Bloodline

:

Season 2
  • Network: Netflix
  • Series Premiere Date: Mar 20, 2015
Season #: 3, 2, 1
Metascore
60

Mixed or average reviews - based on 9 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 4 out of 9
  2. Mixed: 4 out of 9
  3. Negative: 1 out of 9
Watch Now

Where To Watch

Stream On
Stream On

Critic Reviews

  1. Collider
    Reviewed by: Allison Keene
    May 26, 2016
    60
    Though the plotting lets them down, the series’ actors continue to give the scenes everything they have.
  2. The A.V. Club
    Reviewed by: Joshua Alston
    May 25, 2016
    58
    The season feels like a dull, overlong epilogue, creeping along where it needs to be sprinting. If you think a slow-motion car crash is hard to watch, try watching the slow-motion clean-up.
  3. Vox.com
    Reviewed by: Emily VanDerWerff
    May 31, 2016
    50
    It's so relentlessly self-serious that it becomes increasingly tough to sit through. There's no levity or break from the insistence that what we're watching is a very important story about a family falling apart. If the characters were more active, or even just funnier, that might make them more palatable to hang out with. As it is, they're all mostly there to glower and worry about what they stand to lose.
  5. We Got This Covered
    Reviewed by: Stephen Puddicombe
    May 26, 2016
    50
    Bloodline might not be the deeply meaningful prestige drama it wants to be, but watching the Rayburn family attempt to keep hidden all the secrets and lies constantly threatening to rise from beneath the surface, as they attempt to protect their business and reputation (and even, in John’s case, rise yet further up the social ladder), still makes for a diverting binge-watch.

Awards & Rankings

71
#71 Most Discussed TV Season of 2016

User Reviews

All reviews »
User Score
7.2

Generally favorable reviews- based on 90 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 64 out of 90
  2. Mixed: 13 out of 90
  3. Negative: 13 out of 90
  1. moothemagiccow
    Jul 9, 2016
    5
    The first season of Bloodline was pretty slow, but it was compelling.
    This season is just as slow, but most of the time I was just waiting    The first season of Bloodline was pretty slow, but it was compelling.
    This season is just as slow, but most of the time I was just waiting for it to be over. I remember habitually checking the progress bar to see how many minutes were left.
    New characters are introduced, but there's no real new story. There's no decades-old mystery that keeps you watching, waiting to find out what happened to the family. There's no "how will it happen" event that's foretold in the voiceover at the start. There's a whiny teenager (well, two) which is accurate, but hard to like.
    Leguizamo is good as a crazy guy, but his character really doesn't do much.
    After all that, there's no real climax. It kind of plods along with more shots of the beautiful Florida keys with ominous thrums of music. The main character, John, whose job was a big focus of the first season, doesn't actually do any work. His political motivations, which make up a big part of this season, are unclear. Even when directly asked by another character, he can't explain them in any detail.
    That's mostly what happens this season: the characters just kind of do things, whether they make sense or not. Without a climactic event to drive the story, it ambles around aimlessly.    … Full Review »
  2. JoyBell
    Jun 18, 2016
    4
    Not only does it makes you feel strange, but it also makes you wonder, 'why'?

    This season was boring and complicated enough for me to quit    Not only does it makes you feel strange, but it also makes you wonder, 'why'?

    This season was boring and complicated enough for me to quit the entire show.

    Netfix doesn't want season 3 of Bloodline, I tottaly understand why.    … Full Review »
  3. panandluna
    Jun 7, 2016
    10
    I'm thinking the critics that reviewed this show must just be taking themselves too seriously. I don't agree at all that any of the episodesI'm thinking the critics that reviewed this show must just be taking themselves too seriously. I don't agree at all that any of the episodes were a chore to sit through, and that nothing really happened in Season 2. What happened was character development of the kind that it too rare on television. I feel like I really know these people, and I want to know what they are going to do next! It's a Shakespearean tragedy. I was only upset that there were just 10 episodes, not 13. The last episode blew me away. It left each character where I might be willing to believe they were destined, but I want at least one more season. I hope the writers look backwards and give us more of the Rayburn's story. What really went on at the Inn when dad Robert was alive and the kids were younger? Thought there were some hints in Season One that there was something secret about the relationship between Robert and the little sister that drowned. I'm thinking that John will contact Detective Potts and that he will reveal what he knows. Great writing, addictive story, wonderful actors, beautiful scenery. I loved it and desperate for a Season Three, please Netflix!… Full Review »
See all user reviews »