User Score
Mixed or average reviews- based on 80 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 51 out of 80
-
Mixed: 13 out of 80
-
Negative: 16 out of 80
Review this game
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- By date
- Most helpful
-
Aug 23, 2011People need to get over themselves. How is realeasing a game that fans ASKED FOR, TEN YEARS AFTER THE ORIGINAL RELEASE milking it? Also, they're just going to release another version of 3rd strike 6 months down the line? Proof you have no idea what you're talking about.
Also, your **** megaman game was never getting made anyway. Deal with it.
Oh yeah, fun game. Love 3rd Strike. -
Aug 23, 2011
-
Aug 25, 2011
-
Aug 26, 2011
-
Aug 27, 2011
-
Aug 27, 2011
-
Aug 23, 2011This is the only way to play Street Fighter 3: 3rd Strike online. Capcom brought back a classic, allowing it to reach a new generation of gamers. This is a good thing. The fighting game community that already loves this game will embrace it, as will a lot of new fans, due to all of the enhancements. If you don't like it, go yell into a void.
-
Aug 24, 2011
-
Aug 24, 2011The ability to finally play SFIII:3rd Strike online with other plays is amazing. Even if you're not a full on SFIII fan, this game is worth experiencing.
-
Aug 25, 2011
-
Aug 23, 2011
-
Aug 31, 2011
-
Jun 12, 2013
-
Apr 19, 2014
Awards & Rankings
-
Games Master UKOct 23, 2011Seems a tad pricey. [Dec 2011, p.89]
-
Oct 13, 2011If you are a fan of the old Street Fighter games which wrote history, you will love Street Fighter 3: 3rd Strike Online. It's a solid remake with renewed HD character graphics, but stayed true to it's roots. The level of difficulty is as tough as ever, so if you have a bad timing, you're simply going down. The one bad thing is a stupid Hip-Hop Soundtrack in the menu, though the in-game sounds are great. All in all, the game sends you back into a typical amusement hall of the 90s.
-
Playstation Official Magazine UKOct 11, 2011The only flaw? It's occasionally too brilliant for its own good. [Nov 2011, p.113]