Battlefield V

 PC
User Score
3.0

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 3148 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 674 out of 3148
  2. Mixed: 296 out of 3148
  3. Negative: 2,178 out of 3148
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. pA1N
    Dec 15, 2018
    2
    Why did you have to make it call of duty? why the player models feel cheap and hollow? why the new game modes are so bad? why half of the game is not ready on release? why the gameplay feel of battlefield 1 is way better?
  2. BFDIEHARDFANBOY
    Dec 5, 2018
    0
    EA **** up the franchise. So for 60 bucks you get, half or less of the game modes, half or less of the game content, which is reduced by third from bf4 and bf3. Ridiculous singleplayer stories. Broken game-mechanics from bf1943 and the censorship that took censorship on a whole new level. Thank god I got this game on a separate new Origin account so I could refund the game by selling theEA **** up the franchise. So for 60 bucks you get, half or less of the game modes, half or less of the game content, which is reduced by third from bf4 and bf3. Ridiculous singleplayer stories. Broken game-mechanics from bf1943 and the censorship that took censorship on a whole new level. Thank god I got this game on a separate new Origin account so I could refund the game by selling the god damn account for 30 bucks ... right before the **** sale promotion hit the market.SO if you are hardcore bf fan boy .. DO NOT BUY .. if you are COD kid casual brain-dead player ... GO AHEAD .. u shall enjoy this pathetic pile of manure.And to add they killed the soul and heart of BF games with the progression system of vehicles and guns ... A BIG GO DUCKYOURSELF DICE ... not a single dev worked on bf3 and earlier releases have no part in this pile of manure. No programmer will stay in this company to do this such bad game. DID i mentioned that you can no longer swap team ... yeah .. **** you fanboys ... did i mentioned that you have to unlock weapons by completing weekly assignments and if you don't complete them u have to wait again for this assignment .... ANYONE WHO is a fan since 1942 bf game will say THAT THIS GAME IS NOT A BATTLEFIELD GAME ... go FУcК yourselves you paid bots DICE blackhat SEO ... and i made this acc to post my first review to warn other veteran BAttlefield fans NOT TO BUY THIS PILE of garbage… Expand
  3. RustyJames
    Jan 21, 2021
    1
    Worst first person shooter in last few years. Incredibly bad game with tons of bugs, cheaters, unbalanced mechanics, stupid single player, lots of garbage content, ruined WW2 setting. no idea, how they ruined the series since BF 2 and BF 3, but they do the most iconic downgrade. Dice, it is Battlefield, not COD and Unreal Tournament mix with SJW messages. It's totally OK when game finishesWorst first person shooter in last few years. Incredibly bad game with tons of bugs, cheaters, unbalanced mechanics, stupid single player, lots of garbage content, ruined WW2 setting. no idea, how they ruined the series since BF 2 and BF 3, but they do the most iconic downgrade. Dice, it is Battlefield, not COD and Unreal Tournament mix with SJW messages. It's totally OK when game finishes like 300-0 5 times in a row, with bunch of guys with 50-3 score (ofc tank players) in that trashgame.… Expand
  4. Skipp3rUA
    Dec 1, 2018
    1
    Just another EA uncompleted trash game. Boycott EA products, and you will save Battlefield franchise!!!
  5. Baschy
    Nov 28, 2018
    4
    I am an open minded guy, because I could see past the whole historical incorrectness (but I understand why people dislike it), but the game play has nothing to do with battlefield anymore. There are no parked vehicles that stand around, instead you re-sporn right inside the vehicle. This includes airplanes, witch you cant even land anymore. This feels more and more like call of duty, whichI am an open minded guy, because I could see past the whole historical incorrectness (but I understand why people dislike it), but the game play has nothing to do with battlefield anymore. There are no parked vehicles that stand around, instead you re-sporn right inside the vehicle. This includes airplanes, witch you cant even land anymore. This feels more and more like call of duty, which is not a bad game per se but battlefield shouid feel like battlefield and CoD should feel like CoD. I can not rate this game higher than below average because it is an utter disappointment. Also dislike EA's politics so stay away from this. Do not support this.… Expand
  6. lnadekol
    Dec 3, 2018
    0
    Не куплю даж по скидке это говно. Больше смейтесь на всяких закрытых вечеринках , мы будем смеяться последними)
  7. Denis_Marins
    Dec 17, 2018
    2
    Это полный п*здц они "пофиксили" ТТК, единственное что было номальное в игре и за это я отдал 3500Р? Что за херня DICE? ЗАЧЕМ???????
  8. BillCaggs16
    Dec 3, 2018
    0
    When the company turns against the people it is supposed to be serving, it will die. And Battlefield, EA, Dice, etc. all deserve what is coming.
  9. ParaMedic
    Nov 28, 2018
    3
    Not a friend of their wild customization, weapongrinding and headless-chicken-lone-wolf-gamemodes. Singleplayer as multiplayer feel wrong and somewhat unrealistic due to constant things that are in the wrong place and feel wrong. I feel like they take the word historic as serious as in their last games: not the least bit. They didn't try out something, they made it a bland BattlethingNot a friend of their wild customization, weapongrinding and headless-chicken-lone-wolf-gamemodes. Singleplayer as multiplayer feel wrong and somewhat unrealistic due to constant things that are in the wrong place and feel wrong. I feel like they take the word historic as serious as in their last games: not the least bit. They didn't try out something, they made it a bland Battlething (insert random number) puked out by dice.

    Singleplayer:
    Weapons that don't belong on a certain battlefield or theatre of war at all are combined with unrealistic war stories that grandfather made up.
    You are left alone in a somewhat open level with enemies all over the place that somehow thought it was wise to build weapon caches all around the map and don't even guard them at all. You can stealth, wich is mostly somewhat boring or you can shoot your way through wich is also kind of bland since it feels like playing an arena shooter with bots. There is no smart or good use of scripting to shake things up or make some missions more interesting. And the alone part bothers me, except for some special cases wars were not won by one man commandos, wars were won by platoons of soldiers taking objectives. The story snippets are nice and some are inspired by certain historic events that may have happened...but I think people wich really have fought there would be unhappy with how it's told.

    Multiplayer:
    Battliefield finally somewhat feels like the thing Dice wants it to be: another COD game. It's fast and you need to constantly be on the move otherwise you will die. Teamplay is seldom really there and you don't really need it, they patched that out with Battlefield 3 I guess. I hoped that the voice chat would make the game a bit more about teamplay, but it is only used to yell at your teammates or to troll with horrible music. The game is riddled with bugs. i kind of hated most shooters that tried to implement weaponresting for their unreliabilities with that feature. I was surprised that Dice had their problems with it also, and it has cost me my life countless times. And I wouldn't have a problem if girls or people that really feel like girls could play female characters, but I find it confusing to see that 50% of the team is composed of females. There may have been woman in the war, some even fighting, but....next stop Battlefield 6 - weird panzer girls anime ****    … Expand
  10. Clrhilla
    Nov 29, 2018
    1
    I regret buying this game. It's a terrible experience. I am taking it back as soon as the store opens up to get my money back
  11. Vladonnchik
    Dec 3, 2018
    0
    This is a very bad, untruthful, so nasty and tolerant game! For now, i will hate Dice and EA!
  12. cybermax
    Dec 16, 2018
    1
    This game was a lot of fun when it first came out. The gun play was fantastic and was really rewarding for aggressive and strategic play styles. I also liked how there was clear progression for each class. The game was admittedly addicting, especially if you are a completionist. The game also is rewarding for squads that play the objective.

    The game has a lot of bugs though. Here are    This game was a lot of fun when it first came out. The gun play was fantastic and was really rewarding for aggressive and strategic play styles. I also liked how there was clear progression for each class. The game was admittedly addicting, especially if you are a completionist. The game also is rewarding for squads that play the objective.

    The game has a lot of bugs though. Here are some of the bugs that still exist in the game:
    - Bad netcode which causes time-to-death (TTD) sequences at 1 or 2 frames
    - Getting stuck in the environment
    - Unable to jump over ledges that are practically 1 feet high
    - Unable to launch v1 and JB rockets and have half the screen blacked out
    - Cannot adjust assignments and weapon progression while in game
    - Not preventing spawns on squad-mates that are in combat, which leads to instant spawn deaths
    - No being able to spawn on points without clicking to a different point and clicking back
    - Slow loading screens when quitting out after a match has ended

    In mid December Dice updated the game with a longer time-to-kill (TTK) value, which means a large majority of the weapons require more shots to down someone. This change practically changed the game in the worst way possible. Instead of having fun and rewarding gun play, everything now is more spongy and promotes a more defensive/camping style. Before, if you flanked a team you were rewarded with multiple kills. If you flank now, more than often, the enemy team will notice you and take you down before you can finish more than 1 kill. This just promotes squads clustering up with other squads and "zerging" to one point at a time. Also, having a longer time-to-kill doesn't help new players because in order to down someone, you need more precise shots, which is something they may lack when they first start playing the game. So new players will just find that they can't kill enemies and they still die quickly due to bad netcode and by more skilled players that can shoot with precision. Therefore, these new players will just stop playing the game due to frustration.

    A large portion of the Battlefield community has asked Dice/EA NOT to adjust the time-to-kill, but instead fix the time-to-death issue which is associated with bad netcode. Dice/EA has ignored the loyal Battlefield community and rammed the TTK change down their throats, causing an uproar in social media. EA were hoping the change would please the casual new players during the holiday season, which it does not.

    Because the game is broken now more than ever and due to the lack of respect from Dice/EA, I'm giving this game a score of 1. This game can be salvaged if EA/Dice listens to logical advice. Your core player-base and fans deserve better.    … Expand
  13. itsDimitri
    Dec 16, 2018
    1
    Its not even that bad, just utterly pointless.
    Ofc its bugged, broken and comes with barely any content but I suppose that´s just what we have to expect from battlefield nowadays...
    The fact that its set in WW2 and finally features a warstory about the German side is a big pro, but unfortunately the only one. And even that is screwed as the game doesnt even mention the eastern front,    Its not even that bad, just utterly pointless.
    Ofc its bugged, broken and comes with barely any content but I suppose that´s just what we have to expect from battlefield nowadays...

    The fact that its set in WW2 and finally features a warstory about the German side is a big pro, but unfortunately the only one. And even that is screwed as the game doesnt even mention the eastern front, the pacific or China... but thank god we have a map set in Narvik, seriously someone needs to get their priorities right.
    And talking about warstories, why on earth would you take a covert operation famous for being completed without a single shot fired and turn it into the story of a girl single handedly obliterating half the german occupation force in Norway? JUST WHY??

    And for the Multiplayer: One-shot throwing knifes and killstreaks straight out of CoD and an attrition system that tries to force squadplay but only ends up being annoying and increasing the problem of one or two squads of well coordinated players dominating a match to the point where its just not fun anymore to play when you are alone.
    It just feels like DICE couldnt decide between making the game more casual and making it more hardcore, tried to do both and ended up achieving neither.
    The game is not unplayable, but Bf 3/4 and even Bf 1 are just much more enjoyable.

    And then there is the whole problem of historical revisionism, with DICE pandering to neo-feminist agendas and calling players "uneducated" for pointing out historical facts... but that has already been discussed enough.
    It just adds another reason to not spend your money on this game.

    Luckily however all of this is not really a problem since we can just continue playing Bf 3/4/1 without really missing out on anything, or get World War 3 which is both cheaper and better, or Hell Let Loose,...
    Thats the beauty of the free market, if you dont like something you can always switch to the competition.

    I do hope they get back on track with the next entry though, as it would be a real shame to see Battlefield die because of this mess...    … Expand
  14. Izotop
    Dec 22, 2018
    3
    Are you sure that you made the game, and not the clutter of graphics, code and sound? This is not a game, this is a mistake! Mistake #34601.
  15. LokenMoon
    Jan 7, 2019
    0
    I dont own the game. This is a review of EA. Pathetic way to launch a game. How dare you. My uneducated opinion.
  16. goga12
    Jan 26, 2019
    0
    игровые критики тупые идиоты игра говнище для тупых дегенаратов её цена максимум 10 р
  17. veyr0n09
    Jan 27, 2019
    0
    Worst game of the Century. Cant find any good aspects except the exit button. But ok the the exit button works as is should!
  18. DrugMaple
    Jan 27, 2019
    0
    With every update game become more sad...
    Tides of War is focused around Squad conquest which is SUPER RARE LEGENDARY piece of sh!t, i regret spending any amount of money on this!
  19. Diav
    Jan 27, 2019
    0
    Leaving aside the many questionable narrative decisions made in this game, there is a much bigger problem. Battlefield V on PC is a raging dumpster fire of bugs and poor optimization.

    I've played most of the BF games; they have all struggled with quality, but this thing is on a whole other level. We are more than 2 months past release day, and the game still won't even start reliably.    Leaving aside the many questionable narrative decisions made in this game, there is a much bigger problem. Battlefield V on PC is a raging dumpster fire of bugs and poor optimization.

    I've played most of the BF games; they have all struggled with quality, but this thing is on a whole other level. We are more than 2 months past release day, and the game still won't even start reliably. Origin, which is easily the worst launcher/DRM client in the industry, may be the culprit, but what difference does it make? Origin has, somehow, gotten incrementally worse over time. It feels like a homebrew java app now, and runs worse.

    If you can properly align your decoder ring long enough get BFV running, it's an uninspired, paint-by-numbers WWII shooter. In other words, it's boring.

    EA has taken some undeserved flak over the years. They've earned a ton, too, but some was just a pile-on.

    They deserve every ounce of it for this game. BFV is a low point for a publisher who has had too many of them in recent years.    … Expand
  20. ClatuVerataNict
    Feb 22, 2019
    0
    The cheating is so massive in this game and nothing is done about it. Doubt it? Go in Spectator mode just for a few on public servers and see for you self.
  21. gulanserhat
    Feb 23, 2019
    0
    this game very bad and i am bf1 players . bf1 more beautiful bf5. **** game bf5
  22. Toolguns
    Mar 3, 2019
    2
    Dice has lost touch with what made the beloved Battlefield series so great...

    Way too many different appearances for each Class (of infantry), it makes it confusing trying to identify who's who from who in Multiplayer (IE: trying to find a Medic or a Support? Good luck, there's 10+ different type of outfits each class can wear (Thanks EA and micro-transactions!). Oh and by the way,    Dice has lost touch with what made the beloved Battlefield series so great...

    Way too many different appearances for each Class (of infantry), it makes it confusing trying to identify who's who from who in Multiplayer (IE: trying to find a Medic or a Support? Good luck, there's 10+ different type of outfits each class can wear (Thanks EA and micro-transactions!). Oh and by the way, you can even change to a WOMAN now, so things even get that much more confusing in the chaos of Multiplayer)
    A little too much Dice, you should remember to keep things SIMPLE, TRANSPARENT, AND most importantly of all: FUN! (See Bad Company 2, If I needed a Medic I would just look for the dude wearing the red beret!)

    The audio (voice acting/positional audio + sound effects) in the Multiplayer are also underwhelming.
    Footsteps, audio cues and sound effects just aren't there to make it feel like a Battlefield game for me.
    To get a real sense of what the community expects from DICE in the audio department, see Battlefield Bad Company 2.

    The map designs now-a-days are also underwhelming...
    I don't feel the same vibes of a true WWII scenario (at least not yet) such as BF1942.

    All in all, MP sandbox experience is still there, but I feel that most of the OG DICE Devs are long gone now and don't know if Battlefield will ever be the same again.

    Also what's up with the SJW agenda being shoved down our throats?

    We want cussing, cursing, and authentic feel of a war game... not sensitive pansy whiny audio effects.

    What happened DICE?!?! Did your balls drop off?    … Expand
  23. lildicky
    Mar 3, 2019
    0
    The people in charge of creating this game are simply incompetent. Stupid cash grab, nowhere near as good as it can be. You will get bored in a few days.

    Save your money.
  24. srt8cat
    Mar 8, 2021
    0
    This game just blows. The menus are terrible, loading times are unbearable (even with a PCIe 4.0 m.2 drive) and the addition of female soldiers completely throws you off and takes you out of the experience. It feels like a fortnite kids game with a bf skin.

    As the developers said themselves; “don’t buy it”. Good thing I got this game for free with my GPU purchase.
  25. Mazma
    Dec 25, 2020
    1
    Basta, bisogna tornare alle guerre conteporanee, non dice nulla di nuovo, wow RTX fine dei giochi poi
  26. ChilledTony
    Jan 16, 2021
    0
    Battlefield 5 is a betrayal. DICE has betrayed us - the Battlefield game title community. This is the worst Battlefield game ever, after which I no longer believe (although I want to believe) in the return of the Battlefield game series. I've been playing the Battlefield series since 2003. I played over 10,000 hours in total.
  27. taweley869
    Feb 13, 2021
    0
    With patch 5.2 I can no longer recommend this game. They ignored the userbase and now the game is horrible. They did the same thing last year…
  28. godihatethisgam
    Mar 8, 2021
    0
    It would be really unfortunate if developers of this game got c4nc3r :D and died very painful death :D Really unfortunate:DDDD
  29. LudwigBeethoven
    Nov 20, 2018
    0
    Its like EA is asking to run out of business. Ok. Your wish may be granted.
  30. LinsGun
    Nov 19, 2018
    0
    strange trends. To go with time for tolerance is good. but to touch the game industry and to impose its course of history. that sounds too much to me.
  31. emperorbutts
    Nov 19, 2018
    0
    This game is an ea product. I miss battlefield tremendously. There was a time you turned to bf when every other game got boring ... What happened...?
  32. SANGAR
    Nov 19, 2018
    0
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. DICE сделали игру про масштабное мировое событие минувших лет, в котором они так умудрились обосраться, и нет, речь сейчас не идёт про отсутствие ссср в игре, речь идёт об отношении к людям со стороны студии DICE. Очень жаль что такая игра как "Battlefield" скатилась в такое дно. Надеюсь что "Battlefield V" это последняя игра, после которой студия DICE закроется.… Expand
  33. m-east
    Dec 4, 2018
    0
    $ 60 for early access.$ 60 for early access.$ 60 for early access.
    $ 60 for early access.$ 60 for early access.$ 60 for early access.
    $ 60 for early access.$ 60 for early access.$ 60 for early access.
  34. Phoenix790
    Nov 23, 2018
    2
    It’s clear that a lot of reviews are done because journalists are sucking up to EA. This is not a good game
  35. TpBro
    Dec 4, 2018
    0
    At its core, it's not Battlefield anymore. DICE created a Call of Duty clone with some Battlefield Elements.

    Please, do not buy this game and do not support EA as a company.

    Vote with your wallet and let's eradicate this cancer of a company from the market.
  36. Tyetan
    Nov 25, 2018
    0
    You love Battlefield right!? Zooking, Driving a Bobcat loaded w/ C4 into tanks, repair tool or defib killing bad buys? Well all that **** is gone so go **** yourself. The reason you ask, "realism" of course, but wait a minute there weren't any women combatants in WWII, were there? I don't know about you, but from what I remember in world history there weren't any female black wolfspiritYou love Battlefield right!? Zooking, Driving a Bobcat loaded w/ C4 into tanks, repair tool or defib killing bad buys? Well all that **** is gone so go **** yourself. The reason you ask, "realism" of course, but wait a minute there weren't any women combatants in WWII, were there? I don't know about you, but from what I remember in world history there weren't any female black wolfspirit lesbian Nazis filling the ranks of the Wermacht! Not only does the game fail as a history lesson, it also sucks as a shooter. Bad guys are hard to pick up off the background, the shooting sucks, map design is sub par, vehicles (except for the planes) handle like dog **** walking or running feels sluggish, and to top off this **** sandwich the game is unfinished and buggy as hell. Don't buy this game for your wallets sake, if you wanna try it just get the EA Premier Access for a month and test it out like I did. You and you bank account will thank me. Well my work here is done, I'm headed back to the Battlefield 4 where the fun still live on.… Expand
  37. The_Seaman_
    Nov 19, 2018
    0
    This easily could have been just a expansion pack.
    Multiplayer is fun, but not worth the full asking price,

    Business behind the pre-order deals and the play early versions are something that shouldnt be praised in this industry.
    Paying more for playing the game a few days early is a dirty move EA. The game is done when its done so everybody should be able to experience it.
  38. Azazator3000
    Nov 19, 2018
    0
    Огрызок игры за 60$ - круто, СССР на стороне фашистов - гениально, #apologizeforUSSR
  39. TombstoneWarden
    Nov 19, 2018
    0
    Waiting for EA to close DICE and they will stop mocking Battlefield games...
  40. maestroRogi
    Nov 19, 2018
    0
    The campaign is very historically incorrect. It is an insult to all that died during the second world war. The multiplayer is just BF1 but with new reload animations and some new(bad) mechanics. The devs force you to play as a team by giving you less ammo and fewer medkits HOWEVER this is the same as previous BattleField games where everyone runs off on their own and the speed of the gameThe campaign is very historically incorrect. It is an insult to all that died during the second world war. The multiplayer is just BF1 but with new reload animations and some new(bad) mechanics. The devs force you to play as a team by giving you less ammo and fewer medkits HOWEVER this is the same as previous BattleField games where everyone runs off on their own and the speed of the game instantly slows down. The game isn't fun in the slightest, it feels like a choir to go back and re-stock ammo and medkits. I would rather if this game allowed me to chose if I was a woman or a man during WW2 instead of forcing it upon me.
    I would not recommend this game, just play BF1 for pretty much the same experience.    … Expand
  41. Pozhiloy
    Nov 20, 2018
    0
    Thank you for womanfield 5!
    Тупа советский пушечно-мясной сброд даже в игру не включили
  42. unxc3113d
    Nov 23, 2018
    0
    Меню тормозит, к серверам не подключается, багов куча. Игру еще полгода доделывать и доделывать, сейчас это пустая трата денег. Я уже даже не говорю про женские крики на поле боя, отсутствие главного участника войны (СССР) и прочий бред. Игра элементарно не доделана, но продается за вполне себе приличные деньги. Единственное, что действительно работает лучше, чем в той же BF1 - по alt+f4Меню тормозит, к серверам не подключается, багов куча. Игру еще полгода доделывать и доделывать, сейчас это пустая трата денег. Я уже даже не говорю про женские крики на поле боя, отсутствие главного участника войны (СССР) и прочий бред. Игра элементарно не доделана, но продается за вполне себе приличные деньги. Единственное, что действительно работает лучше, чем в той же BF1 - по alt+f4 выходит быстрее. Синг посмотрел на ютубе и даже пункт меню с ним открывать не буду.… Expand
  43. DOrek
    Nov 23, 2018
    0
    AAA game from indie-studio litle DICE. OMG... Very BAD. Dont buy this sh** game go play on BF2 BFBC2 BF3 BF4
  44. Repo_
    Nov 24, 2018
    0
    Map Design is weird. There is not much love in graphics. Too less vehicles avaiible. It does not feel like WWII. It does not feel like Battlefield.
  45. HoneyCola
    Nov 25, 2018
    0
    so brazenly rewriting history because of feminism ... Game developers are already openly feeding us crap.
  46. alex_tsapin
    Nov 25, 2018
    0
    The atmosphere is lost. The feeling that I got into the women's locker room.
  47. FauxEden
    Jan 27, 2020
    0
    Total ****

    Game was released an unfinished piece of **** and yet somehow still managed to regress from that state. At least the losers at DICE LA is breaking new grounds at how bad you can be at your job.

    Honestly, put me in coach, I don't know **** about coding either and I'd like a paycheck for doing **** nothing too!
  48. Reph3at
    Dec 2, 2018
    1
    The gamy may be fun to play with friends but this doesn't justify the fact what the've done to the history. This game is just too influenced by retarded leftist propaganda, along with feminism. It's also incomplete. Just 8 maps, one of which being a little rework of BF1's Amiens. The resources are recycled as well. if you take a closer look at house models they are copied directly from theThe gamy may be fun to play with friends but this doesn't justify the fact what the've done to the history. This game is just too influenced by retarded leftist propaganda, along with feminism. It's also incomplete. Just 8 maps, one of which being a little rework of BF1's Amiens. The resources are recycled as well. if you take a closer look at house models they are copied directly from the Battlefield 1. The game ditches the Premium service but I feel like they had to do like this after bad first impressions (after May trailer was uploaded). I bought this game because I've received a 50% discount coupon for any order in my local store but I would never pay the full price (which is 45$ afaik). This game is jut not worth it. Battlefield 1 is way better than this, although it's the BF3/4 which I still consider as the best Battlefield games in the series.… Expand
  49. SolaireDaBest
    Dec 2, 2018
    0
    Youngsters, even with the non-stop SJW brainwashing in school, I assume you know there were no female cyborg infantry on the battlefield in WW2. But this is precisely where EA gets very tricksy.

    The real propaganda is the OTHER missions. The ones without cyborgs. EA wants you to think, by comparison, those are accurate. But did you know the Norway heavy water plant raid did happen? Only    Youngsters, even with the non-stop SJW brainwashing in school, I assume you know there were no female cyborg infantry on the battlefield in WW2. But this is precisely where EA gets very tricksy.

    The real propaganda is the OTHER missions. The ones without cyborgs. EA wants you to think, by comparison, those are accurate. But did you know the Norway heavy water plant raid did happen? Only it was conducted by a team of (shudder) men, not a mother-daughter superhero team? And so on.

    #GetWokeGoBroke until they learn.    … Expand
  50. JM81
    Nov 25, 2018
    4
    I dunno. I loved Battlefield 3, which was the last BF I played, and obviously older BF games, but this is just....... so, so different.

    I can't see anything that's going on. I feel like I'm being shot almost immediately by some super pro. The startout weapons are crap and I literally have to grind to get something that's good. There's literally DIRT on the sights.... like, why Dice?    I dunno. I loved Battlefield 3, which was the last BF I played, and obviously older BF games, but this is just....... so, so different.

    I can't see anything that's going on. I feel like I'm being shot almost immediately by some super pro. The startout weapons are crap and I literally have to grind to get something that's good.

    There's literally DIRT on the sights.... like, why Dice? That's just annoying. Anything that clutters your view is annoying to me, and there's toooooooooooooons of that **** in this game.

    I played it for a couple of hours, but never felt any sort of joy from it. It was a chore, emotionally speaking.    … Expand
  51. mrsalty101
    Dec 18, 2018
    0
    I really hope this is on the list of worst videogames of 2018 but I'll never know because it seams Metacritic can't make a working click-through list.
    As for those that bought the game for the "realistic war feel" despite handicapped women on the frontline, I feel bad for you that now they're patching it to make everyone bulletsponges because the noobs got killed too fast.
  52. broccoliballs
    Dec 3, 2018
    0
    White Man, White Man, White Man, White Man, White Man, White Man, White Man, White Man, White Man.
  53. Dyslexicnija
    Dec 4, 2018
    0
    This gaming is insulting to our history, we should be remembering our veterans and not insulting them.
  54. Tristan123
    Nov 30, 2018
    0
    So nice rewriting history to please some critics while taking a dump on the sacrifices of soldiers. Commando squad completed an important mission and BFV goes and tells a story of how they failed and how this young daughter beat an nazi company and destroyed the facility instead. Get woke go broke
  55. Fany000
    Nov 29, 2018
    1
    This is the historicaly most inaccurate game ever, worse, this is the game which trampled the history. How is possible that crap like this is spread in public? CoD WWII was not good, at least it was not fanciful, wanna be history based game, full of pocilital and feminism correctness (F*ck this **** I am not sexist, racist, nothing like this but I am a fan of history, and a girl withThis is the historicaly most inaccurate game ever, worse, this is the game which trampled the history. How is possible that crap like this is spread in public? CoD WWII was not good, at least it was not fanciful, wanna be history based game, full of pocilital and feminism correctness (F*ck this **** I am not sexist, racist, nothing like this but I am a fan of history, and a girl with robotic hand fighting in WWII is really beyond the borders), braindead people celebrating sh*t. For me playing this game was the worst gaming experience ever, and I am not talking about game qualities, because they are none, this game is a piece of sh*t, literally.… Expand
  56. vukkoz
    Nov 24, 2018
    3
    Glimpses of fun gunplay in the puddle of blandness, boredom, weird vehicle mechanics, horrid animations and 2 actually playable maps. A huge step back in the franchise that has taken a considerable decline since battlefield 4 and keeps on reaching lower and lower. I really regret buying this game, think twice before doing so. If you are new and want to try out the series, do yourself aGlimpses of fun gunplay in the puddle of blandness, boredom, weird vehicle mechanics, horrid animations and 2 actually playable maps. A huge step back in the franchise that has taken a considerable decline since battlefield 4 and keeps on reaching lower and lower. I really regret buying this game, think twice before doing so. If you are new and want to try out the series, do yourself a favour and get something cheaper and better - like bad company 2, bf 3 or 4.… Expand
  57. T4BLETOS
    Nov 27, 2018
    1
    Если вы не знали, спермобаки - угнетатели, именно чернокожие азиатки с членами выйграли ВМ2. Ставь луказ если ты анэдьюкейтед
  58. ERMAK_XOY
    Nov 28, 2018
    0
    Где русские?40 млн. человек не вернулись с войны , а играть нам предлагают за немцев? и почему наплевали на 6 героев которые и провели операцию? (EA DICE - ВОТ их имена лейтенанты Кнут Хаугланд и Каспер Идланд , сержанты Фредрик Кайзер (норв. Fredrik Kayser), Ханс Стурхауг (норв. Hans Storhaug), Арне Хьельструп и Биргер Стрёмсхейм (норв. Birger Strømsheim) , Это позор !!! Лучше быГде русские?40 млн. человек не вернулись с войны , а играть нам предлагают за немцев? и почему наплевали на 6 героев которые и провели операцию? (EA DICE - ВОТ их имена лейтенанты Кнут Хаугланд и Каспер Идланд , сержанты Фредрик Кайзер (норв. Fredrik Kayser), Ханс Стурхауг (норв. Hans Storhaug), Арне Хьельструп и Биргер Стрёмсхейм (норв. Birger Strømsheim) , Это позор !!! Лучше бы похронили бы серию только бы не выпускали ЭТО!!!!!… Expand
  59. ghoststalkr
    Nov 28, 2018
    0
    I completely recommend Battelfield: Bad Company 2. For a Battlefield game it has a pretty good story......oh! Battlefield V? it's a piece of sht, don't waste your time and money on this one.
  60. pcgamingisdead
    Dec 6, 2018
    0
    Pc gaming is dead, all these **** cashgrabs for years and years, blatant recycling and lack of quality. The PC gaming in 2018 is **** Videogame journalism is a JOKE. We need a new videogame market crash and weed these **** and greedy developers out.
  61. ahcene81
    Dec 30, 2018
    0
    In the end, even the games (which we thought were good) did not escape the tsunami metoo !!
  62. D-Masta
    Jan 13, 2019
    0
    Very bad game. On servers play one sniper. Changed the story. No USSR.
    Why it was impossible to remove the class sniper? Or remove such damage from rifles? But developers don't care. And, unfortunately, I can not get a refund for the game. = (
  63. faustencion
    Dec 26, 2020
    2
    They tryin to support lgbt and WHOLE OF THIS WORD forget about normal, straight and smart ppl, who, maybe, dont wanna see this sh*t in love game. короче, пизда серии баттлы, дальше - хуже. будет афган, вьетнам, и будут поднимать вопросы тогдашней толерантности.
  64. adomolis
    Nov 17, 2018
    3
    My biggest gripe is that map and spawn design always makes you go into these congested firefights. I hate that. Makes big maps feel small and actually no tactical thinking, just constant brainless shootouts. As someone said, this is a Call of Duty with Conquest mode. NO THANK YOU.
  65. V4N1Sh
    Nov 22, 2018
    3
    Absolutely dog **** of a game, Save your money.

    First 10hrs might feel fine given you're high off Dopamine from all those new weapons to experience but once you delve deep into the core game you start to reminisce the good old day sof BF3-BF4.
  66. Leprikon
    Nov 19, 2018
    0
    Т.к. я из нижнего интернета, то пришло время накручивать 0 баллов, спасибо за СССР, историческую достоверность, тигры в 40-ом и кучу новых работающих механик!
  67. badaftertaste
    Nov 24, 2018
    3
    This game is an abomination to the franchise, and as someone who has been been a fan of battlefield since 1942, it's sad to see my favorite series in such a sad state. Game has barely any content, the fact that it's supposed to be a "live service" model doesn't excuse such a lack of content at launch when you take a full $60 price tag into a consideration. It's plagued with bugs and justThis game is an abomination to the franchise, and as someone who has been been a fan of battlefield since 1942, it's sad to see my favorite series in such a sad state. Game has barely any content, the fact that it's supposed to be a "live service" model doesn't excuse such a lack of content at launch when you take a full $60 price tag into a consideration. It's plagued with bugs and just feels very rushed and unfinished. Stay away, this thing isn't even worth half it's price with such lazy and disrespectful devs.… Expand
  68. Yomomoto
    Nov 24, 2018
    0
    Absolutely degradation of Battlefield series Game is totally bugged,
    its look like alpha stage, campain totally crap,
    multiplayer bores you very quickly, idiotic map and gameplay design
    weapon balance terrible, weapon upgrades useless
    (says man who has 3.0 K/D in this game, i know what about i am talking)
  69. CheesePickle
    Nov 18, 2018
    2
    The game is a broken, glitchy mess. It still plays and looks like a beta. The destruction has been toned down ALOT. Tanks are absolute garbage, a hand grenade does more player damage than the cannon does. An insane amount of invulnerable objects on maps, giving it a distinct CoD feel. Operations is destroyed, now all it is is a random playlist of maps where the winner doesn’t matter. ThisThe game is a broken, glitchy mess. It still plays and looks like a beta. The destruction has been toned down ALOT. Tanks are absolute garbage, a hand grenade does more player damage than the cannon does. An insane amount of invulnerable objects on maps, giving it a distinct CoD feel. Operations is destroyed, now all it is is a random playlist of maps where the winner doesn’t matter. This game is inferior to BF1 in all aspects except for gun play. Don’t waste your money.… Expand
  70. LazyDevsdolla
    Nov 27, 2018
    0
    Graphics 10 years ago
    Gameplay 20 years ago
    Bugs 50 years ago
    Devs 4 years experience
    Investors 200 years old

    Its clear this 1 doesnt have any hart.
  71. Vichozzz
    Dec 3, 2018
    2
    This game is not ready for release. Battlefield is not what it used to be in the old days
  72. CockmageLVL99
    Nov 20, 2018
    2
    Unfinished game with content missing and unnecessarily implemented aspects of political correctness.
  73. tuliomil
    Nov 20, 2018
    0
    Tons of bugs in addition to the politically correct trash make me regret I bought it.
    Very sloppy production.
    This game insults the story.
    Alpha test? NOOOPE, sorry!
  74. uBaH9o
    Nov 23, 2018
    0
    What the ef DICE??!! Is this the company that gave us BF3 and BF4?
    Game feels like paintball. Horrible map design, seems like only sniper campers can benefit.
    And worst part is: it's SO BUGGY!!! The release was delayed and still so many bugs. You can't be serious DICE!
    WORST BF EVER!!!
  75. DESONT
    Nov 19, 2018
    2
    Boring game

    what they sell for a price of a full game is a joke (weapons, vehicles, maps - I unlocked the whole assault class in about 10 hours); customization of your soldier is a nice touch but… Expand
  76. CliffSecord
    Nov 23, 2018
    0
    Reluctant to review this one as i'm typically a huge fan of the franchise. With the marketing campaign and forced diversity and the taunt of dont like it dont buy it, probably couldn't have said it better myself. It also doesn't even look like a WW2 game, most reviews i've seen it's all automatics not bolt action rifles which is not consistent with the war. Game just isnt' for me, i'dReluctant to review this one as i'm typically a huge fan of the franchise. With the marketing campaign and forced diversity and the taunt of dont like it dont buy it, probably couldn't have said it better myself. It also doesn't even look like a WW2 game, most reviews i've seen it's all automatics not bolt action rifles which is not consistent with the war. Game just isnt' for me, i'd rather play COD if i wanted a fast paced non-realistic shooter.… Expand
  77. 2283gmg
    Nov 25, 2018
    0
    Worst video game purchase Ive had. Most idiotic revival system ive seen, you cannot shoot people on the ground when they are injudered and they can ONLY get injured not dead. Nazis do not exist its , USSR isnt even in the game.

    Auido is much worse than previous BF games.

    Never buy this.
  78. Abdulelah
    Nov 26, 2018
    0
    It’s not Battlefield any more bring Bad company BACK ...

    short single player campaign
  79. Dikyr87
    Nov 26, 2018
    0
    Раньше для меня круче Battlefield ничего не было... сейчас это говно(
  80. ALDIOZZ
    Nov 19, 2018
    0
    Абсолютно не понравилась эта дешевая поделка , в погоне за "современными заразными тенденциями" вы попросту потеряли огромную армию фанатов, не говоря уже про здравый смысл.
    желаю этой игре провалиться с треском! Это просто ПОЗОР!!
    #notmybattlefield    Абсолютно не понравилась эта дешевая поделка , в погоне за "современными заразными тенденциями" вы попросту потеряли огромную армию фанатов, не говоря уже про здравый смысл.
    желаю этой игре провалиться с треском! Это просто ПОЗОР!!
    #notmybattlefield
  81. PaiLinFace
    Nov 22, 2018
    3
    Жаль потраченных денег.
    1) Одиночная компания- просто мрак и ужас, коридорная, безынтересная и совершенно не масштабная. Так делали игры в середине нулевых, и то только самые проходниковые проекты.
    2) Графика- смотрится приятно, да и только. Постоянные пересветы, куча мелких частиц. При игре на снежных картах к концу боя начинает болеть голова. 3) Ранний доступ- игра откровенно не    Жаль потраченных денег.
    1) Одиночная компания- просто мрак и ужас, коридорная, безынтересная и совершенно не масштабная. Так делали игры в середине нулевых, и то только самые проходниковые проекты.
    2) Графика- смотрится приятно, да и только. Постоянные пересветы, куча мелких частиц. При игре на снежных картах к концу боя начинает болеть голова.
    3) Ранний доступ- игра откровенно не доделана. Отсутствуют режимы, часть компании, батл рояль, некоторые игровые механики. Обещанные еще при анонсе.

    4) Огромное количество багов и технических ошибок их конечно поправят патчами со временем. Это приемлемо для инди игр или первой -второй игре начинающего разработчика, но не за полную цену ААА игры.
    5) новы режим стрельбы - ориентирован на лютую пристрелку к одному стволу, какой ствол ближе к лазерной штурмовой винтовке с тем народ и бегает. В бете это стг 44 сейчас ке-7.
    6) музыка- по осушению рескин музыки батлы один, и там мне она нравилась тут тоже пойдет. А вот звуки оружия судя по всему записывался на Страйк больном оружии(может это моя субъективщина)
    7) контент- его пока очень мало, и в ближайшие время не предвидеться крупных заливов. следующие что зальют это огрызок компании, и стрельбище.
    8) Кастомизация - её нет. Шкурки на танки еще не ввели. Кастомизация оружия чисто внешние, единственное что можно поменять это прицел. Кастомайз батлы 1 очень ругали, но даже 3 варианта оружия более разнообразны чем местный кастомайз.
    9) нет ни чего нового. Система укреплений не стоит почти ни чего в стандартном режиме захвата точек. Ни крушения крупных объектов, ни элитных классов, ни джагернаутов.
    10) Ужасный мап дизайн, при котором люди размазываются по точкам, и весь гемплей сводиться к перестрелке с 1-2 бойцами. Конечно есть и эпические моменты с массовыми перестрелками, но они случаются гораздо реже чем в предыдущих частях.    … Expand
  82. rfz88
    Nov 18, 2018
    0
    This is by far the worst BF title I ever experienced, and I have now completely abandoned this series. It's insulting to see this kind of poor excuse of a release. Forget realism, forget gp, this is just an insult to all fans & consumers, and a racist one at that.
  83. knarkworst
    Nov 23, 2018
    3
    Battlefield V fails to deliver miserably!

    Grand Operations is just silly... Its an combined package of already existing game-modes. (Break-through, conquest, and thug of war/Frontlines) Its nothing new. Its an cheap rip-off from operations in BF1, that deliverd so much more satisfaction! Break-through is definitely the most intens. Its like rush, but then with much less objectives.    Battlefield V fails to deliver miserably!

    Grand Operations is just silly... Its an combined package of already existing game-modes. (Break-through, conquest, and thug of war/Frontlines) Its nothing new. Its an cheap rip-off from operations in BF1, that deliverd so much more satisfaction!

    Break-through is definitely the most intens. Its like rush, but then with much less objectives. So before you get sucked into the game and intensity rises the game is already finished!

    Ohh and dont even get me started about the SJW vag1na sillyness of the game.

    The good:

    The graphics are amazing.
    So 2 points for that part. That makes at an 3.0 overal because the rest of the game is just CRAP.    … Expand
  84. Xemnuz
    Nov 19, 2018
    3
    Dear Jesus, what a disaster gaming has been of late... shadow of tomb raider is diaper, fall out 76 diaper, then finally this could save the day so I could game with some friends, but instead, it feels like a wet diaper. The maps are too big, too open, too flat, the graphics are worse than that of BF1, the game modes suck as always, barely any vehicels, the customization of everything isDear Jesus, what a disaster gaming has been of late... shadow of tomb raider is diaper, fall out 76 diaper, then finally this could save the day so I could game with some friends, but instead, it feels like a wet diaper. The maps are too big, too open, too flat, the graphics are worse than that of BF1, the game modes suck as always, barely any vehicels, the customization of everything is so foreign compared to BF1, if you have something that works dont fckin break it. Battlefield is known to go 1 step forth and 2 steps back, this is just that, although nothing is a step forth in this case, utter disappointment. How hard can it be to make a decent game? Use a fckin questionaire to understand what people like if you are this clueless. This is not rocket science for fck sake. And a woman on the cover with a weapon in hand? Please...

    Edit: People saying that the fixed all the issues with BF1 and made it better, HOW?! The graphics are worse, the gun models are worse, the maps are worse, even feel of the combat is worse, interesting how divided people can be about something, luckily most people see what this game really is, used diaper    … Expand
  85. afrenziedghoul
    Nov 21, 2018
    3
    Edit: modifying my original review to provide more detail on my opinion based on level 25, most of that time spent playing support.

    What's great: The environments look fantastic. Sounds are amazing. I enjoy the new fortification mechanic for the support class building, though it largely seems unnecessary and at times can be a hindrance to your team. What's annoying: Going prone    Edit: modifying my original review to provide more detail on my opinion based on level 25, most of that time spent playing support.

    What's great:
    The environments look fantastic. Sounds are amazing. I enjoy the new fortification mechanic for the support class building, though it largely seems unnecessary and at times can be a hindrance to your team.

    What's annoying:
    Going prone seems to have changed somehow. Now instead of your character simply resting on the ground wherever you plop down, your character model interacts with the environment. This means that in times of frenetic action, flinging yourself to the ground can place you in greater danger as your body might slide unexpectedly or the environment may push your prone body for several seconds requiring you to wait that additional time before you can open fire. This same collision mechanic can affect you while moving around on uneven surfaces while prone and you can find yourself being 'shoved' about by unseen forces at the most inopportune times. Best case scenario the shoving restricts your ability to deploy a bipod or even return fire and worst case you can be shoved off edges of surfaces entirely resulting more exposure to danger.

    The shared weapon pool between all factions also rubs me the wrong way. I can appreciate the argument that it is 'no fun' to not be able to work on unlocking and progressing your desired weapon, and that in the actual events it wasn't unheard of for enemy weapons to be 'captured' and used. Unfortunately it's just another small ding to the immersion that the franchise once offered. Personally I would much rather face off against foes wielding the weapons they would have been issued for the era.

    Another issue that I have with the weapons is the lack of interesting weapons and weapon specializations. Each class sports a single iconic WW2 weapon a the end of the class progression chain, however the amount of time needed to unlock that single weapon is quite long. I've been playing nightly since the Origin Premium access launch and have yet to unlock the MG42 even after spending all of my time playing as support.

    Single Player:
    Oh boy, what happened here? I was surprised to discover that the Wehrmacht possessed cloaking devices during WW2. How on earth did they lose the war with this kind of technology? On every map enemy infantry appear and vanish repeatedly, bounce up and down as though they are sporting some kind of rocket equipped footwear and operate vehicles while in stealth mode. I burst into uncontrollable laughter the first time a troop transport blew by me with no driver, then stopped abruptly and dumped out a dozen german soldiers who milled about the back of the truck while my AI compatriots and I mowed them down like cattle.

    Overall:
    It just feels, off. Battlefield 1, while not my favorite entry in the franchise at least felt cohesive and appropriate for the time it attempted to represent, the abundance of automatic weapons notwithstanding. This time around however, I don't really feel like I'm anywhere in particular. There is no obvious anchor to WW2 here based on what we have come to expect from a WW2 game and that is what I think bothers me most. All of the dings to cohesiveness, from the random and sometimes inappropriate uniforms, the shared weapon access between factions, to the lack of emotional connection to the settings depicted amount to something that feels more like a game with WW1-WW2 weaponry rather than a game set in WW2.

    Disclaimer:

    Artists, you did a great job. This game looks and sounds fantastic. Developers, I'm sure you did your best given the time you were allotted. It's unfortunate this didn't get more time to bake, it could have been great.    … Expand
  86. VadimMaslayew
    Nov 25, 2018
    1
    Bugs? Lags? They only want your money. I hate this game, fallout 76 is better than this ....
  87. powL
    Nov 19, 2018
    2
    good graphics, nearly "okaish" gunplay, totally trashy gamemodes. your "running" like on streroids all the time, youre dead after 2-3 hits (weapons hit mostly all the time, its not zero realism, its in the negative), and FAR too many people on too little space on the maps, taking all tactical elements out of it. you can get shoot from just everywhere, and nearly all players dont even havegood graphics, nearly "okaish" gunplay, totally trashy gamemodes. your "running" like on streroids all the time, youre dead after 2-3 hits (weapons hit mostly all the time, its not zero realism, its in the negative), and FAR too many people on too little space on the maps, taking all tactical elements out of it. you can get shoot from just everywhere, and nearly all players dont even have any team-sense, since its 100% run and gun. feels more like a tech-show, where everything is thrown togehter without any quality in the gameplay itself, how it feels, and how it plays in the environment.

    this game feels more like making a joke about war, instead of war.

    tldr; its eyecandy trash, not worth your time    … Expand
  88. Snail_nail
    Nov 20, 2018
    0
    The dev said don't buy it so i didn't. EA IS A GOOD COMPANY. ALLAKHN BLESS EA
  89. Kiwaso
    Nov 17, 2018
    4
    Is Battlefield 1.5
    I miss the great variety of weapons, vehicles and personalization that Battlefield 4 brought.
  90. Desuiity
    Nov 19, 2018
    0
    Let me get it straight - this game throws any historical accuracy right throw the window. And I'm not even talking about this whole "robotic females" fiasco. I'm talking about "Norwegian heavy water facility sabotage" - the operation which literally prevented Nazi Germany from developing a nuclear weapon . In REAL history Allies lost ~40 brave men in sequence of operations and onlyLet me get it straight - this game throws any historical accuracy right throw the window. And I'm not even talking about this whole "robotic females" fiasco. I'm talking about "Norwegian heavy water facility sabotage" - the operation which literally prevented Nazi Germany from developing a nuclear weapon . In REAL history Allies lost ~40 brave men in sequence of operations and only succeed to destroy the facility during Operation Gunnerside, where 5 actual commandos (none of which were females) destroyed the entire inventory of "heavy water" . Instead , in this game, a single independent, brave , EDUCATED girl does this in one go... Pathetic.
    The multiplayer is buggy chaos and not enjoyable at all with this "squad" mechanics.
    The only good thing in this game is graphics - its still same BF1 , but hey BF1 still looks good.

    Source for "Operation Gunnerpoint":
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norwegian_heavy_water_sabotage    … Expand
  91. Msx1000
    Nov 19, 2018
    0
    Hi guys,
    When I started playing the game, I heard women's screams, I thought - cool, then they added civilians and some girl got into trouble. But no, this is my Asian combat friend fighting for the Werrmacht and was injured. After 20 minutes of the game. There was a feeling that I got into the women's dressing room, around only women's moans (as if I got into a pornhab), women running    Hi guys,
    When I started playing the game, I heard women's screams, I thought - cool, then they added civilians and some girl got into trouble. But no, this is my Asian combat friend fighting for the Werrmacht and was injured. After 20 minutes of the game. There was a feeling that I got into the women's dressing room, around only women's moans (as if I got into a pornhab), women running around in ridiculous outfits.
    I need a refund!    … Expand
  92. RomanRS
    Nov 20, 2018
    3
    Field of Bugs 5. This game is playable and no more.Story mode is a bad joke with a tons of bugs and with a 'smartly' AI.
  93. 343434343434343
    Dec 18, 2018
    0
    Bad game, bad game, bad game, bad game, bad game, bad game, bad game, bad game and bad game.And i think... bad game, bad game,bad game, bad game and bad game.
  94. RiaskoFF
    Nov 28, 2018
    0
    Its bad game that is not worth its cost and already goes with a discount on ps and xbox stores.
    Its boring, unfun, with poor performance, ive no idea why I should prefer this over bf1 or bf4. Not to mention the SJW bs with "dont like it dont buy it" controversy... dice wants to rewrite history about how blacks and disabled whamen with bionical arms won the ww2. disgraceful.
  95. JMGBORO
    Dec 3, 2018
    2
    This game is aweful, it's bland and boring! It is also unfinished.... How are the graphics worse than Battlefield 1 ??! The game looks terrible. Glad I only went for the trial on origin access, feel sorry for the people who paid full price for this pile of manure
  96. dave9989
    Nov 24, 2018
    2
    The physics are terrible. Buggy as hell on release day. The lighting is terrible. The vehicles are nerfed against infantry and controlling them is a painful experience. Get ready to be trapped in the clipping and see bits of destroyed building floating. On a positive note the classes require more cooperation, and vehicle camping is less as they no longer have infinite ammunition and theThe physics are terrible. Buggy as hell on release day. The lighting is terrible. The vehicles are nerfed against infantry and controlling them is a painful experience. Get ready to be trapped in the clipping and see bits of destroyed building floating. On a positive note the classes require more cooperation, and vehicle camping is less as they no longer have infinite ammunition and the sky in the Norwegian maps is pretty. At this stage in the release at least not every player has an obscure sub machine gun with a modern rate of rate yet but im sure that time is approaching.… Expand
  97. nuserlillepony
    Nov 27, 2018
    0
    Operations has turned into absoloute **** with the rotating gamemode. Also has women in it on the frontlines.
  98. stapor72
    Jan 21, 2019
    0
    So far the worst Battlefield I've ever played. Unnecessarily huge maps, very fast TTK, no spotting, annoying munitions, inaccurate shooting, no suppressive effect for snipers, only 64 players in conquest, dying behind walls, bugs and so on. It's no longer Battlefield, but corrupt COD. No more Battlefields. The best Battlefield was Bf3.
  99. ThatUDLegacy
    Dec 3, 2018
    0
    Battlefield 1 with wamen, lacking content you have to wait months for,

    Im just eneducated. was meant to put 10 but i put 0
  100. The_Good_Critic
    Dec 5, 2018
    1
    Just got around to playing this after finally "completing" the playstation version.
    Suffice to say, its significantly better, but still a terrible battlefield game. It plays more like COD and the story is made up garbage and is as much a true story as the Blair witch project.
    I've lost my chance to get a refund, I hope you don't as well.
Page:

Awards & Rankings

53
#53 Best PC Game of 2018
2
#2 Most Discussed PC Game of 2018
7
#7 Most Shared PC Game of 2018

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
81

Generally favorable reviews - based on 52 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 45 out of 52
  2. Mixed: 7 out of 52
  3. Negative: 0 out of 52
  1. CD-Action
    Nov 14, 2019
    85
    It’s far from being ideal but all the glitches and shortcomings don’t ruin the overall fun of Battlefield V’s multiplayer experience. Although the single player portion of the game is not bad at all, I would have been disappointed if I bought the game just for it. [13/2018, p.56]
  2. PLAY! Zine
    Mar 5, 2019
    80
    In Battlefield V we got back to WW2, but with refined gunplay and death system which works great. There are also little problems such as low number of maps and stability issues, that are taking the fun away, but nothing that can't be fixed.
    Read full review
  3. LEVEL (Czech Republic)
    Dec 31, 2018
    80
    A great World War II shooter that will grow and improve. Do not buy the game because of its singleplayer, but if you consider the campaign a bonus to the multiplayer, you will be satisfied. [Issue#291]
See all critic reviews »