Homefront: The Revolution

 PC
User Score
4.5

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 431 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 132 out of 431
  2. Mixed: 77 out of 431
  3. Negative: 222 out of 431
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. gunemdown5150
    May 19, 2016
    4
    I am taking the time to write this review for two reasons, First about a game that was released in a broken state! and the second reason is to voice my DISGUST with all of those that are defending this game!
    What is wrong with these people??? They are saying things like "you should expect a game to be released
    and need patches" OR " This game is a amazing and i don't mind that it    I am taking the time to write this review for two reasons, First about a game that was released in a broken state! and the second reason is to voice my DISGUST with all of those that are defending this game!
    What is wrong with these people??? They are saying things like "you should expect a game to be released
    and need patches" OR " This game is a amazing and i don't mind that it has technical issues"
    These kind of people need to be slapped into reality or put in isolation away from the general public due to their stupidity level!
    NO it is NOT Ok for a game to be released Broken and almost unplayable! and NO this is NOT a "Amazing" game despite it's technical issues!
    I don't know what other games these people like but it cannot be the same game i do!
    Homefront the revolution was a MISSED OPPORTUNITY to make a incredible game! Period!
    Even without the tech problems that plague this Game, it still is a generic shooter game.
    The actual shooting is not good or fun, the AI is ridiculously bad,the so called Stealth mechanic is NON existent and the side quests are dull,easy and boring!
    The main missions have moments here and there of good and fun gameplay but overall
    they are nothing new or special.
    Bottom line, by supporting this game you are saying to the developers of games that "Hey we do not care you put out crappy games, will will still buy them"
    The fact they are asking $60 for the regular version of this and even more for the deluxe editions($160 for the special Goliath edition) is not only a slap in the face to gamer's but is a insult to out intelligence!
    Buyer beware you have been warned!    … Expand
  2. Upijuss14
    May 26, 2016
    4
    Holy hell now homefront the revolution just SUCKS theres nothing more to say, the framrate, the missions just everything sucks, this game had some hope of turning good but SUPRISE, SUPRISE THEY FU#$ED IT UP!!!
  3. Wolfenstein51
    May 17, 2016
    4
    This is NOT the game to play right after finishing Uncharted 4. I think it has potential, but I cannot recommend it in its current state. The technical issues especially the framerate is what brings the score down for me. I think the open world aspect of the game is done well and the graphics are decent, but that framerate. I would say it averages about 22-25 FPS. I would wait for aThis is NOT the game to play right after finishing Uncharted 4. I think it has potential, but I cannot recommend it in its current state. The technical issues especially the framerate is what brings the score down for me. I think the open world aspect of the game is done well and the graphics are decent, but that framerate. I would say it averages about 22-25 FPS. I would wait for a patch to see if they can bring it up to 30 FPS. If they don't fix it in 3-4 weeks, I'm trading it in.… Expand
  4. GamesLogJp
    May 20, 2016
    4
    I don't know why there are a few 10 ratings in here. The Ai is crap, the map and world are full of bugs, the game crash in my game-play 4 times, animation looks really bad, the voice is so bad and not every time correct, the ending is the Trailer cut-scene, mechanic fells so bad and the animation are so soft no heavy input.

    it the hole game is so bad
  5. Eduardo2552
    May 25, 2016
    4
    The truth is that this game is bad, very bad, artificial intelligence is the poorest I've seen, the graphics bad, but not what was expected for these days literally is a far urban cry, I do not regret I have bought it, but I regret having played. 4/10
  6. PizzaW0lf
    Jul 18, 2017
    4
    This game is below average. It's not very well made at all. First, it's very glitchy on PC and from I've heard other platforms as well. Bugs like NPCs just running into walls, random crashes, and major frame rate dips. The story isn't very good either. It just feels like a worse far cry. It does have good aspects like the weapons being pretty fun and I LOVE the premise. It had a goodThis game is below average. It's not very well made at all. First, it's very glitchy on PC and from I've heard other platforms as well. Bugs like NPCs just running into walls, random crashes, and major frame rate dips. The story isn't very good either. It just feels like a worse far cry. It does have good aspects like the weapons being pretty fun and I LOVE the premise. It had a good direction for the story, but in the end, it wasn't well executed. I would not recommend especially on consoles.… Expand
  7. SaintMSent
    May 22, 2017
    4
    Awful game. Steam free weekend saved my moned. Awful story, game is full of boring open world stuff, and sometimes it forces you to do this stuff. Setting is good, but they didn't use it.
  8. fallouts
    Jun 20, 2016
    3
    Wow what a sorry excuse for a game. Everything in this game is borderline average and that's quite an achievement in itself. What's shocking is how unconvincing this game is in its progression system. 3 hrs in and I inspired the malnourished citizens of America by back stabbing 10 soldiers who were harassing random citizens and by cutting wires on few small generators sitting by the roads.Wow what a sorry excuse for a game. Everything in this game is borderline average and that's quite an achievement in itself. What's shocking is how unconvincing this game is in its progression system. 3 hrs in and I inspired the malnourished citizens of America by back stabbing 10 soldiers who were harassing random citizens and by cutting wires on few small generators sitting by the roads. Now my malnourished fellow Americans are spray painting anti KPA slogans on structures, calling out the KPA, and starting a riot in the streets. These are the same people who were at their lowest 10 mins ago and questioned their existence. The area that was constantly being patrolled by armed KPA soldiers and tanks was empty of KPA forces because people started rioting and screaming. A world power was this easy to scare? Brilliant.

    People giving this game more than 6 haven't played a lot of quality games I would reckon. Do me a favor: If you are interested in this concept, then go get Red Faction Guerrilla and The Saboteur instead. These games do the whole Guerrilla/revolutionary concept far better than this under cooked abomination and are far more interesting and fun to play. And despite having dated graphics, they are far more immersive in their setting and lore. I was going to give this a 6 but I will have to knock the score down to 3 due to glitches and unstable frame rate. And no, I didn't buy this game, I rented it.    … Expand
  9. lhmtgame
    Mar 7, 2017
    3
    I played HF1 and HF: TR. They both have suck stories and the way to play it.

    HF1 has bad graphics but high system resources consumption. And when I played HF:TR, it even worse than Medal Of Honor: Warfighter.
  10. eva3si0n
    Jun 30, 2017
    3
    Boring and uninteresting continuation not of a bad first part. The open world dead and doesn't change from actions of the player in any way. In general after the first part is a failure. And setting very cool, unique. Technical problems continually, beginning from the getting stuck opponents in textures to AI of opponents. Graphics hasn't changed since 2010 at all, it is a shame to releaseBoring and uninteresting continuation not of a bad first part. The open world dead and doesn't change from actions of the player in any way. In general after the first part is a failure. And setting very cool, unique. Technical problems continually, beginning from the getting stuck opponents in textures to AI of opponents. Graphics hasn't changed since 2010 at all, it is a shame to release it in 2016.… Expand
  11. realWhiteMan
    Apr 10, 2023
    3
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. My rating is based on my impressions of the game. This is not an objective review. I play quite a big number of titles per year and decided to review them as a peace of art and not as a product.… Expand
  12. thehenman
    May 18, 2016
    2
    Ok ok. Here we go with this garbage. This is one of the worst games iv ever played. The frame rate is total garbage, the gunplay is the worst iv played in ages. There are identical npc's standing next to each other in the game. The grafics are rubbish. And to top it off its boring as hell. The bad reviews are totally warranted. Please do not give them your money. This is lazy crap
  13. Crackfarmer
    May 24, 2016
    2
    Uses Denuvo, can only be **** A wise man once told me "If Game Dev's care more for Protection rather than Game content, the Game will be **** True words. Awfully optimized. Not worth any cent.
  14. Unlimitedpower4
    May 18, 2016
    2
    Another disappointment from Deep Silver (Seriously, why are they still in the gaming industry?)

    First of, it doesn't look next-gen, it looks like a PS3. Full of bugs and glitches, terrible AI. Runs at 20 FPS. Interesting setting?

    None of the characters are memorable, seriously I can't remember anyone from the campaign.
    Overall this is just a painfully average game, just like the first one.
  15. notTheRadBrad
    May 20, 2016
    2
    This game is the **** sequel ever to be made in the history of gaming (had to put it this way). Really pissed off at what they made , I mean the game's graphics are **** , the clumsiest AI , i got stuck in an NPC civilian for about 10 minutes for christ's sake !
    Conclusion: Don't buy this game , this game doesn't deserve any money at all!
  16. blklabmad
    May 30, 2016
    2
    Homefront Revolution has horrible graphics, in some light conditions you can't see anything. I have changed settings several times to get the best picture. I've see better graphics in PS2 games than this. The aim assist works 1 in 50, maybe. Worst 50$ spent. should've waited. I would recommend you play the trial version to see if you want to waste your $$$$. Seems to be a low budget gameHomefront Revolution has horrible graphics, in some light conditions you can't see anything. I have changed settings several times to get the best picture. I've see better graphics in PS2 games than this. The aim assist works 1 in 50, maybe. Worst 50$ spent. should've waited. I would recommend you play the trial version to see if you want to waste your $$$$. Seems to be a low budget game for lots of $$$$.… Expand
  17. SaeedZer0
    Aug 13, 2022
    2
    GOOD
    + Technical graphics not so bad
    + Interesting upgrade system

    BAD
    - not optimal
    - Awful gunplay
    - Very bad story
    - Not so good gameplay
    - Repetitive side missions
    - Awful visual graphics
  18. Xxdaniels751xX
    May 14, 2017
    2
    The first game I loved even though most people think otherwise, and with this second title I was very disappointed.

    He could have kicked the competition and innovated in something, but no.
  19. Todish
    Dec 9, 2017
    2
    I had big hopes for this game, the first one was nice, the idea is really great but...the implementation, omg...it's so bad. It's a crappy game. Everything you do in it feels pointless, rushed, unpolished, just a couple of stuff thrown in there, no immersion, no voice for the main character (is he mute?)...looks like a free to play. That motorcycle is so pointless. Not a lot of work hasI had big hopes for this game, the first one was nice, the idea is really great but...the implementation, omg...it's so bad. It's a crappy game. Everything you do in it feels pointless, rushed, unpolished, just a couple of stuff thrown in there, no immersion, no voice for the main character (is he mute?)...looks like a free to play. That motorcycle is so pointless. Not a lot of work has been put into this game. Dev team? Are they paying you enough?...I think i managed to get 4 hours into it before i got bored to death and just quit. Quit and Delete! Waste of time! Life is too short to play bad games and this is really, really bad...sorry!… Expand
  20. DonMega
    May 21, 2016
    1
    A sequel no one asked for. A garbled mess of a game with glitches, bugs and unplayable game play. If the sheer fact that the development phase was riddled with drama and didn't put you off the title isn't enough, listen to everyone on here. Don't waste your money. What's hilarious to me is that the developers decided to use denuvo drm, as if anyone actually wanted to pirate this garbage anyway.
  21. terghalin
    May 27, 2016
    1
    Worst than first Homefront.
    Bad AI, bugs and glithces (like 1 glitch per 15 min), unsatisfying story, characters acting like in school drama. Laggy on modern hardware (AMD R290, Core i7, 16 GB RAM) and gun-shooting are just boring.
  22. KICHZY
    Jun 2, 2016
    1
    Do not purchase this game. Homefront: The Revolution is plagued by frame rate issues, glitches and bugs resulting in a horrible gaming experience. Even if these issues was to be fixed later down the line, The game is nothing more than a repetitive side mission in a poorly developed sandbox.
  23. madmoose67
    Jun 11, 2016
    1
    Ok. At first, I was digging the game. I had dual nVidia 760's in SLI. And once again, NO SLI SUPPORT. SO anyway I did the Ryse sli bits. worked ok. Wound up getting a 980ti to avoid the lack of SLI support and upgrade anyway. Played through and was enjoying it, even though it was a hybrid of Far Cry 3/4/Crysis/Dying Light elements. But I continued. Then the bugs came. And kept coming.Ok. At first, I was digging the game. I had dual nVidia 760's in SLI. And once again, NO SLI SUPPORT. SO anyway I did the Ryse sli bits. worked ok. Wound up getting a 980ti to avoid the lack of SLI support and upgrade anyway. Played through and was enjoying it, even though it was a hybrid of Far Cry 3/4/Crysis/Dying Light elements. But I continued. Then the bugs came. And kept coming. Crippling frame rates with an i7 4770k and nvidia 980ti. Solid 60 and drop and stutter to 10... WTF! Random and repeating. For no reason whatsoever. So i trucked through it anyway. But at the end mission, glitches prevented me from even being ABLE to complete the mission. What a LOAD OF SH*T. I honestly would have given this a 6/7 or so, if the damn game wasnt buggy BEYOND BELIEF!!! So basically, game is ok, a little repetitive, copying other games mechanics. Graphics are pretty damn impressive maxed out, when it works and is stable of course. AI is pretty bad, but oh well. The bugs! GOOD GOD HOW DO YOU RELEASE THIS WITH THIS MANY PROBLEMS!!! YEs I know the change mid production yadda yadda. SOrry I literally created a Metacritic account just to voice my RAGE for this atrocity of a game that costs $59.99. This trash is worth $2.99 at best with all these bugs. Could have been a stellar game, but whadda you know, garbage glitches and no SLI support with horrible optimization. So sad to see the CryEngine run so badly! So much potential. Thrown right into the sewer and puked all over and cr*pped on. Get this on sale, or wat till this is $19.99. Don't waste your money.… Expand
  24. OTAKU_FANBOY
    Jan 4, 2017
    1
    It may be a decent game, as far as graphics go, if it wasn't so buggy. I've spent minutes playing and hours trying to get it to work. Between the flickering lights and the crash to blank screen without seeing error code just can't make any progress. Literally within minutes it crashes. Reboot. Try again.
  25. Vanburman
    Feb 17, 2018
    1
    One of the worst games I've ever played. It is soo bland and uninspired its unbelievable. A horrific buggy mess, Devs don't seem to care either. Ignore this or end up wasting your money like I did.
  26. 44JAX44
    Jun 10, 2018
    1
    This game is like a compilation of ubisoft games, with the bugs and everything but it lacks the fun factor out of them.

    The Idea is great, open world, liberate posts buy and upgrade weapons, it is repetitive yea but so is farcry and assassin's creed and watchdogs and division but I had fun playing these games nonetheless. This however has a really bad shooting gameplay, weapons    This game is like a compilation of ubisoft games, with the bugs and everything but it lacks the fun factor out of them.

    The Idea is great, open world, liberate posts buy and upgrade weapons, it is repetitive yea but so is farcry and assassin's creed and watchdogs and division but I had fun playing these games nonetheless.

    This however has a really bad shooting gameplay, weapons animations deviate more into cartoonish, weapons recoil is snappy and oh the mouse acceleration is bad, so bad and u have one overall sensitivity option and when ADS sensitivity levels are higher than when just looking.

    This little gameplay issue made the game really annoying to play, although I found a setting that works for me I was still feeling annoyed while playing and with the story being okay not that bad but not that intriguing and gameplay being repetitive I got bored real bad and I can't continue it.

    Graphics are good but I would expect better graphics since they are working on cryEngine and I haven't encountered any critical bugs. But hey I played more hours on this than I played on the first, I think on their 10th release I'll be able to finish the game.    … Expand
  27. ar1234
    Jul 22, 2017
    1
    worst game.worst graphics.bad story.first one was way much better.wasted all my **** time downloadeding it ***.............................................
  28. vova22379
    Jun 29, 2023
    1
    ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
  29. HitmanStryker
    May 17, 2016
    0
    Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice...well shame on the developer and publisher alike. This game is so bad it make the original Home-Front, (short as it was), look like a masterpiece. For the creative team behind this title, to release such a game with choppy frame-rate as well as a broken shooting system is deplorable. To quote a movie... [This game]... "could have been aFool me once, shame on you, fool me twice...well shame on the developer and publisher alike. This game is so bad it make the original Home-Front, (short as it was), look like a masterpiece. For the creative team behind this title, to release such a game with choppy frame-rate as well as a broken shooting system is deplorable. To quote a movie... [This game]... "could have been a contender."

    Some needs to be done about a company releasing a game that is horrible. If the game wasn't ready it would have been better for the developers to delay the game, but they released it nonetheless. The problem is that once the game is released and opened you CANNOT return it, even if the game is horrible. If you went to a restaurant and the food you order is bad the food is taken of the bill, or that restaurant will not last long. For games, if professional reviewers give it less than 70% then the customer should be able to return it. For those, (like me) who got it through day one digital, you cannot return it. This needs to stop.    … Expand
  30. clarky
    Mar 11, 2017
    0
    You can't skip cut scenes, I was sitting spamming all the keys and buttons for about 10 minutes, I kid you not. No thanks. The game gets zero as I couldn't play it. So long as games continue to do this, YOU WILL WATCH MY VIDEOS OVER AND OVER AGAIN BECAUSE WE PAID FOR IT ISN:T IT COOL. No. Zero.
prev
Page:

Awards & Rankings

54
#54 Most Discussed PC Game of 2016
33
#33 Most Shared PC Game of 2016

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
54

Mixed or average reviews - based on 48 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 2 out of 48
  2. Mixed: 34 out of 48
  3. Negative: 12 out of 48
  1. CD-Action
    Jul 21, 2016
    65
    At its basis (which were copied from Ubisoft) Homefront is not a bad game, but total lack of innovation, ridiculous AI and myriad of lesser flaws make it hard to recommend to anyone but the most avid Far Cry fans. [07/2016, p.44]
  2. Game World Navigator Magazine
    Jul 7, 2016
    50
    If the original game was kind of low-budget and low-grade carbon copy of Call of Duty, then The Revolution – the bricolage of the same quality inspired by Far Cry in its worst forms. [Issue#210, p.72]
  3. PC PowerPlay
    Jul 6, 2016
    60
    A competent enough shooter, but perhaps a touch too ambitious in its scope. Still, it's a massive improvement on the first Homefront. [Issue#252, p.62]
See all critic reviews »