• Network: Netflix
  • Series Premiere Date: Jul 21, 2017
Season #: 4.5, 4, 3, 2, 1
Metascore
66

Generally favorable reviews - based on 29 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 17 out of 29
  2. Negative: 0 out of 29

Critic Reviews

  1. Reviewed by: Ken Tucker
    Jul 21, 2017
    60
    The show has an occasionally suspenseful twist. (Electrocution in the water: Watch out!) But as it proceeds, Ozark takes way too long to make a few good points and to showcase a few good performances, most prominently Jason Bateman’s.
  2. Reviewed by: Sophie Gilbert
    Jul 21, 2017
    50
    Ozark, which contains so many fragments and threads from existing prestige shows that it sometimes feels like a particularly grim televisual quilt, is at least pleasingly tense in its first episode.
  3. Reviewed by: Mike Hale
    Jul 20, 2017
    50
    “Breaking Bad” had propulsive, straightforward stories that dragged you from season to season. In Ozark, a lot happens, but not much is going on.
  4. Reviewed by: Josh Bell
    Jul 20, 2017
    50
    The producers have come up with a somber, plodding, almost entirely humorless mix of Breaking Bad and Justified, when they should have made a show about this spitfire of a character, the only one in the ensemble who isn’t bringing everything down.
  5. Reviewed by: Verne Gay
    Jul 20, 2017
    50
    Ozark can be excruciatingly cumbersome. There are many moving parts, none compelled to move with haste. If the characters were more engaging and likable, pace might not even be an impediment. They’re not, so it is.
  6. Reviewed by: Hank Stuever
    Jul 20, 2017
    50
    Ozark is simply too busy to contextualize its story and surroundings. Having swum out too far in its own murky waters, the show frantically kicks and flails its way to an open-ended conclusion that doesn’t quite feel like it was worth all the trouble.
  7. Reviewed by: Daniel Fienberg
    Jul 11, 2017
    50
    Enough is happening in Ozark that it's never boring, which sets it apart from Netflix's recent misguided stab at prestige programming, Gypsy. Instead of being predictable, though, Ozark becomes monotonous.
  8. Reviewed by: Erik Adams
    Jul 20, 2017
    42
    Marty and Wendy don’t give Bateman and Linney much cause to stretch. One gets saddled with some sub-Scorsese soliloquies about criminal philosophy; the other has to make subtext into text with lines about vultures circling the Byrds’ and the scrubbing of a damned spot on the family’s dock. ... Derivative and lethargic.
  9. Reviewed by: Nick Allen
    Nov 29, 2017
    40
    A lot of this would play more thrillingly if the characters didn’t seem as wooden; if the series felt like it was written to serve more than just a need to present power plays.
  10. Reviewed by: Emily VanDerWerff
    Jul 25, 2017
    40
    Ozark’s insistence on presenting the grimiest version of its story possible stands in the way of explaining why anything within its universe is happening. The presentation and the characters and the smug tone eventually coalesce into something deeply irritating. ... Ozark is offensive and doesn’t understand why it’s offensive.
  11. Reviewed by: Scott D. Pierce
    Jul 20, 2017
    40
    Not only does it feel unoriginal and tired, but it comes across as a vanity project for star/executive producer Jason Bateman, who also directs some episodes.
  12. Reviewed by: Alan Sepinwall
    Jul 18, 2017
    40
    What might have felt like a novel idea 10 or 15 years ago--middle-aged white anti-hero does something terrible to help his family, and only gets pulled in deeper and deeper--is now so tired that it would require sheer brilliance to come out feeling as fresh and untainted as all the money that Marty cleans. And Ozark isn’t up to that challenge.
User Score
8.3

Universal acclaim- based on 406 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Negative: 24 out of 406
  1. Jul 25, 2017
    10
    I was shocked that Ozark, easily the best show set or dealing with rural Americana since Rectify, wasn't rated in the low 90s. This show isI was shocked that Ozark, easily the best show set or dealing with rural Americana since Rectify, wasn't rated in the low 90s. This show is highly underrated and that's a real shame. I read many of the negative reviews and some from legendary critics I respect (such as Yahoo!'s Ken Tucker) who IMO really miffed this one.
    The best way to go into Ozark is with zero background and no expectations.
    I think the worst way to go into Ozark is by comparing it to heavy hitters like breaking bad or weeds. The latter, Weeds no disrespect to Qween Jenji) hit less emotional beats in their last 3 seasons than Ozark does in just 3 episodes. It's laughable how many tv critics repeat the "this show is the new breaking bad" meme, so much so I normally wouldn't dignify them with a response.

    However, the comparisons between BB and Ozark highlight a flaw with this show's reviews and contemporary tv criticism at large. "Prestige garishness" is when a show so overtly panders to critics and NATAS that the effort is cringeworthy and often lacks the taste it so craves. And, it's true that miffed Prestige tropes run rampant throughout the so called 'embarrassment of riches' that is the 2017 TV landscape. However A 'Prestige Trope' isn't inherently a bad thing. Bateman (Ozark's star and director) flirts with some basic 'prestige tropes' but instead of falling face first into them, Bateman deftly subverts them. Compare Ozark first season against Breaking bad's slow burn of a first season, and we see two shows with similar premises and thematic elements however these show are vastly different. Obviously BB season 1 wins against Ozark season 1 in most conceivable categories (particularly in style, balance and protagonist character development) however Ozark's first season IMO comes ahead of BB s01 when it comes to pacing, cast wide character development and episode-to-episode entwining of thematic and symbolic elements with their plot.

    Inversely I foresee the potential for underestimation to mislead many a-viewers to overlook this wonderful series--thinking this is anything like bloodlines (yuck, I get bored and a bad taste in my mouth just saying it). While Ben Mendelsohn is acting gift from the TV gods, bloodlines is a steaming pile of boredom. I almost skipped Ozark because I assumed from a trailer that Ozark would just be a snarkyer Bloodlines with high caliber actors. I was thankfully very very wrong. Ozark May make you want to grab a triple beam scale or a graphic calculator but I guarantee after watching you'll never climb out of water and onto a dock the same way again.
    Full Review »
  2. Jul 21, 2017
    10
    The acting, directing and writing are all brilliant. Both Jason Bateman and Laura Linney shine in their respective roles and mold charactersThe acting, directing and writing are all brilliant. Both Jason Bateman and Laura Linney shine in their respective roles and mold characters that you develop so many thoughts and opinions about. The cinematography is beautiful and enhances the overall tone and mood of the show. Full Review »
  3. Jul 21, 2017
    10
    This gripping drama oozes with originality where it may have some parallels with Breaking Bad, it takes the situation in a very differentThis gripping drama oozes with originality where it may have some parallels with Breaking Bad, it takes the situation in a very different direction. This show provides a side of psychological thriller and unique family relations. I think most people will be drawn in only after a single episode given the story and pace. The acting by Jason Bateman is just superb and believable and illustrates his acting ability is far beyond comedy. I have never felt compelled to leave a review before - but this is one show I consider to be another Netflix masterpiece. Full Review »