Battlefield 3

 PlayStation 3
User Score
7.5

Generally favorable reviews- based on 1893 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1,366 out of 1893
  2. Mixed: 239 out of 1893
  3. Negative: 288 out of 1893
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. jfgalarce
    Dec 23, 2011
    3
    Excellent graphics, great sound, good control, fine detail, but it is very boring, all missions are slow and not get excited, if not for the trophies or achievements makes no sense
  2. Ps3XboxCodBF
    Dec 23, 2011
    9
    battlefield 3 is a great game but not a perfect game. reason is that it still have some major flaw with the sound delay when reloading and sudden quiet during online gameplay.
  3. addtheKILL
    Dec 22, 2011
    9
    amazing game ..campaign is not that great but multiplayer rocks and the maps are also amazing.I would give the multiplayer a 10 out of 10 and the campaign a 6 out of 10......much improvements from bfbc2...
  4. Daryl
    Dec 21, 2011
    5
    I am reviewing this on the campaign only, which is soooooo boring. I played the Modern Warfare campaign before this and that was outstanding but compared to a game that is in the future it shows that Battlefield might have a great multiplayer but the campaign laxks something.
  5. teol
    Dec 21, 2011
    7
    A good game. The multiplayer is just great, nothing to say about it... But the campain is just... it doesn't look like a "battlefield" game, it is short, to linear, some bugs... The scenario is good I think, but that's the only positive point, I think. About the co-op, it is more a stopgap than anything else.

    To buy only for the multiplayer ! Do not expect something clean and beautiful    A good game. The multiplayer is just great, nothing to say about it... But the campain is just... it doesn't look like a "battlefield" game, it is short, to linear, some bugs... The scenario is good I think, but that's the only positive point, I think. About the co-op, it is more a stopgap than anything else.

    To buy only for the multiplayer ! Do not expect something clean and beautiful for the solo!    … Expand
  6. CaD_BaNe1o1
    Dec 21, 2011
    8
    Why is this game rated lower than MW3 by the critics? They don't seem to understand how the qualities in MW3 pale in comparison to Battlefield 3. Just to compare a couple of things on the realism of both games. MW3: A predator missile hits a building and somehow it remains intact, Battlefield 3: You can get in a helicopter and blow the building down. Call of Duty is the same rubbish yearWhy is this game rated lower than MW3 by the critics? They don't seem to understand how the qualities in MW3 pale in comparison to Battlefield 3. Just to compare a couple of things on the realism of both games. MW3: A predator missile hits a building and somehow it remains intact, Battlefield 3: You can get in a helicopter and blow the building down. Call of Duty is the same rubbish year after year with a different cover art, it is just a dlc to the previous game you already own, while Battlefield changes it's game by updating the engine to make it better and changing the immersion of this great shooter entirely.… Expand
  7. Singgihsatch
    Dec 20, 2011
    9
    im fall in love when first playing this game,,
    but i dont hope much in single player because the sotry a'int good..
    the good side on this game is in multiplayer game,, a big map and various vehicle serve in each battle.. we can use plane tank and tactical car in battle.. so its give the player like a real war in field,, we must play in team if we want won match.. a new job like support    im fall in love when first playing this game,,
    but i dont hope much in single player because the sotry a'int good..

    the good side on this game is in multiplayer game,,
    a big map and various vehicle serve in each battle..

    we can use plane tank and tactical car in battle..
    so its give the player like a real war in field,,

    we must play in team if we want won match..
    a new job like support and recon who has different skil each other..

    i think this a best multiplayer game i've played.    … Expand
  8. Meta-MetaCritic
    Dec 20, 2011
    5
    This game was really fun the day I played it in a room with 10 people. When playing online without friends, it's not very fun at all. There's an extremely steep learning curve that I was never able to make it past. People who have played other Battlefield titles seem to like it more than the new people though. One thing that is disappointing is that Frostbite 2 has an extremely powerfulThis game was really fun the day I played it in a room with 10 people. When playing online without friends, it's not very fun at all. There's an extremely steep learning curve that I was never able to make it past. People who have played other Battlefield titles seem to like it more than the new people though. One thing that is disappointing is that Frostbite 2 has an extremely powerful sound engine, yet, I don't feel like there was much creativity in the sound design for this game.… Expand
  9. Charrd
    Dec 19, 2011
    1
    Battlefield 3 was one of the most anticipated games in 2011, and this reviewer can tell you that it is absolute rubbish. The campaign is garbage, as usual with the Battlefield series. The campaign lacks a storyline, and cannot be easily understood other than "Shoot everything you can see". The multiplayer is unstable and buggy, and causes major lag issues. If you ask me, the battlefieldBattlefield 3 was one of the most anticipated games in 2011, and this reviewer can tell you that it is absolute rubbish. The campaign is garbage, as usual with the Battlefield series. The campaign lacks a storyline, and cannot be easily understood other than "Shoot everything you can see". The multiplayer is unstable and buggy, and causes major lag issues. If you ask me, the battlefield lovers should stop hating on the Call of Duty franchise, and look in the mirror.… Expand
  10. Redpepe
    Dec 18, 2011
    8
    Campaña normalita, peor que en bad company 2, multijugador excelente, en mi opinión mejor que call of duty. Motor gráfico con altibajos, malas texturas pero muy buenos efectos de luz y destructividad de los escenarios.
  11. KillerTomato
    Dec 17, 2011
    9
    I really hate to finally play a game when it has received the amount of hype Battlefield 3 has. Even if I thoroughly enjoy every aspect of the game, it's not hard to feel somewhat disappointed when the hype has reached a fever pitch. Fortunately, this is not the case for BF3. I will say that the single player campaign was not on the level I was hoping it would be. The visuals and polishI really hate to finally play a game when it has received the amount of hype Battlefield 3 has. Even if I thoroughly enjoy every aspect of the game, it's not hard to feel somewhat disappointed when the hype has reached a fever pitch. Fortunately, this is not the case for BF3. I will say that the single player campaign was not on the level I was hoping it would be. The visuals and polish were astounding but the story's length and coherency could have been better. But that's not really why I purchased the game is it? I am a relative newcomer to the BF series so I can't help but compare it to Modern Warfare at every level. The first thing I noticed was a glaring glitch of some sort. Every time I shoot an enemy in BF3, they seem to fall over and I am rewarded with points. That never happens in MW3. All kidding aside, BF3 blows away the competition in every respect. The gun play is tight and the bullets are deadly. The movement and animations give me a real sense of control and help to immerse me in the fight. Add vehicles and environmental destruction to the mix and DICE has far exceeded the latest in the COD franchise. I would have loved to see MW3 improve on the now 5 game old formula but at least the excellence of BF3 will force the issue next year. I'm sure many will disagree with my take on the winner of this battle, which is understandable, considering many people like to hide in corners and wait until someone runs past for an easy kill from behind. At least in DICE's offering you can achieve redemption by dropping a building on the sorry sap. I see Battlefield keeping my interest for many months, if not years to come. Bravo to DICE and to EA for recognizing the innovation crippling business model that they almost pioneered. This is a first hand account of what they avoided by letting the creatives do their thing.… Expand
  12. danomac_73
    Dec 16, 2011
    9
    Battlefield 3 and Dice step up and in my mind easily top COD: MW3. The new Frostbite 2 engine enhanced the graphics and physics in the game. The story is good but it is to short to me and this is the main reason it got a 9 instead of 10. The multiplayer is great and is very easy to get into the game unlike COD were it has taken me over 10 minutes to join a COD online game. It is the better buy.
  13. MountZionV
    Dec 16, 2011
    9
    The best modern FPS hands down. That being said, the FPS is a tired genre in my opinion. Otherwise it would have gotten a 10. Most of the maps are great (the subway one is garbage) with the addition of the back to karkand expansion (wake island, you dirty beast) the game is just getting better.
  14. Fr33T
    Dec 16, 2011
    8
    This game is really addictive. The graphics and the battlefield is really amazing. You wont see this kind of open land field warfare in any other game. Especially not with these graphics. Although I have to admit I was a little bit disappointed with the game engine. I thought the explosions would be a little bit more realistic. Also I have noticed the annoying "In-Game Rendering" on theThis game is really addictive. The graphics and the battlefield is really amazing. You wont see this kind of open land field warfare in any other game. Especially not with these graphics. Although I have to admit I was a little bit disappointed with the game engine. I thought the explosions would be a little bit more realistic. Also I have noticed the annoying "In-Game Rendering" on the console versions of Battlefield. Yes the consoles are not as good as PC but still, it gets annoying. None the less, its a amazing game and its definitely worth the money.… Expand
  15. Unknown22
    Dec 15, 2011
    9
    This game looks amazing on ps3. The multiplayer was fine the graphic are fine and the story was fine too. The only thing i hate about it that multiplayer was a bit glitchy. Still the game is amazing.
  16. rtrind
    Dec 14, 2011
    0
    There is a good mulltiplayer aspect to this game, but some flaws mage the game almos unplayable:

    1) A lot of people (me included) are experiencing an enourmous amount of input lag (some youtube videos measure more than 300ms); 2) Deadzone is too great (you have to move the stick much more than normal to start turning); 3) Aim acceleration is strange, when you move the stick just a little    There is a good mulltiplayer aspect to this game, but some flaws mage the game almos unplayable:

    1) A lot of people (me included) are experiencing an enourmous amount of input lag (some youtube videos measure more than 300ms);
    2) Deadzone is too great (you have to move the stick much more than normal to start turning);
    3) Aim acceleration is strange, when you move the stick just a little it's too slow, then it accelerates too fast.

    Join these 3 things and you have a crapshoot, you can only hit stationary target with consistency. If a patch solve these things, it would make the best online experience to date, but for now, stick with BF3 on 360 or PC.

    PS.: If you think you don't have the input lag issue, try playing any other FPS game (especially others with 30 fps like BFBC2) for about 30 minutes and then come back to BF3. You won't like the results.    … Expand
  17. robertmoore12
    Dec 12, 2011
    9
    bf3 is an excellent game especially after the release of back to karkand which brings an even better vibe to the game the single player was forgettable the first time around but when i played threw again on the hard difficulty i enjoyed it a lot more i gave it a 9 because no game is perfect
  18. ZeroEightNine
    Dec 12, 2011
    8
    Battlefield 3 is Amazing "IF" you have friends to play it with. Without a squad you'll probably win 4/10 Games. So if you have friends that bought Battlefield 3 play with them it's Really fun
  19. publix_sushi
    Dec 9, 2011
    8
    AWESOME! Best multiplayer shooter ever. Granted, I have not touched the single-player but I you bought this game for single player you don't know anything about games anyway. My only complaint was DICE let the EOD cheat go on too long so there are lots of bad players with high ranks online.
  20. stefaan
    Dec 8, 2011
    8
    What amazing, nice big maps, beautiful graphics, driving tanks and other vehicles. It's all so fun. But there is something that i don't like. They say: you can destroy buildings to take a strategical advantage. Well, they didn't mention that you can't destroy everything. Maybe five percent of the things standing there. I played this and the first thing I saw was a pretty big house. IWhat amazing, nice big maps, beautiful graphics, driving tanks and other vehicles. It's all so fun. But there is something that i don't like. They say: you can destroy buildings to take a strategical advantage. Well, they didn't mention that you can't destroy everything. Maybe five percent of the things standing there. I played this and the first thing I saw was a pretty big house. I wanted to let it collapse to see how that went. I destroyed all the walls but the door was immune to any kind of explosions. Pretty weird: an highrise supporting on a wooden door. That's why I gave it an 8/10… Expand
  21. sakasurf
    Dec 7, 2011
    10
    Congratilations To DICE and Electronic Arts. this game just rock my world on Multiplayer, and now with 'Back To Karkand' pack, we got a lot of maps, lots of veicules, jets, tanks, jeeps and big maps where snipers can do they magic (if they are good) Great Game. On Campaing the story could have a better end, i liked, but it could be better,
  22. Novelty987
    Dec 6, 2011
    4
    This was worth a $3.00 rent at redbox. I played the main story for about 3 hours and was already bored of it. These games are really starting to get tiring. I have no intention to buy this game. There is nothing fun about the game and if you look at the story and game play from an arm length away, it seems like a cheesy B-rated action flick.
  23. Feifong
    Dec 5, 2011
    10
    I had the privileged of being invited to the Alpha and Beta of this game. I must says this is my favorite one of the series. The game is extremely well done. The graphics, sounds, and abilities just click in Battlefield 3. It is a exceptional game that I enjoy playing on a daily basis. While Battlefield franchise isn't known for their in-depth story lines, I really enjoyed this one.I had the privileged of being invited to the Alpha and Beta of this game. I must says this is my favorite one of the series. The game is extremely well done. The graphics, sounds, and abilities just click in Battlefield 3. It is a exceptional game that I enjoy playing on a daily basis. While Battlefield franchise isn't known for their in-depth story lines, I really enjoyed this one. However the multi-player is always the selling point for me on the BF franchise and I was not disappointed. The way you rank up your player, vehicle, and weapons is well done. The amount of free-range you get per level is something I personally love! I can be tactical in this game with my squad or I can go Lone Wolf once in a while. BF 3 gives you the ability to really diversify your game play and allow you to be influential in the outcome of a match. My hat is off to you EA another fine job! I look forward to the next installment!!!… Expand
  24. AiurForMyLife
    Dec 4, 2011
    8
    I came into Battlefield 3 with high expectations and I will state this: I came into the game looking for something to satisfy my multiplayer cravings; not the single player, I knew the single player would probably be redundant so those who look at a game for its single-player experience, stop. This is not the game for any single player lovers. Has BF3 satisfied my multiplayer cravings? II came into Battlefield 3 with high expectations and I will state this: I came into the game looking for something to satisfy my multiplayer cravings; not the single player, I knew the single player would probably be redundant so those who look at a game for its single-player experience, stop. This is not the game for any single player lovers. Has BF3 satisfied my multiplayer cravings? I think so. It's insanely addictive, the teamwork that this game requires is a massive reason why I like it so much. I can still rank up just from resupplying, healing, spotting, piloting, and etc. A bit slow to rank up but I'm having a fun time ranking up, so why not? I saw the review that was complaining about the fact that the game doesn't remember your favourite map settings? Seriously? There are only 10 maps (soon to be 14 with BtK) and 5 game modes; if you can't remember what game mode you like best and the map you liked best, I pity your memorization capabilities. I have no problems; I know what combo I like best: Conquest and Kharg Island. Done. Simple as that. If you can't adapt to what they've given you by complaining about the difficulty of the game's targetting, man up. Don't expect everything to be given to you on a silver platter even if you paid 60+ dollars. It's called taking some time to actually adapt yourself to the game. There are a lot of things to say about this game's multiplayer but I can safely say that as long as you have an open mind, you will not be disappointed. Are there some short-comings? Sure. I have it for PS3 and the multiplayer gets incredibly slow-paced in the much larger maps like Caspian Border and Kharg Island due to the small amount of players. I'd like it if DICE could improve this somehow even if it means removing some of the destruction aspects of multiplayer. Any other disappointments? I know that some specializations for the vehicles don't work very well (TV Missile) and the forsaken Godlight (I'm sure that they're going to nerf this soon anyways). Rush is kind of a disappointment too, but mostly because if your team isn't very smart, they'll run through the same old gauntlet, die, rinse and repeat. Sniping is also a pain, but who knows? I will say that I suck at sniping but some of the sniper rifles are better without scopes. Jets? Difficult to fly but I do believe that learning how to fly it is incredibly rewarding. In the end, Battlefield 3 is a game made for the multiplayer freak inside of everyone. I can't completely demote it because it doesn't have a worthwhile single-player experience. I was so grateful that I pre-ordered this game; worth it. It does have some bugs and issues that it still needs to fix but I have trust in DICE, it will happen. So in the end, this is a very worthwhile game. I mean, it's not like we got a rehashed game made for a cash grab, right MW3?… Expand
  25. TheEmden
    Dec 4, 2011
    8
    Great game, but the removal of bots means it is not perfect. It is absolutely perfect for people who love strategy based tactical shooters. the maps are large and battles are intense. It has great sound, graphics and one of the best FPS i have played. Once again, DICE have made only one mistake, the removal of bots for people who want to take it easy, practice, or have no internet connection.
  26. timelessone
    Dec 3, 2011
    5
    Perhaps it's my love of the arcade style that Call of Duty provides but I could never get into BF3 (and believe me I tried) on a fundamental level because I just couldn't play it. The story is fairly interesting and all respect goes to the final mission. The frostbyte 2 engine would have been GLORIOUS if my PC wasn't 3 years old and incapable of running it, so I get the mediocre at bestPerhaps it's my love of the arcade style that Call of Duty provides but I could never get into BF3 (and believe me I tried) on a fundamental level because I just couldn't play it. The story is fairly interesting and all respect goes to the final mission. The frostbyte 2 engine would have been GLORIOUS if my PC wasn't 3 years old and incapable of running it, so I get the mediocre at best PS3 version. It's Borderlands level graphics but with glorious texture work wand lighting to make things invisible and not destructible unless you're hiding behind it.… Expand
  27. Abhi
    Dec 3, 2011
    9
    absheffield23
    Nov 9, 2011
    4 As a huge fan of BF:BC2, I have to say that I have been completely let down. This game has been frustratingly uneventful. All of the intense moments were just mediocre at best. Oh, and being shot by enemies that are nowhere to be found really kills the whole experience. Maybe there is one guy left in the room and you get killed, you get sent back to a checkpoint    absheffield23
    Nov 9, 2011
    4
    As a huge fan of BF:BC2, I have to say that I have been completely let down. This game has been frustratingly uneventful. All of the intense moments were just mediocre at best. Oh, and being shot by enemies that are nowhere to be found really kills the whole experience. Maybe there is one guy left in the room and you get killed, you get sent back to a checkpoint and find yourself extremely    … Expand
  28. 1True_Gamer
    Dec 2, 2011
    1
    I have had to update my score for this game for online play, now when you shoot at someone with that blinding flashlight my gun stop shooting hit detection is worst now then when I first got the game.
  29. Trigger_Ace
    Dec 2, 2011
    9
    This game is hands down one of the greatest ONLINE, I haven't played the campaign, because I'd rather play online with friends relatives and co-workers. The first week bf3 came out i wasn't really into it but i had my doubts, I had an outdated television set, and well it wasn't really cutting it, a week later I bought a 1080p 1080i lcd and tried the game out and it was mind blowing, it'sThis game is hands down one of the greatest ONLINE, I haven't played the campaign, because I'd rather play online with friends relatives and co-workers. The first week bf3 came out i wasn't really into it but i had my doubts, I had an outdated television set, and well it wasn't really cutting it, a week later I bought a 1080p 1080i lcd and tried the game out and it was mind blowing, it's not as faced paced as call of duty, but it feels more realistic, and the resolution even though it maxes out at 720 i think, it really looks life like, and the gun sounds are amazing especially if you have good sound setup, it sounds like your at the shooting range,I've owned battlefield bad company 2 and I liked it, thats until Call of duty black ops came out, and well i stuck to black ops, becuase I had fun, but BF3 came out and haven't looked back!! well once in a while to compare, but i really do prefer Bf3, I also purchased MW3, and well the game is good, but it's nothing new to me. I love bf3 it's the game i look foward to, when turning on my ps3 and with the new map pack back to karkland coming out december 6, or around that date i'm excited. especially because i bought the limited ed. and it's going to be free, and as a ps3 owner i'm going to get it a week earlier than the other console, so thats pretty cool, BUT PLEASE IF YOU TRY BF3 MAKE SURE ITS A HD t.v. thats when you will realize the full potential. unless you have a pc.… Expand
  30. mace92
    Dec 1, 2011
    10
    Let me state first that i have NEVER played a Battlefield game before. i've never sat with someone while they played it. The one DICE game i played was Medal of Honor. Boring campaign, but after playing all CODs since MW i really liked the multiplayer offering DICE put up with MOH. I enjoyed the tactical pacing as opposed to COD's frantic running and gunning. Also, LOVED the sound.Let me state first that i have NEVER played a Battlefield game before. i've never sat with someone while they played it. The one DICE game i played was Medal of Honor. Boring campaign, but after playing all CODs since MW i really liked the multiplayer offering DICE put up with MOH. I enjoyed the tactical pacing as opposed to COD's frantic running and gunning. Also, LOVED the sound. Personally, i became better at COD after playing MOH because i learnt to move better. Of course this may only apply to me.
    Anyway, two days ago, i get my copy of BF3. i fire it up and it throws me into Rush on Caspian Border. As soon as i spawn i'm looking at a tank standing on the asphalt. Immediately there's a loud boom; the tank recoils and kicks up dust. A second later i hear another muffled explosion as the shell hits. i'm already thinking WOW, when a chopper buzzes overhead, machine guns spitting fire. There's a shout over the radio about an enemy fast mover, but i'm too preoccupied with the audio visual assault to catch it. A second later a jet buzzes low, chasing after the chopper. Its now that I start running for cover. DICE has thrown me straight in to a war zone. Welcome to Battlefield.
    I have seen very few sights since i started gaming in the early 90s that made me just sit in awe. This was one of them. And many more followed. I've only played the multiplayer so far, so i cant comment on the campaign. i dont play FPS games for campaigns any more, although i did till MW2. i even played the MW3 campaign, but it didnt have that spark anymore. I'd already seen the washington monument destroyed. Manhattan was just more of the same. And the story was flat out cliched. I dont dislike COD. i've spent many enjoyable months on it, prestiged etc. I even played MW3 multiplayer. But it was almost more of the same. Enjoyable, yes. Amazing, no. Now i'm not especially good at online multiplayer. just average. But a day later, im still enjoying every minute of BF3. i cant wait to get back in the game. And not only because of the visuals. BF3 makes you feel like you're contributing with more than just kills. Spotting, repairing, healing; that's you being part of the team. And you get rewarded for it. IW is good at giving you small, frantic and personal gun fights, DICE is great at making you part of a team. MOH made me feel like part of a squad waging a small tactical battle. But that was just an appetizer for Battlefield 3. This, this is war.    … Expand
  31. Dorfo
    Nov 30, 2011
    10
    Battlefield 3 is the best shooter in market. Don't be afraid to buy this game. It's really worth each cent. The war is intense. It's a kind of game that you will play many hours until the next one be launched.
  32. HornetBurrito
    Nov 30, 2011
    10
    Very good game. Everything a sequel to Bad Company 2 should have. Love the introduction of Jets into the game... This has the potential for a long lasting game as long as EA don't start ripping people off for DLC like on Call of Duty.. Back to Karkand DLC looks outstanding as well.. For Free :D
  33. MadDad
    Nov 30, 2011
    10
    incredible exoerience. buy it! Top notch graphics, beautiful enviroments, excellent and realistic sound effects. And a really superb, fun, action packed and strategy based gameplay with really good single player and co-op modes and just an awesome multiplayer mode with so much freedom of choice and tons of unlockables, make Battlefield 3 one of best first person shooters available in theincredible exoerience. buy it! Top notch graphics, beautiful enviroments, excellent and realistic sound effects. And a really superb, fun, action packed and strategy based gameplay with really good single player and co-op modes and just an awesome multiplayer mode with so much freedom of choice and tons of unlockables, make Battlefield 3 one of best first person shooters available in the market right now and makes it a must buy for any fan of the FPS genre.… Expand
  34. s1l3ntsh4d0w89
    Nov 29, 2011
    5
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Battlefield 3, while it may look nice on a PC and be groundbreaking graphically on a PC, lacks, incredibly on both the PS3 and 360. The entire game, is lacking.

    Battlefield 3 is supposed to support the most realistic graphics of any game out there, bringing a large amount of reality, with the simple physics the game has, to the FPS genre. Well, it doesn't. The game looks no where near as well as it was advertised too. While they may have been showing the PC graphics, no mentions nor footage was made available in any advertising of the let down the consoles had to offer. For being such a hyped part of the games advertisement campaign, I am very upset with both DICE and EA on this one. And this is only the graphical fidelity, I haven't even touched on the many, many in game graphical bugs that are absolutely game breaking. Part of the "realism" is the lighting. Honestly, it is some of the worst lighting I have ever seen in any game. Rather than the enviroment looking as though you are a person seeing everything, it appears that you are in fact just a wet camera lens. Every light in the game gives off a blinding glare. Even flashlights from 600 yards away, in the middle of broad daylight, will blind you as if you are starring into a 5 million candle powered mag light. I won't even go any further with these horrendous problems. For what the game was hyped to be, graphically, it is a gigantic let down filled with a multitude of bugs, at least 10 of which I haven't even spoken of.

    Now gameplay for BF3 is split into two areas, a Single player campaign and the online multiplayer. I've played both, and both are terrible. Every single scene from the single player campaign, has been ripped from a call of duty dating back to Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare. From a terrorist setting of a nuclear weapon, a top down mission from a jet fighter reminiscent of the AC-130 level in CoD-4, ride a lont rail shooting levels like that in World at War, shooting innocent police officers because they get in your way in a crowded public area, Modern Warfare 2, to the entire back drop of the single player campaign where you are being interrogated and are playing through flashbacks, Black Ops, to a destroyed Paris overflowing with nerve gas, Modern Warfare 3. There isn't a Call of Duty, that the single player campaign hasn't stolen from. It really is, pathetic. Just more proof, that BF3 really isn't "above and beyond the call."

    Now, multiplayer. Where do we begin? Should I start with tactical flashlights that when mounted on a pistol can blind in broad daylight from 500 yards away or should I start with how if someone is aiming a weapon with a laser sight on it at your feet you are for some reason blinded? Not only are there some terrible implementations like these weapon attachments, but some previous mechanics such as destroying a tank, has been made near impossible without an entire platoon working on it at once. It takes 7 rockets to completely destroy a tank in the multiplayer. Yet only maybe 5 seconds to fully repair a tank to full armor. Some terrible items have been added, such as the Recon classes Recon Drone, which for some reason, you can run over and kill someone with a flying object the size of a basketball. The weapons are completely inbalanced, the bullet drop system only works half the time, the suppression system is just havoc, and once again the EA provided servers are absolutely terrible beyond usage nearly.

    Honestly, this game would not even be worth a rent. I feel bad for the person who buys my used copy from the game store after I return this, only to have to purchase an online pass to play this lackluster title and just become frustrated with it.    … Expand
  35. Sebas236
    Nov 29, 2011
    10
    This game is really good, the graphics are elite for a console. The destruction is so fun to watch, all you'll want to do is blow stuff up. TDM i think is really good, the spwans need some fixing but its not that bad. Overall this is a game to get if you like FPS
  36. gamer687
    Nov 29, 2011
    1
    Just got this game on black weekend at best buy for $30. I thought this was going to be a fun game but it is terrible not unplayable but just bad. The campaign was boring and the multiplayer was horrible a campers wet dream. Trying to shoot someone was a chore and almost impossible but what was harder was trying to find someone on the map. Last but not least I'm not Call of duty fanboy
  37. ashleyfan1
    Nov 29, 2011
    8
    unlike fanboys i gave mw3 the exact same score as this, bf3 is graphically superior on terms with games like crysis 2 i dont think on current consoles in could be beaten the story is ok but before playing this is not a sequel to bad company 2 it is the sequel to battlefield 2 on the ps2 hence the lack of characters from the bad company series but it is still good missions are diverse fromunlike fanboys i gave mw3 the exact same score as this, bf3 is graphically superior on terms with games like crysis 2 i dont think on current consoles in could be beaten the story is ok but before playing this is not a sequel to bad company 2 it is the sequel to battlefield 2 on the ps2 hence the lack of characters from the bad company series but it is still good missions are diverse from storming a town hit by a natural disaster, driving a tank and even being the co pilot in a fighter jet, it actually feels like you are in the war yourself with the atmosphere sounds etc, however it is very short this time clocking in around 6-8 hrs it may take beginners longer as it can be qutie diificult at points, i played it on normal difficulty and died on one particular level a lot, multiplayer is also great apart from one problem the maps are huge and if you play properly with decent palyers can be very fun a tactical however is have been in a match where everyone wanted to sniper one another which resulted in a long boring match where ther was only 10 kills 8 of them being me getting shot running round like an idiot as i hate sniping lol overall a great game worth the money just like the game it has gone to war with, if you me both these games are incredible and are both let down by the same problem and that is the short lengths of their campaigns… Expand
  38. ps3rules
    Nov 28, 2011
    9
    Battlefield 3 built up hype like a snowball running down a hill in the arctic and then release hit. It had a lot to live up to, I loved BC2 personally that is my favourite online game of all time. It captured those "Battlefield Moments" like the other day (on Battlefield 3) the attakers on rush had seven death tickets left and we were on our last MCOM station in Rush game mode and I wasBattlefield 3 built up hype like a snowball running down a hill in the arctic and then release hit. It had a lot to live up to, I loved BC2 personally that is my favourite online game of all time. It captured those "Battlefield Moments" like the other day (on Battlefield 3) the attakers on rush had seven death tickets left and we were on our last MCOM station in Rush game mode and I was defending. They set the charge. Oh no Game over i thought but then soomething swept across me; a defiance; a determination to win it for my time and I turned the corner as a wall got blown up next to me shaking the camera and I sprayed a clip into the blurrs I saw on the screen. Then points after points came up. Triple kill, defender, savior e.t.c. I then diffused the charge much to the relief of my team mates and my friend shouted across the mike f***ing awesome. Of course I knew it. But usually you get these moments at least once a match and I love them. The single player although very well executed feels a bit linear and less freedom is given although the storytelling is a lot better than MW's so called "plot". Overall I love this game but if you're looking for an amazing single player experience look elsewhere but to all you online gamers. Ditch the shackles of COD and not only call in the airstrike. Be the airstrike.… Expand
  39. TimeToKill
    Nov 28, 2011
    9
    Me encanta este juego, el modo campaña es corto pero muy entretenido, dan ganas de rejugarlo más de una vez, las misiones coops muy buenas aunq cortas con un nivel de dificultad muy ajustado. El modo multijugador online es una aunténtica maravilla, horas y horas de diversión con un sinfin de situaciones diferentes en cada partida. ElMe encanta este juego, el modo campaña es corto pero muy entretenido, dan ganas de rejugarlo más de una vez, las misiones coops muy buenas aunq cortas con un nivel de dificultad muy ajustado. El modo multijugador online es una aunténtica maravilla, horas y horas de diversión con un sinfin de situaciones diferentes en cada partida. El juego a falta de nuevos parches tiene algunos errores que no empañan el resultado final del juego. 1000% recomendado.… Expand
  40. RapidFireReview
    Nov 28, 2011
    10
    Now i know what your thinking. 10 out of 10 what an exaggeration right? WRONG! If i dident give this game a 10 id feel like i was lying. Everything in this game feels epic. From just moving around to the huge 64 player battles. 145 ranks online to keep you going for years to come.By far the best sound in a video game ever. Iv put over 100 hours into the online multiplayer and it just neverNow i know what your thinking. 10 out of 10 what an exaggeration right? WRONG! If i dident give this game a 10 id feel like i was lying. Everything in this game feels epic. From just moving around to the huge 64 player battles. 145 ranks online to keep you going for years to come.By far the best sound in a video game ever. Iv put over 100 hours into the online multiplayer and it just never gets boring. Don t want to walk in the front door of a heavily defended building? Then dont, blow open the wall go through that way.Tired of running around on the ground? Fly a jet, drive a tank, its just amazing! This one is going to be a modern classic. Definitely one of the best games iv ever played, and best 60$ iv ever spent.… Expand
  41. Urrthelurr
    Nov 27, 2011
    8
    This is an exceptional game. It has good graphics and game play. The multilayer is great. But the campaign sucks. I like how you can customize your dog tags to show of your stats. I wish there were bigger matches though. I don't know why they limit it to 24 players. That makes conquest mode suck really bad. MAG has 254 player mathes so I don't know why bf3 can't give you at leastThis is an exceptional game. It has good graphics and game play. The multilayer is great. But the campaign sucks. I like how you can customize your dog tags to show of your stats. I wish there were bigger matches though. I don't know why they limit it to 24 players. That makes conquest mode suck really bad. MAG has 254 player mathes so I don't know why bf3 can't give you at least 64. But it's still a great game.… Expand
  42. zombie1531
    Nov 27, 2011
    10
    hello its zombie here and this is my review for battlefiled3 Lets start with the campaign shall we, the campaign last generally about 6 to 8 hours depending on how you tackle each level. the campaign has its high and low points. the story isnt that strong but its good enough to pull the player through there is one sad parthello its zombie here and this is my review for battlefiled3 Lets start with the campaign shall we, the campaign last generally about 6 to 8 hours depending on how you tackle each level. the campaign has its high and low points. the story isnt that strong but its good enough to pull the player through there is one sad part apprently but im not going to go into details ill lets you the players figure that out.

    but enough about the campaign the multiplayer is what battlefield does best its fun its tactical and its teambased. this is a game where you have nice graphics in both the campaign and multiplayer. the frostbite 2 engine does what is does best which makes the game sparkle. this is a game that is worth picking up if your a battlefield fan.

    pros: good multiplayer, nice graphics,and pretty darn fun

    cons:uninspired campaign that is decent.    … Expand
  43. Jonathanp55
    Nov 27, 2011
    3
    Ok. So Single Player is HORRIBLE considered the last 2 games. Linear game play. Not as much open world, just not what I expected. Not sure about online play, SINCE NOT EVERYONE HAS ACCESS TO INTERNET ALL THE TIME! Disappointment.
  44. FPSdaybreaK
    Nov 26, 2011
    10
    great graphics, love the freedom factor that you have whether you want to be a sniper or hop in a tank with some friends and just destroy kids, also EA also listens to people and works with the community on fixing certain things.
  45. BleacherBum23
    Nov 26, 2011
    4
    I am thoroughly disappointed and frustrated with this game. As a loyal Battlefield fan, I was expecting the same game play formula from the other successful titles in this series, but what I got was an embarrassing single-player campaign and multiplayer that is slow-paced due to oversized maps, vehicles that are too hard to control (the jets are a waste of time), and shooting mechanicsI am thoroughly disappointed and frustrated with this game. As a loyal Battlefield fan, I was expecting the same game play formula from the other successful titles in this series, but what I got was an embarrassing single-player campaign and multiplayer that is slow-paced due to oversized maps, vehicles that are too hard to control (the jets are a waste of time), and shooting mechanics that make it virtually impossible to get consistently good shots. "Real-war" my ass, this is a video game- all I wanted was entertainment and all I got was a waste of $60. What a shame!… Expand
  46. romansiii
    Nov 24, 2011
    10
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I have to give this game a 10 out of 10, it surpassed my expectations. After hearing the large number of complaints that the campaign was exactly like Call of Duty, but I was surprised to play it and it being nothing like the Modern Warfare games. Where Modern Warfare was based around the US and Russia fighting each other. Battlefield 3 campaign is specifically about fighting a terrorist organisation. Where the only fight against Russians was not open warfare, but Russia trying to take the same target as the US. This being said the excellent graphics and sound complemented it nicely with the Destruction being fun. I was a bit disapointed that the destruction wasn't amped up more and sometimes on some Multiplayer maps, there was less destruction on buildings than the same type of building in others. But this being said, I had allot of fun blowing up buildings.

    Now the Multiplayer, the maps are fun, unlocks excellent the vehicle warfare excellent, just everything A++. I like the jets and helicopters, I'm just a little disappointed that when your flying the transport helicopter the most points you can get is, 10 per gunner getting a kill and that the scout helicopter's machine gun is a little under-powered.

    Overall I have to give it a 10 out of 10 because it's faults are far outweighs by it's positives.

    And if you thinking of buying this or MW3, go look at the user reviews for MW3.    … Expand
  47. Lait7
    Nov 24, 2011
    10
    This is an amazing game, it exceeds all my expectation. The game play is amazing, the best part is the online gaming and that is free. BF3 should do very well against MW
  48. gerbronicus
    Nov 24, 2011
    8
    Graphics: Better than Bad Company 2, but still not the most impressive out there. Textures come in and out occasionally, but I can't deny the beauty of the destructible environments. Gameplay: So much fun. Has turned me away from Call of Duty and into a Battlefield fan. The different classes rehire you to play and support your team in different ways, and none of them are overpowered.Graphics: Better than Bad Company 2, but still not the most impressive out there. Textures come in and out occasionally, but I can't deny the beauty of the destructible environments. Gameplay: So much fun. Has turned me away from Call of Duty and into a Battlefield fan. The different classes rehire you to play and support your team in different ways, and none of them are overpowered. However, the Support class is a bit underpowered. Multiplayer could keep me occupied for days. Singleplayer is painfully bad, but at least it's forgettable, so it's mostly out of my head now. I would have to say that this game is better than MW3… Expand
  49. theoscar
    Nov 23, 2011
    10
    100/100
  50. AnXiety
    Nov 22, 2011
    9
    Amazing Game, Dice really nailed it this time, this game is a must buy, only if your interested in Multi player that is, but as for single player fans, i cannot recommend the same, the story feels lame, and the checkpoint system is really bad. But then again, Battlefield is famous for its on-line game play and not so much on SP after all, and lets face it, who buys Battlefield games forAmazing Game, Dice really nailed it this time, this game is a must buy, only if your interested in Multi player that is, but as for single player fans, i cannot recommend the same, the story feels lame, and the checkpoint system is really bad. But then again, Battlefield is famous for its on-line game play and not so much on SP after all, and lets face it, who buys Battlefield games for their campaign, not much, so this game is amazing, defined graphics, amazing sound. If your a BF fan, look no further, get your ass to game stop right now and repeat the following "Sir, i would like a Copy of BF3 please"!… Expand
  51. Pissedoffgamer
    Nov 22, 2011
    10
    To all those idiots that have been rating low score to BF3, they are just dumb people that don't get hooked to the experience because they run and gun like if it was CoD. BF 3 isn't meant to be played in that way, it is a objective game, you go to the objective and try to achieve it, whether is the adrenaline fast Rush mode or the slow paced but tactical Conquest. For those that playedTo all those idiots that have been rating low score to BF3, they are just dumb people that don't get hooked to the experience because they run and gun like if it was CoD. BF 3 isn't meant to be played in that way, it is a objective game, you go to the objective and try to achieve it, whether is the adrenaline fast Rush mode or the slow paced but tactical Conquest. For those that played only the single-player and didn't liked, they misssed what is BF100% percent. The graphics looks incredible even on console, that , it was the big fear of many people thinking that the graphics were going to suck. Also for those people that thought that the Beta sucked, that's part of it, Beta's are made , so that the developers can see where they're failing and what they can improve. So stand aside stupid haters , and go play your crappy games .… Expand
  52. Aramis
    Nov 22, 2011
    10
    Battlefield 3 is the pinnacle of videogames attempting to represent the adrenaline-pumping rush of fighting in a warzone. While Modern Warfare 3 is essentially Modern Warfare 2.5, Battlefield 3 takes the best parts of Cod and keeps them, while removing the **** the MW series is known for. Some of this **** is as follows, maps so small every corner has a camper, OP killstreaks, No classBattlefield 3 is the pinnacle of videogames attempting to represent the adrenaline-pumping rush of fighting in a warzone. While Modern Warfare 3 is essentially Modern Warfare 2.5, Battlefield 3 takes the best parts of Cod and keeps them, while removing the **** the MW series is known for. Some of this **** is as follows, maps so small every corner has a camper, OP killstreaks, No class system which leads to **** op class builds at high levels, and not to mention NO vehicles! Wow! how fun does that sound!! Now here's battlefield 3, Vehicles, massive levels, (a.k.a not nearly as much camping) no dumbass killstreaks, class builds which all unlock useful class-specific equipment, not to mention you can level up your goddamn vehicles!! The one reason MW3 can contend with BF3 is very simple. Split-screen, that is all. And spec ops? an amazing first player campaign? of the millions of gamers who buy these games id say a very small percentile actually CARES about the campaign, these games are built for the online and the online is where MW3 falters, and BF3 shines… Expand
  53. Skot_Free
    Nov 21, 2011
    10
    Short and sweet BF3 ups the ante on how FPS's convey realism! First I havent even played the single player as multiplayer has all my attention! Nothing beats being in a fire fight with rockets blazing overhead blowing up structures and bullets whizzing over your head or your squad taking an objective by using cover fire.no game is perfect but in terms of immersion BF3 gets a 10 from me! IfShort and sweet BF3 ups the ante on how FPS's convey realism! First I havent even played the single player as multiplayer has all my attention! Nothing beats being in a fire fight with rockets blazing overhead blowing up structures and bullets whizzing over your head or your squad taking an objective by using cover fire.no game is perfect but in terms of immersion BF3 gets a 10 from me! If you've been playing those other FPS's expect a learning curve but in the end it's all fun!… Expand
  54. bigred2st
    Nov 21, 2011
    9
    a stunning and realistic war simulater as compared to its run and gun rival call of duty, graphically superior and better gameplay if you want a fps i suggest picking up this title
  55. mercutio665
    Nov 21, 2011
    9
    This game would have received a 10 from me if the campaign mode hadn't fallen a little bit short. It's not terrible, but it's nothing that hasn't already been seen or told better before. The graphic and sound content is nothing short of breath-taking, however - the lighting/shading and destruction renders are sensational, and the Frostbite2 audio engine is by and far the most sophisticatedThis game would have received a 10 from me if the campaign mode hadn't fallen a little bit short. It's not terrible, but it's nothing that hasn't already been seen or told better before. The graphic and sound content is nothing short of breath-taking, however - the lighting/shading and destruction renders are sensational, and the Frostbite2 audio engine is by and far the most sophisticated we've heard to date. This game is worth the price of admission just to be able to experience those elements. But then over and above the campaign mode is an absolutely spectacular multiplayer. The levels are vast, the vehicles are mighty, and the use of teamwork and tactical play deserve thunderous applause. Battlefield 3 is a breath of fresh air in the FPS market, even if it didn't end up being all that it was marketed to be. It's still the finest FPS I've ever played in more ways than one.… Expand
  56. Webwolf
    Nov 21, 2011
    9
    There are many FPS games now, maybe too many? but this one of the good ones. It is so fun when you got a bigger battlefield, makes it even better having Vehicles. It feels more like a military game, better than most FPS.
  57. Good-Smurf
    Nov 21, 2011
    9
    Battlefield is an amazing game the frostbite 2 engine make every battlefield in game alive the wind blowing,
    bullets flying by,the sunshine is i think is the highlight of frostbite 2 no other game make it look good until BF3 comes in.
    It may only support 24 players for online match but multiplayer on console is no less intense than PC it realistic and very rewarding. The Best multiplayer    Battlefield is an amazing game the frostbite 2 engine make every battlefield in game alive the wind blowing,
    bullets flying by,the sunshine is i think is the highlight of frostbite 2 no other game make it look good until BF3 comes in.
    It may only support 24 players for online match but multiplayer on console is no less intense than PC
    it realistic and very rewarding.
    The Best multiplayer on console bar none.
    But single player campaign is very short and it didn't give you much freedom to play your own way.
    But FPS fans knew exactly what they doing.
    They buy this kind of game for the multiplayer and Battlefield 3 is the one you'll spend hours and hours on end in multiplayer makes single player campaign more like a freebie.
    A must buy!    … Expand
  58. SniperNighthawk
    Nov 21, 2011
    10
    I really love thus game. It is by far my favorite FPS of all time. The online play is amazingly fun when you have friends who work together with you to play the objective and just have a blast messing around in tanks and choppers. Great game, and will only get better as time goes on.
  59. Humblet_Michael
    Nov 21, 2011
    10
    Magnifique jeu... Que du beau boulot réalisé par les développeur... Malheureusement le multi joeur n'est pas entreprenant... Il manque encore ce petit quelque chose qu'il existe dans le multi de COD... Sinon la campagne en elle même est Extraordinaire... Que du bonheur...
  60. WarGamer
    Nov 21, 2011
    10
    Now this is innovative and fun game to play for a long time! This game is totally amazing and addicted! The graphic engine is much better than the MW3! Now I know why Battlefield 3 won so many awards! Awesome game!
  61. HateThat
    Nov 21, 2011
    10
    This game is why I play video games and support the games industry as avidly as I do. Lets be honest from the get go, this game has direct competition in the way of MW3 and both of these games are 99% multiplayer. I doubt ANYONE played these games for the single player, no matter what the critics say it has no influence in the sales and quality of each game in this day in age. They knowThis game is why I play video games and support the games industry as avidly as I do. Lets be honest from the get go, this game has direct competition in the way of MW3 and both of these games are 99% multiplayer. I doubt ANYONE played these games for the single player, no matter what the critics say it has no influence in the sales and quality of each game in this day in age. They know what they are and thats a MP experience and if you wanna try support the single player, then you obviously haven't played any other proper single player experience this year as the market is littered with better experiences. Now back to battlefield 3, i'll start with a list of innovations in gameplay and graphics.... The destruction system, while flawed and not red faction, its still really immersive and realistic. Terrain deformation, bit of wall flying off wen trying to hide.... its insane who good it looks. I mean I see a bunch of enemies hold up in one area, fire a rocket above them and the building falls and kills them all. Like wow! It brings new levels of realism and immersion to the experience. The animation system they built is incredible, characters die, move, shoot, you name it, they do it so realistic its makes you stop a marvel at the true innovation they've incorporated here. Vehicles looks amazing, firing a tank in a wooded area and all the trees bend to the shockwave of the force from the cannon.... WHAT GAME DOES THIS! So amazing to watch. Small little innovations to gameplay also to balance the experience are implemented like flashlight blindings, laser sights so blind snipers out of their camping poistion, not to mention the lense flare if the sniper point in scope at you specifically. All these little things help push the genre forward. The sound in this game is unrivaled by ANY game. Just amazing, I feel like I'm in a real battlefield from start to finish of a map and it truly shows what can be done these days. This is the game you show to non-gamers to show them how far games have come and how much room for improvement a lot of games need to make to even come close to competitive with this great title. You can tell they put so much time and effort into a truly deep, immersive and NEW experience than its previous iterations. New engine = yes imo. DICE you've done it again 10/1… Expand
  62. Janbo55
    Nov 21, 2011
    9
    This game has really good graphics, we can't get around that. But let's look at the singleplayer first: In general, it's good, but it isn't anything we haven't seen before, it's a simple storyline that has been made before, and it's a bit too lineage for battlefield gamers, also for me who play alot of different type of games. The co-op is very good. Good mix of different type of mission,This game has really good graphics, we can't get around that. But let's look at the singleplayer first: In general, it's good, but it isn't anything we haven't seen before, it's a simple storyline that has been made before, and it's a bit too lineage for battlefield gamers, also for me who play alot of different type of games. The co-op is very good. Good mix of different type of mission, for example, stealth, escape, sniping, defence, and attack missions. Next is the thing that Dice were most succesful in.. the multiplayer. It has really delivered what gamers want, a good mix of classes, lots of vehicles, big maps, and last but not least, not seen since battlefield 2142, jets! In multiplayer they have nailed it, BIG TIME. One more of the things they have changed with the multiplayer is that they reward you for helping the team, for example, you can revive your teammates and you get as many points, as if you kill an enemy.
    All in all, I think it's a good game, but it could've been made better, especially singleplayer.    … Expand
  63. elit3_loco
    Nov 21, 2011
    10
    whose bright idea was the give battlefield 3 a single player campaign? Whatever, its just a plus and it should not damage the games scores at all because the online gaming is just amazing. Will spend days playing this game! MW3 never stood a chance!
  64. BloodSaint
    Nov 20, 2011
    10
    Amazingly stunningly beautiful graphics. I can honestly say this game has the best graphics in the world right now. Single player is fun but Multiplayer is where the real action is. Addictive, fluid and great teamwork-based matches is a heck load of fun. Tons of customisations and unlocks will make you constantly come back. Worth every buck of your money. Fantastic gameplay, breathe takingAmazingly stunningly beautiful graphics. I can honestly say this game has the best graphics in the world right now. Single player is fun but Multiplayer is where the real action is. Addictive, fluid and great teamwork-based matches is a heck load of fun. Tons of customisations and unlocks will make you constantly come back. Worth every buck of your money. Fantastic gameplay, breathe taking visuals and world class multiplayer will make you craving for more… Expand
  65. o-k
    Nov 20, 2011
    9
    i like the game a lot. the new engine is a bit iffy, however with a few updates this will be a game worth keeping for years to come. my only complaints are with the engine. the gameplay is spot on. not to mention a sensitivity higher that MW's.
  66. RBW_82
    Nov 20, 2011
    9
    I love this game, the more I play it the more I learn. It's inventive, looks fantastic and the multiplayer offers everything I could ask for. The campaign was a slight disappointment, but it's all forgotten about when I'm flying a heli with team mates parachuting out, or defending an M-Com as the attacking squad rush in. There's a good sense of team work, and I can achieve a high scoreI love this game, the more I play it the more I learn. It's inventive, looks fantastic and the multiplayer offers everything I could ask for. The campaign was a slight disappointment, but it's all forgotten about when I'm flying a heli with team mates parachuting out, or defending an M-Com as the attacking squad rush in. There's a good sense of team work, and I can achieve a high score even if my KDR isn't that polished.… Expand
  67. NyreX
    Nov 20, 2011
    9
    I'm totally addicted to the gameplay of Battlefield 3, the weapons customization makes us play more. Sadly, the campaign putted the game a little down. Looking forward to see the expansion they are going to make.
  68. Randizzledante
    Nov 20, 2011
    10
    I legitimately thought the game was very good. Way better than the garbage that was BC2. However, I wasn't going to give it a 10 until IGN insisted on writing TWO full articles crying about "Metacritic trolling." Sorry not everyone agrees with you, IGN.
  69. lucaspb
    Nov 20, 2011
    9
    This is an amazing game, it exceeds all my expectation. The game show how a battlefield really is. Its really good. I dont like the lack of mods and not having 64 players experience on ps3, thats why im giving a 9.
  70. Warnock
    Nov 20, 2011
    9
    Single Player sucks.. i would buy this game if it was just a multiplayer game.. rlly i dont see why they had to made a single player campaign when they can do it properly.
  71. yojimbo_2000
    Nov 20, 2011
    9
    I was a little disappointed by the single player campaign and really did not enjoy the multi-point of view story. I prefer the BF Bad Company type story that allows you to learn more about the characters and has a story that is linear in nature. The multiplayer is where this game shines. Driving a tank, flying a helicopter and flying an A-10 into the ground oh my! I purchased bothI was a little disappointed by the single player campaign and really did not enjoy the multi-point of view story. I prefer the BF Bad Company type story that allows you to learn more about the characters and has a story that is linear in nature. The multiplayer is where this game shines. Driving a tank, flying a helicopter and flying an A-10 into the ground oh my! I purchased both BF3 and MW3 at release and always ended up back playing BF3 multiplayer in the end.… Expand
  72. mistaeK
    Nov 20, 2011
    8
    The single player of this game, to me, was pretty bad. It was very much on-rails in terms of how often you lost control of your character so you could watch yourself move into a specific position for a quicktime event. I don't mind a well done quicktime event, but being shuffled around and then be asked to simply "Press Circle" does NOT make me feel integrated to the experience. If you areThe single player of this game, to me, was pretty bad. It was very much on-rails in terms of how often you lost control of your character so you could watch yourself move into a specific position for a quicktime event. I don't mind a well done quicktime event, but being shuffled around and then be asked to simply "Press Circle" does NOT make me feel integrated to the experience. If you are going to put quicktime events in, you have to make it an experience where for every motion you do on screen, there is a relevant button press or sequence. Call of Duty, for all that people discredit it, perfected these sequences in MW1-MW2. Considering that BF3's single player is completely ripping off the CoD formula, I don't think it would be too much to ask to go that extra mile. The multiplayer is the bright spot here, even though I have a feeling that the 30fps is only something consoles achieve in an empty server with nothing going on. Once the flashlights are tweaked, it will be a fairly balanced experience. Well, as balanced as a Battlefield experience can be. While some of the classes are decently equipped to take on vehicles, the fact of the matter is that the playing experience in a vehicle far exceeds being a typical soldier. Your opportunity to actually get on a roll is far easier in a tank than it is on the ground. Considering how many rockets it can take to blow up a tank, things get a little hazier on the ground. This is still the most complete package of a Battlefield product we have seen yet. I hope they continue to tweak it to make it a better playing experience (the input lag on PS3 is very annoying), but it is still a very worthy purchase despite its several flaws. Basically, this is a good game that just got too much hype for the way it turned out.… Expand
  73. EgoCity
    Nov 20, 2011
    10
    The last shooter I played was black ops, I accidentally fell upon battlefield 3 beta and I was in awe. I decided to buy bf3 and I have never played or seen a shooter so imense and fun. Some people may not like as it's realistic with shooting and you can't just run in solo and take on 100 people. Well not all the time. But I love it, best shooter ever.
  74. HaydenRussell
    Nov 20, 2011
    10
    I was really worried when I played the BETA but after playing the online for a long period of time I felt stupid that I was worried. This game does so much right, when you unlock stuff it appears in the middle of the screen you really feel like your constantly being rewarded. You get 100 points for completing a multiplayer game, 200 for winning, 50 for suppresion, 50 for giving ammo, 100I was really worried when I played the BETA but after playing the online for a long period of time I felt stupid that I was worried. This game does so much right, when you unlock stuff it appears in the middle of the screen you really feel like your constantly being rewarded. You get 100 points for completing a multiplayer game, 200 for winning, 50 for suppresion, 50 for giving ammo, 100 for killing someone etc.... it feels great seeing all the numbers appear at the bottom of the screen before being added up. Great game.… Expand
  75. OberPlaysGames
    Nov 20, 2011
    8
    Battlefield 3 brings elements from the older games of the franchise and mixes them with the new to bring fans and new gamers alike into an epic warzone environment from the comfort of their homes.

    Upon entering the single player campaign you'll probably be thinking two things... "I hope this is fun" and "Oh em gee let's skip this cutscene..." The game spits you into the back of an APC    Battlefield 3 brings elements from the older games of the franchise and mixes them with the new to bring fans and new gamers alike into an epic warzone environment from the comfort of their homes.

    Upon entering the single player campaign you'll probably be thinking two things... "I hope this is fun" and "Oh em gee let's skip this cutscene..." The game spits you into the back of an APC with your comrades engaging in conversation before being greeted by the sun as you step out onto the dusty street of a war torn bazaar. The graphics. The graphics. The graphics are nothing short of great-to-look-at, especially on a high definition TV, the sound quality is even better! Well, the presentation of the look and sounds is just fine, but what about the experience itself? Being perfectly honest, the Battlefield 3 campaign is lacking. Although it incorporates the different styles of play battlefield has been known for, it removes the freedom of play and destruction we all know so well. So anyway, you're prodded along by a stick of gunfire and yelling soldiers through the narrow corridor of offline gameplay, and pretty soon you'll be getting sick of that stick, trust me.

    On the other hand, the online action is remarkable. In a good way. Kicking it off you have a small, yet diverse array of weapons and gadgets at your disposal. Leveling through the ranks you'll broaden your horizon in regards to options of combat utensils, and there's even upgrades for each of the vehicle types. The maps are of a large scale, yet still comfortable when made smaller for Team Deathmatch and Squad vs Squad game modes, environments are diverse and real enough to be made into your comfortable second home, at least for awhile. Unless you're a powerleveling experience whoring beast of victory, it should take at least a few months to progress through the main levels of experience, with the top level being 44. After 44 levels you'll enter the prestige state of leveling, you'll gain a new emblem and it will take more experience to level up, but you'll still retain your unlocks. I got really bored and I can't be bothered to continue the review. Anyway, it's a fun balanced game with a couple bugs which will be ironed out, and the singleplayer is not that good.    … Expand
  76. Mrkend54l
    Nov 20, 2011
    9
    The best shooter i have ever played. The multiplayer is just amazing! The singleplayer may be a little bit short, but it's full of action and your really sucked into it.
  77. LoCoSiMuS
    Nov 20, 2011
    10
    Altro che mw3, battlefield 3 è il miglior FPS presente sul mercato oggi è veramente innovativo e divertente anche se vi sono presenti numerosi problemi.
  78. kazper_infinity
    Nov 20, 2011
    7
    The game is really fun to play, however, there are a few issues. One, being the campaign mode is very short and rushed and feels like its lacking some substance and story line, I feel DICE miss the ball on this one where as, in my opinion, Medal of Honor still holds the title for best story in a game. Second, is the issues on multiplayer like, unbalanced weapons, low weapon damage, gameThe game is really fun to play, however, there are a few issues. One, being the campaign mode is very short and rushed and feels like its lacking some substance and story line, I feel DICE miss the ball on this one where as, in my opinion, Medal of Honor still holds the title for best story in a game. Second, is the issues on multiplayer like, unbalanced weapons, low weapon damage, game latency and last but not forgotten is the horrible respawning problem. "Unbalanced weapons" An example of this is the PP-2000 out gunning a Shotgun at close range enough said! "Low weapon damage" Nothing drives me more crazy than wasting an entire Mag on someone to kill them, I mean come on 15-31 rounds into someone standing still before they die is just stupid! "Game latency" proof of this as most people knows who have played the game is while taking fire you run for cover only to be killed once you've made it around a corner or behind an object by the same player who was shooting you to begin with. And now to the worst of them all is the awful "Respawning" for TDM. I can not count the amount of times I have been killed because I have been spawned right into the sights of an enemy and shot dead before i could even hit the run or shot button. I am giving this game a 7 because of these issues and a few others. I ama little disappointed in this game but it is better the most of its competitors and its good to see that DICE is taking the proper steps to correct these problem. It's not often you see the developers listen to their customers and fix the problems these days. Good Hunting out there!… Expand
  79. tyman333
    Nov 19, 2011
    10
    I had fallen in love with this game after a played it for the first time. It's exhilirating and awesome, especially the multyplayer part. Open battlefield combat makes you feel like a real soldier in an epicentre of war. The sound of tanks shots and helicopters flying oround immerse you into battlelfield like never before. I give the game 10 out of 10 becouse of its multyplayer and I don'tI had fallen in love with this game after a played it for the first time. It's exhilirating and awesome, especially the multyplayer part. Open battlefield combat makes you feel like a real soldier in an epicentre of war. The sound of tanks shots and helicopters flying oround immerse you into battlelfield like never before. I give the game 10 out of 10 becouse of its multyplayer and I don't care for campaign.… Expand
  80. gabe129
    Nov 19, 2011
    9
    The campaign was too short and wasn't anywhere nearly as much fun as Battlefield: Bad Company 2's was, but was still alright. The edition of Co-op though, more than makes up for this. But the online multiplayer is why 90% of the people who buy this game, choose to do so, and for good reason. The multiplayer is the best I've seen in years, complemented by large maps and a huge variety ofThe campaign was too short and wasn't anywhere nearly as much fun as Battlefield: Bad Company 2's was, but was still alright. The edition of Co-op though, more than makes up for this. But the online multiplayer is why 90% of the people who buy this game, choose to do so, and for good reason. The multiplayer is the best I've seen in years, complemented by large maps and a huge variety of modes and weapons. The ranking up and unlocks in online mode will keep you coming back for more. The graphics, presentation and sounds also shine through the great game play. If you are a fan on FPS games, or have enjoyed a previous Battlefield game, you are sure to enjoy this one. So, if it's a great online game you are looking for, look no further, but if it's a good offline single player you are looking for, maybe just rent this one.… Expand
  81. Smiffyraf1
    Nov 19, 2011
    9
    I bought this and mw3 at the same time as I was a cod fanboy no less needless to say mw3 is the same juvenile aimed garbage as black ops was. Bf3 has it's faults, no doubt but is a far more complete game. There is so much variety you can play for hours trying different vehicles and weapons and not get bored. Weapons have realistic recoil which means you can't just spray and pray (a goodI bought this and mw3 at the same time as I was a cod fanboy no less needless to say mw3 is the same juvenile aimed garbage as black ops was. Bf3 has it's faults, no doubt but is a far more complete game. There is so much variety you can play for hours trying different vehicles and weapons and not get bored. Weapons have realistic recoil which means you can't just spray and pray (a good thing) so like the vehicles in game are difficult to master but immensely rewarding when you have. Cannot comment on the campaign as I haven't and don't intend to play it as fps games have always been about the online gameplay for me.… Expand
  82. Skyzod324
    Nov 19, 2011
    10
    This game is amazing. I enjoyed the singleplayer. But the multiplayer is what you really buy the game for. The guys at DICE know how to innovate the series unlike Cod with its copy and paste formula. These guys actually achieved a war simulator. Multiplayer is fun, people are cooperative, and none of that homophobic, child screaming you'll find in COD.
  83. alemilan92
    Nov 19, 2011
    10
    Un Gioco epico,con un Multiplayer capace di sorprendere in ogni partita.Peccato solo per il Single,che è corto ma comunque abbastanza piacevole.Il miglior FPS che io abbia giocato in tutta la mia vita.
  84. michilotti
    Nov 19, 2011
    2
    Que decepção, sinto que joguei no lixo meu dinheiro acreditando que o jogo seria tão bom quanto BC2.
    Vou falar somente do multiplayer, ahhhhh a mecanica da mira é irritante, você simplismente não consegue acertar nada a curta distancia e a longa distancia vc balanaça como se tivesse parkinson, as    Que decepção, sinto que joguei no lixo meu dinheiro acreditando que o jogo seria tão bom quanto BC2.
    Vou falar somente do multiplayer, ahhhhh a mecanica da mira é irritante, você simplismente não consegue acertar nada a curta distancia e a longa distancia vc balanaça como se tivesse parkinson, as pessoas estão tão frustradas que mesmo jogando com meus amigos ninguém diz uma palavra pois estão muito ocupados tentando controlar a irritação de não conseguir jogar.
    Mapas enormes com poucas pessoas, você não consegue enxergar seu inimigos pois eles estão longe demais e quando vc finalmente encontra não consegue atirar por causa da dificuldade de controlar os movimentos exagerados da mira (mesmo mudando a sensibilidade). Se você diminui a sensibilidade seus movimentos ficam lentos, mas quando vc aproxima a mira os movimentos ficam rapidos demais, ou seja, não há um balanceamento na mira que faça você ficar confortavel tanto mirando quanto não mirando e o que parece é esse jogo não foi feito pra se jogar com um Joystic.
    O som esta mt pobre comparado ao BC2, os bugs ainda existem e me frustram.....o jogo todo foi uma decepção.
    Durante os 2 dias que joguei não consegui ter 1 minuto sequer de diversão, agora me resta recorrer ao Modern Warfare 3 que tenho certeza que irá me divertir, e vou me desfazer do BF3 ou terei que começar a tomar calmantes toda vez que joga-lo.

    Agora o que nos resta é esperar um Bad Company 3 para podermos voltar a nos divertir.
    FrostBite 2 FAIL

    Orfãos de Bad Company :(    … Expand
  85. sentinelx7
    Nov 19, 2011
    1
    This game was complete garbage. The control sensitivity was all jacked up, the button configuration was confusion, and the campaign story was a copied version of a couple of other games, such as EA's 2006 game BLACK and Black Ops. I traded this for Uncharted 3 within hours of playing it. Glad the other guy had no idea how sh!tty a game this really is.
  86. TheLastRaver
    Nov 19, 2011
    0
    what are your people on, this piece of **** is suppose draw every two frames? but it still keeps dropping frames.

    killzone 3 draws every 2 frames the game looks great, plays great.

    battlefield 3 looks ass, its sluggish. i had low expectations, the were fulfilled by DICE.
  87. TooGoods
    Nov 19, 2011
    10
    Brilliant game, bought it day 1 and enjoying it since, so glad that the Bad Company aspect is gone from the franchise because it made the campaign in BFBC1 and BFBC2 seem too immature. Exciting campaign and an even better multiplayer with modes such as Conquest and Rush as well as Squad Deathmatch for those who want to have a CoD multiplayer experience.
  88. Riater
    Nov 18, 2011
    10
    I absolutely love this game, If you sat at home and got tired of playing Call of duty for a while and wanted to pick a new game up this is definitely for you. All out warfare actual tactics apply, Honestly one of the most realistic military games i have played, down to the point where even comm goes bad with your squad!
  89. ktannen
    Nov 18, 2011
    10
    This is the kind of game that has the potential to expand the entire video game industry. The level of immersion is a glimpse into the future of warfare gaming and is, in my opinion, the best competitive FPS experience currently available. The multiplayer is by far the most fun I've ever had with an FPS. The level of detail is astounding - the scale, graphical marvels and stellarThis is the kind of game that has the potential to expand the entire video game industry. The level of immersion is a glimpse into the future of warfare gaming and is, in my opinion, the best competitive FPS experience currently available. The multiplayer is by far the most fun I've ever had with an FPS. The level of detail is astounding - the scale, graphical marvels and stellar gameplay. Whether I am playing alone or with friends, this game has killed time like no other. I've owned the game since its release and have barely noticed the days of playtime that I've already put into it. If you aren't use to FPS controls, they take some getting used to, but the control-design of everything from your soldier, to both air and land vehicles, and even to the way projectiles are affected by gravity are all superb - fluent and intuitive. Minor bugs have popped up here and there, though this is almost always the case with newly released online games and luckily none remotely game breaking (some being nothing but amusing); they are being dealt with and fixed anyway. Recommended for experienced and new gamers alike, please give this one a chance. If you are in the least curious about online gaming, I beseech you to give this game a real chance and just see if you don't enjoy it.… Expand
  90. TCHeaven
    Nov 17, 2011
    7
    Ok, so first off the single player of battlefield 3 is pretty disappointing, the story was pretty predictable and the storytelling was some of the least dramatic or engrossing I have played. 'Between a rock and a hard place' provided some interesting imagery and 'comrades' must be my favourite level but really the single player offering here is poor. However the multiplayer experienceisOk, so first off the single player of battlefield 3 is pretty disappointing, the story was pretty predictable and the storytelling was some of the least dramatic or engrossing I have played. 'Between a rock and a hard place' provided some interesting imagery and 'comrades' must be my favourite level but really the single player offering here is poor. However the multiplayer experienceis much better I have had no problems finding matches and the option to use a server browser makes finding my kind of games far easier, everything in the multiplayer game seems to work very well and though it can be frustrating at times I feel that this is due to the inherent competetive nature of online shooter rather than any flaw with the game. My only real complaint here is the quality teamplay capabilities, I have only been able to form parties of up to 4 (I believe this is intentional) which is much smaller than I would like in addition to this our group was often split up apon joining matches often onto opposing teams. The quality of voice communication also leaves some to be desired it is often difficult to understand squadmate and you can only communicate with your squad. For this I must dock battlefield points. Overall though with a solid online component it would be difficult to view this as anything but a good buy for an fps fan.… Expand
  91. djwille88
    Nov 17, 2011
    9
    I've put in about 50 hours in the MP portion and I can safely say this is by far the best shooter that's come out this year..sorry MW 3, not even close.
  92. GreatreviewDmac
    Nov 16, 2011
    8
    I find battlefield 3 to be one of the most impressive multiplayer games due to the scale and overall leveling system that keeps you engaged throughout your online warfare. The campaign is good but nothing that we havent all ready seen. It has huge setpieces and a linear plot. Battlefield 3 should be on your wish list if you like fps tactical warfare
  93. fortySIXnTWO
    Nov 16, 2011
    0
    Did anyone else get as sick of the stupid light glare affect? Dumb campaign!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  94. Narrh
    Nov 16, 2011
    0
    A game for kids where you can camp, camp, camp, camp and drive tanks till the fkn end boringness. Disappointed. I bought this and after buying mw3 i sold my bf3 to a friend at 40% price. I Regret that you dont know what a good FPS game is.nAt least in MW3 you train your skills, reflex, fastthinking and abilities to orient and predict. But yea, keep camping and camping and camping, simplyA game for kids where you can camp, camp, camp, camp and drive tanks till the fkn end boringness. Disappointed. I bought this and after buying mw3 i sold my bf3 to a friend at 40% price. I Regret that you dont know what a good FPS game is.nAt least in MW3 you train your skills, reflex, fastthinking and abilities to orient and predict. But yea, keep camping and camping and camping, simply wasting your time, There is 0 tactic in this game, stop comparing this "0" to the best game ever made. BF3 is like total waste of time unless you like to fly jet planes.… Expand
  95. vesperiaLSU
    Nov 15, 2011
    9
    The single player campaign wasn't spectacular at any level, and the story was plain and not well told, yet I still found myself enjoying the gameplay for the most part. Co-op mode could be really addictive given the well designed missions and unlocked new weapons. The only thing that will make it even better is increasing the number of the missions. Multiplayer is unsurprisingly the bestThe single player campaign wasn't spectacular at any level, and the story was plain and not well told, yet I still found myself enjoying the gameplay for the most part. Co-op mode could be really addictive given the well designed missions and unlocked new weapons. The only thing that will make it even better is increasing the number of the missions. Multiplayer is unsurprisingly the best part of this game with tons of weapons and features for you to unlock, and each of the 9 maps released so far is distinctive and fun to play with, let alone all those cool vehicles which did nothing but making the multiplayer gameplay more amazing and unpredictable. However, it does frustrate me from time to time when the map is too huge that I spend a lot more time running than shooting. Overall, it's the best FPS game of the year and I can easily see myself playing it until the release of BF4 or BFBC3.… Expand
  96. DMoney3481
    Nov 15, 2011
    10
    Best game ever!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!f!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  97. footiehiro
    Nov 15, 2011
    9
    As a bad company 2 player, I had high hopes for battlefield 3. And for the most part it meets and even exceeds some of my expectations. Firstly just to get the elephant out of the room or in this 'review', the single player. Battlefield series has never been much of a single player title and battlefield 3 is no different. Due to very restrictive gameplay, very cliché storyAs a bad company 2 player, I had high hopes for battlefield 3. And for the most part it meets and even exceeds some of my expectations. Firstly just to get the elephant out of the room or in this 'review', the single player. Battlefield series has never been much of a single player title and battlefield 3 is no different. Due to very restrictive gameplay, very cliché story and worst of all, getting repetedly killed by an enemy from one corner of the room whilst you are dealing with the enemy in the other die. The only reason why you will want to play the single player mode is to unlock the maps in CO-OP missions. I am not going to talking much about the CO-OP missions since i have only played 2 matches. However the main reason why anyone is going to buy BF3 is for their multiplayer mode. Dice really have shown what they can do with the frost bite engine 2.0 here. From the amazing vehicle damage to the the complete destruction of building it really is a unique experience, compare to other FPS in the market. All of guns feel solid and powerful. Graphically the game looks amazing but I do feel DICE could have done better however what it lacks visually they more than make it up in sound. Its is mind-blowing. From assault rifles to snipers they all sounds amazing. I cannot even tell you the experience of hearing the building next to you being completely obliterated, coming out of the head set. YOU NEED TO HAVE A PROPER HEADSET FOR THIS GAME.

    One other thing DICE have successfully done is rewarding you for every action you do in the game. The game reward you for almost anything you do, so you can be the best player of the match without even killing any of the enemy player. In my opinion Battlefield 3 is the best shooter in the market. DICE have truly have made something special.    … Expand
  98. ReadySetReview
    Nov 15, 2011
    0
    I was so dissappointed in. This horrible game, I was expecting the "beyond the call" but it was all just horrible blantant lies from what the developers told us and showed us in the trailers and E3. The campaign was bullcrap and a waste of my time and hard earned money that should of went to goldeneye, the graphics was not state of the art and ended looking worst than most games to comeI was so dissappointed in. This horrible game, I was expecting the "beyond the call" but it was all just horrible blantant lies from what the developers told us and showed us in the trailers and E3. The campaign was bullcrap and a waste of my time and hard earned money that should of went to goldeneye, the graphics was not state of the art and ended looking worst than most games to come out last year and the years before that even with the new graphics engine, it still looks like crap to me. The multiplayer was fun but got boring when a 2 hour match, endless guns that take forever to rank up, and unfair bullet damage on top of everything else made this game a big mistake to even wait for. I haveplayed BFBC2 and loved it but this game was crap and for all the COD haters giving low scores because you have nothing better to do with your life grow a pair and step up to a real game.… Expand
  99. Ragna
    Nov 14, 2011
    10
    I'm only going to say two words.

    SIMPLY AWESOME!

    If you're looking for the true war, stop searching because this is it. I've never seen a multiplayer game with 64 players, everybody working in squads of four to win the battle, it's really exciting!
  100. Revolver68
    Nov 14, 2011
    0
    Another year and not surprised at all EA has dropped another massive DUMP on those foolish enough to buy this Buggy, steaming pile of CRAP. They will never get a Cent from me, not suckered in by the hype like so many LMAO
Page:

Awards & Rankings

23
#23 Best PS3 Game of 2011
4
#4 Most Discussed PS3 Game of 2011
20
#20 Most Shared PS3 Game of 2011

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
85

Generally favorable reviews - based on 38 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 35 out of 38
  2. Mixed: 3 out of 38
  3. Negative: 0 out of 38
  1. Push Square
    Feb 10, 2012
    80
    Hopefully EA reconsiders its approach to toppling Call Of Duty in the future, and allows its games to develop their own personality, rather than imitate something else.
    Read full review
  2. Playstation: The Official Magazine (US)
    Jan 4, 2012
    80
    Despite its incredible competitive online play, we can't ignore the shortcomings of its campaign and Co-Op. [Jan 2012, p.66]
  3. Official PlayStation Magazine Benelux
    Jan 2, 2012
    90
    The nine multiplayer maps seem to be designed specifically to let players come up with their own creative strategies. Compared to COD, this gives the player a real sense of freedom. There is no such thing as a perfect strategy or a trotten path. [December 2011, p.74]
See all critic reviews »