Call of Duty: WWII

 PlayStation 4
User Score
5.1

Mixed or average reviews- based on 2065 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 718 out of 2065
  2. Mixed: 482 out of 2065
  3. Negative: 865 out of 2065
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. LittleL
    Nov 25, 2017
    5
    I want to really like this game, call of duty was a favorite of mine growing up and when i heard we'd be going back to boots on the ground gameplay i was excited. While this is not the worst game in the series (cough infinite warfare cough) it is in my opinion the worst boots on the ground experience we've been given so far.

    Campaign - While i know most play call of duty for the    I want to really like this game, call of duty was a favorite of mine growing up and when i heard we'd be going back to boots on the ground gameplay i was excited. While this is not the worst game in the series (cough infinite warfare cough) it is in my opinion the worst boots on the ground experience we've been given so far.

    Campaign -
    While i know most play call of duty for the multiplayer, i still love playing the campaigns as well. The one were given here in WW2 has to be one of the worst in the franchise. Characters who i cant remember with the exception of Daniels because everyone was screaming his name every 2 seconds, clipping that can be spotted easily with one example being in the opening scene and vehicle physics that are plain awful. The first level was so much fun but it all just fell apart after that. If your buying just for the campaign, pass on this one.

    Multiplayer -
    Here is where the game should really shine but it just doesn't. We all know what a disaster the launch was so i'm just going to skip over that. The game comes standard with 9 maps and to be honest i only kinda like 2 or 3 of them. Theres no map that comes up in the rotation that i get excited to play on. The spawns are AWFUL and i seem to always be put right infront of someone who ends up shooting me in the back. The guns need some serious work as everyone is just running around with the STG, Bar, PPSH and kar. The new mode war is pretty fun until you realize there are only 3 maps to play on with it and the new headquarters is ripped straight from destiny and feels pointless. I dont play zombies so i cant personally speak on that but from what im hearing its not to great either.

    I hope one day i'll be able to love a call of duty game again but this most definitely is not the one.

    My final rating of Call Of Duty: WW2 is a 5/10    … Expand
  2. Easycw44
    Nov 25, 2017
    5
    After taking a break from this series after MW2, thought they might be able to replicate the brilliance of World at War. Unfortunately to date they have not, maps are small, guns are repetitive, and at times almost useless in the smallest of the small maps (Sniper Rifles). This games doesn't reward skill, if you enjoy twitch shooters, then this is the best on the market. 5 feels fairAfter taking a break from this series after MW2, thought they might be able to replicate the brilliance of World at War. Unfortunately to date they have not, maps are small, guns are repetitive, and at times almost useless in the smallest of the small maps (Sniper Rifles). This games doesn't reward skill, if you enjoy twitch shooters, then this is the best on the market. 5 feels fair because it is still better than most FPS out there, but doesn't hold a candle to Battlefield 1. Could go on about things I dislike, even if the new map packs take it to the next level, you're still going to have to wait, and pay (which is fine). I'm finished with the COD series, Easy come, Easy go… Expand
  3. davidas101
    Nov 25, 2017
    1
    Boring, Bland, Buggy, This COD game is a huge disappointment for me, its single player campaign was average at best, the multiplayer was absolute garbage in comparison to COD Black ops 3 or even Infinite Warfare. The best way to describe this game in my opinion is that the entire time I was playing this I was thinking this game should have launched about 4 years ago instead of AdvancedBoring, Bland, Buggy, This COD game is a huge disappointment for me, its single player campaign was average at best, the multiplayer was absolute garbage in comparison to COD Black ops 3 or even Infinite Warfare. The best way to describe this game in my opinion is that the entire time I was playing this I was thinking this game should have launched about 4 years ago instead of Advanced Warfare or something along those lines. DO NOT BUY… Expand
  4. kyper007
    Nov 25, 2017
    7
    Играл в call of duty еще с ее начала.Купил магазине так как игра была по скринам на коробке очень похожа на Медаль за отвагу и не прогадал. Новая кола это возвращение к этим самым истокам,довольно удачное.
  5. BlackAndWhite
    Nov 24, 2017
    2
    Before I list the pros and cons I want to say that this review is not based on me being bitter or being a "hater" or any of that crap. I got my kill/death ratio to around 2.6 so I'm a lot better than the average player. This is an honest review.

    Pros: ▪Not a bad campaign but not great either. ▪Graphics are good in the campaign and average in multi-player. ▪Footsteps are easily    Before I list the pros and cons I want to say that this review is not based on me being bitter or being a "hater" or any of that crap. I got my kill/death ratio to around 2.6 so I'm a lot better than the average player. This is an honest review.

    Pros:

    ▪Not a bad campaign but not great either.
    ▪Graphics are good in the campaign and average in multi-player.
    ▪Footsteps are easily heard unlike MW Remastered.
    ▪ I personally like the new HQ instead of just sitting looking at a lobby screen. Pretty cool how you can look around and interact with different things.

    Cons:
    ▪Team balancing is horrendously poor. I played around 100 games and was on the team full of clueless morons about 75% of the time. A lot of games were not close at all, too one-sided.
    ▪The game lags quite often and has caused me multiple deaths (Not my connection as every other multi-player game is fine).
    ▪There is something massively wrong in multi-player. In many 1 v 1 gunfights where on my screen we (Me and an opponent) see eachother at the same time and I shoot first, get about 10 bullets into my opponent and he picks his **** gun up whilst being shot and drops me in 2 bullets. I watch the killcam and somehow he was already shooting me before I even lifted my gun up?? He had taken no damage either WTF??! Absolute joke.
    ▪Loot crates should not be in any game ever unless the game was free maybe. People already paid £50+ for the game and these greedy developers aren't satisfied and want more money for doing nothing basically.
    ▪Perk system/Division is just stupid in my opinion as it restricts you. If you don't want to show up on the enemy UAV then you have to use the Mountain division. You may also want to resupply from dead enemies.. Nope! Sorry, you can't have both as resupplying is in another division. So dumb. Should have just had normal perks as usual.
    ▪The maps are absolute garbage except 3. The other 6 are just painful to play. The inept developers had very little imagination when designing them. Only 9 **** maps in the base game is absolutely pathetic as well. The war game mode has its own 2-3 unique maps but that gamemode is pretty poor anyway.
    ▪They are copying off Battlefield with the Bayonet charge, War mode etc.
    ▪Gameplay is too fast paced.. everyone runs around like they are **** Olympic athletes on steroids. Why can't the game just be a bit slower paced??
    ▪Guns have basically no recoil making it very easy for terrible scrubs to shoot you from 40 yards with an SMG, laughable.
    ▪No-scoping and quick-scoping is too easy. Something else that caters to the 10 year olds who think they are pros, Jesus Christ.
    ▪You die a bit too quickly. Well.. I do at least. On my screen I am killed instantly but when I shoot enemies it sometimes takes 15 bullets and that's without missing.
    ▪The community is absolutely cancerous. Sitting in windows or behind objects head-glitching, sitting in corners, drop-shotting etc etc. This is not the developers fault obviously but it is another reason not to buy this trash.

    I could be on all day with the cons so I will just end it there. I give it a 2/10. Just absolutely terrible. The amount of **** which happens in multi-player is just mind-boggling. I almost smashed my controller on 10 seperate occasions. It's depressing thinking how great CoD used to be. WaW, BO1 were just brilliant. This **** doesn't come close to either. This is 100% the last CoD I ever, ever purchase. Deleted the game. Good **** riddance.    … Expand
  6. NopdAuron
    Nov 23, 2017
    8
    I don't understand all the hate here. Yes, the servers were bad at launch but oh well. Call of Duty is finally back to its roots with World War 2 and boots on the ground. The single player is great and worth a try. The multiplayer is pretty good and so is the zombies.
  7. Shalakur
    Nov 22, 2017
    7
    So Call of Duty World War 2, the game i have been waiting for since World at War was released in 2008, was not a disappointment. The game features a detailed story that utilizes the old style health bar system, reminds me of the old medal of honor days. I would give this game at least a 9 if the story was the only feature, but its not. Sledgehammer took zombies in somewhat differentSo Call of Duty World War 2, the game i have been waiting for since World at War was released in 2008, was not a disappointment. The game features a detailed story that utilizes the old style health bar system, reminds me of the old medal of honor days. I would give this game at least a 9 if the story was the only feature, but its not. Sledgehammer took zombies in somewhat different direction that promotes horror and gore rather than the goofy style of Infinite Warfare, it's a rather detailed and immersive zombies experience. Now the important topic, multiplayer. Multiplayer is your standard boots on the ground game play, it has an new create-a-class system called divisions. The division style is much like Battlefield but it allows more customization, by that I mean you can run the machine gunner division with a shotgun and it would still work fine. I really enjoyed the multiplayer but as of Thanksgiving 2017 my game is broken, not the disc I mean the game itself. Many people such as myself have experienced the game-breaking bugs known as error code 1, 3, and 5. The bug downloads a quick playlist update then automatically fails returning you to the start screen, then when you try to join multiplayer (or any other online function) it re-downloads and errors again sending you into an infinite loop. Many of us paid $60-120 on this game just to not play it. That is not the only multiplayer bug, there have been many reports of black-screening, server kicks, and overall complications revolving around the servers. Would be a great game if myself and many others could play it.… Expand
  8. 1983Electric
    Nov 22, 2017
    4
    Campaign player here. I felt like all the cool stories happened with World at War, and then they had to try and come up with other things that just weren't as interesting; too short. Also.. you play as a girl trying to deliver a briefcase for a level. The graphics were really nice though.
  9. REAPER007
    Nov 22, 2017
    2
    F***ing trash. Nothing else to add. Every goddamn year Activision profits on CoD series without making ANYTHING TO IMPROVE IT SOMEHOW. Since the Modern Warfare came out in 2007 the devs have changed absolutely NOTHING (well, besides zombies mode which is improving a bit with every game and the mp mode in Black Ops 2). A complete disaster and lack of any ideas lead to this - a big pile ofF***ing trash. Nothing else to add. Every goddamn year Activision profits on CoD series without making ANYTHING TO IMPROVE IT SOMEHOW. Since the Modern Warfare came out in 2007 the devs have changed absolutely NOTHING (well, besides zombies mode which is improving a bit with every game and the mp mode in Black Ops 2). A complete disaster and lack of any ideas lead to this - a big pile of ten year old excrement with a scent of WW2 piss. And then they demand 50$ for this. Amen CoD, you are dead to me!… Expand
  10. wigclyne
    Nov 22, 2017
    7
    It is great to have boots on the ground again and WW2 is better than Infinite Warfare but the game as whole is a let down. Online connections at launch has been terrible but this has improved but you do not share the barracks anymore . There seems to be few maps but the addition of War mode is a welcome one.

    Story mode is average and a little short but there is a decent amount of    It is great to have boots on the ground again and WW2 is better than Infinite Warfare but the game as whole is a let down. Online connections at launch has been terrible but this has improved but you do not share the barracks anymore . There seems to be few maps but the addition of War mode is a welcome one.

    Story mode is average and a little short but there is a decent amount of scenarios and does have a few great moments.

    Online, microtransactions and it seems a little light on content have let this down. More of WW2 should have been added, it was a world war after all.    … Expand
  11. Quitrightnow
    Nov 22, 2017
    1
    Get the boys back together said the commercial and so we did. But i did not become the happy reunion we were hoping for. This game killed Call of Duty for me. So sad but true. There is just something wrong with the game. I cant put my finger on it but its just not good.
  12. Uglytruck
    Nov 21, 2017
    3
    I've had a long history with COD... I'm done... I play MP and nothing else and what this franchise has become is - MEH. It has surfaced that rather than matchmaking, the netcode guys would rather "inject" random lag across all players. Over time, this shouldn't affect your K/D, but it is just wrong on so many levels. The objective is to give one player a lag advantage along with anI've had a long history with COD... I'm done... I play MP and nothing else and what this franchise has become is - MEH. It has surfaced that rather than matchmaking, the netcode guys would rather "inject" random lag across all players. Over time, this shouldn't affect your K/D, but it is just wrong on so many levels. The objective is to give one player a lag advantage along with an emotional/mental high to keep coming back when they have a match go 17-5 in their favor. Not unlike a drug dealer. Where does it leave the casually good to exceptional player? They don't care and now I don't care. Every game since the original black ops has had this with some varying degree. How many times have you played on a team with one of these games and wonder how the majority of everyone went negative? It's there. Group this up with an anemic number of maps and some of the series worst score streaks, you've got a really boring game. I don't feel compelled to play it - I often forget that I have it. I'm sure not "buying" anything on it. The sad thing is, they'll promote a redux of MW2 when they realize no one is playing or buying it, but they'll do it with the same awful netcode like they did with MWR. This is why the series is dead. Your skill or desire to build a skill-set doesn't mean anything to them.… Expand
  13. Kramerllama
    Nov 21, 2017
    3
    Let's preface this with the fact that the last Call of Duty game I picked up and played quite a bit of was Modern Warfare 3. After that game I lost interest in the series as I began to hate the direction the series was starting to go to. I didn't pick up or play any of the jetpack games, Ghosts through Infinite Warfare, as it finally looked like Call of Duty lost its way, and what theLet's preface this with the fact that the last Call of Duty game I picked up and played quite a bit of was Modern Warfare 3. After that game I lost interest in the series as I began to hate the direction the series was starting to go to. I didn't pick up or play any of the jetpack games, Ghosts through Infinite Warfare, as it finally looked like Call of Duty lost its way, and what the series was initially about.

    When WWII was announced I was a little excited that they were going back to boots on the ground, going back to WWII, and going back to the series roots. Though I was skeptical, and became a little disappointed in some of the features they were implementing, or blatantly ripping off from other games, I still decided to pick the game up on launch day to play it, and hopefully get that same feeling I had when I played CoD 2, 3 and WaW. Sadly, this game is probably one of the worst, if not the worst Call of Duty game I have played.

    To break it down:

    Weapons -
    Dont even bother using any of the other guns unless its the STG 44 or BAR, as silent SMGs dominate in this game. They are great in CQC, and can outgun nearly any sniper rifle, LMG, or typical
    semi auto rifles at medium and long range. STG and BAR have nearly 0 recoil, and again can out shoot any of the other weapons at medium to long range. Don't bother with the shotguns unless you run with the incendiary rounds loaded as even nearly point blank, shotguns are a 2 hit kill.

    Maps -
    These are probably the worst maps in Call of Duty history. Every map is a chokepoint meat grinder. It's you're typical 3 lane map, but there's no tactics involved. They become a meat grinder as they are poorly designed. Maps are filled with clutter, no flanking routes, terrible spawns, and they are easy to spawn camp on. Unless you like to die over and over and over due to campers camping your spawn, you'll probably not enjoy these maps.

    Matchmaking-
    The matchmaking in the game is equally as terrible as anything else. You'll constantly be put on teams filled with the worst players in the game, as the enemy team is stacked with above average and good players, which just results in a steam roll for the enemy team.

    Gameplay-
    This game is filled with players hopping around like Master Chief, and dropping down onto their bellies to drop shot you. Due to all the clutter on the maps, you'll get everyone headglitching behind an object.

    Zombies-
    Zombies in WaW was fun. It was addicting. Zombies in WWII is utterly boring. Played 1 online round of Zombies, got to level 30+ and everytime I died or go downed, I was praying the game would be over. I was that bored of it. I was bored of the game by level 15. It was just too easy to advance. I never felt threatened by the zombies at all. It was just boring.

    This game is just utter crap. It is probably the worst Call of Duty that I have played. I was hoping that when they said they were going back to boots on the ground, they were going back to Call of Duty 2, one of, if not the best game in the franchise, but with modern tech. Nope. This game feels like it was made in 2006. Unbalanced weapons, matches, poorly designed maps, which look like one of the developers toddlers designed them, horrible lag, and matchmaking, and ultimately just a poorly developed game. The fact that this game took 3 years to make is astonishing as it looks like they did everything in 6 months. Wait, Call of Duty 3 was developed in 8 months, and was a better developed game than WWII. There was no sense of accomplishment when you do well, no satisfaction when you kill an enemy who was besting you the whole match, no sense of pride as you rank up yourself, your division or your weapon. I was extremely disappointed with the game, and I didn't have a lot of expectations coming into it. If you want to play a good WWII game, play any of the older Call of Duty games. Play Medal of Honor Frontlines/Rising Sun/Airbourne/Allied Assault, they will all give you a better experience in a WWII setting, and online, and be a whole lot more fun than this game.

    The only thing that is redeemable in WWII is the new War mode. That is the only redeeming factor in the game. Even then, there's only 3 maps, which get old fast. If you want to waste $60 on this game, I won't stop you, but I will warn you I wouldn't spend $20 on it.    … Expand
  14. Joeyz
    Nov 21, 2017
    8
    Call of Duty has went back to its roots, no more jetpacks, wall running, and etc. But I have seen a large amount of people complaining about micro transactions and loot boxes in WW2. I will be talking about my opinion of CoD WW2, the campaign, multiplayer, and zombies.

    Campaign - It's probably one of the best Call of Duty Campaigns up to date. Lots of fun, challenging depending on the    Call of Duty has went back to its roots, no more jetpacks, wall running, and etc. But I have seen a large amount of people complaining about micro transactions and loot boxes in WW2. I will be talking about my opinion of CoD WW2, the campaign, multiplayer, and zombies.

    Campaign - It's probably one of the best Call of Duty Campaigns up to date. Lots of fun, challenging depending on the difficulty, and more. However I feel like the campaign is a little short, you can complete it within 5 hours, but it doesn't matter, as long as I'm having a good time, I have nothing to complain about.

    Multiplayer - Now I will agree that this is probably one of the worst launch for any Call of Duty title, however Sledgehammer is continuing to fix it and multiplayer is now playable. I don't like the fact that you lose some XP or you get the correct amount, I hope they fix that sometime soon. Besides all that, boots on the ground made MP better than the last few CoDs. People are saying that "It's a reskin from the past few CoDs" or "They just copied WAW or BF1", now I will have to highly disagree with this statement, didn't everyone want Boots on the Ground Call of Duty back? Why are they complaining now, by the end of the day they just end up playing it no matter what. MP playing with friends or by yourself is still fun.

    Zombies - This mode has been in the last few CoDs, starting with WAW, BO1, BO2, AW, BO3, IW, and now WW2. Now this zombies mode doesn't beat Treyach Zombies, theirs will always be my favorite out of all of the CoDs. However zombies is still fun, especially with friends. Sledgehammer did a good job with the map (The Final Reich), zombies can come out of no where and they actually look terrifying, yet they can even scare you at times. I wish there were more maps to play on but I guess we will just have to wait for more DLC.

    Micro Transactions - Micro-transactions has been in almost every multiplayer game, Overwatch, Rainbow 6 Siege, Battlefront 2, and more. It's not surprising that Call of Duty: WW2 has micro-transactions, however I see no point of complaining about micro-transactions and here's why. You don't need it. They're just cosmetics for you to wear or use on your guns, and you don't need DLC weapons to be good in a game. To be good in a game, you must be skillful, yes I understand that some CoD players might just sit in corners just to wait for you but here's a solution, throw a grenade to get them out of there. even if they have a DLC weapon or not, they will lose most likely. It's not like Star Wars Battlefront 2 where you get a hero and you become more powerful. Plus people feel the need to get it and the only way to get it is to buy it.... well here's where they're wrong, you don't need to buy items in a game to be good, most likely Sledgehammer is gonna make it so you can spend your Armory Credits on collections to get a DLC weapon and they're not that hard to get. You can complete contracts that will grant you a free supply drop or armory credits or you can be lucky and get a free Rare Supply Drop by the end of the game. So stop complaining, you don't NEED to buy them.

    Issues -
    Maps are tiny (Not that bad though)
    Some guns are weak (like the Shotguns or some SMGs)
    Not enough maps (Only about 9 playable maps, 3 War Maps)
    XP not working correctly
    Disconnected by the end of the game
    Party not working correctly (Sometimes it will kick you out or you will see a black screen until the next game starts)

    Other than that I gave CoD WW2 a 8/10, not a great launch but it is a great game, boot on the ground is back, fun game, I would give it a try.    … Expand
  15. IronTusk
    Nov 21, 2017
    1
    They managed to bring us the most boring and bland collection of multiplayer maps I ever seen in a CoD game. It's a new kind of low.

    It's ass.

    I give this game 11/10 asses because it's much ass.

    It's really just a whole lotta ass. And not the good kind of ass either.
  16. thedaarkbatty
    Nov 21, 2017
    10
    I looove killing Nazi people. Nazis are completely and uttterly subhuman so it's for shooting the bullets at them. Hahahahahahaha screw you nazis I hate you very much.
  17. timaloy
    Nov 21, 2017
    0
    game runs terrrible total hackfest no support very poor from SHgames, More went into loot boxes than the actual game HQ is a joke, easy way to rip off kids
  18. Ikarimalice
    Nov 20, 2017
    4
    Simply put, multiplayer this time around feels the most broken in terms of lag compensation the series has ever had. If I play at 2 or 3 in the morning(EST) I manage high KDR. If I play during prime time, it's pretty much me going 3-20 every match. Gun fights are unwinnable. Half the time I'm shooting at someone the hits aren't registering and if they do, I still will likely be killedSimply put, multiplayer this time around feels the most broken in terms of lag compensation the series has ever had. If I play at 2 or 3 in the morning(EST) I manage high KDR. If I play during prime time, it's pretty much me going 3-20 every match. Gun fights are unwinnable. Half the time I'm shooting at someone the hits aren't registering and if they do, I still will likely be killed first(this is even when I'm crouching around a corner proned and waiting for someone to run into my sights). I wrote this review after attempting to play with a shotgun. I ran around a corner, fired into someone's head and didn't receive a hit marker before I was killed. A respawn later, I sprinted and rounded into someone who ran around a corner at the same time as myself, but somehow fired 4 shots before I could hit my trigger once. This is so bad because it makes the entire sub machine gun/shot gun classes unplayable for those with strong connections. I *have* to use long range assault rifles and even then, I *have* to be viewing down scope before someone is in sight to stand a chance. Ever wanted to know what it feels like to consistently prone down in a corner half covered by a wall waiting for someone to round a corner(not because you're a camper, but because you *have* to camp) and then when they do, they STILL manage to zoom down their scope at you and fire 3 shots before you get to fire one, and then in the replay that half second you saw them before being shot was actually a full 1-2 seconds? Then play this.… Expand
  19. damman
    Nov 20, 2017
    10
    I am changing my review for this wonderful game. It has it flaws but the war mode is really fun. I really like this game so go out and buy it. Been gaming for 30 years and I am back.
  20. Cire
    Nov 20, 2017
    0
    La historia tiene caídas de fps y eso lo hace muy complicado a la hora de jugar (tengo una ps4 slim no se en las demás versiones de ps4) y el online tiene caídas de partidas y muy pocos mapas los cuales son muy malos solo se salva la mitad de los mapas y el colmo son los 50€ del season pass , la verdad jo lo tengo y espero que valga la pena , pero de momento no lo recomiendo.
    Lo bueno es    La historia tiene caídas de fps y eso lo hace muy complicado a la hora de jugar (tengo una ps4 slim no se en las demás versiones de ps4) y el online tiene caídas de partidas y muy pocos mapas los cuales son muy malos solo se salva la mitad de los mapas y el colmo son los 50€ del season pass , la verdad jo lo tengo y espero que valga la pena , pero de momento no lo recomiendo.
    Lo bueno es que vuelven a la segunda gerra mundial.    … Expand
  21. softshoedancer
    Nov 18, 2017
    10
    Well, frankly, I usually cannot get in to COD multiplayer for the first week or so. Then, I can't stop playing. The last COD I play(ed) a lot was MW remastered. I never played the original. But usually, I don't like the game until it hooks me, after the week or so. Advanced Warfare was a game I loved also. And I freely admit to being a WW2 nut...I love anything WW2 combat related...esp.Well, frankly, I usually cannot get in to COD multiplayer for the first week or so. Then, I can't stop playing. The last COD I play(ed) a lot was MW remastered. I never played the original. But usually, I don't like the game until it hooks me, after the week or so. Advanced Warfare was a game I loved also. And I freely admit to being a WW2 nut...I love anything WW2 combat related...esp. War Thunder - a classic! So I might be biased...but I freakin' insta-love this game! The campaign is a blast...at least, it gets better as it goes on; by the end I was totally immersed in the protagonist's story. And re: multiplayer...well, this is the first COD whereby I have loved the multiplayer from the get-go. The guns FEEL like real guns...not like Andy-Pandy futuristic pea-shooters. And the maps feel epic from the word go. Honestly? I could not be more impressed with this game thus far. Love it.… Expand
  22. happythoughts
    Nov 18, 2017
    0
    Summary: Mediocre gameplay, sub-par graphics and multiplayer lag and broken party settings. Feels like a PS3 game.

    I can't believe this game came out after BF1 and Titanfall 2, because the graphics are very mediocre. The servers are crazy laggy in multiplayer, and even though TitanFall2 and BF1 had lag, not to this degree. This seems unforgiveable considering that the games and maps    Summary: Mediocre gameplay, sub-par graphics and multiplayer lag and broken party settings. Feels like a PS3 game.

    I can't believe this game came out after BF1 and Titanfall 2, because the graphics are very mediocre. The servers are crazy laggy in multiplayer, and even though TitanFall2 and BF1 had lag, not to this degree. This seems unforgiveable considering that the games and maps are so small. Kind of reaffirmed what I thought of recent CoD games. Maybe I'll revisit if my friend tells me they have fixed the lag issues. I remember BF4 had some serious multiplayer issues on launch, so hopefully they fix this game so it's not a complete waste of $60.    … Expand
  23. Tgamer15
    Nov 18, 2017
    10
    Great game. Hater 1: "Oh BuT iTs NoT InNoVaTiVe" Hater 2: "ItS a CoPy Of ThE OrIgInAl"
    First of all, if its fun, who gives a damn about innovation. Its entertainment, not a van gogh painting. doesnt have to be art. Second, the original was released over a decade ago. most of the players buying the newer Cod's are not the people who got the first game. Its a new thing to about 95% of    Great game. Hater 1: "Oh BuT iTs NoT InNoVaTiVe" Hater 2: "ItS a CoPy Of ThE OrIgInAl"
    First of all, if its fun, who gives a damn about innovation. Its entertainment, not a van gogh painting. doesnt have to be art. Second, the original was released over a decade ago. most of the players buying the newer Cod's are not the people who got the first game. Its a new thing to about 95% of buyers. Also, most of the unfavorable reviews are just idiots who cant accept that we live in a capitalist world. Things are done to support the bottom line. If you want to rant about companies taking your money, go to battlefront 2. Now for the review. Campaign was awesome, Multiplayer was nice, and despite what others are saying about sniping, it can be done, it just requires skill lmao. shotguns actually work in this game, and aren't just filler weapons. Their range is perfect. I just wish that enemy health bars are displayed, like in infinite warfare. People complain about how the guns are just reskins, but what the hell were you expecting? You cant just make fictional weapons and call it WW2. TL;DR: Stop hating on this game, its great. MAKE MORE OF THESE GAMES SLEDGEHAMMER!    … Expand
  24. mikepatyaev
    Nov 17, 2017
    4
    Why the press is giving 85 to this crap? You irresponsible liars! You're lying to the poor people to buy this garbage. Once again we have the cruel politics who want to take all your money. All this practices are going to end the console industry. Did you see the boxes falling from the sky?
  25. jay_caspian
    Nov 17, 2017
    8
    I found Call of Duty WWII to be a refreshing jump back into the glory days of the series, it's been 7. Years since I last called a CoD title, so many of the issues other people complained about did not effect me. I found the story to be fantastical driven, gameplay to be excellent, and multiplayer to be as fun as ever, even if I suck at it. My only gripe is that Sniper missions wereI found Call of Duty WWII to be a refreshing jump back into the glory days of the series, it's been 7. Years since I last called a CoD title, so many of the issues other people complained about did not effect me. I found the story to be fantastical driven, gameplay to be excellent, and multiplayer to be as fun as ever, even if I suck at it. My only gripe is that Sniper missions were repetitive. Overall, fun game… Expand
  26. lega_lol
    Nov 17, 2017
    0
    instead of being the trendsetter, Activision has forced CoD to just borrow what it liked from other shooters. it's mostly battlefield and rainbow six siege. frustratingly long load times also hinder enjoyment. the hub world is wholly unnecessary and is mostly just used for the loot box thing, (where other players can see what you get in the loot boxes). good visuals don't make up forinstead of being the trendsetter, Activision has forced CoD to just borrow what it liked from other shooters. it's mostly battlefield and rainbow six siege. frustratingly long load times also hinder enjoyment. the hub world is wholly unnecessary and is mostly just used for the loot box thing, (where other players can see what you get in the loot boxes). good visuals don't make up for badly… Expand… Expand
  27. ManOfChap
    Nov 17, 2017
    2
    "BOOTS ON THE GROUND" what a load of nonsense. This is another copy and paste CoD game. Campaign is absolutely awful. Zombies is decent but 1 map is not worth it. MP is lacking and the EXACT SAME for years now.
  28. deLama
    Nov 17, 2017
    6
    6/6 6/66/6 6/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/66/6 6/66/6 6/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/6… Expand
  29. CaptainPuGDoG
    Nov 16, 2017
    4
    Spend 50+ hours
    Story 2/10 So stuipid history,where Great America try to win war,a lot of hero doing dont many actions don't make sense,just 2 or 3 interesting missions, all other is a ****
    Mp 5/10 After 10 or 15 hours,play it is very boring and there is not any interest
  30. VoldemortsNip
    Nov 16, 2017
    0
    Sledgehammer and Activision should be utterly embarrassed and ashamed. Broken, unfinished, poorly designed, only 9 maps and theyre all some of the worst in Cod history.
  31. Hardy1987
    Nov 16, 2017
    7
    I really enjoy this game but the bugs let it down, the games been out for 2 weeks and I've seen very little in progress... So much potential and when fixed will be the best CoD I've played since MW3 BUT needs fixing.
  32. DMein
    Nov 16, 2017
    7
    I think this is the best call of duty game in the past few years. Still doesn't compete with the Modern Warefares or the Black Opps games. However, call of duty has finally created a throw back to the times of no jet packs or running on walls that the gaming community has been asking for for a long time. I really enjoy both the game play of both multiplayer and nazi zombie game modes, butI think this is the best call of duty game in the past few years. Still doesn't compete with the Modern Warefares or the Black Opps games. However, call of duty has finally created a throw back to the times of no jet packs or running on walls that the gaming community has been asking for for a long time. I really enjoy both the game play of both multiplayer and nazi zombie game modes, but both of these game modes lack map size and/or number of maps available to play on. I know that more maps in both game modes will come out, but this will just be another payment addition on the already kind of expensive price tag. I give this game a 10/10 on game play but a 5/10 on game play availability.… Expand
  33. v4vendetta
    Nov 16, 2017
    9
    I am so upset that a game like this gets 3/4 in user score ... what happened to you guys ? Why so sluggish ?

    Dudes, this is a good game. Graphics looks great. Story goes great, feels great, feels epic.
  34. shlammer
    Nov 15, 2017
    10
    This game checks so many boxes. If you like COD for the full-bore arcade action this will not disappoint. So happy Activision released something strong, simple, and on point.
    No bull - just a straight up quality close quarters FPS with ample grime and gore for the console gamer in mind with all three Career, Multiplayer and Zombies being rich and rewarding. Feels like tons of replay value    This game checks so many boxes. If you like COD for the full-bore arcade action this will not disappoint. So happy Activision released something strong, simple, and on point.
    No bull - just a straight up quality close quarters FPS with ample grime and gore for the console gamer in mind with all three Career, Multiplayer and Zombies being rich and rewarding. Feels like tons of replay value 15 hours in have only scratched the surface. It will be exciting to see what additional maps are to come!    … Expand
  35. Mexican_Jesus
    Nov 15, 2017
    0
    I will not stand for a 'return to form' which is simply a re-skin of the same Call of Duty game we've had for years, relying solely on the outdated technical aspects from prior and the resulting lack of impact or originality. The game takes place in World War II just as many people have been wishing for, however from the moment of the game's reveal it was completely apparent thatI will not stand for a 'return to form' which is simply a re-skin of the same Call of Duty game we've had for years, relying solely on the outdated technical aspects from prior and the resulting lack of impact or originality. The game takes place in World War II just as many people have been wishing for, however from the moment of the game's reveal it was completely apparent that Activision were trying to capitalise on Battlefield 1's success in a desperate attempt to remain prominent within the genre.

    The game is entirely lifeless and the setting feels one layer deep, as opposed to the historically accurate 'realism' of war that made the earlier Call of Duty games such a hit. If I can use any gun in any fight, regardless of historical accuracy, I might as well call in a giant Loot box to crush the opponent, that's how immersion shattering it is.

    Speaking of Giant Loot boxes....Call of Duty: WWII is absolutely atrocious in it's dependence on Loot boxes to generate excessive wealth for Activision, and to exploit the consumer. Any game that dares to reward me for watching other people gamble in an attempt to convince me to do so as well will not be tolerated at all.

    To Conclude:
    Call of Duty: WWII is a half-hearted attempt to cash in on the success of its rivals and restore the dwindling fanbase of the series that lacks meaningful characterization or weight both in its writing and technical aspects. The game compromises the legitimacy of its historical emulation for the sake of Loot Boxes and it shows a terrible lack of confidence or respect for both the series itself and the dedicated fans who've supported the series for years.    … Expand
  36. pappm94
    Nov 15, 2017
    2
    This is just a very very average first person shooter, that Activision releases every damn year. It is recycled, which is not a good word in the gaming industry. On top of that, microtransactions, of course.
    Just please don't buy ....
  37. HCL
    Nov 15, 2017
    6
    I must admit i was pretty bored with the futuristic style of the last couple Call of duty's.
    Now they have returned to their roots but with the same fast shooting style. Now its boots on the ground and i liked it allot. But with the messy servers its like they went back to their roots with the servers also, and that's a shame. Games disconnecting or you get kicked out the lobby for now    I must admit i was pretty bored with the futuristic style of the last couple Call of duty's.
    Now they have returned to their roots but with the same fast shooting style. Now its boots on the ground and i liked it allot. But with the messy servers its like they went back to their roots with the servers also, and that's a shame. Games disconnecting or you get kicked out the lobby for now reason. Sledgehammer games what is wrong with the headquarters you promised that the gamers are all in one headquarters but now most gamers are holy solo in there.

    Its like that this COD WW2 wasnt ready to be released. But i must admit when the game does what i must do, its almost the best Cod i played in years.

    The singleplayer experience is like the serie Band of brothers. Its pretty awesome but its still a hollywood like story.

    Conclusion:
    The singleplayer is a Hollywood like story so i gave this a 7 for it.
    with the multiplayer its pretty great but with the messy servers its almost unplayable. so i gave this a 6.

    If you want to buy it wait a couple of months for the patches and fixes, and then you have the best multiplayer experience in almost 9 years.    … Expand
  38. psylife
    Nov 15, 2017
    7
    A well-paced piece of Zionist propaganda. Despite being cheesy, cliche, and misleading in its depiction of the events, it still manages to delight thanks to solid and varied game-play mechanics and an expertly designed single player campaign.
  39. parham76
    Nov 15, 2017
    4
    I wrote this review after attempting to play with a shotgun. I ran around a corner, fired into someone's head and didn't receive a hit marker before I was killed. A respawn later, I sprinted and rounded into someone who ran around a corner at the same time as myself, but somehow fired 4 shots before I could hit my trigger once. This is so bad because it makes the entire sub machineI wrote this review after attempting to play with a shotgun. I ran around a corner, fired into someone's head and didn't receive a hit marker before I was killed. A respawn later, I sprinted and rounded into someone who ran around a corner at the same time as myself, but somehow fired 4 shots before I could hit my trigger once. This is so bad because it makes the entire sub machine gun/shot gun classes unplayable for those with strong connections. I *have* to use long range assault rifles and even then, I *have* to be viewing down scope before someone is in sight to stand a chance. Ever wanted to know what it feels like to consistently prone down in a corner half covered by a wall waiting for someone to round a corner(not because you're a camper, but because you *have* to camp) and then when they do, they STILL manage to zoom down their scope at you and fire 3 shots before you get to fire one, and then in the replay that half second you saw them before being shot was actually a full 1-2 seconds? Then play this.… Expand
  40. KpblcoLLoB
    Nov 15, 2017
    0
    Этот кусок деньгоотнимающего говна не должен существовать. Не позволяйте зажравшимся ААА издателям иметь вас. Голосуйте рублем,
  41. RuslanDZE
    Nov 14, 2017
    5
    CAMPAIGN ONLY REVIEW.
    YES, I am one of these players that playing COD games for a campaign.
    From campaign I usually expect great, creative and epic action scenes and stereotyped vilians. From the announcement that was obvious, they wanna double down on the realism and drama. Game is trying to make sense of comradory and make you care about characters but problem is that there is    CAMPAIGN ONLY REVIEW.
    YES, I am one of these players that playing COD games for a campaign.
    From campaign I usually expect great, creative and epic action scenes and stereotyped vilians.
    From the announcement that was obvious, they wanna double down on the realism and drama.
    Game is trying to make sense of comradory and make you care about characters but problem is that there is nothing special about them to start care. Sometimes you think that game will give you something interesting but after a while you are dissapointed. There is no vilian and story is not cohesive. It feels more like episodes from B1. If I would replace characters in each mission I would not miss anything. QTE is very dissatisfied, even tho you can make them cool (Heavy Rain). There is some new things in the gameplay like you can ask for particular things from your team members. There is some action scenes too, probably the best one is train chase. But these scenes are not impressive because we saw it before. Other games are caught up with crazy action. Lets say few years ago in modern warfare times I would say yes only COD developers can make action as crazy as here.
    I loved France Liberation section.
    THE WORST THING in the game is story. At the announcement event of this game Activision was saying about how personal and important this game to them because they care about history of WW2. Well, that was a joke probably. Whole game is representing how you should not make story about WW2. There is some playing with history but in general is so bad. And I am not expecting everything smart from a Call Of Duty game. But why would deveopers lie about how they care about history..... oh yeah it is marketing.

    Overall, I partly enjoyed this game. Call Of Duty did returned to the throne of FPS games. It is maybe even step back compare to IW in terms of campaign.    … Expand
  42. cesar042
    Nov 14, 2017
    0
    The multiplayer is very bad with nothing of content, the campaigns is a vas copy of "Ryan soldier rescue" and the zombies mode is the same every year nothing of innovación.
  43. Phoenix123
    Nov 14, 2017
    0
    This game is just...bad. It represents everything about greed. How can you have BOTH season pass AND micro-transactions??? Not to mention the Season Pass is the price of a FULL GAME. The campaign is mediocre, the multiplayer is copy and paste from every year. It just isn't worth it. Cod is a dying franchise.

    Oh yeah, and they're adding JETPACKS IN WW2. That makes sense doesn't it???
  44. BenRiley83
    Nov 14, 2017
    8
    Very good game. The campaign is awesome and the multiplayer as fun and addicting as ever. The only issue I have so far are all the server issues the launch has had. They are quite bad, but besides that the game is super fun! I recommend it.
  45. Chronos1
    Nov 14, 2017
    5
    The single player campaign is rather mediocre but then again this is call of duty so not really a big let down there.. the MP is rather bland because there is no real changes there that makes it more interesting to play.. zombie mode is same old same old.. basically another bland COD game.
  46. RyanJamesSez
    Nov 14, 2017
    0
    Get this loot box crap out of this game. It has no place in the experience and ruins the game. I already gave you my money, stop trying to take more. You're screwing over your customers.
  47. howdy0501
    Nov 14, 2017
    10
    Als ganzes gesehen ein super Spiel. Die Grafik, Sound und Umsetzung ist sehr gut gelungen.
    Was noch behoben werden muss sind die Startprobleme wie die Verbindungsabbrüche oder verschiedene kleinere Bugs.
    Sprich, wenn möglichst alle Probleme beseitigt sind, ein Super Spiel!
  48. njustcritic
    Nov 14, 2017
    1
    Достаточно посмотреть несколько отзывов пользователей, просто без слов всё итак с этой игрой понятно, не пойму никогда людей которые предпочтут купить калду, вместо очень годного шутера на рынке взять даже BF1. Всё осталось на прежнем уровне, ладно если бы этот уровень был велик и все бы восприняли игру как 5-6/10. Но всё как и было плохо всё плохо и осталось, денег своих это игра точно неДостаточно посмотреть несколько отзывов пользователей, просто без слов всё итак с этой игрой понятно, не пойму никогда людей которые предпочтут купить калду, вместо очень годного шутера на рынке взять даже BF1. Всё осталось на прежнем уровне, ладно если бы этот уровень был велик и все бы восприняли игру как 5-6/10. Но всё как и было плохо всё плохо и осталось, денег своих это игра точно не стоит советую всем пройти мимо или лучше купить Battlefield 1… Expand
  49. Jb22reviews
    Nov 14, 2017
    6
    Cod ww2 fun but not new
    Single player: the single player player campaign brings new features like med kits rather than health regeneration which sounds like a decent idea but turns out being very annoying having to rummage around for packs or search for a healer becomes repetitive and pointless while also featuring historical inaccuracies like black female nazis and some overblown action    Cod ww2 fun but not new
    Single player: the single player player campaign brings new features like med kits rather than health regeneration which sounds like a decent idea but turns out being very annoying having to rummage around for packs or search for a healer becomes repetitive and pointless while also featuring historical inaccuracies like black female nazis and some overblown action scenes aside from that the campaign is quite enjoyable and one of the better in recent years however with a lack of character development and quite a short length the fun gameplay and setting become less exciting
    Multiplayer: the multiplayer experience is just like any other cod with It's usual modes with the addition of war mode an attack and defence based objective game which is a breath of fresh air amongst other modes like Tdm and ffa which are fun but Arcady and can get stale with only 9 mp maps with few good ones and with a new headquarters space where you can open supply drops get contracts and meet with other players feels like a tower ripoff which doesn't help the fact that there is no one in headquarters anyway because of a glitch the mp is fun but leaves much to be desired
    Overall cod ww2 is the same fun arcade shooter but I wish we saw more innovation    … Expand
  50. Hanbarku
    Nov 14, 2017
    4
    best call of duty in a long time. unfortunately loot boxes drop from the sky on the beaches of normandy no less. do they have any shame anymore. at least its cosmetic. 4/10. no more loot boxes
  51. MasterRiley
    Nov 13, 2017
    8
    Call of Duty: WWII delivers a gritty and emotionally driven campaign that emphasizes the realities of war and the importance of friendship. It has a great story and cast of characters, as well as solid gameplay and cinematic moments you have come to expect from the series. The multiplayer is back to old school Call of Duty, for the better. It is lacking a bit on content, specifically mapsCall of Duty: WWII delivers a gritty and emotionally driven campaign that emphasizes the realities of war and the importance of friendship. It has a great story and cast of characters, as well as solid gameplay and cinematic moments you have come to expect from the series. The multiplayer is back to old school Call of Duty, for the better. It is lacking a bit on content, specifically maps and party game modes, but hopefully in time those will come. And finally the zombies is fun and absolutely terrifying.… Expand
  52. TheOnlyHopee
    Nov 13, 2017
    0
    este juego no sirve todo con microtransacciones es una cagada danando todo lo que es COD mardita empresa sigan defiendo estas mierdas porque no son sinceros y dicen lo que enrealidad es
  53. biggame
    Nov 13, 2017
    10
    best game ever!!1 is so much better than battlefield1........................................................................................................................................................................................................................
  54. AstartesXVI
    Nov 13, 2017
    0
    DO NOT BUY! I lost $65 on this horrid pile of trash, so inaccurate in it's portrayal of world war II it makes inglorious basterds look like real history. The multi player is pointless garbage, it's idiotic.
    Trash-hammer games have managed to make "boots on the ground in world war II" feel like some bizarre alternate reality where black females are fighting for the Nazis and shovel's rule    DO NOT BUY! I lost $65 on this horrid pile of trash, so inaccurate in it's portrayal of world war II it makes inglorious basterds look like real history. The multi player is pointless garbage, it's idiotic.
    Trash-hammer games have managed to make "boots on the ground in world war II" feel like some bizarre alternate reality where black females are fighting for the Nazis and shovel's rule the field of battle. Haha what a bad joke this game is, COD IS DEAD.

    Will be trading my copy in to deny the filth known as activision a sale.    … Expand
  55. haydos89
    Nov 13, 2017
    5
    I can't go as far to say that COD WW2 is a bad game. The campaign is fantastic with a great story, likable characters and a real sense of realism when it comes to the hellish circumstances that came battling in World War 2. Unfortunately that only lasts around 6 hours or so and then you're left with the multiplayer modes...which is basically has just been re-skinned to suit the WW2I can't go as far to say that COD WW2 is a bad game. The campaign is fantastic with a great story, likable characters and a real sense of realism when it comes to the hellish circumstances that came battling in World War 2. Unfortunately that only lasts around 6 hours or so and then you're left with the multiplayer modes...which is basically has just been re-skinned to suit the WW2 setting. The pace, scorestreaks etc are all the same as before and to be honest it is getting quite old and never makes you feel like you're in a true battle or makes you feel like you've accomplished anything when you win a match.

    It is a shame because i was looking forward to heading back to the classic COD we all came to love, but unfortunately it's a big miss for me. Personally i am happy to trade it in for battlefront 2 and also head back to battlefield 1.    … Expand
  56. JMARSseph
    Nov 13, 2017
    5
    Campaign....beautiful graphics, great sound, not very good dialogue and story and a horrible ending....
    Zombies..... great map, but of course only one... decent customization although the unlockables weren't exactly mind blowing
    Multiplayer...typical Call of Duty, extreme downgrade in presentation next to campaign and the new lobby is a poor, poor attempt to be a community playground    Campaign....beautiful graphics, great sound, not very good dialogue and story and a horrible ending....
    Zombies..... great map, but of course only one... decent customization although the unlockables weren't exactly mind blowing
    Multiplayer...typical Call of Duty, extreme downgrade in presentation next to campaign and the new lobby is a poor, poor attempt to be a community playground
    The campaign is quick and forgettable, the zombies are a dangling carrot to spend more for more and the multiplayer , as usual, was plagued with issues..... already traded this title at the local Vintage Stock...and would not recommend.....high hopes for a return to ww2 were only that, high hopes...    … Expand
  57. Phil_Panteleit
    Nov 13, 2017
    6
    I have waited for 10 days to give this game a proper review. It's not a 0 out of 10 like some idiots say it is. However it is not close to bing a 10 either. The campaign is great but WAY TO SHORT. 5 hours and its done. Multiplayer is well great too. This is COD i don't think this part needs to be even talked about because you either love it or you don't. Zombies is fun but once again ifI have waited for 10 days to give this game a proper review. It's not a 0 out of 10 like some idiots say it is. However it is not close to bing a 10 either. The campaign is great but WAY TO SHORT. 5 hours and its done. Multiplayer is well great too. This is COD i don't think this part needs to be even talked about because you either love it or you don't. Zombies is fun but once again if your a zombie fan you will love it.

    However, this is the part where I say do not waste your money. The reason is because the game is broken. Headquarters is broke. When you get into a game with your friends you are guaranteed for one or more of you to be kicked or lose connection to host after every game. There is a glitch in one of the trophies for doing daily challenges. Sledgehammer has had ample of time to fix the bugs and still have not. They had a Beta and never thought to put the HQs in it and wow now its broke.

    Sledgehammer needs to go. This game is a solid 6 out of 10 and a good pick up for no more than $40    … Expand
  58. PaulV97
    Nov 13, 2017
    10
    Real score is an 8.5, im scoring 10 to balance the user reviews a little. Campaign mode is pretty good, nothing great, but it is fun and has some nice epic moments. multiplayer has some connection issues, at least here in Argentina, but it works ok most of the time. Gameplay is the classic cod gunplay, do not expect nothing new. Zombies is great, best zombies map ever and it is veryReal score is an 8.5, im scoring 10 to balance the user reviews a little. Campaign mode is pretty good, nothing great, but it is fun and has some nice epic moments. multiplayer has some connection issues, at least here in Argentina, but it works ok most of the time. Gameplay is the classic cod gunplay, do not expect nothing new. Zombies is great, best zombies map ever and it is very accesibe to new players. This may not be the game best game ever, but it is really fun and its certainly the best call of duty of this generation.… Expand
  59. mrrader72
    Nov 12, 2017
    5
    When I person can run around the map with just a shovel while everyone else has machine guns, and have the high score your WWII shooter has problems. This game is buggier than road kill. Snipers quick scoping in close quarters without taking time to aim, because the aim assist for snipers is ridiculous. it has the potential to be so much fun too. That's what makes playing it so frustrating.
  60. 000Sarmad
    Nov 12, 2017
    6
    I’ve been waiting for this game for so long. After playing I would say it is a disappointment of the year. Being a fan of fps, I thought COD WII would replace battlefield 1 but I was wrong. Let’s back to the game-play and of course multiplayer, which is the most popular feature of this series.
    Firstly, campaign is just mediocre. I would say that the game play is good but story is    I’ve been waiting for this game for so long. After playing I would say it is a disappointment of the year. Being a fan of fps, I thought COD WII would replace battlefield 1 but I was wrong. Let’s back to the game-play and of course multiplayer, which is the most popular feature of this series.
    Firstly, campaign is just mediocre. I would say that the game play is good but story is disappointing thought. Graphic is good but not as good as I was expecting. In campaign, I was expecting Russian, Japanese, Italian and many other countries that were the victim of WWII but the campaign only focus on few events between US and Germany. How could COD not include Russian and Japanese in campaign? I love COD World at War campaign and if I compare to this latest edition I would say it is below par.
    Secondly, multiplayer is repetitive and I got bored after few matches. War mode is a good addition but it is not enough to make things right. There are few maps and all of them were small, poorly designed and heaven for SMGs, being a fan of bolt action rifles and M1 Garand it is frustrating.
    In the end, I would like to say that it is just like an old COD games with WWII theme. No innovation nothing new in it, War mode is a copy of Battlefield 1 operation mode, Headquarter mode is a replica of Destiny 2 clan, campaign is a more or less same as Saving Private Ryan Hollywood movie. Just 5 hour campaign, it would easily extend to 10 hours by adding more content by including Russia, Japan, Italy and other main players in WWII.
    I would honestly give COD WII 5 out of 10, but being a little bias and as a fan of this series; my final verdict is 6 out of 10.    … Expand
  61. beardedwarrior1
    Nov 12, 2017
    3
    A good solid base, completely and utterly ruined by dreadful programming, connections and server issues. After putting a solid 20+hours into the game, around 5 in single player and 15+ in multiplayer I can honestly say "save your money", i'm quite regretting purchasing the game myself. When the game is fun, it is great (Mainly when playing with friends), however, it constantly disconnectsA good solid base, completely and utterly ruined by dreadful programming, connections and server issues. After putting a solid 20+hours into the game, around 5 in single player and 15+ in multiplayer I can honestly say "save your money", i'm quite regretting purchasing the game myself. When the game is fun, it is great (Mainly when playing with friends), however, it constantly disconnects you from your party, from games, halfway through games, when the game ends, when the game begins. Gives you loading screens that last in excess of 20 minutes. Black screens that you can not back out of, therefore making you reset the game completely. No dedicated servers. No host migration (it simply ends the game if the host leaves). Completely empty HQ thanks to **** connections, so you cant complete some of the challenges e.g. give 50 commendations to other players. The game is shipped out with the bare minimum when it comes to maps and variation, probably waiting to release more maps via season pass (as if we didn't realise Activision is money hungry already). The maps they give us are very poorly designed and thought out, because playing as a black, female Nazi in the London Docks was somehow going to make sense. In the last 2 hours of gameplay alone I have been disconnected/kicked/black screen'd at least 17 times. Party members have been thrown into random games not with the party and if that wasn't infuriating enough when we joined the game, the remaining 3 party members where split 2/1 on the teams, fantastic right?

    Honestly, if you are REALLY interested in the single player campaign (which lasts maybe 5 hours) then wait for a sale and then get it, or at best lend/rent it from somewhere. This game is not worth the £49 asking price. Not by a long shot, unless they get their fingers out their ass and fix the myriad of problems it currently has.    … Expand
  62. Sexbot-5000
    Nov 12, 2017
    5
    There really isn’t a need for a long review. It’s call of duty. It’s WW2, it’s mostly unchanged, and they added a couple tropes from other games. War mode from Battlefield’s rush, COD version of social from destiny, and the loot boxes from Overwatch without cartoon style to give them the freedom to create actual costumes. If you think you’ll like this game you probably will. If you thinkThere really isn’t a need for a long review. It’s call of duty. It’s WW2, it’s mostly unchanged, and they added a couple tropes from other games. War mode from Battlefield’s rush, COD version of social from destiny, and the loot boxes from Overwatch without cartoon style to give them the freedom to create actual costumes. If you think you’ll like this game you probably will. If you think you won’t like this you probably won’t. It’s that easy. There’s a long list of more unique and creative shooters out there. At the end of the day if you like the game you’ve been playing for a decade you have no reason to think you won’t like this one. It’s a five. Equal parts exciting and boring.… Expand
  63. Crockpot19
    Nov 12, 2017
    1
    Another money grab by this infamous title. I have played this game for a couple day and I am already sick of the lack of maps and all around absence of creativity involved with this game. It looks and runs like a cut rate Battlefield 1. Half the time after you finish a multiplayer game, it kicks you or your friends from the lobby. This forces you or your party to back out of the lobby andAnother money grab by this infamous title. I have played this game for a couple day and I am already sick of the lack of maps and all around absence of creativity involved with this game. It looks and runs like a cut rate Battlefield 1. Half the time after you finish a multiplayer game, it kicks you or your friends from the lobby. This forces you or your party to back out of the lobby and regroup or reset your game.

    They also added a "public" area for interactions with other players. The game servers run so poorly though that you can't even connect to random online players. If the game did run correctly, the game would make you go into these public area to open your loot boxes in front of everyone. They do this in hopes of sparking other players to buy loot boxes if yours contains a good weapon skin or other useless items.

    The 6 hour long campaign and one zombie map doesn't justify the full $60 price tag. I hope you don't repeat my mistake of buying this game.    … Expand
  64. adamf13
    Nov 11, 2017
    0
    - Terrible linear campaign
    - Historical inaccuracies
    - Only 8 MP maps
    - Feels like recent COD game with different skin.
    - Total let down wish I hadn't bought it.

    Really was the last chance with COD for me and it has been really poor, never buying COD again.
  65. martyisruling
    Nov 11, 2017
    7
    The Game as a whole is good, but not Great. It looks and plays amazing. The Campaign is great, but it's short. That's pretty much the theme with this COD. The new War mode is pretty solid. The problem is there are few maps all around in multiplayer in general. Unless you want to pay $50 for the season pass. So, before you buy this game you have to ask yourself, is $60 too much to pay forThe Game as a whole is good, but not Great. It looks and plays amazing. The Campaign is great, but it's short. That's pretty much the theme with this COD. The new War mode is pretty solid. The problem is there are few maps all around in multiplayer in general. Unless you want to pay $50 for the season pass. So, before you buy this game you have to ask yourself, is $60 too much to pay for half a game? Is the full game worth $100? Next year there will be another COD, and players will migrate over. Buyer beware.… Expand
  66. iHamid4Wizard
    Nov 11, 2017
    10
    Amazing i loved back to roots graphics sounds music game play all very very good i loved ....................................... عالیه محشر پادشاه برگشت
  67. Arutairu
    Nov 11, 2017
    0
    I cant believe people pay for this game , only campaing is decent but very short...I rather replay first two call of duty then this......People got really brainwashed by return to ww2 to buy this...If u like watching people opening cases game is for you otherwise stay away from this waste of time.

    PS: i refunded game.
  68. lheg95
    Nov 11, 2017
    5
    I play like 8 or 10 hours and this game is so boring. The first mission of the campaign, the D-Day, the moment all WWII lover wait for is disappointing. The campaign is short and mediocre. There are some "wanna be BF1" points like the Train Mission or the multiplayer mode that is the same as conquest but in a shorter map.
    The graphics are great, they really upgrade all the visual effects    I play like 8 or 10 hours and this game is so boring. The first mission of the campaign, the D-Day, the moment all WWII lover wait for is disappointing. The campaign is short and mediocre. There are some "wanna be BF1" points like the Train Mission or the multiplayer mode that is the same as conquest but in a shorter map.
    The graphics are great, they really upgrade all the visual effects (finally!), but, to be a game that sells more than 10 millions copies each year, the upgrade is less that I expect.
    The sound is great, I really doesn't have any complaint.

    For zombies, I like the scary sounds and ambient that create for this mode, but the map is not great and it's not bad and the survive mode is ok, nothing special.    … Expand
  69. Calitoris
    Nov 11, 2017
    7
    People hating the game just because it comes out every year. It's a polished game, runs smooth, but it's just the same good game new skin. It's obviously not a bad game, just a repeating well oiled machine. Single player is short but it's not what everyone plays COD for.
  70. Alex1010500
    Nov 10, 2017
    0
    Игра, наполненная микротранзакциями и созданная исключительно чтобы только продавать лутбоксы. Молодцы так держать, играйте сами в свою игру.
  71. TsukasaHiiragi
    Nov 10, 2017
    1
    Single player is essentially just more of the same, nothing new or groundbreaking. Some missions are more annoying than others, especially missions requiring stealth can be annoying or even buggy. Multiplayer is a mess, loot boxes in a COD game? Seriously?

    The entire franchise is desperate to add something new, but in the end always settles for focusing on the multiplayer side of    Single player is essentially just more of the same, nothing new or groundbreaking. Some missions are more annoying than others, especially missions requiring stealth can be annoying or even buggy. Multiplayer is a mess, loot boxes in a COD game? Seriously?

    The entire franchise is desperate to add something new, but in the end always settles for focusing on the multiplayer side of the game, which the codtards always eat up.

    Another MAJOR issue is that the tank controls are awful, straight up terrible. It makes for an incredibly difficult and frustrating experience when your tank turns like a slug, gets stuck on scenery and is downright bad - the controls need to be reworked. Another major issue is the hit boxes, they are bad - really really bad, more than a few times on a quick time event you can just blindly fire your gun and miss the target...but it'll still register as a hit/kill.

    I would like to see COD evolve from both a weak single player experience, and a weak multiplayer arena shooter, the logical step would be an open world live war with dynamic missions, drop in/out multiplayer.    … Expand
  72. lufy617_elfo
    Nov 10, 2017
    0
    This game is just **** because it's a copy of battlefield 1 and battlefield 1 is a copy of the 1st world war wich is also a copy of the Carthaginian wars, so it's a copy of greek people.
  73. Matttappen
    Nov 10, 2017
    2
    By far, the worst call of duty ive ever played. Just terrible in all aspects. I was actually kind of excited about this game but it was such a huge dissapointment. The zombies is okay. If i were to rate the zombie game mode by itself id give it a 6.5. But the multiplayer is honestly terrible.
  74. Jcupps12
    Nov 10, 2017
    3
    I can’t believe all the people praising the graphics. They are a huge turn off for me especially after seeing how good battlefield 1 looked 2 years ago they are a complete embarrassment. Online time to kill is ridiculously fast. Doesn’t matter what gun you use as recoil is no existent and again time to kill is so fast regardless it’s rarely noticeable the damage differences of weaponsI can’t believe all the people praising the graphics. They are a huge turn off for me especially after seeing how good battlefield 1 looked 2 years ago they are a complete embarrassment. Online time to kill is ridiculously fast. Doesn’t matter what gun you use as recoil is no existent and again time to kill is so fast regardless it’s rarely noticeable the damage differences of weapons unless the suppressor is attached. Sniping is essentially just everyone quick scoping. The sound design is actually fairly good but would ay I mainly noticed it on grenades and explosives. Gun sounds are better in bf1. Game play is better in bf1. Loot boxes.....I mean really? It’s fun to hop on play 3 or 4 games and then move on. Campaign is short, boring, and doesn’t seem to matter to be honest. Glad it’s back to boots on the ground but it is miles and miles and miles away from being a great game or recapturing what call of duty once was. Put simply, it’s just not very good.… Expand
  75. Jarhead335
    Nov 10, 2017
    8
    This is a genuinely objective review: CoD WWII is really quite good.

    The last CoD I played was Black Ops 3, and I thought that iteration was acceptable. The last truly great Call of Duty I've played was Modern Warfare 3. After half a decade of the wallrunning, exosuit-toting madness, I was really not holding out hope for WWII to be anything other than a bland money grab. Of course,    This is a genuinely objective review: CoD WWII is really quite good.

    The last CoD I played was Black Ops 3, and I thought that iteration was acceptable. The last truly great Call of Duty I've played was Modern Warfare 3. After half a decade of the wallrunning, exosuit-toting madness, I was really not holding out hope for WWII to be anything other than a bland money grab. Of course, being a giant moron, I pre-ordered it at 11:45 on the night of launch rather than go for broke on Wolfenstein 2. I spent the 15 minutes before actual launch wondering who had drugged my dinner to make me do such a thing. And then I played it.

    Barring the launch night issues connecting to multiplayer servers, the game is a beautiful and sincere addition to the franchise. The campaign is, in its purest essence, Saving Private Ryan without the Private Ryan. It even opens with the landing at Normandy, and from there blossoms into a not so imaginative, but hellishly fun shooter. I'm on the third or fourth level at this point, and I'm eager to play the rest: It sounds amazing (Sledghammer took notes from the original Star Wars: Battlefront reboot) and it looks just as great. The audio and visuals have never been better in CoD. Character design is pretty standard for the FPS genre, but the connection and relationships between characters is still suitable to make the campaign enjoyable, rather than a chore.

    Multiplayer is quite refreshing in that it gets straight back to what once made Call of Duty the must-own in FPS land: Raw, skill-based arcade shooting, with a delicious array of weapon attachments, cosmetic upgrades, and skill perks to unlock which revolve around a new and intriguing "Division" system. This isn't in line with the usual CoD title, where ten or so custom classes are yours to outfit. Instead, it gives you that option with the ability to truly maximize a given class's skillset: If you play as the "Mountainous" (Sniper) Division, you will see added rewards for keeping your sniper equipped rather than toting an SMG in your ghillie suit. The Divisional loadouts give reason to diversify your classes, rather than set up five different iterations of the same OP rifle or other that typically plague CoD installments. How many of us used anything other than an ACR combo in the old days? Now, you're incentivized to branch out with your custom classes in order to maximize your killing potential. Lastly, the new War mode is really compelling: It can be difficult at times given some spawn and location advantages for defenders/attackers depending on map, but a really neat mode that I look forward to them expanding upon. New maps and variants should make War a great staple mode, particularly for those who like campaigns and don't traditionally favor online multiplayer.

    Zombies, too, has met a drastic and much-needed upgrade. BLOPS3 zombies at launch, frankly, sucked. It was too hard to progress, too unclear in its rules, and ultimately if you didn't matchmake with someone who knew what they were doing, it was far too difficult to last beyond the initial waves, no matter how fun Jeff Goldblum is to play with. With a refreshing return to actual zombies and shambling mutants that are - above all else - enjoyable to kill and fight, I was really pleased with the experience. So far I've gotten a few 1.5-2 hour long runs under my belt, although I have yet to meet the "big boss" I've heard about waiting at the finish. That dang zeppelin gets me every time. From the ground up, the zombies mode is creepier and more intricate in its campaign mission and overall tone: It feels more cohesive than any mode before, including my beloved Tranzit from the BLOPS2 days. Guns feel good in zombies mode, and everything but the starting pistol packs enough punch to at least feel useful in some scenario or other. The added quest markers and objective notes make it that much more user-friendly to get to the bottom of the campaign and make tangible progress, which is both friendly to noobs and dismissable entirely for those who want to try their hand at exploring with no direction. The lore is at least suitably engaging, and on the whole it's a treat to play, with friends or online.

    The ultimate bads:

    Campaign: Derivative: doesn't do much that's new for WWII, but brings a nice exposure to the conflict to a younger audience that doesn't remember Finest Hour or Medal of Honor the way I do. Characters are well-worn tropes that could use some inspiration.

    Multiplayer: not very friendly to newbies. At this point, if you're not well-versed in CoD and FPS shooters generally, you're going to get killed a lot and that's going to really frustrate you. But the modes are just diverse enough to stay interesting. Guns are fun to use and sound great, but really there are only a handful that you see time and time again. The community knows the STG-44 is it.

    Zombies: Needs a non-campaign mode.

    Verdict: Dang good. 8/10.    … Expand
  76. CyclePlus
    Nov 10, 2017
    4
    Game is trash. Campaign is around 5 hours and is a fairly standard corridor shooter with nothing memorable that comes to mind in regards to the storyline or characters. It basically plays like an fps from 2003 but with fancier graphics.

    Multiplayer is where the ineptitude of Activation and Sledgehammer really shines through though. MP is a bug filled, lagging mess full of hit-markers    Game is trash. Campaign is around 5 hours and is a fairly standard corridor shooter with nothing memorable that comes to mind in regards to the storyline or characters. It basically plays like an fps from 2003 but with fancier graphics.

    Multiplayer is where the ineptitude of Activation and Sledgehammer really shines through though. MP is a bug filled, lagging mess full of hit-markers that don't kill your enemies due to Activision's refusal to implement dedicated servers and one of the most counter intuitive menu systems of all time. The perk system in this game is pretty much non-existent and there are only 9 maps available which are all uninspired 3 route camper fests and a chore to play.

    The only reason anyone even likes this game is because the previous three titles in this franchise set the bar so astronomical low that something as asinine as boots on the ground game play seems refreshing to the fanboys who waste their money on this game year after year.    … Expand
  77. BoTToX_CH
    Nov 10, 2017
    1
    Useless game of 2017 !!! That's all folks !
    Servers Crash, boring and very short campaign, ridiculous sounds effects.
    Multi player in very little maps without soul and all in same type of environment !
    Just a little bad game
  78. Skydog
    Nov 10, 2017
    0
    "Call of duty is back to it's roots"
    Um no. It's definitely not. This game is full of tiny ass maps where the ADHD children can continue to run to spawns and feel like their tiny dicks are bigger. No one in their right mind would give this game over a 5. It's got a decent campaign and zombie mode but the MP is complete and utter trash STILL.
  79. WorstNovak
    Nov 10, 2017
    0
    This game is unfettered **** Sledgehammer Games is incompetent and I personally will never buy anything they touch ever again. The servers are unstable and **** the hit detection is functionally non-existent, the weapon balance is bad, the maps are boring and there's only 9 of them, the list goes on and on and on. Do not buy this game.
  80. EmirKhorasani
    Nov 10, 2017
    1
    The multiplayer is wildly inconsistent. Under the exact same circumstances one game it will take 3 bullets to kill a full health player and 6 the next game. The hit boxes for sniper rifles extend in a 3 foot radius around player making sniper rifles win every single time in close quarters with the auto aim snapping. It's broken and it's annoying as hell.
  81. millerjr9566
    Nov 10, 2017
    2
    Seriously? Small maps, even for CoD standards. But my biggest complaint has to be the servers/connection. From playing EVERY single other CoD online, I have never had this many issues before. Complete trash, and I've never written a single game review in 15 years of gaming. Congrats on being that bad. You're right up there with that P.O.S. grinding for nothing Destiny game. The onlySeriously? Small maps, even for CoD standards. But my biggest complaint has to be the servers/connection. From playing EVERY single other CoD online, I have never had this many issues before. Complete trash, and I've never written a single game review in 15 years of gaming. Congrats on being that bad. You're right up there with that P.O.S. grinding for nothing Destiny game. The only positive outcome of this game was they got rid of those exo-skeleton jet packs.… Expand
  82. cem12
    Nov 10, 2017
    5
    Gráficamente el juego está bien, lo único que puedo decir bueno de el. El modo Zombies esta entretenido, y es totalmente diferente a los vistos hasta hoy. La historia de la segunda guerra mundial para nada se parece a lo que representa en este juego. Se han burlado de la gente. Metiendo mujeres en la segunda guerra mundial, uniformes inventados, armas fuera de su tiempo y pantallas lasGráficamente el juego está bien, lo único que puedo decir bueno de el. El modo Zombies esta entretenido, y es totalmente diferente a los vistos hasta hoy. La historia de la segunda guerra mundial para nada se parece a lo que representa en este juego. Se han burlado de la gente. Metiendo mujeres en la segunda guerra mundial, uniformes inventados, armas fuera de su tiempo y pantallas las cuales jamás hubo batalla alguna. Es un juego lleno de micro transacciones, fomentando la compra de productos ya que te muestra descaradamente lo que le toca al resto de jugadores. Los emblemas nazis "volaron", jamás podrás elegir uniforme aleman. Siendo americano juegas con armas alemanas, no te da opción a elegir. Sigo enamorado el Cod: World at War, un juego que sí cumplía con la historia, escenarios y soldados. pensaba que Activision por fin lo iba a volver a hacer, pero me equivoque. Han creado un juego de "guerra antigua" por llamarlo de alguna manera, para que los "niños rata" sean felices. Creando micro transacciones, matar por matar ya que no matas Nazis, sino alemanes que no han hecho nada; poniendo mujeres que apenas las hubo en los ejércitos alemanes ni americanos, creando las cajas de de premios "traga perras" Lo único que celebro, es que por fin se abandonen los malditos juegos futuristas.… Expand
  83. thunt
    Nov 10, 2017
    0
    my dogs left something out in the backyard. another piece of crap game trying to suck out every penny of gamers as possible. rip off, boycott c.o.d. games do not support this rip off company any further! abandon this series!
  84. scruffy_77
    Nov 10, 2017
    4
    Sadly, this game was a real let down for me. Firstly, and to be fair the campaign was ok, just way to short. I did enjoy playing each section but before I knew it I was at the end within 5 hours of gameplay, £50 for five hours’ entertainment is not great value when you compare this to such titles as Horizon Zero Dawn, or the Witcher 3. But the real let down for me was the multiplayer, asSadly, this game was a real let down for me. Firstly, and to be fair the campaign was ok, just way to short. I did enjoy playing each section but before I knew it I was at the end within 5 hours of gameplay, £50 for five hours’ entertainment is not great value when you compare this to such titles as Horizon Zero Dawn, or the Witcher 3. But the real let down for me was the multiplayer, as an old school CoD fan who spent so much time on the likes of Modern Warfare 1 & 2, and black ops 1 I was excited for this back to the roots Call of Duty, but unfortunately my experience couldn’t be further from my nostalgic memories. To begin it didn’t work for a few days, just stuck at a loading screen, then when it did work my ping was so bad, I had no chance – this is despite being on a 250mbps connection. The maps are too small, and it just loads the same ones over and over again. The whole lobby thing I don’t get either – Just need a menu, and find match… Such a shame, I was overly looking forward to this game, and personally for me, they missed the target. But credit where credit is due, at least they have changed direction from the awful double jumping futuristic rubbish that the last few instalments followed.… Expand
  85. Beyblades
    Nov 9, 2017
    5
    Before buying WW2, i was excited for Call of Duty to go back to BOTG. Although i was disappointed with how unoriginal and uninspiring the game is as a whole.

    Zombies: Without a doubt, zombies is my favorite part of the whole game. I have been a big fan of WAW,B01, and B02 zombies and still play it today with my friends. WW2 zombies to me feels VERY similar in ways to these games but    Before buying WW2, i was excited for Call of Duty to go back to BOTG. Although i was disappointed with how unoriginal and uninspiring the game is as a whole.

    Zombies: Without a doubt, zombies is my favorite part of the whole game. I have been a big fan of WAW,B01, and B02 zombies and still play it today with my friends. WW2 zombies to me feels VERY similar in ways to these games but doesn't add too much. With the two zombie maps that come with game, you get bored with them fairly quick (but that's not to say they are horrible maps). Although if you're looking to get WW2 strictly for zombies, i would recommend waiting for Zombie DLC maps to come out first.

    Multiplayer: For me, the WW2 multiplayer was a huge let down. The game itself feels very slow paced, for the reasons that:
    - If you are firing from a fair distance with an smg, it can take up to 7 shots to kill someone.
    -It takes a 5 kill streak just to get a UAV.
    -Maps are way to big (most maps of the maps i hate)
    For some people i can understand if you would enjoy a slower paced game. But for me I hate it. On the positive side, the sounds and visuals in the game a very satisfying.

    Campaign: After completing the campaign i was in shock to how boring of a story it was. The campaign could of been written by a kid in elementary school. How the story progressed was very predictable, and there were only missions that involved Americans and Nazi's... With that, the missions itself were just boring. There wasn't a single mission that i would love to go back and replay.

    Overall WW2 in terms of call of duty standards was a disappointment. It was nowhere worth the amount of money the game costs and the campaign felt like a complete waste of time. I would recommend trying to borrow the game first and possibly waiting for future dlc and patches to come out.    … Expand
  86. cheater95
    Nov 9, 2017
    1
    The game is awesome i loved the story of all campaign,multiplayer and zombies.But i put this score because it has so many bugs it's getting frustrating i can't play a game without a server error i was about to finish the Easter Egg and it kicked me out because of the server.It doesn't matter what kind of story it has or anything if you can't play a game properly.Fix the issues and the bugsThe game is awesome i loved the story of all campaign,multiplayer and zombies.But i put this score because it has so many bugs it's getting frustrating i can't play a game without a server error i was about to finish the Easter Egg and it kicked me out because of the server.It doesn't matter what kind of story it has or anything if you can't play a game properly.Fix the issues and the bugs and i'll definitely put a positive review.But for know this is what you get 100% for the bug issues.… Expand
  87. Reciter5613
    Nov 9, 2017
    6
    It was alright. I mean the campaign is really what I was into then anything else.

    It really felt like a war most of the time and the story felt like Band of Brothers. Of course the stealth elements were frustrating and the objectives are hard to understand right away. The multiplayer is still the same. Mostly run & gun with you getting killed almost instantly so it seems why bother.    It was alright. I mean the campaign is really what I was into then anything else.

    It really felt like a war most of the time and the story felt like Band of Brothers. Of course the stealth elements were frustrating and the objectives are hard to understand right away.

    The multiplayer is still the same. Mostly run & gun with you getting killed almost instantly so it seems why bother. The new WAR mode was a nice idea however.

    Zombie mode was boring as ever making me wanna die just to end it.

    Overall, this installment was nice for a short time but it one of the reasons I prefer renting games then buying.    … Expand
  88. xenofiend95
    Nov 9, 2017
    5
    I was interested to here COD would be going back to WW2 for the first time in nearly a decade, being that World at War was one of my favorite games in the series along with COD 2. This game happens to be anything but interesting, not terrible, not bad, it is just incredibly mediocre. Campaign is uninteresting, multiplayer maps are uninspired and not fun to play or look at, then you haveI was interested to here COD would be going back to WW2 for the first time in nearly a decade, being that World at War was one of my favorite games in the series along with COD 2. This game happens to be anything but interesting, not terrible, not bad, it is just incredibly mediocre. Campaign is uninteresting, multiplayer maps are uninspired and not fun to play or look at, then you have the obligatory zombies mode. The game is a huge disappointment, but not bad.… Expand
  89. vitek__ok
    Nov 9, 2017
    7
    "+":
    - Well-made campaign;
    - Good visuals(except sprite fire), great prerendered cutscenes in singleplayer;
    "-":
    - Bad running and weapons animations straight from 2007, especially noticeabe in multiplayer;
    - Boring shooting;
    - Bad sound-design in russian version (some elements too loud, some are too quiet);
  90. Sworld
    Nov 9, 2017
    0
    This game is an EPIC FAIL for me. Why this game dont have lolal multiplayer for 4 players???? It is made for playstation 4 and if you dont know dear developers... playstation 4 have 4 controllers !!!
    We were looking forward for this game with my friends .... and now we cant play together. It is stupid. Why some COD has 4 players local.... some not, some yes, some not..... PLEASE FINALLY    This game is an EPIC FAIL for me. Why this game dont have lolal multiplayer for 4 players???? It is made for playstation 4 and if you dont know dear developers... playstation 4 have 4 controllers !!!
    We were looking forward for this game with my friends .... and now we cant play together. It is stupid. Why some COD has 4 players local.... some not, some yes, some not..... PLEASE FINALLY DECIDE WHAT GAME DO YOU WANT TO DO !!!!    … Expand
  91. Smoda
    Nov 9, 2017
    2
    When this game works it's great but it never works. There are constant disconnects and issues with lobbies and matches. Many times your progress does not get recorded and you can't complete the daily and weekly objectives. Even when you do not get disconnected you still do not always see your wins recorded. Constant lag makes many matches unplayable for all but a few players in the lobby.When this game works it's great but it never works. There are constant disconnects and issues with lobbies and matches. Many times your progress does not get recorded and you can't complete the daily and weekly objectives. Even when you do not get disconnected you still do not always see your wins recorded. Constant lag makes many matches unplayable for all but a few players in the lobby. There are many signs of laziness in this game and it feels like a cash grab.… Expand
  92. willsmichael964
    Nov 9, 2017
    2
    Let me start by saying that I 'am a 34 year old die hard gamer. I have owned systems and played games that some may have never seen or even heard of. Games have been a major part of my life since I was a child throwing tantrums over Thrillas Surf and Safari. I have played many COD titles and always at least tried to remain a loyalist. It wasn't until the N64 era that I really dug into theLet me start by saying that I 'am a 34 year old die hard gamer. I have owned systems and played games that some may have never seen or even heard of. Games have been a major part of my life since I was a child throwing tantrums over Thrillas Surf and Safari. I have played many COD titles and always at least tried to remain a loyalist. It wasn't until the N64 era that I really dug into the FPS genre with classic titles like Goldeneye and Perfect Dark. Call of Duty launched (many years later), and wow what a fantastic beginning to a franchise! Epic multiplayer and short yet powerful campaigns. It almost seemed like it would never stop either, every year a new COD would launch and it was a must have! Suddenly it seemed like it started to falter. It went from a perspective I understood to double jumping and running along the walls; flying through the air with jet packs.. Needless to say I wasn't much of a fan and only bought the new franchise titles when they were on sale or at a killer discount. Even then... After playing Ghosts, I realized the franchise had completely fallen into disarray and I converted my attention more into the battlefield franchise. I played Infinite Warfare with a friend and almost couldn't physically do it. Another COD failure. I should have known better. Then alas! A "boots on the ground" Call of Duty! Could this be a rebirth of a once great franchise!? Could this be another great title; reminiscent of the original Black Ops 1?? How exciting! I had to go out and get it on launch day! Nov 3rd! I had high hopes and hadn't bought a COD title in years. I dove right into multiplayer and tested every available weapon I could. It had a renewed feeling and I was excited. For 20 minutes. Then the endorphins settled and I took note to aspects of the game that became more evident. Like why do I keep playing the same 2 or 3 maps over and over? why is everyone running around with SMGs? Why is every map so small and contained? I quickly started to feel like I spent 59.99 for a few hours of enjoyment, and that afterwards, this game would sit on the shelf with the dozen or so other titles I have that rarely played in the last 6 months or so, and as I sit here typing, that is where CODWW2 sits. In the case, on my shelf, next to The Wolf Among Us. I anticipate that is where it will stay, while Battlefield 1 sits pretty in my Playstation. Mark my words, this WILL be the last COD game that I purchase, and I implore you to not make the same mistake that I did. Now I sit, eagerly awaiting the next Battlefield installment, but even if that takes years, Battlefield 1 will still satisfy me more than CODWW2 ever could.… Expand
  93. mackenzie129
    Nov 9, 2017
    3
    Read before you downvote
    I hate that I'm going to get down-voted to hell for rating it so low, But honestly lets be real I'm a call of duty fan boy bought it every release. I try to be fair to games never rating them in red unless they are broken or a rip off. I like many people bought it on the psn store so no tax yay...but now i cannot return it boo..... A lot of people my dumbass    Read before you downvote
    I hate that I'm going to get down-voted to hell for rating it so low, But honestly lets be real I'm a call of duty fan boy bought it every release. I try to be fair to games never rating them in red unless they are broken or a rip off. I like many people bought it on the psn store so no tax yay...but now i cannot return it boo..... A lot of people my dumbass included thought it'd be W.a.W2 (It is not)

    Pros
    -Campaign is good return to form
    -Zombies is fun
    -WW2
    -Graphically it inst shiet
    -When your team actually works together War mode is fun
    -Headquarters is neat

    Cons
    -Multiplayer is broken (Spawns, Finding matches, Contracts, Guns)
    -Multiplayer maps are honestly ****
    -Campaign can easily be beaten in one sitting
    -Zombies is overly convoluted
    -Multiplayer is unbelievably broken
    -BS deaths in the campaign

    I don't care about the supply drops they are in every game seriously if you're rating it low for that shut the **** up. The playing as black people and women in the MP who ****ing cares, The iron crosses in Campaign who cares?! Yeah I wouldve liked it if the Nazi army had swastikas but whatever its no bother. Fan boys accept that its not perfect get off the 10s Haters accept that its a game out there that people enjoy get off your 0s. So much hype so much disappointment.
    When they fix the actual broken things my rating will go up    … Expand
  94. Alexuis
    Nov 8, 2017
    9
    I actually like this game. I'm into war/action genre. I love the sound of exploding grenades and dirt tossed in mid-air. The overall feeling for me is amazing. With accumulated user-score of 4.4, this made me realize that the over-all quality of a game sorely rely on our personal taste. From now on, i will not depend on User/Critics rating of a game whether it's low or high. As long as i'mI actually like this game. I'm into war/action genre. I love the sound of exploding grenades and dirt tossed in mid-air. The overall feeling for me is amazing. With accumulated user-score of 4.4, this made me realize that the over-all quality of a game sorely rely on our personal taste. From now on, i will not depend on User/Critics rating of a game whether it's low or high. As long as i'm enjoying it. This time COD WW2. The game made me feel like I'm back as a kid playing the classic COD. I think the reason why this game has a low user score is because most gamers today are too critical to the point where even a very tiny mistake or not meeting their expectations , the game is trash for them. If you're just a casual gamer who are into war/action games, looking for fun and missing the classic COD experience, i highly recommend this for you. For me, COD WWII is worth my money.… Expand
  95. aeuteneuer
    Nov 8, 2017
    1
    This game is a complete waste of money. Please, I urge you not to buy; you will be highly disappointed. From the basic non-strategical gameplay to the tiny maps there is not much to enjoy about this game. Compare this to another game with world war two style settings and guns like Battlefield One and there is no comparison. Battlefield One blows Call of Duty World at War out of the water.This game is a complete waste of money. Please, I urge you not to buy; you will be highly disappointed. From the basic non-strategical gameplay to the tiny maps there is not much to enjoy about this game. Compare this to another game with world war two style settings and guns like Battlefield One and there is no comparison. Battlefield One blows Call of Duty World at War out of the water. Call of Duty really let their fans down with this game. I don't like the game play, maps are way too small, small amounts of people in a game (6 Person teams), and on top of that its just not fun. I was not a fan of Call of Duty's last release of Advance Warfare but looking back even that is 100 times better than this new one. I am trying to find something positive to say about it so I will say that their cut scene are very cool and the graphics are amazing but non of that translates into the actual gameplay. The zombies can be fun and seems to be the main selling point of their game because its really the only thing people play. I would highly recommend NOT buying Call of Duty World War II. Instead, If you are looking for a strategic world war II game with big detailed maps and large amount of players in games then, I would Battlefield One. It far surpasses any of its competition at the moment and is an incredibly fun game to play.… Expand
  96. TalentUK
    Nov 8, 2017
    0
    First things first i am glad to say i did not line activisions pockets by buying this game, i borrowed it from a mate for 2 days then asked him would he like me to bin it for him.....He said yes
    For those people who buy this (including my mate) your destroying gaming for gamers ..... while this recycled trash with added money for this and that plagues the industry you the gamers will get    First things first i am glad to say i did not line activisions pockets by buying this game, i borrowed it from a mate for 2 days then asked him would he like me to bin it for him.....He said yes
    For those people who buy this (including my mate) your destroying gaming for gamers ..... while this recycled trash with added money for this and that plagues the industry you the gamers will get ripped off with cheap nasty games like this.....The Good old copy and d paste with a new background seems to fool most off you.....It is the same game without the jumping boosts with extra censorship and lots of Bull S*$t PC .....    … Expand
  97. Towel1905
    Nov 8, 2017
    10
    Its good CoD! Better iw and bo3. Zombies not suck like in iw. Loot boxes balance. good game! The best online on pc and on ps! Record! SHG, good job!!!
  98. Sikver91
    Nov 8, 2017
    3
    una literal mierda de juego ahora con sus cajitas y sin emocion en el multijugador no hay miedo a morir, cheaters y hacks por todo lado servidores caidos un juego de una nota por ahy de 3 por mucho a 4 y esta en 8 ? es una broma ? que basura de juego
  99. UncutSuspiria
    Nov 8, 2017
    1
    80 gigabytes of garbage.

    I have hated COD since BLOPS2. As soon as it turned into Halo, I started hating it. But, I was really looking forward to this one because it was going back to their roots. This is 80 gigs of trash. I sold it less than owning it for 24 hours. Campaign: SUCKS. This is NOT a campaign. It is only 5 hours long. I am sorry, but a campaign should not take 5 hours    80 gigabytes of garbage.

    I have hated COD since BLOPS2. As soon as it turned into Halo, I started hating it. But, I was really looking forward to this one because it was going back to their roots.

    This is 80 gigs of trash. I sold it less than owning it for 24 hours.

    Campaign: SUCKS. This is NOT a campaign. It is only 5 hours long. I am sorry, but a campaign should not take 5 hours to beat. I have purchased DLC content greater than that.

    Multiplayer: TERRIBLE. COD continues to use the same gaming engine from 2007 and it shows in the graphics, they are terrible. Gameplay and movement is horrible. You are constantly swaying side-to-side which was intentional to give it that feel of really walking, it failed. Aiming is choppy as well. Above all that, the thing that really destroys COD is the community. You still have the same people playing that ruin the game. This game requires no skill, you can pick it up and get 15 kills without trying. People either hide or run around aimlessly like morons.

    Zombies: Didn't even play. I was so displeased with everything else that I sold the game not even 24 hours later.

    Lootboxes: These are NOT pay to win, they are cosmetic crap only.

    I really wanted to like this game so much.    … Expand
  100. czdz87
    Nov 8, 2017
    0
    This is not a game for e-sport games. S & D mode, too much noise on the map. The maps are too small and too fast. Class of "mountains" in quiet walking destroys game. E-sport in this game does not exist.
Page:

Awards & Rankings

82
#82 Best PS4 Game of 2017
9
#9 Most Discussed PS4 Game of 2017
9
#9 Most Shared PS4 Game of 2017

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
79

Generally favorable reviews - based on 83 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 62 out of 83
  2. Mixed: 21 out of 83
  3. Negative: 0 out of 83
  1. CD-Action
    Jan 10, 2018
    70
    I really wanted CoD’s return to World War II to be something more than a solid game – but it’s not. I couldn’t shake the feeling that I’ve already seen all this, that the developers (or perhaps the publisher) chose to create something as safe as possible. There’s just one campaign mission that surprised me with its scale, the rest is just a disappointing “best of Call of Duty”. The multiplayer is as good as usual, but it was infused with unnecessary systems resembling mobile titles, e.g spending in-game currency on pointless tasks of the “kill 100 enemies” variety. Missions that make you watch other players open their loot boxes are the pinnacle of absurdity. [13/2017, p.64]
  2. The Digital Fix
    Dec 22, 2017
    70
    A solid return to its roots, Call of Duty WWII reminds us what made us all fall in love Call of Duty in the first place. It ticks all the boxes which is both a blessing and a curse. Good fun and worth your time but offers nothing exceptional.
    Read full review
  3. Playstation Official Magazine UK
    Dec 15, 2017
    90
    Revitalised and exemplary FPS gaming. Multiplayer trims back to the essentials, campaign shows sensitivity and Zombies...well it's a new excuse to play CoD Zombies. [Christmas 2017, p.77]
See all critic reviews »