Battlefield V

 PC
User Score
3.0

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 3148 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 674 out of 3148
  2. Mixed: 296 out of 3148
  3. Negative: 2,178 out of 3148
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. Kiwaso
    Nov 17, 2018
    4
    Is Battlefield 1.5
    I miss the great variety of weapons, vehicles and personalization that Battlefield 4 brought.
  2. EvanSTW
    Nov 17, 2018
    10
    Most of the negative reviews are from people that have not actually played the game, and is still riding the hate train in reaction to the poor PR and marketing before its release. This game is a turning point for the series, I truly believe it. As a long time BF vet, the overall feeling of war and depending on your mates is overwhelming, and sucks you in right away. 3D spotting is goneMost of the negative reviews are from people that have not actually played the game, and is still riding the hate train in reaction to the poor PR and marketing before its release. This game is a turning point for the series, I truly believe it. As a long time BF vet, the overall feeling of war and depending on your mates is overwhelming, and sucks you in right away. 3D spotting is gone so you depend more on your awareness and senses, which causes you to slow down and play more intelligently. This game is epic. Ignore the mindless hate.… Expand
  3. DevilSaysTake
    Nov 17, 2018
    1
    Felt mediocre on my medium-end PC. Game is raw and bad optimised. Constant lags ruin playing experience. Just a worse re-skin of BF 1. Save your money.
  4. scorpionm84
    Nov 17, 2018
    0
    If you are searching for a game without a soul you are in the right place. Maps design is awful and every map looks like a running simulator. A lot of game mode are bad because the map design has 0 sense. UI and HUD are terrible and not user friendly, Plus we have a lot of bugs and is cleary an unfinished product. You get bored after few rounds in each map. WW2 without nazi and iconicIf you are searching for a game without a soul you are in the right place. Maps design is awful and every map looks like a running simulator. A lot of game mode are bad because the map design has 0 sense. UI and HUD are terrible and not user friendly, Plus we have a lot of bugs and is cleary an unfinished product. You get bored after few rounds in each map. WW2 without nazi and iconic battle? Come on..... BF is dead.… Expand
  5. bertendclaus
    Nov 17, 2018
    7
    Solid multi shooter. BF1 +, better but in this new direction. More like for young players than for older audience.
  6. AlexTheNerd
    Nov 17, 2018
    9
    The gameplay of this game is solid, the gunplay, movement and general flow of the game is back to Battlefield 3. Although the game has some bugs that I really want to get fixed pretty fast. One example is the sound glitches in some of the planes, especially the Stuka bomber. Singleplayer is meh except the into. Otherwise I would recommend this game to a lot of people, except peopleThe gameplay of this game is solid, the gunplay, movement and general flow of the game is back to Battlefield 3. Although the game has some bugs that I really want to get fixed pretty fast. One example is the sound glitches in some of the planes, especially the Stuka bomber. Singleplayer is meh except the into. Otherwise I would recommend this game to a lot of people, except people searching for a authentic experience. As always, battlefield is not meant to be authentic, so for me this does not matter.… Expand
  7. Meteora48
    Nov 17, 2018
    0
    Игрострой совсем с ума сошел,раз делает такое в конце 2018 года. Нет озвучки, ужасная графика, физика,темнокожие азиаты на всех фронтах, нет Совка, сюжетка-мрак. Как итог Коричневая жижа на кончиках пальцах.
  8. cloudelka
    Nov 17, 2018
    0
    One of the best Battlefield V for me, the game is amazing with new game system, no microtransaction p2w, no dlc.
  9. kuky90
    Nov 17, 2018
    9
    Don't listen to butthurts with 0 and lack of content or similar things. Game is actually really good and with just enough content. There are few bugs in game yes, but other than that epic game. It have potential to be best game in whole franchise.
  10. ilya_gg
    Nov 17, 2018
    0
    The EA had the love of fans, the expected and interesting setting of WW2, a lot of money and resources. And what did they do? They made a silly game unrelated to the real history. By buying this game you support the further course of stupidity and lack of talent.
  11. TacoSupreme
    Nov 16, 2018
    0
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I gave BFV a try because a friend of mine got Origin Access Premiere and gifted me a 7 day trial, and after playing multiplayer for about 8 hours, I'm just not into it. I took a break from the BF series after putting about 1,000 hours into BF4 on 360 (and countless hours on previous titles back to Bad Company), so getting to try BFV out for free on PC was pretty exciting. I'm running a Ryzen 2600/Windforce OC 1080, and playing the game in 1440p with all of the important settings maxed is great (the graphics are AMAZING), but it just doesn't feel like Battlefield. If I ever decide to get Access Premiere, I might give BFV another try in a few months, but as of right now, I won't be playing it anymore. There's too many good shooters out right now, and this isn't one of them. If you're on the fence, spend $5 and try it out for a few hours, or if you're lucky, have someone gift you a pass. If you don't like it, there's over 150 other games to choose from.

    *edit
    Anyone claiming this is the best Battlefield ever either hasn't played it or they're straight up lying. Some people are even saying they don't like it but they're giving it a good review score to "balance out the bad reviews". How much of a loser can you possibly be? If the game sucks (and it does), just say it sucks. Stop lying to yourself. Anyone who plays this for more than a few minutes knows it's trash.    … Expand
  12. ConfluxReflux
    Nov 16, 2018
    10
    This game does not deserve a 10, but I need to help balance it out. I would so far give it an 9. Compared to other BF games I'd give BF4 an 8, BF1 a 9, and BFH a 5 or 6.
    I really want Metacritic to make it so you have to confirm that you own the game in order to review it. The number of people who have not even played the game and left a review on the game is insane. I am not a crazy SJW,    This game does not deserve a 10, but I need to help balance it out. I would so far give it an 9. Compared to other BF games I'd give BF4 an 8, BF1 a 9, and BFH a 5 or 6.
    I really want Metacritic to make it so you have to confirm that you own the game in order to review it. The number of people who have not even played the game and left a review on the game is insane. I am not a crazy SJW, I think it was kind of annoying to very prominently include women for money, but that doesn't mean you should spam 0.
    Gamers are becoming entitled. BF players wanted 3D spotting removed. Guess what? Gone. No one really likes DLC. Right? They made it free. Do you like amazing graphics? I do, and guess what, the graphics in Battlefield 5 are the best I have ever seen, especially in 4K. The game doesn't run too bad either. Low amount of stuff in the game? Was there a huge outrage in Battlefield 1, because BF5 has the same amount of primary weapons, more tanks, the same amount of planes, more vehicles, etc, only lagging behind in gadgets and secondary weapons. If you want, try to manage to get a 7 day free trial of Origin access and you will get 10 hours of play time in the game. Make sure you cancel the subscription before the 7th day though. As for the reuse of textures and sounds in the game, it is not like a crap ton were reused or anything. The game looks WAY different from Battlefield 1. The weapons in BF1 that made their way into BF5 were obviously redone.    … Expand
  13. Paster58
    Nov 16, 2018
    0
    -Medic class dead
    -teamplay without microphone dead
    -the maps aren't thought for fps.
    -women everywhere wtf ww2 really ?
    -the weapon customization is a joke.
  14. LastHope17
    Nov 16, 2018
    0
    EA pays for good reviews don't get fooled. Half the "Reviews" on Youtube are paid for by EA.
  15. PSPfreaky
    Nov 16, 2018
    10
    Battlefield 5 is my new Battlefield 3! Forget Battlefield 4 and Battlefield 1! BF5 looks amazing, the gunplay is better and every match is exciting. All updates in the future are FREE. I recommend Battlefield 5 to Battlefield fans.
  16. mrbeanjoga3
    Nov 16, 2018
    9
    Game is Very good, need more content tho, campaign is "Ok", Graphics are 10/10, Sound is beautiful, gameplay is much better than the previous game (Battlefield 1), Customization is great and etc... sad that the game is on a hate train because of women being implemented in-game.
  17. Auser
    Nov 16, 2018
    0
    A game based on the politically correct, with censorship in the online with words like Nazi, white man and DLC, and we are talking about it is a game of the Second World War. Please do not support censorship, do not buy this game!
  18. Octavio89
    Nov 16, 2018
    0
    Battlefield Bad Company 2 and Battlefield 1 are among my favorite games of all time, but unfortunately I'm not educated enough to play this one.
  19. KennetBaker
    Nov 16, 2018
    0
    This game is totally not ready for release.
    Please, do not buy this game and do not support EA as a company.
  20. pripolicy
    Nov 16, 2018
    0
    Very sloppy production. Tons of bugs in addition to the politically correct trash make me regret I bought it.
  21. FAdingDE
    Nov 16, 2018
    10
    Battlefield 5 hat aktuell noch mit einigen Bug´s zu kämpfen.
    Für mich ist es das beste Battlefield seit Jahren.
    DIe Kämpfe fühlen sich westlich besser und taktischer an als in den letzten Teilen!! Der aktuelle Content reicht für mehrere Stunden, die Karten sind abwechslungsreich und gut gestaltet. Bisher haben mir alle Karten sehr gut gefallen. Immersion blablabla.... Wenn euch    Battlefield 5 hat aktuell noch mit einigen Bug´s zu kämpfen.
    Für mich ist es das beste Battlefield seit Jahren.

    DIe Kämpfe fühlen sich westlich besser und taktischer an als in den letzten Teilen!!
    Der aktuelle Content reicht für mehrere Stunden, die Karten sind abwechslungsreich und gut gestaltet. Bisher haben mir alle Karten sehr gut gefallen.

    Immersion blablabla.... Wenn euch weibliche Soldaten usw. stören, dann kauft es einfach nicht!    … Expand
  22. iMiles12
    Nov 16, 2018
    10
    Best battlefield of the series, Gameplay/gunplay is solid and fun, Customization is an welcome addition, FREE DLC, Microtransactions are almost non-existent, and those that exist are only for cosmetics, no progression can be bought, Some maps are small, but they are geniously designed to have a bunch of verticality if the map is small, Disregard political comments from other commenters, asBest battlefield of the series, Gameplay/gunplay is solid and fun, Customization is an welcome addition, FREE DLC, Microtransactions are almost non-existent, and those that exist are only for cosmetics, no progression can be bought, Some maps are small, but they are geniously designed to have a bunch of verticality if the map is small, Disregard political comments from other commenters, as they do not know the meaning of character customization, they think adding sex choice of male and female is pushing an agenda, Its also hard to ignore the "It sucks because the internet said so" behind said reviews.… Expand
  23. Graphic-J
    Nov 16, 2018
    5
    Gun gameplay and game mechanics are great but the art direction and the so called "WW2" aesthetics and immersion is horrendous. A pandering to a certain crowd that doesn't even play these games-joke at times. ... and we all know what and why this is.
  24. RedOctStandinBy
    Nov 16, 2018
    6
    The battlefield franchise lost itself. The game play is to fast to promote good squad play which is what makes this series good. Instead of nice coordinate squad gunfights what you wind up with is a bunch of people running around like headless chickens.
    20/10 graphics dice will never fail you in this category
    6/10 immersion this could have given me ptsd it couldve been so immersive    The battlefield franchise lost itself. The game play is to fast to promote good squad play which is what makes this series good. Instead of nice coordinate squad gunfights what you wind up with is a bunch of people running around like headless chickens.
    20/10 graphics dice will never fail you in this category
    6/10 immersion this could have given me ptsd it couldve been so immersive but the game play is just to fast to keep full immersion.
    5/10 Gun play sometimes its great sometimes its bad
    5/10 overall fun
    100/10 free dlc its amazing for a good battlefield game i was willing to buy premium pass bf4 is a perfect example i own a copy on xbox 360, xbox1 ,and pc all with premium and i don't regret a dollar. but the problem is if the game if you want people to spend money the core game play has to be good.

    I don't know what it is but this game just doesn't seem to be great for me i am a battlefield fan i understand that the game evolves and i think it may be a game that a lot of people love but for veteran battlefield players i don't think this is the game you are looking for.    … Expand
  25. namehere
    Nov 16, 2018
    9
    This is a review of multiplayer. I haven't played the campaign.

    An excellent evolution of the franchise. A solid launch and compelling gameplay. Less gimmicky than BF1, the new mechanics force you to think before you act. Strong modes, strong maps, well balanced classes and greatly improved gunplay make multiplayer feel fair and skill-based. The reduced time to kill is unforgiving but    This is a review of multiplayer. I haven't played the campaign.

    An excellent evolution of the franchise. A solid launch and compelling gameplay. Less gimmicky than BF1, the new mechanics force you to think before you act. Strong modes, strong maps, well balanced classes and greatly improved gunplay make multiplayer feel fair and skill-based. The reduced time to kill is unforgiving but it works both ways.

    Performance has been smooth as butter on my original XBox One. In my opinion it looks better with all the post-production effects turned off, but either way it's a great looking game. That said, it's necessary to tweak brightness settings etc to ensure you can see enemies, who are occasionally hard to pick out.

    Maps are varied, well balanced, with good verticality as well as lots to interact with and destroy, creating the usual BF emergent experiences. So far, more so than I experienced in BF1 and BF4.

    New game modes have played well. Grand Operations takes place over several in-game days and mixes modes and maps, with a loose narrative intended to tie them together. The mix and match approach will appeal to some more than others but it's a good way to force variety. I wish they'd kept Rush but there's more than enough to compensate.

    Classes have been mixed up a bit with Recon feeling more PTFO focussed, Assault having been given SLRs and Medics SMGs. No fundamental changes to previous Battlefields with similar gadgets and tasks but much better gunplay. Weapon progression is tree-based, you have to choose which direction you want to specialise your weapon in and a step in one direction limits options in another.

    Vehicles feel much better balanced than in BF1 but I main infantry so don't have much authority to comment. The gunner role in tanks is much more viable than it was in BF1, feeling more like Bf4.

    If you're shot at you die quickly and this can be frustrating. But it forces consideration and encourages cooperation. You'll need to be willing to adapt to the implications of that; especially as the health and revive mechanics have been revised to contribute to attrition -- you don't regenerate to full health but can carry one med pack to do that for you, squad mates can revive each other but not to full health and very slowly, medics can revive fully and quickly whilst leaving you with a med pack.

    A few bugs with games not ending when the timer ticks to zero, menus not closing and revives not working. Annoying, fixable, not gamebreaking.

    Some pre-launch controversy emerged around changes to the attrition system, the introduction of women characters and a cosmetics microtransaction market. Make of that what you will but it seems to have encouraged negative reviews regardless of the quality of the game. That said, attrition is new but not bad, female characters have no impact on gameplay and it looks like microtransactions/skins will only be relevant to people who care about cosmetics; nothing I've seen there impacts core gameplay either.

    The menu UI is clunky and a bit baffling but it's Battlefield and I expected that. Overall this is a fantastic game with a lot of potential. If the pre-launch controversies are put to one side, there's no reason this game isn't a 9/10 title. It loses one mark for the occasional (definitely patchable) launch bugs.    … Expand
  26. Davis119
    Nov 16, 2018
    0
    EA seal of shame and with anti consumer practices all the way.

    - Get 11 days ealier access for paying a bit more - Releasing an unfinished product, then selling it as "free DLC" - generell lack of vehicles - More Call of a Duty feeling, rather than an immersive 2nd world war simulation - historical accurarcy ... who needs that... - Microtransactions on launch for a 60 dollar game    EA seal of shame and with anti consumer practices all the way.

    - Get 11 days ealier access for paying a bit more
    - Releasing an unfinished product, then selling it as "free DLC"
    - generell lack of vehicles
    - More Call of a Duty feeling, rather than an immersive 2nd world war simulation
    - historical accurarcy ... who needs that...
    - Microtransactions on launch for a 60 dollar game
    - pretty uneven classes to say the very least
    - insulting the player base as uneducated before the game even released
    - bringing an ideology to an goddamn Battlefield game (most likely due to thinking they can pander to an audience, which doesn't even buy their games)
    - "Game journalists" which try to sell you this turd as a 83 points game (most likely due to pressure from EA)

    EA you did it again! You completely **** up everything, which could have potentially been good about a once great franchise! Don't buy this in the current state and wait for it to become a bargain bin product. (Should not take all that long thanks to EA's atrocious marketing and anti-consumer practices).    … Expand
  27. fisher351
    Nov 16, 2018
    0
    Terrible singleplayer: terrible AI, sjw propaganda, terrible singleplayer, zero contents, tonn of bugs. AAA project, but feels like ftp chinese shooter. My grandfather in barnaul had insult afther playing this game.
  28. Gloserous
    Nov 16, 2018
    10
    Dice really have out done themselves with this years battlefield. One of the best battlefield experiences yet.
  29. d25bev
    Nov 16, 2018
    3
    I'll be brief. The campaign is bad & short as hell. 'Untold stories' sounds intriguing but doesnt work, especially in the one man army style they've stupidly chosen in WW2.

    There's only 4 decent-ish multiplayer maps out of 8, with only 2 more in the next 6 months, which some fans have previewed & said are pretty terrible. Its incredibly buggy, full of sjw things that feel completely    I'll be brief. The campaign is bad & short as hell. 'Untold stories' sounds intriguing but doesnt work, especially in the one man army style they've stupidly chosen in WW2.

    There's only 4 decent-ish multiplayer maps out of 8, with only 2 more in the next 6 months, which some fans have previewed & said are pretty terrible.

    Its incredibly buggy, full of sjw things that feel completely out of place & break immersion. It changes historical battles/missions just to be 'politically correct' which is ridiculous when they could've included women in realistic true to history roles & made it much more immersive & gritty. The game feels & is incomplete, with barely any content coming to the game in future. The game has far too many reused assests & has really no feeling of ww2. This game screams missed potential.

    Even if like this game & you rate it a 10 then you're clearly lying to yourself & others. 10 means a game is perfect & this game has many, many problems. I love the battlefield series but rating this game a 10 means you're just a blind fanboy, you'll see in time what this game really is.    … Expand
  30. Slashout
    Nov 16, 2018
    1
    No battlefield has felt as much as a COD game as this one.
    Smaller maps, fewer vehicules, focus on gunfight in close quarters, skill gives places to the "first who spots the other" tactics. You've got it all here.
    Classes have been changed, in a bad way. For exemple medics are now redondant, everyone can do anything they can do, just a little slower. Health packs can be picked easily,    No battlefield has felt as much as a COD game as this one.
    Smaller maps, fewer vehicules, focus on gunfight in close quarters, skill gives places to the "first who spots the other" tactics. You've got it all here.
    Classes have been changed, in a bad way. For exemple medics are now redondant, everyone can do anything they can do, just a little slower. Health packs can be picked easily, you can be revived by non medics, hardly anyone will need your healing. They most likely already have a health pack or they die as soon as they are spotted. I used to finished in the top 3 players playing just as a pure medic and not as a killing machine. You can't do that anymore, as a medic your job is just secondary to killing now.

    The focus is now on squad play. Which is lame. How often do you have 3 friends ready to join you? Do you even want to? I usually launch the game for a quick match when I have the time. I do not want to plan an event to enjoy the game every time and playing as squadmates with strangers is a dice roll.
    What about the UI? Still terribly confusing. It's messy, doesn't give the right info and makes you go to many clicks to do what you need to. I still haven't really figured out some of the stuff to improve my weapons.
    All this and the terrible terrible political stance of this game and its devs... Makes me give it a 1. It's not a good game.    … Expand
  31. V1rax
    Nov 16, 2018
    9
    This review is based solely on the Multiplayer and not the SP. I would have given the multiplayer a 10 but in case the SP is total garbage I'll slap on a 9. As the Singleplayer is not the driving force of the game.

    Battlefield 5 is absolutely fantastic. I've played 7 or the 8 maps on conquest and 2 full rounds of Operations and I can firmly say I'll be playing this game for a few years.    This review is based solely on the Multiplayer and not the SP. I would have given the multiplayer a 10 but in case the SP is total garbage I'll slap on a 9. As the Singleplayer is not the driving force of the game.

    Battlefield 5 is absolutely fantastic. I've played 7 or the 8 maps on conquest and 2 full rounds of Operations and I can firmly say I'll be playing this game for a few years. The maps are all super fun and tactical but I really want to point out Aerodrome and Devastation as some of the best Battlefield gameplay I've played since Metro in BF3. The gameplay and gunplay feel fantastic and a step up from the Beta.    … Expand
  32. zillerziller
    Nov 16, 2018
    9
    I've been playing Battlefield for more than 10 years and I can safely say this BF5 is one of the best. Going back to their roots, slowing down the gameplay and putting forward teamplay is the best thing that could have happened to this franchise. Spotting is gone, huge variety of maps and vehicles and soldier customization make it for a first time in BF. One of my favorite Battlefield toI've been playing Battlefield for more than 10 years and I can safely say this BF5 is one of the best. Going back to their roots, slowing down the gameplay and putting forward teamplay is the best thing that could have happened to this franchise. Spotting is gone, huge variety of maps and vehicles and soldier customization make it for a first time in BF. One of my favorite Battlefield to date.

    disclamer: A lot of people are reviews bombing this game. As people noticed, a lot of reviewers never played the game. You can clearly spot them whey talk about stuff that are not even in the game yet (microtransaction)    … Expand
  33. kkanar
    Nov 16, 2018
    10
    With some bug fixes this is gonna go down as the best frostbite era Battlefield. Majority of the people who gave it negative review never actually played the game and are riding on their stupid propaganda thing. Metacritic really should disable the ability to post review for the people who don't own the game.
  34. RanchDubois
    Nov 16, 2018
    10
    Pretty much every negative review here is from someone that has clearly never played the game. The cosmetics are completely toned down in this game. There are no pay-to-win microtransactions either. This game took what BF1 had and improved on it.
    -No 3d spotting
    -Nerfed certain vehicles
    -No spam revive
    -No spam ammo
    -Building fortifications
    -Throwing nades back
    -Better map design
  35. Fu1crom
    Nov 16, 2018
    9
    A very good Battlefield game at its core. Huge improvements over BF1. Random bullet deviation gone, Fortification system, Squad revives etc. are all playing weirdly well into each other and create a very nice Multiplayer experience. Sure there are a few bugs on release, but they will get ironed out and with new content it could very well be a 10/10. But 9/10 for now for me.
  36. Smaxx
    Nov 16, 2018
    9
    Overall a great game, but weapon balancing needs some more time and the storytelling could be improved – but I'm talking about a multiplayer focused title pre-launch, so…

    Is the game a reskinned Battlefield 1? Certainly not. While some features and mechanics feel similar, it shouldn't surprise anyone, it's a Battlefield game after all. So far we don't know exactly what kind of    Overall a great game, but weapon balancing needs some more time and the storytelling could be improved – but I'm talking about a multiplayer focused title pre-launch, so…

    Is the game a reskinned Battlefield 1? Certainly not. While some features and mechanics feel similar, it shouldn't surprise anyone, it's a Battlefield game after all. So far we don't know exactly what kind of monetization plans EA has, so it's impossible to actually judge those. From what we know so far, they plan to charge for cosmetic items (you can customize helmets, chests, and legs, in addition to several weapon parts). So far there's no season pass or "battle pass" or anything like that. You buy the base game and you get everything. Deluxe Edition extras are mostly cosmetic alterations/retextures.

    So far the weapon selection is smaller compared to previous game, but you can basically pick 4 modifications per weapon modifying them in some way (changing magazine sizes, precision, bullet physics, etc.). In some way it's a bit like BF1's weapon variations, although more diverse and flexible.

    The selection of vehicles is also still quite limited, although it feels as diverse as it's been in previous titles. You got to pick light, medium, and heavy tanks, air superiority fighters, ground attack planes, and bombers.

    Singleplayer is nice to play through, although the stories feel weaker than those in BF1 and it's mostly around getting to objectives and stealth gameplay. I would have wished more in the style of BF1's Through Mud and Blood.

    Performance wise, the game has nothing to hide. With latest Nvidia drivers I'm getting butter smooth 60fps on a 4 year old i7 4770k with a GTX 1080 (non-Ti) and 16GB RAM. Loading times are ridiculously short (5-10 seconds), except when going back to the main menu.

    Ah, and yes, two last but important points:

    Run and gun is mostly dead, you have to play more careful and work as a squad/team. This doesn't mean you're forced into camping, but you can't just run through a street melting everyone, no matter whether you're on foot or in a tank.

    Yes, the game allows you to play female characters in multiplayer, but it's overall rather decent and at some distance impossible to tell them apart. Also customization is rather decent and kept faithful to the time period the game is set in.

    Overall I'm enjoying the game tremendously, if you're on the fence, get Origin Access – risk that few bucks – and give it a spin. Totally worth it. And let's be real. If you just want the campaign (can entertain you for a few days if you want to master everything on Hardcore difficulty) and maybe dab into multiplayer, 15 bucks is an absolutely good deal for renting the game for a month.    … Expand
  37. JustAPotato
    Nov 16, 2018
    9
    Its funny how people hate the game, the game its not a 10 but 0?? 1?? Really the game is good now you need skill to play, this is not BF1 there is not shotgun, Fedorov, Automatico and other no skill weapons. the construction can change the game, It can help or bury your team.
  38. 6stringaddict
    Nov 16, 2018
    8
    First and foremost a multiplayer game. So I haven't bothered with the single player yet. The multiplayer maps are spectacular. Balance is pretty good. Gameplay aimed at team/squad-play, which is what I want in a Battlefield. This is not a CoD run&gun. Few glitches/bugs here and there, but it's inevitable in such a big game. I love it.
  39. Roggiiieee
    Nov 16, 2018
    0
    What does $60 buy you in 2018? A quarter of a mediocre game. There are Indie Studios putting out early access games with better content than this game.

    $60.
  40. becktionary
    Nov 16, 2018
    9
    I don't know why people are complaining about micro transactions here, there's no way to currently put more money into the game and DICE has said when they do you will only be able to purchase cosmetics that you can already buy with in-game currency. The game is pretty good, there are spots that aren't as polished as they should be but that's been the case with every Battlefield title. AsI don't know why people are complaining about micro transactions here, there's no way to currently put more money into the game and DICE has said when they do you will only be able to purchase cosmetics that you can already buy with in-game currency. The game is pretty good, there are spots that aren't as polished as they should be but that's been the case with every Battlefield title. As someone who has been playing these games since Battlefield 1942, this is a very strong entry that brings me back to that first title. I just hope they follow through with adding more factions via the Tides of War service.… Expand
  41. Doom721
    Nov 16, 2018
    10
    First off let me preface this review by saying I have thousands of hours in games like BF5. Well over 2-3,000 in BF2/Project Reality, Around 600 or so in BF3/BF1/BF1, and around 4,500 hours in Planetside 2.

    I had low expectations for BF5 before the beta because nothing had been released to really drive the game home. Upon playing the beta something was different, every mechanic and    First off let me preface this review by saying I have thousands of hours in games like BF5. Well over 2-3,000 in BF2/Project Reality, Around 600 or so in BF3/BF1/BF1, and around 4,500 hours in Planetside 2.

    I had low expectations for BF5 before the beta because nothing had been released to really drive the game home. Upon playing the beta something was different, every mechanic and interaction has been touched on from shooting, feedback on hitting, dying, movement, maps, cover, bipods and overall feel to the game.

    This is the most fluid BF game since 3 with amazing domain ( infantry/tank/plane ) gameplay.

    Everything is lethal, and everything is lethal to each other but powerful in its own regards which makes it enjoyable. Tanks die quickly, but can wipe out entire squads when used right. Bombers decimate the landscape but are wrecked by a skilled fighter pilot. Snipers kill the open lanes, but medics block the sight lines with smoke.

    The game is a masterpiece and a masterwork and worth your time to revisit the Battlefield series.    … Expand
  42. 5denn
    Nov 16, 2018
    9
    Did you enjoy Battlefield 3/4?
    If yes, you're likely going to like this one.
    Do you prefer Battlefield 1? A number of things from BF1 have been brought over into this game, but made more suitable for classic Battlefield gameplay. (Subjective!) It feels and looks more stunning than ever, but offers much more enjoyable gunplay and less 'distractions' (Behemoths, etc.) from objective    Did you enjoy Battlefield 3/4?
    If yes, you're likely going to like this one.

    Do you prefer Battlefield 1?
    A number of things from BF1 have been brought over into this game, but made more suitable for classic Battlefield gameplay.
    (Subjective!) It feels and looks more stunning than ever, but offers much more enjoyable gunplay and less 'distractions' (Behemoths, etc.) from objective focused play.

    Many of the overly negative reviews in this thread seem to be focused on supposed microtransactions (couldn't find any in 20h of playtime) and the fact that Battlefield V introduced the option of playing as a female character into the series.
    The latter is simply personal preference and can obviously be changed very easily, if one wishes to do so.
    Most criticism regarding this change is outrage over adding something that is optional, not mandatory and doesn't change the game in any meaningful way.

    In the end Battlefield V is a very good step into the right direction, with focus on gunplay, objectives and the overall feel a Battlefield game used to have.    … Expand
  43. HoloHolovic
    Nov 16, 2018
    10
    I have only played Battlefield 1 from Battlefield series. Battlefield V feels way better in every way than Battlefield 1. Gunplay is much smoother and maps feel great. There noticeable less grenade spam. I haven't played singleplayer campaign and I probably wont play it. It is Battlefield it's about multiplayer experience with lot of players on same server. Microtransactions are only forI have only played Battlefield 1 from Battlefield series. Battlefield V feels way better in every way than Battlefield 1. Gunplay is much smoother and maps feel great. There noticeable less grenade spam. I haven't played singleplayer campaign and I probably wont play it. It is Battlefield it's about multiplayer experience with lot of players on same server. Microtransactions are only for cosmetics same as BF1 buy you don't buy battlepacks now you can buy credits in exchange for real money, which you are getting by playing too and you can buy some skins.… Expand
  44. llNekoNinjall
    Nov 16, 2018
    10
    A lot of people just hating the game because of the controversy, thats all, the game its not a 10/10 but its really good if you are an old Battlefield player you will recognise a lot of ald mechanics, now you cant play like the shotgun assault killer or the granade spam support, now you need real skills to survive.
  45. BL8kes_7
    Nov 16, 2018
    8
    Love the game and as a player since 1942, this feels like coming back to Battlefield. Still some bugs and the future is still unclear about what it will hold, but it is the most fun I have had in ages, so many "only in Battlefield" moments.
  46. mr656
    Nov 16, 2018
    10
    Absolutely love the game and like they said there’s no transactions and the prologue to the game was absolutely beautiful same with the two war stories I’ve played
  47. Rembrandao
    Nov 16, 2018
    0
    This game has absolutely nothing common with history. If my was grandfather was alive he would have been shocked by this. This tolerance is just unbearable. What's next in the WW2? Orcs? Elves? Aliens?
  48. Hamburgers
    Nov 16, 2018
    10
    Pros
    No more grenade/mortar/explosive spam.
    Removal of 3D spotting. (Sniper scope can spot, but they can't shoot while doing it. Support specialization can spot, but it is when they do their job and suppress.) Gun play is great, bullets hit where you aim. Tanks are not gods of the battlefield anymore, like in BF1. They need to be protected. Visuals are amazing You can throw back    Pros
    No more grenade/mortar/explosive spam.
    Removal of 3D spotting. (Sniper scope can spot, but they can't shoot while doing it. Support specialization can spot, but it is when they do their job and suppress.)
    Gun play is great, bullets hit where you aim.
    Tanks are not gods of the battlefield anymore, like in BF1. They need to be protected.
    Visuals are amazing
    You can throw back grenades. You can also shoot them.
    Fortifications add an amazing defensive experience
    The maps are beautiful
    We were given a schedule on future releases. (That are free)
    No content locked behind paywall to separate the community.
    They have listened to the community and worked to make an amazing game.

    Cons:
    There are fixable bugs in the game.
    ---------------------

    Honestly, this game is amazing and is definitely worth a buy. I cannot wait to experience the content they will be continuing to release.

    Unlike all these 0's, I have actually played the game.    … Expand
  49. Silver_S
    Nov 16, 2018
    10
    One of the best Battlefields IMO, Atleast since BF3 for me, As a medic player primarily, The changes to revives and health make the experience so much better, I've had so many great moments with random squads, Keeping them alive and taking points against many many more enemies, Single player is **** but whatever, The multiplayer is too good to not give out a 10
  50. Maxwellito
    Nov 16, 2018
    10
    This game has all the makings of a lasting title. Loads of customization. The 3D sound is crazy good. Also, the game keeps you busy and focused. Squad play has the most meaning of any BF game to date.
  51. Grus
    Nov 16, 2018
    1
    It is disgrace to World War 2 history. Nothing interesting in this game except skins for multiplayer.
  52. jonasstub
    Nov 16, 2018
    10
    even better than bf1, incredible visuals and gameplay. 10/10 worth the bank
  53. Largoat
    Nov 16, 2018
    9
    Almost all of the negative reviews on here are just people hating the game because of the original issues when it was announced.

    Fact is, their first trailer and responses kinda sucked, but over the past couple of months they've taken a complete change of direction. The Devs are very vocal and honest, providing masses and masses of information every day about what's going on behind    Almost all of the negative reviews on here are just people hating the game because of the original issues when it was announced.

    Fact is, their first trailer and responses kinda sucked, but over the past couple of months they've taken a complete change of direction.

    The Devs are very vocal and honest, providing masses and masses of information every day about what's going on behind the scenes and what their plans are. They've taken on loads of feedback from the community and not only said they would react to it, but have ACTUALLY reacted to it and in most cases if they didn't, they've given reasons why. I absolutely love this new approach DICE have taken.

    Also, at no point have they said this is historically accurate. In fact when it was announced, Lars said "OUR take on WW2". Just like when a new Spider-man movie comes out, it's a new take on Peter Parker's story.

    As for the game itself;
    - Gunplay is amazing. There's some balancing issues sure but the feel of the weapons is great. You can learn a weapon now. Learn it's behaviour and recoil patterns. Rather than it be completely random as it was in previous games.

    - Level design is great. They look so nice and coupled with the Fortification system can provide some great experiences. I do hate Narvik but that's only because I've played it to death and I'm bad at it. Other maps are on point

    - Menus. I'm confused as to why they've chosen this UX in the menus. It doesn't fit the game. So many clicks just to do simple actions is not a good User Experience. Some of this they are working to fix for us but I can't imagine it drastically changing. Saying that, they've done it before...

    - Gadgets etc. A lot of the gadgets have had good changes applied. Medics no longer have to spec the syringe to be able to revive. My only wish is that there were some stats for some of the gadgets such as damage etc for the RPGs

    - Vehicles. They often feel weak but also insanely strong at the same time. Couple of times I've been in tanks that have taken 2 RPGs to be destroyed, and I've done similar to tanks myself. Other times I can pile on 2 TNT and an RPG at the back and the tank just drives off without a problem. Bombers are also insanely OP with AA being absolute garbage. They also start the round before infantry for some reason meaning that you often get a mass killing by carpet bombs at the start of the round.

    - Story. When you boot the game for the first time you're put in to a kind of prelude that you have to play. That annoys me, but it's so frickin' epic that it gave me actual goosebumps. I've played one War Story so far and it was much of the same feeling. AI is quite annoying though as sometimes you can fool them and flank around while they search where you used to be, but other times they're tracking you like AI of the early 2000s.

    - Content. I think there's enough maps and weapons etc for now. I don't want it littering like it was in BF1. However I feel like a lot of the content has been held back for whatever reason. Part of me thinks that it's because it still need more work, or it's being reworked based on feedback, but part of me thinks it's to make it appear like more content is being drip fed to us for free at regular intervals.

    - Special Assignments. These make sense to me now, but it took a while to understand wtf was going on and how I unlocked more. I guess it was my fault for scan reading but it should have been more obvious for sure. Also not being able to change them without leaving the server is damn annoying.

    Overall it's an amazing game. Lots of changes that we've needed for years both in gameplay and in communications from DICE. It feels like EA have finally told DICE to do what they need to do rather than getting involved

    Also, there are no "Microtransactions". These people are just sad lonely internet trolls. There's a section where you can buy some basic skins with GAME CURRENCY. Which is easy to earn just by playing. In the future there will be an option to buy cosmetics with real world money but they'll all have the ability to buy with the game currency too.    … Expand
  54. ewarf
    Nov 16, 2018
    10
    This game builds upon the few strength of battlefield one but eliminates most of its flaws. A lot of small and some big changes (+ the good maps) lead to a massive improvement in team-play, tactics and overall balance. This is just intense and fun. You never want to touch bf1 again.
    But they should tone down the "comeback" mechanic, it's silly.
  55. gamerelite
    Nov 16, 2018
    10
    Been a BF gamer since 1942 and I have to say I am so stoked to go back to WW2. If you like casual gaming and WW2 setting, you don't want to miss this game. Have fun playing solo or join with friends. This game is worth it.
  56. GoDofKiwiS
    Nov 16, 2018
    10
    Best multiplayer BF ever. You don't know it till you try it. It feels so great with the reduced (almost 0) spread shots, no explosive spam, tanks and aircraft balance and ofc the cool ww2 setting.
    This game does not have microtransaction yet (confirmed it will have) so i don't know why people say it has a tone of it. Great multiplayer experience but the warstories aren't good except for    Best multiplayer BF ever. You don't know it till you try it. It feels so great with the reduced (almost 0) spread shots, no explosive spam, tanks and aircraft balance and ofc the cool ww2 setting.
    This game does not have microtransaction yet (confirmed it will have) so i don't know why people say it has a tone of it. Great multiplayer experience but the warstories aren't good except for the prologue which is excellent. The graphics are the best I've seen in any game and it run smooth with my i7-8700 and my gtx 1080 on ultra.    … Expand
  57. christryhard
    Nov 16, 2018
    8
    (Mulitplayer review) They removed all the crap from BF1, kept in the good stuff and made substantial improvements. It retains the authentic feel of being in a war (BF4, while a good game, didn't really feel like a war game to me) without sacrificing good gameplay.

    There are still some glitches (like getting stuck in the environment) and balance issues (AT rockets too strong against    (Mulitplayer review) They removed all the crap from BF1, kept in the good stuff and made substantial improvements. It retains the authentic feel of being in a war (BF4, while a good game, didn't really feel like a war game to me) without sacrificing good gameplay.

    There are still some glitches (like getting stuck in the environment) and balance issues (AT rockets too strong against tanks) but nothing major. It has a fair business model: no premium pass and you can unlock everything (including cosmetics) through playing the game and it doesn't look very grindy.

    I'll give it a 9/10 if they fix the bugs and 10/10 if the single player is really good. The latter is very unlikely tbh but what we have got here is an amazing Battlefield game.    … Expand
  58. carly99
    Nov 16, 2018
    10
    Pros
    - Great gunplay - so much fun to snipe, use the machine gun
    - Amazing maps - There's something for everyone - small maps, big maps, maps for planes, tanks, etc - Grand Operations is really fun - Game is very smooth for me. Graphics are some of the best for an FPS game. - Love the new mechanics they introduced - especially attrition. It forces you to stick with your squad and use    Pros
    - Great gunplay - so much fun to snipe, use the machine gun
    - Amazing maps - There's something for everyone - small maps, big maps, maps for planes, tanks, etc
    - Grand Operations is really fun
    - Game is very smooth for me. Graphics are some of the best for an FPS game.
    - Love the new mechanics they introduced - especially attrition. It forces you to stick with your squad and use teamwork
    -Looking forward to free content where I don't have to break my wallet

    Cons
    - Few bugs here and there but the devs should sort that out soon    … Expand
  59. AlfredTButler
    Nov 16, 2018
    10
    The game is alot of fun.

    Great mechanics.
    Great gunplay
    Epic moments

    Alot of reviews havent acctually played the game. sad, they just want to ruin the game
  60. BIG_IRON
    Nov 16, 2018
    9
    It's an amazing game and single handedly the purest battlefield experience since BF3

    No weapon variants No behemoths/mega vehicles No elite classes No OP spawning pickups (ala BF4) No sweet spot No LeVeluTiON No 3d spot spamming No gas (thank god) Back to 4 man squads No explosive spam Way better/fairer/less random gunplay and gunfights CQ back to classic ticket system No OP    It's an amazing game and single handedly the purest battlefield experience since BF3

    No weapon variants
    No behemoths/mega vehicles
    No elite classes
    No OP spawning pickups (ala BF4)
    No sweet spot
    No LeVeluTiON
    No 3d spot spamming
    No gas (thank god)
    Back to 4 man squads
    No explosive spam
    Way better/fairer/less random gunplay and gunfights
    CQ back to classic ticket system
    No OP heavy bombers ala **** Ilya Muromets
    No random war bonds currency to unlock weapons (I'm fine with coins for skins/specializations but for the weapons themselves it was annoying)
    Maps (launch ones at least) are a lot less tiny and/or linear and favour more playstyles rather than favouring snipers sitting at the back of the map the whole time
    them stuka sirens are thicc

    Some BF2 vets are going even further and saying it's the most classic-styled since the refractor era games, with the slower ticket bleed etc.    … Expand
  61. ren0
    Nov 16, 2018
    10
    Fun and beautiful game. It doesn't deserve a 10 but I had to do it to balance the scores since lots of cry babies give it 0 just for fun
  62. ThorAndreas
    Nov 16, 2018
    9
    Good launch maps.
    Great gun-play.
    Good customisation.
    Movement feels like a good mix of BF1 and BF4.
    Progression speed feels good.
    Solid game, only wish there were a few more launch maps and weapons.
  63. xSociety
    Nov 16, 2018
    10
    Best BF since BF4 or BF3. **** amazing gameplay! Would recommend to any BF fan.
  64. Lilescalade87
    Nov 16, 2018
    10
    I wonder how many of these haters actually played the game? This game is so much fun! It's War Thunder, World of Tanks, and infantry game play of Medal of Honor in one game. Future content is absolutely FREE! And the gameplay is the best in the series, period.
  65. N1cknamed
    Nov 16, 2018
    10
    People that are giving this game low scores have not played the game, they just don't like the fact that there are women in it. This game is the bestt multiplayer shooter of the year. It is truly breathtaking and has deep gameplay. EA has done away with DLC which is another plus. If you like FPS, you're gonna like this one.
  66. garuspl
    Nov 16, 2018
    9
    The best since BF3. Huge improvement over Battlefield 1 which is rage inducing. This is back to being more strategic and squad based, needs UI improvements but that is coming.
  67. Xakep1993
    Nov 16, 2018
    8
    Я не знаю, что за люди которые пишут негативные отзывы. Батла 5 очень даже неплохой продукт. Да он чем то схож с бф1, но это ведь конвейер. Без совесткого союза очень как то играть неправильно.
  68. Umbertobrizzi
    Nov 16, 2018
    10
    They took everything from Battlefield 1 and made it better. Gunplay is maybe the best since BF3 and the graphics and animations like damaged planes are fantastic. With the addiction of all the future updates (gratis) this will be a masterpiece. Do not trust the reviews bombing.
  69. Superpaul
    Nov 16, 2018
    10
    Looks like the best battlefield game ever, played allrdy about 50+ hours, and still want to play more. Last BF wich i want to play was BF3, this one is much better
  70. Herios
    Nov 16, 2018
    10
    A huge step up from Battlefield 1. They took everything good from BF1 and amped it up.

    Battlefield V is harder and more punishing. Teamplay is a key factor again.
    Being tactical really pays off, and it feels like Battlefield should feel.
  71. BGBLOOD
    Nov 16, 2018
    9
    i have played only bf5 and bf1, i can tell u bf5 is a huge step up! there are things to be required, but i bought it and hope they will take care of us.
  72. MDG
    Nov 16, 2018
    10
    People are leaving **** reviews even if it's obvious that they know nothing about the game. I have seen claims about it being filled with Micro transaction and it being a BF1 re-skin. This plays totally different and it's way more skill based than previous Battlefield game thanks to the new movement and shooting mechanics. Dice did a great job with the Micro transaction since you CAN'T buyPeople are leaving **** reviews even if it's obvious that they know nothing about the game. I have seen claims about it being filled with Micro transaction and it being a BF1 re-skin. This plays totally different and it's way more skill based than previous Battlefield game thanks to the new movement and shooting mechanics. Dice did a great job with the Micro transaction since you CAN'T buy anything that affects gameplay with real money .… Expand
  73. imajor75
    Nov 16, 2018
    10
    For those who liked the teamplay aspect of the series, this is a really good addition, way better than BF1.
  74. Omnicron2
    Nov 16, 2018
    10
    Absolutely brilliant online FPS experience. Leaps ahead of BF1 and now the best AAA FPS on the market. Map design is top class and the sense of realism. No season pass or paid DLC, no micro-transactions. Just a solid game with 2 years content support. Ignore the SJW complaints, the women take nothing away from the experience.
  75. Bestspiler
    Nov 16, 2018
    10
    It could be the best BF, if they will support this game for long term. Gunplay is good, the explosion spam is gone, no spotting and other good changes.
  76. Tresman
    Nov 16, 2018
    7
    This review come from a player that actually played the full release of Battlefield V and played about 8-10 hours of Multiplayer so this review will at least have some stance compare to all the crap that everyone putting on here hating on women in the game and SJW stuff that seem to be mostly happening in America and is pointless for the game. ( typical as some American like to causeThis review come from a player that actually played the full release of Battlefield V and played about 8-10 hours of Multiplayer so this review will at least have some stance compare to all the crap that everyone putting on here hating on women in the game and SJW stuff that seem to be mostly happening in America and is pointless for the game. ( typical as some American like to cause problems that are not even there) however i can understand gamer stand on EA and the crap they've pulled in the pass and i won't defend them in anyway for there dodgy practice.
    Review
    So when you play the game shockingly to some here who most likely haven't touch the game, BF5 compare it to BF1 and BF4 has great improvement and positive about the game but also setback to the newest installment of Battlefield but one that can only get better.
    Firstly, the graphic are on point as normal. Dice knows how to made a world feel alive and even on the PS4 pro, it just stunning so no problems there .

    Next the gameplay which has been change from BF1 and is so much better. guns feel different from each other and getting kills feel a lot more awarding since the challenge of shooting is back. There is a quicker TTK which has its up and down moments but its forces player to think more and plan there attack with your squad which is more vital for doing well in this game. You can solo with some on the new gameplay applied but it now much harder to Rambo unlike BF1 and you end up dead if your not prepare. However i feel the balance at the moment between vehicle , planes and soldiers is better then BF1 (where planes always bombed you and never go down) and BF4 which (Jesus Christ!!!!! , the bloody helicopter are just BROKEN and nobody mention this anywhere in recent time and its seem like BF4 is the god of all Battlefield when there some glaring problems) (small rant).

    The weapon choices at first seem meh and underwhelming which i can understand when there a good number of iconic WW2 weapon missing and Faction ( pph, type 100, m1 Grand ) but i bet you will see them later with the tide of war going though the years of WW2. However what weapon we go a first seem like Dice haven't try since there a good handful of WW1 weapon transfers to BF5 (which might make this look lazy but they did have a role in WW2 so that why there here) but they have improve the performance of the weapon so they don't feel copy and paste from BF1 gameplay and they handle different enough to take more skill to master the weapons so the list is a lot better then BF1 even though the list is small but it will grow with FREE content which is a nice bonus in AAA gaming which mean you don't have to pay more money for MAP, GUN, NEW MODE etc. although there more or less will be micro transaction for cosmetic which is a pain to have but i prefer that over loot boxes and season Passes although this is EA so i'm waiting for the catch. never trust E.

    Music and sound effect are also on point but i feel the sound of footstep is a bit muted which can make it really hard to hear enemies nearby. that hopefully will be fix in future updates . It also use some of the music from previous Battlefield which is awesome. :D

    The few negative i have with this game is the content is bare bone at this time. you get a small single campaign of three stories and a interesting fourth coming soon and 8 launch maps at the beginning with a handful of modes to start with. It all good with what there, i enjoy it but the lack of content there is so easy to see and at the moment I can see why paying £50 is not worth it for some player however with what coming in top for FREE in the next 3 months, that will help this game grow and can becoming something amazing so if you want to wait till then, that understandable.

    The hate this game get make no sense. I'm a fan of Battlefield and can understand the backlash it got with the trailer but not for the women in the game, Just the none sense of the video and Micheal Bay stuff. The cosmetic is there so you can customize your solider which i think is a good idea for battlefield 5 (shame it not has deep has i though ) it seem the gaming community has turn rotten just for something like this. if you don't like women being in BF5, then that your choice but it doesn't ruin the experience so calm your troll hands. However EA have done them self's for it marketing campaign that DICE had to pick and try fixed and is the sole cancer for the Battlefield name so i will join and agree with the hate on them (since they ruin so many games already) .
    Overall
    Battlefield 5 is a good game and one for the hardcore fans at least even with the faults but I can't give it anymore then 7 for the sheer lack of content at this moment. I think the rating will improve as time goes on with free updates and more content and will be a 8 or a 9 if they fixed some problems, i hope this review will help understand where this game stand at this time    … Expand
  77. FrostormNidhegg
    Nov 16, 2018
    3
    Давайте по полочкам, хорошо?
    1) Графика. она спорная. Днем все либо пересвеченное и белое, не яркое, а именно белое, либо перезатемненное и черное. Вечерние карты - норм выглядят. Ночные - все черное и белое, я не знаю зачем они так настроили шейдеры. Ну не так все освещается и затеняется в реале (и в хороших играх), не так. Снежок падает, с крыш стекает если в дом врезаться, это есть. Но    Давайте по полочкам, хорошо?
    1) Графика. она спорная. Днем все либо пересвеченное и белое, не яркое, а именно белое, либо перезатемненное и черное. Вечерние карты - норм выглядят. Ночные - все черное и белое, я не знаю зачем они так настроили шейдеры. Ну не так все освещается и затеняется в реале (и в хороших играх), не так. Снежок падает, с крыш стекает если в дом врезаться, это есть. Но в целом графика - обычная. Она похуже, чем в БФ1, хуже, чем в БФ 3.
    2) Звук. Звук определенно хуже, чем в БФ1.
    3) Игровые механики. Стрельба так себе, импакта нет. Целиться - менее выгодно, чем стрелять от бедра, потому что все оружие на ближней и средней сверхточное, на прицел только зря время потратишь. После того, как тебя отстрелят, ты лежишь и орешь, это бесит, ресать тебя естественно никто не торопится - а зачем? Чтоб его рядом положили? Строительство укрытий - не нужно, их быстро ломают, только время потеряешь. Патронов постоянно нет. Это реализм? Нет, это просто бесячая особенность, которая ничего не дает, кроме нервов. На одной карте тебя отстреливают пока ты в воздухе находишься, на парашюте, то есть спавнкилл. Спасибо, Дайс. Я лично на этой карте просто ливаю и все, чтоб время не тратить и нервы.
    4) Сингл. О господи, это самый убогий сингл в истории видеоигр. Если у вас есть мозг, сингл вас оскорбит. Смотрите, есть 3 компании - про бабу, которая всех убила, про негра и про британца. Четвертая будет про нацистов-танкистов. Игра про нацистов, клево, да? Про британца - более менее, обычная тупая пафосная история, не плохая и не хорошая, обычная нормальная кампания. Минус только один - проходится за час. Кампания про бабу - можно в помещении ездить на лыжах, можно вручную убивать всех, если рашить их в лоб, злодеи в нее не стреляют. А еще она проваливается под воду, зимой в горах, тупо плывет к берегу и потом спит в сугробе, на утро просыпается и идет всех руками душить. Смерть от обморожения в первые полчаса после вылезания из воды? Вы о чем, вообще никакого дискомфорта. гордым независимым женщинам плевать на физику, законы природы, логику и т.д. Точнее не женщинам, а идиотам из Дайс. Короче ребят, сингл в этой игре это просто клоунада.
    5) Баги лаги и т.д. баги есть, плохая регистрация попаданий есть, можно расстрелять с дробовика и ничего не будет, но это скорее всего поправят, это меньшее из зол.
    ИТОГ - эта игра - пародия и клоунада, никакого отношения ко 2 мировой не имеет. Это как порно - пародия, только без порно. Контента нет, режимов мало, карт мало, сейчас это не игра, это демо-версия. Если у вас есть БФ1 - играйте в него, новый БФ вам ничего не даст, это просто рескин, с тотальным урезанием контента. Играть можно только если вам ее кто-то подарил, самому ее покупать - пустая трата денег. Никому не советую. Лучше БФ 1 играть, он лучше во всем    … Expand
  78. Consar
    Nov 16, 2018
    2
    a stupid spawn and shoot game with pretty graphics. it's a shame battlefield series came to this.
  79. Panzerfaust1944
    Nov 16, 2018
    0
    It can't get much worse than this, can it? This game is literally a rushed mess more focused on shoving it's BS sjw politics down your throat than giving you a good story or gameplay. Two thumbs down from me.
  80. Mr_Don_RaZoR_
    Nov 16, 2018
    0
    This game is nothing but a SJW propaganda. No immersion at all, even worse I haven't even had the feeling of playing a WW2 game. The shooting mechanics are even worse than BF1. Spotting is a mess and makes absolutely no sense in a WW2 game. Lack of content considering you pay 70 euro for the deluxe edition, but nothing, not even all of the single player missions, are available.

    I'll    This game is nothing but a SJW propaganda. No immersion at all, even worse I haven't even had the feeling of playing a WW2 game. The shooting mechanics are even worse than BF1. Spotting is a mess and makes absolutely no sense in a WW2 game. Lack of content considering you pay 70 euro for the deluxe edition, but nothing, not even all of the single player missions, are available.

    I'll stick with BF1 and BF4.    … Expand
  81. dape
    Nov 15, 2018
    5
    Pros:
    - Graphics are quite good (although nothing exciting these days)
    - Animations are solid - Shooting mechanics are solid Cons: - Terrible visibility in every aspect of a game: you don't see enemy in front of a wall, you can't pick enemy in tons of garbage, it's hard to read deploy map to see what's going on, kill feed is disabled by default taking away crucial information - UX    Pros:
    - Graphics are quite good (although nothing exciting these days)
    - Animations are solid
    - Shooting mechanics are solid

    Cons:
    - Terrible visibility in every aspect of a game: you don't see enemy in front of a wall, you can't pick enemy in tons of garbage, it's hard to read deploy map to see what's going on, kill feed is disabled by default taking away crucial information
    - UX is something DICE never heard of. Menus are not intuitive and take long to navigate. Configuring every class for both sides is a choir - battlelog was a lot better than this.
    - Bugs, bugs, bugs, bugs - I've had one team on server suddenly not be able to revive, flying tanks, objects hovering in the air, unkillable enemies, flickering textures
    - Maps are bad. And I mean really bad - they are beautiful but hardly playable - a lot of clutter with a lot of open spaces. Again: VISIBILITY is sacrificed for a fancy visuals. It's bad for multiplayer game. Look at: CS GO, Overwatch, Fortnite - those games have extremely good visibility and that makes them so good. In BF: V for most of the time you are wondering if it's some fancy map decoration or proned camper from other team.
    - "How did I die this time?" - Is a question you will be asking yourself a lot. Game gives no information what is going on, who made damage to you, where was he when it happened. Compared to COD killcam it's a joke (because it's nonexistent) and done probably to hide bad netcode (later on that) and growing problems with hackers (whoever plays bf1 knows what i'm talking about). You will die many times mostly not knowing how - just get used to it.
    - Informational chaos - game hides important information from you (hidden kill-feed, no info on how you got killed) but feeds a lot of totally not necessary information (something about your squad leader being changed, something about progression in achievement, something about community event will find its way to your display)
    - Lack of content - Maps that are here are not only bad but also scarce. I guess EA clearly goes for a long term Origin Premium model and wants to spoon-feed content so people stay interested and pay for subscription for as long as possible. There are not that many guns in game and there is no deep customization for them anymore.
    - Inconsistent netcode - Again you die in a milisecond. Again you can try to hit enemy that is further than high refresh bubble and nothing will happen. Guess that just comes with inventory.    … Expand
  82. AnnGamer
    Nov 15, 2018
    0
    DICE what happen to you? Has the key devs finally turned into blind EA execs? BFV is lazy P.O.S game to put it lightly. Reskinned BF1 with zero thought into story or accuracy and mundane boring gameplay. Let's just hope there is enough backlash to fire the management at DICE and get proper game next time.
  83. Avitoast
    Nov 15, 2018
    10
    This game is all we wanted in a Battlefield game, no Premium, no DLCs, no 3D spotting, skill based gunplay, and generally less arcade gameplay direction, the opposite from Battlefield 1. It has one of the best gameplay experiences from a Battlefield game yet! And it is bound to only get better.

    Now I do feel like it was released too early, as it features quite a few bugs, nothing    This game is all we wanted in a Battlefield game, no Premium, no DLCs, no 3D spotting, skill based gunplay, and generally less arcade gameplay direction, the opposite from Battlefield 1. It has one of the best gameplay experiences from a Battlefield game yet! And it is bound to only get better.

    Now I do feel like it was released too early, as it features quite a few bugs, nothing game-breaking but you can tell it needed a bit more time to be ironed out before releasing. So I would say it's an 8-9, though I still gave it a 10 simply to balance the score against the wave of trolls who give it 0 and haven't even played it yet, and lie about micro-transactions while there are literally none in the game yet. And it has the same amount of content at launch or more of the previous game BF 1.

    So I would say this game is well worth your money, especially if you are looking for more serious Battlefield gameplay compared to BF 1's arcade direction.    … Expand
  84. abdullah9o9
    Nov 15, 2018
    10
    great gunplay great maps everything in this game great , dice did great job in this game
  85. LostBedlam
    Nov 15, 2018
    5
    In my entire career of playing video games, I’ve never written a review. This game though, has had me frustrated since the moment I’ve tried it. First off, I love Battlefield games, and have been playing them since the early 2000s. I know that bugs will be fixed and one will adjust to the new mechanics of the game, but personally, I can’t stand the new feel and layout of the game. I triedIn my entire career of playing video games, I’ve never written a review. This game though, has had me frustrated since the moment I’ve tried it. First off, I love Battlefield games, and have been playing them since the early 2000s. I know that bugs will be fixed and one will adjust to the new mechanics of the game, but personally, I can’t stand the new feel and layout of the game. I tried playing the campaign and multiplayer, and both have left me so pissed off, I had to write this rant. Aside from graphics and all that good stuff that comes with Battlefield games, these are just a few of my early observations and complaints. I can’t see enemies for **** They are so dark and hidden in every circumstance that I have encountered so far. I’m getting killed every two seconds when I spawn. I usually do fairly well in Battlefield games, but my first hour of playing, I was getting destroyed by players half way across the map and then when I attempt to aim, I see a shadowy figure amongst blackness and my gun fires all over like I’m holding a piece of spaghetti. Sure, people will love the challenge of aiming and moving like a sloth through the battle, but I like the idea that this is also a source of action/entertainment, and I’m not enjoying it so far, as much as I really want to. Perhaps I’m just too old now, and need to hang up the towel with these hopes that Battlefield will provide more memorable moments of action and fun. I find this game just overly frustrating so far, both visually and in controls. The ammo and health thing is really annoying, as the second I spawn, I’m instantly dead....ready to wait another 15 seconds, spawn, and run for five minutes, and then be instantly killed my the shadow of an enemy...is it a friendly? Or and enemy? I can’t tell, guess I’ll shoot my spaghetti gun and hope I don’t run out of ammo after one use. I’m sure this game will improve as time goes on, but honestly, this game put me over the edge like no other has before. Something about it, just sucks! And I hate saying that because I really appreciate the other Battlefield games. If you enjoy this game, that’s awesome. Myself on the other hand, it’s not working out. Doesn’t feel right and just pisses me off left and right. I uninstalled it and went for writing a review to help relieve myself of the rage. Maybe others will get a kick out of it and laugh it off like we all should. It’s just a game anyhow, but still something that could be much better and not so riddled with customization confusion and “realism” that doesn’t seem real at all. If you want a refreshing experience of a video game, play Red Dead 2....it’s slow paced and everything, but it’s been a joy to play in my experience. I went from that to this turd burger battlefield V. I’ll keep playing, because I’m a sucker for these games...but I’ll likely dislike it for a long while. Save your money if you haven’t purchased it yet, and wait until it’s damn near free.… Expand
  86. azgoodaz
    Nov 15, 2018
    7
    Battlefield V, it's not a 10/10 game, not even an 8 or 9.

    For one, the announcer and the whole UI layout feels and looks like Star Wars: Battlefront which is hilarious. I personally LOVE how EA/DICE is making us pay $60 for a missing game mode they promised, Battle Royale (which we are getting 'next year' lol) and many features just missing. You can't customize your character    Battlefield V, it's not a 10/10 game, not even an 8 or 9.

    For one, the announcer and the whole UI layout feels and looks like Star Wars: Battlefront which is hilarious.

    I personally LOVE how EA/DICE is making us pay $60 for a missing game mode they promised, Battle Royale (which we are getting 'next year' lol) and many features just missing. You can't customize your character in-game/server, groups/platoons don't exist and so many more features just lacking. What is this? An Early Access game on Steam? Why are we missing core features that the Battlefield series always had? Then you have weapons, they just feel "squishy" against enemies. It takes a full magazine to kill someone or if you use a sniper and shoot them straight at the chest it doesn't kill someone. Sometimes even a headshot won't kill a player instantly. The health idea in this game is just stupid. Why are there health packs on players? Battlefield is team orientated. Nope, not this Battlefield. You have health packs like Call of Duty now just to replenish your health. No need for teammates to go Medic for health or even Support for ammo. Can I also mention that DICE censors 'curse words' in-game text chat? Rated 'M' game and we can't call our own horrible team bad words because it may hurt them. Finally, sadly another year without Battlelog. Why? I want detailed statistics, no one wants that crap website companion or app.

    Want to play this game? Play on 'Hardcore' servers created by the community. Official servers with DICE's own rule sets are trash.

    Battlefield 4 is better and more balanced, Battlefield V is catering to more "casual" players. EA/DICE want that Call of Duty fan base too much rather than on just expanding on what Battlefield is and what they created from the start. You aren't missing out much if you don't play or buy this. If you really want it, wait for a sale. It will probably be like $30 by next year like Battlefield 1.

    I bought every Battlefield game, played each one (ranging from Xbox 360, Xbox One and PC) and I have to say one thing. I personally would have liked to have Battlefield: Bad Company 3 this year or I would have rather taken Battlefield Hardline 2, instead we got Battlefield V. It could be such a fun game to play, but at the same time it's such a disappointing game.    … Expand
  87. ILoveMyUnicorn
    Nov 15, 2018
    2
    I don't know how they managed to **** up WW2 that way. This feels like an impossible era to **** up and yet they managed to do it.

    If you like World War 2, if you want to know more about World War 2, If you want to feel like World War 2.

    That game is not for you.
  88. Praetorian_bgx
    Nov 15, 2018
    0
    If you want to pay for overpriced BF1 mod with implemented political agenda, then this is for you. Otherwise - Avoid like the plague.
  89. Schalv
    Nov 15, 2018
    10
    No entiendo porque tanta gente le da bajo rating yo pobré este juego y es una belleza.
  90. Rockett
    Nov 15, 2018
    8
    Combat is solid, graphics are beautiful, game mechanics are clean and clear, you will like this game if you like any of the previous battlefield titles multiplayer, including the modern day setting games.
    But with a great looking game, comes very strict hardware requirements, you will not be able to play this game without good PC specs, make sure you meet the recommended requirements for    Combat is solid, graphics are beautiful, game mechanics are clean and clear, you will like this game if you like any of the previous battlefield titles multiplayer, including the modern day setting games.
    But with a great looking game, comes very strict hardware requirements, you will not be able to play this game without good PC specs, make sure you meet the recommended requirements for the best experience.

    Squad play is now a necessity for a team to succeed, you can no longer go full on solo Rambo around the map like in the previous titles, it requires more skill, tactics and coordination to out do your opponents. A squad that plays well allows a squad leader to request more vehicles, a supply drop or if the squad achieves enough points the deadly V1 Rocket!

    The addition of building is a welcome one, never thought about it before but it works so well and cleanly allowing you to block off entrances and better protect objectives.

    The single player is short, shows off how impressive this game looks and is a good introduction for players into the battlefield series. completing it and earning the collectibles earns you skins for your multiplayer weapons. Sadly it is not as historically accurate as it should be and is a lot more fantasized like with most WW2 games.

    For now there are some improvements which would push my review up to a 10:
    -more game mode variety (Conquest and infantry focus game modes are great, grand operations is not as good in its current state as BF1's due to there only being 2 different operations)
    -female death screams are much more noticeable than males, tone them down a bit
    -Dragging downed soldier to safety mechanic added to game

    As of this review being written there are currently NO micro transactions, it is clear most of the user reviews for this game, haven't purchased it and tried it out as they would know this, currently the only way to earn in game currency is through levelling up and completing assignments.

    To address the addition of females in WW2, my only gripe is how piercing screams are for them, they stand out in a fight. Despite them being noticeable in multiplayer i remain immersed, you feel that the person that just got shot is generally screaming for their life.

    So to conclude, the game looks great, weapon handling is amazing, the sounds are immersing. Its a great all rounder. If you want a more challenging, realistic shooter than BF1, this is for you, the only thing that will make this game even better is the content to come over the next few years.    … Expand
  91. mecke
    Nov 15, 2018
    3
    EIn Casual Shooter für Noobs, der den Nerv der Zeit trifft und kleine Fortnite Kinder abholen will.
    Leider eines der schlechtesten Battlefield Teile, seit Battlefield 3 ging es mit der Serie Berg ab, genau wie bei CoD, mit BF5 haben wir den Bodensatz erreicht. Mein Gott es gibt nicht mal Friendly Fire... das sagt eigentlich schon alles, stumpfsinniges anspruchsloses Geballer. Richtig    EIn Casual Shooter für Noobs, der den Nerv der Zeit trifft und kleine Fortnite Kinder abholen will.
    Leider eines der schlechtesten Battlefield Teile, seit Battlefield 3 ging es mit der Serie Berg ab, genau wie bei CoD, mit BF5 haben wir den Bodensatz erreicht. Mein Gott es gibt nicht mal Friendly Fire... das sagt eigentlich schon alles, stumpfsinniges anspruchsloses Geballer. Richtig lustig ist im Vergleich dazu die Diskussion um Authentizität bezüglich Frauen im Spiel oder zu unrealistisch Skins. Das GANZE SPIEL ist total unauthentisch, Weltkriegs Atmosphäre? NULL!    … Expand
  92. marcantoineg
    Nov 15, 2018
    0
    An insult to every single man who died fighting in ww2. The game is sold as a historical one but it could be considered a alternate history fantasy. Ridiculous.
  93. Nejco
    Nov 15, 2018
    10
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. There are a lot of trolls claiming microtransactions are in game. They aren't even in yet. But They don't know that cause they are too busy hating because they are hate females. That's reality of BFV, haters gonna hate.… Expand
  94. Catchy
    Nov 15, 2018
    4
    Single player is full of incorrect facts, example being the heavy water production in Norway, why couldn’t DICEEA just follow the proper historical events? That would be so much better.
    I was so looking forward to the heavy water mission, playing the role of Norwegian heroes, boy what a disappointment.
    Instead we play the role of ONE girl called Solveig, who take on a whole German army    Single player is full of incorrect facts, example being the heavy water production in Norway, why couldn’t DICEEA just follow the proper historical events? That would be so much better.
    I was so looking forward to the heavy water mission, playing the role of Norwegian heroes, boy what a disappointment.
    Instead we play the role of ONE girl called Solveig, who take on a whole German army by herself. Seems DICE and EA wants to change history because of "Political correctness", it’s sad and weak. It would be like they made a game with flat earth.
    In single player the gameplay feels like your common DoomWolfensteinDukenukem or any other first-person shooter gameplay from 1990s-2010s, where you solo a bunch of stuff yourself, simply boring.
    Also, what’s with the damn voices? Why on earth do we have to listen to a foreign language? It’s not like I’m going to read damn subtitles while I’m in a firefight!
    However, the major player base is going to play multiplayer, so that might be the reason why single player is such a mess.

    Multiplayer is ok, not much to say really, it’s same as before with a little more BF3 feel. However, the classes should be a bit more balanced, seems medic has a huge disadvantage over long range combat maps at the moment.
    Rumor has it that BF 5 has a matchmaking system and is supposed to balance players? If so, that is very good, it isn’t fun meeting a team of players who play videogames as a job, just imagine racing a F1 driver...And since the last patch multiplayer has been an enjoyment, with good balance, hope it lasts.
    I don’t understand the complaint that there are female characters however, you could just choose not to play as one, but yeah, their screams are a bit annoying.    … Expand
  95. MarcoFicktDich
    Nov 15, 2018
    9
    The gunplay has been improved upon BF1, graphics are still gorgeous, sound design is A+,Singleplayer is whack, but who plays the SP anyways. Don't listen to Hurensöhne talking about SJWs ruining the game, as what the soldiers genitals are is in no way important to gameplay.
  96. Dumbdud3
    Nov 15, 2018
    0
    This game sucks. It took all of the good mechanics of a game like Battlefield 4 and stripped them down to make this a casual game. Team play is completely destroyed and progression has been removed even more so than it was in Battlefield 1 which was already too casual and lacking in progression. The game right now if completely unfinished and needs more content. After not even an hour IThis game sucks. It took all of the good mechanics of a game like Battlefield 4 and stripped them down to make this a casual game. Team play is completely destroyed and progression has been removed even more so than it was in Battlefield 1 which was already too casual and lacking in progression. The game right now if completely unfinished and needs more content. After not even an hour I was bored of Battlefield 5 and that's coming from someone with 1,500 hours in BF4 and 500 hours in BF1. On top of that EA called it's customers "uneducated" and has tried to ruin WWII with feminism and crazy stuff that never happened in WWII. This game's only strong point is the tighter gunplay than BF1, though that's a really low bar to set. It has decent gunplay but all the vehicles have been sort of removed from the game. You never really see more than one tank or plane ever. This game has increasingly become call of duty with more players. It's a s***show of pew-pew-ing. This game is a crappy excuse for a shell of a Battlefield game and you should just get BF4 or some other game instead.… Expand
  97. Phoenix123
    Nov 15, 2018
    0
    World War 2 games have been extremely overdone, but if you want to compare this to Battlefield 1, it's an absolute joke. This is in no way accurate to the actual WW 2, almost as inaccurate as Cod WW2, and shoves political agenda down your throat. A rather bad and forgettable installment into the Battlefield franchise.
  98. Velzer
    Nov 15, 2018
    0
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Компания потеряла связь с реальностью , ссср МЕНЯЛА СТОРОНУ? серьезно? больше не 1 игры этой компании не куплю , просто потому что ссср МЕНЯЛО СТОРОНУ , это уже не простить , этому нет оправдания !!!… Expand
  99. Shemin07
    Nov 15, 2018
    0
    Disappointed with your SJW agenda,you made that as the backbone of this game plus in the name of tides of war you tricked the customers with the release of your game in parts showing as you are going to add many things in the game lately while in the first hand only 10% of a supposed AAA title is given,nice try but not this time,hope dice LA will deliver next time
  100. trooper1993
    Nov 15, 2018
    1
    At its core, it's not Battlefield anymore. DICE created a Call of Duty clone with some Battlefield Elements.

    Please, do not buy this game and do not support EA as a company.

    Vote with your wallet and let's eradicate this cancer of a company from the market.
Page:

Awards & Rankings

53
#53 Best PC Game of 2018
2
#2 Most Discussed PC Game of 2018
7
#7 Most Shared PC Game of 2018

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
81

Generally favorable reviews - based on 52 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 45 out of 52
  2. Mixed: 7 out of 52
  3. Negative: 0 out of 52
  1. CD-Action
    Nov 14, 2019
    85
    It’s far from being ideal but all the glitches and shortcomings don’t ruin the overall fun of Battlefield V’s multiplayer experience. Although the single player portion of the game is not bad at all, I would have been disappointed if I bought the game just for it. [13/2018, p.56]
  2. PLAY! Zine
    Mar 5, 2019
    80
    In Battlefield V we got back to WW2, but with refined gunplay and death system which works great. There are also little problems such as low number of maps and stability issues, that are taking the fun away, but nothing that can't be fixed.
    Read full review
  3. LEVEL (Czech Republic)
    Dec 31, 2018
    80
    A great World War II shooter that will grow and improve. Do not buy the game because of its singleplayer, but if you consider the campaign a bonus to the multiplayer, you will be satisfied. [Issue#291]
See all critic reviews »