- Publisher: cdv Software
- Release Date: Mar 27, 2006
- Summary:
Buy Now
- Developer: Revolution of Strategy
- Genre(s): Strategy, Real-Time, Historic, Historic, Command
- # of players: 8 Online
- Cheats: On GameFAQs
- More Details and Credits »
Trailer
Play Sound
Please enter your birth date to watch this video:
You are not allowed to view this material at this time.
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 1 out of 16
-
Mixed: 10 out of 16
-
Negative: 5 out of 16
-
American Conquest is a solid RTS that will entertain many a history buff and the casual gamer alike. Though it does have its share of issues, the game is still worth checking out.
-
Pelit (Finland)A mediocre real-time strategy. Unfortunately, the game seems to be based on the old American Conquest engine instead of the newer and more refined Cossacks II engine. [Feb 2006]
-
I suppose, if you have an interest in US history, you might eke more enjoyment from the game than I did. But, I am afraid all the fears I had when I first unwrapped the game came true. Playable but, in the end, pretty dull.
-
While American Conquest: Divided Nation is sure to have civil war buffs drooling over its adherence to historical accuracy, from a strategic gameplay point of view, it's not exactly going to give the more established and, let's be honest, more technologically advanced RTS games like Rome: Total War or Cossacks II a run for their money. [PC Zone]
-
BoomtownIt’s just an anachronistic burp from long ago, repeating itself with an apologetic grin and a flutter of its eyelashes to turn into an average RTS of today. Er, I’ve got no idea where this metaphor’s going. Just look at the score.
-
Overall, it is difficult to find a reason to recommend this game over, say, "Age of Empires III." A higher learning curve, more micromanagement, dated graphics, and an interface that could use a bit of fine-tuning make this a mediocre game.
-
Computer Games MagazineDivided Nation is a step backward. It's a journey to the past in more ways than one, and not an interesting trip at all. [Oct. 2006, p.73]
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 3 out of 5
-
Mixed: 0 out of 5
-
Negative: 2 out of 5
-
DanF.Mar 25, 2006I played this game it has great replay value if you know how to have fun.
-
-
DisguisedSep 13, 2007Good game, some people just don't know how to have fun if they're rating this a zero.
-
-
KinChungL.Jan 16, 2006
-
-
Aug 27, 2022This review contains spoilers, click expand to view.
-
-
J.S.Jun 3, 2006no tutorial, manual is not very clear,, support is hard to get,,, never could get the online function to work.
-