Battlefield 1

 PlayStation 4
User Score
7.9

Generally favorable reviews- based on 2521 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1,851 out of 2521
  2. Mixed: 411 out of 2521
  3. Negative: 259 out of 2521
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. bigec
    Jan 11, 2017
    10
    Best way to play this game...
    what all is open..

    https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B01LXS3Z9A/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&tag=allthigs-20&camp=1789&creative=9325&linkCode=as2&creativeASIN=B01LXS3Z9A&linkId=15a19e3c5f21d5df2129d38789a3f397
  2. kenmil
    Jan 10, 2017
    3
    You know you have bought a faulty product when they release a patch with over 100 "fixes" within weeks of the game going on sale. The silly thing is that after this patch, many of the most obvious faults in the game have still not been fixed !! This game could have been good, but sadly, it is rubbish.
  3. neropx
    Jan 9, 2017
    10
    Campaign is short, but very decent, they tell good stories and enjoyed playing them. But this is not why most people buy battlefield, including me. The multiplayer is the reason... and well I haven't got bored of it since playing on it for a few months, and that to me is a big thing because I get bored easily. So that's why I give this a 10.
  4. hawkeye766
    Jan 9, 2017
    10
    Battlefield one is the excellent counter to call of duty's infinite warfare, and a perfect answer to the longing of many gamers (myself included) to play a shooter that doesn't cast them as a barely human cyborg, powered by cybernetic implants. It is the difficulty of BF1 that makes it so compelling. It is incredibly inconvenient every time you reload your weapon, and your characterBattlefield one is the excellent counter to call of duty's infinite warfare, and a perfect answer to the longing of many gamers (myself included) to play a shooter that doesn't cast them as a barely human cyborg, powered by cybernetic implants. It is the difficulty of BF1 that makes it so compelling. It is incredibly inconvenient every time you reload your weapon, and your character takes 30 seconds or so to do it, but at the same time, a little grin creeps on to my face each time it happens. Health is hard to regain, unless you have a medkit, and it is not uncommon to be unable to ADS because of the gasmask on your face, protecting you from a deadly cloud of mustard gas. It's these little details, that make this came so compelling.
    The story is incredibly powerful as well. From the opening sequence where you play as about 5 different characters, all of whom inevitably perish, the game powerfully conveys the hopelessness of a war where battlefield tactics had yet to catch up to the death dealing technologies of the period. The Short anthology type stories do a great job of highlighting specific aspects of the war. These stories are extremely moving, as they manage to connect you to the characters and create meaningful development over the course of only three or four levels.
    BF1 also features an immensely fun multiplayer. The most enjoyable aspect of which is the new operations feature; a bit of a cross between domination, and rush, with the large scale chaos of conquest. One match will take about 3 rounds, and sometimes moves to a different map. Usually at least once in a course of a match, one side is reinforced by a zeppelin, train, or dreadnought battleship. The scope of the matches is monstrous. Each time you spawn in, the camera zooms into a spot on the map, speaking to how small, helpless, and inconsequential each soldier must have felt; especially when there are things like Zeppelins looming in the sky, raining death on all who dare to venture underneath.
    Whether you are a hardcore fps gamer, or someone who is interested in history, and compelling heroism, Bf1 is a mightily entertaining experience.    … Expand
  5. criticool
    Jan 8, 2017
    8
    Pros: Fantastic Graphics, very immersive from the visuals to the sound effects. Managed to somewhat incorporate the WW1 theme into a BF game.

    Negatives: Steps to make the game more casual, hip firing is stupidly accurate. Few steps back in some aspects. Complete lack of any meaningful progression system. There is no real need to use any of the level 10 guns, with the only one you'll    Pros: Fantastic Graphics, very immersive from the visuals to the sound effects. Managed to somewhat incorporate the WW1 theme into a BF game.

    Negatives: Steps to make the game more casual, hip firing is stupidly accurate.

    Few steps back in some aspects. Complete lack of any meaningful progression system. There is no real need to use any of the level 10 guns, with the only one you'll regularly see being the assault sub machine gun.

    Complete misfire by EA adding the cosmetic boxes, Battlefield is popular because it isn't COD. and simple things like cosmetics are fairly irrelevant in 64 player game modes on huge maps.

    Inability to see other players stats.

    These changes might have been intended to make the game more inviting, but they will have the secondary effect of killing off longevity.    … Expand
  6. Dodger107
    Jan 5, 2017
    0
    I have already commented that the game is only good as a concept and that using the game is clumsy, incredibly slow and not well thought out. Play the game for any length of time and you will see that for yourself.
    On play itself, you will discover that if you throw a Grenade and get immediately killed, your grenade miraculously disappears In mid flight. Tell me that's realistic. Also the    I have already commented that the game is only good as a concept and that using the game is clumsy, incredibly slow and not well thought out. Play the game for any length of time and you will see that for yourself.
    On play itself, you will discover that if you throw a Grenade and get immediately killed, your grenade miraculously disappears In mid flight. Tell me that's realistic. Also the game does not appear to like you shooting someone at the same time they are shooting you, it seems the software cannot cope with the complexity of that idea. If you use the up button to put your gas mask on, sometimes (not always) you find yourself grabbing a grenade or pulling out a syringe instead depending on your accessory. The game seems to have trouble remembering what the up button is for.. As mentioned by others, you can get blocked by a small object yet walk through some larger items so very little consistency there..
    The whole game seems to have been rushed out with an eye to making the big Christmas profit deadline and with seemingly little thought given to making the game playable. However there is no excuse for the developers poor attention to spawning. This is so bad and is simply a continuation of the poor respawning of previous games, only much much worse. You can get spawned right in front of an enemy in front of tanks in fires you name it and the developers appear to have ignored it. The result you can have several respawns before spawning safely. Not all the time but enough to want to make you play something else quite often. That and the fact that the game is sooo slow to put you into a match and or take you back to main menu if you quit. (I assume that's a punishment for quitting) in fact it's so slow to do anything that you have to wonder if the developers really sat down and thought it through    … Expand
  7. MonkeyDPrime
    Jan 4, 2017
    8
    Just simply breath-taking, from the amazing graphics to the outstanding war-like environments. Definitely worth picking up!!! Only reason why it is a 8 and not any higher, is because personally i felt like there was a limited amount of content given out on release date. For example, there were no such things such as custom games and personally, i feel like there should be at least one orJust simply breath-taking, from the amazing graphics to the outstanding war-like environments. Definitely worth picking up!!! Only reason why it is a 8 and not any higher, is because personally i felt like there was a limited amount of content given out on release date. For example, there were no such things such as custom games and personally, i feel like there should be at least one or two more maps. However, the game is still amazing!… Expand
  8. agosac74
    Jan 3, 2017
    9
    Después de Battlefront DICE nos muestra de lo que es capaz. Battlefield 1 es fiel a su saga, y es el máximo exponente de la misma.
    La campaña esta bien dirigida? no se, pero es espectacular y es algo que se agradece en esta saga, ya que hace tiempo no se hallo una buena en la misma.
    El multijugador es muy fiel, innova en lo justo pero se siente fresco con la increíble ambientación de la    Después de Battlefront DICE nos muestra de lo que es capaz. Battlefield 1 es fiel a su saga, y es el máximo exponente de la misma.
    La campaña esta bien dirigida? no se, pero es espectacular y es algo que se agradece en esta saga, ya que hace tiempo no se hallo una buena en la misma.
    El multijugador es muy fiel, innova en lo justo pero se siente fresco con la increíble ambientación de la primera guerra mundial, con nuevos vehículos, armas, accesorios y grandes cambios en las calses. También hay que sumarle el clima dinámico, los vehículos gigante que aparecen para el equipo que va perdiendo. Sus mapas y localizaciones son excelentes, excepto algunos como desierto de sinai, suez etc, etc...
    No es solo que gráficamente el juego luzca increíble, sino que su motor se expande a todos los niveles, como la destrucción, iluminación, detalle, efectos, partículas, texturas etc, etc...
    También al nivel sonoro es brillante, unos temazos únicos y muy bien hechos.    … Expand
  9. Riskyreview
    Jan 2, 2017
    10
    This game is one of the best Battlefields ever!
    The stories are short but they're movie quality in script and voice acting, if you love SP milshooters buy this right now!
  10. Tsanoff
    Dec 30, 2016
    10
    If you read my review, you should consider that I'm a newbie at PS4 shooters (playing with DS4) and I'm a master on PC shooters.
    The game is awesome. That's all.
    The graphics are great. Even greater than SW Battlefront.
    The multiplayer is fun to play. It's not about the kills your get but the objectives.
    Every great game has some cons. And for me - this is the short Campain.
  11. Glitchy97
    Dec 21, 2016
    9
    Campaign is quite short but still really good, I would love for them to bring out some more sp missions or let us play the ones that didn't make the cut for the original game.
    Multiplayer is great, massive, well thought out maps and some new gamemodes. Lacking in weapons and things to unlock suck as attachments, also need more things to do while waiting for games to load, such as making    Campaign is quite short but still really good, I would love for them to bring out some more sp missions or let us play the ones that didn't make the cut for the original game.
    Multiplayer is great, massive, well thought out maps and some new gamemodes. Lacking in weapons and things to unlock suck as attachments, also need more things to do while waiting for games to load, such as making loadouts and looking at stats.
    Some things need to be changed though:
    Reviving someone should be 100 points to encourage people to do it more often, or just make it exactly the same as in bf hl.
    The medals shouldn't need tracking or have different stages it should just be possible to do it all at the same time.
    Assist counted as kill needs to be lowered to 75% of health like in hl.
    The rest of the game though is brilliant or good enough despite those small setbacks and the core gameplay is fun and exhilarating.    … Expand
  12. killerkitty
    Dec 20, 2016
    9
    This is the best FPS I have played to date, I love the realism in this game. The story in single-player mode is fantastic (or rather the history lesson), and the maps are so detailed in multiplayer -- the only thing I wish was different is that I'd like to see the replay of my last death, to see how it happened, instead of watching my dead body on the ground while the game continuesThis is the best FPS I have played to date, I love the realism in this game. The story in single-player mode is fantastic (or rather the history lesson), and the maps are so detailed in multiplayer -- the only thing I wish was different is that I'd like to see the replay of my last death, to see how it happened, instead of watching my dead body on the ground while the game continues around me (I understand this is due to the possibility of being revived, but this is a rare occurrence as I find fewer Medics on my team than other classes).… Expand
  13. colinsmall34
    Dec 17, 2016
    9
    The campaign is highly enjoyable. Excellent graphics, varied and fun gameplay, with solid stories and gritty realism throughout. The campaign is fairly short though, so best to wait for a drop in price if you're not into online multiplayer (like me).
  14. TheStudioBoy
    Dec 15, 2016
    7
    First of, the story is way to short. You follow a few people's stories throughout the front from France to the Ottoman empire but most of them don't have much or any character development and that means you can't grow attached to them and feel what they feel in that moment. The first two story missions are the exceptions with the prologue having real emotion in it and the first real storyFirst of, the story is way to short. You follow a few people's stories throughout the front from France to the Ottoman empire but most of them don't have much or any character development and that means you can't grow attached to them and feel what they feel in that moment. The first two story missions are the exceptions with the prologue having real emotion in it and the first real story having long enough to develop characters. It also doesn't have any story from the central powers (Germany, Austro-Hungary and the Ottomans) which means that they are portrayed as pure evil like you would portray the Nazi's in a WW2 game which is horribly wrong. It stands as a nice piece of tutorial for multiplayer though.

    The multiplayer is very fun with each map needing different tactics and weapons if you want your team to succeed and win. It has a few game modes with each being very different but some aren't as good as others. Operations is the best game mode with it feeling like an actual battle with progress but War Pigeons is kind of bland but can be chaotic fun. There are a variety of weapons for each class but it is definitely less than what you had on offer in BF3 and BF4. Tank and plane combat is really fun with each vehicle felling powerful and weak all the time. The destruction is brilliant in this game with small bits of wall falling of and even injuring people. However some maps favor certain weapons to much like Argonne forest favoring shotguns and Suez favoring snipers, which can lead to so much rage because you are always killed by the same things.    … Expand
  15. Code2ILL
    Dec 12, 2016
    8
    Battlefield 1 is a welcomed edition to the FPS genre, it mixes historical moments with over the top action sequences that are fun and somewhat educational, though it is more than just a history lesson with a trigger.

    It's single player campaign stories, called War Stories, are told through the eyes of 6 different people all fighting in the same war which was spread throughout Europe,    Battlefield 1 is a welcomed edition to the FPS genre, it mixes historical moments with over the top action sequences that are fun and somewhat educational, though it is more than just a history lesson with a trigger.

    It's single player campaign stories, called War Stories, are told through the eyes of 6 different people all fighting in the same war which was spread throughout Europe, the Middle East and Northern Africa. The characters and stories are well written and well acted, with a couple exceptions. (The Australian kid, did not sound Australian)

    The single player campaign feels as if Dice were not willing to gamble the time and money on developing a deeper and longer story, as the Battlefield franchise is mostly aimed towards the multiplayer fanbase. The single player campaign is a great way to teach new players the mechanics of multiplayer without boring you with a shallow narrative but I am still waiting for something to top the story of 'Brother's In Arms - Hell's Highway'.
    I just hope the developers at Dice hear enough positive feedback to maybe focus on developing a full story next time around, because it was really enjoyable.

    The sound design and visuals are the best I have seen and heard in a video game. From the sound of tanks moving closer, to the silhouettes of enemies piercing through fog, to the sound of bombs falling from planes overhead, to the massive destruction they bring to the landscape and buildings around you. Simply amazing.

    As for the multiplayer, it is everything the single player campaign has to offer all condensed into amazingly designed maps which are a joy to play. This game is a must have for anyone who loves FPS and even for new players to the genre, I would highly recommend this.    … Expand
  16. mikepatyaev
    Dec 11, 2016
    8
    Campaign is short . Feels like a introduction to the multiplayer (which is what this games is all about) and the multiplayer experience is great . The sound , environments , classes ,guns . Team work is what is this game about . Some people are hating the game and in my opinion it's not because it's bad . It's because they don't know how to play . This is no COD, running around with anCampaign is short . Feels like a introduction to the multiplayer (which is what this games is all about) and the multiplayer experience is great . The sound , environments , classes ,guns . Team work is what is this game about . Some people are hating the game and in my opinion it's not because it's bad . It's because they don't know how to play . This is no COD, running around with an automatic spraying everyone . Yo do that here and in less than 20 seconds you are a dead body . USE TACTICS AND THE ENVIRONMENT play as team 9 / 10… Expand
  17. msg78
    Dec 10, 2016
    6
    What do you guys see that I don't? There is nothing special about this game, it's actually a worse FPS than the older games such as CoD Modern Warfare 1 and 2. It's decent, it's a good game. There is nothing great about it whatsoever.
  18. TheFreeman148
    Dec 10, 2016
    10
    Are you interested in playing one of the most immersive, historically accurate, thrilling, and well made military shooters of all time? Then you may want to pick up Battlefield 1 because it is all of those things and more with amazing sound design and intense infantry combat. It is truly pulse pounding to be thrown into an epic battle on some of the best multiplayer maps available in aAre you interested in playing one of the most immersive, historically accurate, thrilling, and well made military shooters of all time? Then you may want to pick up Battlefield 1 because it is all of those things and more with amazing sound design and intense infantry combat. It is truly pulse pounding to be thrown into an epic battle on some of the best multiplayer maps available in a video game. This is a must own!… Expand
  19. phoeniix23
    Dec 8, 2016
    6
    Battlefield 1 is my first ever Battlefield experience, and I approached the game expecting an authentic and emotional take on WW1 from it's campaign. I am disappointed after having played all War Stories. It started out super impressive and promising with a sombre and serious tone, moving quotes and a grim prologue. I was really hoping for more stuff along those lines. What I took awayBattlefield 1 is my first ever Battlefield experience, and I approached the game expecting an authentic and emotional take on WW1 from it's campaign. I am disappointed after having played all War Stories. It started out super impressive and promising with a sombre and serious tone, moving quotes and a grim prologue. I was really hoping for more stuff along those lines. What I took away from the rest of the campaign is very cliche and cheesy stuff. Tank mission reminded me of Fury which was OK. The flying mission was grand and bombastic, very Hollywood. The Runner mission is very typical of a veteran taking a liking to a private soldier, assaulting a fort on his own. Very predictable. The Italian Iron Man is just completely ridiculous. The Arabian mission is just Deus Ex in WW1. Most of these missions have a one man vs whole world feel to them, with superhuman stealth sections, and overpowered guns. I didn't even bother completing the last war story cos I was just so turned off by the non-immersion of the campaign. I just finished watching Band of Brothers and The Pacific, and World War themes always focus around brotherhood and carmaraderie, with human atrocity lessons and philosophical ideas. This is just action, over the top heroism and unauthentic take on war. Games like Wolfenstein, destiny, titanfall, etcaynget away with this cos it fits their respective themes but WW1?? Come on, I expected much much more. What I got was just annoyance and irritance at a missed opportunity to deliver a poignant WW1 experience.

    Graphics though, are AMAZING!!

    I didnt play much multiplayer, except for deathmatch and capture the flag. Kinda fun but my MP time is completely for Destiny. I am definitely missing out on the complete Battlefield experience but i really bought this game for a WW1 single player experience, and it failed to deliver that to me.

    If you're buying this for the campaign only, i highly recommend renting it.    … Expand
  20. 4theLoveofGames
    Dec 7, 2016
    8
    I've given this game and 8/10 as the game is such high quality,
    BUT (and dats a big BUT) this game fails quite badly at what a good multiplayer centric game should excel at. Keeping players playing. The games progression and unlock system when compared to BF4 or BF3 is so poor it's unbelievable. Literally level up each soldier type to rank 3 and excluded rank 10 weapons, you are literally    I've given this game and 8/10 as the game is such high quality,
    BUT (and dats a big BUT) this game fails quite badly at what a good multiplayer centric game should excel at. Keeping players playing. The games progression and unlock system when compared to BF4 or BF3 is so poor it's unbelievable. Literally level up each soldier type to rank 3 and excluded rank 10 weapons, you are literally done progression, your level is completely irrelevant about from showing how much of your life you've wasted in the MP. o add to this the MP content is shocking compared to previous titles, I purchased premium for BF3 and 4, but never felt felt I needed to. BF1 NEEDS DLC unfortunately.

    Rant aside,

    This game is very, very good and gameplay/graphics wise this is the most polished and enjoyable BF game to date IMO.
    Solid multiplayer, which with the addition of Operations mode, it literally feels like war and because of this I had some of the most enthralling MP experiences I have ever had in a video game.
    A surprisingly enjoyable campaign for which I decided to replay and collect all codex entries and unlock the platinum for it. (fairly easy, 30~ trophies).
    What a welcome escape from the other military FPS games on the market at the moment, thanks DICE/ EA for listening.    … Expand
  21. vitaminbeer
    Dec 7, 2016
    7
    Good but short campaign mode.

    Multiplayer is unfortunately completely random and is in need of some serious balancing. Camping is too easily rewarded here, AA guns take down planes from across the map, tanks are taken out way to easy by infantry. The dreadnaught is also way to easy to kill with boats and cannons from offshore. Please fix multiplayer!
  22. bartalex
    Dec 7, 2016
    9
    Sin duda es el mejor miltijugador del año
    Un modo historia impresionante con una potencia grafica notable.
    Un multijugador con modos de juegos muy buenos de hasta 64 personas y muy bueno el modo de juego operaciones ya que es un frenetismo puro y duro
    La unica pega es que no hay tantas armas con en las anteriores sagas.
  23. Bastrix
    Dec 7, 2016
    8
    I'm a hugeee fan of BF series, I've been playing BF4 up until the release of BF1. My review is based on a comparison between these two games.

    Graphics, sounds, atmosphere and the entire experience are BRILLIANT. The action is quite a lot slower but does not take away the intensity of the action by any means. Weapons feel really really cool, well balanced and the handling works as    I'm a hugeee fan of BF series, I've been playing BF4 up until the release of BF1. My review is based on a comparison between these two games.

    Graphics, sounds, atmosphere and the entire experience are BRILLIANT. The action is quite a lot slower but does not take away the intensity of the action by any means. Weapons feel really really cool, well balanced and the handling works as expected.

    For me the are a couple of important issues with this game though. performance on this PS4 version when playing large battles is poor, quite poor actually. The other issues for me is that I miss all the extra add-ons for the weapons that make the multiplayer a lot richer. Seems to be a bit of lack of content in my opinion. Battlepacks feel quite lame to me, I don't see the point in unlocking visuals although I do quite like the new medals system.

    All in all an EXCELENT game!!    … Expand
  24. wacousta7
    Dec 6, 2016
    3
    Had this game for two days and want a refund. This is simply Destiny with bolt-action rifles. It has all the grind of the Bungie game, minus the loot and the RPG elements. Not to mention the server problems and the fact that every other tab button makes me put on my gas mask! The campaign is beautiful but from what I can tell adds no benefits to your multiplayer character, so playing it isHad this game for two days and want a refund. This is simply Destiny with bolt-action rifles. It has all the grind of the Bungie game, minus the loot and the RPG elements. Not to mention the server problems and the fact that every other tab button makes me put on my gas mask! The campaign is beautiful but from what I can tell adds no benefits to your multiplayer character, so playing it is a futile activity. Really disappointed.… Expand
  25. JoeJutty
    Dec 6, 2016
    6
    Looks nice. Plays okay. Multiplayer got boring really quick. Played mostly conquest and TDM, but I'm just not into it. Too many "what the hell just happened" deaths, players spawning all over the place, mediocre classes/builds, and not a fan or the vehicle mechanics. The in-game map needs work too.
  26. Agoonergamble
    Dec 6, 2016
    9
    First time playing battlefield and any fps online and have to say im hooked. It has a few bugs and issues but nothing to wonky to take away from my enjoyment and experience. Great graphics, top sound and solid game mechanics makes this a must buy for any fps fan. Plus Dice do a good job of regularly updating and patching all the issues the community flag up
  27. EmirKhorasani
    Dec 5, 2016
    6
    It's Battlefield. Plain and simple.

    If you're expecting World War I Simulator, do not buy. It's a battlefield game with full auto weapons and nearly invincible tanks with a WWI aesthetic. Horrific balancing and infuriating choices (invincible gas that permeates everything, friendly gas obstructs your vision, going prone where the game determines you may not makes your character stand up    It's Battlefield. Plain and simple.

    If you're expecting World War I Simulator, do not buy. It's a battlefield game with full auto weapons and nearly invincible tanks with a WWI aesthetic. Horrific balancing and infuriating choices (invincible gas that permeates everything, friendly gas obstructs your vision, going prone where the game determines you may not makes your character stand up and you are trapped in that animation, meaning 9/10 times you die) plague multiplayer which is the main draw of the game. But that's to be expected from a DICE/EA online shooter.

    The single player is pretty great. It's vignettes into the war from a few different perspectives. They are sometimes infuriating (Avanti Savoia) and sometimes wildly fun and made me cheer out loud (The Runner, Friends in High Places).

    If you want another Battlefield, this is the game for you. If you want realistic WWI combat and a deep complex dive into the war with a single player campaign and more than 12 hours of offline gameplay, do not buy.    … Expand
  28. nascent
    Dec 4, 2016
    10
    Incredible game, incredible experience. I've not been a fan of the Battlefield games since the original 1944, although 1943 wasn't bad. However since the fall of Call Of Duty, and the general disappointment of FPS in general I have kept a vested eye on Battlefield 1. Seeing the gorgeous visuals, and the return to the World War, I had hoped for the definitive War FPS game of the newIncredible game, incredible experience. I've not been a fan of the Battlefield games since the original 1944, although 1943 wasn't bad. However since the fall of Call Of Duty, and the general disappointment of FPS in general I have kept a vested eye on Battlefield 1. Seeing the gorgeous visuals, and the return to the World War, I had hoped for the definitive War FPS game of the new generation.

    The only thing I had heard about the game in the negative was the campaign being a bit lacking, but honestly since playing it I have to say it's one of the best FPS campaigns since COD4. It's a brilliant series of stories that really pack the punch of mortality and survival.

    So the most important points to cover are gameplay and visuals. This game looks incredible, I had to pause and shows others the levels and atmosphere on multiple occasions just because how stunningly real everything looks. I will be replaying and coming back to this game for a long time just to re-live the visuals and atmosphere.
    The gameplay is perfect. The guns feel old and exactly as they should, but also aren't too hindering, they're fun to shoot, they feel very physical. The movement is good, moving around maps isn't as frustrating as it is with many other games which constantly weigh you down, or burn down your stamina very quickly, making every movement a chore. The level design is great, and feels very much a warzone rather than just a paintball gun game arena. The cities, desertscapes and mountains all feel real, beautiful but fragile, and the stories add to the game rather than distract from it. Every mission feels like something you need to do because you are the character rather than a chore you have to fulfil to further the story, which is something I havne't felt with an FPS for a long time.

    Absolutely recommend this game if you in any way like FPS, this is the FPS to get.

    As a side note the recent Wolfenstein games are pretty good as is Doom 4, but honestly they failed to keep my interest SP completion, and Rainbow Six Siege is a pretty well made tactical fps,but it is a little too trapped in grinding and unlocking, and digital currencies for my liking.    … Expand
  29. STARTtheREACTOR
    Dec 3, 2016
    5
    The campaign is basically just a bunch of extended vehicle tutorials, getting you ready for multiplayer by forcing you to endure boring vehicular combat and set pieces.
    Multiplayer is literally just run around, get shot in the back. Run around, kill, kill, get shot in the back.
    Here's the thing, team based combat should be two teams on either side meeting in the middle. Not spawning all    The campaign is basically just a bunch of extended vehicle tutorials, getting you ready for multiplayer by forcing you to endure boring vehicular combat and set pieces.
    Multiplayer is literally just run around, get shot in the back. Run around, kill, kill, get shot in the back.
    Here's the thing, team based combat should be two teams on either side meeting in the middle. Not spawning all over the place so you end up getting killed within 20 seconds because you've spawned in an enemy infested area.    … Expand
  30. Lowzone
    Nov 30, 2016
    8
    Visuel époustouflant, campagne satisfaisante, mécaniques traditionnelle de la série !

    J'aurais personnellement aimé avoir une campagne un peu plus long... 40 heures minimum me semble un standard assez répandu de nos jours. Malheureusement, les joueurs plus expérimentés finiront beaucoup beaucoup plus rapidement. Alors -1 ici. Pour ce qui est du pvp, je le trouve bien balance les    Visuel époustouflant, campagne satisfaisante, mécaniques traditionnelle de la série !

    J'aurais personnellement aimé avoir une campagne un peu plus long... 40 heures minimum me semble un standard assez répandu de nos jours. Malheureusement, les joueurs plus expérimentés finiront beaucoup beaucoup plus rapidement. Alors -1 ici.

    Pour ce qui est du pvp, je le trouve bien balance les combats sont épique et le nombre de joueurs sur les serveurs est plus que satisfaisant. Cependant, je crois que certaine mécanique sont brisées au niveau du retour à la vie. Souvent il m'arrive de spawner derrière un adversaire et de le tuer super facilement.... hourra pour moi... malheureusement ca va vous arriver à vous aussi et vous serez celui qui se fait tuer....

    Les véhicules ne sont pas OP. l'on aurait cru qu'ils auraient été plus dur à éliminer vu la qualité des armes de ce temps. Mais non ils sont assez facile à contrer mais c'est mon opinion personnelle.

    L'autre point qui pour moi est moins fort c'est l'audio.... la musique, les sons de Foley, les armes.... le mix globale n'est pas bien mixé à mon goût. TOUT est dans le tapis.... si je tire du fusil je ne veux plus entendre tous les foley et les bruits de pas des gens autour de moi... et surtout la musique n'est pas du tout interactive. On ne change pratiquement jamais de stage de musique... ce qui enlève beaucoup de l'aspect épique que l'on cherche en jouant à ce jeux. -1 ici

    En résumé le jeux est fantastique et très bien réussi pour un jeu multijoueur    … Expand
Page:

Awards & Rankings

8
#8 Best PS4 Game of 2016
11
#11 Most Discussed PS4 Game of 2016
21
#21 Most Shared PS4 Game of 2016

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
89

Generally favorable reviews - based on 34 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 34 out of 34
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 34
  3. Negative: 0 out of 34
  1. BaziCenter
    Feb 10, 2017
    90
    Despite a very short campaign, Battlefield 1 still offers the best single-player experience in the series. Mix it with a huge, brilliant multi-player that the series is known for and you have an almost complete package. Definitely the best approach to World War 1 yet.
    Read full review
  2. Games Master UK
    Jan 1, 2017
    90
    Set in the past but still a defining modern day shooter. Smart and uproariously entertaining. [Christmas 2016, p.62]
  3. Playstation Official Magazine UK
    Dec 27, 2016
    90
    The rougher edges of WWI make Battlefield a louder, fiercer, more engaging shooter. But the carefully interwoven campaign and multiplayer aspects show a more reflective side. [Christmas 2016, p.86]
See all critic reviews »