Metascore
78

Generally favorable reviews - based on 12 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 11 out of 12
  2. Negative: 0 out of 12
Watch Now

Where To Watch

Stream On

Critic Reviews

  1. Reviewed by: Alan Sepinwall
    Feb 1, 2016
    91
    It's an experiment, and one with some rough edges. But Alda, Falco, and Buscemi are powerhouse dramatic actors, and C.K. makes a good reactive foil to them. The first episode (which runs slightly over an hour) feels like such a self-contained story that I have no idea what later installments will be about, or feel like, but I can't wait to see them, whenever they happen to appear.
  2. Reviewed by: Sonia Saraiya
    Feb 1, 2016
    90
    It’s not easily definable as a format, being the love child of a passion for O’Neill, stand-up comedy, and the most available format C.K. has--a webseries. That makes for a strange and sublime episode, one that is gripping in both how different it is and how familiar it feels.
  3. Reviewed by: James Poniewozik
    Feb 1, 2016
    90
    There is, as in live theater, the occasional hesitance over a line, and the first episode relies on melodramatic twists that don’t always feel earned. But when it really gathers steam--nearly any time Mr. Alda opens his mouth, and especially in his scenes with Ms. Falco--it’s like little else on TV. (If it can be said, technically, to be TV at all.)
  4. Reviewed by: Ray Rahman
    Feb 1, 2016
    83
    A lot of these scenes hit the mark, others hit the floor with a thud. But, much like last summer’s The Carmichael Show, it’s an admirable exercise either way.
  5. Reviewed by: David Sims
    Mar 8, 2016
    80
    If the show has flaws--it’s certainly slow-moving, and the intentional abrasiveness of its characters can sometimes feel cartoonish--they deserve to be forgiven just because of the singularity of vision on display.
  6. Reviewed by: Ken Tucker
    Feb 1, 2016
    80
    There’s a lot of speechifying, some of it is moving and fascinating, some of it sounding like penny-ante Eugene O’Neill. It’s also completely fascinating, and full of really wonderful performances.
  7. Reviewed by: Robert Lloyd
    Feb 1, 2016
    80
    Even at its most obvious or ungainly, it's never less than interesting, and it's certainly not shy of conviction; no C.K. fan with an Internet connection and $5 to spare will want to pass it by.
  8. Reviewed by: Matthew Gilbert
    Feb 16, 2016
    70
    The acting is superb, especially as the tensions become more overt in the second half.... He’d probably kill with the same material [on poltics and current events] in a stand-up show, but in a script about abuse, alcoholism, denial, and family estrangement, it doesn’t quite work. The strength of Horace and Pete is in the age-old themes festering at its heart.
  9. 70
    Too much of the show may remind you of the experience of being trapped in a bar with shrill drunks who aren’t anywhere near as fascinating as they seem to think. Still, the series lingers in the mind. With its hurts and silences, its yellow-brown lighting and oak-and-sawdust textures, and its sense of impending doom, it is unlike anything else that calls itself American television.
  10. Reviewed by: Tim Grierson
    Feb 5, 2016
    70
    With Horace and Pete, [Louis C.K.'s] ambitions can sometimes outrace his execution, but the commitment of his cast to a consciously old-fashioned kind of drama reminiscent of Arthur Miller and Eugene O’Neill makes the pilot exciting even when it’s a bit stilted.
  11. Reviewed by: Liz Shannon Miller
    Feb 26, 2016
    67
    Horace and Pete is quiet and intimate when it's at its best, but in so many ways it feels like indulgence. And that's fine. If you're operating at Louis C.K.'s level, I guess you get a few of those.
  12. Reviewed by: Daniel D'Addario
    Feb 1, 2016
    50
    The show falls short of being worth the fee. Its plot, surprisingly, ended up becoming both fairly complicated and quite maudlin, but the characters are too remote to either follow in byzantine detail or feel for.
User Score
8.4

Universal acclaim- based on 150 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Negative: 13 out of 150
  1. Mar 13, 2016
    10
    Brilliant stuff. It is no surprise that Louis CK is as fine a writer as he is a stand-up comedian. There is an honesty and poignancy that takeBrilliant stuff. It is no surprise that Louis CK is as fine a writer as he is a stand-up comedian. There is an honesty and poignancy that take this series a level up from anything television and most things films have to offer. Hemingway meets Norman Lear here. Then there is the acting. Any one of the key actors is fun to watch in mediocre productions. Of course they shine in Louis CK's masterful hands.
    Users jameslk1 and Thirdrail--your characterizing this show as "pretentious" just underscores your own inadequacies as human beings. Let me help you. This is what the people who are much brighter and much more perceptive than you call "art." You're welcome.

    The set is well done, from the worn floors to the outdated furniture to the beautifully articulated suggestion of a thin coat of the grimy buildup of cigarette smoke and demolished dreams that covers everything. Each and every performance is believable. This show is deeply satisfying and as tasty as a freshly slaughtered elk to a starving tiger. If all you ever eat is Twinkies, Thirdrail and jameslk1, anything else is going to piss you off. Go Louis CK. Kudos to ALL the actors. This show is making history and will continue to do so.
    Full Review »
  2. Mar 11, 2016
    10
    It's a brilliant show. Original, deep, funny. The characters are full and complex and their relationships seem genuine. Warning: there are noIt's a brilliant show. Original, deep, funny. The characters are full and complex and their relationships seem genuine. Warning: there are no special effects, gag jokes or laugh tracks. "Pretentious" is defined as "making an exaggerated outward show; ostentatious." This is 180 degrees from that, the complete opposite. It's quiet, understated, and timeless. Full Review »
  3. Mar 6, 2016
    10
    Congratulations to Louis CK for creating what I think is a compelling, thought-provoking, heartbreaking piece of work. It's hard for me toCongratulations to Louis CK for creating what I think is a compelling, thought-provoking, heartbreaking piece of work. It's hard for me to look away from it, including (or especially because of) the long silences and single shots. The caliber of acting is incredibly high, and the entire cast appears committed to their stories. Alan Alda is a revelation. I've seen the first four episodes so far and am immediately going to watch the next ones. For me, this is the best "television" I have seen ... I can't stop thinking about the characters that Steve Buscemi, Jessica Lange, Edie Falco, Laurie Metcalf and Ariana Grande have created. I would recommend this production unreservedly to anyone who is willing to spend time and really think about a truly literary production. Full Review »