Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare

 PC
User Score
4.9

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 1348 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 436 out of 1348
  2. Mixed: 307 out of 1348
  3. Negative: 605 out of 1348
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. dubbel
    Dec 17, 2014
    10
    This game is best, and all haters can go cry plz this game is now super hardcore and cool,!! If somebody says this game is for kids PLOXXX only hater he is
  2. bvenjamin
    Dec 17, 2014
    5
    I haven't played this game but it seems my review will be as informative as all the ones already uploaded.

    upvote if u never want to see a useful review again
  3. Ireland914
    Dec 17, 2014
    7
    This is the most innovative Call of Duty title in years. It plays like a classic arena shooter which is a nice change to the usual gameplay. The graphics are decent and the single player aspect is pretty enjoyable if that's what you're interested in. I buy COD games solely for the multiplayer portion and in this title, I was not disappointed.

    The reason I refrain from giving this game a    This is the most innovative Call of Duty title in years. It plays like a classic arena shooter which is a nice change to the usual gameplay. The graphics are decent and the single player aspect is pretty enjoyable if that's what you're interested in. I buy COD games solely for the multiplayer portion and in this title, I was not disappointed.

    The reason I refrain from giving this game a higher rating is due to the terrible launch it had. Sadly, this is expected for blockbuster titles these days and I find it unacceptable. Performance on launch was horrendous and the lack of dedicated servers is a joke. Poor optimization at time of launch and a missing server browser held this game back from being amazing.    … Expand
  4. the-epikninja
    Dec 17, 2014
    7
    Leaving out the biased comments aside. Everyone, please stop exercising your bigotry and try to make an attempt to play the game before criticizing it's value. I have played the Battlefield franchise for years, which I lean more towards to because of my personal preference when it comes to simulating warfare.

    Thanks to the Steam sale, I was able to give AW a go without hesitation, I    Leaving out the biased comments aside. Everyone, please stop exercising your bigotry and try to make an attempt to play the game before criticizing it's value. I have played the Battlefield franchise for years, which I lean more towards to because of my personal preference when it comes to simulating warfare.

    Thanks to the Steam sale, I was able to give AW a go without hesitation, I admit that I was intrigued when I saw the trailer. Bought it at a lower price to set my expectations and never looked back.

    Honestly, this is coming from a Battlefield 4 player. Advanced Warfare looked absolutely breathtaking with all the fancy DirectX 11 features like Bokeh DOF, Spacial Bloom, Tessellation, NVIDIA exclusive HBAO+ AO, TXAA Anti-Aliasing and Volumetric Rays.
    Supersampling is also an option which I've enjoyed using without much impact on performance.
    Overall, despite the awful plot and tedious linear gameplay on top of its apathetic expositions. Almost forgot to mention the ancient peer to peer multiplayer hosting. AW is a must buy for most seasoned veterans of both franchises.

    7.5/10 Singeplayer
    6/10 Multiplayer    … Expand
  5. sevredox
    Dec 15, 2014
    10
    I have only been playing this game for a few days, but so far this game has exceeded my expectations. I think anyone who was a fan of quake2/quake3 back in the day should give this a go. This is the kind of MP experience I was really hoping for but didn't get from Titanfall when it came out. And I am also happy with how optimized it is for PC (compared to Ghosts). The SP is also a lot ofI have only been playing this game for a few days, but so far this game has exceeded my expectations. I think anyone who was a fan of quake2/quake3 back in the day should give this a go. This is the kind of MP experience I was really hoping for but didn't get from Titanfall when it came out. And I am also happy with how optimized it is for PC (compared to Ghosts). The SP is also a lot of fun for what it is. I mean, so far it is a linear FPS with a fairly predictable plot. I haven't finished it yet, but I'm enjoying it every bit as much as any other COD game I've ever played. Also, for anyone trying to do the Steam Box / HTPC thing, this game has full controller support with Aim assist and everything. Take this review with a grain of salt if you want. I am one of the few people who actually really liked Ghosts as a game, but I refused to write a positive review for it because I felt like PC gamers really got the shaft on that release. But with AW, I get the impression that they really put some effort into the PC version.… Expand
  6. fade3
    Dec 15, 2014
    2
    Having played Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare since its release in 2007, none of the successors have improved over the past years. On the contrary. With the filthy console age we live in, the PC version of Advanced Warfare is a horrible port. 90fps cap, big lag spikes online, ripoff crysis / titanfall exo suit, bad mouse sensitivity adjustment, boring achievement and unlockables. All ofHaving played Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare since its release in 2007, none of the successors have improved over the past years. On the contrary. With the filthy console age we live in, the PC version of Advanced Warfare is a horrible port. 90fps cap, big lag spikes online, ripoff crysis / titanfall exo suit, bad mouse sensitivity adjustment, boring achievement and unlockables. All of this puts this game at a score of 2 / 10. How on earth they came to the conclusion of continuing the non-dedicated server hosting system is beyond my comprehension. This series stopped at COD4:MW, wich is still going strong with its dedicated server and hardcore fanbase.… Expand
  7. M4ximilli4n
    Dec 13, 2014
    9
    I wrote this review because i have played the game 4 times and I have played Call of Duty from Call of Duty 3. Advanced Warfare is offer a very interesting gameplay. So far Advanced Warfare has the best story line but maybe not as good as Black Ops 2 that has a choice feature. But Advanced Warfare still better than any other FPS game in this year. Why I'm giving only 9, because AdvancedI wrote this review because i have played the game 4 times and I have played Call of Duty from Call of Duty 3. Advanced Warfare is offer a very interesting gameplay. So far Advanced Warfare has the best story line but maybe not as good as Black Ops 2 that has a choice feature. But Advanced Warfare still better than any other FPS game in this year. Why I'm giving only 9, because Advanced Warfare single player doesn't have the ability to chose your loadout at the beginning of the mission, and there's a little weapon to chose. But the futuristic world, weapon, tech, and Exoskeleton make the game fun and make player can embrace new tactic at multiplayer. Importantly Call of Duty Advanced Warfare is a game that JUST RELEASED, it age not even reach half a year. So there's still a lot of update and patch that will make the game better. So DON'T JUDGE TO SOON!!! That's all.… Expand
  8. b5001
    Dec 13, 2014
    10
    Love this game everybody thats hates it is just a noob.Because this game is so good now love the flying jumping aspect of it.Its like mw3 on speed.Very good game runs great super fun .Dont believe the haters the game is very good just needs some more dlcs and peeps playing but its not that bad usually there is people playing not like ghosts nobody played sometimes.But I like this game bigLove this game everybody thats hates it is just a noob.Because this game is so good now love the flying jumping aspect of it.Its like mw3 on speed.Very good game runs great super fun .Dont believe the haters the game is very good just needs some more dlcs and peeps playing but its not that bad usually there is people playing not like ghosts nobody played sometimes.But I like this game big improvements and I hope they never get rid of the exo suits and abilities.akimbo is back not as strong but still very good and fun to play.This is the best out there of its kind.… Expand
  9. frankie-Z
    Dec 12, 2014
    0
    poor performance , there is no reason besides just not caring about the consumer that a game of this caliber should run so poorly on a PC , the continued lack of dedicated servers for MP is another reason to stay clear of this mess
  10. ultimadwarf
    Dec 11, 2014
    4
    Great gameplay, really different and interesting style. Horrible PC port.

    I have 8GB 1600Mhz RAM, an i5 4570 and an OCd 280X and can barely play this game on lowest settings at 720p. Horribly optimized.
  11. Nerocz1
    Dec 8, 2014
    8
    Surprisingly great game. I was playing only single player and this game reminded me my favourite movie Elysium and it´s such a fun to play. Give it a try !!!
  12. GabrielSchmidt
    Dec 7, 2014
    8
    Dessa vez o game se passa no ano de 2054, onde a maior força militar mundial pertence a uma corporação privada, cujo o fundador é Jonathan Iron. Depois de ter bases instaladas em quase todos os países, a Atlas quer atacar os EUA, pois a mais de um século que eles vem falhando inúmeras vezes ao tentar instalar democracias em todos os países.
    Antes de começar a falar sobre os modos    Dessa vez o game se passa no ano de 2054, onde a maior força militar mundial pertence a uma corporação privada, cujo o fundador é Jonathan Iron. Depois de ter bases instaladas em quase todos os países, a Atlas quer atacar os EUA, pois a mais de um século que eles vem falhando inúmeras vezes ao tentar instalar democracias em todos os países.
    Antes de começar a falar sobre os modos separadamente, irei falar dos gráficos e dos jogabilidade, pra quem jogou na nova geração e no PC, deve ter se surpreendido com os gráficos de Advanced Warfare, simplesmente foi o maior avanço gráfico da franquia, já pra quem jogou na geração passada não precisa ficar triste, os gráficos da antiga geração são razoavelmente bons.
    Já a jogabilidade é extremamente fácil, se acostumar com os movimentos do exoesqueleto não demora muito, já o resto continua a mesma coisa que os outros jogos da franquia.

    CAMPANHA:
    A história de Advanced Warfare é boa porém previsível, pois ela não prende o jogador. O que faz você continuar a jogar a campanha é a própria gameplay, pois a maioria das missões que há na campanha são realmente muito divertidas.
    As ligações entre os personagens é fraca, você não consegue perceber a amizade entre Gideon e Mitchell e a ligação com Irons e seu filho.
    A dublagem de Advanced Warfare comete vários erros, principalmente em sincronia labial, você vai encontrar varias vezes personagens mexendo a boca sem falar nada. Agora em questão de qualidade da dublagem, são poucos os personagens que combinam com a voz do dublador, e o pior de tudo é que a Activision continua com o descaso em não lançar o jogo em PT-BR para PC, pelo menos uma legenda eles teriam que se dar o trabalho a colocar.

    MULTIPLAYER:
    Se você achava que o exoesqueleto iria trazer muita inovação ao multiplayer, você está errado, logo depois de algumas partidas os movimentos do exo já se tornam "normais" e você quase não nota diferença. O jogo tem pouca variedade de armas e scorestreaks, porém as classes estão bem mais personalizáveis, não irei entrar em muitos detalhes para não alongar a análise.
    Sobre os mapas, na minha opinião, a maioria não presta, são poucos os mapas que me agradaram, e todos, sem exceção, contém paredes invisíveis, e isso irrita muito, principalmente na hora que você precisa fugir de algum oponente.
    Apesar de tudo isso, o multiplayer é bastante divertido, na minha opinião um dos mais divertidos, e isso torna as paredes invisíveis apenas um pequeno incomodo.

    EXO SURVIVAL:
    O exo survival é o que mais deixa a desejar, parece que a sledgehammer games fez esse modo só pelo motivo que o coop vem se tornando obrigatório em todos os COD's, difetente do extinction (COD: Ghosts) e do Zombies(COD: World At War e sequência Black Ops), o Exo survival tem os mesmos mapas que o multiplayer, e isso reforça o que eu disse antes. Porém o modo zombies que irá vir por DLC promete ser muito bom.    … Expand
  13. Jonny247
    Dec 7, 2014
    2
    So disappointing, this is without doubt the worst call of duty game made to date and mine is going straight back to the shop. Many will have said this is just halo with a C.O.D badge on it but it's true. In cod there have always been options to play different styles and with different equipment, like claymores and bouncing Betty's, that let you hold off an area and watch your back, or youSo disappointing, this is without doubt the worst call of duty game made to date and mine is going straight back to the shop. Many will have said this is just halo with a C.O.D badge on it but it's true. In cod there have always been options to play different styles and with different equipment, like claymores and bouncing Betty's, that let you hold off an area and watch your back, or you can run and gun. With advanced warfare, no options, just run and gun makes for a very narrow playing experience. Multiplayer menus are slow on line, armory graphics look cheap and the selection of guns is rubbish. After owning it for 2 weeks I'm bored to tears with it and just can't find a gun that's "fun" to play with. Do yourself a favour and keep your money til next year, hopefully treyarch won't drop the ball like sledgehammer had.… Expand
  14. TheNoobPolice
    Dec 7, 2014
    1
    I avoided CoD Ghosts due to bad reviews, but thought I'd give this one a go seeing as it seemed to get more favorable reports from some of the more respected commenters, such as TB.

    However, I must say that this is the worst purchase I have made this year, and am kicking myself for not trusting my gut. The single player is exactly the same thing as every other CoD, and has now become    I avoided CoD Ghosts due to bad reviews, but thought I'd give this one a go seeing as it seemed to get more favorable reports from some of the more respected commenters, such as TB.

    However, I must say that this is the worst purchase I have made this year, and am kicking myself for not trusting my gut. The single player is exactly the same thing as every other CoD, and has now become so boring to play. The hand-holding mechanics are now at an unprecedented level in my opinion, and seems even worse than previous incarnations. The only improvement to campaign this time around is Kevin Spacey, whose fantastic performance does lend some quality to the campaign. Unfortunately, the storyline fundamentally is not up-to-scratch, and it's all a bit too predictable. As far as single player goes, I will not buy another CoD game if there is even a hint of "follow me" mechanics in there, not when there are so many other great single player experiences on the market today.

    The multiplayer has been universally praised as "fresh" and "exciting" by critics. I must be playing a different game. The "innovative" movement mechanics are basically just variations of "double jump" in different directions and apart from that it's exactly the same as previous games. These new mechanics have also clearly just been designed for console controller look/turn speed, and as such the gameplay on PC is just stupid, with every one jumping about and swiveling at breakneck speed, it's just a gigantic cluster f**k with no tactical elements whatsoever. It doesn't feel like a military shooter at all. They have abandoned the idea of dedicated servers, instead opting for the "one player is host system" which makes the lag the worst of any multi-player PC game I have ever played.

    The audio is terrible, there are no sounds of your enemies moving to create immersion in the environment or any tactical audio elements and everything is really "soft" and "nice" sounding (not in a good way - it doesn't feel like a battle ground in the slightest). Explosions sound like fireworks.

    The port is what I would call just about passable. There is strange mouse acceleration on certain configurations, and limited options (you can't even fine tune the sensitivity of the mouse, it's either too fats or too slow). There is no FOV slider for single player, which means I had to play it with a wireless controller and sit 6 feet from monitor to avoid headaches.

    There are many other issues with the game, the menus lag (Yes, a AAA game in 2014 has laggy menus!!!) and the player count on PC is now getting ridiculously low already (you better want to play team Deathmatch, because all the other modes are empty and/or unplayably laggy as the game seemingly gives host to Pablo from Brazil playing on 128kbit dial-up)

    Suffice to say, the game is uninstalled.    … Expand
  15. MorinSarkov
    Dec 6, 2014
    0
    It is amazing how many critics they paid off to give them good reviews. For a game that's called "Advanced Warfare", the system is ridiculously outdated. No dedicated servers on a competitive PC game? Seriously?! That should be an automatic zero in my book. But for those who are willing to be a little more lenient in their judgment of this game, let me outline some more atrocities aboutIt is amazing how many critics they paid off to give them good reviews. For a game that's called "Advanced Warfare", the system is ridiculously outdated. No dedicated servers on a competitive PC game? Seriously?! That should be an automatic zero in my book. But for those who are willing to be a little more lenient in their judgment of this game, let me outline some more atrocities about this game:

    * Shader preload is an option that theoretically loads the map before you join the game, thus eliminating FPS drops. It's a really cool idea, and guess what? It doesn't work for half of the maps. As a matter of fact, it does nothing more than kick you out after waiting for several minutes. BOOOO.

    * Lag compensation. Their way of dealing with the hosts having the best connection is to introduce artificial lag that all players in the match have to deal with, just to even out the game. So if someone on another continent joins your game, then everyone gets to play with lag! Sounds fair, right?

    * Horrendous optimization. Those with powerful GPUs are still going to run into FPS drops when playing AW on the lowest settings. -sigh-

    * Instead of innovating the map design to encourage players to "parkour" everywhere, there's just a ton of boundaries everywhere. If you try to jump onto a ledge that you think you can grab, instead you'll find yourself falling off with an annoying "Out of Bounds" message. The new movement system is great, but these maps do not support it. These maps could have been thrown in any other CoD and would've done just as well there. TItanfall's map design and movement system is far more satisfying.

    * It's missing a lot of fun game types like Gun Game and Demolition. Momentum and Uplink are okay, but they don't come close to filling the void.

    Titanfall, a game that came out over half a year ago and can be bought for a fraction of AW's price, is a much better game. That's really saying something. And the worst part is, I bet AW2 is already in development. -_-    … Expand
  16. mikhailmaldonag
    Dec 6, 2014
    3
    El juego es en sí termino medio, le pondría un 5 si es que funcionará mejor. Lastimosamente tiene algunos problemas de configuración. Algunas opciones gráficas no están bien configuradas y cargar 5 minutos de video cada vez que se hace una configuración arruina bastante el comienzo del juego.

    La jugabilidad, el exo, la acción y la mira con el mouse están muy bien logrados, por tal    El juego es en sí termino medio, le pondría un 5 si es que funcionará mejor. Lastimosamente tiene algunos problemas de configuración. Algunas opciones gráficas no están bien configuradas y cargar 5 minutos de video cada vez que se hace una configuración arruina bastante el comienzo del juego.

    La jugabilidad, el exo, la acción y la mira con el mouse están muy bien logrados, por tal motivo el juego no puede llevar un cero.

    Kevin Spacy le da otro punto y la historia no es tan mala pero si muy predecible, ni una sorpresa. si esperan algo memorable como el MW1-2 o el BO1-2 se van a llevar una decepción muy grande. Mejor no esperar nada y así se lleva otro punto en historia.

    El multiplayer no anda, así que un juego multijugador pierde la mitad de sus puntos al no funcionar (-5 puntos por eso)

    Total 3 puntos: 1 historia, 1 jugabilidad y 1 entretenimiento (kevin spacy entretiene y la acción de momentos es muy divertida)

    Observación: el juego es muuuuucho más lento que Titanfall, los que busquen adrenalina mejor prueben el otro.    … Expand
  17. sam712
    Dec 5, 2014
    0
    Nauseating, Michael Bay-esque nonstop action. Poor story pacing. 1-dimensional characters. Waste of Kevin Spacey. Low resolution textures. Poor porting to PC. Poor performance on high-end PCs. Gimmicky gadgets. North Koreans have a South Korean accent. Zero effort.

    "Innovation" in Call of Duty has and always will be reduced to filling in the blank in Call of Duty: ______
  18. wtfskilz
    Dec 5, 2014
    8
    Well the game Performance is better then on any of the former COD games,
    not too much CPU bottle neck and the graphics were looking very well.
    the game has many different futures compared to the last COD games. new weapons and upgrade options. Cons: You can't skip cut scenes and every time you make one graphic change it will replay the cut scene and reload the map, so if you have a    Well the game Performance is better then on any of the former COD games,
    not too much CPU bottle neck and the graphics were looking very well.
    the game has many different futures compared to the last COD games.
    new weapons and upgrade options.
    Cons: You can't skip cut scenes and every time you make one graphic change it will replay the cut scene and reload the map, so if you have a graphic issue, like texture tearing due to a setting called sun/spot shadow rendering. Well it took me about 20 minutes to find which setting was causing the issue.
    This game has issues with playing cut scenes the audio is delayed by 500MS, even if you use the setting to load map after the cut scenes.    … Expand
  19. strelokk
    Dec 4, 2014
    9
    La campaña sigue teniendo las mismas mecanicas que las ultimas vistas, explosiones, espectacularidad, pasillos, etc...
    Aun con todo, tanto el motor graficos como las voces ayudan a meterse en la historia, y apoyado en el exo es una campaña muy amena de jugar.
    Cosa que no entiendo, esque la personalizacion que teniamos en el BO II se ha visto reducida a elegir que mejoras le ponemos al    La campaña sigue teniendo las mismas mecanicas que las ultimas vistas, explosiones, espectacularidad, pasillos, etc...
    Aun con todo, tanto el motor graficos como las voces ayudan a meterse en la historia, y apoyado en el exo es una campaña muy amena de jugar.
    Cosa que no entiendo, esque la personalizacion que teniamos en el BO II se ha visto reducida a elegir que mejoras le ponemos al exo ( mayor rapidez, mas salud, etc )
    El coop, modo horda, no es modo zombi, pero la verdad, no que quien dijo que habria seguro.... y la verdad comprarse un cod ( 60 pavos ) .... pues nose xDDD
    Decir que esta bien puesto que entre hordas podemos cambiar de armas, perks, las rachas, etc...
    Y pasando al multi, pues que decir, que es el cod mas completo hasta la fecha por muchas razones.

    1º Muchos mapas
    2º Muchos modos, dos nuevos que son muy divertidos ( unlink e iniciativa )
    3º Es el primer cod que permite personalizar esteticamente nuestro soldado, dandonos mas razones para jugar y desbloquear cosas con las que fardar :P
    4º El sistema de clases se ha mejorado mas, pasando de las 10 ranuras de BO II, a 13 ( pudiendonos quitar hasta las rachas )

    En lo puramente tecnico, el sonido normal, ni fu ni fa... Los graficos ( por fin ) es un nuevo motor, no es una revolucion ni mucho menos, pero al menos es de este siglo.
    El problema radica aunque esta bien optimizado, hay algunas opciones graficas que hasta que das con ella te chupa muchos recuros, eso unido al lag que y las congelaciones de pantalla algunas partidas sean un suplicio ( con el ultimo parche esto mejoro un poco ).

    Por ultimo decir que el exo, aporta ( desde mi punto de vista ) frescura y frenetismo a las partidas, cosa que le va de lujo a cualquier COD ( y si te gusto como a mi titanfall, mas todavia )    … Expand
  20. Camkey666
    Dec 3, 2014
    4
    While this call of duty isn't the worst of the franchise, it dosen't do much different once again, even with the exo suits. In the end they just end up as a way to escape more than anything. Again the game runs on a 10 year game engine and dosen't have any dedicated servers, along with cheap and worthless game mechanics.
  21. danneu89
    Dec 2, 2014
    3
    3/10 is for the campaign, which is fun. Not a great story or anything, just some fun, call-of-duty-esque fun.
    0/10 is for the multiplayer. Doesn't work. Please add dedicated servers like you promised. Too laggy to play as of now. If you thought battlefield 4 had netcode problems, holy ####. Prepare to hit a guy 5-8 times to be shot before he even turns around, then watch the killcam show    3/10 is for the campaign, which is fun. Not a great story or anything, just some fun, call-of-duty-esque fun.
    0/10 is for the multiplayer. Doesn't work. Please add dedicated servers like you promised. Too laggy to play as of now. If you thought battlefield 4 had netcode problems, holy ####. Prepare to hit a guy 5-8 times to be shot before he even turns around, then watch the killcam show that none of your shots even fired.

    Every once in a while you enter into a server where everything is running smooth, and it is a truly great game. In these moments, I feel like this could be the best COD multiplayer experience ever. I feel nostalgia for quake and unreal tournament. Then the next game I'm back to these terrible P2P matchmaking shenanigans. Please fix this games MP and I will update it to the 8 or 9 out 10 that this game deserves.    … Expand
  22. Karga
    Nov 30, 2014
    1
    I read some stuff about Activision taking down some videos on youtube. Well that's a big negative imo. I wouldn't waste a single dollar to a company like that, no matter how big-budget or fancy their games are. If you don't respect your customers, you don't deserve a penny. That being said, I heard the game is full of cheats, bugs etc. People having lots of connection issues. NowadaysI read some stuff about Activision taking down some videos on youtube. Well that's a big negative imo. I wouldn't waste a single dollar to a company like that, no matter how big-budget or fancy their games are. If you don't respect your customers, you don't deserve a penny. That being said, I heard the game is full of cheats, bugs etc. People having lots of connection issues. Nowadays people have so many options, limitless shooters in the market. So I would gladly try-out some low-budget games instead of any COD game.… Expand
  23. Bamki
    Nov 27, 2014
    9
    Personally I love this. The multiplayer is very playable but yes lag is a bit of an issue. I'm glad it lived up to my expectations. Its new character customization and gun variants a very neat to find and collect to use in game. The single player was great fun and exo survival is a blast and exo zombies looks very difficult even to a experienced nazi zombie player. Even though there are soPersonally I love this. The multiplayer is very playable but yes lag is a bit of an issue. I'm glad it lived up to my expectations. Its new character customization and gun variants a very neat to find and collect to use in game. The single player was great fun and exo survival is a blast and exo zombies looks very difficult even to a experienced nazi zombie player. Even though there are so many variants of guns to collect i feel that most of the guns in-game are not good for use in competitive gameplay. Such as the AMR9 with its horrible damage and the XMG and EPM3 just not being useful in gameplay. The only guns you see in multiplayer are Ak12 and Bal 27 with a few acception here and there. This is a HUGE problem and i think some guns should get nerfed and some buffed, but that is just me. Overall this game is amazing and i hope it gets even better with the DLC to come.… Expand
  24. Banhammer0
    Nov 26, 2014
    6
    If Black Ops 2 and Titanfall had a baby it would be Advanced Warfare.
    You have almost the same (no wallrun sadly) moves available but with all the mechanics and style of CoD.
    Pros: - Exo-moves are fun - Optimization is very good for a CoD game, equal to BLOPS 2 - Create-a-class in this CoD is the best so far - Crates dropping weapon variants and clothing for your character is a fun    If Black Ops 2 and Titanfall had a baby it would be Advanced Warfare.
    You have almost the same (no wallrun sadly) moves available but with all the mechanics and style of CoD.
    Pros:
    - Exo-moves are fun
    - Optimization is very good for a CoD game, equal to BLOPS 2
    - Create-a-class in this CoD is the best so far
    - Crates dropping weapon variants and clothing for your character is a fun addition
    Unfortunately this CoD has some major issues
    Cons:
    - Kill streaks are the LEAST FUN in any CoD game released so far (very hard to get and just...weak)
    - CHEATERS !!!!! Those **** 12-year olds who fukd your mom last night are back with a vengeance. Not as bad as MW 3 but enough to make me sick of playing it.
    - Item progression is kinda bad, some challenges required for certain attachments and camoes are very grindy, and there is no reason for it

    Not a bad CoD title but I may go back to BLOPS 2 after a while, killstreaks ruin it for me. This CoD is just not nearly as rewarding. 6/10    … Expand
  25. Rumface
    Nov 25, 2014
    3
    The PC version of this game is by far the absolute worst and feels like a step back on previous call of duty games and the battlefield series which have leveraged the PC platform to make great games better on a more open and powerful system. What would have been a good multi-player shooter is stifled with technical and design issues making it almost unplayable.

    I found the single player    The PC version of this game is by far the absolute worst and feels like a step back on previous call of duty games and the battlefield series which have leveraged the PC platform to make great games better on a more open and powerful system. What would have been a good multi-player shooter is stifled with technical and design issues making it almost unplayable.

    I found the single player uninteresting but your mileage may vary over the 5 hour campaign for it's high retail price.

    If you are returning to COD after a few of their previous titles failed to impress on the PC - don't bother picking this one up - it is a complete mess and cheaters, lag issues on the peer to peer system and awful performance issues and crashes are all that you can bet on greeting you.    … Expand
  26. Ochetazinco
    Nov 24, 2014
    10
    I really don't you guys at all...when a game ships, like Assassins Creed Unity, which is un-runnable even on the highest end hardware, you **** that it's a poor console port, and that they did a terrible job with optimization. When a game ships like Call of Duty Advanced Warfare, with graphics capable of running even on $400 gaming PCs with APUs, you call it a terrible console port withI really don't you guys at all...when a game ships, like Assassins Creed Unity, which is un-runnable even on the highest end hardware, you **** that it's a poor console port, and that they did a terrible job with optimization. When a game ships like Call of Duty Advanced Warfare, with graphics capable of running even on $400 gaming PCs with APUs, you call it a terrible console port with dated graphics with a game engine form 10 years ago...listen guys, the reason we get crap like Assassins Creed Unity is because nobody can figure out what you F#$% want, do you want a game that stresses your multi thousand dollar extreme core i7 gaming PC until it chokes, or do you want a game that is perfectly playable on your mid-range budget PC and can push it to 4k no problem. At what point does your opinion balance out? or are you just trolling?... At least Sledgehammer is smart and knows a LOT of people are going to buy this game and be able to run it on modest hardware. There are those of us, a lot more than you, that just want to play a game. If you want to choke you overclocked multi $$$ PC until it dies and lags out, that's you, you should go buy Assassins Creed Unity, that might be the game for you.… Expand
  27. Cuecuemore
    Nov 24, 2014
    0
    This game is simply horrible. Sledgehammer claims the engine is all-new, but the RPG trails are still the same as they were in CoD4, so this is pretty clearly just IW7. The story is nauseatingly bad.
  28. tpapas1
    Nov 24, 2014
    0
    what a piece of crap. 10 yrs ago it would be an achievement. still this is where it belongs. not in 2014. if you want exosuites and and robots and advanced warfare do as I did: buy Titanfall
  29. faceless-1
    Nov 24, 2014
    2
    This game got broken multiplayer. It fails to find games and you have to edit config to even work and even then its lag fest. The single player is super short and average at best.
  30. Polys
    Nov 23, 2014
    3
    this game had a lot of potential,but it's been a month now with all minor updates and no information about dedicated servers,that is what is killing the game...goodbye sledghammer,hello treyarch again...black ops 2 will climb back at the charts after people get tired of the lagfest and hackfest that's taking place now in advanced warfare's "SERVERS" people host hacked lobbies,almost everythis game had a lot of potential,but it's been a month now with all minor updates and no information about dedicated servers,that is what is killing the game...goodbye sledghammer,hello treyarch again...black ops 2 will climb back at the charts after people get tired of the lagfest and hackfest that's taking place now in advanced warfare's "SERVERS" people host hacked lobbies,almost every leaderboard 10 top players is cheaters,if they'd been honest with us and told us that the game will NOT have dedicated servers maybe i wouldn't be here writing this opinion comment right now but if you are reading this SHG people,you and infinity ward lost many many players...

    it's 2014 for god's sake...and we have to rely on connections instead of STABLE AND RELIABLE DEDICATED SERVERS ?

    WHY ? because they cost ? ok...i'll tell you what's gonna cost more...the ammount of time you'll spend to develop DLC's and NOONE going to buy them because even the MAIN GAME is broken...so why would i pay to "have more" when i'm not able to enjoy the current material you had with the launch...

    ghosts died,advanced warfare is dying only 1 month since release

    it's all about treyarch now...let's hope for the best    … Expand
Page:

Awards & Rankings

85
#85 Best PC Game of 2014
24
#24 Most Discussed PC Game of 2014
59
#59 Most Shared PC Game of 2014

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
78

Generally favorable reviews - based on 18 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 15 out of 18
  2. Mixed: 2 out of 18
  3. Negative: 1 out of 18
  1. CD-Action
    Jan 9, 2015
    85
    This game is a lot of fun. There’s some Crysis in it, some Titanfall, some elements borrowed from Unreal Tournament and Battlefield. Underneath it’s still Call of Duty though, finally modernized in terms of visuals. [13/2014, p.50]
  2. PC PowerPlay
    Dec 23, 2014
    80
    It's the best Call of Duty campaign in years, and the multiplayer continues to scratch a certain itch. [Jan 2015, p.64]
  3. GameWatcher
    Dec 14, 2014
    80
    A new engine and new ideas breath new life into a series that was in serious danger of turning stale.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »