Battlefield V

 PC
User Score
3.0

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 3148 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 674 out of 3148
  2. Mixed: 296 out of 3148
  3. Negative: 2,178 out of 3148
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. cpt_felix
    Nov 28, 2018
    8
    Summary:
    I really dont get this negative Review score.
    BF 5 is a great game IN THE MULTIPLAYER. Singleplayer: The singleplayer is really weak. that's true, wich is btw. the reason for the Review score 8. The same thing like in bf1 except for less inspiration with the mission design. Multiplayer: DICE has made a lot of changes depending specific gameplay- and teamplay Mechanics.    Summary:
    I really dont get this negative Review score.
    BF 5 is a great game IN THE MULTIPLAYER.

    Singleplayer:
    The singleplayer is really weak. that's true, wich is btw. the reason for the Review score 8.
    The same thing like in bf1 except for less inspiration with the mission design.

    Multiplayer:
    DICE has made a lot of changes depending specific gameplay- and teamplay Mechanics.
    And holy **** i do love these new mechanics! especialy, the fact that Everybody is able to revive in Battlefield V sounds stupid on the Paper, but in game it feels awesome.
    The Medic is still an extremely important class because of the new regeneration system, and all around the Classes seems to be ballanced on a great way. The CORE-Teamplay (Reviving, resupplying, and fighting together is working absolutely fine to me!
    Another Point... BF5 left the path of being such an expensive DLC based game.
    It will be delivering Content for Free to all players. So GG to EA! Havent seen this for such a long time in a AAA production!
    The game itself feels great!
    Now one negative Point.
    It feels like we do have a little lack of Content on release.
    Especialy to mee i just want to see more of it! but i know there might be alot of you angry about it. It is a big point.

    In General i just can Say - Good Job to DICE.
    Leave out the Singleplayer - Focus on the multiplayer and give us more of it!    … Expand
  2. Zoso
    Nov 28, 2018
    10
    This is right up there with Battlefield 3, and in many aspects, it's even better.
    Of course visually, for example, but the one thing they absolutely nailed is Squad Play.
    If your squad cooperates, this creates maybe the best game moments I experienced so far in >20 years of gaming. If it doesn't, it's still good, and while I personally would have hoped for a steeper attrition curve here,    This is right up there with Battlefield 3, and in many aspects, it's even better.
    Of course visually, for example, but the one thing they absolutely nailed is Squad Play.
    If your squad cooperates, this creates maybe the best game moments I experienced so far in >20 years of gaming. If it doesn't, it's still good, and while I personally would have hoped for a steeper attrition curve here, encouraging even more squad play, I'm fine with the current compromise.

    I can only suspect that all the negative reviews come from people being upset with female soldiers, and that's just ridiculous.    … Expand
  3. RiaskoFF
    Nov 28, 2018
    0
    Its bad game that is not worth its cost and already goes with a discount on ps and xbox stores.
    Its boring, unfun, with poor performance, ive no idea why I should prefer this over bf1 or bf4. Not to mention the SJW bs with "dont like it dont buy it" controversy... dice wants to rewrite history about how blacks and disabled whamen with bionical arms won the ww2. disgraceful.
  4. Beliar
    Nov 27, 2018
    2
    I've been actually playing this game for some time now (12h) so I guess im way beyond "you have to feel the game" stage. I gotta say, it's one of the worst Battlefields released so far.

    Don't get me wrong, some of the improvements are cool (I liked fortifications, visual effects, graphics, sounds) but anything else is just garbage. The big maps feel too big, with to little vehicles.    I've been actually playing this game for some time now (12h) so I guess im way beyond "you have to feel the game" stage. I gotta say, it's one of the worst Battlefields released so far.

    Don't get me wrong, some of the improvements are cool (I liked fortifications, visual effects, graphics, sounds) but anything else is just garbage.

    The big maps feel too big, with to little vehicles. Gun play and movement are weird & clunky. Game in general feels rushed and unpolished (not to even mention bugs).

    Also I don't feel any immersion. It's not WW2, it's also not what was presented in BF1. It's somewhere....no where? And who thought about those stupid revival animations and character screaming "there's blood everywhere!"? Yeah no ***t Sherlock. In case you didn't know - teammates revive you with giving you a hand (literally). WTF?    … Expand
  5. besidehimself
    Nov 27, 2018
    9
    The low User Score for Battlefield V is representative only of the propensity for butt-hurted-ness of the gaming community at large.

    Battlefield V is a great game, both on it's own and as part of the larger franchise. I have played every Battlefield game since Battlefield 1942. The new frostbite engine is absolutely stunning. Every session I notice new physics interactions; most    The low User Score for Battlefield V is representative only of the propensity for butt-hurted-ness of the gaming community at large.

    Battlefield V is a great game, both on it's own and as part of the larger franchise. I have played every Battlefield game since Battlefield 1942.

    The new frostbite engine is absolutely stunning. Every session I notice new physics interactions; most recently I was amazed when a nearby explosion causes the packed snow to slide off the top of a house on one of the snowy maps. One of the - if not the - most beautiful games I have ever played, and it seems to be very well optimized.

    I do wish we had some larger maps with more vehicles scattered about. I miss that about the old-school battlefield games. I'm willing to give that up for immersion of the frostbite engine.

    The whiners that think this game would be made realistic by removing female avatars fail to recognize that this is a videogame and not a history lesson. If women (or men) want to play this game as female characters they should be able to. If you want to play a historically accurate WW2 shooter go play Red Orchestra.    … Expand
  6. nuserlillepony
    Nov 27, 2018
    0
    Operations has turned into absoloute **** with the rotating gamemode. Also has women in it on the frontlines.
  7. LazyDevsdolla
    Nov 27, 2018
    0
    Graphics 10 years ago
    Gameplay 20 years ago
    Bugs 50 years ago
    Devs 4 years experience
    Investors 200 years old

    Its clear this 1 doesnt have any hart.
  8. maartendc
    Nov 27, 2018
    8
    Battlefield V is a good game, albeit a little dissapointing in some aspects.

    + The gameplay / gunplay is good and fun + The graphics are amazing + Sound is amazing + There are some good multiplayer maps, Hamada, Arras and Twisted Steel and fun times to be had. + They will add DLC content for free + No pay-to-win, only cosmetic items. + More squad-focused gameplay is good. + Some    Battlefield V is a good game, albeit a little dissapointing in some aspects.

    + The gameplay / gunplay is good and fun
    + The graphics are amazing
    + Sound is amazing
    + There are some good multiplayer maps, Hamada, Arras and Twisted Steel and fun times to be had.
    + They will add DLC content for free
    + No pay-to-win, only cosmetic items.
    + More squad-focused gameplay is good.
    + Some innovation with fortification building
    + The weapon specialization trees are actually a good way to customize the guns to your playstyle.

    - The content feels a bit light, with only 8 maps, and some short War Stories. Although they will add to the game later on for free.
    - A lot of the multiplayer maps are too infantry focused an miss that "Battlefield" feeling: Devastation, Rotterdam, Fjell, Narvik: All pretty small and vehicles don't play a significant role.
    - Lacks the iconic WW2 battles (Stalingrad, D-day, Operation Market Garden, Battle of the Bulge, Iwo Jima, etc.). Feels much less like WW2 than even the original BF1942.
    - The grand operations mode is disappointing: not as good as Operations in BF1
    - Chaotic interface with a lot of visual clutter
    - Too much cosmetic B/S for the guns etc.

    All in all I have had a lot of fun with this game so far, 20 hours in. But they will need to add some more content and maps soon, or it will start to feel old really quickly.    … Expand
  9. T4BLETOS
    Nov 27, 2018
    1
    Если вы не знали, спермобаки - угнетатели, именно чернокожие азиатки с членами выйграли ВМ2. Ставь луказ если ты анэдьюкейтед
  10. Batareykin
    Nov 27, 2018
    7
    Very atmospheric game! But a score of 7 for:
    -Must play for the Nazis and kill the allies.
    -the developers propose to dress the fascists more beautiful. What for ???
    - there are friezes between maps.
  11. ED-ED
    Nov 27, 2018
    10
    Das beste Battlefield seit den dritten Teil. Gibt noch ein paar kleine Fehler, die aber in keinster Weise den Spaß an dem Spiel nehmen.
    Es sieht Top aus und die Karten sind sehr abwechslungsreich.
    Das Waffengefühl ist perfekt, genauso wie das Soundgefühl.
  12. dasBOT
    Nov 26, 2018
    1
    It doesn't matter how good the gameplay can be or how stunning the graphics is, without the proper anti cheat this game is dead to me, massive online shooter more like massive cheaters fest
  13. clarkaddison
    Nov 26, 2018
    8
    Being with the franchise as long as I have been with COD, little over a decade, it is nice to see WWII done with poetic ness and class that BF 1 did with WWI. Are there things I would change? Sure, but it is still fun. I enjoyed my experiences with the war stories and so far have not come across too game breaking in the multiplayer aspect. Just minor things here and there but overall stillBeing with the franchise as long as I have been with COD, little over a decade, it is nice to see WWII done with poetic ness and class that BF 1 did with WWI. Are there things I would change? Sure, but it is still fun. I enjoyed my experiences with the war stories and so far have not come across too game breaking in the multiplayer aspect. Just minor things here and there but overall still a great game with the Frost engine shine to it.… Expand
  14. Dikyr87
    Nov 26, 2018
    0
    Раньше для меня круче Battlefield ничего не было... сейчас это говно(
  15. max2017
    Nov 26, 2018
    0
    This is garbage - I wouldn't' play it even it's FREE

    I am a rabid fan of BF series and has played though BF1942/2/3/4/Vietnam/1, but I cannot believe DICE made this absolute garbage of a game. It is evident that there is no COHERENT DESIGN in this game. It is NOT WW2. IT HAS NO SOUL. the stories are junk. Multiplayer is no fun. they just re skinned BF1 and even Blatantly recycled map    This is garbage - I wouldn't' play it even it's FREE

    I am a rabid fan of BF series and has played though BF1942/2/3/4/Vietnam/1, but I cannot believe DICE made this absolute garbage of a game. It is evident that there is no COHERENT DESIGN in this game. It is NOT WW2. IT HAS NO SOUL. the stories are junk. Multiplayer is no fun. they just re skinned BF1 and even Blatantly recycled map from BF1. Absolutely DESTROYED everything great about battlefield into a pile of horse **** buggy ,WEIRD shoot- them up that has no identify. Also stop with the Woman fighting everywhere in WW2 bull**** WTF absolute feminism gone nuts.

    I WANT MY MONEY BACK!!    … Expand
  16. Gista
    Nov 26, 2018
    8
    I didn't play, BF1 . Only the beta but I thought it was boring. This actually is fun. I bought it in consideration of that I probably would not like it. But surely it is quite fun! The graphics are insane with ray tracing and for the first time in my life, it really feels that you are hiding in a bush or grass when you are. Every branch and leaf is on its own. Who cares about if there areI didn't play, BF1 . Only the beta but I thought it was boring. This actually is fun. I bought it in consideration of that I probably would not like it. But surely it is quite fun! The graphics are insane with ray tracing and for the first time in my life, it really feels that you are hiding in a bush or grass when you are. Every branch and leaf is on its own. Who cares about if there are female characters. The maps are gorgeous and the gameplay is smooth also the environment is realistic as **** I just to be a BF hater before. Not anymore.… Expand
  17. Abdulelah
    Nov 26, 2018
    0
    It’s not Battlefield any more bring Bad company BACK ...

    short single player campaign
  18. Sneezepee
    Nov 26, 2018
    8
    So, I didn't like BF1 really. I bit the bullet and bought BFV finally and it's honestly fantastic. I don't care about war stories and you can change your appearance to a man or whatever you want to be anytime you want. Gunplay is excellent compared to BF1 and team play is MUCH better, also no more explosive spam. I do miss my mortar though. It doesn't deserve a 10 yet though but it's defSo, I didn't like BF1 really. I bit the bullet and bought BFV finally and it's honestly fantastic. I don't care about war stories and you can change your appearance to a man or whatever you want to be anytime you want. Gunplay is excellent compared to BF1 and team play is MUCH better, also no more explosive spam. I do miss my mortar though. It doesn't deserve a 10 yet though but it's def not a 1 - 5 score game.… Expand
  19. Gerard92
    Nov 25, 2018
    10
    Dont listen,dont care and dont read all those 0 score bots,they probably never played the game and they are just a bunch of casuals with some hours in bf4,crying like little babies. I will give you reasons of why this is the best battlefield ever.
    +The graphics are beautiful
    +Teamplay has been improved +Free dlc and season pass +A lot of issues from gun play have been fixed,now it    Dont listen,dont care and dont read all those 0 score bots,they probably never played the game and they are just a bunch of casuals with some hours in bf4,crying like little babies. I will give you reasons of why this is the best battlefield ever.
    +The graphics are beautiful
    +Teamplay has been improved
    +Free dlc and season pass
    +A lot of issues from gun play have been fixed,now it feels great to shoot and actually rewards skilled players
    +A lot of customization
    +Fortifications are interesting and fit well into the game
    -Loud female screams ruin the immersion
    -Poor marketing
    -Perk system isn't the best thing
    Since i saw so many copy paste comments about this:
    I actually asked my grandparents,they dont feel insulted by the game at all,and told me that everyone who thinks it's insulting, well.." they are fools and dont know what they say and ask for,it's a good thing that the game isn't fully realistic and doesn't picture it the way it was,you have no idea what kind of horrors you are forced to see nor what kind of things you have to do in order to stay alive,it is not insulting you are the ones insulting us for wanting things we don't want to see anymore" My grandfather fought in the german side and saw lot of women picking up rifles or throwing handmade grenades at german tanks in 1944 and partecipated in the occupation of the France and im 1945 he was forced to hide and escape from the allies,he told me how many people he killed and how he never forgot their faces nor their names,is this what you want? Grow up it's a game.    … Expand
  20. alex_tsapin
    Nov 25, 2018
    0
    The atmosphere is lost. The feeling that I got into the women's locker room.
  21. Tyetan
    Nov 25, 2018
    0
    You love Battlefield right!? Zooking, Driving a Bobcat loaded w/ C4 into tanks, repair tool or defib killing bad buys? Well all that **** is gone so go **** yourself. The reason you ask, "realism" of course, but wait a minute there weren't any women combatants in WWII, were there? I don't know about you, but from what I remember in world history there weren't any female black wolfspiritYou love Battlefield right!? Zooking, Driving a Bobcat loaded w/ C4 into tanks, repair tool or defib killing bad buys? Well all that **** is gone so go **** yourself. The reason you ask, "realism" of course, but wait a minute there weren't any women combatants in WWII, were there? I don't know about you, but from what I remember in world history there weren't any female black wolfspirit lesbian Nazis filling the ranks of the Wermacht! Not only does the game fail as a history lesson, it also sucks as a shooter. Bad guys are hard to pick up off the background, the shooting sucks, map design is sub par, vehicles (except for the planes) handle like dog **** walking or running feels sluggish, and to top off this **** sandwich the game is unfinished and buggy as hell. Don't buy this game for your wallets sake, if you wanna try it just get the EA Premier Access for a month and test it out like I did. You and you bank account will thank me. Well my work here is done, I'm headed back to the Battlefield 4 where the fun still live on.… Expand
  22. Elnealio
    Nov 25, 2018
    0
    This game has so much fun stuff but it riddled with super annoying bugs and design decisions.

    AA is useless, even when you do great on an AA vs a plane they just avoid and heal and are back in the game after like 20 seconds and will avoid that AA turret or just come back to kill you and repeats this. You got no chance against planes. If your team is only potatoes you will get **** in    This game has so much fun stuff but it riddled with super annoying bugs and design decisions.

    AA is useless, even when you do great on an AA vs a plane they just avoid and heal and are back in the game after like 20 seconds and will avoid that AA turret or just come back to kill you and repeats this. You got no chance against planes. If your team is only potatoes you will get **** in the air.

    Furthermore, extremely weird and annoying terrain blobs that make you slide down at certain cap points making it impossible to aim at range to countersnipe.

    The spawn selection is horrendoes. It is extremely slow and the transition from squad to map is annoying especially when your teammates gets in combat and you gotta **** transition again.

    there is a lot more but i dont want to put in the effort to write it.    … Expand
  23. VadimMaslayew
    Nov 25, 2018
    1
    Bugs? Lags? They only want your money. I hate this game, fallout 76 is better than this ....
  24. 2283gmg
    Nov 25, 2018
    0
    Worst video game purchase Ive had. Most idiotic revival system ive seen, you cannot shoot people on the ground when they are injudered and they can ONLY get injured not dead. Nazis do not exist its , USSR isnt even in the game.

    Auido is much worse than previous BF games.

    Never buy this.
  25. Sakaa
    Nov 25, 2018
    9
    I really have no idea why everyone is giving so much bad reviews.
    I liked and enjoyed the game, its better than bf1.
    There are some issues here and there but nothing big.
    Buy this game, I loved it and I think you will too.
  26. jokerdeus
    Nov 25, 2018
    8
    I think the game is very good, I already had a ton of fun with my friends.
    The gunplay is good, gamefeel is great, graphics and sounds are great.
    It is true though that the game wasn't ready for release, it has been rushed. There are quite some game breaking bugs. Hopefully EA will quickly fix that. However I respect their decision to release free DLCs for this game. Also, even    I think the game is very good, I already had a ton of fun with my friends.
    The gunplay is good, gamefeel is great, graphics and sounds are great.

    It is true though that the game wasn't ready for release, it has been rushed. There are quite some game breaking bugs. Hopefully EA will quickly fix that.

    However I respect their decision to release free DLCs for this game.

    Also, even if that's not really appropriate to write this in a review, I was wondering... why are the people saying : "I have been playing the game for 3 weeks..." or "I have been playing for 100 hours..." and then rating ZERO. If it entertained you for 3 weeks, do you really think it deserves a 0 ?
    But well... haters gonna hate, they will play the game nonetheless, that's the beauty of it.    … Expand
  27. Dagger95
    Nov 25, 2018
    7
    Le campagne sono carine e danno un bel senso di libertà, ovviamente il comparto tecnico è mostruoso anche se avendolo giocato prima del lancio ho riscontrato diversi bug fastidiosi ed in alcuni casi invalidanti. Ottimo togliere il premium dal gioco, FINALMENTE. Non è un gioco che si può considerare storico e punta sul divertimento, quindi non vi aspettate molto da questo punto di vista. IlLe campagne sono carine e danno un bel senso di libertà, ovviamente il comparto tecnico è mostruoso anche se avendolo giocato prima del lancio ho riscontrato diversi bug fastidiosi ed in alcuni casi invalidanti. Ottimo togliere il premium dal gioco, FINALMENTE. Non è un gioco che si può considerare storico e punta sul divertimento, quindi non vi aspettate molto da questo punto di vista. Il multiplayer è bello anche se a volte i server laggano. Mi è piaciuta la classe del cecchino che ora è più un supporto per individuare nemici, in questo capitolo non troveremo quindi metà giocatori a fare i cecchini visto che questa classe ha più una funzione di spotting, tutto sommato direi che è un buon gioco anche se avrei garbato un sacco più campagne al lancio (almeno il doppio) che sono veramente belle.… Expand
  28. OxiGen
    Nov 25, 2018
    0
    I didn't think that white people participated in World War II. Why can't I play for a black German woman? Because only racists work in EA. I will never buy this game. Just 0/10 EA
  29. MichaelFox
    Nov 25, 2018
    10
    I like the game, especially multiplayer. It's almost perfect and in my opinion one of the best ones. Try multiplayer with a clear head, it's awesome.
  30. HoneyCola
    Nov 25, 2018
    0
    so brazenly rewriting history because of feminism ... Game developers are already openly feeding us crap.
  31. JM81
    Nov 25, 2018
    4
    I dunno. I loved Battlefield 3, which was the last BF I played, and obviously older BF games, but this is just....... so, so different.

    I can't see anything that's going on. I feel like I'm being shot almost immediately by some super pro. The startout weapons are crap and I literally have to grind to get something that's good. There's literally DIRT on the sights.... like, why Dice?    I dunno. I loved Battlefield 3, which was the last BF I played, and obviously older BF games, but this is just....... so, so different.

    I can't see anything that's going on. I feel like I'm being shot almost immediately by some super pro. The startout weapons are crap and I literally have to grind to get something that's good.

    There's literally DIRT on the sights.... like, why Dice? That's just annoying. Anything that clutters your view is annoying to me, and there's toooooooooooooons of that **** in this game.

    I played it for a couple of hours, but never felt any sort of joy from it. It was a chore, emotionally speaking.    … Expand
  32. vukkoz
    Nov 24, 2018
    3
    Glimpses of fun gunplay in the puddle of blandness, boredom, weird vehicle mechanics, horrid animations and 2 actually playable maps. A huge step back in the franchise that has taken a considerable decline since battlefield 4 and keeps on reaching lower and lower. I really regret buying this game, think twice before doing so. If you are new and want to try out the series, do yourself aGlimpses of fun gunplay in the puddle of blandness, boredom, weird vehicle mechanics, horrid animations and 2 actually playable maps. A huge step back in the franchise that has taken a considerable decline since battlefield 4 and keeps on reaching lower and lower. I really regret buying this game, think twice before doing so. If you are new and want to try out the series, do yourself a favour and get something cheaper and better - like bad company 2, bf 3 or 4.… Expand
  33. Hack
    Nov 24, 2018
    9
    This is my favorite Battlefield thus far, it's a gorgeous game with incredible visuals, atmospheric audio and very fluid gameplay. As a package it's incredibly well made, and it runs like a dream.

    The main issue I have is with the staggered release date, giving an 11 day advantage to "premier members" was a huge, greedy mistake. The fact that actually buying the game was the worst    This is my favorite Battlefield thus far, it's a gorgeous game with incredible visuals, atmospheric audio and very fluid gameplay. As a package it's incredibly well made, and it runs like a dream.

    The main issue I have is with the staggered release date, giving an 11 day advantage to "premier members" was a huge, greedy mistake. The fact that actually buying the game was the worst option is madness to me. Other issues include a poorly thought out UI, which looks nice but requires far too many clicks to get anywhere, and a slight lack of content, the game is definitely a few maps light and the customization options are left wanting. All of this is being fixed in an upcoming patch, and when it is there will be very little for me to complain about.    … Expand
  34. Bushimasu
    Nov 24, 2018
    9
    I have played BF games since BF 2 on PC and all the way to this one. By my count that is 12 games before BFV. I love this multiplayer game. It is faster than BF1 and forces more tactical team play with limited health and ammo. It runs very well on the PS4 pro I use. There limited maps but I am not worried about it. I believe they will support the game as it goes on and the free contentI have played BF games since BF 2 on PC and all the way to this one. By my count that is 12 games before BFV. I love this multiplayer game. It is faster than BF1 and forces more tactical team play with limited health and ammo. It runs very well on the PS4 pro I use. There limited maps but I am not worried about it. I believe they will support the game as it goes on and the free content will keep the player base together unlike the standard DLC maps/ model of previous BF games and COD games. I have only played 1/3 of SP but it was fun enough. I play MP for hundreds of hours so I don't care about the SP experience.… Expand
  35. Zybane
    Nov 24, 2018
    0
    I've got about 20 hours into this game (PC) and I've come to the conclusion that it is TERRIBLE. I cannot even describe how many crap decisions DICE made with this game.

    From maps being boring and linear; to hearing women screaming all the time (nothing says WWII like shrieking women on the front lines!); to HAND GRENADES damaging PATHETIC worthless paper Tanks; to INVINCIBLE bombers    I've got about 20 hours into this game (PC) and I've come to the conclusion that it is TERRIBLE. I cannot even describe how many crap decisions DICE made with this game.

    From maps being boring and linear; to hearing women screaming all the time (nothing says WWII like shrieking women on the front lines!); to HAND GRENADES damaging PATHETIC worthless paper Tanks; to INVINCIBLE bombers that have thousands of hit points and who's tail gunner has about twice as powerful of a gun than the CANNON on FIGHTER planes.

    The bugs; the de-sync; the ridiculous balance of weapons; ground vehicles being worthless and there just for background scenery.

    This is NOT a BF game. This is a large map CoD. It's a shame we've gone from games like BFBC2, to BF3, to trash like this.    … Expand
  36. badaftertaste
    Nov 24, 2018
    3
    This game is an abomination to the franchise, and as someone who has been been a fan of battlefield since 1942, it's sad to see my favorite series in such a sad state. Game has barely any content, the fact that it's supposed to be a "live service" model doesn't excuse such a lack of content at launch when you take a full $60 price tag into a consideration. It's plagued with bugs and justThis game is an abomination to the franchise, and as someone who has been been a fan of battlefield since 1942, it's sad to see my favorite series in such a sad state. Game has barely any content, the fact that it's supposed to be a "live service" model doesn't excuse such a lack of content at launch when you take a full $60 price tag into a consideration. It's plagued with bugs and just feels very rushed and unfinished. Stay away, this thing isn't even worth half it's price with such lazy and disrespectful devs.… Expand
  37. Repo_
    Nov 24, 2018
    0
    Map Design is weird. There is not much love in graphics. Too less vehicles avaiible. It does not feel like WWII. It does not feel like Battlefield.
  38. yeeter_griffin
    Nov 24, 2018
    8
    rating the game on the game itself and not all about this SJW, feminist and historical accuracy bull****. it's a solid game, runs very well on my pc with good graphics and fluid gameplay. played all the other battlefields and this one isnt bad at all. some aspects look similar to bf1 but its much better than the previous title.
  39. dave9989
    Nov 24, 2018
    2
    The physics are terrible. Buggy as hell on release day. The lighting is terrible. The vehicles are nerfed against infantry and controlling them is a painful experience. Get ready to be trapped in the clipping and see bits of destroyed building floating. On a positive note the classes require more cooperation, and vehicle camping is less as they no longer have infinite ammunition and theThe physics are terrible. Buggy as hell on release day. The lighting is terrible. The vehicles are nerfed against infantry and controlling them is a painful experience. Get ready to be trapped in the clipping and see bits of destroyed building floating. On a positive note the classes require more cooperation, and vehicle camping is less as they no longer have infinite ammunition and the sky in the Norwegian maps is pretty. At this stage in the release at least not every player has an obscure sub machine gun with a modern rate of rate yet but im sure that time is approaching.… Expand
  40. kartana
    Nov 24, 2018
    6
    It's another unfinished product released way too early. There is a lot missing (coming soon) and there are a lot of bugs. As usually DICE is saying "we are working on it" but who knows how long it will take. I would stay away at least for a few months and check back later to see in what shape the game is. Don't buy into the "early access" thing because that's what BF5 currently is.
  41. Niths
    Nov 24, 2018
    9
    Good game. Overall nice changes to gameplay and progression system (since bf1). Fun to play.
  42. Yomomoto
    Nov 24, 2018
    0
    Absolutely degradation of Battlefield series Game is totally bugged,
    its look like alpha stage, campain totally crap,
    multiplayer bores you very quickly, idiotic map and gameplay design
    weapon balance terrible, weapon upgrades useless
    (says man who has 3.0 K/D in this game, i know what about i am talking)
  43. CliffSecord
    Nov 23, 2018
    0
    Reluctant to review this one as i'm typically a huge fan of the franchise. With the marketing campaign and forced diversity and the taunt of dont like it dont buy it, probably couldn't have said it better myself. It also doesn't even look like a WW2 game, most reviews i've seen it's all automatics not bolt action rifles which is not consistent with the war. Game just isnt' for me, i'dReluctant to review this one as i'm typically a huge fan of the franchise. With the marketing campaign and forced diversity and the taunt of dont like it dont buy it, probably couldn't have said it better myself. It also doesn't even look like a WW2 game, most reviews i've seen it's all automatics not bolt action rifles which is not consistent with the war. Game just isnt' for me, i'd rather play COD if i wanted a fast paced non-realistic shooter.… Expand
  44. Strandhagg
    Nov 23, 2018
    1
    Full of Bugs and a **** gameplay. More like Call of Duty than Battlefield.
    Its just dont make fun to play
  45. Acraian
    Nov 23, 2018
    10
    I played every single battlefield ever came out for a really high amount of hours so my opinion is well founded. People really need to calm down,they are worst than Ea,reviewing the game based on sjw and meme? This isn't kindergarten nor elementary school,they were right to call you uneducated,look at your own words. That aside now the game looks and plays great,it's different thanI played every single battlefield ever came out for a really high amount of hours so my opinion is well founded. People really need to calm down,they are worst than Ea,reviewing the game based on sjw and meme? This isn't kindergarten nor elementary school,they were right to call you uneducated,look at your own words. That aside now the game looks and plays great,it's different than previous battlefields but it plays something that sits between bad company2 and bf3. The building system despite being limited it's a nice addition and the teamplay is one of the main focus during the battles,i suggest playing with some friends and fight for points and completing tasks. There is a huge customization now compared to previous games,i personally don't like the new perk system but i am slowly getting used to it. Also for the uneducated people who call out in anger other factions they just proved to mot know to listen and read. Other factions will come later as free dlc as the game evolves. Can't say anything about the battleroyale mode,there will be a mode also focused on tank battle only. There are some historical errors but nothing too bad like the average hater make them sound. The war stories are beautiful and emotional. The game in the end is like a 8/10 but i leave a 10 as provocation for those blind haters. Also i agree that female screams are too loud.… Expand
  46. Phoenix790
    Nov 23, 2018
    2
    It’s clear that a lot of reviews are done because journalists are sucking up to EA. This is not a good game
  47. smoussie
    Nov 23, 2018
    5
    Seems like everyone who puts this game more than 5 never played original battlefield games. This game is crap. I don't want to mention tons of bugs and broken net code. I want to focus on game mechanics and setting fail. First of all, AAA project about WW2 without any maps that reproduce any famous WW2 battles. Someone will say that we shouldn't forget about smaller battles and paySeems like everyone who puts this game more than 5 never played original battlefield games. This game is crap. I don't want to mention tons of bugs and broken net code. I want to focus on game mechanics and setting fail. First of all, AAA project about WW2 without any maps that reproduce any famous WW2 battles. Someone will say that we shouldn't forget about smaller battles and pay respect, but most likely lazy developers just wanted to finish this game faster, just look at 80% of maps. It's just an empty map with some rocks, houses and hangars. Second, wtf weapons? I have feeling that I shoot paintball gun with all this tracer rounds everywhere. Who thought that building fortifications is a great idea? In such fast paced game it's a nonsense. Build base for 3 minutes. loose it in seconds... Where is spoting system? Spotting system is what makes this game - battefield. User interface is a ux designers nightmare... Really. DICE please fire everyone who was hired after Battlefield 3. TBH I miss old Battlefield games with already spawned vehicles, spotting system and great wonderfull maps. I don't care about women in this game, or man with different color, I just want old good battlefield...… Expand
  48. DOrek
    Nov 23, 2018
    0
    AAA game from indie-studio litle DICE. OMG... Very BAD. Dont buy this sh** game go play on BF2 BFBC2 BF3 BF4
  49. LadJustesen
    Nov 23, 2018
    0
    Politics have just ruined yet another well established franchise.
    Whether or not you accept and agree with DICE's take on WWII, I believe it is vital to boycott this game in order to prevent future series and titles from getting infected by modern politics.
  50. unxc3113d
    Nov 23, 2018
    0
    Меню тормозит, к серверам не подключается, багов куча. Игру еще полгода доделывать и доделывать, сейчас это пустая трата денег. Я уже даже не говорю про женские крики на поле боя, отсутствие главного участника войны (СССР) и прочий бред. Игра элементарно не доделана, но продается за вполне себе приличные деньги. Единственное, что действительно работает лучше, чем в той же BF1 - по alt+f4Меню тормозит, к серверам не подключается, багов куча. Игру еще полгода доделывать и доделывать, сейчас это пустая трата денег. Я уже даже не говорю про женские крики на поле боя, отсутствие главного участника войны (СССР) и прочий бред. Игра элементарно не доделана, но продается за вполне себе приличные деньги. Единственное, что действительно работает лучше, чем в той же BF1 - по alt+f4 выходит быстрее. Синг посмотрел на ютубе и даже пункт меню с ним открывать не буду.… Expand
  51. knarkworst
    Nov 23, 2018
    3
    Battlefield V fails to deliver miserably!

    Grand Operations is just silly... Its an combined package of already existing game-modes. (Break-through, conquest, and thug of war/Frontlines) Its nothing new. Its an cheap rip-off from operations in BF1, that deliverd so much more satisfaction! Break-through is definitely the most intens. Its like rush, but then with much less objectives.    Battlefield V fails to deliver miserably!

    Grand Operations is just silly... Its an combined package of already existing game-modes. (Break-through, conquest, and thug of war/Frontlines) Its nothing new. Its an cheap rip-off from operations in BF1, that deliverd so much more satisfaction!

    Break-through is definitely the most intens. Its like rush, but then with much less objectives. So before you get sucked into the game and intensity rises the game is already finished!

    Ohh and dont even get me started about the SJW vag1na sillyness of the game.

    The good:

    The graphics are amazing.
    So 2 points for that part. That makes at an 3.0 overal because the rest of the game is just CRAP.    … Expand
  52. uBaH9o
    Nov 23, 2018
    0
    What the ef DICE??!! Is this the company that gave us BF3 and BF4?
    Game feels like paintball. Horrible map design, seems like only sniper campers can benefit.
    And worst part is: it's SO BUGGY!!! The release was delayed and still so many bugs. You can't be serious DICE!
    WORST BF EVER!!!
  53. Drazd
    Nov 23, 2018
    7
    Поиграл на днях, могу сказать, что ситуация схожа с BattleFront 2, такой же овер-хейт. По факту игру следует ругать за другие вещи, нежели за женщин-солдат. Игра позиционирует себя как ААА проект, но это не так. Мало серверов, проблемы с подключениями и дисконнектами. Мало карт, мало оружия и техники. Кастомизация никакая, нет, она конечно есть, но преподносили её как нечто невероятное, ноПоиграл на днях, могу сказать, что ситуация схожа с BattleFront 2, такой же овер-хейт. По факту игру следует ругать за другие вещи, нежели за женщин-солдат. Игра позиционирует себя как ААА проект, но это не так. Мало серверов, проблемы с подключениями и дисконнектами. Мало карт, мало оружия и техники. Кастомизация никакая, нет, она конечно есть, но преподносили её как нечто невероятное, но опять же шкурок там 7-8 на сторону, которых пока в игре всего лишь две (бриты и гансы). Это не релиз, а ранний доступ за 3000 рублей в базовом варианте. Игру будут допиливать со скоростью черепахи так же как и баттлфронт. Из плюсов - играет бодро и весело. Малое количество боеприпасов убирает проблему кемперов, что всю игру могут на одном месте сидеть. Пулеметчик не восполняет гранаты, это тоже плюс, а то все бы просто перекидывались ими. Поставил 7 из 10 , но это для полной игры, в далеком будущем.… Expand
  54. Studog78
    Nov 22, 2018
    9
    Wow the salt is real...!!! Really a score of 0??
    People want a realist World War 2 experience???
    By playing a video game??? WTF. If you want a true WW2 simulator the odds are you would spawn in as a Russian or Chinese civilian running around trying not to be murdered, die of disease and/or famine at the hands of the Japanese or the German forces. Sounds fun?? If not stop whining    Wow the salt is real...!!! Really a score of 0??
    People want a realist World War 2 experience???
    By playing a video game??? WTF.
    If you want a true WW2 simulator the odds are you would spawn in as a Russian or Chinese civilian running around trying not to be murdered, die of disease and/or famine at the hands of the Japanese or the German forces. Sounds fun?? If not stop whining about the facts and just play a game because that is want it is, a game set loosely on historical fact, oh and BTW if the game had "Nazi" material in it the game wouldn't fly in German these days ethier. (how do people not know this **** Plus there were female soldiers in pretty much every major conflict and if someone wants the option (which it is) to play as a female then why shouldn't they!
    Go watch a documentary or read something if you what to learn about the war.
    Stop trying to decrease a player base in the game in which most people will enjoy and if they listen to you idiots out there, they may not have the pleasant experience of being involved.
    That said....
    The game is great and the best in the franchise to date IMO. Played BF3, BF4, BF1, FYI.
    The gun play is skill based and feels right straight up, more so than in the previous title BF1 and I imagine this is the major cause of the salt.
    The team revive is a great addition and feels great playing with your squad mates as they tend to stick together more in this title. PTO is more important in this title because winning objectives is the main source of ammo and heals.
    The removal of the old spotting mechanic creates more game play options. This removes the snipers on the edge of the map spamming 'Q' to spot there next player. It stops just shooting at the red donuts on the screen which took the emersion away in the later titles. But there are some players that like shooting at red donuts.
    This player is the player that gets salty when there play style might need to change for the new title. This is the player that reviews the game a "0" after they play the game for one match and get there arse handed to them. This is the player who checks there K/D ratio after every game.
    This is the player that quits if the team might lose or changes sides as there squads back capping F.
    THIS IS THE PLAYER THAT WE DON'T WHAT TO PLAY WITH! THIS IS THE PLAYER THAT SHOULD NOT REVIEW GAMES! THIS IS THE PLAYER WITH A HIGH XP THAT RUNS AROUND LIKE A HEADLESS CHICKEN WHEN YOU GET TO CLOSE!
    That said the single player game is poor and to be honest single player AI in FPS hasn't got any better in any single player FPS in the past 10 years. So the attention has been placed on the multiplayer game which is why we play the game. Map balance will improve over time but is pretty good so far.
    That's my 2 cents anyway, wow that was a rant really. Peace out man.    … Expand
  55. Obisx
    Nov 22, 2018
    1
    It's just sad. There is no historical accurarcy. Frome game to game battlefield is losing so much from it glory. I prefer battlefied 4 bugy lunch than that *#*!. Some designers at DICE need to educate them selfs about history.
  56. Tsargorn
    Nov 22, 2018
    0
    Endless loads, crashes and bugs!
    And what even more matters: extremely stupid single player company.
    Perfect!
  57. CTAsasin
    Nov 22, 2018
    9
    THERE ARE CURRENTLY NO MICROTRANSACTIONS IN THE GAME. I want to get that out of the way because I've seen a few reviews now quite blatantly lie about this. As of right now there is no premium / cash currency and all the unlockable content is unlocked through playing the game (I hate blatant lying from trolls who haven't even touched the game).

    This is a really strong Battlefield title    THERE ARE CURRENTLY NO MICROTRANSACTIONS IN THE GAME. I want to get that out of the way because I've seen a few reviews now quite blatantly lie about this. As of right now there is no premium / cash currency and all the unlockable content is unlocked through playing the game (I hate blatant lying from trolls who haven't even touched the game).

    This is a really strong Battlefield title that does a lot to keep players engaged and working together as a team. They've reinvented a few game modes from previous titles so there are more ways to play than ever. Buy this for the multiplayer; the singleplayer war stories are extremely short.

    The gunplay has been reworked from Battlefield 1. Weapons now feel actually pretty good to shoot, it's a little less luck based and with practice you can do so much better than was possible in 1.

    Behemoths are gone, though DICE now introduces Squad Reinforcements which ... kind of take their place (though they aren't as grand). Now, when your squad gets a certain number of points, the squad leader can call in special vehicles or even a V-1 rocket to cause massive damage.

    The weapon unlock and customization system is amazing. Weapons are unlocked as you rank up your class, so no more "get 50 kills in one life" challenges to unlock a weapon (at least not yet). You unlock customization options for your weapon as you level it up, and as you hit certain milestone ranks you can unlock assignments ("Get 60 kills while attacking objectives") to unlock variations of the parts (especially scopes/sights). There are also specialization "perks" for the weapons and vehicles that you buy with Company Coins (which you only get from playing the game and completing assignments). These specializations grant you small but crucial bonuses (for instance, faster reload times or slightly better recoil control on weapons, or additional armor or stronger ammunition on vehicles), and they can be swapped out from the game menu at any time.

    Vehicle combat feels far more fleshed out now. Rockets and shells have a chance to be deflected off armor, tanks have more vulnerability points, you can make pilots crash by shredding a wing up, etc. Ground vehicles do feel underpowered, and air vehicles feel overpowered (especially when you start adding perks and specializations to them), but in a balanced match the aircraft aren't too overwhelming.

    The game looks incredible, though I do have to dock it a point here because there are some very glaring issues with brightness and contrast on certain maps. On one map, for instance, there are bright outside areas and darker interior spaces. Even with HDR off and brightness settings adjusted, it can be really difficult to see enemies in those pitch black apartment hallways. On a snow covered map, though, that adjusted brightness setting instantly blinds you, so there's no happy medium point for now.

    I also wish they had shipped with more maps at launch, but considering how well the Grand Operations play out on the maps that do exist, I won't complain too much about it.

    I'm also not the best Battlefield player -- I tend to hover around a 1:1 KDR and generally finish in the top 35% of my team -- but at about 42 hours in-game (not necessarily play) time, I have completed all the unique Assignments for online (meaning the only other assignments I can complete are for classes and weapons), I 100% the first war story (which took about two and a half hours with restarts...), have achieved character rank 36, maxed out the medic class rank and one weapon rank, and have almost "mastered" both the weapon and medic class.

    I think the progression system is more than fair, but it does seem a little unbalanced in certain areas.

    Overall, this is a very impressive game, and I'm really excited to see what the future has in store for us!

    EDIT: For what it's worth, my experience with online FPS dates back to the original Counter-Strike and Day of Defeat mods for HL1 and I've played Battlefield since 1942. This is a great game with a lot of potential that it's not currently filling, but it's still a fun experience while we wait.    … Expand
  58. 2Netz
    Nov 22, 2018
    2
    Thats what you get when rewriting history in the favor of minorities. Also no USSR in WWII game, seroiusly? lmao
  59. Samjogo
    Nov 22, 2018
    0
    BF5 is a dumpster fire p.o.s. gaming application. This game is major trash and a step down from BF1.
  60. KejVan
    Nov 22, 2018
    0
    This game sucks. It took all of the good mechanics of a game like Battlefield 4 and stripped them down to make this a casual game. Team play is completely destroyed and progression has been removed even more so than it was in Battlefield 1 which was already too casual and lacking in progression. The game right now if completely unfinished and needs more content. After not even an hour IThis game sucks. It took all of the good mechanics of a game like Battlefield 4 and stripped them down to make this a casual game. Team play is completely destroyed and progression has been removed even more so than it was in Battlefield 1 which was already too casual and lacking in progression. The game right now if completely unfinished and needs more content. After not even an hour I was bored of Battlefield 5 and that's coming from someone with 1,500 hours in BF4 and 500 hours in BF1. On top of that EA called it's customers "uneducated" and has tried to ruin WWII with feminism and crazy stuff that never happened in WWII. This game's only strong point is the tighter gunplay than BF1, though that's a really low bar to set. It has decent gunplay but all the vehicles have been sort of removed from the game. You never really see more than one tank or plane ever. This game has increasingly become call of duty with more players. It's a s***show of pew-pew-ing. This game is a crappy excuse for a shell of a Battlefield game and you should just get BF4 or some other game instead.… Expand
  61. oEvReY
    Nov 22, 2018
    0
    Государству, сыгравшем ключевую роль во второй мировой войне не нашлось место в игре.
    Зато толерантность есть.
  62. Tornation
    Nov 22, 2018
    9
    Seems like everyone who gave this game a bad rating clearly hasn't played the original games. The mechanics overall are amazing, and sure there are bugs and issues but isn't that how it goes in every new game. Plus, all the people who give it a 0 because of women should stop. If you don't like women being in the game, then don't play as one. Dice have said countless times that they're notSeems like everyone who gave this game a bad rating clearly hasn't played the original games. The mechanics overall are amazing, and sure there are bugs and issues but isn't that how it goes in every new game. Plus, all the people who give it a 0 because of women should stop. If you don't like women being in the game, then don't play as one. Dice have said countless times that they're not going for a 100% historically accurate game. Overall, this game is great.… Expand
  63. Schnuffli
    Nov 22, 2018
    0
    I loved battlefield 1 but this game is just horrible compared to it:

    * Netcode sucks. I need 3-4 shots to kill an enemy but I die very often with one shot because of whatever problems they have with their netcode. * Maps are horrible and congested. You have to rush to very narrow corridors just to die on the other side. There are no flanking paths. Tactical thinking is not possible. *    I loved battlefield 1 but this game is just horrible compared to it:

    * Netcode sucks. I need 3-4 shots to kill an enemy but I die very often with one shot because of whatever problems they have with their netcode.
    * Maps are horrible and congested. You have to rush to very narrow corridors just to die on the other side. There are no flanking paths. Tactical thinking is not possible.
    * Guns feel jittery compared to BF 1 or CoD. It was like that in BF 3 but now this strange gunplay feeling is back. In BF 1 or CoD you feel that you are in control of your weapon, in BF V not.
    * Explosives feel like throwing popcorn. In BF 1 the rocket launcher was great for assault so you could fight longer range targets or campers even if you had an SMG or shotgun equipped. With BF V the rockets are very inaccurate. Also, grenades feel very weak.
    * You run very slow in this game making moving around tedious.
    * I can only play as waman (and you play by default as waman for some classes) but not as a black transgender single mom waman with an abusive husband? I guess EA is racist and sexist against this minority? ;)
    * Again this early battlefield feel of randomly dying from all directions is back which they fixed in BF 1 which at least for me takes the fun out of it.    … Expand
  64. frozenology
    Nov 22, 2018
    0
    EA did it again, This is not finish product.
    Lot of glitches are still present, some are annoying.
    Women scream so much in battle which is not good thing for WW2 game.
    BF mechanics are changed and force player to do quest to unlock their progressions.
    Microtransactions may come soon for unlocks.
  65. V4N1Sh
    Nov 22, 2018
    3
    Absolutely dog **** of a game, Save your money.

    First 10hrs might feel fine given you're high off Dopamine from all those new weapons to experience but once you delve deep into the core game you start to reminisce the good old day sof BF3-BF4.
  66. dark47killer
    Nov 22, 2018
    8
    BATTLEFIELD V does not deserve a 10, that is true, but it as well does not deserve a 0.

    The game is not perfect the game is buggy, it is not fully finished, but it feels like a Battlefield game. Teamwork is there, fas and slow paste situations are there. 64 player multiplayer with big maps and destruction. It's all there. Everyone can agree the marketing for the game has been very    BATTLEFIELD V does not deserve a 10, that is true, but it as well does not deserve a 0.

    The game is not perfect the game is buggy, it is not fully finished, but it feels like a Battlefield game. Teamwork is there, fas and slow paste situations are there. 64 player multiplayer with big maps and destruction. It's all there.

    Everyone can agree the marketing for the game has been very bad. But the game itself is great, the Singleplayer as always is par, but that is normal for a Battlefield game. The main focus on the game is Multiplayer. No microtransactions, no DLCS, no premium noting. The community stays together and won't get separated.

    Teamwork: This has always been a thing that you look for in a Battlefield game and this game offers this so much it's crazy seeing the situations you can get into with your squad or with your whole team as you push an objective together.

    Nade spamming is gone too!

    Honestly, this game is great it has so much potential.    … Expand
  67. Chrosziel
    Nov 22, 2018
    1
    Basically nothing new from EA and Dice. Same greedy douches here - they release a raw and buggy game but this time even less maps and wait for the new maps and stuff for even longer. You pay all the money for the so-called Triple A game but get a fragment of a full game, that is actually not so good at all. The map design is poor, the user Interface IS AWFULL (!!!!). they managed to make aBasically nothing new from EA and Dice. Same greedy douches here - they release a raw and buggy game but this time even less maps and wait for the new maps and stuff for even longer. You pay all the money for the so-called Triple A game but get a fragment of a full game, that is actually not so good at all. The map design is poor, the user Interface IS AWFULL (!!!!). they managed to make a decent interface of BF1 completely not logical and not handy to manipulate. The game is not stable, tons of bugs. The gameplay went to a poorly handled hardcore mode coz of the new spotting mechanics, but THIS hardcore implements the same old crappy TTK system, not a real Hardcore TTK. So everybody tend to camp in the dark areas and behind corners. This game is more about selling the skins to the players but not about well crafted maps and nice gunplay. Nothing is good in here. I strongly do not recommend this game to any one. There is a nicely crafted (after endless months of tweaking) BF1 out there, there is perfect to play (compared to BF5) BF4 there, so why pay more? **** Dice, **** EA. You do not deserve our money and attention.… Expand
  68. PaiLinFace
    Nov 22, 2018
    3
    Жаль потраченных денег.
    1) Одиночная компания- просто мрак и ужас, коридорная, безынтересная и совершенно не масштабная. Так делали игры в середине нулевых, и то только самые проходниковые проекты.
    2) Графика- смотрится приятно, да и только. Постоянные пересветы, куча мелких частиц. При игре на снежных картах к концу боя начинает болеть голова. 3) Ранний доступ- игра откровенно не    Жаль потраченных денег.
    1) Одиночная компания- просто мрак и ужас, коридорная, безынтересная и совершенно не масштабная. Так делали игры в середине нулевых, и то только самые проходниковые проекты.
    2) Графика- смотрится приятно, да и только. Постоянные пересветы, куча мелких частиц. При игре на снежных картах к концу боя начинает болеть голова.
    3) Ранний доступ- игра откровенно не доделана. Отсутствуют режимы, часть компании, батл рояль, некоторые игровые механики. Обещанные еще при анонсе.

    4) Огромное количество багов и технических ошибок их конечно поправят патчами со временем. Это приемлемо для инди игр или первой -второй игре начинающего разработчика, но не за полную цену ААА игры.
    5) новы режим стрельбы - ориентирован на лютую пристрелку к одному стволу, какой ствол ближе к лазерной штурмовой винтовке с тем народ и бегает. В бете это стг 44 сейчас ке-7.
    6) музыка- по осушению рескин музыки батлы один, и там мне она нравилась тут тоже пойдет. А вот звуки оружия судя по всему записывался на Страйк больном оружии(может это моя субъективщина)
    7) контент- его пока очень мало, и в ближайшие время не предвидеться крупных заливов. следующие что зальют это огрызок компании, и стрельбище.
    8) Кастомизация - её нет. Шкурки на танки еще не ввели. Кастомизация оружия чисто внешние, единственное что можно поменять это прицел. Кастомайз батлы 1 очень ругали, но даже 3 варианта оружия более разнообразны чем местный кастомайз.
    9) нет ни чего нового. Система укреплений не стоит почти ни чего в стандартном режиме захвата точек. Ни крушения крупных объектов, ни элитных классов, ни джагернаутов.
    10) Ужасный мап дизайн, при котором люди размазываются по точкам, и весь гемплей сводиться к перестрелке с 1-2 бойцами. Конечно есть и эпические моменты с массовыми перестрелками, но они случаются гораздо реже чем в предыдущих частях.    … Expand
  69. TheRussianEvil
    Nov 22, 2018
    0
    I don't like this game so i didn't buy it. It doesn't show warld war 2 the way it was - it shows the war as USA sees it - without Soviet Union winning it. The game itself is poor, only propaganda and social justice thing.

    PS Btw i hope you go to hell EA.
  70. F7GOS
    Nov 22, 2018
    9
    Don't normally voice my opinion but the "user score" here is unrepresentative of the opinions of most folks I've talked to IN GAME

    From the campaign and multiplayer the best insight I can offer so far is that the SJW pandering "diverse" trailer shown earlier in the year is absolutely not reflective of how the game stands at the moment. It's enjoyable and from the content I have seen so    Don't normally voice my opinion but the "user score" here is unrepresentative of the opinions of most folks I've talked to IN GAME

    From the campaign and multiplayer the best insight I can offer so far is that the SJW pandering "diverse" trailer shown earlier in the year is absolutely not reflective of how the game stands at the moment. It's enjoyable and from the content I have seen so far in this initial release, respectful of the reality of war.

    BFV paints a grim depiction of war, throwing you into enjoyable scenarios in war stories. Its derivative for sure, but still a decent way to spend a few hours.

    The changes to multiplayer are welcome with the game feeling different enough to BF1 to be worth a purchase. The map design is good with a couple of "best in series" additions and the game appears to be very well optimised - at least when running on my Ryzen / Vega combo.

    Overall it's the most enjoyable BF multiplayer experience I've had to date and the solo missions while not AAA are a nice inclusion.    … Expand
  71. man0max
    Nov 22, 2018
    0
    The game was bought on the 15th (deluxe version). After 6 days instead of a patch with bug fixes (Unable to connect to EA servers 2000) and many other bugs that do not even allow to play, they launch another sale in origin... They threw the owners of bf1 with premium purchased at the game release, now they just ignore. DICE did not live up to trust... Twice
  72. MachoTaco24
    Nov 21, 2018
    7
    Scores for the Lazy:

    Gameplay: 10/10 Visuals: 10/10 Performance: 7/10 Content: 6/10 Replayability: 9/10 Bugs: 5/10 Story: 6/10 Audio: 10/10 Final Verdict: 7.4 (Rounded down to a 7) To start off, I was one of the people who didn't like DICE's depiction of WW2 and was against the game from the start. The closed alpha was quite good, but the beta was an outright disaster. That    Scores for the Lazy:

    Gameplay: 10/10
    Visuals: 10/10
    Performance: 7/10
    Content: 6/10
    Replayability: 9/10
    Bugs: 5/10
    Story: 6/10
    Audio: 10/10

    Final Verdict: 7.4 (Rounded down to a 7)

    To start off, I was one of the people who didn't like DICE's depiction of WW2 and was against the game from the start. The closed alpha was quite good, but the beta was an outright disaster. That said, I can confidently say that this year's installment has the best gameplay since BF3. If you want a game with an in-depth progressions system that you can sink hours into with its constant genre-defining epic moments for hours on end, this is the game for you. Cosmetics are surprisingly good. All characters you can choose are faction specific, meaning no black woman nazis, restricting the player to choose from a variety of men and women from a select character pool. For those concerned about historical accuracy, it is barely noticeable aside from the uncomfortable and loud women screaming on the battlefield. The content is quite light at launch. While there is a lot of variety in the content itself, the quantity is lacking. Features such as dragging downed friendlies, vehicle customization, and the Last Tiger war story are lacking from the game. The game is also very buggy. I'd say there aren't many 'game breaking' bugs (although I've encountered an infinite revive state glitch where I couldn't respawn), as most of the bugs are ignorable at best. The story is alright. 2 of the 3 war stories are quite decent, and one is just downright garbage. The AI is piss poor, and there is no variety in gameplay other than the typical one man army style gameplay. Performance isn't up to standard right now, as hectic moments can get quite laggy especially if you don't have a good CPU. So, should you buy the game? Not yet. Either wait till it's on sale or until more content comes out. I also recommend you try out the game by buying one month of EA Access. I've had a blast with the game so far, and I look forward to Tides of War.    … Expand
  73. SevenXP
    Nov 21, 2018
    9
    Игра мне понравилась, кампанию можно пройти ради шлемака. Но если у вас сильно развито чувство истории и вам это мерзко, как перевернули факты. То не стоит запускать кампанию.
    Дальше об основной части игры. ставлю 9 может даже 8.5:
    Минусы: 1) В игре мало карт, тем более что мелкие бои происходят на тех же самых картах 2) Режимы, ленятся, могли бы с CoD подтянуть пару прикольных    Игра мне понравилась, кампанию можно пройти ради шлемака. Но если у вас сильно развито чувство истории и вам это мерзко, как перевернули факты. То не стоит запускать кампанию.
    Дальше об основной части игры. ставлю 9 может даже 8.5:
    Минусы:
    1) В игре мало карт, тем более что мелкие бои происходят на тех же самых картах
    2) Режимы, ленятся, могли бы с CoD подтянуть пару прикольных режимов.
    3) Есть не значительные баги.
    4) Самый главное за что снял, балан оружия. Он больше под приставку. Берем винтовку, шутрмовику и все вы имеете мощное орудие на дальность (уступаете только снайперу) и за того что на PC быстро стреляешь и целишься, то и в ближнем бою король (либо мне такие нубы попадались, хотя я сам не крутой)
    Плюсы.
    1) Изменили механику стрельбы, она по мне стала круче.
    2) Специализация бойца и навыки оружия позволяет сделать бойца, который вам нужен. Настроить разные оружие под разные тактики.
    3) Бабы в игре +- минус в том, что визуально не отличить, а голос сильно противный. А в целом норм. Хотел женщину бойца делай, не хочешь не делай. В игре все равно не видно кого убиваешь.
    4) Команда, теперь это реальная грозная 4-ка, которая представляет из себя очень очень опасное звено, особенно если играть командно, это вытекает необходимость и за измененной механики.
    5) Механику изменили, играки на PC на приставках в BF было по приятнее играть. Теперь на много больше людей старается выполнить цель, а не сидеть как горные бараны со снайперок. а вторые с минометом под горой. Или на технике в конце карты. Игра стала более активной, динамичной (просто раньше все сидели на горе, и только половина, пытались выполнить цель 2-ая половина горные козлы). Все бегают, строят, выполняют то что надо.
    6) Строительство это круто.
    7) подтянули значительно кастомизацию

    По поводу хейта, многие даже адекватные причины назвать не могут, Путают или говорят о том чего в игре нет. Основываясь на придуманных ими вещах (которые может выходят из 1-вого трейлера)    … Expand
  74. afrenziedghoul
    Nov 21, 2018
    3
    Edit: modifying my original review to provide more detail on my opinion based on level 25, most of that time spent playing support.

    What's great: The environments look fantastic. Sounds are amazing. I enjoy the new fortification mechanic for the support class building, though it largely seems unnecessary and at times can be a hindrance to your team. What's annoying: Going prone    Edit: modifying my original review to provide more detail on my opinion based on level 25, most of that time spent playing support.

    What's great:
    The environments look fantastic. Sounds are amazing. I enjoy the new fortification mechanic for the support class building, though it largely seems unnecessary and at times can be a hindrance to your team.

    What's annoying:
    Going prone seems to have changed somehow. Now instead of your character simply resting on the ground wherever you plop down, your character model interacts with the environment. This means that in times of frenetic action, flinging yourself to the ground can place you in greater danger as your body might slide unexpectedly or the environment may push your prone body for several seconds requiring you to wait that additional time before you can open fire. This same collision mechanic can affect you while moving around on uneven surfaces while prone and you can find yourself being 'shoved' about by unseen forces at the most inopportune times. Best case scenario the shoving restricts your ability to deploy a bipod or even return fire and worst case you can be shoved off edges of surfaces entirely resulting more exposure to danger.

    The shared weapon pool between all factions also rubs me the wrong way. I can appreciate the argument that it is 'no fun' to not be able to work on unlocking and progressing your desired weapon, and that in the actual events it wasn't unheard of for enemy weapons to be 'captured' and used. Unfortunately it's just another small ding to the immersion that the franchise once offered. Personally I would much rather face off against foes wielding the weapons they would have been issued for the era.

    Another issue that I have with the weapons is the lack of interesting weapons and weapon specializations. Each class sports a single iconic WW2 weapon a the end of the class progression chain, however the amount of time needed to unlock that single weapon is quite long. I've been playing nightly since the Origin Premium access launch and have yet to unlock the MG42 even after spending all of my time playing as support.

    Single Player:
    Oh boy, what happened here? I was surprised to discover that the Wehrmacht possessed cloaking devices during WW2. How on earth did they lose the war with this kind of technology? On every map enemy infantry appear and vanish repeatedly, bounce up and down as though they are sporting some kind of rocket equipped footwear and operate vehicles while in stealth mode. I burst into uncontrollable laughter the first time a troop transport blew by me with no driver, then stopped abruptly and dumped out a dozen german soldiers who milled about the back of the truck while my AI compatriots and I mowed them down like cattle.

    Overall:
    It just feels, off. Battlefield 1, while not my favorite entry in the franchise at least felt cohesive and appropriate for the time it attempted to represent, the abundance of automatic weapons notwithstanding. This time around however, I don't really feel like I'm anywhere in particular. There is no obvious anchor to WW2 here based on what we have come to expect from a WW2 game and that is what I think bothers me most. All of the dings to cohesiveness, from the random and sometimes inappropriate uniforms, the shared weapon access between factions, to the lack of emotional connection to the settings depicted amount to something that feels more like a game with WW1-WW2 weaponry rather than a game set in WW2.

    Disclaimer:

    Artists, you did a great job. This game looks and sounds fantastic. Developers, I'm sure you did your best given the time you were allotted. It's unfortunate this didn't get more time to bake, it could have been great.    … Expand
  75. Howlmighty
    Nov 21, 2018
    0
    I'm a Battlefield veteran from Battlefield 1942, and Battlefield V is one of my favorite episodes, thanks so much EA for this great job, i love the Multiplayer system, this is a real FPS, bugs can be fixed with patch and more, but really, nice work! Solid game.
  76. DOZENT
    Nov 21, 2018
    10
    + + + + + best Battlefield ever ! + + + +

    lu4shii battlefield v istorii battlefield.

    beste battlefield aller zeiten.
  77. SoundZ
    Nov 21, 2018
    9
    Single Player review ~~~

    Rather then I do hate that I actually agree on the most on this game when it comes to that the War Stories are too short and the fact that you can play it through in less than 5 hours, dossen't sincerely mean that it is a bad game. I would like to call it a sacrifice for a better story. But still not to the point I wanna spend 59 pund's for it. So after what    Single Player review ~~~

    Rather then I do hate that I actually agree on the most on this game when it comes to that the War Stories are too short and the fact that you can play it through in less than 5 hours, dossen't sincerely mean that it is a bad game. I would like to call it a sacrifice for a better story. But still not to the point I wanna spend 59 pund's for it.

    So after what I started this review with and the base of my score you would probably be like what the hell is this guy smoking? Well yeah, I do find the stories a bit short for their price, but after playing them I feel like I was there when it happened. And not many games have given me THAT feeling. And personally I REALLY like story modes with a solid story and have that ability to make a man really feel what the character feels, And so far BFV have hit me right in my hearth.

    The stories are uniqe and really satisfied with a good war time soldier humor to a more serious arguing and the crying from fear of the death itself. It brings all this feeling into perspective that made this like a Christopher Nolan's movie Dunkirk to a cinematic experiance you can interact with yourself. And I have never had this much emotion going through a videogame single player mode before. So from people blaming to DICE about a short story, I love that they perfected them instead of beeing a long one without the same quality.

    Even if I spent 59£ on this, after all theese emotions and dedication, I feel it is well worth this. And even better if they come with more war stories throughout the game.

    Thank you DICE, for bringing Stories from WW2 to my PC which I can interact to with passion.    … Expand
  78. johncmo
    Nov 21, 2018
    9
    Battlefield V does not take risks and does not seem to care much about it, but it manages to be competent in multiplayer mode. With 64 players in Grand Operations, with a long and full game of twists, you have the true experience of the franchise. The weapons are accurate and you adapt to recoil. The snipers, though boring and taking advantage, are weaker and the classes give an extraBattlefield V does not take risks and does not seem to care much about it, but it manages to be competent in multiplayer mode. With 64 players in Grand Operations, with a long and full game of twists, you have the true experience of the franchise. The weapons are accurate and you adapt to recoil. The snipers, though boring and taking advantage, are weaker and the classes give an extra layer of strategy to the clashes. The maps are well done and the graphics in these online modes are beautiful, but the game as a whole could be better, with some more relevant news regarding Battlefield 1. The campaign is weak and I found it dispensable, although beautiful and with remarkable moments. The mistake was the focus on stealth rather than clashes, in the absence of vehicles and the weak AI of the enemies. There are many bugs in all modes, but I do not think they spoil the experience. It's a new Battlefield. And that's all.… Expand
  79. rubysown
    Nov 21, 2018
    0
    Battlefield is no longer battlefield. Full of bugs that render your game useless until you restart, server issues in almost every gaming session (I have extremely fast internet, so it's not me), I get shot around barricades and corners even though I already ran through them, etc. Battlefield 3 seemed to be last real one.
  80. Brando
    Nov 21, 2018
    9
    Looks like you can't even trust user reviews anymore. This IS a good game, been playing a lot and having lots of fun don't listen too these fortnite Normies.
  81. meandreas
    Nov 21, 2018
    10
    I play via Origin Access, so with that in mind and the fact that I might play for 1-2 month and therefore only spend half of the retail price.. i really really like this game at the moment. Maybe it will become quite dull after some month, but right now i play the hell out of it
  82. Hudson633
    Nov 21, 2018
    0
    So many fundamental FPS features are missing or butchered, things that used to be in older Battlefield games. The remaining experience is warped to chase after COD and CS playerbases (and later, Battle Royale I'm sure). Battlefield has lost its identity, leaving it a broken and awkward mess.
  83. watchoutch02
    Nov 21, 2018
    0
    Yeah no. This is an insult to WW2. And EA challenge us? You don't want me to buy the game? So be it. I'll keep playing BF1 for the years to come.
  84. dennistom
    Nov 21, 2018
    0
    Bf1 was better bf4 was better bf3 was better
    bf5 looks good but thats its only andvantage over the others
  85. Fapoleon
    Nov 21, 2018
    10
    A completely New Experience in terms of Gameplay,you can choose how your character looks so you dont have to play as a black woman as an allied medic, yo ucan easily choose to be a white dude easily, so they fixed that, everything, from the graphics to the gunplay was brought up to 100 and then some, the game feels exciting,the guns have a proper feel and kick to them, the ambience and theA completely New Experience in terms of Gameplay,you can choose how your character looks so you dont have to play as a black woman as an allied medic, yo ucan easily choose to be a white dude easily, so they fixed that, everything, from the graphics to the gunplay was brought up to 100 and then some, the game feels exciting,the guns have a proper feel and kick to them, the ambience and the ambient sound design is bloody brilliant. And best of all, NO MICROTRANSACTIONS OR LOOTBOXES, this is a brand New Battlefield Experience and it is amazing. The Removal of 3D Spotting adds a new depth to the game where you have to watch out and be on high alert when running through open spaces, fortifications can really turn the way of game around if properly built. Overall a great game, with amazing mulitplayer, breathaking Campaign, a fantastic package!… Expand
  86. MarshmeloIL
    Nov 21, 2018
    9
    i love it. worth playing and buying the game. new experience. still waiting for bug fixing- but still very enjoyable
  87. prase007
    Nov 21, 2018
    10
    Compensation 10/10. I hate activists, either SJWs or antiSJWs, all I want from battlefield is fun and few frags and this one delivers.
  88. Kauzer
    Nov 21, 2018
    8
    There are few bugs. But that game is better then BF and has huge potencial.
  89. Inquizit0r
    Nov 21, 2018
    1
    BF1 and Battlefront clone...
    No more spirit of Battlefiled, such as BF3 and BF4.
    Ugly clone game.
  90. rhpsystems
    Nov 21, 2018
    1
    A remake of BF1, are no type of control over the classes, where in open spaces all choose to be snipers, where vehicles like airplanes seem toy arcade style. There is no team game, the type of classes per squad is not limited, which makes everything unbalanced.

    And of course the story, which does not reflect reality at all. It's a joke, where in order to get along with the feminist    A remake of BF1, are no type of control over the classes, where in open spaces all choose to be snipers, where vehicles like airplanes seem toy arcade style. There is no team game, the type of classes per squad is not limited, which makes everything unbalanced.

    And of course the story, which does not reflect reality at all. It's a joke, where in order to get along with the feminist community they turned the game into a struggle of men and women alike, something totally outside of historical reality.

    A big disappointment, like everything EA has been doing lately. Without a doubt, I will play Black Ops 4 again, trying to forget that I threw 70 USD in a game that is not worth it at all.    … Expand
  91. Baileylufflesu
    Nov 21, 2018
    1
    **Multiplayer Review**

    This game was a huge disappointment. The game feels like it's about 60% complete. The UI alone is just an absolute mess. It takes so many clicks to get anywhere, but they have said they are fixing that "soon". That aside, the maps are bland, the new building mechanic feels more like a gimmick than anything else. Medic weapons are so ridiculously under powered it's    **Multiplayer Review**

    This game was a huge disappointment. The game feels like it's about 60% complete. The UI alone is just an absolute mess. It takes so many clicks to get anywhere, but they have said they are fixing that "soon". That aside, the maps are bland, the new building mechanic feels more like a gimmick than anything else. Medic weapons are so ridiculously under powered it's not even funny. I do like that they moved more toward infantry based combat, but at the same time I feel bad for people who like vehicles. The vehicles are slow and clunky and I don't even spend time in them because of it. Where you can customize your player and weapon skins, there is a major lack of actual weapon customization for actual parts that effect gun play. Each class only gets a tiny handful of weapons and there's almost no variety to what you can use per class. Though I don't really care that women are about 75% of the battlefield, it's just that there are times when a lot of people are dying and it basically sounds like a bunch of seagulls are being viciously strangled to death, that kind of takes away from the immersion.

    All in all this game feels empty and it is in no way worth a $60 price tag. The best thing I can recommend is to wait a few months before buying. They have promised to add more content in the coming months for free, so we'll see how that goes, until then, I have refunded the game. Do not forget Origin will let you buy the game and play it for 23 hours from the time you launch it. If you don't go past the full 24 hours you are eligible for a full refund. This 23 hour trial took all of 7 hours for me and I was done with it.    … Expand
  92. StrikerFIN
    Nov 21, 2018
    0
    SJW revisionist trash. Do not support

    Battlefield games are played predominantly by men and boys. And WW2 was a war predominantly fought by men and boys. Idiots trying so hard to be "woke". You just can't mess with that iconic WW2 stuff we've seen in history books, old combat footage, historical photos. You just can't mess with it
  93. Kozyrr7
    Nov 21, 2018
    10
    Отсутствие СССР это не очень хорошо, добавьте красную армию в игру!
  94. Tweakedgenius
    Nov 21, 2018
    9
    First of all I think this Battlefield is a very solid game, the weapons feeling really great, and you get instant the feeling that you hit and kill somebody. This makes me really happy as a battlefield veteran. I really missing the American soldier + Russian soldiers + de m1 Garand. But besides that this is one of the best Battlefield games I'v ever played.
  95. Cabin4Boy
    Nov 21, 2018
    0
    Геймплей может быть не плохой, но отличий от 1 не очень много. Сюжет и локации поменялись.
    Но переделка под свои хотелки исторических фактов это уже край, поэтому жирный 0.
  96. JuSoGu
    Nov 21, 2018
    0
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Bad game, a lot of bugs, bugs in the start menu and everywhere.
    The plot is so simple and dull. I will never buy
    BATTLEFIELD, again.
    If you want to play a historical game. it is not this
    Stupid things leading for the fashion of nowadays, kill this game.    … Expand
  97. hunn3r
    Nov 21, 2018
    8
    Half of the reviews here talking about the sjw propaganda and other stuff, but it's really not in the game. You have very realistic military female models and real life like camos, no other bs whatsoever. People who talking about that i promise you won't even play this game, just still talking crap because of the trailers. Moving on from this...

    This is a true Battlefield game with many    Half of the reviews here talking about the sjw propaganda and other stuff, but it's really not in the game. You have very realistic military female models and real life like camos, no other bs whatsoever. People who talking about that i promise you won't even play this game, just still talking crap because of the trailers. Moving on from this...

    This is a true Battlefield game with many "only in battlefield" moments in it. I'm seriously didn't enjoyed a BF title this much since BF3, and i'm played them all. This game has tactical infantry and vehicle gameplay, the fortification system is a true masterpiece, you can easily put up new defense line for yourself -after the buildings get leveled- making it easier -or even just possible- to defend again and angain. The gunplay feels good and the maps are good. It just feels good to play.

    There are some bugs, some serious even and i think it's still not acceptable to ship a tripe A game in this state even if we slowly get used to it, that the betas are demos for you to hook you up and the first 1-2 months are the real betatest with live servers. More and more game companies do this but it's still not okay and never will be.

    All in all, i am currently enjoying this new chapter of the Battlefield series, and hoping for quick fixes and good content being delivered after release. The devs seems to willing to do this.    … Expand
  98. ShaMana
    Nov 21, 2018
    8
    Battlefield is an excellent first person shooter that suffers of a tough case of "unfinishienatus", There is a lot of content missing, probably cause by the short deadlines given to the team, but with the promise of free support for new content through out the life cycle of the game, this will change in the near future.

    Aside from that the changes made to the game in the form of    Battlefield is an excellent first person shooter that suffers of a tough case of "unfinishienatus", There is a lot of content missing, probably cause by the short deadlines given to the team, but with the promise of free support for new content through out the life cycle of the game, this will change in the near future.

    Aside from that the changes made to the game in the form of attrition and movement mechanics, do cause a shift from your old habits. It hasn't been so important to play with your squad in years, that has upsides and downsides. If the squad is responsive and fairly decent players, it's a blast and immense fun. If the squad isn't however, the experience can be a bit frustrating as you play not only against your opponents in this case.

    Gun play is great, with the downside of all weapons being a bit too automated. I do miss the majority bold action rifles from old games. Vehicle play is great. It's really tough to find faults in the core gameplay of the game.

    The single player however is insultingly short. I greatly enjoyed playing through the BF1 SP which was super short as well but this one left me with a bad taste of "COME ON! Where is the rest?" otherwise the stories are mostly forgettable.

    As a summary: If you liked old Battlefields, there is a lot to like here too and i strongly recommend. If you didn't however and prefer a more casual shooter, this BF will not be for you.    … Expand
  99. Veraxxys
    Nov 20, 2018
    10
    BF5 is one of the best BF releases to date! Is BF5 a 10, no, but I gave it a 10 to offset the ridiculously low scores some users are giving it for completely inaccurate reasons. Reasons like:

    "No battlefield has felt as much as a COD game as this one. Smaller maps, fewer vehicules, focus on gunfight in close quarters" -- Slashout This statement has ZERO bearing in reality. The    BF5 is one of the best BF releases to date! Is BF5 a 10, no, but I gave it a 10 to offset the ridiculously low scores some users are giving it for completely inaccurate reasons. Reasons like:

    "No battlefield has felt as much as a COD game as this one.
    Smaller maps, fewer vehicules, focus on gunfight in close quarters" -- Slashout

    This statement has ZERO bearing in reality. The game launched with 8 maps, several of which are very large and have you engaging over very wide distances, 100 meters + And not all engagements on the "city" maps, or the maps that are considered close combat, are at close range, often you are engaging at 75-100 meters.

    "The campaign is bad & short as hell" --D25BEV

    If you are purchasing a BF title for it's campaign, then you must not be familiar with the franchise. Judging a BF title for it's campaign is like judging KFC for their corn on the cob. Campaign has NEVER been the focus of ANY BF title. Early BF games didn't even release with a campaign at all.

    "full of bugs and microtransactions" --YourMumWashes

    Bugs....maybe...the game runs fine for me on i5 8600k, gtx1070, 16GB DDR4.

    Microtransactions.....no, this is not a problem AT ALL. They aren't even releasing a Season Pass for this game. I think the media fiasco and subsequent stock price plummet due to Battle Front 2 taught them a lesson.

    In conclusion, BF5 is a solid BF release, great graphics, fast, heart pounding game play, all the things you know and love from a good BF title are in this game. They need to increase the squad count back to 5 and do some UI tuning, but overall I am more than satisfied with BF5, and I cannot wait to see what their royale looks like. Don't make your decision based on these negative reviews by people who clearly haven't the slightest idea of what they are talking about. Take it from me, a BF vet since the days of 1942, this is a good BF game!    … Expand
  100. Jacsam
    Nov 20, 2018
    8
    I play these games for the single player. I never play multiplayer. The graphics are great and the RTX makes it look better. The combat is very good and the story modes are good as well. If you like FPS and great graphics the game is worth a look. Also, it is the first game with ray tracing.
Page:

Awards & Rankings

53
#53 Best PC Game of 2018
2
#2 Most Discussed PC Game of 2018
7
#7 Most Shared PC Game of 2018

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
81

Generally favorable reviews - based on 52 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 45 out of 52
  2. Mixed: 7 out of 52
  3. Negative: 0 out of 52
  1. CD-Action
    Nov 14, 2019
    85
    It’s far from being ideal but all the glitches and shortcomings don’t ruin the overall fun of Battlefield V’s multiplayer experience. Although the single player portion of the game is not bad at all, I would have been disappointed if I bought the game just for it. [13/2018, p.56]
  2. PLAY! Zine
    Mar 5, 2019
    80
    In Battlefield V we got back to WW2, but with refined gunplay and death system which works great. There are also little problems such as low number of maps and stability issues, that are taking the fun away, but nothing that can't be fixed.
    Read full review
  3. LEVEL (Czech Republic)
    Dec 31, 2018
    80
    A great World War II shooter that will grow and improve. Do not buy the game because of its singleplayer, but if you consider the campaign a bonus to the multiplayer, you will be satisfied. [Issue#291]
See all critic reviews »