Call of Duty: WWII

 PlayStation 4
User Score
5.1

Mixed or average reviews- based on 2065 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 718 out of 2065
  2. Mixed: 482 out of 2065
  3. Negative: 865 out of 2065
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. merengueti
    Nov 8, 2017
    1
    la verdad que el juego es un copia pega con algunas texturas cambiadas y poco mas, aparte el sistema de loot que la gente no quiere, lo han implementado para intentar engachar a la gente a los micropagos con sus politicas abusivas. te has lucido activision
  2. lufuxe
    Nov 8, 2017
    7
    Graphics: from the last parts there is a step forward, but if you peer into the textures, everything is bad ..
    Physics: bad, so is the physics of weapons .. they simply do not have ..
    Plot: I liked it
    That's why 7 points
  3. McEmow
    Nov 8, 2017
    0
    A full priced game with Free-to-play lootbox elements? Rewarding players in watching others opening lootboxes??? Are you kidding me? What is this nonsense. 1/10.
    Same old COD with a WW2 skin. The headquarter only exists for lootbox purpose. Nothing more.
  4. evani
    Nov 8, 2017
    3
    if you care at all about multiplayer then do not buy this cod, 9 maps 4 of which are decent the rest are average at best! the game play is also terrible combined with minimal gun management and perk customization, possibly the worst CoD MP i have ever played.
  5. Tenacidad963
    Nov 7, 2017
    0
    Este Call Of Duty es una burla a la inteligencia, puede tener en algunas partes buenos gráficos y pocos momentos buenos que contentan a los que no piden mucho a un juego. Sin embargo, malogran un hecho histórico muy importante al ponerle cajas de micropagos. Eliminan un momento que debería ser épico por ponerle en la cara al jugador su mala praxis de vender ítems que te ayudan, pero seEste Call Of Duty es una burla a la inteligencia, puede tener en algunas partes buenos gráficos y pocos momentos buenos que contentan a los que no piden mucho a un juego. Sin embargo, malogran un hecho histórico muy importante al ponerle cajas de micropagos. Eliminan un momento que debería ser épico por ponerle en la cara al jugador su mala praxis de vender ítems que te ayudan, pero se pierde el aspecto de inmersión. A pesar de tener gráficos actuales se ve como si fuera para niños. Entonces te das cuenta de que te subestiman como jugador, independientemente de que si ya has jugado a otros Call Of Duty´s. La campaña dura poco de entre 5 o 6 horas, el multijugador parece que le han puesto mucho entusiasmo parece que creen que el jugador es conformista y fácil de manejar.

    In English
    This Call Of Duty is a mockery to the intelligence, it can have in some parts good graphics and few good moments that please those who do not ask much for a game. However, they spoil a very important historical fact by putting boxes of micropayments. Eliminate a moment that should be epic for putting in the face of the player his bad practice of selling items that help you, but you lose the immersive aspect. Despite having current graphics it looks as if it were for children. Then you realize that they underestimate you as a player, regardless of whether you have already played other Call Of Duty's. The campaign lasts little between 5 or 6 hours, the multiplayer seems to have put a lot of enthusiasm seems to believe that the player is conformist and easy to handle.    … Expand
  6. Termin8ter
    Nov 7, 2017
    7
    Another year, another Call of Duty game. First off, the engine still needs to be rebuilt completely or shot on the spot, ok? Still using the Quake engine from 99? Really? The art team did a good job though. The gameplay still feels the same as it did ten years ago in Call of Duty 4, despite the massive change in setting. The campaign is quite good, quite lengthy as well. Better thanAnother year, another Call of Duty game. First off, the engine still needs to be rebuilt completely or shot on the spot, ok? Still using the Quake engine from 99? Really? The art team did a good job though. The gameplay still feels the same as it did ten years ago in Call of Duty 4, despite the massive change in setting. The campaign is quite good, quite lengthy as well. Better than Infinite Borefare and BO3's overly complicated plot. It's just a slimmed down, grounded war experience, and that I like. The multiplayer is mostly a very samey Call of Duty multiplayer experience that we have gotten since Modern Warfare, aside from the great new War mode, which is a fantastic addition. But it unfortunately doesn't quite save the multiplayer mode. Zombies. Sledgehammer's last crack at Zombies in AW only proved that only Treyarch could nail it correctly, so I was hoping they could save face here. I like how the mode feels like it's own beast and not a clone of BO3 zombies. The tone is very serious and mature, and that ascends the overly humorous tone of IW's zombies, which is great too. The gunplay itself is quite good, and I liked how the team opted for a proper campaign with horde sections, rather than repeating Treyarch's zombies mode. To be honest, the zombies is probably the best part of World War II. This game is definitely better than Destiny 2, and takes some strong strides in the right direction, but It doesn't earn a purchase at full price. I wouldn't get it for more than 15$.… Expand
  7. WeatherfordJac
    Nov 7, 2017
    0
    Lootboxes? Oh boy! I can't wait to feel like I'm playing on a crap phone game! Plus, the gameplay is lackluster and the story, as usual, is short and boring.
  8. BorderlineBunk
    Nov 7, 2017
    4
    I gave this game a 4 for the passable campaign and the barely adequate zombies mode, but GOD is multiplayer trash. I feel like I'm constantly playing this game in a state of lag where it feels like the same 4 bullets to kill take half the time for my enemies than it takes me. Its likely a result of their garbage peer to peer connectivity COD insists on implementing every game when gamesI gave this game a 4 for the passable campaign and the barely adequate zombies mode, but GOD is multiplayer trash. I feel like I'm constantly playing this game in a state of lag where it feels like the same 4 bullets to kill take half the time for my enemies than it takes me. Its likely a result of their garbage peer to peer connectivity COD insists on implementing every game when games like BF1 are just burying them in quality. This isn't even a Battlefield fanboy over here. I've been with COD since COD 2, but its blatantly obvious that they don't care about making a fun UNIQUE experience anymore and its just about **** on this years version of another subpar game. God just give up COD this is the nail in the coffin of the series for me. So done with their ****… Expand
  9. xCxJ
    Nov 7, 2017
    8
    WW2 Isn't a perfect game by any means but it has it's moments, graphics are really good, at least on the Pro. The single player campaign isn't anything spectacular but it's actually really decent for a CoD game, it definitely has it's moments and it can be challenging at times. It's a campaign that I personally could go back to and play it again. When it comes to the multiplayer, well,WW2 Isn't a perfect game by any means but it has it's moments, graphics are really good, at least on the Pro. The single player campaign isn't anything spectacular but it's actually really decent for a CoD game, it definitely has it's moments and it can be challenging at times. It's a campaign that I personally could go back to and play it again. When it comes to the multiplayer, well, it's just another CoD game, if you like CoD multiplayer then you'll like the multiplayer in WW2. The HQ is an interesting choice, it's really cool other than the fact that you can watch people opening loot boxes that fall from the sky...Overall, WW2 is a welcomed change compared to the past couple of years and I would recommend it to anyone who's a CoD fan and anyone who hasn't played any CoD games before but would like to get into the world of CoD, it's a good starting point. In my honest opinion and as someone who prefers Battlefield I will gladly give WW2 an 8.5/10… Expand
  10. SeptemberFly
    Nov 7, 2017
    7
    Call of Duty World War 2 is, well... It's a Call of Duty game. I haven't played a call of duty game since black ops 2, so it's been a good bit since I've played one of these games so this review is coming from someone with an outside perspective. Playing this game after a long break from the series, it still feels very much the same as when I stopped playing the series. The changes inCall of Duty World War 2 is, well... It's a Call of Duty game. I haven't played a call of duty game since black ops 2, so it's been a good bit since I've played one of these games so this review is coming from someone with an outside perspective. Playing this game after a long break from the series, it still feels very much the same as when I stopped playing the series. The changes in multiplayer feel very minor, as the experience felt about the same to me as it has always been. The only changes to multiplayer that I really noticed is that there's a hub area in multiplayer that you're in before going into a match and that transitioning to new matches feels a lot more seamless than it used to. However, the changes that were made are probably feel a lot more important to a hardcore call of duty fan than it was to me. The zombies mode in the game is very fun to play with friends. I didn't play too much of it, but the time I had with it was fun and I was surprised that they actually made a campaign out of it. The strongest part of Call of Duty WW2 to me was the main campaign. It feels like the Call of Duty campaigns fly under the radar, which I've always felt is unfortunate. Strange as it may sound, I think that the Call of Duty campaigns can be compared to the Marvel films. They feel like pretty standard cookie cutter stories that always play it pretty safe, but the experience is usually a good time and has characters you can feel attached to. Call of Duty WW2 uses this format as well, and it's probably one of the best campaigns in the entire series. It gives off a Saving Private Ryan kind of vibe, and includes many characters that you actually become attached to and care about what happens to them. The main protagonist Robert "Red" Daniels is one of the more interesting characters, who has a good backstory and his chemistry with the rest of the cast helps make the story remain engaging. Overall, Call of Duty WW2 feels like the same Call of Duty that we've always known it to be. The multiplayer feels the same as it did when I played it many years ago, as does almost every other area. If you are a Call of Duty fan who plays the game every year, you won't need my recommendation because Call of Duty fans will buy the game no matter what. As for other outsiders to the series like myself, I'd recommend either renting the game or waiting for the price to drop just to play the campaign or zombie mode, but I wouldn't pay full price for it.… Expand
  11. Vermelho_
    Nov 7, 2017
    10
    Played the whole single-player campaign, completed first easter egg in zombies, and level 40 in multiplayer. I Have enough to say that this game is quite perfect. The graphics for the previous CODs is nice, gameplay bringing the good old days back, and with changes so it doesn't get boring. I really don't know why people are hating this game but it sure made up to my expectations. For me,Played the whole single-player campaign, completed first easter egg in zombies, and level 40 in multiplayer. I Have enough to say that this game is quite perfect. The graphics for the previous CODs is nice, gameplay bringing the good old days back, and with changes so it doesn't get boring. I really don't know why people are hating this game but it sure made up to my expectations. For me, the best CODs ever were BO1, WaW, MWs. Is good to be back to a promising game.… Expand
  12. Xalon
    Nov 7, 2017
    1
    They screwed up the launch. That's unacceptable in the modern era, where this should be easily anticipated as these launches happen with regularity. Also, the game is horribly inaccurate. The guns are wrong and used by the wrong groups at the wrong times. There's heavy censorship. The characters are unlikable. The mechanics are annoying. WTF was I thinking giving another COD game aThey screwed up the launch. That's unacceptable in the modern era, where this should be easily anticipated as these launches happen with regularity. Also, the game is horribly inaccurate. The guns are wrong and used by the wrong groups at the wrong times. There's heavy censorship. The characters are unlikable. The mechanics are annoying. WTF was I thinking giving another COD game a chance? Pass on this at all costs.… Expand
  13. aaronaccidently
    Nov 7, 2017
    6
    How this game garners 8 and 9/10 scores is insane, and unless COD gets special handicap treatment for being such a heavyweight in game titles, it is not an accurate grade for the quality of this game.

    I was excited for COD WWII because I read it had team members from the original Deadspace, and the last COD WWII game, World at War was pretty good. I played through the first level,    How this game garners 8 and 9/10 scores is insane, and unless COD gets special handicap treatment for being such a heavyweight in game titles, it is not an accurate grade for the quality of this game.

    I was excited for COD WWII because I read it had team members from the original Deadspace, and the last COD WWII game, World at War was pretty good.

    I played through the first level, the D-day landing and it was okay, but no better than Allied Assault on PC a decade ago. As a historical shooter goes, Battlefield 1 is superior in every way. The Zombie mode is okay, but it's the same old same old deal. If you were expecting anything new or different...

    This is the best COD game I've played since the first Modern Warfare, but it still seems like a rushed/cheap wannabe triple a game. Considering it's nearly 2018, this game feels like it's a couple years old. I had no interest in multiplayer, so I didn't try it. Immediately swapped it in for Wolfenstien 2, which I hope is better.    … Expand
  14. AAT
    Nov 7, 2017
    0
    Multiplayer is not even close to history. COD still (for a 10+ years) doesn't have any dedicated servers. Still same old stupid multiplayer mechanic. Nothing new to me.
  15. fakkel
    Nov 7, 2017
    0
    Worse Cod game ever! Multiplayer= head glitching, Shoot first die first, Weapons with now weight behind them, poorly designed maps made for campers. GG well played
  16. PolleDK
    Nov 7, 2017
    3
    Once again the Cod franchise disappoints.....
    the game has amazing graphics and starts out really awesome, but after some short time the game just keeps coming up with RANDOM encounter of German soldiers that fight to the dead the 1 sec and surrender the next. the first mission has more action packed in the whole mission than the whole game of Modern warfare 2 and it makes it dull.. and    Once again the Cod franchise disappoints.....
    the game has amazing graphics and starts out really awesome, but after some short time the game just keeps coming up with RANDOM encounter of German soldiers that fight to the dead the 1 sec and surrender the next. the first mission has more action packed in the whole mission than the whole game of Modern warfare 2 and it makes it dull.. and to make it a lot worse the main story Glorifies the American Perverted vision on themselves in WW 2
    And whats up with all this STRONG independent Woman in games now a days!??! i can understand the women in the resistance but in the British special forces??? give me a break from all this feminist ****    … Expand
  17. EJSC_pt
    Nov 7, 2017
    9
    Best Call of Duty I ever played.

    The game is very gun-skill based, unlike the previous versions. It rewards the player with better aim on close quarters gunfights. If you don´t have reflexes or good aim you will not kill your enemy. And that is how a shooter should be, just like Quake. Most of the users hating on the game, are just doing it because they are either bad players or    Best Call of Duty I ever played.

    The game is very gun-skill based, unlike the previous versions.

    It rewards the player with better aim on close quarters gunfights. If you don´t have reflexes or good aim you will not kill your enemy. And that is how a shooter should be, just like Quake.

    Most of the users hating on the game, are just doing it because they are either bad players or they hate cod overall and like to contribute for a low score user rating.

    The numbers don´t lie, this is the best selling CoD ever on launch already, on console, and the most played CoD on PC ever. There is a reason for that. The game is good, skilled. If you´re not good at it, you will not like it. You can go back to casual and slow Battlefield or Pubg for a different experience.    … Expand
  18. c9sasza
    Nov 7, 2017
    0
    Lootboxes and trailer from dlc map before game come out? I must say no i sold this after beat campain in 5 hours.Zombie is good but you buy season pass other way you got only one map
  19. BlakDak666
    Nov 6, 2017
    4
    Call of Duty has been a series that has struggled to stay relevant in recent years due to a shift in the futuristic styles that people have come to dislike and loathe. As a player to the franchise since COD4 and playing pretty much every COD since, I have absolute confidence in saying that this game is hot garbage and if this is the direction and attitude it has chosen, then I am trulyCall of Duty has been a series that has struggled to stay relevant in recent years due to a shift in the futuristic styles that people have come to dislike and loathe. As a player to the franchise since COD4 and playing pretty much every COD since, I have absolute confidence in saying that this game is hot garbage and if this is the direction and attitude it has chosen, then I am truly done with this series for good. I will breakdown the campaign, multiplayer and zombies and give my thoughts on them:

    Campaign - This is easily one of the worst COD campaigns and maybe even worse campaigns as a whole to a game I have ever played. Maybe this is because I'm a history major and researching WW2 as a teen but this genuine trash. The narrative struggles to be either a Band of Brothers style or a over the top action film you'd see from Michael Bay, with explosions and scenes of "loud explosion following ears ringing and dude pulling you on your feet" scattered in too many times. The characters are mostly cardboard cutouts that have no real personality, depth or weight to the situation and their abilities you use in combat are more frustrating and gimmicky than satisfying. The mission variety is typical COD design: boring shooting galleries of killing scores of people with little to no reaction, QTEs and gimmicky additions like tank and plane escorts that don't bring out the full potential it should. The authenticity of WW2 is pretty much trashed; it takes place in 1944-1945, which is invalidating most of the war (in which the first three CODs and World at War did correctly), the Allied forces are largely set aside for the American v.s. Nazis clash and more as gimmicky tokenism of cultures that disrespect their service (despite the opening clearly stating over 50 countries fought and left 65 million dead), characters don't act realistic to the situation, hitmarkers, retreading the same exact structure as other CODs before it. The climax and ending was forced and tonally out of place. It's trash and deserves no love and only scorn. I don't care that people only buy it for the multiplayer; if you put something in your game you want those players to play that in their game. Case closed. 3/10

    Multiplayer- Standard COD multiplayer with a WW2 skin. It wasn't like COD 2 or 3 had great multiplayers anyways, it was COD 4 that put COD on the map in the first place. The game modes are still the same, the division system is pointless as you can pick any gun you want anyways, war mode is weak on operations, the inclusion of PC friendly race and gender options instantly destroys any authenticity this game claims to have, a **** hub world copy and paste from Destiny, loot boxes that fall from the sky and promote gambling and skinner box mentality that is abhorrent and should be scorned deeply. I suppose if you play with friends there can be some fun to be had and it feels more grounded compared to the last entries, but it doesn't do anything new that is concerning and by my fifth match I was already bored and wanted to play something else. Also add connectivity issues at launch and you got a fine example of a rushed product. 4/10

    Zombies- Usually my favorite mode COD ever has and in some ways is the best to date. I like some of the changes made to the design of the game, but I unfortunately couldn't help to feel that it is too easy (as a vet of zombies since 2008). The characters aren't interesting and boring; their constant breathing and gasping becomes grating and annoying after awhile. The zombies themselves lose their dark charm quickly and their voicework makes them goofier than what should be (since I thought this was going to be a far more edgier zombies). Loot boxes in this mode is pointless and extremely ****. With it being easy and being able to get to high rounds with little challenge, I honestly felt bored and wall guns are just powerful as mystery box guns, completely making it pointless to use. The most disappointing part is each past zombies game (WAW and the Black Op series) had ideas that never got here despite being worth the inclusion. The human like models of WAW, the extra maps from BO1, the passive perks you get and the bank system in BO2 and gumballs in BO3 all could have been in this game, but isnt. The single map at launch is insulting and even with friends it can only last so long before you get bored. Decent overall. 6/10

    The game will have microtransactions, has a season pass and generally feels like 'another Call of Duty', no matter if it returns to its roots or not. I am sick and tired of this series, the greed behind it and the stupid masses (myself included) who buy these games anymore and pass it off as dudebro topics. I gave COD a chance and after a decade, it's time to throw in the towel for any hope for the series. COD definitely has found its roots, but to grow a big nasty parasite of a plant instead of the hopeful tree of originality and charm. 4/10 overall. DO NOT BUY THIS GAME.    … Expand
  20. tetetoto
    Nov 6, 2017
    10
    all time best blockbuster came back ! It's perfect resurrection of old school. Must play for WW2 lovers. Wish to ask Cons is there other FPS game instead of this.
  21. sityoazzdown
    Nov 6, 2017
    8
    After the abomination that was infinite warfare, I had little hype for this game ( I also bought this game accidentally on psn). But I must say after beating the campaign and putting in 5 hours into the multiplayer I can say this game is good. The campaign is amazing and easily a 9/10 for me. The gunplay is great, the journey (story) and pacing/variety in the campaign is amazing. TheAfter the abomination that was infinite warfare, I had little hype for this game ( I also bought this game accidentally on psn). But I must say after beating the campaign and putting in 5 hours into the multiplayer I can say this game is good. The campaign is amazing and easily a 9/10 for me. The gunplay is great, the journey (story) and pacing/variety in the campaign is amazing. The characters are believable and likeable and for some reason the graphics in the campaign is amazing, whilst the multiplayer looks last gen. I like how we switched between characters (kinda like gta 5) depending on the circumstances; and the surprise and smile on my face when we got to fight in the skies was great. It also has amazing blockbuster driving sequences and explosive sequences that are really fresh and jaw-dropping. I can't like and recommend this campaign enough. Fun diverse gameplay, captivating journey, amazing cutscenes; campaign is definately a 9/10. Now the multiplayer is serviceable but it's only serviceable because they slapped a COD on it. Maps are a **** which promotes camping, 80% of it's map are too small and feel like mazes. The divisions are a disappointment and takes away player freedom. Guns feel/look/ sound too similar too each other. Typical COD playlist. Positives on multiplayer: will be dominated by veterans, more tactical and not as much run and gun, is satisfying when you're on a killstreak. Multiplayer was ok for me and is a generous 6/10. In a nutshell I want to say buy/rent (if you want) for the campaign and treat the serviceable mp as a treat. However if you're buying COD just for multiplayer I would advise skip it, (well it depends what type of gamer you are, definitely skip if you want 100 hours into mp type of game, as I feel this MP will grow stale quick.)… Expand
  22. Peptide
    Nov 6, 2017
    9
    Lets get one thing clear....more than 75% of all the negative reviews are from trolls. Most of the remainder are Mario gamers who do not like CoD anyway.
    This game is awesome. Its fun to play. There is a lot of variety in the MP part. Between the MP, Zombies, and the campaign, there is an enormous amount of polished content for the price. I'll take this over Destiny or Overwatch or    Lets get one thing clear....more than 75% of all the negative reviews are from trolls. Most of the remainder are Mario gamers who do not like CoD anyway.
    This game is awesome. Its fun to play. There is a lot of variety in the MP part. Between the MP, Zombies, and the campaign, there is an enormous amount of polished content for the price. I'll take this over Destiny or Overwatch or any BF game anyday. And the campaign is fantastic.    … Expand
  23. The_XIII
    Nov 6, 2017
    6
    The game is far from perfect, and honestly not that enjoyable in the long rung. But you know what's hilarious? Reading these severly autistic kids crying about black women in videogames.
  24. id_archer
    Nov 6, 2017
    4
    графоний растворился в мыльце...(( и чуство что я в это уже играл не как не покидает меня
  25. thaesino
    Nov 6, 2017
    7
    (Disclaimer: I will not comment on microstransactions, nor take that into account when reviewing this game, as it is our fault, the gamers, that these publishers have gotten away with such things. Placing a bad rating on the Developers' hard work due to the greed of the Publishers and the ignorance of the Players, would not do justice to any of the many AAA titles riddled with(Disclaimer: I will not comment on microstransactions, nor take that into account when reviewing this game, as it is our fault, the gamers, that these publishers have gotten away with such things. Placing a bad rating on the Developers' hard work due to the greed of the Publishers and the ignorance of the Players, would not do justice to any of the many AAA titles riddled with microtransactions or DLC. If you want them out, STOP PAYING FOR THEM. YOU ARE THE ONES PAYING FOR THEM TO BE THERE.)

    Let me make this short and break it down into three sections: Call of Duty: WW2, the game; Call of Duty: WW2, the Comparisons; and, Call of Duty: WW2, the Community.

    --- The Game: This is a game which can be easily scored anywhere between 5 and 8, depending on your mood, on your common sense, on your intelligence, or on your need to defend your purchase of this game, or to attack it in order to defend your purchase of another game (i.e. BF1, Destiny 2). The Campaign is good, albeit short. The MP is exactly like the Beta, plus the usual millions of microtransaction options which just keep getting cleverer and cleverer.

    --- The Comparisons: This game is not BF1. It has great visuals and good voice acting/writing. However, because it is not BF1, it also moves faster, which is great. BECAUSE it moves faster, it does not need to look as good. No one buys a game like this in order to stare at puddles in the mud, that's what games like Horizon: Zero Dawn are for. People compare for various reasons, not the least of which is, they simply don't know what they want anymore... and it is not our fault. Publishers and Critics and even YouTubers swing us left and right (bet they have fun doing it) for the sake of a sale, or for the sake of a sponsorship. In the end, so many people ended up buying Infinite Warfare BECAUSE of MW:RE... so it didn't matter. Activision won. Yay! And so did DICE/EA, because they also bought BF1. And so did Blizzard (Activision's merge), because they also bought Overwatch. And there go more than $180.

    The Community: I'll lay it flat. Go anywhere. Whether here on Meta, or YouTube, or the Activision community, or just on the mics on PS4 and you'll reach the same conclusion I have reached: Call of Duty has been hijacked by children, and this is here to stay. Children, because, well, that is what children do, are not the best at playing well, although if you don't take the game too seriously, you'll be fine, since they are pretty good at just having plain fun in ridiculous ways, without worrying about dying or having their teammates killed, etc etc, and heck... since when did we get so serious about games?

    Enjoy this game if you bought/buy it. That's all I can say. I couldn't enjoy it, but notice my score. My personal experience doesn't change what I see to be a solid COD experience, like in the past with MW and MW2.    … Expand
  26. TomasLacerda
    Nov 6, 2017
    0
    For the sake of you wallet, DO NOT. BUY. THIS GAME.

    The story is dangerously inaccurate. The characters are as predictable as every bad movie you ever seen. Lifeless, idiotic bunch. The A.I. is surprising awful for a 2017 game, even for a 2014 game would be an issue. There's no ambience to the game, constantly being stopped by irrelevant cutscenes. This game isn't made for adults.    For the sake of you wallet, DO NOT. BUY. THIS GAME.

    The story is dangerously inaccurate. The characters are as predictable as every bad movie you ever seen. Lifeless, idiotic bunch. The A.I. is surprising awful for a 2017 game, even for a 2014 game would be an issue. There's no ambience to the game, constantly being stopped by irrelevant cutscenes. This game isn't made for adults.

    Don't play it.    … Expand
  27. eYeArr
    Nov 6, 2017
    0
    I got this game on day one, the best thing so far is amazon delivery service, lets point out some stuff:

    Negative The size of the installation is HUGE Connecting to play day 1, 2 3, was impossible After it managed to connect the view of the guns is awful, when you have 2,3 4 games with other optics it really sucks. The teams respawn on the same side almost all the game its all so    I got this game on day one, the best thing so far is amazon delivery service, lets point out some stuff:

    Negative
    The size of the installation is HUGE
    Connecting to play day 1, 2 3, was impossible
    After it managed to connect the view of the guns is awful, when you have 2,3 4 games with other optics it really sucks.
    The teams respawn on the same side almost all the game its all so lineal, what makes camping the most common thing.
    Killing its hard dying is easy
    The zombie mode is boring and you get 10000000 points of life, it gets so boring after round 15
    The maps are really with good texture but not enjoyable

    Goods
    Maps graphics
    Campaign

    I am selling or returning this game, it really sucks I am very very dissapointed.    … Expand
  28. Jumballi
    Nov 6, 2017
    0
    Rather than innovate, they simply went back and repackaged the previous game and just took out the super jumps. The only innovation is the fact they made loot boxes more toxic than any game before it.
  29. dexter3
    Nov 6, 2017
    6
    I've been playing this game since COD 3. Here's what I think:

    Campaign: I have found it to be decently fun. Not an amazing experience, not horrible either. There are some people complaining about realism. If you're looking for realism, you shouldn't be playing COD. It's the same type of COD campaign that we've seen in most of the games. Multiplayer: The new war mode is the most fun I    I've been playing this game since COD 3. Here's what I think:

    Campaign: I have found it to be decently fun. Not an amazing experience, not horrible either. There are some people complaining about realism. If you're looking for realism, you shouldn't be playing COD. It's the same type of COD campaign that we've seen in most of the games.

    Multiplayer: The new war mode is the most fun I have had in COD for a long time. It's freaking awesome!! Your KD doesn't matter so it really encourages the team to play the objective. It very much takes after Battlefield One (a lot of the game does), but that doesn't bother me because I enjoy this game mode very much. If taking the positive elements from other games bothers you, you might have a problem with this. The downside is there are only 3 war maps and 9 regular MP maps... way too few. I have not experienced any server problems, my matchmaking times have been basically instant (I'm not denying the problem, I'm saying the people who come here are generally the ones who want to complain so you're going to read about more problems than good things). The rest of the MP is not very different, so if you've played any other COD game you know what to expect. Except gun camos are like COD4 which is fantastic. Gun balance is good and sniping is really fun so good job on that.

    Zombies: Only one real map so far which is pretty disappointing. The map itself is pretty good though. I like the changes to zombies. Blitz machines replace perks, armor replaces Juggernog and gets more expensive each time you buy it, which is a welcome and challenging change. The zombie types are varied (there are 5 main types, plus a boss you can fight), and are done cleverly. The zombies are quite different than old BO and BO2 zombies. The music is phenomenal at the beginning and really adds to the horror of the game, but I found it getting annoying after a while and turned it off. They have added a real progression system which is great. You can unlock and equip perks (mods) and start with new starting guns, unlock attachments, etc.

    -----

    Other points:

    - The UI is horrible. It is the worst UI I have seen in a COD game. It is extremely counterintuitive and I find myself constantly searching too long for what I want. Maybe I'm too used to the old menus, but this one is just poorly laid out.
    - Microtransactions are a disease in gaming and every game with them deserves a lower score. Please DO NOT BUY THEM.
    - SPLITSCREENERS BEWARE: The splitscreen is completely broken. The things that pop on screen (objective lost, pick up gun, etc.) are HUGE and completely block your view. It's like no one even tested this. It's so so bad. It has great potential but they need to make everything way smaller. I have a 65' TV and it is very difficult to play splitscreen. I really hope they fix this.
    - Graphics are in the middle. Obviously there are better looking games but it does the job for me.
    - The content is high quality for COD standards, but there's not much of it. Not a whole bunch of guns and not very many maps. Campaign is short.
    - SJW stuff is a sad sad part of the world now, and breaks some of the immersion.    … Expand
  30. se7enX90X
    Nov 6, 2017
    5
    -Some of the worst multiplayer maps in the call of duty franchise. Majority of your deaths will come from being shot from behind due to awful map design.

    -When this game was first announced Sledgehammer lied to the world by saying they were making an authentic WWII game that was going to be true to the war and as accurate and realistic as possible....That was a big fat lie.    -Some of the worst multiplayer maps in the call of duty franchise. Majority of your deaths will come from being shot from behind due to awful map design.

    -When this game was first announced Sledgehammer lied to the world by saying they were making an authentic WWII game that was going to be true to the war and as accurate and realistic as possible....That was a big fat lie.

    -Censorship in a game that's supposed to be for adults is inappropriate. Sledgehammer has no right to tell others what's too sensitive to view and what's not. Hiding swastikas in a game about WWII is just immature and illogical on Sledgehammer and Activision's part.

    -The outdated connection service they use is really showing just how outdated it is. A mass amount of people that bought the game cannot connect to the servers. The fact that Activision makes literally billions of dollars a year from their gambling crates but still use the cheapest possible multiplayer service is disgusting...

    When its all said and done this game could've been amazing. Sledgehammer could've created a masterpiece and proved to everybody that they really don't just make these games on a yearly basis as a cash grab. They dropped the ball and WWII is the result. I've been playing cod for over 10 years and after the amount of disappointment I received from WWII, I'm officially done with the franchise. Won't be contributing to a company like Activision who is 100% anti consumer.    … Expand
  31. Dankie
    Nov 6, 2017
    9
    The game brings back all of the best aspects of call of duty there's been a lot of hate but to me, it brings back the weapon balance and plus sniper power too they did really good well done Sledgehammer
  32. Klayer44
    Nov 6, 2017
    0
    The last Call of Duty game I purchased was MW2. I have tried each game since, but not parted with my money because I thought 'if I keep paying them they will think it's okay to keep producing this copy/paste detritus'.

    Maybe this time there would be improvements, genuinely well thought out ideas that added value to the game. I had a weekend to kill and a few friends were buying so I    The last Call of Duty game I purchased was MW2. I have tried each game since, but not parted with my money because I thought 'if I keep paying them they will think it's okay to keep producing this copy/paste detritus'.

    Maybe this time there would be improvements, genuinely well thought out ideas that added value to the game.
    I had a weekend to kill and a few friends were buying so I joined in and I wish I hadn't bothered.

    The campaign is somehow worse than the most recent transformers, and most recent fast/furious films,and that's just the story and voice acting.
    The most frustrating element is the illusion breaking invisible walls and magic shields that force the player to do tasks in exactly the way the developer planned.
    This is fine for certain games, but when the illusion of choice is given to you, and then for no logical reason and without explanation is taken away; forcing you to start at the last checkpoint, it's offensive, it's lazy and it's not acceptable for a AAA title.

    Minor (and even a few mission failing) bugs could be forgiven if the above wasn't true and coupled with this title's cream of the crop price tag. Something HAS to change.

    Whilst the multiplayer is better than the campaign, it too has seen very very little innovation unless you include the headquarters lobby which I don't as it isn't game play. The illusion of being surrounded by players does not create an atmosphere as there is very little you can do to interact with each other and no one bought the game to socialise with random players.

    Same old copy paste create a class system with only superficial changes. Same old bulletproof hedges, invisible map walls funneling players into one of seven(not several) engagement positions on each map. Same old grind, fast twitch no scope, zero strategy , low team cooperation as the last 8 COD derivatives.

    And FINE. I might be able to forget all this and just sip my BUY&LARGE cup cake in a cup and play..

    IF I COULD CONNECT TO THE ONLINE SERVERS MORE THAN 1/20 TIMES.

    Obviously don't buy it, but I did so I won't blame you. We need to stop giving battlefield/battlefront/cod/fifa our money and start demanding a better product from them than a repackaging. We need to change the game, so we can change the game.    … Expand
  33. Boscovelli
    Nov 6, 2017
    1
    I've played (and fully prestiged in) every Call of Duty aside from Infinite Warfare (for obvious reasons) and I can say with confidence that this is in the bottom three Call of Duty games.

    Now, I, myself, don't play zombies. Which is a 1/3rd of the draw for most people. So take that into consideration when I say there's just not enough to warrant paying $80 for me. The campaign clocks    I've played (and fully prestiged in) every Call of Duty aside from Infinite Warfare (for obvious reasons) and I can say with confidence that this is in the bottom three Call of Duty games.

    Now, I, myself, don't play zombies. Which is a 1/3rd of the draw for most people. So take that into consideration when I say there's just not enough to warrant paying $80 for me. The campaign clocks in at around 6.5 hours. So don't even consider it if you're strictly a single player fan. The multiplayer is more of the same with a fresh (kind of) coat of paint. Same old bullet sponge casual mechanics, Same old glitches throughout that likely won't ever get addressed, but perhaps worst of all - completely unbalanced maps. I was a little surprised at this because map design for the most part has been fairly consistent in Call of Duty, but alas, never count the franchise out for brand new disappointments.

    Some of the maps are just glaringly uneven. Objective based maps where one team is constantly fighting uphill in the open puts that team at a considerable disadvantage and makes for a 100% consistent rate of losses on those maps in my experience. Even with a party of 6 good players we found ourselves losing on those specific maps in those specific game modes.

    The game is a joke. The franchise has been a joke for nearly a decade. Do not buy this game.    … Expand
  34. xxxsssjjjk
    Nov 6, 2017
    0
    The campaign is about 1 hour long, the multiplayer only comes with 9 maps!!! and zombies only has 1 map. The graphics suck and the guns are unrealisitic and sound fake. The game is not worth 60 dollars wait until its on sale or buy battlefield 1.
  35. Cuberian
    Nov 6, 2017
    3
    You really need an explanation? You saw this black soldier in Germany army in multiplayer ?! No, because it looks like I'm looking through the eyes of myopic
  36. Ubermonkey88
    Nov 6, 2017
    7
    I've seen a lot of varying reviews of COD WW2 but a lot seem to be bashing by fanboys of another franchise or completely biased praise by COD fanboys, so hopefully I can give a bit more of a balanced view.

    I've played most CODs (some for a long time, some VERY briefly) since the very original on PC all those years, and although the return to WW2 does suggest a lack of new ideas etc,    I've seen a lot of varying reviews of COD WW2 but a lot seem to be bashing by fanboys of another franchise or completely biased praise by COD fanboys, so hopefully I can give a bit more of a balanced view.

    I've played most CODs (some for a long time, some VERY briefly) since the very original on PC all those years, and although the return to WW2 does suggest a lack of new ideas etc, it's one of the better recent releases, especially following last year's abysmal Infinite Warfare. The return to WW2 obviously means no jetpacks, double-jumps or futuristic tech that distracted from the actual gunplay, which for now, is a welcome change. There are plenty of issues too, which I will mention below, along with the positives -

    Pros

    - The single player campaign is fun, which is something that can't be said for the past few iterations of COD. It does visit settings and places that have been done in every other WW2 game but it does it with a level of polish that isn't seen in many others. Objectives are varied, so although it is the familiar campaign, it does help mix things up a bit. The introduction of squad mates who provide you with supplies/health packs/support is a nice addition that keeps you on your toes.

    - The multiplayer benefits greatly from the lack of futuristic nonsense (drones, robots, nanobots etc) and is a much more focused experience for it. Because of the WW2 setting, the developers are more restricted in types of weaponry available and the game benefits from it, meaning it''s a bit more balanced and not quite as chaotic as before. It also introduced Headquarters, which is a social hub, not unlike The Tower in Destiny/Destiny 2. It's initially overwhelming but once you get used to it, it's good to be able to run about in and check with vendors while waiting for a game to start.

    - Graphically the campaign looks great. Textures are nice, it's very polished and it all runs very smoothly.

    Cons

    - Graphically, the multiplayer doesn't look great (which is nothing new in COD) especially now that the devs have had a few years with the PS4 (and XBone) kits, which is disappointing. It looks like it could easily be from the last generation of consoles, but I suppose graphics aren't everything.

    - Considering that it's gone back to WW2, it's no surprise there isn't an awful lot of innovation, and nothing that hasn't been seen in other WW2/COD/BF games.

    - The biggest issue at the moment is the servers - at times the online is unplayable due to errors, extremely slow matchmaking (which has been confirmed to be an issue with the servers as opposed to my connection) and completely empty Headquarters hubs. It's completely possible that if you do manage to connect to the online services that you could be sitting in a lobby waiting for a game for 15 minutes - it's that slow. It is assumed that this issue will be fixed with a patch or update very very soon, but it's still shocking that for a game as big and popular as COD that this is such a problem.

    Other points

    - Zombies - it has zombies mode as usual. I don't care, and never have cared for Zombies but if it's something you like, it's there and is pretty much the same as previous Zombies modes in previous games, so if you liked them then yay! If not, it likely won't change your mind.

    Overall, COD WW2 is an enjoyable enough game with a few issues holding it back, none more so than the servers which will hopefully be fixed soon. Definitely worth playing through and having a go on multiplayer - if you loved older CODs (such as 2, 3, Modern Warfare and World at War), then you'll feel right at home. If you don't like COD though, I don't think this will change your mind.    … Expand
  37. Dog3117
    Nov 6, 2017
    4
    I was stuck between this game and wolfensetin 2, I ended up choosing this one hoping for the replay-ability/longevity factor. Made the cock up of choosing this. BS microtransactions, boring multiplayer, and all round scumbag business ethics by the publisher of this game. This game had a fairly enjoyable campaign, and I did appreciate the attempt and creativity of war mode but these are theI was stuck between this game and wolfensetin 2, I ended up choosing this one hoping for the replay-ability/longevity factor. Made the cock up of choosing this. BS microtransactions, boring multiplayer, and all round scumbag business ethics by the publisher of this game. This game had a fairly enjoyable campaign, and I did appreciate the attempt and creativity of war mode but these are the only 2 positives I see in an otherwise boring soulless cash grab of a 'game'. To y'all giving it a 1 or 0, quit being sheep and be honest, its not a genuine 1 and your the reason this site is nearly completely useless… Expand
  38. arnav99
    Nov 5, 2017
    8
    this game is amazing. the campaign is actually really good, especially the stealth missions, however, there are a few meh moments in there, just a whole lot more whoa moments in the campaign though. I don't understand the destiny style hub area though. it doesn't make too much sense since most people will rush to match lobbies rather than roam around in some place that could easily havethis game is amazing. the campaign is actually really good, especially the stealth missions, however, there are a few meh moments in there, just a whole lot more whoa moments in the campaign though. I don't understand the destiny style hub area though. it doesn't make too much sense since most people will rush to match lobbies rather than roam around in some place that could easily have been accessed in a menu. also, at least in Europe, i see no one in the hub area, like 0. I waited for a 1v1 match for 3 whole minutes and I was the only one in the queue the whole time. however, the multiplayer is damn awesome, I love the map designs, really fun and easy to move around in and the designs are actually really cool. cod should probably change their engine in the next coming years since graphics are starting to look dated, it's far from bad but we can see better from AAA games. it's kinda hard to understand how the whole hub area works, I have no idea how supply drops work even after 15 hours of gameplay, I just somehow get them from time to time. I also don't know how to get armory credits, like at all, the whole thing with the quartermaster is hard to understand. I guess I'll have to figure it out as I go along. the weirdest thing to me is that no one is in the hub world, I mean it takes literally no time to get a match but it's no man's land in the hub world. so far the game is 8 but it could be a 9 when I understand how everything works, it's so hard to figure out these things, right now but just playing this game is a joy, I really like these map designs even though the template is pretty much the same.… Expand
  39. RealKandari
    Nov 5, 2017
    9
    COD WW2 is Activision's and Sledgehammer Games' greatest COD since MW3 and the best COD in the entire series since COD 4.

    The campaign mixes humor, story-telling and action really well and it's no way a disappointment. I've played little multiplayer mode since it came out and it's very different from past modes. This year you have to strategise your movement and weapon choice due to    COD WW2 is Activision's and Sledgehammer Games' greatest COD since MW3 and the best COD in the entire series since COD 4.

    The campaign mixes humor, story-telling and action really well and it's no way a disappointment.

    I've played little multiplayer mode since it came out and it's very different from past modes. This year you have to strategise your movement and weapon choice due to the small maps.

    This COD is by far the best in the entire series after MW1 and the boot-to-the-ground aspect really helped with the series' sales and enjoyment diverting from space-combat    … Expand
  40. vangoat
    Nov 5, 2017
    3
    I am not recommending this game to my friends.

    I got it thursday night...and couldn't play it because servers were down, yay. Played some friday morning had some fun. Played saturday with my friend very sporadically because we were both continually being kicked form servers. Zombies was awesome, feels just like the best of the the old zombies. What I played of campaign was decent.    I am not recommending this game to my friends.

    I got it thursday night...and couldn't play it because servers were down, yay. Played some friday morning had some fun. Played saturday with my friend very sporadically because we were both continually being kicked form servers. Zombies was awesome, feels just like the best of the the old zombies. What I played of campaign was decent. Multiplayer tho...it sucks. War is great. The rest tho, is just like other reviewers say, very empty. Absolutely terrible spawns...how many times did I spawn in to immediately (seriously seconds later) be killed by the same exact person! OMG!

    Its just so spastic of a game, all reflexes, no thinking. Quick-scoping!? really? Why keep that in these games!? I watched one play of the game where a sniper quick-scoped two people from 12 feet away! So stupid. Campers absolutely galore! Campers and quickscopers will love this game.

    It is a much better installment of COD, BUT everything that ever annoyed me about old COD games is still present. And the servers are absolute garbage so good luck not getting errored out. I would think game companies would be better prepared for releasing games than this...why run a beta if you cant even properly release a working game? Cant they figure out how stressed their servers will be by how many freaking preorders they had?!?! obviously not...very disappointed. Theres a good chance this is the last COD I will play.

    I really wanted to like this game. I will play it some more. But today was Sunday, I woke up did some chores and played games most of the day, but did not once feel inclined to play COD WW2. 2 days after having it and I already was losing interest. That sums it up for me. I would love my 60 bucks back.    … Expand
  41. GamerElephant
    Nov 5, 2017
    9
    Whole lot of little children who shouldn't be allowed on the internet let alone rating things with their undeveloped immature minds thinking their pointless opinion means anything. But definitely side with the critics on this one. Not like you wouldn't anyway. You already know how toxic the COD community is with these little squeakers. They ruin the game and than negatively vote theWhole lot of little children who shouldn't be allowed on the internet let alone rating things with their undeveloped immature minds thinking their pointless opinion means anything. But definitely side with the critics on this one. Not like you wouldn't anyway. You already know how toxic the COD community is with these little squeakers. They ruin the game and than negatively vote the game they ruined.

    In fairness, the game maps are incredible although I wanted at least 2-3 more. The graphics are amazing. The story is pretty fun so far although not my favorite of the 3 modes. Zombies is actually gorey and dark finally with some amazing multiplayer fun to be had. But most of all the multiplayer is amazing. The servers had their ups and downs at launch so little 9 year old billy finds the need to lose his Hi C over it. but even with unstable servers so far the HQ is amazing, the camos aren't tasteless, it actually has better multiplayer achievements and gives you a sense of reward for good matches. Random supply drops ect... it needs more with updates added. More camos, more outfits and more calling cards. But all and all the game is legendary. Enjoy. :)    … Expand
  42. ProGamerbf1
    Nov 5, 2017
    0
    Very bad game. The maps are have tight cornors so the only gun you can use is an smg. The hit detection is off and the game is just like infinite warfare but with no jump packs. Plus the servers have been down every time I try to play it, if you are looking for boots on the ground get Modern Warfare Remastered. It is just as good as the origional.
  43. xenomorph287
    Nov 5, 2017
    6
    Im conflicted about this game. I love the singleplayer, every mission was fun and the characters were memorable, and probably my 3rd favorite story in COD. Multiplayer on the other hand, is pretty bad. I enjoy the war mode a lot, but every other game mode is bland. In short, wait until a sale, and just play the campaign.
  44. Euknowia
    Nov 5, 2017
    4
    Another prosaic iteration in the COD series fulfilling the expectations of most – although the loot crates add a nice sinister touch (not to mention alluring players to the insidious and addictive temptation of gambling by incentivizing an exhibition of the virtually vain where lottery rewards are braggingly presented to varying onlookers assuring critics that Activision is indeed takingAnother prosaic iteration in the COD series fulfilling the expectations of most – although the loot crates add a nice sinister touch (not to mention alluring players to the insidious and addictive temptation of gambling by incentivizing an exhibition of the virtually vain where lottery rewards are braggingly presented to varying onlookers assuring critics that Activision is indeed taking steps on realizing their daunting casino dream through a system which they so modestly patented).
    - The campaign is too short, although decent, forgettable.
    - Game modes are banal (big surprise), done much better in alternative games of the same genre
    - Zombies are still fairly entertaining to play with friends, but the game mode is quite like the nature of a zombie – lifeless, often pedestrian, and mostly uninspired.

    This time around, I’d say COD is lower than mediocre. I absolutely encourage waiting for a price drop (unless you absolutely adore COD multiplayer/zombies).    … Expand
  45. JeremyDoesGames
    Nov 5, 2017
    7
    1. Don't get ANY of the negative reviews

    2. Why is a 7 considered mixed? To me it means really good; 5 is mixed for me and under that is negative Anyway, onto the review. "Call of Duty: WWII" is the best "Call of Duty" game since "Black Ops 2" a mere 5 years ago. The gameplay feels fresh, the campaign has an excellent story (and it's the games' biggest strongpoint), and the    1. Don't get ANY of the negative reviews

    2. Why is a 7 considered mixed? To me it means really good; 5 is mixed for me and under that is negative

    Anyway, onto the review.

    "Call of Duty: WWII" is the best "Call of Duty" game since "Black Ops 2" a mere 5 years ago. The gameplay feels fresh, the campaign has an excellent story (and it's the games' biggest strongpoint), and the characters are really great. The multiplayer is nothing new, but it is fun. It's not a GREAT game, but I really enjoyed play "Call of Duty: WWII" (especially for the campaign), and I'm excited to play it some more. A pretty solid entry to this series that hasn't had a good game in years.    … Expand
  46. Bossuk
    Nov 5, 2017
    1
    the single player is not bad as far as COd games goes, much better than infinite warfare.
    But the Multiplayer is the worset i have ever seen with multiple server crashes, huge delays in joining games, huge delays in getting a map started, and the whole orders implementation is manged badly.
    COD is a multiplayer game, and Activision have really messed up. I've played every COD and got    the single player is not bad as far as COd games goes, much better than infinite warfare.
    But the Multiplayer is the worset i have ever seen with multiple server crashes, huge delays in joining games, huge delays in getting a map started, and the whole orders implementation is manged badly.

    COD is a multiplayer game, and Activision have really messed up. I've played every COD and got everyone on launch day, but what ias the point if you can't play thay game!!!!

    Awful. Don't buy until they promise to invest in the MP.    … Expand
  47. cjwallington
    Nov 5, 2017
    1
    absolutely horrible. no manual, no tutorial, no (even in-game) controller layout and a completely linear plot. Now I remember why I dislike the CoD series. Perpetually dying is no way to win a following.
  48. Aresman
    Nov 5, 2017
    3
    I got this game for the SP campaign, but after finishing it in less then 6 h, i can't recommend this game not even on sale at how mediocre the missions were the single mission that i enjoyed and was good from the begging to the end was the Battle of Bulge but even on that the map was almost a copy and paste from united offensive, i wish there was more idk, i mean the D-Day mission onlyI got this game for the SP campaign, but after finishing it in less then 6 h, i can't recommend this game not even on sale at how mediocre the missions were the single mission that i enjoyed and was good from the begging to the end was the Battle of Bulge but even on that the map was almost a copy and paste from united offensive, i wish there was more idk, i mean the D-Day mission only the begging is epic after that all u do is clear bunkers but the way it looks and it's made makes me thing they had a very limited and small budget to make that mission and they wasted too much on the first part and after that they reused same bunker over and over with little change to it and it's things like that that makes the campaign boring and dull, idk how a game that's 12 y old is more epic has more awesome action and bigger then this but idk maybe it's just my opinion and blind by nostalgia, i hope i am.… Expand
  49. iamevilhomer
    Nov 5, 2017
    1
    Please take this review seriously as it's for the good of gaming...

    Call of duty world war 2? More like Call of duty wont work 2 lololol. Know that I haven't played the game myself but also know that I'm not a idiot when it comes to quality FPS games and guess what? This game sucks. You play one of these crappy cod games and you have pretty much played them all... I have done enough    Please take this review seriously as it's for the good of gaming...

    Call of duty world war 2? More like Call of duty wont work 2 lololol.

    Know that I haven't played the game myself but also know that I'm not a idiot when it comes to quality FPS games and guess what? This game sucks. You play one of these crappy cod games and you have pretty much played them all... I have done enough research and have seen that the game is as I had expected. Trash... But hey... We smart people all saw this coming. We knew it was going to suck lol. Just another terrible cod game with the WW2 paint coat put on.

    Short 6 hour campaign that's not very historically accurate as advertised. Also has dumb AI and glitches on top of stuttering issues many have been reporting.

    Game also has micro transactions which automatically knocks the game down several points.

    Lobbies and load times are totally garbage in this game. Dead zone issues with aiming have been reported multiple times.

    Trash maps that are very few with many guns missing that I'm sure will be released over time through dlc/micro transaction horse **** and butt ****ery...

    Here's the funniest thing of all... Apparently the ps4 version is working better than the xbox one version. The xbox one version was unplayable for the first few days of launch for most xbox one folk... At least the online multiplayer part. So why is the ps4 version getting a slightly lower metacritic critic score by the critics???? Lol whatever... Maybe it's got something to do with that over priced and pretty much useless for gamers console known as the xbox one x? Who knows who cares...

    There are other problems but I don't care to remember them right now. I'm just caring enough to do this review for laughs and for the good of gaming. DON'T buy jokes of a game like this one. They exist to rob you blind and leave you with nothing but frustration. You people should honestly know this by now. I mean for ****s sake... It's cod... It's crap division... It's supposed to suck lol.

    Decent visuals though... Lets not let this review be all negativity... Gotta give credit where it's due I suppose... Just to be fair and nice : )

    Even without many of the problems I listed though... It's still just trashy cod at the end of the day so I would still give it a low score lolz.    … Expand
  50. northernlad
    Nov 5, 2017
    4
    where to start multiplayer 6v6 is it not 2017? maps are tiny even for a cod game campaign is short which i wouldn't mind if it was great but its not boots on the ground not gonna twist about that no jet packs is a plus this game series must have made a small countrys worth of money in profit over the years the seer inept level design tiny player counts tiny campaign are unbelievable thewhere to start multiplayer 6v6 is it not 2017? maps are tiny even for a cod game campaign is short which i wouldn't mind if it was great but its not boots on the ground not gonna twist about that no jet packs is a plus this game series must have made a small countrys worth of money in profit over the years the seer inept level design tiny player counts tiny campaign are unbelievable the gaming industry at the minute has me worried microtransactions poor poor game releases i may need to start a new hobby… Expand
  51. SchroederRock
    Nov 5, 2017
    6
    WWII suits Call of Duty better, to a degree, than all the future stuff. However, where CoD WWII stumbled the most is in its scale. The campaign has its moments and ends up being a good reason to pick up Call of Duty to begin with but its multiplayer pairing is not so fortunate. Much of WWII's multiplayer feels heavily rehashed from previous games, adding little new to spice up the formula.WWII suits Call of Duty better, to a degree, than all the future stuff. However, where CoD WWII stumbled the most is in its scale. The campaign has its moments and ends up being a good reason to pick up Call of Duty to begin with but its multiplayer pairing is not so fortunate. Much of WWII's multiplayer feels heavily rehashed from previous games, adding little new to spice up the formula. Maps are typically dense and lead to more encounters between players but that doesn't translate to more fun. Often times, players can be cornered into spawn kill/deaths, especially if an opposing team knows where to stop pressing to keep the predictable computing from spawn-swapping. It really bugs me that no Activision title with the CoD moniker has fixed this problem after years of abuse. Nazi Zombies always has its fun moments, bringing a more visceral experience to the shooter. It's clear to me that this game mode is the only aspect that delivers time after time. It shows complexity, strategic thinking, and white-knuckle experiences because of how unpredictable the game mode can be. Good on Sledgehammer for keeping this part of the game fun and interesting. However, outside of an OK campaign, there isn't much to love here. Call of Duty continues to be nothing more than a re-skinned version of itself, year after year. This is a huge irritation as Call of Duty is begging to break out of its shell. Perhaps the future will yield a larger sandbox feel to CoD, especially as console and PCs continue to advance and offer more horsepower to smoothly handle the heavy computing that can come with AAA games.

    As for WWII - if you like the setting, this is not the game to play. Battlefield 1 offers a much deeper and open experience that encourages a little role play here and there. Only CoD fanboys that wait on the scraps that fall from Activision's table will ever find a lot to love here. WWII continues the tradition of CoD failing to impress. It is clearer to me year after year that the original Infinity Ward crew were the lifeblood of Call of Duty and once Activision broke up that team, some of which went on to make Titanfall years later, that the pulse of CoD fell dramatically. With the exception of Black Ops, Call of Duty hasn't been interesting since the Modern Warfare series. I'm still waiting for the franchise to be resurrected and WWII does nothing to make that happen. Buy at your own risk.    … Expand
  52. NeoReaper
    Nov 5, 2017
    0
    The campaign should be nominated for an Oscar. Zombies is alright. The Multiplayer is yet again another **** show. The graphics are really bad(PS4 Pro). It's like the game has a very hard time to figure out what to focus on which leaves blurring everywhere.

    Metacritic needs to figure out away to tell if someone has actually played the game instead of letting the BF kiddies come one here    The campaign should be nominated for an Oscar. Zombies is alright. The Multiplayer is yet again another **** show. The graphics are really bad(PS4 Pro). It's like the game has a very hard time to figure out what to focus on which leaves blurring everywhere.

    Metacritic needs to figure out away to tell if someone has actually played the game instead of letting the BF kiddies come one here and just review bomb it.    … Expand
  53. JasonBaureBond
    Nov 5, 2017
    0
    WW2 is back that mean no jumping jets and other futuristic nonsense. Gameplay is good there could be more maps but everyting is good.
    Sory but women dont belong to this it s painfull to watch and listen them.
  54. sgy0003
    Nov 5, 2017
    7
    Set in WWII, you think they would put more effort into the game since it's an actual part of the history and not some sci-fi future shooter ****

    Well, although the campaign is much better than the last three entries (BO3, AW, and IW). There are mix of tank section, aviation battle, espionage, and stealth. However, tank and aviation battle especially sucks, because even though they are    Set in WWII, you think they would put more effort into the game since it's an actual part of the history and not some sci-fi future shooter ****

    Well, although the campaign is much better than the last three entries (BO3, AW, and IW). There are mix of tank section, aviation battle, espionage, and stealth. However, tank and aviation battle especially sucks, because even though they are fun it only lasts about 15-20 min as part of a mission, and NOT as a whole mission. Espionage while entertaining, it's easy enough for anyone with basic stealth instincts can plow through. And Stealth.....oh my god, it sucks. There is so much stealth in this game. You'd think that would be nice taking a break from full frontal combat, but these stealth sections are annoyingly paced. I was expecting a brother-in-arms type of bonding with my npc comrades, but that never happened.

    Multiplayer is also a lot better, but still kinda the same. We finally don't have jet-packs and futuristic abilities, so the gameplay is much more grounded (literally). It's still only fun when you are the one kicking asses, but you'll still be plagued with cheap shots, 6-year olds who apparently did your mother, and **** who are better than you. Oh and lootboxes, while unnecessary, shows the greedy corperate **** side of Activision in a full force.

    If you are looking to get COD, WWII is the game I'd recommend(sorta). The game looks great, campaign has its moments, and multiplayer as always needs some serious balancing.    … Expand
  55. Belialll
    Nov 5, 2017
    9
    Если коротко, то WWII - та самая игра, про которую говорили "раньше было лучше". Она во многом копирует классические CoD'ы, при этом выглядит и играется абсолютно современно. Кампания вполне стандартная, для такого сеттинга, с простой историей, приятной стрельбой и красивой графикой. Мультиплеер хорош, в том числе и из-за нововведений, например режим "Война" довольно интересный. Сам неЕсли коротко, то WWII - та самая игра, про которую говорили "раньше было лучше". Она во многом копирует классические CoD'ы, при этом выглядит и играется абсолютно современно. Кампания вполне стандартная, для такого сеттинга, с простой историей, приятной стрельбой и красивой графикой. Мультиплеер хорош, в том числе и из-за нововведений, например режим "Война" довольно интересный. Сам не фанат "зомби", но в целом не плохо. В итоге: классический CoD, выполненный в соответствии с современными тенденциями.… Expand
  56. hoohoo
    Nov 5, 2017
    6
    Well.. it's not a bad game. But I'm still really disappointed. I expected so much more, but it is just a tunnel run with some quite weak story around it. Shoot the same predictable enemies, who just run into your bullets. Meh.
  57. Fabulous_Filou
    Nov 5, 2017
    3
    So... first time Review. This game is probably the worst in the Series and I really regret to have bought it. The cmpaign is just a really big pain. It's so unaccurate its not even funny. Russian guns in the Normandy, in under three minutes is Omaha Beach taken (it took about half an hour until they arrived at the bunkers in reality, even Medal Of Honor did this right 15 Years ago). ThatSo... first time Review. This game is probably the worst in the Series and I really regret to have bought it. The cmpaign is just a really big pain. It's so unaccurate its not even funny. Russian guns in the Normandy, in under three minutes is Omaha Beach taken (it took about half an hour until they arrived at the bunkers in reality, even Medal Of Honor did this right 15 Years ago). That was the first Mission. Okay, it was okay, I didn't expect much but it got worse. The driving parts are so fast, its like playing Need For Speed. And then the tankdriving... Horrible, especialy when my little Sherman with his short 75mm gun takes out multiple Panzer 4s and a freaking Kingtiger... What a laugh! Over alll it was a really nice showcase of how freaking great the americans where and that they won the war ALONE. Well, no... for me it's just bitter how they try to tell this story. I am german and yes, my great grandfathers fought in this terrible war. I know a lot about it. The Story forgot the Brits and Canadians, even on the overview Map there where no signs of them, STUPID. The resistance part of the game was a bit new and gave a new perspective but here was also nearly everything wrong. First i thought the Voiceacting was cool, all Germans speak perfekt german and the conversations made sense but then there was this one offizier that name i forgot... He spokes very bad german with a stupid acsent... and the game lost me once again. So the unrealistic story went on and I played through.... but then there was the part i was most disappointed: The scene at the end with the KZ... Just some random buildings, two hanging copses, some corpses on the ground... nothing really shocking nd tht is the problem. If yo visit a real memorial site of a KZ and you read all the history and look at the pictures you can't sleep for days, thats how horrific it really is and this game needet to tell this story better, more shocking. But no, it looks like a random prison with some people who might have died. Seriously? The developers didn't take the time for research, everything is wrong about it. The Bunkers, the Tanks, the Soldiers, the Weapons... I've been even to france, I know how it should look like.
    But CoD isn't really about the campaign, right? So what about the Multiplayer. Well... It's standart, the Wa Mode is fun but nothing really new. I wish i could wright more about it, but the last three days where just a pain in the you know where. Server problems, buggy HQ, Lootboxes disappering. Nothing really works and thats all AFTER closed and open Beta. so no... nothing to be proud of right now.
    But there's a Zombiemode. And yes, it's fun, but not for so long. pretty standart, too.
    Overall this game is screwed and no recomandation at all!
    Battlefield 1 did so much right last year. The campaign was great, Told many storyyys and you cared about the characters. The multiplayeer WORKED and was fun, too.    … Expand
  58. AMX121
    Nov 5, 2017
    0
    CoD is the primal representation of everything wrong with the game industry. Multiplayer focused, loot boxes, micro-transactions, season pass, dlcs and pay to win **** **** THEM AND EVERYTHING THEY MAKE
  59. DayFul
    Nov 5, 2017
    0
    I skipped infinite warfare due to being tired of the tiny maps, Ultra low ttk and terrible connectivity that has been a hallmark of recent COD games. Activision have Blizzard in their back pocket and are still too cheap to use their dedicated servers that ensure Overwatch provides a vastly superior online experience (EA's Battlefiled series also embarasses COD in this area). The game isI skipped infinite warfare due to being tired of the tiny maps, Ultra low ttk and terrible connectivity that has been a hallmark of recent COD games. Activision have Blizzard in their back pocket and are still too cheap to use their dedicated servers that ensure Overwatch provides a vastly superior online experience (EA's Battlefiled series also embarasses COD in this area). The game is simply living off it's name at this point there's zero inspiration it may as well be a sport game with how little improvements are made. It's simply a new coat of paint on what it's a knackered car.… Expand
  60. FearAndLoathing
    Nov 5, 2017
    9
    Finally. This is a gem, its the true successor to black ops that has made COD unplayable for some time now. The pace is slower, the maps are well done, the weapons and visuals are great. The fact that pretty much any style of play can work is something we haven't seen in too long. LMGs setup down a corridor or in a bunker can hold down a point until flanked, and teamworking points seems toFinally. This is a gem, its the true successor to black ops that has made COD unplayable for some time now. The pace is slower, the maps are well done, the weapons and visuals are great. The fact that pretty much any style of play can work is something we haven't seen in too long. LMGs setup down a corridor or in a bunker can hold down a point until flanked, and teamworking points seems to happen more naturally because of the maps.

    So far, some cons to note are the networks have been off and on, and they disabled HQ mode while they fix it. Honestly, the destiny-style hq mode annoys me - id rather go through menus than fake interactions but whatever, its down right now if thats your thing.

    Steep upgrade curve - until you get a few attachments, your basically cannon fodder feeding the silly negative reviews on here.

    And i'll just address the negative reviews head on, it certainly feels to me (as someone who swore off any more cod games until I had tried this one and was won back over) that many of these reviews have not actually played the game, and have it out for the devs. Reviews that talk about bad starts, probably legit, but just be wary.    … Expand
  61. Defalc0
    Nov 5, 2017
    2
    Multiplayer is a joke, such a bad joke. To hell with PC culture and its influence. Women (portrayed WAY out of context) , LGBT flags, and furries. what in the hell is this. Player customization is tolerable, but where is AXIS customization??? The allies have some cool uniforms. BUT we only get to customize our player to use for only 50% of our playtime?!!! who the heck thought that wasMultiplayer is a joke, such a bad joke. To hell with PC culture and its influence. Women (portrayed WAY out of context) , LGBT flags, and furries. what in the hell is this. Player customization is tolerable, but where is AXIS customization??? The allies have some cool uniforms. BUT we only get to customize our player to use for only 50% of our playtime?!!! who the heck thought that was ok? the helmets that all players can equip look ridiculous when they are on german soldiers... because they are american GI helmets. ive never played such an immersion breaking (WW2) game. I never have wrote a review on here, but this game pushed all the wrong buttons with me.Seriously, how is World at War STILL a superior game in this day and age. OH YEA, because it wasnt afraid to make you feel uncomfortable, it wasnt afraid to make you uneasy. That game still gives me chills, so dark and so gruesome. Thats the image of war that haunts me. one day this pandering needs to stop.

    The standard issue calling cards DO NOT include flags of nations that actualy faught in the war, instead we have to swallow the image of these LGBT my little furrie flags flying over Normandy. GOD ALMIGHTY, stop with this political **** you are literally killing yourselves with this stuff sledge...
    If i could go back in time only once, I would stop sledgehammer games from ever being part of the call of duty cycle.

    im giving this game 2 points because zombies is actually good, and might only play that.    … Expand
  62. ResQ2
    Nov 5, 2017
    0
    Played the single player campaign. Absolutely pointless quick time events and the most bland missions i've never seen. absolutely standard cod, nothing special. The graphics could easily be from 2010 too. Definitely worse campaign than the "future settings" ones - and those were already pretty bad.
  63. swagerx
    Nov 5, 2017
    0
    Just close the series already . Its just getting worse. Quick tip : IF YOU EVER TRY TO DO A HISTORICAL GAME , **** LEARD HISTORY , DUMB **** .The last enjoyable / playable CoD was Black Ops 1 . Everything after it is just trash.
  64. BielSiqueira
    Nov 5, 2017
    10
    O jogo esta um xuxu muito bom graficos otimos jogabilidade excelentes partes epicas esse jogo esta um xuxu adoro quando os cara fala chucrute adorei e
  65. albodoin
    Nov 5, 2017
    5
    First time I'm buying a COD game since MW3, I decided to move on from this franchise because it preferred by far Battlefield (still do). For once in a cod game I can say that the campaign is spot on. Okay it might be built around war cliches but it's just enough to be enjoyable without being to corny. The zombie mode is amazing as always but this time it's less cryptic with the addition ofFirst time I'm buying a COD game since MW3, I decided to move on from this franchise because it preferred by far Battlefield (still do). For once in a cod game I can say that the campaign is spot on. Okay it might be built around war cliches but it's just enough to be enjoyable without being to corny. The zombie mode is amazing as always but this time it's less cryptic with the addition of clear objectives. But the main drawback (which is a huge one) is the multiplayer...thank god they added the War mode and the headquarter as a lobby to join friend! Finally Activition is trying to improve, but that is pretty much it. The rest is still the same as always, corridor maps, run and gun, corner camping, people that plays for their kill ratio instead of the objectives. It's basically a Modern Warfare or Black Ops with a WW2 skin!; nothing new. Maybe I'm getting old but I'm tired of reflex shooters and would like something more immersive because right now I really don't feel like I'm fighting against hordes of nazis but more like farming kill for xp to unlock the next **** weapon skin for my pistol.… Expand
  66. MysticDingo
    Nov 4, 2017
    0
    Same old, same old, except this time with loot crates and micro transactions galore. I used to love COD, but the series has been going down hill for quite some time. Idk if it's just franchise fatigue, the fact that it's the same twitchy shooter on absolutely horrible maps(because I actually like twitchy shooters on good maps), or if people are just sick of the money grabbing ofSame old, same old, except this time with loot crates and micro transactions galore. I used to love COD, but the series has been going down hill for quite some time. Idk if it's just franchise fatigue, the fact that it's the same twitchy shooter on absolutely horrible maps(because I actually like twitchy shooters on good maps), or if people are just sick of the money grabbing of Activision, but this game is absolute garbage. Money better spent elsewhere. Maybe COD should take a cue from Ubisoft and take a year or two break from COD and really take the time to craft a sick shooter, with an actually good campaign, and awesome multiplayer. Most likely though, we will be seeing a trailer for the next COD in 4-5 months. 0/10 trash.… Expand
  67. WillByers
    Nov 4, 2017
    10
    Not at all surprised by the user score. Most of these haters i noticed are rpg fans, listen, you guys are the most toxic and annoying gamers in existence. Go play your childish fantasy role playing **** this game is for grown ups.
  68. IDNUNUN
    Nov 4, 2017
    10
    Honest Opinions:
    I've never played a Call of Duty game for months though this game delighted me. Call Of Duty WWII is a diverse Call of duty game. The game is an amazing with good gameplay, a great story, and a horrifying zombie mode.
    The singleplayer was great with memorable characters and missions. Call Of Duty leads you towards the action and makes you feel more like a real soldier.    Honest Opinions:
    I've never played a Call of Duty game for months though this game delighted me. Call Of Duty WWII is a diverse Call of duty game. The game is an amazing with good gameplay, a great story, and a horrifying zombie mode.

    The singleplayer was great with memorable characters and missions. Call Of Duty leads you towards the action and makes you feel more like a real soldier. Enemy A.I has "EXTREMELY" improved with its actions. Friendly A.I react very realistically to their movement. The problems with the singleplayer are, that when characters talk, the characters don't even look like they are talking, and plus the beginning of the campaign felt like you were more than special but after the first quarter, you start to feel like a real soldier.

    Multiplayer is "Astonishing" with its well-paced gameplay and great animations. Call Of Duty WWII supplies you with weapons used in the 1st and 2nd World War. When I first played this, I had a big smile on my face because of how fun the gameplay was. But there is a big fall down with the multiplayer and it is the map design. Though some maps were great, in Call Of Duty WWII's map design, it felt like you knew where to go.

    Zombies was a disappointment but I didn't say it was bad. Zombies put you in a great stance if you want to get scared. The experience was great but I didn't play too much of it.    … Expand
  69. CrazyCRO
    Nov 4, 2017
    10
    Simply for all FPS games out there this one is G.O.T.Y. Love every single part of this game and to be honest i didn't expect such a good product. I am sorry for all negative reviews out there because this game and dev team that made this miracle happen don't deserve that.

    GG Dev's
  70. bmc87
    Nov 4, 2017
    4
    Single player campaign is alright but nothing special. My biggest beef is the tired old graphics engine that looks basically the same as BO1. It's 2017, these graphics are unaccetable. I don't have a problem with twitch shooters or lack of realism but good lord, visually this game is not good.
  71. Rembo
    Nov 4, 2017
    2
    Sorry for my english. How do dear critics of various gaming editions put this game 9-10 points? Are you crazy? "Apparently, they got a good salary from the creators of the game." There is nothing interesting in this game! The BLACK OPS series is 10 points! Missing confidence in the ratings of critics! Only users' opinions can be trusted!
  72. SuperkenGaming
    Nov 4, 2017
    8
    Call of Duty WWII
    Great Campaign, mess of an online
    Call of Duty WWII comes from the sledgehammer studio that made advanced warfare and modern warfare 3… This game features a 5 and a half hour long campaign, a Nazi zombies mode and of course an online competitive mode The star of this game is hands down the campaign.. Here you play as Daniels, a member of the United States army during    Call of Duty WWII
    Great Campaign, mess of an online
    Call of Duty WWII comes from the sledgehammer studio that made advanced warfare and modern warfare 3…
    This game features a 5 and a half hour long campaign, a Nazi zombies mode and of course an online competitive mode
    The star of this game is hands down the campaign..
    Here you play as Daniels, a member of the United States army during World War II…
    You occasionally play as a few surprise characters to infiltrate or take control of a tank for example...
    But the games campaign mostly focuses on him…
    And the story here is so personal, that for the first time in call of duty’s history I felt this soldier and his story wasn’t throw away…
    Easily my favorite campaign in the entire call of duty series…
    These characters are so fleshed out, all having their own personalities to them... it feels like an interactive movie..
    You have a girl waiting for you to get home, and you feel her pulling you through the entire way as you feel immersed in the battleground of world war 2
    Unique to this campaign is that you have to manage your health…
    It’s definitely takes some time getting used to patching yourself up rather than taking cover and waiting for your health to regenerate..
    But this leaves you being more cautious and aware of cover…
    This health management is made less of a nuisance thanks to your squad members... stopping this from feeling like a survival game…
    depending on the mission you’re on you’ll have different squad mates with a cool down meter to give you a med pack or ammo for example.. Mark enemies in the field…
    Again immersing me into the game, caring about my position and where my squad mates are…
    There aren’t really those epic moments you’d expect from a call of duty campaign... as this one feels more grounded in reality…
    But there is plenty of variety as you’ll be in the trenches, in a tank, in a plane, you’ll go undercover as a Nazi.. There are car chases...
    Making this campaign hard to step away from…
    but once your time in the campaign is over its back to what you’re used to from call of duty// zombies, multiplayer, and regenerating health…
    The zombies mode this time is all about Nazi tech, you’re killing zombies for points to buy new weapons, armor, upgrades, and unlocking gates and fulfilling objectives, not so much boarding up windows this time around…
    And then there’s the online multiplayer which currently during launch weekend is a complete mess…
    The game will get stuck on a load screen… there are server issues that force you to reset your router to fix.. End game results freeze on screen not giving any indication anything is happening... finding a match is a chore…
    once you do finally get a match you’re thrown into your typical call of duty modes around some pretty weak maps…
    probably my least favorite maps in the game’s history…
    And since this is a world war 2 game the weapon variety doesn’t feel that present …
    you start choosing your infantry out of 5 choices based on your play style and working on leveling them up to unlock their unique perks…
    making matches and players more unpredictable…
    once you choose your infantry you’re given that classes weapon, though you aren’t stuck with it as you can unlock any gun with rank tokens…
    And then you take your favorite gun out into the call of duty world and level it up to unlock attachments for it…
    Pretty typical stuff
    There are also daily challenges for you to do to unlock items like supply drops or earn currency to buy cards in game and unlock a special weapon or cosmetic item to give you an xp bonus or a one hit kill bonus in zombies…
    giving players something to work towards and play for online..
    It could be just me... but the maps, modes, and variety of weapons just couldn’t hook me…
    And the games awful server issues at launch didn’t help this...
    That being said... this game is worth picking up on its own for its campaign...
    I give Call of Duty WWII
    an 8/10    … Expand
  73. Mikedee
    Nov 4, 2017
    3
    Campaign is great. Zombies good. Multiplayer horrible. Cod ww2 is a AAA game that is treated like a free-to-play game except you pay full price for a game and then to compete you have to buy supply drops. Never again will I support these guys until they quit with the cash grab.
  74. clone901
    Nov 4, 2017
    0
    This game is broken and the d day is not as good as medial of honor. the multiplayer is boring and the guns sound like paintball guns. this game is a terrible and boring just buy iw,bo3 or bo2
  75. KittyWhisky
    Nov 4, 2017
    8
    I couldn't put less points, but wanted. This game has amazing graphics, gameplay is a step back. But Sledgehammer Games was able to show a real war. It showed the war without embellishment, real, brutal war. We have forgotten what it is. We used fun to kill enemies in video games without hesitation. After CALL OF DUTY: WWII start to appreciate the peaceful times in which we live.

    The    I couldn't put less points, but wanted. This game has amazing graphics, gameplay is a step back. But Sledgehammer Games was able to show a real war. It showed the war without embellishment, real, brutal war. We have forgotten what it is. We used fun to kill enemies in video games without hesitation. After CALL OF DUTY: WWII start to appreciate the peaceful times in which we live.

    The story tells the usual story of a military soldier. Together with brothers in arms wades through a real hell. We've seen similar stories in games, the war has not been shown so realistically. Basically, this effect causes dismemberment. Very often we will see people without body parts, burning people and the atrocities of the Nazis.

    The plot is simple, but you believe in this war, believe what is happening on the screen. All the characters have their own character, everyone has their demons. It is interesting to observe the drama of the characters.

    The gameplay is now in spirit first every part OF CALL OF DUTY. Because of this the gameplay has become more boring. You sit behind cover and aims at enemies. Diversity is not. But there is one good innovation. The developers decided to implement in a single company element of teamwork. If we need supplies, first aid kit or swegene about the enemy - we are asking comrades. This is an interesting thing. and Yes, now health itself is not restored - it is necessary to look for kits. Here you don't feel like a super soldier ready to kill everyone, you could die at any moment.

    Call of Duty: WWII is a game about realistic warfare. A single company is not very long, but no time to get bored. It's not the best Call of Duty, gameplay and artistic design can to lose IW, but nevertheless it was nice to return to the battlefields of WWII.    … Expand
  76. PCMasterRaceFTW
    Nov 4, 2017
    0
    I preordered the digital deluxe edition, something like 150$ CAD , the game is TRASH. Right on release , all servers went down for more than 3 hours and there you go all the ppl who preordered got screwed.
    The first thing I noticed was how HEAVILY supply drops are advertised in this game, that whole headwaters thing or whatever is the most shady thing Ive ever seen in a game. You're    I preordered the digital deluxe edition, something like 150$ CAD , the game is TRASH. Right on release , all servers went down for more than 3 hours and there you go all the ppl who preordered got screwed.
    The first thing I noticed was how HEAVILY supply drops are advertised in this game, that whole headwaters thing or whatever is the most shady thing Ive ever seen in a game. You're basically encouraging little kids to watch other people open their supply drops and get all those cool guns, encouraging those kids to ask mommy and daddy for money so that they can get them. On top of that you have the supply drop matchmaking which puts bad players against good players who have Supply drop weapons, on purpose, in order to further advertise them. If you're a parent DO NOT BUY THIS GAME FOR YOUR KIDS
    The game takes a ridiculously long time to load , the graphics look horrible. The hit detection and lag and insanely bad too. And last but not least , speaking of insanely bad , the MAPS are the worst maps ive ever seen in call of duty. Not only is it super hard to see people in the first place, but the maps themselves have so many openings, so much stuff everywhere. It doesn't matter how you play , you can get shot from behind. I can barely hear footsteps too. There is no way to tweak the graphics to make it easier to see ppl either ,everyone is headglitching and spawn camping in what seems to be an endless labyrinth of bs. The menu is awful, I want the old create a class point system. How does a 5KD player in all other boots on the ground cods struggle to get a 1KD in this game ? How does my 50mbps up and 50 mbps down drop to 2 bars every time I meet an enemy ?
    Every cod game seems to be getting worse and worse ever since Ghosts and every time they are trying harder and harder to push supply drops . Its like its not even about the game anymore, its about, what kind of shady bs we can do to sell more supply drops.
    You know what Im not even mad. Thank you for the refund PlayStation ! This is the 3rd CoD game I return following Ghosts , Advanced Warfare and Infinite Warfare.
    I swear on my mothers grave I will never buy another CoD game every again ! Not only that, I genuinely feel relieved and dont feel like id miss anything.
    Let's conclude this with the fact that supply drops should be made illegal, this is literally gambling, and Im not really concerned about me, as I haven't spent a dime on that scam, I'm more concerned about the younger audience. Manipulation of young innocent children to such high extent with what should be ILLEGAL gambling like I said should be made illegal.
    Every single game that has supply drops in it SUCKS, as they are nothing more than a corrupted scheme to steal people's money and CoD WW2 is the perfect example of what happens when you try to push this ever harder.
    Good luck dealing with legal trouble in the future Activation , it won't be long till you start getting lawsuits and all those money which you manipulated people and pretty much near stole it from them is going to be taken away from you.    … Expand
  77. Tubey
    Nov 4, 2017
    4
    CoD: WWII goes back to the roots of the series in all the wrong ways possible. Instead of taking the best of what made CoD a smash hit and injecting new life into it, they have cherry picked the same old same old stale nonsense, cobbling together a dated, lifeless single player campaign with every FPS "story mode" trope you care to think of, combined it with the same old same old casualCoD: WWII goes back to the roots of the series in all the wrong ways possible. Instead of taking the best of what made CoD a smash hit and injecting new life into it, they have cherry picked the same old same old stale nonsense, cobbling together a dated, lifeless single player campaign with every FPS "story mode" trope you care to think of, combined it with the same old same old casual multiplayer boredom and dropped in the most bollocks loot box system yet devised by mankind.

    Oh, but the critics love it, don't they? Well, they would, given that most of them reviewed it at a special swanky event held by Activision, closely supervised for their impressions whilst having their every need catered for. "Gaming journalism" indeed; integrity personified. Amazing how that little tidbit of trivia isn't widely publicised eh? Pfft...

    I am convinced people buy this out of habit at this point. I certainly don't buy it, but I think everyone has that one friend who still does because the series made him happy when he was a teenager or something and it's become a drug to them. They tolerate any level of pure crap the series throws at them because they scored that perfect kill 10 years ago and it made them smile.

    Good for them. For the rest of us who can't casually discard our brain, CoD:WWII is a complete waste of time and epitomises every single last thing wrong with this ridiculous industry.    … Expand
  78. Jambobbyb
    Nov 4, 2017
    8
    Review based on PS4 Pro @ 4K ... Single player is great looking plays well and has been thoroughly enjoyable. Zombies looks immense and plays again really well all the zombies are nicely done and the sound effects are A++ Multiplayer is decent but I feel the colour pallets is a little bit drab not massively keen on the customisation and a lot of the TDM maps are smaller sized. I’m no CODReview based on PS4 Pro @ 4K ... Single player is great looking plays well and has been thoroughly enjoyable. Zombies looks immense and plays again really well all the zombies are nicely done and the sound effects are A++ Multiplayer is decent but I feel the colour pallets is a little bit drab not massively keen on the customisation and a lot of the TDM maps are smaller sized. I’m no COD fan boy but This is the best COD in a long time 8.5//10 but I’m voting if a 9...… Expand
  79. P_D1LLY
    Nov 4, 2017
    5
    The campaign and zombie mode seems fine, but I am here for the Multiplayer...for your reference, my favorite games in the series were Modern Warfare 1 & 2 and Black Ops II, in no particular order.

    This is one of the bigger disappointments in my gaming life, my friends and I were going to get the gang back together, after one day of this mess we will probably all be returning the game.    The campaign and zombie mode seems fine, but I am here for the Multiplayer...for your reference, my favorite games in the series were Modern Warfare 1 & 2 and Black Ops II, in no particular order.

    This is one of the bigger disappointments in my gaming life, my friends and I were going to get the gang back together, after one day of this mess we will probably all be returning the game. This game might look like boots on the ground WW2, however it doesn't feel like it at all. You're zooming around the map like it's nothing, it's a twitch shooter, I can't remember a COD game that felt so, for a lack of a better word, wrong. Advanced and Infinite warfare weren't my cup of tea, to say the least, but the way they controlled was in line with the setting and equipment.
    My biggest complaint might actually be the maps. Not only are they tiny, they are weirdly streamlined, don't feel like authentic environments, just corridors with a coat of paint (ugly coat of paint too, the graphics in mp are very underwhelming). The interface in my opinion is a mess, the hub world completely unnecessary. Bottom line, I have no intention of going back to the game. Which is kind of sad, we were all really looking forward to this. Even World at War was a superior WW2 shooter. I won't give this game a 0, because it obviously just doesn't deserve that, but I do believe a 5 is a fair score, I am shocked by the positive reception by some gaming sites (apart from the single player). I'd say stay away from this one...    … Expand
  80. wapakalypse
    Nov 4, 2017
    5
    I give it a five. It looks amazing and I like the HQ concept. Its fun to play. Its boots on the ground COD. There are a lot of desperate people pulling drop shots and jumping around like fairies to avoid being shot but that is just the reality of COD right now.

    The servers are unable to handle these cool new ideas. It is constantly crashing, infinite loading screen and error codes all    I give it a five. It looks amazing and I like the HQ concept. Its fun to play. Its boots on the ground COD. There are a lot of desperate people pulling drop shots and jumping around like fairies to avoid being shot but that is just the reality of COD right now.

    The servers are unable to handle these cool new ideas. It is constantly crashing, infinite loading screen and error codes all day. The error codes present a link to www.callofduty.com/wwii/status where you can check updates on the server status however this page is clearly not updated because no one on my friends list can access any online function of this game yet the website indicates that all systems are green...

    The worst part, is that they have censored WWII and made it politically correct.

    Next Gen video games are ruining the gaming experience because video game developers seem to be simply riding the hype of next gen gaming while putting minimal effort into the actual performance of the games. Micro transactions have turned gaming into a profit first industry, have removed the artistic integrity of games, and have completely disregarded the consumer.

    My advice is to buy this game used on Kijiji and prevent these developers from making m.ore money than they deserve    … Expand
  81. Joshinatir2200
    Nov 4, 2017
    4
    This game takes all of the problems from previous COD titles and amplifies them. Ridiculous wait times, button functions not working (this is fixable), etc. The campaign is very meh, multiplayer is very unmemorable, and the nazi zombies is boring after playing it once, even zombies in space land was better.. I can't believe I spent $60 on this junk. It's worth half that at most. MayThis game takes all of the problems from previous COD titles and amplifies them. Ridiculous wait times, button functions not working (this is fixable), etc. The campaign is very meh, multiplayer is very unmemorable, and the nazi zombies is boring after playing it once, even zombies in space land was better.. I can't believe I spent $60 on this junk. It's worth half that at most. May be the last COD game I ever buy.… Expand
  82. krokode
    Nov 4, 2017
    10
    بازی شگفت انگیزیه، به شدت از سری جنگ جهانی 2 خوشم میاد. گرافیک بازی دلنشین و زیباست.داستان بازی خیلی خوبه. گیم پلی بازی حرف نداره.

    going back to WW 2 , amazing graphics, amazing sound, amazing acting, amazing gameplay, most of all amazing back to the roots. love WW 2 series and stories. really love this game, amazing. two thumbs op COD:WW2    بازی شگفت انگیزیه، به شدت از سری جنگ جهانی 2 خوشم میاد. گرافیک بازی دلنشین و زیباست.داستان بازی خیلی خوبه. گیم پلی بازی حرف نداره.

    going back to WW 2 , amazing graphics, amazing sound, amazing acting, amazing gameplay, most of all amazing back to the roots. love WW 2 series and stories. really love this game, amazing. two thumbs op COD:WW2
  83. SnyderVanHoven
    Nov 4, 2017
    10
    CoD WW2 opens with a dramatic flair, befitting of the prestigious franchise that CoD is. The moment I started the game I knew for sure I was in for something great. Sledgehammer and Activision deliver on the high quality that this brand is known for, delivering high octane and responsive action that we've never seen the likes of for the past decade. In fact, I daresay this game is a lifeCoD WW2 opens with a dramatic flair, befitting of the prestigious franchise that CoD is. The moment I started the game I knew for sure I was in for something great. Sledgehammer and Activision deliver on the high quality that this brand is known for, delivering high octane and responsive action that we've never seen the likes of for the past decade. In fact, I daresay this game is a life changer. Since playing this game, I've noticed that some aspects of my life have changed dramatically. Food is trivial to me, as CoD WW2 has provided me all sustenance I need. I no longer require sleep, I no longer **** the way mere mortals **** I now **** rainbows, befitting of my godlike status after playing this game. I've also since had all my debt cleared and, in fact, received riches that no one could even fathom. My gamer skills have gone up +100000000000000000000000000000000000 points, now video games are a mere novelty and now equate to pictures moving rapidly on a screen. What nonsense! My IQ has raised to be around 300, so yes, playing this game DOES make you smarter than watching Rick and Morty!(to all the naysayers out there) No game could E V E R compare to the splendor of CoD WW2, they could only hope to lick the boots of it. I implore you all, BUY THIS GAME! It will change your life for the best.… Expand
  84. Hecatom
    Nov 4, 2017
    0
    Just like many others have said before me.
    This game is the culmination of everything bad in the AAA game industry so far.
    The sad part is that as usual the lowest common denominator will keep enabling this kind of practices until is too late.

    Watch how the next Starwars Battlefront 2 will up all the negative aspects of this game and people will eat it gladly.
  85. metooo
    Nov 4, 2017
    6
    I wanted to mention something a little different from other reviews. Played cod since mw1. My biggest gripe is that maps have been getting more and more streamlined, to the point where cod feels like glorified laser tag. I got the deluxe edition hoping it would be a throwback to the good old days where you'd snipe from a destroyed building, lurk through tall grass, or hide in the carcassI wanted to mention something a little different from other reviews. Played cod since mw1. My biggest gripe is that maps have been getting more and more streamlined, to the point where cod feels like glorified laser tag. I got the deluxe edition hoping it would be a throwback to the good old days where you'd snipe from a destroyed building, lurk through tall grass, or hide in the carcass of a downed helicopter, but instead they got rid of all that realistic hc Tdm stuff to appease the trigger fingers of people who complain about camping. The result is that it feels more streamlined than ever, in a very backward way. No you can't climb that tower it's decoration. No you can't hide in that grass, it's decoration too. BF1 really ruined COD for me, that was truly next gen and I got this hoping Cod was really gonna go back to the roots and then innovate from there. Loved advanced warfare btw, sledgehammer makes good games, but the slow boots on the ground doesn't work IMHO if you're using a map style still suited for fast play in the vein of advanced or infinite warfare. Slow play should have a tense stealth element to it which is what made the old games so fun for me,… Expand
  86. xismius
    Nov 4, 2017
    3
    El juego no está mal pero el problema más gordo ahora de lanzamiento es que no se puede ni jugar de la cantidad de bugs que hay sobretodo con el tema de la conectividad, el juego ahora mismo está roto, por lo demás yo lo veo un juego bastante decente, no diré de los mejores de la saga, pero pasable e infinitamente superior a los anteriores aunque eso tampoco es muy difícil viendo el nivelEl juego no está mal pero el problema más gordo ahora de lanzamiento es que no se puede ni jugar de la cantidad de bugs que hay sobretodo con el tema de la conectividad, el juego ahora mismo está roto, por lo demás yo lo veo un juego bastante decente, no diré de los mejores de la saga, pero pasable e infinitamente superior a los anteriores aunque eso tampoco es muy difícil viendo el nivel de los ultimos años.… Expand
  87. zippitybop
    Nov 4, 2017
    10
    lot of the zero out of ten ratings are nonsense it implies that the game is literally unplayable or can have no joy derived from it at all. For me this was not the case and have thoroughly enjoyed it. i will be upfront and say it probably does not deserve a full ten and i have not fully dived into every aspect of the game. but it is certainly a better cod title than some of the recent oneslot of the zero out of ten ratings are nonsense it implies that the game is literally unplayable or can have no joy derived from it at all. For me this was not the case and have thoroughly enjoyed it. i will be upfront and say it probably does not deserve a full ten and i have not fully dived into every aspect of the game. but it is certainly a better cod title than some of the recent ones and I plan on trying to see if my attention span can hold up to max prestige.… Expand
  88. Jedimaster007
    Nov 4, 2017
    0
    R.I.P Call of Duty.

    I was really looking forward to this game because of all the media-fed hype. IMO wasted my money on this lame excuse for a game. There is nothing new here to see.... "please move along". You can see that they have completely run out of any new ideas: instead opted to create a lame game with heavy overtones of Battlefield 1 (which is a good game). This game is    R.I.P Call of Duty.

    I was really looking forward to this game because of all the media-fed hype. IMO wasted my money on this lame excuse for a game.
    There is nothing new here to see.... "please move along". You can see that they have completely run out of any new ideas: instead opted to create a lame game with heavy overtones of Battlefield 1 (which is a good game).

    This game is simply a cash-cow for Activision: a guarantee'd earner: micro-transaction hell.

    In multiplayer: the graphics are pretty dismal. The maps nothing new. Weapons boring. I'm trying really hard to think of anything that impressed me.

    On day of release the servers were running really slow. Sometimes we waited 5 minutes+ to get into a match. One thing in particular that I found annoying was the 'Headquarters' a place where all online gamers congregate prior to finding a match - more like a pen to contain the sheep.

    I have bought and played all of the Call of Duty games since CoD 4 and watched as Activision have run out of ideas and produced lesser titles. I honestly didn't think anything could have been a greater disappointment than Infinite Warfare. This is.

    The reality is a group of 6 of us - gamers who loved playing CoD were talking about trading the game in on day 2 of release really puts it in perspective.

    If you enjoy FPS don't waste your money on this pile of tripe. If we keep buying this junk and filling their purses without saying how it really is then this is the end of gaming. :)

    Have a nice day.    … Expand
  89. russb23
    Nov 4, 2017
    9
    Dont see why so much complaining. i really like the game. I dont play cod for the campaign. Multiplayer is classic cod, but its back to ww2. What more can you ask? This isnt battfield or PUBG. THIS IS COD. Im realy enjoying the multiplayer, and the people complaining probably just suck to be honest. Who cares about loot crates. Just play multi player and have a blast with friends. GreatDont see why so much complaining. i really like the game. I dont play cod for the campaign. Multiplayer is classic cod, but its back to ww2. What more can you ask? This isnt battfield or PUBG. THIS IS COD. Im realy enjoying the multiplayer, and the people complaining probably just suck to be honest. Who cares about loot crates. Just play multi player and have a blast with friends. Great game. Classic WW2 cod.… Expand
  90. matdevine21
    Nov 4, 2017
    4
    Had high hopes but the entire campaign feels disjointed and lacking focus, also the change from regenerating health to health packs whilst adding a level of difficulty does stop this feeling like a COD game and more like a Steam Unity knock off.

    Multiplayer is meh, nothing different from the old World at War, lacks maps and game modes. My main problem with this supposed next generation    Had high hopes but the entire campaign feels disjointed and lacking focus, also the change from regenerating health to health packs whilst adding a level of difficulty does stop this feeling like a COD game and more like a Steam Unity knock off.

    Multiplayer is meh, nothing different from the old World at War, lacks maps and game modes.
    My main problem with this supposed next generation of maps is that they are no different than last gen, where is the dynamic settings? why cant there be a physical changes to the map randomly i.e. a battle on a sinking battleship or a war around you with buildings exploding? its just lazy and derriviative but compared to what Activision charges for season pass / map packs its just insulting!

    Loot crates are obviously there, disgusting to have them opening on normandy batlefield in your "social area" and visable to all, there really isnt an "enough money earned here" is there!

    Overall I feel more down on the franchise now than ever before, it needs to go away and have a high level rethink about COD's future as come next year, COD will not be a pre order or even a day one purchase for me!    … Expand
  91. mdrenth
    Nov 4, 2017
    0
    gameplay is pretty okay but the loading screens and waiting times are horrible, wouldn't recommend buying right now. multiplayer feels like an early acces
  92. Deafdumbmute
    Nov 4, 2017
    10
    People complaining about this being a twitch shooter is like people complaining Mario games are platformers, it's stupid. Also if you knew it had microtransations and it was a twitch shooter why buy it?
    Are you stupid? Secondly after the debacle with the Wolfenstein II reviews, it's pretty obvious that there are many who simply want to downvote it for political reasons. At this stage in    People complaining about this being a twitch shooter is like people complaining Mario games are platformers, it's stupid. Also if you knew it had microtransations and it was a twitch shooter why buy it?
    Are you stupid? Secondly after the debacle with the Wolfenstein II reviews, it's pretty obvious that there are many who simply want to downvote it for political reasons. At this stage in the game, Metacritic's user scores are not fit for purpose.    … Expand
  93. Draclif2
    Nov 4, 2017
    9
    Amazing graphics, amazing sound, amazing acting. Any review under 5 is written by children. While not.a masterpiece, this game is a top notch experience. Take your time with the story. Play on veteran mode. Make it last. The pvp is creative and diverse although I want more game modes and variety in war mode.
  94. Barbod
    Nov 4, 2017
    10
    Call of duty is getting back ...
    With a good story and a good multiplayer part , is one of the best shooting game in this year.
    This game can make you to feel you are in WW2
  95. destinyfan1
    Nov 4, 2017
    8
    I have played cod ghosts, aw , bo3 and infinite warfare and now their is cod ww2 and from all of them this is the best cod
    Note that I still need to play a lot of zombies and multiplayer before i finish my review
    I beat the campaign ,and while it may not be the best cod campaign ,it is finally not as dull and boring as the last cods But its still far from perfect and it is very short    I have played cod ghosts, aw , bo3 and infinite warfare and now their is cod ww2 and from all of them this is the best cod
    Note that I still need to play a lot of zombies and multiplayer before i finish my review
    I beat the campaign ,and while it may not be the best cod campaign ,it is finally not as dull and boring as the last cods
    But its still far from perfect and it is very short like every cod
    From the couple of hours zombies and multiplayer i must say that I like the changes for now, and overall I have an enjoyable experience
    Zombies is now scarier , but people on youtube are overreacting like its a horror masterpiece , but i like it already a lot, not sure or i like it more then bo3 zombies but its definitly fun.
    Multiplayer is not so much different and feels a little bit like aw but its still fun,but i am not amazed
    I am not prestige yet so i still need to do a part of the headquarters,but so far i really like it
    Microtransactions are definitely back , but I don't give a **** about them anymore because almost every game in this dirty game industry does it right now

    So far the most enjoyable cod in years    … Expand
  96. IONOSGAMES
    Nov 4, 2017
    6
    Un juego de disparos, shooter sin mas. No profundiza en la historia, no innova, es un juego para pasar el rato, divertido sin mas. Es recomendable a los que les gusta el shooter a bajo precio, ya que su duracion pienso que no esta acorde a su precio. Lo malo es el parche de salida que es OBLIGATORIO. No se puede jugar sin ese parche, por lo que suspendo este juego
  97. Ghoster
    Nov 4, 2017
    1
    Sad! I had big expectations for that game looking forward COD is back to WW2. Unfortunately game is terrible. Strong aim assist make me feel game is made for 7 years old.
  98. Talbis
    Nov 4, 2017
    4
    I once said that if Call of Duty will return to World War II I'll give it another chance. Well, here we are.

    One of the most vivid games in my memory is the first Call of Duty, the campaign that made me simply happy to play and replay it over and over. This time around the campaign is amazing. I love it. Characters are great, the story is compelling and both audio and visuals are of the    I once said that if Call of Duty will return to World War II I'll give it another chance. Well, here we are.

    One of the most vivid games in my memory is the first Call of Duty, the campaign that made me simply happy to play and replay it over and over. This time around the campaign is amazing. I love it. Characters are great, the story is compelling and both audio and visuals are of the best quality I have ever seen in CoD. I can see myself playing it again and again alongside the first games. Props on this one. And man, I wish I could buy a singleplayer only for a third of a price because the rest of this game...

    Zombies have zombies. Enough said. I vomit with zombies. Movies, TV, games, zombies are everywhere. They are boring. They were boring years ago. Just stop making zombie games and movies already! They've been done to death... Pun intended.

    Multiplayer is weird. You have that new hub section where a bunch of people run around, open boxes with random **** and do nothing but look for a menu to see the multiplayer modes. It's confusing at first but it is a good idea... but seeing loot boxes being open, seeing other people getting some random junk made me realize that the point of this hub is to gloat about your loot. Nothing social or interesting takes place here, just consumerism at its finest! The gameplay itself is like CoD of old. No recoil, no strategy, no thinking. Maps are built with sniper nests and choke points from grounds up, so... every game looks exactly the same. It gets boring after a while and because of how weapons handle you feel like the game was programmed as your first shooter - when you're done go play something better (most games are better).

    To sum this up. Singleplayer campaign is an easy 9/10, multiplayer is for me 3/10 (7/10 for CoD players) and zombies is about -1000/10. It's a shame you can't buy just the singleplayer, I'd pay for that.    … Expand
  99. raefon
    Nov 4, 2017
    0
    COD was once the bench mark for FPS and what every one strived to be. However those days are long gone and sledge hammer has continued to not only put nails in the coffin, but has dug the hole and started throwing dirt in.

    This game is beyond rubbish, its has outdated graphics, terrible animation, weapons, physics, map development and sound. There is not one single redeeming feature.    COD was once the bench mark for FPS and what every one strived to be. However those days are long gone and sledge hammer has continued to not only put nails in the coffin, but has dug the hole and started throwing dirt in.

    This game is beyond rubbish, its has outdated graphics, terrible animation, weapons, physics, map development and sound.

    There is not one single redeeming feature. Activision and sledge hammer should hold their heads in shame as this shambles and desecration of COD.

    R.I P. old friend its a shame you died with out the grace and respect you deserved.    … Expand
  100. pina
    Nov 4, 2017
    2
    I bought it yesterday since it was back to the roots, but it went literally back to the roots. They forgot that we're in 2017 and not in 2007. This game is SO poor: graphics are nowhere as it should be on today's consoles, animations are the same as 10 years ago, explosives are poorly done and the indestructible and hidden borders of the environment is something retarded.

    That's because    I bought it yesterday since it was back to the roots, but it went literally back to the roots. They forgot that we're in 2017 and not in 2007. This game is SO poor: graphics are nowhere as it should be on today's consoles, animations are the same as 10 years ago, explosives are poorly done and the indestructible and hidden borders of the environment is something retarded.

    That's because of the old engine from the beginning of the franchise. They just 'modified' it but the basics remain the same. The download package is 70GB (!!!!), all of which is bloatware. We're not talking about ultra HD graphics are heavy renedering for next gen consoles.

    The gameplay in multiplayer is very arcade, very fast and it's like I'm playing against and with bots. They all move so jerky. Shooting mechanics are poorly done, it doesn't feel right, it's all too fast. After a MP round, it takes ages and ages before a new game starts and you have to stare five minutes at the scoreboard without any possiblity to go to another screen.

    What's great? The unlockables, the perks and kill cams are still great and something to play for. But the gaming experience is so so so poor and it's painful to see how the gaming press keep giving it high scores. Perhaps it's because of the Campaign Mode, which I'm not interested in.

    But the whole game experience and above all, the game mechanics are retarded and outdated. This is a game for PS3, not for current gen consoles. Once again, you should be ashamed Activision to support publishing a cheap rip off of this franchise. IW or Sledgehammer MUST create a new engine for this game.

    This is like like playing FIFA 07 on a PS4 in 2017.    … Expand
Page:

Awards & Rankings

82
#82 Best PS4 Game of 2017
9
#9 Most Discussed PS4 Game of 2017
9
#9 Most Shared PS4 Game of 2017

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
79

Generally favorable reviews - based on 83 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 62 out of 83
  2. Mixed: 21 out of 83
  3. Negative: 0 out of 83
  1. CD-Action
    Jan 10, 2018
    70
    I really wanted CoD’s return to World War II to be something more than a solid game – but it’s not. I couldn’t shake the feeling that I’ve already seen all this, that the developers (or perhaps the publisher) chose to create something as safe as possible. There’s just one campaign mission that surprised me with its scale, the rest is just a disappointing “best of Call of Duty”. The multiplayer is as good as usual, but it was infused with unnecessary systems resembling mobile titles, e.g spending in-game currency on pointless tasks of the “kill 100 enemies” variety. Missions that make you watch other players open their loot boxes are the pinnacle of absurdity. [13/2017, p.64]
  2. The Digital Fix
    Dec 22, 2017
    70
    A solid return to its roots, Call of Duty WWII reminds us what made us all fall in love Call of Duty in the first place. It ticks all the boxes which is both a blessing and a curse. Good fun and worth your time but offers nothing exceptional.
    Read full review
  3. Playstation Official Magazine UK
    Dec 15, 2017
    90
    Revitalised and exemplary FPS gaming. Multiplayer trims back to the essentials, campaign shows sensitivity and Zombies...well it's a new excuse to play CoD Zombies. [Christmas 2017, p.77]
See all critic reviews »