Marco Polo (2014)

:

Season 1
  • Network: Netflix
  • Series Premiere Date: Dec 12, 2014
Season #: 2, 1
Metascore
48

Mixed or average reviews - based on 21 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 5 out of 21
  2. Mixed: 9 out of 21
  3. Negative: 7 out of 21
Watch Now

Where To Watch

Stream On
Stream On

Critic Reviews

  1. USA Today
    Reviewed by: Robert Bianco
    Dec 11, 2014
    37
    Clearly what Netflix hopes you'll see a big-bucks, prestige entertainment along the lines of that HBO fantasy epic, but in truth, Marco is far closer to one of those cheesy international syndicated adventures.
  2. New York Magazine (Vulture)
    Reviewed by: Margaret Lyons
    Dec 15, 2014
    30
    The show is vacant and uninspiring, so much so that I'd rather fill my imaginary home with ball utensils than watch Marco Polo.
  3. The New York Times
    Reviewed by: Neil Genzlinger
    Dec 11, 2014
    30
    It would have been nice to see someone take the successful “Game of Thrones” formula and expand on or enhance it, but Marco Polo ends up skeletonizing it.... The show’s most egregious flaw, though, is its exploitation of female characters.
  5. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
    Reviewed by: Rob Owen
    Dec 11, 2014
    30
    The first hour is a deadly dull slog. Viewers get plopped into the action without much effort to provide context and then there are flashbacks to confuse matters further.
  6. Time
    Reviewed by: James Poniewozik
    Dec 11, 2014
    30
    Making Marco Polo dumb fun would be just as legitimate as making it weighty historical realism. But the show tries to be both (sort of, though producers freely admit to playing with facts and the timeline), lurching between modes without warning.
  7. Washington Post
    Reviewed by: Hank Stuever
    Dec 11, 2014
    30
    The show suffers from a profound lack of momentum and meaning, with plots and subplots that are stiff and predictable.
  8. Uncle Barky
    Reviewed by: Ed Bark
    Dec 11, 2014
    25
    Marco Polo might best be utilized as a sedative or sleeping pill. All those dark to pitch black exteriors and interiors seem guaranteed to prompt an onset of heavy eyelids if not a complete conk-out. And if that doesn’t get you, the ponderous pace almost certainly will.

Awards & Rankings

2
#2 Most Discussed TV Season of 2014
32
#32 Most Shared TV Season of 2014

User Reviews

All reviews »
User Score
8.0

Generally favorable reviews- based on 499 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 411 out of 499
  2. Mixed: 31 out of 499
  3. Negative: 57 out of 499
  1. Wrz77
    Dec 12, 2014
    10
    Truly a superb show. The expensive production really shines in both CGI of structures, sets, costumes, sound, cinematography, and all otherTruly a superb show. The expensive production really shines in both CGI of structures, sets, costumes, sound, cinematography, and all other aspects that I could discern. There is a perfect balance of complex geopolitical scenes that highlight the culture and politics of the Mongols in the 13th century and also a tasteful amount of action.

    This is another diamond in the rough drama series that rewards paying attention and where one will pickup more detail on future re-watches. But also one can watch it casually and still understand the plot.
    Absolutely no characters seemed one dimensional and they all had colorful and dynamic backgrounds and interesting traits.
    Sex scenes are also tastefully done unlike many TV-MA shows where they seem like filler and run on for way too long.

    Cinematography: 5/5 - The colorful sets and outdoor scenes alike are breathtaking and really pull you in. I was fully absorbed within the first 10 minutes of watching.

    Acting: 4/5 - I found the acting on the level of Game of Thrones and other hit drama series.
    Plot: 5/5 - The most important aspect of any drama movie or TV series is the plot, in my opinion, and this does not disappoint. It goes into the complex geopolitics of the Mongols and explores it without dragging on, seeming like filler, or becoming boring.

    Picture Quality: 4/5 - I watched in Super HD on a 40" display and did not notice any macroblocking or other common artifacts associated with bitrate starvation.
    The only nitpick I have is the aspect ratio not being 16:9 as all other modern TV series are. However, the black bars are extremely minimal and nowhere near as big as movies often have so it was not distracting.

    Audio: 5/5 - I only have a 2.0 sound system so I listened to the Stereo mix which sounds very different than the Dolby DD+ 5.1 mix - on my 2.0 system the Stereo mix sounded like it was optimized specifically for 2.0 systems rather than a cheap downmix from 5.1.
    The musical score really adds to the tone and feel of the show and I find the quality of the compositions to rival John Williams or other big names in film.    … Full Review »
  2. jaykota123
    Dec 12, 2014
    8
    The first episode is surprisingly good and far better than the reviews let out. It may not match Game of Thrones but then they don'tThe first episode is surprisingly good and far better than the reviews let out. It may not match Game of Thrones but then they don't explicitly say they are aiming for that level- only the media seems to make that comparison.

    Frankly I found it interesting and something I am willing to watch through the 10 episodes- unless the quality tanks.

    That said- it may also be due to a lack of anything good out there right now besides homeland and walking dead.    … Full Review »
  3. Polofan
    Dec 14, 2014
    10
    I registered to write this review for Marco Polo after having my expectations for Marco Polo unfairly lowered by what I now see as ignorantI registered to write this review for Marco Polo after having my expectations for Marco Polo unfairly lowered by what I now see as ignorant critics.

    Usually, I think critics get it right. If some show has a low score on metacritic it is usually not worth watching. I had been waiting for the release of Marco Polo with anticipation, but as the early reviews began coming in I started to think the show was almost unwatchable and easily forgettable.

    I now know that this was a totally wrong mindset. The critics have got it wrong on this one and why they derided this show as a bunch of crying hyneas is a good question. I see no justification for the low ratings it has had.

    A lot of the early critique seems centered on the acting and dialogue. I agree that the dialogue for the early episodes may have been a bit off but I am now on the 9th episode and I think the dialogue is now extremely good and on a par with Game of Thrones. The acting fo the main character has also been criticised as boring and without passion. I actually think the producers made the right choice in making Marco Polo be subdued as a character. The central role of Marco Polo is not to be the centre of attention but more an observer of the Khan's court. The really colourful characters are the Chinese and Mongols and I think this is why some Western critics have lambasted the show so much. A lot of Western critics are simply full of ethnocentrism so when they see a show like Marco Polo they invariably compare it to Game of Thrones whose Pseudo-European Medieval universe is known to most TV and Film viewers. They totally fail to appreciate how Marco Polo is set in a culture that is far removed from what Game of Thrones would have us believe the Medieval world of Power politics looked like. This is Asia which is a continent with as many varied cultures as Europe. Marco Polo shows that really well by having the court of the Khan stocked with foreigners who at one point or another seem to have been enslaved by the Mongols - this makes their loyalty interesting to question. The differences between Mongol culture and Chinese is also well depicted - Chinese culture being more adept at diplomacy and cunning and the Mongols being influenced by Chinese culture while still relying on brute force as the foundation of their power.

    There are so many good reasons to love this show and I very much hope fans will support it and prove the critics wrong. If this show is a one season wonder then it is a travesty when other crappy shows like Walking Dead get rave reviews and run season after season. With Marco Polo Netflix has once gain raised the bar and made a show that normal TV channels should produce but don't produce because they are old-fashioned and ethnocentric.    … Full Review »
See all user reviews »