Red Faction II

 PC
User Score
5.9

Mixed or average reviews- based on 92 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 24 out of 92
  2. Mixed: 48 out of 92
  3. Negative: 20 out of 92
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. JaydenPickens
    Feb 20, 2019
    8
    Childhood game right here! This sequel to Red Faction wasn't as good as original, but still it was a hell of a game. The campaign was very short, but fun. The game shined mostly in multiplayer which was fun as hell and I'm pretty sure I've lost a couple of hundred hours while playing it. The destruction element sadly was pushed back, you can't destroy everything like in Red Faction whereChildhood game right here! This sequel to Red Faction wasn't as good as original, but still it was a hell of a game. The campaign was very short, but fun. The game shined mostly in multiplayer which was fun as hell and I'm pretty sure I've lost a couple of hundred hours while playing it. The destruction element sadly was pushed back, you can't destroy everything like in Red Faction where you could basically build new tunnels with explosives... but that's sadly a trend in RF franchise... neither of sequels will reach the same level of destruction that OG RF had. Check out this game and you won't be disappointed! March on, Red Faction calls! Pickens approves… Expand
  2. Jay_Pickens
    Jul 25, 2018
    8
    Childhood game right here! This sequel to Red Faction wasn't as good as original, but still it was a hell of a game. The campaign was very short, but fun. The game shined mostly in multiplayer which was fun as hell and I'm pretty sure I've lost a couple of hundred hours while playing it. The destruction element sadly was pushed back, you can't destroy everything like in Red Faction whereChildhood game right here! This sequel to Red Faction wasn't as good as original, but still it was a hell of a game. The campaign was very short, but fun. The game shined mostly in multiplayer which was fun as hell and I'm pretty sure I've lost a couple of hundred hours while playing it. The destruction element sadly was pushed back, you can't destroy everything like in Red Faction where you could basically build new tunnels with explosives... but that's sadly a trend in RF franchise... neither of sequels will reach the same level of destruction that OG RF had. Check out this game and you won't be disappointed! March on, Red Faction calls! Pickens approves!… Expand
  3. EdTha
    Jun 8, 2003
    9
    Great game... It gets together, the good things of almost every fps, ands adds interaction with teh sorroundings...
  4. MichaelA.
    May 10, 2007
    10
    One of the best if not the best first person shooters ever made. Multiplayer is amazing along with great 1 player mode. 10 out of 10.
  5. J.W.
    Aug 21, 2003
    10
    This game is awesome, I have it on my PS2, my friend has it on his PS2, I play it every time I go to his house, he plays it every time he comes to my house. How can the PC version be worse if it came out at a later date? You're all CRAZY!!!
  6. Anderson
    May 7, 2011
    10
    This game was amazing for it's time. Yes it is short, yes it doesn't have multiplayer. But who cares? When you can just terrorize the civilians? Or save them... The attention to detail is great. The music has some roots to the first game, but it has some of it's own tracks which are phenomenal. The story is interesting. The Geo Mod gives us nice looks, even though more scripted. I wouldThis game was amazing for it's time. Yes it is short, yes it doesn't have multiplayer. But who cares? When you can just terrorize the civilians? Or save them... The attention to detail is great. The music has some roots to the first game, but it has some of it's own tracks which are phenomenal. The story is interesting. The Geo Mod gives us nice looks, even though more scripted. I would recommend this only to people who like singleplayer experiences. People hate it for being less of the first game. But i played this one first and i know that the first game was bigger, but it laked detail and polish. While this is simply what the game probably should have been. I give it a 10/10 to keep the score higher then what it is.… Expand

Awards & Rankings

39
#39 Most Discussed PC Game of 2003
61
#61 Most Shared PC Game of 2003

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
64

Mixed or average reviews - based on 10 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1 out of 10
  2. Mixed: 7 out of 10
  3. Negative: 2 out of 10
  1. GameZone
    65
    For those of you who are online multiplayer fans though, an offline botmatch may just be seen as unacceptable … and that’s what you get with RFII. That’s a shame since the first one was fantastic.
    Read full review
  2. ActionTrip
    55
    Short is never good, no matter which context you put it in. And this game is short. It's penis-envy short. It's the shortest single-player FPS game I've ever played. A four hour gameplay experience for a retail product is like a 20 second sexual intercourse. It just doesn't feel right, and you feel cheated.
    Read full review
  3. IGN
    74
    Fun, certainly, but single-player is a bit too linear and bit too short, even if the combat is engaging, well-thought out, and generally intense.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »