User Score
Mixed or average reviews- based on 51 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 29 out of 51
-
Mixed: 13 out of 51
-
Negative: 9 out of 51
Buy Now
Review this game
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- By date
- Most helpful
-
Nov 17, 2016Paris looks great, and the controls are intuitive. Just wish you could take the tunnel vision off. They have done this to stop people getting motion sick, however I have no problems this way in VR, so would just like the option there in the options menu for people like me, who can handle it, to get a full screen view (like Windlands and Rigs do).
-
Nov 13, 2018
-
Nov 25, 2019Very different, and I'll give the team behind it credit for trying something different. I enjoyed playing the game a lot for a couple of hours, but the two issues with it are: 1- being very repetitive (that, the studio responsible for) 2- poor graphics (we can only blame the limitations of the PS VR).
-
Feb 7, 2019I wanted to like this a lot as it seemed like a cool concept but the graphics are awful and there just isn't much to the gameplay. If you have a weak vr stomach this will test you as well.
-
Dec 18, 2017Eagle Flight is VR game from the perspective of an eagle. Your constantly in movement in small open world going from race to race, of which their is a decent amount of types. With a great sense of speed and good graphics Eagle Flight is one the better PSVR games.
-
Feb 1, 2017Despite the generic design of Eagle Flight’s story missions and the inability to reliably play online, it’s still a thrilling thing to experience in VR. It would be easier to write off were it a tradition, VR-free PlayStation game, but the immersion the headset offers makes it all the more fun and a good way to destress from the day.
-
games(TM)Jan 27, 2017Simplistic in scope, but oh so satisfying to play. [Issue#182, p.83]
-
Games Master UKJan 26, 2017Some conservative design can't spoil a thrilling experience that's close to a must for early VR adopters. [Jan 2016, p.64]