Star Trek Online

 PlayStation 4
User Score
5.5

Mixed or average reviews- based on 37 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 13 out of 37
  2. Mixed: 11 out of 37
  3. Negative: 13 out of 37

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. EvilWays1
    Sep 17, 2016
    3
    Note: This is for the state of the game as of September 17, 2016.

    Having played this on and off for the past several years on PC (and I even purchased the lifetime subscription), this is in a sad state right now. This is first few PC seasons bad. Mind you, the game has only been out for less than two weeks, but the lessons PWE should have learned from glitches (and fixes thereof) on the    Note: This is for the state of the game as of September 17, 2016.

    Having played this on and off for the past several years on PC (and I even purchased the lifetime subscription), this is in a sad state right now. This is first few PC seasons bad. Mind you, the game has only been out for less than two weeks, but the lessons PWE should have learned from glitches (and fixes thereof) on the PC version did not translate over to the console versions.

    Here are my main issues and grievances as of the playable version available during this review:

    - This game is WAY too streamlined. I get it, this is a console, not a PC...but it doesn't excuse the extreme amount of streamlining that PWE enacted on this game to put this game on consoles. The interface alone is stripped down and wonky. Unless you can constantly remember where something is in the heat of battle, you are screwed. Even then, the console controls tend to not be favorable for certain tasks (having to use a wheel to select an ability in the middle of battle is obnoxious).

    - The mini-map. Oh god, the mini-map. You cannot zoom that thing in, so you are constantly having to pop up the bigger map to find where objectives are.

    - GLITCHES! There are several noted gamebreaking glitches in the current version of the game. There is at least one that will not let you start the mission (Diplomacy) and requires you to skip it to proceed through the rest of the story arc (else it crashes the game back to the XMB every time you try to play the mission - many reports of this on the web)...and leaves you without the story arc trophy. Story mission glitches, mission procession glitches, graphical/model glitches...did I hop back to PC Season 2???

    - Missing features. With this one, I'm hoping these features do work their way in to the game with successive patches/updates. From my understanding, certain fleet features are missing.

    - Server related issues. Rubberbanding galore is back with a vengeance. Also, be prepared to see Server Not Responding with counting timer more often than you'd like. Come on PWE, with the money you are making with microtransactions, could you not afford better server farms?

    - Pay to win. This is the sad result of free-to-play games. And that lifetime subscription option? Don't bother. Compared to the PC version's lifetime sub, you get jack for that cost. Some sub exclusive items, titles and access to a location that is always dead. That's it. You get that and more, including a monthly 500 Zen stipend, with the PC lifetime sub. What gives? And those eff'ing master keys...

    - Lack of additional contact methods with the GMs. As usual, there are already several bots in the game chat spamming for sale sites for Energy Credits and Master Keys (and a lot of people complaining about being ripped off). While you can report them, the ignore function resets after log off or leaving the zone and coming back. On top of that, how are the players supposed to report bugs to the devs...through the forums? Why not a direct route from the game itself?

    As it stands, this game is a mess. If you are a Star Trek fan, avoid this game for the time being until PWE fixes at least the major issues (the Diplomacy game breaking bug being one of the biggest), or play the PC version which is much more mature as far as bug/glitch fixes go. While this game does have a lot of microtransactions, you can actually ignore most, if not all, of them and still enjoy the game. The big problem will be with starships (you stop receiving new ones around level 40, which stops you at Tier 5 and you will end up needing a Tier 6 ship with the higher levels of 50+). This game has most, if not all, of the story missions, but the issues might distract you from the fun.    … Expand
  2. Ariako
    Oct 19, 2016
    0
    This game is among my favorite pc games, and on PC I rate it highly. That said, the ps4 release of this is among the WORST experiences I've ever had. The game started off buggy and lacking all but a skeletal frame of the glory found in the PC version... Fun, but lacking... Then the first patch came in, cementing the console dev team as the worst to have ever existed. Take E.T. on Atari,This game is among my favorite pc games, and on PC I rate it highly. That said, the ps4 release of this is among the WORST experiences I've ever had. The game started off buggy and lacking all but a skeletal frame of the glory found in the PC version... Fun, but lacking... Then the first patch came in, cementing the console dev team as the worst to have ever existed. Take E.T. on Atari, hold it next to this game and it looks good. That's how bad terrible. I'll revise my review when/if the current dev team are ALL sacked and the game is fixed. Until then, 1/10 - worse than Onigiri (game)… Expand
  3. TheOmegaMale
    Sep 11, 2016
    4
    Star Trek Online is a God awful piece of garbage that should have stayed on PC. I mean seriously, if this is an example of what the PC master race get to spend their time on, then I'm glad I'm a console exclusive gamer. Keep this damned pollution off my PS4.

    What we have here is another example of the gaming industries free to play cancer spreading like the malignant tumour it is onto    Star Trek Online is a God awful piece of garbage that should have stayed on PC. I mean seriously, if this is an example of what the PC master race get to spend their time on, then I'm glad I'm a console exclusive gamer. Keep this damned pollution off my PS4.

    What we have here is another example of the gaming industries free to play cancer spreading like the malignant tumour it is onto other gaming formats. So, like all the others of it's type it's a glitchy mess that has you repeating the same dull as dishwater activities over, and over, and over again. Over an extended period of time you slowly grind out levels and upgrades that allow you to do the same boring activities against slightly more powerful enemies. Rinse and repeat until you hit a wall and feel pressured into dropping money on the game, or you just walk away from it.

    If you're a Star Trek fan you may remember the Starfleet Command series of games. Go and play those games again. Believe me when I say that they do more justice to the Star Trek franchise than this hideous malformed beast of a game. And most importantly, you'll actually have fun playing them.

    Look, Star Trek Online is free to play so just download and try for yourself. Then after a short time delete from your hard drive, put the whole sorry mess out of your mind and chalk it up to experience. Never to repeat again.    … Expand
  4. Loigan
    Sep 7, 2016
    10
    A great time. Highly recommend especially if you enjoy Star Trek, however even those who arent fans will find fun here. The combination of ground and space combat is great
  5. RoguePaladin
    Sep 9, 2016
    6
    I've played the PC version since it's original beta and the console release is a buggy, incomplete mess - just like the PC release was. There's lots of good content, but there's also huge junks of the gameplay missing as well, and a ridiculous amount of glitches and bugs.Basic features either are not there or don't function correctly. Space combat is wonderful, the UI works beautifully.I've played the PC version since it's original beta and the console release is a buggy, incomplete mess - just like the PC release was. There's lots of good content, but there's also huge junks of the gameplay missing as well, and a ridiculous amount of glitches and bugs.Basic features either are not there or don't function correctly. Space combat is wonderful, the UI works beautifully. But they need to fix things like camera distance and angles, they worked correctly for me for only 2 hours then glitched and have been stuck at very awkward and unusable angles ever since, no matter what I do.

    All in all, hugely disappointing, and that's from an STO fan.    … Expand
  6. dartanian0801
    Sep 18, 2016
    6
    The game is unfortunately very buggy. Lots of attention to detail in terms of the story archs. Unfortunately presentation is lacking. Space combat id fair but ground combat is hilarious. Just standing there and shooting your lasers in open.....The game is fun for about 5 to 6 hours. After that even though the stories are different, the mechanics are exactly the same.
  7. Relkan
    Sep 24, 2016
    8
    For a free game, there's hundreds of hours of content - immersive worlds and enthralling solar systems. You'll feel like you belong amongst the 5 legendary Captains. That said, it's dragged down by immersion breaking bugs, which really should have been addressed before launch.

    Perfect World's done a good job, in general, converting this PC game to PS4. There are notable bugs, such as    For a free game, there's hundreds of hours of content - immersive worlds and enthralling solar systems. You'll feel like you belong amongst the 5 legendary Captains. That said, it's dragged down by immersion breaking bugs, which really should have been addressed before launch.

    Perfect World's done a good job, in general, converting this PC game to PS4. There are notable bugs, such as the player camera unpredictable zooming out, or cinematic where the character is standing with their legs half way in the floor. I would have hoped they'd have addressed these minor flaws before releasing the game, especially since they gave no indication as to the actual release date.

    On that topic, I would say that while their game is good, the company's communication is dire. The community isn't shy about raising the various bugs as issues, so you'd think that Perfect World would want to address the issues head on and explain their plan of action. No luck there - just silence and continued efforts to push extra content.

    The game itself is fun. I'm a Trekkie, so flying the ships from the films and TV series is a real fanboy moment. Immersion is great in parts, with pretty good voice acting and impressive set pieces. However, some missions go the opposite way with either no voice acting, or ones where you wonder whether it's the developers themselves doing it on the cheap. There doesn't seem to be any consistency with where voice-overs are placed. But considering the original game had none, they've done well to catch up to the 21st century.

    The music is generally sub standard and after 30mins of listening to it at the beginning, I turned it off and made a Star Trek Spotify playlist. Problem solved - but not one I should have had to solve.

    Space combat certainly carries this game. Flying past beautifully rendered nebulae, or though asteroid belts, lit by cracking solar storms is brilliant. There's some massive space battles, which are unlike any space sim game I've played before and are truly epic.

    Beaming down to a planet offers a similarly impressive graphic haul and the new lighting has massively boosted the game. But, the ground combat is still jerky and archaic, so don't get your hopes up there. It's only redeemed by fun class-specific abilities, like turrets and shields etc.

    Overall, this game has, without a doubt, improved since I last played 3 years ago. The missions are more coherent and are all story driven, having done away with the generic 'patrol missions'. However, for casual Trek gamers, you'll struggle to look past the bugs and average combat gameplay. For hardcore fans, you'll likely put up with it and allow your imagination to carry you through the ranks. It definitely picks up, the longer you persevere.    … Expand
  8. Tristalasama
    Oct 20, 2016
    0
    Great game ruined COMPLETELY by the worst team of developers to have ever lived. I would give it 1/10, but the game is really that bad in its current abysmal state.
  9. Lightangel
    Nov 10, 2016
    0
    BUG, BUGS, BUGS, BUGS, BUGS....

    Did I mention the B-U-G-S ?!!! This Game is in an unbelievable HORRIBLE ALPHA STATE (11/2016)! I am playing for 8 Weeks now and discovered at least 40 different Bugs, reading about far more of them online. I think this game has hundreds, if not thousands of bugs!! Nearly EVERYTHING is not working properly in this Game! This is the crappiest Game I    BUG, BUGS, BUGS, BUGS, BUGS....

    Did I mention the B-U-G-S ?!!!

    This Game is in an unbelievable HORRIBLE ALPHA STATE (11/2016)! I am playing for 8 Weeks now and discovered at least 40 different Bugs, reading about far more of them online. I think this game has hundreds, if not thousands of bugs!! Nearly EVERYTHING is not working properly in this Game!
    This is the crappiest Game I have ever played within the last 30 Years!

    At first I liked it, although it has cheap graphics like a 10 years old Game (and this is already the advanced Version with better Graphics compared to PC), HORRIBLE PRIMITVE ground Gameplay like a 20 Years old RPG or Textadventure, but then I stumbled over more and more BUGS, GLITCHES, STUTTERING, CRASHES and even Missions you cannot start or finish, which leads to further bugs and annoyance! Although I am a huge Star Trek Fan, I really cannot recommend this ATM. Furthermore the Game feels quite overloaded with all its Features, Skills, Abilities and more. You have to study wikis regularly for hours - promised.

    I do not know if the Producer even HAS a Q/A Team, but at best wait at least a 6-12 Months if you want to play and try this crap. Otherwise you will hate yourself when you already got addicted and cannot let loose.

    It's a shame, this Game COULD be quite nice with all its complexity and variety of the Star Trek Universe, but not if you fight the most Time against Bugs and disappointment instead against your Enemies.

    BEWARE! Do not try the PC Version on Windows XP, after 6 Years (!!!) this is STILL THAT buggy, that it destroys your Windows Installation!!! (Corrputs install/uninstall Programs Manager).

    This Game should be banned from Playstation Network!    … Expand
  10. Maddness
    Sep 10, 2016
    5
    Space combat is fun for 10 minutes or so though, but the rest, such as on foot combat, or character animations are just hilariously mediocre. Still, game is free (ish), so give it a go, just don't expect a Mass Effect sort of space opera.
    5 out of 10
  11. Myselfandyou
    Jul 1, 2018
    2
    The pc version is a complete mess. One of the most buggy and broken games ive ever played in 20 years. So i cant imagine how bad is the ps4 version, keeping in mind it has all the bugs from pc, and the game is not even half of what the pc version is lol. I would never recommend this game to a pc player, but even less to a console player lol. Its a shame that CBS will never care aboutThe pc version is a complete mess. One of the most buggy and broken games ive ever played in 20 years. So i cant imagine how bad is the ps4 version, keeping in mind it has all the bugs from pc, and the game is not even half of what the pc version is lol. I would never recommend this game to a pc player, but even less to a console player lol. Its a shame that CBS will never care about actually giving the rights to a DECENT company to make a decent STAR TREK (because the game isnt about star trek since ages ago) videogame. As long as they only care about $$$, they will keep relying on cheap and terrible companies like pwe/cryptic to release star trek games. Sad. Really sad.… Expand
  12. jimmylittle007
    Oct 27, 2016
    0
    One for only the hardest of hardcore fans. An already terrible PC game has been ported, terribly, to console. Quite literally every mission has bugs and glitches of varying severity. Voice acting provides some brief amusement for the sheer awfulness of both the script and delivery. Ship combat is fun, ground combat is...not. Graphics and sound well below standard. But, if you own an actualOne for only the hardest of hardcore fans. An already terrible PC game has been ported, terribly, to console. Quite literally every mission has bugs and glitches of varying severity. Voice acting provides some brief amusement for the sheer awfulness of both the script and delivery. Ship combat is fun, ground combat is...not. Graphics and sound well below standard. But, if you own an actual star trek uniform, you'll probably find some pleasure in the references to characters and events from the franchise.… Expand
  13. CraigEchols
    Jun 8, 2017
    3
    This is a review for the game on PS4. I downloaded the game with an open mind. I wasn't a Star Trek fan really, but the thought of an open space MMORPG was a bit intriguing. I played for a week so I could get a proper idea of the game.

    There are few things to like about the game. First of all, it is a Trek game so it does a good job staying consistent with the source material. Player    This is a review for the game on PS4. I downloaded the game with an open mind. I wasn't a Star Trek fan really, but the thought of an open space MMORPG was a bit intriguing. I played for a week so I could get a proper idea of the game.

    There are few things to like about the game. First of all, it is a Trek game so it does a good job staying consistent with the source material. Player customization is very deep (as it should be in an MMORPG). The use of guns is a great idea for an MMORPG and item customization is simple enough for anyone to pick up on. And that's just about where it ends.

    For the bad, the game is a buggy mess. Even the areas where their are no chats or other players, it can be a buggy mess. I have a strong connection and it even affected me. Also, the acting from the NPCs is laughable. You don't necessarily need to be Golden Globe or Oscar winners to do voice acting, but that was just awful.

    The missions are a bit linear and the story is meh. You're a guy who takes over the ship after already dealing with a attack and the person who was in your command is killed and then you kill the guy that kills them and......yeah. Just a mess.

    The fighting system is good in theory, but leaves a lot to be desired. They would have done a better job taking a page from Mass Effect, Gears of War, and everything other 3rd person game that has allowed cover fire. Also, could they have made the enemies and more stupid? They dodge from left to right or stand still and just take hits. How about some......difficulty?

    The biggest issue is the game is completely incomplete and lacks a lot of features. I can deal with the pay to win model since at the end of the day, it is a f2p game. However, as long as you can get access to the same content by grinding or playing the game out, I don't particularly mind (even if it takes awhile). But, this is pretty bad. Its not too late for them to fix the issues with this game, but they need to get to work because as of right now.....its just bad.    … Expand
  14. echobase2002
    Mar 3, 2017
    2
    The game is hot garbage. As another person said, this is another free to play download bait that tries to generate in game sales later. Graphics are at least two generations old (think slightly better than Goldeneye on N64). Animations are clunky and repetitive. Battle is simple stand in place and shoot at enemies who also stand in place and shoot. Missions are boring. I shouldn't sayThe game is hot garbage. As another person said, this is another free to play download bait that tries to generate in game sales later. Graphics are at least two generations old (think slightly better than Goldeneye on N64). Animations are clunky and repetitive. Battle is simple stand in place and shoot at enemies who also stand in place and shoot. Missions are boring. I shouldn't say missions plural because I was so bored and annoyed partway through the first mission I quit and deleted the game. Any developer or publisher who thought this was ready for release either doesn't play games or hasn't played any since the late 90s.… Expand
  15. SynysterSoulz
    Oct 13, 2017
    7
    I've enjoyed it so far a lot of nostalgia for star trek fans can be found here. It feels a bit dated though and needs more voice acting. It's not really an mmo as I've seen just single player missions. Relatively good game overall though.
  16. Ricewynd
    Mar 10, 2019
    0
    If I could give this game a lower score then I would, while it is not up there with some of the worst games of all time the general unplayability of this game plus its continuous pleas for money make it a cringy worthy experience at the best of times.
    Players will experience bugs and glitches from the very moment they start the game, with the character creation screen being so laggy it is    If I could give this game a lower score then I would, while it is not up there with some of the worst games of all time the general unplayability of this game plus its continuous pleas for money make it a cringy worthy experience at the best of times.
    Players will experience bugs and glitches from the very moment they start the game, with the character creation screen being so laggy it is advised to simply skip it, you can re-edit the appearance of your character at a later date.
    From then on gameplay becomes a rollercoaster of popping assets, broken dialogue and cutscenes either distorted beyond all recognition or simply missing. Characters from the various Star Trek shows are shoe-horned in at random points and in many cases lowers the experience to something that feels worthy of a fan-film as characters pause mid-dialogue to throw a reference or in-joke with a "hey guys remember star trek?" nod and a wink to the camera.
    Some missions revolve entirely around these pathetic attempts at nostalgia pulling and special credit must be made to LaVar Burton who's ham-fisted phoned-in performance where he delivers each line of dialogue in such a monotone way you could be forgiven for believing him to genuinely be on the other end of a phone reading off a card. His special mission encompasses exactly 5 minutes of gameplay and uring its debut STO ran a subtle add campaign in regards to a series of podcats LaVar Burton was in, in which he proclaimed his character 'Geordi La Forge" was gay and it was only because of "the oppression by white men" could the audience not see this.

    The rest of the game can be described as shoddy, beyond expectation, the sheer scale of glitches and bugs make Fallout 76 seem a fairly well-polished game by comparison and this is only emphasised by the number of disconnection errors one can expect to fight with, in one half hour session I was disconnected three times, this is somewhat average.
    The Graphics are reminiscent of the PS2 era and characters frequently stop lip syncing or moving their mouths at all, opting to instead nod their head to the words as if rocking out to a particularly heavy metal song. Dougluge interrupts, errors and missing cutscenes are also a common occurrence.
    In one example an early mission had me fight off a large armada of Borg ships side-by-side with a series character called Nog, as voiced by Aron Eisenberg, my bridge crew and several other NPCs kept referring to him by a different name and it was only later I learned Eisenbergs character was replacing a previous NPC. Nog had been shoe-horned in as a replacement but the NPC dialogue had not been changed to reflect this.
    Such incidents are highly common and many newer players could end up confused as various NPCs refer to events which have not happened, characters that are not there or refer to the player as the wrong species, faction and gender.

    The game does slowly taper up towards endgane, with much of the developers focus primarily in this region, the game comes over as particularly top heavy and requires users to purchase a Tier 6 starship, unavailable through any in-game currency least a player sell on to you, for around $30. Without one a player can expect to fight waves of impossible enemies or be meet with frustration as their ship is constantly one-shot killed in both PvP and PvE events, limiting what end-game content is available to free players and those who choose to pay.
    In stark comparison to early and mid-game, the content available to premium end-game users is rather enjoyable and of considerably higher quality, the PS2 graphics and glitchy cutscenes of the early game give way to a spectacular series of well-detailed maps, photo-realistic characters and well-polished cutscenes, proving that the developer team is well within their capabilities to improve the game as it currently stands.
    However as it stands it is obvious the developer team is only interested in providing end-game content for the few users willing to shell out hundreds of dollars for end-game content and keys to loot boxes.
    If you are looking for an online Star Trek Experience, look elsewhere.
    Outside of the aesthetic of some of the ships, and characters the similarity of the game vs the show ends, with combat thrust upon the character in 99.9% of all situations, the Federation being in a constant state of war with one faction or another and the diplomacy and exploration missions being either unplayable due to game-breaking bugs, or simply removed entirly.    … Expand
  17. Meth-Weasel
    Mar 11, 2019
    8
    While the F2P parts are there with monetization, it never feels like it's extortion like most other F2P games. It's old and the ground missions aren't the best, but it has a lot of replay value, they do a good job of balancing the game and adding new content where while you may have not played in a year, you can jump back on and you're still pretty much in the same place you were. OnlyWhile the F2P parts are there with monetization, it never feels like it's extortion like most other F2P games. It's old and the ground missions aren't the best, but it has a lot of replay value, they do a good job of balancing the game and adding new content where while you may have not played in a year, you can jump back on and you're still pretty much in the same place you were. Only reason i'm not giving it a 10 is because of how a lot of the cool ships are locked behind loot boxes.… Expand
  18. Volsyden
    Apr 29, 2019
    1
    Im going to tell you if you decide to play this game.... this game will cost you A LOT of money to play... now i may be free to play but to do anything in this game will cost you a huge amount of cash... i tried playing and got sucked in to paying and i wish i would not have. they really take huge fans and drain you dry without a care in the world... the ground combat is a joke and thereIm going to tell you if you decide to play this game.... this game will cost you A LOT of money to play... now i may be free to play but to do anything in this game will cost you a huge amount of cash... i tried playing and got sucked in to paying and i wish i would not have. they really take huge fans and drain you dry without a care in the world... the ground combat is a joke and there is not much to do in the long run. i wont spoil anything but if you want good gear either wait 10 years to get something good or pay a huge amount to stay good... that goes for every ship as welll... hundreds of ships that cost you 20-30 per ship... Good luck.… Expand
  19. Eprom
    May 5, 2023
    4
    It lags and is very buggy. Sorry, i would love to play this but the technical difficulties make it impossible. Also what is with the PS2 graphics?
  20. Jacegyan
    Nov 3, 2020
    2
    As of 3 Nov 20, the lag makes the game unplayable. It is a good port of a broken game. The PC game has gone through both positive and negative updates. The original design however results in a lackluster experience that does not pull the player into the Star Trek world. The space battles are unrealistic, the ground battles are terrible with the player constantly under attack (flanked)As of 3 Nov 20, the lag makes the game unplayable. It is a good port of a broken game. The PC game has gone through both positive and negative updates. The original design however results in a lackluster experience that does not pull the player into the Star Trek world. The space battles are unrealistic, the ground battles are terrible with the player constantly under attack (flanked) and needing to rely on under utilized AI for help.

    Star Trek fans will be in awe until the tutorial ends. Now with Perfect World Entertainment at the helm, it is pay to win with exorbitant fees for competitive ships.

    Unless you want to grind, or pay, avoid the disappointment.    … Expand
  21. russelj31
    Mar 4, 2021
    6
    A great port to the ps4 from PC but the PC version has much better gameplay.
    Still good but better on PC. SERIOUSY get the PC version
  22. MickeyFinn
    Sep 20, 2022
    10
    After trying most of the mmos on ps4, i can say this one is the best. From a scamming perspective at least. Not sure why, maybe CBS is keeping stupid on a short leash. U can get anything by farming, and farming is easy. U do anything and u gain stuff and dilithium. And u can sell dilithium for zens for the store. It takes a few months to get to good builds ofc. All the other games haveAfter trying most of the mmos on ps4, i can say this one is the best. From a scamming perspective at least. Not sure why, maybe CBS is keeping stupid on a short leash. U can get anything by farming, and farming is easy. U do anything and u gain stuff and dilithium. And u can sell dilithium for zens for the store. It takes a few months to get to good builds ofc. All the other games have some kind of schemes to shove paying stuff in player's faces.. not sto. Must try… Expand

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
tbd

No score yet - based on 3 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1 out of 3
  2. Mixed: 2 out of 3
  3. Negative: 0 out of 3
  1. Destructoid
    Sep 29, 2016
    75
    There's a lot to like about Star Trek Online, even for players who aren't hardcore Star Trek fans or crazy people like me, but it does ask to be put up with to a certain extent. As for the console versions, it's also not all there yet, almost literally. At the same time, it's hard to name a more overtly generous free-to-play title on the current market, and it's worth a shot, for both Trek devotees and the merely Warp-curious.
    Read full review
  2. Hardcore Gamer
    Sep 28, 2016
    70
    Star Trek Online is a game that casual and dedicated Star Trek fans should check out. While it doesn’t beat out Neverwinter as far as mechanics goes, it allows players to inhabit a fascinating facsimile of the universe, exploring, undertaking complex missions and always boldly going forward (because we can’t find reverse).
    Read full review
  3. CGMagazine
    Sep 22, 2016
    70
    This is one of those games that could use a little more time in the oven.
    Read full review