Battlefield 1

 PlayStation 4
User Score
7.9

Generally favorable reviews- based on 2521 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1,851 out of 2521
  2. Mixed: 411 out of 2521
  3. Negative: 259 out of 2521
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. Defer94ARG
    Sep 4, 2018
    7
    Great game, quite fun to play, and the graphics are excellent. The multiplayer, the best part, but its more fast-paced that the older games: lots of people running through the map with automatic weapons and little people playing the objective. Its not COD, of course, but its different to other battlefields. Terrible progression, you can unlock the weapons you want, literally, in your firstGreat game, quite fun to play, and the graphics are excellent. The multiplayer, the best part, but its more fast-paced that the older games: lots of people running through the map with automatic weapons and little people playing the objective. Its not COD, of course, but its different to other battlefields. Terrible progression, you can unlock the weapons you want, literally, in your first day. Also, if you´re looking for a WW1 game, this is not for you; this doesnt look like WW1 at all. Finally, the single player campaign its ok, but, again, you are not going to see a great representation of the Great War. Most of the time its you, alone, behind enemy lines, with a really stupid (almost inexistent) IA. Only a few missions are different between each other. Dissapointing for me, as a long time battlefield player, but you cant denny the game quality. 7/10… Expand
  2. raccoondaddy
    Sep 1, 2018
    9
    When I first got into Battlefield (Bad Company), I never saw myself using an armored trooper with a Maxim machine gun, dropping bombs on populated sector or charging into a hail of gunfire to cheat death or fall. Battlefield has always been about bringing the intensity of the combat, newer things to flesh that experience out. Battlefield 1 does it in the best way possible, all out warWhen I first got into Battlefield (Bad Company), I never saw myself using an armored trooper with a Maxim machine gun, dropping bombs on populated sector or charging into a hail of gunfire to cheat death or fall. Battlefield has always been about bringing the intensity of the combat, newer things to flesh that experience out. Battlefield 1 does it in the best way possible, all out war and large scale operations and vintage (mostly historically accurate) weaponry.

    For new players, forget what you know about every other shooter. Battlefield will train your failures into success the more you play it. At first, you may charge into battle hoping to find another to kill. At first, you will realize, that you are gunned down before snapping a shot in. So you die and respawn, begin to realize that moving too much is your enemy and that proper teamwork, accuracy and attacking carefully is the name of the game. (provided you aren't in a tank, which does change the dynamic slightly.) Second, you begin to understand what the hell classes/gadgets are and how they improve how you fight and survive longer.

    Once you figure out that, you'll realized what you've missed all these years and realize that Call of Duty was the wrong shooter to play. Battlefield is where its at!    … Expand
  3. zamaymazay
    Aug 20, 2018
    0
    Very Very bad game. it's impossible to play for more than 30 hours which is inadmissible for an online shooter. And online 20k on ps4 it confirms. at first fun, but the game does not offer anything new due to what becomes boring. And here are terrible map.
  4. TheLedPonty
    Aug 19, 2018
    10
    Новая игра серии Battlefield заслуживает оценку 10/10. Во многом благодаря огромной работе над мультиплеером, которому также на руку играет и сам сеттинг Первой Мировой войны. Несмотря на отсутствие реализма оружия, играется очень интересно. Порадовала графика, музыкальное сопровождение и разрушаемость, само-собой.Новая игра серии Battlefield заслуживает оценку 10/10. Во многом благодаря огромной работе над мультиплеером, которому также на руку играет и сам сеттинг Первой Мировой войны. Несмотря на отсутствие реализма оружия, играется очень интересно. Порадовала графика, музыкальное сопровождение и разрушаемость, само-собой.
  5. Zucheto
    Aug 5, 2018
    8
    There's a lot to love about Battlefield 1.. Amazing graphics, intense gameplay, unique maps, etc. It's a really good game that I put several hundred hours into (multiplayer exclusively). There are a few things that I didn't like however.. Scoring system in the game is horrendous.. If one team gets up a couple hundred points early on, it is impossible to overcome.. You almost always knowThere's a lot to love about Battlefield 1.. Amazing graphics, intense gameplay, unique maps, etc. It's a really good game that I put several hundred hours into (multiplayer exclusively). There are a few things that I didn't like however.. Scoring system in the game is horrendous.. If one team gets up a couple hundred points early on, it is impossible to overcome.. You almost always know which team will win by the first 5 minutes of the game or so. The matchmaking is horrible, which has always been true of Battlefield games... You'll start a game with 30 people on one team, 20 on another, and the 30 person team builds a big enough lead before the other team fills up to guarantee them a win. Lastly, the guns kill too fast, which has been a trend of Battlefield games over the last 10 years..It's not something I appreciate.. I don't like getting shot in the back with a couple bullets and dying before I can turn around and engage the enemy.. I guess I'm in the minority in this thinking, but it's extremely frustrating to me.. I don't get any sense of accomplishment when I walk up behind a dude and waste him in 2 seconds either. Still a good game though.… Expand
  6. Enddless
    Aug 4, 2018
    9
    Игра мне очень понравилась, но на команду стало меньше танков чем в battlefield 4.
  7. gingie2017615
    Jul 20, 2018
    8
    This game is definitely a change from the past games, Battlefield 4 & Battlefield 3, but i find this to be a good change. I really enjoyed the last two games, but i found they were very similar and if this game was found to be similar as well, then the series of the game would get boring, so i am very glad that they made these change.s

    The multiplayer made a extreme change. its very    This game is definitely a change from the past games, Battlefield 4 & Battlefield 3, but i find this to be a good change. I really enjoyed the last two games, but i found they were very similar and if this game was found to be similar as well, then the series of the game would get boring, so i am very glad that they made these change.s

    The multiplayer made a extreme change. its very fast paced so you definitely wont get bored. i think the different variants of guns was a good idea, but found it hard to navigate around your solider menu.

    The campaign was very interesting in the way that it was based on true stories. found that was very short and some missions kind of drowned on. But i think if more missions were added it could've been a lot better    … Expand
  8. whoever81
    Jul 19, 2018
    10
    Simply put a masterpiece of epic proportions!
    Easy to get going, very hard to master.
  9. CaptainRocks
    Jul 15, 2018
    1
    Singleplayer is kind of bored for me. i felt like it's a game from 2001 with 2015 graphic, A.I. are emotionless. Graphic are great and i enjoyed multiplayer rather than campaign.
  10. Nathan1423
    Jul 8, 2018
    7
    If you love multiplayer, this review is not for you. I play these games for the single player campaign. This one was short and divided into several small stories. The stories are told very well and the game also feels very good to play, minus the stiff running which feels like sliding. However, there wasn't enough time to get invested in any character too much or really feel like it wasIf you love multiplayer, this review is not for you. I play these games for the single player campaign. This one was short and divided into several small stories. The stories are told very well and the game also feels very good to play, minus the stiff running which feels like sliding. However, there wasn't enough time to get invested in any character too much or really feel like it was you in the thick of it at all. Also the time to die under fire can sometimes be a little short, requiring you to only play the game a certain way instead of fighting however you want. This is more realistic but less enjoyable for me personally. I enjoyed the cutscenes more than the shooting sometimes, and for a fps game, that's not ideal. I would give it a 6 but some of the stories are epic and memorable, even if I didn't feel connected to the characters as I was playing them. If you're like me and mostly play these for single player, you might want to get this game at a hefty discount.… Expand
  11. HairyClutch
    Jul 2, 2018
    4
    This game has been out for almost a year and already has so much DLC but the fact that I'm still experiencing regular glitches/server issues is just unacceptable. The lack of coop in the campaign is also very disappointing considering the let down of the BF4 campaign. Overall, the game feels fun but that never lasts longer than a round or two because of the ugly flaws.
  12. VmsCritic
    Jun 28, 2018
    8
    I'm a first person shooter gamer that enjoy the single player experience. So my comments are based on the campaign. The graphics are by far one of the best in this generation, and the best for shooters. The sound is incredible. I found the new dynamic of single player very innovative. For personal reasons, I'm not a big fan of past wars concerning shooting games, and not a fan at all ofI'm a first person shooter gamer that enjoy the single player experience. So my comments are based on the campaign. The graphics are by far one of the best in this generation, and the best for shooters. The sound is incredible. I found the new dynamic of single player very innovative. For personal reasons, I'm not a big fan of past wars concerning shooting games, and not a fan at all of tanks battle, etc...so I didn't enjoy so much the weapons, expect their stunning reality. The flying chapter is amazing!… Expand
  13. waveathon
    Jun 14, 2018
    8
    I've only played the Campaign story and it was just touching. Graphics wise I was only able to enjoy it during single campaign.

    Game is very good!
  14. Henriquez94
    Jun 5, 2018
    7
    Es un gran juego, pero su gran defecto el premium pass.
    El modo offline, o sus historias de guerra fue algo que sorpredio mucho, te narraban la guerra desde diferentes perspectivas, muy interactivo, lo malo que fueron demasiado cortas, pero muy bien desarrolladas, primera guerra mundial, un juego muy bien hecho.
    Graficamente asombroso para consola, pero su apuesta mas grande no fue el    Es un gran juego, pero su gran defecto el premium pass.
    El modo offline, o sus historias de guerra fue algo que sorpredio mucho, te narraban la guerra desde diferentes perspectivas, muy interactivo, lo malo que fueron demasiado cortas, pero muy bien desarrolladas, primera guerra mundial, un juego muy bien hecho.
    Graficamente asombroso para consola, pero su apuesta mas grande no fue el modo offline, sino el multiplayer, y lastimosamente, poco contenido si compraste la version standard, pocos mapas, pocas armas, lo mas destacable fue su modo multijugador operaciones, que podian jugar hasta 64 players en un mismo mapa, asombroso, pero todos queriamos ver a francia o al ejercito frances, a los rusos, mas armas, mas mapas, y en efecto EA lo tenia pero tenias que pagar mas por el.
    Decepcionante como las politicas tan abusivas pueden arruinar un titulo que superaba en todo aspecto a los ultimos 5 COD incluyendo los black ops, pero en fin, EA nunca aprende.
    Me compre el premium pass junto a un amigo por $15 en total, y el juego lo compre no de salida a unos meses de lanzamiento por $40.
    Actualmente si lo compras por $20 en su version complete, y para PC vale la pena.
    Saludos.    … Expand
  15. Jargentium15
    Jun 2, 2018
    9
    very good game modes. excellent graphics and good game. Of the best games of 2016
  16. PeterAlexander
    May 29, 2018
    9
    Battlefield One is one of the best first person shooters ever made. The gameplay is incredibly immersive and rewarding. The only improvements could be made with a better progression system and a more engaging story.
  17. GAMERGUYCASUAL
    May 29, 2018
    10
    Battlefield 1 is the pinnacle of First Person Shooters. Up to this point I was uninterested and disappointed by Battlefield, only delving into it every now and again. This game made me change my mind about the Battlefield franchise, not only is it a great first person shooter, but is far superior to the likes of Call of Duty (Don't say I'm a Battlefield fanboy because I enjoy COD too).Battlefield 1 is the pinnacle of First Person Shooters. Up to this point I was uninterested and disappointed by Battlefield, only delving into it every now and again. This game made me change my mind about the Battlefield franchise, not only is it a great first person shooter, but is far superior to the likes of Call of Duty (Don't say I'm a Battlefield fanboy because I enjoy COD too). With the direction the COD franchise is going as of right now this is a good alternative, and if you don't like WWI then fine wait for Battlefield V or buy Battlefield 1943. If you like modern day shoot for Battlefield 4 or Bad Company 2.
    Now on to the actual game itself, while I have not finished the War Stories they suffice for a good 5 hour distraction from multiplayer. Multiplayer is fantastic offering a variety of tactical choices, but don't rush headfirst into battle like I did at first because you need your teammates as they are essential to your survival. There is four classes Assault, Medic, Support, and Scout. Assault is more focused on as you can clearly tell, assault, it offers a variety of different guns focused on this type of behavior everything from shotguns to automatic weapons and more, this class is also essential to taking down vehicles as they offer rocket guns and anti-tank grenades.
    Medics do as they do they are medics, they are more focused on semi-auto rifles as far as guns go, but will help you on the battlefield as they can drop med packs that will heal you faster, they also have a needle that revives players that have fallen in battle.
    Support is focused on LMGs for their guns, they can drop ammo packs that will give players more ammo, And that's the jist of them.
    Scouts are more accustomed to bolt-action rifles either scoped or unscoped. They have special bullets that will damage vehicles but won't do much, you can also cycle the zeroing distance on most rifles.
    Each class has the ability to spot players by pressing R1, and they also have the ability to put on a gas mask by pressing up on the d-pad.
    Battlefield 1 is truly an amazing first person shooter that must be played. Goodbye.    … Expand
  18. SethDaReviewer
    May 16, 2018
    10
    Stunning visuals and fun multiplayer action!
    BF1 is an amazingly fun game. It may not be historically accurate but it is fun!
    EA and DICE valued fun over historical accuracy which may be frustrating to
    the gamer who is a historical shooter fan, but I don't mind what it lacks in
    historical accuracy it makes it up in the sheer fun factor alone.
    I greatly recommend this game. 10/10
  19. njja02
    May 15, 2018
    8
    The campaign isn't that good at all. However, this is one of the best multiplayer experiences I've had in a while. Definitely a recommendation for whoever likes multiplayer.
  20. filmcaps
    May 9, 2018
    9
    just an overall masterpiece that puts cal of duty to shame. i didn't give a 10 because the game gets boring after a while but STILL a very well made game.
  21. d3sm0nd
    Apr 22, 2018
    7
    Amazing game. DICE managed to create an immersive massive multiplayer combat experience. The WW1 setting is interesting and unique. Game suffers from severe team balance issues.
  22. JordiSkateIoko
    Apr 20, 2018
    9
    The best shooter multiplayer under my point of view (a bit above battlefront 2). The idea of multiple short stories is really good, and those stories are very good, soundtrack is AWSOME, pvp is so much fun specially if you play with sniper. Multiplayer maps are really spicy, the only problem is it's price (right now you can find it for 20€, but 2 years ago was 100€). 9/10.
  23. Sergiusz56
    Apr 2, 2018
    7
    Great gameplay, beautiful graphics and a real feeling of immersion in the Austro-Hungarian vs Russian and Italian maps. Unfortunately forced diversity ruined immersion on just about every other map.
  24. madcritic_
    Mar 18, 2018
    9
    Battlefield 1's old-timey weapons and vehicles bring immense personality to its compelling single- and multiplayer.
  25. mrnice
    Mar 3, 2018
    8
    Battlefield 4 is more addictive. And 1 has too few online trophies, and Bad Company 2 had such fun helicopters and jeeps where in comparison 1 feels like a lite version of the more hectic modern games.

    Also, it seems they adjusted the health-bar so that soldiers die faster from less damage. So there are few real shootouts, more instant deaths just when an enemy pops into view. Maybe    Battlefield 4 is more addictive. And 1 has too few online trophies, and Bad Company 2 had such fun helicopters and jeeps where in comparison 1 feels like a lite version of the more hectic modern games.

    Also, it seems they adjusted the health-bar so that soldiers die faster from less damage. So there are few real shootouts, more instant deaths just when an enemy pops into view. Maybe that's just me being bad at the newest entry though.

    The only totally positive aspect of 1 is that there's a sense of exploring a historical period. It feels detailed and well researched. Oh yeah and it runs well enough.    … Expand
  26. btm666
    Mar 3, 2018
    0
    Garbage. The story line is weak as hell, short and it seems like the idiots at EA are more concerned with being politically correct than with actually delivering a good game. After spending $70 on this steaming pile of dog **** I will never buy another EA game. If they do manage to pull their collective heads out of their asses, and make a decent game, I will just pirate that **** This isGarbage. The story line is weak as hell, short and it seems like the idiots at EA are more concerned with being politically correct than with actually delivering a good game. After spending $70 on this steaming pile of dog **** I will never buy another EA game. If they do manage to pull their collective heads out of their asses, and make a decent game, I will just pirate that **** This is the worst first person shooter game I have ever played. Save your money and stick to playing Call of Duty. Those that gave this a 10 are nothing more than paid reviews by EA games. Trash like this is one of the reason EA games has been voted as the worst company to work for every year for the last 4 years in a row.… Expand
  27. Jonnif1
    Feb 24, 2018
    6
    Graphics is the bes I ve ever seen so far
    The game is stupid , has no strategy in multiplayer just rush
    and enemies can hit you from everywhere I d rather a multiplayer like Rainbow six in maps more little Also the headshot sucks you can hit enemy so many times with a rifle but anything happens .. so bad because the game is beautiful graphics and everything but is not playable is    Graphics is the bes I ve ever seen so far
    The game is stupid , has no strategy in multiplayer just rush
    and enemies can hit you from everywhere
    I d rather a multiplayer like Rainbow six in maps more little
    Also the headshot sucks you can hit enemy so many times with a rifle
    but anything happens .. so bad because the game is beautiful graphics and everything
    but is not playable is just run and shoot .    … Expand
  28. mircopetruzzell
    Feb 14, 2018
    0
    Full of bugs, slow and biased. Thankfully, it does not last long. Worse game of my collection.
  29. zgmoser
    Jan 22, 2018
    9
    A stunning game. The multiplayer is so fun, especially conquest, with beautiful and thought out maps. The classes are all unique and so fun to play. Every action helps or hurts you team. An amazing game that I would deftness recommend.
  30. iddqd4
    Jan 22, 2018
    4
    Почему в такой известной и дорогой игре, такая убогая синг составляющая?
  31. HonestOpinio
    Jan 10, 2018
    0
    The game has no progression its get a gun at level 1 and 2 then one at 10 no character customizability
    you couldn't do anything with your weapons some you could change the scope that's about it. The weapon skins were lame the vehicle skins were lame. You may as well just stick with the base weapons. Do not buy if you like progression or customizablilty one thing that ill say that is good    The game has no progression its get a gun at level 1 and 2 then one at 10 no character customizability
    you couldn't do anything with your weapons some you could change the scope that's about it. The weapon skins were lame the vehicle skins were lame. You may as well just stick with the base weapons. Do not buy if you like progression or customizablilty one thing that ill say that is good is that the game looks really good. I wasted my money on this game and it was on sale.    … Expand
  32. chr1so
    Dec 26, 2017
    8
    Really well made game, especially online. Graphics are unbelievable.
    In saying that though, it just doesn't consume me like a lot of call of duty's have previously. I don't know what it is, apart from the fact I struggle at the game. Great game though.
  33. loadstone007
    Dec 26, 2017
    10
    The most perfect FPS game I've ever played (and I'm playing games for >20 years), with the best multiplayer I've ever experienced. Call of Duty is nowhere near this work of art, which to me makes this game dominate the FPS genre.
  34. JyroJyro
    Dec 22, 2017
    8
    Battlefield 1 manages to exceed expectations in all aspects, including that 'dreaded' campaign mode. This time around, the emotions are tangible & the individual missions are relatively varied. The graphics are also incredible - jaw dropping no matter what location you are paying in. However, it can't be a Battlefield game without also being a masterpiece online, and it doesn't disappoint.Battlefield 1 manages to exceed expectations in all aspects, including that 'dreaded' campaign mode. This time around, the emotions are tangible & the individual missions are relatively varied. The graphics are also incredible - jaw dropping no matter what location you are paying in. However, it can't be a Battlefield game without also being a masterpiece online, and it doesn't disappoint. I am constantly rewarded with some of the most intense and most wide-scale battles I have ever been a part of. Weapons are a little limited but you can't expect much given the era...… Expand
  35. YatNami
    Nov 26, 2017
    8
    Battlefield 1 is a nice change of pace from the deluge of Modern/Futuristic shooters that have flooded the market recently. Having it take place in a time period that is often not touched by developers is a welcome change of pace. It has a decent amount of content to keep one invested, and the two map packs that recently came out change enough to make them good, if unnecessary editions toBattlefield 1 is a nice change of pace from the deluge of Modern/Futuristic shooters that have flooded the market recently. Having it take place in a time period that is often not touched by developers is a welcome change of pace. It has a decent amount of content to keep one invested, and the two map packs that recently came out change enough to make them good, if unnecessary editions to the game.

    In terms of graphics, the game is gorgeous, and often times looks like it could be photo realistic. There is some minor issues with character model glitches but other than that it is still fantastic. The sound design is great as well, with all the guns sounding like they have real firepower behind them.

    The gameplay is also very good, though a bit arcade-y. Being able to drive and fly in vehicles from the time period is great, and the shooting is a lot of fun, but the prevalence of automatic firearms is a bit odd considering the time period wouldn't have that many and mostly had bolt action rifles. The spawning of vehicles and planes from outside the map is also something I'm personally not a fan of, as I like having the vehicles on map to get in at any time. But the overall gameplay is fun and is challenging enough to make you want to come back.

    The Campaign, or "War Stories", are an interesting addition. Most of them are pretty well made, having a good production value behind them, though I feel like focusing on only 1 of the campaigns, and making it longer and have better character development would've been a better idea. The lack of any campaign for the central powers was also a missed opportunity, especially considering the rather "Gray" nature of the first World War.

    Overall, it is a fun game and a nice addition to the Battlefield franchise, and I think we will see a rise in shooting games from the world war period again due to its success, and nowadays, I think this will be a welcome change.

    8/10    … Expand
  36. Easycw44
    Nov 25, 2017
    10
    Simply put, this game is the best FPS I've ever played. After almost a year of online play, I still find myself amazed at some of the action that can take place at any given time in matches. The last time I felt this way about a game was COD: WAW, and this game far surpasses that. Hope this franchise can continue to keep this up going forward (Battlefield: Hardline was a misstep, IMHO).Simply put, this game is the best FPS I've ever played. After almost a year of online play, I still find myself amazed at some of the action that can take place at any given time in matches. The last time I felt this way about a game was COD: WAW, and this game far surpasses that. Hope this franchise can continue to keep this up going forward (Battlefield: Hardline was a misstep, IMHO). Kudos for this installment.… Expand
  37. wurdalacrow
    Nov 25, 2017
    10
    игра действительно заслуживает такой оценки,просто лучший шутер, не имеющий аналагов. хороший баланс,много разнообразной техники,очень большой онлайн не то что на пк. правда слабенький нераскрытый сюжет, надо было затянуть его ведь когда умирает персонаж, ты не сопереживаешь ему потому что ты наиграл в кампанию всего 15 минут и не привязался к данному персонажу. онлайн сделан на 1010 сюжетигра действительно заслуживает такой оценки,просто лучший шутер, не имеющий аналагов. хороший баланс,много разнообразной техники,очень большой онлайн не то что на пк. правда слабенький нераскрытый сюжет, надо было затянуть его ведь когда умирает персонаж, ты не сопереживаешь ему потому что ты наиграл в кампанию всего 15 минут и не привязался к данному персонажу. онлайн сделан на 1010 сюжет на 710… Expand
  38. Almu01
    Nov 24, 2017
    0
    This game has good graphics and the classic battlefield modes. i like how they went back in time. This is much better than the future. Most shooter games focus in the future, like COD. This is a game changer. not just the graphics are amazing, but the views are one thing you will surely recognize. This game focus more on the players skill, then buying weapons and gadgets.
  39. ramzessla
    Nov 20, 2017
    0
    Game is good

    But ping on ps4 is awful, and EA dont give a **** about this, greedy ****, screw you, EA! Do something, help your customers, you lazy bastards! Its only your fault, another net games running perfectly! At the start all was ok, but 6 months ago ping started increase from 60 to 400!!! Its impossible play with ping 400!
  40. BlakDak666
    Nov 17, 2017
    7
    Battlefield 1 reinvigorated my interest in multiplayer games; a true Battlefield that wages 64 players in a all out war of the first World War in stunning visuals, sounds and gameplay that is truly spectacular. Bayonet charging with chaotic screaming, blowing down towers and houses with explosions and more make the experience feel very convincing and my jaw was down when I played a match.Battlefield 1 reinvigorated my interest in multiplayer games; a true Battlefield that wages 64 players in a all out war of the first World War in stunning visuals, sounds and gameplay that is truly spectacular. Bayonet charging with chaotic screaming, blowing down towers and houses with explosions and more make the experience feel very convincing and my jaw was down when I played a match. Conquest and Rush is apart of the BF staple for fans, with also Domination and Team Deathmatch as a reach for Call of Duty fans and other shooters but not as creative. Even its War Pigeons is lackluster, but what sells it is Operations; a hour long pseudo-meta game that sets up attackers and defenders and wages control over points with only three attack attempts. It is the coolest idea and deserves alot of praise for this.

    With all this praise there are some issues needing to be addressed of why it stays to a 7/10. Microtransactions, loot boxes and season passes loom over this game much like the previous and have an effect that hurts this grand scale of war play entirely. The campaign is mediocre that feels more like a glorified tutorial than an actual campaign. There are also some issues with network connections and servers as well. In the end however Battlefield 1 delivers a exhilarating experience of war that deserves your time, just be cautious with your money.    … Expand
  41. cem12
    Nov 9, 2017
    7
    En grandisimo juego, una calidad gráfica nunca antes vista y unos mapas muy bien hechos. El fallo que le veo, es que apenas hay jugadores en los servidores debido a la gran opción de búsqueda de servidores. Deberían simplificarla a fanático y normal El modo fanático es impresionante
  42. ppsim
    Nov 7, 2017
    10
    An interesting campaign sample, but does not let deep. But a great multiplayer! In this field is the best warfare FPS of all time in the present. A lot of variety and a lot of action in a game with an enveloping environment, enriched with excellent music, well framed for the time of the 1st World War. Innovative and odd!
  43. elshahhat
    Nov 4, 2017
    9
    the game is a solid 9 .. very immersive multi story campaign .. the graphics are very nice (specially when flying) .. multiplayer is a lot of fun (after a whole year of playing i still have fun every time i go online)
    it sure has some issues but overall the game is the FPS i enjoyed the most
  44. MannWithNoEyes
    Oct 17, 2017
    4
    Battlefield 1, the game which was supposed to surpass Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare in every single way may have indeed done such a thing, however that's not saying much, considering that Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare was surpassed by almost every other game in 2016 as well. The story of Battlefield 1 cannot decide whether it's embracing the moral gray area of World War 1 or trying to beBattlefield 1, the game which was supposed to surpass Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare in every single way may have indeed done such a thing, however that's not saying much, considering that Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare was surpassed by almost every other game in 2016 as well. The story of Battlefield 1 cannot decide whether it's embracing the moral gray area of World War 1 or trying to be about good guys and bad guys. There may be a moment of two soldiers spotting each other from a distance and each simultaneously deciding not to kill each other, followed by a mission where it is necessary to mow down countless German soldiers in order to complete the objective. The gameplay, however, is on the complete opposite end of the spectrum. If the story was tonally inconsistent and incoherent, the gameplay never strays from monotonous, boring, and dull. There are very few changes to structure or form between this game and other generic, by the numbers FPS games. The shooting mechanics are very simple games of whack-a-mole, but in this aspect I do feel as though Battlefield 1 is superior to Infinite Warfare. It doesn't have the messy, over-the-top wall running or jump pack mechanics, so it's more simplistic. This results in the moment to moment gameplay being cleaner than Infinite Warfare's messy and chaotic battles. However, this works against the game in another aspect because despite not having the lows of Infinite Warfare, it cannot embrace the highs. When the movement mechanics and more frantic gunplay in Infinite Warfare work together, it can be fun and entertaining, despite how little time is spent in which the mechanics do work together. Similarly, instead of many missions being terrible and one or two being decently fun and providing some interesting moments, Battlefield 1 pumps out consistently mediocre missions without fail, and never delivers anything beyond the most basic experiences required of a shooting genre. Interlocking mechanics and physics allow for some magical moments that can be entertaining, until the repetitive missions and unoriginal story sink in. Really it's up to personal preference which is worse. I personally believe that Infinite Warfare is the inferior game because for the first few hours of the game, Battlefield 1 can be pretty fun, but for me, it got old way too fast for me to give it anything more than a 4 out of 10.… Expand
  45. LowKeyGamer1
    Oct 5, 2017
    0
    I NEVER thought I would type this but they make you BUY THE PREMIUM PASS IN ORDER TO UNLOCK YOUR EXP TO LEVEL UP. ARE YOU F'ing KIDDING ME?!?! I got to rank 20 and they said in order for me to further upgrade my guy I have to BUY THE PREMIUM PASS to CONTINUE to level up. I WILL NEVER EVER BUY ANOTHER BATTLEFIELD GAME EVER IN MY LIFE

    F YOU EA and DICE YOU GREEDY FUC*'s 30 dollars!!? ALL    I NEVER thought I would type this but they make you BUY THE PREMIUM PASS IN ORDER TO UNLOCK YOUR EXP TO LEVEL UP. ARE YOU F'ing KIDDING ME?!?! I got to rank 20 and they said in order for me to further upgrade my guy I have to BUY THE PREMIUM PASS to CONTINUE to level up. I WILL NEVER EVER BUY ANOTHER BATTLEFIELD GAME EVER IN MY LIFE

    F YOU EA and DICE YOU GREEDY FUC*'s 30 dollars!!? ALL SET. CAMPAIGN WAS A JOKE TOO.    … Expand
  46. rAMZA
    Aug 28, 2017
    0
    Good looking game, but they removed so much from it, so battlefield 3 and 4 are much beter. i recommend battlefield 4. weapons are not fun to use and there isnt many to use.
  47. Michael_Stars_5
    Aug 11, 2017
    9
    How good can a shooter be? This question is answered with great power in Battlefield 1's addictive multiplayer, moving stories and captivating graphics. Once you pop the disc in you are thrown into the front lines where they show you the horrors of this catastrophic event that went down over 100 years ago. A true classic with fun gameplay and beautiful graphical power.
  48. Garmbrood
    Aug 8, 2017
    1
    10/10 on graphics, 10/10 on audio, and a ******* 1/1 on game play. We definitely know a game is bad when it's an over hyped EA game. They spend so much time and priority on graphics, audios, gimmicks, etc. and yet barely any time on game play and everything else that revolves around it.
  49. Batmandude46
    Aug 2, 2017
    9
    This game is more or less an amazing FPS game, if not the best imo this generation. For once, the battlefield series has a great story, and add its signature multiplayer greatness and jaw dropping graphics, you get a surprisingly great game. Only problem is that it does feel to similar to BF4 in terms of gameplay, but otherwise, buy it
  50. User3
    Jul 27, 2017
    0
    Another generic FPS online game, this one with a WW1 gimmick. These have been done to death in recent years and the obligatory mountain of DLC is extortionate.
  51. RandomWhorie
    Jul 25, 2017
    6
    El sector cinematográfico de los videojuegos vuelve a la carga con un título esta vez de temática bélica, concretamente se trata de la Primera Guerra Mundial, la guerra de trincheras y gaseo de rivales hasta quedarlos inhabilitados para la continuidad decente rutinaria de la vida, es decir discapacitados totalmente.
    Después de la sorna decir que los actores interpretan sus papeles a la    El sector cinematográfico de los videojuegos vuelve a la carga con un título esta vez de temática bélica, concretamente se trata de la Primera Guerra Mundial, la guerra de trincheras y gaseo de rivales hasta quedarlos inhabilitados para la continuidad decente rutinaria de la vida, es decir discapacitados totalmente.
    Después de la sorna decir que los actores interpretan sus papeles a la perfección, como narran las diversas historias bien hilado todo y adornado con una BSO que haría temblar a Howard Shore obligandote a soltar lágrimas por doquier.
    No inventa nada nuevo pero es suficiente para hacerle un rasguño al imperio Call Of Duty.
    También es una buena forma este videojuego de desplazar un poco el foco gringo a una visión mas europea de la guerra, tiene guasa que haya 100.000 peliculas tratando el tema bélico desde una óptica norteamericana pero sin embargo la mayor parte de ellas o el contenido en el que se basan tienen que ver desde la cabeza a la cola con Europa.
    Es lo que tiene poseer del arma propagandistica más potente que existe en tu territorio: Hollywood.    … Expand
  52. NutZdk
    Jul 18, 2017
    2
    This is by far the worst FPS game experience you can have. Yes the graphics are amazing and yes everything looks and sounds awesome, but the MAIN element here is the movement and gunplay - BOTH sucks, you get stuck trying to vault everything, you get oneshotted by a pistol after shooting someone 7-10 times with an smg... this happens CONSTANTLY, I have never played a shootergame where ****This is by far the worst FPS game experience you can have. Yes the graphics are amazing and yes everything looks and sounds awesome, but the MAIN element here is the movement and gunplay - BOTH sucks, you get stuck trying to vault everything, you get oneshotted by a pistol after shooting someone 7-10 times with an smg... this happens CONSTANTLY, I have never played a shootergame where **** situations just dominate the game like this.
    All of it is due to the game engine DICE insists on using, every SINGLE game they have made on Frostbite have had **** like this happen, getting shot once youre around a corner, getting shot after from enemies you cannot see and they cannot see you, shooting someone to 1 hp and then getting instantkilled by them from an inferior weapon... All of this makes the experience horrible to a person who have tried what it feels like to actually be able to rely on who shoots first and where you hit.
    Only positive thing about gameplay is in its singleplayer.    … Expand
  53. elric19
    Jul 16, 2017
    4
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. My first impression was: ok, this game looks pretty good. But then i started to look closer. So where do i start...
    Weapons:
    Lets start with the new weapon custimization, which actually doesnt exist. As a player you have to choose between several prebuilt weapons with different attachments, which only purpose is to make the amount of weapons not looking miserable. Your are able to change the zoom and can sometimes choose betweens 2 different iron sights on the most smgs or self loading rifles, but thats everything (sorry, but i wont count useless skins for weapons as custimization, which ill get into later on). So compared to Battlefield 4 and the old weapon system, i was really disappointed. And overall, being in the menu it doesnt feel like battlefield at all.
    Vehicles:
    Like in Destiny pvp, dice cant really come to a conclusion on how to properly adjust your vehicle maintenance. From several changes (from more direct repair, to less direct repair, to faster direct repair,...)- And trying to solve this will definitely go on, because this paper tanks make too many people sit on a hill with their artillery truck, getiing maybe 15 kills in one round of conquest, which is a goddamn waste of a tank. The tanks sidearms are mostly useless, resulting in an 6 space A7V tank with only the driver reliing on the ground troops. And as many tank drivers realized, you cant tank that much and without protection, youre done in less than 30 seconds, resulting in people camping on hills with tanks.
    Gameplay:
    At best i start with something positive this time. Dice did actually make some improvements on the gameplay. They erased bugs which were existing since the release of battlefield...after several month. Everyone who played conquest will have experienced the medic bug, which hasnt made you able to properly use your weapons upon getting revieved. But sadly, i still have this bug, like many other players, and since reviving is key part in battlefield this HAS to work 100%.
    Overall the gameplay, beside the bugs, feels pretty sharp. Fluent movement, physics, is actually how i wanted it to be. Another part of the new Bf game is the behemoth, the most retarded feature in a battlefield game so far. When a team gets behind too much, it recieves a huge armored tank, train, airship or ship, which are only annoying and the reason most players ambrace the new frontlines mode much more than oldsc...oh wait, newschool conquest.
    Graphics:
    They look very good, so does the atmosphere.
    UI:
    Battlefield 1 features a new way of selecting the teams starting vehicles, which sucks incredibly, seriously. Go watch Bf4 and then compare to BF1, youll see yourself. For changing or customizing the vehicle of your choice, there has to be one available, which is retarded and gets me mad every...time.
    The maps:
    For battlefield-standard, they are really small. Too small. And thats why you only have maximum 2 tanks per team, which is sad, compared to BF4s 5 tanks. Nevertheless the design itself looks pretty nice on most maps, especially forest of argonne is one of the best maps ive ever seen, despite its infantry only and also small.
    The game-modes:
    It features the classic conquest, hardcoremodes and normal deathmatch. Dice added throughout some new game-modes which were actually awesome, but removed them after one month and havent brought them back in. Which is one reason the game doesnt offer enough content in terms of game modes. So nearly one year after the release, im still missing modes like "airfight only", "tankfight only",...
    Everything else:
    Battlepacks! Beside the behemoth, the most useless stuff ever in a game. They offer skin variations for weapons, and they are actually the only longterm motivation bf1 offers, despite the fact that they are useless and not motivating at all. Which shows in massive decrease in player count (visit bftracker for the numbers). Too many players took a look at the good graphics, played for a month, stating the game is awesome and gave the game 9/10, which it doesnt deserve. Since you are able to unlock nearly any weapon within the first 10 hours, the game has no longterm motivation at all.
    That being said, the release of upcoming dlcs is taking ages, not to mention urgent bugfixes and improvements, which are still missing. The community sucks really hard. Since many people played bf1 because the last CoD also sucked, you get too many teammates which dont revive, supply or play the objective (or spot enemies, which also doesnt work properly (key feature of the Bf series, but hey the CoD guys give 9/10 for the looks, so who cares)).
    Last word:
    The game could get 9/10 without any problem and the potential it offers is incredible. But still it wont get me the Bf-feeling from BF4 or the earlier games, maybe because the real Bf veterans are still playing the old games. So if the game would really be 9/10,like many people claim, then why is this massive decrease in player count?!    … Expand
  54. rabe3
    Jul 10, 2017
    9
    Maybe it's number one in the FPS games available in the market right now
    but i still hope they will improve the online servers for PS4
    but in general it's totally worth it
  55. Ghoster
    Jul 2, 2017
    9
    I love settings back to WW1. Battlefield was always brilliant in multiplayer, but campaigns was usually not that great (if it had it at all). Here I liked campaign very much and liked Idea to make it in 6 different settings and characters. Multiplayer take a lot from previous BF's with some nice aditions. Generally, best BF after Bad Company 2!
  56. Unnamed_gamer
    Jun 30, 2017
    7
    I like this game only for online / not great story and Campaign Ends like 5-6 Hours
    But Online of BF1 for me Best online game of Last year (final word: if u want a awesome Online Game buy BF1 But this game not Good for Offline)
    7/10 My score to this game
  57. FaceCrack
    Jun 24, 2017
    10
    Как обычно DICE сделали прорыв графики, дизайна, механики и т.д. По началу когда начинаешь играть в BF1, у тебя глаза разбегаются из-за масштабности карты. Ты не понимаешь куда бежать, где занять хорошую позицию. Но после одной недели, ты играешь и не замечаешь тех моментов, которые были в начале.Как обычно DICE сделали прорыв графики, дизайна, механики и т.д. По началу когда начинаешь играть в BF1, у тебя глаза разбегаются из-за масштабности карты. Ты не понимаешь куда бежать, где занять хорошую позицию. Но после одной недели, ты играешь и не замечаешь тех моментов, которые были в начале.
  58. badgerryan19
    Jun 19, 2017
    8
    Aside from BF2 and Bad Company 2 this is the best BF game to date. They unlike Activision listened to there fans to bring a WW1 setting that many people didn't think would work, but they did pull it off. With destructible environments and fun gameplay as ever.
  59. Jaga-9403
    Jun 13, 2017
    7
    Battlefield 1, y el nuevo motor grafico Frostbite es un juegazo graficamente un mounstruo, jugabilidad; sus controles y movimientos, fisicas, muy bueno. y el sistema de destruccion de estructuras por disparos, minas, granadas, disparos de tanque, es maravilloso, justo lo que un FPS deberia ser.
    Un Multijugador asombroso, el fuerte del videojuego, DICE Lo supo hacer muy pero muy bien, me    Battlefield 1, y el nuevo motor grafico Frostbite es un juegazo graficamente un mounstruo, jugabilidad; sus controles y movimientos, fisicas, muy bueno. y el sistema de destruccion de estructuras por disparos, minas, granadas, disparos de tanque, es maravilloso, justo lo que un FPS deberia ser.
    Un Multijugador asombroso, el fuerte del videojuego, DICE Lo supo hacer muy pero muy bien, me he pasado mas de 75 horas, con rango nlv 70, lo he disfrutado con amigos, modo operaciones, partidas de hasta mas de 40 minutos, hacer uso de tanques pesados personalizados, caballeria, vehiculos, armas con recarga manual.
    El "2" mejor Battlefield, que se come a cualquier Call of Duty de estos ultimos 10 años.
    Pero no todo es bueno, y recordemos un titulo de EA sacaran hasta el ultimo beneficio de esto, y es un modelo de negocio inaceptable, un juego recordato, es decir un juego basado en la 1 guerra mundial y no te dejan jugar con el ejercito frances o ruso? :(
    Inaceptable, un "premium pass" por $49.99. No recomiendo la compra de este premium pass, no apoyemos este modelo de negocio.
    El juego me lo consegui por $40 , no recomiendo pagar mas por este titulo.
    PD: Para mi el mejor Battlefield es el 3 :D    … Expand
  60. FourEyedGeek
    Jun 13, 2017
    2
    This maybe an unfair review as I didn't and won't play the multiplayer aspect of this game, which I've heard is impressive. I did however buy this game for the single player aspect as I longed for a decent First World War game.

    Firstly and most importantly I'll talk about the AI, it's probably the worst I've seen in an AAA game since the year 2000. The fact that the enemy charge at you,    This maybe an unfair review as I didn't and won't play the multiplayer aspect of this game, which I've heard is impressive. I did however buy this game for the single player aspect as I longed for a decent First World War game.

    Firstly and most importantly I'll talk about the AI, it's probably the worst I've seen in an AAA game since the year 2000. The fact that the enemy charge at you, constantly shooting with no tactics is painful. While driving a tank you have an near infinite number of enemies charging and shooting at your impervious tank, they cannot do any damage, they do not take cover and are happy to die. The artillery that can actually do damage, fires at very consistent patterns allowing you to reverse the tank to avoid hits and move forward again to shoot them. You rinse and repeat the same tactics with every artillery. I think the developers should be ashamed of their work.

    As for game play mechanics, being able to pop out instantly, repair a tank that has taken multiple artillery shells hits by cranking a wrench is silly, but actually forgivable and you can allow that arcade mechanics. However, if a game does use silly arcade mechanics, do not use cut scenes that try to impart a serious note, it is ridiculous to attempt to impart the serious horrific nature of war alongside missions that have aircraft trying to take out Anti-Aircraft Guns.    … Expand
  61. homer4president
    Jun 1, 2017
    9
    One of the most intense FPS I've ever played. Laying in a bomb out fox hole created by the constant shelling of an airship, while a tank drives over your head is some of the most exciting moments I've ever experienced in any Battlefield game.
  62. Dimkas
    Jun 1, 2017
    10
    Коротко.Игра хорошая,графен нормальный сюжетка тоже.Атмосфера хорошая, геймплей затягивающий.Музон ахренительный и настроение передает отлично.Из минусов нашел только баги но их пофиксят.А так игра замечательная моя оценка 12/10Коротко.Игра хорошая,графен нормальный сюжетка тоже.Атмосфера хорошая, геймплей затягивающий.Музон ахренительный и настроение передает отлично.Из минусов нашел только баги но их пофиксят.А так игра замечательная моя оценка 12/10
  63. B0lverk
    May 26, 2017
    9
    Great game. Been a fan of this franchise for a long time. I really only play the multiplayer. It is a great way to hang out with friends around the world without the awkwardness of a video call or the "get to the point already" of a phone call.
  64. Kamikazeshocki
    May 24, 2017
    9
    This game is a very good Battlefield game and I can't really say something against it. Disregarding the campaign (B3- B4 was better), which is totally irrelevant in any Battlefield game anyway: Very good maps, good classes, awesome graphics (PS4 Pro, hell yeah). The only thing I notice after just the first DLC is that I miss the modern technology warfare stuff. I have to admit all the mainThis game is a very good Battlefield game and I can't really say something against it. Disregarding the campaign (B3- B4 was better), which is totally irrelevant in any Battlefield game anyway: Very good maps, good classes, awesome graphics (PS4 Pro, hell yeah). The only thing I notice after just the first DLC is that I miss the modern technology warfare stuff. I have to admit all the main weapons feel more the same than they did in BF3 and BF4. So far I have Premium account and am at about 90h play time online I had soo much fun it definetely was worth the money. But ..let's see if the second DLC gets me back with better maps. I would give it 8.9 If I were able to. B3 and B4 were better though.… Expand
  65. Lewis-Angelo
    May 1, 2017
    5
    el Battlefield que menos me ha gustado.

    una campaña floja, apenas es un homenaje a los combatientes, sin historia, sin chispa, con unos retos repetitivos y aburridos. increíble que se hayan dejado fuera a franceses y rusos para sacarlos en un carísimo dlc. el online es un paso atrás, se ha simplificado mucho al estilo Battlefront, corto de contenido, muy casual. por fin han    el Battlefield que menos me ha gustado.

    una campaña floja, apenas es un homenaje a los combatientes, sin historia, sin chispa, con unos retos repetitivos y aburridos.
    increíble que se hayan dejado fuera a franceses y rusos para sacarlos en un carísimo dlc.

    el online es un paso atrás, se ha simplificado mucho al estilo Battlefront, corto de contenido, muy casual.

    por fin han arreglado el motor gráfico, al fin destrucción de escenario como en BC2, gráficamente no es muy estable, buena banda sonora, el sonido envolvente de la localización de pasos y disparos no está muy conseguido.

    tiene poco de WWI, Camperfield 1    … Expand
  66. Raspervoet
    Apr 18, 2017
    1
    So to keep it sort - I really enjoyed the campaign, but the multiplayer is horrid. Guns are slow to aim, and extremely underpowered. Especially the starting guns. There are no enemy indicators on the minimap, and leveling takes a really long time. The game feels in favour of players that have been playing a long time, as their guns are vastly superior to starting guns. Look, each to hisSo to keep it sort - I really enjoyed the campaign, but the multiplayer is horrid. Guns are slow to aim, and extremely underpowered. Especially the starting guns. There are no enemy indicators on the minimap, and leveling takes a really long time. The game feels in favour of players that have been playing a long time, as their guns are vastly superior to starting guns. Look, each to his own, but I was an avid BF3 and BF4 player. BF1 is just not fun in my opinion. Rather play Titanfall 2, that is an excellent example of a studio who knows what makes FPS games fun. #rantover… Expand
  67. RottenDaHam
    Apr 17, 2017
    10
    The actual score I would give to this game is 9.5 but, anyways, best Battlefield game since Bad Co, 2. Great history mode, nice graphics. Fun to play. There are some glitches EA, or DICE, could fix, but they do not affect the gameplay. WWI plot is creative and amazing, there is historical inaccuracy, indeed, but the game itself is great.
  68. Kalyn
    Apr 16, 2017
    9
    Me gusto en primera porque es diferente a los juegos de disparos que salen ultimamente, campaña aunque corta es muy buena, multiplayer divertido aunque con pocos mapas la verdad, buenas graficas en resumen de lo mejor en cuanto a juegos de disparos en los últimos años, si tuviera mas contenido en cuanto a mapas y armas le ponía el 10, pero no prefirieron cobrar por los dlc eso le quitaMe gusto en primera porque es diferente a los juegos de disparos que salen ultimamente, campaña aunque corta es muy buena, multiplayer divertido aunque con pocos mapas la verdad, buenas graficas en resumen de lo mejor en cuanto a juegos de disparos en los últimos años, si tuviera mas contenido en cuanto a mapas y armas le ponía el 10, pero no prefirieron cobrar por los dlc eso le quita puntos, me encanta el tanque pesado es el mejor.… Expand
  69. NoobTooberton
    Apr 7, 2017
    9
    WOW! This game not only looks amazing but the gameplay is equally as impressive. For anyone who has been a fan of Battlfield in the past will certainly want to pick this title up. Personally I enjoy the more basic weapons and vehicle's as in past installments the guns and attachments got alittle out of hand.

    The maps are large and immersive. I can't wait to see the maps in the future.    WOW! This game not only looks amazing but the gameplay is equally as impressive. For anyone who has been a fan of Battlfield in the past will certainly want to pick this title up. Personally I enjoy the more basic weapons and vehicle's as in past installments the guns and attachments got alittle out of hand.

    The maps are large and immersive. I can't wait to see the maps in the future. Apart from a few people taking advantage of hacks, the online community is very reliable. i typically only play conquest however the various game modes keep replay high. Like the other Battlefields; the more you play and help your squad the better. It limits the amount of "lone wolves" out there just doing their own thing. The tanks and planes add a fun aspect and nothing is better than taking down an entire building with a bomb drop or perfectly placed tank shell.

    Often times I find myself stopping to just simply take in everything that is going on around me. It's simply the best war shooter available! I would give it a 10 but the sometimes long load times and sporadic server issues drop it to a 9 in my book.

    GET THIS GAME!!    … Expand
  70. kwame
    Apr 7, 2017
    10
    Battlefield 1 blew me away of how good it was. I was pretty exited for battlefield 1 and it did not dissapoint at all. This is not only the best battlefield game to this date but one of the best games ever.
  71. cylentstorm
    Apr 5, 2017
    6
    Welcome to Star Wars Battlefront with a WWI skin. The latest entry in this ancient series takes a step forward in presentation, but two or three backwards in terms of gameplay. It plays a little like a blend of BF 1942/1943 and SWB. That translates to wildly inconsistent weapon damage and behavior, terrible collision detection (gas/incendiary/explosives ignore walls and cover,Welcome to Star Wars Battlefront with a WWI skin. The latest entry in this ancient series takes a step forward in presentation, but two or three backwards in terms of gameplay. It plays a little like a blend of BF 1942/1943 and SWB. That translates to wildly inconsistent weapon damage and behavior, terrible collision detection (gas/incendiary/explosives ignore walls and cover, vehicles/infantry becoming stuck on invisible boundaries,) overpowered sniper rifles with nearly zero bullet drop, and the typical DICE bugfest.

    Despite all this, there is fun to be had, but only if one is fortunate enough to find a team with players who know how to play the classes and objectives without adding to the 32 other snipers in each round.    … Expand
  72. Termin8ter
    Apr 3, 2017
    8
    Dice's Battlefield 1 is a true return to form for the WW2 FPS genre. After goodness knows how many futuristic Call of Duty titles, the pre-unsuccessful Battlefield franchise bounces back with a gritty, realistic, and well-crafted World War 2 shooter that has put the CoD franchise on the backfoot for now. BF1's multiplayer is just as good as Battlefield's multiplayer has always been, withDice's Battlefield 1 is a true return to form for the WW2 FPS genre. After goodness knows how many futuristic Call of Duty titles, the pre-unsuccessful Battlefield franchise bounces back with a gritty, realistic, and well-crafted World War 2 shooter that has put the CoD franchise on the backfoot for now. BF1's multiplayer is just as good as Battlefield's multiplayer has always been, with tanks, planes, blimps and intense infantry combat to boot. The only "meh" part of the game is the campaign, which has always been a weak link in the Battlefield series, that quite frankly needs to get fixed now. Call of Duty nailed the campaign in Modern Warfare, why can't the developers at Dice hit the bar right too?
    Overall, Battlefield 1 is an excellent shooter that helps make the dying CoD franchise become at bit more irrelevant. Activi$ion better have a good trick up their sleeve if they want to beat this game's resounding success.    … Expand
  73. stiglitzz
    Apr 3, 2017
    9
    If not for greedy EA and their Premium Pass (Wait for DLC or buy PP), which is not all bought and not small bugs after the start of the game (a curved sight, it is impossible to use weapons after lifting you by a medic, etc.) would put 10/10.
    The best shooter. Continuous, QUALITATIVE dynamic action, which has no analogues
  74. ToddDow
    Apr 2, 2017
    2
    I don't see the appeal. This genre just feels like the EXACT SAME GAME being pumped out for the past 20 or so years. I borrowed this one from a friend, it's just the exact same boring stuff as all the other FPS games.
  75. BabyRants
    Mar 29, 2017
    10
    DICE, You've done it again.
    Not much to say about this game, other than it's executed outstanding and stunningly. I'm alright with people disliking the game, but for me and maybe some of you, it's a 9.9/10, go get yourself this game.
  76. joaopontesvaz
    Mar 21, 2017
    9
    Graphics: 9.5 Sound: 9.2 Gameplay: 9.3 Fun/Story: 9.4

    Nice first World War game. Polished, beautiful and a refined documentary touch. Multiplayer is very good too.
  77. moy_rocker
    Mar 17, 2017
    7
    OK, first of all, this game has great mechanics like previous releases which I particularly find it great. The reason why I give a 7 is because this game has serious problems between menus, specially during battle. at this day (mar/17/17) EA released an UPDATE, giving new maps, etc, but you know what? SOME GLITCHES they have solved, ARE F*****G BACK! The cursor on menu during a match isOK, first of all, this game has great mechanics like previous releases which I particularly find it great. The reason why I give a 7 is because this game has serious problems between menus, specially during battle. at this day (mar/17/17) EA released an UPDATE, giving new maps, etc, but you know what? SOME GLITCHES they have solved, ARE F*****G BACK! The cursor on menu during a match is slow AF. Don't get me wrong, I really like other features of this battlefield (since I own BF BC, BC2, BF3, BF4) but they are ruined with unsolved glitches. You can't enjoy a game with errors like that, you are blind or tolerant enough to ignore those thing, but I don't because I paid 60 dollars for having a complete game without errors, glitches and flaws.
    I have this game 3 weeks after release by recommended friends, and none of F***ERS told about the flaws. I cursed those Mofos.
    I hope you find this review to consider before you buy.
    And I want EA solve this game ASAP instead trying to make easy money from hardcore/casual gamers, I'm sick of this thing of half games fully priced...    … Expand
  78. ruben_rubio5
    Mar 15, 2017
    8
    Vuelve la guerra a gran escala, battlefield 1 nos lleva a la primera guerra mundial en unos combates epicos a la altura de la saga, un juego en el que echaras todas las horas al multijugador ya que la historia siendo buena, no tiene mucha rejugabilidad y una vez te la pases no queras jugarla mas, el multijugador es muy bueno, con unos mapas y modos de juego muy entretenidos y graficos queVuelve la guerra a gran escala, battlefield 1 nos lleva a la primera guerra mundial en unos combates epicos a la altura de la saga, un juego en el que echaras todas las horas al multijugador ya que la historia siendo buena, no tiene mucha rejugabilidad y una vez te la pases no queras jugarla mas, el multijugador es muy bueno, con unos mapas y modos de juego muy entretenidos y graficos que te dejan con la boca abierta, como todo gran juego tambien tiene sus cosas malas, muchos bugs fallos puntuales en servidores y algun que otro problema que han ido solucionando, si te gusta la guerra, battlefield 1 es tu juego… Expand
  79. ZicX
    Mar 12, 2017
    8
    A great game but i got bored so fast.
    Great visual , decent SP , fantastic MP.
    But for me the content is not enough to keep me playing more and more.
    But if you like shooter and MP go get this game
  80. Jon_Demolidor_
    Mar 12, 2017
    8
    In my opinion this game is good, but it did not bring the thrill of playing that other bfs, I think it could have more different game modes that made you want to play more and more.
  81. Camy89
    Mar 12, 2017
    9
    I had never been a fan of the Battlefield series, and always leaned towards CoD. However, the recent developments within Call of Duty that have made it increasingly unpopular finally forced me to change my mind and give Battlefield a go. And since October 2016, I haven't looked back.

    A visually stunning game, with depth and emotion tethered into the single player campaign. It's the only    I had never been a fan of the Battlefield series, and always leaned towards CoD. However, the recent developments within Call of Duty that have made it increasingly unpopular finally forced me to change my mind and give Battlefield a go. And since October 2016, I haven't looked back.

    A visually stunning game, with depth and emotion tethered into the single player campaign. It's the only game I've played to make you feel the gravity of war and what it meant to those fighting in it. The single player is a little short, but that doesn't mean it isn't thoroughly enjoyable.

    The multiplayer has had me hooked for months. Stunning effects, explosions, destructible structures and a wide array of vehicles to play with. When it comes to the weapons, I've read other reviews complaining about how inaccurate they are, how weak they are etc etc. Well, newsflash, World War 1 was over 100 years ago, so expect the guns to be 100% perfect.

    Overall, a brilliant game, occasionally buggy, but thoroughly enjoyable nonetheless. I plan on playing this game for a long time to come.    … Expand
  82. ChestyPuller
    Mar 7, 2017
    9
    This is for the online only. It's great, the best thing I have played in years as far as online FPS's are concerned. The huge maps (I don't play as a sniper, so this is a pro and a con), the graphics are great, and the pace is just right. I do find myself always remembering a few features that are missing or some imbalances, but I'd say a great game.
  83. Daveman
    Mar 7, 2017
    9
    Battlefield 1 is a fantastic return to form for EA, having taken a different route away from modern and futuristic warfare and going back BEFORE the era that made this franchise a hit.

    In all honesty though, for a game centered on World War I, the developers have taken the liberty of using a lot of (functional) automatic weapons and some high capacity semi-automatic rifles. That    Battlefield 1 is a fantastic return to form for EA, having taken a different route away from modern and futuristic warfare and going back BEFORE the era that made this franchise a hit.

    In all honesty though, for a game centered on World War I, the developers have taken the liberty of using a lot of (functional) automatic weapons and some high capacity semi-automatic rifles. That historical inaccuracy aside, the variety of weapons does keep the gameplay from being dull. It's probably better to think of this as a WW2 game with a WW1 skin on it.

    Graphics and sound design are outstanding, as to be expected from DICE. More importantly, the game is not rife with bugs and glitches like the release of Battlefield 4 and Hardline. The game also has a surprisingly engrossing single-player campaign mode, where you see the point of view of old soldiers fighting in different theatres of the great war. What the campaign does right is give you an opportunity to operate the vehicles of the game, a lesson they've learned from BF4's lackluster campaign.

    Operations Mode is a relatively simple, yet enticing multiplayer mode that plays somewhat like Rush, but on a much larger scale, operating on multiple maps with an overarching narrative. This change truly makes you feel like you're fighting as a part of something much bigger, allowing you to be absorbed by the conflict in hand.

    A few things I do dislike are the certain weapons that take an enormous amount of grinding to unlock, like the Hellreigel SMG, one of the most effective weapons in the game. Certain areas of a map (ie. Argonne Forest) have very narrow choke points that essentially become a game of "Who has more grenades?" and can become a frustrating standstill. Remember Operation Locker and Metro in BF4? Yeah, it gets that bad.

    Argonne Forest aside, the designs for the maps are outstanding. There's a natural feel and flow to the landscape, where some areas have a natural advantage and disadvantage without feeling broken or artificial. Hopefully DICE's future works in the franchise are influenced by BF1's map design.

    BF1 is the most exciting shooter I've played in years. I've had a blast traversing the fields on foot, and especially in the war vehicles that were in use during the great war (war horse ftw!) Almost everything DICE did with this game is a step in the right direction, and I hope they continue down this path of excellence.    … Expand
  84. Fruitylemon11
    Mar 3, 2017
    5
    This game is a MASSIVE disappointment (ASTEROID SIZE). But listen I won't even write on it DICE looks incredibly fragile and weak after this nonsense of a excuse for Battlefield. Graphics are cool but unfortunately it won't make the game better. I promise you it'll put you to bed early so try it out. Lastly, I won't even talk about guns or anything because I want people get the EA (BOSS)This game is a MASSIVE disappointment (ASTEROID SIZE). But listen I won't even write on it DICE looks incredibly fragile and weak after this nonsense of a excuse for Battlefield. Graphics are cool but unfortunately it won't make the game better. I promise you it'll put you to bed early so try it out. Lastly, I won't even talk about guns or anything because I want people get the EA (BOSS) DICE (CADET) BF1 (SCRUB) first person WWI experience so get yourself a copy GUYS!!!!!! No comment on maps either.… Expand
  85. GamerxWolf
    Mar 3, 2017
    9
    This game definitely lives up to the name, Battlefield.

    It is true warfare and it's very hard to put down when you get used to the maps, to the weapons and gear, and stationary weapons, tanks, planes, et cetera. Battlefield 1 has an impressive multiplayer and it literally DEFINES combat FPS games. The War Stories could've been improved, however, but I liked some of them, especially    This game definitely lives up to the name, Battlefield.

    It is true warfare and it's very hard to put down when you get used to the maps, to the weapons and gear, and stationary weapons, tanks, planes, et cetera.
    Battlefield 1 has an impressive multiplayer and it literally DEFINES combat FPS games.

    The War Stories could've been improved, however, but I liked some of them, especially the one in Sinai Desert and Monte Grappa.

    I simply adore it.    … Expand
  86. Resuaicata
    Feb 28, 2017
    9
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I over all enjoyed every aspect of the game in a short summary, but if you want more details please continue reading, and it will contain spoilers.

    ---The Campaign---
    Holy s*** a BF campaign I actually care about and enjoyed, I haven't had this feeling since the days of Bad Company. In the BF game you will "Relive" some epic moments of many different soldiers on many different fronts. Sadly no French, Russian, Ottoman, German, Austria-Hungary. The game just feels epic in ANY of the campaigns you play in, probably the least enjoyable to me was the Italian campaign but that may just be me.

    Now to the issues I have the campaign and I'll s*** on this game alot for it (But don't let that mislead you, it's still an incredibly enjoyable game). The SJW themes in this movie. White/Europe/British just as bad as the Ottomans, thats the message I got from the story tellers especially in the middle Eastern campaign. And you'll get this theme alot of the game designers overly trying to be inclusive.

    -----Multiplayer-----
    "We wuz snipers en shiat" Sorry terrible joke on part but continuing on from the SJW talk, yes I have yet to play a "Sniper class" that isn't Black. Even for the Germans, apparently the Germans enlisted heavily from their massive black population to feed into the meat grinder. I'm of course joking, and find it laughable that the game devs couldn't atleast attempt to keep it close to history. And because it doesn't stay close to history it personally breaks the immersion for me occasionally. But again NO BIG DEAL, just a minor gripe.

    The multiplayer is very fun, even getting spanked and losing horribly I've yet to have a "Throw my controller" moment because the game is still fun even when losing. There is just way to much to talk about for here, just pick it up and try yourself YOU WILL NOT REGRET IT!    … Expand
  87. Olakasexd
    Feb 26, 2017
    0
    Una oportunidad tirada a la basura, Una campaña olvidable y corta, que apenas al final del capitulo 3 te hace sentir algo. Vendieron el juego con trailers de la campaña para esto? Encima el multijugador es un Battlefront 2, simple, casual, sin personalizacion, pocas armas, pocos mapas y dlcs abusivos. Arruinaron mi saga favorita, gracias EA.
  88. jackmcready
    Feb 19, 2017
    9
    This is the game that brought me back to FPS gaming after a few years' hiatus. I got very bored with the modern and futuristic shooters, at least when it came to online gaming. For example I thought the modern BF games were tremendously boring on PS3 (on BF3 the maps were too big for so few players, for example). With that in mind, I was a bit skeptic to say the least when BF1 wasThis is the game that brought me back to FPS gaming after a few years' hiatus. I got very bored with the modern and futuristic shooters, at least when it came to online gaming. For example I thought the modern BF games were tremendously boring on PS3 (on BF3 the maps were too big for so few players, for example). With that in mind, I was a bit skeptic to say the least when BF1 was announced. During the beta it was confirmed: I did not like BF. But I tried it at a friends place over new years and got hooked. This game is so well built.

    The single player has a surprisingly good campaign that doesn't end in 4 hours. I don't know if the game is worth it solely for the solo campaign, but it's close. They have managed to capture the gritty feeling of World War I; BF1 does a very good job at presenting the hell this war was. The campaign is composed of several short stories that offer a variety of missions. Best of all: it doesn't feel like a tutorial for the multiplayer.

    The multiplayer is also very good. Several different game modes, from the bombastic Operations (a more story based kind of game mode that could well take 1-1,5 hours to play) to the fast paced War Pigeons which is sort of a mobile "capture the hill", or a version of Capture the flag but without bases. It is super intense and an instant favorite. A round could take anything from 3 to 30 minutes. But it feels longer. The game is also well balanced for each class, so that none of the 4 classes are overpowered compared to each other. It's all down to how you decide to play. A positive consequence here is that if you get bored assaulting, simply switch class to something else and change your way of playing. It will add new dimensions to the game.

    There are few minor mishaps that prevents this game from getting a 10, but those problems are quite easy to oversee.

    In conclusion, this is by far the best Battlefield game I have ever played and the most fun I've had with the series since when 1942 was first released. I hope they stay away from modern warfare games for a while now and let this game brew a lot longer.    … Expand
  89. DanBenevenuto
    Feb 17, 2017
    8
    Battlefield 1 has amazing graphics, a good story mode with a great theme, great mechanics to play. Talking about the story mode, I thought it so interesting, they worked very well on the story line and the result is phenomenal. The online mode is very good and we can have hours of fun playing it. EA Ganes and Eletronic Arts made the best war game for the console until now.
  90. iwishyouwereold
    Feb 15, 2017
    9
    Fluid gameplay, graphically superb and an all around tribute to the genre. In a nutshell: Would I buy again? YES Would I recommend? YES! Have a great day!:)
  91. Nick2021
    Feb 13, 2017
    9
    Battlefield 1
    Pros:
    Graphics/Visuals Dynamic Maps WW1 theme Single-Player Campaign Sound design Multiplayer Cons: Glitches Battlefield 1 is a first person shooter placed in WW1 and published by EA. This action packed shooter starts at a price around the $60 range and is rated M. An explanation for Battlefield 1 having such a good reveiws is because the Campaign is unique, it    Battlefield 1
    Pros:
    Graphics/Visuals
    Dynamic Maps
    WW1 theme
    Single-Player Campaign
    Sound design
    Multiplayer

    Cons:
    Glitches

    Battlefield 1 is a first person shooter placed in WW1 and published by EA. This action packed shooter starts at a price around the $60 range and is rated M. An explanation for Battlefield 1 having such a good reveiws is because the Campaign is unique, it is split up into 5 different war stories from different people and how they were affected by the war.

    Battlefield 1’s Multiplayer is one of the best ever created, the game modes included are Conquest,Rush,War Pigeons,Operations, and Many many more because BF1 has an option to make your own mode to your own liking.

    While playing BF1 multiplayer you are given 4 options for classes + Extra Special classes like mechanic and pilot. The normal 4 classes include the medic,support,assault, and scout. All of these classes include different abilities and gear so it is good to have your team balanced with a decent amount of all 4.

    The bad things in BF1 are actually the glitches that can occur while playing multiplayer. These glitches are usually not that bad but it could go from not being able to quit a match or even not having a gun.

    Besides the unfortunate glitches, Battlefield 1 is one of the most balanced and solid game i have ever played because of the graphics,story, and overall being different from other franchises. If i were you i would grab a copy of BF1 now.

    My rating - 94%    … Expand
  92. srg123
    Feb 4, 2017
    2
    Played around 90 hours and I really wanted to like this game, BUT the overall experience is absolutely horrible.

    1. FPS drops on ps4(non-pro) sometimes make the game literally unplayable. 2. DICE does not give a **** about fixing bugs and game balance (revival bugs, hit registration delays, body-object collision bugs when you cannot climb over a small obstacle and get killed due to    Played around 90 hours and I really wanted to like this game, BUT the overall experience is absolutely horrible.

    1. FPS drops on ps4(non-pro) sometimes make the game literally unplayable.
    2. DICE does not give a **** about fixing bugs and game balance (revival bugs, hit registration delays, body-object collision bugs when you cannot climb over a small obstacle and get killed due to that etc etc etc)
    3. Quitting the game takes a freaking day
    4. Map loading takes too long as well
    5. There is no actual progression in this game.
    5 guns per class - really ? Is that what DICE/EA are charging us 60 bucks for? pff (not gonna buy premium for sure)
    No normal medals/ribbons system of progression
    6. stupid sweet-spot mechanics, far too casual sniping and lots of campers on any map because of it
    7. empty custom servers, so users are made to play official servers.
    8. boring campaign with locations that are almost exact copies of multiplayer maps (disappointed :( )

    I don't get how people keep playing this game with all the issues it has. So far, Overwatch provides a much more solid online multiplayer experience in all the aspects.

    Regret getting BF1 digital copy - I could have sold this ****. No more pre-orders, super-premium editions from DICE and EA, thanks for teaching me this lesson.    … Expand
  93. Sky-Line___
    Jan 25, 2017
    7
    Absolutely beautiful graphically, the sound effects are amazing too !

    However, the multiplayer mode lacks of depth in content (weapons, armies and even maps). I also regret the fact of not being able to do a +5 squad, it might not be everyone's problem, but I have a lot of friend playing it and separating in 2 squads is annoying. There are also big framerate problems on certain maps    Absolutely beautiful graphically, the sound effects are amazing too !

    However, the multiplayer mode lacks of depth in content (weapons, armies and even maps). I also regret the fact of not being able to do a +5 squad, it might not be everyone's problem, but I have a lot of friend playing it and separating in 2 squads is annoying.
    There are also big framerate problems on certain maps when there are a lot of craters on the ground with many people around and shooting everywhere. A game, especially a FPS, should always feel fluid.

    Unlike many other people I'm not a fan of the solo mode even if it is decent. Yes some missions are surprisingly entertaining, but on the other hand there are a lot of identical missions (infiltration phases for example are very present in the game and it gets boring after a while).

    It's a good BF, occasional players will love it, but more serious gamers will get bored after a few dozen hours.    … Expand
  94. Adamo_Unit
    Jan 24, 2017
    0
    I'm not very good at this game really, but my buddy Tone is. I really like it, I play it a lot but I just can't get good. Still the best game out right now, graphics, sounds, environment are all super cool. Just wish I was good at it.
  95. Dietrich_
    Jan 23, 2017
    10
    The battlefield is another. bones managed to keep the spirit of the previous parts and added dynamics, even in a game about the first world war. The company, which reveals the storyline of different characters is always good. Here it is made quite large. In network mode, all as fun, varied and unpredictable. But after buying some of the necessary weapons, money ceases to have value. PrettyThe battlefield is another. bones managed to keep the spirit of the previous parts and added dynamics, even in a game about the first world war. The company, which reveals the storyline of different characters is always good. Here it is made quite large. In network mode, all as fun, varied and unpredictable. But after buying some of the necessary weapons, money ceases to have value. Pretty small selection of weapons for the classes and a weird system of opening boxes with the camouflage. Despite its flaws Battlefield remains for me the best shooter.… Expand
  96. Unlimitedpower
    Jan 23, 2017
    1
    Battlefield 1 is the latest entry in the long running Battlefield francise. This game is supposed to be set in WW1. But you'll get confused and forget what era this game is supposed to be set in since everyone is running around with SMGs and LMGs that were never used in WW1.

    For real, though. This is another content lacking, unbalanced DICE shooter with 4-5 hours worth of gameplay since    Battlefield 1 is the latest entry in the long running Battlefield francise. This game is supposed to be set in WW1. But you'll get confused and forget what era this game is supposed to be set in since everyone is running around with SMGs and LMGs that were never used in WW1.

    For real, though. This is another content lacking, unbalanced DICE shooter with 4-5 hours worth of gameplay since the campaign is only 1-2 hours long and the multiplayer is barely worth playing since you'll die the moment you spawn in by some sniper, tank or bomber plane. If you reach rank 3 with all classes well you're pretty much done with the game since you don't get any more weapons untill rank 10. Which means you must grind away for hours and hours on the same 9 maps using the same weapons and vehicles over and over untill you're stupid enough to reach rank 10 and get 1 more weapon.

    There's also no variety in the soldiers. Even Star Wars Battlefront has more variety in the Stormtroopers and Rebels. Here they all look the same.

    Oh, and France and Russia 2 key factions in WW1 are locked behind a paywall. Meanwhile, America is in the base game although they didn't join the war untill late 2017.

    Like I said, the campaign is a boring, 1-2 hour experience. With no interesting main characters except for T.E Lawrence. So, do we get to play as him and experience epic adventure though the Middle East? Nope. Instead of actually playing as an interesting character we get to play as some random woman who was part of some tribe. So I bought this game just to play as an idol of mine. And it turns out he's just a side character with 10 or so minutes of screen time, Even the Lawrence of Arabia skins for the multiplayer is locked behind the deluxe edition paywall.

    So, I don't and probably never will recommend Battlefield 1. Just buy Verdun if you want a fun WW1 shooter with standard issue rifles and trench warfare. Because Battlefield 1 has none of those things.    … Expand
  97. destinyfan1
    Jan 22, 2017
    9
    positive

    +stunning graphics
    + outstanding gun fights
    + gun sounds
    + good original campaign
    + multiplayer maps
    negative
    - campaign is given on a way some people may not like
    - compared to other shooter games ,less guns
    battlefield 1 is absolutely stunning with a lot of fun
    'and then the reader bought the game'.
  98. TheOshawan
    Jan 21, 2017
    4
    Fantastic Game, great single player but Multiplayer is another story
    unless you shell out big bucks in game upgrades and instant weapon paks - you will get beaten and lose interest.
    This is a problem industry wide, It used to be that you got experience by PLAYING multiplayer now EA goes the greedy route and forces you to pay up or get killed by others who BOUGHT their way to the top!    Fantastic Game, great single player but Multiplayer is another story
    unless you shell out big bucks in game upgrades and instant weapon paks - you will get beaten and lose interest.
    This is a problem industry wide, It used to be that you got experience by PLAYING multiplayer now EA goes the greedy route and forces you to pay up or get killed by others who BOUGHT their way to the top! This is precisely why the re-issue of cod modern warfare - with no purchase upgrades is so popular
    You gotta risk it to get the biscuit. EA - you blew it. Selling my copy.    … Expand
  99. SassyQuatch
    Jan 12, 2017
    8
    Battlefield 1 offers a truly incredible multiplayer experience. Unlike most games with well done graphics, the jaw dropping effect doesn't really go away with this game. This is because there is almost always bound to be some sort of surprise had in store, be it from a plane crash missing you by an inch or a tank popping up out of nowhere and blasting you to oblivion. And during all ofBattlefield 1 offers a truly incredible multiplayer experience. Unlike most games with well done graphics, the jaw dropping effect doesn't really go away with this game. This is because there is almost always bound to be some sort of surprise had in store, be it from a plane crash missing you by an inch or a tank popping up out of nowhere and blasting you to oblivion. And during all of this action packed excitement the game pulls off the task of looking great.

    Because of this the game succeeds in immersing you in the action. The serious tone that it took accompanied by a piano-laden music score and solemn narration creates an internal consistency and gives the game a more mature undertone.

    Nevertheless, the game does suffer sometimes from performance issues. This seemed to occur to me the most when playing medic, as I'd toss out my medic pack and nothing would happen for a full five seconds, which is a bigger deal than it seems when every second counts in battle.

    Furthermore, the campaign suffers, like most other Battlefield games. Battlefield 1's campaign is certainly better than its two predecessors, but that isn't saying much. Often times the emotion that they were trying to convey in the story felt underwhelming due to lack of complex writing and uninteresting gameplay. There are a few good moments, but those are somewhat far and between.

    Overall, however, Battlefield 1 really makes up for its faults in the absolutely stellar multiplayer experience, an experience that contains much more depth (the ability to customize, the historical accuracy, the map design, etc) than other multiplayer games like Overwatch.    … Expand
  100. Rovencis
    Jan 11, 2017
    9
    Something that DICE had not accomplished in Battlefield: History. It is certainly one of the best in the entire saga. The multiplayer as always the best. Only the sigle player is to short. An excellent game, makes clear that those who do not know the story, are doomed to repeat it.
Page:

Awards & Rankings

8
#8 Best PS4 Game of 2016
11
#11 Most Discussed PS4 Game of 2016
21
#21 Most Shared PS4 Game of 2016

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
89

Generally favorable reviews - based on 34 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 34 out of 34
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 34
  3. Negative: 0 out of 34
  1. BaziCenter
    Feb 10, 2017
    90
    Despite a very short campaign, Battlefield 1 still offers the best single-player experience in the series. Mix it with a huge, brilliant multi-player that the series is known for and you have an almost complete package. Definitely the best approach to World War 1 yet.
    Read full review
  2. Games Master UK
    Jan 1, 2017
    90
    Set in the past but still a defining modern day shooter. Smart and uproariously entertaining. [Christmas 2016, p.62]
  3. Playstation Official Magazine UK
    Dec 27, 2016
    90
    The rougher edges of WWI make Battlefield a louder, fiercer, more engaging shooter. But the carefully interwoven campaign and multiplayer aspects show a more reflective side. [Christmas 2016, p.86]
See all critic reviews »