Call of Duty: WWII

 PlayStation 4
User Score
5.1

Mixed or average reviews- based on 2065 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 718 out of 2065
  2. Mixed: 482 out of 2065
  3. Negative: 865 out of 2065
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. mrsalty101
    Nov 4, 2017
    2
    Why is everyone so pissed about the 85 rating from the critics. I don't feel bad for the kids that fall for it and play this like it's the best thing ever. I feel bad for the parents that didn't block their kid's accounts from spending, because you know those idiots are buying loot boxes galore.
  2. luckydutch
    Nov 4, 2017
    7
    I don't really get all the hate for this. It's not groundbreakingly innovative but the campaign is interesting and the multiplayer is just classic CoD multiplayer. The microtransactions are FAR less toxic and invasive than the RNG P2W rubbish in the upcoming Battlefront 2. Based on my current experience, I reckon I will unlock every gun within 30-40 hours of online play which is prettyI don't really get all the hate for this. It's not groundbreakingly innovative but the campaign is interesting and the multiplayer is just classic CoD multiplayer. The microtransactions are FAR less toxic and invasive than the RNG P2W rubbish in the upcoming Battlefront 2. Based on my current experience, I reckon I will unlock every gun within 30-40 hours of online play which is pretty reasonable.

    If you like CoD, you'll like this. If you don't like CoD, why are you buying it in the first place?    … Expand
  3. Freaxuk
    Nov 4, 2017
    9
    I did play CoD since first one , i hate infinity warfare , black ops 3 etc all this futuristic crap , but this one come back to basics and is really good game , campaign as always short but action packed with cool graphic , zombie with few new things really great , and multiplayer as classic i love it , for people who love CoD they will love it , haters will hate, people who say is theI did play CoD since first one , i hate infinity warfare , black ops 3 etc all this futuristic crap , but this one come back to basics and is really good game , campaign as always short but action packed with cool graphic , zombie with few new things really great , and multiplayer as classic i love it , for people who love CoD they will love it , haters will hate, people who say is the same thing never did play a game :) same game every year is fifa but they did come back to classic and people will enjoy it ;)… Expand
  4. Firewing2
    Nov 3, 2017
    5
    Honestly, I was extremely disappointed with this game. I played through the campaign in a short afternoon, and was surprised at how truncated it felt. A lot of cutscenes and not a lot of game play... trying too hard to shove the story of "brotherhood" down your throat. The squad system feels tacked on, and the campaign brought nothing new to the franchise.

    I'm a huge fan of the CoD    Honestly, I was extremely disappointed with this game. I played through the campaign in a short afternoon, and was surprised at how truncated it felt. A lot of cutscenes and not a lot of game play... trying too hard to shove the story of "brotherhood" down your throat. The squad system feels tacked on, and the campaign brought nothing new to the franchise.

    I'm a huge fan of the CoD series as a whole, and was very excited by the promise of a return to the WW2 roots, but this game is just disappointing.    … Expand
  5. KratosGodOfWar
    Nov 3, 2017
    10
    TOXIC!! That is how I want to explain the CoD community, they **** and moan about everything!! "It's a twitch shooter, wah, wah, bloody wah..." CoD has ALWAYS been a twitch shooter...like wtf? The definition of insanity is doing the same things over and over again expecting a different result...like CoD haters, you know it's a twitch shooter and still expect it to be different? GTFO! ThisTOXIC!! That is how I want to explain the CoD community, they **** and moan about everything!! "It's a twitch shooter, wah, wah, bloody wah..." CoD has ALWAYS been a twitch shooter...like wtf? The definition of insanity is doing the same things over and over again expecting a different result...like CoD haters, you know it's a twitch shooter and still expect it to be different? GTFO! This is easily the best Multiplayer in CoD in a long time. None of this insta-melt Infinite Warfare crap. I gave up playing that mid year, although the DLC was really good I must say, they were redeeming themselves a bit. All this ****ing about microtransactions, yet it's exactly like Modern Warfare Remastered, everything can be unlocked through grinding...plus CoD points aren't even available to buy yet you lying butthurt virgins. Hating a game because it has been something it always has been is like hating God Of War because it has QTE. Just don't buy it and play it if you're no good at it instead of trolling Metacritic with your pimply arsed, Lil' Jimmy noob reviews. Game is what the hardcore fans wanted...BOOTS ON THE GROUND and not this bunny hopping, zero quick scoping catastrophe that has become of it lately. This is just straight up fun, nice maps to flank on, awesome zombies mode and refreshing campaign. Haters are gonna hate, players are gonna play...what do you want to be?… Expand
  6. riverkev95
    Nov 3, 2017
    3
    Una correcta decisión regresar al multiplayer clásico y a una historia mas acorde a la saga tras el gran fiasco de COD: Infinite Warfare, por lo cual en ese apartado mejora bastante, aunque cabe resaltar que la historia pudo haberse aprovechado de mejor manera siendo "la segunda guerra mundial" y el multiplayer corre muy bien pero el desbalance que genera el matchmaking entre gente queUna correcta decisión regresar al multiplayer clásico y a una historia mas acorde a la saga tras el gran fiasco de COD: Infinite Warfare, por lo cual en ese apartado mejora bastante, aunque cabe resaltar que la historia pudo haberse aprovechado de mejor manera siendo "la segunda guerra mundial" y el multiplayer corre muy bien pero el desbalance que genera el matchmaking entre gente que paga por mejores armas con la gente que juega sin pagar mas por el videojuego es terrible.
    A pesar de sus puntos positivos anteriormente descritos, lo que mas choca en este juego es el hecho de que se hayan implementado todas las políticas mas nefastas que existen actualmente en el mundo de los videojuegos, aprovechandose así de su inmensa base de usuarios fieles a la saga.
    Entre estas políticas nefastas puedo mencionar que el juego viene recortado de lanzamiento (Prueba de esto es el DLC ya anunciado para enero de 2018), las lootboxes que están tan de moda en casi todos los videojuegos pero en este juego son implementadas de una forma mas descarada ya que tú puedes ver como los otros jugadores reciben sus premios tras comprar una cajita de estas, esto va acorde al matchmaking que relacione jugadores que no han gastado dinero extra en el videojuego con personas que gastan un montón y por lo tanto consiguen mejores armas en tu cara, lo cual provoca un online totalmente desbalanceado, por no decir que roto.
    En conclusión, este juego mejora algunos aspectos del juego del año anterior, pero la forma tan descarada en que Activision gana dinero de sus usuarios en este juego no me deja ponerle una mejor nota que "3".    … Expand
  7. StoryMaterial
    Nov 3, 2017
    10
    Amazing game that far surpasses my super high standards. Competitive multiplayer includes many features to work towards and the vast variety at display is outstanding. The new ideas within this game provides fresh gaming moments whether it be headquarters, the new war game mode or the numerous of other surprising additions. Lastly I can't wait for the ranked play season to begin and fromAmazing game that far surpasses my super high standards. Competitive multiplayer includes many features to work towards and the vast variety at display is outstanding. The new ideas within this game provides fresh gaming moments whether it be headquarters, the new war game mode or the numerous of other surprising additions. Lastly I can't wait for the ranked play season to begin and from what I hear ranked play is going to be done right just like this entire game!… Expand
  8. timefish576
    Nov 3, 2017
    0
    Single player seems fine, even if it is more of the same. I play COD for the multiplayer but this is a step backward (and I don't mean because its BOTG). This plays like it is Advanced Warfare (BOTG Edition). If I paid attention and saw that Sledgehammer was making this I would have rented before buying. I'm pretty sure they even used some of the same sounds from AW. So far for me itSingle player seems fine, even if it is more of the same. I play COD for the multiplayer but this is a step backward (and I don't mean because its BOTG). This plays like it is Advanced Warfare (BOTG Edition). If I paid attention and saw that Sledgehammer was making this I would have rented before buying. I'm pretty sure they even used some of the same sounds from AW. So far for me it is purely twitch gameplay which means you can't play smart. For most of the COD multiplayers I'm a 2.0 KD player. I like to outsmart people, not just out reflex them. Sniping is a joke, no point when a AR can pick you off across map. Shotguns are way to powerful (probably will be nerfed). Overall the movement and aiming feel floaty, like AW. I'll keep playing for now but I'll probably be going back to MW remastered soon. Please Please make a Modern Warfare 2 remaster!

    FWIW my top COD multiplayers:

    MW2
    Ghost (all the hate ruined the series IMO)
    MW3
    MW Remastered
    BO2    … Expand
  9. kinlopunim
    Nov 3, 2017
    2
    instead of being the trendsetter, Activision has forced CoD to just borrow what it liked from other shooters. it's mostly battlefield and rainbow six siege. frustratingly long load times also hinder enjoyment. the hub world is wholly unnecessary and is mostly just used for the loot box thing, (where other players can see what you get in the loot boxes). good visuals don't make up for badlyinstead of being the trendsetter, Activision has forced CoD to just borrow what it liked from other shooters. it's mostly battlefield and rainbow six siege. frustratingly long load times also hinder enjoyment. the hub world is wholly unnecessary and is mostly just used for the loot box thing, (where other players can see what you get in the loot boxes). good visuals don't make up for badly copied game mechanics.… Expand
  10. CommonSenseGuy
    Nov 3, 2017
    2
    I've only played this game for like 4 hours, but I've had to restart it about 20 times because I keep getting errors. I'm not a big COD fan, but I bought the game to play with a few friends. Meeting my expectations shouldn't have been difficult, but this experience has been worse than I could ever imagine. 80% of this game has been about actually trying to play it. The other 20% isI've only played this game for like 4 hours, but I've had to restart it about 20 times because I keep getting errors. I'm not a big COD fan, but I bought the game to play with a few friends. Meeting my expectations shouldn't have been difficult, but this experience has been worse than I could ever imagine. 80% of this game has been about actually trying to play it. The other 20% is actually playing the game. The game itself, when I can actually play it, isn't bad. I haven't touched the campaign because, like I mentioned before, I only bought this to play online multiplayer with my loved ones. I'm willing to change my review score if Sledgehammer can patch things up so I can actually play the game that I bought. I only ask that I can go 10 minutes without an error popping up. An error literally just showed up as I was typing this review. I'm not even joking. Kill me… Expand
  11. fr003ank
    Nov 3, 2017
    0
    They put the maps that are supposed to be in the base game in the first dlc which only leaves the base game with 10 MP maps including the bonus map, this is unacceptable for a COD game
  12. liamandjo
    Nov 3, 2017
    1
    Disappointment seems to under-describe it. The multiplayer is just rubbish compared to BF1 and, as my first COD purchase since the current gen consoles (having grown tired of paying for the same maps release after release), I am gob-smacked at how little COD has developed, If I want to pew-pew then Doom is so much better and more fluid. Stupid spawn points, tiny maps, not time to thinkDisappointment seems to under-describe it. The multiplayer is just rubbish compared to BF1 and, as my first COD purchase since the current gen consoles (having grown tired of paying for the same maps release after release), I am gob-smacked at how little COD has developed, If I want to pew-pew then Doom is so much better and more fluid. Stupid spawn points, tiny maps, not time to think just run around a corner and get blasted. Campaign mode is OK, hence the 1 point. But I doubt I will get back to it. And the graphics - seriously? I feel I am back on my PS3.… Expand
  13. Rafasempere
    Nov 3, 2017
    0
    Un auténtico engaño de juego a base de corta-pega de otros títulos de la saga. Coge cualquiera de los últimos CoD, quítale los saltos y las movidas futuristas y ponle una skin de la segunda guerra mundial. Ya tienes el CoD WW2.
    Armas sin retroceso alguno y totalmente descompensadas, texturas y animaciones tan simples que el Counter Strike le da un buen repaso. Los mapas multijugador son    Un auténtico engaño de juego a base de corta-pega de otros títulos de la saga. Coge cualquiera de los últimos CoD, quítale los saltos y las movidas futuristas y ponle una skin de la segunda guerra mundial. Ya tienes el CoD WW2.
    Armas sin retroceso alguno y totalmente descompensadas, texturas y animaciones tan simples que el Counter Strike le da un buen repaso. Los mapas multijugador son enanos, simples y monótonos diseñados para contentar a los niños rata en su carrera a ver quien es el primero en sacarse los prestigios.
    Haber pagado más de 60€ por semejante aberración me hace arrepentirme de haberlo comprado digital (si lo tuviera en físico ya lo tendría a la venta).
    El que quiera jugar a un fps con ambientación clásica que compre el Battlefield 1. Ya está bien de tanto engaño con la serie CoD. Nunca más.    … Expand
  14. ApexCryptLord
    Nov 3, 2017
    4
    I must say the story is really great, it has some great missions and it has some really great moments. But tbh. the multiplayer is still not good as the old ones. What is really disappointing. And i don't really know, why CoD has a MMO mod?
  15. Quijote
    Nov 3, 2017
    2
    Why the press is giving 85 to this crap? You irresponsible liars! You're lying to the poor people to buy this garbage. Once again we have the cruel politics who want to take all your money. All this practices are going to end the console industry. Did you see the boxes falling from the sky?
  16. whatever523
    Nov 3, 2017
    0
    Yay, lootboxes!

    You are paying for those extra profits with user ratings. I think you will find that in the long run, it's not worth it. Just ask Ubisoft.
  17. metasebii
    Nov 3, 2017
    3
    I'm a totally neutral FPS player and have enjoyed both COD and BF in the past. After playing BF1 for the last year or so, switching to this felt like playing a game from the 90s. There is simply no realism in the mechanics, the history, or even the sound effects. I felt zero immersion when playing this game. I was seriously hyped about this title, more than I have been about any other forI'm a totally neutral FPS player and have enjoyed both COD and BF in the past. After playing BF1 for the last year or so, switching to this felt like playing a game from the 90s. There is simply no realism in the mechanics, the history, or even the sound effects. I felt zero immersion when playing this game. I was seriously hyped about this title, more than I have been about any other for a long time, and I was severely disappointed. After playing the game both in campaign and online for a couple of hours, I am going to return it today.

    More than disappointing — this is just a bad game.    … Expand
  18. NRPostma
    Nov 3, 2017
    8
    Let's be clear. People giving this game below a 5 are pathetic reviewers. They can't imagine a perspective outside their own and let anger interfere with their judgment. The developers put loads of work into this game and it came out great, while not perfect, no COD ever is. The argument that it deserves a 0 or 1 because it is a twitch shooter is absurd. If you don't like twitch shootersLet's be clear. People giving this game below a 5 are pathetic reviewers. They can't imagine a perspective outside their own and let anger interfere with their judgment. The developers put loads of work into this game and it came out great, while not perfect, no COD ever is. The argument that it deserves a 0 or 1 because it is a twitch shooter is absurd. If you don't like twitch shooters that's fine, but understand lots of people love them. There are lots of amazing games that I hate to play because they are not my type! I don't go and review them as a 1 because they don't suit my taste, or because I'm bad at them. Yes, this is the millionth cod and they are all relatively similar. People complain they want something new. They get something new and complain they want old cod. Accept you guys can never be satisfied. It's not the games fault, you have just grown out of the series. When you start a new job, you may love it at first, but as the year's progress you will find complaints and issues with it even though its the same old job from before. COD games bring in BILLIONS of dollars for a reason. Overall, people cant stop playing, hating, and loving every moment of the games. Get a grip on your all or nothing opinion.… Expand
  19. Yunior
    Nov 3, 2017
    8
    SMH!!! People coming in here to give a bad review just because they suck at the game. People, the game is way better in all aspects than any previous COD game. Is it perfect?? No, it is not perfect. It still has many areas where it needs improvements. But it is way better and way more fun than any other COD. Don't listen to all the exo suit fanboys coming in here to give bad reviews.
  20. Vebshtar
    Nov 3, 2017
    6
    Call of Duty has been a complete failure for years now. Does WWII redeem the franchise? No, it doesn't. But it's a start.
    Graphics: 7/10. I've seen better.
    Gameplay: 8/10. Simple boots on the ground. I like it. Campaign: 7/10. I haven't finished it, but it's decent so far. Multiplayer: 7/10. I'm out of practice, but it's still fun. Historical Accuracy: 2/10. You'll see. Call of    Call of Duty has been a complete failure for years now. Does WWII redeem the franchise? No, it doesn't. But it's a start.
    Graphics: 7/10. I've seen better.
    Gameplay: 8/10. Simple boots on the ground. I like it.
    Campaign: 7/10. I haven't finished it, but it's decent so far.
    Multiplayer: 7/10. I'm out of practice, but it's still fun.
    Historical Accuracy: 2/10. You'll see.

    Call of Duty is like an Adam Sandler movie. I know I'm not getting the best, and parts of it may suck, but it's still fun.    … Expand
  21. Allthat
    Nov 3, 2017
    0
    This game is not a true return to the glory days of Call of Duty like everyone said it would be. Setting it during WW2 didn't really do much since it feels exactly like the last few CoD games. Micro-transactions and loot boxes never existed during CoD's true glory days, yet they play a huge role in this entry.

    There is a Destiny style social space that makes no sense. There's no benefit    This game is not a true return to the glory days of Call of Duty like everyone said it would be. Setting it during WW2 didn't really do much since it feels exactly like the last few CoD games. Micro-transactions and loot boxes never existed during CoD's true glory days, yet they play a huge role in this entry.

    There is a Destiny style social space that makes no sense. There's no benefit to having this feature apart from showing off to everyone what you get from loot boxes. This allows Activision to bank on other players jealousy and sell even more loot boxes.

    The historical inaccuracies are really insulting too. Red dot sights and hollow sights did not exist during WW2, soldiers weren't allowed to wear colorful uniforms yet this game allows you to buy weird skins that do fit warfare or even the time period, AND WHY ARE THERE BLACK NAZIS? This is insulting to black people. Nazis were openly racist and I wouldn't want to dress up as someone who committed major atrocities against my race.

    Swastikas are censored BTW. And you can play as female soldiers just as easily as male ones. SJWs have hit the gaming industry really hard.

    Not gonna talk about zombies cause I'm tired of shooting zombies. ENOUGH ZOMBIES.

    Campaign has a very good story and characters are interesting, but its too short. 6 hours is too little and this game was clearly developed multiplayer first with single-player as an afterthought. I won't be surprised when the day comes that CoD ships without a single player campaign.

    DONT BUY THIS. LETS CHANGE THE INDUSTRY WE LOVE. VOTE WITH YOUR WALLET.    … Expand
  22. Guilfred
    Nov 3, 2017
    0
    luck boxes en un cod? enserio, aparte de tener la campaña mas sosa y corta que e visto en un juego de la 2da guerra mundial, del asco, despues de todo eso entras al multijugador y llena de cheatters pff no recomiendo el juego, lo acabo de regresar en steam
  23. mrseannathan
    Nov 3, 2017
    5
    I will keep an open mind seeing as it hasn't even been 24 hours since launch.

    1. I expected a much better visual experience when playing online. Graphics feel like they were pulled from a COD 4 -5 years ago. 2. This social hub or whatever it is.. yes, i know it's obvious but damn, way to copy Destiny. I want my COD to be simple with the menus and everything the way it has been. 3.    I will keep an open mind seeing as it hasn't even been 24 hours since launch.

    1. I expected a much better visual experience when playing online. Graphics feel like they were pulled from a COD 4 -5 years ago.
    2. This social hub or whatever it is.. yes, i know it's obvious but damn, way to copy Destiny. I want my COD to be simple with the menus and everything the way it has been.
    3. LOADING TIMES.. HOEEEE LEEEEEEEEE (Holy!)... Even when leaving a match, i'm waiting ages until I can leave.

    I give this a 5/10 only because I am a long fan of Call of Duty and I will always love the series. Despite the poor execution, it still offers that appeal in a WW2 game... Especially now that they have added 'WAR', a mode perfected by Battlefield and one I have always wish to see in COD. There are some things that need to get fixed and I'm sure they will over the next couple days but in my eyes, it's failed on launch unlike the past releases.

    I'm a huge sucker for WW2 games but I have to say.. I miss the jumping, fast-paced gameplay COD evolved into.. and at this current moment, I can say I enjoyed IW way more that WWII.    … Expand
  24. leonardo2360
    Nov 3, 2017
    0
    este videojuego es el claro ejemplo de como esta la industria en estos momentos cajitas aleatorias cayendo del cielo, season pass, campaña cortisima, penoso de verdad no compren este juego no apoyen a estas compañias que quieren dividir la comunidad del videojuego por politicas de mierda.
  25. joseLuis1
    Nov 3, 2017
    0
    no lo recomiendo, las cajas con regalos caen del cielo (las cuales te sacan del video juego por completo), hay muertes ilimitadas, muy repetitivo y poco innovador, parece un casino de la segunda guerra mundial, muy decepcionado de esta entrega, espero que las próximas entregas mejoren.
  26. Blindsyde
    Nov 3, 2017
    0
    As I started playing the campaign , I felt like I did back in the good ol days of Call of Duty 2 , on the Xbox 360. The graphics and sound are top notch, the story is something familiar , but that’s not a bad thing for me. There’s something special about knowing that the experience you are playing through really happened. I haven’t played through the whole campaign , but I’m lookingAs I started playing the campaign , I felt like I did back in the good ol days of Call of Duty 2 , on the Xbox 360. The graphics and sound are top notch, the story is something familiar , but that’s not a bad thing for me. There’s something special about knowing that the experience you are playing through really happened. I haven’t played through the whole campaign , but I’m looking forward to getting back to it tonight.
    The zombies are darker, realer, creepier. Much better than the corny ones of the past.
    Multiplayer/pvp..... hmmm. I wanted to like it , but it’s definitely just another year of twitch shooting reskinned for the time frame. There are a few new things added, which are welcome additions. The new social hub , headquarters, is just like destinys “tower”,...which is a welcome addition to me. I like that they added the shooting range. War is an attempt at adding something new and fresh, but honestly I’d rather go play some Battlefield 1 for that fix. Battlefields pvp is in a league of its own, compared to this. I had a match last night where I was watching a replay of a final kill cam that showed some nonsensical quick scoping for kills that weren’t even CLOSE to being a hit. I tried to upload the capture to YouTube from my PS4 , but it keeps giving me errors and not letting me upload it. Good for Activision that I can’t get this footage out. They’d be embarrassed , lol.
    All in all, I really enjoy the campaign and zombies , but for my pvp fix there are newer , fresher things to play right now.    … Expand
  27. MKGamer
    Nov 3, 2017
    10
    1 hour ago I finished this game.It was a strange feeling.I wish it was never finished. I think the story is fantastic. I love that so much.It's very beautiful and emotional ... It was very magnificent. This is the best game of 2017...touched my heart.I wish it continued forever
  28. kingz261
    Nov 3, 2017
    5
    Okay so first off. This is the best Call of Duty campaign in roughly ten years. I personally think all of the campaigns since the first two have aged like **** but MW1, MW2, Blops, WAW, were all pretty fun campaigns when they came out. Call of Duty 1 and 2 have the best campaigns as they were made with primarily a PC focus and the campaigns were the main draw point to those two. Those twoOkay so first off. This is the best Call of Duty campaign in roughly ten years. I personally think all of the campaigns since the first two have aged like **** but MW1, MW2, Blops, WAW, were all pretty fun campaigns when they came out. Call of Duty 1 and 2 have the best campaigns as they were made with primarily a PC focus and the campaigns were the main draw point to those two. Those two are classics and this game definitely tries to recapture what made those so good. Its a pretty good campaign but very short (5 or 6 hours on hardened). The switch back to healthpacks instead of the regenerating bulls*** is a amazing choice here. So the campaign is great, whats wrong? Well the zombies is meh, not bad nor good. And the multiplayer.... Its still the same garbage tripe that the series has been pushing out the past few years. Advanced Warfare had one of the better multiplayer components in recent years and it still wasnt very good. This multiplayer is just bad, they took a lot of inspiration from the originals for the campaign but didnt do anything for the multiplayer. I do not understand how people still enjoy this after all these years and improvements from other series. Its the same garbage circular map design where its basically a matter of who sees who first with a focus on grinding so you can unlock the cheap a** weapons so you can mow down the lower level players who use pea shooters. Its the same unbalanced garbage that really requires very little skill and lots of bulls***. Its a shame because the campaign is one of the best in the series.

    Campaign = 7.8/10 (still very short which sucks and some bad on-rails sequences and QTEs)
    Multiplayer = 3/10 (very little good to be said about this)
    Zombies = 5/10 (nothing new really, just a horror atmosphere and its just boring.)
    Graphics = 9.2 (pretty damn good)
    Sound = 9.5 (COD always has fantastic sound design)

    Id say buy this used and beat the campaign then return it or get it on sale. The multiplayer is what really kills this game since its the main focus and its abysmal. But even though most of my review is negative, the campaign still deserves a lot of praise as a call of duty campaign since the past 5 have had absolute garbage campaigns.    … Expand
  29. mrcrunch08
    Nov 3, 2017
    3
    I don't get the hype and high reviews. Level layout in mp is pretty crap and controls are clunky. It feels like a big step back and oddly feels older and worse than cod remastered. The campaign is good and looks great but is short as usual. It's just the mp that is a huge let down. My guy constantly stops running for no reason resulting in my guy standing still or slowly walking into aI don't get the hype and high reviews. Level layout in mp is pretty crap and controls are clunky. It feels like a big step back and oddly feels older and worse than cod remastered. The campaign is good and looks great but is short as usual. It's just the mp that is a huge let down. My guy constantly stops running for no reason resulting in my guy standing still or slowly walking into a bullet. The majority of the maps seem to have no effort at all put in to them. It blows my mind that some people think this is better than infinite. There is nothing at all new or exciting here. Just a slow paced, clunky fps with mediocre mp. It doesn't even come close to cods of old and shouldn't even be allowed to sit on a shelf next to bf1.… Expand
  30. EvanGeistfeld
    Nov 3, 2017
    4
    The only thing that shines in the game is the Singleplayer. Hello Everyone and Welcome. I happened to get a lot of time in on the multiplayer and zombies, but for the singleplayer, well I could play that all day if I really wanted to. The graphics actually look realistic in the singleplayer more so than the multiplayer. This review though is only based on what I thought of the multiplayerThe only thing that shines in the game is the Singleplayer. Hello Everyone and Welcome. I happened to get a lot of time in on the multiplayer and zombies, but for the singleplayer, well I could play that all day if I really wanted to. The graphics actually look realistic in the singleplayer more so than the multiplayer. This review though is only based on what I thought of the multiplayer aspects and zombie mode. The multiplayer seems to be different for those who are used to jetpacks yatta yatta. We are heading back to WW2 and it feels nice for a change. I topped the leadboard on my first match with flame shotgun bullets. It was satisfying for sure. Although there is something that I do not like about this game, and it is the fact that they tried so hard to make this a game that would be played for hours on end, with amazing detail and what not. Unfortunately this game is not amazing and lacks a lot of graphical improvements and the optimization is just crap. I played on a 144hz monitor 2460 or 2K screen, with a 1080 graphics card and it didn't look all that great. The multiplayer is ok at best, but moving over to zombies, is just downright cringe worthy. The zombies look amazing art wise and their voices uncomfortable feeling which is great, but it just isn't as scary as we had hoped for the series. It has jump scares, but that is it. This Call of Duty, is by far an improvement for sure in some areas, but overall just isn't a game that I am interested diving more into. It was unfortunate because this was one of my anticipated game of this year, and it did not deliver to the hopes I thought it would bring.… Expand
  31. sargent
    Nov 3, 2017
    10
    This year we saw a very powerful headline. Both in terms of visual effects and personality in the narrative The best first-person shooter of the year ever since
  32. Seifer706
    Nov 3, 2017
    2
    This game is horrible. Literally the only redeeming quality is parts of the campaign but even then it is one of the shortest campaigns in CoD history and still does nothing compared to CoD4/MW2/WaW/BO1/BO2.

    The MP... good lord is it horrible... guns lack any authenticity and are completely reskins (Tommy gun is literally the ASM-1 of AW). Returning the moment I leave work.
  33. matinsareban
    Nov 3, 2017
    10
    Start playing with a very beautiful epic music, returning this series of games to their roots. Great sound when shooting and blasting, using cinematic characters ...
    call of duty ww2 is one of the best cod series
    is the best ...
  34. Dialex9
    Nov 3, 2017
    10
    Played CoD: WW2 yesterday and wow, if you are fan of zombies, well I gotta say you're gonna love it, based on screamers, terrifying zombies, excellent weapons, the graphics are just amazing, upcoming 4K patches for PS4 Pro and Xbox One X, the only bad thing yesterday was that I wasn't able to play with friends due to the servers, but right now you might be able to play online, but out ofPlayed CoD: WW2 yesterday and wow, if you are fan of zombies, well I gotta say you're gonna love it, based on screamers, terrifying zombies, excellent weapons, the graphics are just amazing, upcoming 4K patches for PS4 Pro and Xbox One X, the only bad thing yesterday was that I wasn't able to play with friends due to the servers, but right now you might be able to play online, but out of that, WW2 is breaking boundaries!… Expand
  35. CPD98
    Nov 3, 2017
    9
    La gente nunca está contenta al parecer. La campaña es una vuelta a las raíces de la saga con la jugabilidad de hoy en día, el multijugador es muy adictivo y la inclusión del CG es sensacional. El modo zombis recupera el encanto terrorífico de antaño. Una entrega muy recomendable.
  36. Lyvins
    Nov 3, 2017
    6
    the game itself is ok but not worth the price tag.
    To be fair this might look like WW2 but doesn't feel like it.
    I would honestly say save your money and buy battlefront 2. Atleast you got no season pass to buy and they changed the lootbox system so it's pretty much buy base and enjoy game now. This game is not a 8 or higher, nor is is a 5 or lower. but anyone giving it more are just    the game itself is ok but not worth the price tag.
    To be fair this might look like WW2 but doesn't feel like it.
    I would honestly say save your money and buy battlefront 2.
    Atleast you got no season pass to buy and they changed the lootbox system so it's pretty much buy base and enjoy game now.

    This game is not a 8 or higher, nor is is a 5 or lower. but anyone giving it more are just overreacting.    … Expand
  37. lakings78
    Nov 3, 2017
    1
    First time doing a metacritic review. Just going to speak my mind. I'm a 39 y/o gamer. The way the COD franchise has gone, has left me highly disappointed in a game series that used to be absolutely great. This whole twitch shooter crap is just garbage. There hasn't been a decent COD game since Black Ops One, and even then, that's where the series started to change for the worst.First time doing a metacritic review. Just going to speak my mind. I'm a 39 y/o gamer. The way the COD franchise has gone, has left me highly disappointed in a game series that used to be absolutely great. This whole twitch shooter crap is just garbage. There hasn't been a decent COD game since Black Ops One, and even then, that's where the series started to change for the worst. Even the remake of Modern Warfare has left little to be desired. Twitch shooters are not fun, just mindless running around. I really wanted to give this game a chance, as they promised going back to the roots. Well, they went back to the roots of Call of Duty on the surface only, that being a themed game in World War Two. That's the only thing. It is still a stupid, mindless twitch shooter. My first hour in, I was four matches into playing just regular Team Death Match and my soldier score was 16/45 with a KDR of .36. I don't seem to have that trouble on games like Battlefront or Battlefield. I do like the layout of the maps, lots of choke points, but the fact remains that this is a twitch shooter. The gameplay gets very tiresome very quickly. The last Call of Duty game I "bought' brand new was with my Xbox One and that was Ghosts. Ghosts was a better attempt to fix the last couple of releases prior to it, but still fell short. I vowed never to buy a COD game again. Yet the promises and hope that Activision finally drilled into the developers heads that the players wanted a solid COD game again, has fallen very short. It's the same rinse and repeat re-skinned twitch shooter. So now that I have wasted my money, I can say that I am officially DONE with this franchise. I will never purchase another COD game new. I didn't even buy the remastered Modern Warfare new because I had a feeling it was going to be trash, I bought it cheap on ebay and I recommend anyone wanting to give this game a chance to wait a while and do the same, get the game cheap on ebay as a re-sell and the company doesn't get the profit. OH, and if you thought the microtransactions of the last game were bad...wait until you see COD WW2's. Micro transactions everywhere. This is a trash game, save your money and continue to have faith in DICE and the Battlefield series...they for the most part listen to their customers and deliver a mostly solid game.… Expand
  38. Daikenkini
    Nov 3, 2017
    0
    A game purely defined by the conglomeration of each and every bad trend nowadays gaming industry currently has to offer - if you buy Call of Duty: WWII, not only do you give up your demands you should have as a customer for the publishers, you even reward them for patenting and abusing a shady transaction scheme that is purposely matching high-spenders with normal edition buyers so as toA game purely defined by the conglomeration of each and every bad trend nowadays gaming industry currently has to offer - if you buy Call of Duty: WWII, not only do you give up your demands you should have as a customer for the publishers, you even reward them for patenting and abusing a shady transaction scheme that is purposely matching high-spenders with normal edition buyers so as to get ALL players to spend money on loot boxes - yeah it's not only that. You will also be left completely disappointed with the game overall, which offers absolutely nothing new, and is not enjoyable whatsoever.… Expand
  39. b123blake
    Nov 3, 2017
    8
    Call of Duty: WW2 is, to be honest, a great game with few faults. With an amazing Campain, fun zombies mode (with a sweet horror factor that keeps the player on his or her edge the entire game), and of course a great multiplayer, Call of duty hasn't been this good since 2012. Also, don't even get me started on the fantastic soundtrack, sound effects, and graphics. This truly is a must-playCall of Duty: WW2 is, to be honest, a great game with few faults. With an amazing Campain, fun zombies mode (with a sweet horror factor that keeps the player on his or her edge the entire game), and of course a great multiplayer, Call of duty hasn't been this good since 2012. Also, don't even get me started on the fantastic soundtrack, sound effects, and graphics. This truly is a must-play in 2017-18.… Expand
  40. Superuser100
    Nov 3, 2017
    10
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This very good game good music very good graphic this 10 10 one say this good game who wrrite 0 this game bad, not play this game, realy this game very much… Expand
  41. Saeed9988
    Nov 3, 2017
    8
    Ok, first of all, why are people saying the game is "not authentic".Like they explained a billion times the campaign is the historically accurate part of the goddman game, not the multiplayer.And second of all, really, your complaining about micro transactions that do no bullsh*t to your weapon other than giving it a new look.Whatever, for me the game is good, but not the best.TheOk, first of all, why are people saying the game is "not authentic".Like they explained a billion times the campaign is the historically accurate part of the goddman game, not the multiplayer.And second of all, really, your complaining about micro transactions that do no bullsh*t to your weapon other than giving it a new look.Whatever, for me the game is good, but not the best.The campaign(The historically accurate part of the game)is actually good.The old health system is great, the idea of allies giving you supplies to help you is great and much more.My only complaint is that the idea of having to press the middle button on the ps4(Or the back button on XB1 and any button you chose for it on PC)so you can see where the objective is can be annoying,Also, it makes the game look black and white.Wow.Whatever, overall the campaign is good.The multiplayer is ok, but I have 3 complaints about the multiplayer.First of all, why 9 maps(War maps don't count)?Seriously, I think they should add more(Maybe when Carentan is free which I know it will).Second of all, a lot of the tasks so you can earn rewards in the HQ can be difficult.Third and finally, 3 war maps is small.They should've added like maybe 5.Overall, the multiplayer is better(Better than last year, but we don't talk about it).Finally, zombies.First of all, the mods are OP af.Anyways, the maps that they choose were ok.The main map(The Final Reich)is really great.It has good atmosphere and the time being at night really sets the atmosphere.However, it's complex.Shadows of evil complex.Then the second and least important map(Grousten haus, I think that's what it's called), which is really hard.Even harder than The Final Reich.The map is tight, there is no box, you only have 3 wall weapons and you only have the random blitz(Basically, the wundersphere)so you can have perks.Dont forget that there is no PAP.The map is really hard(I am good at zombies and I died on round 6)due to the amount of zombies that spawn and the tightness of the map.For me, this gamemode should never be played by new players.Overall, the game is good.I hope that Activision doesn't f*** with us again and add weapons(They will, I know they will).Well, whatever.If you disagree with me then it's fine.People have different opinions and I can respect that(Unless the reason is absolute bullsh*t).… Expand
  42. Edjin
    Nov 3, 2017
    0
    A game with promise and disappointment. More work should be done to figure out the core of what this franchise is, with the story being fun but way too short. Sure multiplayer is the focus, but more effort can be placed to put more action set pieces for story players. Multiplayer has not had much innovations in the last iterations of the franchise, it needs to figure out new and innovativeA game with promise and disappointment. More work should be done to figure out the core of what this franchise is, with the story being fun but way too short. Sure multiplayer is the focus, but more effort can be placed to put more action set pieces for story players. Multiplayer has not had much innovations in the last iterations of the franchise, it needs to figure out new and innovative ways for players to enjoy the game… Expand
  43. UhMing
    Nov 3, 2017
    1
    I'm only interested in campaign which was disappointing

    + Visually stunning.
    - Shortest CoD campaign ever.
    - Plot is scattered, unfinished, and feels truncated.
  44. Marionette64
    Nov 3, 2017
    8
    This call of duty just came out and people are already giving negative reviews! just give up!!! This is not infinite warfare, its not pay-to-win, its a good game, just stop! Unless you have played it, don't review it.
  45. javironcho
    Nov 3, 2017
    0
    The campaign is like 5 hours, it has no replayability at all, and the multiplayer fells like a very bad battlefield 1 team deathmatch clone, it is exactly the same game we got 10 years algo with a wwii reskin
  46. Devistator66
    Nov 3, 2017
    9
    Amazing Call of Duty experience and one you will definitely love. The game offers a fun campaign that doesn't last too long just like other entries in the franchise. The multiplayer is very fun especially if you are playing with your friends. The Nazi Zombies mode definitely delivers on the scare factor and it's overall action gameplay is spectacular! Sledgehammer delivered on what theyAmazing Call of Duty experience and one you will definitely love. The game offers a fun campaign that doesn't last too long just like other entries in the franchise. The multiplayer is very fun especially if you are playing with your friends. The Nazi Zombies mode definitely delivers on the scare factor and it's overall action gameplay is spectacular! Sledgehammer delivered on what they promised and gave us what we wanted. This game in my opinion deserves a solid 9/10 because there is always room for improvement but hopefully as the year goes on Sledgehammer will keep adding innovative content to this amazing game.… Expand
  47. nickae01
    Nov 3, 2017
    10
    With the game going back to WWII, of course people see it as a last resort or a way to profit. I feel it could be for this, but the game actually feels like real time and hard work were put into it. The story is a story again and not a jumbled together piece of action, zombies is an intense and real mode where you feel intimidated and excited at the same time while playing, and multiplayerWith the game going back to WWII, of course people see it as a last resort or a way to profit. I feel it could be for this, but the game actually feels like real time and hard work were put into it. The story is a story again and not a jumbled together piece of action, zombies is an intense and real mode where you feel intimidated and excited at the same time while playing, and multiplayer while still keeping elements from every game before, is still innovative and exciting. The new headquarters to me even though it is a rip off of the tower from Destiny still seems better than the tower, and I myself am a day 1 destiny player. The zombies mode especially to me shows much improvement and along with the story I think it's helped push cod into a better era than the boost jumping toddler fest we've all come to know.… Expand
  48. PrimalBanana
    Nov 3, 2017
    7
    Another year and another Call of Duty game. This time they've ditched the jetpacks and what not and gone back to their roots. CoD WW2 unsurprisingly takes place during WW2. Trailers shown before release had me actually looking forward to the campaign. In fairness its not terrible but its not exactly engrossing or exciting. We get to play through a story that we've played a thousand timesAnother year and another Call of Duty game. This time they've ditched the jetpacks and what not and gone back to their roots. CoD WW2 unsurprisingly takes place during WW2. Trailers shown before release had me actually looking forward to the campaign. In fairness its not terrible but its not exactly engrossing or exciting. We get to play through a story that we've played a thousand times before. Im struggling to really connect with the chatacters too. Mainly because squad mates are bloody useless in a fire fight leaving it up to me to do everything. The AI is as dim as ever and the dialogue is just a clichè fest. Like i said its not terrible but its certainly not worthy of anything over a 6 or 7 out of 10. The MP is as you'd expect. Solid and tight and raining loot crates. Activision go to extreme legths to try to convince you to part with your cash, its kind of embarassing to be honest. There's even a daily mission to watch 3 people open loot crates in the social space. Gunplay is good, sounds are good and the level design is overall pretty decent. Graphically Call of Duty continues to show its age and as i've said in the past its desperate for a new engine. Certainly a better Call of Duty than we've had in the last few years but its nothing special so dont expect too much except your normal Call of Duty experience.… Expand
  49. RaRaRa
    Nov 3, 2017
    8
    Don't listen to these reviews people are crying because of supply drops even though they aren't pay to win. Also most of these people haven't even played the game but give it a 1/10 anyway. Thank you for reading this and do yourself a favour and look at a different website.
  50. kqnqrdS
    Nov 3, 2017
    9
    + Perfect sound design.
    + Good campaign.
    + Very good Zombies Nazis mod.
    + Classic CoD in multiplayer with new game modes like War or HQ.
    + I play at 1440p 21:9 Ultra the game is beautiful with a good optimisation for me.

    -Some textures are blurred.
    -Certain accessories are not totally in adequacy with the theme of the game.
    -Some minor bugs that can be fix in an update.
  51. mrjackthereaper
    Nov 3, 2017
    4
    The Graphics is fine but not enough for a AAA FPS game.

    Characters's face sometime look like not match with the emotion of the voice-over. No chacracter in the game are memorable even the developer make flashback scenes. the gameplay is boring, repeat over and over. Stealth mode look like a joke for this game, maybe they want to copy wolfenstein 2 perharp. The AI is super    The Graphics is fine but not enough for a AAA FPS game.

    Characters's face sometime look like not match with the emotion of the voice-over.

    No chacracter in the game are memorable even the developer make flashback scenes.

    the gameplay is boring, repeat over and over. Stealth mode look like a joke for this game, maybe they want to copy wolfenstein 2 perharp.

    The AI is super stupid and dull some time even play in regular mode.

    The developer still focus too much on Multiplayer more than Singleplayer. Campaign is short and no replay valuable.

    Multiplayer mode is fine but feel like copy battlefield 1 concept in some point.

    NAZI Zombie mode is simply copy treyach-style, boring and no reason to enjoy this.

    Server are still not working sometime.

    My Score: 4/10.

    ANOTHER DISSAPOINTMENT FROM ACTIVITION.    … Expand
  52. gamer_za
    Nov 3, 2017
    10
    If you're a big Call of Duty fan like me, who has played since the early releases, then the chances are you have also been fed up with over-the-top futuristic additions in recent releases. WW2 removes all of this and takes it straight back to its roots - action that is more focused on gunplay, with an incredibly cinematic campaign. Its a breath of fresh air and everything you've wantedIf you're a big Call of Duty fan like me, who has played since the early releases, then the chances are you have also been fed up with over-the-top futuristic additions in recent releases. WW2 removes all of this and takes it straight back to its roots - action that is more focused on gunplay, with an incredibly cinematic campaign. Its a breath of fresh air and everything you've wanted Call of Duty to be for a while.

    I will not compare to other games (e.g. Battlefield), because they are different games, each fantastic in their own way. I personally prefer Call of Duty for fast-paced action, and WW2 is no different in that regard. Multiplayer matches kick in to sixth gear from the get-go, in beautifully crafted environments that will sometimes make you stop and appreciate the design work that has gone in.

    The usual formula that all prior games use is still here, so don't expect a massive change. There are micro-transactions available to purchase, but these are in no way vital to the experience, as WW2 is more about how well you can shoot than how well you can unlock. Most unlockables are aesthetic, so they will not make or break your ability.

    Zombies mode feels incredibly familiar, as there are few new additions to this mode. It does begin to feel like a chore, and there isn't huge replayability in it. The included map is huge, although it would be great if we were given more zombies maps to choose from - even something simple like the survival maps from BO2 (town and farm). That being said it is still a lot of fun, and why change a winning formula?

    Many reviews on Metacritic seem very biased and thats because everybody has preferences. If you have been with the franchise for a long time like me, you most certainly won't be disappointed - this is the COD you've been waiting for for a long time.

    Rating the three categories:
    Campaign - 10/10
    Multiplayer - 10/10
    Zombies - 8/10

    Overall: 10/10    … Expand
  53. dannija96
    Nov 3, 2017
    5
    A game with promise and disappointment. More work should be done to figure out the core of what this franchise is, with the story being fun but way too short. Sure multiplayer is the focus, but more effort can be placed to put more action set pieces for story players. Multiplayer has not had much innovations in the last iterations of the franchise, it needs to figure out new and innovativeA game with promise and disappointment. More work should be done to figure out the core of what this franchise is, with the story being fun but way too short. Sure multiplayer is the focus, but more effort can be placed to put more action set pieces for story players. Multiplayer has not had much innovations in the last iterations of the franchise, it needs to figure out new and innovative ways for players to enjoy the game.… Expand
  54. rezagtx
    Nov 3, 2017
    10
    تا دیروز میگفتن فضایی شده و فلان شده و ... حالا نه انگا امریکایی ها فضایی دوست ندارن از مذخرفات استاروارز و استارترک! همون قسمت ها قبلیهم عالی بودند و نمراتشون مشخصه- اصلا این کاربرها خودشون هم نمیدونن چی میخوان.. حالا که اومده کلاسیک شده نه خوب نیست برگردیم همون قبل-برید بمیرید بتمرگید ول کنید بازی رو .تا دیروز میگفتن فضایی شده و فلان شده و ... حالا نه انگا امریکایی ها فضایی دوست ندارن از مذخرفات استاروارز و استارترک! همون قسمت ها قبلیهم عالی بودند و نمراتشون مشخصه- اصلا این کاربرها خودشون هم نمیدونن چی میخوان.. حالا که اومده کلاسیک شده نه خوب نیست برگردیم همون قبل-برید بمیرید بتمرگید ول کنید بازی رو .
  55. agent13
    Nov 3, 2017
    8
    Most of the critics have given the right score to this game, like advanced warfare, sledgehammer games has been successful in making a good and memorable campaign that you would play more than once but i wish it was longer. But regarding multiplayer, ww2 is somehow disappointing micro transaction ruins the balance of multiplayer mode still battlefield gives you a much better multiplayerMost of the critics have given the right score to this game, like advanced warfare, sledgehammer games has been successful in making a good and memorable campaign that you would play more than once but i wish it was longer. But regarding multiplayer, ww2 is somehow disappointing micro transaction ruins the balance of multiplayer mode still battlefield gives you a much better multiplayer experience but i don't really care about online mode i think the soul and the most important part of a game is it's story and ww2 has a good one.
    I don't have any comments about zombies mode since i don't like zombie games.
    There is something that nobody has mentioned about this game and it's the name, they could be much more creative about naming the game world war 2 sounds like this is the second game of a series but it's not.    … Expand
  56. DlO-BRANDO
    Nov 3, 2017
    8
    This game is definitly a huge step forward compared to Infinite Warfare, the graphics look nice, the gameplay is tight, and the zombies mode is scary as hell. Didn't play the single player yet but i will do that after writing this review. The game is good.
  57. gameofrasht
    Nov 3, 2017
    10
    call of duty ww2 is one of the best cod series
    ww2 have good zombie and perfect modes in multi player and good story with lovely weapons of world war 2
    tnx activision
  58. SoakerCity
    Nov 3, 2017
    1
    This game is the culmination of every bad video game trend in the last decade.

    Its a **** twitch shooter, that totally misses the point of the subject matter. If you like respawning, dying, dying, dying, flukey kill, what happened there, dying, dying, dying, wtf, really?!?, dying, dying, ughhhhh... this has the pacing of a Virtual AI machines meet and fight in nanoseconds-but    This game is the culmination of every bad video game trend in the last decade.

    Its a **** twitch shooter, that totally misses the point of the subject matter.

    If you like respawning, dying, dying, dying, flukey kill, what happened there, dying, dying, dying, wtf, really?!?, dying, dying, ughhhhh... this has the pacing of a Virtual AI machines meet and fight in nanoseconds-but ATTACHED TO THE GODDAMN SECOND WORLD WAR...

    It makes no sense. It isn't fun. Its packed with super-honed COD players that treat WW2 like Quake. Its just gross. And the extra money-grabs are just the icing. Avoid this game, its a waste of time. you could be playing something fun. This is a serious setback for Activision. Worst game I've played in years. Its like forcing long-time fans to fight like dogs. Unelegant. Crass. Tampered-with. Admit it, you played this game and it WASN'T fun. I'd rather play Counterstrike, Battlefront, checkers, with myself, ANYTHING is more fun than this. 2/10, because nice single player...sorta. Crashed 4 times on me on PS4 before I got to "play". TWITCH SHOOTERS CANT BE WW2 SHOOTERS!    … Expand
  59. ahmadgoly
    Nov 3, 2017
    10
    عالی بود واقعا. یکی از بهترین کال هایی که اومده. واقعا بازگشت داده به ریشه ها. فوق العاده بود. بی نظیر و صد البته ترسناک و خوف انگیز.
  60. ocelotx
    Nov 3, 2017
    10
    it's just the best that was with the franchise for the last time. in all seriousness I urge everyone to play in single-player campaign , is just gorgeous. the graphics are excellent , sound is good, I'm just excited for this game
  61. PAYAMFURY
    Nov 3, 2017
    10
    بازی شاهکاریه هم از نظر گرافیک و هم از نظر داستان . بخش زامبی هم خیلی ترسناک و پیشرفت کرده چون اسلج همر توی بازی های deadspace همکاری داشتهویک بخش زامبی عالی آورده.میریم سراغ بخش چندنفره که با داشتن چند حالت جدید پیشرفت زیادی داشته و به دوران اوج خود رسیده.بازی شاهکاریه هم از نظر گرافیک و هم از نظر داستان . بخش زامبی هم خیلی ترسناک و پیشرفت کرده چون اسلج همر توی بازی های deadspace همکاری داشتهویک بخش زامبی عالی آورده.میریم سراغ بخش چندنفره که با داشتن چند حالت جدید پیشرفت زیادی داشته و به دوران اوج خود رسیده.
  62. carpetad
    Nov 3, 2017
    10
    Start playing with a very beautiful epic music, returning this series of games to their roots. Great sound when shooting and blasting, using cinematic characters ...
    But in some cases, such as explosion and dispersal of dust, there is still a problem. Enemies have low artificial intelligence.
next
Page:

Awards & Rankings

82
#82 Best PS4 Game of 2017
9
#9 Most Discussed PS4 Game of 2017
9
#9 Most Shared PS4 Game of 2017

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
79

Generally favorable reviews - based on 83 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 62 out of 83
  2. Mixed: 21 out of 83
  3. Negative: 0 out of 83
  1. CD-Action
    Jan 10, 2018
    70
    I really wanted CoD’s return to World War II to be something more than a solid game – but it’s not. I couldn’t shake the feeling that I’ve already seen all this, that the developers (or perhaps the publisher) chose to create something as safe as possible. There’s just one campaign mission that surprised me with its scale, the rest is just a disappointing “best of Call of Duty”. The multiplayer is as good as usual, but it was infused with unnecessary systems resembling mobile titles, e.g spending in-game currency on pointless tasks of the “kill 100 enemies” variety. Missions that make you watch other players open their loot boxes are the pinnacle of absurdity. [13/2017, p.64]
  2. The Digital Fix
    Dec 22, 2017
    70
    A solid return to its roots, Call of Duty WWII reminds us what made us all fall in love Call of Duty in the first place. It ticks all the boxes which is both a blessing and a curse. Good fun and worth your time but offers nothing exceptional.
    Read full review
  3. Playstation Official Magazine UK
    Dec 15, 2017
    90
    Revitalised and exemplary FPS gaming. Multiplayer trims back to the essentials, campaign shows sensitivity and Zombies...well it's a new excuse to play CoD Zombies. [Christmas 2017, p.77]
See all critic reviews »