• Network: FX
  • Series Premiere Date: Oct 9, 2008
Metascore
37

Generally unfavorable reviews - based on 12 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 2 out of 12
  2. Negative: 7 out of 12
Watch Now

Where To Watch

Stream On

Critic Reviews

  1. There are people in this world who find flatulence mightily entertaining, and they should be happy here.
  2. 70
    The two-zany formula still works for movie after movie, and the occasional TV show. Case in point: Tonight's Testees, airing on the risk-happy FX network; the comedy doesn't push boundaries so much as trounce and trash them.
  3. I don't know that there's a long-running series here--even the pilot runs out of steam before the end--but I did laugh several times.
  4. In FX's Testees, viewers get a good premise gone sophomorically sideways.
  5. 40
    The crass gags--some of which I laughed at--ultimately overwhelm everything else. Better to dole out the tastelessness carefully, so that each crude zinger has some value.
  6. 37
    At least these comedies are upfront about what they are: Cheerfully raunchy shows that lean heavily on adolescent obsessions with bodily functions. If that’s your thing, you may enjoy the deadpan Testees.
  7. All of this might be vaguely defensible if “Testees” were trying to satirize the abuses of Big Pharma, or the limited opportunities for dumb white men, or really if it were trying to satirize anything at all. But it just sits there, inert, like a patient on a gurney.
  8. 30
    A show so strange and vile and stupid that I really wish I could strongly recommend it.
  9. 20
    Testees probably shouldn't be considered part of the fall season, but let's be fair--it's as lousy as anything the broadcast nets have come up with.
  10. Reviewed by: Verne Gay
    16
    It's horrible, horrible, horrible, and you will hate yourself for laughing--although I'm afraid you will.
  11. There's no need to go any further. Testees makes "Kath & Kim" look smart and savvy, a nearly impossible feat.
  12. Reviewed by: Brian Lowry
    10
    Mostly, this is poor man's Farrelly brothers material, without the explosive wit or glee that would make the raunch irresistible, if not palatable to watch while eating.
User Score
7.6

Generally favorable reviews- based on 47 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 37 out of 47
  2. Negative: 9 out of 47
  1. Apr 17, 2013
    9
    This show was clever, very clever, it made the sort of cringing humor that I normally despise, work... And boy they made it work well! EveryThis show was clever, very clever, it made the sort of cringing humor that I normally despise, work... And boy they made it work well! Every episode took the show to new levels of depravity and stupidity and I loved it. Jelly bean omlettes was a classic. I still and cringe when I think about it. Steve Markle deserved an Oscar for doing that one scene. Superb. Full Review »
  2. Aug 8, 2012
    10
    What a huge difference between what users are saying about the show and how the critics rated it... Obviously there are a lot of fans. CountWhat a huge difference between what users are saying about the show and how the critics rated it... Obviously there are a lot of fans. Count me as one... very well written and acted show. Shame FX couldn't have given it another season to catch on. Full Review »
  3. Apr 26, 2012
    10
    In a time dominated by ridiculous shows such as Two and a Half Men that only by the grace of God has somehow managed to find a place at theIn a time dominated by ridiculous shows such as Two and a Half Men that only by the grace of God has somehow managed to find a place at the top of the most watched television shows, I am left in disbelief that a little slapstick humour like that of Testees has been met with so much displeasure, I hope that this show is given another chance because, at the end of the day, life can get you down and as silly as this show is, it makes you laugh, and that, after all, is all a comedy sets out to do. In that respect, Testees ticks all the right boxes. Full Review »