Call of Duty: Ghosts

 PC
User Score
2.3

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 3604 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 474 out of 3604
  2. Mixed: 384 out of 3604
  3. Negative: 2,746 out of 3604
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. Dareviewer12
    Jul 22, 2014
    2
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This game is **** This is the 2nd WORST COD ever and is the WORST game of 2013 for me. this game has nothing new. Its just the same thing from MW1. Full of 12 year old **** and it gets boring in a day. There is very little destructible environment compared to BF4. And single player story is a load of **** Its where the USA falls to its knees. WTF Activision. Who ever made this game should DIE… Expand
  2. RainbowPieFiM
    Nov 7, 2013
    2
    The graphics are from 2011, that's okey, but... the requeriments... i have a GTX 480 and in maximum settings i have "60" frames, with drops to 20fps and 1fps.
    70GB, yep.. 70GB for graphics from 2011 (Have textures that looks the same in Black Ops II and Black Ops II are only 20GB)
    The history pfff.... i don't want to talk about that. The Extinction mode is fine, is funny. Ah, and we    The graphics are from 2011, that's okey, but... the requeriments... i have a GTX 480 and in maximum settings i have "60" frames, with drops to 20fps and 1fps.
    70GB, yep.. 70GB for graphics from 2011 (Have textures that looks the same in Black Ops II and Black Ops II are only 20GB)
    The history pfff.... i don't want to talk about that.
    The Extinction mode is fine, is funny.
    Ah, and we don't have quickscope anymore (And we can't do ALT+TAB)    … Expand
  3. Thatweirdguy
    Nov 5, 2013
    2
    Ok now besides the fail graphics and stuff the PC version so Called Pre-load Just totally wasted24 GB that when u launch the game it totally deletes and re download 24GB Which took my like 2 Days
  4. richardh754
    Nov 5, 2013
    2
    PC version is a joke
    Graphics are poor, Gun sounds are poor
    Black Ops 2 is much better!
    Game pauses & stutters even on I7 6 core with 3 GTX 680s & 12GB Ram!
  5. Zurvan
    Nov 5, 2013
    2
    First of all I have played the old COD 1 en 2 on the pc. Those two are the best COD's and they are from the times that infinity ward and activision gave a damn about their consumers. Back when you paid 60$ for a full game and no 15$ map packs, back when the developers made actual expansion packs with new story line and new maps and not only 4 maps.
    So after such a long time I decided to    First of all I have played the old COD 1 en 2 on the pc. Those two are the best COD's and they are from the times that infinity ward and activision gave a damn about their consumers. Back when you paid 60$ for a full game and no 15$ map packs, back when the developers made actual expansion packs with new story line and new maps and not only 4 maps.
    So after such a long time I decided to get the newest installment because they hired a good writer to write this game. (I have not played black ops or any of the other cod's)

    The sad thing is that Activision hired Stephen Gaghan to do the writing but there isn't much dialogue in this game. You basically have an idea of what the story is about but you are shooting most of the time, there is no connections with the characters and the campaign is too short. The missions are varied but we have seen them in the previous COD's. All COD's have climbing down from a window and then shoot the guys inside the room, the snow missions are getting repetitive, the underwater mission is nice but we also had that. Also the 40gb install and 6gb of ram are just lazy coding or maybe all the DLC's are already installed and need a 15$ code to unlock it.

    The multiplayer is just a recycle of previous modern warfare's it seems: Same animation kill, reloading animation, same guns and knifing feels like you poke someone. The kill streaks are stupid because you can see the enemy on the radar and the dog attack is just overpowered.

    LOOKING FORWARD TO BLACK OPS 3 NEXT Year, SAME TIME, SAME PLACE :s    … Expand
  6. awkenney
    Nov 5, 2013
    2
    The single player component features the same outlandish fiction that has been prevalent since MW2. While the presentation was on-par, the game play was uninspired and unoriginal.
    The multiplayer component would be a rock-solid title if it were not for the incredibly aggressive anti-lag tech being applied to the game. In the COD4/World at War generation, this was easily resolved by    The single player component features the same outlandish fiction that has been prevalent since MW2. While the presentation was on-par, the game play was uninspired and unoriginal.
    The multiplayer component would be a rock-solid title if it were not for the incredibly aggressive anti-lag tech being applied to the game. In the COD4/World at War generation, this was easily resolved by dedicated servers which had min and max ping settings and the ability to turn anti-lag OFF.
    The anti-lag tech produces effects where your actions can be up to 2 seconds behind an opponent, giving you little hope to win in a face to face gun battle. It also impacts general hit registration. Hilariously, some guns are exempt from this. That being said, I can't in good conscience recommend a game that still has this problem after several iterations.    … Expand
  7. bieelll
    Nov 6, 2013
    2
    I wish I could give a better score, but since I've been locked away from the multiplayer due to not meeting the RAM specifications, even though my pc can run it smoothly, I think a game that makes me throw away my money is a game that doesn't deserve much.
  8. Ebelon
    Nov 6, 2013
    2
    I'm a hardcore CoD gamer that loves to compete to be the best, but with all these new "innovations" it has become impossible to get more than one kill without dying. Its an endless cycle; you run around, kill, get killed, then run around kill and get killed some more. The only way to get a +1,5 k/d is by camping, but I don't have time to waste my life hiding in a corner. This game justI'm a hardcore CoD gamer that loves to compete to be the best, but with all these new "innovations" it has become impossible to get more than one kill without dying. Its an endless cycle; you run around, kill, get killed, then run around kill and get killed some more. The only way to get a +1,5 k/d is by camping, but I don't have time to waste my life hiding in a corner. This game just doesn't require skill anymore.
    I was also very disappointed with the "customize your soldier", I was expecting something along the lines of rainbow six ,but it was more like GTA 4's customization options; barely anything to choose from.
    My major complaint though is the removal of Search and Destroy from pub games, I used to love playing Search and Destroy with my team, now its been replaced by this stupid search and kill confirm game type.
    The series sure went down hill after they fired West and Zampella. MW2 was a masterpiece, after that, it was the same call of duty trash. The series has officially died for me. Time to move on. Looking forward to Titan fall, which IMO is the true successor to MW2.    … Expand
  9. azarth
    Nov 7, 2013
    2
    Hi there, atm the state of the game is just awkward.
    1) Impossibile to play Single Player campaign due to a bug with some AMD and Nvdia video cards
    2) Graphic is simply AWKWARD and to damn heavy. Srsly i run Bf3 at full settings but this s*** snap in a 10 square meters map??!! I had to set to medium all graphic options and still i have some snap in certain moment, fps drop and so on. 3)    Hi there, atm the state of the game is just awkward.
    1) Impossibile to play Single Player campaign due to a bug with some AMD and Nvdia video cards
    2) Graphic is simply AWKWARD and to damn heavy. Srsly i run Bf3 at full settings but this s*** snap in a 10 square meters map??!! I had to set to medium all graphic options and still i have some snap in certain moment, fps drop and so on.
    3) 30 and more gb for a game like this?! Nice optimization
    4) Paying 60 for "playing" (if you can call it play) a beta. SHAME    … Expand
  10. grik
    Nov 8, 2013
    2
    First time im review a game. Iv only played MultyPlayer yet, thats why i bought it in first place. Let me tell you the first thing, avoid buying this game !
    Im a player since the first ages, playing COD feels like returning to the first Wolfenstein with better graphics. Soldiers seem to be fluctuating, they dont seem realistic not even close and the gameplay suffers with that.
    Iv seen    First time im review a game. Iv only played MultyPlayer yet, thats why i bought it in first place. Let me tell you the first thing, avoid buying this game !
    Im a player since the first ages, playing COD feels like returning to the first Wolfenstein with better graphics. Soldiers seem to be fluctuating, they dont seem realistic not even close and the gameplay suffers with that.
    Iv seen alot of games, played a few, if you want to use multiplayer in the PC version, avoid buying. I dont know if BF4 is better, i played the Beta and it felt the same.
    COD Ghost is a Beta game that will be forever beta im sure, even correcting some things i dont think they will be correcting the big picture of the problem.
    Another thing, i felt nausea's playing COD Ghosts, its because of the FOV being to low, its ridiculous never had this problem with a game.
    I would love to have my money back    … Expand
  11. omaifkngod
    Nov 8, 2013
    2
    BO2 was my first attempt in the COD series, and I loved every minute of it. Fast forward a year later, and I'm dying to play Ghosts. Due to money and time issues, I chose Ghosts over BF4 and GTA. What a huge mistake. Really disappointing. Mouse sensitivity issues, game crashes, in-game sounds not balanced etc. Last COD i will ever play.
  12. SuperGrover
    Nov 9, 2013
    2
    We were promised dedicated servers, instead we got peer to peer this seems nothing more than MW3 with a pretty wrapper over it. And by the 4th day, the same hackers who were around in MW3 are back, standing in the middle of the map getting head-shot after head-shot, with scores like 38 for 0 and there is nothing anyone can do about it. Hackers and lag. This game is intrinsically broken.
  13. samahl
    Nov 12, 2013
    2
    Sure the action is there with cliche moments and more explosions than the all Hollywood actions movie ever made combined, but we have seen it before.

    A step back and could easily be a DLC instead of a independent game.
  14. StarGame1994
    Nov 12, 2013
    2
    Do not like! The same thing every year! Once the dog out of the new, the rest is all the same thing that we saw back in 2007, in Modern Warfare 1. I even encountered a feeling that the graphics and everything else in the first Modern Warfare better than in ghosts. 2 points only because I once loved this series until it has slipped to the so-called pipeline. That's my opinion.
    P.S. Errors    Do not like! The same thing every year! Once the dog out of the new, the rest is all the same thing that we saw back in 2007, in Modern Warfare 1. I even encountered a feeling that the graphics and everything else in the first Modern Warfare better than in ghosts. 2 points only because I once loved this series until it has slipped to the so-called pipeline. That's my opinion.
    P.S. Errors certainly clear that I am Russian, but in spite of them, I really wanted to express their discontent.    … Expand
  15. daiv156
    Nov 12, 2013
    2
    This game is horrible.You need 6GB RAM over 30GB hard disk and DirectX11 cards and other things.Bad multiplayer,bad singleplayer. infinity ward CoD=SSDF(Same Different Year)
  16. SILENTBOB
    Nov 15, 2013
    2
    Activision release a beta game to the market.

    The multi-player on this game is a mess. To get it working correctly the use of 3rd party plugin's is required, but by using these plugins you will run the risk of your account being banned. This is supposed to be a next gen game but it doesn't support sli. Even the steam overlay is not recommended with this game. Takes another    Activision release a beta game to the market.

    The multi-player on this game is a mess. To get it working correctly the use of 3rd party plugin's is required, but by using these plugins you will run the risk of your account being banned.

    This is supposed to be a next gen game but it doesn't support sli. Even the steam overlay is not recommended with this game. Takes another multi-player aspect away from a bad game.Theres that many things wrong or broke in the game that the 5000 max letters wouldn't be enough.

    In its current state avoid the PC version of the game.

    Cons    … Expand
  17. Zabre
    Nov 15, 2013
    2
    The game does a great job!... of doing the same thing with the Cod 4 engine that IW did with the other CoD games. Disgustingly bad singleplayer paired with poor graphics and too much of an emphasis on multiplayer make this game an obvious miss for those looking for a truly good time.
  18. Kanaric
    Nov 15, 2013
    2
    If anyone waited for this game to be the "last chance" they held on too long and cant be taken seriously. Expected release from CoD for any objective gamer. Expected meaning it is terrible.
  19. trollkorv
    Nov 16, 2013
    2
    Worst game in the series. We're not here for innovation but one does expect some quality to a title like this. Graphics are very poorly optimised, sound is way, way uglier than its predecessors and level design is uninspired. Don't even ask about the story of the single player campaign. Everything feels worse than the last time around. They've actually made it worse! How clueless can aWorst game in the series. We're not here for innovation but one does expect some quality to a title like this. Graphics are very poorly optimised, sound is way, way uglier than its predecessors and level design is uninspired. Don't even ask about the story of the single player campaign. Everything feels worse than the last time around. They've actually made it worse! How clueless can a studio be. MW2 is better than MW3 is better than Ghosts. Infinity Ward is apparently a worthless studio without West and Zampella. A big waste of money this is.… Expand
  20. woofwoof
    Nov 18, 2013
    2
    I started off excited about the new COD, but this game is so bad, it's hard to know how to start the review.
    This game does not run properly, even on a high end system. It crashes frequently, freezing up the pc completely. Also there is micro-stutter all the time. The FPS keeps dropping extremely low. The graphics looks dated and the textures are very, very bad. The fov is extremely    I started off excited about the new COD, but this game is so bad, it's hard to know how to start the review.
    This game does not run properly, even on a high end system. It crashes frequently, freezing up the pc completely. Also there is micro-stutter all the time. The FPS keeps dropping extremely low. The graphics looks dated and the textures are very, very bad. The fov is extremely small and likely to induce motion sickness, which actually happened to a friend of mine.

    The gameplay also has huge problems. The flinch is extremely strong and the weapons are overpowered. This means that the first person to hit the target will win every duel, and you will die without a chance to react, over and over again. Because there are no dedicated servers and huge ping differences, combining with the op weapons, playing is extremely frustrating.

    The character customization is ridiculously complicated. To unlock challenges you have to have "operations" active, which means that you will take years unlocking challenges you would have otherwise completed many times. What kind of imbecile came up with that idea? And of course there is widespread hacking. Here in Europe there are now hackers, not just wallhackers, but aimbotters in almost every other game and nothing is being done about it. I bought every COD, but this is the last one. I hope this review can change someones mind about buying this game. If they lose most of their PC customers Activision would care enough to start fixing the issues, but I doubt it. Uninstalling.    … Expand
  21. Rapapara
    Nov 21, 2013
    2
    I love this game it is so awesome, great optimalization great gameplay i can feel next gen just looking at it, epic upgrades and other stuff

    nah just kidding same as 5 last parts of the series 2/10
  22. kwilks3
    Nov 21, 2013
    2
    This game is garbage. Horribly optimized, no dedicated servers like promised(yes, another P2P matchmaking system), and the spawn system puts you in the middle of the opposing team. Graphics are average at best. Like others have said, they took a few steps back with this one. Even the weapons sound like toys. I'm glad I only bought the game, and not the map packs. This will be the last CODThis game is garbage. Horribly optimized, no dedicated servers like promised(yes, another P2P matchmaking system), and the spawn system puts you in the middle of the opposing team. Graphics are average at best. Like others have said, they took a few steps back with this one. Even the weapons sound like toys. I'm glad I only bought the game, and not the map packs. This will be the last COD from infinity ward I buy. I should have learned my lesson from MW3. Black Ops 2 is way better.

    BTW, all the game modes are available in core mode, but in hardcore you only get 3. Very F'n lame IW!. And you can't use the "Free Fall" map in hardcore either as of now.

    The only i'll give this game is that the maps are very nice, but that's all this game gets from me. Over powered dogs and your typical crappy lag compensation makes this game almost unplayable. Even high end PC's struggle to play this game evenly at normal settings.

    Activision, Infinity Ward, I give you two middle fingers ,,l,,(-_-),,l,, for putting out this garbage you call a game. You have officially ruined the COD franchise in my eyes.    … Expand
  23. NavyAlphaGamer
    Nov 23, 2013
    2
    God awful PC port. Multi-player is nothing new. Single-player is the same OVER-THE-TOP story. If the this is Call of Duty's ''Next Gen'' game, then Battlefield has nothing to worry about. Don't waste your time with this game, especially the PC version.
  24. The_true_critic
    Nov 24, 2013
    2
    Here it goes. Call of Duty: Ghosts, maybe good, maybe bad, is it a remake or a ressurect. Well my critic is final and on my honest opinion this is one of the worst remakes I've ever seen. Past-gen graphics, horrible gameplay, nothing new compared to the versions before, it's just painfully repeated. I'm only giving a 2 because the development team worked hard copying the 3d models. I'mHere it goes. Call of Duty: Ghosts, maybe good, maybe bad, is it a remake or a ressurect. Well my critic is final and on my honest opinion this is one of the worst remakes I've ever seen. Past-gen graphics, horrible gameplay, nothing new compared to the versions before, it's just painfully repeated. I'm only giving a 2 because the development team worked hard copying the 3d models. I'm not going to buy your game until the 9 years old go away, the story becomes interesting, and the game becomes cheaper.… Expand
  25. Gamer70
    Dec 6, 2013
    2
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This game is a crap-optimized, otherwise it would not be bad, shame on you IW!The next idiot who will give money out of it!The graphics are a step backward from previous parts!The PC community has not been watching nothing!… Expand
  26. BRBullet
    Dec 13, 2013
    2
    This game is terrible, the whole look of the game is grey and boring. its not optimized and even the main menu is laggy. I have a great pc witch can run anything 1000 times better than this crap.

    The only thing ''ok'' in this game are the maps, nothing more than ''ok''. The rest of the game is plain Im very sad over the money i paid for this crap. The new unlocking system is very    This game is terrible, the whole look of the game is grey and boring. its not optimized and even the main menu is laggy. I have a great pc witch can run anything 1000 times better than this crap.

    The only thing ''ok'' in this game are the maps, nothing more than ''ok''. The rest of the game is plain Im very sad over the money i paid for this crap. The new unlocking system is very boring and slow. THIS GAME IS NOT FUN, IT IS COPY PASTE. This is no joke, its plain BORING and LAGGY.    … Expand
  27. insyncgamer
    Dec 29, 2013
    2
    Ok so I already reviewed this game and originally gave it a 1 as my first impressions warranted that. I have spent the last few days playing (all night I might add) as I couldn't figure out what it was I was doing wrong to get so many deaths. Now I am not a great COD player but on Blops 2 I'll rarely go neg but Ghosts was just fishy I was getting killed so much.

    I do still stand on my    Ok so I already reviewed this game and originally gave it a 1 as my first impressions warranted that. I have spent the last few days playing (all night I might add) as I couldn't figure out what it was I was doing wrong to get so many deaths. Now I am not a great COD player but on Blops 2 I'll rarely go neg but Ghosts was just fishy I was getting killed so much.

    I do still stand on my point that it is not next gen but it is an improvement ie we have prettier maps albeit not up to par of what other games have and are doing. Super fast reactions as well as a good knowledge of maps seem to be extremely important in doing well. Staying together as a team also seems to work well.

    I from my experience have had more then just a handful of games/deaths where I'm almost certain aimbots and other hacks are being used. This is not a small problem but quite common compared to Black Ops where I didnt have consistent problems.

    I feel this game actively promotes camping with way too many little corners which allow people to hide with nothing but one point to aim at. Now I know there is always a corner in COD maps which can be abused but were talking not one two or three but multiples on every map.

    When I first heard about bigger maps I thought great. That was until I played on them and found that the action would be miles away with no enemies in sights. Until next minutes when there everywhere and I get killed 3 times in a row.

    Onto my last point as I could go on forever but the spawn system is not just bad, terrible but flawed from the very ground up. If you cannot implement a system where by you are not within line of sight and xx metres from a opposite teams player them you should not have released the game. I couldn't believe it when I saw them advertising a DLC map pack after how terrible this game currently and most likely always will be. We should get the DLC for free. Do you actually expect us to buy a DLC after the countless lies. No quick-scoping lie, we'll fix things LIE (you clearly carried on working on DLCs).

    In the future all I can say is I should of listened to the warnings if you can only choose one game to buy my advice is do not buy this one. In all seriousness either buy Black Ops 2 or just wait until the best COD producer Treyarch does next Novembers release. I have faith they will give us what WE want not fish and dog ai that no one cares about.

    I loved COD and IW you have got so big headed that it has blown right up in your face this time when if you had just listened to what your fans said you would of at least made an average game as creativity is not something you do well.

    Revised from 1 to 2 only due to the MP having a few nice new bits and bobs but nothing worth more then a £12 DLC    … Expand
  28. Driftic
    Jan 6, 2014
    2
    This game is a clone to all the other modern warfare games. The PC version is practically unplayable due to the amount of bugs and almost non existent optimisation. The singleplayer story made me question humanity as a species because of how stupid it is. Dont buy this game unless you want to torture somebody.
  29. Darklion24
    Jan 10, 2014
    2
    i bought this game for 120$ via steam, once installed, the single player have a lag on the welcome screen, when tried to play MP the game is totally lag, I have 16GB RAM, R9280XOC, 1100T AMD, 8MB UP 3MB Down Internet , im fan of this game since Mw but i feel i loose my money with this, I prefeer to play MW3 and MW2 instead this, i can play BF4 and other games without problems... Pleasei bought this game for 120$ via steam, once installed, the single player have a lag on the welcome screen, when tried to play MP the game is totally lag, I have 16GB RAM, R9280XOC, 1100T AMD, 8MB UP 3MB Down Internet , im fan of this game since Mw but i feel i loose my money with this, I prefeer to play MW3 and MW2 instead this, i can play BF4 and other games without problems... Please dont buy this game.… Expand
  30. SenorCocainum
    Jan 12, 2014
    2
    The Call Of Duty games are really just the same, every new game has the same weapons as the game prior but look slightly different and adding one or two more perks. When this game was announced it was said to be the pinnacle of the franchise, that this was the best one. However, I found this game to be the biggest anti-climax ever. After all the hype, all of the waiting, we finally gotThe Call Of Duty games are really just the same, every new game has the same weapons as the game prior but look slightly different and adding one or two more perks. When this game was announced it was said to be the pinnacle of the franchise, that this was the best one. However, I found this game to be the biggest anti-climax ever. After all the hype, all of the waiting, we finally got presented with possibly one of the worst games in the franchise. It's graphics are terrible and the PC port was downright awful. As always, no thought was put into the story line and all focus was put into the multiplayer. Also it seemed that Activison was observing Treyarch and decided to put their own version of Zombies into the game. This however turned out to be terrible to as it didn't contain a lot of content and became boring seeing the same enemy 50 times every wave. It seems Activision didn't put a lot of time into this and wanted it out before the fanboys got too hectic. Maybe further updates can resolve these problems but for now, I recommend you don't buy it.… Expand
  31. Hunnoycombe
    Jan 21, 2014
    2
    This game is BOLLOCKS...
    Buy it to show non gamers how bad this **** can get, then get em' FEZ or something.
    The one reason I'm giving it more than 0 is the alien mode, witch is not so much super fun as a break from badly textured zombies.
  32. TIE_Breaker
    May 4, 2014
    2
    Let's face it. Modern Warfare was an awesome game. In fact, MW1 was so great that they continued the series with World at War. After another big success, we got a second MW2. All of these were so big that they took the Modern Warfare ones and duplicated them enough to make 4 "sequels," with one new release every year. In the big move to Next-Gen consoles, what do we get? Nothing. ILet's face it. Modern Warfare was an awesome game. In fact, MW1 was so great that they continued the series with World at War. After another big success, we got a second MW2. All of these were so big that they took the Modern Warfare ones and duplicated them enough to make 4 "sequels," with one new release every year. In the big move to Next-Gen consoles, what do we get? Nothing. I seriously took this game and checked in across from MW2, and to be honest, it looks like some really popular modder's "MW2 Advanced." It seriously doesn't even have enough changes to it to make it a great sequel. Speaking of which, has anyone heard of "CoD: Advanced Warfare?" It's already queued for release in November.

    Aside from that, the port is awful. It's clunky, it's badly optimized, it takes 40 GB of space (enough to install 3 Total War games and Battlefront II), and it still has bad graphics. It's just a bad game in general.

    Why does it not have a flat-out zero? It got one point because I really liked CoD 1-5, and even 6 a little bit. It also got one more point because they're not the only ones doing this. They're following suit with Battlefield, and even Assassin's Creed and Dead Space now. The fact that we find more from independent developers than we do AAA is just all around a horrible thing. No thank you, Infinity Ward.    … Expand
  33. TheColonel123
    Feb 20, 2014
    2
    Dont listen to IGN or any other **** reviewer's, They were bribed into giving it good scores. Call of duty is not only a step back in CoD, (a **** franchise) but is infact a step-back in gaming itself. Alongside other CoD games. Heres the decision: Get yourself a DOS PC and a copy of Doom, or buy a peice of **** shoved in a box called "Call of duty". **** THIS GAME
  34. re1tar
    Feb 24, 2014
    2
    ///Sorry for bad english/// the worst part COD what I played ,the graphics on the level MW3 and requirements4 gb video ram 8 **** SERIOUSLY? the worst multiplayer I've seen in the last 5 years , single company generally crap and should this miracle 29$ **** you in your ass ,go and play BF4 i rate 0 of 2.5 for graphics(requirements/image) , 0 of 2.5 for campany , 1 of 2.5 multiplayer and///Sorry for bad english/// the worst part COD what I played ,the graphics on the level MW3 and requirements4 gb video ram 8 **** SERIOUSLY? the worst multiplayer I've seen in the last 5 years , single company generally crap and should this miracle 29$ **** you in your ass ,go and play BF4 i rate 0 of 2.5 for graphics(requirements/image) , 0 of 2.5 for campany , 1 of 2.5 multiplayer and 1 of 2.5 for atmosphere 1 of 10 totaly **** Not recommended!!!… Expand
  35. Nemesis30
    Feb 25, 2014
    2
    This 2 goes very seriously. I've been playing video-games for 11 years, and I've played about 110-120 video-games. I'm very proud to say this is the worst game I've ever played.

    About the technical section, considering the year and the generation, it's one of the worst games ever created. An AAA game worst than indie games... unbelievable. Gameplay? It's more s***play. I could play    This 2 goes very seriously. I've been playing video-games for 11 years, and I've played about 110-120 video-games. I'm very proud to say this is the worst game I've ever played.

    About the technical section, considering the year and the generation, it's one of the worst games ever created. An AAA game worst than indie games... unbelievable.

    Gameplay? It's more s***play. I could play about 5 minutes without get bored. I suffered a lot trying to finish the campaign (it was impossible, because I'm not a masochist) and the multiplayer modes are just more junk.    … Expand
  36. NutZdk
    Aug 28, 2014
    2
    This is a new low for the COD games, the quality has been steadily decreasing ever since Modern Warfare 1. The difference between normal and hardcore gamemode has been lowered to a point where it doesnt seem like there is any difference anymore.
    The whole feel of the game - gunplay and movement especially feels cheap and rushed, which again is about what you can expect from a yearly no    This is a new low for the COD games, the quality has been steadily decreasing ever since Modern Warfare 1. The difference between normal and hardcore gamemode has been lowered to a point where it doesnt seem like there is any difference anymore.
    The whole feel of the game - gunplay and movement especially feels cheap and rushed, which again is about what you can expect from a yearly no effort production.
    On a positive note the singleplayer campaign is actually worth playing, which I dont think could be said about Modern Warfare 3.
    Im sure this wreck of a multiplayer experience has scared off enough players from getting another CoD game for a while. Myself included!    … Expand
  37. pahammer
    Mar 12, 2014
    2
    Positively the last CoD game I will buy. What a waste. There is nothing new here since Black Ops 2 disappointed me. I still go back to the original Black ops as the pick of the litter.
  38. CarM21
    Apr 12, 2014
    2
    The story is intriguing but ends on a terrible cliffhanger,the multiplayer is broken and how people can view this as better than Halo or Battlefield is beyond reason.The only reason Activision continues this series is that its an annual source of money.Dont buy it,consider other games like this.
  39. Bondon45
    Apr 16, 2014
    2
    Main Problem: Maps are not as fun; too big and no UAV's
    Story was never as good as the black ops ones
    No options for buying indavidual maps for extinction instead of all the other useless maps
    Overpriced Weapon, Camos and character DLCs
    Michael Myers and Predator? What next? David Hasselhoff?

    Overall rating: 2/10 because you can slide and there are explosions in one of the levels
  40. SomaliJihadiDak
    May 25, 2014
    2
    10/10 like skyrim with guns, this movie made me feel true europhia, I went to the movies wearing my fedora and the movie was that good that my fedora went flipping across room, and I started pissing mountain jew, I shat my pants so hard that allah knocked down the cinema walls and started screaming "allahu ackbar" until my gonads started bleeding and my neckbeard fell off.
    This movie is    10/10 like skyrim with guns, this movie made me feel true europhia, I went to the movies wearing my fedora and the movie was that good that my fedora went flipping across room, and I started pissing mountain jew, I shat my pants so hard that allah knocked down the cinema walls and started screaming "allahu ackbar" until my gonads started bleeding and my neckbeard fell off.
    This movie is so great, that all my jihadi friends went down to the cafe and spread the word using bombs, the meaning of life, is that if you allahu ackbar without the guidance of allah and true euphoria you will go to xX420HELLYOLO69Xx
    So overall, I give this fantastic euphoric adventure, 10/10, like somalia with furry arabic suicice bombers. this got me so hard that my dick burst.    … Expand
  41. Glitshy
    Jun 17, 2016
    2
    CoD, a franchise wich bocomes more bad after every year, always the same with a few "new" things wich make everything worse. JUST DON'T BUY IT OR THE SEQUEL!
  42. ccam
    Mar 7, 2015
    2
    This game is a copy & past of previous CoD's

    Nothing new respect the previous titles. The dog (which supposed to be something new) appear just few times and is not relevant character at all.

    Need super good PC in order to play with medium graphics settings.
    I do not recommend this game.
  43. Taylord99
    Aug 15, 2018
    2
    Just a watered down re-skin of MW3 with a godawful story and a stale multiplayer mode. Don't waste your time on this one.
  44. stilgar1984
    Nov 6, 2013
    1
    Graphically weak, with a short and predictable campaign.

    The multiplayer part is completely ruined by the so called lag compensation, which shall make you lag in every "server" (btw, there are NO dedicated servers), even if you have a top-notch connection.

    This games sucks, and does it very badly
  45. Sinster
    Nov 28, 2013
    1
    This game for PC isn't worth pirating. What a pile of steaming Don't let the TV commercial fool you with 10 out of 10 ratings. It might be that on a console, but this game is far from a 10 on a PC. It's more of a 1. If you have to have the game wait until it's in the 5.99 bin.. even then it's too much.

    Pro- Nothing Con's Everything -Graphics are 2005 -Sound isn't great    This game for PC isn't worth pirating. What a pile of steaming Don't let the TV commercial fool you with 10 out of 10 ratings. It might be that on a console, but this game is far from a 10 on a PC. It's more of a 1. If you have to have the game wait until it's in the 5.99 bin.. even then it's too much.

    Pro- Nothing

    Con's Everything
    -Graphics are 2005
    -Sound isn't great
    -Video lag, Audio Lag from the hooter to the tooter.

    My system can handle on high/ultra settings.
    -Farcry 3 check
    -Crysis 2 check
    -Battlefied 3/4 check
    -COD: BLOPS/BLOPSII check
    -Borderlands 2 check
    -Bioshock Infinity check
    -COD: GHOST runs like crap and barely playable. WTF!!!!!!

    My specs
    AMD 8350FX
    AMD 2 X 6970 in crossfire
    GSkill 16 GB RAm
    X-Fi Titatium    … Expand
  46. Salvaje9
    Nov 10, 2013
    1
    After cod 4 this series has been getting worst with every release, they want to force the console limitations on the PC, no dedicated servers, no mod tools, they should cancel this for pc.
  47. karmasleeper
    Nov 5, 2013
    1
    4gb of RAM user here. I had to get a crack from some Russian kid to play SP. SP is your typical follow this NPC and do whatever he tells you uninspired crap. Set pieces look neat but 6gb of RAM? Nothing I have seen so far justifies this system requirement. Can't play MP but it's probably not that terrible. Battlefield 4 is a game with larger maps, dynamic destruction, vehicles, more4gb of RAM user here. I had to get a crack from some Russian kid to play SP. SP is your typical follow this NPC and do whatever he tells you uninspired crap. Set pieces look neat but 6gb of RAM? Nothing I have seen so far justifies this system requirement. Can't play MP but it's probably not that terrible. Battlefield 4 is a game with larger maps, dynamic destruction, vehicles, more players on screen at any given time, better animations, and only requires 4gb of RAM. Last Call of Duty I buy.… Expand
  48. necrom33
    Nov 25, 2013
    1
    Mediocre graphics, stupid plot, short campaign. I am having a hard time thinking of the POSITIVE things to say about this game. Infinity Ward should be removed as the developer of the next CoD game. Because there WILL be a next CoD game. At this point, for this franchise, money matters more than quality. And Ghosts seems to have made a of it.

    Too often the missions in the single    Mediocre graphics, stupid plot, short campaign. I am having a hard time thinking of the POSITIVE things to say about this game. Infinity Ward should be removed as the developer of the next CoD game. Because there WILL be a next CoD game. At this point, for this franchise, money matters more than quality. And Ghosts seems to have made a of it.

    Too often the missions in the single player started with "shhhh... or something to that effect. The problem is that I did not purchase a stealth game. There are much better stealth franchises out there, if that is what I wanted to play. When we are inevitably discovered, it became a by-the-numbers run to the exit, or hatch, or helicopter, or tank... whichever.

    And by the way: these have to be the loudest 'ghosts' ever.

    Riley the gimmick (sorry, the dog) is an afterthought for the most part. As a matter of fact, there seem to be only two characters that you develop any kind of emotional response to and they are not Riley or the brothers.

    In an era that is producing games like Grand Theft Auto 5, Bioshock Infinite and FarCry 3, just to name a few, it IS possible to produce quality and sales in sequels. Activision seems to have given up on quality for this franchise if the evidence is the last two games they have thrown out: Black Ops II and Ghosts. Both are a case of slapping some explosions together, throwing in some Multiplayer maps and putting 'Call of Duty in front of whatever is this game's name and out the door it goes. Then they sit by the register and wait for us, the stupid people, to dish out the money for it. We do it, even though sometimes we are questioning if this one is going to be any good.

    The only reason I still play is because of the people I play with, but it may now be time to catch up on games I missed previously like Batman Origins or Splinter Cell Blacklist.

    If you work hard for your money, save some of it and pass on this turkey. Or, at the very least, wait for the first price drop. At the rate people are leaving the Multiplayer, you will not have to wait long.    … Expand
  49. Cadder
    Dec 7, 2013
    1
    At the begining i was optymistic but after playing for a longer period of time i have to say this game is trash. Graphics didnt imrpove much, texture quality is a distater and generally its pathetic compared to other AAA Games. On the other hand requirements increased rapidly and new CoD is requiring Intel Quad Core GPU like Geforce gtx770 in order to get constant 60fps on high settingsAt the begining i was optymistic but after playing for a longer period of time i have to say this game is trash. Graphics didnt imrpove much, texture quality is a distater and generally its pathetic compared to other AAA Games. On the other hand requirements increased rapidly and new CoD is requiring Intel Quad Core GPU like Geforce gtx770 in order to get constant 60fps on high settings there is plenty of frame drops and stuttering without any good reason[ high settings in cod is worse then lowest in bf4]. there is no FOV slider in game for pc players LOL-Multiplayer: Few interesting maps, more of them are just bad with enemies spawing behind you, or with camping spots. Players camp all the time and know there is now UAV or SAT to spot them... so expect camper in every window and in every corner. Gunplay is idiotic, weapons have bigger side to side recoil then up/down. CoD even mw3 were quite fun to play cause there was a lot of run&gun jumping etc. Now its more static and i guess players are forced to camp. There are not many weapons to play with, there is no server browserm only dumb p2p matchmaking[ or dedicated matchmaking], CoD Cinema was completely removed so now you cant watch your replays or check if someone was a cheat or he jus had been a pro. For me it looks like a lazy work.
    SinglePlayer- I had some fun but its not as fun as mw trilogy or blackopses and i bought this game for MP.
    Extinction- There are plenty of COOP games for few bucks, this mode is compared to them. Its just boring and pointless.
    In Conclusion- Dont buy this game. Maybe if people stop buying unfinished or just bad game then devs and their publishers will try harded to deliver a proper entartaining product. For now Activision is focused only on and they dont care about players there is no FOV slider in game for pc players-    … Expand
  50. mbbird
    Nov 13, 2013
    1
    Amazingly, the Call of Duty devs have managed to take one step backwards yet again. It's a repetitive, rehashed, recycled, badly written, downright ugly piece of work that is a laughable excuse for it's self-proclaimed "next generation" video game title.
  51. xargon
    Nov 10, 2013
    1
    A total disaster. Poorly made. Its the worst of the all COD parts. Game stutters all the way (even after patch). Its totally unplayable. They said there will be dedicated servers, and they lied to us (host system is the same as in MW2 and MW3). Don't buy it its a waste of money.
  52. Spikey
    Dec 8, 2013
    1
    This could have been a great follow on to the last CoD game, but sadly it's been a rushed affair, probably to steal some Battlefield 4 thunder. I bought both. As a small mapped 'Run and Gun' it's ok, but is let down by some terrible errors. 1. It's Peer to Peer (P2P). WTF were they thinking when trying that? (again). For PC players its does not work. Lag is common and you get theThis could have been a great follow on to the last CoD game, but sadly it's been a rushed affair, probably to steal some Battlefield 4 thunder. I bought both. As a small mapped 'Run and Gun' it's ok, but is let down by some terrible errors. 1. It's Peer to Peer (P2P). WTF were they thinking when trying that? (again). For PC players its does not work. Lag is common and you get the feeling of juddering around. You cannot tell who it was as there is NO ping meter (guess we know why...). 2. The Field of View (FoV) is set at the console 65 degrees. Really? Every other PC game including the CoD ones use 90 degrees and up! If your'e wondering who shot you, its the guy next to you juuust out of sight. 3. Sound is average, with no spacial awareness. 4. Four DVD's to install this game? over 65 Gig? It also takes an age to load. How rushed were the programmers to deliver this mess? When you look at 30 gig in BF4 and what you get you wonder what what kind of (finance) deadline they were put on. All things considered, unless the above is solved in the future, its the last CoD game I'll buy. Think of that Activision, you greedy tw@ts.… Expand
  53. Shinigami_UA
    Nov 5, 2013
    1
    Please remember: Black Ops and Ghosts are made by different companies! Its correct to compare Ghosts to Modern Warfare series, while Black Ops were made by same company as World at War and some previous CODs. This game may have all the bugs and sad things that MW2/3 had as its made by same people, same company, and often same mistakes were made (which makes the game so damn terrible).
  54. Skitterin
    Nov 6, 2013
    1
    Another copy and paste, yearly release from activision. Go look at youtube under the title "Call of Duty: Ghosts Copy & Paste Modern Warfare 2 Ending" and you will see just what you're in for with the next installment of this increasingly lazy game franchise.

    The only reason this series makes $1 Billion in 24 hours is because of Console Fanboys who would buy the game regardless of the    Another copy and paste, yearly release from activision. Go look at youtube under the title "Call of Duty: Ghosts Copy & Paste Modern Warfare 2 Ending" and you will see just what you're in for with the next installment of this increasingly lazy game franchise.

    The only reason this series makes $1 Billion in 24 hours is because of Console Fanboys who would buy the game regardless of the circumstances.    … Expand
  55. ozorxoron
    Nov 7, 2013
    1
    I can actually say without a doubt that this is the worst game I've played this generation of gaming. This is not next-gen, this isn't even up to par with current gen titles, this is an embarrassment.

    This is a poorly optimized, poorly designed, poorly written game with no redeeming qualities. This game is literally selling on its title alone, I can not imagine anyone will actually    I can actually say without a doubt that this is the worst game I've played this generation of gaming. This is not next-gen, this isn't even up to par with current gen titles, this is an embarrassment.

    This is a poorly optimized, poorly designed, poorly written game with no redeeming qualities. This game is literally selling on its title alone, I can not imagine anyone will actually recommend this game because they've enjoyed their time with it.

    Admittedly I haven't played the console versions, but the PC port is practically broken in its current state. Crashes, frame drops, lag, stuttering and clunky controls. This is what you can expect from this game. Not to mention this isn't even a high demanding game, for shame Activision, for shame.    … Expand
  56. eccentrik
    Jan 2, 2014
    1
    I usually somewhat enjoy the COD series, not a hater but I don't have my tongue up Activision's ass either. I didn't care for Black Ops II and heard horrible things about Ghosts but I thought I'd give it the benefit of the doubt and go ahead and get it on sale. Shame on me for thinking that! What a complete steaming pile of retched garbage. Atrocious optimization for PC, single player isI usually somewhat enjoy the COD series, not a hater but I don't have my tongue up Activision's ass either. I didn't care for Black Ops II and heard horrible things about Ghosts but I thought I'd give it the benefit of the doubt and go ahead and get it on sale. Shame on me for thinking that! What a complete steaming pile of retched garbage. Atrocious optimization for PC, single player is unplayable due to crashes and freezing. (I can't even play five minutes into it.) The cutscenes have audio stuttering. With the amount of money this series makes there is absolutely no excuse for this. How dare they charge me a cent for this alleged "game". I'll never contribute another dime to these thieving fatcat shiesters!… Expand
  57. Reworker
    Nov 12, 2013
    1
    6 Gb RAM?next-gen graphics?I only saw the old boring game play of MV3.In this game there are a couple of interesting game moments. But I do not think that this game is worth the money
  58. MasterAlighieri
    Nov 5, 2013
    1
    I always liked the CoD games. I knew they never were fresh or creative but the multiplayer part just worked well. So really liked BOPsII and was looking forward to the multiplayer part in ghosts.

    But this game is just a shame. Performance vise its terrible. It looks like a bumped up MW2 but how the hell does this need triple the hardware to run smoothly (if only it would....)? It has    I always liked the CoD games. I knew they never were fresh or creative but the multiplayer part just worked well. So really liked BOPsII and was looking forward to the multiplayer part in ghosts.

    But this game is just a shame. Performance vise its terrible. It looks like a bumped up MW2 but how the hell does this need triple the hardware to run smoothly (if only it would....)? It has all kind of bugs, lag a pathetic single player campaign. This time I bought is and I feel sorry. Next time I won't... I am just glad that I didnt buy any map packs.    … Expand
  59. DustEater
    Nov 5, 2013
    1
    First of all. 1 point is for a cinematic story. Its boring, americanish style action plot without sense etc. But 1 point because its the only one thing which holds the game.

    Rest. Graphic didnt change since first Modern Warfare. Details which are more and more requiring from our PCs are taken from nowhere. Minimum 6GB RAM? Where game uses only 2GB MAX!? Pixels and pixels everywhere.    First of all. 1 point is for a cinematic story. Its boring, americanish style action plot without sense etc. But 1 point because its the only one thing which holds the game.

    Rest. Graphic didnt change since first Modern Warfare. Details which are more and more requiring from our PCs are taken from nowhere. Minimum 6GB RAM? Where game uses only 2GB MAX!? Pixels and pixels everywhere. Even setting textures and map textures resolution to HIGH or EXTRA dont give the effect, still seeing pixels.
    Freezing sound in movie sequences.

    That's how NEXT GEN game should be looking? IW must be kidding.    … Expand
  60. ausgebombt85
    Jun 30, 2014
    1
    One of the most boring games I have ever played. If you, like me, have already experienced (and enjoyed) the Call of Duty franchise from day one, getting excited over Modern Warfare, thinking about the Black Ops series as the most innovative one in the series and then gliding over MW3 as it became formulaic and repetitive, Ghosts will only reaffirm that this series has stalled becoming tooOne of the most boring games I have ever played. If you, like me, have already experienced (and enjoyed) the Call of Duty franchise from day one, getting excited over Modern Warfare, thinking about the Black Ops series as the most innovative one in the series and then gliding over MW3 as it became formulaic and repetitive, Ghosts will only reaffirm that this series has stalled becoming too reliant on the visual spectacle (on which you are merely an observer, since your interaction is limited to shooting up bad guys). The premise was interesting enough, even though the story is as cliché as it comes, but it only requires a couple of levels to become bored to tears to the cheap shots at emotion that the games take with its stunning vistas of destruction and its laughably underdeveloped characters.

    CoD will always have an audience, but my gaming generation (and the couple of ones that have already come after myself) has matured enough out of these games.

    Look up to Wolfenstein: The New Order to see how to really make an engaging, thrilling, excellently paced FPS with superb narrative, acting, soundtrack and characters.    … Expand
  61. crawlord
    May 2, 2014
    1
    I have played and prestige'd on most of this franchises games be it treyarch or infinity ward. I liked part of the campaign of ghosts (the first medal of honor reboot beats it however making you feel like a tier one operator). It gets my 1 . However the regurgitation of minuscule maps , lack of innovation , removal of game modes like sabotage and demolition in multi-player leave this gameI have played and prestige'd on most of this franchises games be it treyarch or infinity ward. I liked part of the campaign of ghosts (the first medal of honor reboot beats it however making you feel like a tier one operator). It gets my 1 . However the regurgitation of minuscule maps , lack of innovation , removal of game modes like sabotage and demolition in multi-player leave this game wanting . For the developers this is a cash cow they have milked too long . I hope gamers starve their revenue until they innovate on future releases.
    EPIC fail COD .. EPIC fail.    … Expand
  62. Riko1590
    Nov 5, 2013
    1
    Just a mediocre game. What is so difficult to make that Call of Duty, who was gorgeous in 20 07? It's hard to say it, but unfortunately for you Activision, Dice you did.
  63. Pityek
    Nov 20, 2013
    1
    Okay, i will try to make this review without knowing that this is a copy paste game! So lets say this is IW's first game: With todays standards it fails big time, the Single Player story is extremly boring, the typical linear go through the pipe game! And may i ask why does the antagonists u sing the EU symbol The graphs is terrible... i mean just look at it, they want to sell it asOkay, i will try to make this review without knowing that this is a copy paste game! So lets say this is IW's first game: With todays standards it fails big time, the Single Player story is extremly boring, the typical linear go through the pipe game! And may i ask why does the antagonists u sing the EU symbol The graphs is terrible... i mean just look at it, they want to sell it as a next gen game?! Please the engine is like idk...... 6-7 years old now and they keep saying that they have worked on this hardly.... Anyway the multiplayer is minimal.... nothing special about it. Just whineing, rageing kids.

    Oh and that dog.. that dog... the based their whole marketing on it..... news flash: dogs are not uncommon in games!

    Wonder when people will wake up and see that Activision keep stealing their money    … Expand
  64. WTFSandman
    Nov 19, 2013
    1
    Single player is the best part of this game, even then its crappy. The multi-player is for consoles, vaulting is crap, being shot after you spawn is too numerous to imagine. IW is far from the best and the worst part is that treyarch is now adapting IW crap into their games. I thought MW3 was bad, i was severely and horrible wrong.If you want to waste your money, this is the game for you.Single player is the best part of this game, even then its crappy. The multi-player is for consoles, vaulting is crap, being shot after you spawn is too numerous to imagine. IW is far from the best and the worst part is that treyarch is now adapting IW crap into their games. I thought MW3 was bad, i was severely and horrible wrong.If you want to waste your money, this is the game for you. Heck i'd play infestation survivor stories before this.… Expand
  65. lord222
    Nov 5, 2013
    1
    The good news concerning Call of Duty Ghosts it is not that kind of as Modern Warfare 3 But that's the only good news. As for the rest it's quite faded game with a very large percentage of repetitions of the previous parts low-quality toy scenes of massive attacks and destructions. In general, up to Black Ops 1-2 infinitely far away. On the engine is completely without tears will notThe good news concerning Call of Duty Ghosts it is not that kind of as Modern Warfare 3 But that's the only good news. As for the rest it's quite faded game with a very large percentage of repetitions of the previous parts low-quality toy scenes of massive attacks and destructions. In general, up to Black Ops 1-2 infinitely far away. On the engine is completely without tears will not look at nextgene only light twirled The most failure it is a plot game again took a few studios and studio frankly these are different in terms of the quality of missions vary directly apparent. It turns out such a huge big- dermozavr hastily cobbled together out of all that is possible and madly while reeking Well the multiplayer is stable for its audience… Expand
  66. Y4nk33
    Jun 8, 2014
    1
    At first I didnt understand people who would complain about the MW series. The storyline was great, the multiplayer was eehhh after 2 but it worked out fine. But this game? It was a total waste of time. 30 gigabyets for what? 3 hours of campaign?Seriously?About the storyline, I think a 5 year old could think of a better one. It`s the same story as the one from the previous only theyAt first I didnt understand people who would complain about the MW series. The storyline was great, the multiplayer was eehhh after 2 but it worked out fine. But this game? It was a total waste of time. 30 gigabyets for what? 3 hours of campaign?Seriously?About the storyline, I think a 5 year old could think of a better one. It`s the same story as the one from the previous only they changed the names. I dont even bother going into multiplayer… Expand
  67. Badrebel
    Nov 8, 2013
    1
    So disappointing!!! Poor graphics, arcade gameplay. Bad storyline and you´ll finish it within 5-6 hours.
    Multiplayer is as everytime very bad. I just can´t tell you who Cod Ghosts needs almost 35 GB Hard Disc Space, it looks like a game from 2009. I´m so disappointed.
  68. crytech
    Nov 10, 2013
    1
    firstly, those who said its the mw3 never played mw3. this game is not like mw3
    it is not its as the mw series. its boring
    the story is not good. it does immerse you in the gameplay. also the guns are weird, boring and they don't make want to firr use them. not great variety of guns also they do not sound like real guns. the sounds like cans hitting togwther even the tank parts sucks.    firstly, those who said its the mw3 never played mw3. this game is not like mw3
    it is not its as the mw series. its boring
    the story is not good. it does immerse you in the gameplay.
    also the guns are weird, boring and they don't make want to firr use them. not great variety of guns also they do not sound like real guns. the sounds like cans hitting togwther
    even the tank parts sucks. they move like little kart cars and yoy do not ecen heard tge engine. voice acting also bad.
    to sum up its garbage. dont buy it.    … Expand
  69. Mbdelta
    Nov 15, 2013
    1
    This game may appeal to Call Of Duty fans who will play any game with that title, but will baffle people who know a good game when they see it. A big step down from Black Ops II.
  70. QueenAndrea
    Apr 30, 2014
    1
    I'll be very honest here and I admit - I did not buy this game. The Internet is a sole reference area of mine.

    User score tells it all. User score does not lie. Every user has the free speech. I cannot do anything more than just agree and rant along with vast majority of users. Think about it this way. Ghosts on PC is a console port (and still terrible despite the patches). A single    I'll be very honest here and I admit - I did not buy this game. The Internet is a sole reference area of mine.

    User score tells it all. User score does not lie. Every user has the free speech. I cannot do anything more than just agree and rant along with vast majority of users. Think about it this way. Ghosts on PC is a console port (and still terrible despite the patches). A single title can be released only once and there's no coming back. Compare this to other CODs since 2007. What changed so far? Is this what next-gen game looks like? Because I think it doesn't.

    Nowadays, Call of Duty is like a widespread cancer. Everyone who became hardcore fan is sentenced for suffering from metastases known as CoD sequels. At least more people get the idea and try to avoid infection.

    "Ain't broke, don't fix it"? - fine, let it be. But I won't be interested.

    Call of Duty. Please change or die.    … Expand
  71. Jadexter
    Nov 10, 2013
    1
    How this game is even credited to the Call of Duty franchise is unbelievable. The performance on PC is absolutely terrible, you have a locked FoV, view bob is by default on and cannot be changed, the game doesn't run with more than 1 Graphics Card and it is not well optimized at all. The game requires 6GB of RAM just to start up, which it definitely doesn't require as the graphics engineHow this game is even credited to the Call of Duty franchise is unbelievable. The performance on PC is absolutely terrible, you have a locked FoV, view bob is by default on and cannot be changed, the game doesn't run with more than 1 Graphics Card and it is not well optimized at all. The game requires 6GB of RAM just to start up, which it definitely doesn't require as the graphics engine is nearly 8 years old now, and there seems to be absolutely no change from the graphics seen in Black Ops 2 or Modern Warfare 3. Gameplay wise it's your average Call of Duty game; set pieces, set pieces, set pieces. The story mode doesn't even need you to take part in some cases, as your AI companions simply clear out all the enemies as you move up, and the clear reskin of the ending to Modern Warfare 2 in the first sequence of the game is just hilariously lazy. Online the game has removed all the core gamemodes such as Search and Destroy and Domination, and gave us what? Cranked. Yep, this that about sums up online. The Extinction game mode is quite simply an attempt to gain players by reskinning the popular Zombies mode from Treyarch games, and it is probably the best part of the game, which is worrying. Activision is clearly only in it for the money now. Don't buy, just get Battlefield 4… Expand
  72. toaddy07
    Mar 9, 2014
    1
    this game is terrible I use to love cod but hear me out fan boys I liked cod but this is wye I hate it first of all look at bf4 it had huge destruction graphic upgrades and it evolved and what did you add sliding and did you ever bother updating your engine no the guns are all the same the players are horrible yet have I gone on a server where people aren't contently swearing or usingthis game is terrible I use to love cod but hear me out fan boys I liked cod but this is wye I hate it first of all look at bf4 it had huge destruction graphic upgrades and it evolved and what did you add sliding and did you ever bother updating your engine no the guns are all the same the players are horrible yet have I gone on a server where people aren't contently swearing or using horrible tactics such as camping dolphin diving and quick scopeing the game makes me say I want my fing money back the install at the beginning seems unnescery and the campaigne bored me to tears and was completely unprofessional the character custom is really low options so wye bother adding Thant honestly cod ghost was rushed and is completely disipointing… Expand
  73. Ravenus
    Nov 5, 2013
    1
    Its the first CoD that i waste My money and time, even that dog wont save it... And multi is all the same that i saw from older titles, customization wont help. I think Im gonna buy BF4...
  74. Grant259
    Feb 27, 2014
    1
    Multiplayer is very laggy, the game just feels badly coded a big disappointment. I waited for the updates and I truly think they made the game even more unplayable. Playing from Asia (Hong Kong) where I now stay is impossible even with the most badass internet connection the game is just to dam laggy and for $59 you know I'm pretty pissed.
  75. Usser
    Nov 7, 2013
    1
    Step back from Black ops 2
    Why ?
    "Next Gen" graphics Dog Animations from MW2 and MW3 Sounds from MW3 And my pc Running Metro last light and BF4 FPS 60 on Very High And this game IS 30 MAX on Mid That bad side And now Good Sides +..... +..... +..... + Multi (That same was in bo2 ) And That is all good sides My Verdict is 1/10 If You want good Campaning and Multi Go buy    Step back from Black ops 2
    Why ?
    "Next Gen" graphics
    Dog
    Animations from MW2 and MW3
    Sounds from MW3
    And my pc
    Running Metro last light and BF4 FPS 60 on Very High
    And this game IS 30 MAX on Mid
    That bad side

    And now Good Sides
    +.....
    +.....
    +.....
    + Multi (That same was in bo2 )
    And That is all good sides
    My Verdict is
    1/10
    If You want good Campaning and Multi
    Go buy Black Ops 2
    You will save money and get a better game    … Expand
  76. BrutalBarracuda
    Nov 5, 2013
    1
    They have removed search and destroy from the public lobbies and replaced it with some lame dog tag variant. Original search and destroy is now ONLY avaliable in private matches! I now have no reason to play this game.
  77. unixuser101
    Nov 8, 2013
    1
    You would have thought 28GB download would have brought down from the digital heavens a game of awesome graphics,game-play, lots of amazing cut scene video and engaging story. If you were like me you would be very disappointed. What did they do with all that download?

    I like to play the Campaign mode first before duke-ing it out with the boys online. Well this time the campaign is the    You would have thought 28GB download would have brought down from the digital heavens a game of awesome graphics,game-play, lots of amazing cut scene video and engaging story. If you were like me you would be very disappointed. What did they do with all that download?

    I like to play the Campaign mode first before duke-ing it out with the boys online. Well this time the campaign is the shortest so far. The story made more sense this time and some of it was fun. But very short. REAL SHAME. Why is the trend in these FPS to ignore the campaign mode.

    As for the game itself there is little to recommend buying it. Graphics are s***! for a 2013 title. I know its a straight port of the console. But I think the console version looks better on my TV then on a good quality 1080P monitor with top notch Nvidia graphics card.

    I reviewed this game based on the campaign mode only. So it might pick up a few more points once I played it online for a bit. I always like COD online. Even if i get my ar$e handed to me on a constant basis.

    If you only had the money to buy Ghosts or BF4 then its a no-brainer. Buy BF4.

    I hope this is a flop so Activision wakes up and dosnt ruin this franchise even more.

    Recommendation DONT BUY until its on 75% discount on Steam.    … Expand
  78. rogerxing0318
    Nov 5, 2013
    1
    I'm a competitive player and cod ghosts is a horrible disaster.
    the net code is broken: death is very quick compared to killcam,
    weapons' damage way too high,
    leveling up way too slow,
    Maps way too big and does not follow traditional 3 lanes,
    and of course all the PC bugs and errors including freezes and crashes,
    SLI results in attachment and environment flashes etc
    DO NOT BUY THIS GAME!!
  79. lochdoggg
    Nov 7, 2013
    1
    This game is terrible, Bad host connections, terrible FPS even with mid to high end computer, the ram required is 6gb while the game only uses 2gb. Maps suck, lowering graphics makes it look terrible, bad spawns. This game needs an update.
  80. SeriousKir
    Jun 8, 2014
    1
    Buy this game, it's like paying cheaters online.Horrable graphics,music,gameplay,characters."Absolutely new game experience"?.F^&u you,activision and Infinity ward!
  81. Mor0
    Nov 6, 2013
    1
    No improved graphics. The multiplayer recycled in 99%, as we expected. Recycling did happen even to singleplayer, it's kind of interesting though. Still sucks.
  82. serp86
    Nov 5, 2013
    1
    For an AAA title this is just stupidly bad Graphics very mediocre for 2013 on PC horrible optimization a story so bad it almost makes Road to Hell Retribution seem intelligent and tons and tons of stupid characters. I was actively rooting against my character and his allies because of how unlikeable they are.

    Worst AAA title in years for SP MP is the only reason to buy it if    For an AAA title this is just stupidly bad Graphics very mediocre for 2013 on PC horrible optimization a story so bad it almost makes Road to Hell Retribution seem intelligent and tons and tons of stupid characters. I was actively rooting against my character and his allies because of how unlikeable they are.

    Worst AAA title in years for SP

    MP is the only reason to buy it if you're a fan of CoD MP but even that is just a new iteration of only things that have been done to death for year.    … Expand
  83. Avodeskorm
    Nov 18, 2013
    1
    What is this trash? It would be considered dead. Oh wait it is dead. It's called ghosts after all. A shadow of it's former self. The only thing improved in this game over the others is the knifing.
  84. Nekromant1666
    Nov 6, 2013
    1
    Graphics 1/10

    Story 5/10

    Gameplay 3/10

    Copy & Paste 9/10

    PR 100/10

    Total 0/10

    Not to relax

    It is especially sad looks copy&paste "The Dark Knight Rises". It is a failure for the series.
    And Activision were going to break the record of GTA 5 LOL LOL LOL
  85. wibaki
    Dec 23, 2013
    1
    Honestly this game is exactly what you expect.Another call of duty game with nothing changed(except maps). What i cant understand is how this game is much heavy.Its even heavier than battlefield 4 playing on 64-player map.Read this party AGAIN.Its true.The game needs better pc than any other game does.I recently bought a 1300$ rig and it still lags in the beginning of the game till itsHonestly this game is exactly what you expect.Another call of duty game with nothing changed(except maps). What i cant understand is how this game is much heavy.Its even heavier than battlefield 4 playing on 64-player map.Read this party AGAIN.Its true.The game needs better pc than any other game does.I recently bought a 1300$ rig and it still lags in the beginning of the game till its open for like 2 mins.But if you enjoy cod games there is nothing changed so you will enjoy this one too.… Expand
  86. haw2991
    Jan 2, 2014
    1
    Ghosts can probably be described as an full step back from Black Ops II and that's putting it lightly. There is no reason to delve into the specifics as most of the other users have already explained it all. This simply is a disappointing and nearly unplayable game.....
  87. Gamesarebetter
    Nov 5, 2013
    1
    This is the worst damn PC port I have ever seen. First of all, the system requirements are ridiculous, what is this 50gb install for? The game constantly stutters even in the menu on high end gaming PCs, Still no dedicated servers, and as you'd expect, lag. The graphics are underwhelming. At least Black Ops 2 had color and a futuristic art style, here its just bland, colorless, and dullThis is the worst damn PC port I have ever seen. First of all, the system requirements are ridiculous, what is this 50gb install for? The game constantly stutters even in the menu on high end gaming PCs, Still no dedicated servers, and as you'd expect, lag. The graphics are underwhelming. At least Black Ops 2 had color and a futuristic art style, here its just bland, colorless, and dull environments accompanied by abysmal textures. I can run Battlefield 3 and 4 at max settings yet when I set this to the lowest settings it still doesn't manage to clock in at 60fps.

    Is there at least a Field of View slider? Of course not! Four Delta One had PC gamer's backs with a FOV slider for Ghosts available on their website, but everyone's favorite publisher, Activision, took it down. Now PC gamers are stuck with 65 FOV and it is making my head hurt. I'm now going to request a refund from Steam. I've been scammed by Activision yet again.    … Expand
  88. soglasen
    Nov 5, 2013
    1
    disappointment of year! is absent sound settings,
    only a loudness scale in the game, sounds very silent but the announcer it is audible very loudly
    the mouse can't be adjusted forcibly there is an acceleration and a curve, game is constructed on detection of the opponent by a radar.
  89. apoe
    Nov 5, 2013
    1
    This is a step back from Black Ops 2 in almost every way. No FoV slider on PC version, or FPS cap setting, both of which were present in BO2. Bugs in MW3 that were addressed in BO2 are now somehow back in Ghosts, for example the random jumps in mouse sensitivity that happen if certain programs are running in the background (such as FRAPs). Theater mode, one of the best features of recentThis is a step back from Black Ops 2 in almost every way. No FoV slider on PC version, or FPS cap setting, both of which were present in BO2. Bugs in MW3 that were addressed in BO2 are now somehow back in Ghosts, for example the random jumps in mouse sensitivity that happen if certain programs are running in the background (such as FRAPs). Theater mode, one of the best features of recent Call of Duty games, has been removed. Optimization wise, my computer runs Battlefield 4 on max settings at higher frame rates than Ghosts. Image quality defaults to 'high', which causes upscaling of resolution like a console game rather than rendering at your chosen resolution. Sound effects sound like they were taken straight from MW3. Sad.… Expand
  90. IAmJakub
    Nov 5, 2013
    1
    I made an account just to post here about this so that no more people fall into this trap. This was my first entry into IW take on CoD after loving CoD:blOp and blOp2...Ghosts is atrocious mess by comparison, utter waste of money, sound frequently drops out or gets choppy, Multiplayer looks horrible and is close to unplayable. The visuals are non existent, if this is what you call next genI made an account just to post here about this so that no more people fall into this trap. This was my first entry into IW take on CoD after loving CoD:blOp and blOp2...Ghosts is atrocious mess by comparison, utter waste of money, sound frequently drops out or gets choppy, Multiplayer looks horrible and is close to unplayable. The visuals are non existent, if this is what you call next gen then I'll sit this one out or any future entries of CoD for that matter. Genuinely feel like asking for a refund. Sad… Expand
  91. candoballs
    Nov 5, 2013
    1
    What a fail of EPIC proportions. Tried to play this game, got a sudden warning I needed to get more RAM! Not only did I have to buy a new laptop for this, it wasn't fun in the slightest (no new improvements on previous entries in the series, all the same old stale run and shoot gameplay) and the game didn't even end up utilizing the full 8GB I have now. What's the deal with that?
  92. amit55
    Nov 5, 2013
    1
    GHOSTS ON PC...My God.. Why did i even bother. This game Runs like BF4 on BETA i have a 560Ti 6GBS Ram. and a i7860 at lease if u run extra quality please don't make me freeze mid map. Im not even using that much power and i doubt that playclaw's overlay is lying. I got this game for free on PC. Audio is Bad. Graphics are not that Impressive and netcode #GGNORE
  93. Moxxij
    Nov 5, 2013
    1
    Gets higher than a 0 simply because the game is capable of running. Beyond that, the graphics feel horrendous why is everything blurry? I've reached out to the community to see if there's a fix, and it seems that this blur is on purpose. FOV is awkward, moving around feels unnatural, and don't get caught in deep water because your character apparently can't swim worth a damn. I'mGets higher than a 0 simply because the game is capable of running. Beyond that, the graphics feel horrendous why is everything blurry? I've reached out to the community to see if there's a fix, and it seems that this blur is on purpose. FOV is awkward, moving around feels unnatural, and don't get caught in deep water because your character apparently can't swim worth a damn. I'm incredibly disappointed because with a game like this, it's expected to be the "same but with some improvements here and there. CoD: Ghost has failed on all fronts.

    Save your money. Skip this disappointment of a game.    … Expand
  94. bops2hardcore
    Nov 5, 2013
    1
    Played MW3 and Bops2 hardcore. Bops2 felt different at first but quickly you realized the gameplay and movement was evolved besides the graphics.
    COD ghost campaign story line is compelling and graphics are ok.
    COD MP is terrible a step back from bops2. High FPS still seems laggy, movement not the same,, maps are small. Definitely developed for consoles to showcase mediocre graphics    Played MW3 and Bops2 hardcore. Bops2 felt different at first but quickly you realized the gameplay and movement was evolved besides the graphics.
    COD ghost campaign story line is compelling and graphics are ok.
    COD MP is terrible a step back from bops2. High FPS still seems laggy, movement not the same,, maps are small. Definitely developed for consoles to showcase mediocre graphics with lighting effects on small maps.
    +1 guns are to be more detailed.    … Expand
  95. ZiMaN
    Nov 5, 2013
    1
    The game looks disgusting, the texture of poor quality, lack of physics (the windows in the houses do not fight, pieces of walls are not crumbling when entering or explosive grenades, and so on), some models are obviously deprived of polygons, the effects look faded, and the game slows down no optimization. System requirements are not comparable to the quality of the game.
  96. Johnix
    Nov 5, 2013
    1
    Call of duty did it again:
    Releasing the same game which naive people will buy again.
    It is a very disappointing game if you played the series for a long time.
    It has almost no innovation at all. The highly praised by the marketing team next gen engine is just a bit prettier than MW3. Single player is decent, but only if you don't get tired of linear map design.
  97. Kymeimei
    Nov 5, 2013
    1
    BF4 had a beta, in the BETA it was obvious that the game ran poorly. The issues were fixed before release. CoD ghosts, it is obvious that the game runs poorly. This product was released to the public Nov 5th and that is what you will receive if you buy this game. In the future AMD and nvidia might fix the problem, but fact is the game was released with the devs knowing it doesn't run wellBF4 had a beta, in the BETA it was obvious that the game ran poorly. The issues were fixed before release. CoD ghosts, it is obvious that the game runs poorly. This product was released to the public Nov 5th and that is what you will receive if you buy this game. In the future AMD and nvidia might fix the problem, but fact is the game was released with the devs knowing it doesn't run well on PC.
    8gb ram EVGA GTX 670 SC Intel 3570k @4.2ghz win 7    … Expand
  98. Sens5555
    Nov 5, 2013
    1
    This game offered NOTHING. Terrible performance! Some People are getting 40 FPS on a GTX TITAN! This is a step back from Black Ops 2. Black Ops 2 even had better graphics. This game makes me feel literally SICK, there is no field of view slider at all. My head literally hurts when I play this pathetic excuse of a game. There is no reason to waste your time or money on this game. DO NOT BUY.
  99. BrumskiGriff
    Nov 5, 2013
    1
    Not only is this the worst Call of Duty game of the series it has to be one of the worst games period.

    It's quite clear that there's no ambition, drive or enthusiasm left in the Call of Duty series and it's clearly been milked dry as a cash making exercise before people simply give up and stop buying regurgitated rubbish. I can't speak for console players but as a PC player since the    Not only is this the worst Call of Duty game of the series it has to be one of the worst games period.

    It's quite clear that there's no ambition, drive or enthusiasm left in the Call of Duty series and it's clearly been milked dry as a cash making exercise before people simply give up and stop buying regurgitated rubbish.

    I can't speak for console players but as a PC player since the early DOS games this is a shameful example of the utter contempt some game developers have for the platform that launched the Call of Duty franchise many years ago.

    I could list all the faults but it's simply not fit for purpose. FPS artificially capped, FOV limited to a ridiculously tiny setting, poor performance on high end systems, sloppy map design, poor gameplay but they all pale into insignificance compared to the fact it's quite simply a really poor game. A game is something to be enjoyed, invoke excitement and something to leave you wanting more. This is anything but that.

    I implore any prospective PC purchaser to walk away.    … Expand
  100. FtPwny
    Nov 5, 2013
    1
    Do not buy this game on PC. IW and Activision lies once again: THERE ARE NO DEDICATED SERVERS. All multiplayer is done on a lobby system as with the previous iterations. The graphics are no better than the previous COD games, but the performance is 3x worse. It lags and stutters even the lobby. There is no FOV slider or anyway to uncap the FPS (capped at 90). If you have a 120/144hzDo not buy this game on PC. IW and Activision lies once again: THERE ARE NO DEDICATED SERVERS. All multiplayer is done on a lobby system as with the previous iterations. The graphics are no better than the previous COD games, but the performance is 3x worse. It lags and stutters even the lobby. There is no FOV slider or anyway to uncap the FPS (capped at 90). If you have a 120/144hz monitor, you will not be able to take full advantage of it due to this (so much for "next gen"). This game is a disgrace to what PC gaming is capable of. Buy Crysis 3, Metro Last Light, and Battlefield 4. Do not pay more than $10 for Call of Duty: Ghosts!… Expand
Page:

Awards & Rankings

9
#9 Most Discussed PC Game of 2013
53
#53 Most Shared PC Game of 2013

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
68

Mixed or average reviews - based on 14 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 5 out of 14
  2. Mixed: 7 out of 14
  3. Negative: 2 out of 14
  1. PC PowerPlay
    Dec 30, 2013
    80
    It's exactly what fans of the franchise have grown to expect. No surprises here, folks. [Jan 2014, p.90]
  2. LEVEL (Czech Republic)
    Nov 25, 2013
    60
    Nothing to see here in terms of innovation: the campaign is dull, the multiplayer fun. But this time, the air of sameness is a little bit too much. [Issue#236]
  3. IncGamers
    Nov 24, 2013
    40
    An utterly horrible PC port mars an otherwise very, very average Call of Duty game. Nothing to see here.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »