Carter as well. Unfortunately the main problem with the first film is still present in this one. Said problem is that the script tries to add logic to a source material that is supposed to be the absence of logic. When they try to add logic to it, the problems with the film start to show. The time travel was easy to follow but it costed the characterization of the Red Queen since it was reveled that she became a mad tyrant after loosing the crown to her sister. This misses the point of the original source material since the appeal of the character is that she is really a child an adult's body and as a critique on the monarchy of Britain, In this case though the film tries to give her a tragic backstory but it falls flat since it was also revlead that she was responsible for kidnapping the Mad Matter's family and burned his village down. It is considered difficult to sympathize with her since she is responsible for so much death just because of a simple sibling rivalry. The Chesire Cat lost his charm even more when it shows that he is a child hood friend of the Mad Hatter because he was always the trickster character. by giving him an allegiance to his friends it ruins the mystery of the original character. There is a noticeable emphasis on the Mad Hatter due to the fact that he is played by Johnny Depp and is the loner which is present in a lot of Burton's films. Burton may not have directed this film but it does have his blue prints around it. It tries to be dark but it doesn't go far enough like it's predecessor. There is a scene with Alice being in an Asylum which doesn't really go anywhere after Alice escapes making the whole subplot pointless. To the film's credit it tries to have a moral and an admirable one at that which is that time does take away but it also gives and people should value what it gives. The fact that Alice wanted to give up her ship to help her mother get out of dept would have signified her finally letting go of her past but the lesson wasn't ;earned though because her mother rips the contract anyway. In conclusion this film would have been better if was an original family film if it didn't have the likeness of the Lewis Carrol novels. Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
5
MordoReviewerMay 28, 2016
....
It was good...it wasn't great or dark or anything that connects with the original book
It should be called "Alice Through the Time", not "Alice Through the Looking Glass " Anyway, good visual, good acting, decent writing (a bit
....
It was good...it wasn't great or dark or anything that connects with the original book
It should be called "Alice Through the Time", not "Alice Through the Looking Glass "
Anyway, good visual, good acting, decent writing (a bit confusing), etc
If you loved the first one because it was dark, this is more childish, but still it has a good moral
Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
6
MovieDudeDevyn5Jun 8, 2016
Is it perfect. Heck no. Is it okay. Yeah. I mean, the CGI is great, The girl who plays Alice is good, and Sacha Bohen Caron is fantastic! Plus, i like Wonderlands Backstory. But, it has cringe-worthy time puns that make no sense, annnoyingIs it perfect. Heck no. Is it okay. Yeah. I mean, the CGI is great, The girl who plays Alice is good, and Sacha Bohen Caron is fantastic! Plus, i like Wonderlands Backstory. But, it has cringe-worthy time puns that make no sense, annnoying side characters, a hateable villan ( Red Queen) and more. It isnt bad, but its not good either. I give Alice Through The looking Glass a 6/10 Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
4
JaneDoe123Jun 10, 2016
This was a well put together film but it did not come close to its title material. While I know that movies never follow the book exactly, this movie seemed to be created by sombody who did not even read the book. While the movie was o.k. IThis was a well put together film but it did not come close to its title material. While I know that movies never follow the book exactly, this movie seemed to be created by sombody who did not even read the book. While the movie was o.k. I belive that they should have given it a title that better fits the movie. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
5
MarinRovikOct 9, 2016
I wasn't sure what to expect from another Alice movie. The previous love for the characters jumped into this one too and do I even have to compliment Johnny Depp's acting skills once again? Hope not. Anyway, although at first I thought theI wasn't sure what to expect from another Alice movie. The previous love for the characters jumped into this one too and do I even have to compliment Johnny Depp's acting skills once again? Hope not. Anyway, although at first I thought the plot was a bit forced, it turned out to be not so predictable.The movie starts to get interesting pretty soon and it has a good morale and more than just a happy ending, it has a double happy ending to be precise. But I must say, in my opinion, some things and facts are a bit too complicated for children, who during the movie should have more than a couple of „but why mom?“ and might confuse them. As a fantasy movie it's pretty solid, the visuals are o.k. and it has original some original characteristics of course. As I was at about half movie I was going to rate it much worse, as things got too clogged and were happening without order, it was rather confusing for me,which I disliked. But it was actually pretty satisfactory when it all unfolded, making it a solid combination of fantasy and family movie. I would recommend it to anyone who wants to spend happily their evening in company of their kids (or parents). If you mind movies that don't logically connect all the facts and could make sense in our world, this movie is not for you, but if you are here to watch a movie that will relieve you of your negative thoughts and immerse you into a new world, you should give it a try! Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
5
JPKDec 15, 2019
Purely Mediocre
Despite lavish visuals and decent performances, Through The Looking Glass has a sloppy script, bland characters, and no sense of aw and wonder.
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
6
LeZeeNov 4, 2016
Alice returns to the wonderland for a new adventure.

Based on the nearly 150 years old children's book, and a sequel to the 2010 film. Its quite a long gap for a follow up film, but the original cast has returned and directed by 'The
Alice returns to the wonderland for a new adventure.

Based on the nearly 150 years old children's book, and a sequel to the 2010 film. Its quite a long gap for a follow up film, but the original cast has returned and directed by 'The Muppets' famed filmmaker. So, I was not expecting it since I considered the first film an average. All I wanted was a normal live-action 'Alice in Wonderland' films, but I disliked this weird make-ups and large head characters. In that perspective, this one was much better. Still, this is not the best, but definitely a lot better than the previous one.

A simple adventure story with nice graphics and performances. The Alice returns to the Wonderland for a new adventure where she has to cross the layers of the present, past and future. So in one word, this is a time travel theme in the fantasy genre. Mia Wasikowska ruled it, she was everywhere. She overran all other characters and takes the toughest challenge to achieve impossible.

Nearly a two hour journey into wonderland might make happy for little kids. Because it did not look like a normal fairytale, but very modern. This is not the Disney's best film, so I don't think there will be any more sequel. I want it to be rebooted, but not any time soon, at least a decade of gap needed. So I hope they won't rush and ruin this classic tale like three 'Spiderman' reboots in less than 20 years. Meantime, this film is okay for watching once, though I'm not in favour to recommend it to anybody except little children.

6/10
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
BrianMcCriticOct 21, 2016
This film looks great with bright colors and I felt it was better than the first one. The problem is there is just way to much going on that by the third act you start to loose interest. C-
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
FreedomFightersApr 17, 2018
Admittedly, when "Alice in Wonderland" came out in 2010, I enjoyed the film. Sure, it was a flawed Hollywood blockbuster, but it definitely had some good things to it. When I heard that a sequel was coming out, though, I didn't get my hopesAdmittedly, when "Alice in Wonderland" came out in 2010, I enjoyed the film. Sure, it was a flawed Hollywood blockbuster, but it definitely had some good things to it. When I heard that a sequel was coming out, though, I didn't get my hopes all that high. Sure, the first film was solid enough, but was it worth making a sequel? And six years after the first one at that? Well, I recently checked out said sequel and, admittedly, it wasn't all that bad. Sure, some of the humor falls flat, the plot is utterly ridiculous, and Johnny Depp provides an uninteresting performance, but the film is visually sound, has some decent characters, a solid performance from Mia Wasikowska, and surprisingly, the film actually has some legitimately exciting (and emotional) moments. No, it's not a great film, and it's nothing amazing, but all in all, it's a decent little film, and even despite my rating, I still recommend giving it a shot to see if the wholly ridiculous, nonsensical plot adds to the charm of the film for you, or if it just feels frustrating. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
marcmyworksJan 16, 2017
I wouldn't say this installment in the Alice franchise is as bad as the original, in fact the good thing about it is its original story. However like the original it suffers from being bogged down by CG effects, Johnny Depp's inexplicablyI wouldn't say this installment in the Alice franchise is as bad as the original, in fact the good thing about it is its original story. However like the original it suffers from being bogged down by CG effects, Johnny Depp's inexplicably bizarre character rendition and its basic story line. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
CameraBounceGodOct 4, 2016
having watched it in full lag i still watched it .....there was nothing really upsetting except maybe the arcimboldo fruit monsters language....i kind of felt that they were often alluding to the fact that she tricked everyone in the moviehaving watched it in full lag i still watched it .....there was nothing really upsetting except maybe the arcimboldo fruit monsters language....i kind of felt that they were often alluding to the fact that she tricked everyone in the movie stoker.....but its hard to see her and not immediately think of that piece of crap movie...that being said the jokes were pretty good.....the time spent traveling in the chronosphere and in the real world was all garbage lesbian **** Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
RalfbergsJan 29, 2017
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I liked the visuals and all that, plus there were some good actors in this, but the actual story was so predictable - not just the ending, I mean it is a Disney movie, but the whole thing about Hatters parents and also eventually about how red queen became like that. I wanted something more, something different and more extraordinary. Not a bad movie, but nothing impressive. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
avr50Mar 20, 2017
The first film was the one that started the live-action films based on disney material. This is one that proves that not all movies are made live-action. The first one was ok, but nobody ask for a sequel and there´s no surprise why the movieThe first film was the one that started the live-action films based on disney material. This is one that proves that not all movies are made live-action. The first one was ok, but nobody ask for a sequel and there´s no surprise why the movie made like 700 million less than the other.
There is no question why Johnny Depp´s career is going down, because of mediocre films and mediocre performances.
The only good thing in this movie is Mia Wasikowska and her little performance in this movie.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
FuturedirectorDec 14, 2016
Alice Through The Looking Glass meets some cool music, a brilliantly talented cast and a full-of-emotion story-telling..., then it sinks under failure, thanks to it's flawed try to live up the classic characters that we've seen before.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
SrPepeApr 29, 2018
Una película aburrida y totalmente innecesaria. Había tenido un buen cierre y ahora lo siento muy descolocado.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
WhiskeyStoriesSep 20, 2018
Back in the day I disliked Burton's Alice in Wonderland, but I have to admit I really enjoyed this sequel. It's still far from being a great or even a generally good film, but it is just a lot more fun. I felt like everything about the firstBack in the day I disliked Burton's Alice in Wonderland, but I have to admit I really enjoyed this sequel. It's still far from being a great or even a generally good film, but it is just a lot more fun. I felt like everything about the first film was slightly improved in this sequel. The plot is a lot more enjoyable, though not very deep, the CG is better, though many times it did look like actors performing on a sound stage, and the acting is a lot better. I felt like Johnny Depp was immensely more fun here and the addition of Sacha Baron Cohen was very welcome, also Helena Bonham Carter was still as enjoyable as ever with Mia Wasikowska bringing much more gusto to the character and sense of charm as well in Through the Looking Glass. It's a pretty solid fantasy/adventure movie for the family. Though it has its fair share of problems I kinda loved it. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
SomePersonaFeb 5, 2017
What starts out great ends up being one trying-to-be-great mess. All of the primary problems with the film are in the writing which feels uninspiring, clichéd, and safe. It also didn't feel very faithful to Lewis Carrol's characters or hisWhat starts out great ends up being one trying-to-be-great mess. All of the primary problems with the film are in the writing which feels uninspiring, clichéd, and safe. It also didn't feel very faithful to Lewis Carrol's characters or his novel "Through the Looking Glass, and What Alice Found There." Then there's a horrible song by P!NK at the end to ruin the show. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
whostosayAug 1, 2017
The opening of the movie started out so promising. Larger than life visuals, dazzling action that drew one in - but once Alice climbed through the looking glass, it was all visual effects and a weak storyline. You can't dress up a skeletonThe opening of the movie started out so promising. Larger than life visuals, dazzling action that drew one in - but once Alice climbed through the looking glass, it was all visual effects and a weak storyline. You can't dress up a skeleton even though the costume design was brilliantly executed. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
FilipeNetoFeb 9, 2021
There are some films that are made only for the money that is expected to be collected from them. After seeing this film, I think it fits that description. "Alice in Wonderland" was a box office and critical hit, and had a good financial fit.There are some films that are made only for the money that is expected to be collected from them. After seeing this film, I think it fits that description. "Alice in Wonderland" was a box office and critical hit, and had a good financial fit. The sequel, expected, takes advantage of the title of a novel that Lewis Carroll wrote after “Alice in Wonderland”. Just the title! The story has nothing to do with the book that, out of curiosity, turned 145 years in the year the film was released.

The script begins with Alice's return from a trip to the Chinese seas and the discovery that her mother had gone into debt and passed control of the family firm to Hamish who, by malice, decided to take revenge by forcing her to sell her ship. It's in this context that Alice returns to the magical country that she already knows after going through a mirror. There, she discovers that she was "summoned" to the country to help the Mad Hatter, who is dying of sadness for believing that his entire family, presumably dead, may be alive somewhere. Alice will have to go to the Castle of Time and get the Chronosphere, a time-travel machine that would allow her to discover what happened to the Hatter's family.

I was unimpressed with this film. I think the direction of James Bobin bet a lot on the visual and little on the script. In fact, I found surprising that Burton did not stay with the direction and preferred to stay in production. I think it would have been better for the film to have Burton in the chair. Linda Woolverton's script seemed to be predictable and not very creative, with childish's dialogues, forced jokes and too many puns that fade over time. The material given to the actors was probably not the best either.

Mia Waskikowska is quite good as Alice, she looks safe and confident. Helena Bonham Carter gave soul and emotion to a character who was, therefore, very humanized. Sacha Baron Cohen is also in good shape and this is reflected in the inspired and fun way he brought Time to life. I bet he had fun with the character and did this job with pleasure, I got to feel it when I saw him. However, if we put aside these three actors who, in fact, did very well, the cast's performance is generally poor. Johnny Depp, for example, was a shadow of himself, and he is one of those actors that I consider almost a safe bet for fantastic characters. I believe that the bad phase he was going through at the time of filming had a strong influence (the stormy divorce with Amber Heard), but the bad material of the script did not help him either. Anne Hathaway was also bad in a lifeless, emotionless performance, as if she was not engaged in her work. The film also features Rhys Ifans, Geraldine James, Lindsay Duncan and Leo Bill, but they all seem to be adrift, doing as they see fit and without much support from the director. The voice actors, as their characters, were in the third place of importance, highlighting only the very brief contribution of Allan Rickman because it was his last work.

Technically, the film is great, as its predecessor had previously been. These are films with a great visual focus, and where a lot of money is invested in CGI and state-of-the-art effects. The result is what is calculated: a visual show with a colorful, vibrant and intense cinematography. The effects of the storm at sea and the maritime maneuvers of Alice's ship were very well done and the fantastic world of Wonderland looks incredible, although not as absurd as Carroll's imagination would have liked, I think. This is compensated by the Castle of Time, as extravagant as possible. The costumes also help, starting with Time's and the two queens (I didn't like Alice's oriental costume so much, I confess). Still a word for the good conception of the Seconds and, particularly, of the guard of the Red Queen, inspired by the magnificent art of Arcimboldo, who is one of my favorite artists of the Renaissance period. Whoever has never seen one of his artworks must see it. As for Danny Elfman's soundtrack, I think it meets expectations, but it doesn't stand out.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews