• Network: PBS , BBC
  • Series Premiere Date: Nov 18, 1990
Season #: 3, 2, 1
Metascore
85

Universal acclaim - based on 11 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 11 out of 11
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 11
  3. Negative: 0 out of 11
Watch Now

Where To Watch

Buy on
Stream On
Stream On

Critic Reviews

  1. Reviewed by: Ken Tucker
    Jun 7, 2013
    91
    This political satire operates at a level of sharpness that American television hasn't seen since Robert Altman's HBO miniseries Tanner '88.
  2. Chicago Tribune
    Reviewed by: Rick Kogan
    Jul 18, 2014
    90
    This is a "Masterpiece Theatre" of unexpected thrills, biting humor and pointed satire. [29 Mar 1991]
  3. Newsday
    Reviewed by: Marvin Kitman
    Jul 18, 2014
    90
    It's just super, a triumph of programme-making that even Alistair Cooke himself with his famous British overstatement can't exaggerate. [28 Mar 1991]
  4. St. Louis Post-Dispatch
    Reviewed by: Eric Mink
    Jul 18, 2014
    90
    A thoroughly captivating production. ... You'll want to have a couple of blank videotapes ready for this one. [31 Mar 1991]
  5. The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
    Reviewed by: Ian Mayer
    Jul 18, 2014
    90
    It is not necessary ... to be a student of British politics to appreciate the script, acting and direction of this intricate and addictive series. [30 Mar 1991]
  6. USA Today
    Reviewed by: Matt Roush
    Jul 18, 2014
    90
    Brilliantly performed. [29 Mar 1991]
  7. Reviewed by: Howard Rosenberg
    Jul 18, 2014
    80
    This is at once a chucklingly good satire of political infighters and dishonest press barons... and a grim thriller whose scheming protagonist makes Richard Nixon look like a guileless wimp. ... Its flaws are not in the acting or in Paul Seed's directing, but in the writing ... Otherwise, "House of Cards" is no less than evil at its grandest, bolstered by one sterling performance after another as it moves smoothly toward its jolting conclusion.
  8. San Diego Union-Tribune
    Reviewed by: Robert J. Hawkins
    Jul 18, 2014
    80
    "House of Cards" is a bit of a rough go at first -- the characters, their roles and the British political culture aren't all that clear to Americans. They sort themselves out soon enough, though, and the reward for the persistent is one whopping tale of intrigue. [30 Mar 1991]
  9. Reviewed by: John J. O'Connor
    Jul 18, 2014
    80
    The plot of "House of Cards" requires more than just a couple suspensions of disbelief. Seemingly perceptive characters turn inexplicably naive. The obvious is overlooked just a bit too frequently. But, directed by Paul Seed, the production moves ahead briskly, and as the story turns more and more vicious, the timely potboiler becomes surprisingly compelling. Much of the credit belongs to Ian Richardson's scarily perfect performance as Francis Urquhart.
  10. Wall Street Journal
    Reviewed by: Dorothy Rabinowitz
    Jul 18, 2014
    80
    "House of Cards" is not without its flaws -- the occasionally heavy dribblings of symbolism, for instance, as exemplified by the regular appearance of gnawing rats. We could have figured out, without the rats, that this is black comedy. The last episode, further, is so written as to produce an Urquhart of considerably flattened character. By this time, however, it has been a superb ride for so long that no one will care. [25 Mar 1991]
  11. Boston Globe
    Reviewed by: Ed Siegel
    Jul 18, 2014
    70
    The high and witty style of Ian Richardson and the production team headed by Ken Riddington will have you coming back for more, even though there's really much less going on here than meets the eye. [20 Mar 1991]
User Score
7.7

Generally favorable reviews- based on 19 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 16 out of 19
  2. Negative: 2 out of 19
  1. Jun 7, 2016
    10
    This is a fun TV series. I don't know anything about politics or even the structure of the government but I could still make sense out of thisThis is a fun TV series. I don't know anything about politics or even the structure of the government but I could still make sense out of this TV series. The acting is very good, the story and dialogues are brilliant. I especially like the central character. Full Review »
  2. Jan 10, 2017
    0
    J'ai commencé par la série "remake" avec Kevin Spacey qui m'a fortement déplu malgré le grand Kévin, aussi ai-je jeté un oeil par curiosité àJ'ai commencé par la série "remake" avec Kevin Spacey qui m'a fortement déplu malgré le grand Kévin, aussi ai-je jeté un oeil par curiosité à la série anglaise originelle. Force est de constater une étonnante fidélité de la cadette envers l'aînée, ce qui bien sûr ne constitue en rien une qualité puisqu'on y retrouve les mêmes défauts mais sans le charisme de Kévin pour compenser ce qui peut l'être ou ce qu'il en reste.

    Toujours cette manie de parler à la caméra comme un concierge de bas étage, toujours les magouilles des politicards qui nous en touchent une sans faire bouger l'autre et cet ennui profond qui s'en dégage, cette lenteur et cette confusion d'une intrigue déjà essoufflée avant même de commencer. La série échoue totalement à tenter de nous intéresser aux combines de ces pitoyables crevards : à cet égard, n'importe quel journal télévisé, n'importe quel journal papier (s'il en existe encore) est 100 fois plus passionnant que cette série misérable.
    Full Review »
  3. Mar 7, 2013
    9
    Excellent Remake. Excellent acting...it's Kevin Spacey people. You'll enjoy this Netflix original series with its subtle sarcasm and climacticExcellent Remake. Excellent acting...it's Kevin Spacey people. You'll enjoy this Netflix original series with its subtle sarcasm and climactic endings despite its Washington jargon. Full Review »