• Network: Netflix
  • Series Premiere Date: May 21, 2015
Season #: 2, 1
User Score
4.9

Mixed or average reviews- based on 49 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 18 out of 49
  2. Negative: 18 out of 49

Review this tv show

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling

User Reviews

  1. May 23, 2015
    4
    This review is made based on the first episode alone, untill I get to see some (If it gets better).

    So far, It's really not the good. 1) We've seen that exact premise in Dome, which so far is much better (from the very first episode). 2) bad dialog : Let me give you an exemple. (Spoilers) The epidemic has alreay killed a few dozen people. Yet when a teenager tells his mom that
    This review is made based on the first episode alone, untill I get to see some (If it gets better).

    So far, It's really not the good.

    1) We've seen that exact premise in Dome, which so far is much better (from the very first episode).

    2) bad dialog : Let me give you an exemple. (Spoilers) The epidemic has alreay killed a few dozen people. Yet when a teenager tells his mom that they should leave the town while they can, comes the this response : "Oh Son, don't be silly. You're over reacting. We'll be just fine." Really? REALLY? I mean did the writter of this piece of crap read the news in the past year? Did they see how people lost their minds with Ebola when it actually didn't do much in the states/europe? And you expect me to believe that people living in a small city would just chill and relax when knowing that people are dying of an unknowed deseases? Get the **** out! Who wrote this ****

    3) weak/Cliché characters : **** richest dad in town? Check! His equally **** rich boy with fancy car? Check! Nerdy/hacker protagonist? Check!

    Look, I am not saying the show is terrible. But so far, the first episode is extremely "average" (and I am being generous here). Maybe it will get better later on (Hated falling skies at first and loved it later on).

    But from what I have seen so far, I don't think this show will have that much success.
    Expand
  2. Jul 25, 2015
    5
    After watching 6 episodes, would say there's a lack of strength on the script.

    Besides the fact that everything looks too similar with " Under The Dome ", there's a boring vicious circle lying in the underground, just like a sad poetry on which everything can only get worse, and the action goes too sharp from one thing to the following. I think the cherry on the top of the pie
    After watching 6 episodes, would say there's a lack of strength on the script.

    Besides the fact that everything looks too similar with " Under The Dome ", there's a boring vicious circle lying in the underground, just like a sad poetry on which everything can only get worse, and the action goes too sharp from one thing to the following.

    I think the cherry on the top of the pie appears when a Cessna gets hit by a rocket, such explosion looks like a tutorial for after fx or something.

    Lots of fixes to be done in order to give to this series some sort of relevance.
    Expand
  3. Sep 9, 2015
    4
    Where to begin? I binge watched the series. And pretty sure i am done with it. Sparse storyline, bad writing and bad actors make this a forgettable show. No depth to the characters, confusing storyline and what is it with the different camera angles. It has an Under The Dome feel with as bad writing as UTD. Which is probably why UTD was canceled. Save your time and wait for The WalkingWhere to begin? I binge watched the series. And pretty sure i am done with it. Sparse storyline, bad writing and bad actors make this a forgettable show. No depth to the characters, confusing storyline and what is it with the different camera angles. It has an Under The Dome feel with as bad writing as UTD. Which is probably why UTD was canceled. Save your time and wait for The Walking Dead to return. Expand
  4. Jul 27, 2015
    5
    While not necessarily a bad show, "Between" misses the mark on a number of key components that make a suspense drama really click.

    Nearly every main character is a two-dimensional archetype, which would be fine as suburban youths are not expected to have a wealth of complexity to begin with, but the show's virtual absence of character development results in a continual feeling of
    While not necessarily a bad show, "Between" misses the mark on a number of key components that make a suspense drama really click.

    Nearly every main character is a two-dimensional archetype, which would be fine as suburban youths are not expected to have a wealth of complexity to begin with, but the show's virtual absence of character development results in a continual feeling of detachment from our protagonists, lessening the gravity of their trials and tribulations.

    On the other hand, while I have heard many reviewers knock the dialogue for being bland and sometimes plain silly, I feel that while it doesn't make for the most entertaining character interactions, the dialogue befits that of teenagers and young adults. They are going to be any variation of blunt, ambiguous, or just not well thought out in general. It would be more off-putting for 18-21-year-olds to be slinging snappy lines of Hollywood quotation.

    "Between" also suffers from pacing and continuity issues. The main plot, if a little hollow and ambiguous, kicks things off pretty strongly as the first episode covers a ten-day span over which a disease that kills all those over the age of 21 spreads like wildfire. Small windows of action are shown during this time (Day 1, Day 4, Day 6, etc) with a repetitive sort of pattern; some reference to the virus, introduce another sub-plot, a marginally significant adult dies, etcetera. Then, as early as the second episode, the main plot fades to the background as a bevy of sub-plots begins to struggle for relevance, at least until the last half of Episode 6 when the main plot shows up again and attempts to stuff itself into a 20-minute slot of improbable action and lukewarm suspense. As well, while the town of Pretty Lake itself is believably depicted, the appearance of any given main character where the plot requires is not. The town is not a huge place, but no one at the site of any peril could throw a rock without hitting at least one main character. Even in remote locations where no one could reasonably expect another character to come into the mix, a walking deus ex machina always manages an appearance wherever there is trouble, even if that particular person was clearly across town doing some other such thing only five minutes earlier.

    "Between" comes across as a fledgling attempt at the survival drama genre that has gained prevalence over the last 10 years, but as of its introduction, falls short of its predecessors (Under the Dome, Lost, Jericho, even Revolution to an extent). Maybe with a full season, "Between" would have room to grow and flesh out its characters.
    Expand
Metascore
47

Mixed or average reviews - based on 10 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 2 out of 10
  2. Negative: 2 out of 10
  1. Reviewed by: Tirdad Derakhshani
    May 22, 2015
    70
    It's too early to tell where Between will take us. But it's off to a great start.
  2. 30
    The dialogue on Between is horrendous, and the performances are not much better.
  3. Reviewed by: Mary McNamara
    May 21, 2015
    40
    The town is lovely, the premise solid if overfamiliar, but the script lacks both depth and tension (big problem), and McCurdy is one of the few cast members who can act. All of which makes it difficult to care very much.