Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare

 PC
User Score
4.9

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 1348 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 436 out of 1348
  2. Mixed: 307 out of 1348
  3. Negative: 605 out of 1348
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. Murdockk
    Jun 27, 2023
    5
    Genel call of duty çizgilerinin dışına çıkmış bir oyundu. Oyuna bir yenilik getirip daha gelecek vari bir oyun yapmışlardı. Beni de pek sarmamıştı açıkçası
  2. AgentLvi
    Jun 19, 2023
    9
    Excellent game. The story is so enjoyable, scoring is really great, visual is decent, and the voice is stunning
  3. Snjake
    Mar 18, 2023
    7
    Overhated i liked the story and enjoyed the multiplayer with friends a lot.
  4. dggt
    Mar 9, 2023
    5
    покращилася тільки графіка, і то погано оптимізована, сетінг трешовий й не цікавий, стрільба нудна, сюжет тухлий, вдосталь халтури для ААА проекту, пукалка на вечір під пивко
  5. threeoftendie
    Feb 5, 2023
    7
    Это одна из игр моего детства. И, несмотря на возраст и недостатки, о которых я сейчас узнаю от других, она не кажется мне плохой
  6. Joe2539
    Jan 3, 2023
    10
    Very Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good
  7. bar0yka
    Dec 29, 2022
    5
    sıkıcı grafikler aynı bazı yerlerde hata veriyor ve hikaye leş .
  8. Miz_Gamer
    Nov 20, 2022
    7
    Graphics 7/10
    Sounds 8/10
    Gameplay 6/10
    Story:6/10
    DLC:2/10
    Multiplayer:6/10
  9. hileger
    Oct 29, 2022
    5
    Пиздец какого гавно стрельба как из игрушечных пистолетиков лагает на 2070 игра 2014 года хуеплеты , да таже гост на уровне была ,а это просто мусор
  10. nfs7379
    Sep 4, 2022
    8
    8/10.......................................................................
  11. Legicey
    Jan 19, 2022
    3
    Gameplay: Generic, fast paced, COD. The main gimmick is the "advanced movement" which isn't that bad in the campaign, but in the Multi-Player the entire **** screen is an angle you can get shot from. I also hate the map design and the guns are really boring. No dedicated servers ether to I can only really play with bots as of today, the game is dead. 2/10 Bad

    Story: Campaign story isn't    Gameplay: Generic, fast paced, COD. The main gimmick is the "advanced movement" which isn't that bad in the campaign, but in the Multi-Player the entire **** screen is an angle you can get shot from. I also hate the map design and the guns are really boring. No dedicated servers ether to I can only really play with bots as of today, the game is dead. 2/10 Bad

    Story: Campaign story isn't that bad. It's kind of just generic Hollywood and the main antagonist is so generic it's funny. The ending sequel baits as well. Also, F to pay respects. 4.5/10 Below average

    Exo Zombies: It's ass. 1/10 Truly Horrible

    Graphics: Pretty good for the time and they still kind of hold up today. Interior lighting looks better then exterior lighting and textures kinda look like **** compared to modern textures we have to day but overall, not bad. 5/10 average (If compared to graphics today).

    Sound: Guns sound fine, if a bit compressed and the music is also just meh.

    A game like this rests on the back of it's gameplay, which is bad, so overall 3/10. Not the worst COD game out there (WW2 is worse) but still far from good.    … Expand
  12. moonlaba
    Jan 17, 2022
    6
    여러 스타 배우를 고용한다고 없던 캐릭터성이 생기진 않는다는점.. 근현대물인건 신선했지만 여러 슈트의 능력들이 1회용으로 그것도 별로 유용하게도 쓰이지 않는다는점이 아쉽다.
  13. vova22379
    Dec 18, 2021
    6
    ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
  14. Kotofon
    Aug 13, 2021
    8
    Сюжет затрагивает сразу 7 лет истории человечества будущего: с 2054 до 2061 год. Цивилизация сделала серьёзный скачок в технологиях, за счёт чего были созданы экзо-скелеты, увеличивающие способности человека, повышая высоту прыжка, силу удара с кулака, и повышая бронированность и защищённость. За счёт увеличения доходов частных компаний, они смогли создавать собственные военные структуры иСюжет затрагивает сразу 7 лет истории человечества будущего: с 2054 до 2061 год. Цивилизация сделала серьёзный скачок в технологиях, за счёт чего были созданы экзо-скелеты, увеличивающие способности человека, повышая высоту прыжка, силу удара с кулака, и повышая бронированность и защищённость. За счёт увеличения доходов частных компаний, они смогли создавать собственные военные структуры и вступать в конфликты с противостоящими им корпорациями в схватке за мировое господство.… Expand
  15. Greek_objektife
    Jun 9, 2021
    5
    Получилась намного лучше чем Ghosts,сюжет хоть и туп,но неплохо написан,графика была кардинально улучшена и геймплей благодаря сеттингу будущего стал поразнообразнее но мультиплеер полное говно и зомби режим скучный
  16. yeezymane
    Apr 1, 2021
    7
    Графика - 8/10
    Игровой процесс - 7/10
    Сюжет - 7/10
    Музыка - 5/10
  17. Cz3rw0ny
    Feb 10, 2021
    7
    It is not a bad game. It is a Call of Duty game, which kind of answers all the questions regarding the gameplay and the mechanics. I am not into COD Multiplayer, but single was quite entertaining and short enough not to bore me.
  18. VigilanteOito
    Jan 27, 2021
    8
    Eu não curto muito os COD futurista, mas esse é jogavel.
    Jogabilidade e campanha são boas.
    Vilão memoravel.
  19. Crimert
    Jan 16, 2021
    7
    I can say that the campaign mode was okay. I found this game better than the COD: Black Ops series and the COD: Ghosts. But it's still not good enough for me... 7hrs on record.
  20. ErayTellezi
    Nov 17, 2020
    7
    Cod'un 10 yıl süren fecaat döneminde arada çıkan ender güzel oyunlardan. ok
  21. Jorchking
    Oct 27, 2020
    4
    Una campaña decente pero con un port a PC desastrozo: Muchos crasheos, stuttering, porteado desde consola, no han incluido el doblaje hispanoamericano en PC y es muy difícil configurar la sensibilidad de apuntado y demás opciones (hay que hacerlo desde el archivo y no se siente bien de todas formas).
    No comprar.
  22. Lelik_mc_kawai
    Jul 21, 2020
    0
    Отсутствие русских субтитров, разработчики забыли о глухих1
  23. greenbey
    Jul 3, 2020
    8
    A-
    Gameplay is fun, graphics are good, story is predictable but not bad.
    Overall an okay game but doesn't improve in any way to its predecessors.
  24. Garian
    Jun 26, 2020
    4
    The multiplayer brings nothing new to Call of Duty apart from quicker movement and slightly more verticality. Every other mechanic is the same and there STILL aren't any dedicated servers, so your connection will never be optimal. The game is basically what Titanfall would have been if it was an unfinished release where you can't run on walls, and titans didn't exist. All of that beingThe multiplayer brings nothing new to Call of Duty apart from quicker movement and slightly more verticality. Every other mechanic is the same and there STILL aren't any dedicated servers, so your connection will never be optimal. The game is basically what Titanfall would have been if it was an unfinished release where you can't run on walls, and titans didn't exist. All of that being said... its call of duty. Its still fun every now and then.… Expand
  25. r03vg
    Apr 15, 2020
    6
    Одна из последних ролей Кевина Спейси. Все еще та самая старая Call of Duty с мыльными текстурами. Хороший звук, интересная история.
  26. arbitrator
    Mar 24, 2020
    3
    I can honestly say that this game is not terrible, it clearly doesn't deserve a 10, but it also very obviously doesn't deserve all the 0's and 1's it is getting. So far this is a very basic list of pro's and cons I have found

    Pro's _____ - Movement from jetpack is fantastic and feels pretty natural. -Lack of op weapons and overall fairly balanced -graphics have improved regardless    I can honestly say that this game is not terrible, it clearly doesn't deserve a 10, but it also very obviously doesn't deserve all the 0's and 1's it is getting. So far this is a very basic list of pro's and cons I have found

    Pro's
    _____
    - Movement from jetpack is fantastic and feels pretty natural.
    -Lack of op weapons and overall fairly balanced
    -graphics have improved regardless of what all these people seem to think (water still looks awful)
    -if you can find hardcore matches it is reminiscent of CS in it's tactical gameplay and team communication
    -A lot less op perks and the perks you do get while advancing the game do not take over - Modern warfare 2 anyone? :)

    Cons
    _____
    -Some very annoying bugs, such as the huge lag spikes for the first ~30 seconds of the game
    -No delay on jetpack so you can basically bunny hop 15-20 feet in the air constantly (more of a problem in regular games as hardcore you can easily shoot them down)
    -Lack of guns in general, I'm sorry no matter how many reskins you release of a gun with slight variations, it isn't a different gun. Having 1 more bracket in fire speed with 1 less in accuracy just means its a modded gun, no a new one.
    -Still no dedicated servers, and this is the biggest one for me. No matter what people say, they have been plagued by this problem for years and they always mention they will add them but they don't, just like Ghost.

    My final thoughts are really that this is in improvement in the franchise and if they continue supporting it and adding polish it will be one of the better ones, I would recommend picking this up if you like a more tactical game then the previous installments and are willing to play hardcore.

    P.S. As a side note, since I'm sure people will think this is a fanboy thing since I didn't instantly give it a 0, I have played every cod up to black ops, then stopped for for the next few installments after looking into them. decided to give this one a try and while it wasn't all I was hoping for, it is definitely worth a looking into.

    Edit: came back to fix this up. It was good until hackers went rampant and they did nothing about it. Quickly went from a 7/10 to a 3/10.    … Expand
  27. Shimmeywill
    Feb 26, 2020
    4
    Change of gun design and aesthetic doesn't do the drawn out franchise any favours. A mediocre experience.
  28. Nameless2131
    Feb 6, 2020
    5
    5/10 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
  29. DrawidsAR
    Jan 17, 2020
    8
    Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare Это весьма спорный проект. Выбор оружия огорчил. Во всем остальном норм
  30. Genek13
    Nov 15, 2019
    4
    This game looks like this - jumping like an idiot through entire map to kill everybody on the map (no tactis, just jump and shoot)
    I was so pissed after few hours in MP...
  31. Ahmed_Alwazir
    Oct 12, 2019
    9
    I don't care much about the story. It's the action that drives me to games. And this game is a hell of a ride.
  32. SilverOrlov
    Sep 29, 2019
    9
    Many people did not like this game judging by the reviews and ratings. Well, not a masterpiece, yes, but not bad too. I liked it as for the game-play so for its story.
  33. kimchiwarrior
    Jul 11, 2019
    1
    The developer came to Korea and the launch event was also the background of the first mission, but the Korean subtitle is not supporting it. OMFG
  34. nintendo-sekta
    Jan 13, 2019
    1
    Игра плоха. В ней дикое оказуаливание: гранаты которые показывают врагов, самонаводящиеся гранаты, за прохождение игры я не разу не видел экрана смерти ибо враги наносят мало, а жизни восстанавливаются быстро. Сюжет копирует Codmw только укороченный в раза 3. Ну возможно игра понравиться тем кому нравиться быстрые перестрелки.Игра плоха. В ней дикое оказуаливание: гранаты которые показывают врагов, самонаводящиеся гранаты, за прохождение игры я не разу не видел экрана смерти ибо враги наносят мало, а жизни восстанавливаются быстро. Сюжет копирует Codmw только укороченный в раза 3. Ну возможно игра понравиться тем кому нравиться быстрые перестрелки.
  35. Taylord99
    Aug 15, 2018
    4
    Overall a bad game. Not much to say here. The story is extremely silly and the multiplayer is average.
  36. gold
    Jun 2, 2018
    5
    Даже на минимальных настройках лагало, не возможно было играть (ближе к концу игры перестало). Сюжет - 9, Графика - минимальная графика на 5, геймплей - 4.
  37. LightPoth
    Jan 24, 2018
    4
    2018 oh nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo not Kevin Spacey oh nooooooooooooooooooooooo
  38. muzmuz
    Nov 24, 2017
    8
    Advanced Warfare is definitely one of the most attractive and appealing Call of Duty title at the time of release, at least on the campaign side. Personally, the way AW handles futuristic tech is what I would call the sweetspot of this theme; anything beyond it is just ridiculous.
  39. Xxdaniels751xX
    May 13, 2017
    1
    The problem is the same for many years now. COD is a painful product not because of its playability that you may like it or not. Yes because each delivery is made with the law of minimum effort.

    Activision laughs at their fans and they continue to support them. That is the real problem and not that it is futuristic of the WWII or the Neolithic era. Each year is a rehash more, with    The problem is the same for many years now. COD is a painful product not because of its playability that you may like it or not. Yes because each delivery is made with the law of minimum effort.

    Activision laughs at their fans and they continue to support them. That is the real problem and not that it is futuristic of the WWII or the Neolithic era.

    Each year is a rehash more, with small improvements and a different story and now. They raise hundreds of millions and come back the next year to get you the same **** that costs them 4 dollars (well now they spend more because they hire famous actors for the characters) and they spend on marketing more than it costs the game.

    The dynamics can not be broken. Renewing the formula or the engine means 2 or 3 years of development, bad for the results account. And total, to sell the same.

    Post anything, take advantage of this new COD. Let's see if you get bored and start to be a bit critical. With me this saga died after the MW3.    … Expand
  40. Battletoad
    Mar 21, 2017
    4
    The gaming industry continues to roll into hell. Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare stupid shooter category C with backward graphics in which it's not fun to play.
  41. OvidiusOvidius
    Feb 26, 2017
    10
    All i can say is I had a lot of fun. I was only playing the single player campaign . I was looking for a game with real FPS experience after the boring attempt of playing Deux Ex MD ,and where can you find that shooter experience if not in COD? People are **** a lot about COD but i think they got used with excellent gameplay mechanics, great spontaneous adventure , rewarding aim and shotAll i can say is I had a lot of fun. I was only playing the single player campaign . I was looking for a game with real FPS experience after the boring attempt of playing Deux Ex MD ,and where can you find that shooter experience if not in COD? People are **** a lot about COD but i think they got used with excellent gameplay mechanics, great spontaneous adventure , rewarding aim and shot and cool weapons design. I liked that a lot, even if i could recognize elements from Crysis and even Batman gameplay in here. I do recommend it for people who want to have fun.… Expand
  42. Shekky
    Nov 3, 2016
    0
    Terrible game. Futuristic shooter is unrealistic and not at all what I would be want. I miss the realism of previous call of duty games. Black Ops 1, Modern Warfare 2, Cod 4 are all games activision really needs to get back too.
  43. sgthombre
    Sep 26, 2016
    7
    I'm just writing at least 150 characters because I wanted to save this review in a more convenient way to look back at scores that I had given stuff as a user.
  44. stupidcapslock
    May 15, 2016
    4
    I found that that this game really portrays how the CoD franchise has been declining. The campaign mode was relatively fun but clichéd- then again I wasn't expecting much going by past games. However, it was the multiplayer that I felt made the game as disappointing as it was; unbalanced and only a few guns that I felt were a viable option. The mechanic of supply drops also seemed veryI found that that this game really portrays how the CoD franchise has been declining. The campaign mode was relatively fun but clichéd- then again I wasn't expecting much going by past games. However, it was the multiplayer that I felt made the game as disappointing as it was; unbalanced and only a few guns that I felt were a viable option. The mechanic of supply drops also seemed very cheap to me and I hope that the trend of microtransactions in games like this doesn't continue. As usual, the zombies mode was fun for a while but I couldn't help but notice that no trial of exo zombies is available in proper before buying the maps through packs or the season pass - something that would have been helpful, especially with the inclusion of a new movement system that many people did not like.
    Personally, I'm not too fussed about the graphics and I found the maps much brighter than previous instalments, which in my opinion is a good thing - one of the only real positive features of the game as well as the high quality voice acting in campaign.    … Expand
  45. Nerosoma889
    Feb 10, 2016
    5
    Looked forward to this, but disappointed me straight away, so much so that I was not even interested in the zombie DLC, which is quite rare for me. The graphics were horrendous for my above average PC (770 / i5 / 8GB), but was later fixed with some troubleshooting and online tutorials (thanks CODAW). Overall, story was quite mild, however, I like how levels are non-linear in some cases,Looked forward to this, but disappointed me straight away, so much so that I was not even interested in the zombie DLC, which is quite rare for me. The graphics were horrendous for my above average PC (770 / i5 / 8GB), but was later fixed with some troubleshooting and online tutorials (thanks CODAW). Overall, story was quite mild, however, I like how levels are non-linear in some cases, and was probably the best part of the entire campaign.

    The multiplayer was your bog standard COD, no real difference apart from the movement system, which became boring and quite annoying as time went on.    … Expand
  46. oz4n
    Jan 27, 2016
    10
    Go get Battlefield if you're that fond of Multiplayer. COD is fabulous with its campaign and story-line.

    Graphics were amazing, gameplay was amazing, story was pretty cliche though unpredictable at some points and thus amazing, I'm telling you everything was amazing about this game and I never got bored not even for one second! Of course Modern Warfare had another taste, Black Ops    Go get Battlefield if you're that fond of Multiplayer. COD is fabulous with its campaign and story-line.

    Graphics were amazing, gameplay was amazing, story was pretty cliche though unpredictable at some points and thus amazing, I'm telling you everything was amazing about this game and I never got bored not even for one second!

    Of course Modern Warfare had another taste, Black Ops trio also had a different style. But Advanced Warfare was completely unique, and I'm really delighted with it.

    Go get it guys, YOLO!    … Expand
  47. Sir_Swag117
    Jan 19, 2016
    0
    We need to make a video-game version of the Geneva Convention, before games like this spread and corrupt the Master Race. We must contain the disease.
  48. Smishi
    Dec 12, 2015
    9
    hg ghuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
  49. Jeezadapus
    Nov 26, 2015
    8
    I've enjoyed every moment of the game. The campaign was a little short or maybe i was just too invested.
    Gameplay was fun, guns felt great and overall it delieverd a great COD game.
    A lot of people are frustrated with bugs and fps drops, most of them i fixed by changing one setting. The fps drops does get to you sometimes and therefor i can not give it a 10/10 But for the enjoyable    I've enjoyed every moment of the game. The campaign was a little short or maybe i was just too invested.
    Gameplay was fun, guns felt great and overall it delieverd a great COD game.
    A lot of people are frustrated with bugs and fps drops, most of them i fixed by changing one setting.
    The fps drops does get to you sometimes and therefor i can not give it a 10/10
    But for the enjoyable time Advanced Warfare gave me i think it deserves it.
    You shouldn't listen to every one that just gets frustrated with the small stuff and give the game a lousy score, read the reviews here and you can see most of them are about the same issue.
    This game is worth your time and worth giving it a chance!    … Expand
  50. CODAWHATER
    Nov 4, 2015
    0
    hey,activision here is a joke , what is brown and ****
    CALL OF DUTY ADVANCE WARFARE
    HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!
  51. ankit1
    Oct 27, 2015
    10
    I can't believe most reviews are negative.......... because of MP.....
    But they don't go for review SP.......
    What A Game...... As My Experience of hundreds of FPS and TPS games........ This all time best game that ever made for it's graphics and gameplay.......... Only For this game metacritic must be give 10000000 points....... Please don't see or read other critic and user    I can't believe most reviews are negative.......... because of MP.....
    But they don't go for review SP.......
    What A Game......
    As My Experience of hundreds of FPS and TPS games........
    This all time best game that ever made for it's graphics and gameplay..........
    Only For this game metacritic must be give 10000000 points.......

    Please don't see or read other critic and user reviews for this no.1 GAME.........    … Expand
  52. ucin97
    Oct 22, 2015
    0
    es puta mierda, por que ........por que si viendo que la pagina es puta mierda tambien. puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda putaes puta mierda, por que ........por que si viendo que la pagina es puta mierda tambien. puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda puta mierda. Posdata; puta mierda de juego, basura inmunda, los locust de gears of war se limpian el culo lleno de callos con las caratulas del juego. Bazofia inmunda nacida del seno de activision,… Expand
  53. ChosenOne
    Sep 21, 2015
    1
    NO GAMES FOUND
    NO GAMES FOUND
    NO GAMES FOUND
    NO GAMES FOUND
    Single campaign is not so bad, by the way.
    NO GAMES FOUND
    NO GAMES FOUND
    NO GAMES FOUND
    But multiplayer doesn't work
    NO GAMES FOUND
    NO GAMES FOUND
    NO GAMES FOUND
    NO GAMES FOUND
  54. born28
    Sep 18, 2015
    4
    When this game isn't lagging its full of kids and full grown men with family's hacking it to bits. Snapping from one head shot to the next head shot, don't get me wrong there's fun to be had if you can avoid the lag and hackers good luck doing both!
  55. EggManStudio
    Sep 5, 2015
    9
    Easily the best Call of Duty for a long while. New features, abilities and the best CoD story for quite a while makes Advanced Warfare a welcome return to form for the series.
  56. jelikey
    Aug 21, 2015
    7
    this game gives me standard fun. series as well. and new technology of future war is good to see. but, the single campaign mission is too short, and optimization is a little poor.
  57. RageTwentyTwo
    Jul 29, 2015
    1
    Call of Duty. Again Call of Duty. Its nothing new and nothing special. Call of Duty Advanced Warfare features a boring singleplayer and a laggy, unbalanced and buggy multiplayer. My Computer crashes sometimes when i try to play the game (and its the games fault, not the fault of my hardware). I cant say that its fun, not even a little.
  58. NatT96
    Jul 6, 2015
    6
    This game was painfully poorly optimized requiring an extreme amount of power for PC's. I mean this lags on mid graphics cars and even high ones as well with massive frame drops and oh boy, every single review is correct, having dedicated servers is a must for the price I paid for this title, its so gosh darn bad....this is the last COD game for me.
  59. can1235
    Jun 14, 2015
    9
    The multiplayer really feels fresh and fun with the exo suits with maps designed around them. Loot drops extend the replayability ten billionfold. Even though gun variations can have more damage, range, etc, the benefits are evened out with reduced other stats, giving you the ability to find the variant for you. Also, Kevin Spacey.
  60. empleat
    Jun 2, 2015
    0
    Pls stop buy call of duty, it is same looking game, only with other design.
    It is like dlc 6 years all cods.
    Pls don't buy next call of duty.
    Have mind.
  61. idohaker
    Jun 1, 2015
    4
    game is boring and exo suits are boring!!!!!! game is boring and exo suits are boring!!!!!! game is boring and exo suits are boring!!!!!! game is boring and exo suits are boring!!!!!!
  62. Jester2372
    May 18, 2015
    4
    Overall this is a quality built game with terrible network and support issues from Activision and Steam. This game has true potential but sadly due to the on-going issues with connecting to the game, not being able to load certain maps, lag (SEVERE LAG), to the non existent support, very few people are playing the game.
    It is sad that a good game like this is just hung out to dry because    Overall this is a quality built game with terrible network and support issues from Activision and Steam. This game has true potential but sadly due to the on-going issues with connecting to the game, not being able to load certain maps, lag (SEVERE LAG), to the non existent support, very few people are playing the game.
    It is sad that a good game like this is just hung out to dry because the manufacturer already has their money and does not care at all for supporting their customers.
    More people are playing World at War, MW3, Black Ops2 and often MW2 than are playing this game on a daily basis.
    It is very difficult to find a game anymore and after spending way too much time rebooting and attempting to connect, when you do get in game, the possibility of the map not loading is rather high. It is not unusual for some people to spend 30 minutes each time they attempt to play to only experience multiple issues and when they do get in game, there is a 65% chance the lobby will be very laggy.
    Although I do not have near the issues of my clan mates, I see the struggle daily. After putting in various tickets on my own, I have never received helpful assistance to resolve the on going issues.
    Had these issues been resolved, I would have rated this game around an 8 but I feel more than generous with the 4 as I find myself going to other games way too often simply as a direct result of poor performance on the manufacturers part. Activision is obviously only in business to rob all of us and we are suckers for it.    … Expand
  63. Valfar
    May 11, 2015
    1
    Boring plot already seen a thousand times, no challenge... This franchise is getting worse and worse, that's a shame. But people seem to buy these anyway so why would they make any effort.
  64. krj38
    May 8, 2015
    7
    I'm a BF person when it comes to online shooters. However, I felt like playing an FPS campaign, just for relaxation. After having skipped a couple of CoD games (my last one was Modern Warfare 3 and it was tiresome) I borrowed CoD:AW and was quite pleased with the result. What follows is a review of the single-player mode only.

    The campaign is, well, Call of Duty. Tons of explosions,    I'm a BF person when it comes to online shooters. However, I felt like playing an FPS campaign, just for relaxation. After having skipped a couple of CoD games (my last one was Modern Warfare 3 and it was tiresome) I borrowed CoD:AW and was quite pleased with the result. What follows is a review of the single-player mode only.

    The campaign is, well, Call of Duty. Tons of explosions, overly epic action, "you're a regular soldier, but it so happens that you save the world" sort of stuff. The plot has its moment and takes around 5-6 hours to complete. It's full of cliches and a quasi-patriotic solemnity. It's also annoying at times. The total death toll after one playthrough reached 1700 casualties. This means that 1700 people died shot by the player/protagonist. And I find it difficult to believe that such a killing-machine can be incapacitated or imprisoned by someone and is rendered helpless. I just don't buy it. And this, I mean the heroes weaknesses, are constantly shown "during cut-scenes" to add drama to the action. However, instead of drama, I find it annoying. Take for instance the stealth mission in Detroid. You have a freaking exo-suit that allows you to bend metal and tear off car doors: why can't I punch the first encoutered guard in the face and take away his rifle? I don't know. And this sucks.

    Overall, I found the campaign rather pleasant. So I'd give it a 6,5 and as halves aren't allowed, 7 it is!    … Expand
  65. gudulster
    May 3, 2015
    1
    This is such a piece of garbage. Not only is this one of the worst cod games, but is one of the worst games ever made. There is so much lag, the game is so poorly optimized, menus are awful and the game itself is just ridiculous. They spent no time ironing out the many problems of this game. Not enough people play this crappy game, that you can even play the game mode you want to. so teamThis is such a piece of garbage. Not only is this one of the worst cod games, but is one of the worst games ever made. There is so much lag, the game is so poorly optimized, menus are awful and the game itself is just ridiculous. They spent no time ironing out the many problems of this game. Not enough people play this crappy game, that you can even play the game mode you want to. so team deathmatch it is... This is only the previous cod games with frickin jumping. Don't waste your time, cuz the game developers could care less anyway.… Expand
  66. InsaneLaserPT
    Apr 18, 2015
    7
    7/10
    The game is not bad but there are some things that really suck in this game:
    -Only some guns are good (ASM1, Bal-27)
    -Exos are really crap after some time.
    -Some connection problems.
  67. BobbyM747
    Apr 14, 2015
    2
    Oh great, another call of duty title. Decided to try this when it was free during a weekend on steam. It is just like the rest, but with a few more features. It was fun at first, but then FPS was all over the place, and it became repetitive very quickly. I don't know what it is about MW3 and BO2 that makes them addictive for me, but this isn't great at all. Completely overhyped, to theOh great, another call of duty title. Decided to try this when it was free during a weekend on steam. It is just like the rest, but with a few more features. It was fun at first, but then FPS was all over the place, and it became repetitive very quickly. I don't know what it is about MW3 and BO2 that makes them addictive for me, but this isn't great at all. Completely overhyped, to the maximum capacity. Weapons are not impressive at all, the maps are decent, create a character is actually pretty cool. That's about it. The only reason I give this a score of 2 is because of the new movement and new character creation. Other than those two, its the same as the rest.… Expand
  68. kwilks3
    Apr 1, 2015
    3
    I buy COD games for multi-player only, so I can only comment on that aspect of the game. That being said, I didn't buy this game, it was a gift. After all us PC gamers got ripped off buying an incomplete shoddy port of Ghosts, I vowed never to buy anymore IW versions of this game, and now I can add Sledgehammer Games to that list.

    Pro's - The game is beautiful. Graphics are a solid    I buy COD games for multi-player only, so I can only comment on that aspect of the game. That being said, I didn't buy this game, it was a gift. After all us PC gamers got ripped off buying an incomplete shoddy port of Ghosts, I vowed never to buy anymore IW versions of this game, and now I can add Sledgehammer Games to that list.

    Pro's -
    The game is beautiful. Graphics are a solid 9+.

    Most of the movement is fluid, and most of the weapons feel balanced.

    The customization of the avatar's outfit and Exo is a nice touch

    Con's -
    P2P, after repeatedly being told that the game would have dedicated servers, that simply is not the case... again. This game has so much potential, but is hindered greatly without dedicated servers. This leads into problems in many areas, and a major issue is the lag compensation. One game I'll have ok hit detection, then the next I'll squeeze off 4-5 bullets directly on target, and not one will register. This leads to whoever I'm shooting at to hear me fire, turn and return fire and kill me with bullet. Spectating your team will also display this behavior in lag comp, and leads to a ton of warranted complaining.

    The spawn system needs to be reworked. You will literally spawn right in front of the enemy, making it super easy to be killed. I've spawned several time in the middle of a group of the opposing team, which always results in me being killed again instantly, and usually the enemy will get a team kill or two in the process.

    The maps are decent size for players without exo suits, but since all players have them, it makes the maps feel really small.

    DLC... there are a few issues here. First is the fact that Microsoft and Activision are in bed with each other, and have a deal worked out where Xbox gets any DLC 1 month before the other platforms, which IMO is a dumb practice that alienates everyone else that paid good money for the game too. Why are we be penalized because we do not own an Xbox? Makes no sense. This doesn't make me want to buy an Xbox, it makes me not want to buy the game. The 2nd part is this DLC nonsense is that is separates the gaming community into the haves and have nots. As seen with MW2, BO, MW3, BO2, Ghosts, and now AW, it splits the community and quickly kills the game. The falloff on Ghosts was so bad that the game was a ghost town after the first DLC was released, but that also had to do with the fact that Ghosts was a horrible game. And now that you can purchase guns, ie laser guns, this game has become a Pay to Win game. The laser guns are ridiculous overpowered and ruin what little balance the game had.

    Conclusion -
    Avoid this game at all costs. It's 6 moths after release, and major flaws/issues still have not been addressed, and this point, probably never will. It's definitely not worth the $59.99 price tag, and even at 50% off, that would still be a stretch. Save your money.    … Expand
  69. IGN_Reviews
    Mar 28, 2015
    10
    Literally the best game ever made! The game contains beautiful graphics and the weapons feels fun to shot. Singeplayer has a immersive story, great characters and best music ever used in a video game. Multiplayer requires skill and 360 noscoping has never felt better.

    11/10 IGN_Reviews
  70. alexalexalexale
    Mar 28, 2015
    7
    Finaly somethink new and fresh this doesnt save the series forever but it is a step in the right direction
    just hope the next one is better that would be awesome
  71. alexsch
    Mar 18, 2015
    0
    terrible lag due to per to per servers. They should be ashamed of themselves to put this product out to the market in a state that can only be describe as beta testing at best.
  72. kane_1371
    Mar 8, 2015
    0
    No, I do not.
    Good thing that I didn't waste 60 dollars on this.
    You know what? This crap is so unbalanced that the game is actually dead outside of Team deathmatch. The lasers are all you need to dominate a match. the game is a bigger chaotic mess than ever again. Almost any class except submachine gun and lasers are useless. The variety of assault rifles is a joke with only one    No, I do not.
    Good thing that I didn't waste 60 dollars on this.
    You know what?
    This crap is so unbalanced that the game is actually dead outside of Team deathmatch.
    The lasers are all you need to dominate a match.
    the game is a bigger chaotic mess than ever again.
    Almost any class except submachine gun and lasers are useless.
    The variety of assault rifles is a joke with only one semi automatic weapon that is also crap.
    This game is a sad end to what was started so many years ago back to the first Call of Duty.
    I bet more than half of these kids playing COD nowadays have no idea what it was like to actually play a good Call of Duty multiplayer.
    don't waste your money and get a better game.

    Also no dedicated servers, yeah....    … Expand
  73. Allions
    Feb 22, 2015
    2
    Boght the key for this at 24€. My last COD was MW3 on xbox and i did not like it a lot.
    Anyway... this is a bad copy of titanfall with the COD multuplayer. The single player is BORING, feels the same thing from others CODs. The multiplayer is LAGGY (no dedicated server) always with the NAT problem (damn i play every online game OK and with this i need to do al the mess with my router?)    Boght the key for this at 24€. My last COD was MW3 on xbox and i did not like it a lot.
    Anyway... this is a bad copy of titanfall with the COD multuplayer. The single player is BORING, feels the same thing from others CODs. The multiplayer is LAGGY (no dedicated server) always with the NAT problem (damn i play every online game OK and with this i need to do al the mess with my router?) and not very funny. Many DLC as always with maps and guns... and the price is too high. Anyway i not reccomend them because the game is really bad. In multiplayer everyone only jump to avoid being hit. WTF!?    … Expand
  74. AHMEDXtreme
    Feb 19, 2015
    0
    This game is just a BS*t and S*ks to the end . nothing new were added and if you,re trying to have a good match you wont cause of its sick methods however they,re trying to show show new features but they fail and so that this game doesn't deserve any money . stupid game
  75. Saratosa75
    Feb 18, 2015
    4
    I haven't played any CoD game since the original. So count me off, as someone who got sick of the CoD games over the years. Nope. I played BF, BF2, BF3, The last game I've played was "Bad Company 2", which I thought was fun and well made. So I said, what the hell...I'll give it a shot. Bought it with a big discount (50% off) and see what's the fuss is all about.
    So....I think, there    I haven't played any CoD game since the original. So count me off, as someone who got sick of the CoD games over the years. Nope. I played BF, BF2, BF3, The last game I've played was "Bad Company 2", which I thought was fun and well made. So I said, what the hell...I'll give it a shot. Bought it with a big discount (50% off) and see what's the fuss is all about.
    So....I think, there isn't much changed since the original CoD. Sure the graphics look better, but damn, this game is old! The way it plays is just so same like 10 years ago! They seem to be unable to innovate? Why is this still small claustrophobic maps, while the single player is a tunnel shooter? Predetermined paths and scripted events, dumb AI. I thought we were over this a long time ago!
    Graphics is one thing, but for c-st sake..innovate something already! I can't even imagine, that all the incarnations of this game over the years (I can't even count the CoD titles I skipped over the years) and - apparently- it's still the same? People need to stop buying this, because in the corporate gaming world, your wallet is your vote. Please do not spend money on this series, the developers and the distributor needs to get a clear message, that it's time to move on!    … Expand
  76. Rizwan
    Feb 16, 2015
    10
    Well , I am not a Call of duty fan at all.Don't even a call of duty player. I am a lover of Sci-fi game.And as this Call of duty game has turned into a great Sci-fi game containing a great gameplay, multyplayer,graphics,story,fun,action and environments, I don't just like this one. I love this one
  77. WOODERSON1105
    Feb 14, 2015
    2
    Do not buy the pc version of this game. There is no dedicated servers like they said there were there are alot of players with cheats and hacks they dont kick . You cant enjoy the multiplayer gameplay because of cheats and spawns. some games you will get spawn killed dozens of times even with a gaming pc the maps start out very laggy this is by far the worst cod yet ghost was pretty badDo not buy the pc version of this game. There is no dedicated servers like they said there were there are alot of players with cheats and hacks they dont kick . You cant enjoy the multiplayer gameplay because of cheats and spawns. some games you will get spawn killed dozens of times even with a gaming pc the maps start out very laggy this is by far the worst cod yet ghost was pretty bad but nothing compared to this black ops 2 was last decent game cod has. Every year when they put out game they have a stament saying there will be dedicated servers but there never is. It might just be the pc version i dont know but worst game on pc every. DO NOT BUY… Expand
  78. badbluewolf
    Feb 4, 2015
    2
    It might be fine on consoles. I don't know. Judging it on the PC version. It's completely and utterly unplayable for about 3 hours until you figure out how to optimise the damn thing. 'Oh hey' says the game, 'you want to make your game look better on a good machine?'. 'Yes' I reply. 'Well tough' says the game. So glad I only got the free multiplayer trial and since this series nowIt might be fine on consoles. I don't know. Judging it on the PC version. It's completely and utterly unplayable for about 3 hours until you figure out how to optimise the damn thing. 'Oh hey' says the game, 'you want to make your game look better on a good machine?'. 'Yes' I reply. 'Well tough' says the game. So glad I only got the free multiplayer trial and since this series now emphasises that multiplayer is now as important if not more important than single player, I'll take that as a sign to judge it entirely on what I have seen. So concluding, it's a horrible, buggy, badly optimised mess. Give it a mess, 2 out of 10.… Expand
  79. Fancypenguin
    Jan 25, 2015
    10
    I don't understand the low rating for this game. Yeah, the game is garbage but how can a game where Kevin Spacey declares war on the entire world have a 4.5 rating? 10/10
  80. UnOffical
    Jan 24, 2015
    6
    The call of duty series has always been a strange one. Call of duty 4 was brilliant, and was (in my personal opinion) one of the best COD games ever made. MW2 was highly anticipated, and did an OK job at expanding the story line and improving multiplayer by a considerable amount. One of the first "Off topic" call of duty games was World At War, which changed the whole way COD was played.The call of duty series has always been a strange one. Call of duty 4 was brilliant, and was (in my personal opinion) one of the best COD games ever made. MW2 was highly anticipated, and did an OK job at expanding the story line and improving multiplayer by a considerable amount. One of the first "Off topic" call of duty games was World At War, which changed the whole way COD was played. Advanced warfare is a modern World at war. It has drastically changed the way COD is played, in good (and bad) ways. Many people have became highly critical of this game due to it's new features. Because of this, AW has developed a sort of "Love/Hate" Relationship with its fans. I think that sledgehammer took a huge risk with this game- which was unexpected, due most cod games being the same thing, but with different things in them. Call of duty is a lot like a sandwich. The concept is the bread, and the series/title is the filling. The bread stays the same, but the filling changes. They have changed the bread to flatbread for this game.
    The campaign lacks replay ability. It's very short too. Engine is very old, and it's turning into titanfall.
    If you're a die hard COD fan and you have the money spare, this is a decent buy. If you've never played COD games before, give this one a miss- it's nothing like its predecessors.    … Expand
  81. fycworldwide
    Jan 21, 2015
    7
    Basically what sledgehammer did was take ghosts, improve it significantly, and add a jetpack because why the **** not. This ends up with a mediocre game, that is more enjoyable than ghosts by a longshot. Nothing amazing, but its alright.
  82. rlilewis
    Jan 21, 2015
    0
    No privately rented dedicated server support and a server browser... STOP BUYING THIS GARBAGE!

    If the developers can't be bothered to implement the basic building blocks of an online FPS game then why bother giving them money!? I don't want to sit in some stupid lobby like these filthy console peasants waiting to get a game, and then when you do get a game have to put up with ridiculous    No privately rented dedicated server support and a server browser... STOP BUYING THIS GARBAGE!

    If the developers can't be bothered to implement the basic building blocks of an online FPS game then why bother giving them money!? I don't want to sit in some stupid lobby like these filthy console peasants waiting to get a game, and then when you do get a game have to put up with ridiculous latency, host migrations or pathetically low max players per match.

    P2P match making lobbies are clearly vastly inferior to dedicated servers where I choose which server to join to ENSURE I get good latency not having to hope for good latency, and no, getting dedicated servers hosted by the developers in a data centre isn't good enough either.

    We need privately owned/rented servers without any restrictions on what companies we can rent from with a fully functional server browser and favorites list.    … Expand
  83. irishbloke
    Jan 17, 2015
    1
    I wanted to like this game, but the multi player game is unplayable for me. I have above the recommended specs and 2 months later i cant play the game due to huge fps drops in the multiplayer game. Avoid this if you have AMD hardware.
  84. megaD
    Jan 15, 2015
    10
    This game feels like a completely new Call of Duty! The graphics are much better than previously and the sound has been also improved too. The facial animation is astonishing and having Kevin Spacey as a really good actor in the game is awesome. Moreover the game has been bug free on day-1. This is something where Ubisoft and EA I.e. failed lately! Advanced Warfare doesn't have Nvidia-onlyThis game feels like a completely new Call of Duty! The graphics are much better than previously and the sound has been also improved too. The facial animation is astonishing and having Kevin Spacey as a really good actor in the game is awesome. Moreover the game has been bug free on day-1. This is something where Ubisoft and EA I.e. failed lately! Advanced Warfare doesn't have Nvidia-only features anymore either like the non-sense dynamic fur of the dog in Ghosts! Well done Splash Hammer Games!… Expand
  85. Floof
    Jan 12, 2015
    2
    A new call of duty. Its like taking the last years presents and wrapping them again. No one wants that. It has also been ported to PC quite poorly. I don't even see the so called "next-gen" textures. They should focus on bug-fixing and porting the game better. For me, the game doesn't lag or anything like that. Its just that they still use the player-as-host method which is pretty oldA new call of duty. Its like taking the last years presents and wrapping them again. No one wants that. It has also been ported to PC quite poorly. I don't even see the so called "next-gen" textures. They should focus on bug-fixing and porting the game better. For me, the game doesn't lag or anything like that. Its just that they still use the player-as-host method which is pretty old already. If people have a bad connection its just cancer to play. I played this for 20+ hours then i uninstalled it. Its like MW3 all over again. 70€ down the drain. 0/5 would buy again. (Still giving a 2 because of the way things are going, i hope that someday i might want to play Call Of Duty again. Like in the old days.)… Expand
  86. andrewscool101
    Jan 11, 2015
    0
    Very poor game. Campaign has no FOV slider making me feel sick playing it. When you play a mission in the campaign, there is a very long loading screen that will always stop at 50% during an intro video and won't load the rest until it's over meaning it takes a while to get into a mission. I have a pretty powerful PC so it's not my hardware. If the game crashes, you quit or even change aVery poor game. Campaign has no FOV slider making me feel sick playing it. When you play a mission in the campaign, there is a very long loading screen that will always stop at 50% during an intro video and won't load the rest until it's over meaning it takes a while to get into a mission. I have a pretty powerful PC so it's not my hardware. If the game crashes, you quit or even change a graphical setting, the intro video plays again (un-skippable) and the game has to reload, extremely annoying.
    The multiplayer has an FOV slider that goes up to 90, good enough for me. Well, it would be if the multiplayer actually worked! I haven't been online since November since the servers have never worked! Activision has been less than helpful until finally I spoke to someone who went through all the troubleshooting steps with me with no avail, so he said he would create a case report. I hope that something gets done about this.
    I should have listen to the "mixed" reviews on Steam and not bothered with this game.    … Expand
  87. NutZdk
    Jan 10, 2015
    0
    Im gonna review the multiplayer only here, singleplayer might be good - but who the hell buys this for the singleplayer?
    No dedicated servers like usual, a big fat lie from the devs saying we will get them as usual.
    Performance issues, hit detection issues, lag issues - superlong load times that will sometimes just lock up and have you sit and watch your monitor till it times out 5-10    Im gonna review the multiplayer only here, singleplayer might be good - but who the hell buys this for the singleplayer?
    No dedicated servers like usual, a big fat lie from the devs saying we will get them as usual.
    Performance issues, hit detection issues, lag issues - superlong load times that will sometimes just lock up and have you sit and watch your monitor till it times out 5-10 minutes later without a chance to cancel it.
    The whole thing just feels lazy and it stinks a developer that doesnt give a **** about their game or their craft.
    The issues is killing the game and the devs are adding gamemodes and double exp - they clearly dont give a **** ... and why should they, come October/November and we have another set of devs that feed us the same bull**** and made up lies about their game.    … Expand
  88. parttimegenius
    Jan 7, 2015
    4
    Been playing COD since the first installment (yes, I’m that old). Skipped Ghosts, but bought all the others, even though I started to like the franchise less and less. Tried Advanced Warfare for a good three weeks and have just uninstalled it. Here are my two cents:

    - Poor optimization for pc: slightly larger maps (roughly half of all the maps) lag intolerably for minutes on end. And    Been playing COD since the first installment (yes, I’m that old). Skipped Ghosts, but bought all the others, even though I started to like the franchise less and less. Tried Advanced Warfare for a good three weeks and have just uninstalled it. Here are my two cents:

    - Poor optimization for pc: slightly larger maps (roughly half of all the maps) lag intolerably for minutes on end. And yes, my system (decent i5, 32 Gb of Ram, SSD, Radeon R9 290) should be able to handle the game easily. Hell, all the other games (including the new Wolfenstein) do. When the lag settles (about five minutes in) the game is almost over. The lag never goes away completely, it just becomes less of an issue. At the start, it’s like wading through mud. In an iron suit. Turn shaders on (an in-game video setting) and you’re lag free. But in that case most maps won’t load. At all. Pick your favorite option. Rinse and repeat.

    - Poor optimization for pc: the lag compensation is laughable. The faster your connection, the more you will die. According to the killcam, you might even die standing up when you’re actually prone. Or die while in cover, when killcam shows you in the open. Et cetera.

    - Bad anti-cheat (if any). There are cheaters. Period.

    - Small maps: the map may look big at first, but they aren’t really. You move so fast this time around (thanks to the exo suit), even the larger maps take seconds to cross. That is, if you can overcome the ever present lag.

    - Unbalanced guns: the laser guns require no aim. Whatsoever. Say ‘bye’ to skill.

    - Poor patching choices. Instead of fixing (or even addressing) the lag issues, the developers decided to tweak some guns. I can live with that, since the balance was not all that great. So what they did, was make lasers stronger. That’s right, the already overpowered, no aim needed gun was made even stronger than it was in the first place. Now all pre-teens really have to use them.

    - Controllers are allowed on the pc. They have auto aim. Which sort of defeats the purpose of skill based shooters.

    - Because controllers are allowed, pitch and aim (turn-speed) are adjustable, not in game, but in the configuration. On many maps you will see people constantly doing 1260’s in the air, while they quickscope anything bigger than a flea with amazing ease. I wonder if that was supposed to happen.

    - You will get shot in the back. A lot. Sure; flanking has always been a valid tactic, but this time around, because of the extremely fast movement, the ability to do all kind of jumps (exo suit) and the poor map design (did I mention they are small?) most one on one gunfights end by being shot in the back. Not by the player you were fighting, but by someone else entirely. This accounts for about 60-75% of all the kills.

    - And, lastly, there are no dedicated servers.

    That’s about it. Try for yourself. Maybe you will like it. I did not.    … Expand
  89. Le__Xenomorph
    Jan 6, 2015
    7
    This is kind of a first impression review. I have played a good 3 hours of the game on Steam. The graphics are amazing, the soundtrack is great, and just overall it is visually beautiful. Not to mention the story (from what I've seen) is much stronger than the other Call of Duty games. The guns are very cool as well and do feel like they are from the future. But where the game's problemsThis is kind of a first impression review. I have played a good 3 hours of the game on Steam. The graphics are amazing, the soundtrack is great, and just overall it is visually beautiful. Not to mention the story (from what I've seen) is much stronger than the other Call of Duty games. The guns are very cool as well and do feel like they are from the future. But where the game's problems lie are in its questionable frame-rate drops and its amount of glitches. One of them is the off lip-syncing. I don't know if anyone has this issue, but the lips seem to be a split second behind their voices. Not to mention some murky textures and sometimes, the unresponsive controls. Overall, the controls are good, but sometimes when i double-jump, my character doesn't respond to it. I see a great potential for this game as long as they have dedicated servers for the multiplayer. 7/10 (good)… Expand
  90. global_1995
    Jan 1, 2015
    5
    garbage game, not too many things i can control in the game that we should be able to, its like theyre teasing us, keep on getting "loading" in the middle of intense scenes, not very realistic, good graphics horrible recticles and dont ever get back up from my "team" in campaign. i thought call of duty wouldve stepped it up
  91. vaultah
    Dec 31, 2014
    0
    It's lagging, it's full of hackers, it doesn't have dedicated servers. I was a CoD fanboy, I bought the Digital Pro edition of the game and now I regret it.
  92. YouDieToday
    Dec 30, 2014
    3
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Because the concept of the exo skeletons seemed so awesome, I decided to pre-order this game on PC.
    When starting the single-player, I noticed the great graphics. Sadly, the game had to start like it usually does. You lose a compagnion. Reaally sucks.

    The single player itself is, just like most of the call of duty's, awesome, but the storyline is always boring. It's so predictable! Some random missions, and then some development in the storyline. Even a kid can see where the storyline goes to. No surprises, really. Except for the alliance with Comrack, which I enjoyed. The extra features were nice. The graphics of the storyline movies are outstanding, the best I have yet seen in a game. If this could turn in actual gameplay, wow. The gameplay graphics are still the same.

    The storyline is, again, way too short.. I would rather have them publish a game every two years that's long with an outstanding storyline and great multiplayer, than this rubbish. It's all about the money, it seems.

    As I explored the multiplayer, I became very disappointed. The exo skeletons aren't an extra. They suck. I can imagine it's amazing for some, because of new speed, new dimensions, a new way of playing etc., but for me it's plain rubbish. I like to play a game stealthy without camping, but here there is no stealth at all. And if you're trying to be, someone will always spot u while hovering over you.

    I play with a controller on my pc and I feel I have a disadvantage. People with gaming mouses can set it up to reduce the recoil of the weapon and thus stabilize it while shooting. When I shoot, the weapon mostly shoots everywhere, while others (I watch the killcams) don't seem to have any difficulty with firing their weapon.

    I don't feel like buying anymore of their games!! If only I could sell this very bad game!    … Expand
  93. Orderan
    Dec 29, 2014
    4
    I don't know if this game can be called titanfall 1.5 (since it has more content in term of weapons) or titanfall beta (since the exo armor gameplay is less exploited).

    I am not going to going to talk about the fact that activision promised dedicated servers, giving a picture of a guy giving the finger would have been less straightforward than doing that. For the rest, it's still    I don't know if this game can be called titanfall 1.5 (since it has more content in term of weapons) or titanfall beta (since the exo armor gameplay is less exploited).

    I am not going to going to talk about the fact that activision promised dedicated servers, giving a picture of a guy giving the finger would have been less straightforward than doing that.

    For the rest, it's still Call Of Duty. The same graphic engine pushed even as it is writhing in pain on the floor agonizing. The same "shot-take cover-watch your allies discuss how screwed you are" campaign.The same gameplay of chosing the sames guns with different models that have been there for 10 years ,then rush into a deathmatch to have fun with your killstreak, etcaetera...

    Something that evolved so little (and not enough often in a good way) that if you have already a title from MW2 onward into your library, you should reconsider if Advanced Warfare is worth it)    … Expand
  94. TAFM17
    Dec 28, 2014
    0
    Just...Just no. £30 on this piece of crap. It's the same as ALL the other call of duty games, with sub-par graphics for the ps4, and for some reason the game just freezes when in mid-battle! It really is a bad game. DO NOT BUY THIS! .Well, there is a 4 hour campaign (!) , so nothing to talk about there, and the online is just bad.It's a copy and paste generic shooter, but you can doubleJust...Just no. £30 on this piece of crap. It's the same as ALL the other call of duty games, with sub-par graphics for the ps4, and for some reason the game just freezes when in mid-battle! It really is a bad game. DO NOT BUY THIS! .Well, there is a 4 hour campaign (!) , so nothing to talk about there, and the online is just bad.It's a copy and paste generic shooter, but you can double jump and run faster sometimes.So disappointed… Expand
  95. Phallex
    Dec 28, 2014
    1
    After the disaster that was Black Ops, I've stayed away from COD games. After reading a few reviews on here that critics were just fanboy bashing and that they had genuinely tried something different in the FPS field, I decided to get a (discounted) copy.

    What a disappointment. This is just the same tired COD, the same tired gameplay, the same graphics. With a double-jump feature.    After the disaster that was Black Ops, I've stayed away from COD games. After reading a few reviews on here that critics were just fanboy bashing and that they had genuinely tried something different in the FPS field, I decided to get a (discounted) copy.

    What a disappointment. This is just the same tired COD, the same tired gameplay, the same graphics. With a double-jump feature. That's it. That's classed as innovation now.    … Expand
  96. regimechange
    Dec 27, 2014
    3
    A decent revamp of an already tired series. The new gadgets and tricks for more mobility help some with the multiplayer quality, but its nothing I haven't seen done better in other games before. 3/10 for effort.

    Also, still no dedicated servers, and the game is so unoptimized its ridiculous. I can play Ryse: Son of Rome on max but not CODAW?
  97. DrugsMeazureTim
    Dec 23, 2014
    8
    this game renewed the cod franchise. despite the short single player. the engine now have been changed. despite that on normal graphics it looks bad. ye my video card is gtx 660
    cod seen awful days since mw3 and ghosts. and then this one arrived. with a new fresh thing. the best cod since mw2 without a doubt. the singleplayer was short but fun overall. hit detection is now better. no    this game renewed the cod franchise. despite the short single player. the engine now have been changed. despite that on normal graphics it looks bad. ye my video card is gtx 660
    cod seen awful days since mw3 and ghosts. and then this one arrived. with a new fresh thing. the best cod since mw2 without a doubt. the singleplayer was short but fun overall. hit detection is now better. no trickshoots. no 10 year old kids like in the **** xbox live. i can enjoy it without 10 year old **** or frame rate issues. game is great. i hate activision, but this game made me bit forgive to them    … Expand
  98. NachoGentile
    Dec 23, 2014
    4
    This game is well... A joke.

    Starting from the technical side: Let's suppose you bought the game, you install it and open the Single Player. The resolution is wrong, and you want to change it, but you can't! There's no "Settings" in your menu... Ok, let's play, New Game... And the intro video starts playing. A fairly long video that introduces you to the campaign. Then the video    This game is well... A joke.

    Starting from the technical side:
    Let's suppose you bought the game, you install it and open the Single Player. The resolution is wrong, and you want to change it, but you can't! There's no "Settings" in your menu... Ok, let's play, New Game... And the intro video starts playing. A fairly long video that introduces you to the campaign. Then the video finishes and the game is still loading. I have an SSD so I thought it was downloading some updates or something... Ok game starts, you go to options (now options exists), change the resolution, apply, and then boom! black screen, the intro video plays again, the whole game loads again, another long 2 minutes of loading. What is going on?? The only setting you can change without reloading the whole game is VSync!

    Once you configured the game and it performs ok you think you're ready to play... But it's just the beginning! the textures get weird, the game starts to be unplayable in some parts, there's stuttering, memory leaks, crashes, sometimes the whole computer crashes (that may be Windows 8 fault...). Then you start reading online or trying around disabling some settings. The conclusion: you will learn by hearth the dialogues of the intro video, I promise!

    Ok... aside from the technical problems... The graphics look like the game is 2 or 3 years old, Battlefield 4 released more than one year ago have by far better graphics. But graphics are not everything! that's true...

    About the single player: The campaign starts in a interesting way, it seems a cool game, but at some point random things that are not explained start to happen, it's like you missed a couple of chapters or something... You lose completely the story line.

    Another thing I don't like from this game is that some little things that make the game more realistic are not really accomplished. For example, collisions with dead bodies, you really pass through the bodies like they were ghosts. Or for example melee killing doesn't have a cool animation like many games today.

    AI, at least for me, is a very important from an FPS. In this game it feels like you are supposed to attack from a specific point of the level otherwise enemy bots, well.. They act weird, they don't know what to do, it's like... you are not supposed to be here! now what? sometimes they stare you, sometimes they kill you, sometimes they ignore you... I would expect something similar to Crysis 3, I know this game is not supposed to let you choose how and where you attack from, but at least the enemies would be able to react to a attack strategy change.

    I don't know, maybe I'm being to critic because I compare it with BF4, which also had a lot of bugs and technical problems some persisting today, but even if BF4 drove me mad with all the crashes, memory leak and incompatibility with Windows 8.1, it seems like a very achieved game compared to the PC version of Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare.

    I gave it a 4/10 because I found the multiplayer interesting and funny, futuristic weapons are cool and it reminds Quake because of some details. The double jump other kind of futuristic things you have give a game a cool online gameplay, that is a mix of Titanfall (except you can't run on walls :( ), Crysis 3 and Quake 3 Excessive mods.

    The conclusion is... It's a console port, a not really achieved one. Maybe better achieved than previous versions, ok, but not enough for PC players, who demand some minimum quality. It have a lot of graphic options yes, but it's because you need to tweak a lot the game for working on your rig and configuring the game is really painful. You feel stupid for spending the money on that game every time some error appears, and you expect for the budget of the game, a better story development during the campaign.

    I haven't played too long this game online but the times I did it took too long to make the matchmaking. Titanfall which is probably less played than CoD:AW is very fast finding a game, what's happening? I also read that there are several problems with the servers like lag and disconnecting that I haven't experienced yet.

    Don't buy this game on PC.    … Expand
  99. slava3d
    Dec 22, 2014
    8
    good game !!! gute spiel !!! paar bugs aber es macht troztem spass !!! mix aus CoD BO2 und Crysis 2 !!! Nächste teil wird auf jeden fall auch gekauft.
  100. Davidesol
    Dec 17, 2014
    3
    This franchise is getting worst with every new game, when i purchase ghosts i said myself, that will the last one, i liked it, i had so many problems with my system configuration (2 graphic card, triple monitor setup...), and also is wasnt good enough to pay the amount it costs.

    I am disappointed again, this time game works better, but it doesnt worth the money spent on it, short    This franchise is getting worst with every new game, when i purchase ghosts i said myself, that will the last one, i liked it, i had so many problems with my system configuration (2 graphic card, triple monitor setup...), and also is wasnt good enough to pay the amount it costs.

    I am disappointed again, this time game works better, but it doesnt worth the money spent on it, short singleplayer campaings, and barely played a few hours on multiplayer vs hundreds played on modern warfare series :(    … Expand
prev
Page:

Awards & Rankings

85
#85 Best PC Game of 2014
24
#24 Most Discussed PC Game of 2014
59
#59 Most Shared PC Game of 2014

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
78

Generally favorable reviews - based on 18 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 15 out of 18
  2. Mixed: 2 out of 18
  3. Negative: 1 out of 18
  1. CD-Action
    Jan 9, 2015
    85
    This game is a lot of fun. There’s some Crysis in it, some Titanfall, some elements borrowed from Unreal Tournament and Battlefield. Underneath it’s still Call of Duty though, finally modernized in terms of visuals. [13/2014, p.50]
  2. PC PowerPlay
    Dec 23, 2014
    80
    It's the best Call of Duty campaign in years, and the multiplayer continues to scratch a certain itch. [Jan 2015, p.64]
  3. GameWatcher
    Dec 14, 2014
    80
    A new engine and new ideas breath new life into a series that was in serious danger of turning stale.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »